DOCSLIB.ORG

Categories of Second-Wave Feminist Performance Art

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Categories of Second-Wave Feminist Performance Art Carleton University Render Volume 7 Politics and Performance: Categories of Second-Wave Feminist Performance Art Jessa Laframboise Art History (SSAC), Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Abstract Through a consideration of feminist performance art from the twentieth century, this paper seeks to explore three categories of performance – the temporary live, the private documented and the trace of a performance. These categories are sustained by essential differences which are present in performance, and they ultimately assist in promoting certain thematic intentions. In works which navigate themes of gender, identity, the female body, commodification and femininity, these three categories provide readers with the ability to understand the diversity of feminist performance art, its various methods and techniques and recognize priorities that artists seek to portray. Beginning with an overview of second-wave feminism and performance art the remainder of this discussion will reveal the specific characteristics which make up each category of performance by introducing examples and concepts which pertain to either the temporary live performance, the private documented performance, and the trace of a performance. Additionally, this paper will consider notions of gender performativity, the use of the explicit body in performance and feminists artists interest in performance art to help contextualize the discussion. Keywords: Performance Art, Feminist Art, Second-Wave Feminism, Gender Performativity, Postmodernism, Marina Abramović, Carolee Schneemann ultimately embarrassing because politics and art were incompatible.2 Meanwhile, others Prior to the emergence of feminist art in the recognized that art could have political 1960s, modern art was separated theoretically implications but ultimately maintained that it from politics by most male art theorists of the could do very little to change things. However, at time, and was intended to strictly “transcend or the height of modernism and the social and to provide an alternative to the crude exigencies political unrest of the 1960s, the separation of of social struggle and political strife”.1 Similarly, art and politics came to an abrupt end, causing many modern artists aimed to refute the the art world to reevaluate its priorities. 3 possibility of a political agenda and believed that Unsurprisingly, many artists resisted this social “painting or sculpture that had any kind of real and political transition to what is now called significance in terms of political content” was 1 Jane Wark, Radical Gestures: Feminism and 2 Wark, Radical Gestures, 14. Performance Art in North America, (Montreal & Kingston: 3 Kim Levin, “Farwell to Modernism,” Art Magazine, McGill – Queen’s University Press, 2006), 5. October 1979, 91. 1 © Render, Carleton University Render Vol. 7 Jessa Laframboise postmodernism, carving out the 1960s and the performance. Although feminist art included a 1970s as the hybrid decades, an era vacillating vast array of socially-charged artistic practices, between modern and postmodern. It consisted performance art was intrinsically linked with of a generation of artists who tried to revive the politicization of feminist art; the powerful fading values of modernist art theory while political qualities of feminist performance was working alongside the new and prominent due to the explicit presence of the autonomous ideologies of postmodernism which ultimately female form – the sometimes nude autonomous aligned with the overall priorities of both the female form – in a realm and institution that has public and artists.4 With postmodernism historically maintained their explicit absence.7 emerged feminist art, a movement defined by its When exploring performance art in relation to its political consciousness. It was during this period political nature, three categories emerge: the of feminism in the ‘60s and ‘70s – also known temporary live performance, the private as second-wave feminism – that the slogan “the documented performance and the trace of a personal is political” emerged which reiterated performance. These categories reference one that “no aspect of life, art included, was exempt another but approach political priorities in from politics.” 