TOI Brochure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TOI Brochure REPORT SUMMARY • Townships have the lowest LOCAL DEMOCRACY labor costs, and employ a AND THE TOWNSHIPS larger share of part time OF ILLINOIS employees. America's small local governments This is particularly important, since the provide quality services at low costs to largest component of local government taxpayers. One half of the local govern- expenditures is labor costs. ments in the United States have 1,000 or fewer residents. These smaller govern- More Efficient and Effective ments are well positioned to respond to the present public budget challenges. The success of small local governments, such as townships, results from various Local Democracy in Illinois factors: Illinois relies on local democracy. The • Local elected officials in smaller average local government serves 1,800 governments are able to take a more people in Illinois, compared to the nation- direct role in administering government al median (middle) of 2,850 people. finances and services. As in the rest of the nation, smaller gov- • Individual citizens have more influence ernments (municipalities) in Illinois tend in smaller governments. to spend and borrow less. • In smaller governments, including • The smallest local governments had townships, interest groups have less expenditures per capita that were gener- influence, because individual citizens ally one-half those of local governments have more influence. with from 10,000 to 250,000 population. Local government abolitions and consol- idations are effectively irrevocable and it Expenditures per capita in can be virtually impossible for discon- the smallest local govern- tented citizens to restore smaller units of ments were approximately government. On the other hand, cooper- one-fourth or less that of the ative agreements allow governments to city of Chicago. work together to periodically evaluate such arrangements to ensure that they • Most of the reporting local govern- continue to be in the public interest. ments with less than 2,500 population Thus, the "bigger govern- had no bonded indebtedness. In the ments spend less" theory is population categories above 25,000, bonded indebtedness per capita ranged not indicated by the actual from over $500 to nearly $5,000 in the experience. largest local government, Chicago. The larger local governments that result from consolidation are likely to lead to Superior Efficiency for higher rather than lower taxes and Townships spending per capita. Also importantly, the remoteness of such governments Townships and township road districts are from the electorate can dilute citizen an integral element of local democracy in influence more challenging and public Illinois. They build and maintain most of service quality can suffer. the road mileage in the state (through township road districts), administer relief to low income households, discover, list Enduring Value of Small Local and determine fair cash value of the prop- Government erties in the jurisdiction and provide a vari- ety of additional services. Consistent with The smaller township governments that the lower costs of local democracy, town- typify local democracy are generally ships have achieved superior efficiency. more efficient and they are better posi- tioned to provide quality public services • Township expenditures have grown at to their residents. The history and per- a lower rate than those of any other level formance of local democracy is witness of government in Illinois since 1992. to its enduring value. This preference for township govern- Some local governments, such as town- ment can be traced back centuries, to ships provide multiple services, while sources like the New England town school districts specialize, providing a meetings. The local democracy inherent single public service, education (and in smaller local governments has proven ancillary services such as school trans- to be timeless, by providing among the portation). Special districts generally most efficient and highest services. provide specialized services over a larg- Efficiency was defined as follows by er geographical area, especially where governance expert Robert Bish: it would be less efficient to provide services at the municipal level. The The ultimate measure of Illinois approach to local governance local government efficiency is consistent with the concept of "fiscal federalism," which holds that public is not a count of jurisdic- services should be administered as tions or taxing districts, close to the people as feasible. but rather their relative expenditures per capita for Townships Epitomize quality public services. Advantages The townships of Illinois epitomize the These attributes are particularly impor- advantages of local democracy. tant in today's challenging public finance Townships, together with township road environment. Smaller, more manageable districts provide local