Land at Blue Mountain Representations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land at Blue Mountain Representations From: To: Development Plan Subject: Blue Mountain - Land modification request Date: 10 October 2013 15:01:22 Thank you for the email with the attached letter regarding the meeting which has been called to release the land from the covenant whereby it should remain a golf course. As I read it I wondered if there is any point in objecting to this? Isn't it basically a foregone conclusion that houses ( and a school and a football stadium or whatever is decided is a necessity) will be constructed on this land? Why would I waste my valuable time thinking of something to write (yet again) that would hopefully change the mind of someone who even cared about the local community and what this facility and green space means to them. Then I thought back to a comment my 8 year son made last week as he looked out of the front landing window of our house and saw the fog lifting across the part of the golf course we can see, just as the sun was breaking through.He commented on how beautiful the golf course looked and how lucky we are to live in such a lovely village with the open space and green land of Blue Mountain. At that moment my heart just sank.We like to think that we can protect our children and we do our best to bring them up in green surroundings ( which is why we moved here in the first place) and in the blink of an eye it is completely out of your hands.Everything you had ever intended to be the environment where you wanted to raise your family is gone. I told my son about the plans for Blue Mountain.He has been having golf lessons there since he was 4 years old and he cried.He cried and asked why? Why would someone do that to that lovely big open space? He is 8 years old and yet his life will change forever, as will every other resident of this village and everybody who uses the facilities or the open space at Blue Mountain. The covenant in the agreement states that the land is not to be used for any other purpose.Why then can this be so easily overthrown? What was the point of the covenant in the first place if it is not worth the paper it was written on? Do the local community not have any protection at all? At the back of my mind I keep thinking that Binfield has gained the 'short straw' here. A football stadium is needed as the town centre land has been sold off for prime location housing.Where can land be found to relocate this? Binfield. A secondary school is needed as it was never built when it was promised years ago in the Temple Park/Quelm Park area.Where can land be found to build this? Binfield.Extra affordable housing which is essential......In fact surely two birds are being killed with one stone here....everything can be built in Binfield.Problem sorted. I strongly object to the land modification request and, although I doubt it very much, I would like my objection to be taken seriously. I expect every resident in Binfield will also object, although they may, like me, wonder is it actually worth bothering to write to express their views as the decision seems to have been made already and that this is merely a formality. Regards From: Development Control To: Subject: FW: Land at Blue Mountain Golf Course, Binfield. Date: 11 October 2013 08:56:20 From: Sent: 10 October 2013 18:12 To: Development Control Subject: Land at Blue Mountain Golf Course, Binfield. 10th October 2013 Dear Sir/Madam Re : LAND AT BLUE MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE - BINFIELD NOTICE OF REQUEST TO MODIFY A PLANNING AGREEMENT DATED 16TH FEBRUARY 1990 I strongly object to Bracknell Forest Council releasing the landowners - The Trustees of the Luff Pension Scheme and Luff Farms Limited from the covenant signed in 1990 to keep this land for use as a Golf Course for 125 years. This covenant was put in place to protect this land from development for 125 - this should not be revoked as the Council will be breaking their signed promise to the residents of Binfield and Temple Park. What was the point of signing and agreeing this covenant if it can be broken for the benefit of the developers and landowners just so that they can build 400 plus houses, a football pitch, a secondary school, which the residents do not want. The secondary school is only required because of the large development to be built at Warfield. The secondary school should be built on land in Warfield so that the pupils will not have to drive to Binfield - which in turn will put pressures on the already congested infrastructure. The residents of Temple Park and Binfield signed a petition to keep this land as a Golf Course for 125 years - they do not want all the extra traffic and pressures on their services and facilities