DOCSLIB.ORG

Yakabindie Aquatic Fauna Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yakabindie Aquatic Fauna Study Yakabindie Nickel Project Baseline Aquatic Biology and Water Quality Study of Jones Creek, including the South- west Claypan Area prepared for by Wetland Research & Management Baseline Aquatic Biology and Water Quality Study of Jones Creek, including the South-west Claypan Area Prepared for: Nickel W est, a division of BHP Billiton 191 Great Eastern Highway, Belmont, W A 6104 Ph: (61 8) 9479 0500, Fax: (61 8) 9479 0641 By: Wetland Research & Management 28 W illiam Street, Glen Forrest, W A 6071, Australia Ph (61 8) 9298 9807, Fax (61 8) 9380 1029, e-mail: awstorey@ cyllene.uwa.edu.au In Association with: Sinclair Knight Merz 9th Floor Durack Centre, 263 Adelaide Terrace, PO Box H615, Perth W A 6001, Australia Ph (61 8) 9268 4400, Fax (61 8) 9268 4488 Final Report 16/09/05 Frontispiece: (clockwise) main picture, Eucalyptus camaldulensis at confluence of northern and eastern tributaries; adult burrowing frog Cyclorana platycephala; main channel of Jones Creek at Goldfields Highway crossing (Site 2); shield shrimp Triops australiensis australiensis. ii Study Team 3anagement: Andrew W . Storey Field W ork: Andrew W . Storey & Sue Creagh Macroinvertebrate Identification: Jess Lynas Micro-invertebrate Identification: Russ J. Shiel (University of South Australia) Data analysis: Sue Creagh & Jess Lynas Report: Sue Creagh & Andrew W . Storey Acknowledgements This project was undertaken by Wetland Research & Management (W RM) on behalf of Sinclair Knight Merz for Nickel W est, a division of BHP Billiton. W RM would like to acknowledge the following UW A researchers for assistance with taxonomy; Dr Don Edward (Chironomidae), Dr Brenton Knott (Anostraca) and Martin Dziminski (frogs). The maps of the study area were provided by Sinclair Knight Merz. Jenny Yan (SKM) is thanked for constructive criticism on the draft report and for her efficient overall management of this project on behalf of SKM. W e are grateful to Doug and Lucy Brownlie (managers of Yakabindie Pastoral Lease) for access to wetlands within property boundaries. John Tomich, Kevin Shugg, Kim Brand and Leisa Turner (all Nickel W est, Mt Keith) are thanked for kindly providing assistance on-site. Finally, our thanks to Keith Berry (Nickel W est, Perth) who provided data and text on the hydrology and hydrogeology of Jones Creek. Recommened Reference Format W RM (2005). Yakabindie Nickel Project: Baseline Aquatic Biology and W ater Quality Study of Jones Creek, including the South-west Claypan. Unpublished report by W etland Research & Management to BHP Billiton. June 2005. Disclaimer This document was based on the best information available at the time of writing. W hile Wetland Research & Management (W RM) has attempted to ensure that all information contained within this document is accurate, W RM does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility to any third party for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information supplied. The views and opinions expressed within are those of W RM and do not necessarily represent Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM) or BHP Billiton policy. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of BHP Billiton and W RM. iii Jones Creek Baseline Aquatic Biology & Water Quality Study CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................. vi 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 STUDY AREA................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Hydrogeology ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.2 Hydrology........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.3 Catchment Condition.......................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.4 Previous Aquatic Fauna and Flora Surveys....................................................................................... 11 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................................... 11 2. METHODS ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 BIO-MONITORING IN TEMPORARY WATERS................................................................................................. 12 2.2 SITES AND SAMPLING DESIGN..................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 BACI Design....................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 RIPARIAN CONDITION ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.4 PHYSICO-CHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................................. 18 2.5 AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.5.1 Macroinvertebrate Fauna – Benthos.................................................................................................. 19 2.5.2 Micro-invertebrate Fauna - Zooplankton........................................................................................... 20 2.6 FISH FAUNA ................................................................................................................................................ 20 2.7 TADPOLES ................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.8 DATA ANALYSES......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.8.1 Univariate Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 21 2.8.2 Multivariate Analysis.......................................................................................................................... 21 2.8.3 Power Analysis and Sampling Design................................................................................................ 22 3. RESULTS & DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................... 