DOCSLIB.ORG

Land at Blue Mountain Representations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land at Blue Mountain Representations From: Development Control To: Subject: FW: Objection to Blue Mountain Golf Course development Date: 04 November 2013 09:35:01 From: Sent: 03 November 2013 18:30 To: Development Control Cc: Subject: Objection to Blue Mountain Golf Course development Hi, I was shocked and distressed to hear as a landlord in Pitch Place, Binfield directly outside of the golf course you have decided to attempt to rebuild the area with new property,schools and a football pitch. Particularly dismayed that the council has acted in stealth and chosen not to inform the intention to directly affected properties in the area and you have done this without consultation which will effect the legal title I hold. As you can imagine i would not be willing for you to change the title i hold and will do everything to fight these plans. The reasons for my objects are as follows: 1. I puchased my property knowing i had views of the golf course and purchased the property at premium and validating this with my solicitors that a covenant was in place to protect it. You are now planning this to the detriment of my investment and enjoyment. 2. There is a precedence for upholding 1) based on attempts by neighbour(s) to hide the views of the golf course which shows the councils general agreement that 1) would be to of detriment to me i.e. investment and enjoyment. 3. The covenant to protect the property is in place and i do not agree with it being changed or removed 4. Section 52 already exists which protects blue mountain and as stated it CANNOT be used for anything other than its current purpose or open recreational space 5. A Football pitch and development will increase traffic into roads and side rides that are already pushed and did not account for this increase in population.Side roads are barely able to cope with the existing populations traffic. 6. The Council signed an agreement on my behalf and there is no reason to change it 7. You do not have the right to spend taxpayers money to break a LEGAL agreement Bottom line is you are attempting to build on an area that will effect my families and others similarly quality of life, depreciated assets, deteriment to hard earned investment which has always been transparently underpined in law as being a plot of land reserved for open enjoyment or recreation. I am expecting the council to address these point urgently and be transparent and forthcoming on its intentions. Regards From: Development Control To: Subject: FW: Objection to the removal of Section 52 agreement. Date: 04 November 2013 09:36:24 From: Sent: 03 November 2013 19:03 To: Development Control Cc: Subject: FW: Objection to the removal of Section 52 agreement. Dear Sir, I write to object to the removal of Section 52 agreement made between Bracknell Forest Council and Luff Developments Ltd in 1990 to keep the land at Blue Mountain as a golf course or open space for 125 years. This agreement was a condition of the planning permission for Temple Park. I believe the Council is now determined to remove this agreement because they have allocated the site for a housing development, 2 schools and Bracknell Town Football stadium. This is most regrettable and indicates that the Council is not as trustworthy as the people of Bracknell had believed and deserve. It is such a pity that we cannot depend on our Council to keep their word and the good faith of the people. I object in the strongest possible terms to this proposed development. I was never consulted on the proposed change and was not aware of same until recently. I believe the infrastructure for such a development does not exist. The roads would be dangerous and congested in an area which already is experiencing these problems. I certainly do not support taxpayer's money being used to break a legal agreement that was designed to protect this area. Building on the golf course will have an adverse affect on my enjoyment of the open space, sports and recreational/community facilities, views, tranquility and the current green gap between Binfield and Bracknell. Yours faithfully, From: Development Control To: Subject: FW: Objection to removal of Section 52 agreement on Blue Mountain Golf Course, Binfield Date: 04 November 2013 14:06:25 From: Sent: 04 November 2013 13:12 To: Development Control Cc: Subject: Objection to removal of Section 52 agreement on Blue Mountain Golf Course, Binfield FAO: Head of Development Management, BFC, Environment, Culture and Communities Department My husband and I are objecting to the proposed removal of the Section 52 legal agreement protecting Blue Mountain Golf Course. We have been residents of Temple Park since it was built and have not been contacted or consulted about this proposed