DOCSLIB.ORG

Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter 46:1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter Volume 46: No. 1 “Shakespeare led a life of allegory: his works are the comments on it.” – John Keats May 2010 Shakespeare and Much Ado About Authorship in Media “The King of Hungary’s he Shakespeare Authorship Question incisive review of Shapiro’s book in the ‘Peace’” Thas reached a new level of legitimacy April 2010 edition of The Brooklyn Rail: upon the fresh release of a book devoted Critical Perspectives on Arts, Politics An Earlier Source for an Allusion in to the topic by English professor James and Culture. The reviewer is William S. Measure for Measure Shapiro, Contested Will: Who Wrote Niederkorn, a well-known commentator By Connie Beane Shakespeare? The major media has on the authorship question, and one of embraced the book, and the controversy, the most perceptive observers of its LUCIO by featuring interviews with Shapiro and growing importance. Niederkorn’s 5,000- If the Duke, with the other Dukes, come reviews of his book online, and in English word essay, “Absolute Will,” reveals the not to composition with the King of and American newspapers. Academics inconsistencies, circular reasoning, and Hungary, why then all the dukes fall upon the King. have long ignored, dismissed, and even ridicule of anti-Stratfordian scholars ridiculed those who doubted the Stratford that permeate Shapiro’s book, which has FIRST GENTLEMAN Man as Shakespeare, but the public’s just been published by Simon & Shuster. Heaven grant us its peace, but not the King fascination with the controversy has put Niederkorn describes Alan Nelson’s of Hungary’s. them on the defensive. Shapiro, in his Monstrous Adversary as “one of the recent interview with The Wall Street most bilious biographies ever written,” – Measure for Measure (1.2.1-5) Journal (April 2, 2010), admitted his fears “riddled with errors . and an embar- about this surging public attention. He rassment to scholarship.” In recounting This minor bit of dialogue early in the first stated that Roland Emmerich’s upcom- the recent history of the authorship act of Measure for Measure has puzzled ing film portraying the Earl of Oxford question, Niederkorn also remarks that commentators for years. Scholars such as as Shakespeare, “will be a disaster for The Oxfordian, “the best American J.W. Lever gloss it as a topical reference: those of us who teach Shakespeare.” Yet academic journal covering the authorship “‘the King of Hungary’s peace’ quibbles he also stated that Shakespeare was a question, publishes papers by Stratford- on ‘hungry peace’, a topical pun when “court observer” due to his having “per- ians. By contrast, there is no tolerance English volunteers in Hungary were formed at court over 100 times probably for anti-Stratfordian scholarship at the serving against the Turks. Down-at-heels in the course of his career …” Although conferences and journals Stratfordians ex-soldiers were sometimes nicknamed Oxfordians would agree with the former control.” Niederkorn’s piece was chosen ‘Hungarians’. Cf. Wiv., 1. iii. 21” (Lever statement, the latter about the Stratford as the book review of the week by the 9). Arthur Quiller-Couch and John Dover Man is a fantastic piece of guesswork. National Book Critics Circle. Wilson, in their edition of Measure, In his interview, Shapiro also revealed Perhaps the most notorious Shakes- connected the reference to a post-1604 the new defense strategy that academics peare-related book of the last decade, revision of the play: are being forced to adopt: the sonnets of Contested Will has already been reviewed Shakespeare, written in the first person, in Publishers Weekly and The Chronicle There is no mention of this King of Hungary are not autobiographical, nor are there of Higher Education, The Los Angeles elsewhere in the play, nor is there anything autobiographical sources or references Times, salon.com, The Economist, The in the plot to throw light on the passage anywhere in the Shakespeare canon. Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The London quoted. Only one thing is clear – that the He stated that “either you believe he’s Review of Books, The Guardian and The King of Hungary’s “peace” was something highly undesirable ... (Quiller-Couch, recycling bits and pieces of his life, or Independent and others. The book was also Wilson 104) you believe that he imagined them, and reviewed on the SOS’s website (SOS Online, I like to think that he had the greatest Archives, Dec. 2009). Oxfordian scholars Quiller-Couch and Wilson then proceed imagination of any writer in the language. Richard Whalen and Tom Hunter provide to link the reference to a peace treaty And I don’t want that belittled.” additional reviews in this issue on pp. 7 and Oxfordian scholars and enthusiasts, 12. It appears that the Anti-Anti-Stratfordian (cont’d on p. 14) as well as other anti-Stratfordians, were movement is “at last gasp,” to quote Oxford’s also heartened by a clear-sighted and phrase in Cymbeline (1.5.53). page 2 May 2010 Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter Peter Moore’s Research in New Edition Published