that this amount of development will bring. The Blue Mountain Golf Course and Conference Centre is much loved and very well used facility which provides recreation and entertainment for the local residents. If this is demolished to make way for houses and a football pitch it will greatly affect the lifestyles, wellbeing and health of the community. This is a profitable business that provides jobs for over 60 people and also provides facilities for local schools, groups and local companies. This golf course is not surplus to requirement - the golf course is very well used by local people who can walk to the course. Many young children use the driving range and golf coaching school which cannot re replicated at any local course. Golf is a growing sport and with a growing community this facility should be promoted and not demolished to make way for houses. It is a very busy golf course and provides much needed open space for people to socialise, exercise and engage in the peaceful sport of golf. The Council owned Downshire Golf Course is not within walking distance of Binfield and residents would have to drive there to use the course. The Downshire Golf Course is losing money - and is a drain on rate payers money. People from Binfield and Warfield will not travel to the Downshire Golf Course as this area is notorious for traffic problems and the facilities are sub-standard. To replace this tranquil green area used by many families for golfing, walking, cycling, dog walking, horse riding etc and to replace it with a football pitch is not a suitable replacement. Binfield has its own very successful football club which is in the same league as Bracknell Town. Binfield Football Club is a successful football club - Bracknell Town Football Club is a failing club with dwindling supporters (Bracknell Town were promoted to the same league as Binfield by default - they applied for promotion and were only accepted because no other club had sufficient facilities to be promoted). We do not need two football clubs in one village. We need green areas to stop the coalescence of the two areas - Binfield should keep its character and rural landscape. If this green space is developed it will cause untold effects on the lives and wellbeing of many of the local resident and the home owners on Temple Park who purchased their homes on the understanding that the golf course would remain as it is for 125 years! This was a PROMISE made by Bracknell Forest Council and SHOULD NOT BE BROKEN - IF IT IS HOW CAN WE TRUST ANYTHING THE COUNCIL EVER SAYS IN FUTURE? The NPPF states:- 3. Supporting a prosperous rural economy ● support sustainable rural tourism and leisure developments that benefit businesses in rural areas, communities and visitors, and which respect the character of the countryside. This should include supporting the provision and expansion of tourist and visitor facilities in appropriate locations where identified needs are not met by existing facilities in rural service centres; and ● promote the retention and development of local services and community facilities in villages, such as local shops, meeting places, sports venues, cultural buildings, public houses and places of worship. 8. Promoting healthy communities ● safe and accessible environments where crime and disorder, and the fear of crime, do not undermine quality of life or community cohesion; and ● safe and accessible developments, containing clear and legible pedestrian routes, and high quality public space, which encourage the active and continual use of public areas. 70. To deliver the social, recreational and cultural facilities and services the community needs, planning policies and decisions should: ● plan positively for the provision and use of shared space, community facilities (such as local shops, meeting places, sports venues, cultural buildings, public houses and places of worship) and other local services to enhance the sustainability of communities and residential environments; ● guard against the unnecessary loss of valued facilities and services, particularly where this would reduce the community’s ability to meet its day-to-day needs; ● ensure that established shops, facilities and services are able to develop and modernise in a way that is sustainable, and retained for the benefit of the community; ● 73. Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation can make an important contribution to the health and well-being of communities. Planning policies should be based on robust and up-to-date assessments of the needs for open space, sports and recreation facilities and opportunities for new provision.
Recommended publications
  • Cycling in Bracknell Forest