government servic- local governments are well positioned to es in 85 of the state's 102 counties. In provide value for taxpayer funding. parts of the nation where there are no township or township road district equiv- Generally, national data indicates that alent governments (whether in Illinois or smaller local governments spend and in the non-township states), citizens out- borrow less per capita than larger local side incorporated local governments are governments. dependent upon county governments for local services. Illinois Relies on Local Democracy Townships provide important services in Illinois. Township road districts build and This "smaller governments are more effi- maintain the township road systems. cient" pattern extends to Illinois. Illinois These systems comprise more than relies substantially on local democracy. one-half of the road mileage in the state. For the most part, local governments These roads are crucial to residents who tend to be small, which increases the live outside incorporated municipalities, access of citizens to their elected offi- but also to the state's economy, cials and other public administrators. especially its large agricultural industry. Illinois Road Mileage by Government 2009-2010 State 11% County 12% Township 52% Municipality 25% Figure 1 One of the substantial advantages of township road districts is their ability to Change in Total Expenditures ensure a high level of maintenance and ILLINOIS: BY TYPE OF GOVERNMENT: 1992-2007 snow clearance because their facilities tend to be located closer to the roads 74% they administer. (Figure 1) 66% Township Expenditure Trends 51% 50% The comparative efficiency of townships 35% is illustrated by expenditure trends. From 1992 to 2007, total township 17% expenditures increased 17 percent, after adjustment for inflation. In contrast, state State County Municipal Township School Special government expenditures rose nearly District District Figure three times as much, at 51 percent. The 2 rise in municipal expenditures was 50 percent, also nearly three times that of Average Wages & Salaries townships. County expenditures rose 66 ILLINOIS: BY TYPE OF GOVERNMENT: 2007 percent, nearly four times the increase in township expenditures. (Figure 2) $4,449 $4,358 $4,050 $3,776 Personnel expenditures and practices $3,730 also indicate the relative efficiency of $2,993 township governments in Illinois. Like the most efficient municipal govern- ments in Illinois, . townships tend to be smaller governments, with State County Municipal Township School Special District District small staffs. Figure 3 The average township staff is approxi- mately equal to the average for villages Part Time Employees in the state with a population of less than ILLINOIS: BY TYPE OF GOVERNMENT: 2007 1,600. Employee compensation represents the largest element of local government 77% expenditure. 53% Township wages and salaries levels per employ- 31% 25% ees are the lowest among 23% the various government 9% State County Municipal Township School Special types in the state of Illinois. District District Figure 4 (Figure 3) Average Wages & Salaries: Roads Further, townships rely to a large degree ILLINOIS: BY TYPE OF GOVERNMENT: 2007 on part time employees. (Figure 4) This not only reduces wage and salary expense, but also reduces employer paid fringe benefits. $6,042 $4,501 Similarly, the wages and salaries of $4,279 township road employees is well below those of road employees of state and $2,773 municipal governments. (Figure 5) Employer paid benefits would be less as well. State County Municipal Township Figure 5 REPORT SNAPSHOT Local Government: • Efficient and effective • Popular (elected officials have high ratings) • Low labor costs • Quality core services Expenditures Per Capita: • Smaller governments spend and borrow less • Smaller forms of government are more cost efficient providing more services at a reduced cost • Intergovernment agreements and cooperation Local government in Illinois rely less on state funding and pay for themselves to a greater degree than in 38 other states. Positive Public Official Ratings: • 88% Townships • 42% State • 27% Federal Citizen complaints far more likely to be attended to by the elected official Labor/Benefit Costs: Local townships employ a larger share of part time employees and have lower benefit costs Services: Myth: Combining services will save money and offer greater efficiencies. As well, the claimed “duplication of services” virtually never exists. Local governments have specific geographical areas of responsibilities. Pervasive Evidence: Thus, the evidence is pervasive, both at the national and local level. The smaller local governments
Recommended publications
  • City Hall & Town Hall Locations
