DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP Secretary of State for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP Secretary of State for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Grant.Shapps@Dft.Gov.Uk The Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP Secretary of State for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR [email protected] Dear Secretary of State, This letter brings together both businesses and local leaders in the North East. We are writing to you united to make the urgent case for investment in the East Coast Main Line as part of the Government’s Integrated Rail Plan, this will show that the Government truly is committed to investing in the North and the levelling up agenda as part of the recovery process. We believe that the East Coast Main Line and regional stations in the North East are key areas for investment. The North East shouldn’t have to choose between investment in these or HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail. We need HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail delivered along with investment in regional links to tackle decades of underinvestment in the North East’s railways. HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail are essential to increase rail capacity and create reliable rail connections across the North. With the Government now set to publish an Integrated Rail Plan in the coming months it is essential that Northern Powerhouse Rail, the HS2 Eastern Leg, and upgrading the East Coast Main Line in the North East are all included. In order to achieve its levelling up agenda and increase productivity the Government needs to invest to increase capacity and create reliable, sustainable connections for the North East. The North East has faced historic underinvestment in its transport network. With only one track north and one track south between Northallerton and Berwick the East Coast Main Line faces severe capacity and reliability issues. There simply isn’t enough space for the connections the region needs. The East Coast Main Line was highlighted by the National Infrastructure Commission as a key route for investment in its proposals, we need to see a major upgrade to the route north of York in the Integrated Rail Plan with a focus on improving capacity rather than focussing purely on speed. Investment in the East Coast Main Line between Northallerton and Berwick needs to be made over the period 2024-34 in order that sufficient capacity can be provided for passenger and freight services. This can be achieved through the reinstatement of the disused Leamside Line between Pelaw in Gateshead and Ferryhill in County Durham coupled with upgrades for the existing East Coast Main Line, including the complimentary route between Northallerton and Norton and between Norton and Ferryhill (the Stillington line). A key element of this is providing W12 gauge clearance of the full parallel route between Northallerton and Ferryhill to enable all existing and future freight to use it. Fortunately, reinstating the Leamside line in full, along with upgrades to the line between Northallerton and Norton and to the Stillington line, could be delivered relatively quickly because unlike new build it does not need new legislation or the purchase of land. Better still, creating this new continuous parallel route to the East Coast Main Line would improve rail journeys for thousands of existing passengers each day, and its economic impact would be felt across England and Scotland. The East Coast Main Line is a key economic route providing vital connections to Scotland, the rest of the North, the Midlands and London as well as allowing businesses to move their goods more sustainably by freight to our region’s ports. Central to our region’s ambitions is the urgent need to improve the East Coast Main Line to allow for reliable connections to the North East. The line is currently unreliable due to there being only one track north and one track south between Northallerton and Berwick. This track is being used by local, long distance and freight trains, there simply isn’t enough space for the connections the region needs. These capacity issues are causing delays with passenger services stuck behind slow moving freight trains and disruption leaving the North East cut off from the network as there are no alternative routes. Research from Invest East Coast shows that halving the number of delays on the East Coast Mainline over 10 minutes would deliver an extra £62.7 million a year for the UK’s economy. Investment in the route will increase capacity and resilience across the rail network as well as benefiting the wider UK economy. Increased capacity on the East Coast Main Line will also allow for more frequent local rail services and for more stops on the intercity routes, creating better connections for the Tees Valley linking to the Darlington and Middlesbrough station redevelopments and for Chester-Le-Street