Estimates Committee C 2009

Additional Information

Volume 1 of 1 Estimates Committee C 2009 Additional Information

Table of Contents

Minutes of Meetings

¾ 18 June 2009 ¾ 29 June 2009 ¾ 16 July 2009 ¾ 28 July 2009

Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade

¾ Questions on Notice (Non-Government) ¾ Answers to Questions on Notice (Non-Government) ¾ Questions on Notice (Government) ¾ Answers to Questions on Notice (Government) ¾ Answers to Questions taken on Notice at Hearing ¾ Documentation tabled at Hearing

Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

¾ Questions on Notice (Non-Government) ¾ Answers to Questions on Notice (Non-Government) ¾ Questions on Notice (Government) ¾ Answers to Questions on Notice (Government) ¾ Documentation tabled at Hearing

Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

¾ Questions on Notice (Non-Government) ¾ Answers to Questions on Notice (Non-Government) ¾ Questions on Notice (Government) ¾ Answers to Questions on Notice (Government) ¾ Answers to Questions taken on Notice at hearing ¾ Documentation tabled at Hearing

Minutes of Meeting 18 June 2009 Minutes

Original Held: RD

File No: Est C 2009

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C MINUTES Meeting at 1.11pm on Thursday, 18 June 2009 Room 5.01a Parliamentary Annexe

Present: Mr Evan Moorhead MP (Chair) Ms Peta-Kaye Croft MP (from 1.16pm) Mr David Gibson MP Mr Steven Kilburn MP Mrs Rosemary Menkens MP Mr Jeff Seeney MP Ms Lillian van Litsenburg MP

In attendance: Ms Renee Easten, Research Director Ms Jenny North, Executive Assistant

Apologies: Nil

Election of Deputy The Chair called for nominations for the position of Deputy Chair: Chair. Mr Seeney was nominated for the position of Deputy Chair by Mrs Menkens and the nomination was seconded by Mr Gibson. There being no further nominations, Mr Seeney was declared elected as Deputy Chair.

Estimates Inquiry The committee considered the draft inquiry timetable timetable: provided, especially noting the timeframe for questions on notice and answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing. On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Mr Kilburn, the committee resolved that Members’ questions on notice and notice of areas of examination in detail be forwarded to the research director by 3pm on Friday, 26 June 2009 and that Ministers’ answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing, and any additional information about an answer given at the hearing, are forwarded to the research director by 5pm, Monday 20 July 2009. The committee agreed to adopt the draft inquiry timetable.

Hearing program Hearing Time Allocations for Thursday 16 The committee discussed the draft timetable. July 2009: On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Ms van Litsenburg, the committee resolved that for the committee's public hearing on Thursday, 16 July 2009, the order and time allocations as amended below be adopted.

Portfolio Organisational Unit Session Time

Minister for Natural Department of Natural Resources 8:30am – 10:15am Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade

Break 10:15am – 10:30am

Minister for Natural Department of Mines and Energy 10:30am – 11:15am Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Energy GOCs/Energy Ombudsman 11:15am – 12:15am Trade Trade 12:15pm – 12:45pm

Lunch 12:45pm – 1:30pm

Minister for Community Services and Housing Department of Housing 1:30pm – 2:30pm

and Minister for Women Department of Communities and Office for Women 2:30pm – 3:45pm

Break 3:45pm – 4:00pm

Minister for Infrastructure Department of Infrastructure and 4:00pm – 5:45pm and Planning Planning

Introductory statements, order of questioning and non- committee members On the motion of Mr Gibson, seconded by Mr Kilburn, the committee resolved that non-committee members be given leave to ask questions during the hearing.

Broadcasting of the Hearing On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Mrs Menkens, the committee resolved that: • That television film coverage and photography be allowed during the Chair’s opening statements and the introductory statements of the Ministers as well as for a short period during each changeover of ministerial advisors; and • That audio and video of the hearing recorded by Parliamentary Service cameras and microphones in the Red Chamber shall be broadcast by the Parliamentary Service via the Service’s website and to receivers throughout the Parliamentary Precinct. RULES FOR THE RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING, INCLUDING REBROADCASTING, OF THE PROCEEDINGS: 1. Broadcasting of the proceedings shall be for the purpose of making fair and accurate reports of those proceedings, and, in particular: a. shall not be the subject of commercial sponsorship or be used for commercial advertising; and b. shall not be used for electoral advertising. 2. Recording and broadcasting of the proceedings shall not be such as to interfere with the conduct of those proceedings. 3. The committee may report to the House any willful breach of these conditions. GUIDELINES FOR CAMERA OPERATORS • The Parliamentary Service is responsible for video broadcasting of the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly’s committees. • The broadcasting of the public hearing of Estimates Committee C must support a dignified, accurate and consistent image of the committee. To achieve this image, camera operators shall comply with the following guidelines: 1. Cameras will only begin to film when the Chair declares the hearing open, and will cease filming when the Chair declares the hearing closed, adjourned or suspended. 2. Generally, cameras should only focus on the committee member or minister, or to a ministerial advisor to whom a minister has referred a question to answer. Shots should be no closer than ‘head and shoulders’. 3. Cameras should never focus on a committee member who is not asking a question or a minister or ministerial advisor who is not giving an answer. 4. Fine tuning or variations to depths of field at the discretion of the operator is acceptable. 5. Sparing use of wide-angle shot may be used at other times. 6. Reaction shots of a committee member, minister or ministerial advisor are not permitted. 7. If an exchange between committee members, a minister and ministerial advisors is too fast to permit normal camera switching, a wider camera shot incorporating those involved in the exchange, including the Chair, is permitted. 8. In the event of unparliamentary behaviour or disturbance in the proceeding, the camera is to focus on the Chair or a slightly wider angle shot of the hearing which does not show the offending incident. 9. No close-up shots of committee members’, ministers’ or advisors’ papers are permitted. Instructions from the Chair in relation to the operation of the vision equipment shall be observed.

Ministers’ use of ancillary materials The committee discussed the possible use by Ministers of ancillary materials at the hearing. The committee agreed that Ministers be allowed to use ancillary materials during the hearing, subject to compliance with the following guidelines: • The materials should not be of a size or nature which could create safety or security issues (eg they impede movement within the Chamber, impede access to and from the Chamber, require power cords to be run across the floor or are difficult to move into, and out of, the Parliamentary precinct) • If the materials contain or depict information, that information should also be presented to the committee in documentary or other acceptable form. • Advance notice should be given to the research director of the nature of any ancillary materials the Minister proposes using, so that the committee can assess its compliance with the above.

Catering: The committee agreed that morning and afternoon tea would be provided and members would arrange their own lunches. Coffee and tea making facilities will be available all day behind the Chamber. Ms Croft arrived at 1.16pm

Next meeting: 8:00am, Thursday, 16 July 2009 in Room A.35.

Adjournment: There being no further business, the meeting closed at 1:17pm.

Confirmed the 16th day of July 2009.

Mr Evan Moorhead MP Chair

ATTACHMENT A

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C DRAFT INQUIRY TIMETABLE 2009

TIME/DATE DETAILS

1.00pm, Thur 18 June First Meeting (Room 5.01a Parliamentary Annexe)

Questions on Notice from Committee Members to be provided to the 3.00pm, Fri 26 June Research Director (SO 181(1) & 181 (2))*

Notices of intention to examine in detail (if any) to be provided to the 3.00pm, Fri 26 June Research Director (SO179(1))

Answers to Questions on Notice to be provided to the Research Director 10.00am, Wed 15 July for distribution to Committee Members (SO 181(3))

8.00am, Thur 16 July Pre–hearing meeting in A.35 [behind Legislative Council (Red) Chamber]

8.30am, Thur 16 July Public Hearing commences in Red Chamber

Answers to Questions taken on notice at hearing to be provided to the 5.00pm, Mon 20 July Research Director for distribution to Committee Members (SO 182(3)(b))

4.00pm, Fri 24 July Draft Report circulated to Committee Members

Committee meeting to consider and adopt draft report (Room TBA – 11.00am, Tues 28 July teleconference facilities available)

Statements of reservation/dissenting reports to be provided to the 11.00am, Wed 29 July Research Director ‘within 24 hours after the committee’s reports is adopted’ (SO 187(3))

Tabling of report and additional information folders Mon 3 August 2009 (SO 189)

*SO=Standing Order ATTACHMENT B

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C HEARING PROGRAM - THURSDAY 16 JULY 2009 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL CHAMBER

PORTFOLIO TIME

MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE

Department of Natural Resources 8:30am – 10:15am

Morning tea 10:15am – 10:30am

Department of Mines and Energy 10:30am – 11:15am

Energy GOCs/Energy Ombudsman 11:15am – 12:15pm

Trade Queensland 12:15pm – 12:45pm

Lunch 12:45pm – 1:30pm

MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN

Department of Housing 1:30pm – 2:30pm

Department of Communities and Office for Women 2:30pm – 3:45pm

Break 3:45pm – 4:00pm

MINISTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING

Department of Infrastructure and Planning 4:00pm – 5:45pm

ATTACHMENT C

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C BROADCASTING OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY 16 JULY 2009 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL CHAMBER

Proposed Resolution:

That television film coverage and photography be allowed during the Chair’s opening statements and the introductory statements of the Ministers as well as for a short period during each changeover of ministerial advisors; and

That audio and video of the hearing recorded by Parliamentary Service cameras and microphones in the Red Chamber shall be broadcast by the Parliamentary Service via the Service’s website and to receivers throughout the Parliamentary Precinct. RULES FOR THE RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING, INCLUDING REBROADCASTING, OF THE PROCEEDINGS: 1. Broadcasting of the proceedings shall be for the purpose of making fair and accurate reports of those proceedings, and, in particular: a. shall not be the subject of commercial sponsorship or be used for commercial advertising; and b. shall not be used for electoral advertising. 2. Recording and broadcasting of the proceedings shall not be such as to interfere with the conduct of those proceedings. 3. The committee may report to the House any willful breach of these conditions. GUIDELINES FOR CAMERA OPERATORS The Parliamentary Service is responsible for video broadcasting of the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly’s committees. The broadcasting of the public hearing of Estimates Committee C must support a dignified, accurate and consistent image of the committee. To achieve this image, camera operators shall comply with the following guidelines: 1. Cameras will only begin to film when the Chair declares the hearing open, and will cease filming when the Chair declares the hearing closed, adjourned or suspended. 2. Generally, cameras should only focus on the committee member or minister, or to a ministerial advisor to whom a minister has referred a question to answer. Shots should be no closer than ‘head and shoulders’. 3. Cameras should never focus on a committee member who is not asking a question or a minister or ministerial advisor who is not giving an answer. 4. Fine tuning or variations to depths of field at the discretion of the operator is acceptable. 5. Sparing use of wide-angle shot may be used at other times. 6. Reaction shots of a committee member, minister or ministerial advisor are not permitted. 7. If an exchange between committee members, a minister and ministerial advisors is too fast to permit normal camera switching, a wider camera shot incorporating those involved in the exchange, including the Chair, is permitted. 8. In the event of unparliamentary behaviour or disturbance in the proceeding, the camera is to focus on the Chair or a slightly wider angle shot of the hearing which does not show the offending incident. 9. No close-up shots of committee members’, ministers’ or advisors’ papers are permitted.

Instructions from the Chair in relation to the operation of the vision equipment shall be observed.

Minutes of Meeting 29 June 2009 Minutes

Original Held: RD

File No: Est C 2009

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C MINUTES Meeting at 11.00am on Monday, 29 June 2009 by teleconference Room 5.04a Parliamentary Annexe

Present: Mr Evan Moorhead MP (Chair) Mr Jeff Seeney MP (Deputy Chair) Mr David Gibson MP Mr Steven Kilburn MP Mrs Rosemary Menkens MP (from 11.05am) Ms Lillian van Litsenburg MP

In attendance: Ms Renee Easten, Research Director Ms Jenny North, Executive Assistant

Apologies: Ms Peta-Kaye Croft MP

Estimates Inquiry The Chair opened the meeting and advised the Committee timetable: of the changes to the hearing timetable, which included revised department names and Mrs Menkens suggested amendments. Discussion ensued. On the motion of Ms van Litsenburg, seconded by Mr Seeney, the committee resolved to rescind the Committee’s resolution of the 18 June 2009 to adopt the public hearing timetable. On the motion of Mr Gibson, seconded by Mr Kilburn, the committee resolved to adopt for the committee's public hearing on Thursday, 16 July 2009, the timetable as amended below.

Portfolio Organisational Unit Session Time

Minister for Natural Department of Natural Resources 8:30am – 10:15am Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade

Break 10:15am – 10:30am Minister for Natural Queensland Mines and Energy 10:30am – 11:15am Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Energy GOCs/Energy 11:15am – 12:15am Trade Ombudsman/Office of Clean Energy Trade Queensland 12:15pm – 12:45pm Lunch 12:45pm – 1:30pm

Minister for Community Housing and Homelessness 1:30pm – 2:30pm Services and Housing Services and Office for Women and Minister for Women Community and Youth Justice 2:30pm – 3:45pm Services and Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian Break 3:45pm – 4:00pm

Minister for Infrastructure Department of Infrastructure and 4:00pm – 5:45pm and Planning Planning

Ministers’ use of The committee had previously discussed the possible use by ancillary materials: Ministers of ancillary materials at the hearing at it’s meeting on 18 June 2009.

At that meeting the committee agreed that Ministers would be allowed to use ancillary materials during the hearing, subject to compliance with the following guidelines: • The materials should not be of a size or nature which could create safety or security issues (eg, they impede movement within the Chamber, impede access to and from the Chamber, require power cords to be run across the floor, are difficult to move into and out of the Parliamentary precinct) • If the materials contain or depict information, that information should also be presented to the committee in documentary or other acceptable form. • Advance notice should be given to the research director of the nature of any ancillary materials the Minister proposes using, so that the committee can assess its compliance with the above. The Research Director advised members that the secretariat had been notified that the Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women would be utilising flip charts and other materials relevant to her portfolio. Discussion ensued. Mrs Menkens joined the meeting at 11.05am. The Committee agreed that if the materials fell within the above guidelines and were relevant to, added to, or supported the answers to the questions, that they be allowed, but that no promotional materials could be displayed. Once the materials were no longer required by the Minister, they should be removed from the chamber. Item noted. For the benefit of Mrs Menkens the Chair recapped the items discussed before she joined the meeting.

Next meeting: 8:00am, Thursday, 16 July 2009 in Room A.35.

Adjournment: There being no further business, the meeting closed at 11:09am.

Confirmed the 16th day of July 2009.

Mr Evan Moorhead MP Chair

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C HEARING PROGRAM - THURSDAY 16 JULY 2009 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL CHAMBER

PORTFOLIO TIME

MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE

Department of Natural Resources 8:30am – 10:15am

Morning tea 10:15am – 10:30am

Queensland Mines and Energy 10:30am – 11:15am Energy GOCs/Energy Ombudsman/Office of Clean 11:15am – 12:15pm Energy 12:15pm – 12:45pm Trade Queensland

Lunch 12:45pm – 1:30pm

MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN

Housing and Homelessness Services and Office for 1:30pm – 2:30pm Women 2:30pm – 3:45pm Community and Youth Justice Services and Commission for Children and Young People and

Child Guardian

Break 3:45pm – 4:00pm

MINISTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING

Department of Infrastructure and Planning 4:00pm – 5:45pm

Minutes of Meeting 16 July 2009 Minutes [DRAFT]

Original Held: RD

File No: Est C 2009

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C MINUTES Meeting at 8.02am on Thursday, 16 July 2009 Room A.35 Parliament House

Present: Mr Evan Moorhead MP (Chair) Mr Jeff Seeney MP (Deputy Chair) Ms Peta-Kaye Croft MP Mr David Gibson MP Mrs Rosemary Menkens MP Ms Lillian van Litsenburg MP

In attendance: Ms Renee Easten, Research Director Ms Jenny North, Executive Assistant

Apologies: Mr Steven Kilburn MP

Confirmation of On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Ms van Minutes of previous Litsenburg, the committee resolved that the minutes of the meeting: meetings on 18 and 29 June 2009 be confirmed.

Business arising nil from the Minutes:

Public hearing Standing Orders 177, 178, 180 and 183 procedures: Chair requests committee members to note the following

matters concerning the hearing: • Questions are to be directed to the Minister, not to his advisers. The Minister may refer questions to his advisers to answer. • Questions shall be no longer than 1 minute and answers no longer than 3 minutes. The member asking the question may agree to extend the time for an answer, but any extension over 2 minutes must be agreed to by the chair. • One bell will sound 15 seconds before the expiration of time limits, and a double bell will sound at the expiration of the time limit. A double bell will also sound 2 minutes after an extension of time has been given. • Questioning will be conducted in 20 minute sessions, rotating between government and non-government members. The first session will be allocated to non- government members. • Documents may only be tabled by the Minister, a witness or committee member, with the leave of the committee. • Any time expended when committee deliberates in private is to be equally apportioned between government and non-government members. • The committee has given leave for non-committee members to attend and ask questions. • Ministers may make opening statements of up to 5 minutes.

Release of inquiry On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Ms van documents: Litsenburg, the committee resolved to authorise the publication of all documents so far presented to it in the course of its inquiry, pursuant to section 50(2) of the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001. The Chair advised members that a further resolution covering all documents presented to the committee during the remaining stages of its inquiry, will be proposed at the committee’s final meeting.

Other business: Nil

Next meeting: At 11.00am on Tuesday 28 July 2009 in room 5.04a of the Parliamentary Annexe to consider the draft report. Members may attend by teleconference if they wish. Confirmation of the time of that meeting will be sent out in due course. A draft report will be emailed to Members by 4.00pm on Friday, 24 July 2009, as previously agreed.

Close: There being no further business, the meeting closed at 8:06am.

Confirmed the 28th day of July 2009.

Mr Evan Moorhead MP Chair

Minutes of Meeting 28 July 2009 Minutes

Original Held: RD

File No: Est C 2009 ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C MINUTES Meeting at 11.02am on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 by teleconference Room 5.04a Parliamentary Annex

Present: Mr Evan Moorhead MP (Chair) Mr Jeff Seeney MP (Deputy Chair) Ms Peta-Kaye Croft MP Mrs Betty Kiernan MP Mrs Rosemary Menkens MP Mr Steven Kilburn MP

In attendance: Ms Renee Easten, Research Director Ms Jenny North, Executive Assistant

Apologies: Mr David Gibson MP Ms Lillian van Litsenburg MP The Chair advised the Committee that Ms van Litsenburg was overseas attending a funeral, and that Mrs Kiernan had been appointed to Estimates Committee C, in her place, for the remainder of the Estimates process.

Confirmation of On the motion of Ms Croft, seconded by Mr Seeney, the Minutes of previous committee resolved that the minutes of the meeting on 16 meeting: July 2009 be confirmed.

Consideration of On the motion of Mr Moorhead, seconded by Mr Kilburn, the Chair’s draft Report committee resolved that the Chair’s draft report be adopted as the report of the committee.

Reservations or The Chair asked whether any members are proposing to dissenting reports lodge a statement of reservation or a dissenting report. The Research Director advised that David Gibson had notified the secretariat that he would be providing a statement of reservation or a dissenting report. Mr Seeney and Mrs Menkens advised that they would each be providing a statement of reservation. The Chair noted that a statement of reservation or dissenting report, signed by the relevant member, must be provided to the Research Director within 24 hours (by 11.00am on Wednesday 29 July 2009). The Research Director advised that she would be off-site at a conference at that time and asked that those documents be initially provided to the Committee’s executive assistant.

Release of On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Mrs Kiernan, the remaining inquiry committee resolved that pursuant to section 50(2) of the documents: Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 and Standing Order 182(3)(e), and further to the resolution passed at its pre- hearing meeting on 16 July 2009, the committee authorises the publication of all remaining documents presented to it in the course of its inquiry.

Determination of On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Mr Kilburn, the additional material to committee resolved that the committee table, together with be tabled with the report, a volume of “Additional Information”, which will report(s) and contain: minutes • the meeting minutes; • the questions on notice; • the answers to questions on notice; • documents tabled at hearing; • the answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing; and • the hearing transcript.

Hearing transcript The Chair discussed requested editorial amendments to the hearing transcript noting those which were approved by the Chief Hansard Reporter. On the motion of Ms Croft, seconded by Mr Kilburn, the committee resolved that the transcript of the hearing, as so edited, be confirmed.

Date for tabling On the motion of Mr Seeney, seconded by Ms Croft, the committee agreed to table the Report of Estimates Committee C and the volume of “Additional Information” on Monday 3 August 2009.

Other business: The Chair advised that he would be in Parliament House on 3 August 2009, for tabling of the report. Close: There being no further business, the meeting closed at 11:10am.

Certified correct the 3rd day of August 2009.

Mr Evan Moorhead MP Chair

Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade

Questions on Notice (Non-Government) QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 2-21 and the industry consultation regarding the proposal to amend the royalty regime for petroleum and changes to metalliferous royalties announced in the 2008-09 budget, can the Minister provide:

• the names of the top twenty industry groups and companies that have been consulted and the times and dates of these consultations; • how much each of those groups or companies have paid in royalties and for what tonnage; • when the proposed Regulatory Impact Statement from both this budget and last years will be published?

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to Table 1.2 of page 22 of the Capital Statement “Queensland Future Growth Fund projects”, can the Minister outline:

• the total amounts committed to fund the business cases, scoping studies, and pre-feasibility studies of the ZeroGen project along with the Callide Oxyfuel project and the post-combustion project; • the commitments already made to ZeroGen versus other Clean Coal technology projects of its kind such as those to XStrata and GE, including the costs already spent on business

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to the department 2008-09 predicted initiatives sourced at SDS 2-6, can the Minister please provide details as to: the amount of the Smart Mining-Future Prosperity program for stimulating exploration has been directed towards the rapid development of underground coal gasification and coal seam gas production;

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to the Capital Statement on page 18, can the Minister outline: the budgeted capital spend of and (being more than $2billion) by proposed region in relation to the augmentation and maintenance of the distribution network

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 3-242, will the Minister outline the details of the $26million blowout in Grants and Subsidies attributed to the Queensland Water Commission for communications campaigns? In particular:

• a full list of the companies or consultants paid by this amount of money;

• a full list of the elements of the communications campaigns that comprised the amount

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 3-204 and the $300million in rebates returned to the people of Queensland, can the Minister outline:

• the details by region that received rebates; • what amount of savings of water have been calculated in these areas; • whether the home or garden was the dominant user of the water in these areas

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 2-7 and the establishment under the Department of Mines and Energy industry exploration ambassadors to promote Queensland opportunities across the world, with the Minister provide a break-down of each ambassador proposed by:

• Staff Position • Salary • Travel expenses • General expenses • Allowances • Benefits • Living expenses • Benchmarks used to measure performance

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 2-14 and outbound trade missions –

Detail by destination all 2008-09 outbound trade missions, broken down by:

• Destination/s; • Date of trip; • Total cost (listing travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses separately); • Who travelled on this mission and their role; • Purpose of trade mission; and • Benchmarks used to measure success.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 2-9 and overseas locations –

Provide a listing of the operating cost of each office location, detailing:

• Number of staff; • Salary level of each staff member • Position of each staff member; • Travel expenses of each staff member • General expenses of each staff member • Allowances of each staff member • Benefits of each staff member • Living expenses of each staff member • Benchmarks used to measure performance

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr Jeff Seeney, MP, Member for Callide

to ask The Minister for Mines and Energy

With reference to SDS 3-207 and drought assistance rebates, will the Minister outline:

• the regions around that have received these rebates; • the amount given in rebates to those individual regions to rural irrigation water users on payment of fixed water supply charges

Answers to Questions on Notice (Non-Government) PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 1

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 2-21 and the industry consultation regarding the proposal to amend the royalty regime for petroleum and changes to metalliferous royalties announced in the 2008-09 budget, can the Minister provide:

• the names of the top twenty industry groups and companies that have been consulted and the times and dates of these consultations; • how much each of those groups or companies have paid in royalties and for what tonnage; • when the proposed Regulatory Impact Statement from both this budget and last years will be published?

ANSWER:

Firstly, I draw the member’s attention to Standing Order 181 (5) which clearly states that each question is not to contain sub-parts or to, in effect, ask more than one question.

I will however proceed to answer the multi-part question as one question.

The Metalliferous Industry Consultation Paper is scheduled to be released for public comment in the near future.

The Government is currently assessing the petroleum royalty options and will shortly decide on the best course of action.

Due to reasons of confidentiality, details in relation to tonnages and actual payments by companies cannot be provided.

The following table provides the royalty amounts paid for petroleum and base and precious metals operations.

Accrued Royalty Revenue Year Ended Petroleum Base & Precious Metals 30-Jun-08 $72,853,680 $188,620,601 30-Jun-07 $67,034,620 $202,599,064

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 2

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to Table 1.2 of page 22 of the Capital Statement “Queensland Future Growth Fund projects”, can the Minister outline:

• the total amounts committed to fund the business cases, scoping studies, and Pre-Feasibility studies of the ZeroGen project along with the Callide Oxyfuel project and the Tarong Energy post-combustion project;

• the commitments already made to ZeroGen versus other Clean Coal technology projects of its kind such as those to XStrata and GE, including the costs already spent on business

ANSWER:

From the “Queensland Future Growth Fund” the has committed:

− $102.5 million to ZeroGen Pty Ltd (ZeroGen) for preparation of a Feasibility Study for an IGCC with CCS project and operating costs of Zerogen; − $10 million to CS Energy as its financial investment towards the construction and operation of the Callide Oxyfuel Project where the total costs are $206 million; and − $10 million towards the Carbon Geostorage Initiative to conduct a state wide assessment of carbon dioxide storage potential.

These commitments have leveraged initial investments from the Australian black coal industry from the Coal21 Fund:

− $26.2 million to ZeroGen for preparation of a Feasibility Study for an IGCC with CCS project, with a further $20 million committed subject to conditions regarding the final scope of work; − $67.9 million to the Callide Oxyfuel Project; and − $20 million to the Carbon Geostorage Initiative.

The Queensland Government has made no commitment of funds from the “Queensland Future Growth Fund” towards the Tarong Energy post-combustion capture trial project.

The Queensland Government has made no other commitments to Clean Coal Technology Projects of the kind similar to ZeroGen.

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 3

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to the department 2008-09 predicted initiatives sourced at SDS 2-6, can the Minister please provide details as to: the amount of the Smart Mining-Future Prosperity program for stimulating exploration has been directed towards the rapid development of underground coal gasification and coal seam gas production

ANSWER:

The Bligh Government has made a commitment in Q2 to create a stronger Queensland economy by increasing the number of business that undertake research, development or innovation by 50 percent. The Smart Mining - Future Prospertiy program is one way we are delivering on this promise.

Smart Mining – Future Prosperity is a four year program ending in 2010 aimed at increasing exploration expenditure in Queensland. This is being achieved by acquiring new geological and geophysical data in greenfield and frontier areas of the state, by facilitating access to land subject to native title, and by providing industry grants mainly for collaborative drilling projects.

The collection of new geological and geophysical data will continue in 2009-10 as will the assistance to industry, improving processes for access to land subject to Native Title.

Increased exploration is important to find new mineral and energy resources to replace those already mined and to increase the state’s resource stocks.

The exploration for coals suitable for gasification and for coal seam gas utilises exploration data and information collected by the department as a normal part of its activities and under various exploration Initiatives such as Smart Mining – Future Prosperity.

Underground coal gasification development and coal seam gas development are not exploration activities as they are respectively undergoing pilot studies and are becoming commercialised. Therefore, support would be provided under the Collaborative Drilling Initiative or Industry Network Initiative to test a new exploration concept.

Underground coal gasification development is currently subject to Queensland’s Underground Coal Gasification Policy which involves pilot studies to develop the technology, consider environmental management practices and ultimately determine whether the technology is sustainable and suitable for ongoing use in Queensland. The policy also endeavours to resolve the issues relating to tenement overlaps affecting underground coal gasification and coal seam gas production. The Government established an industry consultative committee to assist with policy implementation.

Coal seam gas development is proceeding under the provisions of the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004. Some coal seam gas based liquefied natural gas projects have been given significant project status by the Co-ordinator General within the Department of Infrastructure and Planning.

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 4

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to the Capital Statement on page 18, can the Minister outline: the budgeted capital spend of ENERGEX and Ergon Energy (being more than $2billion) by proposed region in relation to the augmentation and maintenance of the distribution network

ANSWER:

With reference to the Member’s specific question, I have been advised by ENERGEX and Ergon Energy that the total budgeted capital spend on augmentation and maintenance of the distribution network, including expenditure on non-system assets such as vehicles, property and information technology systems is outlined by region as follows:

Region Network Provider Budgeted Capital Spend ($’000,000) ENERGEX 936.9 Far North Ergon Energy 119.0 Northern Queensland Ergon Energy 150.0 Ergon Energy 275.0 Ergon Energy 196.0 Wide Bay Ergon Energy 108.0 Non-system expenditure ENERGEX 107.7 Non-system expenditure Ergon Energy 200.0 TOTAL 2,092.6

Program highlights for South East Queensland include:

• $15.4 million to establish a new substation at Gympie to increase network capacity and reliability; • $9.3 million to upgrade electricity supplies at the Bundamba substation to increase network capacity; • $8.6 million to improve electricity supplies between Coomera and Hope Island to cater for increased electricity demand in the northern Gold Coast area; and • $7.4 million to upgrade electricity supplies from the Mudgeeraba substation to improve reliability and increase capacity.

Program highlights for Far , Northern Queensland, Central Queensland, South West Queensland and Wide Bay regions include:

• $13 million for a new substation located at El Arish in ; • $20 million to upgrade capacity for supply from Black River substation which will improve reliability and supply for approximately 2,000 customers in Northern Queensland; • $124 million to reinforce supply to growth areas of Central Queensland through the construction of a new substation at Glenella, 11 kilovolt feeders and dual circuit 132 kilovolt lines; • $26 million for a new substation at Berseker in north Rockhampton to meet the expansion of the area; • $41 million for the construction of a new substation at Munduberra to increase power supplies in the Wide Bay region; and • $14.8 million will be invested in the 2009-10 financial year to continue the redevelopment of the Dalby bulk supply point to substantially increase its capacity.

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 5

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 3-242, will the Minister outline the details of the $26 million blowout in Grants and Subsidies attributed to the Queensland Water Commission for communications campaigns? In particular:

• a full list of the companies or consultants paid by this amount of money;

• a full list of the elements of the communications campaigns that comprised the amount

ANSWER:

Page 3-242 of the Service Delivery Statement in relation to costs of the Queensland Water Commission does not refer to any expenditure against Grants and Subsidies.

However, if the Honourable Member is able to provide further details in relation to the information he is seeking I will be happy to provide further information when the Committee sits.

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 6

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 3-204 and the $300 million in rebates returned to the people of Queensland, can the Minister outline:

• the details by region that received rebates; • what amount of savings of water have been calculated in these areas; • whether the home or garden was the dominant user of the water in these areas

ANSWER:

During the worst drought on record the Government made a commitment to work with Queenslanders to help them reduce their water consumption. We delivered on that commitment via the Queensland Government’s Home and Garden WaterWise Rebate Schemes.

These schemes, which have now closed, were the largest and most successful schemes of their type in Australia.

The Schemes which operated from July 2006 paid out $321.26 million to the people of Queensland for a range of water efficient devices including rainwater tanks, 4 Star water-rated washing machines, dual flush toilet suites and garden products.

Calculations on water savings cannot be done on a regional basis, however, it is estimated that some 8,418,000 kilolitres can be saved each year from the ongoing use of the water saving products for which rebates have been paid across the State.

It is estimated across the State that greater residential water use occurred in the home through showers, toilet and laundry uses rather than in the garden.

Applications and rebates were recorded statistically by local government authority and the table attached represent the amounts provided to residents within 67 Queensland local government authorities over the life of the Schemes. ATTACHMENT

Local Government Rebate paid Authority Balonne $169,176 Banana $701,387 Barcaldine $74,484 Barcoo $11,085 Blackall-Tambo $56,836 Boulia $600 $117,301,783 Bulloo $3,800 Bundaberg $3,718,897 Burdekin $248,440 Cairns $2,302,818 Carpentaria $10,615 Cassoway Coast $954,056 Central Highlands $381,918 Charters Towers $203,577 Cherbourg $1,600 Cloncurry $21,718 Cook $227,326 Croydon $20,455 Dalby $2,320,855 Etheridge $61,151 Flinders $36,867 Fraser Coast $4,128,904 Gladstone $2,030,719 Gold Coast $36,904,670 Goondiwindi $402,959 Gympie $3,277,334 Hinchinbrook $399,915 Hopevale $200 Ipswich $16,355,693 Isaac $255,437 Lockhart River $1,050 Lockyer Valley $3,204,096 Logan $22,734,517 Longreach $167,752 Mackay $1,975,472 Mapoon $1,200 McKinlay $9,818 $39,242,094 Mornington $200 Mount Isa $117,693 Murweh $228,583 North Burnett $693,167 Palm Island $200 Paroo $22,522 Pormpuraaw $1,000 Quilpie $54,925 Redland $7,360,826 Richmond $7,409 Rockhampton $2,195,540 Roma $669,351 $3,125,699 Somerset $2,314,784 South Burnett $2,828,594 Southern Downs $4,002,013 Sunshine Coast $15,675,612 Tablelands $3,599,260 $15,559,678 Torres $3,600 Torres Strait Island $400 Townsville $2,078,729 Weipa $6,300 Whitsunday $779,651 Winton $14,130 Woorabinda $200 Wujal Wujal $1,000 Yarrabah $1,200 TOTAL: $321,263,534

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 7

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 2-7 and the establishment under the Department of Mines and Energy industry exploration ambassadors to promote Queensland opportunities across the world, will the Minister provide a break-down of each ambassador proposed by:

ƒ Staff Position ƒ Salary ƒ Travel expenses ƒ General expenses ƒ Allowances ƒ Benefits ƒ Living expenses ƒ Benchmarks used to measure performance

ANSWER:

The Bligh Government is committed to delivering more jobs for Queenslanders, and supporting the mining industry is one way we are achieving this.

The establishment of the Queensland Resource Industry Ambassadors (QRIA) is delivering on our commitments by supporting the long-term growth of investment in minerals and energy exploration in Queensland.

The QRIA comprises a group of senior resource industry leaders who are unpaid individuals offering a private sector view of what Queensland has to offer in relation to exploration and development potential. Ambassadors will not receive salaries, travel allowances, benefits or other payments. The Associate Director-General (Queensland Mines and Energy) is an ex-officio member of the QRIA.

As private sector senior executives, the ambassadors would regularly attend meetings and conferences both in Australia and overseas as paid employees of their companies – usually on company business and sometimes presenting papers in their own right. The operating model for the QRIA seeks to gain leverage from the personal status of these individuals to act as Queensland exploration ambassadors who will work with Queensland Mines and Energy executives to promote opportunities for exploration and resource development in Queensland.

While the QRIA has a broad objective to make Queensland the “greenfield exploration capital of Australia by 2020”, at an operational level, Queensland Mines and Energy will ensure that practical performance indicators will be measured in terms of the level of participation of the QRIA in significant forums and events.

PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 8

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 2-14 and outbound trade missions –

Detail by destination all 2008-09 outbound trade missions, broken down by: • Destination/s; • Date of trip; • Total cost (listing travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses separately); • Who travelled on this mission and their role; • Purpose of trade mission; and • Benchmarks used to measure success.

ANSWER:

Trade missions, coordinated by Trade Queensland, provide a cost effective tool for Queensland companies to enter the global marketplace and raise the profile of Queensland exporters internationally.

The total costs for these missions was $683,427 with outcomes totalling $56,855,830. In cases where Trade Queensland is represented by an overseas office, these missions were supported by local staff.

In order for Queensland to retain and increase its export market share, Queensland must continue to not only nurture the relationships that exist but develop new opportunities. Trade missions are fundamental to providing credibility to Queensland companies wishing to develop or expand their export business.

There were a total of 21 missions for the year 2008-09. These missions covered destinations which were considered Queensland’s primary markets such as Japan, USA and Europe, and emerging markets including Latin America, Middle East, South East and South Asia.

Attached is a spreadsheet detailing all missions, their respective costs and outcomes. “Other costs” on this spreadsheet includes Trade Show expenditure, seminar costs, marketing material, networking/briefing events, Austrade and other business matching fees and transport and car hire.

The decision on the targeted trade missions managed by Trade Queensland is based upon the level of interest, needs and requirements of Queensland’s exporters.

The tools for measuring the success for a trade mission are simple. A trade mission is deemed successful if it met the varying needs and specific expectations of the mission participant. Depending on their level of export experience, exporters will use trade missions for a variety of reasons.

New or first time exporters will use the mission to ascertain if the market is right for them, and will use it for market research. Other with more experience could be seeking collaborative partners, agents or distributors, or to identify competitors. Well established exporters will set out to achieve actual export sales.

While direct export sales from trade missions can vary from immediate to long term outcomes, they are not the only outcomes being sought by participants.

Post mission, each participant is followed up to determine the success of the mission, whether the mission met their requirements, and to identify their future needs.

QUESTION ON NOTICE SDS 2-14

TOTAL Mission Dates Qld Govt representative Role Costs A$ A$ travel accom ent. Other expenses Electra Mining Exhibition, 7-18 September 08 Greg McKean, Principal Trade Officer, Trade Mission Leader 3,075 2,475 0 9,499 15,049 Johannesburg, South Africa Overseas Market Development, Europe and Provided in-market support to Qld firms Sub-Saharan Africa, Trade Queensland participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress collaborations with Qld

Queensland Mining Exhibition at 22-24 September 08 This mission was supported by Trade 2,572 3,644 0 61,713 67,929 MINExpo, Las Vegas, USA Queensland staff based in the Americas

Trade Mission to the Middle 15-24 November 2008 Minister John Mickel MP, Minister for Trade Trade mission leader East, Big5 Exhibition (costs for the Minister and Ministerial staff are covered by Ministerial Services and are not reflected in this table)

Martin Bradshaw, Policy Advisor, Office of the Minister for Transport, Trade, Employment and Industrial Relations Loftus Harris, Special Rep for Middle East & Provide support to the business 32,969 16,218 43 19,133 68,363 India delegation, including management of business meetings and official functions. Youhanna Yassa, Director, Middle East and Trade Mission Manager North Africa Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, arrange specific site visits and run Glen Nunn, A/Director, Trade Services Business Delegate support (UAE) As previous Commissioner to the UAE, Glen Nunn provided additional support to the business delegates. While in the UAE, Glen Nunn also facilitated crucial administration arrangements for the This mission was supported by Trade Queensland staff based in the Middle East

Mining Indaba Conference, Cape 9-12 February 09 Andrew Craig, Agent-General and Trade Mission Leader 6,071 1,956 0 7,316 15,343 Town, South Africa Commissioner Provided in-market support to Qld firms participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress collaborations with Qld Trade Mission to Latin America 9-20 March 2009 This mission was supported by Trade Trade Mission Leader 29,229 7,157 0 91,719 128,105 Queensland staff based in the America Provided in-market support to Qld firms Mexico City, Mexico participating in the mission. Bogota, Colombia Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt Sao Paulo, Rio De Janeiro, Belo and private sector allies to progress Horizonte, Brazil and Santiago, collaborations with Qld Chile Trade Mission Manager Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, Queensland Bio mission 12- 21 May 2009 The Hon. Stephen Robertson MP, Minister for Trade (Ministerial Services covers the costs for the Minister and Ministerial staff and is not reflected in this table)

Minister Robertson - Los Angeles Kathie Standen, Principal Advisor, Office of and Atlanta the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade

This mission was supported by Trade Queensland staff based in the Americas

Activities and meetings organised locally as part of the Biotech 2009 conference are not included (for example the Queensland North America Biotechnology Council Meeting)

13,954 10,063 0 10,808 34,825

28 Feb - 8 Mar 2009 Nicole Smith,Senior Trade Officer (IDB), Mission Member and 5,244 1,493 0 3,055 9,792 Australian Trade Mission to the Sector Services, Trade Queensland Coordinator of Queensland participants ADB & World Bank, Manila, Philippines Kathy Rankin, Principal Trade Regional Mission Member & Coordinator for Development Officer, Cairns Regional members of the Australian Tropical Office, Department of Tourism, Regional Expertise Consortium Development and Industries

Queensland Education & 29 Oct- 12 Nov 08 The Honourable Paul Braddy Trade Mission Leader 22,988 12,279 940 13,026 49,233 Training International (QETI) Chair, QETI Board Provided in-market support to Qld firms Mission to Vietnam, Hong Kong, participating in the mission. Macua & China Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress collaborations with Qld

Mr Stephen Biggs, A/Director, QETI Trade Mission Manager Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, Trade Mission to Singapore 4 - 8 September 2008 Mr Gary Fenlon, MP 20,279 20,279 Parliamentary Secretary for Transport, Trade, Employment and Industrial Relations (travel costs covered by Ministerial Services and not reflected in this table)

Mr Martin Bradshaw Policy Advisor, Office of the Minister for Transport, Trade, Employment and Industrial Relations Queensland Building and 18-24 October08 Nil 675 506 0 14,652 15,833 Construction Trade Mission to attend BuildArch 2008, Bangalore India Queensland Mining 3-8 November 08 Loftus Harris, Queenlsand Special Trade Mission Leader 10,888 6,467 0 14,798 32,153 Infrastructure Mission to attend Representative for India and Middle East Provided in-market support to Qld firms the International Mining and participating in the mission. Machinery Exhibition 2009, Facilitated business matching for Qld Kolkata, India firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Queensland Trade Mission to the 11-16 November 08 Ms Julie Boyd, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader 10,880 4,160 0 12,863 27,903 Philippines Represetative for Philippines Provided in-market support to Qld firms participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Mr Russ Mackie, Business Manager Trade Mission Manager Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, arrange specific site visits and run Queensland Mining Trade 15-21 November 08 Mr Bob Quinn, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader 5,376 885 413 11,433 18,107 Mission to Balikpapan, Representative for Indonesia, Singapore, Provided in-market support to Qld firms Indonesia Thailand and Malaysia. participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Queensland Beauty, Lifestyle 11-14 November 08 Mr Steve Bredhauer, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader 6,350 3,023 299 31,857 41,529 and Wellbeing Trade Mission to Representative for China and Vietnam. Provided in-market support to Qld firms Hong Kong and Southern China participating in the mission. to attend Cosmoprof 2008 This mission was supported by Trade Facilitated business matching for Qld Queensland staff based in Asia firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Ms Amada Chen, Senior Trade Officer, Trade Mission Manager Trade Queensland Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, Queensland China Mining 4-13 November 08 Mr Steve Bredhauer, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader 17,213 11,199 300 39,166 67,878 Equipment, Technologies and Represnative for China and Vietnam. Provided in-market support to Qld firms Services Mission to Beijing, participating in the mission. China & China Coal Expo 08 and This mission was supported by Trade Facilitated business matching for Qld China Mining Expo 08 Queensland staff based in Asia firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Mr Geoff Goh, Business Manager, Trade Trade Mission Manager Queenlsand Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, arrange specific site visits and run Queensland Mining Trade 22-28 February 09 Mr Bob Quinn, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader 10,742 4,496 2,275 3,666 21,179 Mission to Indonesia to co- Representative for Indonesia, Singapore, Provided in-market support to Qld firms incide with Ozmine 2009, Jakarta Thailand and Malaysia. participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Ms Donna Manungkalit-Smith, Senior Trade Trade Mission Manager Officer Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, arrange specific site visits and run Queensland Marine Mission to 17-22 February 09 549 2,694 606 8,212 12,061 Mumbai International Boat Show This mission was supported by Trade 2009 Queensland staff based in India Processed Food Trade Mission 6-9 May 09 Mr Steve Bredhauer, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader 9,264 1,449 159 28,547 39,419 to Hong Kong and Southern Representative for China and Vietnam Provided in-market support to Qld firms China to attend HOFEX participating in the mission. This mission was supported by Trade Facilitated business matching for Qld Queensland staff based in Asia firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress Infrastructure Trade Mission to 10-23 May 09 Mr Steve Bredhauer, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader - Vietnam Leg 17,601 6,089 0 13,597 37,287 Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand Representative for China and Vietnam Provided in-market support to Qld firms participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld This mission was supported by Trade firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt Queensland staff based in Asia and private sector allies to progress collaborations with Qld Mr Bob Quinn, Queensland Special Trade Mission Leader - Malaysia and Representative for Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand Leg Thailand and Malaysia Provided in-market support to Qld firms participating in the mission. Facilitated business matching for Qld firms and met with key Govt, non-Govt and private sector allies to progress collaborations with Qld Mr Russ Mackie, Business Manager Trade Mission Manager Provide assistance and facilitation in all matters including logistics and coordination to the participating companies, provide in-market briefings, ensure the business matching meetings for the companies run smoothly, accompany the companies to meetings, arrange specific site visits and run Queensland Trade Mission to 20–22 May 09 This mission was supported by Trade 250 17,243 17,493 International Food Ingredients Queensland staff based in Japan and Additives Conference Tokyo Marine Trade Mission to Korea 2-7 June 09 This mission was supported by Trade 3,686 3,686 International Boat Show Queensland staff based in Korea PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 9

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 2-9 and overseas locations –

Provide a listing of the operating cost of each office location, detailing:

• Number of staff; • Salary level of each staff member • Position of each staff member; • Travel expenses of each staff member • General expenses of each staff member • Benefits of each staff member • Living expenses of each staff member • Benchmarks used to measure performance

ANSWER:

The Bligh Government went to the last election with a commitment to create and maintain jobs. Trade Queensland is contributing to the achievement of this commitment by supporting growing new businesses and assisting firms deliver Queensland’s innovative goods and services to the world.

The operating costs of each overseas representative location are provided in the attached table.

Staff Numbers

There are 52 staff directly employed by Trade Queensland overseas as at 6 July 2009, made up of: • Eight Commissioner Australia-based (A-based) positions; • One A-based Deputy Commissioner and one Director Business Development position; and • 42 Locally Engaged Staff (LES) positions, including two Commissioner positions employed under local contracts.

The numbers are listed on the attached table. -2-

Salary Level and Position Titles

The position levels and salary scales for locally engaged staff are determined through a benchmarking exercise delivered by an independent, international HR consulting firm, an agency which is used by other Australian Government agencies with overseas staff. This data is market-specific, based on local labour market conditions. Locally engaged staff salaries are quoted in local currency and periodically converted to Australian dollars. Locally-engaged staff receive a salary and entitlements in line with local benchmark employers and in accordance with local labour law, such as sick leave, recreation leave and public holiday leave.

Australia-based position levels and salary scales are determined in accordance with the Queensland Public Service Act 2008 under Section 122.

Travel Expenses

All official travel has been undertaken in accordance with business needs to maximise trade and investment outcomes for Queensland. All relevant approvals are obtained in accordance with the Queensland Government Overseas Travel guidelines. Travel is undertaken by staff based in overseas locations to support or lead major trade missions and trade promotional visits and to provide direct in-market support to Queensland companies as well as for wider promotion of Queensland as a supplier of choice. This targeted travel is critical to the overall success of Trade Queensland in delivering the Government’s export targets.

General Expenses

There are no specific expenses provided to staff over and above that provided under their employment contracts.

Allowances

Allowances apply only to A-based positions (not LES) and are similar to benchmark Australian Government agencies. Allowances include an overseas living allowance. The majority of staff in Trade Queensland overseas offices (42 out of 52 staff) are locally-engaged and as such, do not receive allowances.

The system used to calculate allowances for A-based staff uses a post (location) index data base supplied by a private sector international Human Resources company, Employment Conditions Abroad (ECA). ECA is an international Human Resources Consultancy Group which provides Overseas Living Allowance (OLA) data.

The key allowance which is similarly applied by benchmark agencies, such as the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) is the Cost of Living Allowance, which is designed to compensate for the different cost of purchasing goods and services at the overseas location.

-3-

Benefits and Living Expenses

Benefits applicable to A-based positions include home leave fares, telephone, removal and storage fees, excess medical expenses and education fees. These benefits are not applicable to locally-engaged staff.

Living expenses for A-based positions include rental assistance, utilities, and household maintenance and assistance. Locally engaged-staff, who make up 42 of the total 52 staff employed overseas by Trade Queensland, do not have an entitlement to living expenses. Locally-engaged staff receive a salary and entitlements in line with local benchmark employers and in accordance with local labour law, such as sick leave, recreation leave and public holiday leave.

Performance Benchmarks

Trade Commissioners and the market development teams have a set of Key Performance Indicators linked to the overall Trade Queensland Service Delivery Statement performance measures. They have their own annual targets and are subject to a rigorous performance reporting process.

Trade Queensland monitors performance on a monthly basis and it is formally reviewed each quarter by Trade Queensland’s senior management team through their Strategic Review Group.

The Commissioners and their teams report on the: • Number of Trade Queensland’s Strategic Export Projects they participate in, and related outcomes. • Number of clients assisted. • Value of export outcomes generated by client firms assisted. • Number of Exporter Development Initiatives (seminars and workshops aimed at skilling exporters and deepening the culture of exporting). • Number of Trade Initiatives promoting Queensland products and services (inbound and outbound missions and trade exhibitions).

Additionally, the Commissioners and the market development teams also assist investment to Queensland and report the number of investment leads they generate and any related investment dollar value.

All dollar value outcomes by clients assisted is substantiated by Export Impact Forms signed and endorsed by the exporter, acknowledging the importance of the assistance provided by Trade Queensland.

Trade Queensland benchmarks Austrade parameters to guide their selection of Key Performance Indicators, including the design of the Export Impact Form. Austrade also reports clients assisted, value of trade outcomes and outward investment achieved.

-4-

Trade Commissioners and the market development teams have contributed significantly to Trade Queensland’s Service Delivery Statement (SDS) outcomes for 2008-09. The preliminary figures for these outcomes are: • Assisted 2,900 client firms, with 44% of these businesses located in regional Queensland. • A proportion of the assisted client firms generated more than $500 million in exports. • Implemented 23 strategic export projects and delivered 151 trade initiatives and 163 exporter development initiatives.

In addition, Trade Commissioners and their teams have generated 76 investment leads and assisted $329 million of direct investment to Queensland.

Attachment 1 Overseas Office Network 2008-09

Total Office Business OFFICE Base Salary Operating Outcomes Costs ABU DHABI 118,752.00 213,497 $9,931,833 BANGALORE 273,991.00 774,490 $23,469,020 GUANGZHOU 122,895.50 541,903 $6,145,000 HONG KONG 630,699.00 1,184,197 $37,228,595 JAKARTA 38,617.00 448,796 1 $21,968,113 LONDON 725,379.00 2,671,417 2 $44,624,831 LOS ANGELES 687,861.00 2,340,032 $32,250,827 RIYADH 157,263.00 226,766 $129,707,500 SEOUL 416,116.00 968,594 $39,911,880 SHANGHAI 367,901.00 1,017,494 $37,228,595 TAIPEI 238,061.00 555,998 $16,081,481 TOKYO 759,830.00 1,829,421 $45,308,242 TOTAL STAFF 4,537,365.50 12,772,605 $443,855,917 Other Export Outcomes 3 $64,325,653

TOTAL EXPORT OUTCOMES $508,181,570

1Includes the cost of a contract with Austrade under which a dedicated Trade Queensland Business Development Manager operates from the Austrade Office in Jakarta, Indonesia. 2Includes Deputy Commissioner costs 3 Includes outcomes from International Development Business projects, markets in the Pacific Region and other regions Attachment 2 Overseas Locations - Staff Position Titles and Salary levels LES Base Salary/ Base Salary Office Position Title contract PA (Local AUD Currency) Abu Dhabi Commissioner - LES total AED 318,000.00 AUD 118,752.00 Abu Dhabi Total AED 318,000.00 AUD 118,752.00 Bangalore Commissioner AUD 122,437.00 Business Development Manager Rp1,167,874.00 Business Development Manager Rp861,515.00 Office Manager Rp572,353.00 Administrative Assistant Rp179,353.00 Business Development Manager - Rp1,400,000.00 Mumbai (home-based) Advisor - Mining Equipment, Technology Rp1,320,000.00 and Services, Jamshedpur LES Total Rp5,501,095.00 AUD 151,554.00 Bangalore Total Rp5,501,095.00 AUD 273,991.00

Guangzhou Director, Business Development AUD 109,456.00 Marketing Officer RMB 66748.00 LES SalaryTotal RMB 66748.00 AUD 13,439.50 Guangzhou Total RMB 66748.00 AUD 122,895.50

Hong Kong Commissioner AUD 216,822.00 Deputy QLD Govt Commissioner HKD 959,015.00 Director - Admin, Migrtn & Education HKD 644,260.82 Business Development Manager HKD 414,292.06 Office Manager HKD 321,449.72 LES Salary Total HKD 2,339,017.60 AUD 413,877.00 Hong Kong Total HKD 2,339,017.60 AUD 630,699.00

Jakarta Queensland Business Development Manager AUD 38,617.00 Jakarta Total AUD 38,617.00

London Commissioner AUD 291,548.00 Director, Business Development £58,290.00 Business Development Manager £39,570.00 Office Manager £34,716.00 Information / Marketing Officer £27,023.00 Accounts Officer £21,430.00 Administrative Assistant £23,032.00 Business Advisor - France £9,504.00 LES Total £213,565.00 AUD 433,831.00 London Total £213,565.00 AUD 725,379.00

Los Angeles Commissioner AUD 171,093.00 Deputy Commissioner AUD 164,463.00 Business Development Director USD 69,546.00 Business Development Manager USD 68,155.00 Business Development Manager USD 68,155.00 Office Manager USD 51,059.00 LES Salary Total USD 256,915.00 AUD 352,305.00 Los Angeles Total USD 256,915.00 AUD 687,861.00

Riyadh Commissioner SAR 430,000.00 AUD 157,263.00 Riyadh Total SAR 430,000.00 AUD 157,263.00

Seoul Commissioner AUD 133,412.00 Market Development Manager WON 54700062.00 Business Development Manager WON 55816390.00 Market Development Manager WON 55816390.00 Business Development Manager WON 55816390.00 Office Manager WON 42700500.00 LES Salary Total WON 264849732.00 AUD 282,704.00 Seoul Total WON 264849732.00 AUD 416,116.00

Shanghai Commissioner AUD 133,412.00 Director, Business Development RMB 406551.00 Senior Project Manager - Beijing RMB 307633.00 Senior Business Development Manager RMB 219484.00 Business Development Manager RMB 156189.00 Business Development Officer RMB 104245.00 Office Manager RMB 106373.00 Administration Assistant RMB 64105.00 BD Manager Education RMB 206577.00 LES Salary Total RMB 1571157.00 AUD 234,489.00 Shanghai Total RMB 1571157.00 AUD 367,901.00

Taipei Commissioner AUD 114,525.00 Marketing Officer NTD 1,248,992.00 Marketing Officer NTD 974,087.00 Administration Officer NTD 757,622.00 LES Salary Total NTD 2,980,701.00 AUD 123,536.00 Taipei Total NTD 2,980,701.00 AUD 238,061.00

Tokyo Commissioner AUD 133,412.00 Business Development Manager JPY 11,485,224.00 Business Development Manager JPY 7,707,513.00 Business Development Manager JPY 7,864,809.00 Office Manager/Accountant JPY 11,058,912.00 Business Development Officer JPY 6,612,015.00 LES Salary Total JPY 44,728,473.00 AUD 626,418.00 Tokyo Total JPY 44,728,473.00 AUD 759,830.00 PRE-HEARING NON-GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 10

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR SEENEY ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 3-207 and drought assistance rebates, will the Minister outline:

• the regions around that have received these rebates;

• the amount given in rebates to those individual regions to rural irrigation water users on payment of fixed water supply charges

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government has administered two fixed water charges rebate schemes to assist irrigators with prolonged low water availability in areas with an announced allocation of 20 percent or less.

The Irrigators Fixed Water Charges Rebate Scheme provided a rebate on fixed water supply charges depending on the duration of low water availability. Irrigators in schemes that experienced prolonged low water availability over a number of years were eligible for a higher percentage rebate. The number of eligible irrigators varies significantly between schemes due to scheme size. Consequently, the amount paid in rebate payments in each scheme varies substantially.

The Additional Irrigators Fixed Water Charges Rebate Scheme is also available to irrigators in prescribed areas with an announced allocation of 20 percent or less on 1 July 2008.

Attachment Table 1

Regions and amount paid under the irrigators fixed water charges rebate scheme

Water Supply Scheme (WSS) & Water Management Area (WMA) Total Paid ($) Barker Barambah WSS 279,743 Border Rivers WMA 54,616 Bowen Broken Rivers WSS 40,407 Boyne River and Tarong WSS 169,490 Bundaberg WSS 228,975 Callandoon WSS 9,238 Central Lockyer Valley WSS 78,862 Chinchilla Weir WSS 10,566 Condamine Plains WSS 28,252 Dawson Valley WSS 91,051 Logan River WSS 284,993 Lower Lockyer River WSS 318,488 Macintyre Brook WSS 664 Maronoa River WSS 54 WSS 184 Nogoa Mackenzie WSS 425,697 Pioneer Valley WSS 331,515 St George WSS 136,402 Upper Burnett WSS 80,196 Upper Condamine WSS 560,840 Warrill Valley WSS 363,008 Yambocully WSS 11,632 Total 3,504,863

Table 2

Regions and amount paid to irrigators under the additional rebate scheme up until 30 June 2009

Water Supply Scheme Total Paid ($) Barker Barambah WSS 212,029 Three Moon Creek WSS 465 Upper Burnett WSS 11,727 Upper Condamine WSS 178,195 Central Lockyer Valley WSS 35,431 Lower Lockyer WSS 122,162 Total 560,009

Questions on Notice (Government) Estimates Committee C Government Members Questions on Notice

Hon Stephen Robertson MP, Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade

Member for Waterford, Mr Moorhead

1. I refer the Minister to page 2-25 of the Service Delivery Statement: Can the Minister please advise why there was an increase in the number of corrective/compliance action in the mining area during 2008-09?

2. On page 2-11 of the Service Delivery Statement reference is made to a new Queensland Mines and Energy office opening in Roma. Can the Minister please outline the importance of having a new office in assisting land owners and miners deal with land conflict issues?

3. Reference is made to a mining and energy trade mission to South America coordinated by Trade Queensland (page 2-14 of the Service Delivery Statement). Can the Minister please outline the real outcomes for Queensland businesses as a result of this delegation?

Member for Chatsworth, Mr Kilburn

4. With reference to page 2-6 of the Service Delivery Statement, can the Minister please outline the potential of geothermal energy for Queensland?

5. I refer you to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement where it says that Wild Rivers protection will be extended to a further eight river basins in 2009-10. There has been some contention and misleading information purported by some media outlets that especially indigenous economic development is restricted by the legislation. Can the Minister advise exactly what kind of activity is and isn't allowed in declared Wild River areas?

Member for Redcliffe, Ms van Litsenburg

6. I refer to page 2-21 of the Service Delivery Statement. Can the Minister please advise the Committee on the mining health and safety improvements as a result of the introduction of the safety and health services levy?

7. I refer to page 3-212 of the Service Delivery Statement where it is shown that the target for Water licences transfers and renewals dealt with in 30 business days has been exceeded by an additional 20%. Can you advise how this efficiency was achieved and the benefits for regional Queenslanders?

Member for Broadwater, Ms Croft

8. On page 2-24 of the Service Deliver Statement reference is made to Community Service Obligation payments. Can the Minister please outline how much per capita was paid in community service obligations to keep electricity prices down for regional Queenslanders?

9. I refer you to page 3-204 of the Service Delivery Statement where we see that $300 million in rebates has been granted across Queensland through the Bligh Government's Home Water Wise Scheme. Can you advise how many grants and the total value of these have been granted in my electorate of Broadwater?

10. Minister, I refer you to the Capital Statements and ask the Minister what measures are being undertaken to ensure the long term sustainability and safety of SEQ's water supply?

Answers to Questions on Notice (Government) PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 1

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR MOORHEAD ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

I refer to page 2-25 of the Service Delivery Statement: Can the Minister please advise why there was an increase in the number of corrective/compliance action in the mining area during 2008-09?

ANSWER:

The Mines Inspectorate officers issue corrective action requirements, known as Directives, to the mining industry when a risk to safety and health is detected during audit or inspection of a mine or quarry.

A major factor that resulted in an increase in the number of corrective action requests during 2008-09 was the increased number of inspectors during the year.

As a result of commitments made in late 2007-08, the complement of the Mines Inspectorate was increased and a major successful recruitment campaign was undertaken in early 2008-09.

The campaign included recruitment of six new staff from overseas. These new inspectors are: y an inspector of metalliferous mines who is based in Mount Isa; y an inspector of coal mines who is based in Mackay; y two inspectors of coal mines based in Rockhampton; y an inspector of coal mines based in Brisbane; and y a graduate trainee inspector based in Brisbane.

The new inspectors will allow increased numbers of inspections and audits, particularly in the most hazardous area of underground coal mining.

The increased numbers of inspectors also allowed the implementation of the Small Mines Program designed to ensure improvements in safety and health at small mining operations and at small quarries. This resulted in an increase in the number of corrective action requests issued to that sector of the mining industry.

The increased numbers of inspectors also resulted in increased numbers of audits and inspections across all industry sectors. From these audits and inspections, the inspectors were able to identify additional areas of non-compliance that required corrective action requests to be issued to the relevant mines and quarries. PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 2

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR MOORHEAD ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

On page 2-11 of the Service Delivery Statement reference is made to a new Queensland Mines and Energy (QME) field office opening in Roma. Can the Minister please outline the importance of having a new office in assisting land owners and miners deal with land conflict issues?

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government is acutely aware of the challenges presented in balancing the interests of the agriculture and resources sectors over exploration and its impact on the businesses of agricultural landholders. While the issues associated with access to agricultural land have arisen historically, the growth of the coal seam gas industry and the potential for a new liquefied natural gas industry has resulted in significant increases in exploration activity and an escalation of this friction, especially in the Surat Basin.

In order to address these issues, the Government is committed to working with exploration companies and landholders at the grass-roots level to ensure they have ready access to Government resources to assist in negotiating mutually beneficial outcomes for access to land for exploration.

The establishment of the QME office in Roma provides an essential regional presence for QME in an area that is experiencing considerable growth in exploration. The Surat Basin Field Office has been operational since late May and is staffed by two Deputy Mining Registrars, and two support staff, with assistance from a QME Community Liaison Officer.

In addition to the Roma office, QME has established a ‘hot desk’ in Dalby which will be staffed at regular scheduled times by a Deputy Mining Registrar. This is in recognition of the demand for this important service in the area.

The two new Deputy Mining Registrar positions at Roma will give the community a local presence to resolve mining and exploration issues. These officers have skills in mediation and conflict resolution, as well as statutory powers under the Mineral Resources Act 1989 and the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004.

They will exercise normal statutory powers to investigate alleged breaches, issue directions, and call parties into conference.

Staff of the QME Roma office will play a key role in implementing the new Land Access Policy Framework being developed by the Land Access Working Group.

QME officers in the Roma office will be joined soon by officers of the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM). Co-location of DERM and QME will assist in improved communication across agencies in relation to important resource development and environmental issues and improve stakeholders access to relevant Government services.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 3

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR MOORHEAD ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

Reference is made to a mining and energy trade mission to South America coordinated by Trade Queensland (page 2-14 of the Service Delivery Statement). Can the Minister please outline the real outcomes for Queensland businesses as a result of this delegation?

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government is committed to supporting Queensland business and Queensland jobs by supporting international trade opportunities.

In March 2009, Trade Queensland organised a major Latin American mining, infrastructure and energy trade mission to Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, and Chile. The mission was led by Trade Queensland’s Commissioner for the Americas, Peter Beattie.

Latin America is a strong emerging market for Queensland and Trade Queensland has been actively supporting Queensland companies, especially those servicing the mining sector, access export opportunities in this region since 2001.

Over this period Queensland’s exporters to Latin America have become more experienced and this trade mission was especially developed to support their changing market development requirements. While still predominately targeting the large mining projects, the mission’s objectives were broadened to include identified opportunities in related transport infrastructure and the energy sectors.

Trade Queensland coordinated trade missions provide a cost effective tool for Queensland companies to enter or strengthen their presence in a market. This mission was tailored to provide the participants with first-hand market knowledge of opportunities associated with key mining and infrastructure projects through a program of pre-mission briefings; one-on-one business meetings with key executives; briefings on targeted projects; and business networking functions.

Representatives of 16 Queensland companies participated, showcasing Queensland’s capability in the mining equipment, technology and services sector.

-2-

These Queensland companies included Ausenco, Cardax Australia, Connell Wagner, GHD, Ground Breaking Innovations, GroundProbe, Industrea, Laser Services, Ludowici, Noja Power Switchgear, NQ Survey Supplies, Power Step Australia, Sinclair Knight Merz and Wagners Global Services, Australian Institute of Management and Brisbane Marketing.

Queensland has a competitive international advantage in mining industries and this mission helped to further cement Queensland’s reputation as a willing and reliable supplier of quality products and services across a broad spectrum of industries in Latin America.

In Mexico, the mission program included the signing of a Statement of Intent to pursue opportunities for future collaboration in the mining sector, and pave the way for improved cooperation and stronger business links between key industries in Queensland and Mexico. With Mexico rated as the 12th largest economy in the world this agreement will provide Queensland companies with a competitive edge.

A key aspect of the mission program were high level meetings, which provided business delegates with access to key decision makers and foreign government officials which they would not otherwise have had access to.

This includes the Trade Commissioner’s meeting with the President of Colombia, Alvaro Uribe. As a result of this meeting, and the priority being accorded to Queensland’s activities in Colombia, there are high expectations of growing opportunities for Queensland companies.

On the Brazil leg, trade mission participants visited the State of Minas Gerais, with which Queensland has a Memorandum of Understanding. Minas Gerais is a well- known mining centre of Brazil. As part of the visit, a Minas Gerais/Queensland Mining Network Seminar which successfully attracted over 200 mining and infrastructure executives.

The significant government-to-industry and government-to-government links that Queensland has established in Latin America undoubtedly assists Queensland companies in developing their business relationships in the region.

Companies participating on these missions range from highly experienced exporters to those attempting to access the market for the first time and they all acknowledge that there is a significant lead time and much follow-up work to be done in achieving export results.

The success of this mission is well illustrated by Brisbane-based electrical switchgear manufacturer, NOJA Power Switchgear. The company has a line of specialist products for global application by electricity companies, and has secured new contracts recently in Latin America.

-3-

NOJA Power reported that, as a result of their participation on the trade mission, it has generated $9.4 million in new business contracts to date.

In addition Ground Breaking Innovations Pty Ltd (GBI) was able to enter into a formal partnership with a Brazilian company, Distritec to provide mining intelligence services to mines throughout Brazil. This arrangement has already resulted in GBI’s services being trialled at four Vale iron ore mines near Belo Horizonte with a potential to generate $5 million in exports.

Queensland firms who participated in the mission provided the following feedback:

Ross Cosgrove, Director, Laser Services: “These missions are very important for Queensland exporters and we thank Trade Queensland for being at the forefront of such efforts”. “The mission provided access to quality companies that would not have been accessible by any other means”.

Lorraine Elsmore, Global Manager Marketing, Groundprobe: “We received four propositions from well established companies to represent us in the Brazilian market”. “This delegation was very well run and organised. Trade Queensland personnel were also helpful and a pleasure to be involved with….The introductions to potential customers and distributors would have been very hard to secure by any other means”.

Neil O’Sullivan, Managing Director, NOJA Power Switchgear: “The business networking events were tremendous and were very well organised and in our case, our local representatives in each country made important new contacts that will assist Queensland and Australian trade”.

Further significant export outcomes are expected as participating companies undertake the long process of following up on the contacts and strong leads they established as a result of the mission program.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 4

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR KILBURN ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to page 2-6 of the Service Delivery Statement, can the Minister please outline the potential of geothermal energy for Queensland?

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government is committed to exploring this new emerging energy source and capitalising on the vast potential resources of geothermal energy available in Queensland.

Potential geothermal resources in Queensland are currently identified using maps of temperatures at five kilometre depths.

Based on current indications, between five and 10 percent of Queensland may be underlain by rocks at temperatures in excess of 200 degrees centigrade at depths of less than 5,000 metres.

If water already exists in, or can be injected into these rocks, this heat can potentially be extracted and used in the production of electricity or for other industrial purposes.

Areas with geothermal energy potential have been identified using maps prepared by Geoscience Australia and the Australian National University and feature large anomalously hot areas underlying southwest Queensland with smaller anomalies identified elsewhere within the State.

The data used to prepare the heat maps is derived largely from petroleum well data and artesian bore data and indicates geothermal energy is predominately located beneath the Great Artesian Basin.

However, eastern and northern Queensland have a limited number of data points in areas with complex geology and, hence, the geothermal potential is less clearly defined.

The Coastal Geothermal Energy Initiative is designed to provide additional information in relation to sources of hot rocks for geothermal energy close to existing electricity transmission lines in eastern Queensland.

This initiative will obtain additional data by measuring temperature profiles from the bottom of purposely drilled holes.

The geological history of eastern Queensland is complex and provides a variety of different settings where hot rocks may be present.

The holes to be drilled are being sited to test specific geological settings that based on current knowledge are likely to have the potential to be a source of geothermal energy.

The temperature data obtained from this initiative will increase knowledge in relation to geothermal energy potential and assist companies to target their exploration activities better.

Geothermal resource discoveries in coastal areas are more likely to be developed as the main market for geothermal electricity or potential industrial uses of geothermal heat is in this part of the state.

Preliminary temperature data from the Coastal Geothermal Energy Initiative will become available in the later part of 2010.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 5

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MR KILBURN ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

I refer you to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement where it says that Wild Rivers protection will be extended to a further eight river basins in 2009-10. There has been some contention and misleading information purported by some media outlets that especially indigenous economic development is restricted by the legislation. Can the Minister advise exactly what kind of activity is and isn't allowed in declared Wild River areas?

ANSWER:

The Bligh Government is committed to keeping our promises. In relation to Wild Rivers, this means extending protection to the Wenlock basin and an additional eight River areas in the next financial year.

These river areas will follow on from nine that have already been declared Wild Rivers and were election commitments by the Beattie and Bligh governments.

Economic development can continue to occur in wild river areas. The purpose of the Wild Rivers Act 2005 is to preserve the natural values of the wild rivers. This is done through the management of development, not by locking up the areas to all development activity. The declaration of a wild river area has no impact on existing authorised activity like businesses or farms.

Development activity is managed, as it is in all of Queensland, through a development application and approval process. Development approval in a wild river area relies on the development meeting specific criteria. This includes protecting the native vegetation around streams, managing sediment and wastewater delivery into streams, protecting stream bed and banks and not impacting on water quality.

This smart management of development ensures preservation of a wild river’s natural values, whilst continuing to allow sensible and sustainable development.

Sustainable economic development is encouraged under the Wild Rivers legislation. Stock grazing, pasture improvement, the taking of water for stock or domestic purposes and weed and pest management are all allowed within the High Preservation area of a Wild River. In addition, development activities relating to low impact agriculture, tourism, outstations, essential services such as roads and town water and sewage treatment, are allowed also.

Outside the High Preservation Area is the Preservation Area of the Wild River where most development activity can still occur. The only prohibitions in this area are stream realignment (that is, the redirection of a creek or river) and instream quarry material extraction. However, it should be noted that these activities are allowed for roads and residential complexes.

The Wild Rivers legislation is about preserving the natural values of wild rivers while still supporting economic development. Hence a wide range of economic development is permitted with limitations placed only on high impact development as surface mining, instream dams and weirs, and indiscriminate clearing of native vegetation.

The State Government acknowledges that it is important to preserve the unique biodiversity of our State while also working to secure greater employment for all Queenslanders, and on Cape York Peninsula we have been active in assisting Indigenous communities to meet their economic aspirations.

Cape York Peninsula has a great potential for eco and cultural tourism, and the wild river declarations will protect those features that are so important to this industry while still allowing tourism development to occur. The wild river declarations encourage economic activity by providing for a reserve of water for indigenous use. This means water is available for Indigenous communities to help them achieve their social and economic aspirations.

Initiatives on Cape York Peninsula, such as the Cape York Peninsula Heritage Act 2007, the employment program for Wild River Rangers, the Round Table on Economic Participation (Chaired by Minister Boyle), and the Cape York Peninsula and Torres Strait Tourism Action Plan will all work to provide better opportunities for remote communities.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 6

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MS VAN LITSENBURG ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

I refer to page 2-21 of the Service Delivery Statement. Can the Minister please advise the Committee on the mining health and safety improvements as a result of the introduction of the safety and health services levy?

ANSWER:

The Bligh Government is committed to strengthening protections for the safety and health of Queensland’s miners. The mining industry safety and health levy which was introduced in September 2008, has boosted the services provided by the state’s mine safety watchdog, the Mines Inspectorate.

The Inspectorate provides vital safety and health services that help save lives, such as safety audits and inspections, investigations, provision of advice, collection and reporting of safety and health information and research into mine safety.

The levy has funded seven new specialist mines inspectors, two investigators, five scientific research staff, an occupational hygienist, a statistician and a manager of health surveillance.

The levy has allowed Safety and Health Division of Queensland Mines and Energy to bring its staffing numbers up to the budgeted levels following an extensive successful recruitment campaign in the first half of 2008-09.

New inspectors were engaged who have skills and competencies across all relevant mining disciplines, particularly in the hazardous area of underground coal mining.

The levy has also allowed the introduction in 2008-09 of the Small Mines Program in which the inspectorate provides an advisory and education service to small operators. This service will allow the small operators to develop safety and health management systems prior to the planned introduction of new legislative requirements in mid 2010.

The Health Surveillance Unit of Safety and Health Division has been upgraded with the addition of two occupational hygienist positions. This unit will enhance the health component of the inspectorate and provides a more holistic service to the men and women employed in the mining industry.

During the current financial year 2009-10, the full benefits of the levy will allow a greater inspectorate presence in the field at mines and quarries, improved collection and reporting of safety and health information and improved safety and health systems in the small mines sector.

Queensland has the best mine safety legislation in Australia and it must continue to be enforced mine by mine, employer by employer, worker by worker.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 7

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MS VAN LITSENBURG ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

I refer to page 3-212 of the Service Delivery Statement where it is shown that the target for Water licences transfers and renewals dealt with in 30 business days has been exceeded by an additional 20%. Can you advise how this efficiency was achieved and the benefits for regional Queenslanders?

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government is committed to providing high quality services to land holders. Water licence transfers and water licence renewals are an integral part of managing the State’s water resources, providing security for water entitlement holders’ right across Queensland.

The number of water licence transfers and water licence renewals dealt with in 30 business days has exceeded the service delivery statement due to a concerted effort by the Department of Environment and Resource Management to continuously identify and implement business improvement opportunities which will help its clients.

One such business improvement implemented in 2008-09 was the distribution of delegations under the Water Act 2000 to the department’s senior administration officers who are actively engaged in the water licence transfer and the water licence renewal functions. This process improvement has resulted in significant efficiency gains and ensured prompt attention to client dealings without compromising the security of the dealing.

Anyone purchasing or selling land that involves the transfer of a water entitlement will appreciate the prompt turnaround time so that the property settlement date is not adversely affected.

The Queensland Government is committed to improving service delivery to its water licence clients and is implementing a new computer based Water Management System for processing applications and introducing other major reforms. These include increasing the term of licences to 10 years and separating the billing function from the renewal function. PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 8

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MS CROFT ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

On page 2-24 of the Service Delivery Statement reference is made to Community Service Obligation payments. Can the Minister please outline how much per capita was paid in community service obligations to keep electricity prices down for regional Queenslanders?

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government’s Uniform Tariff policy delivers on the commitment to ensure all Queenslanders have access to an affordable electricity supply regardless of their geographic location. However, the distribution of electricity to regional customers incurs far higher costs than for metropolitan customers, mainly due to the higher network costs and transmission and distribution system losses associated with providing regional customers with an electricity supply. Ergon Energy Queensland provides supply to regional Queensland customers at the uniform tariff as a Community Service Obligation.

Ergon Energy is compensated for the difference between the efficient cost to supply its rural and remote customers and the revenue recovered from customers, via a monthly Community Service Obligation payment, from the Government.

For the 2007-08 financial year total payments were $625 million. The 2008-09 financial year budget for the Community Service Obligation was $499.8 million, which equated to approximately $760 per customer, keeping electricity prices fair for rural and remote Queenslanders.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 9

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MS CROFT ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

I refer you to page 3-204 of the Service Delivery Statement where we see that $300 million in rebates has been granted across Queensland through the Bligh Government's Home Water Wise Scheme. Can you advise how many grants and the total value of these have been granted in my electorate of Broadwater?

ANSWER:

The Queensland Government’s Home and Garden WaterWise Rebate Scheme was the largest and most successful scheme of its type in Australia. It delivered on the Government’s commitment to help Queenslanders reduce their water consumption during the worst drought on record.

The Scheme which operated from July 2006 and is now closed, paid out $321.26 million to the people of Queensland for a range of water efficient devices including rainwater tanks, 4 Star water-rated washing machines, dual flush toilet suites and garden products.

Gold Coast local authority residents received more than $36.9 million in rebates over the life of the Scheme.

PRE-HEARING GOVERNMENT QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 10

asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

MS CROFT ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

Minister, I refer you to the Capital Statements and ask the Minister what measures are being undertaken to ensure the long term sustainability and safety of SEQ's water supply?

ANSWER:

From 2001 to 2009 Queensland experienced the worst drought on record. The Queensland Government made a commitment that it would secure water supplies for south east Queensland (SEQ) and is implementing a new approach to water supply planning and management to achieve this.

This holistic approach incorporates the establishment of the $9 billion SEQ Water Grid, an award-winning demand management program and extensive institutional changes.

This reform will be long-lasting, delivering new standards of water security and efficiency in the face of the challenges of population growth and climate change, while building on recent improvements to waterways health.

The establishment of the SEQ Water Grid involves the delivery of a range of innovative projects that is unprecedented in Australia.

The Grid connects water supplies across the region, providing SEQ with a greater diversity of water sources, with a mix of both climate resilient and climate dependent supplies.

More than 420 kilometres of pipe have been laid, allowing water to be moved across the region to where it is needed most. The benefits of this are significant. Operated as a connected network, the system yield of current sources of supply is at least 14 percent higher than the sum of their individual yields. At almost 60,000 million litres a year, this dividend is larger than the capacity of the Tugun desalination plant.

The SEQ Water Grid includes the construction of new water supplies, such as the Western Corridor Recycled Water Project and the SEQ (Gold Coast) Desalination Facility, the Brisbane aquifer project and recommissioning of existing dams.

-2-

A range of other projects are currently underway, including: • Stage 3 — due for completion by 31 December 2010; • — due for completion by 31 December 2011; • Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2, from Landers Shute to Noosa — due for completion by 31 December 2011; and • Traveston Crossing Dam — with a proposed completion of around 2016/17, subject to final approvals;

In total, these new sources of supply will reduce our reliance on climate dependent supply sources. Supplies from dams and weirs will also be diversified through the construction of large dams in different catchments. This diversity reduces our vulnerability to climate variability and change, and provides for an improved level of system reliability and water quality management.

Since construction of the SEQ Water Grid began, more than 5,500 workers have worked at more than 80 sites across the region. This $9 billion project will have the capacity to deliver up to an additional 600,000 megalitres of water a year to the region’s supply when complete.

Demand management is the second key element of the response, the residents of SEQ having embraced water efficiency as a way of life.

This has included water restrictions, regulations to achieve structural water efficiency, rebate schemes to achieve water efficiency in homes and business and community education campaigns.

Across the restricted area, these measures, combined with the change in how residents value water, have resulted in: • residential consumption reducing from pre-drought usage of more than 300 litres per person per day to an average of 134 litres per person per day in 2008-09; and • water usage across the business sector reducing by 73.5 million litres per day, a saving of 37 percent from 2004-05 levels.

Finally, a transformation in water management in SEQ was required in order to realise the benefits of the SEQ Water Grid and to ensure the efficient and effective operation of the diverse range of supply sources.

Historically, the institutional arrangements for water supply in SEQ were parochial and fragmented, with bulk source, transport and treatment assets owned by 25 different entities, supplying 17 separate retail businesses. The drought highlighted that these arrangements suffered from serious weaknesses that directly impacted on the ability of the water supply system to meet the needs of all of SEQ.

The first phase of reform implementation was completed on 1 July 2008, with the establishment of the four new entities that own and operate the SEQ Water Grid.

-3-

Reforms are continuing in relation to the retail and distribution sectors. These reforms reduce the number and complexity of SEQ water supply organisations and improve standards of operation and reliability of service.

As a package, the SEQ Water Grid, water efficiency measures and the management arrangements that we have in place today are world class. However, we need to have in place robust planning in order to maintain this sustainability and security of supply in the longer term, taking into account the challenges of population growth and climate variability and change.

That is why we have the SEQ Water Strategy. The draft SEQ Water Strategy integrates infrastructure, water resource management and demand management programs as part of a 50 year water supply plan for the region. In doing so, it presents one of Australia’s most comprehensive and innovative long-term year water supply planning frameworks. The new Commissioner is currently reviewing and finalising the Strategy for release later this year.

Answers to Questions taken on Notice at Hearing HEARING QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 1

asked on Thursday, 16 July 2009

MR JEFF SEENEY MP, MEMBER FOR CALLIDE, ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

I refer to the $30,000 paid by the Department for a book sponsorship and I ask:

• What was the name of the person to whom this money was paid?

• Who wrote the book?

• Can the Minister provide a copy to the Committee?

ANSWER:

Queensland Mines and Energy has provided the $30,000 sponsorship to the to produce this book.

The authors of the book are Tim Horberry, Associate Professor of Human Factors at the Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre at the University of Queensland and Robin Burgess-Limerick Associate Professor in the School of Human Movement Studies at the University of Queensland.

Human factors is the study of the human element in safety incidents such as fatigue, human error, and musculoskeletal disorders related to mining equipment. Currently there is little practical information available to the mining industry on human factors.

The book and its outcomes will be used to develop intervention techniques to control human factor causes at all levels of decision-making to reduce high potential incidents in the mining industry and to also investigate incidents to help prevent their recurrence.

The book is directed at the resources sector including mining companies, health and safety officers, regulators, equipment manufacturers and researchers in the field.

This study and subsequent book will be the first of its kind in Australia to provide the human factors framework in evaluating the role of human error in mining incidents, and will be of worldwide significance in this field.

The estimated total cost of producing the book is $100,000.

-2-

The book will be launched at the 2010 Queensland Mining Industry Health and Safety Conference in Townsville — which is the industry’s premier safety and health event attended by in excess of 500 delegates from the Queensland resources industry.

HEARING QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No 2

asked on Thursday, 16 July 2009

MR JEFF SEENEY MP, MEMBER FOR CALLIDE, ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

Can the Minister provide details of all contracts and consultancies allotted by his Department to Mr Paul Miley or Consulting Partners Pty Ltd.

ANSWER:

Paul Miley or Consulting Partners Pty Ltd have been involved in three Office of Clean Energy/Queensland Mines and Energy projects, namely:

Project Period Solar Hot Water Program Current Solar Bonus Scheme From 24 March 2008 for a 14 week period Burke Shire Renewable Energy Project Nine days in the period July to October 2008

HEARING QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C 2009

No. 3

asked on Thursday, 16 July 2009

MR LAWRENCE SPRINGBORG MP, MEMBER FOR SOUTHERN DOWNS, ASKED THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND MINISTER FOR TRADE (MR ROBERTSON)—

QUESTION:

With reference to SDS 2-9 and overseas locations –

Provide a listing of the operating cost of each office location, detailing:

• Number of staff; • Salary level of each staff member • Position of each staff member; • Travel expenses of each staff member • General expenses of each staff member • Benefits of each staff member • Living expenses of each staff member • Benchmarks used to measure performance

Specifically broken down, including actual dollar amounts reported separately.

Trade Queensland – export results for Queensland

• In 2008-09 Trade Queensland assisted Queensland companies to secure more than $500 million in export sales.

• Trade Queensland assisted 2,909 clients to get export ready or to make new export deals in the last financial year.

• Forty-four per cent of these clients were from regional Queensland.

• In 2008-09 Trade Queensland managed 21 trade missions, with 307 Queensland companies participating. These missions covered destinations including China, Japan, USA, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, South East Asia and South Asia.

• The location of Trade Queensland offices overseas reflect existing and new export markets which best align with the competitive strengths of Queensland exporters. The presence of state based trade offices to support Queensland firms in these markets has yielded strong export successes for Queensland.

-2-

Continuous Improvements in Cost of International Network

• The following examples are ways in which Trade Queensland has reduced the costs of overseas operations: • An assessment of the business needs and resources in London has resulted in a reduction of staff, including the role of Deputy Commissioner from July 2009. • Similarly, an assessment in the Los Angeles office will result in the complete removal of the role of Deputy Commissioner from July 2010. • Trade Queensland has assessed and reviewed its representation in Indonesia.In 2008-09, the roles of the Commissioner and office support staff in the Jakarta office ceased. This is one of Queensland’s long-standing export destinations and a new business model to supporting businesses here in Queensland exporting to Indonesia and also in the Indonesian market has been developed. A full-time Indonesian Business Development Manager, funded by Trade Queensland, has been engaged through Austrade and will work exclusively for Queensland. This is a cost-effective approach to delivering services to this important exporting market. • The long-term Commissioner for Korea recently retired. For the new Commissioner in Korea, appointment to this key role will be on a Locally Engaged basis (as opposed to an Australian based contract). This will result in a substantial reduction in costs (salary and allowances). • In addition, resource planning has resulted in a reduction in trade support staff in Taiwan, Japan and Hong Kong. An overall reduction of 12 positions in Trade Queensland’s overseas offices was achieved in 2008-2009. • The reductions in Hong Kong (of one officer over the past 12 months and a second officer in 2009-10) resulted in savings of approximately $40,000 in 2008-09 and a further saving of approximately $143,000 in the Hong Kong budget in 2009-10. The reduced size of the Taiwan staffing profile of 3 officials has resulted in permanent savings of $178,000. A reduction by one staff member in the Tokyo office has resulted in savings of approximately $90,000. • Further reductions in the costs of the overseas offices will result from changes to all business related air travel. For air travel (in-market domestic and international travel) Trade Queensland staff will travel economy class.

• Trade Queensland constantly reviews its overseas locations to ensure they are positioned in markets which offer the best opportunities to Queensland exporters and to attract foreign investment to the State.

• Trade Queensland continues to adapt and meet the needs of the global export market and of a key client base – Queensland exporters. The agency is committed to providing the Government value-for-money in delivering export assistance and support to those exporters.

-3-

• The costs for each office varies, which in part reflects the different costs of doing business in different overseas markets. This will depend on the relative cost of living for the key export market (a number of offices are in high cost global locations – refer attached global index); the geographical size of the market (for example, Europe and Africa, and The Americas); the staffing profiles for each of the overseas offices and the salary and related costs in each market; and medical and education costs for family members of the agency’s contracted Commissioners.

• Further, as an international agency, the sole Queensland Government agency to focus its entire operation on supporting Queensland exporters, international travel is a critical tool in carrying out its business. Servicing the global regions, particularly those with larger geographies and where there is no representation (for example, Latin America – and when coupled with North America this is one of the largest regions of responsibility), is essential to building and maintaining key relationships and identifying opportunities for Queensland exporters.

In these tough economic times, Trade Queensland continues to adapt to a changing environment – continuing to meet (and exceed) its performance targets and meet the current and emerging needs of Queensland’s exporters.

The further details against each of the above points are as follows:

Number of staff, salary level and position of each staff member

Staff Numbers

There are 51 staff directly employed by Trade Queensland overseas as at 17 July 2009, made up of: • Seven Commissioner Australia-based (A-based) positions; • One A-based Deputy Commissioner (a second Deputy Commissioner position in London concluded on 8 July 2009) and one Director Business Development position; and • 42 Locally Engaged Staff (LES) positions, including two Commissioner positions employed under local contracts and the vacant Seoul Commissioner position which will similarly be employed under a locally-engaged basis.

Following the recruitment of the vacant Seoul Commissioner position, the total will be 52 Trade Queensland staff.

Refer table in Attachment 1, noting that for locally engaged staff, their salary levels in local currency have been included and for Australia-based staff, their A$ salary figures have been included.

-4-

Staff Locations

In addition to these staffing positions, Trade Queensland employs contract business development staff, including one in Jakarta, Indonesia, in India (one full time contractor in Mumbai and one part time contractor in Jamshedpur), and one in Paris, France.

Refer table in Attachment 1, noting that for locally engaged staff, their salary levels in local currency have been included and for Australia-based staff, their A$ salary figures have been included.

In addition to these staff employed by Trade Queensland, other agencies have minimised operational costs through accommodating their staff in Trade Queensland offices. They include Tourism Queensland, Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Education Queensland International and the Redlands City Council.

Within Asia, Tourism Queensland has partnered to reduce costs. In Shanghai, Tourism Queensland is based within the Trade Queensland Shanghai office. This is the head office for Tourism Queensland’s Regional Director, China, covering China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, with two staff. In Taiwan, Tourism Queensland has a marketing manager located within the Trade Queensland Taipei office, and in Hong Kong Tourism Queensland sub-leases space from the Trade Queensland Hong Kong office.

Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries has a temporary officer located in the London office until the end of July 2009.

Education Queensland International has a dedicated education officer co-located in the Shanghai office.

Under a new pilot arrangement for two years, the Redlands City Council has engaged a marketing officer within Trade Queensland’s Guangzhou, China office in order to advance links in southern China. The Trade Queensland Guangzhou office also has an additional administrative officer, funded by CPA Australia.

Salary Level and Position Titles

The position levels and salary scales for locally engaged staff are determined through a benchmarking exercise delivered by an independent, international HR consulting firm, an agency which is used by other Australian Government agencies with overseas staff. This data is market-specific, based on local labour market conditions. Locally engaged staff salaries are quoted in local currency and periodically converted to Australian dollars. Locally-engaged staff receive a salary and entitlements package in line with local benchmark employers and in accordance with local labour law, such as sick leave, recreation leave and public holiday leave.

Australia-based position levels and salary scales are determined in accordance with the Queensland Public Service Act 2008 under Section 122.

-5-

Travel expenses of each staff member

All official travel has been undertaken in accordance with business needs to maximise trade and investment outcomes for Queensland. All relevant approvals are obtained in accordance with the Queensland Government Overseas Travel guidelines. Travel is undertaken by staff based in overseas locations to support or lead major trade missions and trade promotional visits and to provide direct in-market support to Queensland companies as well as for wider promotion of Queensland as a supplier of choice. This targeted travel is critical to the overall success of Trade Queensland in delivering the Government’s export targets.

Official travel expenses for each staff member have been included – Refer table in Attachment 2.

General expenses of each staff member

There are no specific expenses provided to staff over and above that provided under their employment contracts.

Benefits of each staff member

Benefits applicable to A-based positions include home leave fares, telephone, removal and storage fees, excess medical expenses and education fees. These benefits are not applicable to locally-engaged staff.

The benefits for each staff member relate solely to Commissioners and heads of overseas offices – Refer table in Attachment 3.

Living expenses of each staff member

Living expenses for A-based positions include rental assistance, utilities, and household maintenance and assistance. Locally engaged-staff, who make up 42 of the total 52 staff employed overseas by Trade Queensland, do not have an entitlement to living expenses. Locally-engaged staff receive a salary and entitlements in line with local benchmark employers and in accordance with local labour law, such as sick leave, recreation leave and public holiday leave.

The benefits for each staff member relate solely to Commissioners and heads of overseas offices – Refer table in Attachment 4.

Allowances of each staff member

Allowances apply only to A-based positions (not LES) and are similar to benchmark Australian Government agencies. Allowances include an overseas living allowance. The majority of staff in Trade Queensland overseas offices (42 out of 52 staff) are locally-engaged and as such, do not receive allowances.

-6-

The system used to calculate allowances for A-based staff uses a post (location) index data base supplied by a private sector international Human Resources company, Employment Conditions Abroad (ECA). ECA is an international Human Resources Consultancy Group which provides Overseas Living Allowance (OLA) data.

The key allowance which is similarly applied by benchmark agencies, such as the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) is the Cost of Living Allowance, which is designed to compensate for the different cost of purchasing goods and services at the overseas location.

Performance Benchmarks

Trade Commissioners and the market development teams have a set of Key Performance Indicators linked to the overall Trade Queensland Service Delivery Statement performance measures. They have their own annual targets and are subject to a rigorous performance reporting process.

Trade Queensland monitors performance on a monthly basis and it is formally reviewed each quarter by Trade Queensland’s senior management team through their Strategic Review Group.

The Commissioners and their teams report on the: • Number of Trade Queensland’s Strategic Export Projects they participate in, and related outcomes. • Number of clients assisted. • Value of export outcomes generated by client firms assisted. • Number of Exporter Development Initiatives (seminars and workshops aimed at skilling exporters and deepening the culture of exporting). • Number of Trade Initiatives promoting Queensland products and services (inbound and outbound missions and trade exhibitions).

Additionally, the Commissioners and the market development teams also assist investment to Queensland and report the number of investment leads they generate and any related investment dollar value.

All dollar value outcomes by clients assisted is substantiated by Export Impact Forms signed and endorsed by the exporter, acknowledging the importance of the assistance provided by Trade Queensland.

Trade Queensland benchmarks Austrade parameters to guide their selection of Key Performance Indicators, including the design of the Export Impact Form. Austrade also reports clients assisted, value of trade outcomes and outward investment achieved.

-7-

Trade Commissioners and the market development teams have contributed significantly to Trade Queensland’s Service Delivery Statement (SDS) outcomes for 2008-09. The preliminary figures for these outcomes are:

• Assisted 2,900 client firms, with 44% of these businesses located in regional Queensland. • Implemented 23 strategic export projects and delivered 151 trade initiatives, secured more than $500 million in export sales, and 163 exporter development initiatives.

In addition, Trade Commissioners and their teams have generated 76 investment leads and assisted $329 million of direct investment to Queensland.

Top 50 Cities Cost of Living Base City: New York, USA (=100)

Rank Rank Index Index City Country 2009 2008 2009 2008 1 2 TOKYO JAPAN 143.7 127 2 11 OSAKA JAPAN 119.2 110 3 1 MOSCOW RUSSIA 115.4 142.4 4 8 GENEVA SWITZERLAND 109.2 115.8 5 6 HONG KONG HONG KONG 108.7 117.6 6 9 ZURICH SWITZERLAND 105.2 112.7 7 7 COPENHAGEN DENMARK 105.0 117.2 8 22 NEW YORK CITY US 100.0 100.0 9 20 BEIJING CHINA 99.6 101.9 10 13 SINGAPORE SINGAPORE 98.0 109.1 11 10 MILAN ITALY 96.9 111.3 12 24 SHANGHAI CHINA 95.2 98.3 13 12 PARIS FRANCE 95.1 109.4 14 4 OSLO NORWAY 94.2 118.3 15 89 CARACAS VENEZUELA 93.3 79.3 16 3 LONDON UK 92.7 125 17 14 TEL AVIV ISRAEL 91.9 105 18 16 ROME ITALY 91.2 103.9 19 21 HELSINKI FINLAND 90.5 101.1 20 52 DUBAI UAE 90.1 89.3 21 19 VIENNA AUSTRIA 89.3 102.3 22 61 SHENZHEN CHINA 89.0 86.3 23 55 LOS ANGELES US 87.6 87.5 23 70 GUANGZHOU CHINA 87.6 83.9 25 16 DUBLIN IRELAND 87.4 103.9 26 65 ABU DHABI UAE 86.7 85.7 27 34 DOUALA CAMEROUN 86.1 95.1 28 25 ATHENS GREECE 85.9 97 29 25 AMSTERDAM NETHERLANDS 85.7 97 30 45 BRATISLAVA SLOVAKIA 84.8 90.6 31 89 WHITE PLAINS US 84.7 79.3 32 30 LAGOS NIGERIA 84.6 95.9 33 74 TEHRAN IRAN 84.1 82.2 34 51 ABIDJAN IVORY COAST 82.5 89.6 34 41 DAKAR SENEGAL 82.5 92.2 34 78 SAN FRANCISCO US 82.5 81 37 28 MADRID SPAIN 82.3 96.7 38 43 LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG 82.1 91.3 38 31 BARCELONA SPAIN 82.1 95.2 40 57 ALGIERS ALGERIA 81.7 86.8 41 77 HONOLULU US 81.6 81.4 41 39 BRUSSELS BELGIUM 81.6 92.9 41 80 BEIRUT LEBANON 81.6 80.8 44 44 ALMATY KAZAKHSTAN 81.5 90.7 45 75 MIAMI US 81.4 82 46 18 ST PETERSBOURG RUSSIA 81.3 103.1 47 37 MUNICH GERMANY 81.2 93.1 48 40 FRANKFURT GERMANY 80.9 92.5 49 38 BERLIN GERMANY 80.8 93 50 84 CHICAGO US 80.7 80.3

Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

LES Base Salary/ contract Base Salary Export Office Local Position Title Other Top 5 Outcomes PA (in local currency) AUD1 Outcomes

* Developed the relationship with the Government of Abu Dhabi to further the Memorandum of Understanding with Queensland leading to several Qld Govt agencies and Qld companies providing expertise and advice to the Abu Dhabi Govt. * Managed and coordinated Trade Qld Construction and Infrastructure Trade Mission to UAE, including to Big 5 trade show. Abu Dhabi Commissioner AED 318,000 $9,931,833 * Assisted Education Queensland International with tender for Abu Dhabi Education Council. * Encouraged and facilitated high level visit to Queensland by the Abu Dhabi Emiratisation Council. * Provided critical in-market support to numerous Qld companies across broad range of sectors doing business in the UAE.

* Coordination and facilitation of a MOU signing with the Federation of Karnataka Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI) - India with the Gold Coast Combined Chamber of Bangalore Commissioner $122,437.00 $23,469,020 Commerce this MOU is concerned with information exchange between the chambers and companies from Gold Coast City and the State of Karnataka - April 2009.

* Coordination assistance provided to the Ipswich City Council concerning the signing of an Business Development Manager Rp1167874 MOU between the Federation of Karnataka Chamber of Commerce (FKCCI) – India and industry and Ipswich City Council - April 2009.

* Coordination and introduction between the Cairns Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Business Development Manager Rp861515 the Federation of Karnataka Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI) – India to assist the two chambers to further develop a relationship to support business interaction - April 2009.

* Strategic support provided to the Indo-Queensland Dialogue on Collaborative Research Opportunities Delegation - incorporating the visit to India of Mr Brian Anker, Deputy Director- Office Manager Rp572353 General, Science and Technology Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation.

Administrative Assistant Rp179353 Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

* Guangdong Yudean, Guangdong's largest power generator, opened an investment liasion office in Brisbane to facilitate Yudean identifying and developing investment projects in Queensland coal mining and power generation sect. * A formal agreement was signed between Queensland Department of Education and the Arts and Guangdong Provincial Labour and Social Security Bureau to promote Queensland vocational training expertise in Guangdong province. The agreement will promote Queensland vocational training, especially in TAFE colleges among industrial workers in Guangdong province. Guangzhou Director, Business Development $109,456.00 $6,145,000 * Griffith University Vice Chancellor signed a cooperation agreement with President of Guangdong Sun Yat Sen University on cooperative research into prospective anti malaria drugs being developed from plant extracts from Australian native species. * In July 2009 the University of Southern Queensland managed a Sino Australian Conference on Non Traditional Security Threats in association with Sun Yatsen University. Leading experts from Australian and Chinese think tanks and universities spent two days discussing non traditionial security threats to Australian and Chinese national interests. Issues canvassed i * Finalised Agreeement with Redland Council for a position in Trade Queensland Guangzhou.

