DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1707.08675V3 [Astro-Ph.EP] 18 Aug 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1707.08675V3 [Astro-Ph.EP] 18 Aug 2017 Draft version July 2, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 PROSPECTS OF DYNAMICAL DETERMINATION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY PARAMETER β AND SOLAR QUADRUPOLE MOMENT J2 WITH ASTEROID RADAR ASTRONOMY Ashok K. Verma,1 Jean-Luc Margot,1, 2 and Adam H. Greenberg2 1Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT We evaluated the prospects of quantifying the parameterized post-Newtonian parameter β and solar quadrupole −1 moment J2 with observations of near-Earth asteroids with large orbital precession rates (9 to 27 arcsec century ). We considered existing optical and radar astrometry, as well as radar astrometry that can realistically be obtained with the Arecibo planetary radar in the next five years. Our sensitivity calculations relied on a traditional covariance analysis and Monte Carlo simulations. We found that independent estimates of β and J2 can be obtained with precisions of 6 × 10−4 and 3 × 10−8, respectively. Because we assumed rather conservative observational uncertainties, as is the usual practice when reporting radar astrometry, it is likely that the actual precision will be closer to 2 × 10−4 and 10−8, respectively. A purely dynamical determination of solar oblateness with asteroid radar astronomy may therefore rival the helioseismology determination. Keywords: astrometry | gravitation | minor planets, asteroids: general | relativistic processes | Sun: fundamental parameters | techniques: radar astronomy arXiv:1707.08675v3 [astro-ph.EP] 18 Aug 2017 Corresponding author: Ashok Kumar Verma [email protected] 2 Verma et al. 2017 1. INTRODUCTION (2:2±0:1)×10−7 (Will 2014). Dynamical estimates that The parameterized post-Newtonian (PPN) formal- do not rely on fits to helioseismology data yield similar −7 ism is a useful framework for testing metric theories values of J2 = 2:3 ± 0:25 × 10 (Fienga et al. 2015) −7 of gravity (Will 2014). It consists of 10 dimension- and J2 = 2:25 ± 0:09 × 10 (Park et al. 2017). High- less parameters that describe the general properties of precision dynamical estimates are important to validate the metric. In general relativity (GR), only 2 of the our understanding of the interior structure of the Sun. 10 parameters are non-zero. They are known as the Our simulations of the determination of β and J2 Eddington−Robertson−Schiff parameters γ and β. γ using a variety of asteroid orbits suggest that indepen- represents the amount of curvature produced by a unit dent values of β and J2 can be obtained with satisfac- mass, and β represents the amount of nonlinearity in tory precision: with the traditionally conservative as- the superposition law for gravity. signment of radar uncertainties, β can be constrained at −4 Several techniques have been used to place obser- the 6 × 10 level and J2 can be constrained at the −8 vational bounds on these parameters (Will 2014), in- 3 × 10 level. With uncertainties that more closely cluding observations of the bending and delay of light reflect measurement errors, this precision may be im- by spacecraft tracking (Bertotti et al. 2003, e.g.,) or proved by a factor of ∼3. (Section4). Very Long Baseline Interferometry (e.g., Lambert & The outline of this paper is as follows. In Section2, Le Poncin-Lafitte 2009), and fitting of ephemerides to we describe our choice of target asteroids. In Section3, observations of planetary positions (e.g., Folkner 2009; we discuss the estimation of asteroid orbits with opti- Fienga et al. 2011; Verma et al. 2014; Fienga et al. 2015). cal and radar measurements. Our dynamical model and In GR, γ and β are equal to one. Doppler track- data reduction procedures are described in Section 3.1 ing of the Cassini spacecraft has shown that γ does and 3.2, respectively. Orbit determination results are not differ from one by more than 2 × 10−5 (Bertotti presented in Section 3.3. Simulations of the determina- et al. 2003). Ephemeris-based studies prior to 2009 indi- tion of β and J2 are described in Section4. cated that β − 1 does not differ from zero by more than 2. TARGET ASTEROIDS 10−4 (Folkner 2009; Pitjeva & Pitjev 2014). More re- cently, the availability of precise ranging data from the The per-orbit secular advance in the angular position MESSENGER Mercury orbiter (Solomon et al. 2001) of the perihelion is given by (Misner et al. 1973) enabled improved estimates (Verma et al. 2014; Fienga 6πGM (2 − β + 2γ) 6π (1 − 3=2 sin2 i) δ! = + R2 J ; et al. 2015; Park et al. 2017). Here, we evaluate the a(1 − e2)c2 3 2 a2(1 − e2)2 2 prospect of asteroid orbit precession measurements to (1) place more stringent bounds on β. We consider Earth- where ! is the argument of perihelion, GM is the Sun's based radar observations of near-Earth asteroids with gravitational parameter, R is the radius of the Sun, c −1 perihelion shifts larger than 10 arcsec century . is the speed of light, and a, e, and i are the semi-major Orbital precession can also be caused by the nonuni- axis, eccentricity, and orbital inclination (with respect formity of the gravity field that results from the oblate to the solar equator) of a planetary body, respectively. shape of the Sun. The solar oblateness is character- Because both GR and solar oblateness affect perihelion ized by the solar quadrupole moment, J2 (e.g., Kaula precession, estimates of β and J2 are highly correlated 2000). Simultaneous estimation of β and J2 requires and it is desirable to track a variety of solar system that the precessional effects due to GR and to the Sun's bodies with a range of a, e, i values to disentangle the oblateness be disentangled. Fortunately, GR is a purely two effects. central effect, whereas the oblateness-induced precession Our selection of target asteroids follows the method of has an inclination dependence. The two effects also have Margot(2003). We select asteroids with both large per- a different distance dependence (Misner et al. 1973). As ihelion shift values and favorable observing conditions a result, observations of a small sample of near-Earth with radar (Table1 and Figure1). This sample of as- asteroids with a variety of semi-major axes and inclina- teroid orbits includes a wide range of semi-major axes, tions (Table1) can in principle be used to estimate β eccentricities, and inclinations, which are advantageous and J2 (Margot 2003; Margot & Giorgini 2009). when simultaneously solving for β and J2 . The pre- Current estimates of the solar quadrupole moment dicted rates of perihelion advance, δ!_ , shown in Figure are typically derived on the basis of interior models 1 and Table1 were computed assuming γ = β = 1 and of the Sun constrained by helioseismology data (e.g., −7 J2 = 2:2 × 10 . Mecheri et al. 2004; Antia et al. 2008). The current best value from the helioseismology literature is J2 = 3. METHODS Prospects of determination of GR parameter β with asteroid radar astronomy 3 Table 1. Selected asteroids and orbital elements: Semima- the value of the semi-major axis, but Yarkovsky drift jor Axis (a), Eccentricity (e), and Inclination with Respect does. This nongravitational effect has been shown to to the Ecliptic (iec) and Sun's equator (ieq). affect the semi-major axes of small bodies due to the 00 −1 anisotropic re-emission of absorbed sunlight (e.g., Bot- Target a (au) e iec (deg) ieq (deg) δ!_ ( cy ) tke et al. 2006). The change in semi-major axis with 1566 Icarus 1.078 0.827 22.9 15.8 10.1 time due to Yarkovsky orbital drift, hda=dti, was esti- 1998 TU3 0.787 0.484 5.41 3.41 9.11 mated for all target asteroids with the method of Green- 1999 KW4 0.642 0.688 38.9 46.0 22.1 berg et al.(2017). The values ranged in amplitude be- 1999 MN 0.674 0.665 2.02 5.25 18.5 tween 4 and 50 au/My, which is plausible for kilometer- 2000 BD19 0.876 0.895 25.7 28.0 26.9 sized bodies. Only one target (1566 Icarus) is common 2000 EE14 0.662 0.533 26.5 26.1 15.0 between our target list and the 42 Yarkovsky detections 2001 YE4 0.677 0.541 4.82 11.0 14.4 of Nugent et al.(2012), and only one target (1999 MN) 2004 KH17 0.712 0.499 22.1 14.9 12.0 is common between our target list and the 21 Yarkovsky 2006 CJ 0.676 0.755 10.3 16.1 23.7 detections of Farnocchia et al.(2013). In both cases, our Yarkovsky drift estimates are consistent with and better constrained than prior work. Note. The predicted rate of perihelion advance in arcsec To initialize the integration process, we used a priori century−1 (00 cy−1), δ!_ , was computed using Equation (1). state vectors extracted from the Minor Planet Center (MPC) database (Minor Planet Center 2017). We first determined nominal trajectories for asteroids 3.2. Existing optical and radar astrometry in our sample with astrometric (i.e., positional) data, both optical and radar (Table2). The process involved We used both optical and radar astrometry to de- three steps: (1) numerical integration of each asteroid's termine the nominal trajectory of each asteroid. Op- orbit and calculation of partial derivatives of the equa- tical measurements provide positional information on tions of motion with respect to the solve-for parameters the plane of the sky. They are typically expressed as (i.e., the six components of the state vectors), (2) eval- right ascension (R.A.) and declination (decl.) in the uation of simulated optical and radar observables and equatorial frame of epoch J2000.0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observation of Near-Earth Object (1566) Icarus and the Split Candidate 2007 MK6
