DOCSLIB.ORG

Record of Decision Sites 5, 24, 37PS, 69, 76CS, 76OD, 126, 155, 184, and 186 Savanna Army Depot Activity Savanna, Illinois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Record of Decision Sites 5, 24, 37PS, 69, 76CS, 76OD, 126, 155, 184, and 186 Savanna Army Depot Activity Savanna, Illinois Record of Decision Sites 5, 24, 37PS, 69, 76CS, 76OD, 126, 155, 184, and 186 Savanna Army Depot Activity Savanna, Illinois Final Prepared for: Louisville District 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Place Louisville, Kentucky 40202 Prepared by: Science Applications International Corporation 8301 Greensboro Drive McLean, Virginia 22102 August 2013 Contract No. DACW62-03-D-0003, Delivery Order No. CY01, SAIC CRN 142044 Contract No. W912QR-08-D-0008, Delivery Order No. 0012, SAIC CRN 180617 Record of Decision Sites 5, 24, 37PS, 69, 76CS, 76OD, 126, 155, 184, and 186 827.20130822.001 Savanna Army Depot Activity Savanna, Illinois Final Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District Louisville, Kentucky 40202 Prepared by: Science Applications International Corporation 8301 Greensboro Drive McLean, Virginia 22102 Contract No. DACW62-03-D-0003, Delivery Order No. CY01, SAIC CRN 142044 Contract No. W912QR-08-D-0008, Delivery Order No. 0012, SAIC CRN 180617 August 2013 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Certification 4 CONTRACTOR STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has completed the Record of Decision for Sites 5, 24, 37PS, 69, 76CS, 76OD, 126, 155, 184, and 186 at Savanna Army Depot Activity, Savanna, Illinois. Notice is hereby given that an independent technical review has been conducted that is appropriate to the level of risk and complexity inherent in the project as defined in the SAIC Quality Assurance Plan. During the independent technical review, compliance with established policy principles and procedures, using justified and valid assumptions, was verified. This included review of assumptions, methods, procedures, and materials used in analyses; the appropriateness of data used and the level of data obtained; and assessment of the reasonableness of the results, including consistency with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) policy. August 20, 2013 Marcy Larriva, P.E., PMP Date Project Manager August 20, 2013 Joseph E. Peters Date QA Manager August 20, 2013 Jed Thomas, P.E. Date Independent Technical Review Team Leader Significant concerns and explanation of the resolutions are documented within the project file. As noted above, all concerns resulting from independent technical review of the project have been considered. August 20, 2013 Lisa Jones-Bateman, REM, PMP Date Vice President THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 INSTALLATION LOCATION AND SITE NAMES .......................................................... 1-1 1.2 STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE ........................................................................ 1-1 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED REMEDY AND ASSESSMENT OF THE SITES ......... 1-3 1.4 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS .................................................................................. 1-3 1.5 ROD DATA CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST .................................................................... 1-4 1.6 AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES ......................................................................................... 1-5 2. DECISION SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 INSTALLATION HISTORY, SITE NAMES, AND LOCATIONS ................................... 2-1 2.2 SITE HISTORY AND REGULATORY ACTIVITY .......................................................... 2-1 2.3 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................... 2-9 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .......................................................................................... 2-9 2.5 SCOPE AND ROLE OF RESPONSE ACTION .................................................................. 2-9 2.6 SITE DESCRIPTIONS ....................................................................................................... 2-10 2.6.1 Site 5 (Liquid Propellant Burn Area) ................................................................... 2-10 2.6.2 Site 24 (CF Plant Melt and Pour Facility) ............................................................ 2-11 2.6.3 Site 37PS (Pole Storage Area) ............................................................................. 2-13 2.6.4 Site 69 (Contaminated Waste Processor – Building 2215) .................................. 2-14 2.6.5 Site 76CS (Former Coal Storage Area) ................................................................ 2-15 2.6.6 Site 76OD (Open Drum Storage Area) ................................................................ 2-17 2.6.7 Site 126 (CN Plant Boiler Building USTs, Building 502) ................................... 2-18 2.6.8 Site 155 (CF Plant Drilling and Boostering Building – Building 729) ................ 2-19 2.6.9 Site 184 (CL Plant Compressor Building – Building 640) .................................. 2-21 2.6.10 Site 186 (CF Plant Generator Building – Building 707) ...................................... 2-21 2.7 HISTORICAL AND POTENTIAL FUTURE LAND USES ............................................. 