Living Lakes a Global Network of Partnerships for the Future U Guidelines and Case Studies for Improving Lake Management Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Living Lakes a Global Network of Partnerships for the Future U Guidelines and Case Studies for Improving Lake Management Contents LIVING LAKES A GLOBAL NETWORK OF PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE FUTURE U GUIDELINES AND CASE STUDIES FOR IMPROVING LAKE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCING LIVING LAKES 2 GETTING STARTED 4 CASE STUDY: LAKE CONSTANCE 6 LIST OF MEMBERS (see map on page 5) CASE STUDY: LAGUNA DE BAY 8 CASE STUDY: LAKE ST LUCIA 9 Columbia River Wetlands Canada Nestos Lakes Greece CASE STUDY: LA NAVA 10 Mono Lake USA Wetlands of Larache Morocco CASE STUDY: COLUMBIA RIVER 12 Lake Chapala Mexico Lake Victoria Africa WETLANDS Laguna Fuquene Colombia Lake St Lucia South Africa Pantanal Brazil Lake Uluabat Turkey WHAT THIS TOOLKIT Mar Chiquita Argentina The Dead Sea Jordan IS ABOUT The Norfolk and Suffolk Broads England Lake Tengiz Kazakhstan La Nava Spain Lake Baikal Russia Living Lakes is a network of environmental partnership organisations striving for the protection of lakes Lake Constance Germany, Switzerland Lake Poyang-hu China worldwide. The Living Lakes partnership promotes and Austria voluntary international collaboration among organisations Lake Biwa Japan that carry out projects benefiting lakes, people, and Võrtsjärv-Peipsi lake system wildlife. This brochure explains how these partnerships Estonia and Russia Laguna de Bay The Philippines work in practice and Unilever’s role as global sponsor, and suggests ways for businesses, NGOs and others to work Milicz Ponds Poland. Mahakam Lakes Indonesia together to promote lake and wetland quality. MESSAGE FROM THE MESSAGE FROM THE UNILEVER CHAIRMEN GLOBAL NATURE FUND understanding and responding to For Unilever, the world wide operating the demands of specific water ‘Global Partner’ of Living Lakes, it is of catchment areas is the basis for this course a daily matter to deal with Living Lakes toolkit. international exchange and co-operation. Through Unilever’s financial support Making partnerships work is not and managerial input we have been always easy, particularly in regions able to further develop the suffering high water stress, where Living Lakes network. there are often historically entrenched positions, difficult And Living Lakes is growing. According environmental challenges, and to our long-term strategy, by 2005 the many competing demands for a network will comprise about 40 partner scarce resource. The partner lakes lakes and 50 associated members. It is Antony Burgmans Niall FitzGerald and wetlands of the Living Lakes Networking – an almost magic word important to work across a wide range network differ widely in character these days. We are all part of one of partners. What is still more important, Water is a shared resource and its care requires yet have many management issues in common. network or another. We benefit from however, is the quality of the us all to act responsibly. Unilever is playing its part In five selected case studies we illustrate the networks through making contacts, co-operation. Networks are run by – and wants to do more – to help ensure that in practical partnership approach to the exchanging information and learning organisations with people behind them. the future there is enough clean water to meet all improvement of lake conditions, and show how from others, including perhaps people Living Lakes is a ‘personal’ network based our everyday needs. As part of our approach to Unilever has engaged in different ways in support from quite different backgrounds. on confidence and reliability among the the sustainable use of water, Unilever is the of local projects. We hope this toolkit will partners – this applies to lake partners Global Sponsor of Living Lakes, a network of encourage more lakes and wetlands to adopt When the Global Nature Fund created and business partners alike. Mutual environmental partnerships which has now the Living Lakes approach, and promote new the Living Lakes network in 1998, we respect, reliance, and professionalism are grown to represent internationally important and useful partnerships between businesses, were well aware that the co-ordination of attributes of Living Lakes – for a common lakes and wetlands on five continents. Unilever’s NGOs and local authorities in the conservation such an international network would be vision and future. Water Initiative is one of our three sustainability of water resources. more difficult than one might expect. initiatives, the other two being Agriculture An effective exchange of information and and Fisheries. experience requires well-functioning structures and available resources – Working with a wide range of partners, otherwise the expected results and Unilever and an international panel of water synergies do not come off. The network experts developed SWIM, a practical has been growing continuously during management tool to help focus effectively the past five years, and we have learned on sustainable local water management a great deal – thanks to our well-versed projects of all sizes. The structured SWIM partner