DOCSLIB.ORG

Carrie Severino

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carrie Severino CARRIE SEVERINO CHIEF COUNSEL AND POLICY DIRECTOR, JUDICIAL CRISIS NETWORK Life in Brief Quick Summary Hometown: Kent County, Michigan Sophisticated judicial activist leading advocacy campaigns to confirm conservative judges Current Residence: Washington, DC Metro across the country. Savvy use of campaign Area funding, national advertising, and direct outreach has played crucial role in confirming Trump Education: appointees • BS in Biology, DuKe University, 1999 • MA in Linguistics, Michigan State • Conservative legal activist with University, 2001 textualist/originalist approach to the Constitution • JD, Harvard Law School, 2004 • Fundamental legal views further developed out of law school while clerking for conservative Family: judges on the DC Circuit and for Justice • Husband Roger Thomas Severino is also Clarence Thomas a lawyer, serving as the Director of the • Since 2010 has led Judicial Crisis Network as Office for Civil Rights at the U.S. Chief Counsel and Policy Director; shifted the Department of Health and Human organization to invest more resources in state Services and local campaigns during the Obama • Six children Administration • Along with the Federalist Society, set the Work History: agenda in the 2016 campaign by circulating a • Chief Counsel and Policy Director, list of acceptable conservative federal nominees Judicial Crisis NetworK, 2010-Present • Uses wide-ranging approach to push judicial • Fellow and Dean’s Visiting Scholar, nominees, including targeted advertisement in Georgetown University Law Center, key marKets, national campaigns, frequent 2008-10 personal media appearances, and direct • Law ClerK for Supreme Court Justice engagement with lawmakers. Channels Clarence Thomas, 2007-08 resources to reward lawmakers for supporting • Law ClerK, Becket Fund for Religious Administration nominees Liberty, 2005-06 • Law ClerK, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Approach and Motivations DC Circuit, 2004-05 Singularly focused on confirmation of conservative justices • Though Severino often comments publicly on court decisions and legal issues, her approach to policy focuses entirely on supporting the confirmation of conservative judges and justices • In her own views on federal jurisprudence, supports originalist interpretations of the Constitution, judicial restraint, and limited government • Is a devout Catholic, which directly informs many of her policy views PEOPLE RESEARCH SERVICE 1 CARRIE SEVERINO JUDICIAL CRISIS NETWORK Policy Positions and Areas of Focus Core Communities Focuses her energies on confirming Works primarily with conservative legal conservative federal, state, and local judges activists and scholars Judicial Confirmations – Severino’s primary Judicial Crisis Network – JCN was initially set goal is promotion and outreach in support of up and funded by well-connected Republican judicial nominees business executives and lawyers • Helped rebrand the Judicial Confirmation • Ann Corkery, influential fundraiser and Network as the Judicial Crisis Network lawyer involved in organizing launch of JCN following the election of President Obama, • Robin Arkley II, real estate magnate, and increasingly focused on funding local involved in the startup and funding of JCN and state-wide elections to expand the • Neil Corkery, former JCN treasurer and number of conservative judges nation-wide prominent conservative fundraiser with his • With the Federalist Society, helped push list wife Ann of acceptable potential nominees in the 2016 • Gary Marx, rising conservative star and first campaign Executive Director • Has made extensive national advertising purchases to support Trump Supreme Court Federalist Society – Works in tandem with the nominations Federalist Society to support conservative • Directs advertising and outreach to nominations and develop lists of potential lawmakers in support of confirmation nominees campaigns • Leonard Leo, Executive Vice President • Was extremely vocal in support of Justice • Steven Calabresi, Chairman of the Brett Kavanaugh following sexual assault Federalist society and Northwestern allegations Professor • Issues sharp critiques of legal groups like • Eugene Meyer, President of the Federalist the American Bar Association accusing them Society of liberal bias and of raising unfounded slander and allegations to prevent Conservative Commentators – Focused on conservative confirmations supporting Administration policy goals and judicial nominees Conservative Legal Issues – Adheres to • Mollie Hemingway, co-author and The traditional conservative legal orthodoxy Federalist (online magazine) senior editor • Advocates textualist/originalist • Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst interpretations of the Constitution • Andrew C McCarthy, former U.S. Attorney • Argues for judicial restraint