change which affects the title deeds of our property. One of the main reasons for purchasing our property was the inclusion of green open space for use by residents and the community facilities - both the park at Jocks Lane and the Golf Course, We were assured that as the Golf course had the legal agreement on it, it would not be built on but would always be preserved as green communal space. It also provides a much needed break in the development of the parish of Binfield between Bracknell and the Binfield village centre. Our property was sold to us with the covenant in place and we strongly object to it's removal or amendment. Our understanding is that the Section 52 agreement protects the Blue Mountain area from development and if it's use was to change from a golf course, it could only be to an open or other recreational space for the next 102 years (remaining duration of this legal agreement). The Borough and County Councils signed this agreement on behalf of the property owners at the time and as an owner, we see no reason why this should change now. We also strongly object to the fact that our taxpayer's money would be used to break the Section 52 agreement. It is not right that the same owner who agreed to and signed the agreement to protect the land now wishes to break this agreement in order to build more houses, for his own personal financial gain, and that the council would also supported this original agreement is going back on their own policy statements for their financial gain. Any possible building on the golf course would adversely affect our enjoyment and use of the open space, sports and recreational/community facilities, views and tranquillity of this area - an area we chose to move to because of these features. Subsequent additional traffic from the proposed development would be unsustainable on the Binfield Village environs and make this a much less attractive place to live, affecting our and our family's quality of life. The golf course area already supports a thriving business, provides employment to many people and a leisure and business facility renown far and wide as excellent, There are other much less productively used spaces, not covered by legal agreements, in the borough which should developed instead of Blue Mountain. This proposal rides rough-shod over individuals personal rights and wishes and should not legally be allowed. In summary, we object to the proposed removal of the Section 52 agreement covering Blue Mountain Golf Course. From: Development Control To: Subject: FW: OBJECTION TO PLANS FOR BLUE MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE Date: 04 November 2013 14:07:14 From: Sent: 04 November 2013 13:46 To: Development Control Cc: Subject: OBJECTION TO PLANS FOR BLUE MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE Dear Sir, I am writing to strongly object to the proposed plans to develop the land at Blue Mountain Golf Course, Binfield. It was agreed under Section 52 that the land cannot be used for any other purpose than a golf course, open space or recreational space for 125 years from 1990. The Borough Council and County Council (at the time) and owner signed-up to this and I can see no reason why it should change. Furthermore, I do not support the use of taxpayers’ money to break this agreement. When we bought our house the land was still farmed and this open space was a prime reason for choosing to live in Binfield. Much enjoyment is derived from the golf course by residents and others from further a field. It greatly adds to the culture, ambiance and standing of the village. I do not want it to become a suburb of Bracknell. Yours faithfully, From: Development Control To: Subject: FW: Objection to Request to Modify legal agreement Section 52 for Blue Mountain Golf Course Date: 05 November 2013 09:13:06 From: Sent: 04 November 2013 18:22 To: Development Control Subject: Objection to Request to Modify legal agreement Section 52 for Blue Mountain Golf Course I wish to notify you that I strongly object to any modification of the legally- binding Section 52 Agreement, which prohibits the removal of the golf course for 125 years, and also prohibits using the land for any other purpose. Like many fellow residents of Temple Park, I moved to this estate in the 1990s, while it was still under construction, because of its small size and attractive adjoining golf course. Fortunately, Bryant Homes provided ample documentary confirmation (along with a ream of other planning-related documentation) that the adjoining golf course land was legally-protected for 125 years and could only be used as a golf course. I regularly use the golf course's facilities and have done so since I moved to Temple Park.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cycling in Bracknell Forest
