Arxiv:0712.1618V1 [Physics.Optics] 10 Dec 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cavity Opto-Mechanics T.J. Kippenberg∗ Max Planck Institut f¨ur Quantenoptik, Garching, Germany and K.J. Vahala2† California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA The coupling of mechanical and optical degrees of freedom via radiation pressure has been a sub- ject of early research in the context of gravitational wave detection. Recent experimental advances have allowed studying for the first time the modifications of mechanical dynamics provided by radi- ation pressure. This paper reviews the consequences of back-action of light confined in whispering- gallery dielectric micro-cavities, and presents a unified treatment of its two manifestations: notably the parametric instability (parametric amplification) and radiation pressure back-action cooling. Parametric instability offers a novel ”photonic clock” which is driven purely by the pressure of light. In contrast, radiation pressure cooling can surpass existing cryogenic technologies and offers cooling to phonon occupancies below unity and provides a route towards cavity Quantum Optomechanics I. INTRODUCTION and can occur outside of the opto-mechanical context. Indeed, the same dynamic back-action phenomena have been predicted to occur in systems where a mechanical Recent years have witnessed a series of developments oscillator is parametrically coupled to an electromagnetic at the intersection of two, previously distinct subjects. resonant system, and have indeed been observed in an Optical (micro-)cavities[1] and micro (nano) mechanical electronic resonance of a superconducting single electron resonators[2], each a subject in their own right with a rich transistor coupled to a mechanical oscillator[14, 15] (or scientific and technological history, have, in a sense, be- LC circuit[10, 16]). come entangled experimentally by the underlying mech- anism of optical, radiation pressure forces. These forces and their related physics have been of major interest in the field of atomic physics[3, 4, 5, 6] for over 5 decades and the emerging opto-mechanical context has many par- allels with this field. The opto-mechanical coupling between a moving mir- ror and the radiation pressure of light has first appeared in the context of interferometric gravitational wave ex- periments. Owing to the discrete nature of photons, the quantum fluctuations of the radiation pressure forces give rise to the so called standard quantum limit[7, 8, 9]. In addition to this “quantum back-action” effect, the pio- neering work of V. Braginsky[10] predicted that the radi- FIG. 1: (a)A cavity optomechanical system consisting of ation pressure of light, confined within an interferometer a Fabry Perot cavity with a harmonically bound end mir- (or resonator), gives rise to the effect of dynamic back- ror. Panel (b): Different physical realizations of cavity action (which is a classical effect, in contrast to the afore- optomechanical experiments employing cantilevers, micro- mentioned quantum back-action) owing to the finite cav- mirrors, micro-cavities, nano-membranes and macroscopic ity decay time. The resulting phenomena, which are the mirror modes. Red and green arrows represent the optical trajectory and mechanical motion. arXiv:0712.1618v1 [physics.optics] 10 Dec 2007 parametric instability (and associated mechanical oscilla- tion) and opto-mechanical back-action cooling represent two sides of the same underlying “dynamic back-action” mechanism. Later, theoretical work has proposed to us- The experimental manifestations of optomechanical ing the radiation-pressure coupling to realize quantum coupling by radiation pressure have been observable non-demolition measurements of the light field[11] and as for some time. For instance, radiation pressure forces a means to create non-classical states of the light field[12] were observed in the pioneering work of H. Walther and the mechanical system[13]. It is noted that the ef- at the MPQ, manifesting themselves in radiation pres- fect of dynamic back-action is of rather general relevance sure (pondermotive) bistability[17], while even earlier work in the microwave domain had been carried out by Braginsky[10]. Moreover the modification of mechani- cal oscillator stiffness caused by radiation pressure, the ∗Electronic address: [email protected] “optical spring”, have also been observed[18]. How- †Electronic address: [email protected] ever, in contrast to these static manifestations of ra- 2 diation pressure, the dynamic manifestations of radia- To understand how the coupling of optical and me- tion pressure forces on micro- and nano-mechanical ob- chanical degrees of freedom occurs in any of the depicted jects have only recently become an experimental real- geometries, one need only consider the schematic in the