and Northumberland. Without more capacity on the network these communities will continue to be served by infrequent links. Regular connections from the East Coast Main Line to the rest of the North East are also essential. Improvements to Darlington and Middlesbrough stations have been highlighted by the Commission in their report as quick wins to increase capacity and help to deliver more services along with the Northumberland Line scheme to provide connections between Newcastle and Ashington. Investment in the Durham Coast line must not be overlooked. The route links some of the largest centres of population in the North East, including Sunderland, with plans to double the resident population of the city centre it will become an increasingly well-used transport hub. Parts of the route have suffered from under- investment over the years, end to end rail journey times from Newcastle to Middlesbrough are considerably slower than travelling by car. Additional capacity is also much needed at Hartlepool station to meet demand. We support these schemes as quick wins offering Government an early opportunity to commit to the ‘levelling up’ agenda. Strong regional links are key for the North East; however we shouldn’t have to choose between local investment and reliable links to the rest of the North and the Midlands. HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail delivered with improvements to the East Coast Main Line will deliver over £11 billion of wider economic benefits to the UK’s economy according to Invest East Coast. The only way to provide the connectivity and capacity the North so badly needs is by delivering the eastern leg of HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail in full. We need large projects like HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail to reach the North East and open up investment opportunities here. As an example, the Darlington HS2 Growth Hub proposal envisages around £100 million of investment. It would provide over 59,000 square metres of new business space and almost 1,500 homes, with the station connecting to the Central Park Enterprise Zone. Encouraging investment in the North East will be essential as part of the economic recovery for the region. Improved connectivity will help to encourage businesses to invest in the region and create new opportunities for trade. Data from Transport for the North has shown that 106,540 more businesses will be able to connect with Newcastle within 90 minutes with Northern Powerhouse Rail. This will help to connect key sectors in the North opening up new supply chain and trading opportunities as well as making the North East more attractive for investors. As the Commission’s report shows, increasing rail spend could transform the North’s economy by increasing productivity, facilitating trade and encouraging investment in new areas. In order to drive economic growth as part of the recovery for the North East we need investment in our connections. Improved connectivity will help to open- up new markets and boost investment in the North East, create new jobs and training opportunities for people as well as encouraging sustainable travel and supporting the tourism and leisure industry. Without this much needed investment our region’s potential will continue to be held back by out-dated infrastructure. If the Government plans to limit spending this will curtail investment in the North East and harm our economic recovery. We need Government to be ambitious in its ‘build back better’ programme and commit to investing in truly transformational projects for the North. Offering a more frequent and reliable rail service both regionally and long-distance will help to encourage people to use rail to transport goods, to travel to work, meetings with clients and for leisure. This will help to take cars off the roads and reduce congestion in the North East, helping to encourage more sustainable travel across the region. Both the Chamber, our members and the region’s political leaders have been campaigning for increased capacity on the East Coast Main Line to create improved connectivity. There is already a united voice from the region and the evidence showcasing the need for investment. The Government now needs to act and commit to investing in the North East in the Integrated Rail Plan. Yours sincerely, James Ramsbotham, CBE DL, CEO, North East England Chamber of Commerce Councillor Martin Gannon Leader of Gateshead Council Councillor Nick Forbes Leader of Newcastle City Council Councillor Graeme Miller Leader of Sunderland City Council Councillor Simon Henig Leader of Durham County Council Councillor Glen Sanderson Leader of Northumberland County Council Councillor Tracey Dixon Leader of South Tyneside Council Councillor Carl Marshall North East board member for Transport for the North Mayor Norma Redfearn Elected Mayor of North Tyneside Mayor Jamie Driscoll Mayor of the North of Tyne Combined Authority Lucy