in rulings, and National Review contributing editor/legal especially on political issues like redistricting expert where she does not see a role for the courts • Strongly opposes abortion and supports religious freedom rulings, drawing on devout Catholic background 1 PEOPLE RESEARCH SERVICE 2 CARRIE SEVERINO JUDICIAL CRISIS NETWORK TITLE Selected Publications Media Appearances Writes regularly in conservative opinion Appears regularly across the full spectrum of media, and recently published a book media outlets to advocate for conservative charting the events surrounding Justice Brett legal causes and judges Kavanaugh’s confirmation TV – Regularly appears on MSNBC, Fox Book – Recent book sharply criticizes the News, CNN, C-SPAN, and ABC. perceived unfairness of Justice Kavanaugh’s • Fox News: July 2019, discussed the legacy confirmation hearings of recently deceased Justice John Paul • With Mollie Hemingway, Justice on Trial: Stevens The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future • The Hill TV: September 2018, speaking on of the Supreme Court, 2019. Criticized use limited evidence regarding allegations about of “unverified accusations” to slander Kavanaugh Kavanaugh • C-SPAN: “Newsmakers” interview, discussing recent Supreme Court decisions, Articles – Provides updates on confirmations July 2019 in conservative publications and critiques liberal judicial views and tactics Speaking Engagements • “Judicial-Nominations Update,” National Occasionally speaks publicly in conservative Review, November 2019 legal forums, typically related to Supreme • “Demand Justice’s SCOTUS List Is Too Court cases of the confirmation of judges Extreme Even for Obama,” National Review, • Federalist Society discussion on 2019 October 2019 Supreme Court term, October 2019 • With Mollie Hemingway, “The Moment • Federalist Society discussion on the book Kavanaugh’s Foes Overplayed Their Hand,” Justice on Trial, September 2019 The Daily Signal, July 2019 • Hillsdale College Kirby Center discussion • “Another Trump Judicial Nominee, Another with Mollie Hemingway on their booK, Smear,” National Review, August 2019 Justice on Trial, July 2019 Financial Donations Supports establishment Republican politicians with modest donations • $250, John Adams for Virginia, 2017 (also held event valued at $1,488) • $250, Marco Rubio for President, 2016 • $350, Moll for Congress, 2013 • $500, Romney for President, 2012 PEOPLE RESEARCH SERVICE 3 CARRIE SEVERINO JUDICIAL CRISIS NETWORK TITLE Criticisms and Controversies Info From Formative Years Attracts criticism for lack of transparency in Mentored early in her career by Clarence JCN’s spending on controversial issues Thomas; approaches law issues with an • Following the election of Barack Obama, originalist perspective JCN significantly increased the flow of dark • Raised devout Catholic money to state and local elections • Following her graduation from Harvard Law, • Spent substantial funding on national clerked for the DC Circuit and for advertising campaign in support of Justice conservative Justice Clarence Thomas Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation process Family Background Profiles Others Have Written Raised in Michigan by devout Catholic Severino is a private person, but limited parents profiles feature the growth of JCN • Raised Catholic • Met husband, Roger Severino—who is also Viveca Novak and Peter Stone, “The JCN Story: devoutly Catholic—at Harvard Law. Roger How to Build a Secretive, Right-Wing Judicial Severino is a strong proponent of religious Machine,” The Daily Beast, 2017 freedom and has led the development of • Profile by Daily Beast describes the founding policies that supporters see as advancing and rise of JCN during the Bush and Obama religious liberty but that critics see as Administrations discriminatory toward the LGBTQ community PEOPLE RESEARCH SERVICE 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Few Problems I Have with Cable TV Political Reporting During the 2020 Presidential Election Season (Actually, Many Problems Would Be Truthful)
    A Few Problems I Have With Cable TV Political Reporting During The 2020 Presidential Election Season (Actually, Many Problems Would Be Truthful) (Author’s Note: This is the second in a series of occasional political columns that I’ll be writing for CommPRO.biz until Inauguration Day, January 20. Previously, I wrote 17 political columns leading up to Election Day. FYI – My first public relations job was with a political firm, where I worked on local, statewide and presidential campaigns. In this column, I opine why cable news political coverage is below par. The cut- off date for this article was to be the day of President Trump’s first presser after his election defeat, which was the day this was written, November 13,) Arthur Solomon Do cable news reporters mislead viewers because they don’t know the facts of what they are reporting? Or are they