    D W D L 9 O U A H K O L 0 T Q Y I 3 Q U Primary K YB E B H THW A U U OL OA O D I S D N S D N E N A A A E O E M M O GH S L L NG D C I I O R A E R T T L A R A A N L D OO E M V I R S O O N O M W I O S R A R E SO T O S R O N H INGM M I E A W A CO D Honeyhill UTH RUM L TT A A S D S I TR D S A T T I T N N H I R F Birch Hill G I U N G OAD L E INE MILE RIDE L I Q E D N Y K B3430 B3430 H O N H EY E A H E AY T I D L E RI H L L NE MI W L NI A ND B3430 S R O A Pine Wood D LE RIDE FORESTERS NINE MI Transport Research B3430 Laboratory Caesar’s Camp A3095 E (fort) LE RID NINE MI Clay St Sebastian's B3430 Hill Hut Hill C Of E (Aided) RO Y Primary A L L O U P A I N Quieter roads and tracks K E E R D D I I R R D R linking cycleways E N HO I L P SANDHURST AND CROWTHORNE Q M U NINE MILE RIDE U L Traffic-free cycle route / Subway N B E 0 E U E B343 W NS R RID Y E CYCLE TRAINING LEISURE CYCLING W S A R V E E Blue Route traffic-free / Subway O KO IF TH E C ’ N Bigshotte I N Hatch Ride On-road Bikeability cycle training is offered to children who are The maps contained within this leaflet show the network of G Park HAT H CH Primary R Red Route traffic-free / Subway A IDE RACKNELL ROAD M B TH E R Quieter roads and tracks over 10 years old dedicated and shared-use cycle paths throughout the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Bracknell Forest Rights of Way Improvement Plan
    Bracknell Forest Rights of Way Improvement Plan Consultation and Network Analysis – Initial Results 1. Network Evaluation Bridleways 10.22 km Byways (open to vehicles) 5.67 km Footpaths 52.55 km RUPPs (open to vehicles) 2.74 km Byways & RUPPS (not open to 5.43 km vehicles) TOTAL 76.62 km Bracknell Forest public rights of way by type 69% 4% 7% 7% 13% Bridleway Byway Footpath RUPP Byway or RUPP with TRO Bracknell Forest public rights of way by parish 19% 18% 15% 17% 15% 16% BINFIELD BRACKNELL CROWTHORNE SANDHURST WARFIELD WINKFIELD Binfield 14.04km Bracknell 11.37km Crowthorne 11.95km Sandhurst 11.41km Warfield 13.25km Winkfield 14.6km TOTAL 76.62km Density of public rights of way in Bracknell Forest 1.20 1.00 2 0.80 0.60 km/km 0.40 0.20 0.00 Binfield Bracknell Crowthorne Sandhurst Warfield Winkfield Total Parish Town Parish Town Parish Parish 1.08 0.68 0.92 0.80 1.00 0.37 0.70 Public rights of way by type and parish 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 Length (km) Length 4.00 2.00 0.00 Bridleway Byway Byway (with TRO) Footpath RUPP RUPP (with TRO) BINFIELD 4.66 0.19 0.00 6.98 2.10 0.10 BRACKNELL 0.00 0.00 0.22 10.87 0.00 0.28 CROWTHORNE 2.17 0.11 0.00 7.74 0.00 1.93 SANDHURST 1.27 0.92 0.00 9.22 0.00 0.00 WARFIELD 1.52 4.01 2.11 5.61 0.00 0.00 WINKFIELD 0.61 0.45 0.00 12.12 0.64 0.79 Public rights of way by type and parish 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 Length (km) Length 4.00 2.00 0.00 BINFIELD BRACKNELL CROWTHORNE SANDHURST WARFIELD WINKFIELD Bridleway 4.66 0.00 2.17 1.27 1.52 0.61 Byway 0.19 0.00 0.11 0.92 4.01 0.45 Byway (with TRO) 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 2.11 0.00 Footpath 6.98 10.87 7.74 9.22 5.61 12.12 RUPP 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 RUPP (with TRO) 0.10 0.28 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.79 • Analysis of network (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Bracknell Forest
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 Bracknell Forest_Sheet 1 :Map 1: iteration 1_F THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF BRACKNELL FOREST Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Bracknell Forest December 2020 Sheet 1 of 1 Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2020. KEY TO PARISH WARDS BINFIELD CP A BINFIELD NORTH B BINFIELD SOUTH BRACKNELL CP C BIRCH HILL & NORTH LAKE D BULLBROOK E CROWN WOOD F EASTHAMPSTEAD G GARTH H GARTH NORTH I GREAT HOLLANDS NORTH J GREAT HOLLANDS SOUTH K HANWORTH L HARMANS WATER M JENNETT'S PARK N PRIESTWOOD O TOWN CENTRE & THE PARKS P WILDRIDINGS SANDHURST CP Q CENTRAL SANDHURST A W R COLLEGE TOWN S LITTLE SANDHURST V T OWLSMOOR BINFIELD AD NORTH & WARFIELD CP WARFIELD CP WARFIELD WEST WINKFIELD & WARFIELD U QUELM EAST V ST MICHAEL'S W WARFIELD EAST X WARFIELD PARK Y WHITEGROVE BINFIELD CP WINKFIELD CP Z ASCOT PRIORY AA FOREST PARK AB MARTIN'S HERON & WARREN AC NORTH ASCOT PARISH AD WINKFIELD & CRANBOURNE H U Y X WHITEGROVE G PRIESTWOOD & GARTH N B D AC BINFIELD BULLBROOK SOUTH & JENNETT'S PARK TOWN CENTRE & THE PARKS O WINKFIELD P CP AB EASTHAMPSTEAD L M & WILDRIDINGS HARMANS WATER BRACKNELL F & CROWN WOOD CP I AA E Z GREAT HANWORTH C HOLLANDS K J SWINLEY FOREST CROWTHORNE CP CROWTHORNE T S SANDHURST CP OWLSMOOR & SANDHURST COLLEGE TOWN Q R 00.25 0.5 1 KEY Kilometres BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY 1 cm = 0.176 km PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY CROWTHORNE PROPOSED WARD NAMES SANDHURST CP PARISH NAME.
