Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System 2012 Special Reliability Assessment Interim Report: Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System February 2012 Embargoed until 12pm EST February 29, 2012 This page intentionally left blank Preface Preface The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) has prepared the following assessment in accordance with the Energy Policy Act of 2005, in which the United States Congress directed NERC to conduct periodic assessments of the reliability and adequacy of the bulk power system of North America.1,2 NERC operates under similar obligations in many Canadian provinces, as well as a portion of Baja California Norte, México. NERC Mission The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) is an international regulatory authority established to evaluate reliability of the bulk power system in North America. NERC develops and enforces reliability standards; assesses reliability annually via a 10‐year assessment, and winter and summer seasonal assessments; monitors the bulk power system; and educates, trains, and certifies industry personnel. NERC is the Electric Reliability Organization for North America, subject to oversight by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and governmental authorities in Canada.3 Figure A: NERC Regional Entities Table A: NERC Regional Entities FRCC Florida Reliability Coordinating Council MRO Midwest Reliability Organization NPCC Northeast Power Coordinating Council RFC ReliabilityFirst Corporation SERC SERC Reliability Corporation SPP Southwest Power Pool Regional Entity TRE Texas Reliability Entity WECC Western Electricity Coordinating Council Note: The highlighted area between SPP and SERC denotes overlapping Regional area boundaries. NERC assesses and reports on the reliability and adequacy of the North American bulk power system, which is divided into eight regional areas, as shown in the map (Figure A) and corresponding table (Table A). The users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system within these areas account for virtually all the electricity supplied in the United States, Canada, and a portion of Baja California Norte, México. 1 H.R. 6 as approved by of the One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States, the Energy Policy Act of 2005: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS‐109hr6enr/pdf/BILLS‐109hr6enr.pdf 2 The NERC Rules of Procedure, Section 800, further detail the Objectives, Scope, Data and Information requirements, and Reliability Assessment Process requiring annual seasonal and long‐term reliability assessments. 3 As of June 18, 2007, the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) granted NERC the legal authority to enforce Reliability Standards with all U.S. users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system, and made compliance with those standards mandatory and enforceable. In Canada, NERC presently has memorandums of understanding in place with provincial authorities in Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Québec, and Saskatchewan, and with the Canadian National Energy Board. NERC standards are mandatory and enforceable in British Columbia, Ontario, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. NERC has an agreement with Manitoba Hydro making reliability standards mandatory for that entity, and Manitoba has adopted legislation setting out a framework for standards to become mandatory for users, owners, and operators in the province. In addition, NERC has been designated as the “electric reliability organization” under Alberta’s Transportation Regulation, and certain reliability standards have been approved in that jurisdiction; others are pending. NERC and NPCC have been recognized as standards‐setting bodies by the Régie de l’énergie of Québec, and Québec has the framework in place for reliability standards to become mandatory and enforceable in that jurisdiction. GMDTF Interim Report: Affects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System–February 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents Report Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i 1. Space Weather and the Power System ................................................................................... 1 2. Monitoring and Predicting Space Weather ............................................................................ 8 3. Existing Response Capability ................................................................................................. 14 4. Credible Threat Concept and GIC Calculation....................................................................... 16 5. Power Transformers ............................................................................................................. 25 6. Protection and Control ......................................................................................................... 48 7. Other Equipment .................................................................................................................. 58 8. Power System Analysis .......................................................................................................... 