5 Jane Wark, author of Radical significantly different ways that are noticeable Gestures: Feminist Performance Art in North due to the narratives and techniques portrayed America, explains: in the performance. This meant that, unlike their male peers, Feminist art was a new and radical feminist artists were able to see art not movement which worked to prioritize female as compromised by, or in conflict with artists and their unique gendered experiences. their political goals, but indeed as the For the first time in art history, imagery of object of them. As they sought to women was beginning to be accurately negotiate a new relationship between art, represented by women and no longer were life and politics, feminist artists feminist artists accepting the overt gendered recognized how existing aesthetic discrepancies which permeated the western practices was itself a form of gender canon of art. The fallacy that art was “above oppression.6 gender,” and that gender was irrelevant in the practice and viewing of art was refuted by Feminist artists aimed to develop new feminist artists who clearly acknowledged major modes of artistic expression that not only gender differentiation within their work.8 In the contested strategies cultivated by their male ‘60s and ‘70s, the dialogue of a feminist often predecessors, but also opened their artistic had two things in common, and the most distinct practices to include marginalized and devalued commonality was understanding the concept of modes of creation. This included decorative, gender, triggered as a term for differentiation.9 textile and craft-associated art, body art and Feminists also sought to reconstruct and 4 Levin, “Farwell to Modernism,” 91. 8 Marilyn French, “Is There A Feminist Aesthetic?” Hypatia, 5 Wark, Radical Gestures, 5. no. 2 (1990): 33. 6 Wark, Radical Gestures, 5. 9 Karen- Edis Barzman, “Beyond the Canon: Feminists, 7 Jeanie Forte, “Women’s Performance Art: Feminism and Postmodernism, and the History of Art,” The Journal of Post-Modernism,” Theatre Journal 40, no. 2 (May 1988): Aesthetics and Criticism 52, no. 3 (1994): 327. 217. 2 Render Vol. 7 Jessa Laframboise redistribute the handling of power in society by and aesthetics of twenty-first century placing themselves within a resistance against intersectional feminism. hierarchal power structures which sustained Since the 1960s, feminist performance misogyny and masculinity. However, as time art has utilized many different strategies to progressed and second-wave feminism evolved advance its political objectives and has had a into third-wave and then third-wave transitioned significant influence on “shifting art practices into fourth-wave, feminist artists no longer away from its exclusive preoccupation with maintained gender as the unifying element aesthetic concerns and toward critical which they sought to critique. The emergence of engagement with the social and political twenty-first century feminism recognized a new contingencies of our own times.”11 This paper set of values and aesthetics which were built off will examine, in-depth, a selection of second- the foundation cultivated by feminists in the wave feminist performance art created between ‘60s and ‘70s but with one very important 1960 and 1979. The works examined in this difference – the concept of intersectionality. paper are only a mere fraction of examples that Intersectional feminism prioritizes diversity and could and deserve to be explored in greater is a movement bound by the pursuit of equality detail. While this case study will prioritize for all. Thus, while the dialogue of feminist in a feminist performance art at its roots, it is my contemporary discussion is concerned with ongoing pursuit to acknowledge not just the reconstructing and redistributing the handling of concepts, values and aesthetics which make up “power” in society, these power structures are feminist performance art since the 1960s, but not solely centered around gender inequality also consider where it exists in relation to a anymore. Rather, the dialogue of feminist is just more contemporary conceptions of the artistic as diverse as the subjects who make up the movement. Indeed, feminist art is a movement intersectional feminist community such as, but that has certainly moved and evolved not limited to: queer, trans and gender non- significantly over the last sixty years, and conforming people, people who identify as MAD, because of the increased diversity of feminists, people who have a disability, people of colour their ideologies, goals, values and aesthetics, and people from various social, cultural and contemporary performance art is now reflective economic backgrounds. However, that is not to of intersectional devices which prioritize the say some things haven’t remained intact. “Given visibility of the diverse autonomous female form, that the women’s movement, in all its historical a theme which was absent from second-wave phases, was a struggle of opposition to tradition feminism. Thus, while maintaining the and convention,” and that participation of social theoretical advantages of second-wave and political activism by feminist artists was feminism, many twenty-first century feminist significant in numbers, it is no surprise that the performance artists maintain intersectionality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discovering the Contemporary
