A Tribute to Peter S. Popovich D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2003 As Despite Budget Challenges and Other Judicial Branch with the Transfer of Our Judges and Court Personnel Constraints
A Message From the Chief Justice The Minnesota Judicial Branch children with advocates in court ¶ Continuing the transformation of the enjoyed many milestones in 2003 as despite budget challenges and other Judicial Branch with the transfer of our judges and court personnel constraints. the Second (Ramsey County) and continue to focus on four strategic Fourth (Hennepin County) judicial ¶ Seeing concrete results from the areas: Access to Justice, Childrens districts from county to state funding. work of the Childrens Justice Justice, Technology, and Public Trust Initiative, the countrys first But we do not intend to rest on these and Confidence. These milestones statewide reform of the child accomplishments. The Judicial include: protection system. Branch continues to search for new ¶ Launching the Minnesota Court opportunities to better serve the public, Information System (MNCIS) in three more effectively target the problems counties and preparing to roll out that bring people into court in the first the system statewide. MNCIS will place, and use our budget as link court records, improving efficiently as ever. information sharing among courts The budget challenges faced by the and law enforcement agencies. state in 2003 have impacted the ¶ Reviewing initial data collected judiciary as well. Yet, we remain statewide that will help us assess committed to and focused on our racial disparities in the court system overriding responsibility our so we can work to eliminate them. constitutionally prescribed mission of We also marked the 10th resolving the more than 2 million anniversary of the judiciarys work disputes brought to our courts each toward erasing racial bias in our year. -
ANNUAL REPORT a Message from the Chief Justice
2003 ANNUAL REPORT A Message From the Chief Justice The Minnesota Judicial Branch children with advocates in court ¶ Continuing the transformation of the enjoyed many milestones in 2003 as despite budget challenges and other Judicial Branch with the transfer of our judges and court personnel constraints. the Second (Ramsey County) and continue to focus on four strategic Fourth (Hennepin County) judicial ¶ Seeing concrete results from the areas: Access to Justice, Childrens districts from county to state funding. work of the Childrens Justice Justice, Technology, and Public Trust Initiative, the countrys first But we do not intend to rest on these and Confidence. These milestones statewide reform of the child accomplishments. The Judicial include: protection system. Branch continues to search for new ¶ Launching the Minnesota Court opportunities to better serve the public, Information System (MNCIS) in three more effectively target the problems counties and preparing to roll out that bring people into court in the first the system statewide. MNCIS will place, and use our budget as link court records, improving efficiently as ever. information sharing among courts The budget challenges faced by the and law enforcement agencies. state in 2003 have impacted the ¶ Reviewing initial data collected judiciary as well. Yet, we remain statewide that will help us assess committed to and focused on our racial disparities in the court system overriding responsibility our so we can work to eliminate them. constitutionally prescribed mission of We also marked the 10th resolving the more than 2 million anniversary of the judiciarys work disputes brought to our courts each toward erasing racial bias in our year. -
Results of Elections of Justices to the Minnesota Supreme Court 1857 – 2016 ______
RESULTS OF ELECTIONS OF JUSTICES TO THE MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT 1857 – 2016 ______ COMPILED BY DOUGLAS A. HEDIN 1. The Election Code The Minnesota Constitution, ratified by voters on October 13, 1857, imposed conditions on state judges that were far more restrictive than the standard for federal judges set by Article III, §1, of the U. S. Constitution. Rather than serve “during good behavior,” equivalent to “lifetime” employ- ment, judges on the state supreme court and lower courts were elected to short terms. Article 6, §3, provided: The judges of the supreme court shall be elected by the electors of the state at large, and their terms of office shall be seven years and until their successors are elected and qualified. The inclusion of a requirement of an elected judiciary in the 1857 constitution, besides being a reaction against the policy of presidential appointments to the court during the territorial period, 1 reflected the prevailing belief in the wisdom of the people; popularly-elected judges, it was supposed, would protect the rights and interests of the people; and a wayward judge could be checked at the next election. 2 Each judicial election since 1857 has been conducted according to an election code, which the legislature has amended, revised, reformed, and transformed many times. Unlike contests for executive and legislative 1 For the politics behind the selection of each of the eleven justices to the territorial supreme court, see my article, “‘Rotation in Office’ and the Territorial Supreme Court, 1849-1857” (MLHP, 2010). 2 Minnesota was not alone in requiring the election of its judiciary. -