25 3.1 CATCHMENT & RIPARIAN CONDITION ........................................................................................................ 25 3.2 PHYSICO-CHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................................. 30 3.2.1 Patterns in Physico-chemical Data .................................................................................................... 33 3.3 AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA................................................................................................................ 34 3.3.1 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.2 Taxa Richness..................................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.4 Multivariate Analysis Fauna .............................................................................................................. 37 3.4 AQUATIC VERTEBRATE FAUNA................................................................................................................... 40 3.4.1 Fish..................................................................................................................................................... 40 3.4.2 Frogs .................................................................................................................................................. 40 3.5 POWER ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE ABILITY OF SAMPLING DESIGN TO DETECT CHANGES .......................... 41 4. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 42 4.1 CATCHMENT CONDITION AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION ............................................................................... 42 4.2 WATER QUALITY AND METALS .................................................................................................................. 44 4.2 AQUATIC FAUNA......................................................................................................................................... 44 5. RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................................ 46 5.1 CHANNEL DIVERSION.................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 14.3 Fisheries Survey Findings Appendix 14.3 Fisheries Survey Findings
    Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System Environmental Impact Assessment Report Appendix 14.3 Fisheries Survey Findings Appendix 14.3 Fisheries Survey Findings 1 Overview Between November 2012 and November 2013 (Table 1-1), fisheries surveys have been conducted for trawling, purse seining, gill netting and hand lining, ichthyoplankton, fish post-larvae and two site visits to the artificial reefs at Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park (SCLKCMP) were made. Raw data of the surveys are provided in Annex A. The fisheries survey findings are presented in the following sections: Fisheries survey (fish trawl survey, purse seine survey, gill net survey, hand line survey); Artificial reef survey; Ichthyoplankton and fish post-larvae survey; Summary of fisheries surveys and ichthyoplankton and fish post-larvae surveys results (proposed land formation footprint, northern Chek Lap Kok waters, western Chek Lap Kok waters, The Brothers, SCLKCMP); Fisheries interview survey; Aquaculture interview survey; and Sites of fisheries importance based on literature review and fisheries survey findings. Table 1-1 Fisheries Survey Schedule from November 2012 to November 2013. Survey Types 2012 2013 Dry Season Wet Season Dry Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Fish trawl survey (Day time) 10 4 19 24 16, 20 Fish trawl survey (Night time) 22 11 27 30 9, 23 Purse seine survey 28,29 25 29 27 17 9, 23 Gill net survey 28,29 30 29 27 28 9, 23 Hand line survey 28,29 30 29 27 28 9, 23 Ichthyoplankton, Fish post-larvae and
    [Show full text]
  • A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams
    A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams VOLUME 1 Ian D. Rutherfurd, Kathryn Jerie and Nicholas Marsh Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation 2000 Published by: Land and Water Resources Research and Cooperative Research Centre Development Corporation for Catchment Hydrology GPO Box 2182 Department of Civil Engineering Canberra ACT 2601 Monash University Telephone: (02) 6257 3379 Clayton VIC 3168 Facsimile: (02) 6257 3420 Telephone: (03) 9905 2704 Email: <[email protected]> Facsimile: (03) 9905 5033 WebSite: <www.lwrrdc.gov.au> © LWRRDC and CRCCH Disclaimer: This manual has been prepared from existing technical material, from research and development studies and from specialist input by researchers,practitioners and stream managers.The material presented cannot fully represent conditions that may be encountered for any particular project.LWRRDC and CRCCH have endeavoured to verify that the methods and recommendations contained are appropriate.No warranty or guarantee,express or implied,except to the extent required by statute,is made as to the accuracy,reliability or suitability of the methods or recommendations,including any financial and legal information. The information, including guidelines and recommendations,contained in this Manual is made available by the authors to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help rehabilitate Australian streams.The Manual is not intended to be a code or industry standard.Whilst it is provided in good faith,LWRRDC
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum: Mollusca