organisations of the lake regions (Sustainable Water and Integrated Antony Burgmans Niall FitzGerald throughout the world, and thanks to the Marion Hammerl catchment Management) approach to Chairmen of Unilever support of Unilever. President, The Global Nature Fund 1 INTRODUCING LIVING LAKES Living Lakes is a global network of environmental partnership organisations striving for the protection of lakes worldwide. Conservationists at 23 member lakes on five continents are committed to the protection of the lakes in their respective countries. Together with decision makers and businesses, including Unilever as Living Lakes’ Global Partner, this network strives for the preservation of water quality, the habitats of rare animals, migratory birds and plants, and to encourage lake-sensitive economic development by the lake communities. The Living Lakes partnership was established in together – NGOs, local authorities, other 1998 by the Global Nature Fund, an businesses and networks who may have much international foundation for environment and to offer as partners with a shared aim. Unilever’s WHY LAKES ARE IMPORTANT nature based in Germany. Its aim is the management skills can help to drive the protection of fresh water and the sustainable necessary actions required to achieve the best Lakes and wetlands are development of lakes and wetlands of solutions to improve lake conditions. Its among the world’s most international importance. There were four association with individual lake initiatives has important yet threatened founder member lakes: Lake Constance time and again proved useful to its partners in ecosystems. They are a (Bodensee) which is bordered by Austria, leveraging wider business support or gathering precious part of our Germany and Switzerland; Mono Lake in the community support in engaging with lake cultural and natural United States; Lake Biwa in Japan; and South community projects of all sizes and complexities. heritage, providing a rich Africa’s Lake St Lucia. The network was resource for many sponsored by Unilever from the beginning, and Several of these partnership initiatives are human interests and in 1998 Unilever became Living Lakes Global described in this brochure in an attempt to activities, as well as Partner. A number of other companies also indicate the variety of issues involved. being habitats that support Living Lakes as a worldwide network or Sometimes projects are initiated by business, support a vast diversity more locally through individual member lake others by NGOs. There is no one-fits-all of animal and plant life. partnership initiatives. solution, because every lake is different, but Lakes and wetlands there are often issues in common. The store rainfall, subsequently releasing water gradually into the G23 The Indonesian As the Global Partner, Unilever not only experiences of the widely differing Living Lakes ecosystem. They improve the water quality by storing nutrients Mahakam Lakes contributes crucial funding to the global projects suggest possible approaches to setting and toxic substances in their plants and sediments. They are a (above) are the home organisation of Living Lakes but also supports up successful business-NGO relationships with a of the very rare source of renewable resources, such as reeds for construction, partnership projects with individual lakes and common interest in the preservation of lakes Irrawaddy dolphin fish for human consumption and pasture for grazing livestock. wetlands through its local companies. and freshwater. (see map opposite). They are also important for leisure activities. Above all, they are an essential source of freshwater for communities both on the But more than funding, Unilever contributes its lakeside and beyond. management expertise in bringing people 2 G8 Years ago, the Spanish steppe lake La Nava was drained. Thanks to Living Lakes Spanish partners, it is a living lake again. WARREN MARR WARREN G1 Mono Lake (above) G2 Chapala, the largest G7 The British Norfolk G9 Five million people G10 Monks in the G11 Intensive farming is located in the lake of Mexico is under and Suffolk Broads from three countries, Middle Ages created taking water for California Sierra Nevada severe threat of drying (above) are Britain's Germany, Switzerland, the bird paradise of the agriculture is a major and threatened by up within the next only wetland with Austria, take their water Milicz Ponds (above) problem for the Greek excessive diversion of few years if water status equivalent to from Lake Constance. in Poland. Nestos Lakes (above). water from its tributaries consumption is not a national park. G19 Lake Baikal to Los Angeles. drastically reduced. (above), the ‘pearl of Siberia’, is the deepest G3 The wilderness of lake in the world and the Columbia River the home of the rare Wetlands in Canada is G3 Baikal seal. home to several large mammal species such as G1 the grizzly bear. 18 G19 7 G15 G G2 G 10 G20 G4 Laguna Fuquene G9 G G17 is a shallow water lake G8 11 16 situated in the G G 4 14 G21 Colombian Andes at an G G altitude of 2,500 metres. G22 G20 Lake Biwa in Japan (above) suffers from G6 G5 Mar Chiquita in G23 damage associated Argentina is breeding G5 G13 with high resident and ground for up to 50,000 visitor populations.