SPJ Page One Program 2016
The Minnesota Professional Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists presents: The 2016 Page One Awards June 15, 2016 Town & Country Club, St. Paul The Minnesota Professional Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists Page One Awards Banquet June 15, 2016 7:00 p.m. Welcome Jonathan Kealing MN SPJ Chapter President Student Scholarships Presented by Jenna Ross MN SPJ Board member Presented to Jacob Belgum and Ellis Williams Peter S. Popovich Award Presented by Anna Pratt MN SPJ Board Member Presented to Paul McEnroe President's Award Presented by Jonathan Kealing MN SPJ Chapter President Keynote Jonathan Capehart Journalist and Editorial Board Member Washington Post Page One Awards Presented Jana Shortal KARE 11 Student Scholarship Award Winners Each year, the Minnesota Society of Professional Journalists board of directors selects two college students studying in the field of journalism to receive its annual student scholarship. This year, MNSPJ is pleased to award two $2,000 scholarships. The funds for the scholarship are generated, in part, through your purchases at the Page One Awards Silent Auction. In addition, the board traditionally directs a portion of the local membership dues to fund the scholarships. The scholarship application process is highly competitive, and applicants must either be enrolled in a post-secondary institution in Minnesota or be a Minnesota high school graduate enrolled in a post-secondary institution outside of Minnesota. Jacob Belgum, of Atwater, Minn., is a junior at Augustana University, where he is studying journalism and accounting. After years reporting and editing for the campus paper, Belgum is set to become the editor-in-chief of the Augustana Mirror next year. -
The Minnesota Court of Appeals: Arguing To, and Limitations Of, A
William Mitchell Law Review Volume 35 | Issue 4 Article 10 2009 The innesotM a Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, an Error-correcting Court Sam Hanson Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Hanson, Sam (2009) "The inneM sota Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, an Error-correcting Court," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 35: Iss. 4, Article 10. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol35/iss4/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Hanson: The Minnesota Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, a THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS: ARGUING TO, AND LIMITATIONS OF, AN ERROR-CORRECTING COURT Sam Hanson† Assisted by Jonathan Schmidt†† and Tara Reese Duginske††† I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1262 II. HISTORY ................................................................................... 1264 III. PURPOSE AND FUNCTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS ......... 1267 IV. COURT OF APPEALS RECOGNIZES ITS LIMITATIONS AS AN ERROR-CORRECTING COURT .................................................. 1268 V. THE ERROR-CORRECTING LIMITATION APPLIES TO AREAS BEYOND THE COMMON LAW ................................................. -
Order Opinions”—The Public's Perception of Injustice Kerri L
William Mitchell Law Review Volume 21 | Issue 4 Article 6 1996 "Order Opinions”—The Public's Perception of Injustice Kerri L. Klover Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Klover, Kerri L. (1996) ""Order Opinions”—The ubP lic's Perception of Injustice," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 21: Iss. 4, Article 6. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol21/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Klover: "Order Opinions”—The Public's Perception of Injustice "ORDER OPINIONS"-THE PUBLIC'S PERCEPTION OF INJUSTICE Ideas, ideals and great conceptions are vital to a system ofjustice, but itmust have more than that-there must be delivery and execution. Concepts of justice must have hands and feet or they remain sterile abstractions. The hands andfeet we need are efficient means and methods to carry out justice in every case in the shortest possible time and at the lowest possible cost. This is the challenge to every lauyer andjudge in America.I I. INTRODUCTION ................................ 1226 II. HISTOICAL OVERVIEW ........................... 1231 A. History of the Minnesota Court of Appeals .......... 1231 B. Overview ofJudicial Decisions.................... 1236 1. History of Unpublished Opinions in the Federal Courts 1238 2. History of Unpublished Opinions in the Minnesota Court of Appeals .......................... 1241 a. -
Annual Hennepin County 2020 Bar Memorial