    Whitewater Town Hall )" Mt. Vernon Town Hall )" City Hall & Town Hall Rollingstone Town Hall Elba Town Hall )" )" Minnesota City City Hall )")" )" Locations Altura City Hall Elba City Hall )")" Goodview City Hall )" Norton Town Hall Winona City Hall )" Stockton City Hall )" Homer Town Hall )" )" Hillsdale Town Hall Utica Town Hall St. Charles Town Hall ")" )" )" ) )" Lewiston City Hall Warren Town Hall Richmond Town Hall Utica City Hall Wilson Town Hall )" St. Charles City Hall )" )" Wiscoy Town Hall Fremont Town Hall )" Dakota City Hall )" )" New Hartford Township Hall )" Pleasant Hill Town Hall )" Dresbach Town Hall Saratoga Town Hall )" )" Hart Town Hall )" Government Buildings Municipalities Miles )" City Hall City 0 2 4 8 ± )" Town Hall Township October 7, 2008 last updated 7/23/2021 10:25 CHAIRMAN CLERK TREASURER SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR TOWN MEETING DRESBACH Dave McCann Kim Low Kim Low Nick Erdmann Brant Amble 1st Tues @ 7:00 p.m. 46679 Riverview Dr 46784 Oak Hill Ln 46586 Waas Valley Rd La Crescent, MN 55947 La Crescent, MN 55947 La Crescent, MN 55947 507-643-6470 608-317-5469 608-317-5469 507-643-4422 507-643-6157 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ELBA TOWNSHIP Greg Heim Sheryl Langer Sandra Dietz Stephen Simon Mark Brosig 2nd Thurs @ 7:00 p.m. 20187 County Rd 39 11252 Persons Dr 17485 Calico Hill Rd 12162 County Rd 26 15587 Brosig Dr St Charles, MN 55972 St Charles, MN 55972 Altura, MN 55910 Altura, MN 55910 Altura, MN 55910 507-254-9852 507-269-9836 507-932-5225 507-534-2967 507-689-2652 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] FREMONT Richard Rislow Jodi K.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ACT Act 359 of 1947 an ACT to Authorize the Incorporation of Charter Townships; to Provide a Municipal Char
    THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ACT Act 359 of 1947 AN ACT to authorize the incorporation of charter townships; to provide a municipal charter therefor; to prescribe the powers and functions thereof; and to prescribe penalties and provide remedies. History: 1947, Act 359, Eff. Oct. 11, 1947;Am. 1998, Act 144, Eff. Mar. 23, 1999. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 42.1 Short title; charter townships; incorporation; powers, privileges, immunities and liabilities; petition; special census; expenses. Sec. 1. (1) This act shall be known and may be cited as “the charter township act”. (2) A township, having a population of 2,000 or more inhabitants according to the most recent regular or special federal or state census of the inhabitants of the township may incorporate as a charter township. The charter township shall be a municipal corporation, to be known and designated as the charter township of ............................, and shall be subject to this act, which is the charter of the charter township. The charter township, its inhabitants, and its officers shall have, except as otherwise provided in this act, all the powers, privileges, immunities, and liabilities possessed by a township, its inhabitants, and its officers by law and under chapter 16 of the Revised Statutes of 1846, being sections 41.1a to 41.110c of the Michigan Compiled Laws. (3) A special census of the inhabitants of a township desiring to incorporate under this act shall be taken by the secretary of state upon receipt of a petition signed by not less than 100 registered electors of the township.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribal Lands In
    A REPORT ON INDIAN TOWNSHIP PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBAL LANDS IN THE VICINITY OF PRINCETON, MAINE Anthony J. Kaliss 1971 Introduction to 1971 Printing Over two years have passed since I completed the research work for this report and during those years first one thing and ttan another prevented its final completion and printing. The main credit for the final preparation and printing goes to the Division of Indian Services of the Catholic Diocese of Portland and the American Civil Liberities Union of Maine. The Dioscese provided general assistance from its office staff headed by Louis Doyle and particular thanks is due to Erline Paul of Indian Island who did a really excellent job of typing more than 50 stencils of title abstracts, by their nature a real nuisance to type. The American Civil Liberities Union contrib­ uted greatly by undertaking to print the report Xtfhich will come to some 130 pages. Finally another excellent typist must be thanked and that is Edward Hinckley former Commissioner of Indian Affairs who also did up some 50 stencils It is my feeling that this report is more timely than ever. The Indian land problems have still not been resolved, but more and more concern is being expressed by Indians and non-Indians that something be done. Hopefully the appearance of this report at this time will help lead to some definite action whether in or out of the courts. Further research on Indian lands and trust funds remains to be done. The material, I believe, is available and it is my hope that this report will stimulate someone to undertake the necessary work.