Recommended publications
  • Living Lakes Goals 2019 - 2024 Achievements 2012 - 2018
    Living Lakes Goals 2019 - 2024 Achievements 2012 - 2018 We save the lakes of the world! 1 Living Lakes Goals 2019-2024 | Achievements 2012-2018 Global Nature Fund (GNF) International Foundation for Environment and Nature Fritz-Reichle-Ring 4 78315 Radolfzell, Germany Phone : +49 (0)7732 99 95-0 Editor in charge : Udo Gattenlöhner Fax : +49 (0)7732 99 95-88 Coordination : David Marchetti, Daniel Natzschka, Bettina Schmidt E-Mail : [email protected] Text : Living Lakes members, Thomas Schaefer Visit us : www.globalnature.org Graphic Design : Didem Senturk Photographs : GNF-Archive, Living Lakes members; Jose Carlo Quintos, SCPW (Page 56) Cover photo : Udo Gattenlöhner, Lake Tota-Colombia 2 Living Lakes Goals 2019-2024 | Achievements 2012-2018 AMERICAS AFRICA Living Lakes Canada; Canada ........................................12 Lake Nokoué, Benin .................................................... 38 Columbia River Wetlands; Canada .................................13 Lake Ossa, Cameroon ..................................................39 Lake Chapala; Mexico ..................................................14 Lake Victoria; Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda ........................40 Ignacio Allende Reservoir, Mexico ................................15 Bujagali Falls; Uganda .................................................41 Lake Zapotlán, Mexico .................................................16 I. Lake Kivu; Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda 42 Laguna de Fúquene; Colombia .....................................17 II. Lake Kivu; Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • HUL Announces Key Appointments 26­07­2013
    HUL announces key appointments 26­07­2013 26­07­2013 : Mr Nitin Paranjpe, currently the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of HUL will be joining the Unilever Leadership Executive (ULE), taking on the role of President, Home Care. Mr. Sanjiv Mehta, currently Chairman, North Africa & Middle East (NAME), Unilever, has been appointed as the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in place of Mr. Nitin Paranjpe with effect from October 1, 2013. The appointment has been approved by the Board of Directors of HUL and will be subject to approval of the company’s shareholders. He will also be responsible for South Asia cluster which includes India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Mr Harish Manwani, Chairman, HUL, said, “The changes reflect our strong commitment towards leadership development and our tradition of leveraging experiences and synergies of talent across markets. I wish to take the opportunity to express my deep appreciation for the significant contribution that Nitin made to the business in India and his leadership in driving the growth agenda. I would like to congratulate him on his richly deserved elevation to the ULE.” “I am pleased to welcome Sanjiv to his new role. Sanjiv brings with him rich experience of successfully leading businesses across developing and emerging markets. I am confident that he will further build on the growth momentum and drive the company’s agenda of competitive, consistent, profitable and responsible growth.” About Hindustan Unilever Limited Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) is India's largest Fast Moving Consumer Goods company touching the lives of two out of three Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever Annual Accounts 1999
    Unilever Annual Accounts 1999 This booklet and the separate booklet ‘Unilever Annual Review 1999’ together comprise the full Annual Report and Accounts for 1999 of Unilever N.V. (NV) and Unilever PLC (PLC) when expressed in guilders and pounds sterling respectively. Contents Annual Accounts Additional Financial Information General information 2 Principal group companies Five year record 51 Statements of directors’ responsibilities 4 and fixed investments 41 Additional information for Corporate governance 5 NV company accounts and further United States investors 54 Report of the auditors 6 statutory information 44 Publications 56 Accounting policies 7 PLC company accounts, further statutory Web site 56 information and other information 47 Unilever Group consolidated accounts 9 – Consolidated profit and loss account and Statement of total recognised gains and losses 9 – Consolidated balance sheet 10 – Consolidated cash flow statement 11 – Notes to the consolidated accounts 12 Directors’ remuneration and interests 32 Contact details Rotterdam New York Unilever N.V. Unilever United States, Inc. Corporate Relations Department Corporate Relations Department Weena 455, PO Box 760 390 Park Avenue, New York 3000 DK Rotterdam NY 10022-4698 Telephone +31 (0)10 217 4848 Telephone +1 212 906 4240 Telefax +31 (0)10 217 4587 Telefax +1 212 906 4666 e-mail corporate.relations-rotterdam e-mail corporate.relations-newyork @unilever.com @unilever.com London Unilever Web site: Unilever PLC www.unilever.com Corporate Relations Department PO Box 68, Unilever House Blackfriars, London EC4P 4BQ Telephone +44 (0)20 7822 5794 Telefax +44 (0)20 7822 6907 e-mail corporate.relations-london @unilever.com 2 Unilever Annual Accounts 1999 General information Unilever The two parent companies, NV and PLC, operate as nearly Each of NV and PLC has always paid its own dividends and, as is practicable as a single entity (the Unilever Group, also therefore, neither company has ever been called upon to referred to as Unilever or the Group).