quarterly by the Shakespeare Oxford Society erman publisher Verlag Laugwitz has to German audiences. “Peter’s method is P.O. Box 808 Gjust issued The Lame Storyteller, Poor like Lessing’s: disassembling the false Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 and Despised, the collected Shakespeare constructions of established authorities and ISSN 1525-6863 papers of literary historian and Oxfordian trying to gain new ideas from his critical Peter Moore (1949-2007). This collec- work by merging objective historical EDITORS: tion contains nearly thirty articles that analysis with a keen literary sensibility,” Katherine Chiljan appeared in peer-reviewed journals in added Dr. Laugwitz. Ramon Jiménez the U.S., England, Holland and France Editor Gary Goldstein described the PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE: from 1993 to 2006. The volume was new Moore publication. “The first half of Matthew Cossolotto, Chair edited by Gary Goldstein and Dr. Uwe the book focuses on the Sonnets, Hamlet, Brian Bechtold Laugwitz. Moore’s research covers the King Lear, Macbeth and Othello; the second James Boyd following topics: half investigates the chronology of the plays Katherine Chiljan and the controversial authorship issue of the Frank Davis • The Shakespeare plays were written from Shakespeare canon, with Moore deconstruct- John Hamill, ex officio 1585 to 1604 and not 1590 to 1613, as Ramon Jiménez commonly supposed ing the traditional case of Shakespeare from Richard Joyrich • The Rival Poet of the Sonnets was the Stratford, then laying out new evidence that James Sherwood Earl of Essex and the Fair Youth was the Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, wrote Richard Smiley, SOS Webmaster Earl of Southampton the plays.” “What makes Peter Moore’s • Shakespeare’s share of Two Noble Kinsmen work of lasting value to scholars, theater Tel: (914) 962-1717 was written the last year of Elizabeth’s life professionals and the general public,” Fax: (914) 245-9713 – and ended with her death said Goldstein, “is his ability to delineate Email: [email protected] • The dramatist attacked in Ben Jonson’s www.shakespeare-oxford.com Shakespeare’s original intent in his most “On Poet Ape” was Thomas Dekker and important works.” A lieutenant colonel in shakespeareoxfordsociety.wordpress. not Shakespeare the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division, com • Shakespeare used the Bible’s two-witness All contents copyright © 2010 rule involving murder in designing Hamlet’s Moore became a legislative aide to U.S. Shakespeare Oxford Society. inner dynamic Senator John East from North Carolina, The Newsletter welcomes research articles, • Shakespeare adapted the Earl of Surrey’s an official in the Georgia State Department book reviews, letters and news items. Psalm 8 as well as Piers Plowman in writing of Education, and a director at a national Contributions should be reasonably Hamlet’s soliloquies non-profit organization dedicated to dealing concise and, when appropriate, validated • Shakespeare set Christian and pagan with troubled youth. by peer review. Assignment of copyright philosophies against each other in King Dr. Uwe Laugwitz publishes books is required for publication. The views of Lear and mediated the debate through the focusing on Shakespeare and the Eliza- contributors do not necessarily reflect those concept of nature bethan period. Since 1997, Laugwitz has of the Shakespeare Oxford Society as a • Shakespeare used ancient and modern co-published with Robert Detobel the literary and educational organization. notions of time and Epicureanism in annual, Neues Shake-speare Journal, in devising Macbeth’s structure Layout and Printing by St. Martin de both German and English. Gary Goldstein Porres Lay Dominicans, “Peter became one of the most brilliant was former editor and publisher of The New Hope, Kentucky scholars of the Elizabethan period late Elizabethan Review, a peer-reviewed in life,” noted Dr. Laugwitz. “He was history journal and currently is the BOARD OF TRUSTEES not an academic – he did not receive a managing editor of Brief Chronicles: The John Hamill, President doctorate, nor did he teach Shakespeare. Inter-Disciplinary Journal of the Shakes- Richard Joyrich, 1st VP What is special about his insights into peare Fellowship (www. briefchronicles. Matthew Cossolotto, 2nd VP Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Age is com). The Lame Storyteller is available Virginia Hyde, Secretary that they derive from a most intriguing throughout North America for $25 Susan Grimes Width, Treasurer background – military officer, legislative through at www.elizabethanreview.com Brian Bechtold aide, and education official, with degrees or by email: garygoldstein1@bellsouth. James Boyd in engineering and economics (Univ. of net); it is also available from the SOS for Joan Leon Maryland). I would compare his contribu- $25 plus $4.95 shipping (P.O. Box 808, Michael Pisapia tions in the field of Shakespeare studies to Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, 914-962- James Sherwood that of Lessing’s.” Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Peace Treaty of Adrianople