ity. Curiously, while the theory of dynamic back ac- upper panel of Figure 1. Here, a Fabry-Perot optical tion was motivated by consideration of precision mea- cavity is assumed to feature a mirror that also functions surement in the context of gravitational wave detection as a mass-on-a-spring (i.e. is harmonically suspended). using large interferometers[19], the first observation of Such a configuration can indeed be encountered in grav- this mechanism was reported in 2005 at a vastly differ- itational wave laser interferometers (such as LIGO) and ent size scale in microtoroid cavities[20, 21, 22]. These is also, in fact, a direct representation of the “cantilever observations were focused on the radiation pressure in- mirror” embodiment in the lower panel within Figure 1. duced parametric instability[19]. Subsequently, the re- In addition it is functionally equivalent to the case of a verse mechanism[23] (back-action cooling) has been ex- microtoroid embodiment (also shown in the lower panel), ploited to cool cantilevers[24, 25, 26], microtoroids[27] where the toroid itself provides both the optical modes and macroscopic mirror modes[28, 29] as well as me- as well as mechanical breathing modes (see Figure 1 and chanical nano-membranes[30]. We note that this tech- discussion below). Returning to the upper panel, inci- nique is different than the earlier demonstrated radiation- dent optical power that is resonant with a cavity mode pressure feedback cooling[28, 31], which uses electronic creates a large circulating power within the cavity. This feedback analogous to “Stochastic Cooling”[32] of ions in circulating power exerts a force upon the “mass-spring” storage rings and which can also provide very efficient mirror, thereby causing it to move. Reciprocally, the mir- cooling as demonstrated in recent experiments[26, 33, ror motion results in a new optical round trip condition, 34]. Indeed, research in this subject has experienced a which modifies the detuning of the cavity resonance with remarkable acceleration over the past three years as re- respect to the incident field. This will cause the system searchers in diverse fields such as optical microcavities[1], to simply establish a new, static equilibrium condition. micro and nano-mechanical resonators[2] and quantum The nonlinear nature of the coupling in such a case can optics pursue a common set of scientific goals set for- manifest itself as a hysteretic behavior and was observed ward by a decade-old theoretical framework. Indeed, over two decades ago in the work by Walther et. al[17]. there exists a rich theoretical history that considers However, if the mechanical and optical Q’s are sufficiently the implications of optical forces in this new context. high (as is further detailed in what follows, such that the Subjects ranging from entanglement[35, 36]; genera- mechanical oscillation period is comparable or exceeds tion of squeezed states of light[12]; to measurements the cavity photon lifetime) a new set of dynamical phe- at or beyond the standard quantum limit[11, 37, 38]; nomena can emerge, related to mechanical amplification and even to tests of quantum theory itself are in play and cooling. here[39]. On the practical side, there are opportuni- ties to harness these forces for new metrology tools[34] and even for new functions on a semiconductor chip In this paper, we will give the first unified treatment of (e.g., oscillators[20, 21], optical mixers[40], and tune- this subject. Although microtoroid optical microcavities able optical filters and switches[41, 42]. It seems clear will be used as an illustrative platform, the treatment that a new field of cavity optomechanics has emerged, and phenomena are universal and pertain to any cavity and will soon evolve into cavity quantum optomechanics opto-mechanical systems supporting high Q optical and (cavity QOM) whose goal is the observation and explo- mechanical modes. In what follows we begin with a the- ration of quantum phenomena of mechanical systems[43] oretical framework through which dynamic back-action as well as quantum phenomena involving both photons can be understood. The observation of micromechani- and mechanical systems. The realization of dynamical, cal oscillation will then be considered by reviewing both opto-mechanical coupling in which radiation forces me- old and new experimental results that illustrate the ba- diate the interaction, is a natural outcome of underly- sic phenomena[20, 21, 22]. Although this mechanism has ing improvements in the technologies of optical (micro) been referred to as the parametric instability, we show cavities and mechanical micro (nano-) resonators. Re- that it is more properly defined in the context of me- duction of loss (increasing optical and mechanical Q) chanical amplification and regenerative oscillation. For and reductions