62 9. Grid Monitoring Enhancement ............................................................................................. 71 10. GIC Reduction Devices .......................................................................................................... 73 11. Operating Procedures to Mitigate GIC ................................................................................. 79 12. Managing Geomagnetic Disturbance Risks .......................................................................... 82 13. Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 85 Appendices Attachment 1: Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 96 Attachment 2: April 2011 NOAA SWPC Workshop ....................................................................... 98 Attachment 3: NERC Industry Alert ............................................................................................ 102 Attachment 4: Public GMD Response Procedures ..................................................................... 104 Attachment 5: Public OEM Documentation on GMD ................................................................. 105 Attachment 6: Monitoring and Measurement Architecture ...................................................... 106 Attachment 7: View on Risk Management ................................................................................. 109 Attachment 8: Example of GIC Calculations ............................................................................... 118 Attachment 9: NERC GMDTF Roster ........................................................................................... 128 North American Electric Reliability Corporation Staff ................................................................ 137 Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System–February 2012 Executive Summary I. Executive Summary The highly complex, interconnected North American power grid has provided a long record of reliable, secure delivery of electric power. However, solar storm or geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) events have demonstrated their ability to disrupt the normal operations of the power grid. The most recent example in North America occurred in March 1989, when a GMD led to the collapse of the Hydro‐Québec system, leaving more than six million people without power for nine hours. Figure ES‐1 below shows the March 1989 storm over North America. Understanding the effects of GMD on bulk power systems and the ability of the industry to mitigate their effects are important to managing system reliability. Figure ES‐1: Geomagnetic intensity–March 1989 storm NERC conducted this assessment in response to findings in the High Impact, Low Frequency Event Risk to the North American Bulk Power System (March 2010)4 report, which found the best approach to HILF events was through an organized combination of industry‐led task forces and initiatives. The GMD Task Force implemented that approach for study of geomagnetic disturbances. The breadth of subject matter expertise is shown by the listing of the task force leadership, members, and observers in Attachment 9. I.1 The GMD Phenomena GMD emanate from the sun (see Figure ES‐2). According to scientists, solar coronal holes and coronal mass ejections (CME) are the two main categories of solar activity that drive solar magnetic disturbances on Earth. CME create a large mass of charged solar energetic particles 4 NERC/US Department of Energy, June 2010: High Impact, Low Frequency Event Risk to the Bulk Power System of North America: http://www.nerc.com/files/hilf.pdf i GMDTF Interim Report: Affects of Geomagnetic Disturbances on the Bulk Power System–February 2012 Executive Summary that escape from the sun’s halo (corona), traveling to Earth between 14 and 96 hours.5 These high‐energy particles consist of electrons, along with coronal and solar wind ions.6 Geomagnetic induced currents (GICs) that interact with the power system appear to be produced when a large CME occurs and are directed at Earth. Figure ES‐2: Storm interaction with Earth and transmission lines B t E Charged particles from the CME interact with Earth’s magnetosphere‐ionosphere and produce ionospheric currents, called electrojets. Typically millions of amperes in magnitude, electrojets perturb Earth’s geomagnetic field,
Recommended publications
  • Doc.10100.Space Weather Manual FINAL DRAFT Version
    Doc 10100 Manual on Space Weather Information in Support of International Air Navigation Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition – 2018 International Civil Aviation Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Space weather indicators .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 The hazards ........................................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Space weather mitigation aspects ....................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Coordinating the response to a space weather event ......................................................................... 1-3 Chapter 2. Space Weather Phenomena and Aviation Operations ................................................................. 2-1 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Geomagnetic storms ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Geomagnetic Storms in South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA)