2-23 2.8 SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS ............................................................................................ 2-23 2.8.1 Screening Evaluation ........................................................................................... 2-23 2.8.2 Human Health Risk Assessment .......................................................................... 2-24 2.8.3 Ecological Risk Assessment ................................................................................. 2-26 2.9 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................... 2-27 2.10 APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS......................................................................................................................... 2-27 2.11 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SITES 37PS, 76CS, AND 76OD ............... 2-29 2.11.1 Comparative Analysis of Alternatives ................................................................. 2-30 2.11.1.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment ................. 2-30 2.11.1.2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements ....................................................................................... 2-30 2.11.1.3 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence ......................................... 2-32 2.11.1.4 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment ....... 2-32 2.11.1.5 Short-Term Effectiveness .................................................................... 2-32 2.11.1.6 Implementability .................................................................................. 2-32 2.11.1.7 Cost ...................................................................................................... 2-33 2.11.1.8 Regulatory Acceptance ........................................................................ 2-33 2.11.1.9 Community Acceptance ....................................................................... 2-33 2.11.2 Principal Threat Waste ......................................................................................... 2-33 2.11.3 Selected Remedy .................................................................................................. 2-34 2.12 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SITE 126 .................................................... 2-34 2.12.1 Comparative Analysis of Alternatives ................................................................. 2-35 Savanna Army Depot, Final ROD v August 2013 Sites 5, 24, 37PS, 69, 76CS, 76OD, 126, 155, 184, and 186 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 2.12.1.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment ................. 2-35 2.12.1.2 Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements ....................................................................................... 2-37 2.12.1.3 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence ......................................... 2-37 2.12.1.4 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment ....... 2-37 2.12.1.5 Short-Term Effectiveness .................................................................... 2-38 2.12.1.6 Implementability .................................................................................. 2-38 2.12.1.7 Cost ...................................................................................................... 2-38 2.12.1.8 Regulatory Acceptance ........................................................................ 2-38 2.12.1.9 Community Acceptance ....................................................................... 2-39 2.12.2 Principal Threat Waste ......................................................................................... 2-39 2.12.3 Selected Remedy .................................................................................................. 2-39 2.13 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS ................................................................................ 2-40 2.14 DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNFICANT CHANGES ....................................................... 2-40 3. RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 BACKGROUND ON COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ................................................... 3-1 3.2 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Mississippi River Conservation Opportunity Area Wildlife Action Plan
    Version 3 Summer 2012 UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITY AREA WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN Daniel Moorehouse Mississippi River Pool 19 A cooperative, inter-agency partnership for the implementation of the Illinois Wildlife Action Plan in the Upper Mississippi River Conservation Opportunity Area Prepared by: Angella Moorehouse Illinois Nature Preserves Commission Elliot Brinkman Prairie Rivers Network We gratefully acknowledge the Grand Victoria Foundation's financial support for the preparation of this plan. Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. ii Acronym List .............................................................................................................................. iii I. Introduction to Conservation Opportunity Areas ....................................................................1 II. Upper Mississippi River COA ..................................................................................................3 COAs Embedded within Upper Mississippi River COA ..............................................................5 III. Plan Organization .................................................................................................................7 IV. Vision Statement ..................................................................................................................8 V. Climate Change .......................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Who II of Hanover, IL