    PPS07-P07 JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017 Observation of near-earth object (1566) Icarus and the split candidate 2007 MK6 *Seitaro Urakawa1, Katsutoshi Ohtsuka2, Shinsuke Abe3, Daisuke Kinoshita4, Hidekazu Hanayama 5, Takeshi Miyaji5, Shin-ichiro Okumura1, Kazuya Ayani6, Syouta Maeno6, Daisuke Kuroda5, Akihiko Fukui5, Norio Narita5,7,8, George HASHIMOTO9, Yuri SAKURAI9, Sayuri Nakamura9, Jun Takahashi10, Tomoyasu Tanigawa11, Otabek Burhonov12, Kamoliddin Ergashev12, Takashi Ito5, Fumi Yoshida5, Makoto Watanabe13, Masataka Imai14, Kiyoshi Kuramoto14, Tomohiko Sekiguchi15 , MASATERU ISHIGURO16 1. Japan Spaceguard Association, 2. Tokyo Meteor Network, 3. Nihon University, 4. National Central University, 5. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 6. Bisei Observatory, 7. Astrobiology Center, 8. University of Tokyo, 9. Okayama University, 10. University of Hyogo, 11. Sanda Shounkan Highschool, 12. Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute Uzbekistan Academy of Science , 13. Okayama University of Science, 14. Hokkaido University, 15. Hokkaido University of Education, 16. Seoul National University Background & Aim: A numerical simulation proposes that the origin of near-Earth object 2007 MK6 (hereafter, MK6) is a near-Earth object (1566) Icarus (hereafter, Icarus) [1]. In addition to it, the orbital parameters of the daytime Taurid-Perseid meteor swarm are in good agreement with those of Icarus. Thus, it is considered that MK6 is split from the parent object Icarus by a rotational fission and/or an impact event, and the produced dust became to the daytime Taurid-Perseid meteor swarm. To confirm such a hypothesis, we need to obtain the observational evidence that the color indices of Icarus and MK6 are same. Moreover, if MK6 split by the rotational fission due to the YORP effect, the rotation period of Icarus would be shorten compared with the past rotation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid 1566 Icarus's Size, Shape, Orbit, and Yarkovsky Drift from Radar
    Draft version January 16, 2017 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 ASTEROID 1566 ICARUS'S SIZE, SHAPE, ORBIT, AND YARKOVSKY DRIFT FROM RADAR OBSERVATIONS Adam H. Greenberg University of California, Los Angeles, CA Jean-Luc Margot University of California, Los Angeles, CA Ashok K. Verma University of California, Los Angeles, CA Patrick A. Taylor Arecibo Observatory, HC3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612, USA Shantanu P. Naidu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Marina. Brozovic Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Lance A. M. Benner Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Draft version January 16, 2017 ABSTRACT Near-Earth asteroid (NEA) 1566 Icarus (a = 1:08 au, e = 0:83, i = 22:8◦) made a close approach to Earth in June 2015 at 22 lunar distances (LD). Its detection during the 1968 approach (16 LD) was the first in the history of asteroid radar astronomy. A subsequent approach in 1996 (40 LD) did not yield radar images. We describe analyses of our 2015 radar observations of Icarus obtained at the Arecibo Observatory and the DSS-14 antenna at Goldstone. These data show that the asteroid is a moderately flattened spheroid with an equivalent diameter of 1.44 km with 18% uncertainties, resolving long-standing questions about the asteroid size. We also solve for Icarus' spin axis orientation (λ = 270◦ ± 10◦; β = −81◦ ± 10◦), which is not consistent with the estimates based on the 1968 lightcurve observations. Icarus has a strongly specular scattering behavior, among the highest ever measured in asteroid radar observations, and a radar albedo of ∼2%, among the lowest ever measured in asteroid radar observations.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 X 11 Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85349-1 - Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets Peter Jenniskens Index More information Index a – semimajor axis 58 twin shower 440 A – albedo 111, 586 fragmentation index 444 A1 – radial nongravitational force 15 meteoroid density 444 A2 – transverse, in plane, nongravitational force 15 potential parent bodies 448–453 A3 – transverse, out of plane, nongravitational a-Centaurids 347–348 force 15 1980 outburst 348 A2 – effect 239 a-Circinids (1977) 198 ablation 595 predictions 617 ablation coefficient 595 a-Lyncids (1971) 198 carbonaceous chondrite 521 predictions 617 cometary matter 521 a-Monocerotids 183 ordinary chondrite 521 1925 outburst 183 absolute magnitude 592 1935 outburst 183 accretion 86 1985 outburst 183 hierarchical 