Marketing Officer RMB 66748.00

Queensland Premier and Chairperson of the Standing Committee of Guangdong Provincial People's Congress signed a Friendship Agreement in Brisbane in August 2008 to promote cooperation across a broad range of trade and investment sectors and will assist exporters and other agencies to operate effectively in Guangdong province of Southern China. Led the largest ever trade missions to Hong Kong for the Cosmoprof and Hofex trade missions. Provided extensive assistance to the Queensland Institute of Medical Research (“QIMR”) extensively in Hong Kong to establish research partnerships with the Hong Kong University, Hong Kong Commissioner $216,822.00 $37,607,985 Department of Clinical Oncology and the Sun Yat-Sen University, Cancer Centre in Guangzhou to conduct clinical trials on world first immunotherapy to treat Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma NPC) a treatment developed by QIMR after 30 years of research. Assisted Griffith University to establish a medical research cooperation with the University of Hong Kong to develop a vaccine to treat Gastrointestinal and Upper Areodigestive Cancers. The outcome will be translated to clinical and socioeconomical benefits to Queensland in terms Trade Queensland Hong Kong has spent 3 years to conceptualise, structure and organize the fi

Director Business Development HKD 959,015 Director - Admin, Migrtn & Education HKD 644,261 Business Development Manager HKD 414,292 Office Manager HKD 321,450 Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

*Supported Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries with successful trial shipments of various Queensland produce, in preparation for future exports. *Supported the University of Queensland to formalise its student exchange program, including accreditation with reciprocal universities. *Developed strategic relationships with UK music industry and hosted an industry showcase of London Commissioner $291,548.00 $44,624,831 Queensland bands at Gibson Guitar Studio. *Provided logistical and administrative support to Queensland Health recruitment activities which resulted in 75 positions being offered to UK nurses. *Provided significant promotion opportunities for ten Queensland food and wine companies through the G'Day UK program of events and managed Governor of Queensland's visit to the UK, including participation in official G'day UK events.

Deputy Commisioner 2 $164,463 This position abolished 8 July 2009

Director, Business Development £58,290

Business Development Manager £39,570

Office Manager £34,716 Information / Marketing Officer £27,023 Accounts Officer £21,430 Administrative Assistant £23,032 Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

*Worked with Pfizer executives in New York to obtain a commitment from the Animal Health division to make Brisbane their global headquarters for animal genetics research. *Established the Queensland Energy Independence Working Group and secured the involvement of high profile American partners to work with Queensland experts on innovative energy independence projects. *Opened up the emerging market of Colombia to Queensland companies through a strategic program of visits, a trade mission, key note addresses to conferences and high level Los Angeles Commissioner $171,093.00 $32,250,827 networking including meetings with President Uribe. *Developed and signed a formal agreement with the Canadian province of British Columbia, targeting sectors such as biotechnology, life science and mining services, promoting bilateral education opportunities, enhancing engagement with the Asia Pacific and collaborating on climate change initiatives and energy management. *Developed and signed a Statement of Intent with the Mexico national government in Mexico City to encourage cooperation in the mining sector, facilitate further business related links and enhance trade and investment between Queensland and Mexico.

Deputy Commissioner 3 Contract expires 15 July 2010 $164,463.00 Position will be abolished

Business Development Director USD69546

Business Development Manager USD68155

Business Development Manager USD68155 Office Manager USD51059 Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

*Managed and coordinated the Trade Qld Construction and Infrastructure Trade Mission to Saudi Arabia. *Supported Qld companies at MENA-Ex mining trade show, Saudi Building & Interior Design Exhibition, Saudi Medicare 2009 Exhibition and Cityscape Saudi Arabia Exhibition. Riyadh Commissioner SAR430000 $129,707,500 *Facilitated food and agribusiness visit to Saudi by Qld companies attending Gulfood, UAE. *Developed network of high level government and business contacts to facilitate market access for Qld companies. *Provided crucial in-market support to Queensland firms doing business with Saudi.

QCTN signed an MOU with Gangwong Regional Innovation Agency in October 2008 to Seoul Commissioner $133,412.00 $39,911,880 cooperate in the field of clinical trials and biotechnology.

Assisted Lotte Engineering and Construction to open its branch office in Paradise Point as a Market Development Manager KRW 54,700,062 base to manage current Queensland residential projects valued at over $750 million and to investigate future investment opportunities.

Aassisted a Korean investment consortium to invest $86 million and establish Queensland Accomodation Company Pty Ltd to build new student accommodation at Gold Coast Institute of Business Development Manager KRW 55,816,390 TAFE, which will create over 300 construction jobs and 40 teaching related jobs to service the increase in student population.

Queensland and Gyeongnam signed an MOU to facilitate collaboration and trade opportunities in the marine sectors in July 2008. In addition, two MoUs were signed in the Marine sector Market Development Manager KRW 55,816,390 between Sanctuary Cove International Boat Show and Yacht Korea Boat Show and between Superior Jetties and Shinhwa Marine/JTS in Korea to license pontoon manufacturing.

Geochang College in Gyeongnam Province signed an MOU with Gold Coast Institute of TAFE Business Development Manager KRW 55,816,390 in August 2008 regarding joint operations in the field of professors and training staff exchange and joint programs.

Queensland signed an MOU with Korea Invstement Corporation in June 2009 to cooperate for investment opportunity which would be mutually-benefited and share information under the Office Manager KRW 42,700,500 strategic alliance. Brisbane City Council signed an MOU with Incheon Metropolitan City for the role of the Summit Secretariat and the promotional and marketing activities to support APCS 2009. Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

Provided assistance to the Shenhuo International Group Pty Limited in its successful tendered Shanghai Commissioner $133,412.00 $37,228,595 for the southern half of the Taroborah coal restricted area release, located about 20 kilometres west of Emerald.

Shanghai Week in Queensland took place in Brisbane from 24-30 June 2009. The week of cultural and business development activities brought Queensland and Shanghai Trade Director, Business Development CNY 406,551 Queensland facilitated trade activities in Shanghai week, including a Bridge to China forum for Queensland at which 44 senior Chinese business leaders from Shanghai met with representatives of Queensland companies active in Shanghai market.

Groundprobe and Shenyang branch of China Coal Insitute have signed aggreement to bring Senior Project Manager - Beijing CNY 307,633 world leading slope stability technology in China.

A mining company in China has recently obtained permission to explore a new coal reserve in Senior Business Development Manager CNY 219,484 Queensland.

Business Development Manager CNY 156,189 Business Development Officer CNY 104,245 Office Manager CNY 106,373 Administration Assistant CNY 64,105 Business Development Manager - Education CNY 206,577 Taiwan's First Commercial Bank has been approved to commenced operations in Brisbane September 2009. This branch's operations includes includes wholesale deposits, remittances, documentary bills, loans and advance and will provide financial services between Taipei Commissioner $114,525.00 $16,081,481 Australia and Taiwan. The operation will include placement of 3-4 Taiwan based representatives.

Professor Ian Lowe AO, visited Taiwan (organised in conjunction with National Science Council) April 28-30 2009. His visit included seminars at National Taipei University, National Marketing Officer NTD 1,248,992 Tamkung University, Taipei Municipal JianGou Boys High School, and VIP speaker engagement at the Australian Commerce and Industry Office.

Marketing Officer NTD 974,087 Administration Officer NTD 757,622 Attachment 1 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Staffing 2008-2009

ZeroGen – Clean Coal Technology signed an MOU with Mitsubishi Tokyo Commissioner $133,412.00 $45,308,242 Corp/Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on 30/9/08 .

• QCTN signed MOU with Osaka Chamber of Commerce and Kansai Bio Promotion Council Business Development Manager JPY 11,485,224 for collaboration projects/activities in clinical trials on 20/10/08.

• Gold Coast Institute of TAFE – Yomiuri Institute, signed an agreement to officially open the Business Development Manager JPY 7,707,513 GAIT Japan based office at the Institute.

• GCIT also signed an MOU with the University of Health and Welfare to continue with and Business Development Manager JPY 7,864,809 strengthen their study tour program. In May 2009 Students will visit the Gold Coast Campus on two week study tours. • Fukutake Foundation and their Australian based Global Career Academy signed an Office Manager/Accountant JPY 11,058,912 agreement with Southbank Institute of TAFE following the mission to Queensland in October 2008 to find a suitable Queensland partner. Business Development Officer JPY 6,612,015

Office underwent closure in December 2008 - However two significant trade missions to Indonesa took place including to Balikipan in Novemember 2008 with 10 Queensland Jakarta4 Commissioner $117,369.00 $21,968,113 companies participating and a mission to Jakarata to coinicde with Ozmine in February 2009 with 22 companies participating.

Business Development Manager IDR 154,849,614 Executive Secretary/Office Mgr IDR 75,721,660 Driver/Office Assistant IDR 25,483,117 $32,865.30

Note: Data for salaries is per contract year. 1 LES salaries are denominated in local currency and periodically converted to AUD. LES salaries converted into AUD @ 1 May 2009 2. This position was abolished on 8 July 2009 3. The contract for this position expires on 15 July 2010, position will be abolished

4. The Jakarata Commissioner position expired on 13 March 2009 with the move to a new model of operation in Indonesia involving the placement of a dedicated Trade Queensland Business Development Manager, operating from the Austrade Office in Jakarta. The contracts on the three LES positions have also been concluded. Attachment 2 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Travel Expenses 2008-2009

Export Office Local Position Title Travel Expenses Outcomes

Abu Dhabi Commissioner $13,329 $9,931,833

Bangalore Commissioner $30,491 $23,469,020

Business Development Manager $10,432 Business Development Manager $12,300 Office Manager $5,830 Administrative Assistant

Guangzhou Director, Business Development $10,181 $6,145,000 Marketing Officer $2,273

Hong Kong Commissioner $21,266 $37,607,985

Director Business Development $2,623 Director - Admin, Migrtn & Education $1,623 Business Development Manager $833 Office Manager $4,779

London Commissioner $40,789 $44,624,831

Deputy Commisioner 2 This position abolished 8 July 2009 $13,855 Director, Business Development $19,399 Business Development Manager $1,545 Office Manager $4,722 Information / Marketing Officer $3,312 Accounts Officer Administrative Assistant

Los Angeles Commissioner $130,409 $32,250,827

Deputy Commissioner 3 Contract expires 15 July 2010 $76,624

Business Development Director $10,500 Business Development Manager $17,243 Business Development Manager $163 Office Manager $5,477

Riyadh Commissioner $15,553 $129,707,500

Seoul Commissioner $10,377 $39,911,880

Market Development Manager $3,123 Business Development Manager $3,202 Market Development Manager $916 Business Development Manager $700 Office Manager $4,114 Attachment 2 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Travel Expenses 2008-2009

Shanghai Commissioner $27,884 $37,228,595

Director, Business Development $3,396 Senior Project Manager - Beijing $5,890 Senior Business Development Manager $3,317 Business Development Manager $2,559 Business Development Officer $269 Office Manager $7,455 Administration Assistant

Taipei Commissioner $8,836 $16,081,481 Marketing Officer $1,642 Marketing Officer $957 Administration Officer $4,991

Tokyo Commissioner $23,998 $45,308,242

Business Development Manager $2,267 Business Development Manager $675 Business Development Manager $3,609 Office Manager/Accountant $4,984 Business Development Officer

Jakarta4 Commissioner $476 $21,968,113 Business Development Manager Executive Secretary/Office Mgr Driver/Office Assistant

Note: Data for salaries is per contract year. 1 LES salaries are denominated in local currency and periodically converted to AUD. LES salaries converted into AUD @ 1 May 2009 2. This position was abolished on 8 July 2009 3. The contract for this position expires on 15 July 2010 4. The Jakarata Commissioner position expired on 13 March 2009 with the move to a new model of operation in Indonesia involving the placement of a dedicated Trade Queensland Business Development Manager, operating from the Austrade Office in Jakarta. The contracts on the three LES positions have also been concluded. Attachment 3 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Benefits 2008-2009

Export Office Local Position Title Benefits AUD Notes Outcomes

Abu Dhabi Commissioner $14,800 $9,931,833

Bangalore Commissioner $57,985 $23,469,020 Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager Administrative Assistant

Benefits include Education Guangzhou Director, Business Development $80,143 $6,145,000 Costs for 2 children

Marketing Officer

Hong Kong Commissioner $32,977 $37,607,985

Director Business Development Director - Admin, Migrtn & Education Business Development Manager Office Manager

London Commissioner $46,610 $44,624,831

Benefits include education costs for 3 children. This Deputy Commisioner 2 This position abolished 8 July 2009 $151,504 position and contract ceased on 8 July 2009.

Director, Business Development Business Development Manager Office Manager Information / Marketing Officer Accounts Officer Administrative Assistant

Los Angeles Commissioner $52,317 $32,250,827

This position and contract will Deputy Commissioner 3 Contract expires 15 July 2010 $153,864 cease on 15 July 2010. Business Development Director Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager

Riyadh Commissioner $129,707,500

This position is currently vacant Seoul Commissioner $27,874 and being filled by a locally- $39,911,880 engaged Commissioner. Market Development Manager Business Development Manager Market Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager

Shanghai Commissioner $44,816 $37,228,595

Director, Business Development Senior Project Manager - Beijing Senior Business Development Manager Attachment 3 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Benefits 2008-2009

Business Development Manager Business Development Officer Office Manager Administration Assistant Taipei Commissioner $5,762 $16,081,481 Marketing Officer Marketing Officer Administration Officer

Benefits include Education Tokyo Commissioner $181,992 $45,308,242 costs for 2 children Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager/Accountant Business Development Officer

This position and contract Jakarta4 Commissioner $18,230 $21,968,113 ceased on 13 March 2009

Business Development Manager Executive Secretary/Office Mgr Driver/Office Assistant

Note: Data for salaries is per contract year. 1 LES salaries are denominated in local currency and periodically converted to AUD. LES salaries converted into AUD @ 1 May 2009 2. This position was abolished on 8 July 2009 3. The contract for this position expires on 15 July 2010 4. The Jakarata Commissioner position expired on 13 March 2009 with the move to a new model of operation in Indonesia involving the placement of a dedicated Trade Queensland Business Development Manager, operating from the Austrade Office in Jakarta. The contracts on the three LES positions have also been concluded. Attachment 4 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Living Expenses 2008-2009

Export Office Local Position Title Living Expenses Outcomes

Abu Dhabi Commissioner $0 $9,931,833

Bangalore Commissioner (includes leased accommodation) $33,025 $23,469,020

Business Development Manager $0 Business Development Manager $0 Office Manager $0 Administrative Assistant $0

Guangzhou Director, Business Development (includes leased accommodation) $90,056 $6,145,000 Marketing Officer $0 $0

Hong Kong Commissioner HKD 0.00 $37,607,985

Director Business Development HKD 0 Director - Admin, Migrtn & Education HKD 0 Business Development Manager HKD 0 Office Manager HKD 0

London Commissioner (Includes leased accommodation) $177,425 $44,624,831

Deputy Commisioner 2 This position abolished 8 July 2009, includes leased accommodatio $130,541 Director, Business Development £0 Business Development Manager £0 Office Manager £0 Information / Marketing Officer £0 Accounts Officer £0 Administrative Assistant £0

Los Angeles Commissioner (includes leased accommodation) $120,378 $32,250,827

Deputy Commissioner 3 Contract expires 15 July 2010, includes leased accommodation $182,142

Business Development Director $0 Business Development Manager $0 Business Development Manager $0 Office Manager $0

Riyadh Commissioner SAR 0 $129,707,500

Commissioner (This position is currently vacant and will be filled by Seoul a locally engaged officer for which no living expenses will be $6,993 $39,911,880 payable) Market Development Manager KRW 0.00 Business Development Manager KRW 0.00 Market Development Manager KRW 0.00 Business Development Manager KRW 0.00 Office Manager KRW 0.00 Attachment 4 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Living Expenses 2008-2009

Shanghai Commissioner (includes leased accommodation) $86,725.38 $37,228,595

Director, Business Development CNY 0.00 Senior Project Manager - Beijing CNY 0.00 Senior Business Development Manager CNY 0.00 Business Development Manager CNY 0.00 Business Development Officer CNY 0.00 Office Manager CNY 0.00 Administration Assistant CNY 0.00

Taipei Commissioner (Includes leased accommodation) $82,507.00 $16,081,481 Marketing Officer NTD 0.00 Marketing Officer NTD 0.00 Administration Officer NTD 0.00

Tokyo Commissioner $22,880.00 $45,308,242

Business Development Manager JPY 0.00 Business Development Manager JPY 0.00 Business Development Manager JPY 0.00 Office Manager/Accountant JPY 0.00 Business Development Officer JPY 0.00

Commissioner (includes leased accommodation, contract ceased on Jakarta4 $48,541.00 $21,968,113 13 March 2009) Business Development Manager 0.00 Executive Secretary/Office Mgr 0.00 Driver/Office Assistant 0.00

Note: Data for salaries is per contract year. 1 LES salaries are denominated in local currency and periodically converted to AUD. LES salaries converted into AUD @ 1 May 2009 2. This position was abolished on 8 July 2009 3. The contract for this position expires on 15 July 2010 4. The Jakarata Commissioner position expired on 13 March 2009 with the move to a new model of operation in Indonesia involving the placement of a dedicated Trade Queensland Business Development Manager, operating from the Austrade Office in Jakarta. The contracts on the three LES positions have also been concluded. Attachment 5 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Allowances 2008-2009

Export Office Local Position Title Allowances Outcomes

Abu Dhabi Commissioner 0 $9,931,833

Bangalore Commissioner $47,305 $23,469,020

Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager Administrative Assistant

Guangzhou Director, Business Development $60,238 $6,145,000

Marketing Officer

Hong Kong Commissioner $98,957.00 $37,607,985

Director Business Development Director - Admin, Migrtn & Education Business Development Manager Office Manager

London Commissioner $79,927 $44,624,831 this position Deputy Commisioner 2 $79,392 was abolished This position abolished 8 July 2009 on 8 July 2009 Director, Business Development Business Development Manager Office Manager Information / Marketing Officer Accounts Officer Administrative Assistant

Los Angeles Commissioner $63,252 $32,250,827

Deputy Commissioner 3 this position Contract expires 15 July 2010, position will be $63,099 will cease on abolished 15 July 2010 Business Development Director Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager

Riyadh Commissioner 0 $129,707,500

$139,893 This position is currently Seoul Commissioner vacant and being filled by a $39,911,880 locally-engaged Commissioner (without allowances).

Market Development Manager Business Development Manager Market Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager Attachment 5 Trade Queensland Overseas Offices - Allowances 2008-2009

Shanghai Commissioner $60,661 $37,228,595

Director, Business Development Senior Project Manager - Beijing Senior Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Business Development Officer Office Manager Administration Assistant

Taipei Commissioner $35,488 $16,081,481 Marketing Officer Marketing Officer Administration Officer

Tokyo Commissioner $220,529.00 $45,308,242

Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Business Development Manager Office Manager/Accountant Business Development Officer

$38,738 Jakarta4 Commissioner This position and contract $21,968,113 ceased on 13 March 2009. Business Development Manager Executive Secretary/Office Mgr Driver/Office Assistant

Documentation tabled at Hearing MINES AND ENERGY KEY DEPARTMENTAL CONTACTS Queensland as of 10 June 2009 Government DME Enquires & Complaints line: 1800 657 567

NOTE - In an attempt to maintain version control, can you please advise any changes to Cara Gurnett. Ph: 300 62603 (ext 62603) OR Email: cara.aurnettC3dme.ald.qov.a~ , . . . ,,> >. . . . MIN~#=#.s~. QPqCEG:,, ,, , '-6.1&;. ,'' .rii..!.,'"- . .. , :,.. - ,. , , ... . ,,flMaty street. ,,~i; ROBERTSON, Stephen Hon Minister 322 51 899 (Call Gail) CLELLAND, Gail Personal Assistant [email protected] 322 77538 CHOI. Michael Parliamentary Secretary Michael.choiC3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 389 80673 (ext 10673) McCONNELL, Alec Administration Officer1 [email protected] 324 73068 (call number in full) PA to Parliamentary Sec. STANDEN, Kathie Principal Advisor kathie.standenC3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 322 78070 GEDDES, Myra Senior Policy Advisor [email protected] 322 51854 GOLDIEGatherine Senior Media Advisor catherine.aoldieC3ministerial.ald.aov.au 322 51819 ')IYDE, Matthew Media Advisor matthew.hvdeC3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 322 47332 McCALLUM,Lance Policy Advisor [email protected] 322 51797 DOWNIE,Jenny Assist. Policy Advisor [email protected] 322 51794 - CL0 - Mines and Energy JIMMIESON, Shannon Assistant Policy Advisor Shannon.iimmiesonC3ministerial.ald.aov.au 322 51781 - CL0 - Natural Resources PETERSEN, Charlotte Assistant Policy Advisor charlotte.~etersonC3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 322 78069 - CL0 - OCE CUMMINGS, Mae Office Manager mae.cumminasC3ministerial.ald.aov.au 322 47333 JENNINGS, Michael Chauffeur michael.ienninasC3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 322 51835 GILLIVER, Alice Chauffeur (Casual) 322 48094 LOCKYER, Josh, Administration Officer joshua.iockverC3ministerial.ald.aov.au 322 77537

DEPARTMENTAL LIAISON OFFICERS Lloyd, Linda DLO (Mines and Energy) linda.llovdC3dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 47076 HARTWELL, Deborah DLO (Natural Resources) [email protected] 322 47077

~FFICEOF THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL ivel 17, 61 Mary Slreel Fax: 3237 1317 HUNT, Dan Director-General dan.huntk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 42684 0418 736 803 LAING, Debby Personal Assistant (W,T,F)debby.lainaC3dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71336 VELLA, Kim Personal Assistant (M,T.W)[email protected] 323 71336 THOMPSON, Judith Director [email protected] 3898 0682 (exl10682) 0439792381 SMITH, Annette Executive Officer annene.i.smithC3dme.ald.aov.au 324 75595 MANASSAXIS Sam Execut ve S,pport Oflcer smaree nlanassak1sC3omeold aov a~ 322 52448 BRAY Sbsan Exec S-p Offlcer (M,T.W) s~sanoravC3dmeh d aov a, 323 70623 OVERELL, Denise Exec Sup Officer (T, F) 323 70623 Cabinet and Parliamentarv Services Fax: 3237 1317 Level 17,61 Mary Street RESIDE, Martin AJDirector [email protected] (Cabinet and Parliamentary Services and CLLO) CAVANAGH, Peter Manager peter.cavanaahC3dme.ald.aov.a~ (Cabinet Legislation and Liaison Office) SONG, Anita AJPrincipal Advisor [email protected] 323 83346 MORRISON, Colin AIPrincipal Advisor colin.morrisonOdme.aId.aov.au 340 4801 1 (exl 18011) CHERRINGTON, Dwan Assistant Cabinet Officer [email protected] 322 48231 HAUG, Louise Assistant Cabinet Officer [email protected] 322 46809

Page 1 of 12 information Services Level 5, Mineral House, 41 George Street GRANT, Tony Director 324 74681 CARTER, Stephen Senior Online Analyst 322 48953 (ext 48953) MCAULIFFE, Chloe Administration Officer 324 73899 (ext 33899) KUTUZOV, Alex Principal Computer 324 74602 Systems Officer IVES, Scott Project Manager

DAVIS, Luke Senior Oracle Developer CAVANNA, Tony Oracle Developer MONEY, Mark Oracle Developer UOORTY, Claire Senior Tester

: i.T. Support PANOCHiNI, Daniel Manager WELLINGS. Mark Administration Officer VIGLIOTTI, Stefano LT. Officer GRIMES, Peter ILT, Officer

information Manaqement & Policy VU. Dominic Manager lnfo Mgt Policy MURPHY. Peter Principal Project Officer ROGERS, Steve lnfo Management Consultant SHIPTON, Mark Snr lnfo Officer KING, Larissa Information Officer ADCOCK, Andrew Information Officer

: Project SUDDOII KEBLE, Lance Project Manage1 ADOLFSEN, Karl Manager

. Business Svsfems Support THOMAS, Nigel Manager ALLEN, Joseph Technical Architect BUTLER, Andrew Snr Systems Support Off~cer MURCHIE, David Systems Support Officer JEFFS, Amanda Systems Support Officer DWYER, Michael Lotus Notes CREER, Johanna Lotus Notes ROWLING, Terry Lotus Notes PLAYFORD, Ken Snr Computer Systems Support Officer STAFURIK, Jerry Cornp Systems Officer [email protected] LAM, Quyen Snr Computer Systems auven.lamk3dme.aid.aov.a~ Support Officer SMITH, Megan Comp Systems Officer meaan.smithC3dme.ald.aov.a~ BORANAA, Prerna Comp Systems Officer prerna.boranaak3dme.ald.oov.a~

Support request via email to: DMEBusinessSvstemsSu~~ortk3dme.ald.aov.au

Records F?fanaqement Level 9. Mineral House, Level3, Mineral House, 41 George Street CHASE, Ann Principal Records Officer ann.chasek3dme.ald.aov.a~ P Corporate Capability Unit Level 4, 61 Mary Street fax: 3239 61 19 PARKER, Brenda Director Corp Capability 324 751 37 DIMITRIOS, Oreon NManager, Corporate 389 80675 (ext 10675) Relations BUCKLE, Vikki Manager Employee & IR FARDON, Conor AIManager Workforce Planning KEENAN, Brent Senior HR Officer 389 80674 (ext 10674) TUCKER, Kayla Administration Officer 323 71519 VENABLES, Celia Senior HR Officer 340 43470 LIPCZYNSKI, Jeanette Senior HR Officer 323 83036 FLEMING, Vikki Administration Officer 323 71 533 FLARHETY, Susanne Principal HR Officer 323 90033

Correspondence Manaaement Team Level 4, S1 Mary Street FARQUHARSON. Rachelle Manager FULLARTON, Karen Team Leader KERBY, Justine Correspondence Officer CULLEN. Marina Correspondence Officer GARVIE, Sharon Correspondence Officer GINLEY, Dominic Administration Officer

COOKE, Geoff NExecutive Director [email protected] DARLING, Sandi Exexutive Support Officer [email protected] CONWAY, Tahlia NAdministration Officer [email protected] MACCHION, Lisa Administration Officer [email protected] lndustrv and Ciient Services Unit SCHNEIDER, Darren NDirector [email protected] WILLIAMS, Julie Principal Policy Officer julie.williams(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~ CASSIMATIS, Bill Principal Policy Analyst bill.cassimatis(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~ WALKINGTON, Julie NSenior Policy Officer julie.walkinaton(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~ LLOYD, Linda Policy Officer [email protected] BIRD, Sarah Policy Officer sarah.bird(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~

LODER,Andrew Call Centre Officer [email protected] 322 47530 1800 657 567 EAVES, Craig Administration Officer [email protected] 340 56147 (Dept Enquiries)

Queensland Gas Scheme MITCHELL, Tonya AlDirector [email protected] 322 42712 In full 0423728811 CHURCH, Roger NPrincipal Policy Officer [email protected] 323 541 66 CAMERON, Rod Senior Policy Officer rodnev.cameron(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 77048 LU, (Katherine) Lu NFinance Officer [email protected] 323 90918 JARRAHI, Ali Engineer ali.iarrahi(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~ 324 75138

infrastructure Protection and Emerclencv Res~onse ARCHER, Alex Principal Technical Officer alex.archer(Z3dme.ald.aov.a~

Enerav Reauiation & Leaislation Unit OLDS. Andrea Director [email protected] Page 5 of 12 . HARE, Margaret NManager [email protected] 322 48658 HASTIE, Brook Legal Project Manager [email protected] 340 48275 (ext 72275) JOLLEY. Megan NManager [email protected] 323 71503 KUMAR, Neelam NPolicy Officer [email protected] 322 46372 PARSLOW, Chris NPrincipal Policy Officer [email protected] 340 48007 (ext I 8007) RATNAYAKE, Jay Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 322 45410 YEATES, Suzie Manager [email protected] 322 44624

OFFICE OF CLEAN ENERGY Level 7,61 Mary Street Fax: 3222 2730 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OFFICER COLE, John (Dr) Chief Officer [email protected] 340 53828 (ext 82528) 0417 723 965 HALLAM, Melissa Manager, Office of the CO Melissa.hallamOcleanenerav.ald.aov.au "Long Service Leave'' NYE, Wendy NManager, Marketing [email protected] 322 51 036 0408393529 BOWLES, Camilla Communications Officer [email protected] 323 41075 ALDER, Carly NExecutive Officer [email protected] 340 48273 (ext 72273) MCCANDLESS, Jandy AlSnr Exec Support Officer [email protected] 389 80683 (ext 10683) SEWELL, Beth NPersonal Assistant [email protected] 322 76893

Cleari Ertea:mc~ DANIEL, Murray Executive Director [email protected]; 340 48280 (ea 72280) 0437 01 l 908 JEFFERY, Zoe Executive Support Officer [email protected] 323 71508 %IICVDe~;e/oo?~enii AGNEW, Scott NDirector [email protected] 340 48004 (ext 18004) 0439010762 BURTON, Arnae AIManager [email protected] 340 48276 (ext 72276) ARMSTRONG, Anne Manager anne.armstronak3cleanenerav.ald.aov.a~ 389 80689 (ext 10689) HAMMILL, Clare Principal Policy Advisor [email protected] 300 85795 (ext 35795) MCMULLEN, Angelene NPrincipal Policy Officer an~elene.rncrnullenOcleanenerav.Qld.Qov.au 322 7761 1 WRIGnT. Dav d A Prtnc pa Pollcy Offcer dav,o wr~ant@ceanenerav ald ao- 322 47596 ALEXANDER. Nancy &Snr PO cy Otfcer nancll a exandermcleanenerav ala a d au 323 90036 JENNINGS, Miranda NPolicy Officer [email protected] 323 71385 O'CONNOR, Courtney Assistant Policy Officer [email protected] 340 48005 CHAPMAN, Andrew Graduate Policy Officer [email protected] --Polfc~~~o/etnen~~ CRONIN, Peter AIDirector [email protected] 0439750081 MILEY, Paul Contractor - [email protected] (ext 10855) SHW Project Manager BROWN, Dennis NDirector [email protected] SAWYER, Kay Procurement Officer [email protected] (ext 10853) MCLEAN, Rob Procurement Officer [email protected] (ext 10851) WALTERS, Brooke Principal Project Officer [email protected] HARVEY, Andrea Senior Project Officer [email protected] WALL, Peter AI Policy Advisor [email protected] LlM, Yee-Shin NGraduate Policy Officer [email protected] (ext 82522) CRAFT, Anje NGraduate Policy Officer [email protected] HAZLE, Mark NAdministration Officer [email protected] (exi 10852)

Cleat? E:iein!/ PartnersI7ips TAYLOR, Ty NExecutive Director [email protected] MCDONALD, Kristin AlExecutive Suppan Officer [email protected] (ext 18005) BARTON, Robert Director [email protected] 0427635928 THAMBAR. Kumar Director [email protected] (ext35794) 0418 188 563 McGERTY-HUYNH, Lisa Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 322 42689 ZILLMANN, Melissa Policy Officer [email protected] NIA APPLEBY, Cassie NPolicy Officer [email protected] 322 77573 SPACKMAN, David Assistant Policy Officer david.soackman63dme.ald.aov.au 389 80684

SAFETY & HEALTH DIVISION Level 61, 61 Mary Street. Fax: 3237 1069 Directorate - Mines Inspectorate - Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate- Explosives Inspectorate and Reserves - Slmtars -Uirector~ie BELL, Stewari Executive Director [email protected] 323 71471 0417 703 687 EXCELL. Pamela Executive Officer [email protected] 323 71474 0438 440 009 PRIDMORE, Kellie NExecutive Officer [email protected] 389 80690 (ext 10690) WISE, Grahame State Operations Manager grahame.wise63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71522 0423 026 985 O'DONOGHUE, Mick Principal Advisor [email protected] 323 71628 0417 619 856 PEDLER, Sonja Training Officer [email protected] 323 54442 ATKINS, Cassie Snr Fin 8 Admin Officer [email protected] 323 71520 WIGGINS. Murray Statistician [email protected] 322 47758 (ext 71242) ABBOTT, Estelle NStatistician [email protected] 340 431 43 FEAO, Michelle Snr Admin Officer [email protected] 322 60038

Mines insaeclorale BILLINGHAM, Roger Chief Inspector, Mines roaer.billinaham63dme.ald.aov.a~ TAYLOR, Gavin Chief Inspector, Coal gavin.tavlor63dme.ald.aov.a~ WONG, Teri Executive Assistant [email protected] RASCHE, Tilman Sen lnsp Mines (Met) tilman.rasche63dme.aId.aov.a~ KABEL, John Sen lnsp Mines (Electrical) iohn.kabe10dme.ald.aov.a~ FYNN, Andrew Inspector of Mines Andrew.fvnn63dme.ald.aov.a~ ERIKSSON ri,w Gramate Eng neer huw er~ksson@omeala aov a~ MASOh, Gay e A Scc Boara of Exam nerq gay e mason@ome a a aov aL ROBINSON, Graham AlAdmin officer. Board of graham.robinson63dme.ald.aov.a~ Examiners . . ., , ,+rjij;1 s!;:,3,.2:,i!z,7:3".~-:i,Tjf TIERNAN, Gerard Manager gerard.tiernan63dme.ald.aov.au CAIRNS, Denise Medical Records Officer denise.cairns63dme.aId.aov.a~ SMITH, David Occupational Medic~neSpecialist david.smith63dme.ald.aov.a~ BELL, Amanda Admin Officer Amanda.bell63dme.ald.aov.a~ SYNAK, Tania Temp Admin Officer [email protected]

> g;(i2;..-.:,~.-...?a>,,/;., ,,:.,:J: , -..-,- .-,~.'O#'~~~ DOWNS, Geoff NChief Inspector geoff.downs63dme.ald.aov.au 340 431 51 0409618446 KIRNER, Lyn Executive Assistant Ivn.kirner63dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 47752

,3e!r3jear:3 so,? ;j-,loapn.-r,z-iL2zLkz MATHESON, Stephen Chief Inspector steohen.matheson63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71389 0409260388 VIDOVIC, Lidia NExecutive Assistant lidia.vidovic63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 96888

.-..2<; F.-- ?:,.,.,l:-,-,~,: .,.,. :,; >::::..z,, ,"O";~l...< ,{l Z?#b:.! O'SULLIVAN, Rob NDeputy Chief Inspector [email protected] 476 07408 0412707376 of Metalliferous Mines

, .;aE?;z,i 83 8GU;d.n :.- SKELDING, Chris Manager Safety & Health [email protected] 493 84605 041 7 726 585

:, S*-':.p-.{,. ::,; .Ea2;"ng!g,q GOODE, Phil Regional lnsp of Mines [email protected]

, $jj,lj-,i!,ys Fax: 38:G ,5330 ~?.$::~;j?k .3:y:2:. ;?,$?;&sj: Page 9 of 12 9 Northern Region Fax: 4760 7400 CROTON, Luke Regional Director luke.crotonG3dme.ald.aov.a~ 0417 713 676 NELSON-WHITE, Greg Senior Spatial lnfo Officer grea.Nelson-whiteG3drne.ald.aov.a~ MILLER, Fay Project Officer fay.millerG3dme.ald.aov.a~

Fax: 4938 4310 DANN, Russell NRegional Director russell.dann63drne.ald.aov.a~ 0428 384 153 BARKER, Noel Regional Director [email protected] Succession Planning ELLIOTT, Darlene Administration Officer [email protected]

Souihein Ea;i ,?!:gior: Fax: 3405 5347 KELLY, Mark Megional Director mark.kellvG3deedi.ald.aov.a~ HEYNEN, Michelle NExecutive Assistant michelle.hevnenG3drne.ald.aov.au CONROY, Renee Support Officer renee.conrovG3dme.ald.aov.a~

EXPLORATION & INVESTMENT DIVISION Gate 4. Block A. 80 Meiers Road. lndooroopilly OLD 4058 Fax: 3237 1534 EXPLORATION AND INVESTMENT MASON, Dave Executive Director david.masonG3dme.ald.aov.a~ 041 7 734 282 (ext 95365) MAKRIDAKIS, Yasmin Executive Support Officer yasmin.makridakisG3dme.ald.aov.a~ 336 29364 (ext 95364)

INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT Level 16.61 Mary Street Industry Development: Exploration Strategles - Marketing & Statistics- Strateglc Partnerships-. Project Facllltation POTTER, Bob Executive Director bob.~otter63dme.ald.aov.au 323 71416 SIBLEY. Chris Executive Support Officer chris.siblevG3dme.a1d.aov.au 323 71 540 Ex~lorationand Industry Support JOHN, Brad Director brad.iohnk3dme.ald.aov.a~ KUMAR, Parmila NSenior Admin Officer [email protected] Exploration Strateaies RANDALL Ross NManager, ES [email protected] Prolect Facilitation D'ARCY Russell Manager, PF [email protected] m Marketina and Statistics SMITH, Hillary Manager, M&S [email protected] . Strateaic Partnerships REIKEN, Lee AIManager [email protected]

Enerav Geoscience GREEN, Peter Geoscience Manager, EG peter.areenG3dme.ald.aov.a~ 336 29340 (ext 95340) . Realonal Geoscience MURRAY, Cecil Geoscience Manager, RG cec.murravG3dme.ald.clov.a~ 336 29353 (ext 95353) . Geoscience Information THORNTON, Mark NGeoscience Manager, G1 mark.thorntonOdme.ald.aov.au 336 29360 (ext 95360) Mineral Geoscience CRANFIELD, Len Geoscience Manager, MG len.cranfieldG3dme.aId.aov.a~ 389 69883 (ext 69883) Smart Geosclence TB A Carbon Geostoraae lnitlatlve DRAPER, John Director

Page 11 of 12 .~,..';p, , l ! -' MINES AND ENERGY KEY DEPARTMENTAL CONTACTS Queensland as of 10 June 2009 Government DME Enquires & Complaints line: 1800 657 567

NOTE - In an attempt to maintain version control, can you please advise any changes to Cara Gurnett. Ph: 300 62603 (ext 62603) OR Email: cara.aurnettk3dme.qld.aov.au .? ...... >,? ...... <> ...... -. - ...... ~ ...... 2.. . ,- . .

:;, . . .. $S . -;. ..!,, + .:::;;: :. . : .:i,.!i.\;','i;?k;$~G ;?a ,:., ;:. ,: :,<.:;;$g?,.... z ,..: 1. .. MINISTER~OFFICE,...,+... : ...... :....:.. . . + . ...+. % ...... , , , .....4 >, ,.. ,...... Level !7, 61.~~street : .... 1...... :...... :...... I ..:'.: ~g.3~1828!.~edia~&:3&.5748 ROBERTSON. Slepnen non M n sler 322 51 899 (Gal Ga.1) CLELLAND, Gail Personal Assistant [email protected] 322 77538 CHOI, Michael Parliamentary Secretary [email protected] 38980673 (ext 10673) McCONNELL, Alec Administration Officer1 [email protected] 324 73068 (call number in full) PA to Parliamentary Sec. STANDEN, Kathie Principal Advisor kathie.standenk3ministerial.aid.aov.a~ 322 78070 041 7 795 583 GEDDES, Myra Senior Policy Advisor mvra.aeddesk3ministeriai.ald.aov.a~ 322 51 854 041 9 679 354 GOLDIE,Catherine Senior Media Advisor catherine.aoldiek3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 322 5181 9 0417 728 676 HYDE, Matthew Media Advisor matthew.hvdek3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ 322 47332 0439533248 McCALLUM,Lance Policy Advisor lance.mccailumk3ministerial.ald.aov.au 322 51797 DOWNiE,Jenny Assist. Policy Advisor jennv.downieOministerial.ald.aov.au 322 51 794 - CL0 - Mines and Energy JiMMIESON, Shannon Assistant Poiicy Advisor Shannon.iimmiesonk3ministerial.ald.aov.au - CL0 - Natural Resources PETERSEN, Charlotte Assistant Poiicy Advisor charlotte.uetersonk3ministerial.ald.aov.a~ - CL0 - OCE CUMMINGS, Mae Office Manager [email protected] JENNINGS, Michael Chauffeur [email protected] GILLIVER, Alice Chaufleur (Casual) LOCKYER, Josh Administration Officer [email protected]

DEPARiflflEMTAL LIAlSON OFFICERS Lloyd, Linda DLO (Mines and Energy) linda.liovdk3dme.aid.aov.a~ HARTWELL, Deborah DLO (Natural Resources) Deborah.hartweilk3nrw.aid.aov.a~

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL Level 17,61 Mary Street Fax: 3237 1317 HUNT, Oan Director-General dan.huntk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 041 8 736 803 LAING, Debby Personal Assistant (W,T.F)[email protected] VELLA, Kim Personal Assistant (M,T.W)[email protected] THOMPSON, Judith Director [email protected] (ext 10682) 0439 792 381 SMITH, Annette Executive Officer annette.i.smithk3dme.ald.aov.a~ MANASSAKIS, Sam Executive Support Officer BRAY, Susan Exec Sup Officer (M,T,W) OVERELL, Denise Exec Sup Officer (T, F) Cabinet and Parliamentarv Services Fax: 3237 1317 Level 17,61 Mary Street RESIDE, Martin AIDirector martin.reside dme.ald.aov.au 0408 762 91 8 (Cabinet and Parliamentary Services and CLLO) CAVANAGH, Peter Manager [email protected] 0437547299 (Cabinet Legislation and Liaison Office) SONG, Anita NPrincipal Advisor anita.sonak3dme.ald.aov.a~ MORRISON, Colin NPrincipal Advisor coiin.morrisonk3dme.ald.aov.au (ext 18011) CHERRINGTON, Dwan Assistant Cabinet Officer dwan.cherrinatonk3dme.ald.aov.a~ HAUG, Louise Assistant Cabinet Officer iouise.hauak3drne.aid.aov.au Internal Audit Level4,61 Mary Street Fax: 3239 61 19 KNOWLES, Darryle Director Internal Audit [email protected] 322 42720 MINTEL, Suzanne AiSenior Business [email protected] 323 71512 Support Officer

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR-GENERAL (Policy & Operations) Level 17. 61 Mary Street Fax: 3238 3088 MILLIS, Alan Deputy Director-General [email protected] 322 42191 0427378996 GEORGIEFF, Rachael NExecutive Assistant [email protected] 323 71 134 STANLEY, Connie NPrincipal Advisor [email protected] 322 52418 041 3 331 408

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR-GENERAL (Technology, Exploration & Industry Development) Level 17, 61 Mary Street Fax: 3238 3088 BOOKER, Stuart Deputy Director-General [email protected] 300 85793 0418750307 FORGIONE, Melina Principal Advisor [email protected] 300 85791 (ext 35791) TAVIUNI, Su'esu'e Correspondence Officer su'esu'[email protected] 389 80571 (ext 10571) DUNCAN, Audra Executive Support Officer [email protected] 300 85792 (ext 35792)

CALLAGHAN, Kate Executive Director [email protected] 323 71 530 0407 745 695 GURNETT, Cara AiExecutive Supparf Officer [email protected] 300 62603 BERMINGHAM, Linda Principal Policy Officer [email protected] 340 48272 (ext 72272) (Mon-Thu)

t. t. ildminislraticn Unit -Levels 4.61 Marv Street HALL, Narell Manager [email protected] 340 43520 0419 719 909 O'BRIEN, Carol Administration Officer [email protected] 423 54930 JOCUMSEN. Annette Administration Officer [email protected] 389 80676 (ea 10676)

= Coroowf$ Pe;lorn?ance ilnif ksvel 17. 61 iWariiiv 5?,reeC STEWART. Kirsty NManager [email protected] SMITH, Helen NSenior Advisor [email protected] WEBB. Megan NProject Officer [email protected] JONES, Emilia NProject Officer1 Emilia.ionesci3dme.aId.aov.a~ Exec Assistant

Leaal ices Uni? Level 17, 67 Mar:/ Street JACKSON, Tracey NDirector [email protected] BONESCH, Vanessa Principal Lawyer [email protected] GRANT, Simon Principal Lawyer [email protected] EDMUND, Rebecca Principal Lawyer [email protected] PIPPIA, Andrew Principal Lawyer [email protected] DOYLE, Sara Administration Officer [email protected]

Fr@@rlomof lnforrnation & Privacv Unit Fax: 3239 61 19 ievei4, 61 Mary Sfrzet LAWRENCE, Shane NManager [email protected] BURNS, Ben NPrincipal Policy Officer [email protected] TRAN, Trinh NSenior Policy Officer [email protected] LEWIS, Lee FOI & Privacy Support [email protected] Officer information Services Fax: 3235 41 14 Level5, Mineral House, 41 George Street GRANT, Tony Director [email protected] CARTER, Stephen Senior Online Analyst [email protected] MCAULIFFE, Chloe Administration Officer [email protected] KUTUZOV, Alex Principal Computer [email protected] Systems Officer IVES, Scott Project Manager [email protected]

DAVIS, Luke Senior Oracle Developer [email protected] CAVANNA. Tony Oracle Developer [email protected] MONEY, Mark Oracle Developer [email protected] DOORTY, Claire Senior Tester [email protected]

. LT. Su~uorf PANOCHINI, Daniel Manager [email protected] WELLINGS, Mark Administration Officer [email protected] VIGLIOTTI, Stefano I.T. Officer [email protected] GRIMES, Peter ILT, Officer [email protected]

Information Manaoement & Policy VU, Dorninic Manager lnfo Mgt Policy [email protected] MURPHY, Peter Principal Project Officer [email protected] ROGERS, Steve Into Management Consunant [email protected] SHIPTON, Mark Snr lnfo Officer [email protected] KING, Larissa Information Officer [email protected] ADCOCK, Andrew Information Officer [email protected]

Project Su~~ort KEBLE. Lance Project Manager [email protected] ADOLFSEN, Karl Manager [email protected]

j Business Systems Su~~ofi THOMAS, Nigel Manager ALLEN, Joseph Technical Architect BUTLER, Andrew Snr Systems Support Officer MURCHIE, David Systems Support Officer JEFFS, Amanda Systems Support Officer DWYER, Michael Lotus Notes CREER, Johanna Lotus Notes ROWLING, Terry Lotus Notes PLAYFORD, Ken Snr Computer Systems Support Officer STAFURIK, Jerry Comp Systems Officer LAM, Quyen Snr Computer Systems Support Officer SMITH, Megan Comp Systems Officer BORANAA, Prerna Comp Systems Officer

Support request via email to: [email protected]

* Records Manaoement Level 9. Mineral House, Level 3, Mineral House, 41 George Street CHASE, Ann Principal Records Officer [email protected]

Page 3 of 12 Level 9, iWineral House, 41 George Slree! TYLER, Jacqui Senior Records Officer Jacaui.tvler63dme.a1d.aov.au PANTALONE, Anthony Records Officer anthonv.~antalone63dme.ald.aov.a~ KARALOUKA, Maria Administration Officer maria.karaloukat3dme.ald.aov.a~ (Records) MAKRAS, Kay Administration Officer kav.makras63dme.ald.aov.a~ (Records)

Corporate Cornmonicatlons Unit Fax: 3239 51 19 Level 4, 61 J17ary Street SOUTHWELL, Kate Director kate.southwell63dme.ald.aov.a~ 324 73584 0408 197 932 LYNCH. Paul DME Media Manager paul.lvnchk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 340 481 02 (ext 18012) 0488 719 728 ELLIOTT, Julian Manager (Mktg & Com) julian.elliott63dme.ald.aov.au 324 73588 MCCLAIN, Bron Principal Communications bron.mcclain63dme.aId.aov.a~ 322 461 09 Officer RYAN, Margaret Communication Officer rnaraaret.rvant3dme.aId.qov.a~ CLAYTON, Pauline Media Officer [email protected] AYLING, Glenis AJPrincipal Media Officer glenis.avlinat3dme.ald.aov.a~ /B MOORE, Natalie Principal Corn Officer natalie.mooret3dme.ald.qov.au TAVITA, Christina Communications Officer christina.tavita63dme.ald.aov.a~ BOWLES, Camilla Communications Officer camilla.bowlest3dme.ald.aov.au FRENCH, Krystie Communications Olficer krvstie.french63dme.ald.aov.a~ LAWRANCE. Teena Graphic Designer (M-Th) teena.lawrance@dm~.ald.aov.au TANG, Karen Graphic Designer (T-F) karen.tanat3dme.ald.aov.a~ TALBOT, Renee Executive Assistant renee.talbot63dme.ald.aov.au SMITH, Hillary Marketing Manager hillaw.smith63dme.ald.aov.a~ VECCHIO, Teresa Senior Project Officer teresa.vecchiok3dme.ald.aov.a~ Currently MERRETT, Max (Garry) Senior Project Officer Garrv.Merrett63dme.aId.aov.a~ 1~1 NEWELL, Russell Graphic DesignerlMultimedia Russell.Newell63dme.ald.aov.au

Finan- B Facilifies Uni: Fax: 3235 61 19 Level 4, 6j Mar? Street BEARDMORE, Kevin AIDirector FinancelAdmin kevin.beardmorek3dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 58748 0408 736 143 PARSONS, John Principal Finance Officer john.~arsonst3dme.aId.aov.a~ 340 43517 GOMEZ, Maria Finance Officer maria.aomezt3dme.ald.aov.a~ 324 73256 THOMAS, Melanie Finance Officer melanie.thomast3dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 41076 PARKER, Xym Manager Fac it es &~ar

Rovalfy % Rent Level 16,61 Mary Street Fax: 3237 1447 JOHNSON, Dave Manager 323 71402 MANNIX, Jillian Senior Revenue Officer 323 71403 CUNNINGHAM, Leanne Principal Auditor [email protected] 322 47528 BROWNLESS, Mike Policy Officer rnike.bownlesst3dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71554 DORTA, Sirnon Policy Officer simon.dorta63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71426 MOORE, Bernadette Royalty Officer bernadette.moore63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71408 SMITH, lrene NRental Officer irene.smith63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 79796 WHETTER, Brent NSenior Statistical Officer brent.whetter63dme.aId.aov.a~ 323 71569 SIMON, Zeljka AJProject Support Officer zelika.simont3dme.ald.oov.au 323 71 577 Page 4 of 12 Cor~orateCaDabilifV Unit Level 4, 61 Mary Street Fax: 3239 6 119 PARKER, Brenda Director Corp Capability 324 751 37 DIMITRIOS, Oreon NManager, Corporate 389 80675 (ext 10675) Relations BUCKLE, Vikki Manager Employee & IR FARDON, Conor NManager Workforce Planning KEENAN, Brent Senior HR Officer 389 80674 (ext 10674) TUCKER, Kayla Administration Officer 323 71519 VENABLES, Celia Senior HR Officer 340 43470 LIPCZYNSKI, Jeanette Senior HR Officer 323 83036 FLEMING, Vikki Administration Officer 323 71 533 FLARHETY, Susanne Principal HR Officer 323 90033

Corres~ondenceManaaemenf Team Level 4,61 Mary Street FARQUHARSON, Rachelle Manager 323 71 532 FULLARTON, Karen Team Leader 340 53826 (ext 82526) KERBY, Justine Correspondence Officer 323 71516 CULLEN. Marina Correspondence Officer 323 70188 GARVIE. Sharon Correspondence Officer 322 48599 GINLEY, Dominic Administration Officer 322'48599

COOKE, Geoff NExecutive Director [email protected] 340 56142 0401 999 248 DARLING, Sandi Exexutive Support Officer [email protected] 340 56144 CONWAY, Tahlia NAdministration Officer [email protected] 323 541 64 MACCHION, Lisa Administration Officer [email protected] 340 56145 Industwand Client Services Unit SCHNEIDER, Darren NDirector [email protected] 323 71131 0427 597 943 I WILLIAMS, Julie Principal Policy Officer [email protected] au 322 77585 / CASSIMATIS, Bill Principal Policy Analyst [email protected] 323 71 133 ,, WALKINGTON, Julie NSenior Policy Officer [email protected] 322 22207 LLOYD, Linda Policy Officer [email protected] BIRD, Sarah Policy Officer [email protected]

LODER,Andrew Call Centre Officer [email protected] 322 47530 1800657567 I EAVES, Craig Administration Officer [email protected]~ 340 56147 (Dept Enquiries) Queensland Gas Scheme MITCHELL, Tonya NDirector [email protected] 322 42712 in full 042372881 1 CHURCH, Roger NPrincipal Policy Officer [email protected] 323 54166 CAMERON, Rod Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 322 77048 LU, (Katherine) Lu NFinance Officer [email protected] 323 9091 8 JARRAHI, Ali Engineer [email protected] 324 75138

infrastructure Protection and Emeraencv R~sDO~S~ ARCHER, Alex Principal Technical Officer [email protected]

Enerav Regulation & Leaislation Unit OLDS, Andrea Director [email protected] Page 5 of 12 CHAPMAN, lan Manager 323 71259 0400 651 302 DAVEY, Phyllis Principal Policy Officer 323 90038 GILLIGAN, Lorelle Principal Policy Officer 323 90046 GRIFFITHS, Roberl Principal Policy Officer 389 80680 dial in full PARSLOW, Chris Senior Policy Officer 322 77564 McCONAGHY. Elizabeth Senior Policy Officer 340 56143 BONNICK, Stephen Policy Officer 323 54148 BURR, Jamie Policy Officer 322 461 03 JEKIMOVS, Christian NAssistant Policy Officer 3898 0681 (dial in full)

GOC & Technical Services Unit KERRY, Nicole NDirector GOUT, Juilette Principal Project Officer iu- WOLD, Andrea Manager [email protected] CHRISTY, Chris Principal Technical Officer chris.christvk3dme.aId.aov.au LINDSAY, Norman Principal Technical Officer [email protected] CENEFELS, llona NPrincipal Policy Officer ilona.cnefelsk3cleanenerav.ald.aov.au PATEL, Mitul Tech & Perf Advisor mitul.~atelk3dme.ald.aov.au TOWNER, Cate Policy Officer catherine.townerk3dme.ald.aov.a~ HODGSON. Kerrie Policy Officer kerrie.hodosonk3dme.ald.aov.a~ HOWE, JO-Anne Project Officer jo-anne.howek3dme.aId.aov.a~ HAMILL, Anthony NAssistant Policy Officer [email protected]

Consumer Policv Team GARNER, Syivie NPrincipal Policy Officer slvie.aarnerk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 96928 OSMAN, Salma NSenior Policy Officer salma.osmank3dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71504 MURPHY, Rebecca Policy Officer rebecca.mur~hvk3dme.aid~aov.au 322 48207 GREGORY-KELLY, Samantha NResearch Officer [email protected] 322 461 10

FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION Level 17, 61 Maly Street Fax: 3227 7433 Driving projects with respect to the development of Clean Coal Technologies (ZeroGen, Caliide Oxyfuel. National Coal Gasifier. Geosequestralion of C02); Queensland Clean Coal Council - secretariat; Centre far Low Emissions Technologies - funding and Board membership; Incoming international Delegations relating to energy and clean coal: International Agreements relating to R&D for Clean Coal; Energy lntrastruclure development for North West Mineral Province and Northern Economic Triangle; Mher Special Projech as requested by Minister and Director.General; Climate Change Interface (re energy, greenhouse gas emissions) with Office of Climate Change. WALDUCK, Frank Executive Director frank.walduckk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 340 43680 0412 005 158 COLLEY, Shaun Executive Assistant shaun.collevk3dme.ald.aov.au 300 85797 (ext 35797) 0430366858 HUGHES, Melissa Personal Assistant [email protected] 323 54929

WEATHERLEY, Allan Director [email protected] 300 85798 (ea 35798) 0439 667 250 ANOG, Francis Director [email protected] 322 42847 0421 61 8 323 MORRIS, John Director [email protected] 340 43674 FREIER, Kevin Special Advisor kevin.freierk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 300 85796 (exl 35796) MCCRYSTAL, Mitchel Project Officer mitchel.mccwstalk3dme.ald.aov.au 340 43673 METCALFE, Rob Director rob.metcalfek3dme.ald:aov.a~ 324 741 57 VENABLES, Trent Senior Policy Officer p 340 43676

WARBURTON, Denis Senior Director [email protected] 323 96908 0438 124 065 RYAN, Kate Director [email protected] 322 48296 0409 275 471 WEBSTER, Helen Administrative Officer helen.websterk3dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 42686 DUKES, Kale Administrative Officer [email protected] 322 461 16 ALLEN, Judith Principal Policy Officer judith.allenOdme.ald.aov.au 323 83364 Page 6 of 12 HARE, Margaret NManager [email protected] 322 48658 HASTIE, Brook Legal Project Manager brook.hastiet3dme.ald.aov.a~ 340 48275 (ext 72275) JOLLEY, Megan NManager [email protected] 323 71 503 KUMAR, Neelam NPolicy Officer [email protected] 322 46372 PARSLOW, Chris NPrincipal Policy Officer [email protected]~aov~a~ 340 48007 (ext 18007) RATNAYAKE, Jay Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 322 45410 YEATES, Suzie Manager [email protected] 322 44624

OFFICE OF CLEAN ENERGY Level 7, 61 Mary Street Fax: 3222 2730 d OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OFFICER COLE, John (Dr) Chief Officer [email protected] 340 53828 (ext 82528) 0417 723 965 HALLAM, Melissa Manager, Office of the CO Melissa.hallam@cleanenerav,ald.aov.au "Long Service Leave'' NYE, Wendy NManager, Marketing [email protected] 322 51036 0408 393 529 BOWLES, Camilla Communications Officer [email protected] 32341075 ALDER, Carly NExecutive Officer [email protected] 340 48273 (ext 72273) MCCANDLESS, Jandy NSnr Exec Support Officer [email protected] 389 80683 (ext 10683) SEWELL, Beth NPersonal Assistant [email protected] 322 76893

Clean Enersv Poliy DANIEL, Murray Executive D~rector [email protected]; 340 48280 (ext 72280) 0437 01 l 908 JEFFERY, Zoe Executive Support Officer [email protected] 323 71508 Policv Devsloomenl AGNEW, Scott NDirector [email protected] 340 48004 (ext 18004) 0439 010 762 BURTON, Arnae NManager [email protected] 340 48276 (ext 72276) ARMSTRONG, Anne Manager anne.armstr~na@cleanenerav~~ld.aov.au 389 80689 (ext 10689) HAMMILL, Clare Principal Policy Advisor [email protected] 300 85795 (ext 35795) MCMULLEN, Angelene NPrincipal Policy Officer anaelene.rncrnullenOcleanenerqvold.~ov.au 322 7761 1 WRIGHT, David NPrincipal Policy Officer [email protected] 322 47596 ALEXANDER, Nancy NSnr Policy Officer [email protected] 323 90036 JENNINGS, Miranda NPolicy Officer [email protected] 323 71385 O'CONNOR, Courtney Assistant Policy Officer [email protected] 340 48005 (ext I 8050) CHAPMAN, Andrew Graduate Policy Officer [email protected] 322 46198 Policv :mpisman&n CRONIN, Peter AIDirector [email protected] 323 90031 0439 750 081 MILEY, Paul Contractor - [email protected] 389 80855 (ext 10855) SHW Project Manager BROWN, Dennis NDirector [email protected] 389 80686 SAWYER, Kay Procurement Officer kav.sawver@cleanenera~ld.uov.au 389 80853 (ext 10853) MCLEAN, Rob Procurement Officer [email protected] 389 80851 (ext 10851) WALTERS, Brooke Principal Project Officer [email protected] 322 77049 HARVEY, Andrea Senior Project Officer [email protected] 323 5421 9 WALL, Peter N Policy Advisor [email protected] 340 48003 LIM, Yee-Shin NGraduate Policy Officer [email protected] 340 58322 (ext 82522) CRAFT, Anje NGraduate Policy Officer [email protected] 389 80687 HAZLE, Mark NAdministration Officer [email protected] 389 80852 (ext 10852)

Clean Enerrrv Partnerships TAYLOR, Ty NExecutive Director [email protected] 322 77616 MCDONALD, Kristin NExecutive Support Officer kristin.mcdonaldt3cleanenerav.4ld.aov.a~ 340 48005 (ext 18005) BARTON, Robert Director [email protected] 322 77570 0427 635 928 THAMBAR, Kumar Director kumar.thambart3cleanenerav.ald.aov.a~ 300 85794 (ext 35794) 0418 188 563

Page 7 of 12 ShARAh, Amar A Prlnc pal Project Off cer amar snaranacleanenerav Q d aov a~ 389 80678 DUhKS. Kalr~na Pr~nc~palProject Onlcer 322 42710 DEMPSTER, Alistair Senior Project Officer [email protected] 322 42687

MOORE, John Executive Director [email protected] 323 71 541 041 7 753 033 TAYLOR, Lloyd Director Ilovd.tavlor(53dme.ald.aov.au 340 48270 0429 018 729 SQUIRE, Warwick Principal Advisor [email protected] 340 53823 (ex? 82523) VAN DER WIEL, Alison Manager [email protected],aov.au 322 77563 KEIR, Kathryn Project Officer [email protected] 323 71582

POLICY DIVISION Level 7,61 Mary Sheet Fax: 3224 2526 Strategic Policy El?clricitg & Cins hilarket ?oiicy (including &,:*rice 3* Analysis on Eileigy !iidus:iy Sliar;:ii,..- .?;:A 1r:vr;i:ncnl issus 3rd Elcc!:icity and Gas Market Pricing) a Departmental Legislation Development and CO-orclination8 Carbon ancl Ecot?omicAnslysis on Ener~;yhAar!ic-1s Communily Sw:ice Obligalio~?(CS01 Policy = Mining and Resor;rccs Policv Executive Director Policv Division BELL, Pat NExecutive Director [email protected] 322 58305 0438 131 234 DAVIS, Arnanda Executive Assistant [email protected]> 322 46320 COVENTRY, Sarah MExeculive Support Oflicer sarah.covent~(53dme.ald.aov.a~ 3405 3820 ext 82520

Strateaic Initiatives NORRIS. Michelle Director michelle.norrisOdme.ald.aov.au 322 58256 0437 441 451 MCCUE: Louise Manager [email protected] 322 22208 FINDLAY, Kristen Manager [email protected] 340 48002 ext 18002 WOODS, Leigh Principal Policy Officer [email protected] 322 46927 MASSON; Angela Principal Policy Officer [email protected]:aov.au 324 74145 KEOGH, Fintan Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 322 78973

Enerav and Carbon Market Analysis BURNETT, Andrew Principal Policy Officer [email protected] 322 7761 5 GNANANANTHAN, Gobikrishna Principal Policy Officer [email protected] 323 71127 LI, Amy Graduate Policy Officer amv.li(53dme.ald.aov.a~ 389 80685 DUNCAN, Angus Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 323 7151 1 BATES, Travis Policy Officer 3405 3825

Resources Industry CUSSEN, Catherine Director [email protected] 322 77038 BELLAMY-MCCOURT,Anila Manager anita.bellamv-mccourt(53dme.ald.aov.au 322 46199 REES, Marcus Principal Policy Officer marcus.rees(53dme.a1d.aov.a~ 322 77583

GOODAIR, Rebecca Senior Policy Officer ' [email protected] 387 20762 MAIDEN, Rachel Policy Officer [email protected] 322 58259 JENSEN, Rebekah Policy Officer [email protected] 322 77612 GRAY, Alexis Assistant Policy Officer alexis.arav(53dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 48653

Gas Policv CONNOLLY, Paul NDirector paul.connollvOdme.ald.aov.au 322 46107 JOLLY, Stephanie Manager [email protected] 323 96939 FOX, Nathaniel Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 340 53821 O'DONNELL. Katie Senior Policy Officer [email protected] 324 75594

Leaislation Develooment and Policv Co-ordination COLEMAN, Cecily Director [email protected] 322 77567 0418 878 076 BOTH, Melinda Manager [email protected] 322 4861 l MAKRAS, Myria NManager [email protected] 340 48009 JACKSON, Kate Principal Policy Officer [email protected] 322 77351 Page 8 of 12 McGERTY-HUYNH, Lisa Senior Policy Officer lisa.mcaertv-huvnh63dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 42689 ZILLMANN, Melissa Policy Officer [email protected] NIA APPLEBY, Cassie NPolicy Officer [email protected] 322 77573 SPACKMAN, David Assistant Policy Officer david.s~ackman(53dme.ald.aov.au 389 80684

SAFETY & HEALTH DIVISION Level 61. 61 Mary Street. Fax: 3237 1069 Dlrectorate - Mines Inspectorale - Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate - Explosives Inspectorate and Reserves .Slmtars Dl/rctoratz BELL, Stewart Executive Director [email protected] 323 71 471 0417703687 EXCELL, Pamela Executive Officer [email protected] 323 71 474 0438 440 009 PRIDMORE, Kellie NExecutive ORicer [email protected] 389 80690 (ext 10690) WISE, Grahame State Operations Manager grahame.wise(53dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71 522 0423026985 O'DONOGHUE, Mick Principal Advisor michael.odonoahue(53drne.ald.aov.au 323 71 628 0417619 856 PEDLER, Sonja Training Officer [email protected] 323 54442 ATKINS, Cassie Snr Fin & Admin Officer [email protected] 323 71 520 WIGGINS. Murray Statistician murrav.wiaains(53dme.ald.aov.a~ 322 47758 (ext 71 242) ABBOTT, Estelle NStatistician [email protected] 340 43143 FEAO, Michelle Snr Admin Officer michelle.feao(53dme.aId.aov.a~ 322 60038

Mines insaeclorals BILLINGHAM, Roger Chief Inspector, Mines roaer.billinaham(53dme.ald.aov.a~ TAYLOR, Gavin Chief Inspector, Coal gavin.tavlor63dme.a1d.aov.au WONG, Teri Executive Assistant [email protected] RASCHE, Tilman Sen lnsp Mines (Met) [email protected] KABEL. John Sen lnsp Mines (Electrical) [email protected] FYNN, Andrew Inspector of Mines [email protected] ERIKSSON, Huw Graduate Engineer [email protected] MASON, Gayle AiSec. Board of Examiners gavle.mason(53dme.ald.aov.a~ ROBINSON, Graham NAdmin officer. Board of graham.robinson63dme.ald.aov.a~ Examiners Healfh Su?ve.~jl3nssUnJt TIERNAN, Gerard Manager gerard.tiernan(53dme.ald.aov.a~ CAIRNS, Denise Medical Records Officer denise.cairns63dme.aId.aov.a~ SMITH, David occupational Medicine Specialist [email protected] BELL, Amanda Admin Officer [email protected] SYNAK, Tania Temp Admin Officer tania.svnak63dme.ald.aov.a~

Exolosi~je~insoesicrel~ a-- DOWNS, Geoff NChief Inspector [email protected]~ 340 43151 0409618446 KIRNER, Lyn Executive Assistant [email protected] 322 47752

?aiio!su~n2nd Gas lns~o~foi'z!? MATHESON, Stephen Chief Inspector ste~hen.matheson63dme.ald.aov.au 323 71389 0409260388 VIDOVIC, Lidia NExecutive Assistant [email protected] 323 96888

Regional 0ti!ces Northern Ragion O'SULLIVAN, Rob NDeputy Chief Inspector robert.osullivan(53dme.ald.aov.au 476 07408 0412707376 of Metalliferous Mines Central 8egion SKELDING, Chris Manager Safety & Health chris.skeldina(53dme.ald.aov.a~ 493 84605 041 7 726 585

Scoihzrn Easf W~gjon GOODE, Phil Regional lnsp of Mines philliD.aoode(53dme.ald.aov.au

Fa: 3870 53M

Page 9 of 12 HARRISON, Paul Director SULLIVAN, Leanne Executive Assistant DAVIS, Ray NManager, MRDC PARMAR, Bipin NManager, STC BIRCH, Jim Manager, ETCC DU PREEZ, Hugo Manager, Mackay BRADY, Darren Manager, OHECC HORTLE, Estrella Manager, Fin & Admin EVERSON, Mark Manager, Business Dev BUTLER, Cathy Business Dev Sup Officer

STRATEGIC PRO Lev'el i6.61 Mary Street COOKE, Geoff Executive Director geoff.cooket3dme.ald.aov.au 323 71588 0401 999 248 EDWARDS, Geoff Principal Advisor geoff.edwards(i3drne.ald.aov.a~ 323 54052 SIBLEY, Chris NExec Support Officer chris.siblevt3dme.ald.qov.a~ 323 71540

TIERNAN, Dermot AlExecutive Director SCHULZ, Angela Executive Assistant GRIGG. Ken Principal Advisor HADDOW, Cameron Senior Project Officer MARLAND. Kara Senior Advisor HATFIELD, Sue AlProject Officer

0 ResouCB 3iratrQy Unit BAILEY, Bevan AlDirector SCHOUTEN, Janeen Administration Officer

O,~cr.?iiuns?oiicv *@.?m COONEY, Tanya Manager MARSHALL, Ruth Principal Policy Officer

fijlinerai S £.utr3c!il/.Pinnninq BARKER. Robert Manager

e LandAcci,ss and_Servic,icuDcliv,.rv CRONIN. Rachael D~rector

8 Tenures Qualifv B Traininq HENDEY, Jodie Senior Project Officer SAWATZKI, Ruth Project officer

Native Titie Team MACKIE, Brett Coordinator Industry (Native Title) EVANS, Shenda Principal Project Officer MAYO, Jason Principal Project Officer MUSGRAVE, Kerrie Project Officer

* Community Linisofl Oificer' McKIE, Gerry CL0 gerrv.mckie(i3dme.ald.aov.a~ Page 10 of 12 Norfhern Region Fax: 4760 7400 CROTON, Luke Regional Director [email protected] 476 07434 0417 713 676 NELSON-WHITE, Greg Senior Spatial lnfo Officer [email protected] 4799 7743 MILLER, Fay Project Officer [email protected] 4760 7413

Centi.al Re~ion Fax: 4938 431 0 DANN, Russell NRegional Director [email protected] 493 84321 0428 384 153 BARKER, Noel Regional Director [email protected] 493 84321 Succession Planning ELLIOTT, Darlene Administration Officer [email protected] 493 84334

Southern East Rogion Fax: 3405 5347 KELLY, Mark Megional Director [email protected] 323 8371 1 HEYNEN, Michelle NExecutive Assistant [email protected] 389 63926 CONROY, Renee Support Officer [email protected] 323 83729

EXPLORATION & INVESTMENT DIVISION Gate 4. Block A. 80 Meiers Road, lndooroopilly OLD 4058 Fax: 3237 1534 EXPLORATION AND INVESTMENT MASON, Dave Executive Director [email protected] 336 29365 (ext 95365) MAKRIDAKIS, Yasmin Executive Support Officer [email protected] 336 29364

INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT Level 16,61 Mary Street Fax: 3237 1534 Industry Development: Exploration Strategies - Marketing & Statistics - Strategic Partnerships - Project Facilitation POTTER, Bob Executive Director bob.~otterOdme.ald.aov.au 323 71416 SIBLEY. Chris Executive Support Officer chris.siblev63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71540 Exoloration and lndustw Sup~ort JOHN, Brad Director brad.iohn63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71406 KUMAR, Parrnila AISenior Admin Officer [email protected] 322 76590 Exoloration Strateaies RANDALL Ross NManager, ES [email protected]~ 324 71414 Prolect Facilitation D'ARCY Russell Manager, PF russell.darcv63dme.aId.aov.au 323 71475 Marketina and Statistics SMITH, Hillary Manager, M&S hillarv.smith63dme.ald.aov.a~ 323 71510 Stratealc Parlnershi~s REIKEN, Lee NManager [email protected] 323 71614

Enerav Geoscience GREEN, Peter Geoscience Manager, EG [email protected] 336 29340 (ea 95340) Reaional Geoscience MURRAY, Cecil Geoscience Manager, RG [email protected] 336 29353 (ea 95353) * Geoscience Information THORNTON, Mark NGeoscience Manager, GI [email protected] 336 29360 (ext 95360) Mineral Geoscience CRANFIELD, Len Geoscience Manager, MG [email protected] 389 69883 (ext 69883) Smarl Geoscience TEA Carbon Geostoraae lnltlatlve DRAPER. John Director [email protected],au 336 29335 0408 075 816

Page 11 of 12 (ext 95335) HODGKINSON, Jonathan Program Manager jonathan.hodakinsontadme.ald.aov.au 336 29346 (ext 95346)

Page 12 of 12

Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

Questions on Notice (Non-Government) QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to the Department’s Housing and Homelessness services, (p3-6 of the Service Delivery Statements), can the Minister please outline expenditure from 2008- 09 and budgeted amounts for 2009-10 for these services (listed separately), breaking down expenditure into Commonwealth funds and State funds by type of expenditure.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference top 3-24 of the Service Delivery Statement, and the expenditure on support for seniors’ participation, will the Minister provide a breakdown of the expenditure for 08-09 and the budget for 09-10, listing programs separately and administrative costs.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to page 3-18 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide a further breakdown of the number of staff employed within the Department to match the performance headings (ie including individuals and communities, seniors’ participation, and support for young people)

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to support for seniors’ participation, as on page 3-24 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister list all funds directed towards (i) information about and prevention of elder abuse; (ii) information about and prevention of financial abuse of seniors, and (iii) information about and programs for security measures for seniors.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to the $414 million fund announced on page 3-3 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide an itemised list of which agencies will distribute this money (including amount per agency), target group, and the basis for priority of allocation.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

As per p 3-27 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide a breakdown for figures over the last year of (i) how many people were new additions to the Housing Register, (ii) how many people in total have been on the Register in the last 12 months, (iii) how many people have been on the Register for all of the last 12 months, and (iv) how many people were removed from the waiting list because they were successfully placed (and have not since returned to the list)

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

Will the Minister list all Capital expenditure (itemised by project) in the Community and Youth Justice and Housing and Homelessness areas (p 28 and 31 of the Capital Statement) for 2009-10 that is new and not reannounced, and that is not inclusive of Federal funding.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to p 3-16 of the Service Delivery Statement, can the Minister provide a breakdown of expenditure for the office of women, including amounts spent on each project in the last 12 months, and amounts spent on administration, advertising and staffing.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to SDS 3-23 support for young people, what is the total budget and actual spend for each of the 16 youth justice service centres in 2008/09 and what is the budget for each of the youth justice services centres in 2009/10 (reported by service centre, budget, and actual spend for each year)?

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

25 June 2009

Mrs Rosemary Menkens, MP, Member for Burdekin

to ask The Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

With reference to SDS 3- 23 Support for young people – detention;

a) How many young people in youth detention at any time in 2008/09 had been in detention at least one time previous to their most recent detention? b) How many young people in youth detention at any time in 2008/09 had been under the supervision of Communities at least one time previous to their detention?

Answers to Questions on Notice (Non-Government)

Question on Notice

No. 1

Asked on 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS — With reference to the Department’s Housing and Homelessness services, (p3–6 of the Service Delivery Statements), can the Minister please outline expenditure from 2008–09 and budgeted amounts for 2009–10 for these services (listed separately), breaking down expenditure into Commonwealth funds and State funds by type of expenditure. ANSWER: The 2009–10 capital budget of $1.447 billion will increase the supply of social housing by adding an additional 1,601 rental units and commencing construction on a further 1,742 rental units.

$(m) Construction (commencements/completions) 694.2 Purchases 62.9 Upgrades 153.9 Land acquisition 220.4 Capital grants 309.3 Investments 0.2 Plant & equipment and Intangibles 6.1 Total 1,447.0

Of the total capital budget, $1.031 billion is funded specifically by the Australian Government with $213 million being funded specifically by the Queensland Government. The balance of the program is funded through general funds. The balance of the program is funded through general funds.

In 2008–09, expenditure of approximately $513 million will increase housing supply with 1,066 rental units completed in addition to construction commencing on a further 870 rental units.

$(m) Construction (commencements/completions) 124.0 Purchases 113.2 Upgrades 110.2 Land acquisition 62.2 Capital grants 99.3 Investments 0.4 Plant and equipment and Intangibles 3.6 Total 512.9

Of the total capital expenditure, approximately $49 million was funded specifically by the Australian Government with approximately $214 million being funded specifically by the Queensland Government. The balance of the program is funded through general funds.

Question on Notice

No. 2

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to 3-24 of the Service Delivery Statement, and the expenditure on support for seniors’ participation, will the Minister provide a breakdown of the expenditure for 08-09 and the budget for 09-10, listing programs separately and administrative costs. ANSWER: The Queensland Government provides an extensive range of programs and services to Queensland seniors.

In 2008–09, the Government provided in excess of $171.96 million towards a range of programs and initiatives targeted towards Queensland seniors as follows: − $130.2 million provides up to 700,000 eligible pensioners, seniors and veterans throughout Queensland, with a range of essential services such as the Pensioner Rate Subsidy Scheme, the South East Queensland Pensioner Water Subsidy Scheme, the Electricity Rebate Scheme, the Electricity Life Support Concession Scheme and the Reticulated Natural Gas Rebate Scheme. − $35.9 million towards the Rail Concessions Scheme, delivered through Queensland Rail, which provides discounted travel for pensioners and seniors on Citytrain’s suburban and inter-urban rail services and Traveltrain’s long distance rail services; − $1.8 million to specialised Seniors Legal and Support Services in Brisbane, Cairns, Hervey Bay, Townsville and Toowoomba; − $1.1 million to 20 Older People’s Action Programs across the State to reduce social isolation and foster community connections; − $1.1 million to 23 Sixty and Better programs to promote active ageing and healthy lifestyle options across the State; − $0.25 million to the Seniors Enquiry Line, a statewide telephone information and referral service which provides information on concessions, social activities, independent living, health, finance, retirement and support services for seniors; − $0.38 million to the Elder Abuse Prevention Unit including a statewide telephone helpline to provide information, support and referrals for seniors who are at risk of and/or experiencing elder abuse; − $0.6 million to the Time for Grandparents Program to provide information, respite and support to grandparents raising grandchildren; − $0.11 million to Older Men’s Groups in Hervey Bay and Toowoomba to respond to the mental health needs of older men; − $0.062 million to the Australasian Centre on Ageing at the University of Queensland to conduct research on ageing and seniors issues; − $0.11 million to the Australian Pensioners and Superannuants League. − $0.13 million in grants to support Seniors Week 2008; and − $0.22 million towards promotional events targeting seniors.

In 2009–10, the department will continue to support the delivery of these programs and initiatives with an increased budget of $198.46 million. Administrative Costs Many areas of the Department of Communities undertake activities contributing to the support for seniors’ participation. For example, the department delivers services through its regional offices where seniors organisations are funded and supported and the Office for Seniors develops programs and events to support seniors, active ageing and promote positive attitudes to ageing and older people. A breakdown of the administrative expenditure on support for seniors’ participation for 2008–09 (estimated actual) and the estimated budget for 2009–10 are contained in items 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the following table. Expenditure Description 2008–09 2008–09 2009–10 Budget Est. Act. Estimate $'000 $'000 $'000 1. Employee expenses 4,184 2,504 2,873 2. Supplies and services 2,155 1,272 998 3. Grants and subsidies 6,302 6,757 7,251 4. Depreciation and amortisation 297 196 285 5. Other expenses 25 12 (5) 6. Losses on sale/revaluation of property, plant and equipment and investments 0 1 0 Total Expenses 12,963 10,742 11,402 In addition, the administration budget for Concession Services is $0.559 million (estimated actual) for 2008–09 and an estimated $0.64 million for 2009–10. However, it must be noted that this is for all concession services provided by the department and not just concessions relating to seniors. Furthermore, the administration budget for Seniors Card and Seniors Business Discount Card is $1.6 million (estimated actual) for 2008–09 and an estimated $1.7 million for 2009–10.

Question on Notice

No. 3

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to page 3-18 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide a further breakdown of the number of staff employed within the Department to match the performance headings (ie including individuals and communities, seniors’ participation, and support for young people). ANSWER: 2008–09 2008–09 2009–10 Department of Communities Est. Budget Estimate Actual Performance Statement Support for Communities and Individuals 302 259 259 Support for Young People* 1,012 1,174 1,173 Support for Seniors’ Participation* 45 29 29 Support for Children and Families 157 104 104 Information and Communication 190 202 209 Technology Shared Services Total Community and Youth Justice 1,706 1,768 1,774 Services Output

*Support for young people – this increase is due to growth in service delivery to young people (e.g. enhanced delivery of educational and vocational training, therapeutic and intervention programs and increasing capacity of the Brisbane and Cleveland Youth Detention Centres).

*Support for Senior’s Participation – Following machinery of government changes, 15 FTE’s were transferred to the Department of Public Works to continue their work on senior’s card and concessions.

The following table highlights the staffing breakdown of the Housing and Homelessness Services output against the prior output structure. 2008–09 2008–09 2009–10 Department of Communities Est. Budget Estimate Actual Performance Statement Social Rental Housing 922 970 979 Indigenous Community Housing 63 82 82 Crisis Housing 39 29 35 Private Market Assistance 197 146 154 Community Renewal 83 83 84 Total Housing and Homelessness Services Output 1,304 1,310 1,334

2008–09 2008–09 2009–10 Department of Communities Est. Budget Estimate Actual Performance Statement Women’s services 29 29 29 Total Women’s Services Output 29 29 29

Question on Notice

No. 4

Asked on Friday 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to support for seniors’ participation, as on page 3–24 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister list all funds directed towards (i) information about and prevention of elder abuse; (ii) information about and prevention of financial abuse of seniors, and (iii) information about and programs for security measures for seniors. ANSWER: The Queensland Government delivers a number of services to support our seniors and help them to feel safe and enjoy life. (i) The issue of elder abuse has received increasing attention over the past decade as an issue with serious consequences for the health and wellbeing of older people. Queensland’s response to elder abuse involves a combination of legislative and service responses. These include: - Amendments to the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 in 2003 to extend protection to adults, including seniors, in family and informal care relationships at risk of future violence or abuse - Triennial funding of $0.38 million per annum in 2008–09 to the Elder Abuse Prevention Unit to operate a statewide Helpline that provides information, support and referrals for seniors who are at risk of elder abuse and community education to increase awareness about elder abuse and prevent its occurrence - Triennial funding of $0.11 million per annum in 2008–09 to the Seniors Advocacy Information and Legal Service to deliver a domestic and family violence court support service for seniors in the Brisbane area who are experiencing or at risk of domestic and family violence - $1.8 million per annum in 2008–09 to five specialised Seniors Legal and Support Services for seniors who are at risk of and/or experiencing elder abuse or financial exploitation. (ii) The Department of Communities provides funding to two key organisations that assist with the prevention of financial abuse of seniors: - $0.38 million per annum in 2008–09 to the Elder Abuse Prevention Unit to provide telephone assistance to seniors in relation to financial abuse - $1.8 million to the five Seniors Legal and Support Services to promote seniors’ independence, safety and security and aims to reduce the reliance of older people on social support services, emergency housing or the social security system if assets are lost. (iii) The Queensland Government funds 20 Older People’s Action Programs across the State at a cost of $1.1 million. These services provide assistance to older people to reduce social isolation and foster community connections. The department is also a member of the Seniors Task Force on Crime which produced the Confident, Safe & Secure Living in Queensland: a handbook on safety for seniors.

Question on Notice

No. 5

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION:

MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to the $414 million fund announced on page 3-3 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide an itemised list of which agencies will distribute this money to disability service providers (including amount per agency), target group, and the basis for priority of allocation.

ANSWER:

Question relates to Disability Services and the portfolio responsibilities of the Honourable Annastacia Palaszczuk MP.

REPLACEMENT ANSWER: as tabled by Minister Struthers during the hearing

The Bligh Government is meeting our commitment to the non-government sector which delivers valuable support to a diverse range of Queenslanders, many of whom have critical needs.

The State Budget announced new funds of $414 million over four years to contribute to the sustainability of the non-government community services sector. These funds translate to $65 million in 2009–10, increasing to $125 million recurrently from 2012–13.

Relevant agencies will be allocated funds to distribute on a prioritised basis to assist non-government community service organisations continue the provision of services to dependant and vulnerable clients. Those agencies are the Departments of Communities; Community Safety; Employment, Economic Development and Innovation; Education and Training; the Department of Justice and Attorney-General; and Queensland Health.

The exact allocation to each department is yet to be confirmed.

The priority target group for this funding is people whose needs are such that they are assisted by and/or fully dependent on service provision for their health, well-being and safety.

Question on Notice

No. 6

Asked on 25 June 2009

MS MENKENS (Estimates Committee C) ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— As per p 3-27 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide a breakdown for figures over the last year of (i) how many people were new additions to the Housing Register, (ii) how many people in total have been on the Register in the last 12 months, (iii) how many people have been on the Register for all of the last 12 months, and (iv) how many people were removed from the waiting list because they were successfully placed (and have not since returned to the list) ANSWER: (i) How many people were new additions to the Housing Register over last 12 months?

There were 6,474 new approved applications added to the Housing Register that were eligible for long-term social housing during the 12 months from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009.

(ii) How many people in total have been on the Register in the last 12 months?

The number of applications on the Housing Register eligible for long-term social housing over a 12 month period is not an accurate indication of the number of applicants awaiting long-term social housing, because it fluctuates, as applicants are placed in housing on a daily and weekly basis, depending on their needs.

I’m advised by the Department of Communities that as at 30 June 2009, there were 20,323 applications registered for long-term social housing.

(iii) How many people have been on the Register for all of the last 12 months?

9,284 applications have been on the Housing Register for long-term social housing for all of the 12 months to 30 June 2009. This figure includes applicants who have been assessed as having low to moderate needs.

(iv) How many people were removed from the waiting list because they were successfully placed?

I am advised that more than 5,000 households were allocated to social housing from the Housing Register in 2008-09.

Question on Notice

No. 7

Asked on 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS — Will the Minister list all Capital expenditure (itemised by project) in the Community and Youth Justice and Housing and Homelessness areas (p 28 and 31 of the Capital Statement) for 2009–10 that is new and not reannounced, and that is not inclusive of Federal funding. ANSWER: Housing and Homelessness Capital works and grant programs are generally planned, scheduled and implemented as rolling programs over a number of years. In the case of Housing and Homelessness, the Department of Communities operates a three year rolling program with hundreds of construction and acquisition projects each year. Significant projects are usually announced once they are approved and construction commences or when a purchase has settled. It is not possible to itemise each of these projects, as the type of development means that many are yet to be specified. H New State funds are allocated each year to begin constructions projects, complete constructions started in previous years, purchase established dwellings and land and upgrade existing dwellings. Of the total capital budget $213 million is funded specifically by the Queensland Government with the balance of the programs funded through general funds.

Community and Youth Justice Projects of the scale of a Youth Detention Centre or Neighbourhood Centre cannot be designed, tendered and constructed in one year and usually span financial years. In some instances major refurbishments are undertaken in a phased approach to enable a service to continue operating. Where the State contributes funds to these projects for each phase, it is appropriate to announce the commencement of the new phase. In 2009–10, Community and Youth Justice Services will fund capital projects worth a total of $126.424 million in built assets. $60.38 million were announced in the budget. Two significant new capital works projects for Community and Youth Justice Services were not previously announced: - Cleveland Youth Detention Centre expansion $64.934 million - Mackay Multi Tenant service Centre $ 1.110 million

The $64.934 million funding for the expansion of the Cleveland Youth Detention Centre in North Queensland is part of $160.1 million of new funds over four years.

Question on Notice

No. 8

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMTTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to p 3–16 of the Service Delivery Statement, can the Minister provide a breakdown of expenditure for the Office for Women, including amounts spent on each project in the last 12 months, and amounts spent on administration, advertising and staffing. ANSWER: Expenditure on key programs delivered by the Office for Women to benefit Queensland women in 2008–09 are as follows: • $0.09 million on Economy Wise – Budget Smart Seminars • $0.15 million for Community Leadership Seminars and Mentoring • $0.07 million for Negotiation Skills Seminars • $0.21 million for Women in Hard Hats initiatives • $0.05 million for Smart Women – Smart State Awards • $0.04 million for International Women’s Day • $30,000 for the Rural Women’s Symposium

Office for Women expenditure on administration for 2008–09 was $1.15 million, and covered supplies and services and administrative costs associated with delivery of the key programs. Administrative expenditure covered: • printing and publications • travel • building services (leases for state-wide offices, cleaning, electricity) • telecoms • computer consumables • postage and stationery • conference and meeting facilities • catering, equipment hire, venue hire for Office for Women projects • temporary staff and the cost of professional services.

The Office for Women employs 29.1 full time equivalent staff. Expenditure on staffing in 2008–09 was $2.48 million (including on-costs).

Expenditure on advertising for Office for Women programs in 2008–09 was $0.029 million.

Question on Notice

No. 9

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS) — QUESTION: MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to SDS 3-23 support for young people, what is the total budget and actual spend for each of the 16 youth justice service centres in 2008/09 and what is the budget for each of the youth justice services centres in 2009/10 (reported by service centre, budget, and actual spend for each year?) ANSWER: Statutory youth justice services are delivered by Department of Communities staff at 16 youth justice service centres, which include nine outpost points of service. The 2008–09 budget and actual expenditure for each of the 16 youth justice service centres is as follows: Youth Justice Service Centre 2008–09 2008–09 2009–10 Budget Estimated Draft $ Actual Budget Expenditure $ $ Cairns Youth Justice Service Centre 2,230,290 2,164,878 2,307,365 Rural and Remote (FNQ) Youth Justice Service Centre 2,348,858 2,396,852 2,422,586 Mount Isa Youth Justice Service Centre 1,608,665 1,464,765 1,661,271 Townsville Youth Justice Service Centre 2,068,975 1,998,835 2,139,584 Mackay / Whitsunday Youth Justice Service Centre 1,350,582 1,277,582 1,396,948 Rockhampton Youth Justice Service Centre 2,276,292 2,238,028 2,355,253 Hervey Bay Youth Justice Service Centre 2,034,917 2,152,405 2,104,769 Maroochydore Youth Justice Service Centre 1,251,797 1,252,283 1,297,137 Caboolture Youth Justice Service Centre 1,847,726 1,800,526 1,913,777 Brisbane North Youth Justice Service Centre 1,190,293 1,183,993 1,234,321 Brisbane South Youth Justice Service Centre 1,450,905 1,453,705 1,503,449 Western Districts Youth Justice Service Centre 692,422 755,343 716,328 Gold Coast Youth Justice Service Centre 1,240,775 1,337,139 1,285,585 Logan Youth Justice Service Centre 1,713,610 1,670,059 1,775,425 Ipswich Youth Justice Service Centre 1,172,000 1,141,468 1,214,401 Toowoomba Youth Justice Service Centre 2,502,741 2,476,829 2,582,929 TOTAL 26,980,848 26,764,690 27,911,128

The 2009–10 budget is a draft budget only, based on the 2008–09 budget adjusted for enterprise bargaining salary increases. This year’s budget is subject to final review as part of the transition to the new departmental structure and will be finalised in late July 2009. .

Question on Notice

No. 10

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION:

MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to SDS 3-23 Support for young people – detention: a) How many young people in youth detention at any time in 2008/09 had been in detention at least one time previous to their most recent detention? b) How many young people in youth detention at any time in 2008/09 had been under the supervision of Communities at least one time previous to their detention? ANSWER: a) Between 1 July 2008 and 30 April 2009, 379 young people had been in detention more than once. This Government is targeting the causes of youth offending and re-offending. To this end we are implementing evidence based strategies that demonstrate strong and lasting positive impacts. Youth justice staff located in detention centres and in the community are trained in the delivery of ART (Aggression Replacement Training), a cognitive behaviour program and CHART (Changing Habits and Reaching Targets), a youth justice intervention case management program. Both of these evidence based programs are focused on addressing offending related behaviour. The implementation of the Young Offender Community Response and Bail Support Service in Far North Queensland first introduced in 2007–08 has helped the Department of Communities target high risk young people and their families to address the causes of crime and provide practical transitional support for young people exiting detention and returning to their communities. The department’s focus on transition, achieved through a joint effort between youth detention centres and youth justice service centres, ensures young people being released from detention are supported to address their behaviour. b) Between 1 July 2008 and 30 April 2009, 551 young people had been under the supervision of the Department of Communities at least once, prior to their detention. The department operates Youth Justice Service Centres throughout the State. These centres have a number of functions including providing support to young people who are released from youth detention on supervised release orders. They also provide supervision of young people on community based youth justice orders, including intervention to address issues underpinning their offending, while building positive connections to their community. Through Youth Justice Service Centres, the department has a range of programs to help young people address their behaviour by working with the young person, their family and the community. The programs and interventions provided through the centres encourage the young person to accept responsibility for their offending behaviour and provide them with opportunities to develop responsible, beneficial and socially acceptable ways.

Questions on Notice (Government) Estimates Questions on Notice – Estimates Committee C Government Members

Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women

Member for Waterford

1. I refer to SDS 3-6 and the record capital program of $1.4 billion to boost the supply of social housing dwellings across Queensland and I ask: Can the Minister provide a progress report on this massive investment in social housing infrastructure in Queensland, including a breakdown of where social housing units will be built across the state and the number of jobs expected to be generated?

2. I refer to SDS 3-7 and the supply of housing in the 34 Indigenous communities in Queensland, and I ask the Minister to outline the upgrades, repairs and maintenance that have been undertaken to improve the standard of housing in each of those 34 communities?

Member for Chatsworth

3. I refer to SDS 3-7 and the Homelessness National Agreement, and I ask the Minister to outline the funding being spent on homelessness services in Queensland, and to provide a breakdown, region by region, of the support nights and services that were made available to homeless people across the state in 2007-2008, and whether those services and support nights will continue to be funded in the current financial year to meet the growing needs of homeless people across the state?

4. I refer to SDS 3-12 in relation to Seniors, and I ask the Minister to outline, in detail, the concessions and services available to Seniors in Queensland?

5. I refer to SDS 3-23 which details the number of young people dealt with through youth justice conferencing, and I ask the Minister to provide details of the locations of the youth justice conferences, the initiatives in place at each of these locations to reduce the incidence of youth crime, and to provide details of the effectiveness of youth justice conferencing for participants?

Member for Redcliffe

6. I refer to SDS 3-3 and the State Government’s recognition of the role the non-government sector in meeting the needs of vulnerable Queenslanders, and I ask: Can the Minister provide detailed information on which non-government services will be the recipients of increased award rates for workers in the non-government sector?

7. I refer to SDS 3-5 and the additional funding of $1.1 million in 2009-10 to implement a new integrated approach to preventing domestic and family violence in Rockhampton, and I ask the Minister to provide details of the effectiveness of the Government’s strategies, particularly in relation to early intervention initiatives?

8. I refer to SDS 3-2 and the machinery of government changes that were brought together to form the new Department of Communities, and I ask the Minister to outline in detail, the impact of the changes on everyday Queenslanders and vulnerable Queenslanders who rely on the Department’s resources and services.

Member for Broadwater

9. I refer to SDS 3-12 in relation to the Department of Communities support for Queenslanders affected by monsoonal flooding and tropical cyclones, as well as the major storms that swept across south east Queensland, and I ask the Minister to provide details of the number of applications for assistance and the level of assistance provided to Queenslanders, including the total number of grants and the cost of those grants.

10. I refer to SDS 3-5 and the Department of Communities lead role in meeting the Toward Q2: Tomorrow’s Queensland target to increase by 50% the proportion of Queenslanders involved in their communities as volunteers, and I ask the Minister to outline the initiatives in place to help meet this important election commitment.

Answers to Questions on Notice (Government)

Question on Notice

No. 1

Asked on Friday 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MR EVAN MOORHEAD MP — I refer to SDS 3–6 and the record capital program of $1.4 billion to boost the supply of social housing dwellings across Queensland and I ask: Can the Minister provide a progress report on this massive investment in social housing infrastructure in Queensland, including a breakdown of where social housing units will be built across the state and the number of jobs expected to be generated? ANSWER: This is the biggest investment in social housing infrastructure since the Chifley era.

The $1.4 billion capital program for 2009–10 referred to in SDS 3–6 includes $140 million from the Queensland Future Growth Fund and $977.2 million from the Australian Government’s Nation Building and Jobs Plan and the Social Housing, Remote Indigenous Housing and Homelessness National Partnership Agreements.

Across the State, it is aimed to boost Queensland’s social housing stock through the construction of 1,601 rental units. Construction will also commence on a further 1,742 rental units during 2009–10.

It is a win for people who rely on social housing and a win for workers in Queensland’s building industry by providing them with jobs and job security.

Much of this record expenditure is being allocated under the Australian Government’s Nation Building and Jobs Plan and involves an ambitious program of works.

To deliver on this commitment, there have so far been two ‘request for offer’ callings targeting both the private developer/builder and not-for-profit sectors. The selection process has involved a detailed assessment of compliant proposals against a combination of factors including value for money; suitability against the registered needs of target groups; location relative to services and transport; ease of integration into existing neighbourhoods; presence and density of existing social housing; and projected patterns of urban growth. Preference has been given to projects satisfying universal design and energy rating requirements. There has also been a need to ensure the average dwelling cost of $300,000 including land, could be achieved. This is an expectation of the Australian Government.

As a result of this process, at 30 June 2009, 4,559 dwellings had been submitted to the Australian Government under Stage Two of the Social Housing Initiative, with 1,096 dwellings at various locations across the State approved by the Commonwealth. The balance of the dwellings (3,463) is still being reviewed by the Australian Government.

Although 1,096 dwellings have been approved, it does not automatically imply that all of these dwellings will proceed. It simply means that the Department of Communities can now commence formal negotiations with property developers to enter a contract to deliver each project. As there is the potential for negotiations to stall or for developers to withdraw projects, it is not possible to provide project locations until such time as the project is deemed to have commenced.

Notably, around 57% of the project proposals referred to the Australian Government for approval had a dwelling yield of 12 or less, contributing a large number of reasonably small projects, widely distributed across Queensland. This will ensure the economic stimulus created by this initiative will be broadly based and substantially delivered via a large number of small to medium enterprises throughout the State.

It is estimated that this construction, in addition to maintenance and repairs, will account for over 80% of the record $1.4 billion capital program. This expenditure will directly create and/or sustain over 8,700 jobs* across the building industry for small building companies, large developers, contractors and building suppliers.

* Based on OESR, Queensland Treasury standard employment multiplier (7.54) for 2009–10.

Question on Notice

No. 2

Asked on Friday 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION: MR EVAN MOORHEAD MP — I refer to SDS 3–7 and the supply of housing in the 34 Indigenous communities in Queensland, and I ask the Minister to outline the upgrades, repairs and maintenance that have been undertaken to improve the standard of housing in each of those 34 communities? ANSWER: Tackling indigenous disadvantage is one of the key priorities of the Bligh Government. We’re committed to closing the life expectancy gap between indigenous and non-indigenous Queenslanders. To close this gap, we have to build better social housing in indigenous communities right across Queensland. This is a challenge we are rising to.

The Queensland Government’s ongoing commitment to remote Indigenous communities is evident through the Housing Improvement Program which will provide $196.1 million in 2009–10. This program provides a strong platform to improve housing outcomes in remote communities.

The Housing Improvement Program aims to enhance the quality and extend the lifecycle of housing stock owned and managed by the 16 Indigenous councils (34 Indigenous communities) and improve housing outcomes for members of these communities.

In 2009–10, the Department of Communities will expend almost $29 million on maintenance and repairs to 4,336 dwellings on 34 Indigenous communities. In addition, a further $41.2 million will be spent on 1,311 upgrades. The anticipated breakdown of upgrades and maintenance per community is detailed in the table below.

2009–10 Community Upgrades Maintenance Aurukun 131 189 Badu 35 194 Bamaga 52 209 Boigu 17 53 Cherbourg 41 270 Coconut 10 43 Coen 4 - Darnley 19 68 Dauan 9 43 Doomadgee 114 195 Hammond 4 57 Hope Vale 94 236 Injinoo 26 96 Kowanyama 54 207 Kubin 19 56 Lockhart 27 104 Mabuiag 39 44 Mapoon 11 64 Mer 25 94

2009–10 Community Upgrades Maintenance Mornington 75 227 Napranum 75 199 New Mapoon 34 73 Palm Island 100 338 Pormpuraaw 47 160 Saibai 11 77 Seisia 8 39 St Pauls 20 65 Stephen 3 19 Umagico 21 70 Warraber 14 54 Woorabinda 72 204 Wujal Wujal 19 82 Yam 16 65 Yarrabah 47 333 Yorke 18 64 Other - 45 TOTAL 1,311 4,336

By continuing our maintenance and upgrades programs on the Indigenous communities we support local employment. In 2008–09, these programs employed 189 tradespersons, apprentices and trainees who undertook maintenance on 4,148 rental units and upgraded 463 rental units as well as other building constructions.