    Analysis of geomagnetic storms in South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) Júlia Maria Soja Sampaio, Elder Yokoyama, Luciana Figueiredo Prado Copyright 2019, SBGf - Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica Moreover, Dst and AE indices may vary according to the This paper was prepared for presentation during the 16th International Congress of the geomagnetic field geometry, such as polar to intermediate Brazilian Geophysical Society held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19-22 August 2019. latitudinal field variations. In this framework, fluctuations Contents of this paper were reviewed by the Technical Committee of the 16th in the geomagnetic field can occur under the influence of International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society and do not necessarily represent any position of the SBGf, its officers or members. Electronic reproduction or the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA). The SAMA storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent is a region of minimum geomagnetic field intensity values of the Brazilian Geophysical Society is prohibited. ____________________________________________________________________ at the Earth’s surface (Figure 1), and its dipole intensity is decreasing along the past 1000 years (Terra-Nova et. al., Abstract 2017). Geomagnetic storm is a major disturbance of Earth’s In this study we will compare the behavior of the types of magnetosphere resulted from the interaction of solar wind geomagnetic storms basis on AE and Dst indices. and the Earth’s magnetic field. This disturbance depends of the Earth magnetic field geometry, and varies in terms of intensity from the Poles to the Equator. This disturbance is quantified through geomagnetic indices, such as the Dst and the AE indices.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Inductance and Transformer Theory Questions: 1 Through 15 Lab Exercise: Transformer Voltage/Current Ratios (Question 61)
    ELTR 115 (AC 2), section 1 Recommended schedule Day 1 Topics: Mutual inductance and transformer theory Questions: 1 through 15 Lab Exercise: Transformer voltage/current ratios (question 61) Day 2 Topics: Transformer step ratio Questions: 16 through 30 Lab Exercise: Auto-transformers (question 62) Day 3 Topics: Maximum power transfer theorem and impedance matching with transformers Questions: 31 through 45 Lab Exercise: Auto-transformers (question 63) Day 4 Topics: Transformer applications, power ratings, and core effects Questions: 46 through 60 Lab Exercise: Differential voltage measurement using the oscilloscope (question 64) Day 5 Exam 1: includes Transformer voltage ratio performance assessment Lab Exercise: work on project Project: Initial project design checked by instructor and components selected (sensitive audio detector circuit recommended) Practice and challenge problems Questions: 66 through the end of the worksheet Impending deadlines Project due at end of ELTR115, Section 3 Question 65: Sample project grading criteria 1 ELTR 115 (AC 2), section 1 Project ideas AC power supply: (Strongly Recommended!) This is basically one-half of an AC/DC power supply circuit, consisting of a line power plug, on/off switch, fuse, indicator lamp, and a step-down transformer. The reason this project idea is strongly recommended is that it may serve as the basis for the recommended power supply project in the next course (ELTR120 – Semiconductors 1). If you build the AC section now, you will not have to re-build an enclosure or any of the line-power circuitry later! Note that the first lab (step-down transformer circuit) may serve as a prototype for this project with just a few additional components.
    [Show full text]
  • National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan, 2Nd Edition, July 2000
    National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan, 2nd Edition, July 2000 http://www.ofcm.gov/ The National Space Weather Program The Implementation Plan 2nd Edition July 2000 National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan, 2nd Edition, July 2000 http://www.ofcm.gov/ NATIONAL SPACE WEATHER PROGRAM COUNCIL Mr. Samuel P. Williamson, Chairman Federal Coordinator Dr. David L. Evans Department of Commerce Colonel Michael A. Neyland, USAF Department of Defense Mr. Robert E. Waldron Department of Energy Mr. James F. Devine Department of the Interior Mr. David Whatley Department of Transportation Dr. Edward J. Weiler National Aeronautics and Space Administration Dr. Margaret S. Leinen National Science Foundation Lt Col Michael R. Babcock, USAF, Executive Secretary Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan, 2nd Edition, July 2000 http://www.ofcm.gov/ NATIONAL SPACE WEATHER PROGRAM Implementation Plan 2nd Edition Prepared by the Committee for