LOK SABRA DEBATES (English Version)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FINAL COMBINED SENIORITY LIST of Asis (DISTRICT and PAP) AS PER CONFIRMATION
FINAL COMBINED SENIORITY LIST OF ASIs (DISTRICT AND PAP) AS PER CONFIRMATION Sr No. RANK, NAME & NO/ RANGE DOB DOE CASTE/ LIST C-I LIST C-II ACTUAL LIST D-I LIST D-II MERIT ACTUAL DATE OF ACTUAL DATE OF DATE OF DOP AS S.I REMARKS CATEGORY DOP AS HC NO. AS DOP AS ASI CONF AS CONF DATE LIST E LIST E-II (ACTUAL) P/ASI ASI OF ASI 1 DALBIR SINGH, 292/J BR 13-10-1944 14-06-1963 GC 20-08-1968 01-01-1971 01-09-1980 13-05-1982 01-01-1987 01-01-1987 01-04-1989 16-04-1992 RETD ON 31/10/2002 2 MOHINDER SINGH, 233/PR CP-LDH 29-10-1948 07-11-1969 SC 28-04-1973 19-11-1974 01-04-1982 27-11-1982 01-07-1988 01-07-1988 01-04-1989 14-05-1992 Retd/ on 31/10/06 3 SWARN DASS, 111/PR, 2/R PR 10-04-1951 29-07-1971 SC 02-11-1976 10-11-1976 27-11-1982 01-07-1988 01-07-1988 01-04-1989 14-05-1992 RETD ON 30/04/2009 4 DSP BALDEV SINGH 35/BR BR 16-03-1957 20-02-1976 JAT SIKH 18-12-1981 06-10-1986 05-10-1988 05-10-1988 01-01-1993 19-04-1993 5 SI MOHINDER SINGH 97/FR FR 11-12-1941 12-12-1960 RAMGARIHA 11-03-1971 05-06-1974 01-09-1983 10-11-1984 01-04-1989 06-09-1990 01-04-1991 20-03-1992 RETD ON 31.12.99 6 INSP PRITPAL SINGH PR/CP- 23-02-1964 09-04-1986 - - - - P/ASI 09-04-1986 21-04-1989 21-04-1989 01-10-1990 18-06-1991 266/PR LDH 7 RETD SI BAKHSHISH SINGH JR 01-12-1940 27-11-1962 GC 09-10-1968 02-05-1971 01-04-1982 09-01-1983 01-07-1989 01-07-1989 01-10-1991 28-04-1992 Died on 30.01.94 38/GSP 380/J 8 Insp Ram Singh NO. -
India Postpoll NES 2019-Survey Findings
All India Postpoll NES 2019-Survey Findings Q1: In whatever financial condition you are placed today, on the whole are you satisfied or dissatisfied with it? N (%) 1: Fully satisfied 4937 20.4 2: Somewhat satisfied 11253 46.4 3: Somewhat dissatisfied 3777 15.6 4: Fully dissatisfied 3615 14.9 7: Can't say 428 1.8 8: No response 225 .9 Total 24235 100.0 Q2: As compared to five years ago, how is the economic condition of your household today – would you say it has become much better, better, remained same, become worse or much worse? N (%) 1: Much better 2280 9.4 2: Better 7827 32.3 3: Remained Same 10339 42.7 4: Worse 2446 10.1 5: Much worse 978 4.0 7: Can't say 205 .8 8: No response 159 .7 Total 24235 100.0 Q3: Many people talk about class nowadays, and use terms such as lower class, middle class or upper class. In your opinion, compared to other households, the household you live in currently belongs to which class? N (%) 1: Lower class 5933 24.5 2: Middle class 13459 55.5 3: Upper Class 1147 4.7 6: Poor class 1741 7.2 CSDS, LOKNITI, DELHI Page 1 All India Postpoll NES 2019-Survey Findings 7: Can't say 254 1.0 8: No response 1701 7.0 Total 24235 100.0 Q4: From where or which medium do you mostly get news on politics? N (%) 01: Television/TV news channel 11841 48.9 02: Newspapers 2365 9.8 03: Radio 247 1.0 04: Internet/Online news websites 361 1.5 05: Social media (in general) 400 1.7 06: Facebook 78 .3 07: Twitter 59 .2 08: Whatsapp 99 .4 09: Instagram 19 .1 10: Youtube 55 .2 11: Mobile phone 453 1.9 12: Friends/neighbours 695 2.9 13: -
Dafc VU 4` X E` Wzxye R]] =D Dvred Z FA
* ( RNI Regn. No. MPENG/2004/13703, Regd. No. L-2/BPLON/41/2006-2008 ' "'./01 ,-,- . /!0 $$ , ,12 $3 #+,)'./*0 0+-/* .)*#(0+'/%+ -+/*' +',.#/,)+ 0#+)'-++7+*8(-+*+ % =%";12 '' 13 4 5+ 234 .1256.789.5:1.;<6 !" #$%&! %# '( ! "$% !& R ! " #%&'( said, “The Congress workers the Congress and the BJP, she are not at all disappointed on had said while the former had day after it was left high being left out of the alliance. imposed Emergency in the )* Aand dry by the Samajwadi On the contrary, they are say- country, the latter was respon- Party (SP) and the Bahujan ing that the party would have sible for the current state of n a clear indication that the Samaj Party (BSP) forging an had to contest on 25 Lok Sabha “undeclared Emergency”. IBJP is now ready to accom- alliance, the Congress on seats, but now they would be Azad on Sunday accused modate leaders in 75-year age Sunday