Question on Notice

No. 3

Asked on Friday 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MR STEVE KILBURN MP — I refer to SDS 3–7 and the Homelessness National Agreement, and I ask the Minister to outline the funding being spent on homelessness services in Queensland, and to provide a breakdown, region by region, of the support nights and services that were made available to homeless people across the State in 2007–08, and whether those services and support nights will continue to be funded in the current financial year to meet the growing needs of homeless people across the State? ANSWER: The total funding for homelessness services funded under the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program in 2007–08 was $67.5 million. During that year Queensland specialist homelessness services provided 538,270 support nights. By region, support nights were delivered as follows:

Region Support Nights with Accommodation North Queensland 58,080 Far North Queensland 46,270 Mackay/Whitsundays 23,220 Wide Bay Burnett 39,530 Fitzroy/Central West 27,090 /South West 23,870 Greater Brisbane 191,030 Gold Coast 50,770 Moreton 32,270 Sunshine Coast 46,140 Total Support Nights with Accommodation 538,270

However, this does not give a total picture of services to clients, as many people who are not accommodated also receive services, such as information and referral, personal support, outreach programs, and early intervention services. When these are combined, the combined total is 1,469,900 support days across Queensland. The regional distribution was:

Region Support days (with and without accommodation) North Queensland 157,800 Far North Queensland 143,140 Mackay/Whitsundays 35,410 Wide Bay Burnett 80,270 Fitzroy/Central West 105,640 Darling Downs/South West 64,790 Greater Brisbane 500,060 Gold Coast 150,480 Moreton 63,850 Sunshine Coast 168,460 Support days (with and without accommodation) 1,469,900

A 24-hour statewide helpline service is also available to assist people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness access accommodation and support services. Since its establishment, calls to the Homeless Person’s Information Queensland service have increased from 17,544 in 2007 to 18,545 in 2008.

Reducing homelessness is a priority for the Queensland Government. Evidence of this is the growing investment in homelessness by this Government. In 2008–09, a total of $72.7 million was provided to assist homeless people or those at risk of homelessness to access a wide range of services including crisis and transitional supported accommodation, outreach information and referral services, early intervention services, and a 24-hour statewide helpline. A further $11.73 million was expended under the A Place to Call Home joint initiative with the Australian Government to purchase 22 dwellings for individuals and families who were homeless or at risk.

The Queensland Government is making a further investment in partnership with the Australian Government and the community sector through the National Partnership Agreement for Homelessness. This includes $202.35 million in funding over five years available through the National Partnership Agreement for Homelessness. Of this, $99.39 million is Australian Government funding with $102.96 million in matching Queensland government funding.

The additional funds will maintain and improve current service delivery and implement new initiatives and service models to expand the range of homelessness services available.

Question on Notice

No. 4

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS) — QUESTION: MR STEVE KILBURN MP — I refer to SDS 3-12 in relation to Seniors, and I ask the Minister to outline, in detail, the concessions and services available to Seniors in Queensland? ANSWER: The Bligh Government package of concessions for Seniors is one of the most comprehensive packages available in Australia. We are committed to ensuring our seniors live a fulfilling life and that is why we offer our seniors access to a wide range of concessions and rebates, services, programs and social housing. The Department of Communities provides funding to support seniors through three key programs: Home and Community Care, the Concessions program, the Seniors Participation and Support funding program and social housing specifically for seniors. The Home and Community Care program provides a significant amount of funding to support Queenslanders who are frail aged and their carers, as well as younger people with a disability and their carers. Home and Community Care is jointly funded by the Australian and Queensland Governments. As forecast in the Home and Community Care Queensland Triennial Plan 2008–2011, in 2009–10, both governments will contribute to an expected ongoing budget of $426.2 million to provide a range of basic support and maintenance services statewide, through 313 non-government organisations and 60 state and local council agencies. This level of funding will be an increase of $43 million from 2008–09. In 2009–10, $150.2 million will be provided for concessions services to approximately 900,000 eligible pensioners, seniors and veterans throughout Queensland. These concessions will cover a range of essential services such as the Pensioner Rate Subsidy Scheme, South East Queensland Pensioner Water Subsidy Scheme, Electricity Rebate Scheme, Electricity Life Support Concession Scheme and Reticulated Natural Gas Rebate Scheme. This level of funding represents an increase of over $20 million from 2008–09. The Rail Concessions Scheme delivered through Queensland Rail, provides discounted travel for pensioners and seniors on Citytrain’s suburban and inter-urban rail services and Traveltrain’s long distance rail services. Expenditure under this scheme for 2008–09 was $35.9 million and will increase to $36 million in 2009–10. In addition, a recent national agreement, which provides $50 million over four years to the states and territories, enables Queensland Seniors Card holders to access concession fares on public transport when they travel interstate. The Seniors Card and Seniors Business Discount Card Scheme deliver savings to Queenslanders aged 60 years and older. This scheme recognises the needs of older residents on a fixed retirement income regardless of whether it is derived from a pension, superannuation or dividends from investments. It also acknowledges the contribution made by seniors to the community.

Question on Notice

No. 5

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION: MR STEVE KILBURN MP — I refer to SDS 3-23 which details the number of young people dealt with through youth justice conferencing, and I ask the Minister to provide details of the locations of the youth justice conferences, the initiatives in place at each of these locations to reduce the incidence of youth crime, and to provide details of the effectiveness of youth justice conferencing for participants?

ANSWER: Youth justice conferencing has a proven track record of success in rehabilitating juvenile offenders. It forces young people on the wrong side of the law to confront the consequences of their actions and against juvenile crime. Youth justice conferencing is conducted from referrals in offices located in Cairns, Townsville, Rockhampton, Mackay, Hervey Bay, Maroochydore, Morayfield, Toowoomba, Ipswich, Logan, Gold Coast, Brisbane North and Brisbane South. Regions with rural and remote locations provide outpost services to ensure conferencing is available throughout the State. Agreements typically include outcomes such as repairing damage to property, removing graffiti, volunteer work for a victim or with a community organisation, restitution and/or attendance at a crime prevention, work readiness or counselling program. Examples of crime prevention initiatives to which young people are referred include Police Citizen Youth Clubs, the Fire and Rescue Fight Fire Fascination program, drug and alcohol counselling and locally coordinated responses that range from Indigenous cultural education to responsible road use programs such as U-Turn on the Sunshine Coast. Young people and their families are also referred to specialist education providers and family support programs within their own community as voluntary clients to help reduce risk of reoffending. Australian studies comparing the impact of conferencing and courts on further offending suggests that young people referred to justice conferencing are less likely to reoffend. In 2008–09, 98.9% of victims who attended justice conferencing indicated that they felt the conference was fair, 98.4% agreed that the agreement reached was satisfactory and 97.6% would recommend conferencing to a friend in the same position.

Question on Notice

No. 6

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ELISABETH VAN LITSENBURG MP — I refer to SDS 3-3 and the State Government’s recognition of the role the non-government sector in meeting the needs of vulnerable Queenslanders, and I ask: Can the Minister provide detailed information on which non- government services will be the recipients of increased award rates for workers in the non- government sector? ANSWER: The 2009-10 State Budget provides significant funding for community services as part of the Bligh Government's determination to fund core services and help battlers through challenging economic times.

The Bligh Government is committed to meeting its election commitments by delivering core services and maintaining its massive building program.

The budget includes an extra $414 million over four years to recognise community service workers for the valuable work they do in caring for our most vulnerable citizens.

Workers in this sector look after some of our most vulnerable citizens and the extra funding means we can meet our obligations to the community and key community service providers.

While tough times call for tough measures, some things are simply not negotiable.

We will continue to reach out to people who need our help. That's why we are spending $65 million in 2009-10, increasing to $125 million in 2012-13, on state-funded non-government services.

These organisations and their staff offer a range of services, information, advice and support to some of our most vulnerable people who need our help more than ever before.

Relevant departments will distribute allocated funds on a priority basis to assist recipient non-government community service organisations continue service delivery to high needs clients. The basis of prioritisation includes the dependency and vulnerability of the clients, the criticality of the services in ensuring the health, safety and well-being of vulnerable Queenslanders. The priority target group for this funding is people whose needs are such that they are fully supported by and dependent on service provision for their health, well- being and safety.

Question on Notice

No. 7

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION: MS ELISABETH VAN LITSENBURG MP — I refer to SDS 3-5 and the additional funding of $1.1 million in 2009–10 to implement a new integrated approach to preventing domestic and family violence in Rockhampton, and I ask the Minister to provide details of the effectiveness of the Government’s strategies, particularly in relation to early intervention initiatives? ANSWER: Funding of $2.7 million over two years has been allocated to trial an integrated approach to domestic and family violence in Rockhampton. This initiative acknowledges that family violence is rarely a one-off event and that further harm can be prevented through early intervention and the provision of effective support services for victims and children, and men’s behaviour change programs. The Rockhampton initiative builds upon the current Government investment in the prevention of domestic and family violence. In 2008–09, the Department of Communities provided funding of $15.14 million for prevention and support services, with an additional $15.8 million allocated for crisis supported accommodation services for women and their children escaping violence in the home. The department also funds generalist and intensive family support services for vulnerable families. This includes a $9.2 million investment in 2008–09 for Referral for Active Intervention services across the State. These services support the established domestic violence service system with over half the referred Referral for Active Intervention clients reporting domestic violence as a presenting issue. These services play a key early intervention role. An 18 month program evaluation showed that risk factors for the families involved are reduced, while protective factors and strengths are increased.

Question on Notice

No. 8

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION: MS ELISABETH VAN LITSENBURG MP — I refer to SDS 3-2 and the machinery of government changes that were brought together to form the new Department of Communities, and I ask the Minister to outline in detail, the impact of the changes on everyday Queenslanders and vulnerable Queenslanders who rely on the Department’s resources and services

ANSWER: The new Department of Communities brings together a number of former departments and entities to provide better and, where appropriate, more integrated service from the client’s experience. Those departments or entities include: - Department of Child Safety - the former Department of Communities - Disability Services Queensland - Department of Housing - Sport and Recreation - Indigenous Government Coordination Office. Examples of improvements include: - Staff in the Gold Coast region are reducing waiting times for social housing interviews by allocating extra staff and meeting room spaces from across the department and a non-government organisation to respond to this local priority. - In the Mackay/Whitsunday region, staff have been reviewing the match between applicants on the Housing Register who may also have a disability services funding package, to ensure the most appropriate accommodation is provided. - Geoff Trappett, a gold medal winning Sydney and Athens paralympian who currently works in Disability Services. Geoff has said: "The last presentation I participated in was organised through the Sport and Recreation Services’ Get Active Queensland Accreditation Program. Ironically it was attended by two Disability Services employees who also do volunteer work. Next week I am presenting the Disability Education Program at an event organised through Moreton Bay Regional Council and funded through a Department of Communities' Community Partnerships Grant. For me, the benefits of putting related services under one department are obvious!". - On Friday 24 April, legend Steve Renouf - Ambassador for Indigenous Sport within Sport and Recreation Services, and his long time mate and former Bronco Michael DeVere, took time out to help share some of their experiences with five young people in foster care attending a Transition Camp in Mt Tamborine. - A saving of almost 40% is being achieved with a new Brisbane White Pages listing – with the added benefit of a single full page listing – providing a comprehensive guide to all services for clients. As this approach is rolled out to regional White Pages listings, the savings will continue to grow, as will the presence of the department in the community, making it easier for clients to access appropriate services.

- Finally, the Director-General has laid out a ‘No Wrong Door Approach’ to be adopted by the new department. Staff are being encouraged to help clients, especially those with multiple needs, find the right service, at the right time, at the right place. Over coming months and years, the new department will demonstrate in a myriad of ways the benefits of the recent Machinery of Government changes for clients, for communities, for our partners and for the taxpayers of Queensland.

Question on Notice

No. 9

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION: MS PETA-KAYE CROFT MP — I refer to SDS 3-12 in relation to the Department of Communities support for Queenslanders affected by monsoonal flooding and tropical cyclones, as well as the major storms that swept across south east Queensland, and I ask the Minister to provide details of the number of applications for assistance and the level of assistance provided to Queenslanders, including the total number of grants and the cost of those grants.

ANSWER: The Department of Communities administers pre-agreed financial assistance measures under the State/Commonwealth Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements. This ‘safety net’ is provided through Emergent Assistance Grants, Essential Household Contents Grants and Structural Assistance Grants. As at 1 May 2009, the department had received 37,213 applications for community recovery assistance from people affected by five natural disasters across the State. To support those affected, the department provided $18 million in assistance through the Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements.

Question on Notice

No. 10

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)— QUESTION:

MS PETA-KAYE CROFT MP — I refer to SDS 3-5 and the Department of Communities lead role in meeting the Toward Q2: Tomorrow’s Queensland target to increase by 50% the proportion of Queenslanders involved in their communities as volunteers, and I ask the Minister to outline the initiatives in place to help meet this important election commitment.

ANSWER: Volunteers in Queensland are the backbone of the community. We recognise the valuable role they play in helping to make Queensland a fairer, more caring place. Our volunteers play a key role supporting the arts, sports, health care, emergency services, social welfare and the environment. In these tough economic times, their work is more important than ever before. Whether it’s helping out at the local hospital, working as a volunteer fire-fighter, or simply reaching out to someone in their time of need – volunteers can make a real difference to people’s lives.

Current initiatives being undertaken across government include: o The funding of Volunteering Queensland as the peak representative body for volunteering in Queensland and also to undertake: − Golden Gurus, a project to match skilled older people with community organisations seeking specific expertise, and − the development of VolBiz, an online register that facilitates businesses linking with community organisations about potential volunteering opportunities for their staff and for the business itself. o Further targeting of young people to encourage them to volunteer through strategies including: − the promotion of the delivery of Certificate II in Active Volunteering in state high schools − the expansion of the Young Volunteers Speaking Tour, and − the continued recognition of young volunteers through the Queensland Young Volunteer Awards. o Implementation of a volunteer management strategy to further boost the volunteer emergency service capacity to prepare and respond to emergencies and disasters o The identification of skills recognition opportunities for volunteers that may lead to formal qualifications for volunteers o The continued development of resources to support government and non-government organisations with the recruitment and retention of volunteers, especially those from under-represented groups such as young people and seniors. The Department of Communities also continues to work very closely with Volunteering Queensland, in the development of strategies to engage volunteers.

Volunteering Queensland provides training and support services to volunteers and organisations that engage volunteers, and facilitates the placement of volunteers in non- profit community organisations around Queensland.

Documentation tabled at Hearing rnnr nznerala.co.nz xnicle

Paramilitary programme a success

4:OOAM Tuesday Feb 17,2009 By Isaac Davison

While the Government is not revealing the exact details of a "boot camp", an Auckland programme run partly along paramilitary lines gives an insight to what offenders could face.

Counties Manukau programme Male Youth New Directions (MYND) attempts to turn around the lives of South Auckland's worst youth offenders.

The Counties Manukau Male Youth New The boys are typically Maori or Pacific Islanders, with Direction Programme puts teenagers through their paces on Coopers Beach. Northland. convictions for crimes from burglary and tagging to wounding Photo / Dean Purcell with intent to injure and grievous bodily harm. Your Views Is the Government doing enough to target young Offenders aged 14 to 17 undergo a 20-week discipline and offenders? mentoring programme, which includes an intense 10-day army-like camp, or "away phase", in which they are stripped of Send us Your Views their belongings and gang identities and have their hair W Read Your Views trimmed. Register for Your Views

As well as intense physical activity, the participants undergo Related links: counselling sessions and are reminded of their responsibility for the offences they have committed. Government boot camps to target 'ticking time bombs' The programme, run by former soldier Stephen Boxer, is completed in an 18-week reintegration phase, where the participants aim to return to their communities under supervision.

Since the programme's inception seven years ago, there has been a 58 per cent reduction in total offending from graduates and a 71 per cent drop in serious crimes. Mr Boxer says the military component is only a foundation for ongoing development of individuals.

Copyright 02009.APN Holdings NZ Limited

Question on Notice

No. 5

Asked on Friday, 26 June 2009

THE ESTIMATES COMMITTEE ASKED THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HOUSING AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN (MS STRUTHERS)—

QUESTION:

MS ROSEMARY MENKENS MP — With reference to the $414 million fund announced on page 3-3 of the Service Delivery Statement, will the Minister provide an itemised list of which agencies will distribute this money (including amount per agency), target group, and the basis for priority of allocation.

ANSWER: The Bligh Government is meeting our commitment to the non-government sector which delivers valuable support to a diverse range of Queenslanders, many of whom have critical needs. The State Budget announced new funds of $414 million over four years to contribute to the sustainability of the non-government community services sector. These funds translate to $65 million in 2009–10, increasing to $125 million recurrently from 2012–13. Relevant agencies will be allocated funds to distribute on a prioritised basis to assist non- government community service organisations continue the provision of services to dependant and vulnerable clients. Those agencies are the Departments of Communities; Community Safety; Employment, Economic Development and Innovation; Education and Training; the Department of Justice and Attorney-General; and Queensland Health. The exact allocation to each department is yet to be confirmed. The priority target group for this funding is people whose needs are such that they are assisted by and/or fully dependent on service provision for their health, well-being and safety.

Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

Questions on Notice (Non-Government) QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

SDS 2-121 – With regards to the achievement (top dot point) “completed construction and commissioning of SEQ Grid projects including Western Corridor Recycled Water, Gold Coast Desalination, Sothern Regional Water Pipeline, Eastern Pipeline Interconnector and Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 1 and new water storages at and Bromelton Offstream Storage” please advise for each listed project – date construction completed, date commissioned, total cost and funds expended to date (reported separately).

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

SDS 2-122 – With regards to Departmental Output – Planning, please list all planning documents by status (i.e, draft/ongoing [including anticipated finalisation date] or final [date finalised]) and cost, undertaken by the Department of Infrastructure in 2007-08 and 2008-09.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

SDS 2-118 – With reference to the 2009-10 Highlights will the Minister please list which projects will commence or are ongoing in 2009-10, planned completion dates, expected total cost and funds expended to date (reported separately).

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

SDS 2-120 – Please list the nine significant projects, six EIS and four Coordinator- General Reports by project, capital value, any government contribution and expected start and completion date (reported separately).

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

SDS 2-164 – Please list the location of any “other possible Urban Development Areas” and any timeframes for consideration.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

BP 3 p 93 – Why was none of the budgeted funds in the 2008-09 budget papers for land acquisition expended for the Industrial Land or South East Queensland Strategic Land purchases?

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

BP 3 p92-93 – With regards to the Townsville State Development Area, Coolum Industrial Estate – Stage 1 and South Mackay Industrial Estate, please advise the reason total expenditure on these projects to 30-06-2009 is substantially less than the total expenditure to 30-06-2008 listed in the 2008-09 budget papers.

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

SDS 2-120 – Please list the actions in the 23 per cent of the Northern Economic Triangle Infrastructure Plan that have been implemented and date of implementation. In addition please identify the 77 per cent of actions that have not been implemented, their status and anticipated completion date (if applicable) (reported separately).

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

BP 3-90 With regards to the Water Infrastructure Projects - Program Highlights and the $75 million allocated to the Traveston Crossing Dam for "environmental measures and community projects" please advise which projects will commence or are ongoing in 2009-10, planned completion dates, expected total cost and funds expended to date (reported separately).

QUESTION ON NOTICE

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie

to ask The Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

BP 3-93 With regards to the Water Infrastructure Projects - Property Plant and Equipment, Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 please provide a detailed breakdown of the nature of the funds expended to date and budgeted to be expended in 2009-10 (reported separately).

Answers to Questions on Notice (Non-Government) Question on Notice 26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question 1

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

SDS 2-121 – With regards to the achievement (top dot point) “completed construction and commissioning of SEQ Grid projects including Western Corridor Recycled Water, Gold Coast Desalination, Southern Regional Water Pipeline, Eastern Pipeline Interconnector and Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 1 and new water storages at Cedar Grove Weir and Bromelton Offstream Storage” please advise for each listed project – date construction completed, date commissioned, total cost and funds expended to date (reported separately).

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

Western Corridor Recycled Water Project The $2.493 billion project Western Corridor Recycled Water Project (WCRWP) was built and commissioned in 4 stages.

Stage 1A of the WCRWP was completed (construction and commissioning) on 27 August 2007.

Stage 1B was completed (construction and commissioning) on 28 June 2008.

Stage 2A of the WCRWP was completed 31 October 2008.

Stage 2B construction works completed, satisfying the requirements of the Regulation date of 31 December 2008.

The approved target final cost of the WCRWP has been budgeted at $2.493 billion, with funds expended to date equalling $2.165 billion. Any additional works undertaken will be covered by the existing approved budget.

South East Queensland (Gold Coast) Desalination Project The Gold Coast Desalination Project is in its final stages of commissioning. The project’s approved cost estimate is $1.122 billion. As at the end of May 2009, the project had expended $993.8 million.

Southern Regional Water Pipeline Construction of the pipeline (Cameron’s Hill to Molendinar) was completed on 30 October 2008, ahead of the regulated date of 30 November 2008.

System wide commissioning of the SRWP and the Network Integration pipeline (NIP) from the desalination plant was undertaken in March 2009 and operational handover of the NIP to Linkwater occurred on 18 March 2009.

The target final cost of the SRWP was $833 million, with expenditure to date of $791 million.

Eastern Pipeline Interconnector (EPI) Mainland works commenced in early March 2008, with regulated construction requirements being achieved on 20 November 2008 ahead of the regulated 31 December 2008. All necessary infrastructure has been installed. EPI was handed over to LinkWater Projects on 27 February 2009.

The targeted final cost for EPI was budgeted at $39.2 million, and expenditure to date of approximately $37 million.

Northern Pipeline Interconnector: The Northern Pipeline Interconnenctor (NPI) is a two stage project. Stage One, construction of the 47 kilometre Stage One pipeline from Morayfield to Landers Shute was completed on 18 December 2008 ahead of the regulated 31 December 2009. Supply from the new water treatment plant at the recommissioned , into the Maroochy system commenced on 22 May 2009.

NPI Stage Two is approximately 48 kilometres of pipeline extension from Landers Shute to near Cooroy. Construction is planned to commence in late 2009 with a regulated completion date of 31 December 2011.

The NPI total project budget is $800 million. Expenditure to date for NPI stage One is $303 million, and $34 million for the Ewen Maddock Water Treatment Plant.

Cedar Grove Weir Project construction was completed in January 2008, and final commissioning of the weir was completed in February 2008. The Cedar Grove Weir project had a budget of $18.5 million.

Bromelton Off-stream Storage Project construction was completed in June 2008, with commissioning being completed in July 2008. The Bromelton off-stream storage project had a budget of $39.5 million. Question on Notice 26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question 2

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

SDS 2-122 – With regards to Departmental Output – Planning, please list all planning documents by status (i.e, draft/ongoing [including anticipated finalisation date] or final [date finalised]) and cost) undertaken by the Department of Infrastructure in 2007-08 and 2008-09.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

A table of information (tabulated) against these milestones, is provided below:

Department Output – Planning (SDS 2-122)

“Providing leadership by collaborating with state agencies, local government and other stakeholders to effectively plan for growth and infrastructure provision in Queensland, to maintain a high quality of life and facilitate sustainable development.”

Name of Planning document Status Anticipated Cost (draft/ongoing) finalisation date, or finalised date Draft South West Regional Plan Draft - Draft released 5 558,000 August 2008 - Public consultation closed 30 November 2008 - Anticipated launch within the next few months

Draft Maranoa–Balonne Regional Plan Draft - Draft released 5 313,000 August 2008 - Public consultation closed 30 November 2008 - Anticipated launch within the next few months Bundaberg Regional Council Minister approved Awaiting advice from NIL 1/2008 drafting amendment - Burnett council to proceed to council on proposed Currently with public notification public notification council. stage May 2009. dates. Fraser Coast Regional Council Operational Public notification Council considering NIL amendments - Tiaro complete. submissions and Currently with amendments to council. scheme.

Amendments 5/2008 – Hervey Bay With council Council have advised NIL awaiting responses to that are still working Currently with first state interest on issues raised. council. check. Operational Planning Scheme Amendments Public notification Council reviewing NIL July 2007 – Maryborough completed April submissions to submit Currently with 2009. for second State council. interest review. Gympie Regional Council Public notification Council considering NIL Operational Amendments – Tiaro complete. whether to pursue Currently with amendments post council. amalgamation and split of former Tiaro Shire between Gympie and Fraser Coast Regional Councils. Amend zoning from Community to Minister approved Awaiting advice from NIL Industry – Cooloola council to proceed to council on proposed Currently with public notification public notification council. stage June 2009. dates. Draft South East Queensland Regional Plan Draft in December July 2009 7,529,000 2009-2031 2008 Draft South East Queensland Koala State Draft in December Final released 1 July Nil Planning Regulatory Provisions 2008 2009 (To be replaced by Koala SPP in late 2009) Brisbane City Council Amendment to House Code Second State interest Anticipated response Nil review -with the to Council, July 2009 Department (Draft) Lutwyche Road Corridor Neighbourhood First State interest Anticipated response Nil Plan review - with the to Council, July 2009 Department (Draft) Milton Station Neighbourhood Plan First State interest Anticipated response Nil review – with the to Council, July 2009 Department (Draft) Residential Design Code and Demolition First State interest Awaiting response Nil Code Review – with from Council Council Sherwood/Graceville Districts First State interest Awaiting response Nil Neighbourhood Plan Review – with from Council Council Area Classification Package 59 First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department - with Council Centenary Suburbs Neighbourhood Plan Second State interest Anticipated to Nil review – with Brisbane City Council, Department July 2009 Bracken Ridge District Neighbourhood First State interest Awaiting response Nil Plan review completed by from Council Department - with Council

Draft Rochedale Amendment Second State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department - with Council Acacia Ridge & Archerfield Draft State Second State interest Awaiting response Nil Neighbourhood Plan review - with from Council Council Draft Fortitude Valley Neighbourhood Plan First State interest Anticipated response Nil review – with to Council, July 2009 Department Paradise Wetlands Neighbourhood Plan First State interest Anticipated response Nil review – with to Council, July 2009 Department Dalby Amendment No 2 (2005) Zoning First State interest Awaiting response Nil Amendments adjacent to Dalby Township Review completed from Council by Department – with Council Gold Coast City Council Protection of Golf Courses First State interest Anticipated , July 2009 Nil review completed by Department – with Minister’s office for signing Amendment 5B PSI #222 First interest review Awaiting response Nil completed by from Council Department – with Council Plot Ratio Provisions Amendment Package First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Ipswich Planning Scheme Amendment 2 of 2009 First State interest Anticipated , July 2009 Nil review completed by Department – with Minister’s office for signature Amendment Package 01/2008 Swanbank First State interest Awaiting response Nil New Chum review completed by from Council Department – with Council Lockyer Valley Regional Council Gatton - Temporary Uses Definition First State interest Anticipated response review – with to Council August Department 2009 Laidley - Temporary Uses Definition First State interest Anticipated response review – with to Council August Department 2009 Logan Amendment Package 5 – Park Ridge First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council

Amendment No 5 to Gold Coast (Transfer First State interest Anticipated response Nil area) review completed by to Council , July 2009 Department – with Minister’s office for signing Amendment Instrument No 2 First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Amendment 1 Intensive Horticulture First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Amendment Instrument No 3 First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Redland Signing Changes Russell Island First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Rural Development Code Assessment First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Service Community Land use Area to First State interest Awaiting response Nil Residential Area Amendments – Glengall review completed by from Council Department – with Council Rural Land Area to Residential Land Area Second State interest Awaiting response Nil Amendments review completed by from Council Department – with Council Use of unviable lots in realignment of First State interest Awaiting response Nil boundaries review completed by from Council Department – with Council Sunshine Coast Regional Council Amendments for Sunshine Coast Regional Second State interest Awaiting response Nil Hospital review completed by from Council Department – with Council Moffat Beach Business Park Amendment 3 Second State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Meridan Plains Extractive Resources Area First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Amendment Package 15 (Maroochy) First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Amendment Package 16 (Maroochy) First State interest Awaiting response Nil review completed by from Council Department – with Council Amendment Package 18 (Maroochy) First State interest Awaiting response Nil Review – with from Council Council Amendment Package 20 First State Interest Anticipated response Nil review – with to Council 10/7/09 Department Far North Queensland Regional Plan 2009- Final 13 February 2009 2031 Far North Queensland Draft Regional Plan Released 9 May Superseded by Far 2025 2008 North Queensland Superseded Regional Plan 2009- 2031 on 13 February 2009 State Planning Regulatory Provisions (Far Final 13 February 2009 $1,790,000 North Queensland) Draft State Planning Regulatory Provisions Superseded Superseded by State (Regional Plans) Planning Regulatory Provisions (Far North Queensland) on 13 February 2009 Draft North West Regional Plan Draft 25 June 2009 $449,000 Draft Central West Regional Plan Ongoing Draft regional plan $538,000 (this 2007-08 and 2008-09 finalised and released includes Including community consultation on draft for public consultation $50,000, listed regional plan on 5 August 2008. below, for the Anticipated launch Final Central within the next few West Regional months. Plan,) Planning (Urban Encroachment - Milton Passed by Parliament Commenced 27 April Brewery) Act 2009 and given Royal 2009 Assent Resorts and Other Acts Amendment Bill Introduced to the Debate likely to 2009 House in December reconvene in August 2008 and in may 2009 2009. Parliamentary debate commenced 17 June 2009 Sustainable Planning Bill 2009 Introduced to Debate likely to Parliament on 19 reconvene in August June 2009 2009

Draft Sustainable Planning Regulation Drafting Regulation will be commenced released once the Bill is passed through the house.

Iconic Queensland Places Act 2009 Passed by Parliament Commenced 6 March and given Royal 2008 Assent Fact Sheet for development applications in completed New version the Noosa Iconic Place commenced March 2009 Fact sheet for development applications in completed New version the Iconic Place commenced May 2009

IDAS Guide 1 updated New version commenced Sep 2007 IDAS Guide 3 Updated New version commenced Nov 2007 IDAS Guide 4 Updated New version commenced Feb 2009 IDAS Guide 5 Updated New version commenced Feb 2009 IDAS Guide 6 Updated New version commenced Sep 2007 IDAS Guide 7 Updated New version commenced Sep 2007 IDAS Guide 8 Updated New version commenced April 2008 IDAS Guide 9 Updated New version commenced Sep 2007 IDAS Guide 10 Updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 11 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 12 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 13 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 14 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 15 updated New version commenced Oct 2008

IDAS Guide 16 Updated New version commenced Jan 2009

IDAS Guide 17 updated New version commenced July 2007

IDAS Guide 18 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 19 updated New version commenced April 2008

IDAS Guide 20 updated New version commenced Jan 2009

IDAS Guide 21 updated New version commenced Feb 2009

IDAS Guide 24 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 25 updated New version commenced Sep 2007

IDAS Guide 26 updated New version commenced July 2008

IDAS Guide 27 updated New version commenced Feb 2009

IDAS Assessment Checklist updated New version commenced 02/03/2009 IDAS Form 1, Part A updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part B updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part C1 updated New version commenced 31/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part C2 updated New version commenced 31/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part D updated New version commenced 02/03/2009 IDAS Form 1, Part E updated New version commenced 02/03/2009 IDAS Form 1, Part F updated New version commenced 02/03/2009 IDAS Form 1, Part G updated New version commenced 02/03/2009 IDAS Form 1, Part H updated New version commenced 03/02/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part I updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part J updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K1 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K2 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K3 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K4 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K5 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K6 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K7 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K8 updated New version commenced 09/09/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K9 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part K10 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part L updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part M updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part N updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part O1 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part O2 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part O3 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part P updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part Q updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Part R updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Attachment 1 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 1, Attachment 2 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS Form 2 updated New version commenced 03/03/2008 IDAS General Implementation Note 1 updated New version commenced 21/09/2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 1 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 2 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 3 commenced July 2007

IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 4 commenced Feb 2008 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 5 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 7 commenced May 2008 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 8 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 9 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 10 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 10 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 12 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 13 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 14 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 15 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 16 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 17 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 18 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 19 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 20 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 21 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 22 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 23 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 24 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 25 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 26 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 27 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 28 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 29 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 30 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 31 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 32 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 33 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 34 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 35 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 36 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 37 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 38 commenced July 2007 IDAS Development Assessment updated New version Implementation Note 39 commenced July 2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 1 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 2 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 3 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 4 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 5 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007

IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 7 updated New version commenced 23/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 8 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note 9 updated New version commenced 02/08/2007 IDAS Plan Making Implementation Note updated New version 10 commenced 02/08/2007

QUESTION ON NOTICE NO.3 – Estimates Committee C, 26 June 2009

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

SDS 2-118— With reference to the 2009-10 Highlights will the Minister please list which projects will commence or are ongoing in 2009-10, planned completion dates, expected total cost and funds expended to date (reported separately).

ANSWER: I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

The information requested is provided (below) in tabulated form.

PROJECT – derived from SDS 2-118 Will the Planned completion Expected total Funds project date cost expended to commence in date the period 2009-10 - or is it ongoing in this period? Environmental management precinct study on Curtis Ongoing March 2010 $96,582.75 (GST $25,300 Island incl.) Coordinating submissions for projects seeking funding Ongoing. March 2010 $200,000 for Nil (at 2 July under the Building Australia Fund (Round 2 complete) Round 2 2009). (Round 1 submissions (for March 2008, to 2010-11 budget) Base funded 12 May 2009 service. Budget outcome. Round 2 start July 2009.) Assisting Implementation of the Coal Infrastructure Ongoing Annual Release $88,830 $23,700 Program of Actions Leading consideration and identification of Ongoing 2012/13 $1.718 million $685,000 infrastructure requirements arising from development in the Surat Basin, and facilitating the Surat Basin Railway Progressing the Southport Broadwater to Southern Ongoing October 2009 $558,000 $508,000 Moreton Bay Marine Infrastructure Master Plan Progressing the draft Inskip Peninsula master plan Ongoing Late 2009 $605,000 $579,000 Coordinating the implementation of the Northern Ongoing 2012/13 $6.631 million $1.650 million Economic Triangle Infrastructure Plan Continuing roll-out of water fluoridation infrastructure Ongoing 2012 $35 million $13 million for across regions committed so far statewide for statewide program (also program (also includes SEQ) includes SEQ) Continuing roll-out of water fluoridation infrastructure Ongoing 2012 $35 million $13 million for across Indigenous communities committed so far statewide for statewide program (also program (also includes SEQ) includes SEQ)

Non-Government Question on Notice No.4

ESTIMATE COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

SDS 2-120- Please list the nine significant projects, six EIS and four Coordinator- General Reports by project, capital value, any government contribution and expected start and completion dates (reported separately)

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question. I am pleased to provide actual project details for the 2008-2009 financial year including supplementary environmental impact statements (SEIS), Coordinator-General change reports and other activities undertaken since the release of the budget.

These are as follows: 10 significant projects requiring an EIS (capital value $65.2 billion); two significant projects not requiring an EIS (capital value $3.79 billion), 11 project EISs released (capital value $18.58 billion); four Coordinator-General’s Reports finalised (capital value $5.43 billion); four Coordinator-General’s Change Reports finalised (capital value $7.24 billion). In addition, SEIS reports were released for Bowen Basin Coal Growth Project (Daunia Mine), Gladstone – Fitzroy Water Pipeline, Northeast Business Park, Traveston Crossing Dam, New Acland (Wetalla Pipeline) and Townsville Ocean Terminal.

This information (tabulated) is provided below: Project Capital Government Expected Expected Value contribution construction completion $b1 as budgeted2 start date Significant Projects (EIS) 1 Queensland Curtis LNG (QGC) 8.0 nil Q3 2010 2014 2 Bowen Basin Coal Growth 5.0 nil Q4 2009 Q4 2013 Project 3 Townsville Marine Precinct 0.2 0.2 Q3 2010 Q4 2013 4 Alpha Coal Project 7.5 nil Q2 2011 Q4 2013 5 South of the Embley 0.9 nil Q4 2010 Q4 2013 6 Galilee Coal Project (Northern 5.3 nil Q2 2011 Q3 2013 Export Facility) 7 Gladstone Steel Making Facility 2.8 nil Q1 2011 Q3 2013 8 Australia Pacific LNG (Origin) 35.0 nil Q1 2011 2014 9 Port of Gladstone Western Basin 0.5 0.5 Q2 2010 2012 Dredging 10 Shell Australia LNG --3 nil Q1 2011 2014/2015 Total 65.2 0.7

Significant Projects (no EIS) 1 Abbott Point X110 Development 3.6 3.6 2010 2014 2 Toowoomba Pipeline Project 0.19 0.19 2009 Q1 2010 Total 3.79 3.79

EIS Release 1 Shute Harbour Marina 0.3 nil 2011 2013 2 New Acland Mine (Wetalla 0.03 nil Q2 2010 Q3 2011 Pipeline) 3 Gladstone LNG (Santos) 7.7 nil Q3 2010 2014 4 Gladstone – Fitzroy Water 0.35 nil Dependent on Gladstone Pipeline Regional water demand/supply triggers 5 Northern Pipeline Interconnector 0.45 0.45 Q4 2009 Q4 2011 Stage II 6 Moura Link – Aldoga Rail Project 0.5 0.5 Q1 2010 Q4 2012 7 Northern Link Road Tunnel 1.7 nil Q4 2010 Q2 2014 8 Surat Basin Railway 1.0 nil Q2 2010 Q4 2012 9 Wandoan Coal Project 1.8 nil Q3 2010 Q4 2012 10 Bowen Basin Coal Growth 0.75 nil Q4 2009 Q3 2010 Project (Daunia Mine) 11 Bowen Basin Coal Growth 4.0 nil Q2 2010 Q1 2013 Project (Caval Ridge) Total 18.58 0.95

CG Reports 1 Gladstone Pacific Nickel 4.0 nil Q4 2011 Q4 2014 2 Wyaralong Dam 0.4 0.4 Q1 2009 Q3 2011 3 Townsville Ocean Terminal 1.0 0.02 Q3 2010 Q4 2012 4 New Acland (Wetalla Pipeline) 0.03 nil Q2 2010 Q3 2011 Total 5.43 0.42

CG Change Reports 1 Airport Link 3.0 0.76 Q4 2008 Q3 2012 2 North South Bypass Tunnel 2.1 0.03 Q3 2006 Q1 2010 (Clem7) 3 Hinze Dam Raising 0.38 0.38 Q1 2008 Q4 2010 4 Gateway Upgrade Project 1.76 1.76 Q2 2007 Q2 2011 Total 7.24 2.93

Notes 1. As currently advised by the proponent (may include variations from original estimates) 2. Including contributions from Government Owned Corporations (GOC) and Special Purpose Vehicles. Capital costs expended by GOCs on coal and gas projects are expected to be fully recovered through capital contributions and/or user charging of resource companies 3. No Capital Value estimate provided by Shell Australia LNG Question on Notice No. 5

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C

26 June 2009

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

SDS 2-164 – Please list the location of any “other possible Urban Development Areas” and any timeframes for consideration.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

A range of potential Urban Development Areas (UDAs) has been suggested recently by local governments, private sector developers and government agencies.

The Urban Land Development Authority (ULDA) works with local and State government agencies, communities, local landholders and development industry representatives to help delivery developments that are diverse, affordable and sustainable.

The Government has already named Mackay Showgrounds and Woolloongabba as future Urban Development Areas. Work on these sites is still ongoing and the ULDA continues to get these sites ready for declaration. The locations of other potential UDAs is a commercially sensitive matter and those UDAs cannot be named until an in-principle decision has been made to declare the sites.

The ULDA and the government will be proceeding to confirm the UDAs to be declared over the next few months. UDAs will continue to be announced as and when it is appropriate to do so.

Once declared, an Interim Land Use Plan is put in place immediately which can enable development to be approved within months of declaration. In the case of Fitzgibbon, this has made it possible for homes to be occupied as soon as 18 months after the area’s declaration.

Development schemes are produced for UDAs within 12 months of declaration guiding private sector development and investment decisions. Question on Notice No.6 26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question 6

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

BP3 p 93 – Why was none of the budgeted funds in the 2008-09 budget papers for land acquisition expended for the Mackay Region Industrial Land or South East Queensland Strategic Land purchases?

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

These two projects are being undertaken by the Property Services Group of the Department of Infrastructure and Planning, using the provisions of the Industrial Development Act 1963. These acquisitions involve the purchase of land on the open market, requiring the identification of a suitable site and successful negotiations with a willing vendor.

Prior to the purchase of land, the Department investigates possible sites. Within the Mackay area, the Department investigated several sites to provide land for the future industrial needs of the region. Endorsement of a preferred location is presently being sought from Mackay Regional Council and other State agencies.

Expenditure on the purchase of land has been delayed to allow the completion of the suitability investigations and is subject to agreement being reached with private parties. Once the preferred location has been identified, the land will then be acquitted.

Acquisition of land to secure sites for future industrial development which will meet the continuing growth of South East Queensland is an ongoing priority of the Queensland Government.

Question on Notice 26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question 7

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

BP3 p92-93 – With regards to the Townsville State Development Area, Coolum Industrial Estate – Stage 1 and South Mackay Industrial Estate, please advise the reason total expenditure on these projects to 30-06-2009 is substantially less than the total expenditure to 30-06-2008 listed in the 2008-09 budget papers.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

Townsville State Development Area The Department of Infrastructure and Planning compulsorily acquired land in April 2008 for the purpose of Townsville Port Eastern Access Corridor, which is located in the Townsville State Development Area.

Under the provisions of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (ALA), compensation is payable by the Coordinator-General for the taking of that land. The Coordinator- General has made offers of compensation and had extended negotiations with affected landowners, however until such time as claims for compensations are made by landowners, payment of advances or final compensation cannot be made. In this case, there are potentially three significant claims still outstanding.

Coolum Industrial Estate – Stage 1 The first stage of the Coolum Industrial Estate is being developed by the Property Services Group of the Department of Infrastructure and Planning using the provisions of the Industrial Development Act 1963.

This project was delayed in gaining final development approvals from the Sunshine Coast Regional Council for the construction of the subdivision.

South Mackay Industrial Estate The next stage of the South Mackay Industrial Estate is being developed by the Property Services Group of the Department of Infrastructure and Planning using the provisions of the Industrial Development Act 1963.

The delivery of this project has been delayed due to extended negotiations with Mackay Regional Council and several private developers to establish an infrastructure agreement to fund the upgrade of external roads.

Question on Notice

Estimates Committee C - Non Government Question 8

26 June 2009

THE MEMBER FOR GYMPIE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) -

QUESTION:

SDS 2-120 - Please list the actions in the 23 per cent of the Northern Economic Triangle Infrastructure Plan that have been implemented and the date of implementation. In addition please identify the 77 per cent of actions that have not been implemented, their status and anticipated completion date (if applicable) (reported separately).

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Gympie for his question.

I direct the Honourable Member for Gympie to the attached table which sets out the 38 (32 per cent) actions under the Northern Economic Triangle Infrastructure Plan 2007–2012 which have been implemented and progress to date on the remaining 82 (68 per cent) of actions.

Of the remaining 82 Actions, 80 are progressing and two have been withdrawn from the plan. 42 of these 82 Actions are considered ongoing throughout the life of the plan.

Over the next 12 months there is an expectation that a further nine Actions (7.5 per cent) will be completed.

Attachment 1 - Non Govt QoN 8 Completed NET Actions (38 of 120 or 32%) No. Action Lead Implementation Progress Agency 1 Work with stakeholders to progress an Indigenous DIP ; Indigenous Land Use Agreements executed in October 2007 for Mica Land Use Agreement and release of land for Creek, Kalkadoon and Nordale industrial estates. heavy and light industrial use. 2 Identifying environmental constraints to maximise DERM ; An evaluation of the suitability of State land in Mount Isa was undertaken infrastructure placement and opportunities. for industry purposes in 2008 having regard to environmental constraints.

3 Identifying and preserving areas of environmental DERM ; An evaluation of vegetation management interests on State land in Mount concern. Isa was undertaken in 2009 which identified areas of environmental concern. 4Investigate the feasibility of increasing the capacity QR* ; The Mount Isa System Rail Infrastructure Master Plan 2008 identifies of the western portion (Mount Isa–Hughenden) of infrastructure investment required to cater for increased growth in corridor the rail corridor to reduce congestion and provide volumes, including from Mount Isa to Hughenden. The Master Plan was greater coordination of freight movements to allow finalised in May 2009 and is expected to be publicly released shortly. for expansions in existing and emerging mining operations. 5Explore in coordination with gas infrastructure DIP ; Australian Pipeline Trust commissioned a second compression facility on providers the resolution of issues restricting the the Carpentaria Gas Pipeline in June 2009. This second compression transportation of gas from other areas within the facility will accommodate the current increased growth in demand. state. 6Utilise the Queensland Power Advisory Group DIP ; QPAG concluded in March 2007. Outcomes of QPAG have detailed (QPAG) to provide high-level advice on specific several priorities which have been identified as separate actions in the power issues impacting the growth of the region. NET Infrastructure Plan. 7Continue to develop the Queensland Power DIP ; The plan was completed in February 2007. Project facilitation is Development Plan 2006–2030 to provide a continuing on options to connect North West Queensland to the National competitive energy solution for North and North- Electricity Market through a transmission link and potential location of West Queensland. additional generation in North Queensland. 8Investigate the current electricity transmission DEEDI ; In February 2009, Ergon Energy submitted a report to the Queensland capacity between Mount Isa and Chumvale Government outlining the capacity constraints on the transmission line. substation to manage additional load from Augmentation of the transmission line between Ernest Henry Mine and potential new mining operations attached to the Mica Creek is currently being examined. Mount Isa Interconnected System. 9Investigate the introduction of further energy DIP ; The North West Queensland Energy Demand Report was completed in transmission and distribution infrastructure July 2008. The North West Queensland Energy Delivery Review (Sims providers to promote price competition into the review) commissioned by the Queensland Resources Council and the market. Queensland Government examined options for efficient energy delivery to the North West. This independent review was completed in June 2009 and its recommendations and an implementation plan are now under consideration by the Queensland Government. 10Examine electricity distribution alternatives that DEEDI ; High-level economic modelling as part of the Sims review completed in provide the least cost and highest economic June 2009 assessed the prospect for current isolated mines connecting to benefit for the region and State. the existing North West Queensland (NWQ) electricity grid. The modelling examined the potential for successful connection of isolated mines to the NWQ electricity grid and additional demand necessary to improve the economics of transmission infrastructure connecting Mount Isa to the NEM. This work determined energy supply alternatives that provide the least cost and highest economic benefit for the region and State.

11Further research into the relationship between the DIP ; Electricity Supply and Demand Study (Coffey report) completed in May cost of power and cut-off ore grades to inform 2007. This study informed the Sims review of options for efficient energy decision making in relation to the provision of delivery in the North West. The study contributed to an increased profile sufficient power to expand mineral production and of energy matters in the region and the future economic viability of a mineral recovery. Develop a business case for number of mines which are connected to the North West Queensland provision of additional power. electricity grid. 12Commence investigations regarding input and DEEDI ; In April 2008, Queensland Transport identified the movement of industry linkages maps to understand production inputs and refined minerals in the North East Minerals opportunities for energy and other resource Province, which highlighted the economic potential of maximising development. production input commodities which are located in close proximity to existing mining operations. Options are being progressed with stakeholders. The Sims review, ROAM Consulting studies and geothermal mapping studies have indicated the existence of a "green" corridor between Townsville and Mount Isa, including solar thermal, geothermal and other renewable energy options. This information has been essential for high- level economic modelling in order to determine economic viability of a transmission service between Mount Isa and the National Electricity Market. 13 Investigate the need to establish other locations in DIP ; Studies were completed in March 2008 which provide a land suitability Townsville for development of large scale analysis to be used to assess applications for the Townsville State industry. Development Area. 14Progress authorised agreements with Port of DIP ; All negotiations with Townsville City Council and Townsville Port Authority Townsville Authority and Townsville City Council have been finalised and 27 freehold lots have been transferred to the to transfer land to the Government for the corridor. State at no cost.

15Secure Federal and State funding for the DMR ; $190 million funding commitment by the Federal and Queensland construction of the Port of Townsville Access Government was secured in 2008. Road. 16Adoption and implementation of the City-Port DIP ; The City-Port Strategic Plan was completed and adopted in June 2007. Strategic Plan to guide development to achieve an The plan was distributed to stakeholder agencies in January 2008. effective and sustainable interface between Implementation of the Plan will be driven by Townsville Port Authority and Townsville’s Port area and the adjacent city area. Townsville City Council.

17Adoption and progressive implementation of the QT ; The Port of Townsville Master Plan was completed and adopted in July Port of Townsville Master Plan to drive 2007. Implementation is underway with: Berth 8 redevelopment process appropriate redevelopment, rationalisation and commenced; design works for the Eastern Reclaim commenced; expansion. development process commenced for new marine precinct; and discussions with the Department of Defence commenced for expansion of Berth 10. 18Utilise the QPAG to provide high-level advice on DIP ; QPAG concluded in March 2007. Outcomes informed actions under the specific power solutions for Townsville. NET Infrastructure Plan. 19 Continue to develop the Queensland Power DIP ; The plan was completed in February 2007 and provided the impetus for Development Plan 2006–203 0 to provide a further energy related studies including the North West Queensland competitive energy solution for North and North- Energy Delivery Review (Sims review) which was commissioned by the West Queensland. Queensland Resources Council and the Queensland Government. This independent review was completed in June 2009 and its recommendations and an implementation plan are now under consideration by the Queensland Government. A February 2008 study commissioned by TEL, Mount Isa to Townsville Economic Zone and Regional Economic Development Corporation into options for competitive energy supply in North-Queensland. QPAG identified the need for a more diversified generation mix and the requirement for new generation to be operational by 2013/14. 20Investigate and implement transport solutions for QT ; North East Mineral Province - Transport Infrastructure Report 1 Current efficient transport of minerals from the region and Pending Needs was completed in April 2008. A solution for the extending from Chillagoe to Charters Towers for transport of magnetite ore to the Port of Townsville for export is processing at Townsville and export through the progressing. port. Implement a proactive and aggressive investment DIP **** ; Investment attraction materials to attract heavy industry to the Townsville marketing program. region and the Townsville State Development Area developed by TEL and DEEDI and released in the first quarter 2008. A website to promote the Townsville State Development Area and the Townsville region has been developed by DIP in partnership with TEL. Website was launched 21 in second quarter 2008. 22Develop marketing collateral to support DIP ; Marketing and investment attraction activities are undertaken by DEEDI, investment attraction activities. TEL and DIP and regular communication occurs through the Townsville Local Advisory Committee. 23Investigate the opportunity for greater vertical and DIP ; DEEDI completed the Townsville Minerals Processing Investment horizontal integration between existing industries Attraction Plan in May 2008. The report identified opportunities for further utilising each others by-products and identify other development based on the synergies of existing infrastructure and industries that could co-exist with existing industry industry. Particular opportunities identified were: and seek to attract those industries to the Townsville State Development Area to build Continued growth of production of mineral concentrates and refined critical mass and provide environmental benefits. metals such as copper, nickel and cobalt; Copper/nickel and cupro nickel extruded products; and Further production of metallic salts and mining agents.

The development of coal seam gas based industries in North Queensland was also identified as an emerging medium term opportunity.

24Collaborate with Townsville City Council on the Townsville ; The strategy was completed in November 2007 and is now being Townsville Economic Gateway Development City implemented by the Townsville City Council. The $56 million Strategy . Council redevelopment of the Flinders Street Mall is part of this strategy. 25Support Australian Technical College (ATC) in ATC ; A curriculum has been established for the ATC in North Queensland Townsville with its development of four expert which supports the skills development streams identified in this action. industry groups to address skills development in The ATC has not secured Federal funding at this stage but will continue the areas of construction, engineering, automotive operation as a Queensland Government registered training organisation trade and electro-mechanics. and secondary school establishment.

26 Identify land suitable for industry and declare as a DIP ; Bowen and Abbot Point Industrial Land Concept Plan and Infrastructure State development area under the State Plan were completed June 2007. Abbot Point State Development Area Development and Public Works Organisation Act was declared in June 2008. The development scheme for the Abbot Point (1971) and prepare a development scheme to State Development Area was approved in June 2008. guide development on the proposed state development area. 27Complete upgrade of Port of Abbot Point Stage 2 QT ; Upgrade completed and officially opened on 8 November 2007. to take the terminal to 21 Mtpa. 28Develop a master plan to expand the Port of Abbot QT ; The Abbot Point Multi-Purpose Harbour Concept Plan was completed by Point as a multi-cargo trade port in anticipation of Ports Corporation Queensland in 2007. In 2008, the Queensland emerging demands from industry. Government sought funding from Infrastructure Australia (IA) for a Multi- Cargo Facility at Abbot Point. The project is listed as a potential project in the IA National Infrastructure Priorities document of May 2009.

29Finalise and implement the Bowen Water NRW ; Water Management Policy for the Bowen Subartesian Area finalised Management Policy to ensure the sustainability of October 2007. Implementation was effective for the water year the region’s ground water resources. commencing April 2008.

30 Implementation of the plan and management of DIP ; NET Infrastructure Plan distributed to all agencies September 2007. information on timing and development to government agencies through the Cabinet NET Implementation Progress reports will be provided over the life of the Infrastructure Committee and the Chief Executive plan. Regular and extensive consultation occurs with Government Officer Committee on Prosperity and Productivity agencies through interdepartmental working groups and steering Forum. committees established by the NET Taskforce. 31 Utilise regional Managers’ coordination network DIP ; Advice on NET Implementation Progress has occurred through and other existing mechanisms to liaise on NET at presentations at the Regional Managers Coordination Network in a local level. Townsville in September 2007 and at the Economic Development Subcommittee in August 2008. 32Monitor and report to Cabinet Infrastructure DIP ; Information paper to Mount Isa Community Cabinet November 2007. Committee on the implementation of the plan. Implementation Progress Reports to be provided over the life of the Plan. 33 Maintain regular engagement with QRC, Energy DIP; The NET Taskforce maintains regular consultation with stakeholders Users Association of Australia, industry, Regional through a stakeholder engagement plan. Actions include: and Remote Economic Development DIP sponsorship for Energy Users Association of Australia North Organisations and other major stakeholders on Queensland Power Conferences November 2008 and November 2009; implementation of the NET Infrastructure Plan. Co-funded gas infrastructure study with the Queensland Major Gas Users Group; Quarterly briefings provided to the QRC Infrastructure Committee; Quarterly briefings provided to Townsville Local Advisory Committee; Monthly briefings provided to the Bowen–Abbot Point Technical Working Group; and Ex officio board membership of Enterprise Whitsundays and Mackay Whitsunday Regional Economic Development Corporation. 34 Develop a communications plans to inform DIP ; Communications plan completed for August 2007-December 2008. regional communities on Northern Economic Current communications plan being implemented January-December Triangle activities to engender ownership. 2009. A Bowen Abbot Point Community Consultation Group has been established to engage with the community on the establishment of a new industrial precinct at Abbot Point. 35Implement the Centres of Enterprise initiative DEEDI ; Two Centres of Enterprise launched—Mackay Whitsunday (February which provides the opportunity to undertake 2007) and Townsville and North-West Queensland (June 2007). targeted economic development across the Northern Economic Triangle area by focusing effort on key industry sectors or cross-sector opportunities. 36Forecast population growth for economic centres DIP ; The Planning Information and Forecasting Unit within DIP developed of the Northern Economic Triangle as a result of population projections for the North-West, North Queensland and industrial establishment. Whitsunday Hinterland and Mackay regions in May 2008. 37Develop a policy position and appropriate DIP ; A social impact assessment unit is now established within DIP. In October mitigation measures dealing with community 2008, the Bowen Abbot Point Community Consultation Group was formed impacts resulting from the rapid growth of the to monitor impact on the Bowen community resulting from proposed resource sector and other associated projects in industrial development at the Abbot Point State Development Area and economic centres of the Northern Economic expansion at the Port of Abbot Point. Following adoption of the 2008 Triangle. Sustainable Resource Community Policy, a Resource Summit chaired by the Deputy Premier was held in Mount Isa in November 2008. A Local Leadership Group is being formed to bring together community members, industry and local and State Governments to resolve issues at the local level. 38Develop master plans providing direction to WRC ; Mackay Whitsunday Regional Tourism Investment and Infrastructure private sector developers in relation to the nature Plan 2006–2016 was completed in December 2006. lmplementation of and character of tourism developments desired in the plan by Whitsunday Tourism is ongoing. Bowen and plans for the optimal provision of appropriate infrastructure, particularly roads, to support development of the tourism sector.

Progress with other NET Actions (82 of 120 or 68%) No. Action Lead Implementation Progress agency 39 Plan to develop the Mica Creek Industrial Estate DIP Â Cultural heritage study completed in 2009. Cultural heritage management consistent with market demand of large industry. plan to be developed in late 2009. Further planning, design and development dependent upon industry demand. 40 Investigate the inter-relationship of the North- DIP Â The Draft North West Regional Plan was completed and released in West Regional Plan to coordinate cross June 2009. A community consultation period is underway until 18 government development of the Mount Isa region. September 2009.

41 Work with public and private stakeholders to DIP Â Cultural heritage studies for the Nordale Estate completed. Planning work develop the Kalkadoon Industrial Estate and completed in May 2009 with land expected to be release to the market by Nordale Industrial Estate land parcels (and any fourth quarter 2009. Kalkadoon Estate to be developed following future land parcels) in accordance with industrial successful take-up of land at Nordale. demands. 42 Consider the viability of establishing a future DEEDI Â The Queensland Government is working in partnership with the Mount Isa industrial estate in Mount Isa for light to medium City Council to develop industrial land (Mica Creek) to meet future industry based on industrial demand. demand. 43 Consider the viability of establishing a future DEEDI Â Currently no demand exists for further industrial land in Cloncurry. industrial estate in Cloncurry for light to medium industry and transport. 44 Investigate the implementation of a key resource DERM ◙ Currently no requirement for key resource area designation. area across the mineral province and examine the critical elements of its application.

45 Attract service/light industry to meet the needs of DIP Â The Draft North West Regional Plan which was completed and released population growth. in June 2009 addresses this issue. DEEDI's Mount Isa Regional Centre is also undertaking activities to attract service and light industry. 46Progressively implement funded upgrades to DTMR Â The 2008–09 to 2012–13 Roads Implementation Program (RIP) was roads in accordance with the Auslink released in July 2008. $75 million has been committed to the North West Townsville–Mount Isa Corridor Strategy. The as part of the 2009-10 RIP. Commitments include rehabilitation and corridor strategy outlines objectives, performance widening, higher mass limit upgrades, and shoulder sealing works to measures, priority needs for delivering cost- sections of the Flinders Highway. effective solutions to the transport needs of this corridor. 47Implement below track upgrades to QR’s Mount QR Â A five-year $232 million below rail maintenance and renewal plan Isa–Townsville line to ensure that long-term, year commenced by QR in 2004–05 is now complete. QR Network will round reliability of the network is achieved. continue to invest in network reliability enhancements, including continuing the concrete resleepering program. 48Program upgrades to the Gregory Developmental DTMR Â $65 million has been committed for ongoing widening works and Road and Burke Development Road which strengthening narrow sections of the Gregory Developmental Road as support transportation of concentrates to rail head part of the current five-year Roads Implementation Program (RIP) (2008- and port facilities as well as services to remote 09 to 2012-13). Federal Government National Disaster Relief of Recovery mining communities. Arrangements funding is being sought for emergency repairs on the Gregory Developmental Road. A decision on this funding request is expected by the end of July 2009. 49Develop road strategy for the mineral province DTMR** Â Analysis of the North West Minerals Province road network by DTMR to with flood management measures where identify investment priorities is progressing with funding allocated appropriate. according to strategic need.

50Explore potential economic benefits of alternative DIP Â Two rail options, Charters Towers to Bowen and duplication of the North transport routes between Mount Isa and Bowen. Coast Line, have been examined in the Mount Isa System Rail Infrastructure Master Plan . Progression is dependent on suitable commercial terms being negotiated with industry. 51Facilitate public/private sector power supply DIP Â The North West Queensland Energy Demand Report completed in alternatives that will increase parity in delivered September 2008. Sims review into options for efficient energy delivery to energy prices as compared to the National the North West was completed in June 2009 and its recommendations Electricity Market and consider alternatives (i.e. and an implementation plan are now under consideration by the HVDC, Geo-Thermal) that provide the highest Queensland Government. Construction of the 10 MW pilot solar thermal economic and environmental benefit. generation project at Cloncurry scheduled for completion by fourth quarter 2010. 52 Investigate options to introduce competition into DIP Â North-West Queensland Major Gas Users supported by the Queensland the gas market. Government completed a preliminary Front End Engineering Design (FEED) study in May 2008 to assess the feasibility of constructing a bypass pipeline at Ballera. A full FEED study has now commenced. Negotiations between the Major Gas Users and the South West Qld Gas Producers for new long-term gas contracts are also well advanced.

53Develop a regional water supply strategy that DERM Â The development of the North West Queensland Regional Water Supply provides for future water demand in Mount Isa and Strategy commenced in September 2008. Consultants are undertaking the North-West Minerals Province under the urban and non-urban water demand studies which are expected to be existing water resources planning framework, completed by August 2009. The strategy once completed will be including the Gulf and Georgina/Diamantina Water reviewed at 5 yearly intervals. SunWater is expected to complete Resource Plan, Carpentaria and North-West construction of the Cloncurry Water Pipeline Project running from an Management Areas of the Great Artesian Basin offtake on the North West Queensland Water Pipeline to the township of Water Resource Plan and Wild Rivers Policy. Cloncurry by December 2009. This pipeline will ensure future security of supply to Cloncurry. 54Implement the Smart Mining–Future Prosperity DEEDI Â Smart Mining–Future Prosperity four-year program commenced in program which aims to increase and accelerate September 2006. Approximate 50 per cent increase in area now covered investment in Queensland exploration and mining by exploration tenures in the North West. Four restricted area by providing new geoscientific data, providing designations in the North West were repealed in April 2009 which has led financial assistance to explorers in frontier and to nine local and international explorers applying for permits. To date 12 under-explored areas of the state. projects have secured funding under the Collaborative Drilling Initiative and the Industry Network Initiative in the North and North-West Queensland regions. 55Implement the Smart Exploration program which DEEDI Â $20 million Smart Exploration four-year program commenced in July aims to increase exploration in the State through 2005.The Mount Isa region was one of four areas identified for detailed the provision of modern geological and geotechnical examination. Geological mapping of the Mount Isa region geophysical data over areas with potential for will be completed in the 2009-10 financial year. Geoscience products future mineral and energy discoveries. already released include a deep seismic reflection survey around Mount Isa and an airborne hyperspectral survey in North Queensland.

56Implement the Smart Exploration Restricted Areas DEEDI Â Preliminary interpretation of the geophysical data has identified anomalies program which allows early interpretation of that may indicate the presence of rocks capable of hosting mineralisation. preliminary airborne geophysical survey data Twenty-eight restricted areas have been created over these anomalies. collected under the Smart Exploration program to Nine have been repealed which has successfully attracted a number of identify geophysical signatures which may indicate new international investors to Queensland. possible mineralisation. 57Implement the 2006 Geothermal Call for Tenders DEEDI Â A geothermal call for tenders was approved by the Minister for Mines and program which includes the discovery of a Energy on 28 December 2006, gazetted on 1 December 2006 and closed geothermal resource in the region that has the on 5 April 2007. A total of 11 applications were received, for nine of the potential of supplying electricity into the Mount Isa ten gazetted areas and these applications are still active. region. 58 Implement the 2007 Petroleum Call for Tenders DEEDI Â Eight areas in the Georgina Basin, south of Mount Isa, were released in program which includes eight areas in the the 2007 call for tenders for authorities to prospect for petroleum. Fifteen Georgina Basin south of Mount Isa. areas in the northern Eromanga and Galilee Basins to the east of Mount Isa, were released in the 2008 calls for tenders for authorities to prospect for petroleum. 59 Work with government agencies and collaborative DEEDI Â Townsville and North-West Queensland Centre of Enterprise launched in research centres, in addition to private sector June 2007. A Mining Technology, Services and Equipment Plan that is to stakeholders, to encourage further research and be developed over the next 6 months will include initiatives in this area. development and commercialisation of new technologies to support efficient extraction and mineral processing.

60Encourage private sector investment in mineral DERM Â An ongoing international marketing campaign is being delivered to attract exploration and development. private sector investment in mineral exploration and development.

61Establish a specialist trade and technician skills DET ◙ This action is no longer progressing due to public liability issues relating training campus of Skillstech Australia to lead to the campus. Mount Isa TAFE continues to provide appropriate course diverse product development and delivery through offerings for the region. The initiatives of the Mining Industry Skills Centre North-West Queensland. along with industry and student advocacy will assist in ensuring appropriate delivery is maintained. 62Encourage mining companies to embrace skills QRC Â The Queensland Resource Council and member companies continue to development through support for tertiary studies deliver school, vocational and educational training initiatives through the and take-up of apprentices to train the future Queensland Minerals and Energy Academy (QMEA) (Spinifex College workforce. Mount Isa and Cloncurry State High School are QMEA schools) and have agreed to collaborate with James Cook University (JCU) on long-term resource sector education initiatives. Xstrata Copper leads in providing apprenticeship opportunities. Xstrata launched a New Starters Training Centre on 16 May 2009 at its Mount Isa operations. 63 Identify the need for specific mechanisms in DEEDI Â As part of the Townsville and North-West Queensland Centre of partnership with community, government, industry Enterprise, an attraction and retention workshop was conducted with and business (e.g. scholarships) that encourage, small-to-medium enterprises in the third quarter 2008, with follow-up attract and retain professional graduates and research on the implementation and success of retention strategies being expertise to the region. reported on in the first quarter 2009. The Centres of Enterprise initiative is working principally to assist 2nd and 3rd tier firms improve their business capability and thus provide sustainable employment opportunities. The mining industry continues to provide graduate training programs. The focus of effort has shifted to retaining local workforces since the economic downturn commenced in late 2008. 64Implement the Women in Hard Hats initiative DET Â This $1.6 million initiative is part of the Smart State Strategy. The initiative which includes promoting careers and greater is progressing and has been well received by the community. participation by women in mining, construction, science and engineering and technology. 65Maximise diversification of employment QRC Â This is part of the Townsville and North-West Queensland Centre of opportunities across all industry sectors. Enterprise initiative designed to support value adding industry development opportunities and supply chain development in the Townsville/North West and Mackay/Whitsunday regions. 66 Implement the Skilling Queenslanders for Work DEEDI Â Ongoing strategy via Mount Isa TAFE. initiative to maximise employment opportunities for those most disadvantaged in the labour market.

67Identify skills shortage areas and engage with DET Ongoing strategy via Mount Isa TAFE. indigenous communities and stakeholders to develop training and long-term employment strategies. 68Continue to plan and facilitate provision of DIP Â A Material Change of Use application for the Eastern Port Access Road is infrastructure that establishes the Townsville State currently under assessment by DIP. A planning study is currently being Development Area as a competitive and attractive undertaken to examine current and future uses of the TSDA, in particular location for world scale industry. lands adjacent to the Port Access Corridor and the separate Investigation Area Precinct. The study is expected to be completed in September 2009. Additional infrastructure projects will be identified in accordance with demand. 69Acquire land within the Townsville State DIP Â Acquisition of land within the TSDA will be considered having regard to Development Area as necessary to facilitate demand from industry. Land acquisitions are currently occuring for the infrastructure provision and the establishment of Eastern Port Access Corridor. industry. 70 Continue to support and encourage expansion of DIP Â In 2009, advice on planning and development requirements was provided companies already established and operating to Sun Metals to assist in the operation of its zinc refinery on the TSDA. within the Townsville State Development Area. Investigations continue to be undertaken that will underpin the long-term competitive position of the TSDA and support additional investment from industrial proponents. The Townville Local Advisory Committee meets bi- monthly to oversee investment attraction initiatives for the TSDA.

71Continue to promote the Townsville State DIP Â DIP has contributed to an integrated communications strategy with Development Area as an area to support mineral Townsville Enterprise Ltd (TEL) and through the Townsville Local processing and chemicals production through a Advisory Committee that includes a website and brochures to promote the proactive investment attraction program. TSDA.

72 Develop and implement strategies for attraction of DEEDI Â Supply chain study commenced in November 2008 and is expected to be support industries to locate in Townsville to completed by third quarter 2009. Growing Liveable Regions Strategy service industries located on Townsville State launched in December 2008 promotes career and investment Development Area. opportunities for the Townsville region arising from mining and minerals processing developments in the Townsville State Development Area and other industrial areas. 73Progress acquisition of properties that will form the DIP Â Acquisition of Eastern Port Access Corridor is well advanced. All freehold Eastern Access Corridor and proposed property has been acquired. The Department of Environment and environmental reserve. Resource Management has agreed to the sale of all State owned land required for the Corridor and the adjacent Environmental Reserve. All Plans have been lodged with the Department and the purchase price agreed. Deeds of Grant will be issued shortly. 74Complete negotiations for an Indigenous Land DIP Â There are 3 parcels of land and areas of road remaining that are subject Use Agreement on parcels of land required for the to Native Title. In accordance with Government policy the Coordinator- development of the Eastern Access Corridor. General will address the native title issues. Indigenous Land Use Agreement negotiations are expected to continue over a six month period.

75Continue to support transport routes including the QT Â DMR commenced construction of the Eastern Port Access Road on 19 Port of Townsville Access Road between Flinders August 2008 with an expected completion in the fourth quarter 2011. Highway and the Port of Townsville.

76Facilitate market demand for power sales required DME Â AGL is continuing to investigate the commercial viability of the Townsville to support a commercial decision to develop the South Power Station. Townsville South Power Station. 77Investigate feasibility of a base-load power station DIP Â Investigations undertaken by DIP in March 2008 on electricity costs for within the northern region to support new aluminium smelting in Queensland. Study into options for renewable establishment of large scale energy intensive energy supply in North Queensland undertaken by TEL, Mount Isa To industry. Townsville Economic Zone and Regional Economic Development Corporation in April 2009. 78Facilitate public/private sector power supply DME Â On 21 June 2009, Queensland Renewable Energy Plan was released by alternatives that will increase parity in delivered the Premier. The Plan targets new investment of more than 2500 energy prices and that provide the highest megawatts in renewable energy generated in Queensland by 2020. This economic and environmental benefit. complements recent studies undertaken by ROAM consulting to identify commercially viable renewable energy options which could potentially result in more competitive wholesale power prices. Powerlink's $500 million upgrade to the Central Queensland to North Queensland transmission network by 2010-11 will provide around 400 MW of extra capacity and lead to reduction in the wholesale price of power in North Queensland. Work completed by QPAG identified the need for a more diversified generation mix and the requirement of new generation to be operational by 2013/14.

79Investigate additional supply of gas for power DIP Â Negotiations continue with gas producers for the delivery of gas to North generation and as a feedstock for industry Queensland. provided that demand remains constant.

80Evaluate electricity transmission network impacts DIP Â Powerlink is investing more than $130 million in transmission networks in and required network development in accordance the Townsville/Thuringowa region to be completed by early 2009. In with regulatory requirements. addition, more than $500 million is being invested in the North Queensland reinforcement project to be completed by the summer of 2010–11. 81Progressively implement funded upgrades to DMR Â The 2008–09 to 2012–13 Roads Implementation Program (RIP) was roads in accordance with the Auslink released in July 2008. $75 million has been committed as part of the Townsville–Mount Isa Corridor Strategy . The 2009-10 RIP for the North-West. Commitments include rehabilitation and corridor strategy outlines corridor objectives, widening, higher mass limit upgrades, and shoulder sealing works to performance measures, priority needs for sections of the Flinders Highway. delivering cost-effective solutions for the transport needs of the corridor. 82Implement below track upgrades to QR’s Mount QR Â A five-year $232 million below rail maintenance and renewal plan Isa–Townsville line to ensure long-term, year commenced by QR in 2004–05 is now complete. QR Network will round reliability of the network is achieved. continue to invest in network reliability enhancements, including continuing the concrete resleepering program. 83Develop and manage the North Queensland NRW Â The draft strategy is expected to be completed by mid 2010. Regional Water Strategy under the existing water resource planning framework, including the Burdekin Water Resource Plan. 84Market NET investment opportunities, particularly DEEDI Â US investment program led by Invest Queensland commenced in third the Townsville State Development Area, to quarter 2008. targeted domestic and international companies in Australia and overseas. 85Facilitate industry establishment through utilisation DIP Â This is ongoing work of DIP and is dependant on industry development of the State Development and Public Works and expansion. Organisation Act 1971 and common user infrastructure support.

86Link ATC, TAFE and JCU School of Engineering DEEDI Â ATC established with first students enrolled in January 2008 adjacent to with a skills development strategy for minerals JCU. TAFE, ATC and JCU have established close working relationships processing and further value-adding to minerals. since 2008. Pathways between JCU, TAFE and ATC have been established for students through credit point transfers for relevant technical courses. JCU also have staff sitting on the boards of the Barrier Reef Institute of TAFE and have also been involved with the ATC. JCU is currently exploring the establishment of the Tropical Mining Minerals and Exploration Resource Centre to promote North Queensland's expertise in tropical climate mining techniques and to establish skills priorities to support this expertise. ATC will continue to be a part of this partnership.

87 Develop a coordinated plan for provision of DIP Â Bowen/Abbot Point Technical Working Group established in June 2008 to infrastructure for the state development area. coordinate infrastructure provision to meet the demands of industry to 2040. Land use and infrastructure planning work is being undertaken to ensure that future industry and infrastructure are appropriately accommodated. 88Purchase land within the proposed State DIP Â 6350 hectares of land was acquired by the State in the 2008-09 financial development area to secure land for industry, year for the APSDA. infrastructure and buffers as required.

89Identify infrastructure corridors within the State DIP Â Planning for a common user multipurpose infrastructure corridor is development area connecting it to the port and progressing to guide future infrastructure development. The study is further develop the existing Ports Corporation of expected to be completed by the end of 2009. Queensland infrastructure corridor to service the State development area. 90Progress upgrade of Port of Abbot Point Stage 3 QT Â Expansion to 25 Mtpa was completed in early June 2009. $818 million is taking the terminal to 50 Mtpa (subject to market committed to expanding the coal terminal to 50 Mtpa by 2010 and demand). planning is underway for further expansion to 110 Mtpa.

91Construct the Northern Missing Link linking the QT Â QR and the coal industry are currently reviewing the scope, timing and North Goonyella rail system to the Newlands rail costs associated with this project. system as determined by the market.

92Develop the port in accordance with the master QT Â In 2008, the Queensland Government sought funding from Infrastructure plan and market developments. Australia (IA) for a Multi-Cargo Facility at Abbot Point. The project is listed as a potential project in the IA National Infrastructure Priorities document of May 2009. Negotiations are underway between Ports Corporation Queensland and potential users of the facilities to underpin commercial viability of the Multi-Cargo Facility.

93In line with the network development requirements Powerlink  An environmental impact study was completed in October 2007 and of the National Electricity Regulator, evaluate and easement acquisition for the first 62 km of the route has been completed if positive, expedite construction of a new 132 kV with the remaining 10 km in progress. The project has been approved for Line from Strathmore to Bowen and substation at completion by late 2010 at an estimated total cost of around $83 million. Merinda to support the growing Bowen region.

94In line with the network development requirements Powerlink  An environmental impact study and easement acquisition for a future 275 of the National Electricity Regulator, plan for a 275 kv transmission line has been completed for part of the route and DIP has kV supply to the Bowen–Abbot Point State commissioned Powerlink to identify a possible transmission corridor for Development Area when required. the remainder of the route to the Abbot Point State Development Area. Completion expected by end 2009. 95 Investigate commercial feasibility of a base-load DIP  Negotiations continue with possible energy proponents. Investigations power station on the proposed State development undertaken by DIP in March 2008 on electricity costs for new aluminium area or within the region, in accordance with smelting in Queensland. Study into options for competitive energy supply market demand, to support establishment of large in north Queensland undertaken by TEL, Mount Isa To Townsville scale energy intensive industry. Economic Zone and Regional Economic Development Corporation in February 2008. 96Undertake feasibility investigations in relation to DME  DIP has commenced discussions with potential suppliers for allocation to transmission of Bowen Basin coal seam gas to the industry and energy generation has commenced, plus high level Bowen Abbot Point State Development Area in estimates on construction of infrastructure to transport gas to Abbot Point. anticipation of future demand.

97Progress development of the Water for Bowen DIP Â SunWater's Water for Bowen final business case is expected to be Project to supply adequate water to support urban completed in October 2009. It will include geotechnical investigations, developments, industrial development and preliminary design and environmental assessment. Project completion expansion of the horticultural sector. scheduled for 2012. 98Progressively implement funded upgrades to road DMR, QR Â A 20–25 year strategy focusing on the future development of the corridor. and rail in accordance with the Auslink DMR is continuing discussions with the Federal Government (Department Brisbane–Cairns Corridor Strategy, including the of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Bruce Highway, to meet needs of heavy industry Government) to secure funding for Auslink Roads. which could establish in the Bowen–Abbot Point State Development Area.

99Investigate the feasibility of commuter passenger DIP Â Expressions of interest were sought by the Queensland Government to air services to the Bowen region including any secure aviation upgrades and operational improvements for the upgrade required of the airport and terminal to Whitsunday region. This process has closed and the Government has meet any future requirements. committed to spending $4 million upgrading the Whitsunday Coast Airport at Proserpine. 100Explore potential economic benefits of alternative DIP Â Two options, Charters Towers to Bowen and duplication of the North transport routes between Mount Isa and Bowen Coast Line, have been examined in the Mount Isa System Rail including by road, rail and sea. Infrastructure Master Plan. Progression is dependent on suitable commercial terms being negotiated with industry. 101Develop a proactive and aggressive investment DIP Â A marketing brochure has been developed for the Bowen Abbot Point marketing program. region. Additional investment attraction/marketing material will be developed following identification of infrastructure corridors within the APSDA. 102 Market investment opportunities particularly the DIP Â A memorandum of understanding was signed with the Queensland proposed Bowen Abbot Point State Development Government and Chalco in June 2008 for a feasibility study in to a $2.1 Area to targeted domestic and international billion alumina refinery at the Abbot Point State Development Area companies in Australia and overseas. (APSDA). A business case is expected to be completed by end 2009. Interest from other potential project proponents is being facilitated.

103Develop marketing collateral to support DIP Â A marketing brochure has been developed for the Bowen Abbot Point investment attraction activities. region. Additional investment attraction/marketing material will be developed following identification of infrastructure corridors within the APSDA. 104Facilitate industry establishment through utilisation DIP Â The State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 enabled of the State Development and Public Works the declaration of the APSDA in 2008. Significant project status under the Organisation Act (1971) and common user legislation has been afforded to projects including CHALCO's alumina infrastructure support. refinery, Hancock and Waratah coal projects and Abbot Point Coal Terminal expansions. 105 Investigate the opportunity for vertical and DIP Â Supply chain studies being undertaken by TEL in 2009/10. horizontal integration between industries that could establish on the Bowen–Abbot Point State Development Area and seek to attract those industries to the proposed Bowen–Abbot Point State Development Area to build critical mass and provide environmental benefits. 106Identify skills sets required of industry likely to DETA Â Ongoing strategy for Bowen TAFE engagement with industry. establish on the SDA and support industries and develop mechanisms to assist firms with recruitment and training of the required workforce.

107Integration of existing trade courses delivered DETA Â The Queensland Skills Plan is delivering improved qualifications through high schools and TAFE to address the integration and industry engagement through the Centres of Excellence in requirements of industry. Mining, Energy, Aviation, Building and Construction, and Manufacturing and engineering as well as the establishment of lead institutes including Central Queensland TAFE as the lead institute for mining. 108Implement the Women in Hard Hats initiative DCS Â A $1.6 million initiative part of the Smart State Strategy. The initiative which includes promoting careers and greater focuses on attracting women to careers in mining, construction, science, participation by women in mining, construction, engineering and technology. science, engineering and technology.

109Identify the need and development of specific DEEDI Â This activity continues under the Centres of Enterprise Industry Action mechanisms (e.g. scholarships) that encourage, Plans. In November 2008 the Mackay Whitsunday Regional Economic attract and retain professional graduates and Development Corporation completed the Liveability Audit of Mackay- expertise to the region. Whitsunday-Isaac Region which was funded by DEEDI through the Queensland Regional Development Initiative. This audit identified impediments to skills attraction and the promotion of liveability of regional Queensland and more specifically the Bowen, Whitsunday and Mackay region. DEEDI has also worked with the Federal Government to establish the Mining Technology Innovation Centre in Mackay. This $14 million commitment aims to support the development of innovative practices and skills base of mining related companies in North Queensland.

110Maximise diversification of employment DEEDI Â Implementation of workforce development strategies and actions under opportunities across all industry sectors. the Centres of Enterprise Industry Action Plans for Mining Services and Technologies and Marine Services aims to achieve diverse employment opportunities across these industry sectors. This work is ongoing and is being supported through the Centres of Enterprise Industry Action Plan initiatives. 111Implement the Skilling Queenslanders for Work DEIR Â Ongoing strategy via Bowen TAFE. initiative to maximise employment opportunities for those most disadvantaged in the labour market.

112Identify skills shortage areas and engage with DETA Â Ongoing strategy via Bowen TAFE. Indigenous communities and stakeholders to develop training and long-term employment strategies. 113 Establish a committee of Mayors to provide local DIP Â Draft terms of reference prepared. direction and guidance. 114 Coordinate the formation of an alliance between DEEDI Â Townsville and North-West Queensland Centre of Enterprise launched in members of the mining and mineral processing June 2007. supply chain as a means to improve their Townsville and North-West Queensland Centre of Enterprise continues to productive performance to the mutual benefit of work with local industry to develop the capacity and capability of the all. mining and minerals processing supply chain, meet the demands of industry for a skilled and flexible workforce, promote opportunities in mining and minerals processing, and ensure infrastructure meets projected industry needs. The Townsville and North West Region Heavy Industry Supply Chain Analysis project will analyse gaps in mining and mineral processing supply chains and present new investment opportunities for supply chain members for the next five years. The study is expected to be completed by October 2009. 115 Audit supply chain operations, identify constraints DIP Â The Northern Economic Triangle Transport Issues paper was presented and seek consultation regarding implementing to agencies in September 2008 to assist in planning integrated an improvements to the operations of the supply transport system. The Mount Isa System Rail Infrastructure Master Plan chain with the purpose of enhancing efficiencies. 2008 identifies infrastructure investment required to cater for increased growth in corridor volumes, including from Mount Isa to Hughenden. The Master Plan was finalised in May 2009 and is expected to be publicly released shortly. 116Determine likely impacts from economic changes DIP Â CSIRO and DTMR/DIP are developing a supply chain model that will up stream within the supply chain and likely provide supply chain optimisation tools for the NET transport consequences to downstream infrastructure i.e. infrastructure supply chain. Stage 1 expected to be completed by rail, road and port. December 2009.

117 Capture opportunities through state government DPC Â NET Infrastructure Plan distributed to all agencies September 2007. CEO committees (i.e. Progressive and Productive Implementation Progress Reports to be provided over the life of the Plan. Economy, Planning for Prosperity and Infrastructure Committee) to embrace whole of government approaches and strategies for development and expansion of the Northern Economic Triangle. 118 Identify future urban and community infrastructure DIP Â Draft North West Regional Plan released in June 2009. Whitsunday requirements in response to industrial Hinterland and Mackay Social Infrastructure Facilities Audit completed establishment in Mount Isa and Bowen. 2008. Bowen Accommodation and Community Infrastructure Study to be completed in August 2009. 119Work with state government service providers to DIP Â Bowen Accommodation and Community Infrastructure Study to be ensure their forward planning takes account of the completed August 2009 and provided to state government agencies for urban and community development needs for the forward planning purposes. Resulting from the 2008 Sustainable economic centres as a result of industrial Resource Community Policy, a resource Summit was held in Mount Isa in establishment. November 2008 from which a local taskforce is being developed to advance issues of a regional nature. 120 Support actions for regional liveability and DIP Â Mount Isa City Council and Whitsunday Regional Council undertaking underpin sustainable development to support long- priority infrastructure plans in 2009. term population growth. Bowen Accommodation and Community Infrastructure Study to be completed August 2009. Draft North West Regional Plan released June 2009. Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question 9

THE COMMITTEE asked the Deputy Premier and Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

BP 3-90 With regards to the Water Infrastructure Projects - Program Highlights and the $75 million allocated to the Traveston Crossing Dam for "environmental measures and community projects" please advise which projects will commence or are ongoing in 2009-10, planned completion dates, expected total cost and funds expended to date (reported separately).

ANSWER:

I thank the Committee for the question.

The Queensland Government remains committed to the Traveston Crossing Dam.

In November 2008 the Coordinator-General informed the project proponent Queensland Water Infrastructure Pty Ltd that should he approve the project, it is likely that habitat rehabilitation measures in the Mary River catchment would have to be undertaken prior to building the dam wall.

The 2009-10 Queensland Budget includes funding of $75 million for environmental measures and community projects, such as the establishment of a Freshwater Species Conservation Centre, habitat and vegetation restoration and relevant catchment management initiatives.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question 10

THE COMMITTEE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

BP 3-93 With regards to the Water Infrastructure Projects - Property Plant and Equipment, Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 please provide a detailed breakdown of the nature of the funds expended to date and budgeted to be expended in 2009-10 (reported separately).

ANSWER:

I thank the Committee for the question.

The Northern Pipeline Interconnector (NPI) Stage Two project is currently in the final stages of environmental assessment.

Project expenditure to end of June 2009 is approximately $66 million as summarised below:-

Alliance costs including:- $ 40.44 M contract management, studies, environmental assessment, office facilities, detailed design and procurement. Pipe procurement:- $ 21.00 M Project management & administration:- $ 4.54 M Total $ 66.00 M

Budgeted expenditure provisions for 2009-10 is $211.45 million.

Primary outlays include:-

Alliance procurement and construction including:- $ 197.45 M procurement of pipe, fittings & pumps, site establishment, tunnelling, structures, crossings and pipe laying. Land requirements and related costs:- $ 9.00 M Project management and administration:- $ 5.00 M Total $ 211.45 M

Questions on Notice (Government) Estimates Committee C Government Members Questions on Notice

Hon Stirling Hinchcliffe MP, Minister for Infrastructure and Planning

Member for Waterford

Question 1:

With reference to page 91 of Budget Paper 3 and the allocation of $174.9M for land acquisitions can the Minister outline if further land acquisitions are part of the proposed modification request and advise when he was informed for the proposed modification to the Airport Link Project.

Question 2:

Page 90 of Budget Paper 3 reports the total cost of the Northern Pipeline Interconnector is $450M with $211.5M allocated for the 09/10 financial year. Can the Minister advise why construction of the pipeline is being progressed ahead of the State and Commonwealth approval for the Traveston Dam.

Member for Chatsworth

Question 3:

On page 90 of Budget Paper 3, $75M has been allocated in the 09/10 financial year for the Traveston Crossing Dam to provide environmental measures and community projects. Can the Minister advise what type of mitigation measures can be expected to be put in place if the project is approved

Question 4:

With reference to page 2-121 of the Service Delivery Statement can the Minister provide an update on the progress of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Traveston Crossing Dam and provide advice on the revised construction timeframe and any additional cost imposts for taxpayers.

Question 5:

With reference to page 2-120 of the Service Delivery Statement regarding commencing oversight of the construction of the Airport Link project. Can you provide an update on the shareholder issues of BrisConnections and outline how the State can guarantee the project will continue given the uncertainty surrounding BrisConnections shareholders.

Member for Redcliffe

Question 6:

As reported in Budget Paper 3, p90, can the Minister advise why the Queensland Government has allocated $75M for environmental measures and community projects such as the freshwater Species Conservation Centre, habitat and vegetation rehabilitation and relevant catchment management initiatives in the 09/10 financial year but hasn’t allocated any funding for the construction of the Traveston Dam.

Question 7:

With reference to capital works or infrastructure projects the Minister has responsibility for can he identify each project running behind schedule, not commence or completed and list for each project funds spent to date and future budget allocated.

Question 8:

In my electorate, affordable housing for people is an issue that concerns many of my constituents - can the Minister outline what the Government has delivered as part of the implementation of the 2007 Queensland Housing Affordability Strategy?

Member for Broadwater

Question 9:

Constituents in my electorate are concerned about climate change and want to know how they can cut down on emissions to help reduce the impact on climate change in their neighbourhood: Can the Minister outline how he is progressing the election commitments made by the Premier to provide opportunities through the “Green Door” policy for residents to produce more sustainable housing in their local area?

Question 10:

What is the relationship between the South East Queensland Regional Plan and the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan that has caused the Minister to release the plan closer to the release of the regional plan than the budget this year?

Answers to Questions on Notice (Government) Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 1

THE MEMBER FOR WATERFORD asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

With reference to page 91 of Budget Paper 3 and the allocation of $174.9M for land acquisitions can the Minister outline if further land acquisitions are part of the proposed modification request and advise when he was informed for the proposed modification to the Airport Link Project.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Waterford for the question.

The proposed Wooloowin modification does not require any new land acquisitions. The new worksite will be located on land already owned by the Department of Transport and Main Roads.

The allocation contained in Budget Paper No.3 is for properties already identified as required for the project. The owners of these properties have already received Notices of Intention to Resume. The projects require the resumption of 213 surface properties and 385 volumetric properties.

With regard to the proposed Wooloowin modification, I was formally briefed on the proposal on Friday 19 June 2009 after it was submitted to the Coordinator-General.

Since the announcement of the proposed modification, I have been urging local residents, businesses and community groups to put their concerns in writing in submissions to the Queensland Coordinator-General so these can be considered in his deliberations as to whether the proposal can proceed.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 2

THE MEMBER FOR WATERFORD asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Page 90 of Budget Paper 3 reports the total cost of the Northern Pipeline Inter-connector (NPI) is $450M with $211.5M allocated for the 09/10 financial year. Can the Minister advise why construction of the pipeline is being progressed ahead of the State and Commonwealth approval for the Traveston Crossing Dam.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Waterford for the question.

The Queensland Government aims to introduce an equitable level of water security across South East Queensland (SEQ) and is establishing the SEQ Water Grid to enable the regional sharing of water resources.

The grid links existing and new dams and water storage facilities around South East Queensland to move water from areas of water surplus and transport it to areas that face a shortfall.

The development of the water grid is a key component of the Government’s response to manage drought risk in South East Queensland (SEQ) and address longer-term water needs arising from population increase and the implications of climate change.

NPI Stage Two is an important part of the grid and has been developed as a stand- alone project to connect the Noosa water treatment plant with the NPI Stage One pipeline near Eudlo and augment supplies being transferred to Brisbane from the Landers Shute water treatment plant.

NPI Stage Two links the northern Sunshine Coast to the grid, provides connectivity between local water supply centres and improves operational flexibility under critical supply situations.

The reverse flow pumping capability that is to be implemented into NPI in conjunction with the Stage Two works will provide greater water supply security for Sunshine Coast residents.

The NPI Stage Two project has the potential to create up to 400 jobs and provide support for ongoing employment for other Queenslanders.

NPI Stage Two project is a measure listed under Part 8 of the Water Regulation 2002 with construction to be completed by 31 December 2011.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 3

THE MEMBER FOR CHATSWORTH asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION: On page 90 of Budget Paper 3, $75M has been allocated in the 09/10 financial year for the Traveston Crossing Dam to provide environmental measures and community projects. Can the Minister advise what type of mitigation measures can be expected to be put in place if the project is approved.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Chatsworth for the question.

Traveston Crossing Dam is currently undergoing rigorous and independent environmental assessment by the Coordinator-General and the next step is assessment by the Federal Environment Minister under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth).

The Coordinator-General has advised any approval for the project would likely include conditions requiring compensatory habitat to be established prior to building the dam wall.

As a result of the rigorous Environmental Impact Assessment process, Queensland Water Infrastructure Pty Ltd (QWI) has identified a number of likely important mitigation and sustainability measures for the Traveston Crossing Dam project, subject to the Coordinator-General’s assessment.

A proactive strategy for rehabilitation activities will enhance the catchment’s existing degraded riparian and aquatic areas.

This will provide significant benefits to species including the Mary River Turtle, Mary River Cod, Queensland Lungfish and Giant Barred Frog.

Examples of planned activities include:

• Establishment of Freshwater Species Conservation Centre.

• Habitat and vegetation restoration.

• Relevant catchment management initiatives.

QWI has also planned an extensive program to promote social wellbeing in the Mary Valley, in partnership with a range of community groups. Projects include enhancements for the Mary Valley Heritage Railway, a new clubhouse for the Kandanga Bowls Club and delivering jobs for the long-term unemployed through the construction of a tracks and trail network.

I want to make it absolutely clear, all of these planned activities are subject to the Coordinator-General’s assessment and any conditions he may choose to impose.

For many people in the Mary Valley, the benefits if Traveston Crossing Dam is approved will be far more direct.

Building this dam will create 770 direct construction jobs, that’s 770 more reasons why this Government is committed to Traveston Crossing Dam.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 4

THE MEMBER FOR CHATSWORTH asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

With reference to page 2-121 of the Service Delivery Statement can the Minister provide an update on the progress of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Traveston Crossing Dam and provide advice on the revised construction timeframe and any additional cost imposts for taxpayers.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Chatsworth for the question.

This Government is committed to the Traveston Crossing Dam, the last remaining high yield dam site in South East Queensland.

If built in 2006, Traveston Crossing Dam would by now have filled and overflowed 10 times, despite drought conditions.

It will provide a reliable supply of water for more than 800,000 people in the face of climate change and population growth over coming decades.

This is a dam with excellent hydrological characteristics and its near coastal catchment delivers rainfall on average 55 per cent higher than the Wivenhoe catchment.

The project continues to progress through a rigorous and independent environmental assessment process by the Coordinator-General.

In late 2008 the Coordinator-General advised Queensland Water Infrastructure that should the project proceed, it would be likely conditions would be included requiring the establishment of compensatory habitat prior to building the dam wall. The Coordinator-General also requested the provision of further information about the project, including advice about the establishment and maintenance of habitat rehabilitation areas.

The Coordinator-General is currently awaiting a response from Queensland Water Infrastructure to a number of information requests in the preparation of his evaluation report..

Following the Coordinator-General’s assessment, the project will be assessed by the Federal Environment Minister under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth).

The Government remains committed to this dam.

The Project is now scheduled for completion in 2016-17.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 5

THE MEMBER FOR CHATSWORTH asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION: With reference to page 2-120 of the Service Delivery Statement regarding commencing oversight of the construction of the Airport Link project. Can you provide an update on the shareholder issues of BrisConnections and outline how the State can guarantee the project will continue given the uncertainty surrounding BrisConnections shareholders.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Chatsworth for the question.

Recent issues between BrisConnections and its shareholders have had no impact on the delivery of the Airport Link project. Airport Link remains fully underwritten and BrisConnections and its contractor Thiess John Holland are getting on with the job of building the projects.

On 17 June 2009 the underwriters Macquarie and Deutsche Bank finalised payment to BrisConnections of the shortfall from defaulted units. Under its agreement with the underwriters, BrisConnections must now use best endeavours to recover any shortfall from defaults on the instalment.

As at 29 June 2009 there were 156 shareholders on the BrisConnections register. BrisConnections shares still have one instalment remaining, due on 21 January 2010.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 6

THE MEMBER FOR REDCLIFFE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

As reported in Budget Paper 3, p90, can the Minister advise why the Queensland Government has allocated $75M for environmental measures and community projects such as the Freshwater Species Conservation Centre, habitat and vegetation rehabilitation and relevant catchment management initiatives in the 09/10 financial year but hasn’t allocated any funding for the construction of the Traveston Dam.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Redcliffe for the question.

Traveston Crossing Dam will be delivered to a high environmental standard.

Indeed, the Queensland Government intends to set a new high standard in the sustainable delivery of major infrastructure in Australia.

Through a commitment to a series of Sustainability Principles, developed by CSIRO, Queensland Water Infrastructure (QWI) will deliver the Traveston Crossing Dam project to create major improvements to the area’s local environment for the important species that inhabit the area.

The Environmental Impact Assessment process has identified that the Mary River catchment, including the dam location, has suffered significant disturbance as a result of clearing and cultivation practices over many years.

It is estimated that approximately 85 per cent of the study area has been cleared of native vegetation, the legacy of farming and mining.

The studies and research undertaken for the project indicate one of the most critical factors affecting the continued presence of the Mary River turtle is accidental damage through trampling of nests by cattle.

A key issue in relation to the southern barred frog has been cattle grazing and the impacts of vegetation loss due to farming practices, in particular in swampy areas.

A range of mitigation measures prior to the construction of the dam will provide greater certainty about the establishment of new habitat and use by species of interest.

Given the current condition of the Mary River and surrounds, those measures are vital.

This is about delivering major infrastructure in a sustainable manner.

Marsden Jacobs Associates identified in October 2007 that the Traveston Crossing Dam Project as the most cost-effective and beneficial water storage option for South East Queensland.

That is why this Government remains committed to building this dam and will deliver real environmental benefits by doing so.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 7

THE MEMBER FOR REDCLIFFE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

With reference to capital works or infrastructure projects the Minister has responsibility for, can he identify each project running behind schedule, not commenced or completed, and list for each projects funds spent to date and future budget allocated.

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Redcliffe for the question.

The information requested is provided (below) in tabulated form.

PROJECT Status against Funds spent to Future budget Committed schedule - date allocated capital on time/ behind schedule Gold Coast Marine Development Behind schedule $247,000 $410,000 Nil due to request of and changes to tenderers Ipswich Multifunction Development Project now being $1.058 million $4.162 million Nil PROJECT Status against Funds spent to Future budget Committed schedule - date allocated capital on time/ behind schedule delivered by Ipswich City Council. Townsville Ocean Terminal Behind schedule $397,000 $110,000 $18.5 million due to proposed tender revising master planning Yeerongpilly Landing Development Behind schedule $316,000 $235,000 $2.1 million due to impact of global financial crisis on private proponents Traveston Dam Not commenced $490.2 million $ 1,101.76 $1.592 billion Subject to approval million process Airport Link 1 Commenced and on $13.981 million $180 .784 $194.765 track million million Wyaralong Dam Commenced and on $134.1 million $213.845 $ 348 million track million Gold Coast Desalination Construction $846.5 million $95.500 million $942 million completed, still in commissioning stage Western Corridor Recycled Water Completed $2,362 million $130.748 $2,493 million Project million PROJECT Status against Funds spent to Future budget Committed schedule - date allocated capital on time/ behind schedule Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage Subject to approval $98.37 million $351.63 million $450 million 2 process Toowoomba Pipeline On track $65 .9 million $121.043 $187 million million Raising of Hinze Dam Stage 3 On track $ 195 million $199.8 million $394.8 million

Fitzgibbon Urban Development Area On track $2.8 million $11 million for construction of stages one to four.

1. Total estimated cost includes Land acquisition and early works but excludes land acquisition undertaken by the Dept of Transport and Main Roads ( $122 Million ) and the States contribution of $267.2 Million. Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 8

THE MEMBER FOR REDCLIFFE asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

In my electorate, affordable housing for people is an issue that concerns many of my constituents - can the Minister outline what the Government has delivered as part of the implementation of the 2007 Queensland Housing Affordability Strategy?

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Redcliffe for the question.

In 2007, this government released the Queensland Housing Affordability Strategy to deliver affordable housing outcomes for Queenslanders.

This strategy seeks to provide better access to appropriate housing that will assist individuals, families and communities and contribute to overarching social and economic wellbeing of the state.

This strategy was implemented to address issues that are unique to Queensland where the State is experiencing close to 2,000 extra people coming to live in Queensland every week.

Housing affordability is the difference between what a household can readily borrow and the cost of a typical suburban detached house.

Under this strategy the Queensland Government in less than 2 years has delivered: • Urban Land Development Authority (ULDA) • improved efficient planning and development systems • improved land supply for development • enhanced monitoring of supply land and housing • simplified, standard and transparent infrastructure charging • additionally, in the last 12 months, the government reduced Stamp Duty contributions for first home buyers.

This strategy has focused on getting land and housing on the market more quickly and at a lower cost and achieving a more competitive and responsive land and housing market by reducing timeliness and associated holding costs.

The establishment of the ULDA has facilitated development of specific sites to move land quickly to market.

Bowen Hills and Northshore were declared Urban Development Areas (UDAs) on 27 March 2008 and Fitzgibbon on 24 July 2008. The development schemes for the Bowen Hills and the Northshore Hamilton sites have been approved, with the Fitzgibbon development scheme in its final stages of completion.

The Northshore Hamilton and Bowen Hills UDAs are set to transform these locations into world class retail, commercial and residential properties, over the next two decades.

The government has also commenced working on changing the way infrastructure charges will be provided by local governments. The preparation of Priority Infrastructure Plans (PIPs) for local governments and the development of a clear methodology for infrastructure charging will further assist councils to deliver affordable housing for their local area.

Once implemented, PIPs will provide a clear and transparent result for developers and the local community and will provide more financial certainty for developers and aids in better planning and delivery of land to market faster.

