DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient Greek Tyranny: a New Phenomenon Or a New Name for an Old Phenomenon?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ancient Greek Tyranny: a New Phenomenon Or a New Name for an Old Phenomenon? Durham E-Theses Ancient Greek Tyranny: A New Phenomenon or a New Name for an Old Phenomenon? TAYLOR, JAMES,ROBERT,FRANCIS How to cite: TAYLOR, JAMES,ROBERT,FRANCIS (2017) Ancient Greek Tyranny: A New Phenomenon or a New Name for an Old Phenomenon? , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12086/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Abstract The standard view of Greek tyranny is that it was a unique phenomenon in the ancient Greek world, representing neither continuity nor a long-lived institution. The turannoi are generally described as illegitimate leaders who seized power with the support of the lower classes, usurping the rule of the aristocrats. This school of thought locates the origins of Greek tyranny in the supposed changes in the economic and social climate around the seventh and sixth centuries B.C. Although the image of the tyrant as a populist leader has come under attack in recent years, there has been no attempt to challenge the theory that tyranny was a new phenomenon in the seventh and sixth centuries. This thesis contends that the turannoi were not a new form of ruler born from the supposed turmoil of this period. In reality, the word turannos came to represent a new way of thinking about an old style of leadership. This thesis shows that the Greek tyrants represented a continuation of the form of leadership practised by the Homeric basileis. As new ideas about law and order were formed in the seventh century, such as limited terms of office and magistrates with divided powers, these basileis began to be seen as a negative force by those engaging with the new political concepts and institutions. This change in attitude caused the traditional basileis to become the polar opposite of what was thought to be good for the polis, and not at all compatible with eunomia. Their apparent irreverence towards dikaiosune was at odds with the political atmosphere of the Archaic and Classical Greek polis. These rulers were not seen as representing continuity or a traditional form of rule, but became abhorrent to those practising the new ways of law and politics, attracting the label turannos. 1 Ancient Greek Tyranny: A New Phenomenon or a New Name for an Old Phenomenon? James Robert Francis Taylor A thesis submitted to the Department of Classics and Ancient History at Durham University for the qualification of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 2 Contents Introduction 7 Chapter I: Gaining and Maintaining Power in Homeric Society 23 Chapter II: Archaic Society 98 Chapter III: Archaic Tyrants 160 Chapter IV: Classical Tyrants 227 Conclusion 289 Bibliography 296 3 Acknowledgements A number of individuals have assisted me in the completion of this project, not least my parents and grandparents, Michael and Susan Taylor and Barry and Margaret Payne. Without their generous and wholehearted support this work would not have been possible and I am pleased to dedicate this thesis to them as a small gesture of thanks. Dr Mirko Canevaro and Dr David Lewis provided me with helpful and sage advice and I am grateful to them for readily sharing their knowledge and good sense with me. I would also like to thank Dr Andrej Petrovic for his advice regarding the thesis and general guidance. I must also thank Barnaby Chesterton and Donald MacLennan for reading and commenting on various parts of the thesis and providing helpful comments. It is most important that I thank Professor E.M Harris for his overall guidance as the principal supervisor of this thesis. Professor Harris has been a steady source of support throughout this project and has generously shared his immense knowledge of Greek history with me. Professor Harris’ highly professional and considerate approach to me and to this project enabled its completion and I am extremely grateful for the hard work and generosity he has shown on my behalf. 