Space Weather for the National Space Weather Program Council Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology FCM-P31-2000 Washington, DC July 2000 National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan, 2nd Edition, July 2000 http://www.ofcm.gov/ National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan, 2nd Edition, July 2000 http://www.ofcm.gov/ FOREWORD We are pleased to present this Second Edition of the National Space Weather Program Implementation Plan. We published the program's Strategic Plan in 1995 and the first Implementation Plan in 1997. In the intervening period, we have made tremendous progress toward our goals but much work remains to be accomplished to achieve our ultimate goal of providing the space weather observations, forecasts, and warnings needed by our Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • On Magnetic Storms and Substorms
    ILWS WORKSHOP 2006, GOA, FEBRUARY 19-24, 2006 On magnetic storms and substorms G. S. Lakhina, S. Alex, S. Mukherjee and G. Vichare Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel (W), Navi Mumbai-410218, India Abstract. Magnetospheric substorms and storms are indicators of geomagnetic activity. Whereas the geomagnetic index AE (auroral electrojet) is used to study substorms, it is common to characterize the magnetic storms by the Dst (disturbance storm time) index of geomagnetic activity. This talk discusses briefly the storm-substorms relationship, and highlights some of the characteristics of intense magnetic storms, including the events of 29-31 October and 20-21 November 2003. The adverse effects of these intense geomagnetic storms on telecommunication, navigation, and on spacecraft functioning will be discussed. Index Terms. Geomagnetic activity, geomagnetic storms, space weather, substorms. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction latitude magnetic fields are significantly depressed over a Magnetospheric storms and substorms are indicators of time span of one to a few hours followed by its recovery geomagnetic activity. Where as the magnetic storms are which may extend over several days (Rostoker, 1997). driven directly by solar drivers like Coronal mass ejections, solar flares, fast streams etc., the substorms, in simplest terms, are the disturbances occurring within the magnetosphere that are ultimately caused by the solar wind. The magnetic storms are characterized by the Dst (disturbance storm time) index of geomagnetic activity. The substorms, on the other hand, are characterized by geomagnetic AE (auroral electrojet) index. Magnetic reconnection plays an important role in energy transfer from solar wind to the magnetosphere. Magnetic reconnection is very effective when the interplanetary magnetic field is directed southwards leading to strong plasma injection from the tail towards the inner magnetosphere causing intense auroras at high-latitude nightside regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Source for High Voltage Column of Injector to Proton
    THPSC018 Proceedings of RuPAC-2010, Protvino, Russia POWER SOURCE FOR HIGH-VOLTAGE COLUMN OF INJECTOR TO PROTON SYNCHROTRON WITH OUTPUT POWER UP TO 5KW Golubenko Yu.I., Medvedko A.S., Nemitov P.I., Pureskin D.N., Senkov D.V., BINP Novosibirsk Russia Abstract converter with insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) as The presented report contains the description of power switches (part A) and the isolation transformer with source with output voltage of sinusoidal shape with synchronous rectifier (part B). The design of power amplitude up to 150V, frequency 400Hz and output converter consists of 3-phase diode rectifier VD1, power up to 5kW, operating on the primary coil of high electromagnetic (EMI) filter F1, switch SW1, rectifier’s voltage transformer - rectifier of precision 1.5MV filter L1 C1-C8, 20 kHz inverter with IGBT switches Q1- electrostatic accelerator – injector for proton synchrotron. Q4, isolation transformer T1, synchronous rectifier O5- The source consists of the input converter with IGBT Q8, output low-pass filter L2 C9 and three current switches, transformer and the synchronous rectifier with sensors: U1, U2 and U3. IGBT switches also. Converter works with a principle of pulse-width modulation (PWM) on programmed from 15 Harmonic PS High voltage to 25 kHz frequency. In addition, PWM signal is 400Hz 120V column modulated by sinusoidal 400Hz signal. The controller of 380V the source is developed with DSP and PLM, which allows 50Hz L1 Ls A 900uHn 230uHn optimizing operations of the source. For control of the Cp B 80uF out source serial CAN-interface is used. The efficiency of C1 1.5MV system is more than 80% at the nominal output power C 400uF 5kW.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Magnetospheres