announced it will con- contesting on all the 80 seats of the BJP of dividing the coun- category in important posi- test all the 80 Lok Sabha seats the State.” On possibilities of an try for power and claimed that tions, the party on Sunday in Uttar Pradesh on its own alliance with the Rashtriya Lok the saffron party had failed to appointed senior legislator strength. However, the Dal, Azad said that he would fulfil any of its poll promises. Gulab Chand Kataria as the Congress has kept the doors of not like to speak to the media “The coming Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition in the a possible alliance open saying on this issue. -
Foreign Affairs Record
1996 January Volume No XLII No 1 1995 CONTENTS Foreign Affairs Record VOL XLII NO 1 January, 1996 CONTENTS BRAZIL Visit of His Excellency Dr. Fernando Henrique Cardoso, President of the Federative Republic of Brazil to India 1 External Affairs Minister of India called on President of the Federative Republic of Brazil 1 Prime Minister of India met the President of Brazil 2 CAMBODIA External Affairs Minister's visit to Cambodia 3 Visit to India by First Prime Minister of Cambodia 4 Visit of First Prime Minister of Cambodia H.R.H. Samdech Krom Preah 4 CANADA Visit of Canadian Prime Minister to India 5 Joint Statement 6 FRANCE Condolence Message from the President of India to President of France on the Passing away of the former President of France 7 Condolence Message from the Prime Minister of India to President of France on the Passing away of the Former President of France 7 INDIA Agreement signed between India and Pakistan on the Prohibition of attack against Nuclear Installations and facilities 8 Nomination of Dr. (Smt.) Najma Heptullah, Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha by UNDP to serve as a Distinguished Human Development Ambassador 8 Second Meeting of the India-Uganda Joint Committee 9 Visit of Secretary General of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to India 10 IRAN Visit of Foreign Minister of Iran to India 10 LAOS External Affairs Minister's visit to Laos 11 NEPAL Visit of External Affairs Minister to Nepal 13 OFFICIAL SPOKESMAN'S STATEMENTS Discussion on Political and Economic Deve- lopments in the region -
Who's Who – India As on 29.04.2010
Who's Who – India as on 29.04.2010 President of India Smt. Pratibha Devisingh Patil Vice President of India Shri Mohd. Hamid Ansari Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh Cabinet Ministers Serial Portfolio Name of Minister Number Prime Minister and also In‐Charge of the Ministries/Departments viz: Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions; 1. Ministry of Planning; Dr. Manmohan Singh Ministry of Water Resources; Department of Atomic Energy; and Department of Space 2. Minister of Finance Shri Pranab Mukherjee Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food 3. Shri Sharad Pawar & Public Distribution 4. Minister of Defence Shri A.K. Antony 5. Minister of Home Affairs Shri P. Chidambaram 6. Minister of Railways Km. Mamata Banerjee 7. Minister of External Affairs Shri S.M. Krishna 8. Minister of Steel Shri Virbhadra Singh Shri Vilasrao 9. Minister of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises Deshmukh 10. Minister of Health and Family Welfare Shri Ghulam Nabi Azad Shri Sushil Kumar 11. Minister of Power Shinde Shri M. Veerappa 12. Minister of Law and Justice Moily 13. Minister of New and Renewable Energy Dr. Farooq Abdullah 14. Minister of Urban Development Shri S. Jaipal Reddy 15. Minister of Road Transport and Highways Shri Kamal Nath 16. Minister of Overseas Indian Affairs Shri Vayalar Ravi 17. Minister of Textiles Shri Dayanidhi Maran 18. Minister of Communications and Information Technology Shri A. Raja 19. Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas Shri Murli Deora 20. Minister of Information and Broadcasting Smt. Ambika Soni Shri Mallikarjun 21. Minister of Labour and Employment Kharge 22. -
Journal of 197Th Session