    1 Who Was Who II of Hanover, IL as of April 7, 2011 This proposed book contains biographies of people from Hanover who died after March 2, 1980, and up until when the book will go to the printer, hopefully in February 2011. The first Who Was Who was a book of biographies of everyone from Hanover, who had died, from the first settlers, up until February 28, 1980, when the book went to the printer. PLEASE let me know ALL middle names of everyone in each bio. This will help people doing research years from now. As you read through the information below PLEASE let me know of any omissions or corrections of any of your friends or family. I want this to be a book that will honor all of our past Hanover residents and to keep them alive in our memory. The prerequisites for being listed in this book are (1) being deceased, (2) having some sort of connection to Hanover, whether that is being born in Hanover or living in Hanover for some time, or (3) being buried in one of the three cemeteries. THANKS, Terry Miller PLEASE make sure that your friend’s and family’s biographies contain all the information listed below: 1. Date of birth 2. Where they were born 3. Parent’s name (including Mother’s maiden name) 4. Where they went to school 5. If they served in the Military – what branch – what years served 6. Married to whom, when and where 7. Name of children (oldest to youngest) 8. Main type of work 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Army Corp of Engineers
    us EPA RECORDS CENTER REGION 5 480188 RECORD OF DECISION SITE 32 - NATIONAL GUARD PISTOL RANGE SAVANNA ARMY DEPOT ACTIVITY, SAVANNA, ILLINOIS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District 600 Dr. M.L. King Jr. PI. Louisville, KY 40202-2232 Contract No. W912QR-04-D-0036 Task Order No. 0018 Prepared bv: EQ Environmental Quality Management, Inc. 1800 Carillon Boulevard Cincinnati, Ohio 45240 (800) 229-7495 www.eqm.com EQ FN: 030240.0018 June 2014 Site 32 - National Guard Pistol Range Record of Decision EQ Environmental Quality Management, Inc. June 2014 Sunii' CONTENTS Section Page Technical Review Certification v 1. Declaration 1 1.1 Site Name and Location 1 1.2 Statement of Basis and Purpose 1 1.3 Deseription of Selected Remedy 1 1.4 Statutory Determin ations 2 1.5 Authorizing Signatures 2 2. Decision Summary 3 2.1 Site Name, Location, and Description 3 2.2 Site History and Enforcement Activities 5 2.3 Community Participation 6 2.4 Scope and Role of Operable Unit or Response Action 6 2.5 Site Characteristics 7 2.5.1 Topography and Surface Features 7 2.5.2 Geology 7 2.5.3 Hydrogeology 7 2.5.4 Nature and Extent of Contamination 8 2.5.4.1 Surface and Subsurface Soil 8 2.5.4.2 Groundwater 9 2.6 Current and Potential Future Site and Resource Uses 10 2.7 Site Risks 10 2.7.1 Human Health Risks 11 2.7.2 Ecologieal Risk Assessment 11 2.7.3 Conclusion 12 2.8 Documentation of Significant Changes 12 3.
    [Show full text]
  • SAVANNA, ILLINOIS Highway 84 and Wacker Road Tax Increment Finance Redevelopment Project Area
    SAVANNA, ILLINOIS Highway 84 and Wacker Road Tax Increment Finance Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan June 2016 Prepared by: Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr & Associates 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Tax Increment Financing ....................................................................................................... 4 II. City of Savanna ........................................................................................................................ 5 III. Redevelopment Project Area ................................................................................................. 7 IV. Redevelopment Plan to Address Existing Conditions ....................................................... 8 V. Redevelopment Project Area Goals & Objectives ............................................................. 9 VI. Lack of Development, Growth and Fiscal Impact on Taxing Districts ......................... 12 VII. Redevelopment Activities ....................................................................................................... 14 VIII. Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs ............................................................................ 17 IX. Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation for Redevelopment Project Area ............. 23 X. Anticipated Equalized Assessed Valuation for the Redevelopment Project Area ......... 24 XI. Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and an Affirmative Action Plan ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board
    Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board BIENNIAL REPORT JULY 2006-JUNE 2008 (With addenda covering biennia July 2002 to June 2006) ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION BOARD AS OF JUNE 30, 2008 Members: R. Dan Gooch, Chairman Dr. John E. Ebinger, Vice-Chairman Dr. Chris A. Phillips, Secretary Marilyn F. Campbell John A. Clemetsen Dr. James R. Herkert Susanne Masi Dr. Tom Nelson Dr. Mike Retzer Staff: None ENDANGERED SPECIES TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES (ESTACs) AS OF JUNE 30, 2008 PLANTS: REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS: Dr. John E. Ebinger, Chair Scott Ballard Susanne Masi Dr. Ron Brandon William McClain Dr. Mike Dreslik Randy Nÿboer Dr. Merideth Mahoney Dr. Loy R. Phillippe Dr. Chris Phillips, Chair Dr. Ken Robertson Mike Redmer John Schwegman Beth Shimp BIRDS: Dr. John Taft Marilyn Campbell Dr. James R. Herkert, Chair INVERTEBRATE ANIMALS: Dr. Jeff Hoover Dr. Tim Cashatt Vern Kleen Kevin Cummings Brad Semel Dr. Chris Dietrich Dr. Douglas Stotz Dr. Chris Taylor Dr. Jeff Walk Dr. Steven Taylor, Chair Dr. Mike Ward Jeremy Tiemann Dr. Dan Wenny Dr. Paul Tinerella James Wiker MAMMALS: Chris Anchor FISHES: Bob Bluett Dr. Brooks Burr Dean Corgiat Dr. Mike Retzer, Chair Dr. George Feldhamer Bob Rung Dr. Ed Heske Trent Thomas Dr. Joyce Hofmann Jeremy Tiemann Joe Kath Dan Sallee Dr. Tom Nelson, Chair On the cover, clockwise from upper left: Illinois Chorus Frog (Pseudacris streckeri), Illinois Threatened; Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis), Illinois and Federally Endangered; Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea), Illinois Endangered, Federally Threatened; River Cooter (Pseudemys concinna), Illinois Endangered; and, Leafy Prairie Clover (Dalea foliosa), Illinois and Federally Endangered. 2 PREFACE The Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act, originally enacted in August of 1972 and revised in July of 1986 and January of 2000, requires that the Endangered Species Protection Board prepare and make available a report of its accomplishments biennially.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuse Plan – Savanna Depot September 2018
    FINAL Jo Carroll Depot Local Redevelopment Authority Reuse Plan – Savanna Depot September 2018 Prepared for Jo-Carrol Local Redevelopment Authority 18901 B Street Savanna, IL 61074 Prepared by RKG Associates, Inc. (subconsultant to Weston Solutions, Inc.) In conjunction with Jeffrey Donohoe Associates LLC This study was prepared under contract with the Jo Carroll Local Redevelopment Authority, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of the LRA and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. September 2018 FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................... 3 1.2 History of the Site ................................................................................... 3 1.3 Current Situation .................................................................................... 5 1.4 Development Progress ......................................................................... 11 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................ 19 2.1 Socioeconomics ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Site Remediation Program Annual Report
    Illinois Bureau of Land March 2002 Environmental 1021 North Grand Ave. East Protection Agency Springfield, IL 62794-9276 IEPA/BOL/02-004 FederalFederal SiteSite RemediationRemediation 2 ProgramProgram 0 0 1 AnnualAnnual ReportReport Welcome: During the year 2001, Federal Site Remediation Program staff provided valu- 2001 Achievements able services to the people of Illinois in implementing the Comprehensive Envi- ronmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (known as CERCLA or ● Three new sites Superfund). Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) engineers, added to the NPL scientists, geologists and specialists involved in these cleanup programs are challenged by some of the largest and most contaminated properties in the • Construction state and the nation. They provide leadership and assistance in dealing with completion at three complex technical, legal and community issues. NPL sites, 251 acres remediated Last year, Program staff were instrumental in adding three sites to the National ● 8, 113.34 acres Priorities List (NPL). Currently, there are 47 NPL sites in the State of Illinois. remediated at seven Program staff were also involved in cleanup efforts being conducted at federal federal sites sites. These sites include active installations, closing facilities or properties transferred from the Department of Defense. Through the assistance and su- ● Six Records of pervision of Program staff, health risks were controlled or removed on 8,113 Decision at four acres of land at seven of the federal sites. federal
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Site Remediation Program Annual Report