Winskell OBE, Chair,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Thursday Volume 642 14 June 2018 No. 153 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 14 June 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1053 14 JUNE 2018 1054 Sir Christopher Chope (Christchurch) (Con): Is not it House of Commons right that we in this country are not able to exercise some of the rights that people would wish us to exercise? Thursday 14 June 2018 The freedom to be able to transport live animals for slaughter is a freedom that we would prefer not to have. As soon as we leave the European Union, we will be The House met at half-past Nine o’clock able to take control of those things for ourselves. Mr Baker: My hon. Friend raises a point on which I PRAYERS am sure that many of us have received correspondence. I look forward to the day when it is within the powers of this House to change those rules. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Stephen Hepburn (Jarrow) (Lab): Is not it right BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS that we have a customs union that protects workers’ rights, with the right to allow state aid, the right to UNIVERSITY OF LONDON BILL [LORDS] allow public ownership, and the right to be able to ban Motion made, That the Bill be now read a Second outsourcing and competitive tendering should the time. Government wish to do so? Hon. Members: Object. Mr Baker: If you will allow me, Mr Speaker, I would like to pay tribute to the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.08 MB
    Published: Tuesday 20 July 2021 Early Day Motions tabled on Monday 19 July 2021 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 330 Negotiating a peace settlement on the Korean Peninsula Tabled: 19/07/21 Signatories: 1 Ed Davey That this House notes the work by Congressman Brad Sherman to encourage new efforts towards formally ending the state of war on the Korean Peninsula through his Peace on the Korean Peninsula Act that was recently introduced in the US House of Representatives; recognises that that symbolic move could play a vital role in the next stage of reducing tensions on that peninsula; further notes that the Korean War hostilities were ended by an armistice in 1953, and that no formal peace treaty has been negotiated since that armistice; reiterates support for the 2018 Panmunjom Declaration in which the governments of North Korea and South Korea declared their intention to work towards negotiating a peace treaty to formally end the Korean War; acknowledges the role the UK Government has played in multilateral efforts to facilitate peace and denuclearisation on that peninsula; and calls on the UK Government to actively engage with all relevant parties and the wider international community to accelerate those efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMO Is Produced by the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities (Scojec) in Partnership with BEMIS – Empowering Scotland's Ethnic and Cultural Minority Communities
    Supported by Minority Ethnic Matters Overview 19 July 2021 ISSUE 713 MEMO is produced by the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities (SCoJeC) in partnership with BEMIS – empowering Scotland's ethnic and cultural minority communities. It provides an overview of information of interest to minority ethnic communities in Scotland, including parliamentary activity at Holyrood and Westminster, new publications, consultations, forthcoming conferences, and news reports. Contents Immigration and Asylum Bills in Progress Equality Consultations Racism, Religious Hatred, and Discrimination Job Opportunities Other Scottish Parliament and Government Funding Opportunities Other UK Parliament and Government Events, Conferences, and Training Health Information: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Useful Links Other News Back issues Note that some weblinks, particularly of newspaper articles, are only valid for a short period of time, usually around a month, and that the Scottish and UK Parliament and Government websites have been redesigned, so that links published in previous issues of MEMO may no longer work. To find archive material on these websites, copy details from MEMO into the relevant search facility. Please send information for inclusion in MEMO to [email protected] and click here to be added to the mailing list. The Scottish Parliament is in recess until 29 August 2021. Immigration and Asylum UK Parliament, House of Commons Oral Answers EU Settlement Scheme: Application Deadline Fleur Anderson (Labour): What estimate has [the Minister] made of the number of people who are eligible for the EU settlement scheme but missed the application deadline of 30 June 2021. (902517) Kate Osborne (Labour): What estimate has [the Minister] made of the number of people who are eligible for the EU settlement scheme but missed the application deadline of 30 June 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Kinnock MP Aberav