    [Show full text]
  • [J-127A-D-2012] in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Middle District
    [J-127A-D-2012] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ. ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, : No. 63 MAP 2012 PA; BRIAN COPPOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERVISOR OF : ROBINSON TOWNSHIP; TOWNSHIP OF : NOCKAMIXON, BUCKS COUNTY, PA; TOWNSHIP : Appeal from the Order and Opinion of OF SOUTH FAYETTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA; : the Commonwealth Court at No. 284 PETERS TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, : MD 2012, dated July 26, 2012 PA; DAVID M. BALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COUNCILMAN OF : 52 A.3d 463 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012) PETERS TOWNSHIP; TOWNSHIP OF CECIL, : WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA; MOUNT PLEASANT : TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA; : BOROUGH OF YARDLEY, BUCKS COUNTY, PA; : DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK; MAYA : VAN ROSSUM, THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER; : MEHERNOSH KHAN, M.D. : : : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; : PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION; : ROBERT F. POWELSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC : UTILITY COMMISSION; OFFICE OF THE : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA; : KATHLEEN KANE, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; and E. : CHRISTOPHER ABRUZZO, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : PROTECTION : : : APPEAL OF: PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY : COMMISSION; ROBERT F. POWELSON, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE : PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION; PENNSYLVANIA : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : PROTECTION; AND E. CHRISTOPHER ABRUZZO , : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF : THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : ARGUED: October 17, 2012 PROTECTION : : : ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, : No. 64 MAP 2012 PA; BRIAN COPPOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERVISOR OF : ROBINSON TOWNSHIP; TOWNSHIP OF : NOCKAMIXON, BUCKS COUNTY, PA; TOWNSHIP : Appeal from the Order and Opinion of OF SOUTH FAYETTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA; : the Commonwealth Court at No.
    [Show full text]
  • Township & City Officers
    Waseca Elected Officials List Local City Public Official List For the Year: 2021 Current as of : 1-Aug-21 Alton Township Meetings: First Wednesday @ 7:00 PM Officer Postiton Term Ends Address City Zip Phone #1 Deb Westphal Clerk 2022 1171 370th Ave Janesville 56048 507-461-3245 Virginia Jordan Treasurer 2023 36026 10th St Janesville 56048 507-382-3795 Charles Schwab Chairman 2024 34014 35th St Janesville 56048 507-234-5259 Glenn Ewert Supervisor 2022 3424 360th Ave Janesville 56048 507-234-5633 Keith Wheelock Supervisor 2023 36741 25th St Janesville 56048 507-234-5593 Blooming Grove Township Meetings: First Tuesday @ 7:00 PM Elaine Breck Clerk 2022 14712 383rd Ave Waseca 56093 507-201-4032 Kimberly Maas Treasurer 2023 13645 410th Ave Waseca 56093 507-210-7783 Thomas Davison Chairman 2022 40405 State Hwy 13 Waseca 56093 507-835-5833 Laurel Remund Supervisor 2023 15661 420th Ave Waseca 56093 507-330-3749 Todd Selvik Supervisor 2024 14541 420th Ave Waseca 56093 507-461-1219 Byron Township Meetings: First Tuesday @ 8:00 PM Loren Schoenrock Clerk 2022 24734 80th St New Richland 56072 507-465-3764 Ralph Dobberstein Treasurer 2023 7398 250th Ave New Richland 56072 507-317-7309 Robert Wenzel Chairman 2024 9108 250th Ave New Richland 56072 507-465-8549 Curt Krause Supervisor 2023 6730 205th Ave New Richland 56072 507-465-8428 Scott Routh Supervisor 2022 10902 205th Ave New Richland 56072 507-838-5554 Freedom Township Meetings: Second Monday @ 7:00 PM Geraldine Lienke Clerk 2022 28650 50th St Janesville 56048 507-239-2289 Darrel Flemming Treasurer
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS This Is a Five
    APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS This is a five (5) digit number that has been assigned to each township (see page 7, Item 2 of the regulations for a detailed explanation). If a number identifying a township is not in the following tables, please contact the Utility Location Permit Clerk or the Utility & Railroad Services Manager at (207) 287-2281 to obtain the proper township code. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Auburn 01010 Durham 01020 Greene 01030 Leeds 01040 Lewiston 01050 Lisbon 01060 Livermore 01070 Livermore Falls 01080 Mechanic Falls 01090 Minot 01100 Turner 01120 Wales 01130 Sabattus 01140 AROOSTOOK COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Allagash 03010 Amity 03020 Ashland 03030 Bancroft 03040 1 APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS AROOSTOOK COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Blaine 03060 Bridgewater 03070 Caribou 03080 Cary 03090 Castle Hill 03100 Caswell 03110 Chapman 03120 Crystal 03130 Cyr 03140 Dyer Brook 03150 Eagle Lake 03170 Easton 03180 Fort Fairfield 03190 Fort Kent 03200 Frenchvile 03210 Garfield 03220 Glenwood 03230 Grand Isle 03240 Hamlin 03250 Hammond 03260 Haynesville 03270 Hersey 03280 Hodgdon 03290 Houlton 03300 Island Falls 03310 Limestone 03320 Linneus 03330 Littleton 03340 Ludlow 03350 Macwahoc 03360 Madawaska 03370 2 Mapleton 03380 Mars Hill 03390 Masardis 03400 APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS AROOSTOOK COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Merrill 03410 Monticello 03420 Moro 03430 Nashville 03440 New Canada 03450 New Limerick 03460 New Sweden 03470 Oakfield 03480 Orient 03490 Oxbow 03500 Persham 03510 Portage Lake 03520 Presque Isle 03530 Reed 03540 St. Agatha 03550 St. Francis 03560 St. John 03570 Sherman 03580 Smyrna 03590 Stockholm 03600 3 Van Buren 03610 Wade 03620 Wallagrass 03630 Washburn 03640 Westfield 03650 Westmanland 03660 Weston 03670 Winterville 03680 Woodland 03690 APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS AROOSTOOK COUNTY Unorganized Townships Code # Big Twenty Twp 03801 Connor 03802 Cox Patent 03803 Dudley Twp 03804 Forkstown Twp 03805 Molunkus 03806 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Intergovernmental Agreement Regarding the Bighorn Solar 1 Solar Project Between the City of Pueblo, Colorado and Pueblo County, Colorado
    INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING THE BIGHORN SOLAR 1 SOLAR PROJECT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO AND PUEBLO COUNTY, COLORADO THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of ______________, 2020 by and between Pueblo County (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), 215 West 10th Street, Pueblo, Colorado, and the City of Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), 1 City Hall Place, Pueblo, Colorado. WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 18 of Article XIV of the Colorado Constitution, C.R.S. § 29-1-203 and C.R.S. § 29-20-105 authorize and encourage Colorado local governments to cooperate or contract with one another to provide any function, service or facility lawfully authorized to each local government including, but not limited to, the joint exercise of land use and permitting functions of mutual interest; and WHEREAS, the City and County have each approved a permit within their jurisdictional authority authorizing the development in an area of state interest (“1041 Permit”) pertaining to the Bighorn Solar 1 Solar Project, previously permitted as EVRAZ Solar Center Project, (“Project’); and WHEREAS, the development of the Project including the land use approval and authorizing of building permits will overlap jurisdiction boundaries of the City and County that can be more efficiently completed and streamlined through an Intergovernmental Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate for the City and County to enter into a written agreement setting forth their respective obligations and other terms and conditions for the approval of building permits and other land use actions for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Population of Indian Reservations, Trust Lands and Tribal Statistical Areas in Michigan, 2000