    CLBE001-ESS2E November 9, 2006 17:4 100-C 25-C 50-C 75-C C+M 50-C+M C+Y 50-C+Y M+Y 50-M+Y 100-M 25-M 50-M 75-M 100-Y 25-Y 50-Y 75-Y 100-K 25-K 25-19-19 50-K 50-40-40 75-K 75-64-64 Planetary Magnetospheres Margaret Galland Kivelson University of California Los Angeles, California Fran Bagenal University of Colorado, Boulder Boulder, Colorado CHAPTER 28 1. What is a Magnetosphere? 5. Dynamics 2. Types of Magnetospheres 6. Interaction with Moons 3. Planetary Magnetic Fields 7. Conclusions 4. Magnetospheric Plasmas 1. What is a Magnetosphere? planet’s magnetic field. Moreover, unmagnetized planets in the flowing solar wind carve out cavities whose properties The term magnetosphere was coined by T. Gold in 1959 are sufficiently similar to those of true magnetospheres to al- to describe the region above the ionosphere in which the low us to include them in this discussion. Moons embedded magnetic field of the Earth controls the motions of charged in the flowing plasma of a planetary magnetosphere create particles. The magnetic field traps low-energy plasma and interaction regions resembling those that surround unmag- forms the Van Allen belts, torus-shaped regions in which netized planets. If a moon is sufficiently strongly magne- high-energy ions and electrons (tens of keV and higher) tized, it may carve out a true magnetosphere completely drift around the Earth. The control of charged particles by contained within the magnetosphere of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Interplanetary Conditions Causing Intense Geomagnetic Storms (Dst 100 Nt) During Solar Cycle 23 (1996–2006) E
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, A05221, doi:10.1029/2007JA012744, 2008 Interplanetary conditions causing intense geomagnetic storms (Dst ÀÀÀ100 nT) during solar cycle 23 (1996–2006) E. Echer,1 W. D. Gonzalez,1 B. T. Tsurutani,2 and A. L. C. Gonzalez1 Received 21 August 2007; revised 24 January 2008; accepted 8 February 2008; published 30 May 2008. [1] The interplanetary causes of intense geomagnetic storms and their solar dependence occurring during solar cycle 23 (1996–2006) are identified. During this solar cycle, all intense (Dst À100 nT) geomagnetic storms are found to occur when the interplanetary magnetic field was southwardly directed (in GSM coordinates) for long durations of time. This implies that the most likely cause of the geomagnetic storms was magnetic reconnection between the southward IMF and magnetopause fields. Out of 90 storm events, none of them occurred during purely northward IMF, purely intense IMF By fields or during purely high speed streams. We have found that the most important interplanetary structures leading to intense southward Bz (and intense magnetic storms) are magnetic clouds which drove fast shocks (sMC) causing 24% of the storms, sheath fields (Sh) also causing 24% of the storms, combined sheath and MC fields (Sh+MC) causing 16% of the storms, and corotating interaction regions (CIRs), causing 13% of the storms. These four interplanetary structures are responsible for three quarters of the intense magnetic storms studied. The other interplanetary structures causing geomagnetic storms were: magnetic clouds that did not drive a shock (nsMC), non magnetic clouds ICMEs, complex structures resulting from the interaction of ICMEs, and structures resulting from the interaction of shocks, heliospheric current sheets and high speed stream Alfve´n waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Is the Best Site on Earth? Domes A, B, C, and F, And
    Where is the best site on Earth? Saunders et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 976-992 Where is the best site on Earth? Domes A, B, C and F, and Ridges A and B Will Saunders1;2, Jon S. Lawrence1;2;3, John W.V. Storey1, Michael C.B. Ashley1 1School of Physics, University of New South Wales 2Anglo-Australian Observatory 3Macquarie University, New South Wales [email protected] Seiji Kato, Patrick Minnis, David M. Winker NASA Langley Research Center Guiping Liu Space Sciences Lab, University of California Berkeley Craig Kulesa Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona Saunders et al. 2009, PASP, 121 976992 Received 2009 May 26; accepted 2009 July 13; published 2009 August 20 ABSTRACT The Antarctic plateau contains the best sites on earth for many forms of astronomy, but none of the existing bases was selected with astronomy as the primary motivation. In this paper, we try to systematically compare the merits of potential observatory sites. We include South Pole, Domes A, C and F, and also Ridge B (running NE from Dome A), and what we call `Ridge A' (running SW from Dome A). Our analysis combines satellite data, published results and atmospheric models, to compare the boundary layer, weather, aurorae, airglow, precipitable water vapour, thermal sky emission, surface temperature, and the free atmosphere, at each site. We ¯nd that all Antarctic sites are likely to be compromised for optical work by airglow and aurorae. Of the sites with existing bases, Dome A is easily the best overall; but we ¯nd that Ridge A o®ers an even better site.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Solar Eruptions and Their Space Weather Consequences Nat