    D W D L 9 O U A H K O L 0 T Q Y I 3 Q U Primary K YB E B H THW A U U OL OA O D I S D N S D N E N A A A E O E M M O GH S L L NG D C I I O R A E R T T L A R A A N L D OO E M V I R S O O N O M W I O S R A R E SO T O S R O N H INGM M I E A W A CO D Honeyhill UTH RUM L TT A A S D S I TR D S A T T I T N N H I R F Birch Hill G I U N G OAD L E INE MILE RIDE L I Q E D N Y K B3430 B3430 H O N H EY E A H E AY T I D L E RI H L L NE MI W L NI A ND B3430 S R O A Pine Wood D LE RIDE FORESTERS NINE MI Transport Research B3430 Laboratory Caesar’s Camp A3095 E (fort) LE RID NINE MI Clay St Sebastian's B3430 Hill Hut Hill C Of E (Aided) RO Y Primary A L L O U P A I N Quieter roads and tracks K E E R D D I I R R D R linking cycleways E N HO I L P SANDHURST AND CROWTHORNE Q M U NINE MILE RIDE U L Traffic-free cycle route / Subway N B E 0 E U E B343 W NS R RID Y E CYCLE TRAINING LEISURE CYCLING W S A R V E E Blue Route traffic-free / Subway O KO IF TH E C ’ N Bigshotte I N Hatch Ride On-road Bikeability cycle training is offered to children who are The maps contained within this leaflet show the network of G Park HAT H CH Primary R Red Route traffic-free / Subway A IDE RACKNELL ROAD M B TH E R Quieter roads and tracks over 10 years old dedicated and shared-use cycle paths throughout the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Bracknell Forest Rights of Way Improvement Plan
    Bracknell Forest Rights of Way Improvement Plan Consultation and Network Analysis – Initial Results 1. Network Evaluation Bridleways 10.22 km Byways (open to vehicles) 5.67 km Footpaths 52.55 km RUPPs (open to vehicles) 2.74 km Byways & RUPPS (not open to 5.43 km vehicles) TOTAL 76.62 km Bracknell Forest public rights of way by type 69% 4% 7% 7% 13% Bridleway Byway Footpath RUPP Byway or RUPP with TRO Bracknell Forest public rights of way by parish 19% 18% 15% 17% 15% 16% BINFIELD BRACKNELL CROWTHORNE SANDHURST WARFIELD WINKFIELD Binfield 14.04km Bracknell 11.37km Crowthorne 11.95km Sandhurst 11.41km Warfield 13.25km Winkfield 14.6km TOTAL 76.62km Density of public rights of way in Bracknell Forest 1.20 1.00 2 0.80 0.60 km/km 0.40 0.20 0.00 Binfield Bracknell Crowthorne Sandhurst Warfield Winkfield Total Parish Town Parish Town Parish Parish 1.08 0.68 0.92 0.80 1.00 0.37 0.70 Public rights of way by type and parish 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 Length (km) Length 4.00 2.00 0.00 Bridleway Byway Byway (with TRO) Footpath RUPP RUPP (with TRO) BINFIELD 4.66 0.19 0.00 6.98 2.10 0.10 BRACKNELL 0.00 0.00 0.22 10.87 0.00 0.28 CROWTHORNE 2.17 0.11 0.00 7.74 0.00 1.93 SANDHURST 1.27 0.92 0.00 9.22 0.00 0.00 WARFIELD 1.52 4.01 2.11 5.61 0.00 0.00 WINKFIELD 0.61 0.45 0.00 12.12 0.64 0.79 Public rights of way by type and parish 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 Length (km) Length 4.00 2.00 0.00 BINFIELD BRACKNELL CROWTHORNE SANDHURST WARFIELD WINKFIELD Bridleway 4.66 0.00 2.17 1.27 1.52 0.61 Byway 0.19 0.00 0.11 0.92 4.01 0.45 Byway (with TRO) 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 2.11 0.00 Footpath 6.98 10.87 7.74 9.22 5.61 12.12 RUPP 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 RUPP (with TRO) 0.10 0.28 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.79 • Analysis of network (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Bracknell Forest
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 Bracknell Forest_Sheet 1 :Map 1: iteration 1_F THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF BRACKNELL FOREST Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Bracknell Forest December 2020 Sheet 1 of 1 Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2020. KEY TO PARISH WARDS BINFIELD CP A BINFIELD NORTH B BINFIELD SOUTH BRACKNELL CP C BIRCH HILL & NORTH LAKE D BULLBROOK E CROWN WOOD F EASTHAMPSTEAD G GARTH H GARTH NORTH I GREAT HOLLANDS NORTH J GREAT HOLLANDS SOUTH K HANWORTH L HARMANS WATER M JENNETT'S PARK N PRIESTWOOD O TOWN CENTRE & THE PARKS P WILDRIDINGS SANDHURST CP Q CENTRAL SANDHURST A W R COLLEGE TOWN S LITTLE SANDHURST V T OWLSMOOR BINFIELD AD NORTH & WARFIELD CP WARFIELD CP WARFIELD WEST WINKFIELD & WARFIELD U QUELM EAST V ST MICHAEL'S W WARFIELD EAST X WARFIELD PARK Y WHITEGROVE BINFIELD CP WINKFIELD CP Z ASCOT PRIORY AA FOREST PARK AB MARTIN'S HERON & WARREN AC NORTH ASCOT PARISH AD WINKFIELD & CRANBOURNE H U Y X WHITEGROVE G PRIESTWOOD & GARTH N B D AC BINFIELD BULLBROOK SOUTH & JENNETT'S PARK TOWN CENTRE & THE PARKS O WINKFIELD P CP AB EASTHAMPSTEAD L M & WILDRIDINGS HARMANS WATER BRACKNELL F & CROWN WOOD CP I AA E Z GREAT HANWORTH C HOLLANDS K J SWINLEY FOREST CROWTHORNE CP CROWTHORNE T S SANDHURST CP OWLSMOOR & SANDHURST COLLEGE TOWN Q R 00.25 0.5 1 KEY Kilometres BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY 1 cm = 0.176 km PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY CROWTHORNE PROPOSED WARD NAMES SANDHURST CP PARISH NAME.