As part of the government’s commitment to improve planning and development systems, the Sustainable Planning Bill was introduced into Parliament on 19 June 2009. The new Bill will help local councils achieve better planning outcomes for their communities through streamlined plan-making and development assessment, and stronger enforcement rules.

It contains more than 220 changes to the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and will help to reduce costs for developers and the community. By introducing standard planning scheme provisions, councils will benefit from reduced plan-making costs, lower compliance costs through standardising applications, and fewer mistakes and oversights in applications.

The Queensland Government is committed to delivering more affordable housing opportunities through these initiatives and others such as the Broadhectare land supply in the South East Queensland Action Plan.

The Greenfield land supply strategy is about ensuring appropriate and available land in the Urban Footprint is brought to the market in a timely, cost-effective and efficient manner. The Queensland Government will work with local government and the development industry to accelerate the development of Broadhectare areas. Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 9

THE MEMBER FOR BROADWATER asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Constituents in my electorate are concerned about climate change and want to know how they can cut down on emissions to help reduce the impact on climate change in their neighbourhood: Can the Minister outline how he is progressing the election commitments made by the Premier to provide opportunities through the “Green Door” policy for residents to produce more sustainable housing in their local area?

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Broadwater for the question.

The Queensland Government is committed to protecting our lifestyle and the environment by taking action to reduce Queensland’s carbon footprint. As you are aware Queensland is particularly vulnerable to climate change, yet our per capita emissions are the highest in the country.

As part of the Toward Q2: Tomorrow’s Queensland Green ambitions, the government has set a target for contributing to the reduction of national greenhouse gas emissions. We have set a 2020 target to cut, by one-third, Queensland’s carbon footprint through reduced car and electricity use. This will help us also contribute to the national target of achieving a 60 per cent reduction in national greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

From March 1 2009, all new houses and townhouses in Queensland must achieve a minimum 5 stars (out of 10) energy equivalent rating. 5-star housing will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by around 85,000 tonnes by 2020 or taking 19,700 cars off the road. Queensland Government has committed to requiring new houses and major renovations to meet 6-star or equivalent energy efficient standards and units to meet 5-star or equivalent energy efficient standards by the end of 2010.

Further, all new houses, townhouses and units must install as a minimum: • 4-star Water Efficiency Labelling Standards (WELS) rated toilets; • 3-star WELS rated tapware to kitchen sinks, basins and laundry taps; • a water-efficient irrigation system (where an irrigation system is installed); and • energy-efficient lighting to 80 per cent of fixed internal lights (minimum 27 lumens per Watt).

The requirement for water efficient fixtures outlined above could save up to 141 billion litres of water by 2020, the equivalent of over 56,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools. The increase from a minimum of 40 per cent energy efficient lighting to a minimum of 80 per cent could save over 388,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, the equivalent of taking 90,000 cars off the road. A guideline is available to assist with understanding how the sustainable housing requirements apply to differing circumstances.

From 1 September 2009, air-conditioners sold or installed in Queensland must have a minimum tested average energy efficiency ratio (EER) of 2.9, leading the nation in this area. The EER is the industry-recognised measure for gauging the energy efficiency level for cooling in air-conditioners. An EER of 2.9 is generally equivalent to 4-stars on a current energy rating label.

The installation ban will apply to new or replacement air-conditioners installed (via plug or hard wired) in houses, townhouses and units and the sales ban will prevent air- conditioners which do not meet the minimum standard from being sold in Queensland irrespective of the building they are to be installed in. The new minimum EER is estimated to save approximately 12,500 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually or the equivalent of taking around 2,900 cars off the road. It could also save Queenslanders over $1.7 million of electricity bills annually.

In the recent election campaign, the Government committed to a new initiative, “Green Door.” The Queensland Government has committed to fast-tracking sustainable developments through the “Green Door” for high performance proposals, which will be introduced in consultation with stakeholders.

For new sustainable developments this will involve: • Establishing a “Green Door Advisory Committee” to provide Ministerial advice on appropriate developments that should be considered for a Ministerial direction. • Expanding Ministerial powers to issue “Ministerial directions” to Local Governments at any time to fast-track approvals where a development exhibits exemplary sustainability features. • Designating new “Sustainable Development Case Managers” to provide a dedicated single entry point to government for all major sustainable developments.

The “Green Door” for high performance development proposals is intended to speed up developments and reward those initiatives that contribute to reducing Queensland’s carbon footprint. Fast-tracking sustainable development applications will not only deliver a green dividend for our community, it will also get these projects to market faster, improving job opportunities for Queenslanders.

The Green Door policy commitment is part of the government’s action to tackle climate change.

Question on Notice

26 June 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question 10

THE MEMBER FOR BROADWATER asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

What is the relationship between the South East Queensland Regional Plan and the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan that has caused the Minister to release the plan closer to the release of the regional plan than the Budget this year ?

ANSWER:

I thank the Member for Broadwater for the question.

The annual South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program (SEQIPP) outlines the Queensland Government’s infrastructure priorities to support the SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031, which is due for release in July.

The Infrastructure Plan establishes priorities for regionally significant infrastructure within a 20-year planning time frame. The SEQIPP ensures that State agencies align their infrastructure and service priorities with the SEQ Regional Plan.

SEQIPP 2009, released today, provides for the most up-to-date snapshot possible of the forward program for regionally significant key infrastructure in SEQ. The Regional Plan 2009-2031 requires identified infrastructure to support desired regional growth and help create a more compact urban pattern, cohesive urban and rural communities, and regional development.

Use of infrastructure programs to support and direct development can substantially influence the preferred settlement pattern and urban form. This includes broadhectare areas, urban infill and redevelopment sites and activity centres, all of which are reflected in the SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031.

The location and timing of infrastructure delivery can also drive economic development activities and the distribution of employment opportunities. It also provides coordination of infrastructure and services provided by state agencies, government-owned corporations, local government and the private sector. Through supporting the SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031, the documents help to shape the forward program for coordinated planning for growth and delivery of infrastructure across the SEQ region.

Answers to Questions taken on Notice at Hearing Question on Notice

16 July 2009

Estimates Committee C – Government Question

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie: asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Can you advise the expenditure on infrastructure projects by type - roads, public transport, health, energy, water supply et cetera - for 2008-09 estimated actual, 2009- 10 budget and forward estimates and provide a breakdown by local, state, federal, GOC and private sector contribution to or investment in those projects? (Hansard 16 July 2009, p.70)

ANSWER:

I thank the Honourable Member for Gympie for the question.

The SEQ Infrastructure Plan and Program (SEQIPP) outlines the Queensland Government’s infrastructure priorities in the region through to 2026. Released just today, SEQIPP 2009 remains the largest infrastructure program in the country. Updated each year, the program now comprises 378 identifiable projects worth an estimated $124 billion in infrastructure investment through to 2026. This level of investment is expected to support up to 900 000 jobs over the period.

The 2009-2026 program will see a $115 billion future investment in 291 projects. This comprises $95 billion in road, rail and public transport projects and studies, $13 billion in social and community infrastructure, $4.4 billion in water infrastructure, and $3.3 billion in energy. There are 32 new projects in the 2009-2026 plan, at an estimated additional investment of about $1.9 billion.

As at end March 2009, around $16.4 billion had been invested in projects since the first version of the plan was released in 2005 and 130 000 jobs created. Of this, $7.9 billion was spent in the last financial year.

In the year 2009-10, an additional $5.8 billion is forecast to be spent to reach around $22.2 billion and leading to the creation of a further 45 000 jobs. This is estimated to comprise general government sector spend of $2.8 billion, other government business of $0.9 billion, federal funding of $1.2 billion, private investment of $0.8 billion, local government contributions of $17 million and other funding of $81 million.

In the forward estimates period of financial years of 2009-10 to 2012-13, $22 billion is forecast to be spent, generating 170 000 jobs. This is estimated to comprise general government sector spend of $10 billion, other government business of $2 billion, federal funding of $8 billion, private investment of $2 billion, local government contributions of $62 million and other funding of $198 million. Question on Notice

16 July 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question on Notice

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Can the Minister advise the value of the surplus Western Corridor Recycled Water Project pipes that were sold at auction? (Hansard 16 July 2009, p.75)

ANSWER:

I thank the Honourable Member for Gympie for his question. The pipe auctioned on 17 June had previously been offered to the other water grid projects to ascertain if it was of use in their ongoing work. As it was of no use to these projects, it was offered for auction. The excess pipe auctioned on 17 June 2009 returned a gross amount of $368,145. All items auctioned achieved reserve price.

Question on Notice

16 July 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question on Notice

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie: asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Can the Minister advise how much was spent by WaterSecure to employ so-called independent auditors to identify issues that John Holland and Veolia Water were already aware of? (Hansard 16 July 2009, p.76)

ANSWER:

I thank the Honourable Member for Gympie for the question.

Experts in key discipline areas were engaged to undertake relevant components of the review. Each discipline specialist had the necessary expertise to undertake the relevant reviews and was independent of the projects design and construction.

The cost of the report totals $400,000. This cost is subject to finalisation and close-out of issues identified in the reviews.

Question on Notice

ESTIMATE COMMITTEE C

16 July 2009

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Will the Minister advise the proposed projects that will result in the increase in the number of jobs from 18,000 to over 57,000? (Hansard 16 July 2009, p.76)

ANSWER:

I thank the Honourable Member for Gympie for his question.

Firstly, the 33 proposed projects and the figure of 18,310 jobs was a projected target made 12 months prior, at the end of 2007-08 financial year.

The 39 proposed projects and the figure of 57,185 proposed jobs are those estimated, by review of all projects proposed as at April 2009 (at the time when the Service Delivery Statement (SDS) is produced).

The increase of 38,875 proposed jobs was based on a review across the whole 39 projects and cannot be attributed directly to six additional projects.

A change of industry type has also increased the job projections. For example, more LNG projects were proposed than initially estimated.

Note 19 to the SDS clearly identifies a growth of 24,500 proposed jobs from nine new declared significant projects alone.

The balance of the increase (14,375 proposed jobs) is attributable to the influence of other large and a different mix of proposed projects in industries such as LNG, coal plus transport infrastructure, urban and community development projects.

Significant Projects Branch Capital Expenditure Jobs 1 Aurukun Project - Bauxite Mine and Port Development 1500 890 2 Aurukun Project - East Coast Alumina Refinery & Port Development 1500 2160 3 Ella Bay Intergrated Resort 1810 2260 4 Fisherman's Landing Reclamation 165 0 5 Shute Harbour Marina 240 350 6 Stanwell Clean Coal Project (Zerogen Project) 1000 825 7 Emu Swamp Dam 35 50 8 Linc Energy UCG-GTL 1066 600 9 Hummock Hill Island Resort Integrated Development 635 1050 10 Wandoan Project 500 800 11 New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 500 760 12 Landsborough to Rail Project 550 920 13 Gladstone LNG Project (Santos) 7000 3200 14 Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 250 220 15 Northern Link Road Tunnel 1600 1500 16 Isa-Link HVdc 800 100 17 i-METT (Integrated Motorsport, Education, Tourism and Technology) Project 650 7000 18 Queensland Curtis LNG Project (BG) 8000 4420 19 Bowen Basin Coal Growth Project 5000 3690 20 Townsville Marine Project 100 650 21 Alpha Coal Project (Hancock) 7500 4100 22 South of the Emberly 900 1220 23 Galilee Coal Project (Northern Export Facility) 5300 2960 24 Gladstone Steel Making Facility 2800 2650 25 Australia Pacific LNG 35000 5000 26 Port of Gladstone Western Basin Dredging 500 150 84901 47525 Regional Development Projects 1 Surat Basin Railway 1000 1394 2 Water for Bowen 120 100 3 Nathan Dam 326 200 4 Rookwood Weir/Eden Bann Weir 143 110 5 Connors River Dam and Pipelines 195 150 6 Hook Island 50 75 7 Gladstone to Fitzroy Pipeline 345 210 8 Nullinga Dam 195 150 9 Raising 25 20 2399 2409

Government Development Projects 1 Whitsunday Region Avaition Upgrade 47 75 2 Gold Coast Knowledge Precinct 4875 3 Yeerongpilly Landing Development 890 1750 4 Townsville Port Access Road 320 551 1257 7251

Total Projects = 26+9+4=39 88557 57185 Question on Notice

16 July 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question on Notice

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

When I conducted a search of Queensland Land Titles, it reveals that Queensland Water Infrastructure – the special purpose vehicle – has purchased over $523 million worth of property in the ponded area. Can you advise why over $41 million of expenditure on the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam is not contained in the budget papers and is not being revealed to the people of Queensland? (Hansard 16 July 2009, p.80)

ANSWER:

I thank the Honourable Member for Gympie for his question.

The State Budget clearly lists $490 million dollars as total expenditure for Traveston Crossing Dam Stage One, to the end of the last financial year.

This expenditure includes voluntary land purchasing for Stage One, detailed investigations and a range of other items.

Land title searches do not substantiate the other figures provided in the question.

Question on Notice

16 July 2009

Estimates Committee C – Non-Government Question on Notice

Mr David Gibson, MP, Member for Gympie asked the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (MR STIRLING HINCHLIFFE) –

QUESTION:

Can the Minister provide one example of any planned habitat and vegetation restoration or relevant catchment management activities to be funded from the allocated $75 million at BP 3-90? (Hansard 16 July 2009, p.81)

ANSWER:

I thank the Honourable Member for Gympie for his question.

Environmental measures and community projects prior to construction of Traveston Crossing Dam will ultimately be determined by conditions the Coordinator-General sets for any approval of the project.

As a result of the rigorous Environmental Impact Assessment process, it has been identified that the Mary River catchment, including the dam location, has suffered significant disturbance as a result of clearing and cultivation practices over many years. It is estimated that approximately 85 per cent of the study area has been cleared of native vegetation over that time.

A number of likely important mitigation and sustainability measures to provide significant benefits to species including the Mary River Turtle, Mary River Cod, Queensland Lungfish and Giant Barred Frog have been identified.

Examples of planned activities include: • Establishment of Freshwater Species Conservation Centre • Habitat and vegetation restoration, including weed clearing, revegetation and instream rehabilitation • Relevant catchment management initiatives.

QWI has also planned an extensive program to promote social wellbeing in the Mary Valley, in partnership with a range of community groups.

Projects include enhancements for the Mary Valley Heritage Railway, a new clubhouse for the Kandanga Bowls Club and the construction of a tracks and trail network.

Documentation tabled at Hearing

09 2026 2009 Program and Plan Infrastructure Queensland East South

South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026

Department of Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 Australia tel +61 7 3227 8548 fax +61 7 3224 4683 [email protected] www.dip.qld.gov.au Foreword

In the state s 150th year, South East Moving forward, the government is working Queensland s population continues to hard to achieve a renewed balance in grow unaffected by the greatest global delivering infrastructure and supporting economic challenge in a generation. jobs in a very challenging economic The Queensland Government is confronting environment. This infrastructure plan is a these twin challenges by meeting the key plank of the government s job creation infrastructure needs of the region s commitment, with expenditure forecast to communities and committing to job increase by $5.8 billion to $22.2 billion, creation through this comprehensive plan. generating an extra 45 000 jobs.

In its fifth year, the Queensland The Department of Infrastructure and Government s SEQ Infrastructure Planning is working actively with Plan is still the largest Infrastructure government agencies and industry program in Australia. to drive infrastructure projects from the planning stages through to the This plan identifies an estimated delivery and reporting stages. The Hon Stirling Hinchliffe MP $124 billion in infrastructure investment Minister for Infrastructure and Planning for South East Queensland, which is Work is currently underway on the expected to support about Gateway Upgrade Project, Airport Link, 900 000 jobs through to 2026. sections of South East Queensland s busways, multiple rail upgrades and line In its first few years, the SEQ extensions, Queensland Children s Hospital, Infrastructure Plan has already delivered Princess Alexandra Hospital Emergency a significant number of projects across Department and Robina Hospital. the region including the Tugun Bypass, and the In partnership with other levels of South East Queensland Water Grid. It government and the private sector, the has also delivered new infrastructure Queensland Government is working for public transport including the Inner to ensure the SEQ Infrastructure Plan Northern Busway, 27 new three-car continues to support the economy and trains and 63 kilometres of new track. create more jobs for the region.

Both industry and government have geared The SEQ Infrastructure Plan provides up over the past four years, delivering more a resilient and robust framework to than triple the infrastructure that had been respond to the current economic delivered in the previous ten year period. challenges and looks to the future by supporting sustainable growing Only four years into the program, communities with enviable lifestyles. 87 projects have been completed, another 173 projects are underway, $16.4 billion has been invested and 130 000 jobs created. Table of contents

Foreword from the Minister Highlights 2 Gold Coast 39 What’s updated in this SEQ Infrastructure Plan 3 Priority infrastructure projects 39 Job creation 4 Progress on transport projects 40 Project achievements 6 Sunshine Coast 43 Part A – Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan 10 Priority infrastructure projects 43 About the SEQ Infrastructure Plan 11 Progress on transport projects 44 About the SEQ region 11 Transport investigations 45 SEQ Regional Plan review 11 Freight 48 Infrastructure priorities 13 Activity centre renewal and transit oriented development 50 Funding the SEQ Infrastructure Plan 14 Industry development 52 Partnerships 14 Information and communication technology 55 Federal government contributions 15 Water 56 Delivering the SEQ Infrastructure Plan 16 Establishing a water-efficient community 57 Driving delivery of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan 16 Diversification of our water supplies 58 Working together with industry 16 Energy 64 Improving government processes 17 Electricity 65 Summary of infrastructure investment 18 Gas 69 How to read the SEQ Infrastructure Plan 18 Health 73 Cost estimates used in this SEQ Infrastructure Plan 19 Education and training 76 Part B – Infrastructure classes 20 Early childhood education and care 76 Transport 21 Primary and secondary education 77 Tackling urban congestion 21 Vocational education and training 79 Public transport initiatives 24 Community services 81 Western Corridor 26 Queensland Police Service 81 Priority infrastructure projects 26 Emergency services 82 Progress on transport projects 27 Justice services 83 Transport investigations 27 Social housing 83 Greater Brisbane 31 Corrective services 83 Priority infrastructure projects 31 Infrastructure for rural development 84 Progress on transport projects 33 Regional sport and recreation 86 Transport investigations 33 Outdoor recreation 87 Port of Brisbane 38 Part C – Appendices 91 World-class port 38 Appendix one - useful websites 92 Progress on Port of Brisbane projects 38 Appendix two - index of tables, figures and maps 94

1 Highlights

The SEQ Infrastructure Plan outlines the Queensland Government s program of infrastructure and major projects to support the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2005 2026 (SEQ Regional Plan)

Next year the SEQ Infrastructure Plan The first four years of delivery have will be reviewed to reflect an updated seen a massive response from both SEQ Regional Plan. The government is industry and government to deliver nearly working to achieve a balance between three times the infrastructure provided delivering infrastructure to support jobs at the beginning of the decade. and growth and showing fiscal restraint. In 2009 the SEQ Infrastructure Plan has The plan includes projects covering transport, been stabilised with forecast expenditure water, energy, health, education and training, of around $5.8 billion. This latest regional sport and recreation, infrastructure plan sets out the sustained delivery for rural development, activity centre renewal of infrastructure through to 2026. and transit oriented development, community There has been significant infrastructure services, industry development and progress to date: information communication technology. „ The Queensland Tennis Centre at Tennyson The investment listed in this infrastructure was completed and the first international plan represents almost one-third of the state s tournament was held there in January 2009 total investment in infrastructure. Total investment in this year s SEQ „ Construction of the key elements of the Infrastructure Plan is $124 billion until Western Corridor Recycled Water Project 2026. This includes $94.6 billion in road, were completed in December 2008, rail and public transport projects and including approximately 205 kilometres studies, over $12.6 billion in social and of pipeline and three advanced water community infrastructure, $4.6 billion in treatment plants at Bundamba, Gibson water infrastructure and $3.3 billion spending Island and Luggage Point on energy. These projects are estimated to „ Construction of the Southern Regional support up to 900 000 jobs through to 2026. Water Pipeline was completed in Since the first SEQ Infrastructure Plan December 2008. The pipeline has was released in 2005, the 20-year plan been moving water between the has delivered 87 projects at a cost of more Gold Coast, Logan, Ipswich and than $9 billion. Brisbane since January 2009

2 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Highlights

„ The South East Queensland (Gold Coast) „ The Northern Busway, from the Royal „ The program has undergone a Desalination Project commenced supply to Children s Hospital at Herston to Windsor, re-sequencing process to make delivery the SEQ Water Grid on 28 February 2009. and a new cycle centre near the Royal more efficient and to address emerging By the end of March 2009 the desalination Brisbane Women s Hospital is expected to priorities such as dealing with the plant had supplied one billion litres of be complete in late 2009 global financial crisis. While this potable water into the SEQ Water Grid means that some projects have had „ The Kurilpa Bridge, which will stretch from changes to either their commencement „ Construction is underway on the Airport the North Quay end of Tank Street in the or completion date, overall the Link road tunnel enabling motorists to city, to Kurilpa Point in South Brisbane, program is progressing as expected bypass 16 sets of traffic lights between adjacent to the Queensland Gallery of Bowen Hills and Kedron and 14 sets of Modern Art, is expected to be complete by „ The SEQ Infrastructure Plan is presented traffic lights between Bowen Hills and October 2009 in three updated time periods with Toombul when complete in 2012 the first phase from 2009 10 to „ The Toowong pedestrian and cycle link 2012 13, the second phase from „ The completion in March 2009 of a built over the Centenary Highway linking 2013 14 to 2018 19 and the third $34.7 million refurbishment of the to Mt Coot-tha has been operational since phase from 2019 20 to 2025 26 Queensland Performing Arts Centre March 2009 at Southbank „ An updated education infrastructure „ Construction of a link between sections of category incorporates primary and „ Construction is underway on Queensland s the Boggo Road and Eastern busways is secondary education, vocational education largest road and bridge construction expected to be complete by August 2009 and training and early childhood project. The crucial Gateway Upgrade „ Construction of the Clem7 tunnel is well education and care Project, building 20 kilometres of underway with the project scheduled to duplicated road and a second bridge „ An updated community services open in 2010. across the at Murrarie, is infrastructure category includes scheduled for completion in mid 2011 Queensland Police Service, emergency What s updated in this services, justice services, social „ Construction of additional rail lines for housing and corrective services. the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast with SEQ Infrastructure Plan? the Helensvale to Robina rail duplication The previous SEQ Infrastructure Plan was completed in August 2008 and the released in June 2008. The following facets Caboolture to Beerburrum duplication are new or have changed in this updated completed in April 2009 version of the plan: „ The major reconstruction of the Ipswich „ There are 32 new projects in the plan Motorway/Logan Motorway interchange at Gailes and a 2-kilometre stretch of the „ Project costs have been updated to 2009 Ipswich Motorway between Goodna and dollars to allow price consistency over the Gailes is well advanced full timeframe of the program

3 Job creation

The global financial crisis is making its mark Moving forward, major projects such „ Helping to create 148 000 training places on the Queensland economy and on the as Inner City Rail, Logan Motorway over the next four years to expand lives of every Queenslander. The Queensland upgrade, Ipswich Motorway upgrade, Queensland s skills base in the industries Government, through its commitment to Bruce Highway upgrade, and Airport Link that need them most new infrastructure and new job initiatives, is have potential to constitute some of the „ A scheme to make sure Queensland working to maintain and create employment biggest job generators across the state. businesses and manufacturers get the as its number one priority. In response to the global financial maximum benefit of the Queensland The SEQ Infrastructure Plan s forecast crisis, the government has announced Government building program expenditure for the region up to 2026 is now a raft of measures to help maintain „ A Local Industry Policy providing set to reach $124 billion. employment and increase skills. significant opportunities for employment This investment funds 378 regionally In supporting the creation of 100 000 and economic development by significant projects across the transport, new jobs over the next three years, the ensuring that local businesses have water, energy and social and community government will focus on four key planks of full, fair and reasonable opportunity infrastructure sectors. jobs generation: to tender for work on infrastructure and resource sector projects These projects are estimated to support up to „ Maintaining the building program 900 000 jobs through to 2026. „ The government keeping approval „ Investing in skilling and training processes for all capital works projects Projects such as Wyaralong Dam near „ Developing new industries and supporting within the minimum time possible and Boonah will not only supply up to an extra existing industries lead times in putting works to the market 26 000 million litres of much-needed water will be minimised, without compromising every year (in conjunction with the nearby „ Job creation programs. risk management. The government will Cedar Grove Weir), but will also create Some of the initiatives include: also fast track some pre-construction approximately 420 jobs. Already more than activities where substantial employment 130 staff and sub-contractors are working „ The Premier s Employment Taskforce to and/or economic benefit can be generated on the project with further benefits for provide expert advice to the government local business in Boonah, Beaudesert „ Developing and supporting new „ The Green Army, to provide up to 2300 and across South East Queensland. industries such as liquefied natural gas paid work placements for up to six (LNG) and solar The Gateway Upgrade Project has the months and up to 700 green traineeships potential to create more than 5000 new jobs over the next three years „ Supporting existing industries such and generate an estimated $450 million in as tourism „ Jobs Assist, to provide support for wages and salaries during the design and firms experiencing financial and „ All state government agencies, construction phases of the project. operational challenges and workers government-owned corporations and that have been retrenched statutory bodies are required to fast track new recruitment activities including „ Ensuring 10 per cent of the workforce on advertising, selection and finalisation. every Queensland Government project are apprentices or trainees

4 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Job creation

Figure 1 South East Queensland infrastructure investment and jobs

Note: this figure is an estimate of the job numbers the SEQ Infrastructure Plan will sustain on a year-by-year basis. The program job target estimate is a cumulative assessment of the job numbers based on the total spend for the program from 2005 to 2026. The 2010 data is based on current projected budget estimates and program spend. Future investment on a yearly basis will indicate job numbers against the target estimate. 5 Project achievements

For the past four years the Figure 2 Delivered projects pipeline SEQ Infrastructure Plan There are 87 completed SEQIPP Projects as at 31 March 2009 has been delivering real Completed in 2004-07 benefits for the community. Pacific Motorway: Stewart Road Currumbin interchange (Tugun Bypass) Since the first SEQ Infrastructure Plan was Warrego Highway: Plainlands interchange released in 2005, 87 projects have been Linkfield Connection Road completed and 173 projects are underway. KTIA (Kawana Transport Infrastructure Agreement) Nicklin Way: additional lanes Expenditure to date is already $16.4 billion. Stretton State College (two stages); Meridan State College In completing such a large number of projects Further TransApex investigations: Airport Link government and industry have demonstrated Salisbury to Flagstone/Greenbank passenger rail investigation a successful working relationship to manage growth, create jobs and improve services Ormeau to Coomera: track duplication and facilities in South East Queensland. Groundwater, desalination and recycling investigations

The projects completed to date are diverse Subsidies paid for completed local government projects and far reaching and include road, transport, Construction of new transmission lines between: Greenbank (Logan) and Maudsland (Gold Coast); water, energy, schools and health projects. Belmont and Murarrie (Brisbane) The completion of these projects demonstrates Construction of major substations at: Molendinar (Gold Coast); Algester (Brisbane); the government s commitment to providing a Goodna (Ipswich); Sumner (Brisbane) better future for South East Queensland. Springfield Lakes State School; Burpengary Meadows State School State Softball Centre, Ormiston Cricket Centre of Excellence, Albion Brisbane Cricket Ground, Woolloongabba Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre, Nathan

6 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Project achievements

Completed in 2007-08 Completed in 2008-09

Centenary Highway Boundary Road underpass (joint Brisbane City Council Inner City Bus Access Capacity Study and Main Roads project) Helensvale to Robina, Salisbury to Kuraby: additional track and upgrades Ipswich Motorway alternative northern corridor investigation Sunshine Motorway: Sippy Downs to Kawana Arterial Ipswich to Springfield Public Transport Corridor Study Enoggera Reservoir water treatment plant Caboolture Northern Bypass Southern Regional Water Pipeline Inner Northern Busway improvements and new busway stations Eastern Pipeline Interconnector Hamilton/Eagle Farm Transport Investigation Western Corridor Recycled Water Project Ormeau State School stage one; Australian TradeCoast Transport Study Cupania, Norfolk Village State School stage one Pacific Motorway: Tugun Bypass Northern Pipeline Interconnector (stage one) Bus priority on Smith Street: Olsen Avenue to Gold Coast Highway Automotive trade training facility: Toowoomba Cedar Grove Weir Southbank Institute of Technology Bromelton Off-Stream Storage Pine Rivers Courthouse, Strathpine Brisbane Aquifer Project Queensland Tennis Centre, Tennyson Groundwater Project Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre extension Caltex Brisbane Recycled Water Project Toowong Cycle and Pedestrian Overpass (a sub-project of the subregional cycle network) Construction of a new transmission line between Middle Ridge Brassall Bikeway Connection stage one (Toowoomba) and Greenbank (Logan) (a sub-project of the subregional cycle network) Coomera Springs State School; Park Lake State School Install underground subtransmission cables between Crestmead and Sandgate Courthouse Browns Plains North substations Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre, Nathan upgrade: Centenary Highway two lanes: Springfield to Yamanto hydrotherapy centre Road: additional lanes from Bruce Highway to Pierce Avenue Lamington S pringbrook Great Walk Sunshine Motorway upgrade: Maroochydore Road to Pacific Paradise (including Maroochy River Bridge) Skilled Park, Robina MMTC: Caloundra Mooloolaba Road (new two-lane road): Caloundra Road King George Square Cycle Centre to Creekside Boulevard (a sub-project of the subregional cycle network) The Prince Charles Hospital: upgrade to general hospital Browns Plains Health Precinct New substations at Currimundi, Holland Park and Wacol South Bounty Boulevard State School; Oxenford West State College Further stages on Meridan State College, Stretton State College, Chancellor State College, Coomera Springs State School, and Burpengary Meadows State School Northern Link: Toowong to Kelvin Grove tunnel investigation New passenger rail stock: 24 three-car train sets Powerlink major transmission upgrade: Abermain substation Powerlink major transmission upgrade: Greenbank substation Powerlink major transmission upgrade: South Pine substation Note: this figure does not include ENERGEX network upgrades in South East : Toowoomba upgrade Queensland. Sub-projects of the cycle networks, as noted in the table, are not Aquatic Centre upgrades: Mt Gravatt, Runcorn and Redcliffe considered as fully completed projects. 7 Figure 3 Indicative activity of SEQ Infrastructure Plan to 2026

Note: this figure shows how the program will mature from its establishment phase, marked by a significant period of growing investment and gear-up by both industry and government, especially in delivering the SEQ Water Grid, into a stabilisation phase of sustained delivery of infrastructure over the term of the plan. This represents total funds from all sources and is presented in 2009 dollars.

8 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Project achievements

Figure 4 Program expenditure to date

Note: this figure outlines the actual expenditure by quarter and a cumulative view of the expenditure to date.

Table 1 Program scorecard

Status No. of projects Estimated investment $M

Yet to commence 118 20,674 In progress/underway 91 55,780 Under construction 82 38,636 Complete 87 9,128 Total 378 124,218

Note: project status information current as at 31 April 2009.

9 Part A Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan Part A: Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan

The SEQ Infrastructure Plan was first released SEQ Regional Plan review About the SEQ in 2005 and is updated annually to reflect and align with the latest planning and budget The SEQ Regional Plan is the key plan for commitments. It sets relevant timeframes managing growth and development of Infrastructure and budgets to ensure the timely delivery of South East Queensland. infrastructure supporting the region s growth. Plan The South East Queensland Regional Plan The SEQ Infrastructure Plan is linked to 2005 2026, the first statutory regional plan the annual state budget process and is for the region, was released in June 2005. the principal mechanism for identifying, The SEQ Infrastructure Plan and Since then, South East Queensland has prioritising and delivering infrastructure Program 2009 2026 outlines experienced a period of significant population projects. It also assists the coordination of growth. The sustained growth of the region the government s infrastructure infrastructure and services provided by state has brought with it new challenges including priorities to support the SEQ agencies, government-owned corporations, housing affordability, transport congestion local government and the private sector. Regional Plan and represents and dealing with climate change. an unprecedented long-term By providing certainty about the nature and The Queensland Government has brought timing of regional infrastructure projects and commitment to capital works forward the review of the regional plan to through its improved coordination processes, in South East Queensland. ensure these challenges are met and the the SEQ Infrastructure Plan contributes to a region s great lifestyle is protected. well-planned region. The Draft South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009 2031 takes a balanced approach About the SEQ region to how and where South East Queensland South East Queensland is one of Australia s will grow. It continues to protect the region fastest growing regions. By 2031, its from urban sprawl, focusing growth into the population is expected to grow from Urban Footprint and further developing the 2.8 million to 4.4 million people. regulations introduced in 2004. It preserves the region s landscape, open spaces and The region covers 22 890 square kilometres, farmland and ensures the environmental stretching 240 kilometres from Noosa in the quality of the region is maintained. north to the Queensland-New South Wales border in the south, and 160 kilometres west The draft plan was released for consultation, to Toowoomba. seeking the ideas and concerns of the community in South East Queensland, late in The region s growth will generate demand for 2008. A final plan incorporating this feedback 735 500 new dwellings, as well as supporting will be released in 2009. infrastructure and services, placing significant social, economic and environmental pressures on the region. 11 Map 1 - South East Queensland Region

12 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part A: Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan

Infrastructure priorities Infrastructure shapes growth patterns particularly water, energy supplies, minerals and aggregates. Projects will also By accommodating a higher proportion The SEQ Regional Plan defines the maximise system integration and reduce of population growth within the urban regional land use pattern and desired the waste they generate, the carbon footprint, the most efficient use of regional outcomes. It guides the priorities emissions they cause and the impact they land, infrastructure and services will be for infrastructure investment across have on natural areas. achieved. Public transport will support South East Queensland. Other factors urban renewal and developments that Liveability and community wellbeing considered when prioritising infrastructure focus on population and employment projects are those supporting quality Safe, healthy, accessible and inclusive density around transport nodes of life and community wellbeing. communities are underpinned by well- and activity centres. Broadhectare planned and well-serviced infrastructure. This SEQ Infrastructure Plan takes account of development sites (or large areas of This goal is supported by the timely the Queensland Government s 2020 vision, undeveloped land) will be contained and adequate provision of quality TowardQ2: Tomorrow s Queensland, which within the urban footprint by supplying infrastructure and services relative to strives towards a Queensland that is: infrastructure to support priority areas the economic, social and environmental such as the Western Corridor. Further, the „ Strong: creating a diverse economy needs of the region. This will include SEQ Regional Plan seeks to reduce traffic powered by bright ideas economic infrastructure (transport, and limit congestion on the roads by water and energy), social infrastructure „ Green: protecting our lifestyle and encouraging residents to make use of all (education, health, emergency services environment the goods and services, jobs and leisure and corrective services) and environmental available within their local areas. This will „ Smart: delivering world-class education infrastructure (natural areas, open strengthen communities across the region and training space and recreational opportunities). and reduce environmental impacts. „ Healthy: making Queenslanders Australia s Economic activity healthiest people Efficient resource use Central to the promotion of regional The SEQ Regional Plan recognises the „ Fair: supporting a safe and caring economic activity is the provision of importance of South East Queensland s community. infrastructure that supports diverse rich and diverse natural environment and economic and employment opportunities The strategic outcomes for the SEQ its contribution to the regional economy in priority industries and regional activity Infrastructure Plan, derived from the South and way of life. The SEQ Infrastructure centres. The SEQ Infrastructure Plan East Queensland Regional Plan 2005 2026, Plan seeks to maximise the use of supports economic development initiatives are listed, and include; existing infrastructure and ensure that associated with Smart State initiatives, the associated planning, development knowledge industries, service sectors and and operation of new projects minimise freight transport. the demand they make on resources

13 The government funds infrastructure from Partnerships Funding government cash flows, borrowings and alignment of the government s capital portfolio. In delivering infrastructure in South East Queensland, the Queensland Government The Queensland Government has established the SEQ is a participant in a variety of partnership the Project Assurance Framework (PAF) and arrangements with the private sector and with Value for Money (VfM) Framework in order Infrastructure other levels of government. to ensure high quality project initiation, evaluation and delivery. These frameworks are Queensland s first public private partnership Plan the minimum standard for project initiation, the recently completed Southbank Institute of evaluation, procurement and assurance TAFE Redevelopment Project was awarded The Queensland Government across the Queensland public sector. Best Global Project by the international Public is committed to maintaining a Private Finance Awards in 2007. The PAF is a whole-of-government project strong infrastructure program. assessment tool that establishes a common The South East Queensland Water Grid is approach to assessing projects at critical the product of a partnership between the stages, and aims to maximise the value for government and private sector. The use of money outcomes for project investments. special purpose vehicles and the alliance procurement model provided the flexibility Where the PAF identifies a potential public and governance structure for delivery of this private partnership, the VfM framework huge infrastructure program. provides the assessment guidelines to determine if a public private partnership Alliance contracts and special purpose should be pursued and ensures the vehicles are also used in the delivery of some respective skills of each sector are best road and rail projects. See Working together used to deliver effective infrastructure with industry on page 16 for more details. and services in a timely manner.

Contributions for funding projects come from all three levels of government, with various projects having a sub-regional, regional or national interest.

14 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part A: Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan

Federal government As part of the Australian Government s „ Ipswich Motorway - additional works: contributions $42 billion Nation Building Economic construction commenced in 2009, Stimulus Plan, Queensland will receive a with completion by 2012. Total federal Nation Building Program total of $4 billion towards three programs: investment will be $884 million, (formerly AusLink 2) Building the Education Revolution; Social bringing the federal government overall Housing; and Roads and Safety. commitment to the Ipswich Motorway to The Australian Government is investing over $2.5 billion. $26.4 billion on road and rail infrastructure The Nation Building and Jobs Plan builds throughout Australia via its Nation Building on the stimulus measures already in place „ Gold Coast Rapid Transit: construction Program over the six year period from to support economic activity and jobs, is expected to commence in 2011 and is 2008-09 to 2013-14. including the Nation Building Package. scheduled for completion in 2013. Total federal investment will be $365 million. The Nation Building Program assists Building Australia Fund national, regional economic and social In addition, the federal government The Australian Government has development by funding projects contributed $20 million to undertake a implemented a national approach to which improve the performance of Brisbane Inner City Rail feasibility study, planning, funding and delivering the land transport infrastructure. to determine potential route alignment, nation s future infrastructure needs. construction timetables and a preferred Funding is available for a range of road The Infrastructure Australia Act 2008 came funding model. They also contributed funds and rail programs and projects across into effect on 9 April 2008 paving the way to to the Bruce Highway Cooroy to Curra the National Land Transport Network. establish Infrastructure Australia. (section B) Duplication. Construction is The network is based on national and expected to start in 2009 and is scheduled inter-regional land transport corridors Infrastructure Australia works to develop for completion in 2012. Federal investment that are of critical importance to a strategic blueprint for Australia s will be $488 million. national and regional growth. future infrastructure needs and in partnership with the states, territories, Additional South East Queensland projects There are several components under the local government and the private have been identified by Infrastructure Nation Building Program including: sector facilitate its implementation. Australia for further development and „ National network construction analysis: In the 2009-10 federal budget the government „ National network maintenance committed $8.5 billion to nationally significant „ Port of Brisbane Motorway „ Roads to Recovery infrastructure projects, releasing Infrastructure „ Eastern Busway (stages 2 and 3) „ Black Spot Australia s National Infrastructure Priority List. „ Bruce Highway Corridor (Brisbane to „ Heavy Vehicle Program South East Queensland projects funded as Cairns, including Cooroy and Curra) „ Funding for Local Roads priority infrastructure projects are listed. „ Fully controlled motorways in „ Boom Gates for Level Crossings. South East Queensland

„ Northern Link Road Tunnel.

15 Work undertaken since 2005 to support the Government and industry also work closely Delivering successful collaboration of government and to provide innovation in delivery models industry in delivering the program includes: and procurement for projects within the SEQ Infrastructure Plan. These include: the SEQ „ The South East Queensland Infrastructure Industry Taskforce a joint government, „ A $1.1 billion contract under the Infrastructure industry and union taskforce designed Queensland Government s landmark to develop closer working relationships South East Queensland public private and ensure the smooth delivery of the partnership (PPP) schools project Plan SEQ Infrastructure Plan. The Industry Seven new state schools will be built Taskforce has focused on strategies to in high-growth areas of South East ensure industry capacity to deliver on Queensland and will generate thousands Driving delivery of the one of the largest infrastructure programs of new jobs. Aspire Schools consortium in history. To meet the challenges of SEQ Infrastructure Plan will design, build and maintain six new the current global financial crisis it will The planning and delivery of the SEQ primary schools and one new high school, be necessary to shift this mandate, Infrastructure Plan is coordinated by while Education Queensland will provide specifically to ensure organisations the Department of Infrastructure and teaching resources. Construction will begin down the supply chain remain suitably Planning. The role of the department shortly on prep to year 7 primary schools resourced, skilled and ready for the is to lead local, regional and statewide at Thornlands South in Brisbane and pipeline of work that government infrastructure initiatives to ensure planning Peregian Springs on the Sunshine Coast. and industry will bring to market and infrastructure essential to the state s These schools are due to open in January prosperous future is developed and delivered. The taskforce will continue to develop 2010, with accommodation for up to 370 principles to encourage agreement students each between government and industry on „ The Southbank Institute of TAFE Working together with infrastructure procurement. It will also Redevelopment Project Queensland s create strategies to maintain capacity industry first public private partnership. The project to deliver the program and continue to The collaboration between industry and involved constructing 11 new buildings achieve more effective training outcomes government is vital for the success of the and renovating another four buildings on that contribute to the government focus SEQ Infrastructure Plan. Issues such as the South Bank campus on delivering jobs in Queensland procurement, delivery models, available „ The Airport Link tunnel, which is currently resources and a skilled workforce are all „ The production of procurement and one of Australia s largest road tunnel planned in conjunction with the construction, construction pipelines, which detail public private partnerships. This tunnel engineering and design industries. upcoming projects for the next four will link the Clem7 tunnel, Inner City years. These tools are updated regularly Bypass and local road networks in the and provide industry with a sequenced city s north-east. It will include two program of infrastructure work. parallel, 7 kilometre tunnels and is set to open in mid 2012

16 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part A: Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan

„ The Gateway Upgrade Project, which is „ Several road projects including the „ Developing and rolling out models for currently the largest road and bridge Maroochy River bridge duplication and best practice project governance to ensure infrastructure project in Queensland s upgrade of the Bruce Highway to six lanes focus on service delivery outcomes and history. Queensland Motorways Limited from Uhlmann Road to Caboolture. In better project decision making (a government-owned company) is these projects, the government adopted „ Establishing the Gateway Review delivering the project through a 30-year a new approach called early contractor process. This is an independent franchise agreement and has awarded involvement . Early involvement of the peer review process undertaken at the design, construction and maintenance contractor and the supply chain has key project milestones. This process contract to a private sector partner resulted in a number of benefits including helps project owners by ensuring more scope for innovation, improved risk „ The South East Queensland Water Grid, funds are well spent, and the project management and better forward planning which employed more than meets its strategic objectives and of resource requirements. 3500 workers across more than 45 sites achieves value-for-money outcomes at peak times. The workers were „ Developing corporate governance employed by a number of alliances, Improving government tools for companies established multiple state government agencies, local processes under the Corporations Act 2001 government agencies and companies to deliver infrastructure established under the Corporations Act Not only has the Queensland Government 2001 to deliver infrastructure continued to significantly invest in „ Monitoring and assessing regional infrastructure spending in South East and interstate competition for „ Three rail projects packaged into a Queensland, it has developed and maintained construction resources. rail infrastructure program designed to processes to ensure funds are used make the offering more attractive to efficiently and the impact of construction on the construct and design industries in the community is managed. The following 2006. An alliance between numerous key initiatives are examples of better processes construction companies and QR Limited introduced over the life of this plan. was formed. The combined delivery of these projects is now achieving „ Producing and maintaining a Community considerable savings in time and cost. Engagement Index. This index is a One of the projects involve straightening database of community engagement and duplicating the rail line between activities, planning and infrastructure Caboolture and Landsborough on the delivery activity by state agencies and North Coast line. The remaining two local government. The index helps projects involve extending the rail line government at both levels to coordinate from Robina to Varsity Lakes and building their community consultation activities a third track between Corinda and Darra to share experiences and resources in to increase capacity for passenger and community consultation freight services on the Ipswich line

17 Figure 5 – Snapshot of infrastructure spending across the state Figure 6 – Cumulative expenditure to date by subregion

Note: This chart provides proposed capital spending of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan in Note: South East Queensland spending of $0.8 billion includes SEQ-wide 2009-10 against the balance across the state. SEQ Infrastructure Plan funding is infrastructure projects and programs. Figures at 31 March 2009. inclusive of all funding sources.

Estimated transport investment includes the SEQ Regional Plan. There are other contributions from the state and federal government plans and reports to address Summary of governments, Brisbane City Council and tolling matters that do not fall under this category. companies. The total also includes investment The SEQ Infrastructure Plan is organised by by the Port of Brisbane Corporation Limited, a infrastructure infrastructure class. The transport section is Queensland Government-owned corporation, further divided on a subregional basis, with for infrastructure to service the port’s growing investment additional coverage of freight activities and import and export trade. Port of Brisbane. The SEQ Infrastructure Plan Projects subject to funding from the federal For each infrastructure class, there is a government have been identified in the identifies an estimated description of the government priorities. preferred delivery timeframes, but delivery is $124 billion of infrastructure Additionally, for most infrastructure classes subject to the timing of federal funding. projects to support regional there is a program table, which reports planning outcomes in South Estimated water investment includes the infrastructure projects supporting the East Queensland to 2026. Queensland Government projects and funding SEQ Regional Plan, their indicative delivery assistance from the Queensland Government timeframe and an estimated investment. This is about 32 per cent of for projects being delivered by local This is the section that is tracked and infrastructure spending government and water service providers. measured by the Queensland Government. in Queensland for 2009-10. Funding for electricity transmission and Many projects described and listed in the distribution is shown through to 2012–13. SEQ Infrastructure Plan comprise a number Estimated investment over the life of the Investment beyond this time has not been of subprojects, each representing a separate plan to 2026 has increased by $17 billion, identified, as capital works programs need to component or stage of the overall project, from $107 billion in 2008 to $124 billion take account of growth in electricity demand and generally with varying delivery timeframes in 2009. This additional investment has and regulatory changes which may arise. (overlapping, sequential or separated in time). arisen through the inclusion of completed In some cases, component subprojects have project values; the indexation of costs to been bundled for delivery. For conciseness 2009 dollars to allow price consistency How to read of presentation, these are represented as a over the full timeframe of the program; single project and timeline. inclusion of 32 additional infrastructure The SEQ Infrastructure Plan is based on the projects; rising construction costs; better the SEQ planning horizon in the 2005 edition of the cost estimates on planned projects through SEQ Regional Plan: the review process; and inclusion of projects Infrastructure arising from investigations. The increase in First phase the cost of the plan is across all funding Plan From 2009–10 to 2012–13: this phase sources including state, federal and local represents the four-year Forward Estimates governments and the private sector. The SEQ Infrastructure Plan outlines period of the state budget. It shows current significant infrastructure projects to support funding commitments for the nominated

18 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part A: Context of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan

Table 2 Estimated investment identified in this infrastructure plan

Estimated investment to 2026 Infrastructure class $M Transport (including investigations) 94,624 Industry development 136 Water 4,559 Energy 3,312 Health 5,804 Education and training 2,901 Community services 3,570 Sport and recreation 184 Completed projects (2004-05 to 2008-09) 9,128 Total 124,218

Note: A. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. B. Infrastructure projects have been indexed to account for inflation and expected increases in construction costs. Refer below. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, their timing is subject to negotiation with the federal government.

infrastructure projects in 2009 dollars and Cost estimates used in this Infrastructure investment is classified into five the timing for delivery of the projects. types depending on the level of investigation, SEQ Infrastructure Plan approval and progress as follows: Second phase All cost estimates provided in the SEQ Type 0 = Pre-project estimate: the earliest From 2013 14 to 2018 19: this phase Infrastructure Plan represent the best estimate of project cost and is undertaken complements the first phase and forms information available at present. before a concept design. It is generally a planning period that aims to meet the based on the cost of similar projects plus strategic infrastructure objectives for the Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars a contingency. region, with estimated investment in to allow price consistency over the full 2009 dollars. timeframe of the program. Estimates in the Type 1 = Concept estimate: typically state budget and other documents may differ, undertaken in the initial planning stages, Third phase as they may incorporate costs that reflect and based on a concept design. From 2019 20 to 2025 26: this anticipated changes in input prices between Type 2 = Pre-market estimate: based phase represents the longer term initial planning and the time of construction. on a more detailed review of scope and planning horizon of the SEQ Regional Brisbane City Council projects are shown in requirements. This estimate is determined Plan. It includes infrastructure that out-turn dollars. after the government has assessed the is currently projected to be required Rounding has been applied to projects with costs and benefits of a project. over the longer term and which will a pre-project or concept cost estimate be confirmed in future versions of Type 3 = Market price: the price agreed (type 0, 1 or 2). the SEQ Infrastructure Plan. Project with the contractor. It is no longer an costs are estimated in 2009 dollars. The level of planning that underpins the estimate nor is it a cost, since it has not cost estimates varies with each project. been incurred. The SEQ Infrastructure Plan identifies key Where detailed investigations have been regional infrastructure investments by state Type 4 = Completed project cost: the total completed and funding approved by the agencies and government-owned corporations. cost of the project, which will normally Queensland Government, estimates in the It also refers to some federal and local consist of the market price plus any SEQ Infrastructure Plan reflect approved government projects relevant to the variations. funding. Estimates for projects scheduled SEQ Regional Plan. Where funding for delivery beyond the first phase of the Large projects comprising a number of contributions are expected to be provided by plan are unlikely to have undergone subprojects may fall under two or more of the the federal government and local government, detailed evaluation and generally include investment categories and this is reflected in these are noted. However, the timing and a contingency margin to reflect various the tables. the delivery of these projects are not under project uncertainties. the control of the Queensland Government. Where projects involve a subsidy payment to local government (for example, in the water sector), the expected Queensland Government funding allocation involved is outlined, pending agreement with local government on timing and implementation. 19 Part B Infrastructure classes Transport

Significant population growth in South East Queensland Capacity has led to a marked increase in public transport patronage, Building on additional infrastructure investment private vehicle use, and freight movements. by providing more public transport infrastructure, including rail upgrades and extensions, busways, The SEQ Infrastructure Plan brings together all government bus priority measures and station upgrades to planning documents to address the growing transport needs complement major arterial road construction and of the region and is the key document used for identifying tunnel projects. projects that help tackle congestion in South East Queensland. Some of the recent achievements in relation to urban congestion include:

„„New early morning trains from Caboolture Pricing and travel demand and Ipswich, catering for an extra 15 000 Tackling urban commuters per week Creating incentives for more efficient use of „„The introduction of specialised police the existing network through travel demand patrols of state roads in peak times congestion management measures such as discounted to coordinate quicker clearance of multiple and longer journeys on public The Queensland Government is working broken-down vehicles, or vehicles transport. These measures encourage less to minimise urban congestion through obstructing traffic private vehicle travel, particularly during peak providing quality public transport linking „„Introduction of open roads legislation that congestion periods. to major centres, building and maintaining gives police authority to efficiently clear an orbital motorway system, managing stricken vehicles holding up traffic and travel demand and developing the Principal Travel options their cargo from the road Cycle Network. An Urban Congestion Creating a public transport and active „„Two specially designed heavy-duty tow Taskforce has been established to tackle transport network that is accessible, frequent trucks located on the Gateway and Ipswich congestion across South East Queensland and reliable. Funding goes to more cycling and Logan Motorways to reduce the and is looking at innovative solutions facilities, efficient bus-rail interchanges and clearance time of incidents from an average through the following five core themes. more public transport, including buses and of three hours to an average of 30 minutes new rail rollingstock. „„Investment in major cycle facilities Land use and planning including the Boggo Road cycleway, Toowong cycle and pedestrian overpass Creating development patterns across South Efficiency and Royal Brisbane and Women’s East Queensland, reducing the need for travel, Maximising the efficiency of existing Hospital end of trip cycle facility, which through integrated planning and providing infrastructure investments through optimising all allow access to a sustainable and support for transit oriented developments. the capacity and convenience of public transport reliable transport mode that provides an networks, motorways and arterial roads. alternative to private vehicle travel trips. 21 Key to reducing urban congestion is smarter delivery of transport infrastructure. The SEQ Infrastructure Plan supports this aim in conjunction with other government initiatives: Free-flow tolling in South How free-flow tolling works „ to manage travel demand and alleviate Using electronic tolling systems in place East Queensland traffic congestion and freight bottlenecks of cash toll booths removes the need to The Queensland Government is committed stop or slow down to pay tolls. Tolls are „ to contribute to the government s climate to delivering an integrated road network calculated using an electronic tag placed in change response strategy with initiatives that connects Queenslanders and supports the vehicle or video tolling technology to such as reducing the need to travel and the needs of our growing population. capture the details of a number plate. The updating road design standards On 1 July 2009 free-flow tolling was toll is charged to the account holder as they „ to provide for and promote the use introduced in South East Queensland. travel through a tolling point. of more sustainable transport (public This will change the way road users Roads in South East Queensland to use transport, walking and cycling) as travel on and pay for toll roads. free-flow tolling will include the Gateway convenient, accessible and reliable Free-flow tolling will play an important Motorway and Logan Motorway by July 2009. alternatives to private vehicle travel trips part in managing traffic congestion and Additionally the Clem7 tunnel, Hale Street „ by balancing infrastructure construction improving safety on Queensland roads. Link and Airport Link will also use free-flow with improving public transport service Road users can plan their cross-town travel tolling when they open. levels and policy initiatives to deliver with greater confidence due to increased better value for money travel time reliability and simplicity of travel. Benefits „ by using technology, such as intelligent Free-flow tolling is now accepted nationally transport systems, to better manage the and internationally as standard practice in transport network and improve efficiency planning and operating toll roads. It offers of existing infrastructure many benefits: „ by using best practice project costing and „ Reduction in driver distraction, merging assessment methods to reliably prioritise traffic at toll booths and driver transport system investments and ensure frustration at the need to slow down value for money in a tightening fiscal „ Removing the need to slow down and environment stop to pay tolls means less emissions „ through alternative funding and which is better for the environment project delivery approaches including „ Lower fuel consumption and reduced increased use of public private and wear and tear on tyres and brakes. intergovernmental partnerships.

22 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

Meeting transport challenges will increasingly Supporting cycling in „ Cycleways are under development in require different levels of government and the conjunction with the Gateway Upgrade private sector to work in partnership. The state South East Queensland Project and the combined Airport Link and will continue to work in partnership with the Northern Busway project In November 2007 the government released federal government through the Infrastructure the Principal Cycle Network Plan (PCNP) for „ The King George Square Cycle Centre, Australia program and the Building Australia South East Queensland. The PCNP provides a Brisbane City s premier cycling facility Fund to improve relevant road and rail framework for future cycle network planning became operational in May 2008 and corridors to resolve priority infrastructure and infrastructure in the region. The Cycle provides 420 bicycle parking spots, issues including urban traffic congestion. Network Program has been established to change rooms and showers and other The Queensland Government has implement the PCNP through a comprehensive services to cyclists in the CBD. acknowledged the possible impact of climate capital works and capital grants program. The change in considering transport decisions, program is managed by Smart Travel Centre Connecting SEQ 2031 such as improving road design standards and Queensland and some key projects include: choosing vehicle fleets. For example, the new The Queensland Government is currently „ Stage one of the Brassall Bikeway Houghton Highway is designed to withstand preparing a new regional transport plan for Connection, a 2.9 kilometre off-road a one-in-2000-year storm event, reflecting South East Queensland titled Connecting bikeway linking the Ipswich city centre with engineering lessons learned internationally SEQ 2031: An Integrated Regional Transport Brassall was completed in February 2009 after Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in Plan for South East Queensland. 2005. The duplicate Houghton Highway Bridge „ The Toowong Cycle and Pedestrian Connecting SEQ 2031 will provide a will be approximately four metres higher than Overpass opened in March 2009 providing regional transport plan that serves the the existing bridge. This ensures Redcliffe a much safer way for people to get long term needs of the people living, will keep this vital link to Brisbane in the across the Centenary Highway between working, recreating and conducting aftermath of a severe storm. Mt Coot-tha Road and the Bicentennial business in South East Queensland. Bikeway near the Toowong roundabout Furthermore, the government s public It will respond to new and emerging transport transport and heavy vehicle fleets are „ As part of the Boggo Road busway project challenges, support the review of the gradually being converted to more efficient, a cycleway link and overpass will connect SEQ Regional Plan and the SEQ Infrastructure lower emission vehicles. O Keefe Street in Buranda over Ipswich Plan while presenting a strategic framework Road to the new Princess Alexandra Given growth and development in the for developing the future transport network Hospital bus station finishing at Kent region, the government recognises for the region. The Connecting SEQ 2031 Street near Dutton Park rail station. It will the importance of securing transport draft plan will be released in late 2009 be operational by late 2009 corridors to meet long-term requirements. and residents of South East Queensland The SEQ Infrastructure Plan includes a „ A state-of-the-art cycle centre at the Royal will have an opportunity to provide their number of ongoing strategic and corridor Brisbane and Women s Hospital is being ideas and comments on the plan. investigations to assess future transport constructed as part of the Northern Busway needs, identify corridors that need to be preserved and commence land acquisition.

23 Public TransLink Transit Authority Public transport The TransLink Transit Authority began patronage operating on 1 July 2008 and is the statutory Growth in public transport usage across transport body responsible for improving and expanding South East Queensland has soared almost public transport services across South East 40 per cent since 2004. Approximately Queensland. Customers can now access a new initiatives 174 million passenger trips were undertaken single point of contact for public transport on the TransLink network in 2007–08, Successful first year of services, information and feedback 24 hours up from 163 million during 2006–07. The a day, seven days a week. The authority is the go card increase in demand is due to a number of responsible for coordinating all TransLink After being introduced in January 2008 to factors including the success of integrated public transport services across all modes the TransLink network, the roll-out of the ticketing, the roll-out of extra public in the region, and managing passenger paperless ticketing system across the entire transport services and infrastructure and infrastructure including railway station TransLink network was completed in June the boosted frequency of services. upgrades, park ‘n’ ride facilities, bus stations 2008. Cutting-edge technology enables and stops. Transport station upgrades will be passengers to seamlessly travel on TransLink’s constructed to improve disability access. bus, rail and ferry services, making public transport quicker and easier. Public transport users have embraced the go card, with over 200 000 go cards in circulation by early December 2008—six months ahead of Figure 7 – Public transport patronage predictions. South East Queensland is using Australia’s largest public transport system to successfully roll out smart card technology.

(Source – TransLink 2009)

24 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Transport

Map 2 Transport infrastructure subregions

25 A significant share of the region s population Priority infrastructure Western Corridor growth will occur in the Western Corridor from Wacol through Ipswich City to Amberley projects and includes Ebenezer, Swanbank, Ripley „ Reducing traffic congestion, upgrading The Western Corridor subregion Valley and Springfield. This corridor will also capacity and improving safety on existing be a focus for new industrial development. is defined in this plan as the key links, especially the Ipswich Motorway , the Scenic Development in the Western Corridor is a key Rim Regional Council, the feature of the SEQ Regional Plan to encourage The efficiency and safety of the Ipswich residential and industrial growth away from Motorway is paramount. It is a key Lockyer Valley and Somerset the coast. Timely provision of transport interstate and inter-regional commuter and Regional Council and the part infrastructure to support this development in freight route linking the Western Corridor of the Toowoomba Regional the Western Corridor will be vital. to the rest of South East Queensland. A partnership between the Queensland Council formerly identified Table 3 outlines a transport infrastructure and federal governments will deliver the as Toowoomba City. investment program for the Western Corridor. Dinmore to Gailes section of the Motorway To support population and employment by 2012 13. opportunities around the centres of Ipswich, Springfield and Ripley Valley, the program „ Improvements in capacity on the Ipswich focuses on: rail line

„ reducing traffic congestion, upgrading The Ipswich line is being upgraded with capacity and improving safety on existing additional rail tracks in various locations key links, especially the Ipswich Motorway to provide more capacity for both commuter and freight trains. „ improving and providing new roads and public transport facilities to service „ Improving and providing new road and growing population centres public transport links

„ development of the Principal Cycle Network New public transport infrastructure is needed to link the Ipswich city centre „ investigating the long-term transport with recently developed precincts requirements of the subregion and such as The University of Queensland preserving transport corridors to cater for Ipswich Campus and Springfield Town future growth. Centre, and the future Yamanto and Ripley Valley town centres, Swanbank Business Park and Redbank Plains South. A corridor is being preserved to service these centres in the future.

26 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

As the first integrated road and rail Progress on transport Transport investigations project ever delivered in Queensland, construction of the first stage of the rail projects in the Western To provide certainty, preserve corridors and four-lane road to Springfield has Corridor in 2008 09 and assist other planning, the following commenced and is progressing well. strategic transport investigations and corridor The works include rail from Darra on the „ Works are underway on the Logan identification projects are underway. Ipswich line to a new station at Richlands Motorway Ipswich Motorway interchange „ Southern Freight Rail Corridor and a four-lane extension of the Centenary and on the upgrade of the Wacol to Darra Highway to north of the Logan Motorway. section of the Ipswich Motorway with To boost future rail freight capacity in Ultimately, the project will deliver a four- completions expected in 2009 and 2010 the region, and separate freight activity lane extension of the Centenary Highway respectively. from sensitive residential areas, a study from the Ipswich Motorway to Springfield, „ The Ipswich rail line is being upgraded of the preferred alignment for a dedicated including a new Logan Motorway to cater for the public transport needs freight-only corridor is being finalised. interchange, and a new rail line between of existing and future residents in the This corridor, eventually comprising a Darra and Springfield. Western Corridor. Construction has preferred dual-gauge freight rail line commenced on the third and fourth tracks would connect emerging industrial „ Supporting active transport modes from Corinda to Darra and upgrades of precincts in the Ipswich area, particularly Cycling infrastructure continues to be Oxley and Darra stations with completion Ebenezer, with the standard-gauge planned and delivered in the subregion. expected in early 2010. interstate rail line in the vicinity of the „ Construction of Darra to Springfield Bromelton Enterprise Precinct. These sites Transport Corridor Project (stage one Darra have been identified as being strategically to Richlands) commenced in July 2008 and located to take advantage of this next is expected to be completed by 2011. phase of industrial development.

„ The pedestrian and cycle bridge „ Logan Motorway Upgrade investigations (Springfield Link Bridge) near Woodcrest College over the road rail corridor was Upgrades to the Logan Motorway are completed in October 2008. needed to meet forecast passenger and freight demand, service emerging „ To provide access to the future Ripley logistics hubs and integrate with Valley community and emerging industry capacity improvements currently under at Yamanto, a two-lane extension of the construction on, or scheduled for, Centenary Highway from Springfield to the Ipswich and Gateway motorways. Yamanto was completed in June 2009. An investigation is underway to „ Construction of the Brassall Bikeway determine these essential upgrades. Connection stage one, a 2.9-kilometre off-road bikeway linking the Ipswich city centre with Brassall was completed in February 2009.

27 Map 3a - Western Corridor transport infrastructure

28 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

Map 3b - Toowoomba transport infrastructure

29 Table 3 - Western Corridor and Toowoomba transport infrastructure

Maps Estimated Estimate Completed Delivery timeframe 3a and Project investment category projects 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 3b ref $M (see note D) $M to 2012-13 2018-19 to 2025-26 Motorways, highways, major roads 3.1 Ipswich Motorway upgrade: Dinmore to Darra to Rocklea 3,678 0 & 3 Timing subject to federal contributions 3.2 Ipswich Motorway upgrade: Logan Motorway interchange 255 3

3.3 Toowoomba Bypass 1,390 2 & 4 Timing subject to federal contributions

3.4 Cunningham Highway to Warrego Highway connection 83 1 & 4 Timing subject to federal contributions

3.5 Cunningham Highway four lanes: Ripley Road to Ebenezer 950 0 & 1 Timing subject to federal contributions 3.6 Centenary Highway four lanes: Ipswich Motorway to Springfield 1,128 2 & 3

3.7 Western Ipswich Bypass: new road and interchange 600 0 & 1 Timing subject to federal contributions 3.8 Western Ipswich Bypass: five-mile bridge 55 0 & 1 Timing subject to federal contributions Southern Infrastructure Corridor (road: Yatala to Cunningham 60 0 Highway) Study 3.9 Warrego Highway-Brisbane Valley highway interchange 254 1 & 4 Timing subject to federal contributions 3.10 Warrego Highway: Muirlea interchange and service roads 230 0 Timing subject to federal contributions 3.11 Warrego Highway: safety improvements Ipswich to Gatton 40 0 3.12 Warrego Highway: Toowoomba intersection upgrades 90 0 Timing subject to federal contributions Intelligent Transport Systems (to manage congestion) 65 0 3.13 Gatton to Esk road upgrade 35 1 3.14 Centenary Highway two lanes: Springfield to Yamanto 4 366 Completed 2008-09 Centenary Highway Boundary Road underpass (joint Brisbane City 3.15 4 43 Completed 2007-08 Council and Main Roads project) Ipswich Motorway alternative northern corridor investigation 4 10 Completed 2007-08 3.16 Warrego Highway: Plainlands interchange 4 14 Completed 2005-06 Walking and cycling Subregional cycle network 55 1 to 3 Busways and bus priority Centenary Highway bus priority/transit lanes Ipswich Motorway to 3.17 340 0 Toowong High-occupancy vehicle network program 80 1 TransLink subregional station upgrade program 132 1 to 3 Rail infrastructure 3.18 Ipswich rail line Corinda to Darra, Darra to Redbank third rail track 521 1 & 3 3.19 Springfield passenger rail line 837 1 & 3 3.20 Ipswich to Springfield rail line 1,500 1 3.21 Gowrie to Grandchester rail line 1,400 1 Southern Freight Rail Corridor Study (Rail: Ebenezer to interstate 4 3 standard gauge rail) 3.22 Ipswich to Springfield Public Transport Corridor Study 4 4 Completed 2007-08 Total 13,782 437

Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed or a stage of a project completed, it is noted in the table.

30 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Transport

Greater Brisbane is expected to house a large Priority infrastructure Greater proportion of the total development proposed for South East Queensland. In outer areas projects such as Caboolture and Redland, most of this „ Providing quality public transport Brisbane development will occur on broadhectare sites. infrastructure and services to link activity Within Brisbane city an increasing amount centres with the CBD The Greater Brisbane of redevelopment will occur around existing subregion is defined in this activity centres (such as the Brisbane CBD, This will improve access to major centres infrastructure plan as the Chermside and Indooroopilly), public transport as well as provide a link to activity centres nodes and infill development sites (sites with CBD public transport infrastructure, cities of Brisbane, Logan and intended for development). Table 4 outlines such as railways and busways. They are Redland; and the Moreton a transport infrastructure investment program being expanded and upgraded in areas Bay Regional Council area. for the Greater Brisbane area. Strategic where the SEQ Regional Plan encourages transport needs in this area include: growth. Plans are underway to build new and expand existing busways along „ providing quality public transport northern, southern and eastern transport infrastructure and services to improve corridors. Priority busway projects include access to major centres as well as along key the Northern Busway (Royal Children s routes linking these centres with the CBD Hospital Windsor Kedron), continuing „ building and maintaining a high-standard work on the Boggo Road Busway and orbital motorway system Eastern Busway (Princess Alexandra Hospital Buranda Mains Avenue „ managing congestion and travel demand section). For rail, new rollingstock is „ development of the Principal Cycle Network continuing to be delivered as well as a program of station and line upgrades. „ increasing road capacity and efficiency to cater for growth

„ investigating the long-term transport requirements of the subregion and preserving transport corridors.

31 „ Building and maintaining a high-standard The Airport Link toll road will be „ Increasing road capacity to cater orbital motorway system 7 kilometres long and includes a for growth 5.7-kilometre tunnel. It will connect the A quality orbital road network is Construction is well underway on the Clem7 tunnel, Inner City Bypass and necessary to link centres outside the Houghton Highway bridge duplication local road network at Bowen Hills to the inner city, particularly the Australia and bus priority project at Redcliffe. The northern arterials of Gympie Road and TradeCoast and to preserve mobility project features three traffic lanes, a Stafford Road at Kedron and Sandgate for inter-regional freight. Construction pedestrian and cycle path and a dedicated Road and the East West Arterial in the is progressing on Queensland s largest fishing platform, and is scheduled for north-east. Construction commenced road and bridge project, the Gateway completion in 2011. The upgrade of in early 2009 and is scheduled for Upgrade Project, with completion the Pine Rivers to Caboolture section completion by 2012. expected by mid 2011. This project of the Bruce Highway to six lanes is includes duplication of the Gateway „ Development of the Principal Cycle Network scheduled for completion in 2009. The Bridge and an upgrade of 20 kilometres Uhlmann Road to Caboolture section will Active transport choices, such as cycling of motorway. Advanced technology, be the final section to be completed. and walking, are being encouraged and including intelligent transport systems, Upgrading the Mt Lindesay Highway from this plan identifies the infrastructure will be installed to better manage the Green Road to Rosia Road is underway necessary to achieve it. The construction Greater Brisbane motorway system. with completion expected in late 2009. of improved cycle infrastructure includes Preliminary work towards upgrading „ Managing congestion and travel demand the Toowong Cycle and Pedestrian the Pacific Motorway from Springwood Overpass completed March 2009, a Planning for the grade separation of the to Daisy Hill, including work on the cycleway as part of the Boggo Road Mains Road-Kessels Road intersection in Loganlea interchange, has commenced. Busway project, Royal Brisbane and Brisbane s south is well advanced and Women s Hospital Cycle Centre, and the will reduce traffic congestion and social Kurilpa Bridge at North Quay currently impacts on the Brisbane Urban Corridor. under construction. The subregional The new Clem7 (previously known as cycle network will continue to be North South Bypass Tunnel) and Airport expanded through the rollout of the Link projects will help relieve congestion Cycle Network Program. The Queensland in Brisbane. Construction of Brisbane Government also has a range of capital City Council s Clem7 tunnel, which will works projects in cooperation with provide a direct cross river link between local governments through a dollar- Woolloongabba and Bowen Hills, is due for-dollar capital grants program. for completion in 2010.

32 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

Progress on transport both river piers. Free flow tolling was Road bus lane in southern Brisbane. introduced on 1 July 2009 and several of Other projects commenced in 2009 are projects in Greater the free flow tolling gantries, replacing Greenbank RSL park n ride expansion, Brisbane in 2008 09 tolling booths, have been installed across Dinmore rail station park n ride and both the Gateway and Logan motorways. Moggill Road park n ride. „ Construction continues on the Northern „ Tunnelling works for Brisbane City Busway (Royal Children s Hospital to Council s Clem7 tunnel is progressing. Windsor) and is due for completion late Transport investigations Florence, the southbound tunnel 2009. Construction of the Windsor to The following studies explore options for the boring machine has completed its Kedron section (in conjunction with Airport further development of the transport network 4.3 kilometre journey from Bowen Hills Link) has commenced. in the Greater Brisbane area. to Woolloongabba. The northbound tunnel „ Section one of the Eastern Busway boring machine, Matilda, broke through „ Western Brisbane Transport between the Princess Alexandra Hospital at Woolloongabba in late May 2009. Network Investigation (PAH) and Buranda is under construction „ Construction is well underway on the The Western Brisbane Transport Network and due for completion by August 2009. grade separation of Beaudesert Road and Investigation is a major study that guides „ Section two of the Eastern Busway the interstate rail line at Acacia Ridge and development of the transport network between Buranda and Main Avenue has is expected to be completed in 2010. This across western Brisbane for 20 years and commenced, with detailed design and project will eliminate waiting times for beyond. The investigation identifies a community consultation underway. motorists and provide options for future number of initiatives that are required to expansion of the rail road inter-modal meet the expected growth in travel that „ The Boggo Road Busway (Eleanor Schonell freight terminal at Acacia Ridge. necessitates additional infrastructure and Bridge to PAH) is on schedule and is due enhanced public transport services in the to be completed by August 2009. „ Cycle infrastructure is also being sub-region. Information is available at constructed across Brisbane including „ February 2009 saw the final of www.wbtni.net.au the Toowong Cycle and Pedestrian 24 three-car trains (or sets ) delivered Overpass, which was completed in „ East West Arterial Planning Study and for use in the QR network. Building March 2009. Another cycleway, as part Corridor Preservation of an additional 20 three-car trains of the Boggo Road Busway, is due has commenced. Delivery will be The SEQ Infrastructure Plan includes a to be complete late 2009. The Royal progressively rolled out until late 2010. planning study and corridor preservation Brisbane and Women s Hospital Cycle for Stafford Road in Brisbane s north „ Significant progress has been achieved Centre will be complete in late 2009. west, from Gympie Road to South on the Gateway Upgrade Project. „ The TransLink sub-regional station Pine Road in Everton Park. The final Construction of the bridge s 10-span, upgrade program is currently underway outcomes of the Western Brisbane 700 metre, northern approach is now including the University of Sunshine Transport Network Investigation will complete and work on the main river Coast bus station upgrade and Klumpp guide the scope of this study. span segments is now underway at

33 „„Brisbane – Gold Coast Transport tunnel options to increase rail capacity. employment and economic hub in Network Investigation The federal government contributed the region by 2026. Sponsors include $20 million to undertake a Brisbane Inner the Port of Brisbane Corporation, the The Brisbane – Gold Coast Transport City Rail feasibility study, to determine Brisbane Airport Corporation, state Network Investigation is a major study potential route alignment, construction and local government agencies and that will evaluate the long-term transport timetables and a preferred funding model. Australia TradeCoast. Some of the needs between Brisbane and the Gold This study has commenced and will be challenges the study will address Coast, including east–west connections, to complete by mid 2011. include capacity constraints and the support the region’s continuing economic anticipated doubling of freight and development. Like other recent studies, it „„Gateway Motorway (Nudgee Road – increased travel in the next 20 years, will examine the contribution that can be Bruce Highway) on both the road and rail networks. made by all transport modes across this Ongoing development of the Australia highly urbanised and rapidly growing area. „„Moreton Bay Integrated Transport Study TradeCoast and increasing north–south „„Further TransApex investigations transport movements through Brisbane The Moreton Bay Regional Council city will continue to place demand on the is experiencing rapid population Brisbane City Council has completed a Gateway Motorway. A study is underway growth. State and local governments detailed feasibility study of the Northern developing upgrade options to improve are working together to identify how Link proposal as part of its TransApex safety on the motorway and cater for transport networks can be integrated plan. Northern Link is a proposed tunnel increased travel demand, focusing on the to best serve the land use pattern and toll road project, approximately 16 kilometres of the Gateway Motorway envisaged for this sub-region in 2031. 4.5 kilometres long, linking the Western from Nudgee Road to the Bruce Highway. Freeway at the Toowong roundabout to „„Western and north western public the Inner City Bypass at Kelvin Grove. „„Mt Lindesay – Beaudesert Strategic transport corridor studies and Gympie Council released its Environmental Impact Transport Network Investigation Road Transit Study Statement (EIS) for public and agency The Mt Lindesay – Beaudesert Strategic This investigation will include detailed comment in the second half of 2008. Transport Network Investigation is planning for three projects: bus rapid The submission period for the Northern considering the pedestrian, cyclist, public transit between Kenmore and the Link Environmental Impact Statement transport, freight and road infrastructure Brisbane CBD via Moggill Road and has closed and the evaluation will be requirements for the area. The Coronation Drive corridors, an extension conducted by the Coordinator-General. investigation covers new developments, of proposed bus rapid transit from the In 2007, the federal government such as Yarrabilba, Flagstone, Greenbank, Northern Busway at Kedron to Bracken announced partial funds for this project. Park Ridge and the Bromelton Enterprise Ridge within or parallel to the Gympie „„Increased rail capacity in inner Brisbane Precinct. To support population growth Road corridor and public transport in the Mt Lindesay – Beaudesert area, a priority from the north-western suburbs Brisbane’s inner city rail network is further study will consider an alignment to the Brisbane CBD. the ‘hub’ of the rail network in South of a north-south arterial road east of the East Queensland. Its capacity limits the „„South East Queensland High Occupancy Mt Lindesay Highway that would connect number of additional trains that can be Vehicle Network Strategy and Plan with the planned southern infrastructure introduced on the lines servicing the corridor linking Yatala and Ebenezer. A High Occupancy Vehicle network whole region. Given the existing growth in strategy and implementation plan demand, service increases and proposed „„Salisbury to Beaudesert Passenger will promote efficient priority ehiclev extensions to the rail network, by 2016 Rail Study movement, and ensure a consistent the limited capacity of the Merivale Bridge The Salisbury to Beaudesert Passenger planning approach across all subregions. and the existing CBD rail tunnels will Rail Study will identify and preserve These strategies and plans will be significantly constrain rail services through rail corridor land suitable for possible developed as part of a broader state-wide inner Brisbane. The initial Inner City Rail future passenger rail infrastructure. policy to inform the allocation of road Capacity Study was completed in January The study will identify engineering space in South East Queensland. 2009. It identified the options available feasibility, including rail station locations for increasing capacity and assessed that integrate with the proposed them. Options included support for an urban pattern of development. integrated inner city transport network and for future expansion of the CBD and „„Australia TradeCoast Transport Study inner city. The study found the track The Australia TradeCoast Transport capacity of the inner city rail network will Study is funded by several agencies need to be doubled by 2026. The state in South East Queensland, concerned government has released the outcomes with developing a transport system of the study, which included underground that contributes to the growth of the Australia TradeCoast area as a significant

34 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Transport

Map 4 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan transport infrastructure

35 Table 4 - Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan transport infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 4 Completed Project investment Category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Motorways, highways, major roads Gateway Motorway upgrade: Mt Gravatt–Capalaba Road to Nudgee 4.1 1,866 3 Road including Gateway Bridge duplication Gateway Motorway upgrade: Mt Gravatt–Capalaba Road to 4.2 1,200 0 Timing subject to federal contributions Pacific Motorway 4.3 Gateway Motorway upgrade: Nudgee to Bruce Highway 2,600 0 Timing subject to federal contributions 4.4 Pacific Motorway Upgrade: Gateway to Logan Motorway 1,900 1 & 2 Timing subject to federal contributions 4.5 Pacific Motorway upgrade: Juliette Street to Klumpp Road 90 0 4.6 Clem7 (North–South Bypass Tunnel)(BCC project) 2,088 3 4.7 Airport Link 3,302 3 4.8 Northern Link: Toowong to Kelvin Grove (BCC project) 1,800 0 4.9 Hale Street Link (BCC project) 370 3 4.10 Logan Motorway upgrade: Ipswich Motorway to Pacific Motorway 4,000 0 4.11 East–West Arterial upgrade: Airport Link to Gateway Motorway 301 3 4.12 Kenmore Bypass: Western Freeway to Moggill Road 350 0 Brisbane Urban Corridor (Granard Road & Kessels Road) 4.13 1,100 0, 1 & 2 Timing subject to federal contributions intersection upgrades 4.14 Mt Lindesay Highway upgrade: Green Road to 573 0,1,3 & 4 4.15 Port of Brisbane Motorway 1,300 1 4.16 North–South Arterial: Mango Hill 340 0 Redland sub-arterial road upgrade: Mt Gravatt–Capalaba Road to 4.17 190 2 Tingalpa Creek Cleveland–Redland Bay Road upgrade: South Street to Boundary 4.18 70 2 Road Redland Bay Road upgrade: Tingalpa Creek to Cleveland–Redland 4.19 80 2 Bay Road 4.20 Deception Bay Road upgrade: Bruce Highway to Lipscombe Road 95 1 Burpengary–Caboolture Road upgrade: Bruce Highway to 4.21 140 2 Gaffield Street 4.22 East–west links: Caboolture to Bribie Island Road additional lanes 320 0 & 1 Bruce Highway intersection upgrades: Pumicestone Road, 4.23 210 0 Boundary Road and Bribie Island Road 4.24 Houghton Highway duplication and bus priority 314 3 Logan Road intersection upgrade: Miles Platting Road– 4.25 11 0 Padstow Road Bruce Highway: additional lanes from Boundary Road to 4.26 411 3 & 4 Caboolture Intelligent Transport Systems (to manage congestion) 80 0 4.27 Caboolture Northern Bypass 4 89 Completed 2007-08 4.28 Linkfield Connection Road 4 30 Completed 2005-06 Walking and cycling Subregional Cycle Network 223 1 to 4 4.29 Kurilpa Bridge 63 3 4.30 Additional pedestrian/cycle bridge in the CBD 90 0 4.31 Pacific Motorway Bikeway 16 2, 3 & 4 Subregional Walking Network Program 170 0 Busways and bus priority Northern Busway: Royal Children’s Hospital to Kedron to 4.32 2,635 1 & 3 Bracken Ridge 4.33 Eastern Busway: Buranda to Capalaba 3,264 1 & 3 Eastern Busway: Buranda to Princess Alexandra Hospital to Boggo 4.34 358 3 Road to Eleanor Schonell Bridge 4.35 South East Busway: extension to Springwood 230 1 4.36 Brisbane Cross River Bus Access 430 0

36 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Transport

Table 4 continued - Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan transport infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 4 Completed Project investment Category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 SEQ HOV Network Program 460 1 TransLink subregional station upgrade 331 1 to 4 4.37 Redland bus priority measures 130 1 4.38 Inner Northern Busway improvements and new busway stations 4 493 Completed 2007-08 Rail infrastructure 4.39 Mitchelton to Keperra to Ferny Grove track duplication 104 1 & 4 1 or more stages complete 4.40 Lawnton to Petrie third rail track 95 1 4.41 Petrie to Redcliffe Rail Corridor (including study) (F) 550 1 New passenger rail stock (78 x three-car sets) 1,012 2 & 3 New passenger rail stock (40 x three-car sets) 600 0 Grade separation of Mt Lindesay Highway and interstate rail, 4.42 139 3 Acacia Ridge 4.43 Metropolitan freight capacity upgrades 98 1 & 3 4.44 Inner City Rail Capacity 15,000 1 4.45 Cleveland Rail Corridor upgrades 375 1 4.46 Sandgate to Shorncliffe rail duplication 40 1 Train Servicing Depot 240 1 Port infrastructure Port of Brisbane Infrastructure 2,265 4.47 Berth and Wharf 11 & 12 ($342M) 4.48 Hamilton Site Redevelopment ($65M) Transport Investigations Western Brisbane transport network investigation 19 3 Mt Lindesay Beaudesert strategic transport network investigation 1 3 Gympie Arterial investigation and preservation: Stafford Road to 60 0 Roghan Road Stafford Road investigation and preservation: Gympie Road to 65 0 South Pine Road Brisbane Gold Coast transport network investigation 25 1 Acacia Ridge intermodal access: road network investigations 2 1 Gateway Motorway: Nudgee Road to Bruce Highway 6 3 Planning Study Gateway Motorway extension south of Logan Motorway 70 0 investigation and preservation New Transport Investigations 18 2 Public Transport corridor preservation 250 1 Northern Link: Toowong to Kelvin Grove tunnel investigation 4 5 Completed 2008-09 Inner City Bus Access Capacity Study 4 2 Completed 2008-09 Hamilton/Eagle Farm Transport Investigation 4 0.2 Completed 2007-08 Australian TradeCoast Transport Study 4 1 Completed 2006-07 Further TransApex investigations: Airport Link 4 21 Completed 2006-07 Salisbury to Flagstone/Greenbank passenger rail investigation 4 0.5 Completed 2006-07 Total 54,535 641.7

Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Brisbane City Council projects are shown in out-turn dollars. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed or a stage of a project completed, it is noted in the table. F. Funds include $4 million for a business case and implementation plan by 2010. 37 Although import trade levels are expected usual approach with the port continuing to Port of to slow in 2008 09 in line with the global meet the service and infrastructure needs economy, export markets are looking of the trade and shipping industry. Brisbane promising. With the recent drought-breaking rain, the export of grain and cereals is Progress of Port of expected to perform strongly. The Port of Brisbane is Brisbane projects in Australia s third largest and Despite the slowing in economic growth in the short term, positive growth in the long term 2008 09 fastest growing container is expected and so the ability to expand the „ Completion of the extension of the grain port. It is a key driver of quay-line and terminal space is vital. Berth wharf and terminal in June 2008 and Berth economic growth throughout 10 was commissioned on 3 February 2009 10 in February 2009. South East Queensland. and within the next five years, two more new container berths will be completed and „ Continued works on the general purpose 80 hectares of terminal space developed. The Berth will be completed by the end of 2009. World-class port ability to continue meeting the demands of „ Construction will continue on Berth and long term growth has been assured through Managed by the Port of Brisbane Corporation Wharf 11 and 12 at Fisherman Islands in the construction of a 4.5-kilometre seawall Limited, a Queensland Government-owned order to accommodate the strong growth to enclose an additional 230 hectares. This corporation, the port provides world-class across a range of commodity areas. Berth will enable the construction of up to four new cargo-handling and warehousing facilities. and Wharf 11 is expected to be finalised berths and provide backup land for terminals by 2012 and Berth and Wharf 12 is Progressively developed since 1976, the port and other port-related uses. is a modern, purpose-built 750-hectare facility expected to be completed by 2014. at the mouth of the Brisbane River, just The port is well connected to major 24 kilometres from Brisbane s CBD. Unlike its road infrastructure and improvements to competitor ports in Sydney and Melbourne, transport corridors are designed to keep the Port of Brisbane is unencumbered pace with the ongoing construction of by urban encroachment and associated port-related infrastructure. To achieve this, operational restrictions. Average annual the Queensland Government works closely container growth over the past 10 years has with the Port of Brisbane Corporation been 12 per cent. In 2007 08, there was Limited and the federal government. record total trade of 30.2 million tonnes On 2 June 2009, the Queensland Government equating to 7.7 per cent growth from the announced its intention to sell the Port of previous year and representing the 15th year Brisbane Corporation Limited s business and of continuous growth. Container trade reached assets. It is expected that the sale of the almost 943 000 twenty-foot containers (or Port of Brisbane Corporation Limited will equivalent units) in 2007 08, and motor take place in the next three to five years vehicle trade grew by 8.1 per cent to reach however in the interim it is a business as approximately 221 000 vehicles.

38 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

The emphasis in this plan is on expanding Priority infrastructure Gold Coast public transport infrastructure and services to relieve traffic congestion and provide more projects travel options for residents. Quality public „ Linking major destinations and coastal transport links are needed to connect the The Gold Coast subregion activity centres with improved public Gold Coast s major centres and developing extends from Yatala in the transport services areas. Road projects will support the north to the New South investment in public transport by providing Various east-west road projects will Wales border in the south. both corridor space for public transport within support continued economic growth and Significant population and the Gold Coast and increased capacity for make best use of the passenger rail line activity growth in this area inter-regional travel demand, particularly for and expanding rail services by providing road freight. additional capacity for public transport will challenge the capability and alleviating traffic congestion between Key priorities include: of the existing local transport existing and emerging activity centres. system. Public transport needs „ linking major destinations and major Smith Street Motorway will be upgraded to play an increasing role coastal activity centres with improved with additional lanes between the Pacific in moving people efficiently public transport services Motorway and Parklands Drive to assist access to the new Gold Coast hospital. within the Gold Coast. „ improving passenger rail services on the Gold Coast rail line „ I mproving passenger rail services on the Gold Coast rail line „ upgrading the Pacific Motorway and other roads to alleviate congestion Sections of track are being duplicated and the rail line extended from Robina „ developing the Principal Cycle Network to Varsity Lakes, with a proposed „ identifying and preserving transport extension south of Varsity Lakes in the corridors to cater for future growth. longer term. The draft site master plan for a transit oriented development at the Varsity Lakes station was released in November 2008 and early stages of land development will commence when the Varsity Lakes Rail Station opens in late 2009. The master plan includes developing residential, retail and office space around the new train station.

39 „ Upgrading the Pacific Motorway and other Progress on transport roads to alleviate congestion projects on the Gold The Pacific Motorway is part of the National Land Transport Network and its Coast in 2008 09 importance as a freight route is growing. „ The Tugun Bypass is now finished, with Upgrading the motorway between Nerang an average of about 44 000 vehicles using and Tugun, and improving local transport the bypass each day. It was opened to connections, are essential investments. traffic on 2 June 2008, six months ahead Interchanges will be upgraded to of schedule. improve safety and capacity. Planning for upgrading the Pacific Motorway from „ Duplication of the rail track between Nerang to Stewart Road is progressing. Helensvale and Robina was completed in Construction on the Nerang south August 2008. Construction is progressing interchange has commenced as the first well on the Robina to Varsity Lakes rail stage. Following completion of the Tugun extension which is due to be complete in Bypass, the interchange section from late 2009. Terminal Drive to Bilinga on the Gold „ Twenty-four new three-car passenger Coast Highway will be upgraded to cater trains have now been built and put into for the change in traffic flows. In Labrador, service. It is expected a further 20 x 3 car the Gold Coast Highway will be widened sets will be delivered by late 2010, with to four lanes from Government Road further orders currently being negotiated. to Robert Street. The widening of Hope Island Road to four lanes from Oxenford „ Planning continues on the Gold Coast to Santa Barbara Road was completed Rapid Transit Project from in September 2008. The next section to Parkwood Helensvale to Broadbeach, Columbus Drive will follow. with the final concept design and impact management plan completed. In „ Preserving the intra-regional transport addition to funding from state and local corridor between Nerang and Stapylton governments, the federal government Preservation of this corridor provides has contributed $365 million towards options to meet future north construction of the Gold Coast Rapid south travel demand within the Transit project, Parkwood to Broadbeach. Gold Coast and improve access to growth areas around Coomera.

40 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

Map 5 Gold Coast transport infrastructure

41 Table 5 – Gold Coast transport infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 5 Completed Project investment category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Motorways, highways, major roads Pacific Motorway: additional lanes and interchange upgrades: 5.1 3,389 1 & 3 Timing subject to federal contributions Nerang to Stewart Road 1 or more stages completed

5.2 Pacific Motorway: Coomera interchange (Foxwell Road) 183 1 & 3 Timing subject to federal contributions 1 or more stages completed 5.3 Pacific Motorway: additional Coomera interchange 120 0 Timing subject to federal contributions Gold Coast Highway: additional lanes from Government Road to 5.4 145 3 & 4 1 or more stages completed Stevens Street 5.5 Smith Street: additional lanes from Pacific Motorway to Olsen Avenue 65 0 Hope Island Road: additional lanes from Pacific Motorway to 5.6 164 3 & 4 Columbus Drive 1 or more stages completed Southport–Nerang Road: additional lanes from Minnie Street to 5.7 95 1 Queen Street Burleigh Connection Road: additional lanes from Mattocks Road to 5.8 40 0 Kortum Drive 5.9 Southport–Burleigh Road: intersection upgrades 95 0 Intra-regional Transport Corridor (corridor preservation): Nerang to 5.10 30 1 Stapylton 5.11 Gold Coast Airport access upgrade 30 0 5.12 Gold Coast University Hospital access 130 0 5.13 Gold Coast Knowledge Precinct access 210 0 Intelligent Transport Systems (to manage congestion) 50 0 Nerang–Broadbeach Road upgrades: bus lanes and intersection 5.14 65 2 & 4 upgrade 1 or more stages completed 5.15 Pacific Motorway: Tugun Bypass 4 543 Completed 2007-08 5.16 Pacific Motorway: Stewart Road Currumbin interchange (Tugun Bypass) 4 17 Completed 2004-05 Walking and cycling Subregional cycle network 139 1 to 3 Busways and bus priority 5.17 Gold Coast Highway: bus priority and bus stations 26 3 & 4 1 or more stages completed High-occupancy vehicle network program 120 1 TransLink subregional station program 133 1 to 4 5.18 Bus priority on Smith Street: Olsen Avenue to Gold Coast Highway 4 7 Completed 2007-08 Rail infrastructure 5.19 Coomera to Helensvale, Kuraby to Kingston: additional tracks 360 1 5.20 Southern extension of rail line: Robina to Elanora 1,159 0 & 3 5.21 Southern extension of rail line: Elanora to Coolangatta 700 0 5.22 Beenleigh to Gold Coast Corridor: additional track and upgrades 110 0 Helensvale to Robina, Salisbury to Kuraby: additional track 5.23 4 328 Completed 2008-09 and upgrades New passenger rail stock: (24 x 3-car sets) 4 289 Completed 2008-09 5.24 Ormeau to Coomera: track duplication 4 20 Completed 2006-07 Public transport infrastructure Gold Coast Rapid Transit Project: Parkwood–Helensvale to 5.25 1,800 2 Broadbeach to Coolangatta Total 9,358 1,204

Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed or a stage of a project completed, it is noted in the table.

42 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Transport

As the residential population expands, Priority infrastructure Sunshine Coast particularly in the emerging areas of Sippy Downs and Caloundra South, and employment projects activity increases, transport demand will „ Providing improved access between The Sunshine Coast subregion increase and its focus will change. To support Maroochydore and Caloundra and private travel, public transport and freight comprises the area administered emerging population centres, including movement, the road network must mature by the Sunshine Coast Regional improved public transport Council, and incorporates to provide adequate access between key community facilities, emerging residential The CoastConnect Caloundra to the former shires of Noosa areas and the existing coastal activity centres. Maroochydore project is being developed and Maroochy and the City Upgrading of the north south and east west to provide a quality public transport of Caloundra. The principal grid road network needs to occur to alleviate network between Caloundra and activity centre for this congestion. The Bruce Highway s important Maroochydore. Corridor options have subregion is Maroochydore, role as the gateway to the rest of the state been identified and potential staging must also be preserved. opportunities and timing of delivery are which accommodates the being investigated. A new bus station Table 6 outlines a transport infrastructure key business, service and at the University of the Sunshine Coast investment program for the Sunshine Coast. retail enterprises. Other is currently being built and construction To support greater self-containment of travel of a dedicated bus access road is due major centres in the region and economic growth within the Sunshine to commence in 2009. A priority is to are Caloundra, Nambour and Coast, the program focuses on: extend the Sunshine Motorway south Noosa. There are emerging „ providing improved access between from the Mooloolah River Interchange centres at Beerwah, Kawana Maroochydore and Caloundra and to Caloundra Road within an existing Town Centre and Sippy Downs emerging population centres, including Multi Modal Transport Corridor (MMTC), and a future major activity improved public transport which is designed to cater for future road and public transport infrastructure. centre at Caloundra South. „ increasing the capacity of the north coast The southern-most section of this new rail line and upgrading connections between motorway between Caloundra Road and the rail line and coastal activity centres Creekside Boulevard was completed in „ enhancing the safety and efficiency of the April 2009. Bruce Highway, a national transport link

„ developing the Principal Cycle Network

„ investigating the long-term transport requirements in the subregion and preserving transport corridors to cater for future growth.

43 „ Increasing the capacity of the north coast Progress on transport „ The Sunshine Motorway Sippy Downs to rail line and upgrading connections between Kawana Way upgrade was completed in the rail line and coastal activity centres projects on the Sunshine July 2008. The north coast rail line is being upgraded Coast in 2008 09 „ The Sunshine Motorway from between Caboolture and Landsborough. Maroochydore Road to Pacific Paradise „ Corridor options have been consulted The first stage, Caboolture to Beerburrum, upgrade was completed in March 2009. on and are being further refined for was operational in April 2009 with two the CoastConnect project (Caloundra „ Construction of the new Caloundra Road new station buildings and 14 kilometres to Maroochydore bus corridor). The to Creekside Boulevard road link was of duplicated track. Planning is underway preparation of the concept design and completed in April 2009. for the remaining 17 kilometre section impact management plan will determine between Beerburrum and Landsborough. „ Maroochydore Road, from the Bruce the preferred alignment, staging and This will reduce travel times between Highway through to Kunda Park, has timing of delivery. these centres. Further improvements in been upgraded to four lanes and was the track s alignment and duplication are „ An additional 14 kilometres of duplicated completed in late 2008. being planned between Landsborough track on the north coast rail line and „ Construction work on Caloundra Road and Nambour. Steve Irwin Way, from the upgrade of two existing stations between between the Bruce Highway and Pierce Mooloolah Connection Road to the Bruce Caboolture and Beerburrum are complete. Avenue was completed in April 2009. This Highway will be duplicated to cater for „ Planning for the upgrade and completes the upgrade of Caloundra Road the increasing traffic volumes between the duplication of the north coast rail line to four lanes. coastal areas and the hinterland. between Landsborough and Nambour „ Construction commenced in March „ Enhancing the safety and efficiency of the is well advanced with the project s 2008 on a new road over the rail line Bruce Highway, a national transport link environmental impact statement connecting Beerwah Parade, Roberts being considered by government. A section of the Bruce Highway from Road, Peachester Road and Steve Irwin Federal to Traveston would be inundated „ Preliminary planning on the approved Way. Construction of Beerwah grade by the lake formed by the proposed alignment and station locations of separation works continue and are Traveston Crossing Dam. Replacing this the CAMCOS rail corridor (Beerwah expected to be complete by late 2009. section of the highway will occur as part to Maroochydore) is complete. of the planned upgrade of the Bruce Planning and impact assessment of Highway between Cooroy and Curra. the alignment at Caloundra South and Maroochydore is underway. „ Supporting active transport modes

Cycling infrastructure continues to be planned in the subregion.

44 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

Transport investigations „ Beerwah to Caloundra to Maroochydore „ General Aviation Strategy Public Transport Corridor part of CAMCOS The first stage of this study has looked To assist future transport infrastructure Planning and land acquisition will at the general aviation needs of the planning and delivery for the Sunshine continue for an integrated public region. Stage two, which commenced in Coast, the following investigations are either transport corridor between Beerwah 2008, has looked at the aviation needs underway or proposed. and Maroochydore on the CAMCOS of the Sunshine Coast in particular, „ Multi Modal Transport Corridor to improve alignment. Refinements to the alignment including a strategy for relocating access to emerging communities at Caloundra South and at the Caloundra services from the existing Caloundra aerodrome site, at Kawana, and into the and Caboolture aerodromes to a new Investigations are underway for the Maroochydore central business centre are facility. A preferred location is to be Multi Modal Transport Corridor between being investigated. identified in 2009 for concept planning Caloundra Road and Maroochydore. These and feasibility studies. The replacement investigations include an extension of „ CoastConnect (Maroochydore to Nambour) aerodrome is scheduled for completion the Sunshine Motorway south from the and CoastConnect (Maroochydore to by the end of 2014 when current leases Mooloolah River Interchange to Creekside Noosa) formerly the Nautillus Study on the Caloundra aerodrome expire. Boulevard together with the Caboolture This project has investigated options for to Maroochydore Corridor Study public transport corridors and nodes to link (CAMCOS). Included in this investigation Maroochydore to Nambour and to Noosa. is an extension of Nicklin Way through the Mooloolah River Interchange and „ Bruce Highway from Caboolture to extending north into Maroochydore. Sunshine Motorway

The Bells Creek connection study The studies will determine the road will examine extending the Creekside transport needs for the Bruce Highway Boulevard to Caloundra Road link further from Caboolture to the Sunshine south to Bells Creek. The study, which will Motorway at Tanawha. The studies look at the potential route and project will focus on protecting the role of the timing, is programmed for 2009 2013. Bruce Highway as part of the national The Sunshine Motorway Study for the network and establishing alternative section from the Kawana Way Interchange routes for trips that would be better to the Mooloolah River Interchange will served by local roads. It will improve determine the infrastructure needed safety by removing all remaining at-grade to complete duplicating the Sunshine intersections (where two or more roads Motorway s east west section and to either meet or cross at the same level) support the MMTC. and reviewing existing interchanges. The studies will guide future investment by the federal and Queensland governments.