    [Show full text]
  • Country House with Leisure Complex and Paddocks Old Whitelocks, Garsons Lane, Warfield, Berkshire
    COUNTRY HOUSE WITH LEISURE COMPLEX AND PADDOCKS old whitelocks, garsons lane, warfield, berkshire Freehold SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY WITH A DETACHED COTTAGE, LEISURE COMPLEX AND PADDOCKS old whitelocks, garsons lane, warfield, berkshire Freehold Main House: Reception hall w drawing room w dining room w family room w study w conservatory w kitchen/breakfast room w utility room w 2 cloakrooms w master bedroom with en suite bathroom w 4/5 bedrooms (2 en suite) w family bathroom w dressing room Cottage: Reception hall w sitting room w kitchen/dining room w 2 bedrooms w shower room Leisure Complex: 64’ heated swimming pool w Jacuzzi pool w sauna w changing rooms with shower facilities w gymnasium w leisure room w wine cellar w plant room Outside: Triple garage, workshop and WC with generous office space above w landscaped gardens w ‘all-weather’ tennis court w 2 paddocks w stable block comprising 3 loose boxes, tack room and a haystore w In all, approaching 5.78 acres (2.3 ha) Description Old Whitelocks is a fine country residence dating back to the 17th century with later skilful and sympathetic additions combining to create a substantial and elegant family home. Set within delightful landscaped gardens and adjoining paddocks, the house is positioned to take full advantage of the seclusion and privacy and offers a rare opportunity for those seeking a property of immense character and charm. Period character and modern-day living successfully come together to create a most appealing and fascinating family home and the many features include fireplaces, exposed beams and mellow limestone flooring extending throughout the kitchen/breakfast room and conservatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Lane, Warfield Conservation Area Appraisal
    Bracknell Forest Borough Council Church Lane, Warfield Conservation Area Appraisal The Church of St. Michael the Archangel, Warfield August 2006 Jacobs Babtie School Green, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9HL 0118 988 1555 Fax: 0118 988 1666 Jacobs UK Limited School Green Shinfield Reading RG2 9HL Controlled Copy No. Report No: Bracknell Forest Borough Council Church Lane, Warfield Conservation Area Appraisal Approved by Bracknell Forest Borough Council Executive Member for Planning and Transportation ……………………………………… ………………………………………………….. Jacobs Babtie Technical Director Issue History Date Revision Status August 2005 1 Draft November 2005 2 Draft February 2006 3 Draft July 2006 4 Final Draft August 2006 5 Final Copyright Jacobs UK Limited. All Rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs UK Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs UK Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs UK Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs UK Limited for any use of this report, other than the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of the Jacobs UK Limited using due skill, care and diligence in preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs UK Limited has been made.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cottages Brochure
    THE COTTAGES at POPESWOOD MANOR Binfield THE COTTAGES ........................... at ............................ POPESWOOD MANOR Popeswood Road, Binfield, Berkshire, RG42 4GR Ideally located amidst beautiful Berkshire countryside, Popeswood Manor provides an exceptional opportunity to enjoy country living with Berkshire’s finest towns on your doorstep. This splendid manor house has been sympathetically restored and converted into five grand apartments and a three storey townhouse. The existing manor is complemented by a collection of three new build cottages and four apartments. These new homes have been carefully designed to blend seamlessly into the manor’s grounds & all benefit from an exemplary specification that offers every contemporary luxury associated with a new home. THE COTTAGES ........................... at ............................. POPESWOOD MANOR Page 2 Woodview Cottage, Hunters Cottage & Bramley Cottage Three delightful 3 bedroom family cottages, boasting large gardens backing onto open fields with views across to the Southern Chiltern Hills. THE COTTAGES THE COTTAGES ........................... at ............................. ........................... at ............................. POPESWOOD MANOR POPESWOOD MANOR Page 3 Page 4 N THE COTTAGES ........................... at ............................ POPESWOOD MANOR SITE PLAN THE COTTAGES APARTMENTS POPESWOOD MANOR APARTMENTS POPESWOOD ROAD “ALL NATURE IS BUT ART UNKNOWN TO THEE” - Alexander Pope THE COTTAGES THE COTTAGES ........................... at ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hawthorn Lodge