    [Show full text]
  • Country House with Leisure Complex and Paddocks Old Whitelocks, Garsons Lane, Warfield, Berkshire
    COUNTRY HOUSE WITH LEISURE COMPLEX AND PADDOCKS old whitelocks, garsons lane, warfield, berkshire Freehold SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY WITH A DETACHED COTTAGE, LEISURE COMPLEX AND PADDOCKS old whitelocks, garsons lane, warfield, berkshire Freehold Main House: Reception hall w drawing room w dining room w family room w study w conservatory w kitchen/breakfast room w utility room w 2 cloakrooms w master bedroom with en suite bathroom w 4/5 bedrooms (2 en suite) w family bathroom w dressing room Cottage: Reception hall w sitting room w kitchen/dining room w 2 bedrooms w shower room Leisure Complex: 64’ heated swimming pool w Jacuzzi pool w sauna w changing rooms with shower facilities w gymnasium w leisure room w wine cellar w plant room Outside: Triple garage, workshop and WC with generous office space above w landscaped gardens w ‘all-weather’ tennis court w 2 paddocks w stable block comprising 3 loose boxes, tack room and a haystore w In all, approaching 5.78 acres (2.3 ha) Description Old Whitelocks is a fine country residence dating back to the 17th century with later skilful and sympathetic additions combining to create a substantial and elegant family home. Set within delightful landscaped gardens and adjoining paddocks, the house is positioned to take full advantage of the seclusion and privacy and offers a rare opportunity for those seeking a property of immense character and charm. Period character and modern-day living successfully come together to create a most appealing and fascinating family home and the many features include fireplaces, exposed beams and mellow limestone flooring extending throughout the kitchen/breakfast room and conservatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Lane, Warfield Conservation Area Appraisal
    Bracknell Forest Borough Council Church Lane, Warfield Conservation Area Appraisal The Church of St. Michael the Archangel, Warfield August 2006 Jacobs Babtie School Green, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9HL 0118 988 1555 Fax: 0118 988 1666 Jacobs UK Limited School Green Shinfield Reading RG2 9HL Controlled Copy No. Report No: Bracknell Forest Borough Council Church Lane, Warfield Conservation Area Appraisal Approved by Bracknell Forest Borough Council Executive Member for Planning and Transportation ……………………………………… ………………………………………………….. Jacobs Babtie Technical Director Issue History Date Revision Status August 2005 1 Draft November 2005 2 Draft February 2006 3 Draft July 2006 4 Final Draft August 2006 5 Final Copyright Jacobs UK Limited. All Rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs UK Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs UK Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs UK Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs UK Limited for any use of this report, other than the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of the Jacobs UK Limited using due skill, care and diligence in preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs UK Limited has been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawthorn Lodge
    HAWTHORN LODGE WARFIELD • BERKSHIRE HAWTHORN LODGE MOSS END • WARFIELD • BERKSHIRE • RG42 6EL M4 (Junction 8/9) 5 miles, Ascot 6.5 miles, Windsor 8.5 miles, Bracknell Station (serving London Waterloo) 3 miles; Maidenhead Station (serving London Paddington) 6 miles, Heathrow Airport 20 miles, Central London (SW1) 32 miles. (All distances are approximate) A REFINED COUNTRY HOUSE WITH SUPERB POLO/EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES SET IN OVER 12 ACRES OF GARDENS AND PADDOCKS WITH ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION AND OUTBUILDINGS MAIN HOUSE Reception Hall, Drawing room, Dining room, Family room, Conservatory, Kitchen/breakfast room, Master bedroom with balcony and en suite bathroom, 5 further bedrooms (3 en suite), Cloakroom, Boot room, Linked annexe with magnificent vaulted reception/games room, Study, Kitchen, 2 bedrooms (1 with balcony), Shower room, Cloakroom. EQUESTRIAN 10 loose boxes, Tack room, All-weather arena, Paddocks, Corrals, Polo field with land-drains for stick and ball, Horse-walker for 6 horses. OUTBUILDINGS 2 self-contained studio apartments, 4 car bespoke oak framed garage, Wine store (temperature controlled), Log stores, Laundry/gym, Utility room, Store, Machine store, Gardener’s WC. GARDENS AND GROUNDS Gardens, Pond with island, Swimming pool, Tennis court, Orchard, Woodland path, Further gated access points, Driveway with turning circle, Parking area. In excess of 12 acres (4.8 hectares). Freehold. Tucked away in a discrete location overlooking extensive gardens and grounds, Hawthorn Lodge is a truly unique property with outstanding equestrian facilities. DESCRIPTION Hawthorn Lodge is an exceptional country house believed to date back to the 1650s, with 19th Century additions. In recent years it has been the subject of a comprehensive and sympathetic refurbishment to ensure that whilst character is retained, the house has modern and luxurious features.