86 1995 peak rate 188 activity comets, decrease with distance from Sun 1995 activity profile 188 Halley-type comets 100 activity 186 Jupiter-family comets 100 w 186 activity curve meteor shower 236, 567 dust trail width 188 air density at meteor layer 43 lack of sodium 190 airborne astronomy 161 meteoroid density 190 1899 Leonids 161 orbital period 188 1933 Leonids 162 predictions 617 1946 Draconids 165 upper mass cut-off 188 1972 Draconids 167 a-Pyxidids (1979) 199 1976 Quadrantids 167 predictions 617 1998 Leonids 221–227 a-Scorpiids 511 1999 Leonids 233–236 a-Virginids 503 2000 Leonids 240 particle density 503 2001 Leonids 244 amorphous water ice 22 2002 Leonids 248 Andromedids 153–155, 380–384 airglow 45 1872 storm 380–384 albedo (A) 16, 586 1885 storm 380–384 comet 16 1899
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting the Yarkovsky Effect Among Near-Earth Asteroids From
    Detecting the Yarkovsky effect among near-Earth asteroids from astrometric data Alessio Del Vignaa,b, Laura Faggiolid, Andrea Milania, Federica Spotoc, Davide Farnocchiae, Benoit Carryf aDipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adi Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 5, Pisa, Italy bSpace Dynamics Services s.r.l., via Mario Giuntini, Navacchio di Cascina, Pisa, Italy cIMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universits, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Lille, 77 av. Denfert-Rochereau F-75014 Paris, France dESA SSA-NEO Coordination Centre, Largo Galileo Galilei, 1, 00044 Frascati (RM), Italy eJet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, 91109 CA, USA fUniversit´eCˆote d’Azur, Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Boulevard de l’Observatoire, Nice, France Abstract We present an updated set of near-Earth asteroids with a Yarkovsky-related semi- major axis drift detected from the orbital fit to the astrometry. We find 87 reliable detections after filtering for the signal-to-noise ratio of the Yarkovsky drift esti- mate and making sure the estimate is compatible with the physical properties of the analyzed object. Furthermore, we find a list of 24 marginally significant detec- tions, for which future astrometry could result in a Yarkovsky detection. A further outcome of the filtering procedure is a list of detections that we consider spurious because unrealistic or not explicable with the Yarkovsky effect. Among the smallest asteroids of our sample, we determined four detections of solar radiation pressure, in addition to the Yarkovsky effect. As the data volume increases in the near fu- ture, our goal is to develop methods to generate very long lists of asteroids with reliably detected Yarkovsky effect, with limited amounts of case by case specific adjustments.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid 1566 Icarus's Size, Shape, Orbit, and Yarkovsky Drift From
    The Astronomical Journal, 153:108 (16pp), 2017 March https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/108 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Asteroid 1566 Icarus’sSize, Shape, Orbit, and Yarkovsky Drift from Radar Observations Adam H. Greenberg1, Jean-Luc Margot1, Ashok K. Verma1, Patrick A. Taylor2, Shantanu P. Naidu3, Marina. Brozovic3, and Lance A. M. Benner3 1 University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 Arecibo Observatory, HC3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612, USA 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Received 2016 December 12; revised 2017 January 11; accepted 2017 January 11; published 2017 February 15 Abstract Near-Earth asteroid (NEA) 1566 Icarus (a = 1.08 au, e=0.83, i = 22.8 ) made a close approach to Earth in 2015 June at 22 lunar distances (LD). Its detection during the 1968 approach (16 LD) was the first in the history of asteroid radar astronomy. A subsequent approach in 1996 (40 LD) did not yield radar images. We describe analyses of our 2015 radar observations of Icarus obtained at the Arecibo Observatory and the DSS-14 antenna at Goldstone. These data show that the asteroid is a moderately flattened spheroid with an equivalent diameter of 1.44 km with 18% uncertainties, resolving long-standing questions about the asteroid size. We also solve for Icarus’s spin-axis orientation (l ==-270 10 ,b 81 10), which is not consistent with the estimates based on the 1968 light-curve observations. Icarus has a strongly specular scattering behavior, among the highest ever measured in asteroid radar observations, and a radar albedo of ∼2%, among the lowest ever measured in asteroid radar observations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin, Alan W
