1 Pueblo Boulevard, Xanadu Avenue and 168 Street W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Pueblo Boulevard, Xanadu Avenue and 168 Street W PUEBLO BOULEVARD, XANADU AVENUE AND 168TH STREET W PROJECT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What is the scope and potential cost of the proposed road improvement project? Pueblo Boulevard, Xanadu Avenue and 168th Street W are not currently paved with bituminous. Residents with property fronting these roads have asked the Town Board to consider paving all of Xanadu, all of 168th Street W and that part of Pueblo Boulevard from Bluff Drive on the north to just south of the last curve these roads with bituminous. The Town Board has engaged the services of the Town Engineer to conduct a preliminary examination of the proposed road improvements. Mr. Stordahl has estimated the cost to improve the roads with bituminous to be approximately $830,000. Please note that this cost is an estimate only and not a guaranteed price. The estimated cost is based on historical bid prices from projects of similar scope and adjusted for inflation. Should this project move forward, final project costs will be determined based on actual bids received for this proposed project. It is proposed that the Township will assess 92.3 percent of the total project costs to the benefitting properties on a per parcel basis. The Town has identified 40 parcels that have direct access on to the roads proposed to be improved and that will receive benefit from the proposed improvements. The total estimated project cost to be assessed to the benefiting property owners is $766,090. The total estimated cost to be paid by the Township is $63,910 (20% of cost of road construction, not including paving costs). The estimated project cost to the benefitting properties of this project on a per parcel basis would yield an assessment of approximately $19,643 per parcel. The per parcel assessment for this project is proportionate to the large lot size. The Town Board has retained the services of Nagell Appraisal Incorporated to advise the Town Board in a preliminary way the amount of increase in property value residents could expect if this project were completed. According to the appraiser, the benefit per parcel range from $12,000 to $20,000 with higher value building or larger lots being on the upper end of the range. The assessments may be paid in full up front or amortized over a period of time, typically 10 years, with an interest rate as determined by the Town Board. Generally, interest rates on assessments are on the order of 6 percent or less. The Township is proposing to finance the requested improvements by creating a subordinate service district under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 365A to facilitate financing of this project. Why does the Township propose to assess on a per-parcel basis instead of charging the individual properties by feet of road frontage? The Township prefers to assess on a per-parcel basis because all properties generally use the road equally in a residential district. Front footage assessment is more common with commercial properties, or lots with significant development potential. 1 What is a subordinate service district? A subordinate service district is a geographic area within a township, smaller than the entire township, in which the Town Board provides services at a higher level than are provided generally throughout the jurisdiction or provides services that are not provided at all in the jurisdiction. A district can be set up to provide any governmental service or function that the township is otherwise authorized by law to undertake. Districts have been created for many purposes including the improvement of roads with bituminous. It is a way for residents to request that the Town Board to provide a service (i.e. bituminous roads) that is not currently available to the rest of the Township as long as they agree to pay for the cost of providing the service. How are services paid for? The services are paid for by revenues from within the district. A service may be paid for through a property tax (assessment) or service charge, or a combination of the two, against the users of the service. Townships may issue general obligation bonds without an election for capital projects in subordinate service districts, payable primarily from the taxes or charges from the district but also ultimately backed by the general taxing power of the township. The taxes or fees supporting the bonds must continue to be imposed until the bonds are repaid, even if the district is dissolved. How is a subordinate service district formed? In a township, a subordinate service district may be established by petition. The petition must be signed by at least 50 percent of the property owners in the area to be served. The petition must describe the proposed district boundaries and services. Within 30 days, the Town Board must hold a public hearing and then approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the request. The creation of a subordinate service district may be subject to reverse referendum. If 25 percent of property owners in the district petition for a referendum, a special election must be held. When this occurs, the district is not established unless approved by a majority of those voting on the question. The general procedure for establishing a subordinate service district is as follows: Subordinate Service District Procedure Minnesota Statutes Chapter 365A Residents Petition for District: a. Signatures of at least 50% of the names of all “property owners” in proposed area are required b. Area of proposed District must be identified. Map is generally attached. c. Petition is usually presented at a regular Town Board meeting Township Board Adopts Resolution calling for a Public Hearing: 2 a. Petition must be validated by Clerk for 50% (signatures are correct) b. Town Board adopts resolution calling for public hearing within 30 days of verification c. Notice of public hearing is published once at least 14 days prior to public hearing d. Notice of public hearing be mailed to all property owners (Recommended) Town Board holds Public Hearing: a. Township Board adopts/denies resolution establishing Subordinate Service District b. Within 20 days of adoption of resolution, publication of resolution in newspaper c. Notice sent to all property owners in District d. Property Owners have 60 days from date of publication to petition for referendum. Signatures of at least 25% of “property owners” in proposed area are required e. If no petition for referendum is filed within the 60 days, the district is established f. If valid petition is received then Township holds special election on the creation of the district. Majority rules! Who is a property owner for purposes of signing the required petition? Only official property owners, those with their name on the property's deed, can sign the petition. Many properties have numerous owners, in which case, yes, they can all sign the petition. Others have purchased their house on a Contract for Deed or are renters. In these cases, only the legal owner(s) can sign the petition. Much of the time, there are more property owners than homes in the proposed district. What if the property is in a Trust? Who gets to sign the petition? For properties held in a trust, the trustee authorized to act on behalf of the trust according to the terms of the trust document would be considered the “owner” for signing the petition. The Trust document may list several persons to act as “co-trustees” such that all co-trustees must sign documents on behalf of the Trust. In such an instance, each co-trustee would be considered an “owner” for signing the petition. If you have any questions regarding who is considered an owner with regard to a trust, please contact the Township with a copy of the trust document. The Township will review the trust document and provide an answer as to who can sign the petition as an owner. How is a subordinate service district discontinued? A subordinate service district may be discontinued if a petition requesting it is approved. The petition must be signed by at least 75 percent of the property owners in the area. The Town board must hold a public hearing before deciding whether to discontinue a subordinate service district, but no election is held. If revenues remain after a town subordinate service district is discontinued and all outstanding obligations have been paid, the Town Board may deposit the surplus revenues in the town general fund or refund them to the owners of property charged during the last year a tax or fee was imposed in the district. 3 The costs of the project covered by the Township? Based on the current condition of the road, the Township’s contribution to the project costs would be capped at 20% of the non-paving portion of the project ($64,000). The Township Engineer believes that the current condition of Pueblo Boulevard is really good. The Town Board is not aware of any frost boils or other soft spots that might need more costly subgrade corrections. The ditches generally look in good shape. If the road was in rough shape and needed a lot of maintenance, the argument could be made that the Township investment should be higher as those dollars would be spent anyway. Prior to construction a deeper assessment into what work is really needed out there and what it would actually cost to prep the road for paving. What condition are the culverts in, how much ditch grading is really needed, etc. How many parcels are located within the proposed subordinate services district? There are approximately 40 parcels of land that boarder both sides of the roadways proposed for the paving.
Recommended publications
  • City Hall & Town Hall Locations