45 Map 6 – Sunshine Coast transport infrastructure

46 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Transport

Table 6 Sunshine Coast transport infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 6 Completed Project investment category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Motorways, highways, major roads 6.1 Bruce Highway upgrade: Cooroy to Gympie 3,358 1 & 3 Timing subject to federal contributions Bruce Highway upgrade: corridor preservation Caboolture to 6.2 2 0 Timing subject to federal contributions Caloundra Road 6.3 Bruce Highway upgrade: Caloundra Road to Sunshine Motorway 450 0 Timing subject to federal contributions 6.4 Bruce Highway interchanges: Johnstone Road to Bells Creek Road 120 0 Timing subject to federal contributions 6.5 MMTC: Caloundra Mooloolaba Road duplication: & Caloundra Road to Creekside Boulevard to Maroochy Boulevard 3,400 0 6.6 (including Mooloolah River Bridge) 6.7 Sunshine Motorway upgrade: Pacific Paradise to Doonan 1,500 0 6.8 Sunshine Motorway extension: Mooloolah River to Kawana Way 140 0 6.9 Bells Creek connection: Bruce Highway to Caloundra Road 700 0 Timing subject to developer contribution Maroochydore Road: additional lanes from Bruce Highway to 6.10 109 3 1 or more stages completed Martins Creek 6.11 East West links: Eumundi to Noosa Road upgrade 160 0 East West links: Steve Irwin Way (Glasshouse Mountains Road) 6.12 130 2 upgrade 6.13 East West links: Yandina to Coolum 65 0 6.14 Nambour Connection Road upgrades 230 0 Intelligent Transport Systems (to manage congestion) 60 0 Caloundra Road: additional lanes from Bruce Highway to Pierce 6.15 4 80 Completed 2008-09 Avenue Sunshine Motorway upgrade: Maroochydore Road to Pacific 6.16 4 235 Completed 2008-09 Paradise (including Maroochy River Bridge) 6.17 Sunshine Motorway: Sippy Downs to Kawana Arterial 4 66 Completed 2008-09 MMTC: Caloundra Mooloolaba Road (new two-lane road): 6.18 4 75 Completed 2008-09 Caloundra Road to Creekside Boulevard 6.19 KTIA Nicklin Way: additional lanes 4 7 Completed 2005-06 Walking and cycling Subregional cycle network 139 1 to 3 Busways and bus priority High-occupancy vehicle network program 120 1 TransLink subregional station upgrade program 66 1 to 3 6.20 CoastConnect: Caloundra to Maroochydore quality bus corridor 350 1 Rail infrastructure 6.21 Caboolture to Beerburrum to Landsborough: additional rail line 673 1 & 4 1 or more stages completed 6.22 Landsborough to Nambour: additional rail line 1,800 1 6.23 Rail crossing grade separation: Beerwah 70 3 Public transport infrastructure 6.24 CAMCOS: Beerwah to Maroochydore 3,300 1 Nautilus Study 6 3 Aviation General Aviation Strategy: Replacement Aerodrome Study for 6.25 1 3 Caloundra and Caboolture Aerodromes Total 16,949 463 Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed or a stage of a project completed, it is noted in the table. 47 Freight

Transportation of goods and services is vital to the region s economic development and growth. The freight task in Queensland has accelerated rapidly over the past nine years with forecast data suggesting it will more than double in South East Queensland by 2020 with expected demand driven by strong population growth and economic activity. This is likely to place increasing pressure on key road and rail corridors, particularly those supporting the Port of Brisbane s rapidly expanding import and export activities.

The challenge is to continue to deliver an into an upgrade of the Logan Motorway integrated transport system that is safe and and an extension to the southern end of efficient and promotes the movement of the Gateway Motorway are underway. freight. The South East Queensland Regional Current investigations of rail network capacity, Freight Network Strategy supports the particularly through the implementation of the SEQ Regional Plan, (between Mayne and Fairfield), are allowing which acknowledges freight as an important for future activity and growth for both issue for the region. This strategy aims to passenger and rail freight tasks. Various encourage efficient freight movement across transport investigations are also taking place the transport network taking into account in South East Queensland s future growth economic development, safety, quality of areas to ensure transport networks will life and environmental sustainability. As part sufficiently cater for the increase in freight of this strategy the SEQ Infrastructure Plan needed to service growing communities. identifies a number of initiatives to improve freight movement in South East Queensland. The Southern Rail Freight Corridor is intended Key initiatives for each subregion are outlined to increase and streamline future freight in the respective sections within the plan. capacity, by segregating freight movements from conflicts with passenger and other A quality orbital road network is necessary transport activities. to better link localities such as the Australia TradeCoast with the rest of Brisbane Map 7 identifies the key existing and and beyond. Construction is progressing future freight connections and the on the Gateway Upgrade Project and proposed investigations necessary for Ipswich Motorway and Bruce Highway optimum freight movement within and upgrades. In addition, investigations through South East Queensland.

48 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Transport

Map 7 Regional freight infrastructure

49 Activity centre renewal and transit oriented development

A key focus of the SEQ Regional The SEQ Regional Plan intends transit Since the taskforce was established, key Plan is to encourage infill of oriented development principles be applied achievements regarding transit oriented as part of detailed planning for all regional development have included: existing urban areas, particularly activity centres and land in close proximity to „„recommending governance arrangements through redeveloping suburbs high-capacity, high-frequency public transport around activity centres and nodes and corridors. „„preparing interim selection criteria to assist local governments to find public transport nodes. To The Queensland Government is primarily appropriate locations deliver this, the SEQ Regional focussing on achieving transit oriented Plan adopts integration of development outcomes in three priority areas: „„developing criteria to guide the state’s allocation of funding urban development, transport „„major public transport nodes, public infrastructure, community transport corridors and state landholdings „„developing car-parking principles within a 10-kilometre radius of the services and employment as a „„developing submissions for the Smart Brisbane CBD key strategy for creating vibrant State Council’s Smart Cities report and the communities and achieving more „„regional activity centres identified in the SEQ Regional Plan review SEQ Regional Plan efficient use of urban land. „„advising the government on the „„major new and planned public transport opportunities and priorities project. infrastructure including broadhectare areas. Progress on activity centre Transit Oriented renewal and transit oriented Development Taskforce development in 2008–09 The Transit Oriented Development „„The Queensland Government is working Taskforce was established in 2005 to with developers, local government and support implementation of transit oriented the Urban Land Development Authority development policy contained in the SEQ to pave the way for transit oriented Regional Plan. The taskforce includes communities in a range of locations, representatives from state and local including Albion, Bowen Hills, Buranda, government, academia and the planning and Fitzgibbon, Southbank, Milton, Hamilton development industry. They provide leadership Northshore, Woolloongabba, Gold Coast and advice on transit oriented development University Hospital and sites along the institutional arrangements, policy, projects, proposed Eastern and Northern Busways research and education. and Gold Coast Rapid Transit corridor.

50 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Activity centre renewal and transit oriented development

„ The Queensland Government is working in cooperation with local government to plan for regional activity centres based on transit oriented development Urban Land Development principles at a range of locations Authority throughout South East Queensland, including Coomera, Chermside, The Urban Land Development Authority The government initially nominated five Caboolture, Maroochydore and Ipswich. (ULDA) was established in November strategic locations in the Queensland 2007. It was established to help make Housing Affordability Strategy to be the „ Funds have been allocated to build housing more affordable and to deliver a responsibility of the ULDA. Bowen Hills and a pedestrian bridge to Albion rail range of housing options for the changing Northshore (Hamilton) were declared as station as part of that precinct s residential needs of Queenslanders. UDAs in March 2008 and Fitzgibbon UDA was redevelopment. Detailed design declared in July 2008. Mackay Showgrounds The ULDA s role is to plan, carry out plans are under preparation. and Woolloongabba are yet to be declared. and coordinate land development in „ A master plan for Varsity Station Village selected urban areas such as strategic The achievements of ULDA in the last 12 was released in 2008. Construction infill and redevelopment sites which months include: of the Varsity Station Village will are declared by the government as „ facilitating development in Bowen Hills, start in 2010, when the Varsity Lakes urban development areas (UDAs). train station is to be opened. Northshore Hamilton and Fitzgibbon The ULDA is a statutory authority established UDAs in accordance with the respective „ Construction is underway on the under the Urban Land Development interim land use plans Boggo Road Urban Village, which is a Authority Act 2007 with initial funding of „ public consultation on the proposed transit oriented community. In February $25 million over three years. The ULDA is development schemes including a 2009 the government released an a key vehicle to deliver transit oriented land use plan, infrastructure plan and Expression of Interest for developers development throughout the state. to take up further opportunities in implementation strategy for Bowen Hills, the Boggo Road Urban Village. The ULDA plans for future land use and Northshore Hamilton and Fitzgibbon UDAs infrastructure delivery, provides land „ finalising the development schemes for to market and regulates development Bowen Hills and Northshore Hamilton to within the declared UDAs. be introduced by government regulation

„ preparing new interim land use plans for Bowen Hills and Northshore to ensure protection of the areas while government approval for the final development schemes was obtained.

51 Industry development

TowardQ2: Tomorrow’s The convention and conference market Queensland is the Queensland continues to be a significant contributor Convention to the Queensland economy and the Government’s 2020 vision for government has invested in major upgrades the future of the state. Part of convention centres in Brisbane and and conference of this vision is to create a the Gold Coast. Convention bureaus are diverse economy powered by recognised worldwide as vital to promoting centres bright ideas. In support of this, destinations both for business investment and visitation. They contribute to the the Smart Industry Policy has overall development of tourism by: Brisbane Convention identified 15 priority industry and Exhibition Centre sectors that are essential to „„providing a further channel to attract new visitors Queensland’s continuing drive expansion towards a modern, globally „„creating expenditure in the region from The Brisbane Convention and Exhibition business travel competitive and future-focused Centre expansion is a $136 million project designed to meet increasing international economy. A number of projects „„contributing to local employment and training opportunities. and national demand for convention in the SEQ Infrastructure Plan facilities. The expansion design incorporates directly support these industries It is essential that sites for future industrial five levels of boutique convention and and the emerging innovation development are protected to allow event space, including two new auditoriums. opportunities which give Queensland and technology precincts named An additional 23 000 square metres of businesses a strategic competitive advantage. space will allow capacity comparable to in the SEQ Regional Plan. Such sites should be developed in response the new Melbourne Convention Centre. to market demand and supported with infrastructure and services delivered in a The new expanded facility will be the coordinated and timely manner. only convention venue in Australia to have three stand-alone plenary halls The government is also creating a world- covering meetings from 400 to 8000, two standard home for Queensland researchers ballrooms, three speakers’ presentation and scientists. This includes a new centres and six executive boardrooms. Ecosciences Precinct at the Boggo Road Urban Village in Brisbane, a Health and Food Design development was completed in Sciences Precinct, completing the existing February 2008. The project is due for Queensland Health Forensic and Services completion in 2010. Campus at Coopers Plains and stage one of the Pharmacy Australia Centre of Excellence at the Princess Alexandra Hospital (a University of Queensland project). 52 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Industry development

Gold Coast Convention „ Specific industry sector studies and The co-location of so many of Queensland s projects including aviation and marine. brightest minds will create a highly and Exhibition Centre One major aviation project underway is collaborative working environment stage two extension the replacement aerodrome study for between staff of government agencies Caloundra and Caboolture aerodromes. including; the Commonwealth Scientific The recently completed extension of the Studies also underway are investigating and Industrial Research Organisation, the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition marine infrastructure and activities in Department of Environment and Resource Centre means the centre can now host South East Queensland Management (including the Queensland larger national and international events, Climate Change Centre of Excellence) and „ Planning and design of infrastructure providing seating for up to 6000 patrons the Department of Employment, Economic corridors and facilities to support and more than doubling the space in the Development and Innovation (including economic growth and regional exhibition hall to 10 000 square metres. Primary Industries and Fisheries, Biosecurity connectivity. This includes the Southern Queensland and Mines and Energy). Freight Rail Corridor between Rosewood and Beaudesert, and investigations The Ecosciences Precinct will include offices Land for for future intermodal (road/rail) freight and staff support areas, a caf, education facilities at Bromelton and Purga centre, workshops, laboratories, insect houses, glasshouses and greenhouses. industry „ Site identification and land use planning Located within the mixed-use Boggo Road of employment-generating projects such To support growth within South East Urban Village, the precinct has easy access as the Amberley Aerospace Park and Queensland, the Queensland Government is to the newly integrated bus, rail, cycling and Special Industry Estates Study. undertaking a range of initiatives to ensure pedestrian infrastructure. sufficient supply of suitably located and The precinct is under construction and serviced industrial land and supporting completion is expected in early 2011. infrastructure. Current initiatives include: Science „ Industrial land supply and demand Health and Food Sciences analysis. Industrial land supply and precincts demand studies are being undertaken Precinct in the Ipswich-Western Corridor and the The Health and Food Sciences Precinct at (Caboolture, Pine Ecosciences Precinct Coopers Plains in Brisbane s south will Rivers, Redcliffe and northern Brisbane). As Australia s first centre dedicated to finding expand on the existing Queensland Health The analysis is looking at location, solutions to our biggest environmental Forensic and Scientific Services campus to amount, timing, other market demands issues, the Ecosciences Precinct will provide create a science centre of excellence. Staff in and infrastructure needed a new workplace for around 1000 scientists this precinct will collaborate across agencies and researchers, currently working on to focus on assisting people live longer, issues including climate change, water and healthier lives through advances in healthcare, sustainable growth. 53 medicine, food and nutrition and maintaining Pharmacy Australia Centre world class, coordinated and cost-effective Australia s reputation for clean, safe and high research and testing capability. quality food products. of Excellence stage one The Queensland Government has donated New precinct facilities for 190 scientists from The Pharmacy Australia Centre of Excellence the 1.7 hectare site and the University various Queensland Government departments (PACE) stage one will provide a new facility of Queensland will use part of the land and the Commonwealth Scientific and for the University of Queensland s School for a new School of Pharmacy, to meet Industrial Research Organisation s Food of Pharmacy on land adjoining Brisbane s the growing demand from Australia and Science Australia, include laboratories, office Princess Alexandra Hospital. overseas for new pharmacy graduates space and a food pilot plant. and post-graduate research. PACE will bring together Australia s leading The precinct is under construction and pharmacy educators and researchers, the Other confirmed PACE partners and future completion is expected in early 2010. key pharmacy professional organisations and tenants include The Pharmacy Guild of commercial research and development, in a Australia, The Pharmaceutical Society of smaller scale pharmaceutical version of the Australia, the Society of Hospital Pharmacists computer industry s Silicon Valley. of Australia and the Australian Institute of Pharmacy Management. The unique project will eventually cover every aspect of the pharmaceutical production line PACE is under construction and will be from drug discovery to eventual use, offering developed in three stages. Stage one is due for completion in December 2009. Table 7 Industry development infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 10 Completed Project investment Category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 7.1 Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre expansion 136 3 Gold Coast 7.2 Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre extension 4 35.5 Completed 2008-09 Total 136 35.5 Construction started Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table.

54 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Information and communication technology

Advanced information and communication committees including the Digital Economy „„supporting industry excellence through technology (ICT) is essential to the Working Group, the Broadband Development recognition programs such as the successful delivery of TowardQ2: Tomorrow’s Network and the National Broadband Premier’s Smart Awards. Queensland, the Queensland Government’s Development Group (reporting to the Online Flagship Queensland Government 2020 vision for the state. ICT serves as and Communications Council). activities include: a catalyst for business growth, leads The federal government has primary to increased investment, and positions „„assisting the ICT industry to grow by helping responsibility for telecommunications policy Queensland to be more globally competitive with product development, productivity and regulation. Because telecommunications in the critical areas of commerce, industry, improvement and technology diffusion is so important to the state economy, the enterprise and skills development. Queensland Government works with the „„managing, coordinating and promoting Widespread availability of world standard, federal government to guide and influence state-based Commonwealth programs by affordable, competitively priced, high- broadband and telecommunications policies facilitating and partnering with economic speed telecommunications (broadband) and initiatives. development organisations, local infrastructure and services is critical government and community groups Instruments used by the Queensland to support and advance the continued Government include: „„coordinating state telecommunications growth of South East Queensland. activity through the Queensland „„leveraging national telecommunications Fibre-optic cable is the optimal technology for Telecommunications Steering Committee, initiatives including the National Broadband high-speed broadband telecommunications. with a strong focus on broadband Network, the Digital Education Revolution, However, multiple broadband technologies infrastructure and applications to ensure Clever Networks and e-Health initiatives in association with information and that Queensland benefits from emerging communication applications will be necessary „„developing policy such as the Smart federal initiatives to deliver services economically. Industry Policy and contributing to „„defining the key strategies and actions national initiatives such as the Digital Continued investment in the establishment for government in telecommunications Economy and the role of ICT as a business and upgrading of broadband infrastructure infrastructure and services through the transformational agent in climate change and services will be necessary to Queensland Telecommunications Strategic underpin economic development and „„assisting and encouraging priority Framework 2009–12 growth in South East Queensland. Queensland industry sectors to take up „„providing recommendations to technologies which will transform their While investment in telecommunications government on the delivery of the businesses through innovation, increasing infrastructure is mainly undertaken by the government’s economic agenda over the productivity, exporting for growth and private sector, governments will increasingly next five years through the Smart State building regional strengths (Business and influence such investment through policies, Council. The council has highlighted the Industry Transformation Incentives) programs and the regulatory environment. critical role of broadband and ICT as The Queensland Government actively „„stimulating competition through fundamental enablers of economic growth contributes to national policy directions and leveraging Queensland Government „„rationalising government networks and initiatives through its membership of national spending and investments internet services through CITEC. 55 Water

The South East Queensland Water Grid (SEQ A new approach to sustainable water South East Queensland Water Grid) is now operational. Key elements supply management and long term of the SEQ Water Grid were operational in late planning for security, in combination Water Strategy 2008 and early 2009, including: with tremendous water savings from the The Millennium Drought has changed the community and rainfall, has seen South „„the first major desalination facility on the way residents of South East Queensland East Queensland through the worst drought eastern seaboard think about water – awareness has grown in terms of length and rainfall deficit in that every drop is precious. The draft South „„the first purified recycled water recorded history. The combined dam levels East Queensland Water Strategy, which was scheme in Australia and one of reached over 72 per cent in May 2009. released in March 2008, is a plan for meeting the largest in the world South East Queensland’s water supply „„a series of major pipelines, including the Strategic priorities requirements for the next 50 years. It is Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage designed to deliver a new standard of water In addition to a drought-specific response, the one, Eastern Pipeline Interconnector security in Australia’s fastest growing region. Queensland Government’s strategic priorities in and Southern Regional Water Pipeline. addressing water planning and investment are: The Queensland Water Commission Current forecasts are the projects will developed the strategy using a new planning „„increasing the supply of water to be delivered for about $4.6 billion, methodology and a comprehensive water accommodate growth in the region a saving of about $400 million. balance model that, as far as possible, „„diversifying water supplies to address considers climate change, climate variability, A range of other projects are on track climate variability, climate change and population growth and other regional factors for completion by 2011. Construction of other supply risks affecting supply and demand. Wyaralong Dam has commenced, and detailed planning is underway for infrastructure „„ensuring more efficient management and The strategy seeks to ensure South East to connect the dam to the SEQ Water use of water Queensland will never go back to the Grid. Consultation on the Environmental water-wasting ways of the past. It proposes „„providing policy frameworks and subsidies Impact Statement for the Northern Pipeline an ambitious demand-management to support more sustainable and integrated Interconnector stage two has been completed program forecast to reduce the use of water-cycle management systems and detailed design has commenced. grid water by about 24 per cent compared „„ensuring institutional arrangements with pre-drought trends. The average The Queensland Water Commission continues provide efficient, sustainable and residential consumption target will be to publish monthly reports outlining the equitable delivery of bulk water supply 230 litres per person per day or less. progress of projects yet to be completed, and treatment services. which is available on its website at The strategy highlights, with this reduction www.qwc.qld.gov.au. in demand, additional sources of supply beyond those under development will not be required until at least 2028, except as part of the response to another severe drought.

56 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Water

The strategy identifies a number of potential Water-intensive businesses are required to The Home WaterWise Service was established sources of supply for detailed investigation, prepare Water Efficiency Management in August 2006, by the Queensland including desalination plants and purified Plans to demonstrate they use water Government in partnership with local recycled water schemes. The pressure on land efficiently, or to show how they plan to reduce government. As part of the service, plumbers resources along the South East Queensland their water consumption by a minimum of installed water-saving shower heads for coastal strip and the limited availability of 25 per cent in the near future. Ninety nine residents and fixed leaking taps. The service sites suitable to support a desalination plant per cent of businesses required to submit concluded on 14 November 2008. A total of means it is important to preserve sites which a Water Efficiency Management Plan have 228 551 homes were fitted with water saving could be used in future if required. now done so. Councils have approved and devices, providing an estimated saving of processed more than 80 per cent of these 13.1 ML/day (1ML = 1 million litres) at a total The final strategy is scheduled for release plans. In February 2009 the government project cost of $42 million. in 2009. It will incorporate final decisions announced a relaxation of water efficiency regarding future desalination plant sites and management plan reporting for business their categorisation by priority (see text box Pressure and leakage and industry from quarterly to annually. on page 58). management Residents Significant water savings can be achieved by reducing water loss from leaking Establishing a In June 2006 the Queensland Government and burst water mains and pipes. The launched the Home WaterWise rebate scheme Queensland Government provides subsidies to promote the take-up of water saving water-efficient to councils to implement the pressure opportunities. Under the scheme, rebates and leakage management program more could be claimed for the installation of quickly. The government will contribute community rainwater tanks and water efficiency devices a subsidy of 40 per cent of capital costs such as showerheads, dual flush toilets, The Queensland Government has implemented up to $32 million, and has paid out washing machines, swimming pool covers and a range of initiatives to ensure the best use is $16.9 million to December 2008. greywater re-use systems. made of both climate dependent and climate resilient water supplies as part of a longer About $296 million was paid in subsidies term strategy. in South East Queensland between June 2006 and December 2008, when the scheme Business and industry ceased operation. Rainwater tanks were installed on In consultation with stakeholders, the 236 000 homes in South East Queensland. Queensland Water Commission has With these subsidies, tanks are now implemented a package of measures to installed in about 36 per cent of homes in deliver long-term savings for businesses South East Queensland. while minimising risks to economic production and employment. 57 Preliminary site categorisation Category Site Property description Owner

Lytton site Lot 49 SP193294 Minister for Industrial Development Priority Either Marcoola site or Sunshine Coast Regional Council Lot 753 CG3375 or Part of Lot 64 SP104224 Bribie Island site State of Queensland

Tugun site Lot 30 and Part of Lot 31 SP197355 Gold Coast City Council / State of Queensland

North Stradbroke Island site Part of Lot 1 USL32114 State of Queensland

Reserve Port of Brisbane site and/or Part of Lot 83 SP108337 and/or Port of Brisbane Corporation Limited Brisbane Airport site Part of Lot 1 RP844114 Commonwealth of Australia Either Marcoola site or Bribie Sunshine Coast Regional Council Lot 753 CG3375 or Part of Lot 64 SP104224 Island site State of Queensland

South Stradbroke Island site Lot 17 WD2688 and Lot 18 WD1474 State of Queensland Excluded Kawana site Lot 9 SP174900 and Lot 12 SP174900 Sunshine Coast Regional Council

Diversification

Desalination site The analysis has sought to: of our water categorisation „„maintain enough ‘priority’ and ‘reserve’ sites to potentially accommodate supplies The Queensland Water Commission has desalination facilities with a combined undertaken a preliminary assessment of capacity in excess of 1000 ML/day for possible sites for future desalination plants the long-term South East Queensland in South East Queensland. „„maintain diversity in the location of sites Water Grid Sites under consideration were identified within South East Queensland The SEQ Water Grid is now operational. With in the first phase of the studies completed a mix of climate dependent sources, such „„recognise that future technological in early 2007 and included in the draft as dams and aquifers, and climate resilient change may improve the viability of South East Queensland Water Strategy. sources, such as desalination and purified some sites in the future Through consultation on the draft recycled water, the people of South East strategy and as part of the phase 2 „„identify two ‘priority’ sites for detailed Queensland can be confident of an adequate studies a further three possible sites were investigation as potential responses supply of drinking water now and into the identified. Two of the additional sites to another severe drought if it were to future. About 450 kilometres of new pipelines are at the mouth of the Brisbane River, occur in the short term. have been constructed to transport this water on land that is controlled by the Port of from areas of water surplus to areas facing a Confirmed priority and reserve sites will Brisbane Corporation and Brisbane Airport shortfall, permitting the coordinated use of be included in the final advice to the Corporation. The third potential site is major water sources across the region. Queensland Government as part of the an expansion of the existing South East South East Queensland Water Strategy, due Key projects forming part of the Water Grid Queensland (Gold Coast) Desalination for publication in 2009. are outlined in the following paragraphs. Facility at Tugun on the Gold Coast.

During phase 2, teams of environmental experts, engineers and planners have investigated the feasibility of locating a desalination plant on the sites. The interim findings of the study have formed the basis of the preliminary categorisation of sites as ‘priority’, ‘reserve’ or ‘excluded’. This advice was provided to government in February 2009.

58 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Water

Western Corridor Recycled Water opportunities to supply other industries and Northern Pipeline Interconnector Project major residential and industrial development Stage one of the Northern Pipeline areas, in partnership with Ipswich and Construction of the key elements of the Interconnector has also been constructed, Brisbane City Councils. Western Corridor Recycled Water Project were providing the capacity to transport up to completed by December 2008, including Another 168 ML/day has been made available 65 ML/day between the Sunshine Coast and approximately 205 kilometres of pipeline and to irrigators in the Lockyer Valley and on Brisbane. The 47-kilometre pipeline connects three advanced water treatment plants at the Brisbane River, when it is not required the Landers Shute water treatment plant to Bundamba, Gibson Island and Luggage Point. for emergency use. The state government is the remainder of the water grid, at Morayfield. currently negotiating terms of supply with the On 26 November 2008, the Queensland Stage two of the Northern Pipeline Lockyer Water Users Forum. Government confirmed it would adopt Interconnector will extend the pipeline north an emergency trigger to introduce South East Queensland (Gold Coast) to Noosa, providing a connection between purified recycled water into Wivenhoe Desalination Project the supply sources for Noosa, Caloundra Dam. The Queensland Water Commission and Maroochy and to the remainder of South East Queensland (Gold Coast) advised government the trigger would be the water grid. Desalination Project commenced supply implemented when combined regional to the water grid on 28 February 2009. On 20 February 2009, the government dam levels drop to 40 per cent. By 26 March 2009 the desalination announced it will install reverse flow capacity The Western Corridor Recycled Water Project plant had supplied 1 billion litres of on the pipeline, providing additional security is the primary source of supply to power potable water to the SEQ Water Grid. for the Sunshine Coast. The pumps will be stations in South East Queensland. It installed by the end of 2011, as part of the commenced supply to the Swanbank power Southern Regional Water Pipeline construction of stage two. station in August 2007, and had supplied Construction of the Southern Regional Water Eastern Pipeline Interconnector about 7000 ML to the end of February 2009 at Pipeline was completed in December 2008. an average of 14 ML/day. Supply to the Tarong The pipeline has been moving water between The Eastern Pipeline Interconnector was and Tarong North power stations commenced the Gold Coast, Logan, Ipswich and Brisbane completed in December 2008, providing the in June 2008, with 6600 ML having been since January 2009. capacity to transport up to 22 ML/day between supplied to the end of February 2009 at an Redland and Brisbane. The 8-kilometre A pipeline will be constructed between the average of 34 ML/day. pipeline connects Redlands to the Southern Regional Water Pipeline and the SEQ Water Grid through Logan. Supply to industrial customers will commence water treatment plant proposed to be located in mid 2009, with Brisbane City Council at Cedar Grove Weir to connect the Wyaralong currently finalising arrangements to supply Dam into the SEQ Water Grid. purified recycled water to Incitec Pivot, Boral and the Airport Link project. The Queensland Water Commission is investigating

59 New and upgraded dams In late 2008, it was announced the Aquifers Coordinator-General, if recommending Construction of the Hinze Dam upgrade began Construction of the Bribie Island Aquifer that the project proceed, is likely to in January 2008. Scheduled to be completed project was completed in early 2008, include a condition that a number of by the end of 2010, the upgrade will providing the capacity to supply up to an mitigation measures are required to increase the full supply level of Hinze Dam additional 5 ML/day. The treatment plant is minimise the impact on flora and fauna by 12.3 metres to 94.5 metres (increasing currently being commissioned. prior to construction of the dam wall. supply into the region by 16 ML/day) and provide further flood mitigation benefits. It is now anticipated following project Toowoomba pipeline approval, work will commence on Construction works have started on Wyaralong The Queensland Government is fast environmental measures and community Dam, the next key project in the SEQ Water tracking the construction of a pipeline projects. It is expected construction will Grid, following project approval by the connecting Toowoomba to the SEQ Water commence on dam and other associated Australian Government in late 2008. Grid. The $187 million project involves infrastructure after the conditional construction of a 38-kilometre pipeline The dam will be located about 14 kilometres environmental work is completed. from to . It north-west of Beaudesert on the Teviot is scheduled to be in operation by January Brook (a tributary of the Logan River). When Other water supply 2010, with the state government offering complete, the dam will operate in conjunction to contribute a subsidy up to $75 million with Cedar Grove Weir and Bromelton projects and to provide water from Wivenhoe Off-Stream Storage to meet the Beaudesert Dam at a discounted price until 2013. region s growing demand for water. It will also Reactivating old dams provide additional water supply to the rest of Lake Manchester and Enoggera dams have Other recycled water projects South East Queensland. been reactivated, providing up to 30 ML/day. Brisbane City Council has completed As a further benefit, the dam will improve the Brisbane City Council completed an upgrade projects to supply 4.5 ML/day to the Caltex reliability of the Logan River Water Supply to the Enoggera water treatment plant in mid refinery at a cost of about $35 million, and Scheme, helping to cater for increasing 2008. Commissioning was delayed by the approximately 4 ML/day to other customers local demand from urban and industrial storms that affected Brisbane in 2008, which and commercial tankers. Moreton Bay development. lifted the roof from The Gap reservoir. The Regional Council has constructed an advanced facility is expected to be fully operational in recycled water plant which now supplies When operating in conjunction with Cedar July 2009. up to 4 ML/day to the Amcor paper mill at Grove Weir and Bromelton Off-Stream Murrumba Downs at a cost of $41 million. Storage, Wyaralong Dam will provide A $40 million water treatment plant has been up to 26 000 million litres of additional constructed at Ewen Maddock Dam on the Rural water water each year, enough for more than Sunshine Coast, providing the capacity to The South East Queensland Irrigation Futures 300 000 people. The project is on track supply up to 20 ML/day to Caloundra and Program aims to reduce irrigation water use to be complete before December 2011. surrounding areas. by up to 10 per cent across the region by The Traveston Crossing Dam is currently 2009. More than 30 per cent of irrigators in undergoing environmental assessment. South East Queensland have been involved

60 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Water

in field trials, research and development. „ the Queensland Bulk Water Transport The Queensland Government is working with Authority, which owns all major major industry groups to deliver the program, pipelines in South East Queensland including the Queensland Dairyfarmers (including the eastern and northern Organisation, Growcom, the Nursery and pipeline interconnectors) Garden Industry of Queensland, Queensland „ the South East Queensland Water Turf Producers Association and the Flower Grid Manager. Association of Queensland. South East Queensland Catchments is also a partner. These new bodies carry out the Regional Water Security Plan and the System Governance Operating Plan to ensure water security for South East Queensland. Since 2005 the Queensland Government Reform at bulk level is well underway, with and local councils have been engaged the new entities commencing operation on in improving institutional and regulatory 1 July 2008. arrangements for water. In May 2007 the Queensland Water Commission delivered The Queensland Water Commission and a report to the government recommending new bulk water supply entities will review a restructure of the water sector in South the need for additional capital expenditure East Queensland to ensure, in the face of on water treatment and bulk transport climate change and massive population infrastructure. Within the timeframe of the growth, water supplies and wastewater SEQ Infrastructure Plan, a range of new services will be sustainable and efficient. and upgraded water treatment plants and pipelines will be required. The key features for the new arrangements at the bulk level were to establish:

„ the Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, which owns all dams, groundwater infrastructure and water treatment plants in South East Queensland

„ the Queensland Manufactured Water Authority, which owns the desalination plant at the Gold Coast and the Western Corridor Recycled Water Project

61 Map 8 – Regional water infrastructure

62 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Water

Table 8 Regional water infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 8 Project investment category ref no. Completed 2009-10 to 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) projects $M 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Water Storages 8.1 Traveston Crossing Dam: Stage 1 and water treatment plant (F) 1,800 2 8.2 Wyaralong Dam 350 2 8.3 Raising of Hinze Dam - Stage 3 391 3 8.4 Enoggera Reservoir Water Treatment Plant (G) 4 12 Completed 2008-09 8.5 Cedar Grove Weir 4 19 Completed 2007-08 8.6 Bromelton Off-Stream Storage 4 40 Completed 2007-08 Groundwater sources Brisbane Aquifer Project 4 70 Completed 2007-08 Bribie Island Groundwater Project 4 43 Completed 2007-08 Making best use of available supplies Pressure Reduction and Leakage Management Program (H) 32 3 Recycling, desalination and groundwater investigations and 4 12 Completed 2006-07 preliminary studies Subsidies paid for completed local government projects 4 25 Completed 2006-07 Interconnection Southern Regional Water Pipeline extension: Greenbank to Kuraby (I) 140 1 8.7 Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 and additional works (J) 450 2 8.8 Toowoomba Pipeline: Wivenhoe to Cressbrook 187 3 8.9 Southern Regional Water Pipeline (K, L) 4 801 Completed 2008-09 8.10 Eastern Pipeline Interconnector (K, L) 4 39 Completed 2008-09 Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 1 and Ewen Maddock Water 8.11 4 350 Completed 2008-09 Treatment Plant (K, L, M) Manufactured Water 8.12 South East Queensland (Gold Coast) Desalination Facility (N) 1,209 3 8.13 Western Corridor Recycled Water Project (L, O) 4 2,313 Completed 2008-09 Caltex Brisbane Recycled Water Project (BCC project) 4 12 Completed 2007-08 Total 4,559 3,736

Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table. F. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) released in October 2007 states that the total project capital cost is $1592 million, including mitigation measures, infrastructure relocation and pipeline connections. This estimate has been indexed to 2009 dollars and rounded, consistent with other projects contained in this plan. G. The Gap reservoir sustained damage during the storms in late November 2008. While the water treatment plant was completed in 2008, the commencement of the proving period was delayed until March 2009. H. The Queensland Government will contribute a subsidy of 40 per cent of capital costs up to $32 million towards pressure and leakage management projects. To end February 2009, $16.8 million had been paid to councils with 80 per cent of the targeted savings being achieved prior to the target date of 31 August 2008. The memorandum of understanding expires on 27 April 2009. I. The scope of the Greenbank to Kuraby connection has been expanded since the previous version of this document to include the capacity required to distribute water from Wyaralong Dam. J. The scope of the Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 has been expanded since the previous version of this plan to include the installation of pumps to provide reverse flow capacity. K. These projects achieved practical completion in 2008-09 but are still within the defects and liability period. L. The project cost is the current forecast final cost, which will not be finalised until the end of the defects and liability period. M. The Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 1 has achieved practical completion. The Ewen Maddock water treatment plant will not achieve practical completion until after 30 June 2009. However, it represents only about 15 per cent of the total project cost and will not delay transfers through the pipeline. N. Includes cost of connection to the Southern Regional Water Pipeline. O. Construction of this project was generally completed by end 2008. Additional clarifiers are being constructed at Luggage Point, delaying achievement of practical completion for that advanced water treatment plant until early 2010. Additional pre-treatment processes are being implemented at Luggage Point, delaying achievement of practical completion under the contractual arrangements. Classification as completed should not impact on rights and responsibilities under the contractual arrangements between the parties who delivered the project. There remains further possible expenditure of up to $130 million on this project in 2009-10.

63 Energy

Electricity demand in Queensland is growing at a faster rate than other states, with investment in the South East Queensland electricity network rising at a commensurate rate. The Queensland gas market is also growing rapidly and demand has doubled since 2000. Managing the energy needs of Australia’s fastest growing, most decentralised and energy- intensive state, while at the same time reducing greenhouse emissions, presents challenges.

The Queensland Government will meet these challenges by diversifying its energy sources Figure 8 – Growth in electricity demand across Australia 2009-10 to 2013-14 towards gas and renewable sources, as well as by encouraging competition in energy markets. Queenslanders must also play their part by managing demand, especially during peak summer periods, through increased awareness and use of more energy-efficient appliances, or appliances that use alternative fuel sources.

Much of the infrastructure generating electricity for South East Queensland is located outside the region for various reasons, including proximity to fuel sources and major industry. Energy is then transported to the demand centres within South East Queensland via the high voltage electricity transmission network. Source: 2008 NEMMCO Statement of Opportunities (Native Demand)

64 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Energy

Industry structure „ Distribution Electricity Most business and residential customers The electricity industry comprises three are supplied with electricity via a South East Queensland represents around distinct, yet interconnected sectors: distribution system connected to the high 60 per cent of the state s electricity demand. generation, transmission and distribution. voltage transmission system. ENERGEX The region s pattern of growth in electricity „ Generation delivers electricity to most of South East demand is expected to continue over the Queensland and operates a network that timeframe of the SEQ Infrastructure Plan, with Most electricity in Queensland is includes 50 000 kilometres of powerlines. peak summer demand forecast to increase by generated by coal-fired power stations, Ergon Energy distributes electricity to 4.1 per cent per year over the next located mainly in central and southern Toowoomba and rural and regional 10 years. The growth in electricity demand parts of the state, close to major coal Queensland, and operates a network is being driven by population growth, sources. However, an increasing amount of 150 000 kilometres of powerlines industrial development, and the continued of energy is being produced from natural throughout the state. uptake of airconditioning. Delivering other gas, including coal seam methane, water, transport and community projects also and from renewable sources such as Through its government-owned impacts on the demand for electricity. hydro and biomass. Government-owned corporations, the Queensland Government corporations own most of the larger power owns and maintains electricity generation, Community dependence and expectations for stations, but the number of partially or transmission and distribution assets worth a reliable electricity network create challenges fully privately owned power stations is more than $26 billion. These corporations that will be addressed through extending increasing. Currently about 42 per cent include CS Energy, Stanwell and Tarong the electricity transmission and distribution of Queensland s generation capacity is Energy (generation), networks, refurbishing or replacing ageing privately owned. (transmission), and ENERGEX and network assets, building more facilities and Ergon Energy (distribution). Queensland using modern technologies. „ Transmission participates in the competitive National Powerlink Queensland s high voltage Electricity Market (NEM). transmission network transports electricity from power stations to the distribution networks in South East Queensland.

65 Generation capacity „ The 140 MW coal seam gas-fired Office of Clean Energy . The project will Queensland currently has a generation be fully operational by the end of 2009 Established in November 2008, the capacity of more than 11 000 megawatts „ The 630 MW Darling Downs Power Station Office of Clean Energy (OCE) has been (MW), with more than $4.7 billion of which will be the biggest combined-cycle commissioned to build on existing investment in new generation infrastructure power station in Australia. The project is work and create a new focus on clean since 1998. Major investments include the under construction and will be operational energy opportunities in Queensland. privately owned Millmerran coal-fired power in early 2010. OCE is the Queensland Government s station, Braemar and Townsville gas-fired lead agency for developing world-class power stations, the joint-venture Callide-C These projects all contribute to electricity initiatives in renewable energy, demand coal-fired power station, and the government- supply in South East Queensland via the side innovation and energy efficiency. owned Kogan Creek Power Station. A number electricity grid, but are not included in this OCE will assist the development of the of renewable energy projects have also been plan because they are located outside the clean energy sector by: commissioned, including a 68 MW bagasse- region and are privately funded. fired generator at Pioneer Sugar Mill and a The Office of Clean Energy is working „ advising government on the policy second bagasse-fired generator of 25 MW with energy companies, the renewable frameworks to best support clean at Isis Sugar Mill. The electricity generation energy industry, government-owned energy initiatives industry in Queensland is well placed to meet corporations and other interested parties „ identifying, mapping and sourcing increasing demand, with sufficient generating to actively accelerate the uptake of potential renewable energy locations capacity to meet average demand even under renewable . around the state extreme weather conditions. Support is provided through initiatives „ removing regulatory barriers Projects completed or under construction such as the $50 million Queensland to developing the renewable include: Renewable Energy Fund (QREF) to assist with energy industry „ The 450 MW Braemar 2 gas-fired power commercialising renewable energy generation „ partnership programs to encourage station adjacent to the existing 450 MW technologies; resource mapping; and the solar private sector investment and start-up approximately bonus scheme (solar feed-in tariff). in the clean energy industry 40 kilometres west of Dalby in Southern „ working with the Australian Government Queensland. The project achieved on designing the mandatory renewable commercial operation in mid 2009 energy target scheme to ensure Queensland s interests are protected in the national approach „ working with the electricity industry to assist demand-side innovation and energy efficiency with large-scale users „ assisting deployment of renewable energy infrastructure.

66 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Energy

Electricity network Electricity sector activity ENERGEX has installed more than To meet increasing electricity demand, 4340 kilometres of underground electricity new transmission and distribution network Figures released recently by ENERGEX cable in South East Queensland in the last infrastructure must be constructed. Powerlink reveal in the December quarter (October to 4.5 years, expanding total underground invested $676 million in capital works in December 2008) 8436 additional homes and cabling from 11 025 kilometres in June 2004 Queensland during 2007 08, and expects to businesses were connected to the South to 15 365 kilometres in December 2008. invest more than $2.9 billion over the five East Queensland power network. These are Over this same period, the length year period to 2012 13, to ensure that future new connections and are in addition to more of overhead mains has increased by growth in electricity demand can be met. than 7700 reconnections (mostly for people 1382 kilometres, expanding from moving from one property to another) 35 032 kilometres to 36 414 kilometres. ENERGEX is also investing heavily in its recorded in the same quarterly period. The larger increase in underground electricity distribution network, with a five-year The reliability of the South East Queensland construction is attributed to most urban capital budget in South East Queensland of up electricity grid has shown a 33 per cent subdivisions now being reticulated with to $5 billion. This program is expected to: improvement during the period July 2005 and underground power and the installation of „ increase network capacity to meet forecast January 2009. The normalised interruption additional 11 000 volt feeders from zone demand and peak demand growth duration for the system was 162 minutes for substations to cater for load growth. „ improve network security and reduce the 2004 05 and the 12 month rolling year to amount of electricity load at risk date 2008 09 is currently 129 minutes. „ improve overall reliability Electricity delivered to ENERGEX customers has increased slightly from 20 758 Gigawatt „ renew older assets to maintain network reliability and improve network security hours (GWh) in 2006-07 to 20 920 GWh in 2007-08. „ The tables show proposed transmission and distribution network upgrades in South East Queensland.

67 The Queensland Government also supports Progress on electricity „ Powerlink completed three major demand management programs aimed at substation projects: the $25 million reducing the effect of peak electricity demand projects in 2008 09 expansion of its 275/110 kilovolt Abermain on the network, and programs which support Substation near Ipswich; the $35 million „ ENERGEX has invested more than efficient use of energy, such as: upgrade of its 275 kilovolt Greenbank $674 million in improvements to and Substation in the Logan area; and the „ working with builders and developers to maintenance of its electricity network and $36 million upgrade of its 275 kilovolt implement sustainable housing design supporting infrastructure during 2008 09, South Pine Substation in north Brisbane. up to the end of January 2009. „ supporting a range of energy and These substation augmentation projects, watersaving measures for households „ Increases in network capacity have been together with the completion in achieved through a strong program of 2007-08 of the $138 million Middle Ridge „ promoting energy-efficient air-conditioning works that has seen ENERGEX s total to Greenbank transmission line, have „ improving energy efficiency in government zone substation capacity rise from increased the transmission capacity into buildings, government-owned corporations 8632 megavolt amperes (MVA) at the South East Queensland, helping to meet and statutory authorities via the end of February 2008 to 9142 MVA at the growing needs of the region. This Government Energy Management Strategy the end of January 2009, an increase of new project, together with other upgrades and the Strategic Energy Efficiency Program. 510 MVA in less than 12 months. This at existing substations in South East increase means the network has the Queensland, should cater for the region s capability of supplying an additional bulk electricity transmission needs for the 170 000 homes in South East Queensland. next five years.

68 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Energy

currently working to increase the capacity Gas of the pipeline (by increasing compressor capacity) to meet growing customer demand Natural gas will play an increasingly significant for gas. APA is also considering constructing Solar bonus scheme role as a fuel source for Queensland s electricity a transmission pipeline connecting the RBP at generation, industrial processes, business Gatton to Gympie, enabling delivery of gas to The Queensland Government solar bonus and residential consumers. Total natural gas the expanding Sunshine Coast market. scheme pays households and other small consumption in Queensland is expected to In South East Queensland APA reticulates customers for the surplus electricity more than triple over the period to 2030. gas for domestic, commercial and industrial generated from roof-top solar photovoltaic purposes in Brisbane south and Gold Coast, (PV) panel systems, which is exported Unlike other states, Queensland is not a and Envestra do so for Brisbane North and back into the Queensland electricity grid. single gas market, but a series of markets in Ipswich. APA has made plans to expand The scheme is designed to make solar different locations. South East Queensland is residential customer connections in South power more affordable for Queenslanders, the state s single biggest market for natural East Queensland by 9000 over the next three stimulate the solar power industry and gas, with an annual consumption of around years by supplying new residential estates. encourage energy efficiency. 63 petajoules (PJ) a year approximately 40 per cent of Queensland s overall The solar bonus scheme commenced on gas consumption. 1 July 2008. Customers participating in Market development the scheme are paid 44 cents per kilowatt The Queensland Energy Policy has been hour (kWh) for surplus electricity fed into Transmission and successful in increasing the use of gas in the Queensland grid after the household distribution the state s energy mix. In particular, the load is met. Queensland gas scheme requires at least Gas infrastructure, like electricity, consists 13 per cent of electricity sold in Queensland By April 2009, over 4200 households and of major transmission lines (pipelines) and be from gas-fired generation. This has businesses were signed up to the scheme localised distribution networks. Queensland encouraged the development of new gas representing approximately $320 000 worth has more than 4500 kilometres of high- sources, in particular coal seam gas. of solar energy and over 725 000 kilowatt strength steel gas transmission pipelines, The commissioning in 2006 of the hours exported to the grid from over six which move gas from gas-producing regions 450 MW Braemar Power Station, west of megawatts of installed generation capacity. to customers. This infrastructure is owned by Dalby, brought Queensland s gas-fired power the private sector and is not included in the station capacity to more than 2000 MW, and SEQ Infrastructure Plan. there is more than 2000 MW of gas-fired The 440-kilometre Wallumbilla (near Roma) generating capacity under active development. to Brisbane gas transmission pipeline (RBP) is the sole transporter of gas from the Surat and Bowen gas fields to the growing South East Queensland market. The owners of the RBP, Australian Pipeline Trust (APA), are

69 Map 9 – Powerlink and ENERGEX infrastructure

70 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Energy

Table 9 Powerlink upgrades in South East Queensland

Estimated Estimate Delivery Timeframe Project investment category 2009-10 to 2013-14 to 2020-21 to $M (see note D) 2012-13 2019-20 2025-26 Western Corridor and Toowoomba Halys to Springdale to Blackwall line (500 kV) 1 Halys to Springdale to Greenbank line (500 kV) 1 Swanbank A substation rebuild 35 3 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan South Pine to Sandgate line (275/110 kV) 58 3 Greenbank to Mudgeeraba line (275 kV) 0 Larapinta to Algester line (110 kV) 0 Sandgate to Nudgee line (275 kV) 0 Nudgee to Murarrie line (275 kV) 0 Bergin's Hill to Drewvale line (275kV) 0 Future substations (dependent on electricity demand) 0 Gold Coast Southern Gold Coast bulk supply 0 Future substations (dependent on electricity demand) 0 Sunshine Coast Woolooga to Cooroy South line (275 kV) 0 Future substations (dependent on electricity demand) 0 Total 93 Major transmission upgrades completed 2006-07 207 4 Construction of a new transmission line between Belmont and Murarrie (Brisbane) Construction of a new transmission line between Greenbank (Logan) and Maudsland (Gold Coast) Construction of major substations at Molendinar (Gold Coast), Algester (Brisbane), Goodna (Ipswich) and Sumner (Brisbane)

Major transmission upgrades completed 2007-08 137.5 4 Construction of a new transmission line between Middle Ridge (Toowoomba) and Greenbank (Logan).

Major transmission upgrades completed 2008-09 96 4 Abermain substation ($25m) Greenbank substation ($35m) South Pine substation ($36m)

Total investment since 2005 440.5

Construction started

Notes: A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table. F. In 2007, the Australian Energy Regulator set Powerlink s allowable regulated revenue for the five year period between 1 July 2007 and 30 June 2012, including an allowance for capital expenditure. G. Energy authorities budget on a five-year basis. Project costs beyond that period are not included. H. Timing of future investments will depend on demand. Expenditure will be adjusted as necessary to ensure the South East Queensland distribution network is able to meet demand, while also meeting mandated reliability requirements. I. kV = Kilovolt. J. Map 9 is indicative of long-term planning and does not reflect all information in Tables 9 and 10. 71 Table 10 – ENERGEX network upgrades in South East Queensland

Estimated Estimate Delivery Timeframe Project investment category 2009-10 to 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Western Corridor and Toowoomba 284 Bundamba Substation: install second 110kV transformer to increase network 3 capacity ($10m) Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 2115 Annerley: replace underground cables nearing end life with new larger 3 cables ($11m) Myrtletown: establish a bulk supply substation to boost network 3 capacity ($42m) North Springwood: install new transformer to boost network capacity ($11m) 3 Sandgate: establish a bulk supply substation to boost network 3 capacity ($18m) Toowong-Ashgrove: install a new powerline between Toowong and Ashgrove 3 to boost network capacity and improve reliability ($13m) Taringa: install second transformer inside existing substation, plus new 3 indoor high voltage switchgear ($17m) Buranda: establish new zone substation to cater for electricity load growth 3 in area ($14m) Whiteside: establish a new substation to improve network reliability and 3 increase network capacity on the northern side of ($11m) Gold Coast 483 Beenleigh: upgrade two transformers and 33KV to boost network 3 capacity ($11m) Merrimac: install two transformers to boost network capacity ($25m) 3 Southport: increase substation capacity by installing third 3 transformer ($10m) Coomera Bulk Substation: establish a second 33kV feeder to Hope Island 3 substation ($12m) Mudgeeraba Substation: install second 33kV feeder to improve reliability 3 and second transformer to increase network capacity ($10m) Sunshine Coast 337 Caboolture-Toorbul Point: install a new powerline between Caboolture and 3 Toorbul Point to improve network reliability and capacity ($10m) Total 3219 Completed in 2005-06 142 4 Completed in 2006-07 541 4 Completed in 2007-08 479 4 Completion in 2008-09 42 4 New zone substations in Wacol South ($10m), Holland Park ($10m) and Currumundi ($10m) Underground subtransmission cables between Crestmead and Browns Plains North substations ($12m) Total investment since 2005 1204

Construction started

Notes: A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. G. Projects in the period 2009-10 to 2010-11 have been allocated to respective The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. subregions. Investment in the period 2011–12 to 2012–13 has been allocated to B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full subregions on a proportional basis only. timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents H. Energy authorities budget on a five-year basis. Project costs beyond that period may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input are not included. prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment I. Timing of future investments will depend on demand. Expenditure will be includes funds already expended on projects. adjusted as necessary to ensure the South East Queensland distribution network C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, is able to meet demand, while also meeting mandated reliability requirements. their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal J. Specific projects in this table reflect strategic infrastructure investment within funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the the overall capital investment. As part of the National Electricity Market, projects federal government. valued at more than $10 million are submitted to the market for regulatory D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. testing. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table. K. kV = Kilovolt. F. ENERGEX’s capital works program, up to 30 June 2010, is covered by the current L. In 2008-09 only those projects that are considered strategic infrastructure regulatory determination. The capital works program for the next regulatory investment within the overall capital investment have been included in the period, starting 1 July 2010, will be included in ENERGEX’s proposal to the completed projects count. See note J for further information. national regulator, the Australian Energy Regulator. M. Map 9 is indicative of long-term planning and does not reflect all information in Tables 9 and 10.

72 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Health

Access to top quality services While population growth and changed Progress on health and qualified practitioners demographic profiles are impacting on health systems around the country, especially in the projects in 2008–09 is an essential ingredient area of aged care, an integrated program of „„The $140 million upgrade of The Prince in the maintenance of expansion and improvement for Queensland’s Charles Hospital to a general hospital health infrastructure is helping keep pace health and wellbeing and was completed in 2008-09. As part of this with demands. an improved quality of life project, allied health facilities including for all Queenslanders. Rising cases of preventable diseases, combined a heart valve bank, procedure room and with our growing and ageing population, is eight recovery spaces were completed expected to result in a doubling of the number in stage 2A. Upgrades to four operating of hospitalisations over the next 20 years, rooms and 57 additional beds in two new making these changes vital and urgent. wards will also be commissioned this year. Stage one, completed in 2007, included Improved hospital services is one way to meet a new emergency department, pharmacy, the expected demand with a more far-reaching records, imaging and car park. plan that includes the delivery of health care in community settings and in partnership with „„Early site works for the Gold Coast commercial allied health providers. University Hospital commenced in December 2008. The hospital will The Queensland Government’s Health deliver comprehensive services in cancer Action Plan provides the blueprint for these care, cardiac, neurosciences, neonatal improvements and innovations, which provide intensive care and trauma services. Its a mix of new facilities and refurbishment and 750 overnight beds almost double current a shift in focus for many existing facilities hospital capacity on the Gold Coast along with a significant commitment to the with provision for a co-located private expansion and training of health services staff hospital, medical and specialist services. throughout Queensland. Construction is forecast to commence in 2009 and be completed in 2012.

73 „ Site preparation works for the Queensland „ Construction of the first stage of the „ Master planning for the Ipswich Children s Hospital commenced in February Caloundra Hospital expansion was finished Hospital expansion to include an 2009. The schematic design for the new in 2008 and the project will be completed additional 84 beds commenced early Queensland Children s Hospital is nearing in 2009. The bed capacity at Nambour this year. Expected growth in the region, completion and the final business case Hospital was increased by 30 and a including the delivery of a record will be completed in 2009. The Health new car park was completed in 2008. 612 babies born at the hospital in Services Plan has been updated with the Construction of a new 96-bed ward block the December quarter highlights latest statistical information and workforce has commenced and will be completed the need for this expansion. planning for the Queensland Children s in 2010; modifications to vacated space „ Early construction works for the new Hospital is well underway. in an existing building will continue 30-bed medical assesment planning unit until late 2011. Alternative methods of „ A private hospital providing 110 public and emergency department expansion delivery for the Sunshine Coast Health beds is proposed to be established on the at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Precinct are also being reviewed. Sunshine Coast University Hospital site by commenced in late 2008 with construction late 2013. The availability of public beds „ Construction of the Browns Plains due to be completed in mid 2010. Other on the SCUH site in Kawana represents the Health Precinct was completed in May works to be delivered with this project are first step in the establishment of the SCUH, 2009. Services include aged care and a replacement helipad, oncology bunkers with subsequent construction on the site rehabilitation, children s health services, and a PET scanner. to see the public hospital capacity increase adult community mental health services, to 550 beds by 2016-17 with further drug and alcohol rehabilitation, dental expansion to 650 beds in the future. clinics, antenatal clinics and chronic disease prevention and management „ Construction of a 179-bed expansion of services. An Early Years Centre will the Robina Hospital has commenced. also be located on the site. The project will include two additional operating theatres as well as upgrades to „ Construction of the new North Lakes medical imaging, pharmacy, pathology and Health Precinct is expected to be catering services. The project is due for completed in 2009 giving local residents completion in 2012. access to many health services in the one location. This will also assist to reduce the demand on acute hospitals.

74 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Health

Table 11 Regional health infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 10 Completed Project investment category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Western Corridor 11.1 Ipswich Hospital: additional bed capacity 110 0 11.2 Ipswich Hospital redevelopment 290 0 Health Precincts x 2: Ipswich area 50 0 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 11.3 Queensland Children s Hospital 1,200 1 11.4 Queensland Children s Hospital: Academic and Research Centre 75 0 Princess Alexandra Hospital Emergency Department: additional bed 11.5 52 3 capacity (F) 11.6 North Lakes Health Precinct 56 3 11.7 Caboolture Health Precinct 20 0 The Prince Charles Hospital: Paediatric Emergency Department 11.8 45 0 upgrade Timing subject to federal contributions Emergency Department upgrades: Logan; Redland; Ipswich; QEII; 11.9 75 0 Timing subject to federal contributions Caboolture; Toowoomba Hospitals Timing subject to federal and private 11.10 Translational Research 330 1 contributions 11.11 Browns Plains Health Precinct 4 23 Completed 2008-09 11.12 The Prince Charles Hospital: upgrade to general hospital 4 140 Completed 2008-09 Gold Coast 11.13 Gold Coast University Hospital 1,700 1 11.14 Robina Hospital: expansion 240 1 11.15 Robina Health Precinct 40 0 Sunshine Coast 11.16 Sunshine Coast Health Precinct 30 0 11.17 Sunshine Coast University Hospital 1,300 1 11.18 Sunshine Coast: expansion of existing facilities 191 3 Total 5,804 163

Construction started Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table. F. Formerly described as Princess Alexandra Hospital Emergency Department: expansion and redevelopment. 75 Education and training

The priority is to plan and provide access „„Gaven State School to a kindergarten program for all 31/2 to 41/2 Early „„Deception Bay North State School year-old children in the year before formal schooling. This initiative aligns with the „„Fairview Heights State School, Toowoomba childhood Council of Australian Governments’ (COAG) „„Crestmead State School early child reforms and the commitment to education universal access for all children of this age to „„Rochedale South State School a quality early education program delivered by „„Jimboomba State School a qualified early childhood teacher. and care (extended kindergarten) This initiative will see the roll-out of 240 „„Carina State School new or extended kindergarten services The Office for Early Childhood (extended kindergarten). Education and Care was across Queensland by 2014 at a cost of more The remaining 220 services are to established 1 January 2009, than $300 million. The new and extended kindergartens will double the capacity of the progressively open in 2012, 2013 and 2014. as part of the early childhood Queensland community kindergarten sector reforms announced under and cater for the 12 000 children not currently Extra support for families the State Government’s accessing any centre-based early education or care services. There are a number of other Queensland TowardQ2: Tomorrow’s Government initiatives to assist families with Queensland strategy. Local and The first 20 of these new kindergarten services young children: international research shows will open in 2010 and 2011, commencing with „„The Government has committed high quality education early eight sites to be operational in 2010, including four in South East Queensland: $32 million to establishing four Early in life gives children the best Years Centres across the state. These start and a solid foundation „„Mudgeeraba State School one-stop-shops will provide services for their development. „„Stretton State College for families expecting a child or with children aged up to eight years. Families „„Prince of Peace, Everton Hills can access integrated early education „„Moorooka State School. services, child care, child health services, parenting programs and other family A further twelve sites will be operational in support services in one location. Centres 2011, including ten in South East Queensland: in South East Queensland at Caboolture „„Woodford State School and Nerang commenced operations in late 2008 and the Browns Plains centre has „„Beachmere State School commenced construction. „„Forest Lake College

76 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Education and training

„ Funding of $21.3 million has been „ The Queensland Government is also committed to establish early childhood working with the Australian Government Primary and education and care services. This included to facilitate the construction of six Early funding to purchase and/or refurbish Learning and Care Centres in Queensland. ten preschool sites and to construct one These centres will provide long day care secondary purpose-built early childhood facility on services and some additional support a school site, planned for Acacia Ridge. services in response to community need. education A number of these centres also provide An Early Learning and Care Centre at child health services, parenting programs Amberley in South East Queensland is The adequate and timely provision of and other family support services. Five of expected to commence construction education services is a critical factor in serving the refurbished preschools will be located during 2009 in association with the State the region s existing and future communities. in South East Queensland. West End is School relocated from the Amberley RAAF More than 70 per cent of Queensland school currently operational while construction base to Yamanto. students access the state school system, with commenced at Toowoomba and Beenleigh the Queensland Government operating and in 2008 09. Preschools at Beaudesert Progress on early maintaining 612 schools and environmental and The Gap, along with the purpose education centres in South East Queensland. built facility planned at Acacia Ridge, will childhood projects in Providing new schools in South East commence construction in 2009 10. 2008 09 Queensland presents an ongoing challenge. „ The Queensland and Australian Strong population growth, the need to „ In late 2008, Early Years Centres at Nerang Governments are working closely identify optimum opening dates of new and Caboolture commenced operation; together to establish nine Indigenous schools (to ensure their viability and that of and construction commenced at the Child and Family Centres across existing schools) and the increasing pressure Browns Plains Centre. Queensland, as part of a network of to use land effectively makes the planning 35 such centres across Australia. These „ Construction commenced at the Early and management of demand for schools centres will provide a dynamic mix Childhood Education and Care Centres increasingly complex. of services, responsive to community located at Toowoomba and Beenleigh. The availability of quality information, robust needs, including child care, early school strategies, standards, and master learning and parent and family support plans helps the Queensland Government services. Five of the nine Queensland explore alternative avenues when planning for centres will be established in rural and new schools. These avenues include public remote areas and four in urban areas, private partnerships and joint development which may include parts of South East agreements with other state and local Queensland. The Australian Government government agencies. has committed over $75 million to assist in the construction of these centres.

77 Table 12 Regional state school infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Completed Project investment category projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Western Corridor and Toowoomba 800 0 - 3 4 schools 5 schools 8 schools

Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 850 0 - 3 3 schools 7 schools 9 schools

Gold Coast 400 0 - 3 2 schools 4 schools 2 schools

Sunshine Coast 600 0 - 3 2 schools 2 schools 8 schools

Completed 2008-09 4 115

Completed 2007-08 4 27

Completed 2006-07 4 37

Completed 2005-06 4 32

Total 2,650 211 11 18 27

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table. F. Estimated total costs include land and construction costs. G. The table incorporates additional primary and secondary school provision in Ripley Valley in the period covering 2010 to 2026. H. Gold Coast cost estimates do not include the new Queensland Academy for Health Sciences. I. Provision has been made for the following emergent or newly clarified growth areas: Logan (Park Ridge, Flagstone, etc); Palmview (tentative); Oxley Wedge (tentative); Ripley. J. Provision of schools is dependent upon population thresholds being met and timing of delivery may be adjusted to reflect changing demand.

78 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Education and training

Progress on primary and The Queensland Government s vision is for Vocational a highly skilled, flexible workforce that will secondary education underpin the state s continuing growth and projects in 2008-09 prosperity. The Queensland Skills Plan 2008 is education and a major investment in achieving this vision. To „ Stage one of Norfolk Village State School meet the needs of business and industry, we opened in January 2009 with 427 students training must build the capacity and skills, particularly from Prep to Year 7. This new school professional, of our workforce to meet is located within the Ormeau area of Queensland s continuing economic workplace requirements. northern Gold Coast. strength depends on the state s workforce having the skills to meet the dynamic Key elements of the Queensland Skills Plan „ Stage one of Highland Reserve State needs of business and industry. 2008 include: School opened in January 2009 with „ the consolidation of SkillsTech Australia 163 students from Prep to Year 7. This The successful implementation of the to lead product development and new school is located within the heart initiatives within this SEQ Infrastructure delivery in key trade areas - automotive, of the Gold Coast s current growth Plan relies heavily on the availability of building and construction, manufacturing area - the suburb of Upper Coomera. a skilled workforce. and engineering, electrical/electronics „ Stage one of Bounty Boulevard State The Queensland Government is implementing and sustainable technology. SkillsTech School opened in January 2009 with the Queensland Skills Plan to deliver Australia continues to develop close links 134 students from Prep to Year 7. 17 000 training places a year by 2010. with industry and centres of excellence This new school is located within the Additionally, the government will invest to ensure training programs and rapid growth area of North Lakes. over $124 million to help create nearly qualifications address employer needs 150 000 training places over the next „ Ormeau Woods State High School opened four years in a record expansion of the „ the Southbank Institute of Technology in January 2009 with 245 Year 8 and Queensland skills base. as the lead institute responsible for 9 students. technological and high-level skills training The Queensland Skills Plan 2008 provided and education, with major new facilities „ In 2009, the following recently established a fresh approach to meeting the state s now fully operational schools had new stages open Meridan challenges. It draws together a number State College, Stretton State College, of new actions and strategies combined „ collaborative partnerships with Chancellor State College, Coomera Springs with key elements of the original 2006 industry and private providers, State School, and Burpengary Meadows Queensland Skills Plan, an analysis of the thereby ensuring access to the best State School. labour market, and advice from stakeholders possible training services for clients on opportunities to better meet the state s using publicly funded training. workforce needs.

79 Progress on vocational „„Repositioning the Gold Coast Institute of „„The modernisation of the Metropolitan TAFE, aligned to industry and community South Institute of TAFE to become a lead education and training needs and located in transport-centred institute for programs in aged care, small projects in 2008-09 locations with a new Marine campus business and fashion, at the Mt Gravatt which began operating from the Gold and Loganlea facilities is progressing with The Queensland Skills Plan capital program Coast City Marina in 2008, and planning stage one completed in January 2009 and is being implemented with construction or for the Coomera Education Precinct further works being planned planning underway on many projects including: „„Master planning continues for the upgrade „„The redevelopment of the former „„The major SkillsTech Australia trade of trade training facilities at Nambour Southbank TAFE site at South Brisbane training campus at Acacia Ridge in (Sunshine Coast Institute of TAFE) to establish the Southbank Institute Brisbane continues to be developed. of Technology – the lead institute for „„Construction of an automotive facility at In 2008 construction industry training health, sport and recreation, arts and Toowoomba has now been completed facilities for plumbing, furnishing foundry entertainment, and postgraduate programs and training has commenced (Southern and pattern making were completed. for professionals and para-professionals. Queensland Institute of TAFE) Construction has also commenced on facilities for refrigeration, electrical and painting and decorating trades

Table 13 – Regional vocational education and training infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 10 Completed Project investment category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Western Corridor 13.1 Campus modernisation: Bundamba 16 1 13.2 Automotive trade training facility: Toowoomba 4 2.7 Completed 2008-09 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 13.3 SkillsTech Australia: new campus at Acacia Ridge 111 3 13.4 SkillsTech Australia: Northern Brisbane 55 1 13.5 Metropolitan South Institute of TAFE: Mt Gravatt Stage 2 13 1 13.6 Metropolitan South Institute of TAFE: Loganlea 7 3 13.7 Brisbane North Institute of TAFE: Grovely 1 2 13.8 Southbank Institute of Technology 4 234 Completed 2008-09 Gold Coast 13.9 New Gold Coast TAFE campus: Coomera 25 2 Sunshine Coast 13.10 Campus establishment: Kawana 6 1 13.11 Campus modernisation: Nambour 12 1 13.12 Campus modernisation: Mooloolaba 5 1 Total 251 236.7

Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table.

80 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Community services

ensures the community has ready access to Projects recently completed include: policing services, and that police response Queensland „„new or replacement police stations at times are timely and effective. Mango Hill/North Lakes, Surfers Paradise Police Service In 2008–09 the Queensland Government and Woodford provided $142 million to progress major „„upgrades to Mudgeeraba Police Station capital works projects for the Queensland and Bribie Island Police Station The functions of the Police Service. Key projects within the region Queensland Police Service are planned for the next few years include: „„new police beats at East Brisbane/ to preserve peace and good Kangaroo Point and Woolloongabba „„a new police station at Camp Hill/Carina order, protect the community, „„a new watchhouse at Pine Rivers prevent crime, detect offenders, „„an upgrade to the police station at Beenleigh „„an upgrade of The Gap Police Station. uphold the law, ensure the fair „„a replacement water police facility for and efficient administration the Sunshine Coast District Water Police The Westgate Project is continuing, with currently located at Kawana Waters the design of the new Queensland Police of law, and provide services Police Station. Academy and operational facility at Wacol. in emergency situations. The refurbishment of the first heritage listed Projects currently under construction within building ‘LillyPilly House’ was completed South East Queensland include: Strong population growth in South East in May 2009. This will accommodate the Queensland has continued to increase „„a replacement police station and Westgate project team and later the Driver demand for policing services and presents watch-house at Ipswich Training Unit. It is anticipated the new driver training facility will be fully operational by a significant challenge for the Queensland „„replacement police stations at Fortitude February 2010. Police Service into the future. Valley and Holland Park To address this issue, the Queensland Police „„new police stations at Carseldine, Emerging communities Service endeavours to continuously improve Crestmead/Marsden, Reedy Creek/Robina, service delivery and productivity. Springfield and Sippy Downs The Police Service is continuing to develop new plans and strategies in consultation with Reducing the Queensland road toll „„refurbishment of the Upper Mt Gravatt other state agencies and local governments remains a priority and the Police District Headquarters complex Service works in partnership with the to address the policing needs of emerging community and other agencies to deliver „„a new police station and district functions communities in South East Queensland. a range of road safety initiatives. complex at Burpengary These plans will incorporate the use of new technologies—particularly information „„a new district headquarters at Coomera Establishing and maintaining infrastructure is management systems—and a broad range an essential component of the Police Service’s „„a new police beat at Logan Village. of service delivery options. approach to delivering high-quality policing services. Strong investment in infrastructure

81 The Queensland Government addresses and disaster management while supporting Emergency these challenges by providing an extensive the government s counter-terrorism capability. network of emergency services infrastructure. It will provide for the future growth of New fire and ambulance stations are 000 services in one of Australia s fastest services procured in direct response to current and growing regions. projected service delivery needs reduced The Queensland Government is responsible response times to all types of emergency Progress on emergency for ensuring Queensland communities are calls being a paramount requirement. supported by, and benefit from, a broad services projects in To help meet the challenge of increased range of essential emergency services. Its demand and maintain service standards, operational arms include the Queensland Fire 2008 09 planning for new priorities is informed by and Rescue Service (QFRS), the Queensland „ A $76 million Queensland Emergency the QFRS and QAS capital infrastructure Ambulance Service (QAS) and Emergency Operations Centre in Kedron will plans. These documents assist in identifying Management Queensland (EMQ). These in turn provide a coordinated operational and funding priorities for physical infrastructure support volunteer organisations ranging from communication facility for the delivery of land, buildings, plant and equipment and the Rural Fire Service to Volunteer Marine emergency services in the region. communication technology. Rescue and the State Emergency Service. It will combine dispersed communication The plans are sufficiently flexible and revised centres into one, state-of-the-art As well as the essential front line services regularly to reflect changing societal and communication facility capable of (fire, ambulance, search and rescue), the operational needs. responding to the most complex government also provides for the planning, emergency situations across Queensland. coordination and facilitation needed to build To ensure timely procurement of service-ready Construction has commenced and is due community capacity to be prepared for and facilities, the government has introduced to be completed in 2010. respond to a range of predictable disasters a number of alternative and more efficient and possible emergencies. project procurement and construction „ A $4 million Ipswich Regional Ambulance methodologies. These initiatives include Station is currently at the planning However, emergency services in South East bundling projects on a geographic or building- stage and due for completion in 2010. Queensland are facing three main challenges: type basis, using factory-built buildings, The project will significantly improve strong population growth, increasing and developing a suite of standard designs service delivery in direct response to the high-density development, and further to expedite the design and documentation demands of growth in Ipswich. development within the urban footprint. stages of project procurement. These challenges put the pressure on the „ Construction of the $20 million government s ability to deliver essential Queensland Combined Emergency services and will be exacerbated by the Queensland Emergency Services Academy at Whyte Island has anticipated impacts of climate change, Operations Centre (QEOC) been completed. This facility comprises including increases in the frequency and/or a comprehensive training facility for the intensity of drought, heatwave, storm surge, The QEOC will be a state-of-the art facility full range of emergency services through flood and cyclonic activity. at Kedron Park designed to meet the real-life streetscape, administration and challenges of the 21st century for emergency logistical support units.

82 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Community services

Table 14 Community services

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 10 Completed Project investment Category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Western Corridor 14.1 Ipswich Court, Watch-house and Police Station 110 3 14.2 Gatton Correctional Precinct 2,410 1 & 3 14.3 Police Academy 450 1 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 14.4 Brisbane Supreme Court and District Court 600 3 14.5 Pine Rivers Courthouse, Strathpine 4 18 Completed 2008-09 14.6 Sandgate Courthouse 4 4.4 Completed 2007-08 Total 3,570 22.4

Construction started Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed, it is noted in the table. Justice services Social housing Corrective The Queensland Government The Nation Building Economic Stimulus Plan services provides a range of Social Housing Initiative aims to expand the supply of much-needed social housing and In November 2006 the Queensland infrastructure to support the maximise the involvement of the not-for-profit justice system, including a Government announced it would establish a housing sector. major corrective services precinct at Spring network of courthouses which Queensland will receive nearly $1.3 billion Creek near Gatton. The precinct, which may are critical to maintaining a safe, from $6.4 billion committed nationally by the have an ultimate capacity of approximately just and supportive society. Australian Government for the Social Housing 3000 beds, will be developed in stages and Initiative. This funding will be spent on repairs incorporate a number of correctional centres. Progress on justice services and maintenance to existing social housing, The government has acquired a 600-hectare and construction of approximately 4000 new site and made an initial commitment of projects in 2008 09 properties between 2009 and 2012. $500 million for stage 1A of the project. A managing contractor has been „ A $110 million Ipswich Courthouse, The Queensland Government will direct engaged for construction and early watch-house and police station in the investment under this initiative to the not-for- works have commenced on site including Ipswich CBD. The project includes profit sector through capital grants and head- road and water infrastructure. 12 courtrooms for the District Court leasing arrangements to support: and Magistrates Court as well as a „ the growth of a small number of providers watch-house and police station. to become significant developers of Construction commenced in mid 2007 affordable housing, with plans to develop with completion anticipated for late 2009. 500 to 1000 dwellings or more „ A new Brisbane Supreme Court and „ the growth of specialist tenancy District Court complex at the intersection management organisations capable of Roma and George streets in Brisbane s of managing large portfolios CBD. Construction commenced in late of 500 or more tenancies. 2007 and is due to be completed in late 2011. The 60 000 square metre building will include 45 courtrooms, associated support functions, registry, judges chambers and cells. Along with the existing Magistrates Court and a large public square, the complex will create a new integrated legal precinct and public amenity for the western end of the CBD.

83 Infrastructure for rural development

The SEQ Regional Plan details a Within rural areas the SEQ Regional Plan Sustainable rural communities require reliable wide range of desired regional aims to encourage compact residential and safe water supplies to meet domestic development in existing towns and villages needs and support agricultural and rural land use outcomes and informs and minimise the impacts of development industries. Access to reliable water supplies the Queensland Government’s on areas of economic importance such as has been a major challenge for many rural priority investments in good quality agricultural land and other communities due to prolonged drought and regional infrastructure. important regional landscape values. The the emerging impacts of climate variability. plan contributes to the sustainable economic In 2005, rural production in South East development of rural areas through land Queensland accounted for about 150 000 use planning that protects agricultural million litres, or 24 per cent, of the region’s production areas and supports rural industry total water usage. The draft SEQ Water adjustment and diversification strategies. Strategy contains options for improving the The Queensland Government supports reliability of supply for urban communities the development and maintenance of and, where possible, providing additional rural infrastructure through a range of supplies to support agricultural production grant and subsidy programs that assist and rural industries. rural communities with the costs of water, With water supplies being limited under any sewerage, social, community, and cultural water supply system, sustainable economic facilities. Funding assistance for roads is also development increasingly is reliant on provided through the Roads Alliance program improvements in water use efficiency gains and the Southern Queensland Accelerated by rural and urban users. The SEQ Irrigation Road Rehabilitation program administered by Futures initiative has played a central role the Department of Transport and Main Roads. in assisting agricultural producers and rural industries to be more productive with smaller Additionally, in meeting commitments to volumes of water. develop sustainable rural communities, the Queensland Government has allocated approximately 11 per cent of total funding under the SEQ Infrastructure Plan to directly benefit rural communities across the water, transport, energy and social sectors.

84 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Infrastructure for rural development

To supplement surface and ground water The Rural Futures Strategy to be released infrastructure investments, the Queensland in 2009 proposes a number of actions to Government will continue to investigate address the infrastructure needs of rural opportunities to supply recycled water for areas. These include proposals for rural water rural production through its sub-regional total users to access recycled water; continuing the water cycle planning program. This program SEQ Irrigation Futures (Water Use Efficiency) intends to extend the benefits of investments program; the equitable provision of social in recycled water infrastructure, which add infrastructure to rural areas; and improving to urban supplies in times of drought, into community transport infrastructure. rural communities and support the economic The strategy will form the basis of an development of agricultural and other rural integrated rural planning framework in South industries and businesses. In the medium- East Queensland seeking to balance the term, the Water Grid Manager is developing competition for land and natural resources, arrangements that include pricing to allow the needs of rural landowners, agricultural rural communities and industries to obtain producers, rural communities and the impacts urban water supplies on a temporary basis. of regional population growth. The draft SEQ Water Strategy also plans to provide increased security of supply to more than 200 000 rural residents who are not connected to the SEQ Water Grid or who rely on water from rainwater tanks or groundwater bores. Options listed in the strategy include direct connection to the water grid through the construction of new pipelines and providing additional surface and groundwater supplies.

85 Regional sport and recreation

The Queensland Government Progress on sport and „„Brisbane City Council received funding is committed to providing to construct two aquatic centres; recreation projects in incorporating a 25 metre, eight lane, new opportunities for 2008–09 heated swimming pool, a 16 x 20 metre Queenslanders to participate heated indoor pool, kiosk/administration in sport and recreation, from Queensland Government grant programs facilities, change rooms and amenities at community to elite level. assist local government and community both Mt Gravatt East State School and organisations to construct sport and Runcorn State High School. The centres The government, working with local recreation facilities and prepare recreation were completed and opened to the public government and community organisations, plans to foster improved use and in February 2009 delivers a range of programs and services to management of facilities. During 2008–09 „„Brisbane City Council was provided encourage people to participate in sport and the Queensland Government constructed, or over $1.1 million to construct ten new recreation and ensure sporting facilities are worked in partnership with local government, hard-court synthetic surface tennis courts accessible and used effectively. community organisations and private and a clubhouse at Wavell Heights. partners, to complete the following regionally The Find Your 30 campaign is a major Construction was completed in June 2008 significant projects: initiative to address growing concerns that „„The $2 million redevelopment of the around half of Queenslanders report as „„The Queensland Tennis Centre was Toowoomba Sports Ground incorporating overweight or obese and are not sufficiently completed in December 2008. The a new grandstand, amenities and entry active. Find Your 30 is designed to encourage centre includes 23 international-standard way, was completed in March 2009. Queenslanders to find simple ways of courts including all three grand-slam incorporating at least 30 minutes of physical surfaces (grass, clay and acrylic). The Some of the following projects which will be activity into daily activities. centre court arena seats 5500 people progressed in 2009-10 include: and has already hosted the highly „„Construction of a 25 000 capacity AFL successful Brisbane International stadium on the Gold Coast (estimated tennis tournament in January 2009 at up to $130 million, subject to scope „„The Redcliffe District Rugby League of works) will commence in 2009. The Football Club received funding for stadium will be designed to enable the construction of an indoor heated upgrading in the future if required for swimming pool. The facility opened international events, including athletics, to the public in September 2008 cricket and football. The Queensland Government has committed $60 million to this project. The stadium is expected to open in 2011

86 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part B: Regional sport and recreation

„ Construction of stage one of the The Queensland Government is preparing Runaway Bay sports precinct extension Outdoor measures to coordinate the delivery incorporating six new multipurpose of outdoor recreation services within playing fields. The project is estimated to South East Queensland and identify be complete in late 2010 recreation regional outdoor recreation priorities. Priority projects will be delivered in „ A new motorcycle sporting precinct Outdoor recreation is an partnership with local government, the including motocross track, clubhouse and important part of South East community and the private sector. amenities in the northern Gold Coast area. Queensland s attraction, The project, which is being lead by the Gold Coast City Council, is expected to be livability and lifestyle. Popular Progress on outdoor complete in mid 2010 activities include picnicking, recreation projects in surfing, bushwalking, camping, „ Development of a new aquatic centre 2008 09 including a 50 metre pool at the University canoeing and four-wheel driving. of the Sunshine Coast. The project is The Queensland Government has invested Opportunities to participate in all of these estimated to be complete in mid 2010. funds to develop three regional recreation activities are highly valued by both South trails in South East Queensland. East Queensland residents and visitors. Community programs Safe, convenient and beautiful places for „ Brisbane Valley Rail Trail a 148 kilometre trail following the closed Brisbane The government has a suite of community outdoor recreation form a major part of the Valley railway line between Ipswich and programs that provide practical information, South East Queensland tourism industry Blackbutt. The trail passes through the advice and accreditation to Queenslanders to and help connect people with natural spectacular scenery and agricultural areas increase participation in sport and recreation. environment and rural landscapes. of Fernvale, Lowood, Esk, , They consist of regional workshops, the When people participate in outdoor recreation , Moore and Linville. The project Get Active Queensland Schools Program, the activities they address obesity and other includes track construction, road and gully Get Active Queensland Accreditation Program, health issues. Surveys consistently show that crossings, visitor amenities and directional Moving with Children workshops, Teacher walking; surfing; swimming in creeks, rivers and interpretive signage. A 7 kilometre Professional Development workshops and and lakes; and cycling make up more than section between Moore and Linville was providing sports locker rooms and other half of the physically active forms of sport or opened in November 2007, and new horse clinics. All initiatives are available to the recreation that people choose. yards were opened in Linville in May public free of charge and can be accessed 2008. Another section, north of Cominya, across Queensland. In 2007-08 and 2008-09, was opened in November 2008. About 301 events attracting 33 203 participants 50 kilometres of the rail trail is now open were held in South East Queensland. for public use. Accommodation, food and other services are available in the townships along the trail.

87 „ Boonah to Ipswich Trail a 76 kilometre South East Queensland horse Great Walks of Queensland trail linking Ipswich to Boonah via Flinders trail network In March 2008 the 54 kilometre Gold Coast Peak and the site of the proposed The Queensland Government announced in Hinterland Great Walk opened, linking Wyaralong Dam. This trail is located on 2006 horse riders will have continued use of the and the existing public land including formed and some formed management roads and tracks Springbrook Plateau. unformed roads through important scenic through proposed national parks in South and cultural landscapes. It will cater for Almost $6.5 million was allocated in 2006 to East Queensland (subject to the SEQ Forest walkers, mountain bikers and horse riders. fund the second stage of a network of world Agreement). This continued use will occur on The project includes constructing a new class middle-to-long distance walking tracks formed management roads historically used track, visitor amenities and directional and throughout the very best of Queensland s for horse riding in five project areas: Noosa, interpretive signage. protected area network. Building on the Mapleton-Kenilworth, Caboolture-Bellthorpe, success of the $10 million Great Walks of „ Maroochy River Trail a 50 kilometre Western Brisbane and Gold Coast. Queensland program first released in 2001, trail from near Yandina to Maroochydore A network of approximately 500 kilometres the network will be extended with new tracks along the Maroochy River and its of these trails will remain as a narrow through Cooloola and the Conondale Range tributary streams. The trail passes strip of forest reserve tenure when the in South East Queensland, as well as through through scenic rural landscapes and surrounding forest reserve transfers to the Whitsunday Islands and Carnarvon will cater for canoeists and kayakers. national park. Horse riding will not be National Park. There will be riverside parking areas, allowed on existing national parks and water access pontoons and ramps, The $1.4 million Cooloola Great Walk will this commitment will not set a precedent visitor amenities, and directional and traverse the spectacular Cooloola Section for riding in other national park areas. interpretive signage. The River Trail of the Great Sandy National Park along will be officially opened in 2009. The government will spend $650 000 during a 90 kilometre walking track. Linking the 2009 for operational works, like installing Noosa North Shore to Rainbow Beach via In addition to building the trails, the fences, gates, signage and parking, on formed the upper Noosa River and the eastern high Queensland Government has allocated a management roads through proposed national dunes, the Cooloola Great Walk will provide further $1 million to promote and market parks in South East Queensland. This work four hikers camps and associated facilities outdoor recreation opportunities. will be completed by late 2009. such as lookouts, bridges, trail heads and Walking tracks, camping areas, visitor centres, signage. Construction is well underway and public amenities, roads and picnic facilities on track for completion by the end of 2009. are provided by the Queensland Government The $1.4 million Conondale Range Great in national parks and on other state land to Walk will provide a 70 kilometre circuit walk support outdoor recreation activities. The showcasing the rugged mountains and gorges government spends approximately $15 million of the Conondale Range on a four day walk each year on visitor facilities in South East with numerous opportunities for short walks. Queensland s national parks, state forest Construction is well underway and on track recreation areas and marine parks. for completion by mid 2010.

88 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part B: Regional sport and recreation

Table 15 Regional sport and recreation infrastructure

Estimated Estimate Delivery timeframe Map 10 Completed Project investment category ref no. projects $M 2009-10 2013-14 to 2019-20 to $M (see note D) to 2012-13 2018-19 2025-26 Western Corridor 15.1 Brisbane Valley Rail Trail 3.6 3 15.2 Boonah to Ipswich Trail 2.4 3 Regional Tennis Facility: University of Southern Queensland 15.3 2.7 1 campus 15.4 Gatton Aquatic Centre 2.5 2 15.5 Tivoli Multi-purpose facility Stage 1 3.3 1 15.6 Highfields indoor multipurpose auditorium 1.3 1 15.7 Clive Berghofer Stadium: Toowoomba upgrade 4 2 Completed in 2008-09 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan 15.8 Aquatic Centre upgrades: Colmslie 8 2 15.9 State Equestrian Centre, Caboolture 4 3 15.10 Ballymore Rugby Stadium Redevelopment 4 1 15.11 Meadowbrook multisport fields 3 1 15.12 Redcliffe Tennis Centre upgrade 3 1 15.13 Kippa Ring indoor multi-purpose facility 4.4 1 15.14 Aquatic Centre upgrades: Mt Gravatt, Runcorn and Redcliffe 4 21 Completed 2008-09 15.15 Queensland Tennis Centre, Tennyson 4 82 Completed 2008-09 Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre: Nathan upgrade 15.16 4 10 Completed 2007-08 (hydrotherapy centre) 15.17 State Softball Centre, Ormiston 4 1.3 Completed 2007-08 15.18 Cricket Centre of Excellence, Albion (stage 1) 4 2.5 Completed 2007-08 15.19 Brisbane Cricket Ground, Woolloongabba 4 50 Completed 2007-08 15.20 Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre, Nathan 4 1.5 Completed 2007-08 Gold Coast 15.21 Gold Coast Stadium redevelopment (Carrara) 130 0 15.22 Motorcycle Sporting Precinct: Northern Gold Coast 2.2 1 15.23 Runaway Bay Sports Precinct Stage 1 (new playing fields) 3.9 1 15.24 Lamington Springbrook Great Walk 4 3 Completed 2007-08 15.25 Skilled Park, Robina 4 160 Completed 2007-08 Sunshine Coast 15.26 Maroochy River Trail 0.5 3 15.27 Cooloola Great Walk 1.4 3 15.28 Conondale Range Great Walk 1.4 3 15.29 Aquatic Centre: University of the Sunshine Coast 2.4 1 Total 184 333.3

Construction started

Notes A. The table identifies the expected delivery timeframe for each infrastructure project. The darker shade represents projects that are under construction at 1 July 2009. B. Estimated investment is in 2009 dollars to allow price consistency over the full timeframe of the program. Estimates in the state budget and other documents may differ, as they may incorporate costs that reflect anticipated changes in input prices between initial planning and the time of construction. Estimated investment includes funds already expended on projects. C. Where funding is required from sources other than the Queensland Government, their estimated costs have been included. Where projects are subject to federal funding, it is noted as timing of these projects is subject to negotiation with the federal government. D. For an explanation of estimate categories, refer to page 19. E. Where a project has been completed or a stage of a project completed, it is noted in the table. F. For consistency across this document, amounts less than $20m remain unrounded.

89 Map 10 – Social and economic infrastructure

90 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009–2026 Part C Appendices The following websites provide further information on the scope and Useful websites status of infrastructure projects included in this infrastructure plan.

Project Website

Regional planning and infrastructure projects SEQ Regional Plan www.dip.qld.gov.au Major projects and infrastructure www.dip.qld.gov.au Transport www.transport.qld.gov.au/Home/Projects_and_initiatives Department of Transport and Main Roads www.mainroads.qld.gov.au Gateway Upgrade Project www.gatewayupgradeproject.com.au Bus and busway projects www.translink.qld.gov.au Airport Link www.airportlink.com.au Gold Coast Rapid Transit www.translink.com.au/qt/TransLin.nsf/index/gc_rapidtransit www.transport.qld.gov.au/Home/Projects_and_initiatives/Projects/ Inner City Rail Capacity Study Inner_city_rail_upgrade/ Clem Jones Tunnel (Clem7) www.rivercitymotorway.com.au/content/2036/Clem-Jones-Tunnel Rail upgrades www.qr.com.au/seqip Water Queensland Water Commission www.qwc.qld.gov.au SEQ Water Grid www.watergrid.infrastructure.qld.gov.au/asp/index.asp SEQ Regional Water Supply Strategy www.seqwaterstrategy.qld.gov.au Traveston Crossing and Wyaralong dams www.qldwi.com.au Water Saving Rebate Schemes www.nrw.qld.gov.au/water/saverscheme Sustainable Housing Code www.dip.qld.gov.au Energy CS Energy www.csenergy.com.au Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation www.dme.qld.gov.au (mines and energy) ENERGEX www.energex.com.au Ergon Energy www.ergon.com.au National Electricity Market Management Company (NEMMCO) www..com.au www.originenergy.com.au Powerlink Queensland www.powerlink.com.au Tarong Energy www.tarongenergy.com.au

92 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Part C: Appendices

Information and communication technology Queensland Telecommunications Strategic Framework www.qgcio.qld.gov.au Health Queensland Health www.health.qld.gov.au Queensland Children s Hospital www.health.qld.gov.au/buildinghealth Gold Coast University Hospital www.health.qld.gov.au/buildinghealth Sunshine Coast Hospital www.health.qld.gov.au/buildinghealth Health Action Plan www.health.qld.gov.au/publications/corporate/action_plan.asp Health Precincts www.health.qld.gov.au/publications Smart State Medical Research Centre www.smartstate.qld.gov.au/resources/publications/ss_strategy/building.shtm Education and training Department of Education and Training www.education.qld.gov.au Queensland Smart State Academies www.qldacademies.eq.edu.au Millennium Arts Project www.publicworks.qld.gov.au Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre Expansion www.bcec.com.au Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre Extension www.publicworks.qld.gov.au Queensland Skills Plan www.trainandemploy.qld.gov.au Community safety and justice Community safety initiatives www.emergency.qld.gov.au Queensland Police Service www.police.qld.gov.au Courthouse upgrades www.justice.qld.gov.au Gatton Correctional Precinct www.dcs.qld.gov.au/About_Us/The_Department/Prison_Precinct/index.shtml Regional sport and recreation Sport and recreation funding programs www.sportrec.qld.gov.au and www.dlgpsr.qld.gov.au Horse trails and Great Walks www.epa.qld.gov.au/parks_and_forests SEQ Regional Outdoor Recreation Strategy www.dip.qld.gov.au Skilled Park, Robina www.stadiums.qld.gov.au State Tennis Centre www.publicworks.qld.gov.au Industry development Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation www.dtrdi.qld.gov.au Boggo Road Urban Village Ecosciences Precinct www.sd.qld.gov.au/ecosciencesprecinct Infrastructure for rural development SEQ Rural Futures Strategy www.dip.qld.gov.au

93 Index of tables, figures and maps

Tables Figures Table 1 Program scorecard 9 Figure 1 South East Queensland infrastructure investment and jobs 5

Table 2 Estimated investment identified in this Figure 2 Delivered projects pipeline 6 19 infrastructure plan Figure 3 Indicative activity of SEQ Infrastructure Plan to 2026 8 Table 3 Western Corridor and Toowoomba transport 30 infrastructure Figure 4 Program expenditure to date 9 Table 4 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan transport Figure 5 Snapshot of infrastructure spending across the state 18 36 infrastructure Figure 6 Cumulative expenditure to date by subregion 18 Table 5 Gold Coast transport infrastructure 42 Figure 7 Public transport patronage 24 Table 6 Sunshine Coast transport infrastructure 47 Figure 8 Growth in electricity demand across Australia 2009-10 64 Table 7 Industry development infrastructure 54 to 2013-14

Table 8 Regional water infrastructure 63 Table 9 Powerlink upgrades in South East Queensland 71 Maps Table 10 ENERGEX network upgrades in South East Map 1 South East Queensland Region 12 72 Queensland Map 2 Transport infrastructure subregions 25 Table 11 Regional health infrastructure 75 Map 3a Western Corridor transport infrastructure 28 Table 12 Regional state school infrastructure 78 Map 3b Toowoomba transport infrastructure 29 Table 13 Regional vocational education and training 80 Map 4 Brisbane, Moreton, Redland and Logan transport infrastructure 35 infrastructure Table 14 Community services 83 Map 5 Gold Coast transport infrastructure 41 Table 15 Regional sport and recreation infrastructure 89 Map 6 Sunshine Coast transport infrastructure 46

Map 7 Regional freight infrastructure 49

Map 8 Regional water infrastructure 62

Map 9 Powerlink and ENERGEX infrastructure 70

Map 10 Social and economic infrastructure 90

94 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009 2026 Published July 2009 ISBN: 978-0-9805449-0-9 Published July 2009 ©The State of Queensland (Department of Infrastructure and Planning) ISBN: 978-0-9805449-0-9 Copyright protects this publication. Except for ©The State of Queensland purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, (Department of Infrastructure and Planning) no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the department. Copyright protects this publication. Except for 2026 2009 Program and Plan Infrastructure Queensland East South purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the department.

Images courtesy of: Boggo Road Busway Alliance, ENERGEX, Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre, The Courier Mail, Department of Communities, Department of Transport and Main Roads, Major Hospitals Projects Office, Port of Brisbane, Powerlink, Department of Education and Training, Queensland Health, Queensland Rail, Department of Public Works, Department of Justice and Attorney General, Queensland Water Infrastructure, Rebecca Patrick, Leighton Contractors, Redcliffe Leagues Club, Stadiums Queensland, Mark Straker Photography, Images courtesy of: Southbank Institute of Technology, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Toowoomba Regional Council, Kylie Jackson and Mark Burgin. Boggo Road Busway Alliance, ENERGEX, Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre, The Courier Mail, Department of Communities, Department of Transport and Main Roads, Major Hospitals Projects Office, Port of Brisbane, Powerlink, Department of Education and Training, Queensland Health, Queensland Rail, Department of Public Works, Department of Justice and Attorney General, Queensland Water Infrastructure, Rebecca Patrick, Leighton Contractors, Redcliffe Leagues Club, Stadiums Queensland, Mark Straker Photography, Southbank Institute of Technology, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Toowoomba Regional Council, Kylie Jackson and Mark Burgin.