    [Show full text]
  • Archfield Warfield
    Archfield Warfield lindenhomes.co.uk Maidenhead Windsor WEST END AD RO A3095 L EL KN C FORES A T ROAD R B Bin�eld NEWELL GREEN WARFIELD N E D WAR W FI A ELD E S O E TR N L E R A ET L H L D S A L L P FOREST ROAD RS E E G I AT W R F H E N T I E R B N O N E N A DE L I R BIN ST H A S F VE RVEST IE R RI G L A D I D H E J R O A D W A R F I E L D H A R Bull Brook V E R S T O A R I D D E HARVE B ST RIDE I H N T F U I A3095 O E L S D E R N O A A L D S IG J H A R V E S Ascot AD T O R R RK ID WOK A329 A E INGHA P M RO AD DRIVE L IL H BULLBROOK Y L I L A329 A3095 A329 BRACKNELL Wokingham A329 Ascot Bracknell A329 A322 Bagshot Bagshot Archfield Warfield A wonderful selection of 2 bedroom apartments and 2, 3, 4 and 5 bedroom houses at Archfield, Bracknell. An exciting new development set within the thriving village of Being close to Bracknell and within easy reach of Wokingham and Warfield, Linden Homes’ Archfield is surrounded by beautiful Reading, ensures that extensive shopping, entertainment, sport Berkshire countryside, yet is little over a mile from Bracknell town and leisure facilities are readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • £1,950 Pcm to Let
    Price Innings Lane, Warfield £1,950 pcm To Let This four bedroom detached property has recently undergone many improvements and is located in a very sought after road in Warfield. This property is in close proximity of Warfield and Whitegrove Primary schools, Bracknell town centre and mainline railway station. The ground floor accommodation comprises living room, dining room, modern kitchen/breakfast room, conservatory, utility room and cloakroom. The first floor accommodation offers a large master bedroom with built in storage and re-fited en-suite bathroom, three further bedrooms and a re-fitted family bathroom. This property further benefits from an integral double garage, private rear garden, gas central heating and UPVC double glazing throughout. The property is available on the 7th November on an unfurnished basis. Innings Lane, Warfield This four bedroom detached property has recently undergone many improvements and is located in a very sought after road in Warfield. This property is in close proximity of Warfield and Whitegrove Primary schools, Bracknell town. Bracknell is a town and civil parish in the Borough of Bracknell Forest in Berkshire, England. It Four Bedrooms Refitted Bathroom & En-Suite lies 11 miles (18 km) to the southeast of Reading, 10 miles (16 km) southwest of Windsor and 30 miles (48 km) west of central London. The town has a population of 52,696. The town is surrounded, on the east and south, by the vast expanse of Swinley Woods and Detached Modern Kitchen Crowthorne Woods. Bracknell has two railway stations, Bracknell and Martins Heron, both of which are on the Waterloo to Reading Line, originally built by the London and South Western Integral Double Garage Available 7th November Railway and now operated by South West Trains.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bracknell Forest Ramblers Route
    This broad, straight track is part of a Follow a cinder track for 350 yards (315m) and then turn left off the footpath by some white fencing, where Location map Roman road which once linked London Section 1 you’ll follow an old tarmac road for a further 350 yards. Turn right just after the gas pumping station and follow a with the Roman town of Silchester. Even Ramblers route bridleway, which runs parallel to power lines, in a westerly direction, crossing a stream at one point. Stay on this The Look Out to Wildmoor Heath: though the Romans constructed the road, path for 0.8 miles (1.3 km) until you reach the Crowthorne to Sandhurst road. 4.5 miles (7.2 km) local people who lived here after the Roman Introduction Occupation believed that only the Devil could Numbered text relates to numbered route The Ramblers Route have been responsible for such a feat of sections in the maps. engineering - hence its name. is 26 mile/ 41.8km Section 1 The Look Out Discovery Centre is open daily circular walking trail Continue straight along the Devil’s Highway, and provides many attractions for the family, drop down a slope to a gate and follow the that passes through with over 90 science and nature exhibits. The track beneath the route of the Sandhurst- attractive countryside Look Out is situated on the edge of Swinley Crowthorne bypass. About 175 yards (160m) on the outskirts of Forest which is the largest area of unbroken beyond the bypass, turn left onto a footpath woodland (mostly Scots Pine) in Berkshire at and head south.