RAJYA SABHA WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER, 2002 (The Rajya Sabha met in the Parliament House at 11-00 a.m.) 11-00 a.m. 1. Starred Questions The following Starred Questions were orally answered:- Starred Question No. 221 regarding Induction of AJT in Defence. Starred Question No. 223 regarding Jai Prakash Rozgar Guarantee Yojana. Starred Question No. 224 regarding Deportation of Abu Salem to India. Starred Question No. 226 regarding Insurance schemes for handloom weavers in Andhra Pradesh. Starred Question No. 227 regarding Cooperation of State Governments in NCC activities. Starred Question No. 229 regarding Aircraft crashes. Starred Question No. 232 regarding Constitution of Central Negotiating Division for hostage situations. Starred Question No. 234 regarding Misuse of rice under Food for work Programme. Answers to remaining Starred Question Nos. 222, 225, 228, 230, 231, 233 and 235 to 240 were laid on the Table. 2. Unstarred Questions Answers to Unstarred Question Nos.1506 to 1650 were laid on the Table. 12-00 Noon 3. Statement by Minister Correcting Answer to Question Shri Chennamaneni Vidya Sagar Rao, Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs laid on the Table a statement (in English and Hindi) correcting the reply given in the Rajya Sabha on the 31st July, 2002 to Unstarred Question 1540 regarding ‘Closures of relief camps in Gujarat’. 12-01 p.m. 4. Papers Laid on the Table Shri George Fernandes (Minister of Defence) laid on the Table a copy each (in English and Hindi) of the following papers under sub-section (1) of section 619A of the Companies Act, 1956:— (i) (a) Twenty-eighth Annual Report and Accounts of the Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited, Hyderabad, for the year 2001-2002, together with the Auditor's Report on the Accounts and the comments of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India thereon. -
Report on International Religious Freedom 2006: India
India Page 1 of 22 India International Religious Freedom Report 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the Government generally respected this right in practice. However, the Government sometimes did not act swiftly enough to counter effectively societal attacks against religious minorities and attempts by some leaders of state and local governments to limit religious freedom. This resulted in part from legal constraints on national government action inherent in the country's federal structure and from shortcomings in its law enforcement and justice systems, although courts regularly upheld the constitutional provision of religious freedom. Despite Government efforts to foster communal harmony, some extremists continued to view ineffective investigation and prosecution of attacks on religious minorities, particularly at the state and local level, as a signal that they could commit such violence with impunity, although numerous cases were in the courts at the end of the reporting period. While the National Government took positive steps in key areas to improve religious freedom, the status of religious freedom generally remained the same during the period covered by this report. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) continued to implement an inclusive and secular platform based on respect for the country's traditions of secular government and religious tolerance, and the rights of religious minorities. Terrorists attempted to provoke religious conflict by attacking Hindu Temples in Ayodhya and Varanasi. The Government reacted in a swift manner to rein in Hindu extremists, prevent revenge attacks and reprisal, and assure the Muslim community of its safety. -
DANGER to DEMOCRACY in INDIA Dilip Bose