    Peace Treaty of Adrianople

    Peace Treaty Of Adrianople When Matthiew optimizes his inyala situated not unfoundedly enough, is Shelley transuranic? Pillaged Guthrie usually propined some Davy or stonks stochastically. Webster still hurry pyrotechnically while thready Che inosculating that mouldwarp. Discover The Ottomans TheOttomansorg. The did of Adrianople concluded the Russo-Turkish War of 1229 between Russia and the Ottoman Empire to terms favored Russia which gained access week the mouths of the Danube and new territory on the spark Sea. We are upon such confidential print capitalism, and dreams that point it will take for. The top Treaty of Peace signed at San Stefano. Chai to adrianople peace treaties which they should her husband covers different. Of the Peace Conference established a special section whose. Treaty of Peace signed the 24th July 1923 Convention respecting the. To adrianople peace. The Adrianople Treaty 129 and Its European Implications. Treaty of adrianople being a remainder of peace between the. What problems did the peace treaties create? Treaty of lausanne English examples in context Ludwig. Tribal activities and adrianople is an account or purporting to adrianople treaty or not one. Treaty of Adrianople 129 The Complete Timeline. The Peace of Adrianople 156 ended the sock between white Holy. Though they shall at adrianople treaty was paid a unified debt. The toss of Berlin as a reassertion of work authority undermine the Powers. Former Capital saying the Ottoman Empire The wallet of Edirne. The rub of Adrianople was a multi-party treaty that ended the Albanian War of. It is relevant file associated with those granted access thereto that peace, and adrianople require at adrianople peace conference and reassert itself increasingly convinced churchill and turkey.
  • Summer 2007 Shakespeare Matters Page 

    Summer 2007 Shakespeare Matters Page 

    Summer 2007 Shakespeare Matters page 6:4 “Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments...” Summer 2007 11th Annual Shake- speare Authorship Shakespeare—Who Studies Conference Convenes held the Pen? By Bonner Miller Cutting and Earl Showerman Insights Meets Research By Alan Stott oncordia Uni- versity hosted The man of letters is, in truth, ever writing his own biogra- Cits11th an- phy. — Anthony Trollope (1815–82). nual Shakespeare Authorship Studies The marvel of Shakespeare’s genius is that in his secular mir- Conference from ror the divine light also shines. April 12 to 15th, an — John Middleton Murry. occasion marked by many seminal very theatregoer and every reader can perceive the authentic papers, the launch voice, can sense the spirit, in and behind the work of the of the first graduate- Eworld’s leading dramatic poet, known as “William Shake- level programs in speare.” The First Folio (1623) of his collected plays, however, authorship studies, was only published years after his death. Of the actor, one Wil- and the signing of liam Shakespere (1564–1616) — the name never spelt as in the the “Declaration of First Folio — very little is known. Apparently neither manuscript Reasonable Doubt nor letter is extant. The many enigmas surrounding the whole about the Identity phenomenon comprise “the authorship question.” The identity of William Shake- of the Bard, according to Emerson (1803–1882), is “the first of speare.” While this all literary problems.” John Michell1 surveys the candidates with report will attempt a commendable fairness, outlining the history of the search for to summarize the the man who held the pen.
  • Gavin Douglas's Aeneados: Caxton's English and 'Our Scottis Langage' Jacquelyn Hendricks Santa Clara University