    Extreme Solar Eruptions and their Space Weather Consequences Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA Abstract: Solar eruptions generally refer to coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and flares. Both are important sources of space weather. Solar flares cause sudden change in the ionization level in the ionosphere. CMEs cause solar energetic particle (SEP) events and geomagnetic storms. A flare with unusually high intensity and/or a CME with extremely high energy can be thought of examples of extreme events on the Sun. These events can also lead to extreme SEP events and/or geomagnetic storms. Ultimately, the energy that powers CMEs and flares are stored in magnetic regions on the Sun, known as active regions. Active regions with extraordinary size and magnetic field have the potential to produce extreme events. Based on current data sets, we estimate the sizes of one-in-hundred and one-in-thousand year events as an indicator of the extremeness of the events. We consider both the extremeness in the source of eruptions and in the consequences. We then compare the estimated 100-year and 1000-year sizes with the sizes of historical extreme events measured or inferred. 1. Introduction Human society experienced the impact of extreme solar eruptions that occurred on October 28 and 29 in 2003, known as the Halloween 2003 storms. Soon after the occurrence of the associated solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) at the Sun, people were expecting severe impact on Earth’s space environment and took appropriate actions to safeguard technological systems in space and on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • A BRIEF HISTORY of CME SCIENCE 1. Introduction the Key to Understanding Solar Activity Lies in the Sun's Ever-Changing Magnetic
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF CME SCIENCE 1 2 DAVID ALEXANDER , IAN G. RICHARDSON and THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN3 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA 2 The Astroparticle Physics Laboratory, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3 Department of AOSS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, M148109, USA Received: 15 July 2004; Accepted in final form: 5 May 2005 Abstract. We present here a brief summary of the rich heritage of observational and theoretical research leading to the development of our current understanding of the initiation, structure, and evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections. 1. Introduction The key to understanding solar activity lies in the Sun's ever-changing magnetic field. The potential role played by the magnetic field in the solar atmosphere was first suggested by Frank Bigelow in 1889 after noting that the structure of the solar minimum corona seen during the eclipse of 1878 displayed marked equatorial extensions, called 'streamers '. Bigelow(1 890) noted th at the coronal streamers had a strong resemblance to magnetic lines of force and proposed th at the Sun must, in fact, be a large magnet. Subsequently, Hen ri Deslandres (1893) suggested that the forms and motions of prominences seen during so lar eclipses appeared to be influenced by a solar magnetic field. The link between magnetic fields and plasma emitted by the Sun was beginning to take shape by the turn of the 20th Century. The epochal discovery of magnetic fields on the Sun by American astronomer George Ellery Hale (1908) signalled the birth of modem solar physics.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Sun to the Earth: August 25, 2018 Geomagnetic Storm Effects
    https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-165 Preprint. Discussion started: 10 January 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. From the Sun to the Earth: August 25, 2018 geomagnetic storm effects Mirko Piersanti1, Paola De Michelis2, Dario Del Moro3, Roberta Tozzi2, Michael Pezzopane2, Giuseppe Consolini4, Maria Federica Marcucci4, Monica Laurenza4, Simone Di Matteo5, Alessio Pignalberi2, Virgilio Quattrociocchi4,6, and Piero Diego4 1INFN - University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. 2Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy. 3University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. 4INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Rome, Italy. 5Catholic University of America at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA 6Dpt. of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy Correspondence: Mirko Piersanti ([email protected]) Abstract. On August 25, 2018 the interplanetary counterpart of the August 20, 2018 Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) hit the Earth, giving rise to a strong G3 geomagnetic storm. We present a description of the whole sequence of events from the Sun to the ground as well as a detailed analysis of the observed effects on the Earth’s environment by using a multi instrumental approach. We studied the ICME propagation in the interplanetary space up to the analysis of its effects in the magnetosphere, 5 ionosphere and at ground. To accomplish this task, we used ground and space collected data, including data from CSES (China Seismo Electric Satellite), launched on February 11, 2018. We found a direct connection between the ICME impact point onto the magnetopause and the pattern of the Earth’s polar electrojects.
    [Show full text]