    Illinois Bureau of Land May 2003 Environmental 1021 North Grand Ave. East Protection Agency Springfield, IL 62794-9276 IEPA/BOL/03-004 FederalFederal SiteSite RemediationRemediation ProgramProgram 2 0 0 2 AnnualAnnual ReportReport Welcome: 2002 Achievements During 2002, Federal Site Remediation Program staff of the Illinois Environ- • Five Records of mental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) provided valuable services to the people Decision issued for of Illinois in implementing the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com- NPL Sites and pensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (known as CERCLA or Super- Federal Facilities fund). Program engineers, scientists and geologists are assigned as project • Final transfer of managers for these cleanup efforts. They are challenged by some of the largest property at Naval Air and most contaminated properties in the state and the nation. The project Station Glenview managers provide leadership and assistance in dealing with complex technical, legal and community issues. Illinois EPA’s Federal Site Remediation Program is • Non-time critical recognized as a leader in the nation’s Superfund and federal facility cleanup ef- removal action at forts. Savanna Army Depot Activity Last year, project managers provided leadership for cleanup efforts and reme- dial activities at 35 of the 58 federal facilities and 21 of the 47 NPL sites in Illi- • Demolition of former Texaco-Indian nois. Through their efforts, health risks were controlled or removed on 659 Refining Company acres of land throughout the state during the year. This report highlights these NPL site nears efforts as well as the progress of cleanup activities at several NPL sites and fed- completion eral facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County
    VtÜÜÉÄÄ VÉâÇàç MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL NATURAL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN PARTICIPANTS Carroll County Mount Carroll, City of Chadwick, Village of Savanna, City of Eastland CUSD #308 Shannon, Village of Lanark, City of Thomson, Village of Milledgeville, Village of Thomson Fire Protection District Milledgeville Park District West Carroll CUSD #314 JANUARY 2013 The five year update of this Plan must be completed on or before April 18, 2018. Carroll County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Preparing a planning document of this size and scope takes a considerable amount of effort and time. Unlike some other kinds of planning efforts, this is the first time that Carroll County and the participating municipalities and townships had prepared a Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. This Plan should be a useful resource for current and future residents who are interested in the impacts caused by severe weather in Carroll County. Information from various government sources has been supplemented by photographs and weather data from personal collections. The Carroll County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Planning Committee included residents who live throughout the County. Their knowledge of the devastation caused by severe weather coupled with their commitment to protecting the lives, property, and welfare of Carroll County residents resulted in this Plan. Leroy Getz is a crop and weather reporter who lives on his farm located between Mount Carroll and Savanna. He began recording rainfall totals approximately 30 years ago and his interest expanded to include gathering information about other types of weather events for the Carroll County Farm Bureau. Leroy is a fourth generation dairy farmer whose children help him maintain their Centennial Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 Upland Bird Survey of the Savanna Army Depot Activity, Carroll and Jo Daviess Counties, Illinois
    I LLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. /)7H / 717 1997 Upland Bird Survey of the Savanna Army Depot Activity, Carroll and Jo Daviess Counties, Illinois Edward A. Anderson and Daniel R. Kirk Division of Natural Heritage Illinois Department of Natural Resources June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............ ...... ..... ........ ................... Location and Background ....... ...... ......... ......... ................ 1 Natural Features ......................... ..... .. ... ......a*... .. 1 Endangered and Threatened Species .................................... ... 2 METHODS ...... ... ........ ............ ......... ...... ......... 2 RESULTS ................. .............. ..... ........... ................. 3 G eneral ............................................................. 3 Endangered and Threatened Species .............. ................... .. 4 DISCUSSION ................. ............................................ 5 G eneral ............................................................. 5 Endangered and Threatened Species ................ ........................ 6 Conclusions .............. ....... ............. .. ................... 6 Management Recommendations .......................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................... ................................ 8 LITERATURE CITED ....................................................... 9 Figure 1. Location of the Savanna Army
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Mound Environmental Assessment and Interim
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Lost Mound National Wildlife Refuge Environmental Assessment and Interim Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2002 Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Need for Action ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Decisions to be Made ...................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 The Alternatives ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Study ................................. 4 2.2 Alternatives Carried Forward for Detailed Analysis ................................................ 4 2.2.1 Alternative A: No Action ..................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Alternative B: Refuge Establishment / No Public Use................................... 5 2.2.3 Alternative C: Refuge
    [Show full text]