State of Minnesota District Court County of Hennepin Fourth Judicial District Special Session: Annual Hennepin County 2020 Bar Memorial Convening of the Special Session of Hennepin County District Court Chief Judge Toddrick S. Barnette Presiding Invocation The Honorable Kerry W. Meyer Hennepin County District Court Introduction of Special Guests Recognition of Deceased Members Esteban A. Rivera, 2020-21 President Hennepin County Bar Association Remarks and Introduction of Speaker Jeffrey M. Baill, 2019-20 President Hennepin County Bar Association Memorial Address Tom Nelson, Partner Stinson LLP Musical Selection Lumina Memorials Presented to the Court Kathleen M. Murphy Chair, Bar Memorial Committee Presentation Accepted Court Adjourned Music by Laurie Leigh Harpist Presented by the Hennepin County Bar Association in collaboration with the Hennepin County District Court ABOUT THE BAR MEMORIAL The Hennepin County Bar Association and its Bar Memorial Committee welcome you to this Special Session of the Hennepin County District Court to honor members of our profession with ties to Hennepin County who passed away. We take this moment to recognize and thank Chief Judge Ivy S. Bernhardson for her extraordinary leadership in collaboration with the HCBA Bar Memorial Committee for the past four years. Judge Bernhardson’s term as chief judge ended in June 2020. We now welcome Chief Judge Toddrick S. Barnette as the convenor of this Special Session. We have traced the history of our Bar Memorial back to at least 1898, in a courthouse that is long gone, but had a beauty and charm that made it a fitting location for this gathering. We say “at least 1898,” because there is speculation that the practice of offering annual unwritten memorials began in 1857. -
2014 Public Law Section Awards on May 16, 2014, the Public Law Section Presented Its Annual Awards of Excellence
2014 Public Law Section Awards On May 16, 2014, the Public Law Section presented its annual awards of excellence. The following articles are from presentation comments made at the awards ceremony or from nomination letters submitted on behalf of the recipient. Rosalie E. Wahl Judicial Award of Excellence: Honorable Thomas J. Kalitowski The Honorable Thomas J. Kalitowski Award presentation and comments by Kim Buechel Mesun. Judge Kalitowski was appointed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals by Governor Perpich in November 1987 at the age of 39. He was the 14th judge appointed to the newly created court. He brought to that court experience as a public lawyer, working with the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office from 1973-75. He also had extensive administrative experience with the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture (Asst. Commissioner 1975-77), Minnesota Water Planning Board and Upper Mississippi River Basin Assoc. (Chairman 1977-83), Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (Chair 1983-84), Environmental Division of the State Planning Agency (Director 1983-84), and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Commissioner 1984-87). During his 26 1/2 years on the court of appeals in addition to being an excellent jurist, he served the judicial system in many other capacities serving on various committees, councils, commissions and panels: 2001-02 – Member of Special State Redistricting Panel 2002-04 – Member of Minnesota Supreme Court Juvenile Protection Rules Committee 2006-07 – Member of the Citizens Commission for the Preservation of an Impartial Judiciary 2008-09 – Member of the Minnesota Supreme Court Judicial Performance Evaluation Study Committee 2008-14 – At-large Member of the Minnesota Judicial Council (the administrative policy-making authority for the Minnesota Judicial Branch) Judge Kalitowski also served as an Adjunct Professor at the University of Minnesota Law School from 2006-14. -
A Tribute to Peter S. Popovich James F
William Mitchell Law Review Volume 17 | Issue 1 Article 7 1991 A Tribute to Peter S. Popovich James F. Hogg Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Part of the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Hogg, James F. (1991) "A Tribute to Peter S. Popovich," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 17: Iss. 1, Article 7. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol17/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Hogg: A Tribute to Peter S. Popovich A TRIBUTE TO PETER S. POPOVICH DEAN JAMES F. HOGGt The William Mitchell Law Review has decided to dedicate this issue to Chief Justice Peter S. Popovich. I congratulate the members of the Law Review Board on this decision. The year 1983 was one of great change for the court system in Minnesota. An intermediate appellate court, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, was created, providing a formidable new or- ganizational and administrative challenge. Peter S. Popovich was named by Governor Rudy Perpich as the first Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals. In the four years he held that position Chief Judge Popovich produced and led an efficient, most hard-working, and respected court. From the beginning, the workload was beyond expectations and only a firm guiding hand kept the court within targeted timeliness for handling of cases. -
