Lawsuit-Multiplestates-6-14-Cv-00187-RAW-2014-08-01-NAFC
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 278 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC ) COUNSELORS, INC., a Nevada Non-Profit ) Corporation; et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 6:14-cv-00187-RAW ) 1. NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, a California) Non-Profit Corporation; et al. ) ) Defendants. ) MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS ROYALMARK MANAGEMENT, INC., GREATCIRCLE STUDIOS, LLC, PREMAZON, INC., AND JONATHAN MORETTI AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT Respectfully Submitted, Charles D. Neal, Jr., OBA #6591 [email protected] Rachel D. Parrilli, OBA #18762 [email protected] Stacie L. Hixon, OBA #19477 [email protected] CityPlex Towers, 53rd Floor 2448 East 81st Street Tulsa, Oklahoma 74137 (918) 664-4612 telephone (918) 664-4133 facsimile 6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 278 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 2 of 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................... 2 II. ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES......................................................................... 5 A. This Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction Over These Defendants .................................. 5 1. General jurisdiction Does Not Lie Over These Defendants ..........................................5 2. There Is No Specific Jurisdiction Over These Defendants .............................................8 3. Web Hosting Does Not Provide a Basis for Personal Jurisdiction oOver Royalmark Management, Inc. or Great Circle, LLC ..............................................................................9 a. Royalmark Management, Inc. (28) ........................................................................12 b. GreatCircle Studios (26) ........................................................................................13 4. Neither Premazon, Inc. nor its Employee, Jonathan Moretti, Have Minimum Contacts with this State .....................................................................................................................14 a. Premazon, Inc. (8) .................................................................................................15 b. Jonathan Moretti (75) ............................................................................................17 B. Exercise Of Personal Jurisdiction as to These Defendants Violates Due Process .......19 C. Plaintiffs’ Allegation Of Civil Conspiracy Does Not Establish Personal Jurisdiction Over The Alleged Website Owners ...................................................................................21 D. Plaintiffs Fail To State Any Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted....................22 E. Plaintiffs’ Claims Against Premazon, Inc. and Moretti Should be Dismissed for Insufficient Service of Process..............................................................................................23 III. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................24 i 6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 278 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 3 of 31 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES ALS Scan, Inc. v. Digital Serv. Consultants, Inc., 293 F.3d 707 (4th Cir. 2002) ............................8 Amberson v. Westside Story Newspaper, 110 F.Supp.2d 332 (D. N. J. 2000) ..............................11 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009) .......................................................................................22 Bell Atlantic Corp, v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 554 (2007) ...................................................................22 Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Heliqwest Int’l, Ltd., 385 F.3d 1291 (10th Cir. 2004) ..................8 Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985) .................................................................11 Calder v. Jones, 464 U.S. 783 (1984) ..............................................................................................9 Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185 (1990) ............................................................................7 Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc. 334 F.3d 390 (4th Cir. 2003) ...... .....................................................................................................................................................9,10 Christian Science Bd. of Directors of First Church of Christ, Scientist v. Nolan, 259 F.3d 209 ..10 Clark v. Tabin, 400 F.Supp.2d 1290 (N.D. Okla. 2005) ................................................................22 Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014) ............................................................................6,7 Doe v. Nat’l Med Servs., 974 F.2d 143 (10th Cir. 1992) .................................................................6 Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermillion Fine Arts, Inc., 514 F.3d 1063 (10th Cir. 2008) ...................6,8,9 Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 131 S.Ct. 2846 (2011) ...................................6 Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 (1958) ...................................................................................8,15 Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia, S.A. v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408 (1984) .....................................6 Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence Coalition, 542 F.3d 794 (10th Cir. 2008) ....................................................................................................................23,24 Int’l Shoe Co. v. Wash., 326 U.S. 310 (1945) ...............................................................................6,8 Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation, Inc. 2009 WL 249432 (D. Ariz. Feb. 2, 2009) .............10 Melea, Ltd. v. Jawer SA, 511 F.3d 1060 (10th Cir. 2007) .............................................................22 Near v. Crivello, 673 F.Supp.2d 1265 (D. Kan. 2009) ..................................................................22 OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Ins. Co. of Canada, 149 F.3d 1086 (10th Cir. 1998) ..........8,19,20,21 Peay v. Bellsouth Med. Ass’n Plan, 205 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2000) ..............................................6 ii 6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 278 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 4 of 31 Rusakiewicz v. Lowe, 5556 F.3d 1095 (10th Cir. 2009) ...............................................................18 Shrader v. Biddinger, 633 F.3d 1235 (10th Cir. 2011) .................................................................7,8 Soma Medical Int’l v. Standard Chartered Bank, 196 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 1999) ........................9 Ten Mile Indus. Park v. Western Plains Service Corp., 810 F.2d 1518 (10th Cir. 1987) .............18 THI of New Mexico at Hobbs Center, LLC v. Patton, 851 F.Supp.2d 1281 (D. N.M. 2011) ..........7 Tulsa Specialty Hosp., LLC v. Boilermakers Nat. Health and Welfare Fund, 2012 WL 2887513 (N.D. Okla. Jul. 13, 2012) ...........................................................................................................7 Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc., 2011 OK 9, 247 P.3d 1183 ........................................................20 OTHER 12 O.S. § 1149 .................................................................................................................................2 12 O.S. § 1449 ............................................................................................................................5,20 112 O.S. § 2004(C)(2)(b) and (c) ...................................................................................................24 12 O.S. § 2004(F).............................................................................................................................5 15 U.S.C. § 1116 ..............................................................................................................................5 15 U.S.C. § 1121 ..............................................................................................................................5 28 U.S.C. § 1331 .............................................................................................................................5 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) .........................................................................................................................5 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h) ........................................................................................................................23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(2) ..................................................................................................................1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) .................................................................................................................23 iii 6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 278 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 5 of 31 Defendants Royalmark Management, Inc. (28), GreatCircle Studios, LLC (26), Premazon, Inc. (8) and Jonathan Moretti (75), having entered their special appearance, move for dismissal of the Complaint (Doc. 3) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). These Defendants are alleged to be website owners or operators who have supposedly infringed upon Plaintiffs’ certifications, marks, credentials, or abbreviations Plaintiffs claim to be trademarks protected under the Lanham Act and common law through these sites (which is denied). Plaintiffs have failed to allege any fact which supports a reasonable inference that these non-resident Defendants purposely availed themselves of doing business in this forum, or have any contact with this State whatsoever. Further, Royalmark and GreatCircle Studios do not actually own or operate