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 42, NUMBER 2, A.D. 2015 APRIL-JUNE 89. ASTEROID LIGHTCURVE ANALYSIS AT THE OAKLEY SOUTHERN SKY OBSERVATORY: 2014 SEPTEMBER Lucas Bohn, Brianna Hibbler, Gregory Stein, Richard Ditteon Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, CM 171 5500 Wabash Avenue, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA [email protected] (Received: 24 November) Photometric data were collected over the course of seven nights in 2014 September for eight asteroids: 1334 Lundmarka, 1904 Massevitch, 2571 Geisei, 2699 Kalinin, 3197 Weissman, 7837 Mutsumi, 14927 Satoshi, and (29769) 1999 CE28. Eight asteroids were remotely observed from the Oakley Southern Sky Observatory in New South Wales, Australia. The observations were made on 2014 September 12-14, 16-19 using a 0.50-m f/8.3 Ritchey-Chretien optical tube assembly on a Paramount ME mount and SBIG STX-16803 CCD camera, binned 3x3, with a luminance filter. Exposure times ranged from 90 to 180 sec depending on the magnitude of the target. The resulting image scale was 1.34 arcseconds per pixel. Raw images were processed in MaxIm DL 6 using twilight flats, bias, and dark frames. MPO Canopus was used to measure the processed images and produce lightcurves. In order to maximize the potential for data collection, target asteroids were selected based upon their position in the sky approximately one hour after sunset. Only asteroids with no previously published results were targeted. Lightcurves were produced for 1334 Lundmarka, 1904 Massevitch, 2571 Geisei, 3197 Weissman, and (29769) 1999 CE28.
    [Show full text]
  • Yrfthesis.Pdf
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF COMETARY NUCLEI Yanga Rolando Fernandez Do ctor of Philosophy Dissertation directed by Professor Michael F AHearn Department of Astronomy I present results on the physical and thermal prop erties of six cometary nuclei This is a signicant increase in the numb er of nuclei for which physical information is available I have used imaging of the thermal continuum at midinfrared and radio wavelengths and of the scattered solar continuum at optical wavelengths to study the eective radius reectivity rotation state and temp erature of these ob jects Traditionally the nucleus has b een dicult to observe owing to an obscuring coma or extreme faintness I have taken advantage of new midinfrared array detectors to observe more comets than were p ossible b efore I have also codevelop ed a technique to separate the coma and nucleus from a comet image I develop ed a simple mo del of the thermal b ehavior of a cometary nucleus to help interpret the thermal ux measurements the mo del is an extension to the Standard Thermal Mo del for aster oids We have enough nuclei now to see the rst demarcations of the cometary region on an alb edodiameter plot I make a comparison of the cometary nuclei with outer Solar System small b o dies and nearEarth asteroids All of the cometary nuclei studied in this thesis are dark with geometric alb edos b elow and have eective diameters of around to km except for comet HaleBopp C O which is in the next order of magnitude higher I give an extensive discussion of the nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Master Astronomer Program
    MASTER ASTRONOMER PROGRAM 2019 Program Handbook by Zach Schierl and Leesa Ricci Cedar Breaks National Monument National Park Service i Table of Contents Section 1: About the Master Astronomer Program Section 2: Astronomy & the Night Sky 2.1 Light 2.2 Celestial Motions 2.3 History of Astronomy 2.4 Telescopes & Observatories 2.5 The Cosmic Cast of Characters 2.6 Our Solar System 2.7 Stars 2.8 Constellations 2.9 Extrasolar Planets Section 3: Protecting the Night Sky 3.1 Introduction to Light Pollution 3.2 Why Protect the Night Sky? 3.3 Measuring and Monitoring Light at Night 3.4 Dark-Sky Friendly Lighting Section 4: Sharing the Night Sky 4.1 Using a Telescope 4.2 Communicating Astronomy & the Importance of Dark Skies to the Public Appendices: A. Glossary of Terms B. General Astronomy Resources C. Acknowledgements D. Endnotes & Works Cited 1 SECTION 1: ABOUT THE MASTER ASTRONOMER PROGRAM 3 Section 1: About the Master Astronomer Program WELCOME TO THE MASTER ASTRONOMER PROGRAM All of us at Cedar Breaks National Monument are glad that you are excited to learn more about astronomy, the night sky, and dark sky stewardship. In addition to learning about these topics, we also hope to empower you to share your newfound knowledge with your friends, family, and neighbors, so that all residents of Southern Utah can enjoy our beautiful dark night skies. The Master Astronomer Program is an interactive, hands-on, 40-hour workshop developed by Cedar Breaks National Monument that weaves together themes of astronomy, telescopes, dark sky stewardship, and science communication.