    [Show full text]
  • The Watershed Observer
    Winter 2011-12 THE WATERSHED OBSERVER Inside this issue: Sensitive Habitat Inventory and President’s Report 2 Science Advisory Council 4 Mapping Project (SHIM) LLN and LLNC 4 Upcoming CEC Hearings 5 Award to ACC Student 6 If you have a lakefront cottage on concerned about the sustainabil- 2011 Bajkov Nominations Call 6 Lake Winnipeg, the view of the lake ity of Lake Winnipeg and are 7 from your front deck can be spectac- asking what can be done to keep Project Updates 2011 Fundraising 8 & 9 ular, exhilarating, and restorative. it a memorable recreational des- 10 Or it can be fright- tination. 2012 Photo Contest ening when high . .the LWF applied for and ‘Securing Our Water Future’ 12 To help water and wind Hope—A poem 13 received funds from the Lake Lake Win- combine in de- Our Legacy 14 Winnipeg Basin Stewardship Fund, nipeg, our structive events or the Thomas Sill Foundation, and Foundation adopted two posi- when thick scums Fisheries and Oceans Canada for tions: 1 - control of phospho- of noxious algae its project . rus and 2 - protection of wet- advance up the lands. The LWF will soon es- beach towards your tablish positions on climate warming and biodiversity, both of which are also rel- evant to the Lake Winnipeg ecosystem. To act on these positions, the LWF applied for and received funds from the Lake Winnipeg Basin Stew- ardship Fund, the Thomas Sill Foundation, and Fish- eries and Oceans Canada for its project “Sensitive Habitat Inventory and Mapping of the Foreshore Are- as of Lake Winnipeg South Basin and Development SHIM team on the water near Ponemah of Shoreline Management Guidelines”.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Events by Stream
    World Conservation Forum List of accepted Aliances Workshops by Thematic Stream Stream A new climate for change Code Title Organizer Type 98 Supporting Nations in Natural Capital Accounting with the Global Footprint Network Combined workshop Ecological Footprint 185 Agentes locales y espacios naturales: un nuevo marco Área de Espacios Aliances workshop para la conservación y la calidad de vida Naturales,Diputación de Barcelona 194 Hemispheric Networks Facilitate Multi-Country Partnerships Organziation of American States Aliances workshop 259 Climate Friendly National Parks in the United States - U.S. National Park Service Combined workshop Fostering Climate Change Interpretation and Citizen Engagement. 285 Climate Change as an Opportunity for Conservationists to California Institute of Public Affairs Aliances workshop Build New Alliances 335 Livelihood Centred Adaptation to Climate Change and Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Aliances workshop Ecosystem Management: Sharing Early Experiences Studies 350 Climat, développement et développement durable Organisation Internationale de la Aliances workshop Francophonie 351 Climate Change Adaptation at Community Level: The Christensen Fund Aliances workshop Implications for Conservation of Biocultural Diversity. 382 Areas Protegidas e Hidrocarburos: son conciliables? Asociacion Peruana para la Aliances workshop Conservacion de la Natu 399 Mediators of change: the relevance of protected areas for University of Greifswald Aliances workshop adaptation to climate change 400 CeroCO2 Iniciativa para el cuidado del clima. Acció Natura Aliances workshop Oportunidades del mercado voluntario de reducción y compensación de emisiones para la conservación y restauración de la biodiversidad. 437 Integrated Climate-Biodiversity-Livelihoods Strategies The Gaia Foundation Aliances workshop 503 Leveraging the power of communications, advertising and World Business Council for Aliances workshop marketing Sustainable Development 548 Biofuels: a win- win- win solution for Climate Change? .