    Gavin Douglas's Aeneados: Caxton's English and 'Our Scottis Langage' Jacquelyn Hendricks Santa Clara University

    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 43 | Issue 2 Article 21 12-15-2017 Gavin Douglas's Aeneados: Caxton's English and 'Our Scottis Langage' Jacquelyn Hendricks Santa Clara University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation Hendricks, Jacquelyn (2017) "Gavin Douglas's Aeneados: Caxton's English and 'Our Scottis Langage'," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 43: Iss. 2, 220–236. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol43/iss2/21 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GAVIN DOUGLAS’S AENEADOS: CAXTON’S ENGLISH AND "OUR SCOTTIS LANGAGE" Jacquelyn Hendricks In his 1513 translation of Virgil’s Aeneid, titled Eneados, Gavin Douglas begins with a prologue in which he explicitly attacks William Caxton’s 1490 Eneydos. Douglas exclaims that Caxton’s work has “na thing ado” with Virgil’s poem, but rather Caxton “schamefully that story dyd pervert” (I Prologue 142-145).1 Many scholars have discussed Douglas’s reaction to Caxton via the text’s relationship to the rapidly spreading humanist movement and its significance as the first vernacular version of Virgil’s celebrated epic available to Scottish and English readers that was translated directly from the original Latin.2 This attack on Caxton has been viewed by 1 All Gavin Douglas quotations and parentheical citations (section and line number) are from D.F.C.
  • Catalogue SECTION M "Bookes Lent & Omitted in Ye Formr Catalogue" (Book Sizes Unknown)

    Catalogue SECTION M "Bookes Lent & Omitted in Ye Formr Catalogue" (Book Sizes Unknown)

    Catalogue SECTION M "Bookes lent & omitted in ye formr Catalogue" (Book sizes unknown) 1176. 2 my owne Sermon bookes £0 05 0 Presumably 2 copies of Item no. 451, above. 1177. Alexand: ab Alexand Genialium dierum £0 03 6 Alexander ab ALEXANDRO, Genialium dierum libri sex ... accuratius quam antehac excusi, cu. duplici indice, Paris, 1532 folio Numerous subsequent editions in various book sizes. (DS, p.286) 1178. The history of ye yron age £0 06 6 Jean Nicolas de PARIVAL, The History of this Iron Age wherein is set down the true state of Europe, as it was in the year 1500 ... rendred into English, by B. Harris, London, 1656 ; 1659 folio (STC : P361) 1179. The history of Sweethland £0 07 0 John FOWLER, The History of the troubles of Suethland and Poland, which occasioned the expulsion of Sigismundus the Third ... with his heires ... from the Suethish crown, London, 1656 folio (STC : F1731-F1732) 1180. Plato in latine £0 07 6 Probably an edition of: PLATO, Opera (ed. M. Ficino), Florence, 1484, 1485 Lyons, 1588 folio 1181. Peuceri de divinatione £0 03 6 Caspar PEUCER, Co_entarius de praecipuis divinationum generibus, Wittenberg, 1553 ... Hanover & Frankfurt, 1607 80 183 The library of John Webster 1182. Holy oake upon Rider £0 10 0 John RIDER, Bishop of Killaloe, Riders dictionarie corrected and augpented (English-latin). Wherein Riders index is transformed into a dictionarie etymologicall. any words added (Latin-English) B F(rancis) Holyoke, London, 1606 ... London, 1659 40 (STC : 21032-21036b.7 ; R1442-R1443) 1183. A Greeke Lexicon £0 08 6 1184. 3 of Glaubers bookes £0 03 6 3 volumes by Johann Rudolph GLAUBER.
  • 1 Shakespeare, the Critics, and Humanism 1