59 DANGER TO DEMOCRACY IN INDIA Dilip Bose LEGALLY constituted, constitutionally valid and elected on A a majority basis government has been thrown out of office in an authoritarian manner by a fiat from the Governor of the state (called province under the old British raj) of West Bengal, for the simple crime that this government, called the United Front (UF) government, dared bring about a certain measure of relief and radical measures to ameliorate, at least partially, the almost intoler- able conditions under sky-rocketing prices of foodstuff and other essential commodities, consequent on widespread blackmarketing and corruption. But there is a method by which the ruling Congress party at the Centre is trying to oust not only the Left government in West Bengal but also other non-Congress governments in other states. A government run by the Indian monopolists in collaboration with foreign imperialist interests is resorting to the good old method of purchasing votes of weak and vacillating members of the State Assembly (i.e. the provincial legislature responsible for the govern- ance of the state in general, except of course foreign, defence and such other Central matters) and other Tammany Hall tactics of nepotism, jobbery and corruption. The broadest democratic opinion and all the parties of the Left, inside and outside the Assembly, are fighting back to assert the basic tenets and rules of parliamentary democracy and on its outcome depends the future of democracy and democratic institutions in India. Three state governments have been toppled—Manipur, Haryana and West Bengal—and the difference in approach demonstrates the very quandary of the ruling Congress party at the Centre (i.e. -
Statistical Report General Election, 1998 The
STATISTICAL REPORT ON GENERAL ELECTION, 1998 TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MADHYA PRADESH ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI Election Commission of India – State Elections, 1998 Legislative Assembly of Madhya Pradesh STATISCAL REPORT ( National and State Abstracts & Detailed Results) CONTENTS SUBJECT Page No. Part – I 1. List of Participating Political Parties 1 - 2 2. Other Abbreviations And Description 3 3. Highlights 4 4. List of Successful Candidates 5 - 12 5. Performance of Political Parties 13 - 14 6. Candidate Data Summary 15 7. Electors Data Summary 16 8. Women Candidates 17 - 25 9. Constituency Data Summary 26 - 345 10. Detailed Results 346 - 413 Election Commission of India-State Elections, 1998 to the Legislative Assembly of MADHYA PRADESH LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTYTYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY NATIONAL PARTIES 1 . BJP Bharatiya Janata Party 2 . BSP Bahujan Samaj Party 3 . CPI Communist Party of India 4 . CPM Communist Party of India (Marxist) 5 . INC Indian National Congress 6 . JD Janata Dal (Not to be used in General Elections, 1999) 7 . SAP Samata Party STATE PARTIES 8 . ICS Indian Congress (Socialist) 9 . INLD Indian National Lok Dal 10 . JP Janata Party 11 . LS Lok Shakti 12 . RJD Rashtriya Janata Dal 13 . RPI Republican Party of India 14 . SHS Shivsena 15 . SJP(R) Samajwadi Janata Party (Rashtriya) 16 . SP Samajwadi Party REGISTERED(Unrecognised ) PARTIES 17 . ABHM Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha 18 . ABJS Akhil Bharatiya Jan Sangh 19 . ABLTC Akhil Bhartiya Lok Tantrik Congress 20 . ABMSD Akhil Bartiya Manav Seva Dal 21 . AD Apna Dal 22 . AJBP Ajeya Bharat Party 23 . BKD(J) Bahujan Kranti Dal (Jai) 24 . -
Left Front Government in West Bengal (1971-1982) (PP93)
People, Politics and Protests VIII LEFT FRONT GOVERNMENT IN WEST BENGAL (1971-1982) Considerations on “Passive Revolution” & the Question of Caste in Bengal Politics Atig Ghosh 2017 LEFT FRONT GOVERNMENT IN WEST BENGAL (1971-1982) Considerations on “Passive Revolution” & the Question of Caste in Bengal Politics ∗ Atig Ghosh The Left Front was set up as the repressive climate of the Emergency was relaxed in January 1977. The six founding parties of the Left Front, i.e. the Communist Party of India (Marxist) or the CPI(M), the All India Forward Bloc (AIFB), the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP), the Marxist Forward Bloc (MFB), the Revolutionary Communist Party of India (RCPI) and the Biplabi Bangla Congress (BBC), articulated a common programme. This Left Front contested the Lok Sabha election in an electoral understanding together with the Janata Party and won most of the seats it contested. Ahead of the subsequent June 1977 West Bengal Legislative