Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Bull. Min. Res. Exp. (2019) 159: 99-116 BULLETIN OF THE MINERAL RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION Foreign Edition 2019 159 ISSN : 0026-4563 E-ISSN : 2651-3048 CONTENTS The control of sea-level changes on sedimentation in the Mut Basin: Late Serravallian-Early Tortonian incised valley-¿ ll Bulletin of the Mineral ................................................................ Ayhan ILGAR, Tolga ESøRTGEN, Aynur HAKYEMEZ, Gönül CULHA, Serap DEMøRKAYA ................................................................................................................................... and Banu TÜRKMEN BOZKURT / Research Article 1 Active tectonic and paleoseismologic characteristics of the Yenice-Gönen Fault, NW Turkey, in light of the 18 March 1953 Yenice-Gönen earthquake (Ms=7.2) ................... AkÕn KÜRÇER, Selim ÖZALP, Ersin ÖZDEMøR, Ça÷Õl UYGUN GÜLDOöAN and Tamer Y. DUMAN / Research Article 29 Paleoseismological catalog of pre-2012 trench studies on the active faults in Turkey ................................................................................................................................. ùule GÜRBOöA and Oktay GÖKÇE / Review Article 63 Descriptions, systematics and revisions of the subgenera Alveolina (Glomalveolina) Hottinger, 1960 and Alveolina (Alveolina) d’Orbigny, 1826 (Foraminiferida) ..................................................................................................................................................................... ùükrü ACAR / Research Article 89 Geochemistry and tectonic signi¿ cance of the ophiolitic rocks of the Yarpuz-Kaypak (Amanoslar, Osmaniye) area ................................................................................................Tamer RIZAOöLU, Utku BAöCI and Osman PARLAK / Research Article 99 Typomorphic features of the quartz of various mineral paragenesis from the gold mineralization in Karakshatau Mountains (West Uzbekistan) ....................................................................................................Svetlana KOLOSKOVA and Jakhongir MOVLANOV / Research Article 117 Rare earth element (REE) resources of Turkey: An overview of their characteristics and origin Research and Exploration .......................................................... Hüseyin ÖZTÜRK, Nurullah HANøLÇø, Sinan ALTUNCU and Cem KASAPÇI / Research Article 129 Relationship between petroleum and iodine in Southeastern Anatolia Basin ................................................................................................................................................................ Adil ÖZDEMøR / Research Article 145 Multivariate analysis of log-ratio transformed data and its priority in mining science: Porphyry and polymetallic vein deposits case studies .......................................................................................Farshad DARABø-GOLESTAN and Ardeshir HEZARKHANI / Research Article 185 Statistical assessment of radiation exposure risks of farmers in Odo Oba, Southwestern Nigeria ........................................Theophilus Aanuoluwa ADAGUNODO, Lukman Ayobami SUNMONU, Moruffdeen Adedapo ADABANøJA, ........................................................................Maxwell OMEJE, Oluwole Akinwumi ODETUNMIBI and Victor IJEH / Research Article 201 Evaluation of the alternatives for gold ore grinding circuits by using of laboratory studies results and simulation method; case study: øranian Gold Co. ......................Hojjat HOSSEINZADEH GHAREHGHESHLAGH, Ayúe Tu÷ba CEBECø and ùevket Levent ERGÜN / Research Article 219 A brief note on the effects of À oating standard deviation (non- derivative) and horizontal gradient (derivative) ¿ lters ................................................................................................................................................................Ceyhan Ertan TOKER / Short Note 235 http://bulletin.mta.gov.tr Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Notes to the Authors ..................................................................................................................... 