    of formalist distance upon which modernists had relied for understanding the world. Critics increasingly pointed to a correspondence between the formal properties of 1960s art and the nature of the radically changing world that sur- rounded them. In fact formalism, the commitment to prior- itizing formal qualities of a work of art over its content, was being transformed in these years into a means of discovering content. Leo Steinberg described Rauschenberg’s work as “flat- bed painting,” one of the lasting critical metaphors invented 1 in response to the art of the immediate post-World War II Discovering the Contemporary period.5 The collisions across the surface of Rosenquist’s painting and the collection of materials on Rauschenberg’s surfaces were being viewed as models for a new form of realism, one that captured the relationships between people and things in the world outside the studio. The lesson that formal analysis could lead back into, rather than away from, content, often with very specific social significance, would be central to the creation and reception of late-twentieth- century art. 1.2 Roy Lichtenstein, Golf Ball, 1962. Oil on canvas, 32 32" (81.3 1.1 James Rosenquist, F-111, 1964–65. Oil on canvas with aluminum, 10 86' (3.04 26.21 m). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. 81.3 cm). Courtesy The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. New Movements and New Metaphors Purchase Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Alex L. Hillman and Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (both by exchange). Acc. n.: 473.1996.a-w. Artists all over the world shared U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Exist-Ence Catalogue 2011
    exist-ence a festival of live art, performance art and action art 13 – 16 October, 2011 Brisbane Powerhouse Queensland, Australia http://existenceperformanceart.wordpress.com THANK YOU This event would not be possible without the generosity of each and every participant. You have given your time and your work for free for us to experience your art. Thank You. CURATED, PRODUCED & PRESENTED BY [2011 crew] Thomas Quirk & Rebecca Cunningham PRESENTED BY SUPPORTED BY ARTISTS HAVE HAD ASSISTANCE FROM CONTENTS about exist-ence about exist schedule overview about the program artist’s information writing on performance/ writers in residence 2 day project websites related to this event exist acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which it is situated, and is committed to fostering a culture of remembrance and respect for Indigenous people. The contents of this catalogue is printed in good faith; any errors within are the curators alone. Opinions expressed by exist-ence participants are theirs alone and not necessarily the opinions of the curators of exist-ence. exist-ence: a festival of live art, performance art and action art presented by exist and the Brisbane Powerhouse Venue: Brisbane Powerhouse, 119 Lamington St. New Farm Admission: $10/8 day pass $30/25 festival pass Presenting work by artists from Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, UK, USA About exist-ence: a festival of live art, performance art and action art Following the success of exist in 08, exist presents the fourth annual exist-ence festival, bringing the best, the bold and the brave to Brisbane Powerhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Mendieta and Carolee Schneemann Selected Works 1966 – 1983
    Irrigation Veins: Ana Mendieta and Carolee Schneemann Selected Works 1966 – 1983 On view April 30 – May 30, 2020 Ana Mendieta. Volcán, 1979, color photograph Carolee Schneemann, Study for Up to and Including Her Limits, 1973, color © The Estate of Ana Mendieta Collection, LLC photograph, photo credit: Antony McCall Courtesy Galerie Lelong & Co., New York Courtesy of the Estate of Carolee Schneemann, Galerie Lelong & Co., and Licensed by Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York P·P·O·W, New York “These obsessive acts of re-asserting my ties with the earth are really a manifestation of my thirst for being.” Ana Mendieta Galerie Lelong & Co. and P·P·O·W present Irrigation Veins: Ana Mendieta and Carolee Schneemann, Selected Works 1966 – 1983, an online exhibition exploring the artists’ parallel histories, iconographies, and shared affinities for ancient forms and the natural world. Galerie Lelong and P·P·O·W have a history of collaboration and have co-represented Carolee Schneemann since 2017. This will be the first time the two artists are shown together in direct dialogue, an exhibition Schneemann proposed during the last year of her life. In works such as Mendieta’s Volcán (1979) and Schneemann’s Study for Up To and Including Her Limits (1973), both artists harnessed physical action to root themselves into the earth, establishing their ties to the earth and asserting bodily agency in the face of societal restraints and repression. Both artists identified as painters prior to activating their bodies as material; Mendieta received a MA in painting from the University of Iowa in 1972, and Schneemann received an MFA from the University of Illinois in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Object/Poems: Alison Knowles's Feminist Archite(X)