4 Abbreviations Abbreviations are from the OCD. When not available in the OCD they are the author’s. FGrH F. Jacoby, Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (1923-) Fornara C.W. Fornara (ed.), Archaic Times to the end of the Peloponnesian War, 2nd edn.: Translated Documents of Greece and Rome 1 (1983) IC M. Guarducci (ed.), Inscriptiones Creticae, 4 vols (1935-1950) IG Inscriptiones Graecae (1873-) IvO Inschriften von Olympia, ed. W. Dittenberger and K. Purgold (1896) Koerner R. Koerner, Inschriftliche Gesetzestexte der frühen griechischen Polis (1993) LSAG L. Jeffery, Local Scripts of Archaic Greece, 2nd edn., rev. A. Johnston (1990) Meiggs and Lewis R. Meiggs and D. Lewis (eds.), A selection of Greek historical inscriptions to the end of the fifth century B.C. (1988) 5 Nomima 1 H. van Effenterre, and F. Ruzé (eds.), Nomima : recueil d'inscriptions politiques et juridiques de l'archaïsme grec. Vol 1 (1994-95). Rhodes and Osborne P.J. Rhodes and R. Osborne (eds.), Greek historical inscriptions, 404-323 BC (2003). SEG Supplementum epigraphicum Graecum (1923-) Tod M.N. Tod (ed.), A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the end of the fifth century B.C. (1946) The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author's prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 6 Introduction a) Previous scholarship Archaic and Classical sources mention many tyrants taking power during the Archaic period. The word turannos is not present in Homer or Hesiod and its sudden appearance in poetry from the seventh century combined with the presence of numerous tyrants in Herodotus’ account of the Archaic period has given the impression that turannoi were a new phenomenon. Historians have viewed these tyrants as a new form of ruler and have tried to explain the rise of tyranny in various ways. None of these theories is satisfactory and a new approach to Greek tyranny is clearly required. Recent developments in the study of Archaic Greek archaeology and historiography have made the traditional theories regarding the rise of tyranny in Greece untenable. In the fields of Greek archaeology and history, new discoveries have totally undermined the reliability of established ideas, such as the Archaic ‘hoplite revolution’ and ‘population explosion’ that were widely accepted and consequently factored into the course of Greek political history. As the study of Greek, particularly Archaic, history developed in the late twentieth and early twenty- first century, phenomena such as the hoplite revolution were either recognised to post-date the first recorded tyrant or, like the so-called Archaic population explosion, demonstrated to have never occurred. As the socio-economic factors that were originally believed to have caused the phenomenon of tyranny have been disproven or shifted chronologically, it has become clear that a new examination of the origins of Greek tyranny is necessary. This thesis shows that the Greek tyrants were not a new form of ruler born out of a period of socio-economic crisis, but an old form of ruler that was demonised by those Greeks who subscribed to the rule-of-law 7 ideology that began to emerge in Greece c.650.1 This introduction will review the most recent scholarship that has contributed to the debate on the origins of Greek tyranny. This will not be a comprehensive review of all scholarship concerned with Greek tyranny, but aims to provide an accurate picture of the development of scholarly explanations for the supposed rise of tyranny in the seventh century. The remainder of the introduction will then provide a summary of the four chapters of the thesis and a section on the methodology for working with the various forms of literary sources. Scholarship on Greek tyranny, and particularly its origins, has attributed the rise of tyranny in Greece to a number of factors. There is no single linear development of scholarly thought regarding Greek tyranny but several theories have generally dominated the field. Andrewes’ (1956) book on tyranny was a highly influential work that arguably first popularised the question of the origins of Greek tyranny among Anglophone scholars. Andrewes cited three main factors that caused the rise of tyranny in Greece. These were military, racial and economic factors combined with Anderson’s confident belief in the existence of a fixed class of Greek nobles.2 The racial factor, which described simmering resentment between Dorians and other Greeks never found any real traction among scholars.3 The idea was discarded due to the almost total lack of evidence for an association between Archaic tyrants and racial tensions. Andrewes’ argument was compelled to lean heavily on one or two anecdotes, such as Cleisthenes’ animal epithets for Dorian tribes, rather 1 All dates are B.C. unless otherwise stated. 2 E.g. Andrewes (1956) 84-85. 3 Andrewes (1956) 54-66. Bicknell (1982) 200, for example, has noted that there is no positive evidence for this phenomenon. See also Will (1956) 39-55 and Roussel (1976) 251-253.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE TEMPLE PLUTARCH Rdlted by WHD ROUSE M