    Member Name Constituency Bespoke Postage Total Spend £ Spend £ £ (Incl. VAT) (Incl. VAT) Stephen Kinnock MP Aberavon 318.43 1,220.00 1,538.43 Kirsty Blackman MP Aberdeen North 328.11 6,405.00 6,733.11 Neil Gray MP Airdrie and Shotts 436.97 1,670.00 2,106.97 Leo Docherty MP Aldershot 348.25 3,214.50 3,562.75 Wendy Morton MP Aldridge-Brownhills 220.33 1,535.00 1,755.33 Sir Graham Brady MP Altrincham and Sale West 173.37 225.00 398.37 Mark Tami MP Alyn and Deeside 176.28 700.00 876.28 Nigel Mills MP Amber Valley 489.19 3,050.00 3,539.19 Hywel Williams MP Arfon 18.84 0.00 18.84 Brendan O'Hara MP Argyll and Bute 834.12 5,930.00 6,764.12 Damian Green MP Ashford 32.18 525.00 557.18 Angela Rayner MP Ashton-under-Lyne 82.38 152.50 234.88 Victoria Prentis MP Banbury 67.17 805.00 872.17 David Duguid MP Banff and Buchan 279.65 915.00 1,194.65 Dame Margaret Hodge MP Barking 251.79 1,677.50 1,929.29 Dan Jarvis MP Barnsley Central 542.31 7,102.50 7,644.81 Stephanie Peacock MP Barnsley East 132.14 1,900.00 2,032.14 John Baron MP Basildon and Billericay 130.03 0.00 130.03 Maria Miller MP Basingstoke 209.83 1,187.50 1,397.33 Wera Hobhouse MP Bath 113.57 976.00 1,089.57 Tracy Brabin MP Batley and Spen 262.72 3,050.00 3,312.72 Marsha De Cordova MP Battersea 763.95 7,850.00 8,613.95 Bob Stewart MP Beckenham 157.19 562.50 719.69 Mohammad Yasin MP Bedford 43.34 0.00 43.34 Gavin Robinson MP Belfast East 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paul Maskey MP Belfast West 0.00 0.00 0.00 Neil Coyle MP Bermondsey and Old Southwark 1,114.18 7,622.50 8,736.68 John Lamont MP Berwickshire Roxburgh
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP Secretary of State for Health And
    The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Department of Health and Social Care Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries Unit 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 13 March 2020 Dear Secretary of State, Coronavirus and the social care workforce We are writing as cross-party Parliamentarians concerned about the urgent need to provide support to the social care sector in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. The social care sector plays a crucial role in supporting hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people in high-risk groups for Covid-19. There is a need to ensure both that there are strong protocols in place to keep vulnerable residents safe, and also to ensure continuity of care in the event that a significant proportion of the social care workforce has to take time off during the pandemic. We welcome the Chancellor’s commitment to provide local government with immediate financial support to protect adult social care services dealing with Covid-19 outbreaks, and the commitment that workers who self-isolate will be eligible for statutory sick pay from day one. We also welcome the guidance from NHS England advising NHS Trusts to: ‘Ensure that any member of staff, including bank staff and sub-contractors, who has to be physically present at an NHS facility to carry out their duties, receives full pay for any period in which they are required to self- isolate as a result of public health advice’. However, we are concerned that these actions will not protect the quarter of the social care workforce who are currently employed on zero-hours contracts, and that the drop in income which will result from receiving SSP may act as a disincentive to some social care workers to self- isolate, putting vulnerable people at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 Railfuture from the North East Bulletin
    News and Views about Railways in the North East of England Welcome to the April 2020 RailFuture From the North East Bulletin. This edition is, Editor’s because of the current problems in getting it printed and distributed, only Chair available electronically. It is being emailed to members and will be on our website. We’ve added a number of links to items either on the Railfuture Website or to websites run by other local rail groups – all of these will offer more detail than we can provide in this newsletter. These links are embedded in the text so if you see something that looks like this, and this link takes you to the NE Home page on the Railfuture Website, just click and you will be transported to the appropriate page on the internet. A message from the Branch Chair I find myself writing this from a position of ‘Lockdown’ at home. I, together with the rest of the committee, hope that you are all managing to steer clear of the horrid Covid-19 virus. The current situation means, of course, that we have had to cancel our branch AGM on 25 April, we don’t know whether the current restrictions on meeting will still be in place by then, but we have to assume that they, or something very similar, will. One further change to report is that Tony Walker has chosen to stand down as editor of this Bulletin. Tony has been a stalwart of the branch committee for many years and has given freely of his time over many aspects of our activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party General Election 2017 Report Labour Party General Election 2017 Report
    FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT Page 7 Contents 1. Introduction from Jeremy Corbyn 07 2. General Election 2017: Results 11 3. General Election 2017: Labour’s message and campaign strategy 15 3.1 Campaign Strategy and Key Messages 16 3.2 Supporting the Ground Campaign 20 3.3 Campaigning with Women 21 3.4 Campaigning with Faith, Ethnic Minority Communities 22 3.5 Campaigning with Youth, First-time Voters and Students 23 3.6 Campaigning with Trade Unions and Affiliates 25 4. General Election 2017: the campaign 27 4.1 Manifesto and campaign documents 28 4.2 Leader’s Tour 30 4.3 Deputy Leader’s Tour 32 4.4 Party Election Broadcasts 34 4.5 Briefing and Information 36 4.6 Responding to Our Opponents 38 4.7 Press and Broadcasting 40 4.8 Digital 43 4.9 New Campaign Technology 46 4.10 Development and Fundraising 48 4.11 Nations and Regions Overview 49 4.12 Scotland 50 4.13 Wales 52 4.14 Regional Directors Reports 54 4.15 Events 64 4.16 Key Campaigners Unit 65 4.17 Endorsers 67 4.18 Constitutional and Legal services 68 5. Labour candidates 69 General Election 2017 Report Page 9 1. INTRODUCTION 2017 General Election Report Page 10 1. INTRODUCTION Foreword I’d like to thank all the candidates, party members, trade unions and supporters who worked so hard to achieve the result we did. The Conservatives called the snap election in order to increase their mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Support Statement
    Hearing Statement – Matter 7 (Washington) Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan On behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes (North East)(East of Washington: Washington Meadows) April 2019 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 (Washington) – Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan BDW (North East) (East of Washington: Washington Meadows), April 2019 1. Introduction 1.1. This is a Hearing Statement prepared by Spawforths on behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes (North East)(BDW) in respect of: • Matter 7: The Strategy, Housing Growth Areas and Safeguarded Land for Washington 1.2. BDW has significant land interests in the area and has made representations to earlier stages of the Local Plan process. 1.3. The Inspector’s Issues and Questions are included in bold for ease of reference. The following responses should be read in conjunction with BDW’s comments upon the submission version of the Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan, dated July 2018. 1.4. BDW has also expressed a desire to attend and participate in Matter 7 of the Examination in Public. 2 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 (Washington) – Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan BDW (North East) (East of Washington: Washington Meadows), April 2019 2. Matter 7 – The Strategy, Housing Growth Areas and Safeguarded Land for Washington Issue – This matter considers the strategic policies (SP3, SS2 and SS3) and the Housing Growth Areas (HGA1-HGA6) for Washington. Strategic Policies 1.1) Are Policies SP3 and SS2 justified and effective? 2.1. BDW supports the identification of land to the East of Washington (Washington Meadows) as safeguarded land. However, BDW maintain earlier objections and in line with other statements consider the site should be allocated for housing.
    [Show full text]
  • No Home Left Behind an Inquiry Into Standards in the North’S Private Rented Sector
    Housing in the North NO HOME LEFT BEHIND AN INQUIRY INTO STANDARDS IN THE NORTH’S PRIVATE RENTED SECTOR NOVEMBER 2020 APPG for Housing in the North About the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Housing in the North The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Housing in the North (APPG) is a forum for Parliamentarians to discuss and advance housing and related policy across the three Northern regions. It brings together MPs and Peers from across all political parties to better understand these issues and seeks to ensure the needs and ambitions of Northern communities are addressed in housing policy development. The Northern Housing Consortium provides the secretariat to the APPG and supports it in an administrative and operational capacity. Chair – Ian Mearns MP Vice-Chair – Kevin Hollinrake MP Vice-Chair – Grahame Morris MP Vice-Chair – Simon Clarke MP (up to Dec 19) Vice-Chair – Richard Holden MP Vice-Chair – Mary Foy MP Vice-Chair - Kate Osborne MP Vice-Chair - Lord Goddard of Stockport Secretariat – Northern Housing Consortium This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the group. This Report was researched and prepared by the Northern Housing Consortium. 2 Table of Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]