    JAMES FUENTES 55 Delancey Street New York, NY 10002 (212) 577-1201 [email protected] Nicole L. Woods Some visits later I arrived at his door with eleven color swatches…[Duchamp] chose one and set it aside on the buffet. After lunch, his wife Teeny picked up Object/Poems: the swatch and said, “Oh Marcel, when did you do this?” He smiled, took a pen- Alison Knowles’s cil and signed the swatch. The following year Marcel died. Arturo Schwarz wrote Feminist me suggesting I had the last readymade. Teeny and Richard Hamilton assured me Archite(x)ture that I did not, but that I had a piece of interesting memorabilia.4 You see you have to get right into it, as This brief experience with one of the most you do with any good book, and you must prolific and influential artists of the twen- become involved and experience it your- tieth century was but one of many chance self. Then you will know something and encounters that would characterize Knowles’s feel something. Let us say that it provides artistic practice for more than four decades. a milieu for your experience but what you The experience of seeing the readymade pro- bring to it is the biggest ingredient, far cess up close served to reaffirm her sense of more important than what is there. the exquisite possibilities of unintentional —Alison Knowles 1 choices, artistic and otherwise. Indeed, Knowles’s chance-derived practice throughout the 1960s and 1970s consistently sought to The world of objects is a kind of book, in frame a collection of sensorial data in vari- which each thing speaks metaphorically ous manifestations: from language-based of all others…and is read with the whole notational scores and performances to objet body, in and through the movements and trouvé experiments within her lived spaces, displacements which define the space of computer-generated poems, and large-scale objects as much as they are defined by it.
    [Show full text]
  • “My Personal Is Not Political?” a Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy
    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2009 “My Personal Is Not Political?” A Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy Irina Aristarkhova and Faith Wilding This is a dialogue between two scholars who discuss art, feminism, and pedagogy. While Irina Aristarkhova proposes “active distancing” and “strategic withdrawal of personal politics” as two performative strategies to deal with various stereotypes of women's art among students, Faith Wilding responds with an overview of art school’s curricular within a wider context of Feminist Art Movement and the radical questioning of art and pedagogy that the movement represents Using a concrete situation of teaching a women’s art class within an art school environment, this dialogue between Faith Wilding and Irina Aristakhova analyzes the challenges that such teaching represents within a wider cultural and historical context of women, art, and feminist performance pedagogy. Faith Wilding has been a prominent figure in the feminist art movement from the early 1970s, as a member of the California Arts Institute’s Feminist Art Program, Womanhouse, and in the recent decade, a member of the SubRosa, a cyberfeminist art collective. Irina Aristarkhova, is coming from a different history to this conversation: generationally, politically and theoretically, she faces her position as being an outsider to these mostly North American and, to a lesser extent, Western European developments. The authors see their on-going dialogue of different experiences and ideas within feminism(s) as an opportunity to share strategies and knowledges towards a common goal of sustaining heterogeneity in a pedagogical setting. First, this conversation focuses on the performance of feminist pedagogy in relation to women’s art.
    [Show full text]
  • I – Introduction
    QUEERING PERFORMATIVITY: THROUGH THE WORKS OF ANDY WARHOL AND PERFORMANCE ART by Claudia Martins Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 I never fall apart, because I never fall together. Andy Warhol The Philosophy of Andy Warhol: From A to B and Back again CEU eTD Collection CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS..........................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................v ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................vi CHAPTER 1 - Introduction .............................................................................................7 CHAPTER 2 - Bringing the body into focus...................................................................13 CHAPTER 3 - XXI century: Era of (dis)embodiment......................................................17 Disembodiment in Virtual Spaces ..........................................................18 Embodiment Through Body Modification................................................19 CHAPTER 4 - Subculture: Resisting Ajustment ............................................................22 CHAPTER 5 - Sexually Deviant Bodies........................................................................24 CHAPTER 6 - Performing gender.................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • WOMANHOUSE Intimacy, Identity and Domesticity