    [Show full text]
  • A Absorptivity, 642, 682 Abundance(S), 339, 388, 389, 408
    Index A momentum, 354, 383–385, 443–445, 475, Absorptivity, 642, 682 479, 510, 589, 607, 681, 701, 778 Abundance(s), 339, 388, 389, 408, 410, 484, resolution, 686 485, 491, 509, 541, 560, 561, 616, velocity/velocities, 349, 350, 354, 570, 605 619, 621, 648, 654, 658–661, 665, Apollonius of Myndus, 598 667, 668, 670, 673, 676, 780 Aquinas, T., 598 Acetonitrile (CH3CN), 561, 619 Archaeomagnetic data, 423 Acetylene (C2H2), 559, 560, 562 Ariel (satellite, Uranus I), 523, 527, 532, Adams, J.C., 492, 493, 582 533, 564 Adams-Williamson equation, 494 albedo, 564 Adiabatic Aristotle, 598, 599 convection, 344, 345 Artemis, 648 lapse rate, 348, 368, 369, 375, 385 Asteroid(s) (general) pressure-density relation, 344 albedo(s), 683, 686–688, 696, 700 processes, 345 densities, 639, 689–690 Adoration of Magi, 610, 612 dimension(s), 686–690 Adrastea (satellite, Jupiter XV), 524, 529, 572 double, 689 Airy, G.B., 492 inner solar system plot, 678, 681, 690 Albedo masses, 686–690 bolometric, 338, 477, 636, 642, 687, 780 nomenclature, 648–649, 677–681 bond, 477, 516, 627, 747, 772, 780 orbital properties geometric (visual), 477, 564, 581 families, 681–685 Alfve´n waves, 460 Kirkwood gaps, 582, 678, 695, 697 Aluminum isotopes, 694 outer solar system plot, 588–590, 603 Alvarez, L., 668 radii, 688 Amalthea (satellite, Jupiter V), 355, 529, rotations, 688, 700 537, 572 thermal emissions, 697 Ambipolar diffusion, 402, 703 Asteroid mill, 639, 676, 769 American Meteor Society, 637, 638 Asteroids (individual) Amidogen radical (NH2), (2101) Adonis, 683 Ammonia (NH3), 348, 391, 480, 481, 483, (1221) Amor, 681, 690 485, 512, 558, 560, 619, 625, (3554) Amun, 683 627, 756 (1943) Anteros, 681 Ammonium hydrosulfide (NH4SH), 481, 483 (2061) Anza, 681 Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, 598 (1862) Apollo, 683, 684, 698 Angular (197) Ariete, 689 diameter(s), 493, 686 (2062) Aten, 683 E.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Index to Volumes 1-45
    The Minor Planet Bulletin Cumulative Index 1 Table of Contents Tedesco, E. F. “Determination of the Index to Volume 1 (1974) Absolute Magnitude and Phase Index to Volume 1 (1974) ..................... 1 Coefficient of Minor Planet 887 Alinda” Index to Volume 2 (1975) ..................... 1 Chapman, C. R. “The Impossibility of 25-27. Index to Volume 3 (1976) ..................... 1 Observing Asteroid Surfaces” 17. Index to Volume 4 (1977) ..................... 2 Tedesco, E. F. “On the Brightnesses of Index to Volume 5 (1978) ..................... 2 Dunham, D. W. (Letter regarding 1 Ceres Asteroids” 3-9. Index to Volume 6 (1979) ..................... 3 occultation) 35. Index to Volume 7 (1980) ..................... 3 Wallentine, D. and Porter, A. Index to Volume 8 (1981) ..................... 3 Hodgson, R. G. “Useful Work on Minor “Opportunities for Visual Photometry of Index to Volume 9 (1982) ..................... 4 Planets” 1-4. Selected Minor Planets, April - June Index to Volume 10 (1983) ................... 4 1975” 31-33. Index to Volume 11 (1984) ................... 4 Hodgson, R. G. “Implications of Recent Index to Volume 12 (1985) ................... 4 Diameter and Mass Determinations of Welch, D., Binzel, R., and Patterson, J. Comprehensive Index to Volumes 1-12 5 Ceres” 24-28. “The Rotation Period of 18 Melpomene” Index to Volume 13 (1986) ................... 5 20-21. Hodgson, R. G. “Minor Planet Work for Index to Volume 14 (1987) ................... 5 Smaller Observatories” 30-35. Index to Volume 15 (1988) ................... 6 Index to Volume 3 (1976) Index to Volume 16 (1989) ................... 6 Hodgson, R. G. “Observations of 887 Index to Volume 17 (1990) ................... 6 Alinda” 36-37. Chapman, C. R. “Close Approach Index to Volume 18 (1991) ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions and Helpful Info