Assembly elections, seat- sharing talks between the Left Front and the Janata Party broke down. The Left Front had offered the Janata Party 56 per cent of the seats and the post as Chief Minister to JP leader Prafulla Chandra Sen, but JP insisted on 70 per cent of the seats. The Left Front thus opted to contest the elections on its own. The seat-sharing within the Left Front was based on the “Promode Formula”, named after the CPI(M) State Committee Secretary Promode Das Gupta. Under the Promode Formula the party with the highest share of votes in a constituency would continue to field candidates there, under its own election symbol and manifesto. -
CHAPTER—26 General Rules of Procedure
CHAPTER—26 General Rules of Procedure Notices General procedure very matter proposed to be raised in the House by a member, whether E is in the form of a question, resolution, motion, Bill, amendment, or otherwise, requires notice. Every notice, required by the rules has to be given in writing addressed to the Secretary-General and signed by the member giving notice and has to be delivered at the Notice Office between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m.1 every day except Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday.2 Notices left or received after 4.00 p.m. on any open day, or left on any day when the Notice Office is closed are treated as given on the next open day3 but subsequently modified for different classes of business as notified in Bulletin Part-II prior to the commencement of every session.4 Notices may be delivered by members personally or through messengers and can also be sent by post. The Rules Committee was of the view that the notices/communications received through Fax should be treated as authentic notices/ communications provided that they were signed and followed by written notices.5 At the stage of adoption of the report, the House, however, did not accept the Committee’s recommendation.6 For the convenience of members, in addition to the box kept outside the Notice Office, another box is kept at the Rajya Sabha Reception Counter in the main Reception Hall of the Parliament House, for enabling the personal staff of members to deposit notices of questions, motions, resolutions, etc. -
The Saffron Wave Meets the Silent Revolution: Why the Poor Vote for Hindu Nationalism in India
THE SAFFRON WAVE MEETS THE SILENT REVOLUTION: WHY THE POOR VOTE FOR HINDU NATIONALISM IN INDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Tariq Thachil August 2009 © 2009 Tariq Thachil THE SAFFRON WAVE MEETS THE SILENT REVOLUTION: WHY THE POOR VOTE FOR HINDU NATIONALISM IN INDIA Tariq Thachil, Ph. D. Cornell University 2009 How do religious parties with historically elite support bases win the mass support required to succeed in democratic politics? This dissertation examines why the world’s largest such party, the upper-caste, Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has experienced variable success in wooing poor Hindu populations across India. Briefly, my research demonstrates that neither conventional clientelist techniques used by elite parties, nor strategies of ideological polarization favored by religious parties, explain the BJP’s pattern of success with poor Hindus. Instead the party has relied on the efforts of its ‘social service’ organizational affiliates in the broader Hindu nationalist movement. The dissertation articulates and tests several hypotheses about the efficacy of this organizational approach in forging party-voter linkages at the national, state, district, and individual level, employing a multi-level research design including a range of statistical and qualitative techniques of analysis. In doing so, the dissertation utilizes national and author-conducted local survey data, extensive interviews, and close observation of Hindu nationalist recruitment techniques collected over thirteen months of fieldwork. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Tariq Thachil was born in New Delhi, India. He received his bachelor’s degree in Economics from Stanford University in 2003.