    Population of Indian Reservations, Trust Lands and Tribal Statistical Areas in Michigan, 2000 Area Name Population Bay Mills Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 812 Bay Mills township (part) Chippewa County 404 Sugar Island township (part) Chippewa County 34 Superior township (part) Chippewa County 167 Bay Mills township (part) Chippewa County 205 Superior township (part) Chippewa County 2 Grand Traverse Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 545 Suttons Bay township (part) Leelanau County 0 Helena township (part) Antrim County 0 Benzonia township (part) Benzie County 36 Eveline township (part) Charlevoix County 39 Acme township (part) Grand Traverse County 0 Suttons Bay township (part) Leelanau County 470 Hannahville Community and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 395 Gourley township (part) Menominee County 11 Harris township (part) Menominee County 284 Bark River township (part) Delta County 15 Harris township (part) Menominee County 85 Huron Potawatomi Reservation, MI 11 Athens township (part) Calhoun County 11 Isabella Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 25,838 Chippewa township (part) Isabella County 3,253 Deerfield township Isabella County 3,081 Denver township Isabella County 1,147 Rosebush village Isabella County 379 Remainder of Isabella township Isabella County 1,766 Mount Pleasant city (part) Isabella County 8,741 Beal City CDP Isabella County 345 Weidman CDP (part) Isabella County 292 Remainder of Nottawa township Isabella County 1,641 Union charter township (part) Isabella County 3,876 Wise township
    [Show full text]
  • Fences, Nor Shall the Township Be Responsible for the Determination of the Location of Any Fence to Be Erected, Built Or Constructed
    Charter Township ofShelby Timothy Wood Building Director Phone: ( 586) 731- 5969 52700 Van Dyke Fax: ( 586) 803- 2099 Shelby Township, MI 48316-3572 E-mail: building @shelbytwp.org OUTLINE PROCEDURES FOR ERECTING A RESIDENTIAL FENCE PERMIT PROCEDURE A fence permit shall be obtained by the person or company building the fence. Submit the information indicated below and allow approximately two weeks for plan review and processing. The permit applicant will be contacted when the permit is ready to be picked up. An application fee of$ 25.00 is required at the time the application is submitted. 1) Permit Complete all applicable sections of application. Missing application information will cause delays. 2) Plot Plan Provide a copy of mortgage survey or scaled drawing indicating 3 copies) Legal description, all adjoining roads, location of buildings on this and adjacent properties. Any and all easements Description of fence ( Complete detail) REQUIREMENTS ( See the Charter Township of Shelby Fence Ordinance for full text and additional requirements) Sec. 10-317. Denial of responsibility of township. The Charter Township of Shelby shall not be responsible for the enforcement of any agreement relative to mutual or separate payment for the cost of construction of fences, nor shall the township be responsible for the determination of the location of any fence to be erected, built or constructed. In addition, the Charter Township of Shelby shall not be responsible for the enforcement of any deed or covenant restrictions. Sec. 10- 320. Encroachment. All fences shall be erected so that no part of the fence shall encroach upon an adjacent lot.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHIGAN MUNICIPALITIES Twp Twp
    2 Hudson Pickford Twp Garfield Twp Hendricks Marquette 48 94 Twp Twp St Ignace Twp Raber Newton Moran 129 Twp Twp Twp Twp Brevort Hiawatha Manistique Doyle Twp Clark Drummond Twp Twp Mueller Twp Twp Detour Twp Masonville Twp 134 Twp Twp MACKINAC 2 123 Detour 2 Nahma SCHOOLCRAFT 134 Twp 75 MANISTIQUE Inwood Garden 149 MICHIGAN MUNICIPALITIES Twp Twp 2 Lower Peninsula Ensign ST IGNACE MACKINAC Twp Thompson ISLAND Twp Detroit & Vicinity Bay De Noc Twp Garden St James D B Twp Bois Mackinaw 24 N M Blanc A City O Wawatam Mackinaw Twp L 24 150 C 183 K Chesterfield Twp Twp L A K E H U R O N A A Twp M O Macomb White Lake Shelby Hebron ROCHESTER Twp Twp Twp AUBURN Bliss Carp Twp 59 HILLS Fairbanks HILLS Twp Lake Waterford Twp Beaugrand PONTIAC Twp Twp Twp 53 Peaine 23 Twp Cross 31 UTICA CHEBOYGAN Benton 59 59 Village Twp SYLVAN LAKE Twp KEEGO Center McKinley Munro Inverness HARBOR 24 75 1 Readmond Twp Twp