    HAWTHORN LODGE WARFIELD • BERKSHIRE HAWTHORN LODGE MOSS END • WARFIELD • BERKSHIRE • RG42 6EL M4 (Junction 8/9) 5 miles, Ascot 6.5 miles, Windsor 8.5 miles, Bracknell Station (serving London Waterloo) 3 miles; Maidenhead Station (serving London Paddington) 6 miles, Heathrow Airport 20 miles, Central London (SW1) 32 miles. (All distances are approximate) A REFINED COUNTRY HOUSE WITH SUPERB POLO/EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES SET IN OVER 12 ACRES OF GARDENS AND PADDOCKS WITH ANCILLARY ACCOMMODATION AND OUTBUILDINGS MAIN HOUSE Reception Hall, Drawing room, Dining room, Family room, Conservatory, Kitchen/breakfast room, Master bedroom with balcony and en suite bathroom, 5 further bedrooms (3 en suite), Cloakroom, Boot room, Linked annexe with magnificent vaulted reception/games room, Study, Kitchen, 2 bedrooms (1 with balcony), Shower room, Cloakroom. EQUESTRIAN 10 loose boxes, Tack room, All-weather arena, Paddocks, Corrals, Polo field with land-drains for stick and ball, Horse-walker for 6 horses. OUTBUILDINGS 2 self-contained studio apartments, 4 car bespoke oak framed garage, Wine store (temperature controlled), Log stores, Laundry/gym, Utility room, Store, Machine store, Gardener’s WC. GARDENS AND GROUNDS Gardens, Pond with island, Swimming pool, Tennis court, Orchard, Woodland path, Further gated access points, Driveway with turning circle, Parking area. In excess of 12 acres (4.8 hectares). Freehold. Tucked away in a discrete location overlooking extensive gardens and grounds, Hawthorn Lodge is a truly unique property with outstanding equestrian facilities. DESCRIPTION Hawthorn Lodge is an exceptional country house believed to date back to the 1650s, with 19th Century additions. In recent years it has been the subject of a comprehensive and sympathetic refurbishment to ensure that whilst character is retained, the house has modern and luxurious features.
    [Show full text]
  • Archfield Warfield
    Archfield Warfield lindenhomes.co.uk Maidenhead Windsor WEST END AD RO A3095 L EL KN C FORES A T ROAD R B Bin�eld NEWELL GREEN WARFIELD N E D WAR W FI A ELD E S O E TR N L E R A ET L H L D S A L L P FOREST ROAD RS E E G I AT W R F H E N T I E R B N O N E N A DE L I R BIN ST H A S F VE RVEST IE R RI G L A D I D H E J R O A D W A R F I E L D H A R Bull Brook V E R S T O A R I D D E HARVE B ST RIDE I H N T F U I A3095 O E L S D E R N O A A L D S IG J H A R V E S Ascot AD T O R R RK ID WOK A329 A E INGHA P M RO AD DRIVE L IL H BULLBROOK Y L I L A329 A3095 A329 BRACKNELL Wokingham A329 Ascot Bracknell A329 A322 Bagshot Bagshot Archfield Warfield A wonderful selection of 2 bedroom apartments and 2, 3, 4 and 5 bedroom houses at Archfield, Bracknell. An exciting new development set within the thriving village of Being close to Bracknell and within easy reach of Wokingham and Warfield, Linden Homes’ Archfield is surrounded by beautiful Reading, ensures that extensive shopping, entertainment, sport Berkshire countryside, yet is little over a mile from Bracknell town and leisure facilities are readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • £1,950 Pcm to Let
    Price Innings Lane, Warfield £1,950 pcm To Let This four bedroom detached property has recently undergone many improvements and is located in a very sought after road in Warfield. This property is in close proximity of Warfield and Whitegrove Primary schools, Bracknell town centre and mainline railway station. The ground floor accommodation comprises living room, dining room, modern kitchen/breakfast room, conservatory, utility room and cloakroom. The first floor accommodation offers a large master bedroom with built in storage and re-fited en-suite bathroom, three further bedrooms and a re-fitted family bathroom. This property further benefits from an integral double garage, private rear garden, gas central heating and UPVC double glazing throughout. The property is available on the 7th November on an unfurnished basis. Innings Lane, Warfield This four bedroom detached property has recently undergone many improvements and is located in a very sought after road in Warfield. This property is in close proximity of Warfield and Whitegrove Primary schools, Bracknell town. Bracknell is a town and civil parish in the Borough of Bracknell Forest in Berkshire, England. It Four Bedrooms Refitted Bathroom & En-Suite lies 11 miles (18 km) to the southeast of Reading, 10 miles (16 km) southwest of Windsor and 30 miles (48 km) west of central London. The town has a population of 52,696. The town is surrounded, on the east and south, by the vast expanse of Swinley Woods and Detached Modern Kitchen Crowthorne Woods. Bracknell has two railway stations, Bracknell and Martins Heron, both of which are on the Waterloo to Reading Line, originally built by the London and South Western Integral Double Garage Available 7th November Railway and now operated by South West Trains.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • 200911 Harrison