    THE TEMPLE PLUTARCH Rdlted by W. H. D. ROUSE M_ PLUTARCH'S LIVES '_ EI_3USHED BY 51R THOMAS NORTH INTEN VOLUMES VOI...TEN THE LIVES OF THE, NOBLE GREEKS AND ROMANS The most of them comparedtogether by that grave learned Philosopher and Historio- grapher Plutarch of Ch_ronea THE LIFE OF ARATUS Ca_tsx'_s the Philosopher (my friend Polycrates) A proverb being afraid as it seemeth of the evil sound of an corrected ancient proverb,not rightly as it was spoken, and in use, but as he thought it best, he wrote in this manner: What childrendo theirancestorscommend, But thosewhomfortunefavoursto the end? But Dionysodorus Trcezenian reproving him, doth rehearsethe proverbrightly as indeed it is : Whatchildrendo theirancestorscommend, Butthosewhoselifeis vertuousto the end? Saying,that this proverb stoppeth their mouthswho of themselves are unworthy of praise, and yet are still boning of the vertaes of their ancestors, whose praisethey highly extol. But beforethose that (as Pindarulsaith) : Domatchtheirnobleancestorsin prowessoftheirown, Andby theirfruits comme_athed stockwhencethey themsd,resaregrown. x A PLUTARCH'S LIVES The corn- (As thy self that conformest thy life unto the monweal examples and manners of thy vertuous ancestors:) of the it is no small good hap for them, often to remem- Sicy.oa- 1_n$ ber the noble deeds of their parents in hearing them spoken of, or otherwise for themselves oftentimes to remember some notable doings of their parents. For in them, it is not for lack of commendable vertues, that they report others' praise and glory : but in joining their own vertaes, to the vertues of their ancestors, they do increase their glory, as inheriting their vertuous life, a8 challenging their descent by blood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and Its Reflection in the Homeric Epic: the Iliad
    Near East University (NEU) Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of International Relations The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and its Reflection in the Homeric Epic: the Iliad By: Nicolaie A. Şorodoc We certify that the thesis is satisfactory for the award of the Degree of Master of International Relations Examining committee: Prof. Dr. Levent Köker Faculty of Law, Department of Law, NEU Prof. Dr. Jouni Suistola Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, NEU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali Efdal Özkul Faculty of Education, Department of History Teaching, NEU Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Aykut Polatoğlu 1 Jury Report June, 2010 Student Info: Full Name Nicolaie Alin Şorodoc Faculty Economics and Administrative Sciences Institution Near East University Department International Relations Thesis Info: Title: The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and its Reflection in the Homeric Epic the Iliad Abstract: This study tries to go beyond the boundaries of present day issues and examine the evolution of power and politics of the Mycenaean people during the Bronze Age. At each stage, be it big-man leadership, chiefdom or state based society I examine how power and social complexity increases and what were the reasons behind such a phenomenon. I start with some few considerations regarding developments during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age and then I jump to the question of the “coming of the Greeks.” I argue that any explanation of the political life shall start from early stages; it is only then that we might get a measured insight in respect to the workings of political and social institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman
    Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman In his speech On the Crown Demosthenes often lionizes himself by suggesting that his actions and policy required him to overcome insurmountable obstacles. Thus he contrasts Athens’ weakness around 346 B.C.E. with Macedonia’s strength, and Philip’s II unlimited power with the more constrained and cumbersome decision-making process at home, before asserting that in spite of these difficulties he succeeded in forging later a large Greek coalition to confront Philip in the battle of Chaeronea (Dem.18.234–37). [F]irst, he (Philip) ruled in his own person as full sovereign over subservient people, which is the most important factor of all in waging war . he was flush with