    Whitewater Town Hall )" Mt. Vernon Town Hall )" City Hall & Town Hall Rollingstone Town Hall Elba Town Hall )" )" Minnesota City City Hall )")" )" Locations Altura City Hall Elba City Hall )")" Goodview City Hall )" Norton Town Hall Winona City Hall )" Stockton City Hall )" Homer Town Hall )" )" Hillsdale Town Hall Utica Town Hall St. Charles Town Hall ")" )" )" ) )" Lewiston City Hall Warren Town Hall Richmond Town Hall Utica City Hall Wilson Town Hall )" St. Charles City Hall )" )" Wiscoy Town Hall Fremont Town Hall )" Dakota City Hall )" )" New Hartford Township Hall )" Pleasant Hill Town Hall )" Dresbach Town Hall Saratoga Town Hall )" )" Hart Town Hall )" Government Buildings Municipalities Miles )" City Hall City 0 2 4 8 ± )" Town Hall Township October 7, 2008 last updated 7/23/2021 10:25 CHAIRMAN CLERK TREASURER SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR TOWN MEETING DRESBACH Dave McCann Kim Low Kim Low Nick Erdmann Brant Amble 1st Tues @ 7:00 p.m. 46679 Riverview Dr 46784 Oak Hill Ln 46586 Waas Valley Rd La Crescent, MN 55947 La Crescent, MN 55947 La Crescent, MN 55947 507-643-6470 608-317-5469 608-317-5469 507-643-4422 507-643-6157 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ELBA TOWNSHIP Greg Heim Sheryl Langer Sandra Dietz Stephen Simon Mark Brosig 2nd Thurs @ 7:00 p.m. 20187 County Rd 39 11252 Persons Dr 17485 Calico Hill Rd 12162 County Rd 26 15587 Brosig Dr St Charles, MN 55972 St Charles, MN 55972 Altura, MN 55910 Altura, MN 55910 Altura, MN 55910 507-254-9852 507-269-9836 507-932-5225 507-534-2967 507-689-2652 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] FREMONT Richard Rislow Jodi K.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ACT Act 359 of 1947 an ACT to Authorize the Incorporation of Charter Townships; to Provide a Municipal Char
    THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ACT Act 359 of 1947 AN ACT to authorize the incorporation of charter townships; to provide a municipal charter therefor; to prescribe the powers and functions thereof; and to prescribe penalties and provide remedies. History: 1947, Act 359, Eff. Oct. 11, 1947;Am. 1998, Act 144, Eff. Mar. 23, 1999. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 42.1 Short title; charter townships; incorporation; powers, privileges, immunities and liabilities; petition; special census; expenses. Sec. 1. (1) This act shall be known and may be cited as “the charter township act”. (2) A township, having a population of 2,000 or more inhabitants according to the most recent regular or special federal or state census of the inhabitants of the township may incorporate as a charter township. The charter township shall be a municipal corporation, to be known and designated as the charter township of ............................, and shall be subject to this act, which is the charter of the charter township. The charter township, its inhabitants, and its officers shall have, except as otherwise provided in this act, all the powers, privileges, immunities, and liabilities possessed by a township, its inhabitants, and its officers by law and under chapter 16 of the Revised Statutes of 1846, being sections 41.1a to 41.110c of the Michigan Compiled Laws. (3) A special census of the inhabitants of a township desiring to incorporate under this act shall be taken by the secretary of state upon receipt of a petition signed by not less than 100 registered electors of the township.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribal Lands In
    A REPORT ON INDIAN TOWNSHIP PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBAL LANDS IN THE VICINITY OF PRINCETON, MAINE Anthony J. Kaliss 1971 Introduction to 1971 Printing Over two years have passed since I completed the research work for this report and during those years first one thing and ttan another prevented its final completion and printing. The main credit for the final preparation and printing goes to the Division of Indian Services of the Catholic Diocese of Portland and the American Civil Liberities Union of Maine. The Dioscese provided general assistance from its office staff headed by Louis Doyle and particular thanks is due to Erline Paul of Indian Island who did a really excellent job of typing more than 50 stencils of title abstracts, by their nature a real nuisance to type. The American Civil Liberities Union contrib­ uted greatly by undertaking to print the report Xtfhich will come to some 130 pages. Finally another excellent typist must be thanked and that is Edward Hinckley former Commissioner of Indian Affairs who also did up some 50 stencils It is my feeling that this report is more timely than ever. The Indian land problems have still not been resolved, but more and more concern is being expressed by Indians and non-Indians that something be done. Hopefully the appearance of this report at this time will help lead to some definite action whether in or out of the courts. Further research on Indian lands and trust funds remains to be done. The material, I believe, is available and it is my hope that this report will stimulate someone to undertake the necessary work.