    PHYLUM: MOLLUSCA Authors Dai Herbert1, Georgina Jones2 and Lara Atkinson3 Citation Herbert DG, Jones GJ and Atkinson LJ. 2018. Phylum Mollusca In: Atkinson LJ and Sink KJ (eds) Field Guide to the Ofshore Marine Invertebrates of South Africa, Malachite Marketing and Media, Pretoria, pp. 249-320. 1 University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa 2 Southern Underwater Research Group, Kommetjie, Cape Town 3 South African Environmental Observation Network, Egagasini Node, Cape Town 249 Phylum: MOLLUSCA (excluding Cephalopoda) Sea snails, sea slugs, bivalves, tusk shells and chitons Molluscs are one of the most diverse invertebrate Subclass Caenogastropoda groups with more than 100 000 described species A very diverse group including the periwinkles, and approximately 3 154 marine species recorded in cowries, wentletraps, moon snails, murex shells, South Africa. Organisms belonging to this phylum whelks, volutes and cone shells. are highly diverse but can be identiied by several commonly shared traits, including a mantle, the Subclass Heterobranchia presence of a radula, the configuration of the These are more advanced gastropods including sea nervous system and usually the presence of a shell slugs as well as freshwater and terrestrial snails and that encases the mollusc’s soft body for protection. slugs. The mantle plays an important role in respiration and excretion, while also creating the shell by secreting Class Bivalvia calcium and conchiolin. The radula or rasping tongue acts as the primary feeding organ, and is used Subclass Protobranchia by both herbivorous and carnivorous species for This group includes nut clams with taxodont hinge ingesting food. Along with the main characteristics dentition, as well as the awning clams with their of molluscs, the presence of a foot should also be over-grown periostracum.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFSHORE MARINE INVERTEBRATES of South Africa
    FIELD GUIDE TO THE OFFSHORE MARINE INVERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AFRICA agriculture, forestry and fisheries environmental affairs science and technology REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA FIELD GUIDE TO THE OFFSHORE MARINE INVERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AFRICA Compiled by: Dr Lara J Atkinson & Dr Kerry J Sink ISBN: 978-1-86868-098-6 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) and is free to share, adapt and apply the work, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate citation credit is given and that any adaptations thereof are distributed under the same license. Please cite: Atkinson LJ and Sink KJ (eds) 2018. Field Guide to the Offshore Marine Invertebrates of South Africa, Malachite Marketing and Media, Pretoria, pp. 498. DOI: 10.15493/SAEON.PUB.10000001 (https://www.doi.org/10.15493/SAEON.PUB.10000001) CONTENTS Foreword .........................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and application of this Guide .................................................................................................................4 Structure of Guide ........................................................................................................................................................6 Instructions for collection and preservation at sea .........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Ecological Water Requirements of Collie River East Branch: Risk Assessment of Salinity Mitigation Diversion Scenarios
    Preliminary Ecological Water Requirements of Collie River East Branch: Risk Assessment of Salinity Mitigation Diversion Scenarios prepared for by Wetland Research & Management October 2007 EWRS OF COLLIE RIVER EAST BRANCH – RISK ASSESSMENT OF DIVERSIONS Preliminary Ecological Water Requirements of Collie River East Branch: Risk Assessment of Salinity Mitigation Diversion Scenarios Report Prepared for: THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER Level 4, 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 PO Box K822 Perth Western Australia 6842 Ph (08) 6364-6822 By: Wetland Research & Management 28 William Street, Glen Forrest, WA 6071, Australia Ph (61 8) 9298 9807, Fax (61 8) 6488 1029, e-mail: [email protected] October 2007 Frontispiece (clockwise from top left): East Branch of the Collie at Coolangatta Gauging Station (photo: Katherine Bennett, December 2005), long-necked tortoise Chelodina oblonga (photo by Andrew Storey, January 2006), and Crinia insignifera taken form Bingham River (photo by Andrew Storey). __________ Wetland Research & Management __________ i EWRS OF COLLIE RIVER EAST BRANCH – RISK ASSESSMENT OF DIVERSIONS Study Team Management: Andrew W. Storey Field Work: Andrew W. Storey & Glenn Shiell Macroinvertebrate Identification: Lisa Chandler Hydraulic Modelling: Andrew Storey & Jess Lynas Report: Andrew Storey & Jess Lynas Recommended Reference Format WRM (2007) Preliminary Ecological Water Requirements of Collie River East Branch: Risk Assessment of Salinity Mitigation Diversion Scenarios. Unpublished report by Wetland Research and Management to Department of Water, Perth Western Australia. October 2007. Disclaimer This document was based on the best information available at the time of writing. While Wetlands Research and Management (WRM) has attempted to ensure that all information contained within this document is accurate, WRM does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility to any third party for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information supplied.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice
    Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (s266B) Approved Conservation Advice (including Listing Advice) for the Assemblages of species associated with open-coast salt-wedge estuaries of western and central Victoria ecological community 1. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) was established under the EPBC Act and has obligations to present advice to the Minister for the Environment (the Minister) in relation to the listing and conservation of threatened ecological communities, including under sections 189, 194N, 266B 269AA of the EPBC Act. 2. The Committee provided its advice on Assemblages of species associated with open-coast salt-wedge estuaries of western and central Victoria ecological community to the Minister as a draft of this Conservation Advice in 2018. The Committee recommended that: • the ecological community merits listing as Endangered under the EPBC Act; and • a recovery plan is not required for the ecological community at this time. 3. In 2018, the Minister accepted the Committee’s advice, adopting this document as the approved Conservation Advice. The Minister amended the list of threatened ecological communities under section 184 of the EPBC Act to include Assemblages of species associated with open-coast salt-wedge estuaries of western and central Victoria ecological community in the Endangered category. 4. A draft Conservation Advice for this ecological community was made available for expert and public comment for a minimum of 30 business days. The Committee and Minister had regard to all public and expert comment that was relevant to the consideration of the ecological community. 5. This approved Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time it was approved; this includes scientific literature, advice from consultations, and existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this ecological community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Species of Lamlash Bay in the Nineteenth Century
    The Marine Species of Lamlash Bay in the Nineteenth Century © Colin Cowley, Lamlash, 2013 The Marine Species of Lamlash Bay in the Nineteenth Century Significant changes in public transport were made during the 19th century, the improved ferry services provided by paddle steamers making Arran far more readily accessible from the mainland than had been the case in the days of sail, with important beneficial implications for the economic prosperity of the Island. An increasing number of affluent visitors were able to take 1 holidays in Arran, though the availability of habitable accommodation was limited, and even the most basic of foodstuffs were sometimes in surprisingly short supply. Amongst the more energetic of the visitors there were intelligent albeit occasionally eccentric individuals interested in the study of Natural History, keen to investigate curious details of the geology of the Island and to record any interesting plants & animals which they might discover. Most notable amongst the naturalists was the veteran Arran visitor Rev. Dr. David Landsborough (1779-1854). His knowledge of the various branches of Natural History was wide- ranging, yet he had a fascination with marine species. Born at Dalry in Galloway, he was from 1811 the Minister of Stevenston in Ayrshire, but at the Disruption in 1843 he elected to join the Free Church and he became the FC Minister at Saltcoats. Dr. Landsborough had penned a poem, Arran, 167 pages long, which was published in 1828. This was eventually followed in 1847 by a second, much- enlarged edition, Arran, a Poem; and Excursions to Arran, with reference to the Natural History of the Island, 368 pages long, with natural history lists for Arran between pages 353-366, published by John Johnstone in London & Edinburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblage Response to Experimental Rehabilitation in the Glenelg River, Victoria, Australia
    Fish assemblage response to experimental rehabilitation in the Glenelg River, Victoria, Australia by Travis John Howson (B.Sc. Hons.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Deakin University July, 2013 Acknowledgements Emabarking on a significant journey such as this and seeing its conclusion, could not have been done without the help of a few fellow travellers along the way. Instigation and completion of this study could not have been undertaken without the assistance of the following people. First, I would like to especially thank my supervisor's: Associate Professor Belinda Robson, Dr Ty Matthews and Associate Professor Brad Mitchell. I am greatly appreciative of you always making time to discuss issues at any moment, even when hundreds to thousands of kilometres away and providing much appreciated support, especially throwing work my way to make life more content. Your enthusiasm and assistance was invaluable, and I am especially grateful your wisdom, support, encouragement and of course, friendship. I am also indebted to the knowledge passed to me from helpful discussions with Dr. Ed Chester, Dr. Alecia Belgrove, Dr. Craig Styan, Professor Gerry Quinn, Associate Professor Laurie Laurenson, Dr. Paul Jones and Dr. Daniel Ierodiaconnou. Together with my supervisors, I have learnt alot and especially grateful for meeting such a great bunch of people who gave me very different insights into the discipline of ecology. Your discussions, experiences and thoughts were invaluable and have immensely assisted my development in the field of ecology. Anonymous reviewers of several chapters of this work assisted in improving earlier drafts, and provided much appreciated external insights into the communication of my thoughts to the wider scientific audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Des Bivalves Et Gastéropodes Benthiques Dans Les Zones Infralittorale Et Circalittorale Des Côtes De L’Estuaire Et Du Nord Du Golfe Du Saint-Laurent