money, and he did whatever he wished. He did not announce his intentions in official decrees, did not deliberate in public, was not hauled into the courts by sycophants, was not prosecuted for moving illegal proposals, was not accountable to anyone. In short, he was ruler, commander, in control of everything.1 For his depiction of Philip’s authority Demosthenes looks less to Macedonia than to Athens, because what makes the king powerful in his speech is his freedom from democratic checks. Nevertheless, his observations on the Macedonian royal power is more informative and helpful than Aristotle’s references to it in his Politics, though modern historians tend to privilege the philosopher for what he says or even does not say on the subject. Aristotle’s seldom mentions Macedonian kings, and when he does it is for limited, exemplary purposes, lumping them with other kings who came to power through benefaction and public service, or who were assassinated by men they had insulted.2 Moreover, according to Aristotle, the extreme of tyranny is distinguished from ideal kingship (pambasilea) by the fact that tyranny is a government that is not called to account.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues
    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Proper Names
    PROPER NAMES Acca 820 Aurunci 318 Achaeans 266 Ausoniae 41; Ausonii 253 Acheron 23 Achilles 9f., 14-28, 438; and Hector's Bacchus, and music 737 corpse 72-7; and Patroclus 42-58; Bellipotens 8 Achilles and ritual slaughter 82; death Bitias 396 anticipated 43, 45f., 54 Butes 690 Acoetes 30 Aconteus 612 Calydon 270 Adriatic, names for 405 Camilla 432; biography 535-96; name Aeneas 2; account of earlier events 113, 543; tomb 594; guilt 586; death 114; ancestry of 305; bonus I 06; 794-835; place of, in book xi, xiif. bound to kill Tu. 178f.; burial and corpse 892; vanity of 782 Aen. I 08 -19; commander 2-4, Caphereus 260 14 -28, 36; conflict of duties 94; Casmilla 543 deification of 125; Diomedes and Aen. Catillus 640 243-95; diplomacy of I 09; and des­ Chloreus 768 tiny 232; Evander and Aen. 152; Chromis 675 fama and arma of 124; father 184; Cicero 122-32 fights Tu. 434; good king I 06; Cloelia 535-96 Hector and Aen. 289; imperator 79, Clytius 666 446; just 126; magnanimity of 127; Coras 465; 604 mementoes of Dido 72-7; mourner Cybelo 768 39f., 42 58, 34; feeling for Pallas 36; Cyclopes 263 returns to narrative 904; victorious Cyrene 535-96 4; warrior 126; warrior hero 282fi; weeps 29, 41 Dardanidis 353 Aethon 89 Dardanium 472 Agamemnon 266ff. Demophoon 675 Amasenus 547 Dercennus 850 Amaster 673 Diana 535-96, 537, 591; vengeance of Amazon 648 857 Amazones Threiciae 659 Dido and cloaks given to A en. 72-7; Amazons 535-96, 571, Appx.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sons and Fathers in the Catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233
    Sons and fathers in the catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233 ANNETTE HARDER University of Groningen [email protected] 1. Generations of heroes The Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius brings emphatically to the attention of its readers the distinction between the generation of the Argonauts and the heroes of the Trojan War in the next genera- tion. Apollonius initially highlights this emphasis in the episode of the Argonauts’ departure, when the baby Achilles is watching them, at AR 1.557-5581 σὺν καί οἱ (sc. Chiron) παράκοιτις ἐπωλένιον φορέουσα | Πηλείδην Ἀχιλῆα, φίλωι δειδίσκετο πατρί (“and with him his wife, hold- ing Peleus’ son Achilles in her arms, showed him to his dear father”)2; he does so again in 4.866-879, which describes Thetis and Achilles as a baby. Accordingly, several scholars have focused on the ways in which 1 — On this marker of the generations see also Klooster 2014, 527. 2 — All translations of Apollonius are by Race 2008. EuGeStA - n°9 - 2019 2 ANNETTE HARDER Apollonius has avoided anachronisms by carefully distinguishing between the Argonauts and the heroes of the Trojan War3. More specifically Jacqueline Klooster (2014, 521-530), in discussing the treatment of time in the Argonautica, distinguishes four periods of time to which Apollonius refers: first, the time before the Argo sailed, from the beginning of the cosmos (featured in the song of Orpheus in AR 1.496-511); second, the time of its sailing (i.e. the time of the epic’s setting); third, the past after the Argo sailed and fourth the present inhab- ited by the narrator (both hinted at by numerous allusions and aitia).