    [Show full text]
  • [J-127A-D-2012] in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Middle District
    [J-127A-D-2012] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ. ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, : No. 63 MAP 2012 PA; BRIAN COPPOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERVISOR OF : ROBINSON TOWNSHIP; TOWNSHIP OF : NOCKAMIXON, BUCKS COUNTY, PA; TOWNSHIP : Appeal from the Order and Opinion of OF SOUTH FAYETTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA; : the Commonwealth Court at No. 284 PETERS TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, : MD 2012, dated July 26, 2012 PA; DAVID M. BALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COUNCILMAN OF : 52 A.3d 463 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012) PETERS TOWNSHIP; TOWNSHIP OF CECIL, : WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA; MOUNT PLEASANT : TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA; : BOROUGH OF YARDLEY, BUCKS COUNTY, PA; : DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK; MAYA : VAN ROSSUM, THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER; : MEHERNOSH KHAN, M.D. : : : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; : PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION; : ROBERT F. POWELSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC : UTILITY COMMISSION; OFFICE OF THE : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA; : KATHLEEN KANE, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; and E. : CHRISTOPHER ABRUZZO, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : PROTECTION : : : APPEAL OF: PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY : COMMISSION; ROBERT F. POWELSON, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE : PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION; PENNSYLVANIA : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : PROTECTION; AND E. CHRISTOPHER ABRUZZO , : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF : THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : ARGUED: October 17, 2012 PROTECTION : : : ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, : No. 64 MAP 2012 PA; BRIAN COPPOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERVISOR OF : ROBINSON TOWNSHIP; TOWNSHIP OF : NOCKAMIXON, BUCKS COUNTY, PA; TOWNSHIP : Appeal from the Order and Opinion of OF SOUTH FAYETTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA; : the Commonwealth Court at No.
    [Show full text]
  • Township & City Officers
    Waseca Elected Officials List Local City Public Official List For the Year: 2021 Current as of : 1-Aug-21 Alton Township Meetings: First Wednesday @ 7:00 PM Officer Postiton Term Ends Address City Zip Phone #1 Deb Westphal Clerk 2022 1171 370th Ave Janesville 56048 507-461-3245 Virginia Jordan Treasurer 2023 36026 10th St Janesville 56048 507-382-3795 Charles Schwab Chairman 2024 34014 35th St Janesville 56048 507-234-5259 Glenn Ewert Supervisor 2022 3424 360th Ave Janesville 56048 507-234-5633 Keith Wheelock Supervisor 2023 36741 25th St Janesville 56048 507-234-5593 Blooming Grove Township Meetings: First Tuesday @ 7:00 PM Elaine Breck Clerk 2022 14712 383rd Ave Waseca 56093 507-201-4032 Kimberly Maas Treasurer 2023 13645 410th Ave Waseca 56093 507-210-7783 Thomas Davison Chairman 2022 40405 State Hwy 13 Waseca 56093 507-835-5833 Laurel Remund Supervisor 2023 15661 420th Ave Waseca 56093 507-330-3749 Todd Selvik Supervisor 2024 14541 420th Ave Waseca 56093 507-461-1219 Byron Township Meetings: First Tuesday @ 8:00 PM Loren Schoenrock Clerk 2022 24734 80th St New Richland 56072 507-465-3764 Ralph Dobberstein Treasurer 2023 7398 250th Ave New Richland 56072 507-317-7309 Robert Wenzel Chairman 2024 9108 250th Ave New Richland 56072 507-465-8549 Curt Krause Supervisor 2023 6730 205th Ave New Richland 56072 507-465-8428 Scott Routh Supervisor 2022 10902 205th Ave New Richland 56072 507-838-5554 Freedom Township Meetings: Second Monday @ 7:00 PM Geraldine Lienke Clerk 2022 28650 50th St Janesville 56048 507-239-2289 Darrel Flemming Treasurer
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS This Is a Five
    APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS This is a five (5) digit number that has been assigned to each township (see page 7, Item 2 of the regulations for a detailed explanation). If a number identifying a township is not in the following tables, please contact the Utility Location Permit Clerk or the Utility & Railroad Services Manager at (207) 287-2281 to obtain the proper township code. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Auburn 01010 Durham 01020 Greene 01030 Leeds 01040 Lewiston 01050 Lisbon 01060 Livermore 01070 Livermore Falls 01080 Mechanic Falls 01090 Minot 01100 Turner 01120 Wales 01130 Sabattus 01140 AROOSTOOK COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Allagash 03010 Amity 03020 Ashland 03030 Bancroft 03040 1 APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS AROOSTOOK COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Blaine 03060 Bridgewater 03070 Caribou 03080 Cary 03090 Castle Hill 03100 Caswell 03110 Chapman 03120 Crystal 03130 Cyr 03140 Dyer Brook 03150 Eagle Lake 03170 Easton 03180 Fort Fairfield 03190 Fort Kent 03200 Frenchvile 03210 Garfield 03220 Glenwood 03230 Grand Isle 03240 Hamlin 03250 Hammond 03260 Haynesville 03270 Hersey 03280 Hodgdon 03290 Houlton 03300 Island Falls 03310 Limestone 03320 Linneus 03330 Littleton 03340 Ludlow 03350 Macwahoc 03360 Madawaska 03370 2 Mapleton 03380 Mars Hill 03390 Masardis 03400 APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS AROOSTOOK COUNTY Organized Townships Code # Merrill 03410 Monticello 03420 Moro 03430 Nashville 03440 New Canada 03450 New Limerick 03460 New Sweden 03470 Oakfield 03480 Orient 03490 Oxbow 03500 Persham 03510 Portage Lake 03520 Presque Isle 03530 Reed 03540 St. Agatha 03550 St. Francis 03560 St. John 03570 Sherman 03580 Smyrna 03590 Stockholm 03600 3 Van Buren 03610 Wade 03620 Wallagrass 03630 Washburn 03640 Westfield 03650 Westmanland 03660 Weston 03670 Winterville 03680 Woodland 03690 APPENDIX C TOWNSHIP CODE NUMBERS AROOSTOOK COUNTY Unorganized Townships Code # Big Twenty Twp 03801 Connor 03802 Cox Patent 03803 Dudley Twp 03804 Forkstown Twp 03805 Molunkus 03806 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Intergovernmental Agreement Regarding the Bighorn Solar 1 Solar Project Between the City of Pueblo, Colorado and Pueblo County, Colorado
    INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING THE BIGHORN SOLAR 1 SOLAR PROJECT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO AND PUEBLO COUNTY, COLORADO THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of ______________, 2020 by and between Pueblo County (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), 215 West 10th Street, Pueblo, Colorado, and the City of Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), 1 City Hall Place, Pueblo, Colorado. WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 18 of Article XIV of the Colorado Constitution, C.R.S. § 29-1-203 and C.R.S. § 29-20-105 authorize and encourage Colorado local governments to cooperate or contract with one another to provide any function, service or facility lawfully authorized to each local government including, but not limited to, the joint exercise of land use and permitting functions of mutual interest; and WHEREAS, the City and County have each approved a permit within their jurisdictional authority authorizing the development in an area of state interest (“1041 Permit”) pertaining to the Bighorn Solar 1 Solar Project, previously permitted as EVRAZ Solar Center Project, (“Project’); and WHEREAS, the development of the Project including the land use approval and authorizing of building permits will overlap jurisdiction boundaries of the City and County that can be more efficiently completed and streamlined through an Intergovernmental Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate for the City and County to enter into a written agreement setting forth their respective obligations and other terms and conditions for the approval of building permits and other land use actions for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Population of Indian Reservations, Trust Lands and Tribal Statistical Areas in Michigan, 2000