    Target NEOs! Instructions and Helpful Info. (Modified and updated from the OSIRIS-REx Target Asteroids! website at https://www.asteroidmission.org) May 2021 Prerequisites for participation. • An interest in astronomy. • An interest in observing and providing data to the scientific community. • An interest in learning more about asteroids and near-Earth objects. • Appropriate observing equipment or access to equipment. • Membership in the Astronomical League through a member club or as an individual Member- at-Large. Request a registration form from the coordinators. • Complete the Target NEOs! registration form. • Periodically you will receive updated information about the program. Obtain instrumentation. The minimum instrumentation recommended to participate in this project is: • Telescope 8” or larger; • CCD/CMOS Camera, computer with internet connection; and • Data reduction software (available via Target NEOs!) If you have an appropriate telescope and camera, you will be able to observe asteroids on the Target NEOs! list. The asteroids that can be observed depend on the telescope’s aperture (diameter of the mirror or lens), light pollution, geographic location, and asteroid’s location in the sky on a given night. If you do not have a telescope, you can still participate in the program by obtaining access to observing equipment: • Team up and use a telescope owned by a friend, astronomy club, local college or planetarium observatory. • Use a commercial telescope service. • Are you a member of a local astronomy club? If not, we recommend it! Local astronomy clubs provide connections and opportunities for observations. You will meet friendly members who will be happy to help you. Check out the Astronomical League and NASA Night Sky Network to locate a club near you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin, We Feel Safe in Al., 1989)
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 43, NUMBER 3, A.D. 2016 JULY-SEPTEMBER 199. PHOTOMETRIC OBSERVATIONS OF ASTEROIDS star, and asteroid were determined by measuring a 5x5 pixel 3829 GUNMA, 6173 JIMWESTPHAL, AND sample centered on the asteroid or star. This corresponds to a 9.75 (41588) 2000 SC46 by 9.75 arcsec box centered upon the object. When possible, the same comparison star and check star were used on consecutive Kenneth Zeigler nights of observation. The coordinates of the asteroid were George West High School obtained from the online Lowell Asteroid Services (2016). To 1013 Houston Street compensate for the effect on the asteroid’s visual magnitude due to George West, TX 78022 USA ever changing distances from the Sun and Earth, Eq. 1 was used to [email protected] vertically align the photometric data points from different nights when constructing the composite lightcurve: Bryce Hanshaw 2 2 2 2 George West High School Δmag = –2.5 log((E2 /E1 ) (r2 /r1 )) (1) George West, TX USA where Δm is the magnitude correction between night 1 and 2, E1 (Received: 2016 April 5 Revised: 2016 April 7) and E2 are the Earth-asteroid distances on nights 1 and 2, and r1 and r2 are the Sun-asteroid distances on nights 1 and 2. CCD photometric observations of three main-belt 3829 Gunma was observed on 2016 March 3-5. Weather asteroids conducted from the George West ISD Mobile conditions on March 3 and 5 were not particularly favorable and so Observatory are described.
    [Show full text]