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT: THE NEXT CHAPTER FOR MAP FY 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents From the Executive Director _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Marvellous Mangroves Curriculum _____________________________________________________________________ 3 Community-Based Ecological Mangrove Restoration _________________________________________________ 5 International Advocacy and Outreach ________________________________________________________________ 10 Children’s Mangrove Art Calendar ____________________________________________________________________ 12 2015 Funder Acknowledgement ______________________________________________________________________ 13 Financial Summary _____________________________________________________________________________________ 14 MAP Staff and Board of Directors _____________________________________________________________________ 15 FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR From the Executive Director 2015 was another significant year for both MAP and the mangroves. MAP’s workload greatly expanded and some added new staff helped ease the otherwise unwieldy burden of work overload. Sara Lavenhar took on the position of Outreach and Development Coordinator, while also managing MAP’s new office in Seattle. She was formerly working on MAP’s Question Your Shrimp campaign as an intern, but moved into the important niche of helping build MAP’s organizational capacity via her part-time position. In Thailand, the MAP Asia office hired Pimaaksara (Pick) to take on the newly created position of
    [Show full text]
  • 1972 Annual Report and Account
    UNILEVER Report and accounts UNILEVER N.V. Directors G. D. A. Klijnstra, chairman G. E. Graham E. G. Woodroofe, vice-chairman C. T. C. Heyning A. W. J. Caron, vice-chairman H. F. van den Hoven A. I. Anderson J. J. H. Nagel M. R. Angus M. Ormerod W. B. Blaisse D.A. Orr E. Brough E. Smit J. G. Collingwood A. W. P. Stenham R. H. Del Mar S. G. Sweetman J. P. Erbe The Viscount Trenchard J. M. Goudswaard K. H. Veldhuis Advisory directors H. S. A. Hartog R. Mueller J. H. van Roijen H. J. Witteveen Secretaries C. Zwagerman H. A. Holmes Auditors Price Waterhouse & Co. Cooper Brothers & Co. A special survey of part of Unilever’s Food and Drinks activities is issued as a supplement to this Report. Unilever Unilever comprises Unilever N.V., and manufacturers of timber the combined affairs of N.V. and Rotterdam (N.V.) and Unilever products, in diverse industrial Limited are more important to Limited, London (Limited) and ventures, and in the operation of shareholders than the separate their respective subsidiary an ocean fleet. Unilever also has affairs of either company. companies which operate in more interests in plantations. than seventy countries and are The Report and Accounts as usual mainly engaged in the manufacture N.V. and Limited have identical combine the results and operations and sale of a wide variety of goods Boards of Directors and are linked of N.V. and Limited. for household use. The principal by agreements, including an products are foods (including Equalisation Agreement which This is a translation of the original margarine, other fats and oils; requires dividends and other rights Dutch report.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL UNION for CONSERVATION of NATURE EUROPEAN REGION ANNUAL REPORT 2018 International Union for Conservation of Nature
    years INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE EUROPEAN REGION ANNUAL REPORT 2018 International Union for Conservation of Nature Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) © Flickr CONTENTS 2 Foreword 4 Overview of IUCN 6 Strategic orientation 8 IUCN European Programme and main achievements 8 Valuing and conserving nature 12 Advancing effective and equitable governance of the use of nature in Europe 15 Deploying nature-based solutions to address societal challenges 18 IUCN Europe on the global stage 21 Events and meetings 23 IUCN Europe’s National Committee and Focal Point activities 26 IUCN Commissions’ activities in Europe 29 IUCN Europe’s Members 34 Regional financial summary 2018 35 IUCN European Regional Office team 36 A thank you to our donors FOREWORD 2018 was a special year for IUCN, in which it celebrated its 70th anniversary. Events in Sweden, The Netherlands, Finland, France, Belgium, Spain and others showcased the strong movement for nature that IUCN represents in Europe. As always, the IUCN European Regional Office (IUCN Luc Bas Director Europe) continued to work with its Members and IUCN European partners to help Europe achieve its commitments Regional Office © IUCN and raise its ambition. Although all reports on the state of the environment, climate The total number of species assessed in the IUCN European and nature show that we need to act with more urgency Red List has now grown to over 11,500 species, with and at a larger scale, we saw some steps towards a approximately a quarter of these species being considered more sustainable future. The European Commission has threatened in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 1971 Annual Report and Account