Department of Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 Australia tel +61 7 3227 8548 fax +61 7 3224 4683 [email protected]

www.dip.qld.gov.au

Transcript of proceedings

16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 1 THURSDAY, 16 JULY 2009

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C—NATURAL RESOURCES, MINES AND ENERGY AND TRADE

Estimates Committee C Members Mr ER Moorhead (Chair) Ms P-K Croft Mr DF Gibson Mr SA Kilburn Mrs RN Menkens Mr JW Seeney Ms ECM van Litsenburg

In Attendance Hon. S Robertson, Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade Department of Environment and Resource Management Mr J Bradley, Director-General (Acting) Ms D Best, Deputy Director-General, Water and Corporate Services Mr C Robson, Assistant Director-General, Land and Vegetation Mr D Brown, Assistant Director-General, Regional Service Delivery Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation Mr P Henneken, Director-General Ms K Stewart, Manager, Estimates Mr D Hunt, Associate Director-General, Queensland Mines and Energy Mr M Reside, Director, Cabinet Legislation and Liaison Officer (Acting) Mr J Cole, Chief Officer, Office of Clean Energy Mr R Whiddon, General Manager, Trade Queensland Mr N Abdie, Principal Advisor, Trade Queensland

Committee met at 8.30 am CHAIR: Good morning. I declare this meeting of Estimates Committee C open. I am Evan Moorhead, the member for Waterford and chair of the committee. Joining me on the committee are: Mr Jeff Seeney MP, member for Callide and deputy chair; Ms Peta-Kaye Croft MP, member for Broadwater; Mr David Gibson MP, member for Gympie; Mr Steve Kilburn MP, member for Chatsworth; Mrs Rosemary Menkens MP, member for Burdekin; and Ms Lillian van Litsenburg MP, member for Redcliffe. The committee will examine the proposed expenditure for the 2009-10 financial year as contained in the Appropriation Bill 2009 for the portfolios assigned to it by the order of appointment made on 3 June 2009. The proceedings for today will commence at 8.30 am until 12.45 pm examining the portfolio of the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade. From 1.30 pm to 3.45 pm, the committee will then examine the portfolio of the Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women. From 4 pm to 5.45 pm, the committee will then examine the portfolio of the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning. The committee will suspend proceedings for the following breaks: morning tea from 10.15 am to 10.30 am, lunch from 12.45 pm to 1.30 pm, and afternoon tea from 3.45 pm to 4 pm. 2 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

The proceedings today are similar to parliament to the extent that members of the public cannot ask questions. In that regard, I remind visitors that in accordance with standing order 206 any person admitted to a public hearing of a committee may be excluded by order of the committee or at my discretion as chair. In relation to media coverage of the hearing, the committee has resolved that television film coverage and photography be allowed during my introductory comments and the opening statement of each minister, as well as for a short period during each changeover of ministerial advisers. The committee has also agreed to the live broadcast of the hearing via the Parliamentary Service’s website and to receivers throughout the parliamentary precinct. I ask that all mobile phones and pagers now be switched off. I remind members of the committee and the minister that the time limit for questions is one minute. Answers are to be no longer than three minutes. A single chime will give a 15-second warning and a double chime will sound at the end of each of these time limits. An extension of time to answer the question may be given with the consent of the questioner. A double chime will sound two minutes after an extension of time has been given. The standing orders require that at least half the time available for questions and answers be allocated to non-government members. Any time expended when the committee deliberates in private is to be equally apportioned between government and non-government members. For the benefit of Hansard, I ask departmental officers to identify themselves if the minister calls upon them to answer a question. On behalf of the committee, I welcome the minister, departmental officers and members of the public to the hearing today and declare the proposed expenditure to be open for examination. The question before the committee is— That the proposed expenditure be agreed to. Minister, would you like to make an opening statement? Mr ROBERTSON: Yes, I would. Four years ago when I last sat before an estimates committee as the Minister for Natural Resources and Mines in Queensland our state was in the grip of the worst drought on record. The combined capacity of Wivenhoe, Somerset and North Pine dams was 39.5 per cent and water restrictions had just been triggered. Today our dams are nearly 80 per cent full, but we also understand how quickly things can change. That is why the Bligh government is continuing to deliver on our commitment to construct a $9 billion water grid to ensure South-East Queensland has the water security it needs to grow and prosper into the future. To date, this construction has involved 5,500 workers, the laying of more than 420 kilometres of pipe and the upgrade or construction of eight water treatment plants to diversify and conserve our water sources. Thankfully, the water situation in Far North Queensland is vastly different. We find ourselves in the unique position of having waterways which are still in their pristine condition. The Bligh government is committed to protecting and preserving these wild rivers and is looking to declare a further eight pristine river basins following assessment in addition to the Wenlock. Funding is also being provided for an additional 10 wild rivers ranger positions, which is on top of the 20 rangers already performing valuable work on country and providing real jobs for Indigenous people in Cape York. At this year’s election, we committed ourselves to protect endangered regrowth vegetation and vegetation in riparian zones and priority reef catchments. We have kept that promise and consultation is ongoing to ensure that we get the long-term balance right between the environment and the economic interests of producers. Energy is another part of my portfolio, and what remarkable changes we have seen since I commissioned the Somerville review just over five years ago to undertake a warts-and-all look at the electricity distribution sector in Queensland. The Somerville report provided a virtual blueprint to improve the security and reliability of the delivery of electricity in Queensland. Since 2004 we have seen more than $11 billion invested on our network and generation expansion and upgrades, with a further $3.2 billion to be spent this financial year. The Bligh government is also helping Queenslanders to access renewable energy through the Solar Hot Water Program, which will give up to 200,000 households the opportunity to purchase affordable solar hot-water systems. With respect to my responsibilities as Minister for Trade, I am encouraged to see preliminary figures indicating Trade Queensland exceeded its targets for exports generated in 2008-09. At this stage, it is estimated that just over $500 million of new projects can be directly attributed to support provided by Trade Queensland last financial year, up more than $80 million from its estimates. In a background of tough global financial times, this is a great effort which we hope can be improved on this year. While many parts of my portfolio are familiar to me, there have been numerous changes to the landscape in which they operate. I look forward to working with my new departments to deliver on our government’s commitments. CHAIR: Thank you, Minister. We will now start the questioning. I call the member for Callide. Mr SEENEY: Minister, I refer you initially to the Service Delivery Statements for your department on page 3-201. In the third dot point, you talk about assisting to build stronger Indigenous communities. On the next page, you also outline the government’s intention to continue with wild rivers declarations 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 3 throughout the cape. Minister, how can you reconcile your purported interest in assisting to build stronger Indigenous communities with your continuing moves to take away any chance they have of establishing an economic base? CHAIR: Minister, before you start answering, I ask the media to leave. Mr ROBERTSON: Unfortunately, the premise of the member’s question is wrong. The declaration of a river as a wild river does not stop economic development, and any reasonable reading of the wild rivers declarations for any of the rivers that have been so far declared—whether they be in the cape or the gulf—outlines in quite significant detail the range of economic opportunities that can coexist with a wild rivers declaration. Any reasonable reading of those documents outlines, for example, how much water gets set aside for community development purposes, how much water gets set aside for projects of state significance, how much water gets set aside for major job generating projects. So what we have seen over the last number of months is quite a misleading debate being undertaken by some interests that do not represent the reality of what a wild rivers declaration means. These same people who continue this debate were also the people who were insistent with previous Premier Peter Beattie in putting forward an act of parliament which has been passed that hard-wires economic development opportunities into Cape York so that there can be no confusion whatsoever that a wild rivers declaration stops development. In addition to that, existing economic activities are guaranteed in the declaration. So when I hear and see people on the television claiming that they have had access rights to river banks as graziers for the last X number of years and this has now stopped as a result of wild rivers declaration, either they have been misled or they have not read the guarantees for continuing access for existing enterprises in wild rivers areas. What I would love to see into the future is that those who have an interest in the Cape York and wild rivers declarations engage in a far more honest debate than what we have witnessed, particularly over the last number of months and even last night. Mr SEENEY: Minister, noted Aboriginal leader Noel Pearson has described the wild rivers declarations as ‘sheer insanity’. He says that the state will ‘rip the future out from under Indigenous children’s feet on the cape’. Minister, is Noel Pearson unreasonable? Is he wrong? Or do you know more about the situation on Cape York than Noel Pearson? Mr ROBERTSON: No, I do not think Mr Pearson is wrong because only last night on Lateline he had this to say— There is absolutely no disagreement on our part that those rivers should remain in the way that they have been managed by Aboriginal people for thousands of years and for the past 200 years. Cape York Peninsula hosts the most pristine rivers in the country, and all of those rivers bar a few are on Aboriginal land and that says everything about the stewardship of the traditional owners of the rivers on their land. I sit alongside with Noel Pearson when he says comments like that, because we are as one in terms of wanting to continue to protect those wild rivers. Mr SEENEY: Minister, what is it that you are protecting the wild rivers from? What is the imminent threat that you see that the rivers on Cape York need to be protected from? Mr ROBERTSON: It is not about protecting these rivers from imminent threats. These issues have been debated in the parliament now for numbers of years—in fact, with the support of your side of politics, if I recall correctly. It is a legislated mechanism to ensure that development does not have an impact on those pristine values that we are seeking to protect. It does not stop development, but like any development that occurs in any part of this state or indeed this country it gets informed in terms of the approval process by legislation to ensure that, for example, vegetation is not cleared to an extent more than is necessary, that— Mr SEENEY: The Vegetation Management Act does that surely. CHAIR: Order! Mr ROBERTSON: Correct. You are quite right, but that is what the Wild Rivers Act does, doesn’t it? It calls up those particular— Mr SEENEY: Which apply anyway. Mr ROBERTSON: That is right, so what is your problem? Mr SEENEY: So what are you protecting it from? The Vegetation Management Act protects it from the element that you are talking about. The question is: what is the great threat to these rivers? Given that you agreed Noel Pearson as an Aboriginal leader— CHAIR: I think we have the comment. That is the original question, member for Callide. We will let the minister finish his answer and you will have a supplementary opportunity. Mr ROBERTSON: Those very things resulted in your side of politics supporting the wild rivers legislation is the answer. You surely would have known that, in supporting the legislation that was debated back in 2006. Mr SEENEY: That is not right. That is quite dishonest, and you know it. CHAIR: Thank you. Member for Callide. 4 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr SEENEY: The Aboriginal community is preparing to take court action about the government’s declaration of these areas. Have you made any provision in these budget documents to defend such a court action? Would your department be involved in defending such a court action? Do you think it is appropriate for the Queensland government to spend taxpayers’ money opposing the right of Aboriginal people on the cape to establish an economic base? Mr ROBERTSON: No, we fully support Aboriginal people establishing economic bases on the cape. Mr SEENEY: So have you made any provision in these budget documents to oppose or respond to the sort of litigation that is being prepared by Aboriginal leaders on behalf of the Aboriginal communities on the cape? Mr ROBERTSON: In terms of the general provision of funds to the department, if additional money is required for legal action that may be launched by whomever, then that is a matter that gets taken to the Cabinet Budget Review Committee during the year, but I do not foresee any significant change to the estimates that are before this committee to meet any such challenge. If the challenge is about protecting Indigenous people’s aspirations for economic development, then we agree with those aspirations and they are hard-wired into the wild rivers declarations. I encourage anyone who has an interest in this matter to read those declarations and they will see quite clearly what it is that I am referring to. Mr SEENEY: Minister, when did you last meet Aboriginal leaders from the cape to talk about the wild rivers situation? Mr ROBERTSON: I have had a standing offer to meet with the Pearson brothers and others now since I came into this portfolio a number of months ago. Mr SEENEY: But you haven’t? Mr ROBERTSON: Unfortunately they have not taken up that offer, but we continue to make those offers. In the meantime I have met with representatives of the Cape York Land Council. I was hoping that the Pearsons would have attended the most recent meeting of the Cape York Tenure Resolution Implementation Group, but for whatever reason they were unable to attend. Nevertheless, their representatives had an opportunity to meet with me. My door remains open at any time to meet with Noel or Gerhardt in relation to this or any other matter. In fact, we are trying to organise a meeting for me to travel to Cairns, so keen am I to sit down with these gentlemen to discuss these issues. Mr SEENEY: Minister, when did you last visit any of the communities that were affected by these wild rivers declarations? Mr ROBERTSON: I was in Lockhart River about three weeks ago at a native title determination. It was a great day. Mr SEENEY: Minister, are you suggesting that you were not made aware of the concerns that these communities had when you visited Lockhart River, as you say you did? Mr ROBERTSON: Sorry? Mr SEENEY: Are you suggesting that you were not made aware of the concerns? Mr ROBERTSON: How on earth could you come to that conclusion? Mr SEENEY: Okay. Well, I will put the question to you more directly. Were the concerns of the Aboriginal people on the cape expressed to you on your visit to Lockhart River? And did you dismiss them, or did you take any account of those concerns? Mr ROBERTSON: No-one raised with me during my time in Lockhart River any concern with respect to the wild rivers declaration. Mr SEENEY: Minister, was the wild rivers declaration part of the government’s election promises to any other conservation groups? Were they, like the vegetation management moratorium, a political payback to any particular group? Mr ROBERTSON: No, and nor was the vegetation management announcement. I reject that. That is an offensive statement. CHAIR: Member for Callide, I would ask that you not put argumentative statements within your question. Mr SEENEY: Minister, what, then, do you see as future development opportunities for the cape communities given that this morning you are apparently rejecting the claims by Aboriginal leaders that these wild rivers declarations serve as an impediment to the types of development that they see as being essential for an economic base for those communities? What do you see as the future for the cape? Mr ROBERTSON: I take it that you have read those wild river declarations? Mr SEENEY: Absolutely. Mr ROBERTSON: So you would know what is outlined in them? 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 5

Mr SEENEY: I reject your implied suggestion that my question is answered in those wild rivers declarations. My question to you directly is: what development opportunities do you see for the Aboriginal communities on the cape? What do you and your government which you serve to represent here this morning see as the future for Cape York generally and the Aboriginal communities that have to build an economic base there sooner or later? Mr ROBERTSON: Economic development can continue to occur in wild rivers areas. Activities that are not affected by a wild river declaration include stock grazing, taking water for stock or domestic purposes; weed and pest management; and improving pasture. I would remind you of my opening statement in which I talked about the wild river rangers who have been employed in the cape as a direct result of job-creating opportunities from wild rivers. Although certain types of development are prohibited, the following developments are permitted in high-preservation areas: tourism, such as fishing charters and tours; facilities, such as accommodation and camping grounds; out-stations; residential development; specified work such as roads, railways, powerlines; low-impact exploration for mining; vegetation clearing for necessary infrastructure; and small-scale fuel storage. In the preservation area, which represents the vast majority of the wild river area, all developments in addition to those listed above can continue to occur including agriculture, such as cropping; animal husbandry such as feedlots; in-stream dams and weirs; environmentally relevant activities, for example, aquaculture, grow-out ponds, fish farms, surface mining and petroleum activities. I think there is a wide range of activities that fit within those definitions that can be carried out in both high-preservation and preservation areas in a wild river declared area. Mr SEENEY: Minister, that brings the questioning back to the question I asked you previously, then. What is it that you are protecting the area from? If all of that development can occur and the Aboriginal communities have no need to be concerned about being able to engage in those developments as part of building an economic base, what is it that you are ruling out? What is it that you are protecting the area from? Mr ROBERTSON: Purely these wild river declarations as contained in the legislation are about how development is conducted so it does not impact on the pristine values of those river systems. It is as simple as that. I suspect it is because it was so simple that is why you supported the legislation back in 2006. Mr SEENEY: Once again, for the sake of the record, Mr Chairman, the minister is dishonest in claiming that. CHAIR: Member for Callide, your job is to ask the questions and it is the minister’s job to answer them. If you have another question, I will give you the call. Mr SEENEY: Mr Chairman, surely I also have the right to correct that sort of blatant dishonesty which is meant to deflect the line of questioning. CHAIR: Member for Callide, if you are suggesting that the minister is misleading the committee, you need to put that in writing so that can be considered by the Speaker and the Members’ Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee. This is not the place to debate that. This is your opportunity to ask questions of the minister. Mr SEENEY: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Minister, isn’t the real fact that the wild rivers declarations that you have undertaken are simply a political payoff to conservation groups in the south-east corner that have absolutely no consideration of the effects or the long-term future for the Aboriginal communities in the cape? Mr ROBERTSON: Apart from that being an offensive suggestion, the answer is simply no. I would remind you that at all times we have sought to engage local Indigenous communities in the process of wild rivers declarations, including hiring or contracting Balkanu for some $30,000 to conduct consultations in the most recent wild river declarations, so that we could be assured that that consultation with Indigenous people was conducted at a high and quality level. Mr SEENEY: Minister, I turn to the issue of World Heritage listing for Cape York. Has your department been involved in any negotiations or any consideration of the issue of World Heritage listing? And do you know what the government’s attitude is towards World Heritage listing of Cape York? Mr ROBERTSON: In relation to ministerial responsibility, that rests with my colleague the minister— Mr SEENEY: But my question was— Mr ROBERTSON: No, hang on; I am trying to help you. That is the principal responsibility of my colleague Minister Kate Jones, but in relation to involvement by the department the answer is yes. In fact, it was a topic of discussion at the most recent Cape York Tenure Resolution Implementation Group meeting held here in parliament about three or four weeks ago attended by me, Minister Jones and federal minister Peter Garrett as well as representatives of the Cape York Land Council and others. 6 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr SEENEY: You are not prepared to give us any indication of what your department’s attitude is towards the issue of World Heritage listing? Mr ROBERTSON: We are supportive of it. Mr SEENEY: You support World Heritage listing of Cape York? Mr ROBERTSON: We will be working with the federal government and stakeholder groups— landholders, conservation groups and Indigenous groups—to progress that matter, but ultimately it is the responsibility of the Commonwealth government. Mr SEENEY: So, Minister, in summary, the situation that Cape York Aboriginal communities face is that your government is going to continue with the wild rivers listing, you support World Heritage listing of the cape, and you still somehow believe that that is not going to impact on the economic development opportunities of Cape York Aboriginals? Mr ROBERTSON: That is exactly why our parliament passed the Cape York Peninsula Heritage Act that provides legislative support for the economic aspirations of Indigenous people and other landholders on Cape York. I would remind you that one of Queensland’s biggest development projects under consideration at this point in time—that is, the Aurukun bauxite leases—is located in Cape York. If that project progresses, then that will be a major economic shot in the arm for Cape York and the ability of Indigenous people to secure employment in a project such as that. That is why the proponents of that plan are already working with communities such as the Aurukun community to hopefully identify training opportunities early on for Indigenous people. So, if that project does get up and running, local Indigenous people have an opportunity to get a start in that project. That is just one of a number of projects that are underway in Cape York or planned for Cape York, underscoring our commitment not just to protect the environment of Cape York, and that is something that is world-class, but also to recognise Indigenous aspirations for economic development. CHAIR: We will now move on to government members questions. Mr SEENEY: Mr Chair, I had 50 seconds. CHAIR: I call the member for Callide. Mr SEENEY: Well, I will because there was one question in relation to wild rivers that I believe should be asked, and that is in relation to the proposed declaration for Coopers Creek. Can you give us an indication of the government’s attitude towards the irrigation entitlements that currently exist on Coopers Creek? Mr ROBERTSON: I am aware generally of the debate that is underway in that part of western Queensland, particularly in relation to whether sleeper and dozer licences should be allowed to be enacted. It is a difficult issue. I am aware that the community out there in some respects is split. There are some very strong views. In fact, I met with the representatives of the flood plain association—what are they called? Ms Best: The western river alliance. Mr ROBERTSON: I met with the western river alliance early this week and heard how they would like to see a wild river declaration process and a water resource planning process, because I think the Cooper is currently up for renewal. I can assure you, member for Callide, that I will be considering those issues very carefully and will be listening to both sides of the argument. I will be happy to hear from you and your colleagues, particularly Vaughan Johnson, to get your feedback as to where you think the community is at and how we might resolve those somewhat competing interests that we see out in that part of the world. I think we both agree that it is a unique environment that needs to be handled delicately, because there are some very good enterprises out there that are being able to market themselves as organic beef producers. They do not want to lose that edge that they have been able to establish through working in a pretty clean ‘green’ environment. There are also obviously some aspirations for other types of development to occur out there that may not be complementary to that organic marketing edge that has been established. They are some of the issues that have to be taken into consideration in moving forward with these kinds of initiatives. CHAIR: Minister, I refer you to page 3-239 of the Service Delivery Statements of your department. Can you provide the committee with an update on the status of the water grid? Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you, Chairman. The Queensland government is delivering on its commitment to construct a $9 billion water grid to provide South-East Queensland with the water security it needs to both grow and prosper. Five of the largest water projects are now being commissioned with construction costs of some $4.6 billion. These projects include three interconnector pipelines, the Gold Coast desalination plant and the purified recycled water scheme. To date, this construction has involved, as I mentioned in my opening statement, some 5½ thousand workers and over 12 million hours of work. Over 420 kilometres of pipe has been laid and eight new treatment plants constructed or upgraded to diversify and conserve our water resources. To date, the following volumes have been supplied by the grid: the Northern Pipeline Interconnector some 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 7

3,908 megalitres; the southern regional water pipeline some 11,835 megalitres; the Eastern Pipeline Interconnector some 1,345 megalitres; the Gold Coast desalination plant some 4,700 megalitres; and the Western Corridor Recycled Water Project some 20,800 megalitres. Several key pieces of the water grid are still to be delivered which include: Hinze Dam stage 3, due for completion by 31 December 2010 and currently on schedule; the Wyaralong Dam, construction has now commenced and it is due for completion by 31 December 2011; and Traveston Crossing Dam, with proposed completion by early 2017, subject to final approvals. The government is also committed to construction of the Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage 2 from the Sunshine Coast to Brisbane which is due to commence later this year. On commissioning, the pipeline will be able to move up to 65 million litres of water a day in either direction providing the majority of the Sunshine Coast community with the same high level of water security experienced by the rest of South-East Queensland. Following construction of the Traveston Crossing Dam, the water grid will have the capacity to deliver more than 600,000 megalitres of water a year to South-East Queensland. The completed grid will dramatically improve the reliability of the water supply even with high series population growth and an allowance for a 10 per cent reduction in dam yields due to climate change. The grid is expected to meet the needs of South-East Queensland until at least 2028. Ms van LITSENBURG: I refer to page 3-239 of the Service Delivery Statement and I ask: can you outline the institutional arrangements for the next phase of water reform in South-East Queensland? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. The government in conjunction with South-East Queensland councils has agreed that reforms to the provision of the region’s urban water services are both necessary and overdue. Stage 1 involved a comprehensive reform of the bulk water sector with the commencement of operations of the South-East Queensland water grid on 1 July 2008. This included establishment of three large bulk water businesses to operate the region’s bulk water—that is, , LinkWater and WaterSecure. This replaces the former fragmented structure under which bulk water service provision for the region was delivered. In the second stage of reforms three new integrated retailer distributor entities will be established to be jointly owned by local councils. They will be based on the geographic boundaries that align with the boundaries of the owner councils and will be responsible for water reticulation, sewage treatment and retail services. This stage 2 reform model differs from the state’s previous model which envisaged the establishment of a single distribution entity for the region and three separate stand-alone retailers. However, as result of the concerns of councils about the cost and the perceived complexity of these arrangements, in May 2009 I asked councils to come forward with an alternative reform model to deliver the key objectives at a lower cost. That had the full support of all South-East Queensland councils. We have listened to those concerns and are prepared to move forward with them to implement a new model for the benefit of the region. The second stage of reforms will also involve development of a comprehensive regulatory regime incorporating economic regulation, asset management and water quality. In addition, it will also include the development of customer service standards and land use planning arrangements that are consistent across the region. These new arrangements will provide assurances to the South-East Queensland community that urban water services are being delivered safely and efficiently. These reforms also mean greater transparency of cost and service performance and improved capacity to manage drought and greater efficiency to manage storages at a regional level. Mr KILBURN: I refer to page 3-242 of the Service Delivery Statement and ask: can the minister explain the growth in the operational budget for the Queensland Water Commission and what the commission will be delivering for Queenslanders in 2009-10? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. As a ex-firefighter I am sure he has a real interest in secure water supplies. The commission’s 2008-09 forecast expenditure of $28.5 million reflects its considerable achievements in securing South-East Queensland’s water supplies for the future, including implementation and monitoring of water restrictions, monitoring performance against contractual obligations of bulk water grid entities, market rules administration for the water grid and advice on essential climate resilient water sources including investigation of potential desalination sites, subregional water cycle planning for the Mount Lindesay-North Beaudesert area and continued development and implementation of a long-term regional water supply strategy. During 2009-10 the commission’s significant work program will include further studies into potential desalination sites, delivering ongoing institutional reforms, finalising the South-East Queensland water strategy, engaging with urban planners, land developers and councils, developing responses to management of energy and carbon impacts of the water grid, implementing long-term water efficiency strategies and regulatory solutions to permanent water efficiency and providing advice on the continued development of long-term regional water security options. Announced savings of $22 million over four years in the commission’s budget will be realised through reduced communication programs and corporate overheads with the consolidation of its corporate and communication services into the Department of Environment and Resource 8 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Management. The commission’s published $28.1 million budget for 2009-10 already represented a $3.2 million reduction from the initial estimated budget of $31.3 million. These savings came through reductions in corporate services of $1.1 million and communications expenditure of $2.1 million. The $3.2 million savings offset planned increases in activities required in 2009-10 such as desalination siting investigation, subregional and local water supply studies, major regulatory reform projects and increased costs associated with enterprise bargaining. Without cutting jobs, a further reduction of $2.3 million in corporate communications costs and lower priority projects represents total savings of some $5.5 million for 2009-10. With the commission’s corporate and communications teams merged with the department further savings will be delivered in 2009-10 and sustained thereafter. In addition, resulting from the government’s commitment to implement reforms identified in the Webb and Weller review, the commission’s board of three commissioners has been simplified to a single commissioner model. Amendments to the commission structure or budget do not change its core functions or the important work it continues to undertake throughout Queensland. Ms CROFT: I refer to pages 12 and 13 of Budget Paper No. 3 and ask: can the minister outline the actions that have been taken since the release of the Pascoe report into the fluoride dosing incident at North Pine? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Broadwater. On Friday, 26 June 2009 the final report into the North Pine fluoride incident was released by the state government. The report found the overdosing occurred as a result of equipment failures at the North Pine fluoride dosing facility to which the SEQWater operators did not respond appropriately. There were a number of recommendations by the independent investigator as well as a series of comprehensive compliance actions issued by the Office of the Water Supply Regulator. SEQWater has been given strict deadlines to which it is required to deliver against these compliance actions. All actions are required to be completed and reported to the regulator by the end of this year. I am pleased to be able to report that SEQWater has started work on all immediate actions required by the regulator. In addition, the vast majority of other compliance actions are also underway. Most importantly, steps have already been taken to ensure no existing fluoride dosing facility can operate when the corresponding water treatment plant is offline. SEQWater operators have been instructed to manually disable all fluoride dosing facilities when water treatment plants are offline. Other key initiatives across all SEQWater fluoride facilities include the development of enhanced training for operators, including the management of documentation and reporting, as well as the development of an interlocking control system to ensure no fluoride dosing facility can operate if the water treatment plant is offline. A review is also underway into the hazard assessment of each fluoride facility including upgrading the existing emergency response plans. Following the North Pine incident, SEQWater conducted an immediate review of all fluoride dosing facilities, including an assessment of equipment performance. Importantly, no similar sets of circumstances were identified. SEQWater will be conducting a further, more detailed review of all fluoride dosing facilities over the next six months. This incident should never have occurred and SEQWater has been made well aware of its responsibilities to ensure that it does not happen again. CHAIR: Minister, I refer you to the agency budget highlights document and ask: can the minister provide an update on the vegetation moratorium and the consultation process to date? Mr ROBERTSON: As has been mentioned earlier, the Bligh government made an election commitment on 15 March 2009 for a moratorium on the clearing of endangered regrowth vegetation while the government consults with stakeholder groups about ways of improving vegetation clearing laws. This commitment was made in response to the latest Statewide Landcover and Trees Study which showed a continued high rate of clearing of regrowth vegetation. The Vegetation Management (Regrowth Clearing Moratorium) Bill 2009 was assented to on 30 April 2000, giving effect to the moratorium from 8 April 2009 to 7 July 2009. That moratorium has since been extended for a further three months until 7 October 2009 to ensure proper consideration of the large number of submissions received from stakeholders and landholders. The department has received close to 400 submissions. Not surprisingly the majority are from rural landholders. The submissions are currently being considered to assist in the development of future protection arrangements for regrowth vegetation and regrowth mapping and to ensure the necessary certainty is provided for landholders and rural industries. My department has also been consulting with key stakeholders to seek their views on options for future protection of regrowth. This consultation is occurring with stakeholders such as AgForce, Queensland Farmers Federation, Timber Queensland, World Wildlife Fund, Wildlife Queensland, the Urban Development Institute of Australia Queensland branch, the Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia, the Australian Bankers Association as well as major rural lenders. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 9

In addition, senior departmental staff have toured brigalow country as the management of this land was raised as a key issue in the public submissions. A range of options for the future protection of high-value vegetation regrowth are now being considered. It is important to government that any future arrangements recognise good management practices of current sustainable rural enterprises and consider the potential impact on these enterprises and rural communities as a whole. As part of the consultation process the mapping was identified as a key issue. I am committed to ensuring the most current mapping data and scientifically robust approaches are used for future regrowth mapping. This will ensure that urban areas and crops that were mapped as endangered regrowth on the moratorium map are excluded in any future map. Whilst the moratorium does not affect these areas, the department is committed to developing mapping that is the most representative of high- value regrowth the government is seeking to protect. Ms van LITSENBURG: I refer to the agency’s budget highlights document and ask: can you provide an update on how mapping issues associated with the moratorium will be addressed? Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you, member for Redcliffe. At the start of the regrowth moratorium a map was produced to help landholders identify areas affected by the moratorium. There have been some concerns raised about the accuracy of this map. Mr SEENEY: That is because there was not much accuracy. Mr ROBERTSON: Come now. You are not going to run this old one out again? I thought something might have changed over five years but clearly not. The moratorium map was developed as a template. Mr SEENEY: The point— Mr ROBERTSON: I was provoked. Mr SEENEY: I was provoked. CHAIR: I think there is a bit of provocation on both sides, Minister. Can you come back to the question. Mr ROBERTSON: It could be a long four hours. The moratorium map was developed as a temporary measure to protect high-value regrowth vegetation while the government consults with stakeholders to finalise the long-term arrangements for regrowth protection. Moratorium regrowth vegetation areas which are marked as blue on the moratorium map were identified using satellite imagery. As a result, suburbs and towns which have plenty of trees and shrubs or areas that have been cleared since the date the satellite imagery was captured may appear as moratorium regrowth vegetation areas on the map. However, the map is only a part of the moratorium arrangements and indicates areas where people should check further with my Department of Environment and Resource Management about whether the moratorium affects them. The map needs to be considered in conjunction with the legislation, which provides exemptions for clearing in urban areas and routine management activity, such as clearing for firebreaks and maintaining fences and infrastructure. That is the point that we have made absolutely clear all along. Many landholders have contacted departmental vegetation management officers who have explained the map and the effect, if any, of the moratorium on their property. Landholders can also access easy-to-understand guides from the department’s website to assist in determining the effect of the moratorium map. Many property owners who viewed the moratorium maps and who worked through the guides have found their properties were not affected. For example, where vegetation is shown as blue on the moratorium map and the landholder has a property map of assessable vegetation identifying the area as category X, it is exempt from the moratorium. My department is now working to ensure that the most current mapping data and scientifically robust approaches are used for future regrowth mapping. This includes new mapping methodologies to exclude urban areas and crops that were mapped as endangered regrowth on the moratorium map. My department is committed to developing mapping that is the most representative of the high- value regrowth that the government is seeking to protect. If any landholder has a concern about the moratorium map, or indeed the vegetation maps that can be generated through my department’s website, I encourage them, as I always do, to contact the department and work through those issues to ensure that the mapping that is available in the future is as accurate as possible. Many landholders have taken the opportunity to do that, and I encourage more to do exactly that. Mr KILBURN: Minister, I refer you to page 3-201 at dot point 1 and page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statements and ask: can the minister provide an update on the advances in spatial information and how this will contribute to the economy? Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you. Online services such as Google Earth and the popularity of in-car navigation have changed forever the way citizens think about location based or spatial information. The government is a primary generator and collector of spatial data, with as much as 80 per cent of government data having a spatial component. 10 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Spatial technologies are widely used in natural resource and environmental management, as I have just discussed in my previous answer, and also in the fields of geoscience, biosecurity, emergency management, defence, planning, construction, transport and utilities. Nearly every sector of the economy relies daily on spatial information. The contribution to the Australian economy of spatial technology through services and efficiency gains is considerable. The independent report by ACIL Tasman titled The value of spatial information estimated that in 2006-07 spatial information and technologies contributed between $6.4 billion and $12.5 billion to Australia’s gross domestic product. For Queensland, on a per capita basis that equates to between $14.5 million and $28.3 million. An example of where the Queensland government is advancing spatial technologies for the benefit of citizens and industry is the new electronic access for registry lodgement system. This important project is developing spatial technologies to improve digital flow of cadastral survey information within and between the government and surveying industry. Detailed project planning and design is on schedule for completion this July, with construction of the technologies expected to commence in August and the new online business process and services available in the second half of 2010. I anticipate another busy year for those in the department involved in providing spatial capabilities and services to support the business of government. The increasing recognition that spatial capabilities can assist with the development and evaluation of policy, the delivery of government services to citizens and the improvement of internal business processes will only continue to develop. Mr SEENEY: I refer you to the Service Delivery Statements on page 3-242, which deals with the budget for the Water Commission. My question relates to a number of statements that the Premier made in May 2009, when she promised that $7 million would be cut from the Water Commission’s budget, and in February 2009, when the figure to be cut from the Water Commission’s budget was going to be $15 million. Can you show me in these budget documents where those cuts have been made to the Water Commission budget? Mr ROBERTSON: I have actually provided that information already in terms of my answer to one of the government members, but I am happy to go through it again. Since its commencement in 2006 the Queensland Water Commission has played a major role in the planning and implementation of the $9 billion water grid. Mr SEENEY: I am interested in the budget cuts, Minister. The question related to the budget cuts. Mr ROBERTSON: I was getting to that. Mr SEENEY: I have learned to be patient. Mr ROBERTSON: And I have learned to be patient with you, too. The commission’s published estimated expenditure for 2008-09 is $28.5 million. That is an increase in the estimated actual operating expenditure above the published budget for 2008-09. That principally relates to additional expenditure on developing and undertaking communication campaigns to achieve targeted residential water consumption and further development of the Waterhub modular information management system to deliver accurate regional water consumption data for forecast and infrastructure planning. The published $28.1 million budget for the commission represents a $3.2 million reduction from the QWC budget as it would have been in 2009-10, which would have been $31.3 million without the government’s announced savings measures. Mr SEENEY: So sorry to interrupt— Mr ROBERTSON: No— Mr SEENEY: Does that mean that, rather than cutting, you just did not give them an increase? Is that the crux of your answer? Rather than cutting the budget, you just did not give them an increase and you are counting that as a budget cut? Mr ROBERTSON: Are you right? Mr SEENEY: I am right. Mr ROBERTSON: Okay. Mr SEENEY: Do you want a hand to answer it? Mr ROBERTSON: No. As I was saying, the published $28.1 million budget for the commission represents a $3.2 million reduction from the QWC budget as it would have been in 2009-10. So the budget— Mr SEENEY: So yes— Mr ROBERTSON: The budget for 2009-10 was scheduled to be $31.3 million. As a result of taking action to reduce that budget, we have seen that budget for 2009-10 come in at $28.1 million, which is a $3.2 million reduction. That saving came about through reductions in corporate services, which was cut by $1.1 million in 2009-10, and communications expenditure cut by $2.1 million. This 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 11 saving offsets the increases in front-line commission services required to be delivered in 2009-10, including desalination siting investigations, subregional and local water supply studies and major regulatory reform projects. So that would have increased the budget by some $2.6 million. However, since finalisation of the commission’s published budget, there have been additional savings. So in addition to that which has been published, there has been further work undertaken to identify further savings. As I have mentioned earlier in response to a question from the government members, a further $2.3 million will be achieved in terms of reduced expenditure from the 2009-10 forward estimates published in the Service Delivery Statements, meaning the equivalent 2009-10 expenditure is expected to be $25.8 million rather than the $28.1 million published in the budget. So work continues. Mr SEENEY: Thank you. Minister, does that not make the whole budgeting process a farce? Does it not make claims of budget cuts a farce when you can claim that the budget cuts are actually increases that you did not deliver? You did not give them an increase; therefore that is a budget cut? That is the crux of your answer and does that not make a farce— CHAIR: Member for Callide. Minister. Mr SEENEY: I have not finished my question, Mr Chairman. CHAIR: There was a question there. Mr ROBERTSON: It would be helpful if you had listened to the answer that was previously provided, because what I have just indicated is that work continues to reduce expenditure in the Queensland Water Commission. I was just outlining that a further $2.3 million has been identified for reduced expenditure post publication of the budget. So that represents a saving of some $5.5 million in 2009-10, with the remainder of the total announced savings of $22 million over four years being achieved over the following three years. Mr SEENEY: Minister, what will the people of Queensland get for the $28 million—which I presume it will remain at—that the government will spend on the Queensland Water Commission this year? Mr ROBERTSON: The Water Act 2000 prescribes the commission’s main functions—namely, to advise the minister of the day on matters relating to water supply and demand management for water and the delivery of desired levels of service objectives for water supply to the South-East Queensland region and designated regions; and to facilitate and implement regional water security programs and ensure compliance with the water security proposals and with commission water restrictions. The commission’s significant work program is continuing in relation to planning and implementation of demand management practices for residential and non-residential water use; providing advice to the government on ongoing institutional reform, including the development of regulatory frameworks relating to economic regulation codes, asset management, explicit water grid- wide planning through the system operating plan and the emergency management plans and customer protection; and providing advice to the government on the ongoing development of regional water security options, including finalisation of the South-East Queensland water strategy. The functions of the commission remain critical for ensuring water supply security in South-East Queensland and beyond. After all, it is the Queensland Water Commission. Beyond 2008-09, the commission will continue to conduct further studies into potential desalination sites; deliver ongoing institutional reform, including establishing retail and distribution entities and economic and asset regulatory frameworks; finalise and implement the final South-East Queensland water strategy; engage broadly with urban planners, land developers and councils; develop responses to the emerging needs of managing energy and carbon impacts of the water grid; implement long-term water efficiency strategies and regulatory solutions to permanent water efficiency; and implement efficiency measures with domestic water users to ensure the post drought targets are achieved once introduced on 1 December—later this year. So in terms of the expenditure that is anticipated with the Queensland Water Commission, as reduced as it is from previous levels nevertheless, the work of the QWC remains important across a range of tasks that they have responsibility for. Mr SEENEY: Once again referring to the Water Commission and its budget, in 2006 in the parliament the Premier estimated that the costs for the Water Commission when he set it up would be between $2 million and $2.5 million. Since then the budget has blown out every year, with apparently the only reduction now a stop to the increase. Can you tell us what the Water Commission has achieved that could not have been achieved using the resources of your department? Mr ROBERTSON: I do not think there are any credible critiques of the work performed by the Queensland Water Commission over the last number of years in terms of how quickly and effectively it put in place a range of strategies and initiatives to secure South-East Queensland’s water supply. I think the outstanding result that has reverberated literally around the world in terms of what the QWC was able to achieve was long-term change in customer behaviour in how not just industry but also ordinary South-East Queenslanders now view water and now use water. 12 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

The fact that the target of 140 litres per person per day was reached, and to a large extent has been sustained even though our dams are in a much healthier condition, speaks volumes for the effectiveness of the campaign that the Queensland Water Commission implemented to get us through the worst drought on record. I think that is probably the pinnacle of a range of other achievements that could be listed. For anyone to question the investment that was made in the Queensland Water Commission in terms of what it produced, frankly, I do not think is credible in any way. The fact that there has been international recognition for what the Queensland Water Commission has achieved I think, as I said, speaks—and no pun intended—volumes for the work that it has achieved over the past few years. Mr SEENEY: Minister, the summation of that answer would be that the Water Commission has run a publicity campaign to reduce the consumption of water in Brisbane. Can I take you back to— Mr ROBERTSON: That is absolute nonsense. Mr SEENEY: That is the summation of the question. Mr ROBERTSON: I have heard some spin in my time from you, member for Callide, but not to that level. Mr SEENEY: Can I remind you— Mr ROBERTSON: Please do not paraphrase. Mr SEENEY: Can I remind you of the crux of my question? What is it that they have achieved that your department could not have achieved? Why is it that your department could not have run that same publicity campaign to achieve those markers without the great blow-out in the budget from the Water Commission that we have seen year after year? Mr ROBERTSON: There has not been a blow-out in the budget. That is just absolute nonsense. Mr SEENEY: It blew out from $2 million to $28 million. CHAIR: Order! Mr ROBERTSON: No wonder nobody takes you seriously. CHAIR: Member for Callide, I have given you a fair shake in terms of asking a question and as soon as the minister starts to answer it you then jump down his throat. Mr ROBERTSON: He is a recidivist. I reject his interpretation of my answer that all the QWC did was run a publicity campaign. I have made it quite clear that that was the pinnacle of a range of initiatives, both infrastructure related and related to behavioural change—behavioural change both in industrial customers and in domestic customers. In terms of the initial allocation by the former Premier, that was before the full work program had been developed for the Queensland Water Commission. Once that work program was developed, budget allocations were appropriated accordingly. That is not a blow-out; that is funding a properly considered work program following the establishment of the Water Commission. Everybody knows that. This is why it is just simply spin that the member for Callide is engaging in. In terms of what the Queensland Water Commission delivered, it got South-East Queensland through the worst drought on record. That is what it achieved. It was provided with legislative powers to get in there and do the work using those powers as quickly, effectively and efficiently as possible. That is why today we have a secure water supply for South-East Queensland now and well into the future. Mr SEENEY: Minister, in the section that relates to the Water Commission in the budget documents there is no table setting out the staffing levels, unlike the budget documents that relate to the department as a whole. Minister, is there some reason why you have not reported about the staffing levels of the Water Commission? Can you give us a reason why those full-time equivalent staffing levels have not been included in the budget documents for the Water Commission? Mr ROBERTSON: I will let my director-general answer that question. Mr Bradley: The short answer is that there is no particular reason why the budget documents do not spell out staffing. It is a statutory body, so it is in a separate category to the Department of Environment and Resource Management. In terms of its full-time equivalents, the commission’s staffing levels remain at the same level they have been, apart from the significant change which the minister referred to previously where the communications and corporate services staff are being transferred to the Department of Environment and Resource Management through a departmental administrative notice. What the minister was making clear there was that we are seeking to achieve synergies and efficiency in the way we manage corporate services to the commission as a separate statutory authority while still keeping its separation and independent chair under the single-commissioner model. In terms of the staffing complement of the commission, the answer is that it remains unchanged. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 13

Mr SEENEY: Minister, I took it from the answer that was given by the acting director-general that some staffing elements of the Water Commission are being transferred to the department, and that reinforces what you said. Is it true that the communications staff of the Water Commission are being transferred to the department? How many staff are involved in the communications section of the Water Commission? Will there be anything left in the Water Commission when you transfer the communications and publicity staff out? Now I am getting confused. Mr ROBERTSON: I will invite my acting director-general to assist you in that regard. Mr Bradley: In terms of the commission’s staff who are being transferred, as the Premier announced shortly after the restructure within government, the government elected to seek to find synergies through the merging of corporate services and communication activities within the Queensland Water Commission and to take those back into the department. They will be provided under a service level agreement from the department to the commission. In order to give effect to that, the staff who are involved in those activities in corporate services and in communications will be transferred to the Department of Environment and Resource Management. This means that we can get better use out of the existing resources—both financial and human resources—that are involved in undertaking a range of corporate service activities, from HR, finance et cetera through to the communications activities that the commission undertakes. In terms of the staffing levels within that communication division, again they remain unchanged from the discussion last year in that there are 7.4 staff involved in the media and public relations unit of the commission. Those staff will come over to the Department of Environment and Resource Management and we will be ensuring that we get an integrated approach to the provision of corporate services and communication services across the portfolio. Clearly there are very linked functions, and some of the communication activities and strengths that the commission has developed through its successful campaigns are things where we see there will be opportunities for learning and insight across the communication activities of the Department of Environment and Resource Management as a whole. Mr SEENEY: Minister, I once again refer you to the Service Delivery Statements on page 3-239 at dot point 2, which says in regard to the Water Commission that one of its duties was monitoring performance of South-East Queensland bulk water entities against their contractual obligations. Yesterday I downloaded from the website the monthly progress reports for May 2009, which are the latest ones which I am sure you are familiar with. There is a whole list of projects requiring attention that I would love the time to be able to go through one at a time. However, I think it is a fair summation to say that every project that falls within that monitoring responsibility of the Water Commission is listed as requiring attention. Not one project has met its contractual obligations. Minister, does this reflect any success at all in relation to the Water Commission? Mr ROBERTSON: It might be useful if the member could hand that document across. Mr SEENEY: It is printed off the commission website, but I am happy to give it to you. It is a monthly report that is required under the Water Regulation 2002. I would have thought, Minister, it would have been on your desk before anybody else got it. Mr ROBERTSON: I have found over the years that it is always worthwhile checking what document you quote from, because more often than not— Mr SEENEY: Do not deflect from the answer. Mr ROBERTSON:—they have been found to be somewhat different from how you describe them. That is purely ensuring that— Mr SEENEY: That is a clever little technique to try to deflect away from the question. Mr ROBERTSON: I think the record actually demonstrates that you have been caught out, on more than one occasion, handing over dodgy documents. CHAIR: Minister and member for Callide, I know you are old friends but we might come back to the question. Mr ROBERTSON: We have missed each other. CHAIR: I know, but we might just get back to the question. Mr ROBERTSON: I will ask my acting director-general to provide a response. Mr Bradley: The key thing to make clear is the commission’s role in relation to the publication of those monthly reports. We are responsible under the Water Act 2000 for monitoring implementation of the 26 projects specified under the Water Regulation 2002 which are, as you say, being delivered by a number of different water service providers. Those arrangements were put in place when the government introduced the Water Amendment Regulation (No. 6) 2006 in August of that year which required specific actions to be undertaken by a range of state or local government entities in order to implement projects that would achieve water security. 14 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Those projects included the most significant infrastructure program since the Snowy Mountains hydro scheme in terms of the size and scale of the South-East Queensland water grid, a $9 billion program which has delivered a significant transformation in urban water security in South-East Queensland. The projects that have been delivered there include the desalination plant and Western Corridor Recycled Water Project, both of which have been internationally recognised in terms of the awards that have been provided to them, both for the speed of their delivery and the technical design of those membrane based facilities. There are some world scale projects that have been delivered under that water emergency regulation project. The commission reports under a program that the now Premier—then Deputy Premier— committed to on a monthly basis to provide transparency to the status of those projects. Against each issue the water service provider is required to identify what has occurred in complying with the regulation requirement, any reasons for slippage or delay and how those measures are being brought on track to address any delays which are occurring on the project. Mr ROBERTSON: I will just note that, as I mentioned, it is always worthwhile checking the document that is put forward by the member for Callide because what he has outlined to this estimates hearing is nothing short of just spin. Mr SEENEY: Can I have it back, then? You can print your own off the commission website. Mr ROBERTSON: Absolutely. Mr SEENEY: It is printed off the commission website. CHAIR: The time for non-government questions has expired. Ms CROFT: I understand that the Bligh government supports in principle recommendation 47 of the Webb-Weller review that category 2 water boards should be abolished and their responsibilities transferred to local governments. Can you please advise what process and consultation your department is undertaking with local authorities and the water boards themselves, and what savings and efficiencies are anticipated to be achieved? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Broadwater for the question. When the Premier commissioned the independent review of government bodies in 2008 the purpose of the review was to reduce bureaucracy and unnecessary red tape, improve the overall efficiency of government bodies and maintain the integrity and security of necessary regulatory functions. Recommendation 47 of the review proposed that category 2 water boards be abolished and their responsibilities be transferred to local government. The review also stated that local government should have the flexibility to determine the provision of local water services to the community themselves. In this respect, there are a number of options. Responsibilities could be delegated to local boards or alternative non-government institutional arrangements could be established such as local cooperatives or incorporated associations. The government supports this recommendation in principle, recognising that the recommended changes will bring efficiencies. For example, the alignment of specific water service functions within local government will result in less government oversight and reporting requirements, freeing up resources for water service provision. The full extent of efficiencies will be determined during consultation as transfer options are investigated by local government water bodies and my department. The government’s response to the review, whilst supportive, makes it clear that it will take time to determine institutional arrangements appropriate to local circumstances. There are a number of outstanding issues to work through including the transfer of assets, existing liabilities and resourcing matters. We will ensure that we will work closely with local government and water boards to resolve any concerns they may have and that appropriate institutional arrangements are investigated and carefully implemented according to necessary regulatory functions. I have recently written to each water board outlining the outcome of the Webb-Weller review and that we look forward to working with them to establish appropriate institutional arrangements. The government certainly recognises their dedication to providing water services to the local community. My department has also recently met with the Local Government Association of Queensland on the matter of the review and will be working in collaboration with local government on the implementation of recommendation 47. I just say particularly for the benefit of the member for Burdekin that those letters that I have referred to, having gone out to all water boards, do represent a position by government to ensure that the local interests that he has been advocating on behalf of the North and South Burdekin water boards will be taken into account. We are genuine about wanting to ensure, in terms of reviewing the role and levels of operation of these organisations, that, as I said, local circumstances are taken into account. Whilst I have been unable to agree to a meeting that you have requested, nevertheless I am aware of your specific issues and they will be taken into account in due course. CHAIR: Thank you, Minister. I call the member for Redcliffe. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 15

Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I refer to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement. I note that an additional 10 wild river rangers will be employed. Can you advise how they will be employed, the nature of the work they will perform and where, and the positive outcomes the government has seen from the employment of the existing 20 wild river rangers? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Redcliffe for the question. As I have already discussed, the Wild River Rangers Program provides protection for the world-class natural and cultural values of the Gulf of Carpentaria and Cape York while also creating much needed employment and economic development opportunities in remote Indigenous communities. The Wild River Rangers Program is delivering on the Queensland government’s commitment to better engage the traditional land management skills of Indigenous people to manage Queensland’s wild rivers. The Wild River Rangers Program will be expanded in Queensland with additional funding of $5 million over four years to employ an additional 10 rangers. That means that we are delivering on our commitments. Rangers will be employed through contracts with councils or community organisations to work with landholders, communities and traditional owners. The rangers will implement a wide range of activities including weed and feral animal control, fire management, fencing of wetlands, erosion mitigation, cultural heritage management, transfer of traditional knowledge, community education and visitor management. New rangers will receive nationally accredited training so that they can safely, effectively and efficiently undertake these contracted activities. They will also be provided with relevant and culturally appropriate mentoring and support. Initial placements for negotiation with local Indigenous communities include Hinchinbrook Island and the eastern Staaten River catchment. Other negotiations are likely to include the northern Cape York Peninsula area and additional rangers for established groups throughout the Gulf of Carpentaria and Cape York Peninsula. An evaluation of the program completed earlier this year found that the achievements of the Wild River Rangers Program in its first year are significant, especially considering the challenging geographic and socioeconomic environment in which the program operates. All 20 rangers were employed within nine months and have received nationally accredited and customised on-the-job training supported with intensive personal mentoring by program administrators. They are based in Burketown and Doomadgee—six of them; three of them in Normanton; one in Kowanyama; four in Pormpuraaw; three in Mapoon; and three in Chuulangun. The majority of these areas are Aboriginal owned or controlled and are considered to be of outstanding national and international significance in terms of their natural and cultural features. The outcomes realised by the program also contribute to broader Queensland and Commonwealth government Indigenous policies and initiatives as well as wider ecological, social, cultural and economic benefits. The program has also supported the development of a land management economy for Aboriginal communities by giving them the core capacity to deliver a range of land management services and supporting them to use these skills in an entrepreneurial approach to access multiple investment sources through fee-for-service contracts and other resourcing arrangements. Mr KILBURN: I refer to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement. Could the minister outline the consultation that took place leading up to the declaration of the Archer, Lockhart and Stewart basins as wild rivers and the outcomes of the declarations on the local economy? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Chatsworth for the question. The declarations of the three wild river areas, the Archer, Stewart and Lockhart River basins, followed significant consultation. The department held over 100 meetings in remote areas of Cape York Peninsula, talking to over 300 people in that time. To aid the consultation process the government engaged the Balkanu Cape York Development Corporation to assist in identifying the traditional owners in the three proposed declaration areas and to facilitate meetings with them. The consultation process was targeted particularly at those stakeholders who lived in or had a connection with the three specific areas. To that end, the department met with local business operators, pastoralists, lease holders, mining companies and their representatives, as well as traditional owners and Indigenous groups. During this open and informative consultation process, the wild rivers proposals were outlined to all parties and it was clearly articulated that declaring an area as a wild river does not restrict development in these areas. Rather, it allows development to proceed while taking into account the sensitivity of the wild river’s natural values. There are no constraints on existing authorised developments. A wild river declaration is not retrospective. The declarations do allow economic development opportunities provided that the river, its banks and tributaries are not unduly impacted upon. For example, within the high-preservation area, which is the area immediately adjacent to a river, there are no constraints on grazing activities. Similarly, the construction and maintenance of outstations, roads and facilities for tourism are not prohibited in a high-preservation area. It is the high-impact developments such as intensive agricultural, intensive animal husbandry, instream dams and weirs, surface mining and aquaculture that are restricted in a high-preservation area. 16 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

In terms of impacts on the local economy, all existing business operations are continuing and are not impacted by a wild rivers declaration. Now, I am aware that there was a temporary bridge closure on the Coen River and this had the potential to restrict heavy-vehicle traffic north of Coen. The Main Roads department was able to quickly implement an alternative route, and this was done entirely within the provisions of the wild river declaration as well as other legislation. This example demonstrates that a wild rivers declaration does not halt all operations near or in a river and that development activities can and will continue to occur into the future. CHAIR: Minister, I refer to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement. I see that the Bligh government is intending to extend wild rivers protection to a further eight wild river areas in the next year as part of the Bligh government delivering on its commitments. Can the minister advise the committee of the consultation that will take place, particularly with Indigenous stakeholders as part of the declaration process? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Waterford for the question. The government has consulted widely on the initial nine wild river nominations. This is particularly so when one looks at the most recent declarations of the Archer, Stewart and Lockhart wild river areas. As I mentioned previously, the department held over 100 meetings in the remote areas of Cape York Peninsula, talking to over 300 people during those times. This focused consultation will occur again as the government progresses the declaration proposals for a further eight wild river areas in addition to the Wenlock Basin on Cape York Peninsula over the next year. The department has already identified the key people to contact for those areas and will ensure that all stakeholders will be provided with an opportunity to participate in the consultation process. Unfortunately, there continues to be a lot of misinformation out there and the department is working to address this. The consultation process is about getting the facts out so that people can make informed comment. For example, the department has given special attention to ensuring that stakeholders with little knowledge of the requirements involved with development activities are provided with relevant and accessible information. To achieve this, pictorial support materials, along with innovative mapping design and consultation methods appropriate for the target audience, are utilised and continually improved. A wild rivers DVD targeting Indigenous stakeholders was prepared by the department. This featured recognised community leaders speaking on the attributes of the act, along with high-resolution imagery of Cape York and its unspoilt rivers. The DVD was broadcast across the Imparja Television network. While the innovative use of pictorial support material along with broader educational support from the DVD production has resulted in a range of materials to assist understanding of the Wild Rivers Act and its intent, this cannot replace the need for face-to-face on-ground meetings with stakeholders who may be affected by proposed wild river areas. The government is committed to ensuring that this continues in an effective manner. What that means is that we recognise that, in terms of the population that we are seeking to consult with, we need to understand the special circumstances and environment in which they live and tailor our consultation accordingly. What may work in the suburbs of Brisbane in community consultation does not work in Indigenous communities in remote locations in Cape York. That is why we need to be sensitive and always on the lookout for better ways to improve the way that we communicate in those environments. One of the things that I have done since coming into this portfolio is ensure that the release of the results of our consultation occurs at the time of the declaration. Past practice has been that that material is published some time after the declaration. Understandably that leads to expressed concerns that people have not been listened to. I think that can be improved, which is why I have brought forward the release of those documents in the future—to ensure that people can be assured that comments they have made have been listened to and responded to as a way to further improve how we engage with stakeholders in such matters. Ms van LITSENBURG: I refer to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement and ask: can you outline what will be achieved with the $4.9 million commitment to continue the water metering program across Queensland? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Redcliffe for that question. Metering is a cornerstone of Queensland’s water reforms and is delivering on our commitment to support sustainable water consumption so that users receive their fair share of the resource and ensure environmental needs are met. This initiative is also delivering on our commitment under the National Water Initiative Agreement with the Commonwealth government. Since the program started in 2005, approximately 1,300 new meters have been installed in 24 areas around the state. Water use information gathered by these meters is already supporting the planning of the state’s water resources. Over the next four years the additional funding will provide for installation of new water meters on irrigation offtakes across the state. These meters will ensure that irrigator access to scarce groundwater and unsupplemented stream flows is consistent with their entitlement and is sustainable. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 17

The additional funding provided this financial year will allow approximately 1,000 new meters to be installed in key areas in Central, South-West and South-East Queensland. This significant increase in installation rate and the program of works over the next four years will provide accurate information about water usage in key irrigation areas. The Department of Environment and Resource Management will continue to manage the program, making sure that technical standards are being met and maximising the economies of scale to reduce costs. The program has been established on a user-pays basis, with an annual meter service charged to cut the costs of reading and meter maintenance as well as repay the cost of establishment. The department is working with key stakeholders and groups in each of the project areas, such as Dalrymple Creek and Condamine River alluvium groundwater users in the southern and central Darling Downs and the users in the Pioneer Valley water resource plan area west of Mackay, to ensure that licensees have access to the best information available about the program of works and implications that relate to their particular works. The metering program is also contributing to local economies, with virtually all meter installations undertaken by local contractors with ongoing expenditure for maintenance and reading. An estimated $2.5 million has been injected so far into regional economies since 2005, when the program commenced. With the increase in the rate of installation of new meters this figure will also increase, further supporting regional communities. CHAIR: I call the member for Chatsworth. Mr KILBURN: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Minister, I refer to page 3-202 of the Service Delivery Statement and ask: can the minister provide a update on what has been achieved to date and the future directions of the Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Fund? Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you. The Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Initiative is a jointly funded initiative of the Commonwealth and state governments and participating bore owners. It assists landholders to rehabilitate bores and replace bore drains with pipe systems to reduce water wastage and to preserve the pressure of the Great Artesian Basin. Most of the water discharged from the Great Artesian Basin into bore drains is lost through evaporation and seepage. Despite a substantial number of bores now being fully controlled with water distributed by pipelines to tanks and troughs, a significant volume of outflow from the basin is still wasted because of insufficient bore drain systems. The Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Initiative is necessary to restore artesian pressure and helps landowners to improve management practices, use water more wisely and reduce adverse environmental impacts. The initiative has been operating since 1999. To date the Great Artesian Basin Sustainability Initiative and its predecessor programs are responsible for the rehabilitation of 563 bores in the basin. Over 280 bores have been piped resulting in the shutdown of approximately 10,720 kilometres of bore drains, and water savings are estimated at 170,000 megalitres per annum. The Queensland government announced in the 2009-10 budget that it will commit a further $46.5 million to phase 3 of the initiatives, starting with $7.3 million in this financial year. Under an agreement with the Commonwealth and the Queensland government, landholders in the Queensland section of the Great Artesian Basin will be able to continue to obtain up to 80 per cent government funding to cap uncontrolled bores and pipe open bore drains. Over the next five years the two governments will provide around $90 million towards capping and piping the bores. This will further reduce water wastage and address pressure decline as well as provide for enhanced environmental outcomes. This will be the third five-year phase of this 15-year initiative. This new phase will build on the existing work of GABSI phase 1 and 2 and will provide added emphasis on ensuring the recovery of groundwater-fed springs. This will be achieved by placing a higher prioritisation on works that will lead to water pressure recovery at high-value springs. The cooperative approach to addressing a significant natural resource issue has been enormously successful. Combined with Queensland’s water resource planning activities in the Great Artesian Basin, the continued investment in this initiative has significantly contributed towards securing a sustainable future for the water resources in the basin in Queensland. Mr SEENEY: Minister, I refer again to the Water Commission’s review of performance on page 3- 239 of the Service Delivery Statement. I quote from this report from the Queensland Water Commission which you somewhat surprisingly described as pure spin. Mr ROBERTSON: No. It is a good report. It is just that your interpretation is spin. Mr SEENEY: One of the Water Commission’s duties was to monitor the performance of these entities against the 2002 regulation with regard to, and I quote— Mr ROBERTSON: What page are you quoting from? Mr SEENEY: Page 2. It states— Timelines for completion of the actions and target water volumes to be achieved were outlined in the Regulation. 18 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

It is quite clear from the Service Delivery Statement that monitoring that performance was a responsibility of the Water Commission. Minister, can you confirm that none of the major elements of the emergency regulation in 2002—being either the Southern Regional Water Pipeline, the Eastern Pipeline Interconnector, the Western Corridor Recycled Water Project, the South-East Queensland desalination project, the Moreton Bay Regional Council recycled water project, the Gold Coast City Council recycled water project or the Northern Pipeline Interconnector—have met the requirements of the 2002 regulation? Mr ROBERTSON: I ask the acting director-general to provide you with that answer. Mr Bradley: In relation to the regulation, the monthly reports have been provided since the commencement of the regulation. Against each of those projects there will have been variations against the expected time, cost and scope outcomes. Indeed, the initial stage of the regulation was for proponents to respond to the government with a preferred or a proposed project plan in terms of how to deliver the project against the requirements of the regulation. In relation to those major infrastructure initiatives that have been identified, let me give some examples. In relation to the Eastern Pipeline Interconnector, that relied on the production of water from bore fields on North Stradbroke Island. There was an assessment of the sustainability of the ability to produce water from those bore fields which was required, and that was obviously taken into account in the overall project delivery and would have impacted on project performance. In relation to the Southern Regional Water Pipeline, I can confirm that it was constructed by the regulation date of 30 November 2008 and is fully operational. The Tugun desalination plant substantially achieved its construction within the originally regulated time frame of November 2008. It has had a series of commissioning issues which have been the matter of public reports both through the monthly reporting process that the commission undertakes and through separate communications directly from WaterSecure. But, again, the recognition in terms of this reporting cycle is to make sure that there is detailed information on each of those projects available. The reporting cycle was established at a point at which the water security of the region was significantly under threat and there was a need at that time to make sure that the commission was reporting on the delivery of projects which were contributing to the government’s drought response over that period of time. So that transparency has been maintained, although against individual projects there will have been variations against the time, scope and cost outcomes originally specified under the regulation. Mr SEENEY: I thank the acting director-general for his input. I ask the minister again: in terms of any creditable review of performance of the Water Commission, the fact that none of those major elements of the 2002 regulation have met their time lines for completion or their target water volumes should be considered to be a better indication of the success, or more correctly the failure, of the Water Commission than the claimed success of its public relations campaign. Mr ROBERTSON: Again, any fair reading of this document would suggest otherwise. In terms of the section that you were in fact quoting from—and this is again why I always need to check any document that you put forward—let us work through what this actually says. It states— 2 Program Overview and Drought Strategy Impacts Project Status All nominated Service Providers submitted project reports in accordance with the Regulation. It goes on to talk about projects that have been completed. It states— As at the end of May 2009 the following projects have been completed: • Brisbane Aquifer project; • Gold Coast to Logan transfer project; • Cedar Grove Weir; • Bromelton off-stream storage; • Brisbane City Council—substitute recycled water to industrial customers; • Domestic Retrofit Program Those projects have been completed. It goes on— Furthermore, construction has been completed for a number of other projects which are now in the commissioning or proving period phase, including: • Southern Regional Water Pipeline; • Eastern Pipeline Interconnector; • Eastern Pipeline Interconnector—sustainable take from , while maintaining existing groundwater supply from North Stradbroke Island; • Western Corridor Recycled Water Project; • South East Queensland (Gold Coast) Desalination Project; • Moreton Bay Regional Council—substitute recycled water to industrial customers; • Gold Coast City Council—substitute recycled water to industrial customers; and Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 1 And it goes on— 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 19

Mr SEENEY: The next line is the interesting one that you do not want to read out. There is a whole section devoted to issues. CHAIR: Member for Callide, you will get another opportunity to ask a question after this. Minister, can you answer this one? Mr ROBERTSON: See, that is where the spin comes in. Mr SEENEY: I knew he was going to stop there, Mr Chairman. Mr ROBERTSON: Your first question in opening this section was to suggest that no project that the Queensland Water Commission was responsible for had been completed. Mr SEENEY: I said none of the major projects. CHAIR: Member for Callide. Mr ROBERTSON: So the Brisbane aquifer project, the Gold Coast to Logan transfer project, the Cedar Grove Weir, the Bromelton off-stream storage, the substitute recycled water to industrial customers of BCC and the domestic retrofit program—none of them are major projects according to you. Mr SEENEY: That is right. They were not major projects under the regulation. CHAIR: Order! Mr ROBERTSON: No, no, no. Mr SEENEY: Yes, yes, yes. Mr ROBERTSON: Even when you go through the details of these projects you will find details of where infrastructure has been constructed and has been finalised. Mr SEENEY: None of them have met the requirements under the regulation—not one. CHAIR: Member for Callide, this is going to take longer if you keep interrupting the minister’s answer. I will have to extend his time. I call the minister. Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you. What I am suggesting to you is that this report contains a lot of information. Yes, I am sure you want to highlight some projects that are still ongoing. But you cannot get away from the fact that you misrepresented quite deliberately when you referred to this document first that no projects had been completed when page 2, the very page you quoted from, lists in graphic detail those projects that have been completed and those infrastructure projects that have been completed but are going through the commissioning or proving period phase. Let us have a bit of honesty in terms of this discussion for a change. Mr SEENEY: Minister, in relation to the fact that none of the major projects have met the time lines for actions or the target water volumes that were outlined in the 2002 regulation, can I direct you to one of those major projects which is the Gold Coast desalination project. A question on notice that was asked by my colleague the member for Currumbin to your colleague the Minister for Infrastructure indicated directly that responsibility for comment about that project now rests with you. Can you outline to the committee the situation that currently exists with the Gold Coast desalination project and what the government is doing in relation to addressing the off-site impacts that are being experienced by residents in the immediate area? Mr ROBERTSON: Just so we are clear, the delineation of ministerial responsibility is that responsibility for construction rests with my colleague the Minister for Infrastructure, and that includes the commissioning phase. Once that project has finished its commissioning phase and is formally handed over, then that is where I have direct ministerial responsibility. So that is where the line is drawn. However, I can inform you that today the desalination plant on the Gold Coast is running at 100 per cent capacity. It is producing around 133 megalitres per day and has been doing so for about seven days as part of a 30-day test. So the plant is operating during this commissioning phase. That is not denying that there have been issues, and they have been discussed quite openly over the last couple of weeks. In terms of the issues that were highlighted particularly at the Gold Coast community cabinet or around that time, the Premier has requested both my colleague the Minister for Infrastructure and me to understand or appreciate the issues that have been highlighted particularly by the rugby league club down there and has requested that we meet with them. That meeting is currently being arranged. I think it needs to be understood that one of the issues that will have to be looked at is, as I understand it, that the rugby league club is actually constructed on top of a former landfill site. So all issues, including any possible impact of the construction of the desal plant, will be taken into consideration. As I understand it though, there have been some quite active discussions between the project proponents and the local community in its various iterations, whether it be the sports club or the local homeowners et cetera. That in my view has to continue and as a result of it having been brought to the attention of the Premier, as I said, both my colleague Minister Hinchliffe and I will be meeting with the sports club in the not-too- distant future. 20 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr SEENEY: Minister, in relation to another one of those major projects, the Western Corridor Recycled Water Project, it has been constructed to have a capacity to produce in excess of 230 megalitres per day. It is currently producing somewhere around 30 megalitres per day. Minister, is it the government’s intention that this massively expensive infrastructure is going to continue to operate at a tiny fraction of its design volume or is the government going to source other customers for the recycled water that it produces? Mr ROBERTSON: The simple answer is yes. The government will continue to source users for recycled water in addition to those industrial customers who are already taking this particular product. Mr SEENEY: Minister, can you confirm that the only customers at the moment are the government owned generators at Tarong and Swanbank? Mr ROBERTSON: I do not think there is any secret to that. A major part of getting this project up and running was to get those electricity generators off our drinking water supplies as part of the drought management strategy. Of course they are going to be foundation customers for the use of recycled water. That has been something that I understand you guys were actually very supportive of. Mr SEENEY: That is right. But my question was: can you confirm that they are the only customers? Mr ROBERTSON: At this point in time, however, there have been other customers identified as potential users, and discussions are ongoing with them in terms of quantity and price. Mr SEENEY: Minister, can you provide the committee with an indication of what other potential uses are being considered for this recycled water? CHAIR: You have one minute, Minister. Mr ROBERTSON: Yes, there are two that I can inform you about, and I just need to be a bit careful, I suspect, in terms of any commercial-in-confidence arrangements. Both Incitec Pivot and Boral, which are located near Gibson Island, are also potential users of the recycled water. They are comparatively big users. They would be the kinds of customers that you would want to sign up to use this product. Of course, there are also our friends from Lockyer Valley. How could we forget them? CHAIR: The committee will take a short break. Proceedings suspended from 10.15 am to 10.32 am CHAIR: We will resume the hearing. I call the member for Callide. Mr SEENEY: I thought the minister would make an opening statement. CHAIR: There is only one opening statement. I am sure he will give you another one, if you want. Mr SEENEY: I was prepared to listen again to the minister’s words of wisdom. Thank you, Mr Chairman. Minister, I refer to page 2-11 of the Service Delivery Statements where you talk about reducing electricity bills for Queenslanders. I have here an electricity bill that I paid. Mr ROBERTSON: Sorry, what is the reference? Mr SEENEY: The reference is the third dot point above the heading of ‘Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries’. It talks about ways to save energy and reduce electricity bills, and it says that the department is releasing 30,000 Home EnergyWise kits et cetera. It is about electricity bills. Mr ROBERTSON: I always have to check, don’t I! Mr SEENEY: You do, but you would be surprised to find anything about electricity bills in the budget for mines and energy, I am sure. Minister, I have here an electricity bill that I paid in March 2006 which shows that I paid 13.49c per kilowatt hour for tariff 11. Minister, can you tell the committee what tariff 11 is worth today? Mr ROBERTSON: It is worth about 18.3c or 18.4c. It has increased significantly over the last couple of years. Mr SEENEY: You are pretty close, Minister. Mr ROBERTSON: That was off the top of my head. Mr SEENEY: The Energex website this morning shows that it is worth 18.84c per kilowatt hour, which is something like a 40 per cent increase. Minister, how do you explain to the people of Queensland a 40 per cent increase in their basic electricity tariff over a period of three years? Mr ROBERTSON: I think the government has been at pains to explain to the community the reasons for the increase in electricity prices. I have made the point since coming into this portfolio that nobody, myself included, likes to see electricity prices increased to the extent that they have been. But if what we have in place in Queensland is a system whereby increases reflect the true cost of generating, transmitting, distributing and retailing electricity, then the people of Queensland can be assured that sufficient investment is going into our electricity network to meet not just our needs as a population that is growing at about two per cent a year but also our needs we have in terms of our behaviours as customers, given that we are increasingly energy hungry. Domestic customers are increasing their demand for electricity at about 3.5 per cent a year, almost double the rate of population growth. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 21

As a result, this raises challenges. Those challenges were articulated very well in the Somerville report that I commissioned five years and five days ago: that unless you have sufficient investment going into your generating, distribution, transmission and retail system you end up with an underinvestment that then has a direct impact on the reliability of the supply to households and the commercial sector. I have made the point now on a number of occasions as Minister for Energy that I will not allow Queensland to return to those days of unnecessarily interrupted supply. If we are to commit ourselves to that, then we need to have the money to invest in our networks to meet a growing and increasingly energy-hungry population, and that is what we are doing. Regrettably, that results in price increases such as you have outlined. However, when you look at what is happening throughout the rest of the country, the people of Queensland can be assured that the increases that are being experienced here are still less than the increases that are being experienced generally across the rest of this country. So it is not a Queensland- specific problem that we are having to deal with here; it is one where all jurisdictions, all states and territories, are having to face up to increased costs of getting electricity to people’s homes. Mr SEENEY: Minister, when I paid that electricity bill back in 2006, it was about the time the then Premier guaranteed the people of Queensland that they would be no worse off—they are his words, not mine—following the deregulation of the electricity industry. Minister, do you think consumers such as me who are paying 40 per cent more now than we were in 2006 are worse off because of the deregulation that the government undertook of the electricity industry? Mr ROBERTSON: I am pleased to hear you accurately report what the former Premier said, and the answer is, yes, people are not worse off as a result of the deregulation of the retail sector that was formerly run by Energex and Ergon. What we have in place now in Queensland is a very transparent pricing process whereby retailers, distributors, transmitters and generators all have to basically open their books for full analysis to ensure that the price increases being sought are not excessive in terms of the costs they have to meet. As I said, nobody likes seeing these increases, let alone you and let alone me. But what I am convinced about as a result of the determinations that the Queensland Competition Authority has made is that it has exhaustively grilled the various components of the supply chain of electricity, if I can use that term, to ensure the increases that are requested by the various segments can be justified in terms of the quantum that they seek. We have seen significant increases in the cost of steel, significant increases in the cost of coal and other increases. They all feed into the final price that you and I pay on our electricity bills. But we should always be assured that we have processes in place to ensure that those price increases are not excessive based on the cost pressures that they are having to deal with. I have made the point on a number of occasions that the difference between a taxpayer and an electricity customer is paper thin. We have a choice: either we have cost-reflective electricity accounts or taxpayers put their hands in their pockets to subsidise the generators, transmitters, distributors and retailers so they can continue to operate. If we do not do that, then what I referred to before will happen. We will have an underinvestment in our electricity network that will result in a decrease in the reliability of supply. I have been there and I do not want to see Queensland return to that level of unreliability again. Mr SEENEY: Minister, in recent times you have made some comments about demand-side management strategies as a technique to address this issue of ever-increasing electricity prices. Can you give the same assurance to the people of Queensland that the Premier gave back in 2006 that your demand-side management strategies will not leave any Queensland electricity consumers worse off? Mr ROBERTSON: I must admit I have noted some reporting of an alleged outcome of a ministerial council meeting I attended a week or so ago that suggested that our investigations into smart metering were about looking to put in place further increases in electricity prices. That is in no way part of what we are trying to achieve here. What we are trying to achieve is looking at what products can be offered to consumers to help them reduce their electricity bills, not increase them. The whole purpose of our investigations and trials of smart metering is to determine whether the claims made by those who have been big promoters of smart meters that there will be reduced electricity usage actually do get realised. That is the whole purpose of having those trials. Those trials are not being held to see if we can further bump up the price of electricity and get more money from consumers. It would be patently a nonsense to go down that path. I have made this point publicly as well: I have an open mind on the smart meters project. I will be looking very carefully at those trials that will be conducted here in Queensland and indeed nationally to see whether the claims do in fact stack up: that it is a good and cost-effective way to go to help people reduce their electricity usage and therefore the bills they would otherwise pay. I have an open mind. I am not a big promoter of them. I perhaps lean a degree to being a bit of a sceptic but, as I said, that is the purpose of holding those trials. That matter was discussed at some length at the ministerial council meeting on energy a week or so ago. 22 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

In fact I note, member for Callide, that back in 2006 when we announced the deregulation of the retail side of electricity you actually came out in support of it. It was a very fine press release that you put out praising the government for going down this path, because you thought we might actually see more cost-reflective and more efficient pricing. I hope you have maintained that level of support for that direction we have taken. Mr SEENEY: Minister, does the department of mines and energy have a corporate communications unit? Can you tell me how many people are employed in it? Mr ROBERTSON: I will ask associate director-general Dan Hunt to provide that. Mr Hunt: At 30 June 2009 the mines and energy corporate communications team had nine full- time equivalent officers in media and communication roles. There are a further two officers engaged by the Office of Clean Energy. Mr ROBERTSON: So the answer is yes. Mr SEENEY: The answer is, yes, they have a corporate communications unit and there are nine people employed in it? Mr Hunt: Yes. Mr SEENEY: Minister, I will table a copy of mines and energy department key departmental contacts. Listed there is a whole range of contacts under a corporate communications unit that to my count runs to 18—from Kate Southwell, the director, right through to Russell Newell, the graphic design multimedia person. By my count, there is a media manager, a marketing and communications manager, a principal communications officer, about five communications officers, a principal media officer, an assistant principal media officer, two graphic designers and a marketing manager. It is an incredible list for a corporate communications unit in a department such as mines and energy. Does it reinforce the view that the department, like the rest of the government, is all about spin rather than delivery? And how does that list reconcile with the answer that you have just given the committee? Mr Hunt: Mr Seeney, I am sorry, I gave you the media and communication staff numbers. We also have two staff engaged in marketing activities and 3.4 full-time equivalents categorised as information staff for a total of 14.4 staff. Mr ROBERTSON: Full-time equivalents. Mr Hunt: ‘Marketing’ includes staff who support industry through events and sponsorships, promote Queensland products, industries and regions; ‘information’ includes staff who publish information in a range of distribution channels; ‘media’ includes staff who prepare, distribute and monitor media releases, liaise with the media and manage media issues; and ‘communication’ includes staff who develop and implement a communications plan to support core business priorities. In relation to the sorts of things that we put out, we have media campaigns for certain events. We publish a quarterly Queensland Government Mining Journal, which has been in print now for 125 years, I think. So there is a range of positive activities that those people are engaged in. Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I note that page 2-26 of the Service Delivery Statement relates to the regulation of retail electricity, and I ask: will you outline for the benefit of the committee members what would occur if retail electricity prices increased by CPI? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. As part of the debate about the price increases that have been experienced in Queensland and in other states and territories, there have been some calls for us to intervene and limit price increases to only the level of CPI. That, of course, would be a very populist way to go, but that comes at a real cost. In 2007, full retail competition for domestic customers and small businesses was introduced in Queensland with a new electricity tariff pricing to ensure actual increases in electricity costs are reflected in tariff increases and to maintain the uniform tariff policy across Queensland. The mechanism to calculate annual increases is the benchmark retail cost index, which is based on year-on-year changes in the cost of supplying electricity to consumers. The BRCI replaced the previous CPI retail price index. Independent consultants PricewaterhouseCoopers estimated that from 2007 to 2010 the difference between the nominal revenue received from consumers with the BRCI and the nominal revenue received from CPI escalation of retail electricity prices is approximately $955 million. That means that, if the government reverted to a CPI based escalation, the shortfall of $955 million could only be addressed in the following ways—that is, to provide a subsidy of $955 million to private retailers, Origin and AGL, and an additional subsidy to Ergon Energy from the state government. This would mean about a billion dollars less for important government services such as health or education. Alternatively—and this is what I mentioned before in relation to Mr Seeney’s question—it would mean a reduction in expenditure on maintaining and building the electricity distribution network. That means a return to the pre-Somerville 2004 days, with major impacts on the Queensland industry and therefore employment. These measures are not sustainable financially and will not provide a secure and reliable supply of electricity. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 23

In addition, each year the subsidy would likely increase, reflecting the compounding divergence between the true cost of supply and retail electricity prices indexed by CPI. This would also reduce private sector confidence in the energy sector, remove the incentive for new retailers to enter the Queensland market and reduce investment in energy infrastructure in Queensland for the foreseeable future. Queensland’s demand for electricity continues to grow. To maintain safe and reliable access to electricity for Queenslanders between 2005-06 and 2009-10, Queensland will have spent almost $9 billion on electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure to cope with increased energy demand. A reduction in network expenditure would severely impact reliability of security and supply. As I mentioned earlier, that would be unacceptable to me as Minister for Energy. Mr KILBURN: Minister, page 81 of Budget Paper No. 2 refers to the new regulatory pricing determination being made by the Australian Energy Regulator. Could the minister please outline details of this reset for the benefit of the committee? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. As the committee knows, the benchmark retail cost index—that is, the price that consumers pay for electricity—is made up of three components: the cost of generation, the cost of distribution and the cost to retailers. From 1 July 2010 the Australian Energy Regulator, the AER, will determine what price Energex and Ergon will be able to charge for the cost of distribution of electricity—that is, the network price—over the next five years. Since the Somerville report in 2004, the state government has been delivering on its commitment to invest significantly in the poles, lines and transformers that distribute electricity across the state. This almost $8.1 billion investment has been necessary because of our strong population growth and increasing peak demand. Over the next five years, this investment will continue to grow. The aim of the regulatory reset process is to ensure that we continue to invest in the necessary infrastructure that Queensland needs while ensuring that the price paid for electricity reflects the true cost of delivery. This is a regulated process that is open and transparent and occurs in all states within the national electricity market. From 1 July both Ergon and Energex were required to submit their regulatory proposal to the AER. Once the submissions are deemed compliant, I understand that the AER will open a public consultation process which includes public forums on the distributors’ submissions. Once completed, they will publish a draft determination and then engage in further public consultation, not dissimilar to the way that the QCA has gone about its business. A final determination will be made in around April next year for commencement on 1 July 2010. In April this year the AER determined prices that New South Wales distributors can charge. The initial once-off revenue increases range from 12.58 per cent to 17.86 per cent. South Australia is also currently going through the same process as Queensland, with very large increases anticipated. While no-one likes increased electricity prices, it is important that the prices reflect the true cost of electricity so Queensland does not go back to the bad old days of blackouts and service cuts. Ms CROFT: Minister, I refer to page 2-26 of the Service Delivery Statements and Queensland mines and energy’s delivery of regulatory functions. One of those functions relates to legislation and regulation supporting the supply of gas to retail customers. Can you please update the committee on the Queensland Competition Authority review of the retail gas market and whether you have accepted its recommendations? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. In December 2008 a review by the Queensland Competition Authority of gas pricing and competition for small customers concluded: competition in the retail gas market is low as the profitability levels are insufficient to attract new entrants; and below-cost tariffs, competition for electricity as fuel for appliances and capacity constraints on the Roma-Brisbane pipeline act as barriers to entry and future competition. As a result, they recommend not to re-regulate Queensland’s retail gas market. Prior to the review, residential gas prices were estimated to be around one-third below cost-reflective levels for very small customers, 11 to 14 per cent for average residential customers and two to seven per cent below for large family customers. The Queensland residential gas market is generally characterised by low levels of uptake among households with access to the network and very low average annual consumption, with approximately 80 per cent of gas used for hot-water systems. There are a number of factors which contribute to the small size of the Queensland residential gas market. Firstly, average residential gas consumption in Queensland is significantly less than that of Victoria, where the cooler climate creates high demand for gas based heating. Queensland’s low level of gas consumption sees distribution costs form 60 per cent of average residential gas bills in Queensland—almost twice that of Victoria. Secondly, Queensland’s lower retail electricity prices when compared to other states meant it was cheaper as a fuel for hot-water systems. Thirdly, consumers have expressed a strong preference for solar and heat-pump hot-water systems on cost and environmental grounds. While gas water heaters are cheaper to purchase, the total costs of solar and heat-pump systems are substantially less than natural gas when applicable rebates and life cycle costs are taken into account. 24 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Given recent moves towards phasing out electric hot-water systems and promoting alternative energy sources, gas hot-water heating is likely to face increasing competition from solar and geothermal technologies. Re-regulation of gas prices would not assist in the development of Queensland’s gas market. Low levels of competition and low residential gas uptake are related to low underlying demand for residential gas, the competitiveness of alternative energy sources and below-cost tariffs. An Australian Energy Market Commission review of competition in the Queensland gas market is scheduled for 2012, providing a further opportunity to assess the market against benchmark data provided by the QCA review. CHAIR: Minister, the budget documents make numerous mentions of the government’s Q2 targets. With particular reference to the target of ‘fair, supporting safe and caring communities’, what is the government doing to support the residents of Collingwood Park? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for that question. The 2009-10 budget includes an additional $5.6 million for Collingwood Park, bringing the government’s total financial assistance package to $15.6 million. While the Queensland government is not liable for any damage associated with the subsidence events that have affected up to 40 properties in Collingwood Park, we are still providing this assistance because we believe it is the right thing to do. It is the sign of a good and caring government. To date, the Queensland government has purchased 17 properties as a result of the 2008 subsidence event. Negotiations are continuing with one owner in relation to a settlement date for one further property. Nine of these properties have been purchased because they have been deemed not cost effective to repair and are being demolished. The remaining properties have been purchased due to the special circumstances of the property owners and the hardships they have faced. The government is continuing to assess such cases individually and it is possible further purchases may eventuate. The additional $5.6 million in 2009-10 will fund any further potential statutory and special circumstance purchases and more repairs and importantly allow detailed investigation into possible solutions for longer term remediation of the area. The government is now pursuing further detailed geotechnical studies to determine the technical and economic viability of stabilising the undermined areas of the Westfalen No. 3 and New Redbank collieries through backfilling. Our assistance to Collingwood Park residents has gone well beyond just the purchase of the worst-affected houses and investigations to provide a long-term solution for the suburb. We provided emergency assistance and alternative accommodation for seven families in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 event. We provided counselling and support services for residents in the months after the subsidence. We established an onsite office at Collingwood Park to provide residents with a central point of contact for mine subsidence issues and support. The Collingwood Park mine subsidence response team within Queensland Mines and Energy has dealt with more than 600 phone and field inquiries from residents. A monitoring and inspection program has been conducted by independent structural engineers for an identified 31 properties with mine subsidence related damage. From those inspections a repair program has been rolled out and repairs of seven properties have already been completed and contractors are finalising repairs on two more. A further eight property owners have agreed to the repairs. The response team is waiting for agreement from a further eight property owners. The committee should be assured that we will continue to provide fair and caring support for the Collingwood Park community. Ms van LITSENBURG: I note that page 2-6 of the Service Delivery Statement refers to $12 million in expenditure in 2009-10 as part of the four-year $29.1 million Smart Mining—Future Prosperity program which commenced in 2006. Will the minister please inform the committee of the benefits that have flowed from this program to date and what other benefits the government expects to see in the future? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. Queensland relies heavily on mining for its prosperity. A sustainable mining industry requires an active and ongoing program of exploration. This is an expensive, long-term and high-risk process. To compete in this environment, the government must demonstrate support for the mining industry. The $29.08 million Smart Mining—Future Prosperity program began in 2006-07 with the target of increasing exploration investment in Queensland to $540 million by 2009, and it has achieved this target. In 2007-08 exploration expenditure in Queensland was $563.2 million. Despite the economic downturn, exploration expenditure continues at a high level, totalling $484.7 million in the first nine months of 2008-09. The Smart Mining—Future Prosperity program has also focused on a number of greenfield and unexplored areas. Airborne geophysical surveys have been completed over the Normanton and south- west Queensland areas and are in progress in Cape York. The results of a deep crustal seismic reflection survey through the entire earth’s crust from Cloncurry to Croydon to Mount Surprise to Charters Towers were released in Townsville in June 2009. The seismic profile identified for the first time the Millungera Basin, a new sedimentary basin, as well as other previously unknown major crustal features which indicate potential for further discoveries of mines and energy resources. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 25

Grants under the Smart Mining—Future Prosperity program are being used to assist with the drilling of new exploration targets which are helping to kick-start exploration in parts of the state which are unexplored or underexplored. In the first three rounds of these grant initiatives 83 projects received more than $6.88 million and 20 technical successes have been reported to date. In the north-north-west alone, 57 new exploration projects are focusing on gold, silver, base metals, nickel, iron, mineral sands and diamonds. The Smart Mining—Future Prosperity program has been successful in attracting exploration investment and the government is supporting this exploration with our streamlining initiative. CHAIR: I call the member for Callide. Mr SEENEY: In the department’s budget figures can you tell us how much money is allocated to sponsorship and what the department is sponsoring? Mr ROBERTSON: I invite Associate Director-General Dan Hunt to provide that information. Mr Hunt: During the 2008-09 financial year Mines and Energy approved $112,000 in sponsorship funding. The sorts of things that that sponsorship goes to is: the Queensland Resources Expo in Rockhampton for which we allocated $15,000; the Mining 2009 Resources Convention, which is a major mining conference held towards the end of the year every year in Brisbane, for which we provided $25,000; the Safety Institute of Australia for which we provided $5,000; the Illuminating Engineering Society of Australia Awards for which we provided $5,000; the Greenfest sustainability festival for which we provided $5,000; the North Queensland Energy Forum for which we provide $2,500; the 19th World Congress of Soil Science to be held in 2010 was provided $25,000 towards its development; and for a book on human factors in mining equipment which is a safety analysis of the human influence in accidents we provided $30,000. Mr SEENEY: Minister, it is the last one of those sponsorships that I am interested in—that is, the book sponsorship of $30,000. Can you tell us who the $30,000 was paid to and who wrote the book? It seems an awfully large amount of money—$30,000. Mr ROBERTSON: We will have to take that question on notice if that is okay with you. We will get that information to you. Mr SEENEY: So nobody in the department knows who the $30,000 went to? Mr ROBERTSON: As I said, we will take that on notice and we will get that information to you as soon as possible. Mr SEENEY: Does the department have a particular policy about sponsorship? The list that the director-general read out from the briefing note he read very accurately. I followed it on my copy. How is that list of sponsorship arrived at? What is the department’s policy on sponsorship? Mr Hunt: The department has a policy on sponsorship which specifies the circumstances under which sponsorship will be provided. We respond to requests for sponsorship from a range of sources. The sorts of benefits—and I will read from the briefing note again— Mr SEENEY: I will follow along, if you like. I will make sure your draft is the same as mine. Mr Hunt: So the sponsorships brought a range of benefits to the government, Queensland industries and the community, including promoting mining industry safety and health, supporting exploration investment in Queensland, advancing the Queensland government’s commitment to clean energy and fostering research in industry partnerships and showcasing Queensland’s geoscientific achievements and endeavours. Safety is a primary objective for the department. Mr SEENEY: I look forward to receiving the answer to that question on notice. Minister, can you advise the committee what discussions you have had with your federal colleagues about the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and what case you have put to your federal colleagues about the impact that that scheme will have on the Queensland mining industry generally and the coal industry in particular? Mr ROBERTSON: The discussions that I have had with my colleague Senator Wong at the Murray-Darling ministerial council meeting are consistent with the position outlined by the Premier during her estimates hearing earlier this week and the letter that she has sent to Minister Combet—that is, we have legitimate concerns with respect to the impact of CPRS on the mining industry, in particular the coal industry, and its associated stakeholders. We are seeking from the Commonwealth an appreciation of those special circumstances and asking for further consideration to be given to providing assistance to that particular sector. Meanwhile, I have also had discussions with my colleague the minister for energy, Martin Ferguson, expressing how keen we are to ensure that Queensland gets its fair share of the carbon capture and storage technologies and projects. We want to get at least one of those flagship projects in Queensland. I used that opportunity to again state our responsible concerns about the impact of the CPRS on our coal industry. We will continue to take those responsible approaches with our colleagues in Canberra and try to work through these issues over time. 26 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr SEENEY: Minister, do you agree that CPRS in its current form will have a devastating effect on the Queensland coal industry in particular and the Queensland economy generally? Mr ROBERTSON: Queensland’s position is that which is outlined in the Premier’s letter to Minister Combet. Mr SEENEY: Minister, as the minister responsible for the mining industry in Queensland, should you not have a particular responsibility to be expressing the concerns of the mining industry, the concerns that were outlined by Michael Roche yesterday for example at the conference here in Brisbane? Do you not have a responsibility to be expressing those concerns to your federal colleagues? Mr ROBERTSON: That is why I support the letter that was sent by the Premier to Minister Combet which was outlined earlier this week. That is why I have taken the opportunity in meetings with Senator Wong and Minister Ferguson to discuss the concerns outlined in this letter. Mr SEENEY: Minister, in the current budget documents that we are considering what is the government’s commitment to clean coal projects? What are the commitments the government has made to clean coal projects? Mr ROBERTSON: They are substantial. Mr SEENEY: What are they? Mr ROBERTSON: I am surprised you do not know. Mr SEENEY: I am asking you. The test is to see whether you know. That is the reason for the question. I am trying to determine how genuine your concern is. An indication of that concern would be for you to be able to tell me what the figures are. Mr ROBERTSON: Excitable, isn’t he? I think we can support that by the significant and very serious amount of money that we have put on the table for demonstration projects. ZeroGen is one. The formation of the Clean Coal Council which is the body that was established by the Premier to— Mr SEENEY: Just as well for briefing notes, isn’t it? Mr ROBERTSON: Come on! Mr SEENEY: I have probably got that one too. Mr ROBERTSON: Do you? I am surprised you need to ask the question then. I, along with the Premier, meet with the Clean Coal Council on a regular basis. I think there have been three meetings that I have attended since coming into this portfolio. The Clean Coal Council, among other things, is responsible for assessing the ZeroGen project. There is a second project that is under consideration which is associated with the Wandoan development. They are, in many respects, competing to be our preferred project that will go forward for further funding from the Commonwealth under their flagship program. In terms of the funding, the $900 million for the Australian Coal Association Low Emission Technology, or ACALET, comprises a $300 million commitment by the Queensland government from the Queensland Future Growth Fund and a commitment from the black coalmining industry’s voluntary fund of $600 million over the next 10 years through the COAL21 Fund. The Clean Coal Council continues to provide advice to government in the assessment of those two projects that I have mentioned previously. It is vital, in my view, that one of those projects gets flagship funding from the Commonwealth but also further industry funding as well. If those technologies can be proved via a demonstration project, then that will be an important component to secure the future of our coal industry and the royalties that it generates for Queensland in the years and decades to come. Mr KILBURN: Minister, with reference to page 2-7 of the Service Delivery Statements and the mention of the industry ambassadors, what measures are contained in the budget to ensure that Queensland is promoted internationally as a premium destination for resource exploration? Mr ROBERTSON: To support the long-term growth of investment in minerals and energy exploration in Queensland, the Bligh government is establishing Queensland resource industry ambassadors. Exploration for mineral and energy resources is a global industry. Decisions on when and where companies will commit to exploration are governed by numerous factors, including but not limited to prospectivity, policy settings and sovereign risk. Queensland needs to be recognised throughout the world as a preferred destination for exploration investment and resource development if the state is to fully capitalise on its resources and value-adding potential. The government’s $49.08 million Smart Exploration and Smart Mining—Future Prosperity programs have been the basis for the successful promotion of mining exploration in Queensland in recent years. These programs are primarily structured to target and to provide incentives for investment in exploration state-wide. The program has been successful in attracting and leveraging exploration to Queensland, as demonstrated by the uptake of exploration tenure and growth in exploration expenditure. To consolidate further the gains made already, the ambassadors, with the participation of high-profile private sector representatives, will promote and highlight the benefits of investing in 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 27

Queensland’s mining resource industries. My department’s investigations into a similar successful group in South Australia indicate that this type of initiative can be very effective and mutually beneficial for the government and the private sector. Queensland resource industry ambassadors, with departmental senior officers, will likely target high-profile international and Australian resource conferences to promote the Queensland story from a private sector perspective. The Queensland resource industry ambassadors comprise a group of senior resource industry leaders who are unpaid individuals offering a private sector view of what Queensland has to offer in relation to exploration development potential. Ambassadors will not receive salaries, travelling allowances, benefits or other payments. As private sector senior executives, the ambassadors would regularly attend meetings and conferences, both in Australia and overseas, as paid employees of their companies usually on company business and sometimes presenting papers in their own right. The operating model of the program seeks to gain leverage from the personal status of these individuals to act as Queensland exploration ambassadors who will work with Queensland Mines and Energy executives to promote opportunities for exploration and resource development in Queensland. Ms CROFT: I refer the minister to page 2-6 of the Service Delivery Statements and the reference to streamlining the state’s mining and petroleum exploration and development approval processes. I ask: can the minister provide to the committee further detail as to the current and future progress of this project? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. Earlier this year—in February—the Bligh government announced that it would fast-track around a dozen key mining projects to help stimulate and support the mining sector as well as create new jobs in regional Queensland. By streamlining the process we will be able to create more than 1,500 construction jobs in the regions. New mines mean new jobs. Not only that, local communities and businesses rely heavily on the money spent by mining companies and their workers. That is why the Bligh government is taking steps to fast-track these projects—following due process, of course—as quickly as possible. Mines and Energy work with the department of natural resources and water, the Environmental Protection Agency—or now what is known as DERM—the Department of Infrastructure and Planning and other government agencies to identify areas of regulatory overlap and to streamline approval processes. We are closely monitoring our standing mine lease applications and working directly with companies on actions that we can take to speed up the process. We are also talking to the Rudd government about ways to expedite Commonwealth approvals for key projects. There are two components to the process, the first being to focus on current applications and the approval system and identify priority projects for streamlining processes. The second component is to develop and implement a case management approach to guide mineral and petroleum exploration and development projects through streamlined approval processes across all relevant agencies. Key streamlining initiatives that have been identified to date and which are undergoing detailed investigation are (1) to rewrite guidelines to clearly articulate the requirements and the quality of information required for environmental impact assessments to reduce the number of iterations; (2) system enhancements and a case management database, including electronic web flow between agencies; and (3) native title initiatives around the right-to-negotiate process and the expedited procedure for exploration permits. During the 2009-10 financial year, it is expected that the process of case management of existing applications will result in the grant of at least 10 priority tenure applications. The potential for job creation from mining lease applications for coal is significant. Subject to decisions to proceed, all projects currently under assessment by Queensland Mines and Energy could directly create 5,000 construction and over 3,600 ongoing operational jobs within the next two years. My department and the Queensland Resources Council are establishing a joint working party to progress the streamlining initiatives. The draft terms of reference for this working party are under consideration by the associate director-general for Queensland Mines and Energy. A draft report detailing the streamlining approvals initiatives is due next month for consideration by the working party. CHAIR: Minister, with reference to page 2-11 of the Service Delivery Statements and the mention of low-emission technology demonstration projects, what is the government’s commitment to the development of low-emission coal technologies and associated industries? Mr ROBERTSON: The Queensland government enacted the Clean Coal Technology Special Agreement Act in June 2007, recognising the importance of the value of the coal industry to Queensland in terms of an export product and low-cost fuel for electricity generation and the need to ensure a sustainable future for this part of the state’s economy. The Queensland government and the Australian black coal industry have a combined funding commitment of $900 million to accelerate the development and deployment of low-emission coal technologies to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions from coal fired generation. The act established the Queensland Clean Coal Council, which comprises representatives from government and the coal industry, to advise the government on funding priorities from the combined commitment and other issues to achieve the objective of accelerating the development and deployment of low-emission coal technologies. 28 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