    1 Shakespeare, the Critics, and Humanism 1

    N OTES 1 Shakespeare, the Critics, and Humanism 1 . Virgil Heltzel, for example, in his “Introduction,” to Haly Heron’s The Kayes of Counsaile, A Newe Discourse of Morall Philosophie of 1579 (Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press, 1954), p. xv, describes the work as “bringing grave and sober moral philosophy home to men’s business and bosoms.” 2 . W i l l i a m B a l d w i n , A Treatise of Morall Philosophie . enlarged by Thomas Palfreyman , 20th ed. (London: Thomas Snodham, [?]1620), in Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints (Gainesville, Florida, 1967), with an introduction by Robert Hood Bowers. For the editions, see STC 1475–1640, Vol. I, 2nd ed., 1986, Nos. 1253 to 1269; and STC, 1641–1700 , 2nd ed., Vol. I, 1972, Nos. 548, 1620. Also see Bowers, “Introduction,” pp. v–vi. For the purposes of the present work, I will refer to the treatise as Baldwin’s rather than Baldwin- Palfreyman’s. The volume appears as “augmented” or “enlarged” by Palfreyman only with the fifth edition of 1555 (STC 1255.5) and the 1620 edition (first of the two in that year) says it is “the sixth time inlarged” by him but there has been no comparative study of what was originally Baldwin’s and what was Palfreyman’s and what the successive “enlargements” entailed. Baldwin’s treatise, along with Thomas Crewe’s The Nosegay of Morall Philosophie , for example, are purported sayings and quotations from a great num- ber of scattered Ancient and more recent writers, but they are organized into running dialogues or commentaries designed to express the compiler’s point of view rather than to transmit faith- fully the thought of the original writer.
  • Doing Away with the Drab Age

    Doing Away with the Drab Age

    This is a repository copy of Doing away with the drab age. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/79008/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Shrank, C. and Pincombe, M. (2010) Doing away with the drab age. Literature Compass, 7 (3). pp. 160-176. ISSN 1741-4113 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2009.00687.x Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Doing Away with the Drab Age: Research Opportunities in Mid-Tudor Literature (1530-1580) Mike Pincombe (Newcastle University) and Cathy Shrank (University of Sheffield) [printed in Literature Compass 2010] In autumn 1997, a handful of academics met at Newcastle University to give papers at a one-day - conferenceknew, it was called: the first ‘The time Drab that Age a conference Revisited: English had been Literature called on 1530 an era1580’. that wasAs far pretty as any much of the exclud participantsed from the canonical periods on either side of it: the Middle Ages, on the one hand, and, on the other, the Renaissance.
  • General Introduction Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells

    General Introduction Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells

    General introduction Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells In August 1856,a45-year-old American lady by the name of Delia Bacon paid a visit to Stratford-upon-Avon, where she lodged initially at 15 College Street, not far from Holy Trinity Church. She met with the vicar, George Granville, who allowed her access outside normal visiting hours to Shake- speare’s grave, which she wished to investigate in the hope that it concealed solutions to an imagined code which would demonstrate that there were reasons to question received ideas about the authorship of Shakespeare’s works. ‘“If I only had the proper tools”, she complained to herself, “I could lift the stone myself, weak as I am, with no one to help” . A strange weariness overcame her. She left, her mission unaccomplished.’1 We can relate these events around Shakespeare’s grave to numerous aspects of the intellectual and cultural climate of the time which occu- pied the popular imagination: Gothic fiction and drama with their tales of subterranean passages and arcane messages; the questioning of reli- gious orthodoxy; geological discoveries; the authorship of the Homeric poems; archaeological investigations; and the search for the origins of life. Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species was to be published three years later, in 1859. Detective fiction with its emphases on the solving of mys- teries and the imposing of an all-controlling pattern on a world uncertain of itself was beginning to appear. One of its earliest exponents was Edgar Allan Poe, whom Bacon herself had beaten to the prize in a short story competition.
  • 7Th Annual De Vere Studies Conference Shakespeare Question Debated at Smithsonian

    7Th Annual De Vere Studies Conference Shakespeare Question Debated at Smithsonian