    WOMANHOUSE Intimacy, Identity and Domesticity Susana Solís-Zara1 University of Sevilha 1. Introduction This text examines the issue of art and intimacy, and its strong connection with the concept of identity: and especially representations of female identity in the collaborative feminist art installation, perfor- mance space, exhibition and pedagogical project Womanhouse (Janu- art exhibition, coinciding with the foundation of feminist art criticism at the beginning of the seventies in the United States . The Project Womanhouse was a collaborative project that deals with women’s gender experiences within the context of a real house 1. Susana Solís-Zara https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9932-9452 Universidad de Sevilla Departamento de Educación Artística, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación Calle Pirotecnia s/n. CP. 41013 (Sevilla), Spain. [email protected] 298 Susana Solís-Zara setting in an urban neighbourhood in Los Angeles (http://www.wom- anhouse.net/). It presented and exhibited feminist artistic proposals concerning subjective identity, gender and intimacy like the ones found in domestic spaces. It includes perspectives such as the home as a space for both intimacy and identity, the body-house-home relationship, as- pects of maternity and the dichotomy between the private and the pub- lic, all of which continue to be narratives in contemporary women’s art. The main object of this essay is therefore to analyse the Woman- house project, as well as to examine some of its most prominent art- works and how intimacy was used as a means of expression, bringing - tion. It is precisely women who developed the notion of intimacy, as their role in history has been one of marginality and invisibility, being - WOMANHOUSE: Intimacy, Identity and Domesticity 299 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Perspectives on Curating
    Feminist perspectives on curating Book or Report Section Published Version Richter, D. (2016) Feminist perspectives on curating. In: Richter, D., Krasny, E. and Perry, L. (eds.) Curating in Feminist Thought. On-Curating, Zurich, pp. 64-76. ISBN 9781532873386 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/74722/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://www.on-curating.org/issue-29.html#.Wm8P9a5l-Uk Publisher: On-Curating All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online ONN CURATING.org Issue 29 / May 2016 Notes on Curating, freely distributed, non-commercial Curating in Feminist Thought WWithith CContributionsontributions bbyy NNanneanne BBuurmanuurman LLauraaura CastagniniCastagnini SSusanneusanne ClausenClausen LLinaina DzuverovicDzuverovic VVictoriaictoria HorneHorne AAmeliamelia JJonesones EElkelke KKrasnyrasny KKirstenirsten LLloydloyd MMichaelaichaela MMeliánelián GGabrielleabrielle MMoseroser HHeikeeike MMunderunder LLaraara PPerryerry HHelenaelena RReckitteckitt MMauraaura RReillyeilly IIrenerene RevellRevell JJennyenny RichardsRichards DDorotheeorothee RichterRichter HHilaryilary RRobinsonobinson SStellatella RRolligollig JJulianeuliane SaupeSaupe SSigridigrid SSchadechade CCatherineatherine SSpencerpencer Szuper Gallery, I will survive, film still, single-channel video, 7:55 min. Contents 02 82 Editorial It’s Time for Action! Elke Krasny, Lara Perry, Dorothee Richter Heike Munder 05 91 Feminist Subjects versus Feminist Effects: Public Service Announcement: The Curating of Feminist Art On the Viewer’s Rolein Curatorial Production (or is it the Feminist Curating of Art?) Lara Perry Amelia Jones 96 22 Curatorial Materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Online, Issue 15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002
    n.paradoxa online, issue 15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002 Editor: Katy Deepwell n.paradoxa online issue no.15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002 ISSN: 1462-0426 1 Published in English as an online edition by KT press, www.ktpress.co.uk, as issues 15 and 16, n.paradoxa: international feminist art journal http://www.ktpress.co.uk/pdf/nparadoxaissue15and16.pdf July 2001 and July/Sept 2002, republished in this form: January 2010 ISSN: 1462-0426 All articles are copyright to the author All reproduction & distribution rights reserved to n.paradoxa and KT press. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying and recording, information storage or retrieval, without permission in writing from the editor of n.paradoxa. Views expressed in the online journal are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the editor or publishers. Editor: [email protected] International Editorial Board: Hilary Robinson, Renee Baert, Janis Jefferies, Joanna Frueh, Hagiwara Hiroko, Olabisi Silva. www.ktpress.co.uk n.paradoxa online issue no.15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002 ISSN: 1462-0426 2 List of Contents Issue 15, July 2001 Katy Deepwell Interview with Lyndal Jones about Deep Water / Aqua Profunda exhibited in the Australian Pavilion in Venice 4 Two senses of representation: Analysing the Venice Biennale in 2001 10 Anette Kubitza Fluxus, Flirt, Feminist? Carolee 15 Schneemann, Sexual liberation and the Avant-garde of the 1960s Diary
    [Show full text]
  • Over Front Cover