The $900 million is comprised, as I mentioned before, of a $300 million commitment by the Queensland government and the black coal mining industry’s voluntary fund of $600 million over the next 10 years through the COAL21 Fund. The COAL21 Fund is managed by ACA Low Emissions Technologies Ltd. Participating coal producers have agreed to pay a voluntary levy of 10c per tonne of saleable coal to the COAL21 Fund from 1 April 2007, increasing to 20c per tonne from 1 July 2007. To date, the Queensland Clean Coal Council has recommended to the Premier over $256 million of funding allocations from the $900 million joint commitment. As I mentioned before, there are a number of low-emission coal technology demonstration projects in Queensland. Two projects receiving funding through the Queensland Clean Coal Council are the Callide OxyFuel Project, which has commenced site works to demonstrate oxy-firing technology, and ZeroGen, which received the Queensland Clean Coal Council’s in-principle support in June 2009 to undertake a prefeasibility study for a commercial scale demonstration of an integrated gasification combined cycle with carbon capture and storage. Other activities are underway, including the CSIRO- Tarong postcombustion capture pilot plant. The Queensland government has commenced the identification of safe storage sites for CO2 through its Carbon Geostorage Initiative and is in the process of implementing appropriate regulatory frameworks for carbon geostorage. The Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2009 provides a system to secure tenure for the storage of CO2. Collaboration at national and international levels is also critical to accelerating the deployment of low-emission coal technologies. The Queensland government is a keen participant in the National Low Emissions Coal Council, which has been established to coordinate the effort on national low-emission coal projects and research and development activities. The Queensland government is a foundation member of the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, which will coordinate a strategy for investment in 20 industrial scale low-emission coal demonstration projects with carbon capture and storage globally. CHAIR: Thank you. I call the member for Callide. We are now moving to the GOC part of the consideration. Mr SEENEY: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Minister, in the list of departmental contacts that I provided you before, under the Office of Clean Energy I count a listing of 35 staff members. In the budget documents listed as an output for the Office of Clean Energy— Mr ROBERTSON: What page are you referring to? Mr SEENEY: I am referring to page 2-27, top of the page, the target estimated for the Clean Energy Services output for 2009-10. Apparently you believe that the Office of Clean Energy is going to come up with just six policy initiatives for the year. That does not seem like much for 35 staff to do. Can you tell us what the Office of Clean Energy is supposed to do and how it justifies a staffing of 35 to come up with six policy initiatives? Mr ROBERTSON: One of the most important projects that they have delivered on is the recent release of the renewable energy strategy. A lot of work went into that, and if you have read it—and I certainly hope you have—you would see outlined throughout that strategy a range of projects throughout the state, including in rural and regional Queensland, for investment in renewable energy projects. In addition, which would keep 35 people very busy, they also have responsibility to implement our election commitment in terms of the Solar Hot Water Program. That is a very labour-intensive project in terms of bringing industry— Mr SEENEY: It is a Commonwealth scheme. CHAIR: Member for Callide. You have asked the question. It is the minister’s opportunity. Mr SEENEY: It is a Commonwealth— CHAIR: You can ask another question if you do not like the minister’s answer. Mr ROBERTSON: I am shocked by your level of ignorance—I really am—because I would have thought you— Mr SEENEY: I am shocked by your level of naivety. It is a Commonwealth scheme administered by the Commonwealth government. CHAIR: Member for Callide. Mr ROBERTSON: In addition to the Commonwealth solar hot-water scheme, Queensland has also its own solar hot-water scheme. It is an election commitment of ours, which leverages off— Mr SEENEY: Which passes the application to the Commonwealth. CHAIR: Member for Callide. Mr SEENEY: I am sorry, Mr Chairman. Mr ROBERTSON: Unbelievable. It is actually about leveraging off the Commonwealth’s scheme to bring down the price of standard installed solar hot-water units to a level of $500 for ordinary customers and $100 for pensioners. That is in addition to the Commonwealth’s scheme. That is 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 29 targeting 200,000 households over the next three years to have installed a solar hot-water system. Currently, Queensland’s installation rate is around 20,000 a year. That is in addition to the Commonwealth effort. I am frankly shocked that you would not understand that, member for Callide. That actually requires a lot of work to be done by the Office of Clean Energy to bring industry under that umbrella to provide installed units at those particular price points. There is a lot of work that goes into that in terms of logistics, in terms of rolling out such a program throughout the state, not just in South-East Queensland. That is the kind of work that the Office of Clean Energy is doing. I will also be tasking the Office of Clean Energy with a range of additional projects, as work permits. But it is wrong to say, just looking at that measure, that that somehow allows for a criticism to be made about the work rate of these officers. These are major projects that they are involved in. They are time consuming and resource intensive. Mr SEENEY: Can you explain that, even though there are some 35 staff in the Office of Clean Energy, a firm called Consulting Partners, or a Mr Miley, has been engaged at a cost of $1,500 per day as a consultant to oversight the implementation of the Queensland Solar Hot Water Program which, as I said, is a federal program to which the state passes the applications? Why was it necessary to have your associate director-general, Mr Dan Hunt, on 15 April 2009 approve an increase to the remuneration to this consultant for $1,500 a day to oversight a program when there are 34 other staff in the department and the program is a Commonwealth program anyway? Mr ROBERTSON: It is not a Commonwealth initiative. I wish you would stop being so misleading in your comments. Let us stop this nonsense. You are spinning yourself out of control here. It is not a Commonwealth program; it is a separate Queensland program that leverages off the Commonwealth initiative to bring down the price of installed units to $500 and $100 respectively. The Commonwealth program does not deliver that. In order to make that available throughout Queensland into communities such as yours, a lot of work and a lot of effort are required. It also requires particular skills and capabilities. I will ask my associate director-general to provide the information in respect of this particular individual. Mr SEENEY: Would you like a copy of your brief? Mr Henneken: As the minister has outlined, this is a very substantial program. Some 200,000 solar hot-water systems over three years is, as I said, a very substantial commitment. We do need a logistics expert in the department. Mr Miley is a logistics expert. He is involved with us in setting up all of the processes around the program—that is, setting up the processes around application forms, the legals around all of that and the processes around the renewable energy certificates. We had a tender, and quite a considerable number of providers tendered for the supply of solar hot-water systems. That required very extensive negotiations. That required extensive systems analysis in terms of how the providers and the processes for linking people with providers and all of that were to be established. In the current environment, the amount of money spent on that is well and truly justified from a procurement point of view. Mr SEENEY: Minister, do you think $1,500 a day is an appropriate amount of money to pay a consultant to assist a department that already has 35 staff charged with producing six policy initiatives for the year? Mr ROBERTSON: I hope you did listen to what the director-general had to say, but when you are talking about an individual who has specific skills and skills that would not ordinarily be available in a comparatively small office like that, then of course it is appropriate to bring in consultants. I would have thought that would be a more efficient way to go than having a person with such skills, capabilities and logistics being brought on permanently. That would make no sense to me. Of course from time to time you need to bring on individuals with particular skills to assist with particular projects, and that would appear to be what has happened on this occasion. Mr SEENEY: Minister, you are indicating to the committee that there is nobody in the Office of Clean Energy who has the ability to administer the solar hot-water scheme, that you had to pay a consultant $1,500 a day. Mr ROBERTSON: No, I did not say that at all. Mr SEENEY: Can you indicate the selection process that was involved for the appointment of Mr Miley as a consultant for $1,500 a day? Mr ROBERTSON: The selection process would be a standard selection process based on the particular skills that were being sourced from the market. Mr SEENEY: This briefing note that I have says that on 15 April Dan Hunt approved a departure from the competitive process and the direct engagement of Consulting Partners Pty Ltd was approved to provide key personnel Mr Paul Miley. Can you indicate to the committee why there was a departure from the competitive process and why Mr Miley was engaged directly without that competitive process at $1,500 a day to do a job that all sensible analysis would suggest the Office of Clean Energy should have been able to do itself? 30 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr Hunt: The departure from normal process, I believe, was justified on the grounds of urgency and the specific skills that Mr Miley possessed at the time that were required to quickly implement an election commitment of the government. Mr ROBERTSON: There is nothing unusual about that. That is the discretion that directors- general have in terms of meeting the specific needs of particular projects. I reject once again your statement that in relation to the particular skills of this consultant they would ordinarily be provided or be apparent within an office of that size. That is simply not correct. Mr SEENEY: Minister, can you outline to the committee both the elements of the urgency that warranted the departure from the normal process and the particular skills that Mr Miley has that justified the payment of $1,500 a day? Mr ROBERTSON: The urgency was attached to our commitment to get our program launched by 1 July, hence the decision taken in April to bring particular skills into the office that were to be used for establishing the logistical side of the rollout of that particular program. Mr SEENEY: Minister, I ask the second part of the question again which you chose to ignore: what skills does Mr Miley have that warranted the payment of $1,500 a day and the abandonment of all normal appointment processes for such contractors? Mr ROBERTSON: I will ask Dr John Cole to provide you with assistance with that matter. Dr Cole: The reason we departed from normal process in the sense of addressing the urgency of delivering on an election commitment was that the intention of the government was to launch the program from 1 July. If you recall, the election was held in March. We had very little time to actually put together a very complex piece of infrastructure delivery. As the director-general has already indicated, this program has several important components. Mr Miley was appointed because of his previous experience working with the energy sector and his reputation as a project manager being able to quickly deliver complicated logistics management processes that complemented what is essentially an office that is strong in policy, but amongst the staff that we have we do not have longstanding expertise in this area. The proposition involved in the Solar Hot Water Program also involves the essential retention of a logistics manager and, in fact, a public tender has been called for that and we are in the process right now of negotiating that, as we are with a separate tender for the supply, delivery and installation of solar hot-water systems. So there are two components. As the director-general pointed out, there are a variety of different components including eligibility considerations, the application process and the processing of 28,000 registrations to start with. When it is fully implemented, this program will involve the daily installation of somewhere between 250 and 350 solar hot-water systems. It is a major piece of infrastructure involving many hundreds of millions of dollars. As the minister has indicated, this has been leveraged off a federal program, but it is a significantly major state process that we are involved in here. Mr ROBERTSON: I think it also needs to be appreciated that one of the reasons for the urgency was the desire by the industry itself for us to finalise the arrangements for our Solar Hot Water Program as quickly as possible. The reason why it was treated with such urgency was at the urging of the industry to put these measures in place as quickly as possible. Mr SEENEY: Minister, a number of times this morning we have heard the purchase of solar hot- water systems described by your department as being ‘complicated’ and ‘complex’. Minister, what does that say about the capacity of the Office of Clean Energy to tackle any of the other big issues in the energy sector if it considers the purchase of solar hot—water systems to be so complex and complicated that it has to pay an outside consultant $1,500 a day to administer the applications to the Commonwealth scheme? Mr ROBERTSON: What is implicit in that question is that you clearly do not understand what this program is about. Mr SEENEY: Perhaps you could outline the complexity and the complications of the scheme. Mr ROBERTSON: I am happy to, because if it ends up making you a brighter member I am happy to help. CHAIR: Minister, I just ask that both you and the member for Callide refer the matters through the chair. I have been trying to be fairly informal and allow comments back and forth. If we are going to keep getting off track like this, I ask you to direct your comments through the chair. Mr ROBERTSON: Your first error is to refer to it as a program for the purchase of solar hot-water systems. This is not a program where the Queensland government or the Office of Clean Energy purchases solar hot-water systems. It is a program that, in leveraging off the Commonwealth’s subsidy program or rebate program, we work with industry on to establish a standing offer arrangement with nominated companies to provide throughout Queensland standard solar hot-water units installed at a final price to the consumer of $500 or $100 for pensioners. So it is not simply someone going down the 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 31 road and buying 200,000 units, storing them in a warehouse somewhere and then feeding them out on the basis of applications by customers. For you to represent it that way—and that is clearly what you were doing; it is implicit in your words—that is not the case and it would be dishonest for you to continue to represent it that way. CHAIR: Minister, do you mind directing your comments through the chair, please. Mr ROBERTSON: It would be dishonest of him to continue to represent it that way, Mr Chairman. What I have tried to outline is a program that requires interested companies to be part of a standing offer arrangement to supply standard units. So it is about industry capacity, industry capability; it is not about the Queensland government running a distribution scheme. This is about bringing industry together so that it can supply these units at the nominated amount not just here in Brisbane, because that would be the easiest thing to achieve, but also right throughout Queensland. That takes skills, capabilities and expertise. Mr SEENEY: Minister, in the list of departmental contacts that I referred to that lists 35 staff in the Office of Clean Energy, there is also a section called the Future Technologies Division with a considerable number of staff. There is also a section called the Organisational Positioning and Stakeholder Relations Section. I am also aware that there is an Office of Climate Change. Minister, there is an extraordinary amount of duplication in this area, yet you still seem to be trying to suggest to the committee that the provision of a solar hot-water scheme is so complex that it cannot be handled within the department. Can you outline how those sections of the department work together? How do they coordinate with the Office of Climate Change, which I understand is under the responsibility of the Minister for the Environment, and how many other consultants will all of those sections need to employ at $1,500 a day in order to be able to fulfil your expectations? Mr ROBERTSON: Once again the member is deliberately misleading in his question by now suggesting that the solar hot-water scheme is being run outside of the Office of Clean Energy by a consultant. That consultant has been brought in to assist the Office of Clean Energy because of the particular skills that that individual has, along with the other skills that are part of the Office of Clean Energy. Let us just maintain at least a modicum of accuracy in terms of the current arrangements. All departments and all offices will engage contractors at various points in time to provide assistance. That has been recognised across all governments—yourselves included—as a cost- effective way to bring in specialist advice and skills at particular points in time, and that will continue to be the case. When you look at the renewable energy strategy what you see is a vast array of initiatives, most of which will be the direct responsibility of the Office of Clean Energy to conduct. So it is wrong to say or suggest, as the member for Callide is, that the Solar Hot Water Program is the only initiative being handled by the Office of Clean Energy. Any fair reading of the renewable energy strategy would suggest that there is a very challenging workload on the range of initiatives that has been highlighted in that strategy. In addition to that, there are wider responsibilities that come quite clearly under the Office of Climate Change. Climate change is not just about clean energy; it is about a much wider agenda, and that is the responsibility that the Office of Climate Change has. But in terms of specific responsibilities to run the clean energy component of our climate change response, that is why we have the Office of Clean Energy. CHAIR: Before we go to government members’ questions, member for Callide, the document you tabled, the key contacts list, has a photocopying error. Mr SEENEY: I think it has been rectified. CHAIR: You are happy to table the complete copy of the document? Mr SEENEY: I am happy to do whatever is required. CHAIR: If possible can you table a complete copy of the document. I call the member for Chatsworth. Mr KILBURN: I heard the minister mention earlier that it has been five years and five days since he commissioned the Somerville report. Energex and Ergon’s capital investment for this year is on pages 64 and 68 of the Capital Statement. Can you outline for the benefit of the committee how much new infrastructure this government has invested into the network in South-East Queensland over this time? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. As the committee would no doubt be aware, a major focus of the Somerville report was the need for more money to be invested in electricity infrastructure to increase the ability of the network to provide a secure and reliable electricity supply for all Queenslanders. Since June 2004 Energex has added 4,000 megavolt-amperes of network capacity to its South-East Queensland grid—capacity equivalent to the entire winter power demand for the states of Tasmania and South Australia combined. Between June 2004 and early May this year an additional 22 electricity substations, almost 8,000 new transformers and nearly 70,000 new street lights have been put in place. More than 5,586 kilometres of new underground cables and overhead powerlines have 32 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009 been installed to cater for the growing community, taking the total amount of cable buried between local streets in South-East Queensland alone to more than 15,600 kilometres. Since mid-2004 an additional 170,000 customers have connected to the Energex network, an average of more than 700 new houses, units and businesses being added to the network every week. This network augmentation has necessitated Energex investing an average of more than $3.5 million a day upgrading and maintaining its electricity network. Given the vital importance of uninterrupted power supplies, Energex has continued to improve the reliability of its electricity network. For the bulk of people who live in the urban areas of Energex’s network, the electricity supply reliability has improved over the past five years by more than 40 per cent. Much of this has been achieved since the Somerville report was released. However, there is still more work to be done and that is why the Bligh government is delivering on our commitment to continue rolling out capital upgrades throughout Queensland. Ms CROFT: Just following on from the question from my colleague, the member for Chatsworth, can you please advise how the Bligh government will continue that investment in both South-East Queensland and also, importantly, through regional Queensland? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. Both Energex and Ergon will continue to invest record levels of capital into their electricity networks in order to meet increasing electricity demand and continue to improve network reliability in line with the recommendations of the Queensland government’s 2004 Electricity Distribution and Service Delivery Review. During the 2009-10 financial year Energex will invest a record $950 million in network projects with a further $360 million allocated to the running and maintenance of the electricity network and a range of operational programs. These funds will underpin thousands of jobs and support local businesses during these difficult economic times. Projects range from major new bulk power supply substations and subtransmission powerlines through to much smaller but important upgrades to poles, wires and underground cables in local streets. A key focus of this average $3.5 million a day spend will be the delivery of a safe and reliable electricity supply to the 2.8 million people living in South-East Queensland. Over the past five years some 170,000 additional customers have been connected to the electricity network in South-East Queensland, more than 700 new connections every week. Population projections are suggesting that while this trend may slow slightly due to the economic downturn, significant funds will still need to be invested for the foreseeable future. Significant investment is also being sought in regional Queensland. This financial year Ergon Energy will invest $848.1 million in its distribution network. This is in addition to Ergon Energy’s operating and maintenance budget of $378.1 million for this financial year. The key feature of Ergon Energy’s network management plan for 2009-10 to 2013-14 is the completion of a $4 billion five-year capital investment program. This continued level of investment is the Bligh government delivering on our commitment to provide a 21st century network, develop infrastructure appropriate to the needs of a growing and technologically sophisticated community and support the continued economic development and prosperity of Queensland. Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I refer to 2-21 of the Service Delivery Statement and ask: will you provide advice to the committee on the community service obligation payments to Ergon Energy to ensure those in regional Queensland pay the same as residents living in South-East Queensland? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. The Queensland government is delivering on its commitment to ensure that the cost of electricity for regional and rural Queenslanders is the same as those living in South-East Queensland. The government’s uniform tariff policy ensures all Queenslanders have access to an affordable electricity supply regardless of their geographical location. Due to the higher network costs and voltage loss factors associated with providing a regional electricity supply, the provision of electricity to regional and remote customers costs more than for metropolitan customers. Under community service obligations, Ergon Energy is compensated for the difference between the cost to supply and the revenue recovered from customers. Community service obligation claims are assessed and paid monthly to Ergon Energy by Queensland Mines and Energy. For the 2007-08 financial year total payments were $625 million. The 2008-09 financial year budget for the community service obligation is $499.8 million, corresponding to approximately $760 per Ergon Energy customer. An exact figure is not certain at this time as the claim for June 2009 is yet to be processed. The CSO payment is a further example of the Queensland government’s commitment to regional Queensland, something that we will continue into the future. CHAIR: Minister, I refer to Energex’s budgeted capital expenditure at page 59 of the Capital Statement. Can you outline the details of the Loganlea to Jimboomba powerline and in particular what consultation will be undertaken with affected landowners and the local community? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. I appreciate your interest in relation to this matter as this has an impact on your community. Energex is proposing to construct a 21.9 kilometre, 110 kilovolt overhead subtransmission powerline from Powerlink’s Loganlea substation to Energex’s 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 33

Jimboomba substation via its Kingston substation at a cost of around about $25 million. The powerline is needed to cater for load growth and to improve supply reliability in the Mount Lindesay and northern Beaudesert region. Energex is aware of the public concerns which arise when it announces network augmentation projects and carefully considers all concerns when selecting line routes. In this particular instance, Energex identified and assessed four potential corridors, each of which was incorporated in its corridor selection report which was made available to the public in local libraries, on the Energex website and at the Council Chambers. A preferred route was chosen after consideration was given to social, environmental and economic factors associated with the line. Energex, in managing this project, has attempted to engage all affected parties, commencing its community engagement in December 2008 with a mailout to 15,000 local homes and businesses. A second newsletter was distributed in May this year updating progress on the project. Energex has continued to meet with key stakeholders, including local members of parliament, local government councillors, representatives from the Department of Environment and Resource Management and the Department of Main Roads and directly affected landowners. Early community engagement identified concerns surrounding environmental impacts on the Logan River, visual amenity and the safety of construction along the river. A community group called VETO, Veto Energex Towers Organisation, was formed mostly representing directly affected landowners. Energex met with VETO on 9 March 2009 and again on 15 June regarding the initial assessment report which was released for public comment on that day. Community consultation and information days were held on 28 and 30 May prior to release of the initial assessment report and Energex also wrote to affected landowners and stakeholders on 11 June inviting submissions on the report which was available for public comment until 3 July. I am also meeting with VETO representatives next month. My parliamentary secretary, Michael Choi, the member for Capalaba, met a delegation from VETO at the recent community cabinet meeting on the Gold Coast. Energex will continue to engage with the community and relevant stakeholders as it progresses through the community infrastructure designation process. Mr KILBURN: Minister, carbon reduction is a significant issue that the electricity industry must face head-on. Can the minister outline what positive steps Queensland electricity GOCs are taking to limit the impact on their business and the environment? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. The Queensland government owned energy corporations are undertaking a range of initiatives to reduce Queensland’s carbon footprint while still ensuring security of electricity supply for all Queenslanders. CS Energy’s generation portfolio carbon intensity is currently well below the national average. However, CS Energy intends to cut this by a further 50 per cent by 2030 through such initiatives as installing 500 megawatts of renewable generation by 2020, increasing the proportion of gas-fired generation in its portfolio at Mount Isa and possibly Swanbank, supporting the commercialisation of low-emission coal technologies through the Callide Oxyfuel Project and developing biosequestration projects to develop a carbon offset portfolio. Reducing greenhouse emissions is also a key priority for Tarong Energy. Seeking ways to make current processes more efficient, the corporation is upgrading the to increase the efficiency of the energy conversion process and lower the station’s carbon footprint. Tarong Energy is also part of the CSIRO’s post-combustion pilot plan research program, with a trial of this technology to be conducted at Tarong Power Station. Another GOC, , is investigating commercial gas contracts to broaden its generation portfolio and reduce overall carbon intensity. This gas strategy seeks to increase its upstream control of fuel sources to ensure long-term certainty of a lower emission fuel supply. Tarong Energy and Stanwell also joined the Queensland government and CSIRO in supporting research for low-emission coal technology through other stakeholders and the Centre for Low Emissions Technology in June 2000. Powerlink is a signatory to the Commonwealth government’s Greenhouse Challenge Plus program and has incorporated a number of energy efficiency and fleet management initiatives to reduce its greenhouse emissions in its everyday business operations. As Powerlink realises efficiency gains it is reinvesting these gains into the purchase of green electricity for its head office facilities, delivering a further reduction in emissions. This year Energex increased its green energy purchases to 40 per cent, thereby becoming one of the largest buyers of green energy in Queensland. Energex’s carbon offset program is also reaping some major rewards for the community with the planting of almost 300,000 native plants since 1996. Ergon Energy is similarly focused on opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through projects such as the Townsville Solar Cities initiative, the sustainable poles initiative and a trial of biodiesel on its remote and isolated grid systems. As the committee can see, all six Queensland government owned energy corporations are taking the challenge of a carbon constrained environment seriously and are focused on securing a low carbon energy supply for the future of all Queenslanders. 34 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Ms CROFT: The Energy Ombudsman of Queensland plays a very important role in protecting Queensland consumers. Can you please outline how you plan to work with him to strengthen consumer protection even further? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Broadwater for the question and, I must say, acknowledge your passion for the protection of consumer rights. As the member correctly points out, the Ombudsman plays an important role in protecting small retail electricity and gas customers—the mums and dads out there—from retailers who are not doing the right thing. Earlier this year we saw one electricity retailer use a clause in a market contract to retrospectively increase prices. I find this action reprehensible and have directed the associate director-general of Queensland Mines and Energy to close this loophole in the Electricity Code. This work is close to completion and any retailer with this clause still in their market contracts will face action, including cancellation of their licence. I have also been informed about people being approached by a door-to- door salesperson trying to persuade them to sign up to a new electricity contract by providing untruthful information. While most retailers do the right thing, there are a couple who do not and I want to make sure that all are accountable for their actions. That is why today I am announcing the formation of the retailers round table. Membership will consist of all retailers who hold electricity or gas retail licences in Queensland who market to small energy customers. In addition, I am also inviting the Queensland Council of Social Services and the Queensland Consumers Association to be members and represent consumer interests. The round table will meet three times a year to exchange views on issues affecting consumers, such as billing time lines and door-to-door selling standards without the burden of additional regulation. Senior executives will be directly accountable to me and the Ombudsman, and by making small problems the responsibility of senior management I hope that retailers make changes at the grassroots of their organisations. The Ombudsman will also report to the group the number and types of complaints received since the previous meeting. I believe that the formation of the Queensland Energy Retailers Roundtable will foster goodwill through demonstrated service quality and customer service responsiveness. I am sure all members will support this important development for Queensland consumers. I have now met with a number of retailers operating in the Queensland market and have made it perfectly clear to each and every one of them my expectation that they will operate with ethical practices. It has been reported to me that some of these retailers have been using backpackers who may not be as dedicated to maintaining the script that has been prepared for them by retailers and therefore engaging in behaviour which has raised concerns in the community in terms of retailing practices. Whilst I understand that it is difficult for retailers to monitor each and every one of their employees in terms of how they go about selling their product, that does not mean in my view that they should be let off the hook. I have stressed with each and every one of them my expectation that they will do everything reasonable in their power to ensure that their salespeople operate in an ethical way in selling their product to Queenslanders. CHAIR: Minister, I refer to page 211 of the Service Delivery Statement in relation to the $5 million for Ergon Energy to undertake a trial for use of alternative energy in isolated communities. Can you please provide details of this project, including the benefits to both the communities and the environment? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the chair for the question. Ergon Energy has commenced the isolated communities energy savings pilot in the northern peninsula area—Thursday Island and Horn Island. The pilot is trialling a range of demand management and energy efficiency initiatives targeted at isolated communities. It will also explore how renewable energy can be cost-effectively deployed. This range of targeted policies and programs is aimed at lowering household, business and government energy. It is anticipated that the trial will result in a range of benefits for both the environment and the communities in which it is implemented. Ergon Energy anticipates that a 20 per cent reduction in electricity usage will be achieved throughout the trial. This also reduces reliance on diesel generation in these communities. Residential customers can expect a reduction of up to $200 per year on electricity bills by participating in the trial. Achieving the 20 per cent reduction target will significantly reduce the Queensland government’s community service obligation liability and has the potential to more than offset up-front funding provided for the pilot. Additionally, programs targeting community education will empower local communities to upskill and train local people and use local resources and products. There are a total of 33 isolated generation centres throughout Queensland. The outcomes of the pilot will determine whether energy conservation measures are rolled out to the remaining isolated communities. Ms van LITSENBURG: The solar hot-water project commenced on 1 July. Can you please provide an update for the committee including the industry benefits as a result of the project? Mr SEENEY: You will have to get a consultant to answer that one! CHAIR: Member for Callide. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 35

Mr SEENEY: It is too complex and complicated! CHAIR: Minister. Mr ROBERTSON: Is he finished? CHAIR: He gets an opportunity to ask a question later and I hope that he does take that opportunity rather than interject. Mr SEENEY: Ring Mr Miley. His number is on the list that I gave you. Ring Mr Miley. He will earn his 1,500 bucks. CHAIR: Member for Callide. Minister. Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for the question. The Queensland government is delivering on its commitment to assisting Queenslanders to access affordable solar hot-water systems. Public interest in this program has been overwhelming. There is no doubt because it has been so popular and overwhelming that we have seen the attack on this program by the member for Callide today. In recent weeks 28,000 application packs have been sent to Queenslanders who registered their interest in the program prior to 1 July. The procurement process is in the final stages and the Queensland government anticipates the supply of solar and heat pump water heaters will be available for installation within coming weeks. This is a good story for the Queensland solar water heating industry and for Queensland households. A core policy objective of the Queensland government’s Solar Hot Water Program is to encourage the growth of Queensland’s solar hot-water industry. With up to 200,000 systems being proposed for installation, the program provides industry with an enormous opportunity to increase the number of solar water heaters and heat pumps installed in Queensland households. CHAIR: I call the member for Callide. Mr SEENEY: Minister, referring once again to the Office of Clean Energy on page 27 of the Service Delivery Statement and reflecting on the answers that you gave to questions in the previous session, I draw your attention to this ad for an assistant director-general for the Office of Clean Energy on a salary of between $200,000 and $213,000 a year. Minister, can you explain why, given that the Office of Clean Energy has been in existence for little over six months and all the capacity issues that we spoke about earlier, there is a need to employ an assistant director-general on a salary of between $200,000 and $213,000 a year? Mr ROBERTSON: Simply because the head of the Office of Clean Energy, Dr John Cole, who was at the table earlier, has tendered his resignation. He is taking up a position in academia that was offered some time ago. So that advertisement is to call for applicants to come forward to fill that role. Mr SEENEY: I refer again to the briefing note that makes comment about the impending departure of the Office of Clean Energy’s chief officer, Dr John Cole, and also the executive director of clean energy policy, Mr Murray Daniel. Minister, once again referring to this advertisement, it is for a position that is a long-term contract for three years. Can you tell the committee whether those two departing officers had similar long-term three-year contracts and what will happen to those contracts on their departure? Mr ROBERTSON: Obviously I would not have direct knowledge of what the contracts for those two individuals involved. As I have said, Dr Cole has decided to take up a very senior position with academia. Mr SEENEY: Presumably his contract would not be paid out. CHAIR: Member for Callide, I am not going to let you interject. Mr ROBERTSON: He has tendered his resignation. In relation to the second individual, he is still employed in government. He has taken up an alternative position as chief of staff in a minister’s office. Mr SEENEY: So I take it from that, Minister, you are indicating to the committee that there are no payouts for those contracts for those two positions. Mr ROBERTSON: Again, I do not have that detail available to me. I will check up on it and see what the story is. That is not something that is routinely brought to the attention of ministers. Peter, if you can assist in any way I am happy to have that information provided. Mr Henneken: As the minister has indicated, Dr Cole has resigned, so there is no payout in those circumstances. He has taken up an opportunity which for him is a great opportunity. Mr Daniel has taken up another opportunity and in that circumstance there will be no payout. As you clearly indicate, the position of Dr Cole has been advertised and we will look at the other position at a later stage. Mr SEENEY: Minister, once again in relation to this ad for an assistant director-general’s position on a salary of between $200,000 and $213,000 a year, can you indicate to the committee where the part of the job description for that position will be an ability to purchase solar hot-water systems? 36 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr ROBERTSON: I do not think there is any point in providing an answer to such a question. These issues have been exhaustively determined. It really does not warrant an answer. Mr SEENEY: Minister, we heard the proposition put here this morning that the purchase of solar hot-water systems is too complex and complicated for the Office of Clean Energy, with some 37 staff. You are now proposing to employ a new assistant director-general on a salary of over $200,000 a year. Do you still expect that with the appointment of that new assistant director-general you will continue to pay Mr Miley his $1,500 a day to administer the purchase of solar hot-water systems? Mr ROBERTSON: Once again, the member misrepresents the role of both the Office of Clean Energy and the particular contractor to whom he refers. That particular contractor—I will say one more time—has been brought in for his specific skills in logistics. He is part of a much broader team that uses the skills of other officers in the Office of Clean Energy in other components of rolling out our program to target 200,000 additional households to have solar hot water installed over the next three years. So, in relation to the skills that I would expect of a senior officer of that salary range, I would expect first and foremost that officer to have a range of skills that will deliver the renewable energy strategy in all of its detail in the time frames that are laid out. The Solar Hot Water Program is but one component of the overall strategy and responsibilities of the Office of Clean Energy. Mr SEENEY: Minister, can you indicate to the committee whether you or your directors-general or any of your senior staff have any knowledge of previous contracts that have been let to Mr Miley or indicate whether any further contract will be let to Mr Miley? Mr ROBERTSON: I have no personal knowledge of previous contracts of this individual. Mr SEENEY: Minister, can you take on notice a question regarding any previous contracts that have been let and give an indication to the committee, when you have time to check your department’s records, whether or not any previous contracts have been let by your department or any other department? I do not suppose it would be fair to ask that question. CHAIR: No. You can ask the minister about his department. Mr SEENEY: Can you take on notice whether you are aware of any previous contracts that have been let by your department to Mr Miley? Will you take that question on notice and provide a response to the committee? Mr ROBERTSON: I am not too sure what the question is now. Mr SEENEY: The question is very simple. Have there been any previous contracts that warranted a payment of $1,500 a day to Mr Miley? Mr ROBERTSON: I will take that on notice. CHAIR: The minister has taken that on notice. Mr SEENEY: Can we move on to page 6 of the Service Delivery Statement which deals with the demand side management trial and some $47 million that is going to be allocated to that trial. Minister, can you give an indication to the committee how that $47 million is going to be spent by the GOCs that it is being allocated to? Mr ROBERTSON: Which dot point are you referring to on page 6? Mr SEENEY: On page 2-6 dot point 5 deals with the demand side management trial. I am sure you do not need to read the dot point to know where the $47 million is going to be allocated, surely. Mr ROBERTSON: No. I just wanted to know where it was on the page. I could not readily see it. Just take it easy. As members would know, electricity peak demand is a key driver of electricity infrastructure which is passed on to customers through increased electricity prices. Peak demand reduction measures are therefore an important tool for reducing upward pressure on electricity prices. In collaboration with Energex and Ergon, the Queensland government has developed a range of demand management initiatives to reduce customer energy costs. This year we have committed $47.7 million to the energy conservation and demand management program. This package comprises the residential target initiative which will provide residential customers with energy management options for major household energy appliances such as air conditioners and pool pumps. The demand management for commercial and industrial customers initiative will involve collaboration with industry to reduce their energy use; the reward based tariff work, which will analyse in the short term how best to reward customers for low energy use at peak demand times with existing technologies and in a future intelligent grid environment; and energy conservation communities, which will pilot voluntary programs incorporating energy conservation and demand management in selected towns throughout Queensland. The package which has been developed in collaboration with electricity distributors Energex and Ergon is anticipated to achieve up to 40 megawatts in avoided supply infrastructure augmentation, which equates to approximately $120 million in savings over the next couple of years. Project outcomes will inform the development of further initiatives to achieve greater improvements in the future. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 37

Additionally, new demand management planning and reporting obligations have been recently introduced through the Electricity Regulation 2006. This will help focus the demand management activities of the state’s electricity distribution entities Energex and Ergon by requiring distribution entities to identify opportunities to better manage customer demand and set firm targets for each year starting from 2009-10. The Queensland Competition Authority must provide its review of alternative tariff structures no later than 30 November 2009. Ms CROFT: Minister, the Queensland Renewable Energy Fund outlines the Bligh government’s commitment to 20 per cent renewable energy by 2020. Could you please advise what projects the government is committed to delivering as part of this target? Mr ROBERTSON: Over the next three years, projects will include $4.3 million for the new upgraded Birdsville geothermal power station, $9 million to the Mackay Sugar cogeneration project, $7.5 million to the CSIRO SolarGas project and $5 million for the coastal geothermal energy initiative. The technologies that this funding is spread across demonstrate Queensland’s natural advantages in renewable energy generation. For example, the Mackay project brings innovation to a mature technology utilising sugarcane waste, while the Birdsville project will apply new equipment to an existing geothermal resource. Emerging technologies, such as hot dry rocks using geothermal generation, will also contribute to Queensland’s energy future, and the coastal geothermal energy mapping exercise will help locate those resources close to demand centres, such as cities and towns on the coast. These projects will all play a part in contributing to the state’s goal for renewable energy, which is to achieve at least 20 per cent of investment generated through the national Renewable Energy Target by 2020. The plan will help stimulate up to $3.5 billion in new investment in Queensland, create up to 3,500 jobs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 40 million tonnes by 2020. There are 10 initiatives in the plan targeting three focus areas: accelerating deployment of renewable energy projects, efficient and effective regulation to facilitate new renewable energy investment and smart industry jobs and investment. One of the first projects to commence will be a feasibility study looking at possible locations for a large scale solar thermal power station. Additionally, the plan focuses on providing the right incentives, which may include non-financial measures such as access to land and infrastructure to encourage industry to move beyond business as usual and look for new opportunities. CHAIR: Minister, I want to go back to one of the questions about pricing and the energy industry and GOCs. There are a number of components that contribute to the benchmark retail cost index, and that is mentioned in the Service Delivery Statements on page 2-26. Can you please outline what these are and how these prices are set? Mr ROBERTSON: Under the Electricity Act 1994, regulated electricity prices are adjusted annually in line with the benchmark retail cost index. In broad terms, the benchmark retail cost index for a particular year is calculated by dividing the cost of supplying electricity to the state by the state’s total electricity load. Essentially, consumers pay for the cost of purchasing electricity, including: the cost of complying with the expanded Commonwealth Renewable Energy Target and the Queensland Gas Scheme; network costs, which cover costs associated with the transmission and distribution of electricity—that is, the poles and wires that bring electricity to consumers; and retail costs, which cover reasonable costs incurred by retailers in providing their services, such as billing and overheads. As network and energy costs account for around 90.5 per cent of the total cost of supplying energy—the other 9.5 per cent being retail and costs—changes in these components will usually have the greatest impact on movements and the benchmark retail cost index from one year to the next. Queensland’s demand for electricity continues to grow. To maintain safe and reliable access to electricity for Queenslanders, in the five years from 2005-06 to 2009-10, Queensland will have spent almost $9 billion on electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure to cope with increased demand. Queensland has two government owned distribution network service providers—Energex and Ergon. These businesses are regulated monopolies that move electricity from the high-voltage transmission network to residential and business customers via a network of powerlines, transformers and substations. Energex and Ergon must operate in accordance with distribution revenue determinations made by the Australian Energy Regulator. On 1 July 2010, the Queensland distribution network service providers will enter a new five-year regulatory period. The Australian Energy Regulator’s determination will provide each distribution network service provider with regulated revenue which may be collected from its distribution charges. Predictions of continuing demand growth and network expansion have been made by the providers in their submissions to the regulator. CHAIR: That completes our consideration of the GOCs. We will now move on to Trade, and the Deputy Leader of the Opposition will be asking questions. There will be 15 minutes for questions from non-government members and 10 minutes for questions from government members. Mr SPRINGBORG: Minister, I refer you to non-government question on notice No. 9, which sought details about the overseas staff of Trade Queensland, including the number of staff, the base salary of these staff, their expenses, their benefits and a range of other things. I note that in the answer 38 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009 there was only a general indication of the base salary and the overall cost of running the office. Minister, why wasn’t the information contained with regards to the living expenses and the general expenses of each of the particular people in question? In a nutshell, what is the cost of running Peter Beattie and the others? Mr ROBERTSON: We just tried to be as accurate as possible. If you require further detailed information, I am happy to provide it on notice. Mr SPRINGBORG: Well, the detailed information was asked for some three weeks ago with regards to the travel expenses of each staff member, the living expenses of each staff member and the other entitlements. One would have thought that three weeks was a fair enough time, but if you want more time I am more than happy to put it on notice. CHAIR: Deputy Leader of the Opposition, you are asking the same question that the minister has just taken on notice. I will ask you to ask another question. Mr ROBERTSON: I am happy to take it on notice. Mr SPRINGBORG: Maybe you can get cracking on this one then. CHAIR: Deputy Leader of the Opposition, please do not make argumentative statements as part of your question and please do not make those snide comments. Mr SPRINGBORG: Before I go to the next question, can the committee give an indication of when one would expect the answers to that question? CHAIR: The standing orders require that questions on notice have to be provided to the committee by the close of business tomorrow. Mr SPRINGBORG: Further to the operation of the overseas trade offices, I would indicate to the minister the cost of running those offices as per his answer to question on notice No. 9. It appears to me that the most expensive offices provide less value for money than the least expensive offices. Minister, can you give an indication of why that is the case? To give you an example, the cost benefit for the office in Riyadh is almost $500 for each dollar invested, but if you look at Los Angeles you are dealing with $13 for each dollar invested. Mr ROBERTSON: I do not think it would be appropriate to do a simple calculation such as that simply because each office operates in a different location with different cost structures attached to it. The cost of office accommodation, rental et cetera varies between locations. The important thing for me as minister is that we have a system in place to measure the performance of each of these offices and that those assessments are conducted on a regular basis to ensure we get value for money. Doing the exercise that you have just done is not a valid way of assessing the success or otherwise of any one particular office compared to another because you are not comparing apples with apples. CHAIR: I should clarify my previous advice. The questions on notice are due Monday afternoon at 5 pm. Mr SPRINGBORG: Will the minister outline what the key performance indicators are for these particular trade staff? I do not necessarily mean the number of meetings they undertake or the briefing notes they write. Is there an expectation on these trade commissioners and deputy commissioners that they will return a certain amount for each dollar invested? Mr ROBERTSON: I will ask Mr Rob Whiddon to provide you with that answer. Mr Whiddon: Yes, indeed Trade Queensland very much bases its work out on the field, especially its overseas offices, on strong KPIs which our commissioners are to meet. They have to provide a certain number of strategic projects each year, a certain number of clients per year, a certain number of outcomes in market development. They have to service divisions. There are a range of targets which need to be met and which are monitored monthly by Trade Queensland. Whilst the cost of our overseas offices is large, it is very cost-effective for us and we are constantly reviewing where our overseas offices need to be located. Since becoming general manager, I have indicated both to the organisation but most importantly to business—because the organisation exists to service business clients—that our teams out in the field need to be in locations where Queensland businesses are wanting to do business and are going to get maximum effect and they need to work with business to meet the KPIs that we set. These KPIs are set in their contracts but reviewed each year to make sure that the targets have been met. Constantly, in my view, you need to keep raising the bar so that as new commissioners, for instance, settle into an environment and into a country they are going to perform better as they get more contacts and business feels more confident in dealing with them. So each of our commissioners, as I said, need to meet those criteria. They need to achieve a raft of KPIs. I must say, overall, that our commissioners are achieving those KPIs and beating those targets. I think that is a fairly remarkable situation, given the economic climate we are currently in. I was concerned, as all members of the committee would have been, that the current economic downturn was going to make it very difficult for business in Queensland to achieve results overseas. Instead, what we 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 39 have seen is that we have reached our target for the year. Next year is going to be much more difficult— I have to admit that—but the target has been met and that is because commissioners have reached their KPIs and exceeded them in most cases. Mr SPRINGBORG: Further to the KPI of the various commissioners, are there commissioners that are not reaching their KPIs? What KPIs are they falling short of? What action has been taken to address that underperformance? And who are those commissioners? Mr Whiddon: All of our commissioners have reached their KPIs. I think the business outcomes which are shown in the answer to the question on notice indicate that there are some quite remarkable achievements happening. We in Trade Queensland require our clients whom we serve to sign an export impact form which attests that Trade Queensland has given specific assistance. That makes sure that we do not claim more than we should. We claim only what we have assisted. This is the impact form which must be signed by senior executives of the companies concerned. It gives considerable detail of what Trade Queensland not only in our overseas offices but also in our head office here have provided by way of assistance to reach those targets. I think we had a KPI target of some $420 million for this financial year. I thought that was going to be difficult to reach. I can advise the committee that we have in fact just exceeded $500 million for the financial year, which indicates that all of our offices are working very strongly indeed. Some of those offices are quite small. The ones in the Middle East are just commissioners with no support staff at this stage. What we need to do as an organisation is to review how the year has gone. As I say, next year is going to be tremendously difficult for us and for all Queensland business, but the interesting thing that I have noted is that the number of requests from companies for assistance has increased quite remarkably. It is pretty clear that what is happening is that companies which are doing it tough are looking at all the options they have, including looking to see whether there are overseas markets for their products and their services. We are seeing strong interest in Queensland companies, especially in mining services, in Latin America, which is one of our best markets now. In the Middle East, while Dubai is very difficult, and as you would know the economy is not good, Abu Dhabi is very good for us. I think reaching the KPIs and having targets that are strong and achievable but which raise the bar a little more than you would normally ask is making sure that we all meet our targets. Mr SPRINGBORG: In the answers to the question on notice and also in the answers we have had this morning, there seems to be a strong belief that these offices do provide a strong cost-benefit to Queensland. Has any analysis been done of how we compare with other Australian states which have cut back their presence in these jurisdictions? What is the trend comparison with regard to the amount of trade we are picking up vis-à-vis the other states? Mr Whiddon: I thank you for the question, because I think it comes to the nub of whether these overseas offices are effective or not. I know that it has always been an issue of contention. I can assure the committee that the management of Trade Queensland and the government have been very strict in ensuring that we do have offices in locations which are going to help Queensland business, and that is the driving factor. You have asked specifically about other states. The interesting thing is that other states are currently opening new offices or doing activity in additional countries. While we are remaining stable and have not opened new offices in new locations since I became general manager nearly 18 months ago, other states are doing so. I think the most interesting one is New South Wales, which you will recall closed all its overseas offices some years ago. They were fairly discreet about why they did that, but it was said to be a financial decision. They are now opening five offices around the world. If we are going to compete with other states, as I think we have to in some locations particularly, then we have to match them. As to how they are doing, I cannot answer that. Some of the states like Victoria, New South Wales and South Australia are becoming very active and are spending quite a deal of money. As I say, we have balanced our budget this financial year. The decision that we have to take is where our dollar is going to be best spent, and we have to be driven by Queensland business. If it looks like there are going to be more Queensland companies wanting to search out Latin America, then at some stage we should look to see whether we need someone on the ground. In answer to your question, it is important to say that we are making sure that we are not out there competing with federal agencies and directly with other states for the sake of doing it. I have recently concluded an MOU—not just a piece of paper but a strictly guideline MOU—with Austrade. We are the first Australian state to do that to make sure that we work cooperatively with Austrade around the world and help each other with our limited resources. Just three weeks ago I signed an MOU with EFIC, the federal government’s export finance agency. Again, we are the first state to do so. So we are making sure that we are effective, but I have to say that other states are very active around the world and are sending missions and are opening new offices. 40 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

Mr SPRINGBORG: My last question relates to the presence of our three mainland China offices—Guangzhou, Shanghai and Hong Kong—and also to the situation of the arrested Rio Tinto executive Stern Hu. Is any advice being provided out of those three mainland China offices to clients on mainland China or to any delegations or businesspeople undertaking delegations overseas as they contact Trade Queensland? And what is that particular advice? Mr Whiddon: This is a pertinent question, and I think all Queenslanders would be concerned about what is happening. We have taken the view—rightly, I think—that this is a matter certainly at this stage for the Commonwealth government and have not been saying anything publicly. Our offices in China are reporting to me that business is occurring as usual. We therefore think that this is very much a matter for the Commonwealth and would stay out of it. That being said, we think that the prognosis for trade and business in China is still excellent. It is a major trading partner for us. As you mention, there are a number of offices there. Again, we have to look at our resources, but certainly the fact that Expo will be held in Shanghai next year is I think tremendously important to Australia and the Australian government. All states are involved, as we are. I would think that would be reflected in how the Chinese government and Chinese business would see us, because they are wanting us to do good business there at the Expo. As I say, it is our second largest trading partner after Japan. We are still getting a range of new inquiries about doing business in China. I am not seeing—admittedly at this early stage—that there is any reflection in business that they have some risk in doing so, but obviously we need to work with our offices. The good thing about China is that Queensland has some extraordinary commissioners— Mr Zhang in Shanghai and Simon Lee in Hong Kong, in particular. They have been there for many years. They have excellent relations in the upper echelons of the Chinese government, and they will certainly be able to guide business when still wanting to do activity in China. Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, on page 2-34 of the Service Delivery Agreement it is estimated that the value of exports generated by firms assisted by Trade Queensland is close to $500 million. Can you advise how this was achieved in the current economic climate and what programs Trade Queensland has in place in specific markets to maintain this effort? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Redcliffe for that question. As indicated by Mr Whiddon, preliminary figures indicate that Trade Queensland has far exceeded its targets for exports generated contained in the agency Service Delivery Statement for 2009-10. At this stage it is estimated that more than $500 million of new exports can be directly attributable to exports supported by Trade Queensland. The key outcomes include 21 trade missions with 307 companies participating; and 66 inbound trade delegations and buyers missions, which are a cost-effective way to give Queensland exporters access to international buyers. As well Trade Queensland assisted 2,900 client firms, with 44 per cent of these businesses located in regional Queensland. Despite a difficult global economic situation, Trade Queensland has continued to assist Queensland companies to achieve these outstanding results. It is a sign of the government’s commitment to all stages of economic development, from growing new businesses right through to assisting firms to deliver Queensland’s innovative goods and services to the world. This result delivers on our election promise to create and maintain jobs, and half a billion dollars in export success certainly does just that. To achieve this result, Trade Queensland provides a range of specialist services, advice and assistance to Queensland companies looking to either gain a foothold or to increase their presence in overseas markets. Trade Queensland services companies’ needs in a number of ways including maintaining an overseas presence in 16 key locations. These offices provide a range of specialist advice and assistance including market intelligence, identification of opportunities and leads, pre- mission market briefings, key as well as tailored trade and business missions, site visits and networking events with decision makers. There are four contracted Queensland government special representatives as well as a contracted special adviser developing the relationship between Queensland and PNG and other Pacific island markets. Trade Queensland also delivers a range of exporter education services directly to Queensland exporters. The combination of these programs enables Queensland businesses to utilise the competitive strengths of the state’s economy, both current and emerging, to expand their business and, with the support of the Bligh government, improve our economy. Mr KILBURN: Minister, there has already been a lot said today about measuring the performance of Trade Queensland. Could you expand on how you assess the efficiencies of our trade commissioners, how you monitor their performance against what benchmarks and, more broadly, how they have performed in 2008-09? Mr ROBERTSON: As Mr Whiddon has outlined, trade commissioners have a set of key performance indicators which are linked to overall Trade Queensland Service Delivery Statement performance measures. They also have their own annual targets and are subject to a rigorous performance reporting process. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 41

Trade Queensland monitors commissioners’ performance on a monthly basis, and further still their performance is formally reviewed each quarter by the Trade Queensland senior management team. On top of this, the benchmarks are continuously being reviewed to appropriately reflect the performance of the commissioners. Currently the commissioners report on such areas as the number of Trade Queensland strategic export projects they participate in and related outcomes, the value of export outcomes generated by client firms assisted, the number of exporter development initiatives undertaken, and the number of trade initiatives promoting Queensland products and services undertaken. Additionally, the commissioners also assist with investment attraction to Queensland and report the number of investment leads they generate and any related investment dollar value. All dollar value outcomes by clients assisted are substantiated by export impact forms, which Mr Whiddon referred to previously, and endorsed by the exporter, acknowledging the importance of the assistance provided by Trade Queensland. Trade commissioners have contributed significantly to Trade Queensland Service Delivery Statement outcomes for 2008-09. Trade commissioners have generated 76 investment leads and assisted $329 million of direct investment into Queensland. They have also supported Trade Queensland’s assistance to almost 3,000 Queensland businesses. Clearly, Queensland’s trade commissioners play an important role in the export success of our state’s businesses. The Bligh government investment in trade commissioners delivers on our election commitment to protect and create jobs. Our trade commissioners are generating sufficient investment into Queensland and, just as importantly, are establishing partnerships that will deliver new jobs into Queensland’s future. Examples of formal partnerships facilitated by trade commissioners include, as has been mentioned, signing of a statement of intent between the Queensland government and the Ministry of the Economy of the United Mexican States, a friendship state agreement with China’s Guandong Province, a formal government-to-government agreement with the province of British Columbia in Canada and a number of innovation agreements in knowledge-intensive sectors such as biotech and clean tech. I should say that in some of these areas our trade commissioners are concentrating on, particularly in terms of knowledge-intensive sectors like biotech and clean tech, a financial outcome is not always readily achievable. These are emerging industries and emerging sectors whereby a strategic investment of time by our commissioners will hopefully generate outcomes into the future. This is quite different from the work to assist an exporter get a particular product, say, a widget, into a shopping centre in a particular part of the world. That is why I said in relation to the Leader of the Opposition’s first question that it is not possible to compare apples with apples because each office is different in terms of the cost drivers. But also the activities of our trade commissioners vary according to the markets they are operating in or the leads that they are following. Ms CROFT: Central Queensland is in crisis with rapidly falling export commodity prices, devastating regional towns and cities. What services can the government provide to regional exporters? Mr ROBERTSON: I thank the member for Broadwater for the question. Trade Queensland is actively involved in assisting a broad range of businesses in regional Queensland. The agency works in conjunction with the industry development activities undertaken within the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation. Nearly half—that is, 44 per cent—of Queensland companies provided with export assistance by Trade Queensland are located in regional Queensland. One way that Trade Queensland assists regional exporters is with a suite of services under the title Export Advisory Service. Through this Export Advisory Service Trade Queensland offers a range of products and services tailored to meet the export skills development needs of regional exporters. The Export Advisory Service’s products and services include the ‘Getting export smart’ seminars—a five module export skills development program. For 2008-09 a total of 55 ‘Getting export smart’ seminars were delivered in regional Queensland. Another product is the export master class workshop series which is a higher level, tightly focused workshop for experienced exporters. In 2008-09 a total of five master class workshops were delivered in regional Queensland. The Mentoring for Export program, another Export Advisory Service service, provides export clients with the opportunity to discuss their export strategy with a panel of mentors drawn from government and industry. The government’s export advisers are a one-stop shop and are able to link regional businesses through the overseas offices of Trade Queensland with suitable partners in a range of growth export markets. Queensland’s regions are home to some of Australia’s top exporters. Regional Queensland businesses assisted by Trade Queensland achieved outstanding results in 2008-09. Out of the $500 million total export outcomes supported by Trade Queensland around $142 million or 28 per cent were achieved by regional exporters. This government will not slash $1 billion from the budget as promised by the opposition during the last election campaign. We will continue to support regional Queensland businesses with programs such as these delivered by Trade Queensland as maintaining—not cutting—funds for these programs creates jobs and delivers on our election commitments. 42 Estimates Committee C—Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Trade 16 Jul 2009

CHAIR: On page 2-15 of the Service Delivery Statement I note that Driving export growth for Queensland 2006-11 achieved its five-year knowledge-intensive export target two years early. Minister, can you please advise the committee on how this was achieved and what the aims of this program are for the future? Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you for that question. First of all can I say that to achieve such a target two years earlier is an outstanding effort. I thank all of those involved in the strategy for their commitment. On 23 July 2006 cabinet approved the Queensland government’s five-year export strategy Driving export growth for Queensland 2006-11—in effect the export strategy. The export strategy was released on 9 October 2006 as a whole-of-government strategy. The export strategy achieved its target in the value knowledge-intensive exports in 2007-08 when such exports reached $5 billion. As I said, this is remarkable result given it was originally targeted for 2011. These knowledge-intensive exports are for the whole of Queensland, not just Trade Queensland. This demonstrates that there has been a shift in the composition of Queensland’s economy to a more knowledge based focus. This milestone came about through several key initiatives undertaken by Trade Queensland, including the establishment of the Export Advisory Service delivering export advice and services mainly through the regional centres of the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation and other affiliates within the export advisory network. It also included: new trade representation in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, Riyadh in Saudi Arabia and Guangzhou in southern China; additional export advisors for India and South Korea; and new Tourism Queensland representation in Osaka in Japan and Mumbai in India and an enhanced presence in Shanghai in China. The Latin America Mining Initiative, which commenced in April 2006 and concluded on 31 March 2009, and which focused on the key markets of Chile, Peru and Mexico, was a major contributor and generated $54.2 million in export income by Queensland companies. In the latter part of 2009 a new whole-of-government export strategy that looks at new and emerging industry sectors, such as renewable energy and clean technology, will be developed and aim to open even more markets as we deliver on our election promise to create and maintain jobs. CHAIR: The time allotted for the consideration of the expenditure estimates for the portfolio of the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade has now expired. Minister, on behalf all members of the committee can I thank you, your staff and the department for their assistance in our considerations. Mr ROBERTSON: Thank you Chair and members. Proceedings suspended from 12.51 pm to 1.30 pm 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 43

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C—COMMUNITY SERVICES, HOUSING AND WOMEN

In Attendance Hon. KL Struthers, Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women Ms C Whitton, Principal Advisor Department of Communities Ms L Apelt, Director-General Mr I Fulton, Chief Financial Officer Ms K Bullock, Director, Financial Services Mr D Short, Director, Financial Services Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian Ms E Fraser, Commissioner

CHAIR: Estimates Committee C hearing is now resumed and the portfolios of the Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women will be examined. The proceedings today are similar to parliament to the extent that members of the public cannot ask questions. In that regard I remind visitors that, in accordance with standing order 206, any person admitted to a public hearing of a committee may be excluded by order of the committee or at the discretion of the chair. In relation to media coverage of the hearing, the committee has resolved that television film coverage and photography be allowed during my introductory comments and the opening statement of each minister as well as for a short period during each changeover of ministerial advisers. The committee has also agreed to the live broadcast of the hearing via the Parliamentary Service’s website and to receivers throughout the parliamentary precinct. I ask that all mobile phones and pagers be now switched off. I remind members of the committee and the minister that the time limit for questions is one minute and that answers are to be no longer than three minutes. A single chime will give a 15-second warning and a double chime will sound at the end of each of these time limits. An extension of the time may be given with the consent of the questioner. A double chime will sound two minutes after an extension of time has been given. The standing orders require that at least half the time available for questions be allocated to non- government members. Any time expended when the committee deliberates in private is to be equally apportioned between government and non-government members. For the benefit of Hansard can I ask departmental officers to identify themselves if the minister calls on them to answer a question. I welcome the minister and her advisers today. I declare the proposed expenditure for the portfolio of the Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women open for examination. The question before the committee is— That the proposed expenditure be agreed to. Minister, would you like to make an opening statement? Ms STRUTHERS: Thank you, Mr Chairman, I would. The 2009-10 state budget for the portfolios of Community Services and Housing and Women is a budget for tough times. It is a budget that meets our commitments to the people of Queensland. This budget is directed at strengthening and better coordinating services for people. It includes an extra $414 million over four years to alleviate increasing pressures for funded non- government organisations, including those arising from increased award rates provided by the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission to community service workers. This allocation recognises the valuable work they do in caring for our most vulnerable citizens. The global recession means we have been forced to make some tough choices, but cutting back on community services was not negotiable. This budget further strengthens communities through the allocation of $610,000 for youth justice conferences; $170.2 million in capital funding to expand the Cleveland Youth Detention Centre in Townsville—this project is also a big jobs generator, creating more than 1,400 jobs; $1.8 million for legal and support services for seniors; and $2.7 million over two years to run a pilot program in Rockhampton on a new integrated approach to preventing domestic violence. This budget also includes unprecedented funding for housing and support for homeless people. 44 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

Youth justice conferencing is expanded in this budget because it works. It is where young people face the person they have wronged and take responsibility for their actions. Youth workers tell me it is a powerful process and a powerful deterrent. We know that the vast majority of young people do the right thing. Youth crime is down. In 2001 the rate of juvenile crime was around nine offences per 100 young people. It has now dropped to eight offences per 100 young people, even though the population of young people rose by almost 50,000 in the same period. Jobs and job security are important in tough economic times. Our housing budget this year is a major jobs generator. On top of the state government’s funds of $140 million from the Queensland Future Growth Fund there is around $977.2 million from the Nation Building and Jobs Plan and other national partnership agreements. All up there is a record $1.4 billion to build 4½ thousand new social housing dwellings right across the state. It is a win for people who need a roof over their heads and a win for workers in the building industry. We are planning and building now. Tenants will turn the key on these new homes over the coming months and over the next 3½ years. Our record capital program includes more than $196 million to build and upgrade housing for Indigenous people in remote communities. Better housing for Indigenous families will go a long way towards closing the gap of inequities in Indigenous health and economic status—a key commitment of this government. We have also set aside more than $56 million to help more than 176,000 households in the private market get access to affordable housing. The Bligh government will inject an extra $200 million over four years to tackle homelessness. We have reached a landmark partnership agreement on homelessness. Queensland will contribute $102 million over four years, with matching funds of $99.5 million from the Commonwealth. These funds will go towards a range of reforms including more street-to-home initiatives for chronic homeless people in hot spots across the state, such as in Cairns, Mount Isa, Maryborough and the Gold Coast, and more assistance for people leaving protection services, correctional and health facilities. Our package of concessions for seniors is the most comprehensive in the country. Now we have increased the electricity rebate to pensioners and seniors by 15 per cent, at a cost of $15.5 million. This is to help ease the financial burden on seniors. We are recognising the role of volunteers, especially senior volunteers, through initiatives such as Golden Gurus. We are on track to meet our election commitment to boost the proportion of volunteers in Queensland by 50 per cent by 2020. They are all big-ticket items, but this budget is about more than that. I am talking about initiatives like the Indigenous Youth Parliament. If I am asked to reflect on my time as a minister in the Bligh government I will remember one event above many others—that is, the day in this room when I welcomed 40 young Indigenous men and women to Parliament House for Queensland’s first Indigenous Youth Parliament. It was an historic moment. Indigenous young people are tomorrow’s leaders. This project will be funded again this year. I firmly believe that true reconciliation will not be achieved until Indigenous people take their rightful place in this parliament. All of this effort is about planning and delivering. It is a budget to strengthen our communities and steer them through the difficult times ahead. CHAIR: Thank you, Minister. We will start questioning from non-government members. I call the member for Burdekin. Mrs MENKENS: Good afternoon, Minister. With reference to page 3-31 of the Service Delivery Statement, can the minister list all other government departments her department has actively engaged in an effort to advocate for women? What measures are in place to determine the success of this engagement? Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for her question. The Office for Women and the status of women generally is an important part of my portfolio activities. The Office for Women has a regional structure, with nine coordinators across the state. We are actively engaged in activities across the state including the Rural Women’s Symposium that the Premier attended last year. Were you wanting me to list specific initiatives for the types of activities that are occurring on a daily basis? Mrs MENKENS: Yes, the advocating for women—in which areas are you actually advocating, in which departments and in what areas? Ms STRUTHERS: Some of the key priorities for government include women’s economic prosperity, women’s safety—they are two key areas. Staff in the Office for Women are actively engaged with agencies like Justice and Attorney-General, the police, and other areas of our communities department in order to advance those objectives. For instance, staff from the Office for Women have actively inputted into the new domestic violence strategy that I launched in Rockhampton last week. They actively work with the department of employment on initiatives in relation to women’s employment. They are actively engaged with Justice and Attorney-General in relation to reforms in the legal system 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 45 and the current review of the domestic violence legislation. So both in the regional areas and in corporate office, this staff is very actively working across agencies. That is their role. They are facilitators. They do not have a big budget themselves; they try to facilitate action out of other agencies. They do have funding, for instance, for the Women in Hard Hats project—trying to get more women into non-traditional areas of work: the construction industry, the mining industry, those sorts of areas. They have a small budget for that purpose. But generally, their role is to be facilitators, to remind all agencies of the gender impact of their working and the needs of women and girls specifically Mrs MENKENS: What measures, though, are in place to actually determine the success of their engagement? Ms STRUTHERS: Projects are evaluated. I might just seek some advice on the recent evaluation. The overall office itself, for instance, has just been evaluated. There was a review undertaken by Carolyn Mason in relation to the role of the office. It was a comprehensive review and I met with Carolyn Mason to go through the findings of that review. In relation to specific activities like the Women on Boards strategy, the success of that is measured by how many women are on boards. We are over the 50 per cent target that we have been seeking. I think something like 56.11 per cent of the 221 new appointees to Queensland government boards were women. So there is certainly an indicator there that we are on track with that strategy. With the Women in Hard Hats strategy, we have certainly had some success, but I must admit I am disappointed in the results that not only the Office for Women is achieving but the community is achieving in this area. There is still a very low proportion of women and girls who take up work in those non-traditional areas. Still something like 1.9 per cent or two per cent of the workforce in those areas are women. That is certainly an area that I am keeping an eye on and I want to see extended. The director-general has advised me that in the specific work plan for the Office for Women there are performance indicators against each of those areas of their activity and some of those have clear targets in relation to the number of women assisted in various areas. So if you would like more detail, I can provide it. Mrs MENKENS: Thank you. Ms STRUTHERS: Does that give you a flavour of the work that they are doing? It is a very important area of government activity Mrs MENKENS: With reference to the SDS, pages 3-15 and 3-18, will the minister provide the total number of dwellings that will be constructed with just the state’s contribution to social housing? Ms STRUTHERS: As the member knows, the state has been contributing significantly. We had a commitment of $500 million in the 2007-08 budget under the Queensland Future Growth Fund for housing. That was a significant investment at the state level at that time because, as you would be aware, under the federal government the policy was primarily one of rent assistance to Australians in housing need rather than providing capital through the Commonwealth-State Housing Agreement to the states and the territories. In fact, we were starved of capital funds, essentially, under those arrangements. So Queensland had to dig deep to find additional money. I will just take advice on the specific number of dwellings, but the actual quantum of funding initially was on top of the existing spend in the Department of Housing. I am advised that it is primarily joint initiatives. I am happy to provide you with some detail on the current investment. In relation to the current breakdown of the Commonwealth-state contribution, just bear with me and I will get you the detail on that. I do not want to miss a dollar. Housing is a good news story, as the member would be aware. The Commonwealth contribution currently is at $831 million and the state contribution is $160.5 million. Mrs MENKENS: With reference to pages 3-27 and 3-28 of the SDS, can you explain, therefore, why the state’s contribution to social rental housing has dropped from $73 million to $45 million last year to this year and why Indigenous community housing has dropped from $42 million to $30 million? Ms STRUTHERS: I am not aware that there is a drop in the state contribution. In fact, in these partnership agreements we have significant matching arrangements in some of them— Mrs MENKENS: It is actually in the budget statement. Ms STRUTHERS: Can you give me the specific reference again? Mrs MENKENS: Pages 3-27 and 3-28. CHAIR: Is that of the Service Delivery Statements? Mrs MENKENS: Yes, of the SDS, pages 3-27 and 3-28, specifically page 3-28, halfway down. Ms STRUTHERS: I am advised that there has not, in fact, been a drop but there is a carryover from the 2008-09 year to the 2009-10 financial year. Mrs MENKENS: Underspent? 46 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

Ms STRUTHERS: Housing, as you would be aware, is a rolling program with the capital. It is not a decrease; it is simply the carryover to the next financial year. Just on that, I want to be very clear that we have significant investment in housing. Queensland has contributed a significant amount of money to that. I reiterate that in the last year or two in relation to homelessness and housing generally we are seeing unprecedented investment by all state and territory governments. I have been witness to that at the national ministerial council meetings, where all state and territory governments have been really providing significant support to their public housing and social housing sectors. Mrs MENKENS: But do you find it acceptable that user charges pay for more of the housing budget than the state government contributions? Ms STRUTHERS: I will seek some advice, but I might just comment generally. User charges may be referring to our rental income. I think you would expect that we get significant rental income. We have around 60,000 properties. Let us do the maths quickly on that: 25 per cent of people’s income is contributing to that rental income. That is a whopping amount of money. I will get you some detail if you need that. Mrs MENKENS: But it means that they are putting in more than you are putting in. Ms STRUTHERS: I might just ask Ian Fulton, our chief financial officer who is a bit of a whiz on the number crunching to give us some further advice in relation to that. Mr Fulton: The amount that is set out in the output summary is the output payment that the department receives from Treasury. In addition, there is a capital sum—an equity contribution—that is paid in. That amount for 2009-10 is $160.5 million. Mrs MENKENS: What is the total amount of state funding, excluding all the federal funding, that is being used to reduce the social housing waiting lists? You are saying that that is $106 million. Ms STRUTHERS: I appreciate what the member is trying to achieve here is, I guess, what responsibility we are taking. I am advised that the total state expenditure is $371.4 million this financial year, with a homelessness contribution of $41.3 million. That includes services, not just housing specifically. That is a significant investment from the Queensland government. I hope you are going to ask me about the Commonwealth contribution, because that is very significant. Mrs MENKENS: So do you consider that sort of inequity in the funding to be a partnership or a subsidy? Ms STRUTHERS: It is a partnership. We are matching funds, for instance, in the national partnership on homelessness. The Commonwealth is putting in about $99.3 million; we are putting in $102 million or so. That is a very welcome partnership and investment in the homelessness program. We are seeing $1.1 billion or so in relation to Indigenous housing over the next 10 years. We have never seen that sort of investment prior to the Rudd government coming from the previous federal Howard government. We are in a new era now in relation to recognition that housing needs to be front of mind for everybody. I can remember working both in my role as an MP and in my prior work at the Queensland Council of Social Service trying to get federal government recognition of housing. It had been pretty difficult under the leadership of John Howard, yet it is one of the most significant things in people’s lives. As we know, a job and a secure, affordable, safe roof over your head are two key things that people need in their lives. I simply say that this current level of investment from the federal government puts that era of government to shame. For 10 years we were starved of capital funds. Queensland had difficulty trying to provide the sort of housing we needed. As you know in your area, when people move into these units they are often the best houses in the street, the best units in the street. As I have said previously in the parliament, as one elderly woman said to me one day—and I have not forgotten this—I was opening a set of units at Acacia Ridge, the Patty Boyle units, and she gave me a big hug and said, ‘I feel like I’ve won Lotto.’ That is a tremendous feeling for people. We were deprived of that sort of opportunity. So I am very, very pleased to support and welcome the partnership agreements we are having with the federal government and it is a very, very important opportunity that we have at the moment. Mrs MENKENS: Will the minister state the demographics most prevalent on the housing register, that is, clients demanding one-bedroom dwellings and so forth and those classified as disadvantaged? Which of those groups are afforded priority? The page reference is 3-28, Ms STRUTHERS: You have asked an important question and I want to give you a comprehensive answer. I will just wait for some detail on that breakdown. But a couple of observations I would make that I am really pleased about are that currently 44 per cent of the primary tenants in our social housing are people aged 55 years and over. We are providing a lot of housing for seniors and we will continue to do so. Seniors, as you know, have significant needs. We are also giving priority in our new system for our social register. The assessment process gives priority to women escaping domestic violence and their children, to people leaving mental health and other facilities and people with disabilities. We have a number of criteria that our staff work towards 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 47 in assessing very high need, high need and moderate need down to lower need. If I can provide a detailed breakdown, I will give that to you, but certainly the criteria that we work to is that all applicants must meet the eligibility criteria to receive assistance. They must be Australian citizens or permanent residents. There is an asset test in relation to property and liquid assets. There is an independent income test and a household income test. So there are a number of criteria. In relation to the appropriateness of their housing, we assess where they are currently living, how much need they have in relation to location—do they need to be near hospitals. There is a very, very detailed and comprehensive process of assessment that our staff go through. Currently, 10.6 per cent of our applicants on our register have very high need, 32 per cent high need and down to lower need at 4.5 per cent. As I said, most of those people in that high-need category, or very high need are people escaping domestic violence, people with mental health issues, or disabilities—people who really need support as quickly as possible. Young people coming out of child protection are another high-need group. Mrs MENKENS: Minister, I refer to non-government question on notice No. 8. I ask the minister: what is the unit cost for the key programs offered by the Office for Women? Does she believe that it is value for money to spend $3.659 million on an office that delivers $0.64 million worth of programs? Ms STRUTHERS: The achievements of the Office for Women, as I referred to earlier, have been significant. In terms of a number of the community leadership seminars, the Women in Hard Hats program, the Smart Women-Smart State Awards and the International Women’s Day initiative state- wide, these are some great activities that I have been witness to throughout the regions in Queensland as well. You seem to be assuming that this office may not be achieving much. I am of the view and the review is of the view that the office plays a significant facilitative role in elevating the needs of women across government agencies across the community. Mrs MENKENS: There seems to be an enormous discrepancy between the office administrative costs as compared with the project and the programs. Ms STRUTHERS: One comment that I would make is that this office does not have a big grants program or anything like that, so its influence is probably hard to quantify because it is about facilitating and providing a mechanism of coordination and facilitation across government. I must acknowledge though that I have had a close look at the Office for Women in my time as minister. I have asked for some significant work to be done on a model that may mean actually positioning staff in those key agencies—that is, basically a hub and spoke model is what I am considering at the moment. I want some further work done on that. I would think that that might then provide an opportunity for the Brisbane based staff to actually work on a day-to-day basis in key agencies around the economic employment issues and other areas. I know that the nine staff in the regions, frankly, work their butts off—if I am allowed to say that; it is not unparliamentary, is it—because they actually have big regions to cover and the Brisbane staff are working across agencies here. I would like to see a model where they are actually working alongside others, not just trying to facilitate action from what might be some distance, in a sense. I can give you some assurances that I am very mindful of the need for this sort of area of work to be taken seriously and for it to be supported well. In my view, that is not a big budget allocation. I do not see that as an issue. I think the influence has to be effective, and the review certainly indicated that it is, but I think there is scope for improvement. I am certainly looking at that. Mrs MENKENS: With reference to homelessness amongst youth, can the minister provide a total for the number of youth held in detention centres in 2008-09 because they had no fixed abode? Ms STRUTHERS: Again, you have touched on a really important issue here. One of the things that has concerned me in my time as minister—and I visited the Cleveland Youth Detention Centre in Townsville a month or so ago—is that a number of young people, particularly Indigenous people, are in detention on remand. I think 60-odd per cent are there on remand. They are people who have not been before the court, have not been deemed guilty of an offence necessarily and the presumption of innocence has to hold. But they are being held in detention, which is a significant punishment for someone who has not actually been through the full process of the court. We have initiatives like YBASS—the Youth Bail and Accommodation Support Service—operating across Brisbane. We have programs in Mount Isa for instance. When I was there recently the Mount Isa Youth Shelter was supporting young people so that they could— Mrs MENKENS: I am looking at the ones who have no home; they are there because they have no fixed abode and they are actually— Ms STRUTHERS: What we are trying to do is provide magistrates with confidence that if they are releasing young people on bail or on other conditions they can be accommodated by a youth shelter or support service. Some of the elders, particularly of the Aboriginal kids in Rockhampton and other parts of the state where I visited, are providing that sort of support. The other initiative that I think will play a good role—and I will talk about this a little more, given that that is my one-minute warning—is Kids Under Cover. I met with an organisation which operates primarily out of Victoria but is looking to offer support in Queensland. Kids Under Cover has a very 48 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009 practical support system of putting bungalows onto the back of houses, particularly where there is overcrowding, and this is occurring a lot in Indigenous families. Overcrowding is causing pressure on the family. My principal policy adviser tells me that her daughter is 21 and she would like one of these bungalows. They provide separate space—safe, secure space—on the back of a house and they are portable. They can be moved when the needs of that young adolescent or whomever have been fulfilled. They can actually be moved to another place. We are trying to throw a lot at this to be creative and innovative and to try to respond to the holistic needs of young people. CHAIR: I call the member for Broadwater. Ms CROFT: I refer to the Service Delivery Statement at page 3-6 and the massive funding injection that is being spent on social housing infrastructure here in Queensland, and I ask: how many workers will get jobs out of the construction of new social housing units to be rolled out on the Gold Coast and across the state over the next 3½ years? Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question. I know that she has been pestering me about how much of this housing is going to the Gold Coast. I have been on the coast and visited a number of innovative housing projects, one that St Vincent de Paul is running and others that the Gold Coast Housing Co. has been involved in. The Bligh government will not give up the fight for the workers of Queensland or those people who need help in finding a home. That is why the Queensland government, in partnership with the Australian government, will invest $1.201 billion into around 4,500 new social housing dwellings over the next three years. The new dwellings will become part of Queensland’s One Social Housing System, providing homes to those people who need our support to find a home. Not only are we building homes; we are delivering jobs. My department tells me that the massive program will provide an estimated 4,500 jobs over the next 12 months. This means that we will create or sustain much-needed jobs and business opportunities in the building industry for small companies, large developers, contractors and building suppliers. By June 2010, approximately 500 new dwellings will be completed across the state. The member for Broadwater will be happy to know that phase 1 of the program is already delivering homes and jobs on the Gold Coast, with more to come. As I said, I visited some of these projects such as the St Vinnies project at Arundel—and if you have not seen it yet, get out there; it is a great project of wrap-around support services as well as the housing being provided in that precinct— and social housing units at Southport. The program is an important part of keeping our commitment to reducing homelessness and it also ensures our continued commitment to creating jobs right across the state. Mr KILBURN: I refer to the Service Delivery Statements, in particular page 3-7 in relation to the homelessness national partnership agreement, and I can only agree with you, Minister, that it is a long overdue investment by the federal government in providing for what we all know is an important issue. I ask the minister to advise what steps the state government is taking to help meet the federal government’s target to halve overall homelessness by 2020? Ms STRUTHERS: I have a feeling that I am going to be a bit of a cracked record on some of this stuff, because it is so important and there is a good story to tell. As I have said, the Bligh government is tackling homelessness head-on. We are rising to the challenge of delivering homeless Queenslanders a better deal. From the 2006 census, we know that there is a very disturbing rate of homelessness across this state—around 26,000 people in total. That disturbs me as a minister; it disturbs me as someone who has worked with people in this situation directly in the past. Homelessness has dropped in Queensland as a percentage of the population despite its significant numbers. One of the encouraging signs is that youth homelessness has dropped by 30 per cent in recent years. A recent national report from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare clearly acknowledged that our Youth Support Coordinator program in Queensland was one of the contributing factors to this decrease in youth homelessness. But it is far too high. We aim to halve homelessness in Queensland by 2020, and we are working with the Rudd government to achieve this. We know it will be hard work, but we are rolling up our sleeves and getting on with the job of delivering homeless people a better deal. As I have said, this means building around 4,500 new social housing dwellings as part of the massive $1.2 billion state-wide construction program. We are delivering this infrastructure program in partnership with the Rudd government and in the new spirit of cooperative federalism. This building program marks a win for the homeless Queenslanders and the end of the blame game between the state and the Commonwealth. It puts to shame the 11 years of the former federal government and its inaction on homelessness. One of the things that I have been really impressed by was the fact that when Kevin Rudd got elected one of his first significant policy papers was on homelessness. That to me signalled this is a person who really cares about the social issues as well as the economic issues affecting this nation. It is about more than just providing bricks and mortar; it is providing homeless people with the support services that they need, and that is where the $200 million in funding comes into play. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 49

Today I am pleased to announce that we are at the forefront of this problem. I referred earlier to the Kids Under Cover project. I want to announce during this session that we will invest more than $950,000 in a unique project run by Kids Under Cover. It will receive six relocatable dwellings previously owned by the Department of Communities along with $605,000 to assist with the purchase of 10 bungalows, which I referred to earlier. These bungalows will be placed in the backyard of the family or a carer’s home where overcrowding exists. It will help families to stay connected. They will be available initially to young people in Townsville, Rockhampton, Toowoomba and Inala in the initial stages of the rollout and they will be expanded to other parts of the state as needed and available. As I said, we are trying to be creative and innovative. I really commend both the non-government organisations and our departmental officers, who are working well together to make the lives of homeless people a lot more secure. CHAIR: Minister, I am very fortunate to represent a large number of social housing tenants. I refer to the Service Delivery Statement at page 3-7 and the allocations for maintaining and repairing social housing. I ask you to detail to the committee what funding and what work will be undertaken in my electorate to improve social housing. Ms STRUTHERS: Again, member for Waterford, you are one of the pesky MPs who keeps ringing my office and contacting me about social housing issues in your area, and I know you are a strong advocate for social housing. One of our goals is to ensure our social housing assets are safe, secure and in good repair. The department maintains comprehensive property condition data that allows for planned, regular maintenance and upgrade works to be performed. This year it is expected that over $312 million will be expended on maintenance and upgrades of social housing stock. In the electorate of Waterford the department owns 1,475 properties—and I bet you know where they all are; they would be the best ones in the street—with an average age of 25 years. You will agree that these properties are well maintained and a total of $7.6 million is budgeted for expenditure in your electorate to ensure these properties remain in good repair and are properties that tenants can be very proud to live in. These funds include $1 million in general upgrades including kitchen, bathroom and laundry upgrades and $1.5 million for the renewals program. The renewal program funds general upgrades of whole properties to transform areas into attractive neighbourhoods, offering a better quality of life for current and future residents, and it encourages tenants to take a more active role in their local street and community. There is also $2.9 million for maintenance including painting, repairing leaks, fixing blocked sewers and ensuring properties are of an appropriate standard for new tenants. There is also $2.2 million from the nation-building and jobs program that includes built-in wardrobes, electric hot- water system replacements, roof insulation, floor coverings and general upgrades such as driveways. I recently took the federal housing minister, Tanya Plibersek, to a property. It was not in your electorate; it was in Redcliffe in the electorate of the member for Redcliffe. The federal minister was very impressed, too, with the nature of the work that had been done. Obviously the tenants were very happy with their new built-in cupboards, the paintwork, the driveway and other things. That is what people need. They want to feel safe. They had their security screens installed by the department as well and they felt very proud of their house. That is what we want—people in the wider community to be very proud of our social housing stock. Ms van LITSENBURG: I refer to the Service Delivery Statement at page 3-16 and the RentConnect pilot in Caboolture and Central Queensland, and I ask: how is the trial helping people to enter the private rental market and are there any early indications that it should be rolled out into other areas? Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question and want to acknowledge that the department is not just about the provision of social housing; we have a range of housing products including support for people in the private market. RentConnect is proving to be very successful. Members of this committee would be aware that the pilot RentConnect Advisory Service started late last year. Its purpose is to help people access the private rental market. As the private rental market makes up about 20 per cent of residential housing in Queensland, it makes sense for us to help people find housing in this market. Pilot services were started in Caboolture and Rockhampton with a target of helping 300 people in its first year. I met the staff involved in RentConnect in Rockhampton a few months ago. I am pleased to announce that in just 10 months we have already helped more than 300 people meet the challenge of accessing the private rental market through one-on-one interview assistance, support in linking up with the real estate agents and other support. It is generally people who have been discriminated against in the private market—single parents with a number of kids, that kind of situation. It is about helping them negotiate the private rental market. Some of them do not have references from previous tenancies. We help negotiate with the real estate agents and get them a leg-up into accommodation. It is often a problem for large families. We certainly have been providing what assistance we can. There are simple and effective tips that we give people, and we certainly play a role in advocating with them. 50 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

People are also linked to community services while they might be waiting for housing. They may need low-cost loans to meet set-up costs such as rent in advance and moving costs and we certainly try to help them with that. Importantly, the message is that you are not left on your own. We can offer an innovative range of products through the department, and RentConnect is one of those innovative programs. While 300 people have received one-on-one assistance, I am pleased that many people have also taken the opportunity to download RentConnect fact sheets from the Housing website, with more than 16,000 downloads recorded from July last year. There is a big demand for private rental housing; there is a lot of competition out there and it can be very difficult for people. CHAIR: I call the member for Chatsworth. Mr KILBURN: I refer to page 3-7 of the SDS in relation to social housing and ask the minister what initiatives are in place to help elderly people access social housing and give vulnerable Queenslanders the help that they need to make life at home easier. Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question. Our government is committed to making life easier for our seniors and those in the community who are most vulnerable. Again I say that that is why we are building 4,500 new social housing dwellings, so that these people can be provided with homes. The department has 10,470 dwellings identified as seniors units, specifically for people who are 55 years and older. I mentioned earlier that 44 per cent of Queensland social housing homes are occupied by seniors as the primary occupant and 42 per cent are occupied by people who have a disability. In addition to our massive building program delivering new homes, the Queensland government is also embarking on a massive repair and maintenance program with social housing. We will spend an extra $80 million repairing and maintaining our social housing across the state, split between 2008-09 and 2009-10, including the upgrade and maintenance program, the Home and Community Care Modifications Program. These modifications will help frail aged or people with a disability to remain in their homes longer. That is certainly the goal we are trying to achieve. Housing and Homelessness Services in my portfolio area administers and manages the home modification component of the broader program. In 2008-09 we completed 960 home modifications at a cost of approximately $7.3 million. In the next 12 months we will complete home modifications to approximately 900 more homes. It does not simply modify homes; it provides essential support services for elderly Queenslanders. In January 2009 we began a remote occupational therapist assessment pilot. The pilot will see the therapist visiting elderly Queenslanders in their own homes to come up with ways to support and enhance their independent living. We are offering this service to frail aged people and people with moderate to severe disabilities and people who require support to modify their home. It will help these people stay in their homes longer rather than prematurely enter into a nursing home or hostel. On another front, 31 home modifications were managed and completed in 2008-09 under the Spinal Cord Injuries Response Initiative. We have also delivered $14.6 million in grants in 2008-09 to Home Assist Secure. Home Assist Secure provides a range of highly valued services that make a positive contribution to the health, safety and security of eligible seniors. Around 58,500 households have benefited under this innovative scheme. Our government knows it needs to help elderly people and vulnerable Queenslanders, particularly in these tough times, and we are investing in very practical programs like these that make their lives easier and give them a better quality of life. CHAIR: I refer to the Service Delivery Statement of your department at page 3-7 and the housing stock in Indigenous communities, and I ask the minister to outline the government’s plan to upgrade housing in Indigenous communities in Queensland. Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question. Our record capital works program includes more than $196 million to be spent on housing for Indigenous people in remote communities, and certainly this is part of a national partnership with the federal government. We are planning and delivering major improvements to housing in Indigenous communities and we are rolling out a large number of new dwellings. With these funds we will also be able to carry out repairs and maintenance to lift the standard of housing in many Indigenous communities. I have travelled to a number of communities and at times been concerned about damage to housing. I do not want to be gimmicky here, but I just want to highlight a bit of a before-and-after scenario. This photo shows a house at Woorabinda prior to its upgrade. The other photo shows the kind of work and the quality of our work that is done on hundreds—in fact thousands—of properties around the state. Better housing for Indigenous families will go a long way to closing the gap on inequities in Indigenous health and their economic status. We will build more than 1,100 new dwellings and make repairs to and upgrade more than 1,200 homes. As I said earlier, this is unprecedented investment in housing, unprecedented investment in Indigenous communities and all so important in closing the gap on those inequities. We are working side by side with Indigenous councils to roll out this massive capital works program, and it could not have 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 51 come at a better time for Indigenous Queenslanders. It is also a win for people in the building and supply industries. It is also helping to meet an election commitment to employ more apprentices and trainees on building sites in Queensland. Builders and developers of social housing projects have to demonstrate that Indigenous workers make up 20 per cent of the total workforce and that apprentices make up 10 per cent of the total workforce on the job. It is about delivering jobs, delivering housing and delivering a better deal for our Indigenous people in remote areas. The first cabs off the rank are in communities of greatest need: Doomadgee, Hope Vale, Aurukun and Mornington Island. With these funds we will also be providing assistance for up to 70 households that have chosen to relocate to urban and regional areas to gain better access to housing, health, education and employment opportunities. It is about planning and delivering for the future. It is about tackling overcrowding and giving Indigenous Queenslanders better housing to meet their needs. Ms van LITSENBURG: I refer to Service Delivery Statement page 3-3, the budget highlights, and the funds set aside to support the community services sector to continue to deliver vital services to our most needy, and I ask: will organisations like those that help homeless people in my electorate of Redcliffe receive funds? Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question and her support of those people living in the showgrounds at Redcliffe. I commend you for working with my department and the community organisations to make sure these people were housed appropriately. They now have alternative safe accommodation. It was a combined effort from my department, the wonderful services of Micah, the local neighbourhood centre and Moreton Bay Regional Council. The state government embarked on a whole-of-government response to find alternative accommodation for them. Housing staff stepped in, visited the showgrounds daily, interviewed people, assessed their needs and helped them lodge applications for housing. Regular meetings were held with a range of government, council and community agencies. I commend Micah and the Redcliffe Neighbourhood Centre for their efforts. They pitched in and worked with us in a true partnership and really followed those people through and will continue to do so. A reference group of all stakeholders was established, and they were certainly in daily contact with the people living in the showgrounds. My department has arranged funding for Micah to provide an ongoing support role. Referrals were also made to the Homeless Health Outreach Team for drug and alcohol issues and the neighbourhood centre also provided ongoing support. Every cloud has a silver lining, and in this case safe and secure accommodation was found for all 12 residents. We will continue to fund vital organisations such as Micah because they provide very practical, very welcome, street-to-home programs that help homeless people get into more permanent housing arrangements. It was certainly a job well done by all of those agencies. CHAIR: I call the member for Burdekin. Mrs MENKENS: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Will the minister state the number of complaints that have been received in the last year from neighbours of social housing tenants? Ms STRUTHERS: I will just wait for some advice as to whether we have that calculation, but I might just make a comment in relation to complaints because as minister I do receive letters from members of both sides of the House in relation to neighbourhood complaints. One of the things I really want to impress on people here in the committee, and I do it every day in this job, is that tenants in our public housing system, in our social housing, are some of the best tenants you would ever want to have in your housing. I am not assuming this is part of your question, but I am going to respond to this issue because it bothers me greatly that there is this nonsense around the place that social housing tenants are somehow second-class citizens or problematic tenants. I recently launched the WaterWise Garden Awards for our social housing tenants and met some of the proudest people you could ever meet—people who really take pride in their housing, have wonderful gardens and really want to promote the fact to the community that they value their property and welcome the opportunity government has provided by providing an affordable roof over their head. As I have visited various parts of the state, particularly with this massive building program we are rolling out, I have met a number of people at various sites who have said, ‘Are you putting public housing tenants in there? Are you putting Aboriginals in there?’ It concerns me greatly that people have this stigma. It is unfair. On any given street around the state there will be private properties and there may be public housing or social housing. I would want to put money on the fact that it is probably the private rental tenants that are more problematic than our social housing tenants. The other benefit we have in the public system is that government run housing and our community housing providers in the non-government sector have some of the best tenancy management practices you would ever find. We are onto people quickly. If they are problematic tenants we are onto them quickly. We have to balance neighbourhood harmony with the need to actually house people who have complex needs or low incomes or other issues. That is why they are in our social housing. So we have to balance that. But essentially I am very confident in the practices we have across the state in relation to managing any neighbourhood complaints. 52 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

Staff in our area offices liaise with neighbours on a daily basis to resolve issues where they can before they become, I guess, a more public complaint. We do not always reflect this in our numbers. I do not know that we actually have captured or I can provide you with any confidence the full number of complaints we received around the state. Mrs MENKENS: Could we put that on notice? Ms STRUTHERS: I will try to get you some figures before we finish the committee hearing today. We can give you numbers of evictions and that gives you some indication, but some of these neighbourhood complaints end up with an MP. They will not always end up with the department, so it will not capture everything. But certainly I can provide you with the number of evictions. The number of evictions in 2008-09 was 133 and the percentage of tenancies resulting in evictions was 0.25 per cent of our tenancies. Mrs MENKENS: I am not drawing a parallel between private and department tenancies at all. There are a lot of tenants who can be described as antisocial. I am certainly aware that there are a high rate of complaints in both areas of department and private tenancies. However, what are the processes that your department uses to deal with complaints and with antisocial tenants? I accept that they are only a small percentage and that there are some marvellous tenants, but what are the processes in place and are these processes strong enough? Ms STRUTHERS: The question is a reasonable one because we certainly want the public to be confident that we manage our tenancies well. I certainly look for this as I travel the state and meet with staff in regional housing offices. I ask them questions about their tenancy management and the sorts of complaints they may get about their tenants. I guess there is a very clear framework for us and that is the Residential Tenancies Act. We do not have another system. We operate, like the private rental market, under the Residential Tenancies Act. That has very clear provisions in relation to notices to tenants and guidelines around visiting tenants. Mrs MENKENS: It gets a bit hard though sometimes, doesn’t it? Ms STRUTHERS: I am not naive about this. There are people who cause a lot of neighbourhood disputes. My point earlier was that they are in the private rental market and they are in our system. In our system we do have people with complex family needs, and at times with dysfunctional families there are situations going on within the walls of that house. There is no doubt about it. I have just been advised of a particular case study in relation to management of a tenancy that will give you some idea of the approach that is taken. This is not her name but I will use the name ‘Donna’, who is a 39-year-old Indigenous woman separated from her husband and finding the separation difficult. She has three children who reside with her in a public housing tenancy. She was referred to the Sustainable Tenancies Opportunities Project, the STOP project—and I think non- government agencies fund that project. She was referred by a member of the Indigenous community as she was experiencing difficulty paying rent and managing her debts. She had difficulty working due to unstable mental health, high levels of anxiety and depression, and she was already well linked to mental health services in the area. She had considerable financial difficulties owing to prior loans that she was no longer able to service. At the time of the referral she had applied for Centrelink payments but was still waiting to receive a payment. She had further issues with home security, disruptive neighbours, a desire to move closer to her family and her children’s school. So she had a number of issues going on. But the project worker was able to help her find a new house and this was at the referral of the department. What I am saying is that, where we have people who are not paying their rent or when there are problems with neighbours complaining about them—I imagine she has kids that the neighbours have complained about, as that sort of thing happens commonly when there is a lot of stress going on in a household—assistance is provided. That service helped her link up with a mental health team. She was also assisted with rent payments and vouchers for food and petrol. A number of other services were provided to her so that she could sustain the tenancy. That case may not be the tenant from hell situation that you may be referring to, but she was certainly a woman with complex needs and kids who were probably getting into a bit of strife, but we have opportunities to support people. Mrs MENKENS: Minister, in your opening statement you referred to Mackay as a hot spot for homelessness. So what is the justification for the closure of the Mackay office and the services it provides to the local community, especially for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness? Ms STRUTHERS: I am pleased that you have asked me the question because when there is a bit of mischief out in the community and in the media it is always important to clarify that. I am very keen to clarify for the benefit of the member and the committee that Mackay is not going to experience any service closure. Mackay is a major regional centre. We have moved from 10 regions to seven regions as part of the changes within the department. But Mackay will be strong and will have the regional executive staff and others that it currently has. So it has been a bit of mischief, I believe, in the Mackay media to say that Mackay is going to lose services. Again, I do not want to be too gimmicky, but why not? Mrs MENKENS: But it is going to be controlled from Townsville. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 53

Ms STRUTHERS: This is the new regional chart. I do not know if you can see that properly, but basically the dots represent our services. You can see the concentration around Mackay and Townsville. We have in fact got three major centres of service delivery across that northern region and that will remain. They will be strong. They will be serviced well. They will have senior executive staff in those areas. I am not sure where some of this mischief is coming from. But I really want to assure you and assure the public in the Mackay and Mackay-Whitsunday area that we are not cutting back on any services and no-one will lose their job. Everyone will have a job at level but they will be new jobs. This is a new structure. We are wanting to provide better integrated and coordinated services to our clients across the state. People will have to think differently. They will have to break down those silos. I know you would appreciate that. We have all had experiences of where those silos have not worked to the benefit of people in our electorates, our constituents. This new structure will really focus on client service delivery and better integrate the agencies. I would be confident in saying that the Mackay region will experience better service delivery. There is certainly no cut in services. In fact, in the budget there are new initiatives for Mackay under our homelessness strategy and other strategies. Ms CROFT: Minister, I refer to the Service Delivery Statement at page 3-8 and the Office for Women. Could you please outline what steps the state government is taking to encourage more women, and in particular Indigenous women, to take their rightful place on government boards? Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question. As a member of parliament I have been actively involved in advocating for an increased representation of women in parliament. During the recent state election campaign, I supported an Indigenous woman campaigning to enter parliament. I was involved on a parliamentary committee. The Hands on parliament report was a report we produced a number of years ago with strategies to see more Indigenous people elected to the parliament. The Bligh government is committed to actively pursuing an increase in the participation of Queensland women in all aspects of life, including on our government boards. I am happy to say that we have begun narrowing the gender disparity on boards. Last year, as I mentioned earlier, our Women on Boards Strategy saw 56.1 per cent of the 221 new appointments go to women. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, last month I welcomed 40 young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to parliament for the first ever Queensland Indigenous Youth Parliament. I think more than half of those were young women as well. The Bligh government is dedicated to increasing the number of Indigenous people in leadership roles, and an increase in Indigenous leadership across the state in all walks of life will help to close the gap in Indigenous disadvantage. Nothing succeeds like leading by example. One way this government is working to increase Indigenous leadership is through community leadership seminars delivered through the Office for Women. Through these seminars Indigenous women and girls share stories of leadership. They encourage the next generation to develop their skills and increase confidence through networking and mentoring. Through this government’s policy and program work, we promote and encourage the rights of all Queensland women from all backgrounds. More and more women are taking up leadership roles in their communities. In every community across Queensland there are countless women achieving progress for Queensland women and girls in their day-to-day lives—in their communities, in their workplaces and in their homes. In future I hope to see more women, and particularly Indigenous women, on boards and in this parliament. Mr KILBURN: Minister, I refer to Service Delivery Statement book 3 page 67 and in particular the department’s sale of social housing stock. Could the minister advise on the outcomes of any sale? Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for the question. In 2008-09 we sold 111 dwellings. This revenue, which was more than $35 million, went directly back into social housing. Sales to tenants accounted for 62 per cent of the sales last year, and that is a significant number of people who now can proudly say they are homeowners. Let me assure you that the Bligh government is committed to creating more opportunities for Queenslanders to access affordable housing. The decision to sell properties is not taken lightly, and in fact my department has very good reasons for disposing of properties. We only sell properties when it is determined that it is in the best interests of our clients. For example, since 2004-05 we have helped 314 people purchase the social housing property they were renting through the Sales to Tenants program. A large number of people now own their own home. Without this support, they may not have had that opportunity. We also sell properties that are many years old and have been part of our stock for a long time. These properties may be too expensive to upgrade because of their age or there may not be the need for social housing in that particular area. We have also committed to reducing the concentration of social housing in some areas and creating mixed communities that promote social and economic opportunities. I am sure all members of the committee would agree that that is such an important goal. We have seen the legacy of communities with high concentrations of social housing. The member for Waterford has a number in the Logan area and across through to the Ipswich corridor. In other parts of the state there have been suburbs in regional centres where there has been a higher concentration than we would like. 54 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

When young families and kids are all living in an area where many of them are not so resourceful and there are a lot of issues and complexities going on in their lives, they get limited life opportunities. It is so important that our social housing tenants are near services, near schools, near hospitals and have good life opportunities. Some of these past policies were certainly detrimental. In Inala there has certainly been a very clear program of reducing the density through appropriate disposal and redevelopment. We have undertaken developments in many areas. We are also using land occupied by two or three adjoining detached houses. Where we can remove the dwellings and turn that block into medium- density accommodation enabling more families to be housed, we are certainly doing that as well. Rural and remote residents are also benefiting from redevelopments. We recycle dwellings wherever possible. For example, we moved a surplus department of health house from Cairns to Georgetown. These are all smart ways of operating. We are rolling out, as I said, 4,500 new homes across the state, creating thousands of jobs. CHAIR: We will now move on to the consideration of the appropriations for community services and the Commissioner for Children and Young People and Child Guardian. While that changeover is taking place, Minister, did you want to table copies of the photographs or the diagrams used in answer to your questions? Ms STRUTHERS: You would like them tabled? CHAIR: Do you want to table them? Ms STRUTHERS: No. I am just making a point. I think one picture is worth a thousand words. CHAIR: Thank you. Ms STRUTHERS: Can I take the opportunity to clarify a couple of points I made. I just want to correct the record. I referred to the Residential Tenancies Act. It is actually the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 that came into effect on 1 July. This act replaced the Residential Tenancies Act. The second point I want to clarify for the benefit of the member for Burdekin is that we have recorded 41 per cent of complaints received through the appeals and review process relating to neighbourhood concerns. That is another indicator that complaints through our appeals process have related to neighbourhood concerns. That was one of your earlier questions. CHAIR: Thank you. I call the member for Burdekin. Mrs MENKENS: With seniors comprising 40 per cent of constituents, can the minister explain why spending on seniors participation, as on page 3-24 of the SDS, comprises just three per cent of the portfolio spending? Ms STRUTHERS: Earlier I mentioned that seniors are a very significant part of the work we do in the Communities portfolio. In housing alone, in 44 per cent of our tenancies the primary tenant is someone 55 years and older. If you tallied up the value of that in capital and support—and some of the support that is provided is invaluable and hard to quantify—it is a significant part of our activity across the portfolio. In relation to specific programs that you have put a dollar value on, I might just run through some of those for you. In relation to achievements last year, there were 55 services funded to support seniors. They included specialised Seniors Legal and Support Services in Brisbane, Cairns, Hervey Bay, Townsville and Toowoomba, and they have been re-funded for this year as well. The Older People’s Action Program assisted 20 organisations across the state. There is the 60 and Better Program, and many members would have direct experience of how effective that program is in their local areas. The seniors inquiry line is a very important part of our response system for seniors. There is the Elder Abuse Prevention Unit, including a state-wide telephone helpline. One of the newer initiatives is based on community concern about the pressure grandparents are feeling in relation to caring for their grandchildren. We have certainly been working in that area and we have the Time for Grandparents Program. We also have older men’s groups in Hervey Bay and Toowoomba particularly trying to address the mental health needs of older men. There are a number of other initiatives there. I guess the picture I am painting is that, in specific areas of support, in trying to provide inclusion, activity and support for older people, there are a number of initiatives. In terms of their legal support, we have new seniors legal services. Overall I would not want you to overlook the fact that such a significant part of our investment in social housing is to the benefit of seniors. Mrs MENKENS: I would still ask though, Minister, why you have failed to give it a higher profile, as in an Office for Seniors, and why the seniors section has 16 fewer staff than last year? Ms STRUTHERS: I will need to check on the accuracy of the staffing levels because that is not what I understand the case to be. Let me say again that seniors are a very important part of the work of the portfolio that I am involved in and receive significant support. I have also had recent meetings with 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 55 members of the seniors round table. At the Gold Coast community cabinet just a couple of weeks ago, the Premier and I met with a number of seniors representatives, including Val French and others, who raised similar concerns to you. The Premier was able to put to rest some of their specific concerns and misunderstandings. I do not have the specific title of minister for seniors, and that was one of their concerns, but I have assured them that I will work with them over the coming months to develop a whole-of-government seniors strategy. They have certainly been calling for that and they are going to get that, and they were very happy with that. That is indicative of a group of people who represent a number of seniors groups around the state, and that view is one that they welcomed and want to actively participate in. In relation to their issues around transport, health and safety for seniors—all of those areas of government—my department will take a lead role through the Office for Seniors in coordinating that response and developing some kind of an action plan. I have certainly said that I want action; I do not want another plan or whatever else that might sit on a shelf. I have given them assurances that we will be very action focused in how we identify areas where we can improve government responses to the needs of seniors across the whole government. They were particularly interested, as I said, in transport issues, and I think we can be pretty innovative there too. We talked about some of the community transport options in regional centres around the state where it may not be economically viable to have a major transport system but where there are existing HACC funded buses or RSL courtesy buses; there are these other systems in place that have a lot of downtime. We have been working on a number of creative ways through community transport options, and there are some local projects that are doing very well. So we want to put the whole lot under the microscope and come up with an action plan across government. I have just been advised specifically in relation to your claim that there was a decline of 15 full- time positions that that was due to the transfer of staff working for Smart Service Queensland, which is now part of the Department of Public Works following the machinery-of-government changes. They would have been workers involved in call centre activity, phone line activity, concessions. They are still doing that work focused on seniors but they are part of the group involved in Smart Service Queensland. Mrs MENKENS: I refer to government question on notice No. 8. Minister, what is the cost of machinery-of-government changes? How much of this can possibly be recouped by a 40 per cent saving in a White Pages listing? Ms STRUTHERS: You might have to repeat that question in relation to the White Pages. Mrs MENKENS: It relates to government question on notice No. 8 and the machinery-of- government changes where you talk about your savings. How much can possibly be recouped by a 40 per cent saving in a White Pages listing? Why is it worth documenting? Ms STRUTHERS: I am being advised that we have collapsed all of those details into one advertisement, so that has certainly been a significant change for us. We no longer list all of the separate departments with all of their separate staff, agency phone numbers and whatever. So that has certainly been a saving. In relation to the machinery-of-government changes specifically, I am very confident that we are going to see, firstly, significant improvements in client service delivery through the new arrangements. Already people are working better together across the housing and homeless areas, the community services area, the child safety area. We have already achieved a $10 million efficiency saving in relation to corporate services and other areas of our activities. I guess the message from us as a department is that the machinery-of-government changes are being made in a cost-neutral environment, but where we can find savings we are certainly trying to achieve that through integrating and better coordinating the work of our agencies, particularly in the corporate area of activities and our communications areas. Mrs MENKENS: With reference to page 3-12 of the SDS, can you state how many redress applications are still outstanding and unresolved? Are you aware that applicants, while waiting for finalisation of this process, are dying, and are you aware of how many have died during this time? Ms STRUTHERS: Again, this is a really, really important area of service delivery and concern for our department. You would have people living in your electorate who have been abused as children and young people in institutions run by the church or run by the state. I have certainly met with many of these people and I attended a ceremony at Lotus Place in South Brisbane recently, which is the support service based in Brisbane for many of these people who are seeking redress. Let me say from the outset that Queensland is the national leader in the provision of redress responses to victims of institutional child abuse and neglect. The redress payments are being organised in two phases. In the first phase, people have received payments, and I will just come to some detail in relation to that. The second phase is still underway. As you can imagine, they are complex issues. People have to document the degree of their abuse, and that is emotionally very troubling. One woman said to me that she took six months off work to do that. She was so emotionally affected that she had to separate herself from other activities in her life and she could not continue working while she actually made the application. 56 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

We do not make these application processes difficult. We are trying to be very empathetic to people about this, but they need to provide documentation—which institution it was, what period it was, the names of particular people—so we can verify the accuracy of the situation and the gravity of some of the abuse. So it has been a very, very complex and difficult process. Applicants have expressed concern about the time frame for level 2 payments, and you rightly acknowledged that. I do not have information on specific deaths and I do not know whether we have captured that. I have certainly heard from people who have concerns about the timing. One of the leaders of the support group has developed an innovative invention to clean sports facilities. He wants to get on with his business, and he needs some capital to get ahead with that. He would be very confident of getting a redress payment under level 2, but we cannot fast-track anything for any one individual. It is expected that level 2 letters of advice regarding their payments will be sent to applicants from August. So we will be moving on that as quickly as we can over the coming weeks. I want to thank the members of the independent panel who have had the gruelling task of assessing these applications. I do not think any of those people are here today, but let me put my thanks on the public record. In my meeting with them recently, I was very moved by the stories they told me and very impressed by the way they were systematically and very empathetically going through these applications. Mrs MENKENS: Minister, with reference to page 2-23 of the SDS and the number of young people in detention, I refer to the recent report by the commissioner for children that found on average young people in detention had been there up to five times previously. After 11 years of your government’s revolving-door juvenile justice system, why does your budget not report on successful enrolment and completion of rehabilitation programs in detention? CHAIR: Just before you answer, Minister, can I ask the member for Burdekin to make sure her future questions contain no argumentative elements. Ms STRUTHERS: I want to respond, firstly, by saying that the evidence nationally and internationally suggests that detention is not a very effective deterrent. It does not stop people from reoffending. Usually it is the most serious repeat offenders who end up receiving sentences of detention, so you are actually capturing probably some of the young people who may end up in the adult system as well through youth detention. It has not proven to be a very effective response. Of course the public needs to feel safe and anyone who is going to put anyone else at harm needs to be in secure detention. I have no doubt about that. I just want to, I guess, in some ways challenge this notion that detention is the be-all and end-all. It is not. We need to have an innovative range of responses to youth crime, and that is certainly what our government is doing. We are certainly working on a range of early intervention prevention programs to try to stop young people from ending up in detention, from actually ending up committing crimes. That is the focus we have. I want to refer to the quote from the report that you are talking about. That report states— Research shows that the large majority of young people who appear in court are involved in non-violent property and public nuisance offences and cease their offending after one or two court appearances, without the use of harsh penalties. So I guess what we have in our system is that the vast majority of young offenders are actually not reoffending, but those who become serial offenders—because of life situations, behaviour, whatever—are the ones who end up in detention and they are going to be the hardest kids to turn around. I am not sure if you have visited the Cleveland Youth Detention Centre in Townsville. Mrs MENKENS: I have in the past, yes. Ms STRUTHERS: It is not a pleasant place. I looked in some of those rooms; it is all concrete, steel, a few personal belongings, security, big walls around it. What is good in that place is the commitment of the staff to educational programs, numeracy and literacy programs, jobs programs, sport, fitness and health. A number of these young people, as you would imagine, have complex substance abuse problems, chroming, those kinds of things. That has led them to some of their behaviour. I did not actually talk to many of the young people, other than some who were in a workshop there, but the staff told me that one young fellow, whom I think was actually from your electorate, had a complex range of intellectual disability issues going on in his life as well as longstanding homelessness. That is what we are dealing with. Unless you tackle that problem, you are not going to tackle their reoffending. Mrs MENKENS: So do you have figures on how many are enrolled in rehabilitation programs and how many young people actually successfully complete those rehabilitation programs, because that is the important part? The most important part of the detention is holding them in detention with a strong rehabilitation program. Ms STRUTHERS: Are you referring specifically to rehabilitation in detention or our system of support and intervention—for instance, our youth justice centres, our youth conferencing? Are you referring specifically to rehabilitation while they are in detention? Mrs MENKENS: Initially, yes. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 57