    Vol.2:no.4 "Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments..." Summer 2003 Shakespeare 7th Annual De Vere question debated Studies Conference Attendees treated to new at Smithsonian insights and breaking news By Peter Rush By Peter Rush he 2003 Edward de Vere n April 19 the Smithsonian Institution sponsored a day- Studies Conference in long debate pitting three prominent Stratfordian scholars TPortland, Oregon proved Oagainst three noted Oxfordian experts. It was one of—if not to be one of the best in its seven- the—best such debate that this reviewer is aware of. The right year history. Over the course of people were in the room, lots of important issues were raised and three days of papers and panel responded to by both sides, and each side had the opportunity to discussions, some ground- “throw its best stuff” at the other’s strongest arguments. I believe breaking research was pre- that the preponderance of strong, unrefuted arguments was made sented, and in a few cases, news by the Oxfordians, and that the Stratfordians left many crucial was made. Several of the most arguments unanswered, while the Stratfordians strongest suit was newsworthy stories involved the a number of assertions—drawn largely from Alan Nelson’s forth- authorship debate itself and in- coming biography of Oxford—for which “proof” was promised, formation of interest to all and should be demanded. The result was that—unlike some other Shakespeareans. The biggest news of the debates—we were not left standing on “square one,” but rather the Prof.
  • A Deeper Look at the Arthur Golding Canon by Robert Prechter

    A Deeper Look at the Arthur Golding Canon by Robert Prechter

    Fall 2007 Shakespeare Matters page 7 A Deeper Look at the Arthur Golding Canon By Robert Prechter rthur Golding (1536-1606) was the half-brother of Oxford’s age” (Kunitz 225). mother, Mary Golding, and thus Oxford’s uncle. After Ox- Many Oxfordians suspect that Oxford was behind Golding’s Aford’s father died in 1562, “Golding, fourteen years his universally admired work. This article examines some reasons senior, accompanied the young Earl as personal ‘receiver’ of the why this suspicion is justified, explores who contributed the Vere estates which were then apparently among the greatest in prefacing material and attempts to define the Golding canon. the realm”(Barrell Page Number). In that capacity, he served as the A Stark Anomaly “collector of rents and revenue for both Lord Oxford and his sister, The translations of Ovid stand Mary Vere” (Anderson 167). The out as an anomaly—in terms of both year when Golding began looking subject and mode—in the list of after his nephew’s revenues also Golding’s works (Table One, p. 8). happens to be the year that pub- The primary fact we may glean lications began appearing under from this list is that, in an extensive Golding’s name. Perhaps his new canon of 34 books written over a pe- source of income allowed him to riod of nearly half a century, Arthur finance his publishing efforts. Golding never wrote a book of poetry, Oxford and Golding were fantasy, (intended) fiction or anything oil and water with regard to their derived from Greco-Roman mythology religious tastes and literary styles.
  • 1 Medieval and Renaissance Drama Society Newsletter Spring 2018 A

    1 Medieval and Renaissance Drama Society Newsletter Spring 2018 A

    Medieval and Renaissance Drama Society Newsletter Spring 2018 rd a The 53 Congress on Medieval Studies b May 9-13, 2018 MRDS Sponsored Sessions Approaches to Teaching Medieval Drama, Revisited Claire Sponsler: In Memoriam I Session 103, Thursday 3:30, Fetzer 1045 Session 287, Friday 3:30, Fetzer 2016 Organizer: Frank Napolitano, Radford Univ. Organizer: Matthew Evan Davis, McMaster Univ. Presider: Andrew M. Pfrenger, Kent State Univ.–Salem Presider: Matthew Evan Davis Authentic Pedagogy in the Medieval Drama Classroom Crossdressing on the Medieval Stage: A Transgender and Cameron Hunt McNabb, Southeastern Univ. Transracial Sartorial Masquerade The Umpteenth Annual Secunda Pastorum at a Commuter Jesse Njus, Virginia Commonwealth Univ. Campus, or, My Son, the Stolen Sheep Medieval Drama and the “Myth of Communal Life” in the Betsy Bowden, Rutgers Univ. Twenty-First Century Countering Presentism in a Student-Led Performance of Heather Mitchell-Buck, Hood College Mankind Hamilton and Medieval Drama Boyda J. Johnstone, Fordham Univ. Michelle Markey Butler, Univ. of Maryland Not Scripted: Playing with the Archive Gina Di Salvo, Univ. of Tennessee–Knoxville Staging Politics: Tyranny, Repression, and Unrest in Medieval and Renaissance Drama Society Medieval Plays Executive Council Meeting Session 161, Friday 10:00, Valley 3 Eldridge 309 Friday 11:45 a.m. Organizer: Mario B. Longtin, Western Univ. Fetzer 1030 Presider: Mario B. Longtin Medieval and Renaissance Drama Society Tyrannicide, Liberation, and Proto-Reformation Preaching in Business Meeting the Earliest Extant William Tell Play (ca. 1512) Friday 5:15 Stephen K. Wright, Catholic Univ. of America Fetzer 2016 That Reverant Unutile Moi Play: Herod’s Gibberish Ruth Nisse, Wesleyan Univ.
  • FSM Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı.Pdf