    Unilever NV Report and Accounts 1976 The Unilever group of companies provides a wide range of products and services in some 75 countries, employing over 300 000 people. It has existed for nearly 50 years as a group, but can trace its roots much further back than that. There are two parent companies: Unilever N.V., Rotterdam, and Unilever Limited, London. Equal partners, they have identical Boards of Directors and are linked by agreements, one of which equalises the dividends payable on the ordinary capital of N.V. and of Limited, according to a formula set out elsewhere in this Report. Unilever operates as one group. The combined affairs of N.V. and Limited are, therefore, more important to shareholders than those of the two separate companies and the Report and Accounts deals, as usual, with the operations and results of Unilever as a whole: except where stated otherwise, all the figures are for N.V. and Limited combined. The larger part of Unilever is in branded and packaged consumer goods: mainly foods, detergents and toilet preparations. The foods include margarine, other fats and oils, ice cream, frozen and other convenience products, meat, fish, tea and other drinks. Unilever has other important activities, such as chemicals, paper, plastics and packaging, animal feeds, transport and tropical plantations. UAC International, a major Unilever company, has substantial interests in Africa and other parts of the world in diverse industrial ventures, and as merchants and specialist distributors. Unilever is one of the dozen largest businesses in the world by turnover- and the largest in consumer goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report
    PEREZ-GUERRERO TRUST FUND FOR ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION AMONG DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, MEMBERS OF THE GROUP OF 77GOVERNMENT OF CHINA FINAL REPORT COMMUNITY-BASED SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOOD DEVELOPMENT FOR LAKE PROTECTION Office of Mountain-River-Lake Regional Development Committee of Jiangxi Province (MRLDO) JUNE, 2012 -1- Contents 1. Project information: .................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Activities and outputs ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Activity - I: A training course on alternative livelihood development held in Nanchang city and Poyang Lake Region .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 General aspects .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Participants .......................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.3 The course ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.4 Course Evaluation .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Structures for Transboundary Water Management in the Jordan Basin Content
    Governance structures for transboundary water management in the Jordan Basin Content Executive summary 4 About the authors 5 Abbreviations and acronyms 6 1. Introduction: Context and aim 7 2. Purpose 9 3. Approach 10 4. Types of basin governance structures 11 5. Types of basin instruments 12 6. Defining the mandate 14 7. Regional governance dispute resolution mechanisms 16 8. Sustainable financing mechanism 18 9. Legal framework – Proposed generic articles of a future Jordan River Basin Commission 20 Intellectual Property Rights 10. Case studies 27 ©All Rights Reserved. The contents of this report are the absolute property of the Stockholm International Water Institute and EcoPeace Middle East. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any 11. Identifying, assessing and communicating the benefits of regional governance 35 form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, for commercial use without prior permission 12. Conclusions and recommended next steps 37 from both the Stockholm International Water Institute and EcoPeace Middle East. The text can be used for educational and research purposes with full accreditation to the Stockholm International Water Institute. References and additional resources 38 This study has been commissioned by EcoPeace Middle East as part of its Jordan River Rehabilitation Project supported by the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida). The contents of this paper do not necessarily reflect the positions of EcoPeace Middle East, Sida or the individual authors and contributors. ISBN: 978-91-88495-01-3 How to cite: Yaari, E., Neal (Patrick), M.J., Shubber, Z. 2015. Governance structures for transboundary water management in the Jordan Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure to Disclose Their Biodiversity Impacts And
    BIODIVERSITY MEASURES FOR BUSINESS Corporate biodiversity measurement, reporting and disclosure within the current and future global policy context A review paper with recommendations for policy makers produced as part of the Aligning Biodiversity Measures for Business collaboration 07/12/2020 Disclaimer This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement to the source is made. Reuse of any figures is subject to permission from the original rights holders. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose without permission in writing from the UN Environment Programme. Applications for permission, with a statement of purpose and extent of reproduction, should be sent to the Director, UNEP-WCMC, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the UN Environment Programme, contributory organisations or editors. The designations employed and the presentations of material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UN Environment Programme or contributory organisations, editors or publishers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries or the designation of its name, frontiers or boundaries. The mention of a commercial entity or product in this publication does not imply endorsement by the UN Environment Programme. Suggested citation: UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre 2020. Biodiversity Measures for Business: Corporate biodiversity measurement and disclosure within the current and future global policy context.
    [Show full text]