    Population of Indian Reservations, Trust Lands and Tribal Statistical Areas in Michigan, 2000 Area Name Population Bay Mills Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 812 Bay Mills township (part) Chippewa County 404 Sugar Island township (part) Chippewa County 34 Superior township (part) Chippewa County 167 Bay Mills township (part) Chippewa County 205 Superior township (part) Chippewa County 2 Grand Traverse Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 545 Suttons Bay township (part) Leelanau County 0 Helena township (part) Antrim County 0 Benzonia township (part) Benzie County 36 Eveline township (part) Charlevoix County 39 Acme township (part) Grand Traverse County 0 Suttons Bay township (part) Leelanau County 470 Hannahville Community and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 395 Gourley township (part) Menominee County 11 Harris township (part) Menominee County 284 Bark River township (part) Delta County 15 Harris township (part) Menominee County 85 Huron Potawatomi Reservation, MI 11 Athens township (part) Calhoun County 11 Isabella Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, MI 25,838 Chippewa township (part) Isabella County 3,253 Deerfield township Isabella County 3,081 Denver township Isabella County 1,147 Rosebush village Isabella County 379 Remainder of Isabella township Isabella County 1,766 Mount Pleasant city (part) Isabella County 8,741 Beal City CDP Isabella County 345 Weidman CDP (part) Isabella County 292 Remainder of Nottawa township Isabella County 1,641 Union charter township (part) Isabella County 3,876 Wise township
    [Show full text]
  • Fences, Nor Shall the Township Be Responsible for the Determination of the Location of Any Fence to Be Erected, Built Or Constructed
    Charter Township ofShelby Timothy Wood Building Director Phone: ( 586) 731- 5969 52700 Van Dyke Fax: ( 586) 803- 2099 Shelby Township, MI 48316-3572 E-mail: building @shelbytwp.org OUTLINE PROCEDURES FOR ERECTING A RESIDENTIAL FENCE PERMIT PROCEDURE A fence permit shall be obtained by the person or company building the fence. Submit the information indicated below and allow approximately two weeks for plan review and processing. The permit applicant will be contacted when the permit is ready to be picked up. An application fee of$ 25.00 is required at the time the application is submitted. 1) Permit Complete all applicable sections of application. Missing application information will cause delays. 2) Plot Plan Provide a copy of mortgage survey or scaled drawing indicating 3 copies) Legal description, all adjoining roads, location of buildings on this and adjacent properties. Any and all easements Description of fence ( Complete detail) REQUIREMENTS ( See the Charter Township of Shelby Fence Ordinance for full text and additional requirements) Sec. 10-317. Denial of responsibility of township. The Charter Township of Shelby shall not be responsible for the enforcement of any agreement relative to mutual or separate payment for the cost of construction of fences, nor shall the township be responsible for the determination of the location of any fence to be erected, built or constructed. In addition, the Charter Township of Shelby shall not be responsible for the enforcement of any deed or covenant restrictions. Sec. 10- 320. Encroachment. All fences shall be erected so that no part of the fence shall encroach upon an adjacent lot.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHIGAN MUNICIPALITIES Twp Twp
    2 Hudson Pickford Twp Garfield Twp Hendricks Marquette 48 94 Twp Twp St Ignace Twp Raber Newton Moran 129 Twp Twp Twp Twp Brevort Hiawatha Manistique Doyle Twp Clark Drummond Twp Twp Mueller Twp Twp Detour Twp Masonville Twp 134 Twp Twp MACKINAC 2 123 Detour 2 Nahma SCHOOLCRAFT 134 Twp 75 MANISTIQUE Inwood Garden 149 MICHIGAN MUNICIPALITIES Twp Twp 2 Lower Peninsula Ensign ST IGNACE MACKINAC Twp Thompson ISLAND Twp Detroit & Vicinity Bay De Noc Twp Garden St James D B Twp Bois Mackinaw 24 N M Blanc A City O Wawatam Mackinaw Twp L 24 150 C 183 K Chesterfield Twp Twp L A K E H U R O N A A Twp M O Macomb White Lake Shelby Hebron ROCHESTER Twp Twp Twp AUBURN Bliss Carp Twp 59 HILLS Fairbanks HILLS Twp Lake Waterford Twp Beaugrand PONTIAC Twp Twp Twp 53 Peaine 23 Twp Cross 31 UTICA CHEBOYGAN Benton 59 59 Village Twp SYLVAN LAKE Twp KEEGO Center McKinley Munro Inverness HARBOR 24 75 1 Readmond