Ms STRUTHERS: Because everyone is enrolled. That is part of the deal: when they are in there, they cannot just lie in bed. They have to be out and about, active, and that is what I saw when I was at Cleveland recently. Mrs MENKENS: But while they are on remand they are not actually enrolled in rehabilitation programs. Ms STRUTHERS: Actually that is a bit of a furphy and I am happy to clarify that. They may not have the comprehensive range of programs because it may be that they go to court the next week and they do not get to complete their certificate in woodworking, or whatever it might be. But they do have access to programs and there is a very committed range of teaching staff there— Mrs MENKENS: But woodwork is not rehabilitation. Ms STRUTHERS: I guess it is about job skills. The important thing is the exit support, the transitioning support when young people come out of detention. There is no offending generally while they are in there. The reports of abuse against staff, for instance, or against other residents in detention are declining significantly. I get those reports weekly. There are not many incidents of actual problematic behaviour in detention. It is when young people come out and they have to face the reality of trying to survive again. Imagine young kids from Mornington Island or somewhere who have been sent to Townsville. When they come out, some of them try to settle in Mount Isa or they go back to the community. It is very difficult, unless you actually have the rehabilitation and support as part of the transition out of care. In response to your question, which I hope I have captured in what I have just said, the rehabilitation is important both within the system and particularly outside. Our focus really as a community and as a department has to be putting the support at the front end of the system with kids who at a young age are on a problematic path, and we need to tackle that early and prevent them from ongoing offending and prevent them from ending up in detention. Mrs MENKENS: On rehabilitation, can you give me the figures on the rehabilitation back into their communities, back into their home life, back into their— Ms STRUTHERS: I am not sure that it is a realistic ask. What I can give you is the number of young people in detention each year. What I can tell you is that all of them have gone through some form of rehabilitation or educational program. The reality about young people on remand is that they have not been found guilty of an offence. So we have to have a presumption of innocence around them, but that does not mean that they cannot participate in programs while they are in there. There will be conditional bail support programs and other opportunities where they will be on supervision or community service orders. I am not trying to avoid your question. I am just not sure that it is a realistic ask because, by definition, rehabilitation is very broad and includes our jobskills programs, which is an important part of that. Both within detention and outside of detention there is a range of initiatives. We spend a lot of money on educational and job skills programs, and literacy and numeracy programs. As you may be aware, some of these young people have grade 6 or 7 levels of educational attainment. If they are going to survive as adults and not reoffend, they are going to have to lift that educational attainment. That is where a lot of our effort is going. Mrs MENKENS: Minister, with reference to page 3-78 of the SDS, can you explain why following relocation of the offices of the Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian to its new premises this year the offices were open for business with no signage and no security in place, bearing in mind that this is an office that would genuinely require security? Ms STRUTHERS: I am not aware of that. As it is an independent authority, I might ask Elizabeth Fraser to respond. Would you like the question repeated, Elizabeth? Ms Fraser: Yes. CHAIR: Member for Burdekin, do you mind repeating the question? Mrs MENKENS: Following your relocation, there was no security or signage in place when you first moved into that office, bearing in mind that it is an office that I think does require security. Ms Fraser: Following the relocation, the security that was established was on level 17, which is the joint reception area that we share with the Ombudsman, the Anti-Discrimination Commission and the Health Quality and Complaints Commission. There was contracted security there when we moved in. The signage did take a little bit of time to sort out because initially when it arrived it was not accurate, but we did what we could to try to make sure that our stakeholders knew that we had moved and so did the others. But the signage is now up so hopefully that is rectified. Ms CROFT: Minister, I refer to page 3-5 of the SDS and the government’s funding for youth justice. Could you please explain the Bligh government’s approach to tackling youth crime? Ms STRUTHERS: I have made some comments in relation to this, but I am happy to go through this in more detail. The vast majority of young people do the right thing. That has to be the bottom line in any discussion about youth crime. We need a realistic approach to this. Some of the fear mongering in 58 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009 the community is irresponsible and it causes undue fear. The vast majority of young people do the right thing and are good, valued citizens in their local areas. Youth crime is down from nine offences per 100 young people to eight offences per 100 people from 2001—a significant drop considering that the population of young people rose by almost 50,000 in the same period. That indicates, I think, that we are on track with police, community services, our youth justice centres and others working well together. We often hear about the need for—and even the opposition has at times called for—boot camps and a stronger use of detention as the main response. National and international evidence shows that detention should be a policy of last resort for young people as it has limited benefit in curbing reoffending behaviour, and boot camps had a limited benefit as well. Boot camps are not a new idea. They have been tried mainly in the US but also in Canada and in New Zealand. All of the careful and extensive research that has been conducted points in one direction. In New Zealand, for instance, boot camps were abandoned in 2002 because they resulted in a 92 per cent reoffending rate. We are simply producing fitter, faster young offenders through some of these sorts of initiatives, is the sense I am getting from this. The New Zealand evidence showed that the highest reoffending rate was in that boot camp cohort of people. To protect the community we need early intervention policies that effectively address the causes of youth crime and prevent career criminals from emerging. We need to detain and be tough on serious offenders but tough as well on the causes of crime. That is why this government has a youth justice system that includes prevention, detention, supervision, rehabilitation, diversion, and police and court services to deal with young people who commit or who are alleged to have committed offences. These are tried, proven, effective approaches to supporting and rehabilitating troubled youth—like youth justice conferencing, which is an important mechanism where young offenders meet with victims, families and police and agree on ways to repair the harm their crime has caused. These consistently achieve a 98 per cent satisfaction rate from all participants, particularly the victims. These approaches have proven to be more effective in reducing reoffending. The Bligh government is determined to develop youth justice policies and strategies based on the evidence of what works, rather than some of these failed ideas. Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I refer to page 3-5 of the Service Delivery Statements and the increasing demand for community services. I ask you to outline for us what initiatives the Bligh government has in place to help seniors and pensioners in these tough economic times? Ms STRUTHERS: I am very pleased to respond to your question. We know that a lot of older Queenslanders are doing it tough, and we certainly want to help them as much as we can. To assist vulnerable seniors at risk of elder abuse and financial exploitation, the Seniors Legal and Support Service will receive $1.8 million in this financial year. In 2008-09, concessions totalling $130.143 million were provided to approximately 700,000 eligible pensioners, seniors and veterans throughout Queensland on a range of essential services such as the Pensioner Rate Subsidy Scheme, the South- East Queensland Pensioner Water Subsidy Scheme, the Electricity Rebate Scheme, the Electricity Life Support Concession Scheme and the Reticulated Natural Gas Rebate Scheme. Queensland’s Solar Hot Water Program will offer fully installed greenhouse-efficient hot-water systems for $100 for eligible Queensland pensioners and low-income earners. The electricity rebates for seniors have increased. We have increased that in this budget by 15.67 per cent. This will certainly be a big boost for pensioners and seniors. The electricity rebate has risen from $165 per annum to $190.85, an increase of $25.85. That is an important increase for many low-income people. The Electricity Life Support Concession Scheme has increased from $336 per annum to $388.65, an increase of $52.65. The Reticulated Natural Gas Rebate Scheme has increased by a couple of dollars, but every dollar counts to many of these people on limited incomes. The Rail Concessions Scheme, delivered through Queensland Rail, provides discounted travel for pensioners and seniors on Citytrain, suburban and interurban rail services, and Traveltrain’s long- distance rail services. Expenditure under this scheme for 2008-09 is $35.893 million. Currently some 607,000 Queensland seniors hold the Seniors Card and Seniors Business Discount Card which delivers discounts to Queenslanders aged 60 years and over. There are certainly significant benefits in having that card as well. There is an extensive package of initiatives and programs in place to assist and help seniors, and they are very important initiatives to help them in these tough economic times. CHAIR: Minister, I refer you to the Service Delivery Statement at page 11 and the Logan- Beenleigh Young Persons Project in my electorate of Waterford. I know that recently you were able to meet with me, the member for Woodridge and the service providers. Can you advise the committee of the benefits to local residents from this innovative project? Ms STRUTHERS: Well, haven’t you got a lot of good things going on in your area! That was a great project. I am really pleased that I had the opportunity to attend a meeting of the participants of that program with you last month. The Logan-Beenleigh Young Persons Project is an innovative approach to helping young people with multiple and complex needs through early intervention and prevention. It is the kind of project I was describing earlier that we really need to focus on. Through these kinds of programs we are picking up young people who, if not supported, may end up in systems like our detention systems. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 59

The project targets young people who are pregnant, teenagers, young people at risk of becoming parents too young and/or young people showing signs of mental illness. These young people receive coordinated intensive support for up to two years in order to improve their educational, economic, social and health outcomes. I think you would agree, member for Waterford, one of the things that was impressive about this program was that there is a two-year commitment to these young people. The member for Burdekin earlier talked about a revolving door. That is the legacy of our systems. Many services have worked in isolation. Young people have gone from service to service, from problem to problem, and there has been a revolving door. I certainly acknowledge that. This program seeks to overcome that. It seeks to better integrate service delivery for this group of young people. The young people targeted through this project will have better life chances by being supported to remain in school and increase their employability, reduce their level of involvement in the criminal justice system, develop skills to obtain and maintain appropriate and sustainable accommodation, develop parenting skills, increase their ability to manage their own mental health needs and their medication, and improve the health, safety and wellbeing of themselves and any children they may have with them. It is a five-year project. One year has been completed, and 40 young people have been assisted. The number of young people helped is expected to increase by 80 by the end of 2009, with 120 during the third year and 160 in both the fourth and fifth years of service. It is an intensive project. It is a very important project, and I am pleased that you are giving it your full support. I met a number of young people involved in the project when I attended with you. One of the clients whom I did not meet but I heard her story is a young woman who had suffered trauma and torture in her country of origin. She can understand and speak English but cannot read English. She has a history of chronic depression. One of her children was conceived through a rape. So there are a lot of issues going on in her life. She is one of the young women who is getting ongoing support and a pathway through to a secure and hopefully very good quality life for her and her children. She has been assisted in that project through a number of elements including enrolling her in a young parents high school program. CHAIR: I refer you to page 5 of the Service Delivery Statement and the provision that relates to the new approach to preventing domestic and family violence. Can you provide details of how this new approach will help the victims of domestic and family violence? Ms STRUTHERS: Certainly times have changed in relation to responses to domestic violence. There have been significant improvements over the past 10 to 15 years in Queensland and nationally. We know that domestic violence inflicts a horrendous toll on all those who either witness it or are directly subjected to domestic violence. It is a big cost to our community. It is estimated to cost the Australian community $13.6 billion a year. The cost to the Queensland community is estimated at $2.7 billion to $3.2 billion per annum. That is a lot of housing that the department could build. The financial toll is but one aspect. The emotional toll, the physical abuse and the other aspects of domestic violence are very distressing. I was pleased to launch a new Domestic and Family Violence Strategy in Rockhampton last week: ‘For our sons and daughters: a Queensland government strategy to reduce domestic and family violence 2009-2014’. The strategy has been informed and developed by the consultation process and feedback for a more coordinated response to domestic and family violence. We have committed to delivering a clear program of action each year over the five years of that strategy. The outputs encompass a broad spectrum of initiatives and a program of action each year, particularly for our most vulnerable women and children. In the first year of the plan—and we already have this underway—we will establish a death review panel to oversee a review of current coronial processes and practices. There have been something like 60 deaths related to domestic homicide in the past five years in Queensland. This review panel will have a look at the systemic and other factors underlying those deaths and look for areas where we can improve our practices. We will test a new integrated approach to prevent domestic and family violence in Rockhampton. I met with the magistrates, the police and the community service providers when I was in Rockhampton. They have a great integrated approach that they are working on there. This initiative will help enhance that. We will establish safety upgrades on the Gold Coast, the Sunshine Coast and Townsville so that victims of domestic violence can actually remain in their own homes. We will develop an Indigenous framework in the four Cape York welfare reform communities of Coen, Aurukun, Mossman Gorge and Hope Vale. As I mentioned earlier, we will be reviewing the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act. Work under this strategy will contribute to the Queensland government’s Toward Q2 strategy to build a fairer and healthier Queensland. We certainly see that women and children affected by domestic violence—and in some cases men; I acknowledge them—certainly need our support. We certainly have to deal effectively with perpetrators of violence and make sure that we continue to promote the message that this is not to be tolerated. 60 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

Mr KILBURN: Minister, I refer to page 3-5 of the Service Delivery Statement in relation to specific initiatives that will assist in meeting the Toward Q2: Tomorrow’s Queensland targets. I ask the minister to explain the importance of young volunteers and seniors in helping the government to meet this important goal? Ms STRUTHERS: We are certainly committed as a government to boosting the proportion of volunteers in Queensland by 50 per cent by 2020. That is a pretty ambiguous target. As you know in your own communities, there are people working across sporting, cultural and arts groups as well as in community services and emergency services such as in the SES. There are a lot of people who actively contribute to the community. It is hard to put a price on their contributions, but they are very significant. Volunteers come from all walks of life. They certainly make a great contribution to community life. We have a comprehensive volunteering strategy to improve the lives of all Queenslanders. For seniors it often gives them the benefit of overcoming some of the social isolation they may experience. Our policy, Valuing Volunteers, has three strategic goals. They are to support volunteers and volunteering; to build a stronger base for volunteering; and to strengthen rural and regional volunteering. The policy outlines a range of initiatives and strategies to ensure that we achieve our target. We have a resource kit—Valuing Volunteers. We are holding an annual symposium on International Volunteer Day in December. Each year we hold the Queensland Young Volunteer Awards. They recognise the efforts of some of our outstanding young people. As part of this annual event we will hold the Queensland Young Volunteer Awards speaking tour. We are delivering a $52 million package over five years to boost equipment and training for Emergency Service volunteers. We are also boosting our commitment to marine rescue volunteers through a new four-year $10 million beach and marine safety program. We have developed an insurance agreement with WorkCover Queensland to cover volunteers across all divisions of the Department of Community Safety. Our department will not necessarily be funding these initiatives, but we play a role in coordinating these activities across government. As part of our across-government volunteering strategy, we have developed and implemented a youth engagement strategy that includes a public awareness campaign. One of the other initiatives that I had the pleasure of being involved with recently was the launch of Golden Gurus. Volunteering Queensland has been active in supporting this initiative. This is an initiative of a fellow from Brisbane. He put this initiative up through the 2020 strategy process. We picked it up in Queensland. It is a program which encourages Queenslanders over 50 with business skills to sign up as volunteers. They have skills and experience that many people could benefit from. It is certainly an important part of community life to encourage volunteering. We certainly will continue to do as much as we can to promote it. Ms CROFT: Minister, I refer to the Service Delivery Statement at page 3-12 and the $13.8 million provided to people who have suffered the effects of cyclones Charlotte and Ellie and the severe storms that swept across the south-east. What assistance packages are in place to help stricken Queenslanders in the event of more natural disasters in the summer of 2009-10? Ms STRUTHERS: Thank you for raising this issue. I was just talking about volunteers. What a wonderful community effort we have seen in relation to the support that has been provided during and following these disasters. We have seen great spirit emerge in local communities. People have been getting some wonderful support. Our government is committed to ensuring that individuals, families and communities have the information and support they need to recover from these sorts of disasters. Many people struggle in the aftermath of cyclones, floods and bushfires. They certainly need very direct help and support. Many of them lose everything. They often lose very valued personal possessions as well as assets like their houses. We help to provide them with the basics—food, accommodation, financial support—particularly in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. We also provide assistance to help replace essential household items and repair their dwellings to a safe and livable condition. In the last financial year we have had to contend with five major disasters. They have included the monsoon flooding in the Mackay region, South-East Queensland’s storms, the North and North-West Queensland storms, the Sunshine Coast flooding and the South-East Queensland storms. In response to these events, we have established 10 community recovery centres to operate as one-stop shops so disaster victims can access information, support services and financial assistance. The hotline we set up answered the calls of over 22,000 people in the wake of these events. In total, the government has provided $17 million to assist Queenslanders affected by these terrible natural disasters. It is a crucial safety net. The Emergent Assistance Grant helps individuals and families in immediate personal hardship with the cost of items such as food, clothing, temporary accommodation or medicines in the first few days after a disaster. The grant provides $165 per individual to a maximum of $765 per family for a family of five or more. The Essential Household Contents Grant is another opportunity for support. The 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 61 maximum grant is $1,635 for singles and $4,910 for couples. We also have the Structural Assistance Grant. In North Queensland $6.7 million was provided to people who were affected by the floods under the state-Commonwealth Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements. Three community recovery centres were established in Ingham, Townsville and Mount Isa. Some 454 employees from my department were deployed to assist in North Queensland as part of the government’s response. I thank all of those people for their commitment and dedication. Local businesses and professionals did their bit as well. The community support was very positive. Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I refer to the Service Delivery Statement at page 3-5 in relation to domestic family violence. As well as the new pilot being undertaken in Central Queensland, what other initiatives are in place or planned to help victims of domestic and family violence? Ms STRUTHERS: I am happy to talk further about this issue. As I said earlier, our community and our government do not tolerate domestic and family violence at all. In 2007-08 there were 15,632 domestic violence orders and 12,374 temporary protection orders made in Queensland. In my opinion that is 28,000 too many. I am sure that is the opinion you would hold as well. When I was in Rockhampton last week the magistrate said that there are probably on average each year about 800 orders made through that court alone. She was disturbed by the number of orders that are breached. That is putting people at risk when those orders are breached. We have invested $2.7 million in Rockhampton as the test site of an integrated response model to be carried out over the next two years. This collaborative trial, alongside service providers, will develop an integrated specialised court program. I mentioned earlier that all parties will be involved in that. I met 10 or 12 police at the launch who are very interested in working with the court staff, the community members, the Indigenous elders and others. It was a very positive launch. There is a lot happening. I am particularly pleased that we have the death review panel underway. Marg O’Donnell, a former director-general, is going to chair that review. She is currently a member of the Legal Aid board. We will see some really good outcomes from that. That is an initiative that many service providers have been calling for. We are delivering on our commitments in the domestic violence area. We are going to see some really good outcomes. CHAIR: The minister’s time has expired. I call the member for Burdekin. Ms STRUTHERS: Before we call on the member for Burdekin, can I clarify and provide some further information to the member. CHAIR: Yes. Ms STRUTHERS: The member asked me a question in relation to the redress scheme. She asked how many applicants have died whilst awaiting the processing of their applications. We have certainly been giving priority assessment to people over 70 and people who are of ill health. But sadly there have been applicants who have died during the assessment of their level 1 application. Of the 42 applicants who died, 37 of their families received funeral assistance. The remaining five families did not require funeral assistance. With level 2 applicants who are currently being finalised, 27 people who received a level 1 payment died whilst awaiting the assessment of their level 2 application. If these deceased applicants are found to be eligible for a level 2 payment, it will be made to their estate. Mrs MENKENS: Minister, in response to a government question you said that boot camps had been abandoned in New Zealand. However, based on new evidence from New Zealand released this year and reported in the New Zealand Herald, a program has been operating in New Zealand for the past seven years. It is run by an ex-soldier and has seen a 58 per cent reduction in total offending from graduates and a 71 per cent drop in serious crimes. Given your evidence is clearly outdated and the New Zealand government this year has moved to introduce boot camps, how can you discount such a positive diversionary program when your own figures indicate that under your government child offenders are being pushed through detention over and over again and going on to become adult offenders? I will table that article. Ms STRUTHERS: I thank the member for her interest in doing that work and providing more evidence. I guess my general message to the member is that I want to work with you cooperatively on these issues. The lives of young people are very important, as you know. We have to get the supports, the punishments and the deterrents in the youth justice system right. I am happy to take that evidence on board and have my staff in the youth justice area examine that. There are initiatives operating in Queensland—boot camp like initiatives. I recently had a group member approach me with the member for Burnett. A program called Hard Yakka is run by a former SAS officer. Pardon the expression, but it is horses for courses. Some things work for some young people. What I was referring to was research that showed that the boot camps had not actually reduced the reoffending in that particular study. Some young people will respond to the discipline and the structure of that kind of activity. 62 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009

The young people in the Hard Yakka program operating in the Hervey Bay and Maryborough area dressed up in uniforms. It was a residential for six weeks or so. The fellow who was running it seemed very committed and very responsible. At this stage, our department does not have funding for that kind of initiative. The jury is out for me in relation to the evidence that it works. I suggested that he actually approach the federal Department of Defence. Some of those young people clearly have an interest in that sort of activity. They were not using real rifles but they had weapons. There was a lot of army-like activity. If that is going to work for young people and they want to end up in the Defence Force, let us see the federal defence department pay for it as a recruitment strategy. I had a very productive discussion with the member for Burnett and the colleague that he brought to meet with me. I really want to see us cooperate on these issues. This might not be the right forum, but I would like to have a discussion with you about attending some of the youth justice conferences. The Townsville service where I met staff recently has some really good Indigenous staff as well as non- Indigenous staff. The elder in that group was saying to me that it is such a powerful force. When these young people have to feel the shame of fronting up to their victim and apologising and agreeing to some sort of recompense, they shake in their boots. That is what he was saying to me. There are a lot of initiatives around the state that are proving to be a deterrent. It is my responsibility to work with my department to keep an evidence based approach to our efforts, to fund those initiatives that work and to expand those initiatives that work which let us hopefully intervene early so that young people get back on track and do not cause harm to themselves and others. Mrs MENKENS: In the highlights for 2009-10 of the Service Delivery Statements, at page 3-3 there is a fund to counteract wage increases in the community sector, which has been announced and which you also spoke about in your opening statement. Can you state the maximum amount that a community sector organisation can expect to receive? What will this equate to per employee, bearing in mind that this is a very, very serious issue for those non-government organisations out there? Ms STRUTHERS: Again, I am pleased to hear your support for this wage supplementation. As you would be aware, the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission came down with a very important landmark decision for the community services industry. It was a decision that recognised the need for pay equity. Most of our non-government service providers have been experiencing very low rates of pay. It has therefore been hard to recruit and retain adequately skilled and educated staff in many of these services. We have come up, through the budget process, with a system which the Premier has agreed to. We have focused on the clients in order to provide some supplementation to these services—and keep in mind we are not the employer so we are not directly obliged to fund the wage increases—in terms of sustaining these services into the future with an impost on them that is going to be pretty difficult to deal with. Mrs MENKENS: They will not be able to cover it. Ms STRUTHERS: We acknowledged that we had to find some money to sustain these services and help them with the wage supplementation. So as a combined group of ministers—and this is where the integration of the portfolios is working well—we have put a proposition forward that focused on clients. We have put a case to the budget review committee that said, ‘We need to make sure the services that are providing services to the most vulnerable clients—disability services, 24-hour care services, all of those—should get priority.’ We knew we were in a tight fiscal environment. We knew we could not go cap in hand and ask for full funding of $500 million plus for the wage supplementation. So as a combined group of ministers I thought we came up with a very good model that the department helped us develop. I am not trying to go about this in a roundabout way; I just want you to understand the context. In a difficult environment, it was extremely hard to get any funding at all for this, but the $414 million over the next few years is a significant milestone. It will be allocated through a process of moderation. Some groups, in what we are calling a category A grouping, will get a 100 per cent supplementation now and into the future. A category B group will get 100 per cent supplementation for the first 12 months, dropping down to 50 per cent supplementation after that. A category C group will not get any supplementation, and that group will include, in general terms, peak bodies and others that generally have a capacity to find some of their own source revenue and are not working directly with clients in need of 24-hour support or counselling or direct crisis work. I can only respond in general terms, because this is work in progress, but it is certainly going to mean, too, that because we have found this significant bucket of money to support the sustainability of services we will also be working with them in terms of service improvements as well. We want to see some streamlining and better coordination of their own service delivery. We will be working with the non- government sector to reduce the imposts on them through streamlining our process but also working with them to improve service delivery within their sector. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 63

Mrs MENKENS: I appreciate that you have found some funds there, but certainly on your own admission it is nowhere near enough to cover the added wages for the current services that are being delivered. You have mentioned A, B and C services. Can you enlarge a little bit more on that? What services are not going to be funded? What are the organisations and the services that are going to miss out? Let us face it: what we are going to see is the delivery of fewer services to those vulnerable people in need. Ms STRUTHERS: Yes. Again, you are pursuing a very important area here. What I am presenting to you is that, in a difficult fiscal environment, that was a major achievement. The peak bodies have welcomed it. I went to a budget breakfast with my colleagues after the announcement and the room was full. There were probably 300 or 400 community service providers from around particularly the south- east—some had come down from the north as their peak body representatives. The overwhelming sense was that they welcomed this. They did not expect it, frankly. So let me say that first up—that it has been welcomed. I guess the second point is that I was concerned to hear your own leader during the election indicate that if you got elected there would be a three per cent efficiency dividend. You were actually talking about cuts to services. Mrs MENKENS: But there were not jobs that were going to be lost in that. CHAIR: Member for Burdekin, this is not your opportunity to interject. Ms STRUTHERS: As I said in my opening remarks, service cuts were not negotiable in our minds as community services ministers. When we fronted up to the Cabinet Budget Review Committee on two occasions—and I was shaking in my boots on both occasions—we were hard line in relation to not cutting services. Your position seemed to be one of cutting services. That would have meant $150 million or so gone from the community services budget. It would have meant hundreds of jobs gone. It would have meant cuts to our social housing program. Mrs MENKENS: Minister, that is not the truth and you know that. Ms STRUTHERS: That is the contrast. I am pleased that we have found a significant amount of money to both recognise the pay equity concerns and recognise the value of these people. Again, I pay tribute to their work. There are some 20,000 workers who are affected by this decision of the Industrial Relations Commission around the state who are working in your area, my area—and the state— providing very important service delivery. This gives them a much better position in the future to be sustainable and to continue their service delivery without cuts. Mrs MENKENS: Can the minister provide the total amount budgeted for programs to prevent suicide in the 2009-10 year, including full details of where that money will be allocated? Ms STRUTHERS: I am happy to do that. We do not have primary responsibility for the suicide response. The department of health—the Minister for Health—has the primary carriage of the state-wide Suicide Prevention Strategy but we do, through various programs, provide support that is either directly aimed at suicide prevention or supporting people in a more general way—for instance, some of the work I mentioned earlier with seniors in social isolation and the work that we are doing there. We have had nine projects specifically funded under the Queensland government’s Suicide Prevention Strategy. A total of $0.42 million was carried over from 2007-08. We have certainly seen services for at-risk youth in Mackay. There were some particular incidents occurring in Mackay where a group of community leaders got together and wanted responses there. We have certainly provided support, with two full-time specialist workers to work with young people. We have provided money to vulnerable groups. I think we have provided $100,000 for the lesbian and gay Open Doors—I think the organisation is called—to do suicide prevention work. They met with me recently seeking funding. They had evidence of work they have done in places like Goondiwindi. I thought it was very brave of them— the sort of work they had been doing in some of these more isolated regional centres—raising issues of concern for gay and lesbian young people. That would have been a difficult job, I think, in some of those communities where many of these issues are kept pretty much under the carpet and as a result young people suffer. So we have some innovative responses to suicide prevention but, as I said, the bulk of the effort is through the health department and its funding initiatives. Mrs MENKENS: With reference to pages 31 and 32 of the Capital Statement, can you provide a reason for a 97 per cent underspend in capital on the Northern Outlook project, with just $69,000 spent out of the promised $2 million in 2008-09? Ms STRUTHERS: You would be really interested in Northern Outlook, because it is one of those adventure based responses and activities for young people, trying to get them on track through adventure based activities. The Southern Outlook at Boonah has had a successful record for a long time. The Northern Outlook is operating, and I have met staff from there. They have a mobile Outlook where they take young people to various sites. My sense is that there is a bit of a NIMBY thing going on here—not in my backyard. Because it largely involves a lot of Aboriginal kids, my understanding is that there has been some concern about the location of the land for these adventure based activities. I do 64 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009 not think we have finalised a site, hence the capital being carried over. That is my understanding. I will seek advice on that, but it is an important initiative. It is not a boot camp, but it certainly is adventure based activities. We need these sorts of initiatives. They have a proven record of success through the Southern Outlook and the Northern Outlook activities. However mobile they are, they need a permanent base, but sadly we have been coming across some community concern. You will hear a lot more from me on this NIMBY stuff, because frankly I am very concerned about it. We need to provide support for young people. We need to provide social housing. We need to provide all of these things. The community wants it, but sadly some community members do not want it in their backyard. In terms of any help you can give me on the Northern Outlook, I will be happy to receive. But my understanding is that we are still negotiating in trying to find a site. Mrs MENKENS: Can the minister state how many seniors have used the Seniors Legal and Support Service. If it has been a successful policy, why has the funding remained static? Why are there no plans to expand this service? Ms STRUTHERS: I will just seek some of the detail on the actual numbers using the service, but I met with staff from the Seniors Legal and Support Service at a recent event in Brisbane—a two-day training opportunity that we had funded. Their response to me was very positive. They promoted the very important work that they are doing. There is certainly concern from them that this is non-recurrent funding currently and they have asked me to investigate opportunities for recurrent funding. I will certainly be doing that. I accept that it is a very important service. Actually, I stayed for a presentation on elder abuse and they talked to me about that issue. I do not think many people know about it. I am thinking back 15 years when I was working at a service called the Domestic Violence Resource Centre and the issue of elderly abuse was raised with me and other colleagues by some HACC workers—some people working with seniors. We went online and found a whole lot of information about elder abuse in Canada and North America but not in Australia. At that time we got sent to us a number of packages on elder abuse, but essentially at that time we handed it over to the seniors services rather than running the issue as a domestic violence service. The staff at the Seniors Legal and Support Service said to me that they are doing a lot of work on elder abuse and they still feel that it is an issue that not many people understand or know about. So 15 years on, not a lot has really happened. A lot of people are experiencing financial abuse and neglect rather than direct physical abuse—and primarily at the hands of family members or carers. We have now included this issue in our legislation. In relation to your direct question about the numbers, the service has assisted 670 clients with either advice or ongoing casework during the 2007-08 period. It also provided information and referral services in 1,323 instances and delivered 293 community education awareness sessions attended by over 8,000 people. Given what I said about how this is still an issue that people are pretty silent on or do not know a lot about, that work is critical. Ms van LITSENBURG: I refer to page 3-11 of the Service Delivery Statements. What is the government doing to ensure young offenders are held accountable for their crimes? Ms STRUTHERS: Again, I am happy to talk about youth justice. It is a big part of my portfolio. As I said earlier, and I will say it again, the vast majority of young people do the right thing and I do not want any of us to ever lose sight of that reality. Youth crime is down. Some of the credit for that can go, I think, to our youth conferencing programs. I really have seen how effective they have been around the state. These innovative programs are a powerful deterrent to young people. They bring together the police, the offenders and the victims to develop a legal agreement on which the young person must comply. If they breach that agreement, they have to suffer the consequences of that. I am impressed that police actually refer a lot of young people to youth conferencing. Police would not do that if they thought it was a wussy thing or a soft option. In my understanding of these programs, the police have been active participants, sometimes as victims of the crimes themselves or certainly people who want to be part of the process of those conferences. It certainly works. Victim satisfaction has been measured at 98 per cent, and that is consistent with the evaluations that have been done. Referrals are up 15 per cent and, as I said, many of them are coming from the police, and the courts certainly are indicating a confidence in these programs as well. With such a successful program, we actually want to do all we can to strengthen it. In 2009-10 we will provide over $10 million to hold conferences, including the funding for an additional eight staff. We are focused on prevention of crime and helping young people become productive members of society. Again, I might use a case example without naming the person as an indication of what this process is about. A young man was charged with common assault as a result of a schoolyard dispute when a young person physically assaulted another school student. The conference involved the young person, the victim and his family and the police. A community agency also attended to outline the impacts of bullying and assault. As a result of the conference, the young person undertook 20 hours of volunteer work. He completed the agreement and continued to participate with his father within a community association teaching disabled and disadvantaged children how to fish. The victim was pleased that the young 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 65 person had taken responsibility for his behaviour and was now involved in supporting young people in the community. I guess the message in that is you have to get processes where these young people can dig deep, get some insights into their behaviour, get some empathy happening there, understand what is happening for the people they are impacting on and be shamed as part of this process—really understand what they are doing, how wrong it is and how it impacts on other people. For this young fellow with the support of his father to actually contribute in some way through a community association was certainly a positive thing. Time is up? CHAIR: It is. Mr KILBURN: I refer to the Service Delivery Statement page 3-51. Following machinery-of- government changes, can the minister advise if the independence of the Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian has been maintained? Ms STRUTHERS: Thanks for the question. I am happy to talk about the Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian. The independence of the commission is vital. The Bligh government takes this very seriously. The commission has an important role to play in promoting and protecting the rights, interests and wellbeing of Queenslanders under 18 years of age. I can confirm that the commission is not answerable to the department of communities or me as the minister. The commission is independent. Its decisions are not influenced by any government department or agency. You have met the commissioner, Elizabeth Fraser, here today. The commission does not have any reporting accountabilities to the department or the director-general. Following machinery-of-government changes there have been administrative changes which have not and cannot impact upon the independence of the commissioner. Let me go through these. Firstly, the commissioner is appointed by the Governor in Council with powers and functions clearly stated in the CCYPCG Act. The commissioner’s powers clearly state that the commissioner must act independently and is not under the control or direction of the minister. Secondly, the transfer of the commission does not and will not include any change to the mandated authority of the commission as a statutory body under the control of the commissioner. I fully support the mandate and independence of the commission. I am confident the establishment of the parliamentary Social Development Committee will ensure the commission’s continued independence. The committee has been given the power to review and monitor the work of the commission. The committee will report to the parliament on any changes required for the more effective operation of the commission or the act that establishes it. I am certain the commission will continue its important work in monitoring, reporting and advocating for children and young people. I look forward to any information or advice it provides to help the government assist those in our society who are the most vulnerable, and that is our children and young people. Mr KILBURN: Minister, I was fortunate enough to attend the first Indigenous Youth Parliament that you held here, and I commend your department for that. It was a fantastic day and the speeches that were given were great. The young people and the communities they come from should be proud of the way they presented themselves. I ask the minister to outline the benefits for those young Indigenous men and women who took part in Queensland’s first ever Indigenous Youth Parliament. CHAIR: You have two minutes, Minister. Ms STRUTHERS: I welcome the feedback you have provided. It was an historic event, an amazing event, a very emotional event. It was fantastic to see those people one day in their jeans and T-shirt having a lot of fun in their yarning circle on the other side of the building and then to come here the next day in their suits, ties and dresses already looking like leaders. I spoke to the fellow who was going to be the Premier for the day. He was all puffed up and proud. I spoke to the young fellow who was in my role, the Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women, and I said, ‘You feel good in this job, do you? Don’t get too much of a taste for it, though.’ They were performing absolutely outstandingly. I listened to some of their speeches. These sorts of initiatives are what we want for the future. If we are going to have any impact on closing the gap on the inequities in health, education and economic status of Indigenous people around the state, we need these young people sticking up for their communities, sticking up for their people and leading the way. We had discussions with them in the yarning circle about drugs, alcohol, substance abuse, violence and all those tough issues as much as we had discussions with them about the positive stuff. I attended the NAIDOC ball, the national event, on Friday night. There are so many high-achieving Indigenous people in this nation and this state, but the media will not report much of that unless they are a sporting champ. There is so much good stuff happening in communities on a day-to-day basis involving people who are quiet achievers, people who are achieving great heights. In Rockhampton on Friday I had the pleasure of attending the NAIDOC celebration there. There were 2,000 people in the showgrounds having a great time—alcohol free. I did not see a beer, did you, Director-General? It was a great day for 66 Estimates Committee C—Community Services, Housing and Women 16 Jul 2009 families. A young five-year-old girl got up. She was shaking in her boots. Five years old and she sang the national anthem. She was a shocker, but good on her. It was great to see. That is the sort of achievement and leadership that we want to be proud of. I am pleased that my department sponsors these Indigenous Youth Parliaments because that is the next step. These are the first peoples of our nation and, sadly, none of them sit in this House with us. We had one member, Eric Deeral. I understand he was a lovely fellow and I met him briefly during the Hands on Parliament report that the member for Callide and I were involved in. To think that we have had many years of parliament in this state and only one Indigenous fellow for one term is a sad indictment on our community. We need these young people to come forward. I am not prepared to hand over my job just yet, but that young fellow was ready for it. CHAIR: That concludes the committee’s consideration of the appropriations for the Minister for Community Services and Housing and Minister for Women. Ms STRUTHERS: I just have one revision as well. The member for Burdekin raised an issue about savings on the White Pages, which will be $37,579. I want to table a revised answer to that question that the member asked. CHAIR: You have to seek leave to table it. Ms STRUTHERS: I seek leave to table a revised response to a question on notice—response No. 5. Leave granted. CHAIR: Minister, on behalf of the committee I thank you, your staff and the department for their attendance and participation in today’s hearing. We very much appreciate it. Ms STRUTHERS: I have one closing comment. I, too, want to thank you, Mr Chair, and the members of your committee. We have had a very constructive discussion this afternoon. I want to thank my director-general, her leadership team and departmental officers, who have worked very hard in preparing responses and detailing issues for me in preparation for these hearings. I thank my own staff—the ‘barrel girl’—and the others who have worked very hard and the parliamentary staff who contribute to the success of these estimates committee processes. CHAIR: The committee will resume at four o’clock. Proceedings suspended from 3.48 pm to 4.00 pm 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 67

ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C—INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING

In Attendance Hon. SJ Hinchliffe, Minister for Infrastructure and Planning Mr S Fyfe, Principal Advisor Department of Infrastructure and Planning Mr C Jensen, Coordinator-General and Director-General Ms A Hall, Director, Executive and Communication Services, Strategy and Governance Group (Acting)

CHAIR: This hearing of Estimates Committee C is now resumed. The portfolio of the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning will be examined. The proceedings today are similar to parliament to the extent that members of the public cannot ask questions. In that regard I remind visitors that in accordance with standing order 206 any person admitted to a public hearing of a committee may be excluded by order of the committee or at my discretion as chair. In relation to media coverage of the hearing, the committee has resolved that television film coverage and photography be allowed during my introductory comments and the opening statement of the minister as well as for a short period during each changeover of ministerial advisers. The committee has also agreed to the live broadcast of the hearing via the Parliamentary Service’s website and to receive this throughout the parliamentary precinct. I ask that all mobile phones and pagers be now switched off. I remind members of the committee and the minister that the time limit for questions is one minute and answers are to be no longer than three minutes. A single chime will give a 15-second warning and a double chime will sound at the end of these time limits. An extension of time may be given by the consent of the questioner. A double chime will sound two minutes after an extension of time has been given. The standing orders require that at least half the time available for questions and answers be allocated to non-government members. Any time expended when the committee deliberates in private is to be equally apportioned between government and non-government members. For the benefit of Hansard I ask departmental officers to identify themselves if the minister calls them to answer a question. Minister, your advisers and staff, welcome to today’s hearing. I declare the proposed expenditure for the portfolio of the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning to be open for examination. The question before the committee is— That the proposed expenditure be agreed to. Minister, would you like to make an opening statement? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Yes, I would. Thank you for your welcome and thank you for your fellow committee members’ commitment to this process. I welcome the opportunity to report on my portfolio’s progress in delivering vital infrastructure and planning reforms amid the challenges of a global recession. As Minister for Infrastructure and Planning and faced with the greatest economic challenge in 75 years, I am determined to keep coordinating the largest infrastructure program in Queensland’s history and delivering major reforms for Queensland’s planning, building and development system. Since its formation 2½ years ago, the Department of Infrastructure and Planning has demonstrated its capacity to address state population growth of nearly 100,000 new residents each and every year by coordinating whole-of-government delivery of vital infrastructure. Faced now with the greatest economic challenge in generations, I am determined to continue vital infrastructure delivery to address growth but also to create and support jobs and to prepare Queensland for the global recovery. I am also determined to continue reforming the state’s planning, development and building system to foster greater planning consistency, improved housing standards and increased supply. The Queensland government is keeping promises, meeting commitments and delivering projects. As minister, I promised to keep infrastructure at the centre of the government’s priorities, and the state budget supports my position, allocating a record $18.2 billion for capital works this year in the face of a global recession. Our infrastructure program is the nation’s largest and it is investing $1,000 this year for each and every Queenslander—twice the average investment of other states. I am keeping my promise to support Queensland jobs and the state’s building program is forecast to support 120,000 jobs this year. Today I recommit the Queensland government to the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program 2009-26 with an estimated investment of $124 billion, up from $107 billion, ensuring the fast-growing south-east gets the infrastructure it needs. To that end I seek leave to table for the committee’s information SEQIPP 2009. 68 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

CHAIR: Leave granted. Mr HINCHLIFFE: The revised program includes 32 new infrastructure projects and it is forecast to generate 900,000 jobs in South-East Queensland to 2026. Consistent with that promise to support jobs, we promise to secure South-East Queensland’s water supply. The South-East Queensland water grid is nearing completion in less than three years. The government promised to continue reforming Queensland’s planning, development and building system and we have kept our promise, recently introducing the Sustainable Planning Bill 2009 to the parliament. The new planning bill is the largest reform to Queensland’s planning system in more than a decade and reduces red tape and increases flexibility while focusing on sustainable development. I promised to support the continuing introduction of regional plans across the length and breadth of the state, working in partnership with local stakeholders, and we are delivering. The South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-31 is scheduled for release in a few weeks along with regional plans for the south-west, central-west and Maranoa-Balonne. We promised a regional plan to guide development in the north-west and a few weeks ago I kept that promise and released a draft regional plan for North-West Queensland. We promised to support development of a billion dollar liquified natural gas industry in Queensland and the state budget provided a corridor for an underground superhighway to transport gas from Surat and Bowen basins to the Port of Gladstone. The Queensland government is meeting its commitments. We are meeting our commitment to work constructively with the Australian government and deliver shovel-ready school upgrades and social housing projects across the state in partnership with Canberra. The Bligh government is meeting its commitment to balance sensible development with environment and lifestyle protection. We have also introduced the statutory Far-North Queensland Regional Plan which won two awards from the Planning Institute of Australia for its strong focus on sustainability. We are meeting our commitment to reducing Queensland’s carbon footprint with a range of new sustainable housing measures progressively coming into effect from 1 March this year to reduce carbon emissions from residential and commercial buildings. As minister I am meeting my commitment to reduce transport congestion in South-East Queensland by coordinating the whole-of-government delivery of numerous road and public transport projects and planning which supports containment. The Queensland government supports coordinated whole-of-government infrastructure project delivery. With the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program, which I tabled today, we are seeing a whole lot of things delivered across the length and breadth of South-East Queensland. Four years into the program, some 87 projects are already complete and another 173 are underway. In partnership with industry we are seeing a whole lot of other projects being delivered and I am pleased to work with the Coordinator-General in that role to supply a whole lot of opportunities for industry across Queensland. CHAIR: Member for Gympie? Mr GIBSON: Thank you, Mr Chair, and welcome Minister. Let us begin with SEQIPP because obviously it is a document that I have been looking forward to. I would like to start by referring to SDS 2- 122 regarding the department’s responsibility to provide leadership on planning for growth and infrastructure provision in Queensland. I note in the budget papers and in an answer to the question on notice I asked regarding planning undertaken by your department that SEQIPP is not listed in either, yet this document is extensively referred to by the Department of Transport and Main Roads. Why isn’t SEQIPP referred to in either the question on notice or the budget document papers and is this another example of the Department of Infrastructure and Planning failing in its planning and leadership role? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Through you, Chair, I would like to thank Mr Gibson for his question. SEQIPP and the role that it plays in supporting the South East Queensland Regional Plan is fundamental to the planning that we do across the state. I do not think that it would be right to say that planning has not been the core of what we have been doing as a state. I think you will find that with the 21-year investment that SEQIPP demonstrates, and today being re-emphasised with the 2009 version being released, the Bligh government has demonstrated that it is absolutely committed to the role planning and providing support for planning through the delivery of a program of infrastructure and a pipeline of infrastructure demonstrates. It is updated each year and we need to understand that it needs to respond to the circumstances that are alive at each moment in time. It provides an overarching framework around delivering the systems that a whole range of line agencies will then deliver in terms of particular pieces of infrastructure that they are responsible for. It does assist in that planning and delivery of infrastructure across South-East Queensland, but it does not replace planning and infrastructure that is more broadly addressed by the SEQ Regional Plan plus agency planning that happens in each and every line agency. It supports and assists and helps deliver that South East Queensland Regional Plan but it does not replace all planning that happens across the whole of government. Mr GIBSON: I do not doubt its importance. I am just curious that it was not listed on the non- government question on notice as part of the planning documents. Perhaps that was an oversight. If we continue on with SEQIPP, I note that you launched it at 12.30 today, a month later than was promised by 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 69 your colleague the Minister for Main Roads in answer to a question on notice that he provided to the parliament. I also note that in answer to a question on notice for the government you indicated that it would be released yesterday. Is the timing of the release of SEQIPP today neatly timed to avoid the full scrutiny of estimates but also to be lost in the storm surrounding Gordon Nuttall’s conviction for corruption or is it due to concerns about the quality of the document and just another example of the arrogance of this Labor government? CHAIR: I should say, Minister, that the matter referred to by the member for Gympie is still before the courts so be careful in your answer. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Thank you for your guidance, Mr Chair. I can assure Mr Gibson, through you Chair, that the timing of the launch of the plan was all to do with providing an opportunity to make sure that SEQIPP was provided in this context of the budget process and the estimates process. Indeed, my reason for tabling it here is to allow the committee to consider and use that document in its deliberations. When we had a budget that was focused on the Renewing Queensland Plan it was important and appropriate that the SEQIPP document, which has in the previous two years been released with the budget, be released at a separate time. At the end of this month, in the next few weeks, the final version of the renewed South East Queensland Regional Plan will be released. It was particularly appropriate that SEQIPP 2009 was informed by the content of the South East Queensland Regional Plan as it is close to finalisation. Mr GIBSON: I struggle to believe that by tabling a document here before this committee we would then have time to be able to peruse it. Even accessing it online from the midday announcement it still does not leave the committee much time to peruse the document. My question to you now is: I note in your press release today that SEQIPP talks about 900,000 jobs under this plan. Could you advise the committee how this figure is calculated? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Through you, Chair, I want to thank Mr Gibson for his question and in the first place reiterate that I do think the committee has a process beyond this hearing and I encourage the committee to use SEQIPP in its deliberations and how that then reports to the parliament as a whole. I think Mr Gibson should appreciate the importance of the role of the whole of the committee process and not just a day in the sun like this afternoon might be. I appreciate Mr Gibson’s interest in the very important and significant figure of 900,000 jobs that are provided for as a result of the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program over its life. Those job figures are calculated using a non-dwelling construction index provided by the Office of Economic and Statistical Research extrapolated over the period of the plan. Job numbers are estimated on a year-by-year basis. That is a normal process when it comes to particularly these sorts of infrastructure and construction jobs. The program job target of 900,000 is a cumulative assessment of the job numbers based upon the total spend of the program from 2005 to 2026 which is the nature of the total of the program. The 2010 data is based upon current projected budget estimates and program spend. That is when we are talking about the 45,000 jobs being delivered and supported by the program this year. I think it is important to reiterate the jobs element arising out of the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program. I think that this government places importance on its infrastructure program, its building program, to deliver and support jobs in our community at this very important and very challenging time in the context of a global economic downturn. I want to reiterate how important these job creation and support opportunities are as compared to alternative decisions that might have been made by a different government. I think it is very important that the pipeline of infrastructure, the pipeline of opportunities that arise for jobs in South-East Queensland out of the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program are reassuring to a whole range of people across our region and I would encourage all members to support the program in that context. Mr GIBSON: If I can just get some clarification then. Cumulative over the life of the program to 2026; what year are you calculating? Basically the question is: are you using 2009 figures for wages when you look at those calculations up to 2026? Mr HINCHLIFFE: If you use the principle of using an index that calculates these things you would be using 2009 figures in terms of, as we do throughout the plan, the costs of projects and therefore 2009 wage figures or whatever the figures are to do that calculation in that context. I presume that would be the correct way to go forward. Mr GIBSON: Therefore, I guess, it is reasonable that with increasing wages we could see that estimated 900,000 jobs drop? Mr HINCHLIFFE: If there was an increase in wages it would also be potentially reflected in the increase in the costs of the projects themselves. They are indeed indexed each year, as I mentioned. There is that index, that non-dwelling construction index, which takes into account those sorts of factors. They are the normal ways in which people in industry understand and provide for and plan for these sorts of projects over time. It is no great mystery to anyone in industry who deals with these factors and it is certainly no great mystery to this government that has been planning so well for the provision of infrastructure into a long period to come. 70 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

Mr GIBSON: I am just trying to sift the spin from the facts and I appreciate your assistance in that. CHAIR: Member for Gympie, I would hope that you would keep to the content of the question. Mr GIBSON: Minister, I refer to SDS 2-122 regarding the department’s responsibility to provide leadership on planning for growth and infrastructure provision in Queensland. The recent damning Auditor-General’s report has found this government has failed to provide a transport network that addresses urban congestion and therefore is negatively impacting on South-East Queenslanders’ quality of life. In particular, it found the Department of Infrastructure and Planning’s frameworks and systems for infrastructure delivery did not extend to the management of congestion. Is this another example of the failure of you and your department to provide true leadership on this matter or did you simply overlook the traffic jams outside your window? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. I have spent some time already talking about the importance and role of the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program. Let me go back to taws and make another reference to the South East Queensland Regional Plan. The South East Queensland Regional Plan plays a significant role in providing an overarching planning context for the south-east on behalf of all state agencies, and indeed local authorities and a range of other interested parties including people in the private sector and other interested groups, to plan ahead for the future of Queensland, particularly in the face of, as we have seen, ongoing population growth— population growth which has been unprecedented and unrelenting. The South East Queensland Regional Plan, both in its 2026 iteration and in its 2031 iteration that we will see shortly—the draft form that is out there at the moment—provides significant responses to the issues around traffic congestion. As I am sure members of the committee will appreciate, traffic congestion is not entirely solved by building roads. It is not entirely solved by massive injections into public transport infrastructure and services such as we have seen under this government. It is in part solved by better planning—not better planning around developing new infrastructure but better planning around where people are located, where they move to and how they travel within our region. So the containment of communities, better planning and creation of more employment opportunities in the communities where people live, so that people do not have to make the journey across town to go from their place of residence to their place of work, is part of the planning that we need to do. That is what the South East Queensland Regional Plan provides for in some respects. It also provides for and emphasises opportunities around transit oriented development— development that supports and enhances the use of public transport and the ability for people in the community to shorten journeys and take the pressure off our congested roads and other transport infrastructure. I would encourage the committee in its consideration and deliberation of these issues to consider the fundamental nature of the South East Queensland Regional Plan to the planning work that the state does throughout South-East Queensland and also the way we are using these regional planning documents across the rest of the state. Mr GIBSON: Minister, in light of the fact that we have only just received SEQIPP, I am happy if you want to take this question on notice, as we certainly have not had the time to go through it in detail. Can you advise the expenditure on infrastructure projects by type—roads, public transport, health, energy, water supply et cetera—for 2008-09 estimated actual, 2009-10 budget and forward estimates and provide a breakdown by local, state, federal, GOC and private sector contribution to or investment in those projects? Mr HINCHLIFFE: There are some elements of that which I can address now, but if you want a holistic answer I am happy to get that together and bring it back to you. Mr GIBSON: I am happy if you wish to take part of it on notice and if you wish to address some of it now. Mr HINCHLIFFE: I am sure I will be able to get back to you and deal with some of that before the end of today. Mr GIBSON: Thank you. Minister, in your earlier answer to a question you talked about population growth. I think the word you used was ‘unrelenting’. It is a fact that since 1982 the average annual population growth in Queensland has been 2.2 per cent and that in the past decade the average annual population growth has been an identical 2.2 per cent. Will the minister admit that the current congestion and infrastructure crisis is more due to poor planning and lack of management by this Labor government and not a sudden spurt in our population growth? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. I think you will find that the nature of the statistics that Mr Gibson quotes to the committee hearing are accurate in the way he has quoted them. Equally, it is important to analyse statistics such as that. You need to understand that there are some very different dynamics that have been going on in recent times in terms of the distribution of population, as has been the case in previous periods. The distribution of population growth has been more focused and more centred on some key areas of the state. That is where the pressures have arisen and that is where the pressures lie. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 71

I understand the point that Mr Gibson is making. But I suggest to the committee that we need to be—and indeed we do this through the processes of the South East Queensland Regional Plan, the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program, the Far North Queensland Regional Plan and the Far North Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program—far more fine grained in the analysis of the nature of growth and the pinch points that that creates in the infrastructure that we have to serve that growth. Mr GIBSON: Minister, as recently as Tuesday this week the Premier referred to the pressure that we have on our infrastructure as ‘growing pains’, yet clearly it has been fairly consistent from a percentage perspective. I take your point with regard to distribution, but it begs the question: if the population growth has been known and we have not been planning for its distribution, again is this an example of this Labor government failing to properly plan? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. I think I have demonstrated in answer to a number of questions that through comprehensive planning documents and comprehensive planning action, such as the South East Queensland Regional Plan and the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program, this government is planning for this region in a way that is entirely unprecedented. In fact, you will find that the Australian government is pointing other governments across Australia in the direction of the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program and in the direction of the Queensland government’s planning processes as an example of how to do it well. I would counsel members of the committee against getting the idea that there is a lack of strategic planning happening in relation to the needs of our state and particularly the needs of South-East Queensland. I need only to refer to and point to the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program and its parent document, the South East Queensland Regional Plan, which provides a comprehensive set of arrangements to plan for the growth of our state. If we look at the rollout of regional planning documents in various forms across the rest of the state, we also provide for planning in a range of areas in a range of circumstances, be they high growth or low growth. Mr KILBURN: Minister, I refer you to page 118 of Service Delivery Statement Book 2. Creating jobs in Queensland is important for securing the future for many of the working families in my electorate. Will the minister provide details on the planning program currently being undertaken by the state government to stimulate and fast-track projects that support job creation? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Kilburn for his question. As part of the ongoing program for planning for Queensland, the Department of Infrastructure and Planning is helping to stimulate projects that create jobs through statutory planning, reform agendas, land use plans and economic development opportunities studies and by securing land and funding for essential infrastructure projects for Queensland. They play a multifactoral role in intervening in the economy to support job creation. By way of example I refer to the Sustainable Planning Bill, which I mentioned earlier, that is currently before the House. It seeks to reduce red tape for the development industry and focuses on achieving outcomes faster. I refer to those land use plans that I have mentioned already—the Far North Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031, which was released on 13 February 2009, and the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2031, which is due for release shortly—which identify economic development hubs and opportunities for strategic growth of industries over the next 22 years. My department also continues to plan, facilitate and lead major private sector and government projects that support job creation. They include undertaking site investigations for special industries in Southern Queensland; ensuring land is available and that infrastructure development and planning occur in strategic locations to support industrial development; facilitating the liquefied natural gas industry—a real sunrise industry for the state; coordinating the Northern Economic Triangle Infrastructure Plan; and implementing the coal infrastructure plan of action and coordination of the environmental impact statements process for significant projects. The department coordinates and delivers key infrastructure across the state which I have mentioned at great length in terms of what is contained within the South East Queensland Regional Plan and also a whole range of projects across the rest of the state. But the department also plans, secures and manages land support for development including declaring and managing state development areas and undertaking a state-wide inventory of land for public recreation. Through the Property Services Group, which uses the state’s construction fund, it provides funding for property related and industry development functions that encourage the location and expansion of businesses and industry, thereby supporting job creation in Queensland. It is particularly important in relation to regional Queensland. The department has an ongoing role in coordinating submissions for projects seeking funding under the Building Australia Fund. I can identify four Queensland projects. The Ipswich Motorway, the Gold Coast Rapid Transit project, the Bruce Highway Cooroy-Curra upgrade and Brisbane inner-city rail have secured funding under those arrangements. That was part of the drive that our department supported. 72 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I refer to your Service Delivery Statement, which mentions facilitating the liquefied natural gas industry. LNG is an exciting new industry for Queensland. Can you advise on the potential job creation associated with this up-and-coming industry? Mr HINCHLIFFE: The government committed during the election, as you rightly know, to creating 100,000 new jobs. I am, as the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning, working each and every day to support and create jobs. One of the fundamental planks of that strategy is the creation of jobs through the development of new industries. As the Premier said on Tuesday, a liquefied natural gas or LNG industry in Queensland could create more than 18,000 jobs as well as offer billions of dollars of investment for the state. During the recent election campaign the government committed to creating a gas superhighway to facilitate a multibillion dollar LNG industry for Queensland. It is important for all committee members to note that of the eight current LNG proposals seven are based in the Gladstone area and one is examining the potential of a medium-sized plant at Abbot Point near Bowen. This industry could deliver for the Mackay, Fitzroy and central west regions more than 14,000 jobs. This equates to economic benefits for that regional economy of estimated 8.3 per cent growth. Further, LNG could deliver more than 4,300 jobs to the Downs and south-west regions. This equates to economic benefits for those regions of estimated 4.4 per cent growth. As the Premier said, growth of this nature in these regions is very exciting, especially considering that the state’s current annual growth projection is at half a per cent and that Australia as a whole is not showing any growth at all. So, additionally, the flow-on effect of this growth across the regions is going to be a great contribution to the development of jobs potential particularly. But, equally, rapid development of the Surat and Bowen basins in the past few years means that we can potentially have an LNG export industry of up to 40 million tonnes a year, as well as supply domestic power stations until at least 2050. I ask the committee to note that modelling shows that the LNG industry in 10 years could add more than $3 billion per annum to gross state product. That is from an industry producing 28 million tonnes per year. CHAIR: Minister, I want to follow up on one of my questions on notice, which is government question No. 1. In your response to my question on notice, you said that you were notified by the Coordinator-General on Monday, 19 June of the proposed modification to the Airport Link project. Some media reports have suggested that the government was aware of the modification prior to the election. Can you advise the committee whether there was any earlier advice to you prior to 19 June? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I should clarify that 19 June was a Friday. CHAIR: I apologise. Mr HINCHLIFFE: That is all right. The Airport Link project, as committee members would appreciate because you have heard me say this on a number of occasions, is one of the largest projects of its kind in Australia. When the project is finished, it will deliver major time savings for people travelling across Brisbane, whether by car or by using the Northern Busway. In addition, more than 1,800 people have been employed and are now working on the Airport Link, the Northern Busway and the airport roundabout upgrade projects across seven major work sites. The project delivers on the government’s commitment to create jobs and plan for a better integrated transport and road network to combat traffic congestion. I appreciate that you have raised this question today because it gives me a good opportunity to dispel some rumours, comments and suggestions out there that the government was aware of the proposed modification prior to or during the election earlier this year. I can confirm that the government was not aware or informed of the proposed modification requests to the Airport Link project prior to the election in March. In fact, the problem was not identified by the contractor until after the election. As I have stated in my answer to your question on notice, I was formally briefed on the requests for a project change on Friday, 19 June, after it was submitted to the Coordinator-General. I announced the proposal for the Wooloowin work site at a press conference on the following Monday, 22 June. During an extensive tour of the Airport Link, the Northern Busway from Windsor to Kedron, and the airport roundabout sites in late April after my appointment as Minister for Infrastructure and Planning, I was made aware of concerns about the quality of the ground conditions in the Kedron area. At that time, a number of possible options—including a work site at Rose Street, Wooloowin—were under consideration by BrisConnections and its construction contractor, Thiess John Holland, but I was advised that detailed technical work had not yet been undertaken on any possible alternative engineering solutions. Officers of my department have been working with City North Infrastructure, BrisConnections and Thiess John Holland since late April 2009 to define the proposal and ensure the engineering solutions proposed were adequately and thoroughly investigated prior to seeking public input into the process. The Coordinator-General has received a request for the change and has initiated a process to seek submissions from the community, government agencies and other organisations. It should be understood that community consultation is an important part of the decision-making process. That 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 73 period of consultation closes tomorrow, 17 June, and has been opened since 24 June. The Coordinator- General will assess those submissions and other information that is relevant and make a determination about whether the project change is accepted and if there are any conditions. CHAIR: Minister, you mentioned that it was open until 17 June? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I meant July. My apologies; thank you. Ms van LITSENBURG: Page 2-119 refers to the minister’s Pool Safety Committee. Will you provide an update on work being done in this important area? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Thank you for the question. In December last year, the Premier announced the biggest shake-up of pool safety laws in nearly 20 years. Queensland already has some of the toughest pool safety laws in Australia, and our pool fencing legislation has been effective in reducing drownings by up to 60 per cent since it was introduced in 1991. However, if we can save even one young life with this review, it will have been invaluable. Sadly, in the past three years, 18 Queensland children under five have drowned in private swimming pools. The right pool safety laws are part of meeting our Q2 fair ambitions of supporting a safe and caring community. To that end, an independent panel of experts, including Kidsafe, the LGAQ and Queensland Master Builders, was established and has produced a report with recommendations, and this was released for public consultation earlier this year. The consultation period ended in June and the government is currently considering the feedback received before making decisions on the matter. The committee’s report sets out a range of improvement ideas, such as, firstly, having one pool safety standard to apply uniformly to all pools instead of the 11 that there are currently, with the only variation being for pools before 1991 where child resistant doors can still form part of a safety barrier; secondly, mandatory inspections for new pools as well as at the point of sale and lease of properties; and, thirdly, a register of all pools and tougher rules for portable swimming pools. As part of the consultation process, nine roadshows were held across Queensland in regions such as Mackay, Townsville, Cairns, the Sunshine Coast, Mount Isa, Rockhampton, the Gold Coast and Brisbane. I attended two of those roadshows and found the feedback at those opportunities and the consultation I had with the community and the interested people there—such as building certifiers— invaluable. But, in the end, it is important to remember in all of these measures that the best pool safety measure is supervision: the supervision of children is key to pool safety. I encourage members to make sure that message goes out to all of their constituents as the first thing, because parental vigilance will be the thing that saves more kids than anything else. It is important that we continue to ensure that our pool safety laws are as rigorous as they can be and are as simple to apply as they should be. That is where I think some of the measures that are proposed by the committee will be of great assistance to pool owners across Queensland. Ms CROFT: Minister, I am very pleased to have the opportunity today to ask you a number of questions pertaining to the Gold Coast. I refer you to page 2-128 of the Service Delivery Statement which refers to the Gold Coast desalination plant. I note some issues have been raised by landholders, in particular from the Tugun rugby league club. Can you advise what steps have been taken to address these issues in relation to the club? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I want to thank Ms Croft for her question. I appreciate her ongoing interest in all issues that relate to the Gold Coast. It is true to say that the Gold Coast Desalination Alliance has worked closely with the community and residents, particularly along the pipeline sections, since construction began in 2007. Now that the construction of the pipeline has finished, there is a chance to conclude the detailed assessment of a number of outstanding claims that have been made by landholders. The alliance has made all reasonable attempts to avoid damaging property during the construction phase of course, but these are things that need to be checked and tested. Pre- and post-condition surveys are pretty important to that and they were undertaken along the pipeline, and all property owners were contacted and invited to be involved in that process. With the exception of three new claims that are currently under review, the alliance has investigated all the damage claims and property owners have been contacted regarding outcomes in that regard. There were also a number of issues that the Gold Coast City Council has identified about damaged roads, and it has been contacted and we are working with it on restoration works as well. I note your particular question around the Tugun rugby league club. I understand Minister Robertson mentioned earlier that the Premier has requested he and I meet with the president of the club as soon as possible. I can advise the committee that my office has made tentative arrangements for that meeting to occur, pending the confirmation of the relevant stakeholders who will be involved. I understand that the alliance has previously investigated the claims of the Gold Coast City Council and the Tugun rugby league club that truck traffic, construction activities and blasting from the construction of the desalination plant’s tunnels had caused or accelerated existing damage to the club’s amenity building. My advice from the alliance is that the most likely explanation for the damage to the building was the poor standard of construction on an unstable site. It is an old style, uncontrolled landfill, and under current legislation construction on landfill like that would not be permitted. The 74 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009 desalination site is more than 200 metres from the rugby league clubhouse and the alliance’s view is that the construction activities from the building works had no effect on the clubhouse or adjacent buildings. Equally, I am keen to work with the rugby league club and indeed the Gold Coast City Council around the future of the club. I think more of its concerns are about the long-term future of the club and where its facilities will be located into the future, which I understand the Gold Coast City Council has a view about as well. Ms CROFT: Minister, I was pleased recently to facilitate a meeting between the Minister for Transport and Gold Coast marine industry representatives to discuss a range of issues pertaining in particular to my electorate of the Broadwater. I know they would be very keen to hear your response to this next question I have for you. I refer to page 2-118 of the Service Delivery Statements. Can you outline the progress of the Southport-Broadwater to Southern Moreton Bay Marine Infrastructure Master Plan? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Ms Croft for her question and do note her active interest in these issues. The Southern Moreton Bay Marine Infrastructure Master Plan study is in response to a coordinated response to the rapidly developing marine industries in the Gold Coast and southern Brisbane region. There has also been increased demand for new and improved infrastructure to cater for the increased numbers of recreational and commercial vessels plying the waters off South-East Queensland. The master plan will comprise whole-of-government endorsed outcomes to facilitate marine industry and maritime infrastructure development over the next 20 years. Development under the master plan will be confined to areas which provide optimal potential from an environmental and community perspective and align with the 10-year dredging program of the Department of Transport and Main Roads, which is obviously a pretty key element of it. This is to ensure that industry has certainty and that appropriate water access will be available in line with development proposals. The methodology adopted in the master plan has been endorsed by a steering committee comprising whole-of-government representation and has taken a specific approach to environmental assessment. This methodology will ultimately be adopted state-wide by the Department of Environment and Resource Management when it assesses future maritime opportunities under the State Coastal Management Plan. A feature of the master plan preparation has been the consultation that has taken place with key stakeholders. Stakeholders have included marine industry representatives, developers, environmental groups, the recreation industry and relevant local governments. Peak bodies, such as the Institute of Business Leaders, have also provided advice on matters such as commercial viability and funding models to ensure that master planning outcomes can be sustained on a commercial level. The draft master plan is expected to be completed by August this year, following which it will be placed on public display. A central part of the successful implementation of the master plan is the management of the staged development approach, which is critical to ensure that the necessary dredging requirements are fulfilled in conjunction with development. I encourage you to keep in close contact with that process and have your say and encourage your community to have a say after August 2009. Mr GIBSON: Minister, let us move to the water grid. Page 2-121 of the SDS is the area I am looking at to start with. I would like to also touch base with your answer to non-government question on notice No. 10 and in particular the $21 million already spent on pipe procurement that you refer to there for the Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage 2. Minister, in light of some problems we have seen with pipes—in particular what is now being referred to as a giant soaker hose between the Gold Coast desalination plant and the water grid—can you give us some guarantee that the pipes that will be used for the Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage 2 will not have the same connection problems? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I would like to thank Mr Gibson for his question. I appreciate his concern for ensuring that the Northern Pipeline Interconnector is a quality piece of infrastructure that will serve the people of South-East Queensland for many years to come. I am absolutely committed to ensuring that we see that project deliver the best possible outcomes. As I think Mr Gibson will appreciate, I have already made very clear what I want to see delivered with other projects that he has made reference to. Before the government accepts those projects and makes any final payments, we need to see the specifications met, the design requirements met and the projects being what we want them to be in terms of those assets having durability and the water grid being up to the design requirements. I can absolutely assure you that the design requirements for the Northern Pipeline Interconnector are of high quality and that the government will be requiring the alliance delivering the NPI to ensure that it delivers a quality piece of infrastructure that, as I say, will serve the people of Queensland for many years to come. Not only will it serve the people of Queensland for many years to come; it is serving the people of Queensland tremendously at the moment, with that work supporting some 890 jobs. There are 490 jobs for stage 1 and 400 jobs for stage 2. Those jobs that are delivering the pipeline infrastructure 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 75 that forms part of the water grid, securing the water security for South-East Queensland for many years to come, are jobs not only for the short term but jobs that will be supported through industry’s access to water security for many years to come. Mr GIBSON: Minister, taking on board what you have just said and the importance of making sure the specifications are right, there was recently an auction, on 17 to 19 June, of pipe formwork— plate and steel options—of leftover material from the Western Corridor Recycled Water Project. If you were to go through the auction guide, you would see that there were over five kilometres of leftover pipes that were being put up for auction. Minister, what assurances can this committee have that the $21 million listed for pipe procurement for the Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage 2 will not end up at another auction? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. The Western Corridor Recycled Water Project that you made reference to has involved the construction of some 200 kilometres of large- diameter pipeline. As you can appreciate, 200 kilometres is a lot of pipe. That means that the exact specifications and the exact alignment of it will not always be exactly right, right down to the exact number of pipes. The bulk pipe procurement happened in that project before design was finalised due to the fast-tracking. We were in the depths of a severe drought in South-East Queensland and these projects were being fast-tracked. There is no question about that. I do not think anyone has denied that. That is why we saw that bulk pipe procurement before the design was finalised. We did not leave the pipe out there in the pipeline to sit there on the surface and rust. We made sure that we got hold of them and they were realised as an asset for the project. So we can apply any of those further funds to the delivery of the Northern Pipeline Interconnector and to the other important projects in South-East Queensland to deliver South-East Queensland’s water security for the future. Mr GIBSON: Minister, I am sure you do not have the answer to this, but I am happy to put it on notice. Mr HINCHLIFFE: You might be surprised. Mr GIBSON: I may well be. Do you know what was received from that auction? What was the value of those pipes? Mr HINCHLIFFE: You got me there, Mr Gibson. That is something that I will seek some advice on and return to you during today if I can. Mr GIBSON: I did not think you would quite have that one. Mr HINCHLIFFE: I have not been surfing eBay like you, obviously. Mr GIBSON: Minister, in response to a question on notice asked by the member for Waterford, you provided reasons for progressing NPI stage 2 ahead of any approval for the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam as it is a stand-alone project to connect the Noosa Water Treatment Plant with NPI stage 1. Can you advise the committee of the expected megalitre transfer either to or from the Noosa Water Treatment Plant? Mr HINCHLIFFE: To answer Mr Gibson’s question, currently the NPI can supply up to 65 megalitres of water a day into the Brisbane supply system as part of the water grid. The long-term planning for the NPI is to operate at a maximum design capacity of 206 megalitres per day in the southerly direction. Those issues in terms of how it could be provided in both directions in part depend on decisions that will be made by the water grid manager, who actually determines those issues based upon need. If there is something further I can clarify for you, I can seek to do that. Mr GIBSON: Minister, if you could give us some clarification. The 206 megalitres that you are referring to I am assuming is calculated on Traveston Crossing Dam being online. In answer to a question on notice you indicated that it is a stand-alone project connecting the Noosa Water Treatment Plant to NPI stage 1. I accept that. I am just asking what the numbers are, megalitre wise, that you are looking at drawing either from the Noosa Water Treatment Plant or connecting to the Noosa Water Treatment Plant. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Unfortunately for Mr Gibson, I think he has missed his opportunity to ask that question because the Queensland Water Commission would determine those issues in terms of the specifications and the requirement of the operations of the pipeline. What the Northern Pipeline Interconnector is seeking to do, and will achieve, is to have a pipeline that provides for a connection to the Noosa Water Treatment Plant and see the capability of moving water in either direction. In terms of the quantum of that water, that is a matter which the Queensland Water Commission, which was available to the committee earlier today, would have been in a better position to answer. Mr GIBSON: Minister, I accept that and thank you for that. In light of the fact that the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam is not approved—and I will follow up later to find out exactly what the figure is that is possible to either draw from or take to the Noosa Water Treatment Plant—we are looking at a cost of $450 million for NPI stage 2. Would you concede that, without the Traveston Crossing Dam online, that is a very expensive connection just to a water treatment plant? 76 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

Mr HINCHLIFFE: To answer Mr Gibson’s question, stages 1 and 2 of the Northern Pipeline Interconnector represent a significant element of the South-East Queensland water grid. They provide an ability to move water around the region. They provide an ability to move water to the northern end of the Sunshine Coast from the rest of the region. Indeed, they provide a significant opportunity to deliver water from the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam to the South-East Queensland water grid. I appreciate the point that Mr Gibson is making. None of us on the committee or no-one here before the hearing has any illusions about Mr Gibson’s opinion of the Traveston Crossing Dam. There are no surprises there. I can reassure him that it is an important element of the South-East Queensland water grid— Mr GIBSON: NPI stage 2 without the dam being approved. Mr HINCHLIFFE: The dam is an important part of the South-East Queensland water grid— Mr GIBSON: I understand that. Mr HINCHLIFFE: And it will provide an important contribution towards obtaining water security for South-East Queensland’s population for many years to come. Mr GIBSON: Minister, I am going to ask it again, because you did not answer the question. I appreciate what you have just said: ‘it is a very important part of the water grid.’ I understand the government’s position as well as the government understands mine. But if the dam is not approved, do you concede that the Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage 2, at $450 million to connect the Northern Pipeline Interconnector stage 1 to the Noosa Water Treatment Plant, is a very expensive piece of infrastructure? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Mr Gibson has identified that something that is worth $450 million is expensive. That is no great surprise to anyone. It is an expensive piece of infrastructure but it is delivering an important element of the South-East Queensland water grid— Mr GIBSON: To a water treatment plant. Mr HINCHLIFFE: To the water grid, which is about providing flexibility and security in accordance with the requirements that were set out for the delivery of the infrastructure by the Queensland Water Commission. The Queensland Water Commission made the decisions that determine the nature of the infrastructure that my department is working with the alliance to deliver. This set of questions should have been raised by Mr Gibson earlier today, I would venture. Mr GIBSON: Minister, we can move on to page 2-121 of the SDS. Given that SmartWater is contracted to operate and maintain the Gold Coast desalination plant for the next 10 years, can the minister advise how much was spent by WaterSecure to employ so-called independent auditors to identify issues that John Holland and Veolia Water were already aware of? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. I think what he is getting at is the independent report— Mr GIBSON: The cost of it. Mr HINCHLIFFE:—which was an important requirement that the Coordinator-General requested of the project to ensure that we got to the bottom of the issues around the delivery of this significant piece of infrastructure. That, as I have alluded to with another piece of infrastructure, is an important part of the South-East Queensland water grid. To have an independent analysis of this in the context of a shutdown of the plant—an ability for a range of experts from a range of fields to go into every nook and cranny of the plant, literally crawl through pipes and find out the details—was very important. In relation to the costs of the delivery of that very important independent report, I am happy to take that on notice and get some detail. There have been others at different times in relation to this issue who have made analogies with motor vehicles. I know that when you buy a vehicle it is sometimes good to get the inspection done by the RACQ, which is an independent body. This is what we are doing through this process. That costs, but I am happy to provide that information to the committee. Mr GIBSON: I will move on to industry support at page 2-125 of the SDS. I note that the number of jobs generated from proposed projects has jumped from 18,000 to over 57,000. It also identifies an increase in proposed projects from 33 to 39. Minister, if the increase in the estimated number of jobs created from proposed projects is connected to six additional projects, will you identify those six projects that will bring an estimated 38,875 jobs? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. It absolutely highlights that, even given the significant set of challenges that we are experiencing at the moment in the face of a global economic downturn—a global recession as it has become known—we still have before the Coordinator-General in the order of $100 billion worth of projects for assessment. That shows the significant vote of confidence that the private sector has in Queensland as a place where sound and smart investments will yield outcomes. Even in the face of a global economic crisis we have this level of projects being contemplated by the private sector. They are seeking declaration of their projects as projects of state significance. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 77

We will double-check the projects that are identified. I would suspect that a number of them would be LNG projects. As I have outlined in other answers and in my statement at the beginning of this session, the LNG industry is a huge sunrise industry for the state of Queensland. There are some eight proponents out there around a range of different projects. Four of those have been declared of state significance at the moment. But we would expect further projects to be declared. In recent days a number of projects have been declared and some have moved to be assessed by the Coordinator- General. Mr GIBSON: Just to confirm, will you take that on notice? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Absolutely. Mr GIBSON: With regard to SEQIPP’s 900,000 jobs and what we have seen here with the proposed projects—that is, 57,000 jobs—can you provide the committee with the definition of a job? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. As the Premier said on Tuesday, if you were paying attention, Mr Gibson, with regard to the broader capital program and the range of other things that we talk about in terms of the jobs target, there are people who are employed, in construction projects in particular, and who continue to be employed because we continue to invest in projects rather than scrap them. For consistency, what we do is use the industry standard, which is job years. When we talk about a job we talk about job years. One year on the job equals one job. In essence, the reference to jobs in the SEQ Infrastructure Plan and Program is a reference to 900,000 job years. Ms CROFT: Minister, I refer to page 2-121 of the SDS and appropriate planning for future growth in the Gold Coast area, where housing affordability is really an issue. Minister, can you detail some of the achievements and challenges in delivering greenfield sites for the Gold Coast that were identified in the Greenfield Land Supply Action Plan? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Ms Croft for her question. Greenfield lands are areas of undeveloped area in the urban footprint suitable for urban development. I should clarify that: ‘greenfield land’ is a planners term that does not mean what a lot of people think it means. It does not mean bushland; it means undeveloped land in the urban footprint. Greenfield lands are generally located on fringes of existing urban areas and often require a significant extension or provision of new infrastructure and transport services to facilitate development. One of the challenges for the Gold Coast is that there is limited broad hectare land supplied on the Gold Coast. This necessitates that all remaining parcels be efficiently developed. There is also a role for infill development. That is vital for the medium- and long-term accommodation needs of the Gold Coast’s projected population growth, as Ms Croft would be aware. It is recognised that it may be necessary to engage in more detailed planning to address the site constraints and regulatory provisions while also ensuring planning outcomes meet the density and centre objectives of the SEQ Regional Plan and the Affordable Housing Strategy. As part of the action plan for greenfields, two sites were identified on the Gold Coast—Coomera and Helensvale West. At the time both sites had the benefit of the advanced stages of planning processes completed, that being a reasonable infrastructure supply available and a short-term development time frame of up to five years. Since then the department’s greenfield team has been working with council to ensure that outstanding issues for these sites are progressed as a priority. For the Coomera site the work remains ongoing, although the Coomera Town Centre Structure Plan was endorsed by the government in December last year. Its site is in its final stages of planning scheme preparations. There are some sensitive environmental issues for the landowners across the site. Mitigation and offset solutions are being finalised concurrently with the finalisation of the planning process. Development continues outside the town centre. Assessment for more than 1,480 lots is currently underway. The Gold Coast City Council and the Department of Infrastructure and Planning are working together to finalise the planning scheme. We will be doing that soon. The department is playing a coordinating role between council and developers to remove any of the unnecessary regulatory hurdles. For the Helensvale site, all outstanding planning amendments and regulatory hurdles have been finalised and completed, in January this year. The land is available, ready for market, and development in the area continues. Major developments for the Helensvale site are the Stockland Riverstone Crossing, which the member might be aware of, and the Pacific Pines estates. This has been a great achievement as affordable housing has been delivered quickly, allowing for the accommodation of an additional 10,700 residents in less than three years. Mr KILBURN: Minister, I refer to page 2-122 of the Service Delivery Statement. Can you advise the committee how the Airport Link project aims to improve traffic conditions for Queenslanders? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Kilburn for his interest in this project. This is genuinely one of the great congestion-busting projects for Queensland. As we discussed earlier today, with population growth putting enormous pressure on our infrastructure, keeping pace with the building program is a key issue. Addressing congestion is an important part of that. 78 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

The Airport Link project is a key initiative with the long-term strategy to combat congestion on five fronts: building capacity for growth with new roads and infrastructure; efficiency through working smarter to improve the existing network and how it operates; land use and planning outcomes, making sure that available land is used better to make our journeys shorter and easier; improving the wide range of travel options, which means better public transport, cycling and pedestrian services; and addressing travel demand, which means making sure there are smarter ways to move commuters. The Airport Link project will deliver major time savings for people travelling across the city, whether by car or on Brisbane’s busway system. Modelling shows that the Airport Link and the Northern Busway could reduce traffic on Lutwyche Road by up to 45 per cent when it opens in 2012. The Northern Busway will be a great public transport outcome for South-East Queensland. I will notice in my local area how much Airport Link will take traffic of northside arterial roads and suburban streets. It will provide significant time savings for people using those surface roads. The busway will also provide an attractive public transport alternative. As we know, each full bus takes up to 40 cars off the road. That makes a huge difference. The Northern Busway will be able to cater for 47,000 bus passenger trips per day by 2016, five times higher than on the existing road network that is being used. There are a whole lot of other spin-off benefits that the project is delivering for the community. More than 3½ hectares of new parkland will be provided for local residents upon completion of the projects, including a hilltop park at Bowen Hills which I know the member for Brisbane Central is quite excited about. I genuinely know how much inconvenience there has been during the construction phase of this major project, but I hope that some of the benefits that will result, particularly in my area along Kedron Brook, will provide significant other enhancements and benefits for the community, not just the congestion-busting and the public transport benefits. Finally, I will mention again that 1,800 people are working on the project as we speak. The indirect jobs created out of the Airport Link, the Northern Busway and airport roundabout upgrade project are in the order of 10,000 jobs. Ms van LITSENBURG: Minister, I refer to page 2-119 of the SDS. As the member for Redcliffe I am committed to ensuring Moreton, Hays Inlet and all our environmental ecosystems remain as pristine as possible while developing a robust tourist trade. Can you provide details on how regional planning for South-East Queensland will deliver these objectives to the community of Redcliffe? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Ms van Litsenburg for her question. I really appreciate how committed she is to the important green frame around the peninsula. I was speaking earlier in answer to other questions about the importance of the South East Queensland Regional Plan as a major planning document in terms of dealing with the growth in population and providing employment opportunities. It is fundamental to remember that the South East Queensland Regional Plan protects more than 80 per cent of the region from inappropriate urban development. It does it by establishing an urban footprint that contains urban development by establishing policies and programs that must be followed by all agencies in the planning for the region—that is, by councils and state agencies. The draft South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031 was released for public consultation in December 2008. It includes amending regulations that allow small- to medium-scale development to be assessed by relevant local government rather than requiring assessment by the state government. In particular, regulation for tourist activities has been amended to promote opportunities for appropriate tourism development throughout the region. Redcliffe is designated as a major activity centre in the regional plan as it provides employment opportunities and business and retail functions already. Recognition of Redcliffe as an activity centre promotes further development of business and retail activities which will in turn support tourism by providing a vibrant and attractive centre for residents and visitors. The draft South-East Queensland plan identifies areas with significant biodiversity values—Hays Inlet and the northern end of Bramble Bay. These areas are identified as regional landscape and rural production areas in the regional plan to protect them from that large scale urban development. Equally, the draft regional plan contains policies that ensure that any allowable development in these areas does not impact upon biodiversity values. Policies also identify the need to protect biodiversity corridors through management and rehabilitation. The water section of the draft regional plan includes policies to ensure that development within the region is planned and designed to meet water quality objectives and to protect and manage riparian areas to maintain and enhance water quality and biodiversity. The statutory regional plan for SEQ is supported by strategic regional plans including the South East Queensland Natural Resource Management Plan and the South East Queensland Healthy Waterways Strategy. These plans identify targets and actions to guide natural resource management, waterway management and nature conservation in the region. Implementation of these plans, together with the South East Queensland Regional Plan, will ensure protection of our valuable ecosystems. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 79

Mr KILBURN: For much of South-East Queensland the drought emergency is behind us, but I understand that Toowoomba remains in an emergency state. With reference to page 91 of Budget Paper No. 3, could the minister provide advice on the progress of the Toowoomba pipeline? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I want to thank Mr Kilburn for his question and his commitment to making sure that we do not leave behind the people of Toowoomba in the face of the better condition we are in after our significant May rains in South-East Queensland. Toowoomba did not get those rains like that and that is why we are making sure that we are delivering on the Toowoomba pipeline that will help join Toowoomba to the South-East Queensland water grid. It is also a really good outcome in terms of the jobs that are being created. About 261 jobs have been created with the alliance employing at least one-third of its workforce locally. It is great to see those jobs for people in the valley and in Toowoomba and jobs for Queenslanders generally. We are not only delivering on our commitments to jobs but also delivering on that vital infrastructure that we need. In fact, just four months after the first pipe was laid, we are almost two-thirds complete of this phase of the construction. That is more than 23 kilometres of the 38-kilometre pipeline that has been laid. Currently, the storage in the region’s three dams, the Cooby, the Perseverance and the Cressbrook, has fallen to 10.9 per cent. The area is currently on level 5 water restrictions, which is equivalent to Brisbane’s level 6, and prevents all outdoor domestic use. The delivery of this pipeline on time—which it will be—will provide the opportunity for great relief to that area. Toowoomba was in danger of running out of water. We cannot let that happen to one of our great cities—in fact, the garden city, as it has become known. There are a number of issues in relation to the ultimate pipe ownership that needs to be resolved. I understand that the Queensland Water Commission and the Toowoomba Regional Council are continuing their negotiations around that. I in fact met with the Mayor of Toowoomba, Peter Taylor, to discuss some of those issues recently when I was inspecting the pipeline delivery. I am sure those issues will be resolved satisfactorily. Ms van LITSENBURG: With reference to page 91 of Budget Paper No. 3, can you outline how many jobs have been created with the commenced construction of the Wyaralong Dam? What economic benefits are expected for the local community? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I want to thank Ms van Litsenburg for her question. The South-East Queensland water grid, as I have mentioned during the hearing this afternoon, is an election commitment of this government to secure water supplies for South-East Queensland, which was made in the midst of one of the worst droughts in the history of the state. The Wyaralong Dam is the first new South-East Queensland dam project in 20 years, at a cost of some $348 million, and it is on track to be completed by mid-2011—a good six months earlier than the regulated date. The construction of the Wyaralong Dam provides not only an example of this government’s delivery on its election commitments but it is a project delivering on, in 2006, the water grid but also delivering on the election commitments for 2009 around securing jobs for Queenslanders. Construction of the Wyaralong Dam near Beaudesert is already paying dividends for locals in particular. To date, over 200 individuals have gained work on the first stage of construction, including the new 5.5 kilometre access road to the dam site. It is expected that 420 jobs will be created during the project, which is being delivered in three packages. There is preconstruction work, the Beaudesert- Boonah Road realignment and the construction of the dam itself. Major earthworks have now started on the Beaudesert-Boonah Road realignment and surfacing is underway on the dam access road. Indirectly, over 70 local businesses have gained work from the project, ranging from accommodation providers, cleaners, caterers, plant suppliers, fencers, plumbers, earthmovers, crane hire, security, waste removal, construction material providers, boilermakers and electricians. When I visited the site a little bit earlier this year I was given a tour in a Moxy truck by Daniel MacNellie, one of the many locals who has gained work. Daniel had previously had to travel to Mackay for work and he spent a long time away from his family. So the Wyaralong Dam project has given him a chance to work closer to home with his wife and his two young children. Once complete, the Wyaralong Dam will provide a significant attraction for visitors and tourism expenditure. A draft recreation master plan shows that the creation of some 40 kilometre of bushwalking, horse riding and mountain biking are focused around two trail heads complementing existing facilities in the region in terms of tourism. Other benefits, such as the upgrade of the Beaudesert-Boonah Road, should see improved road safety and shorter travel times in the local community as well. CHAIR: As the member for Waterford, I represent people who live in those outer urban areas you referred to earlier. One of the things close to my heart is ensuring that affordable housing is a reality for my constituents. Can you provide details of what the government has managed to deliver since the launch of the 2007 Housing Affordability Strategy? 80 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

Mr HINCHLIFFE: Thank you, Mr Chairman, and I appreciate your keen interest in this issue. The Housing Affordability Strategy that you refer to seeks to provide better access to appropriate housing that will assist individuals, families and communities and contribute to the overarching social and economic wellbeing of the state. If we cannot afford to have somewhere to live, that is one of the fundamentals that is going to damage the rest of the viability of activity in our economy and in our community. For example, in South-East Queensland, in terms of the strategy that we are implementing, the area has accounted for a lot of growth. Recent ABS statistics show that a record 2,000 people are arriving in Queensland each and every week. So under the strategy, the Queensland government in less than two years has delivered, one, the creation of the Urban Land Development Authority; two, improved efficient planning and development systems; three, improved land supply for development; four, enhanced monitoring, particularly in the monitoring of supply of land and housing; and finally, five, simplified standard and transparent infrastructure charging is available through measures that were brought in under the strategy. Additionally, in the past 12 months we have also seen the government reduce stamp duty contributions for first home buyers. So that is a significant housing affordability measure as well. This strategy is focused on getting land and housing on the market more quickly and at a lower cost, achieving a more competitive and responsive land and housing market by reducing time lines and associated holding costs which are a big impost on industry. Within two years of the establishment of the ULDA—the Urban Land Development Authority—there has been declared three urban development areas, Bowen Hills and Northshore Hamilton in March 2008, and Fitzgibbon in July 2008. On these, the UDLA will deliver a range of housing choices through a mix of densities, types, designs, tenures and affordability to promote community diversity and sustainability within those particular areas. The Bowen Hills site is ideally positioned to capitalise on the overflow of the CBD office market and the areas’s existing media and health related precincts. Northshore Hamilton is a 304-hectare site that is strategically located eight kilometres from the CBD on the Brisbane River, close to Brisbane’s airport, the Gateway Motorway and the Australia TradeCoast. The UDLA at Fitzgibbon is approximately 295 hectares and is located 12 kilometres north of Brisbane. So in each those areas we will see the delivery of that mix of housing type and mix of housing outcomes. By way of illustration, on that Fitzgibbon site we will see the delivery of two-thirds of the housing product delivered at a cost that is the lower than the median house price in Brisbane. CHAIR: I call the member for Gympie. Mr GIBSON: Minister, so little time and so many questions about Traveston. Where will I begin? I have just received an answer to a question on notice that we asked you in which you indicated that the expenditure for the project to the end of April 2009 is $481.8 million. Page 90 of Budget Paper No. 3 refers to $490 million, and I am quite comfortable with the slight difference between the figures. When I conducted a search of Queensland land titles, it reveals that Queensland Water Infrastructure—the special purpose vehicle—has purchased over $523 million worth of property in the ponded area. Can you advise why over $41 million of expenditure on the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam is not contained in the budget papers and is not being revealed to the people of Queensland? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Gibson for his question. While reiterating the importance— Mr GIBSON: We understand. Mr HINCHLIFFE:—of the Traveston Crossing Dam to the South-East Queensland water grid, I can certainly take that one on notice and get you a reply during the rest of this session. Mr GIBSON: I am happy to have it taken on notice. It gives me another chance to ask you a question. The $75 million shown in Budget Paper No. 3 at page 93 for the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam is linked to environmental remediation work. Can you give us an undertaking that this means that no preliminary site works are funded under this state budget as detailed under supplementary EIS 2.1.1 page 2-5 and are planned to be undertaken in the financial year 2009-10 should approval be obtained for the dam? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I want to thank Mr Gibson for the question. As you rightly pointed out during the phrasing of your question, the approval of the dam is a matter that is still the subject of the Coordinator- General’s independent environmental assessment and we need to make sure that we reiterate those issues in that context. It is important to appreciate that the early works in the area that were outlined in the supplementary EIS did not consider the delay in approval. They were outlined on the basis that it was as scheduled. So I do not think it is— Mr GIBSON: I am looking at the funding that has been allocated and just confirming that this is for the environmental rehabilitation work and not for preliminary site work. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Absolutely. Those things were not taken into account. This is around those preliminary environmental issues that have been identified as a consequence of the supplementary EIS process. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 81

Mr GIBSON: One last question on Traveston and then I will have to move on to something less interesting. Mr HINCHLIFFE: We can keep going. Mr GIBSON: I note the answers to questions on notice both asked by me and the member for Chatsworth where we sought examples of the type of mitigation measures that are expected to be funded from that $75 million detailed on page 90 of Budget Paper No. 3. I note that in both of those answers to those questions on notice you failed to provide one example. Can you give us just one example of the planned habitat and vegetation restoration that would be funded from that $75 million, or one example of a relevant catchment management activity that will be funded from that $75 million? Mr HINCHLIFFE: I want to thank Mr Gibson for his question and draw to his attention that there are a range of proactive strategies for rehabilitation activities that will enhance the catchment’s existing degraded riparian and aquatic areas. Mr GIBSON: You obviously do not like cattle. I read about your— CHAIR: Member for Gympie, I will explain how this works. You ask the questions; the minister answers them. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Those mitigation matters are measures that are being considered by QWI and will be submitted to the Coordinator-General for consideration, but if you want to have some examples I can draw your attention to examples, which include the establishment of the Freshwater Species Conservation Centre— Mr GIBSON: I am aware of that. Mr HINCHLIFFE:—which I am sure you are aware of, a range of habitat and vegetation registration projects that can be delivered and a range of relevant catchment management initiatives. Mr GIBSON: I will ask again: one example, Minister. Surely in coming to a figure of $75 million there would have been some discussion about, ‘Let’s do this. That will cost us a couple of million. We’ll throw that into the pile. Let’s draw on this idea. Perhaps that will cost us $10 million. Put that in the pile.’ I am just seeking one, Minister, just one example. Mr HINCHLIFFE: To answer Mr Gibson’s question, these are matters that are subject to consideration by QWI and will be submitted to the Coordinator-General for his consideration. Mr GIBSON: You have no idea, do you? You have not got a clue. CHAIR: Member for Gympie! Mr HINCHLIFFE: I am happy to flag that these are matters that QWI are considering, and I am happy to confirm any specific examples that might illustrate the broader examples that I have already outlined. But if you are looking for something more specific than examples such as the Freshwater Species Conservation Centre—I think we know what we are talking about there—I am happy to get that information from QWI and provide it. Mr GIBSON: That was the intention of the questions on notice by me and the member for Chatsworth, but I am happy to have it on notice again, and if we can get one example I would be really chuffed. Mr HINCHLIFFE: I think one example was clearly provided in relation to the Freshwater Species Conservation Centre. Mr GIBSON: Minister, I am asking the questions; you answer them, thank you. With regard to the Urban Land Development Authority— Mr HINCHLIFFE: You asked another question then. So I am even happy to give you an answer to that. I would appreciate three minutes if I need it to answer that. CHAIR: We will take a step down. I call the member for Gympie. Mr GIBSON: With regard to the Urban Land Development Authority, under the administrative items section of the SDS, you may have noticed that the UDIA last week released a report showing that Queensland needs 1,000 homes a week every week for the next year to meet its growing population but is currently building only 500 homes a week every week. You recently answered a question on notice that showed that only 280 blocks of land will be released through the ULDA in the next 12 months. This represents a shortfall of over 25,000 homes. How is this a good outcome for Queensland? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Mr Gibson, I can assure you that, while the Urban Land Development Authority is a fantastic initiative of this government that will provide excellent leadership across industry and particularly to local authorities around the delivery of developable land in a way that responds to the challenges of a growing state and the need to include sustainability outcomes and high-quality urban design outcomes, it is not the only way in which urban land is being delivered in our state. 82 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 16 Jul 2009

I understand the issues that have been raised by the UDIA, but it is the leadership that the ULDA will show, through some of those projects I have mentioned already in answer to questions, and the assistance of measures contained within the Sustainable Planning Bill that is before the House—and I will not go into great detail about it because that would cause a problem with our standing orders—that will provide a better framework for the delivery of land infrastructure. While I am at it, I have an answer to a question that was raised, if the committee would like to receive that. It was a question from Mr Gibson about the expenditure on the South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program projects by type—that is, roads, public transport, health, water et cetera—for 2008-09 and also the 2009-10 budget and forward estimates and a breakdown of funding measures. In terms of infrastructure class, if we can put it that way—this is the figures for estimated investment over the life of the plan—for transport it is $94 billion. Sorry, I have the wrong figure here. Mr SEENEY: I suggest the minister table the answer and put us all out of our misery. CHAIR: The minister has to offer to table it. Mr SEENEY: I present the minister with the opportunity to table it. Mr HINCHLIFFE: I thank Mr Seeney for his kindness, but I can, after a bit of a struggle, get this out. The infrastructure class, transport—these figures are in millions of dollars. Mr GIBSON: Sorry, millions? Mr HINCHLIFFE: Millions of dollars. It is 94,624. Industry development, 136; water, 4,559; energy—and I should note this is up to the 2012-13 year—3,312; health, 5,804; education and training, 2,901; community services, 3,570; regional sport and recreation, 184— Mr GIBSON: Sorry to interrupt. The original question was by project. If that information is not there, I am still happy to take it on notice. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Sorry, that is not what was provided to us. It does not say ‘by projects by type’. Mr GIBSON: ‘Infrastructure projects by type.’ Mr HINCHLIFFE: It does not say ‘by projects by type’, Mr Gibson. Mr GIBSON: I am not sure what you have been presented with, but certainly what I presented to the committee states ‘advise expenditure of South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan and Program infrastructure projects by type, listing down for 2008-09 estimated actual, 2009-10 budget and forward estimates and provide a breakdown on local, federal, state, GOC and private sector contribution investments’. I am happy to take that on notice and have the detail provided. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Let me give you more of the information in terms of a breakdown of the government sector and different sectors that have contributed, and we can make sure that we provide the information that you are seeking on notice. CHAIR: You are entitled to answer the question. I assume you have the same question that I have. We all have the same question? Excellent. Mr HINCHLIFFE: But it does not say ‘by project by type’; it says ‘projects by type’. CHAIR: It is alright to answer the question. It is also your opportunity to take it on notice— whatever you prefer, Minister. Mr HINCHLIFFE: I am happy to take it on notice and make sure we provide the answer to the question as it has been provided to me. CHAIR: That concludes the consideration of the estimates for the portfolio of the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning. Minister, on behalf of the deputy chair and the committee, I thank you, your staff and the department for their participation in today’s proceedings. Mr HINCHLIFFE: Can I thank you, Mr Chair, your committee, the committee staff, Hansard and other parliamentary officers who have supported the estimates process. I also take this opportunity to express my appreciation to my departmental officers and ministerial staff, who have provided significant support in the preparation for this hearing. In conclusion, I also wish my son a happy 12th birthday. CHAIR: I think we all do. Mr GIBSON: From our side of politics, I express our thanks to the minister and his staff and also to our committee staff for the great work they have done over a very long day and at times an enjoyable one. Thank you. CHAIR: Before we conclude, I would also like to thank other committee members; the deputy chair, the member for Callide; the committee secretariat, Renee Easten and Jenny North; Hansard of course, who have put up with us all day; and the parliamentary attendants for their assistance today. 16 Jul 2009 Estimates Committee C—Infrastructure and Planning 83

Mr HINCHLIFFE: With my very great apologies to Hansard at this late stage, I do have a minor correction I wish to make. I gave an answer earlier in relation to outstanding claims associated with the Tugun desalination plant and made a reference to ‘with the exception of three new claims’. It should have actually been ‘four new claims’. CHAIR: That concludes the committee’s consideration of the matters referred to it by the parliament on 3 June 2009. I declare the hearing closed. Committee adjourned at 5.44 pm.