    [Show full text]
  • The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general. Barley, N. D How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Barley, N. D (2012) The battlefield role of the Classical Greek general.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43080 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Swansea University Prifysgol Abertawe The Battlefield Role of the Classical Greek General N. D. Barley Ph.D. Submitted to the Department of History and Classics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 ProQuest Number: 10821472 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIET OF Henirg m. Sage 1891 .A^^^ffM3. islm^lix.. 5931 CornelJ University Library BL 25.H621911 The higher aspects of Greek religion.Lec 3 1924 007 845 450 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924007845450 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES 1911 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES THE HIGHER ASPECTS OF GREEK RELIGION LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD AND IN LONDON IN APRIL AND MAY igii BY L. R. FARNELL, D.Litt. WILDE LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON WILLIAMS AND NORGATE GARDEN, W.C. 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT 1912 CONTENTS Lecture I GENERAL FEATURES AND ORIGINS OF GREEK RELIGION Greek religion mainly a social-political system, 1. In its earliest " period a " theistic creed, that is^ a worship of personal individual deities, ethical personalities rather than mere nature forces, 2. Anthrqgomorphism its predominant bias, 2-3. Yet preserving many primitive features of " animism " or " animatism," 3-5. Its progress gradual without violent break with its distant past, 5-6. The ele- ment of magic fused with the religion but not predominant, 6-7. Hellenism and Hellenic religion a blend of two ethnic strains, one North-Aryan, the other Mediterranean, mainly Minoan-Mycenaean, 7-9. Criteria by which we can distinguish the various influences of these two, 9-1 6. The value of Homeric evidence, 18-20. Sum- mary of results, 21-24. Lecture II THE RELIGIOUS BOND AND MORALITY OF THE FAMILY The earliest type of family in Hellenic society patrilinear, 25-27.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Society by Mark Cartwright Published on 15 May 2018
    Ancient Greek Society by Mark Cartwright published on 15 May 2018 Although ancient Greek Society was dominated by the male citizen, with his full legal status, right to vote, hold public oce, and own property, the social groups which made up the population of a typical Greek city-state or polis were remarkably diverse. Women, children, immigrants (both Greek and foreign), labourers, and slaves all had dened roles, but there was interaction (oen illicit) between the classes and there was also some movement between social groups, particularly for second-generation ospring and during times of stress such as wars. The society of ancient Greece was largely composed of the following groups: male citizens - three groups: landed aristocrats (aristoi), poorer farmers (periokoi) and the middle class (artisans and traders). semi-free labourers (e.g the helots of Sparta). women - belonging to all of the above male groups but without citizen rights. children - categorised as below 18 years generally. slaves - the douloi who had civil or military duties. foreigners - non-residents (xenoi) or foreign residents (metoikoi) who were below male citizens in status. Classes Although the male citizen had by far the best position in Greek society, there were dierent classes within this group. Top of the social tree were the ‘best people’, the aristoi. Possessing more money than everyone else, this class could provide themselves with armour, weapons, and a horse when on military campaign. The aristocrats were oen split into powerful family factions or clans who controlled all of the important political positions in the polis. Their wealth came from having property and even more importantly, the best land, i.e.: the most fertile and the closest to the protection oered by the city walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Policy in Corinth 421-336 B.C. Dissertation
    POLITICS AND POLICY IN CORINTH 421-336 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by DONALD KAGAN, B.A., A.M. The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by: Adviser Department of History TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD ................................................. 1 CHAPTER I THE LEGACY OF ARCHAIC C O R I N T H ....................7 II CORINTHIAN DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PEACE OF NICIAS . 31 III THE DECLINE OF CORINTHIAN P O W E R .................58 IV REVOLUTION AND UNION WITH ARGOS , ................ 78 V ARISTOCRACY, TYRANNY AND THE END OF CORINTHIAN INDEPENDENCE ............... 100 APPENDIXES .............................................. 135 INDEX OF PERSONAL N A M E S ................................. 143 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................... 145 AUTOBIOGRAPHY ........................................... 149 11 FOREWORD When one considers the important role played by Corinth in Greek affairs from the earliest times to the end of Greek freedom it is remarkable to note the paucity of monographic literature on this key city. This is particular­ ly true for the classical period wnere the sources are few and scattered. For the archaic period the situation has been somewhat better. One of the first attempts toward the study of Corinthian 1 history was made in 1876 by Ernst Curtius. This brief art­ icle had no pretensions to a thorough investigation of the subject, merely suggesting lines of inquiry and stressing the importance of numisihatic evidence. A contribution of 2 similar score was undertaken by Erich Wilisch in a brief discussion suggesting some of the problems and possible solutions. This was followed by a second brief discussion 3 by the same author.
    [Show full text]