Twp Twp Twp Twp MT Twp CLEMENS ORCHARD Harrison Commerce LAKE Clinton Twp Pellston TROY STERLING 27 Grant Twp Bloomfield BLOOMFIELD Twp Bearinger Twp HILLS HEIGHTS Twp 94 212 Twp Wolverine 3 Friendship Pleasant Maple Lake 97 119 Burt Mullett West 75 Twp View Aloha Bloomfield River Twp Twp Twp Twp 23 Twp Twp BIRMINGHAM Rogers WALLED LAKE 5 FRASER West 24 CLAWSON Twp 10 Traverse 53 Little Alanson Ocqueoc Franklin Southfield Twp Twp Tuscarora Beverly Traverse Twp HARBOR Twp 75 Moltke Bingham Farms Hills Twp Koehler North ROYAL MADISON WARREN SPRINGS Waverly Twp ROGERS OAK ROSEVILLE Littlefield Twp Allis HEIGHTS 33 Twp CITY BERKLEY Twp 211 Twp 96 LATHRUP
    [Show full text]
  • Town Status Map T16 R8 WELS Madawaska T16 R13 T16 R12 T16 R6 T16 R9 WELS Eagle Lake T16 R5 WELS Lake Twp T16 R14 WELS WE LS WE LS WE LS Sto Ckholm
    Statewide Standards for Timber Harvesting in the Big Twenty Twp Shoreland Areas T19 R12 WELS T19 R11 WE LS Madawaska Frenchville Fort Kent Grand Isle T18 R11 T18 R12 Saint Ag atha WE LS WE LS T18 R13 WELS T18 R10 WELS Van Buren Saint Sinclair Van Buren T17 R13 T17 R12 John Plt New Cross Saint Wallagrass Twp Cove Twp WE LS WE LS Canada Lake Twp T17 R14 Francis WE LS Allagash Cyr P lt Hamlin Town Status Map T16 R8 WELS Madawaska T16 R13 T16 R12 T16 R6 T16 R9 WELS Eagle Lake T16 R5 WELS Lake Twp T16 R14 WELS WE LS WE LS WE LS Sto ckholm Connor Caswell Westmanland Twp New T15 R14 T15 R13 T15 R12 T15 R11 T15 R10 T15 R6 T15 R9 WELS T15 R8 Winterville T15 R5 WELS Swed en WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Plt WE LS T15 R15 WELS Limestone T14 R15 T14 R14 T14 R13 T14 R12 T14 R11 T14 R10 Woodland T14 R16 T14 R9 WELS T14 R8 T14 R7 WELS T14 R6 T14 R5 WELS Perham WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Caribou August 2021 T13 R15 T13 R14 T13 R13 T13 R12 T13 R11 T13 R10 T13 R16 WELS T13 R9 WELS T13 R8 WELS Portage T13 R5 WELS Wade Washburn WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Fort Lake Fairfield T13 R7 WELS T12 R16 T12 R15 T12 R14 T12 R13 T12 R12 T12 R11 T12 R10 T12 R17 WELS T12 R9 T12 R8 WELS Castle Hill Mapleton WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Nashville Plt Presque Isle T12 R7 WELS Ashland Easton T11 R7 WE LS T11 R16 T11 R15 Clayton T11 R13 T11 R12 T11 R11 T11 R10 T11 R17 WE LS T11 R9 WE LS T11 R4 WE LS Chapman WE LS WE LS Lake Twp WE LS WE LS WE LS WE LS Garfield Plt T11 R8 WE LS T10 R8 WELS Westfield Mars Hill Big
    [Show full text]
  • Subdivision Application and Summary Form
    SUBDIVISION APPLICATION AND SUMMARY FORM PLEASE READ NOTE AND SIGN BELOW: THE SUBMITTED APPLICATION PACKAGE REQUIRES SPECIFIC REPORTS/INFORMATION WHICH MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE AS DETERMINED THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED. ALSO, THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE APPLICATION PACKAGE DOES NOT MEAN THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN APPROVED AND IN FINAL FORM. REVISIONS TO THE PLAN AND/OR REPORTS MAY BE REQUIRED. REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS OF ANY OF THESE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILL HEAR THE WAIVER REQUEST CONCURRENTLY WITH THE APPLICATION. DENIAL OF THE WAIVER REQUEST SHALL RENDER THIS APPLICATION INCOMPLETE AND RESULT IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A NEW SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE DATE AND REVIEW PERIOD. YOUR SIGNATURE BELOW INDICATES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE CONDITIONS. Date: Type of Application: Preliminary Plan No. ________________________________________ Owner’s/Applicant’s/Representative’s Signature If other than owner’s signature, a letter of consent authorizing the applicant/representative to act in owner’s behalf must be included. NOTICE: All information, including emails, submitted to Pueblo County Department of Planning and Development is considered public record and is therefore available for public review. Assessor’s Tax Parcel No. Subdivision Name: Filing No. Location of Subdivision: Township Range Section 1/4 Lot Block Subdivision Legal Description and Acreage (attach if necessary): Minimum Lot Size Existing Zone Proposed Zoning Change: MA No. Proposed Zone
    [Show full text]