instructed to limit facts of a story by their producers to keep viewers’ interested and lure them back as a soap opera does for more? Or is it that the reporters and producers only read the first few paragraphs of the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal for their stories,(in lieu of original reporting), which provides enough factual information for the usual headline type cable news report? In any event, what they report is too often incomplete or inaccurate, or even worse, simply pundits’ conjecturing as they attempt to show the audience how smart they are, when history shows – remember how their 2106 and 2020 Democratic wave elections turned out – the great majority of their gibberish is as accurate as Trump’s claim that the election was stolen from him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Pipeline to the Supreme Court
    The Conservative Pipeline to the Supreme Court April 17, 2017 By Jeffrey Toobin they once did. We have the tools now to do all the research. With the Federalist Society, Leonard Leo has reared a We know everything they’ve written. We know what they’ve generation of originalist élites. The selection of Neil Gorsuch is said. There are no surprises.” Gorsuch had committed no real just his latest achievement. gaffes, caused no blowups, and barely made any news— which was just how Leo had hoped the hearings would unfold. Leo has for many years been the executive vice-president of the Federalist Society, a nationwide organization of conservative lawyers, based in Washington. Leo served, in effect, as Trump’s subcontractor on the selection of Gorsuch, who was confirmed by a vote of 54–45, last week, after Republicans changed the Senate rules to forbid the use of filibusters. Leo’s role in the nomination capped a period of extraordinary influence for him and for the Federalist Society. During the Administration of George W. Bush, Leo also played a crucial part in the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito. Now that Gorsuch has been confirmed, Leo is responsible, to a considerable extent, for a third of the Supreme Court. Leo, who is fifty-one, has neither held government office nor taught in a law school. He has written little and has given few speeches. He is not, technically speaking, even a lobbyist. Leo is, rather, a convener and a networker, and he has met and cultivated almost every important Republican lawyer in more than a generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S6886
    S6886 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE October 31, 2017 that—exactly the opposite. She wrote EXECUTIVE SESSION preme court justices who were not ap- that if a judge’s personal views were to proved by Republican Senators to move impede that judge’s ability to impar- to the Federal bench: Lisabeth Tabor tially apply the law, then the judge EXECUTIVE CALENDAR Hughes from Kentucky, Myra Selby should recuse herself from the case. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under from Indiana, Don Beatty from South As the coauthor of that article and the previous order, the Senate will pro- Carolina, Louis Butler from Wisconsin, current president of Catholic Univer- ceed to executive session and resume Patricia Timmons-Goodson from North sity recently put it, ‘‘The case against consideration of the Barrett nomina- Carolina. Prof. Barrett is so flimsy, that you tion, which the clerk will report. Senate Republicans turned obstruc- have to wonder whether there isn’t The senior assistant legislative clerk tion of judicial nominees into an art some other, unspoken, cause for their read the nomination of Amy Coney form under President Obama. Yet Sen- objection.’’ Barrett, of Indiana, to be United States ator MCCONNELL, day after day, has It does make you wonder. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit. said: ‘‘I think President Obama has To those using this matter as cover The PRESIDING OFFICER. The as- been treated very fairly by any objec- to oppose Professor Barrett because of sistant Democratic leader. tive standard.’’ her personally held religious beliefs, Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, Senator He comes to the floor now regularly let me remind you, there are no reli- MCCONNELL has come to the floor to to complain about ‘‘obstruction’’ of gious tests—none—for public office in complain about what he calls obstruc- Trump nominees.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress
    U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs Michael Moodie Assistant Director and Senior Specialist in Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Updated February 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44891 U.S. Role in the World: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The U.S. role in the world refers to the overall character, purpose, or direction of U.S. participation in international affairs and the country’s overall relationship to the rest of the world. The U.S. role in the world can be viewed as establishing the overall context or framework for U.S. policymakers for developing, implementing, and measuring the success of U.S. policies and actions on specific international issues, and for foreign countries or other observers for interpreting and understanding U.S. actions on the world stage. While descriptions of the U.S. role in the world since the end of World War II vary in their specifics, it can be described in general terms as consisting of four key elements: global leadership; defense and promotion of the liberal international order; defense and promotion of freedom, democracy, and human rights; and prevention of the emergence of regional hegemons in Eurasia. The issue for Congress is whether the U.S. role in the world is changing, and if so, what implications this might have for the United States and the world. A change in the U.S. role could have significant and even profound effects on U.S. security, freedom, and prosperity. It could significantly affect U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Contempt of Courts? President Trump's
    CONTEMPT OF COURTS? PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE JUDICIARY Brendan Williams* Faced with a letter from the American Bar Association (ABA) assessing him as “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice,” Lawrence VanDyke, nominated by President Trump to serve on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, cried during an October 2019 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.1 Republican senators dutifully attacked the ABA as liberally-biased.2 In a Wall Street Journal column, a defender of VanDyke assailed what he called a “smear campaign” and wrote that “[t]he ABA’s aggressive politicization is especially frustrating for someone like me, an active member of the ABA[.]”3 VanDyke was confirmed anyway.4 Contrary to Republican protestations, the ABA has deemed 97% of President Trump’s nominees to be “well qualified” or “qualified.”5 Indeed, in the most polarizing judicial nomination of the Trump Administration, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh’s defenders pointed to the ABA having rated him “well qualified” despite the association having once, in 2006, dropped his rating to “qualified” due to concerns about his temperament.6 *Attorney Brendan Williams is the author of over 30 law review articles, predominantly on civil rights and health care issues. A former Washington Supreme Court judicial clerk, Brendan is a New Hampshire long-term care advocate. This article is dedicated to his father Wayne Williams, admitted to the Washington bar in 1970. 1Hannah Knowles, Trump Judicial Nominee Cries over Scathing Letter from the American Bar Association, WASH. POST (Oct. 30, 2015). 2Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeff Shesol Author, Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt Vs
    Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States Written Testimony of Jeff Shesol Author, Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court August 27, 2021 DIAGNOSIS The Real Mischief In February 1937, when presenting his plan to pack the Supreme Court, Franklin Roosevelt offered a rationale: that the oldest justices had fallen behind in their work and fallen out of step with “modern complexities.” The first of these was demonstrably false; the second was only partly true. This misdirection, Roosevelt later conceded, was a mistake. “I did not place enough emphasis on the real mischief—the kinds of decisions which, as a studied and continued policy, had been coming down from the Supreme Court.” What, we might ask in a similar spirit, is the real mischief today? Or, put differently: what is the core problem this Commission should aim to address? A review of testimony to date reveals a range of concerns: an entrenched majority of ideologically driven, outcome-oriented conservative justices; among those justices, an inconstant relationship with the principle of stare decisis and a willful blindness to “the plainest facts of our national life,” as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes once put it; the systematic incapacitation of government at both the state and federal level to address mounting crises; a shattering of the norms of the judicial appointments process by Senate Republicans. This, of course, is a partial list. A ranking of problems according to significance would surely put agenda-driven judicial activism at the top. The Supreme Court majority’s power—matched, it seems, by its eagerness—to vitiate certain civic institutions, to override hard-won understandings and overturn long-held doctrines, and to deny citizens the ability to do much of anything about it is a destructive sort of mischief.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Community Reacts to the Nomination ­ Law Blog ­ WSJ