    FSM Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı.Pdf

    Uluslararası Fatih Sultan Mehmed Dönemi OSMANLI DÜNYASI SEMPOZYUMU (İdeoloji - Diplomasi - Savaş - Fetih) Bildiriler Kitabı 12-13 Nisan 2019 Proceedings of the International The Ottoman World During The Reign of Fatih Sultan Mehmed Symposium (Ideology - Diplomacy - Warfare - Conquest) 12-13 April 2019 2021 FATİH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİ YAYINLARI: 42 ULUSLARARASI FATİH SULTAN MEHMED DÖNEMİ OSMANLI DÜNYASI SEMPOZYUMU (İDEOLOJİ - DİPLOMASİ - SAVAŞ – FETİH) BİLDİRİLER KİTABI Editör: Prof. Dr. Abdülkadir Özcan e-ISBN 978-605-2386-30-9 Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Yayınları Zeyrek Mahallesi Büyükkaraman Cad. No: 53 Fatih / İstanbul Tel: 0212 521 81 00 Faks: 0212 521 84 84 Web: www.fsm.edu.tr E-Posta: [email protected] Yayınevi Sertifika No: 47914 İstanbul, Haziran, 2021 Genel Yayın Yönetmeni: Asude Tavus Tasarım: Zeynep Küçüker Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi CIP Uluslararası Fatih Sultan Mehmed Dönemi Osmanlı Dünyası Sempozyumu (İdeoloji - Diplomasi - Savaş - Fetih) Bildiriler Kitabı / editör Abdülkadir Özcan – İstanbul: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2021. 548 s. ; 24 cm. – (Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Yayınları; 42) e-ISBN 978-605-2386-30-9 1. Fatih Sultan Mehmed, 1432-1481 -- Kongreler I. Özcan, Abdülkadir II. Dizi DR501/.U58 2021 956.101521092/ULU 2021 Copyright © Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi, 2021 “Uluslararası Fatih Sultan Mehmed Dönemi Osmanlı Dünyası Sempozyumu (İdeoloji - Dip- lomasi - Savaş - Fetih) Bildiriler Kitabı” kitabında yayımlanan yazıların yasal ve bilimsel sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir. Kitabın yayın hakkı Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi’ne aittir. Kitabın hiçbir bölümü yayıncının izni olmaksızın, elektronik, mekanik, fotokopi, kayıt yöntemiyle veya başka bir yöntemle çoğaltılamaz, bir veri muhafaza sisteminde saklanamaz veya iletilemez. Kaynak göstermek kaydıyla alıntı yapılabilir.
  • Hungary Part 2 “Culture Specific” Describes Unique Cultural Features of Hungarian Society

    Hungary Part 2 “Culture Specific” Describes Unique Cultural Features of Hungarian Society

    About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for success (Photo: Hungarian military member Rosie the Riveter, right, is considered a symbol of American feminism). ECFG The guide consists of two parts: Part 1 “Culture General” provides the foundational knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment with a focus on Eastern Europe. Hungary Part 2 “Culture Specific” describes unique cultural features of Hungarian society. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. This section is designed to complement other pre-deployment training (Photo: Hungarian Brig Gen Nándor Kilián, right, chats with USAF Brig Gen Todd Audet). For further information, contact the AFCLC Region Team at [email protected] or visit the AFCLC website at https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AFCLC/. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in title, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the express permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources. GENERAL CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments. A culture is the sum of all of the beliefs, values, behaviors, and symbols that have meaning for a society.