Results of Elections of Justices to the Minnesota Supreme Court 1857 – 2018
Results of Elections of Justices to the Minnesota Supreme Court 1857 – 2018 ______ Compiled and Annotated By Douglas A. Hedin Editor, MLHP October • 2019 1 1. Introduction In the first chapter of the first volume of A History of the Criminal Law of England published in 1883, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen writes of the difficulty of writing the history of law: The law of England as a whole, or even the criminal law as a whole, can scarcely be said to have a history. There is no such series of continuous connected changes in the whole system as the use of the word "history" implies. Each particular part of the law, however, has been the subject of such changes. The law as to perjury and the definition of the crime of murder have each a history of their own, but the criminal law regarded as a whole is like a building, the parts of which have been erected at different times, in different styles and for different purposes. Each part has a history which begins at its foundation and ends when it reaches its present shape, but the whole has no history for it has no unity. How then is the history of the whole to be related? If an account of each successive change affecting any part is given in the order of time, the result is that it is impossible to follow the history of any one part, and the so called history becomes a mass of unconnected fragments. If, on the other hand, the history of each part is told uninterruptedly, there is a danger of frequent repetitions. -
The Impact of the Minnesota Court of Appeals Upon Civil Litigation
William Mitchell Law Review Volume 35 | Issue 4 Article 15 2009 Significant Weight: The mpI act of the Minnesota Court of Appeals upon Civil Litigation Richard L. Pemberton Paul S. Almen Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Pemberton, Richard L. and Almen, Paul S. (2009) "Significant Weight: The mpI act of the Minnesota Court of Appeals upon Civil Litigation," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 35: Iss. 4, Article 15. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol35/iss4/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Pemberton and Almen: Significant Weight: The Impact of the Minnesota Court of Appeals SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT: THE IMPACT OF THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS UPON CIVIL LITIGATION Richard L. Pemberton† and Paul S. Almen†† I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1298 II. WHAT THEY SAY ................................................................... 1300 A. Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Russell A. Anderson, Retired ............................................................ 1300 B. Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge, Harriet Lansing. ........ 1301 C. Wil Fluegel, Fluegel Law Office ....................................... -
Results of Elections of Justices to the Minnesota Supreme Court 1857 – 2010 ______
RESULTS OF ELECTIONS OF JUSTICES TO THE MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT 1857 – 2010 ______ COMPILED BY DOUGLAS A. HEDIN 1. The Election Code The Minnesota Constitution, ratified by voters on October 13, 1857, imposed conditions on state judges that were far more restrictive than the standard for federal judges set by Article III, §1, of the U. S. Constitution. Rather than serve “during good behavior,” equivalent to “lifetime” employment, judges on the state supreme court and lower courts were elected to short terms. Article 6, §3, provided: The judges of the supreme court shall be elected by the electors of the state at large, and their terms of office shall be seven years and until their successors are elected and qualified. The inclusion of a requirement of an elected judiciary in the 1857 constitution, besides being a reaction against the policy of presidential appointments to the court during the territorial period, 1 reflected the prevailing belief in the wisdom of the people; popularly-elected judges, it was supposed, would protect the rights and interests of the people; and a wayward judge could be checked at the next election. 2 1 For the politics behind the selection of each of the eleven justices to the territorial supreme court, see my article, “‘Rotation in Office’ and the Territorial Supreme Court, 1849-1857” (MLHP, 2010). 2 Minnesota was not alone in requiring the election of its judiciary. For articles on the rise of popular elections for the judiciary in other states in 1 Each judicial election since 1857 has been conducted according to an election code, which the legislature has amended, revised, reformed, and transformed many times.