239 Geochemistry and tectonic signifi cance of the ophiolitic rocks of the Yarpuz-Kaypak (Amanoslar, Osmaniye) area Tamer RIZAOĞLUa*, Utku BAĞCIb and Osman PARLAKc aKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Department of Geological Engineering, Kahramanmaraş.orcig.org. 0000-0002-4883-0842 bMersin University, Department of Geological Engineering, Mersin. orcid.org. 0000-0002-9295-2898 cÇukurova University, Department of Geological Engineering, Adana. orcid.org. 0000-0002-4652-3902 Research Article Keywords: ABSTRACT Ophiolite, Petrography, Yarpuz-Kaypak (Osmaniye) region, located in Amanos Mountains, contains harzburgitic tectonites Geochemistry, Supra- and mafi c cumulates. The tectonites are represented by serpantinized harzburgites, whereas the subduction zone, cumulates are characterized by gabbronorite and gabbro compositions. The crystallization order Neotethys, Turkey within the cumulates is clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene plagioclase and amphibole. The major element compositions of the tectonites and cumulate rocks are consistent with formation in an arc-related tectonic setting. Trace element concentrations of these rocks exhibit large ion litophile element enrichments. Both geochemical and petrographic evidence suggest that the tectonite and cumulate rocks from the Yarpuz-Kaypak (Osmaniye) region represent the remnants of an oceanic lithosphere that formed in a supra-subduction zone tectonic setting during the closure of the Southern Neotethyan Received Date: 28.02.2018 Accepted Date: 18.07.2018 ocean and emplaced onto the northern margin of the Arabian platform in Late Cretaceous. 1. Introduction and Yılmaz, 1981; Dilek and Moores, 1990; Dilek et The Tethyan evolution of Turkey covers two al., 1999; Floyd et al., 2000; Robertson, 2002). The tectonic periods, the Paleotethys and Neotethys, Neotethys is composed of two oceanic basins, namely which show continuity with each other in terms of a northern branch and a southern branch (Şengör time. The Paleotethys period took place between and Yılmaz, 1981). The northern branch covers the Carboniferous and Lias, having an effect particularly İzmir-Ankara-Erzincan ocean, Intra-Tauride ocean in Northern and Central Anatolia (Robertson and and Intra-Pontide ocean, whereas the southern branch Ustaömer, 2009; Göncüoğlu et al., 2000, 2007; Okay, covers the Berit and South Neotethyan oceans (Şengör 2000). Whereas the Neotethys period affected the and Yılmaz, 1981; Görür et al., 1984; Robertson and entire Anatolia between the Triassic and Miocene Dixon, 1984; Robertson et al., 2012, 2013a; Figure 1). period, and continued its effect up to present time As the Neotethys ocean started to close during the Late (Şengör and Yılmaz, 1981; Robertson and Dixon, Cretaceous, ophiolites of both northern and southern 1984). The Anatolian Plate is an important part of branches emplaced over the passive continent margin the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt which covers the to the south (Şengör and Yılmaz, 1981; Robertson and remnants of E-W trending Neotethyan oceanic basins Dixon, 1984; Yılmaz et al., 1993; Robertson, 2002; located between metamorphic massifs and/or platform Robertson et al., 2006). The ophiolites, which have carbonate sequences. The Neotethyan remnants a signifi cant place within the Neotethys evolution of from top to bottom are represented by ophiolites, Turkey, are of the supra-subduction zone (SSZ) type metamorphic soles and ophiolitic mélanges (Şengör (Yalınız et al., 1996; Parlak et al., 1996, 2000, 2002, Citation Info: Rızaoğlu, T., Bağcı, U., Parlak O. 2019. Geochemistry and tectonic signifi cance of the ophiolitic rocks of the Yarpuz-Kaypak (Amanoslar, Osmaniye) area. Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration, 159, 99-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.501393 * Corresponding author: Tamer RIZAOĞLU, [email protected] 99 Bull. Min. Res. Exp. (2019) 159: 99-116 Figure 1- Tectonic map of the East Mediterranean Region showing the distribution of Neothetyan ophiolites and their relative U-Pb ages (after Dilek and Flower, 2003; Çelik et al., 2011). 1) Dilek and Thy 2006, (2) Dilek et al., 2008, (3) Liati et al., 2004, (4) Mukasa and Ludden 1987, (5) Konstantinou et al., 2007, (6) Dilek and Thy 2009, (7) Parlak et al., 2013, (8) Karaoğlan et al., 2013a, (9) Koglin, 2008, (10) Koglin et al., 2009, (11) Topuz et al., 2013, (12) Sarıfakıoğlu et al., 2012, (13) Karaoğlan et al., 2012, (14) Robertson et al., 2013b, (15) Karaoğlan et al., 2013b, (16) van Hinsbergen et al., 2016, (17) Alparslan and Dilek 2018. Abbreviations: LO: Lesvos Ophiolite, AO: Antalya Ophiolite, BHO: Beyşehir-Hoyran Ophiolite, ORO: Orhaneli Ophiolite, KO: Kınık Ophiolite, EO: Eldivan Ophiolite, MO: Mersin Ophiolite, PKO: Pozantı-Karsantı Ophiolite; OsO: Osmaniye Ophiolite, GKO: Göksun (Kahramanmaraş) Ophiolite, PO: Pınarbaşı Ophiolite, IO: Ispendere Ophiolite, DO: Divriği Ophiolite, KmO: Kömürhan Ophiolite, SO: Sevan Ophiolite, SKO: Sarıkaraman Ophiolite; plg: plagiogranite, gb: gabbro, dk: dike, tnl: tonalite, rhy: rhyolite. 2009; Robertson, 2002; Çelik and Delaloye 2003, The study area covers an area of about 40 km2 2006; Vergili and Parlak, 2005; Bağcı et al., 2005, in the vicinity of the Yarpuz-Kaypak district in the 2006, Rızaoğlu et al., 2006; Bağcı et al., 2008; Bağcı Osmaniye province. Studies on ophiolites cropping and Parlak, 2009; Sarıfakıoğlu et al., 2009; Dilek and out in this region are limited, and Yılmaz et al. (1984) Thy 2009), and their formation and