    Unrestricted TO: EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR CULTURE, DELIVERY AND PUBLIC PROTECTION 11 September 2020 Parks and Open Spaces Quality Improvement – Farley Wood Director of Place, Planning and Regeneration 1 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To seek approval for the allocation of S106 funding (£ 50,595) to support improvements to outdoor recreational facilities at Farley Wood in Binfield. 1.2 To confirm which financial contributions secured from developers under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 will be applied to the project. (ANNEX 1). 1.3 If approved, the S106 monies will replace and upgrade flood lighting at this recreation and community site, which is owned and managed by Bracknell Forest Council. 2 RECOMMENDATION(S) 2.1 That £ 50,595 of S106 contributions (as summarised in ANNEX 1) are allocated to fund improvements to outdoor recreational facilities at Farley Wood. 3 REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) 3.1 Developer contributions are collected through S106 agreements to support “providing, expanding or improving open space, and/or outdoor recreational facilities (which may include the acquisition and/or improvement of land and/or buildings and/or carrying out or assisting in the carrying out of nature/landscaping conservation projects) within 3 kilometres of the Site.” 3.2 The justification for requiring developers to supporting the improvement of open space and outdoor recreational facilities is given under point 8. Promoting Healthy Communities, The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which states that: “Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation can make an important contribution to the health and well-being of communities.” 3.3 The borough council has adopted a Parks and Open Spaces Strategy (2012) and the Farley Wood project is in accordance with delivering the following two priorities: 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Ecological Survey (2Nd Addendum) Ref: R1989/A
    LP/Ev/8c Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) Sites Bracknell Forest Berkshire Phase 1 Ecological Survey (2nd Addendum) Ref: R1989/a August 2018 1 Diesel House, Honey Hill, Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 3BL Telephone: 0118 3271810 Mobile: 07979 403099 E-mail: [email protected] www.wenman-ecology.co.uk John Wenman Ecological Consultancy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC339057. Registered office: 100 New Wokingham Road, Crowthorne, Berkshire RG45 6JP where you may look at a list of members’ names. 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 APPENDIX 1 – BINFIELD PARISH .......................................................................................... 4 APPENDIX 2 – WARFIELD PARISH ...................................................................................... 56 John Wenman Ecological Consultancy Bracknell Forest Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment - Phase 1 Ecological Survey (2nd Addendum) - 2 - 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 This report is an addendum to the Bracknell Forest Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment – Phase 1 Ecological Survey (Ref: R1562/a September 2017 and CLP/Ev/8a). For ‘how to use this report’, the planning context and the survey methodology, please refer to Sections 1-3 in the main report. This report sets out the findings of Phase 1 ecological surveys for a further five SHELAA sites (BIN16, BIN17, BIN18, BIN19 and WAR25). 1.1.2 The information can be used to guide development to the most suitable sites, and within sites, to the most suitable parts of the site but these surveys were carried out during late summer in dry conditions only; the actual survey date for each site is recorded in Figure 1. Surveys are subject to seasonal and access constraints and represent a snapshot of the sites at the time of the survey, because the ecology of a site will change over time and as a result in changes in land management.
    [Show full text]