    Introduction: An art of the precarious Aaron Levy Edited Transcript: Master class with Carolee Schneemann Jordyn Feingold, Erica Levin, Aaron Levy, Emma Pfeiffer, Justin Reinsberg, Nicole Ripka, David Wilks, and Elliot Wolf sales rep: 1st ofa date: artist: cust: control: job #: Back Cover Front Cover rel #: Introduction: An art of the precarious there’s always these sort of tensions, of reference, but it’s a very succinct little Aaron Levy essay concerning the violence that has always been historically embedded against cats and women, the demonization of them both in early history and For many years, Carolee Schneemann’s work has foregrounded the relationship how that has its residual aspects still. between the artist’s body and the social body. Her art, her relationships, and her institutional negotiations have all foregrounded the fundamental relationship EL: I’ve been wondering about the repetition that happens in Mysteries of between the individual and socio-cultural conditions. She has enabled us at the Pussies, with the Finnish echo of what you say in English. Of course that Slought to think in similar terms, and to negotiate our position, identity, and probably has something to do with the context in which it was made, but for an practice in relation to the city and beyond. English audience there’s also something that I found really moving about how it takes these terrible accounts and turns them into something unrecognizable The word precariousness is often understood in terms of vulnerability, and if you don’t speak the language. There’s something really interesting about how the condition of being dependent on unknown conditions and uncertain that works in the piece that I found myself thinking about a lot afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluxus: the Is Gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Honors College Theses Pforzheimer Honors College Summer 7-2018 Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses Part of the Contemporary Art Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Butcher, Megan, "Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists" (2018). Honors College Theses. 178. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses/178 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pforzheimer Honors College at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The Fluxus movement of the 1960s and early 1970s laid the groundwork for future female artists and performance art as a medium. However, throughout my research, I have found that while there is evidence that female artists played an important role in this art movement, they were often not written about or credited for their contributions. Literature on the subject is also quite limited. Many books and journals only mention the more prominent female artists of Fluxus, leaving the lesser-known female artists difficult to research. The lack of scholarly discussion has led to the inaccurate documentation of the development of Fluxus art and how it influenced later movements. Additionally, the absence of research suggests that female artists’ work was less important and, consequently, keeps their efforts and achievements unknown. It can be demonstrated that works of art created by little-known female artists later influenced more prominent artists, but the original works have gone unacknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Stelarc: the Monograph Free
    FREE STELARC: THE MONOGRAPH PDF William Gibson,Julie Clarke,Timothy Druckrey,Jane Goodall,Amelia Jones,Arthur Kroker,Marilouise Kroker,Brian Massumi,Marquard Smith | 280 pages | 31 Oct 2007 | MIT Press Ltd | 9780262693608 | English | Cambridge, Mass., United States (PDF) Stelarc: The Monograph, The MIT Press, , Preface | marquard smith - Stelarc's art starts from and continually returns to a point at which Stelarc: The Monograph and body have not yet split or at which they have rejoined. His medium is the body as a sensible concept. Problem: In what way is the body an idea and the idea bodily? In what way can probing one extend the other? To say, as Stelarc does, Stelarc: The Monograph technology Stelarc: The Monograph our human nature' and that there is no natural, metaphysically and biologically given human body, is not to suggest that the relation between technology and the human is always and everywhere the same. Different technologies make possible different ways of conceiving this relation at different times. Nor is Stelarc's function to render visible the 'originary technicity' of the human. This would be to reduce his performances to an endless repetition of a past, and a future, that is always the same. What Stelarc performs with his investigations into how different developments in technology robotics, the Internet, virtual reality systems, prosthetics, medical instruments and procedures alter our conception of the human and of the human body, is the way in which technology escapes the control of its inventors to produce unseen and unforseeable changes and possibilities; and thus a future - for Stelarc: The Monograph self, the human, for the body and for technology - which can be neither programmed nor predicted.
    [Show full text]