    2/1/2017 Legal Community Reacts to the Nomination ­ Law Blog ­ WSJ This copy is for your personal, non­commercial use only. To order presentation­ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit http://www.djreprints.com. http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2017/01/31/the­legal­community­reacts­to­the­nomination­of­neil­gorsuch/ LAW BLOG LEGAL COMMUNITY REACTS TO THE NOMINATION PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS By SARA RANDAZZO Jan 31, 2017 8:12 pm ET The nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to be the next Supreme Court justice came as little surprise Tuesday night after days of speculation that he was the president’s leading candidate. Within minutes of the nomination being announced, a website to support the judge’s nomination had been set up with endorsements from around the legal industry. The Judicial Crisis Network said it is funding a $10 million campaign to confirm his nomination, with Carrie Severino, chief counsel for the network, saying they will push back against any Democrats tempted to obstruct the path to confirmation. Here’s what others in the legal community had to say about how Judge Gorsuch, a textualist in the vein of the justice he’s replacing, Antonin Scalia, could affect the balance of the nation’s high court. UC Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky said via email that Judge Gorsuch is “impeccably qualified,” but “the question is whether his views are so conservative to put him outside the judicial mainstream.” As a self-described originalist, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • OP Ed: Another Victim of the Coronavirus: TRUTH (And a Not-To-Forget Lesson for People in Our Business)
    OP Ed: Another Victim Of The Coronavirus: TRUTH (And a Not-To-Forget Lesson For People In Our Business) Arthur Solomon, Public Relations Consultant The deadly coronavirus hates people. It has separated people from their families. It has separated people from their friends. It has caused massive unemployment. It frightens people. It is also responsible for an increase in hate messages on social media, targeting all minority populations, ranging from African-Americans, to Asian-Americans to religious Americans who practice Orthodox Judaism and to Jews who don’t. It has destroyed our way of living. The virus makes people very ill. Worst of all it kills people. But there is also a victim that was only made possible with the assistance of humans – TRUTH. President Trump’s revisionist remarks about the coronavirus, which is happening as I write this, on April 26, continues. The result: For many Americans is there is no TRUTH. And politics and the media have played a large part in aiding the virus to put TRUTH on life support. While TRUTH had been ill since January, it took a sudden turn for the worse in the U.S. on February 28, during a rally in South Carolina, when President Trump described the virus as a Democratic “hoax.” Other presidential remarks like saying, anyone who wants a test can get one; there are plenty of PPE supplies; doctors and nurses are hording them; we have the situation under control; his hawking of medicines for people infected with the disease as if he was a medical scientist, and his contradictory remarks about blaming the coronavirus on China, to name a few of the president’s comments, all added to put TRUTH in a grave condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Chosen Nation: Christianity, Politics, and American Destiny" Dr
    TRANSCRIPT "Chosen Nation: Christianity, Politics, and American Destiny" Dr. Catherine Brekus Harvard Divinity School May 2017 MICHAEL CROMARTIE: Now let me just say, I will introduce our speaker. You've read her entire bio. I will not then read it back to you, simply to say that Professor Brekus, you may not know, was named the Harvard Divinity School Outstanding Teacher of the Year in 2014 and '15. She did her Ph.D. at Yale. Her undergrad was at Harvard, and on this topic some of you have never been here before. What we do is four months out, I meet with E.J. and Will and Karen and Andy Ferguson and others. We have a discussion about what should we be talking about at the next Faith Angle at the intersection of religion and public life, and I believe it was Will who said we really need to talk about religion and nationalism. One of our speakers at last Faith Angle, Grant Wacker, said the best person on this subject is our speaker today, and not only is she good on it, but she's writing a new book on it called Chosen Nation: Christianity and Politics in American Destiny. So when will your book be out? CATHERINE BREKUS: This is a wonderful opportunity for me, because I am going on sabbatical next year to work on this book. I have taught two courses about this and have written a little bit, but there is no publication date. MICHAEL CROMARTIE: But this is the trial run? CATHERINE BREKUS: This is a trial run.