    Distribution des bivalves et gastéropodes benthiques dans les zones infralittorale et circalittorale des côtes de l’estuaire et du nord du golfe du Saint-Laurent Hugo Bourdages, Patrice Goudreau, Jean Lambert, Lysandre Landry et Claude Nozères Direction régionale des sciences Pêches et Océans Canada Institut Maurice-Lamontagne 850, route de la Mer Mont-Joli (Québec) G5H 3Z4 2012 Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques 3004 Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique. Les rapports techniques sont destinés essentiellement à un public international et ils sont distribués à cet échelon. Il n’y a aucune restriction quant au sujet; de fait, la série reflète la vaste gamme des intérêts et des politiques du ministère des Pêches et des Océans, c’est-à-dire les sciences halieutiques et aquatiques. Les rapports techniques peuvent être cités comme des publications intégrales. Le titre exact paraît au-dessus du résumé de chaque rapport. Les rapports techniques sont indexés dans la base de données Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Les numéros 1 à 456 de cette série ont été publiés à titre de rapports techniques de l’Office des recherches sur les pêcheries du Canada. Les numéros 457 à 714 sont parus à titre de rapports techniques de la Direction générale de la recherche et du développement, Service des pêches et de la mer, ministère de l’Environnement. Les numéros 715 à 924 ont été publiés à titre de rapports techniques du Service des pêches et de la mer, ministère des Pêches et de l’Environnement.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex E Marine Species Recorded During Fisheries Survey
    Annex E Marine Species Recorded during Fisheries Survey China Species Survey Locations Taxa Order Family Species Name Common Name Commoness IUCN Red List A* B* C* D* E* F* G* Crab Decapoda Calappidae Calappa philargius Box crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Dorippidae Paradorippe polita Crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Euryplacidae Eucrate crenata Goneplastid crab ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Leucosiidae Leucosia anatum Painted Pebble Crab ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Leucosiidae Seulocia vittata Crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Parthenopidae Parthenope sp Elbow crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Charybdis feriata Red crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Charybdis lucifera Box crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Charybdis sp Crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Portunus pelagicus Blue crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Portunus sanguinolentus Three-spotted crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Portunus trituberculatus Swimming crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Crab Decapoda Portunidae Scylla serrata Mud crab ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Fish Anguilliformes Congridae Uroconger lepturus Slender conger ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Fish Anguilliformes Muraenesocidae Muraenesox cinereus Arabian pike-eel ✓ ✓ ✓ Fish Anguilliformes Muraenidae Gymnothorax reevesii Reeve's moray ✓ ✓ ✓ Fish Anguilliformes Ophichthidae Pisodonophis boro Rice-paddy eel -- LC ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Fish Atheriniformes Atherinidae Atherinomorus lacunosus Hardyhead silverside ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Fish Aulopiformes Synodontidae Harpadon nehereus Bombay duck ✓ ✓ Fish Aulopiformes Synodontidae Saurida elongata Slender lizardfish ✓ ✓ Fish Aulopiformes Synodontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Ecological Modelling of Shallow Sublittoral Mud Habitats to Inform Indicator Selection
    JNCC Report No: 557 Conceptual Ecological Modelling of Shallow Sublittoral Mud Habitats to Inform Indicator Selection Coates, D.A., Alexander, D., Stafford, R. & Herbert, R.J.H. June 2015 © JNCC, Peterborough 2015 ISSN 0963 8901 For further information please contact: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY www.jncc.defra.gov.uk This report should be cited as: Coates, D.A., Alexander, D., Stafford, R. & Herbert, R.J.H. 2015. Conceptual Ecological Modelling of Shallow Sublittoral Mud Habitats to Inform Indicator Selection. Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd - A report for the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, JNCC Report No: 557 JNCC, Peterborough. Conceptual Ecological Modelling of Shallow Sublittoral Mud Habitats Summary The purpose of this study is to produce a series of Conceptual Ecological Models (CEMs) that represent the shallow sublittoral mud habitat in the UK. CEMs are diagrammatic representations of the influences and processes that occur within an ecosystem. The models can be used to identify critical aspects of an ecosystem that may be developed for further study, or serve as the basis for the selection of indicators for environmental monitoring purposes. The models produced by this project are ‘control diagrams’, representing the unimpacted state of the environment, free from anthropogenic pressures. It is intended that the models produced by this project will be used to guide indicator selection for the monitoring of this habitat in UK waters. CEMs will eventually be produced for a range of habitat types defined under the UK Marine Biodiversity Monitoring R&D Programme (UKMBMP), which, along with stressor models designed to show the interactions within impacted habitats, would form the basis of a robust method for indicator selection.
    [Show full text]