    [Show full text]
  • 200911 Harrison
    Unrestricted TO: EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR CULTURE, DELIVERY AND PUBLIC PROTECTION 11 September 2020 Parks and Open Spaces Quality Improvement – Farley Wood Director of Place, Planning and Regeneration 1 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To seek approval for the allocation of S106 funding (£ 50,595) to support improvements to outdoor recreational facilities at Farley Wood in Binfield. 1.2 To confirm which financial contributions secured from developers under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 will be applied to the project. (ANNEX 1). 1.3 If approved, the S106 monies will replace and upgrade flood lighting at this recreation and community site, which is owned and managed by Bracknell Forest Council. 2 RECOMMENDATION(S) 2.1 That £ 50,595 of S106 contributions (as summarised in ANNEX 1) are allocated to fund improvements to outdoor recreational facilities at Farley Wood. 3 REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) 3.1 Developer contributions are collected through S106 agreements to support “providing, expanding or improving open space, and/or outdoor recreational facilities (which may include the acquisition and/or improvement of land and/or buildings and/or carrying out or assisting in the carrying out of nature/landscaping conservation projects) within 3 kilometres of the Site.” 3.2 The justification for requiring developers to supporting the improvement of open space and outdoor recreational facilities is given under point 8. Promoting Healthy Communities, The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which states that: “Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation can make an important contribution to the health and well-being of communities.” 3.3 The borough council has adopted a Parks and Open Spaces Strategy (2012) and the Farley Wood project is in accordance with delivering the following two priorities: 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Responses to Further Consultation on New Sites
    SUMMARY OF RESPONSES (MAIN ISSUES) TO FURTHER CONSULTATION ON NEW SITES – DRAFT BRACKNELL FOREST LOCAL PLAN (PUBLISHED OCTOBER 2018) This document contains a summary of the main issues raised in response to the Further Consultation on New Sites which took place between 3 September and 24 September 2018. Comments are organised in three sections: • Statutory consultees and duty to co-operate bodies • Residents and other local organisations/groups • Developers/promoters of sites Within each comments section, the respondent is identified by either the surname of an individual, or the name of the group/organisation. ‘ID’ reference numbers are also included, which relate to the reference number of the comments generated by our consultation database. Sections of the document can be accessed using the contents pages below. Individuals/groups/organisations can also be searched within the document by using ‘Control’ and ‘F’ keys on a keyboard, which will bring up a search window. Contents Responses to Section: 4.4. Revised Policy LP3 - Sites allocated for residential/mixed use development…………………………………………………………………………………….2 Responses to Section: 4.7/Policy LPX - Land at Hewlett Packard, Cain Road, Binfield.……………..……………………………………………………………………………….12 Comments of evidence base: Appendix C: Housing Background Papers Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………….……...16 Comments of evidence base: LP/Ev/1c: Addendum to the Draft Sustainability Appraisal…………………………………………………………………………………………....18 Other comments……………………………………………………………………………..........20 1 Responses to Section: 4.4. Revised Policy LP3 – Sites allocated for residential/mixed use development Responses to Section: 4.4. Revised Policy LP3 – Sites allocated for residential/mixed use development RESPONDENT COMMENTS RECEIVED (NAME/ORGANISATION & (SUMMARY OF MAIN ISSUES RAISED) OBJECTIVE REFERENCE ID) STATUTORY CONSULTEE/DUTY TO CO-OPERATE BODY Sport (England ID004) Land previously used for sport should be either retained or replaced as per paragraph 97 of the NPPF.
    [Show full text]