    [Show full text]
  • H.R. 1 / S. 1 Disclosure Provisions: How the for the People Act Would Fix American Democracy's Dark Money Problem Campaign Legal Center March 2021 Introduction
    H.R. 1 / S. 1 Disclosure Provisions: How the For the People Act Would Fix American Democracy's Dark Money Problem Campaign Legal Center March 2021 Introduction In the 2020 election alone, more than $1 billion was spent by so-called “dark money” entities that kept their donors hidden from the public.1 The fifteen highest-spending dark money groups accounted for nearly $645 million of that total.2 Because these dark money groups do not publicly disclose their donors, voters cannot know what those secret donors might be getting in return from elected officials. As described in this report, the solution is H.R. 1 / S. 1, the For the People Act, which shines a spotlight on dark money, and which is carefully crafted to address the real- world practices that wealthy special interests have used to keep their political donations hidden from the public. First, H.R. 1 / S. 1 makes clear what political spending is subject to disclosure. In 2020, major dark money groups, both Democrat and Republican, spent tens of millions of dollars on TV and digital ads that were carefully worded or timed to evade existing law. The bill addresses these practices by requiring disclosure when a group spends over $10,000 on ads that promote, support, attack, or oppose a candidate’s election. Second, the bill clarifies who must be disclosed when that spending is reported. Wealthy donors have anonymously poured hundreds of millions of dollars into elections by claiming none of their donations were “earmarked” for a particular ad, or by passing money through an intermediary.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Emily Jo Wharry HIST 490 Dec. 10, 2019 Student Club to Supreme Court: the Federalist Society's Origins on Law School Campuses
    1 Emily Jo Wharry HIST 490 Dec. 10, 2019 Student Club to Supreme Court: The Federalist Society's Origins on Law School Campuses Following the election of President George W. Bush in January 2000, a 35-year-old Brett M. Kavanaugh joined the new White House legal team, taking a position as an associate counsel to the president.1 A couple of months into the job, Kavanaugh came across a news article about his past that frustrated him. The article described him as still being an active member of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, a national organization of lawyers, judges, law school students, and professors who advocate for conservative legal doctrine and originalist interpretations of the United States Constitution. Worrying over this misreported detail, Kavanaugh wrote an email to his White House colleagues in which he assured them of the article's inaccuracy: "this may seem technical, but most of us resigned from the Federalist Society before starting work here and are not now members of the Federalist Society." Kavanaugh continued, "the reason I (and others) resigned from Fed society was precisely because I did not want anyone to be able to say that I had an ongoing relationship with any group that has a strong interest in the work of this office."2 Nineteen years later, in November 2019, the Federalist Society hosted its sold-out annual National Lawyers Convention at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. Kavanaugh, no 1 Scott Shane et al., “Influential Judge, Loyal Friend, Conservative Warrior — and D.C. Insider,” The New York Times, July 14, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/14/us/politics/judge-brett-kavanaugh.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Senators' Amicus Brief
    No. 18-280 In The Supreme Court of the United States _________ NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, ET AL. Respondents. _________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _________ BRIEF OF SENATORS SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, MAZIE HIRONO, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, RICHARD DURBIN, AND KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS _________ Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Counsel of Record Hart Senate Office Bldg., Rm. 530 Washington, DC 20510 (202) 224-2921 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES…………………………. ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............................. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................. 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................ 3 I. THE COURT SHOULD REJECT PETITIONERS’ EFFORTS TO RE-ENLIST IT IN A POLITICAL “PROJECT” ...................... 3 II. IGNORING NEUTRAL JUSTICIABILITY PRINCIPLES TO REACH DESIRED OUTCOMES DAMAGES THIS COURT’S LEGITIMACY ................................................ 9 CONCLUSION ....................................................... 18 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977) ............................................................... 14 Bullock v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 4:18-cv- 00103-BMM, 2019 WL 3423485 (D. Mont. Jul. 30, 2019) ................................................................... 8 Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) ..... 12, 14 Entergy v. Riverkeeper, 556 U.S. 208 (2009) ............ 12 Epic Systems v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018) ......... 12 FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, 551 U.S. 449 (2007) ...................................................................... 14 Gamble v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 1960 (2019) ...... 13 Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. 616 (2014) ...................... 14 Janus v. Am. Fed’n of State, Cty, & Mun. Emps., 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018) .....................................
    [Show full text]