Twp Twp MT Twp CLEMENS ORCHARD Harrison Commerce LAKE Clinton Twp Pellston TROY STERLING 27 Grant Twp Bloomfield BLOOMFIELD Twp Bearinger Twp HILLS HEIGHTS Twp 94 212 Twp Wolverine 3 Friendship Pleasant Maple Lake 97 119 Burt Mullett West 75 Twp View Aloha Bloomfield River Twp Twp Twp Twp 23 Twp Twp BIRMINGHAM Rogers WALLED LAKE 5 FRASER West 24 CLAWSON Twp 10 Traverse 53 Little Alanson Ocqueoc Franklin Southfield Twp Twp Tuscarora Beverly Traverse Twp HARBOR Twp 75 Moltke Bingham Farms Hills Twp Koehler North ROYAL MADISON WARREN SPRINGS Waverly Twp ROGERS OAK ROSEVILLE Littlefield Twp Allis HEIGHTS 33 Twp CITY BERKLEY Twp 211 Twp 96 LATHRUP
    [Show full text]
  • Town Status Map T16 R8 WELS Madawaska T16 R13 T16 R12 T16 R6 T16 R9 WELS Eagle Lake T16 R5 WELS Lake Twp T16 R14 WELS WE LS WE LS WE LS Sto Ckholm
    Statewide Standards for Timber Harvesting in the Big Twenty Twp Shoreland Areas T19 R12 WELS T19 R11 WE LS Madawaska Frenchville Fort Kent Grand Isle T18 R11 T18 R12 Saint Ag atha WE LS WE LS T18 R13 WELS T18 R10 WELS Van Buren Saint Sinclair Van Buren T17 R13 T17 R12 John Plt New Cross Saint Wallagrass Twp Cove Twp WE LS WE LS Canada Lake Twp T17 R14 Francis WE LS Allagash Cyr P lt Hamlin Town Status Map T16 R8 WELS Madawaska T16 R13 T16 R12 T16 R6 T16 R9 WELS Eagle Lake T16 R5 WELS Lake Twp T16 R14 WELS WE LS WE LS WE LS Sto ckholm Connor Caswell Westmanland Twp New T15 R14 T15 R13 T15 R12 T15 R11 T15 R10 T15 R6 T15 R9 WELS T15 R8 Winterville T15 R5 WELS Swed en WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Plt WE LS T15 R15 WELS Limestone T14 R15 T14 R14 T14 R13 T14 R12 T14 R11 T14 R10 Woodland T14 R16 T14 R9 WELS T14 R8 T14 R7 WELS T14 R6 T14 R5 WELS Perham WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Caribou August 2021 T13 R15 T13 R14 T13 R13 T13 R12 T13 R11 T13 R10 T13 R16 WELS T13 R9 WELS T13 R8 WELS Portage T13 R5 WELS Wade Washburn WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Fort Lake Fairfield T13 R7 WELS T12 R16 T12 R15 T12 R14 T12 R13 T12 R12 T12 R11 T12 R10 T12 R17 WELS T12 R9 T12 R8 WELS Castle Hill Mapleton WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Nashville Plt Presque Isle T12 R7 WELS Ashland Easton T11 R7 WE LS T11 R16 T11 R15 Clayton T11 R13 T11 R12 T11 R11 T11 R10 T11 R17 WE LS T11 R9 WE LS T11 R4 WE LS Chapman WE LS WE LS Lake Twp WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Garfield Plt T11 R8 WE LS T10 R8 WELS Westfield Mars Hill Big
    [Show full text]
  • Subdivision Application and Summary Form
    SUBDIVISION APPLICATION AND SUMMARY FORM PLEASE READ NOTE AND SIGN BELOW: THE SUBMITTED APPLICATION PACKAGE REQUIRES SPECIFIC REPORTS/INFORMATION WHICH MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE AS DETERMINED THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED. ALSO, THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE APPLICATION PACKAGE DOES NOT MEAN THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN APPROVED AND IN FINAL FORM. REVISIONS TO THE PLAN AND/OR REPORTS MAY BE REQUIRED. REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS OF ANY OF THESE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILL HEAR THE WAIVER REQUEST CONCURRENTLY WITH THE APPLICATION. DENIAL OF THE WAIVER REQUEST SHALL RENDER THIS APPLICATION INCOMPLETE AND RESULT IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A NEW SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE DATE AND REVIEW PERIOD. YOUR SIGNATURE BELOW INDICATES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE CONDITIONS. Date: Type of Application: Preliminary Plan No. ________________________________________ Owner’s/Applicant’s/Representative’s Signature If other than owner’s signature, a letter of consent authorizing the applicant/representative to act in owner’s behalf must be included. NOTICE: All information, including emails, submitted to Pueblo County Department of Planning and Development is considered public record and is therefore available for public review. Assessor’s Tax Parcel No. Subdivision Name: Filing No. Location of Subdivision: Township Range Section 1/4 Lot Block Subdivision Legal Description and Acreage (attach if necessary): Minimum Lot Size Existing Zone Proposed Zoning Change: MA No. Proposed Zone
    [Show full text]