DOCSLIB.ORG

An Unsung Issue in Bangladesh' Focus on Various Practical Issues with Prescription of Necessary Legal and Judicial Reformation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Unsung Issue in Bangladesh' Focus on Various Practical Issues with Prescription of Necessary Legal and Judicial Reformation ISSN: 2220-6752 Journal of Judicial Administration Training Institute (A collection of writings on various judicial and legal topics) VOLUME XVIII JUNE 2019 . Judicial Administration Training Institute 15, College Road, Dhaka-1000, Fax : 88-02-9574029 Web: http://jati.judiciary.org.bd E-mail : [email protected] PUBLICATION COMMITTEE BOARD OF ADVISORS Mr. Justice Khondker Musa Khaled Chairman Director General Mr. Md. Golam Kibria Member Director (Training) Mr. S.M. Ziaur Rahman Member Director (Administration) EDITORIAL BOARD Mr. Mir Md. Amtazul Hoque Editor Director (Research & Publication) Dr. Md. Alamgir Assistant Editor Deputy Director (Research & Publication) Mr. Al Asad Md. Mahmudul Islam Member Deputy Director (Training) Ms. Nahid Niazi Member Assistant Director (Training) Ms. Nazmoon Nahar Neepu Member Research Officer Mr. Biplob Kumer Kuri Member Assistant Director (Research & Publication) ISSN 2220-6752 Copyright Judicial Administration Training Institute Published by Judicial Administration Training Institute 15, College Road, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Price Tk. 300.00, US $5 ii DISCLAIMER The analysis, opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this Journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the JATI or any other agencies of Government of Bangladesh. Statements of fact or opinion appearing in JATI JOURNAL are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by the editors or publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the institute. The JATI JOURNAL is published annually and contains articles related to the discipline of law contributed by the resource persons. Brief learned comments on articles published in the JATI JOURNAL, reviews, research papers, reports, features, commentary and other literature on law and law related subjects may also be considered for publication. Manuscripts for publication should be sent to the Editor, JATI JOURNAL, Judicial Administration Training Institute, 15, College Road, Dhaka-1000 and cannot be returned. iii Contents FOREWORD v A Brief Analysis on the Code of Conduct and Ethics for the Judicial 1 Officers Justice Mohammad Anwarul Haque The Evolution of Crime and Punishment in Bangladesh: Trends and 15 Issues H M Fazlul Bari Global framework: Addressing the Impact of Climate Change on Coastal 41 Populations Lipika Bhadra Curing Institutional and Individual Corruption in Public Offices: 73 Bangladesh Perspective Maruf Ahmed Development and Present Status of Admiralty Jurisdiction in Bangladesh 93 Md. Abu Hanif International Tribunal in Resolving International Commercial Disputes 119 and Relation With National Courts: An Overview of the Decision of the Saipem’s Case Farjana Hossain Security at the Cost of Liberty: A Critical Evaluation of Trade-Off 141 between Liberty and Security through Preventive Detention Hasan Md. Arifur Rahman Child Marriage in Bangladesh: Causes, Impacts and Legal Protection 167 System Nasrin Jannat Seba Status of Women Empowerment in Bangladesh: An Equal Rights 189 Perspective Mily Sultana Construction Workers’ Rights and Safety: An Unsung Issue in 199 Bangladesh Md. Raisul Islam Sourav A Review on ‘What Next in the Law’ by the Right Honourable Lord 223 Denning Jibrul Hasan iv Foreword It is a matter of great pleasure that the 18th volume of JATI Journal has now been ready for its readers. This law journal is an annual publication of the Institute which seeks to offer an academic platform for the judges and magistrates of the subordinate courts, government law officers and other legal professionals. Therefore, in this volume, an attempt has been made for streamlining the Journal towards achieving more academic standard. It is worth mentioning that this volume has also assimilated different perspectives and dimensions by the contributions of young judges and professionals having international exposure. As many as 11 (eleven) articles have been published in this issue covering a broad spectrum of legal erudition. The first write up titling 'A Brief Analysis on the Code of Conduct and Ethics of the Judicial Officers' has constant relevance to the judicial officers and it elaborates the composite ideas and values concerning the subject. In the same trail, the article on 'Curing Institutional and Individual Corruption in Public Offices: Bangladesh Perspective' outlines suggestive measures for combating the social vices. A good number of articles have been published on the ever-increasing domain of human rights. In this context, the articles on 'Status of Women Empowerment in Bangladesh: An Equal Rights Perspective', 'Child Marriage in Bangladesh: Causes, Impact and Legal Protection System' and 'Construction Workers' Rights and Safety: An Unsung Issue in Bangladesh' focus on various practical issues with prescription of necessary legal and judicial reformation. Similarly, the article on 'Security at the Cost of Liberty: A Critical Evaluation of Trade-off between Liberty and Security through Preventive Detention' provides critical analysis of the laws governing this area in the international perspective. On the other hand, the article on 'the Evolution of Crime and Punishment in Bangladesh: Trends and Issues' sheds light on trends, issues and evolution of criminal justice system of the country. The discussion on 'Global Framework: Addressing the Impact of Climate v Change on Coastal Population' will go a long way to address the issue of protection of environmental rights and obligations of the states at the national level. The deliberation on 'Development and Present Status of Admiralty Jurisdiction in Bangladesh' will help the readers to gather knowledge on development of the Admiralty Court. The paper titled `International Tribunal in Resolving International Commercial Disputes and Relation with National Courts: An Overview of the Decision of the Saipem's Case' strives at drawing a balance between jurisdiction of courts and arbitration tribunals. Lastly, the review of the book of legendary English judge Lord Denning namely ‘What Next in Law’ will create interest in revisiting this classic legal literature. So, the range and variety of the contributions necessarily indicate that the Journal has already become a scholarly forum for the legal professionals of various fields and strata. I am confident that the publication of this journal provides a congenial atmosphere among the judges and other legal professionals for sharing their respective knowledge and expertise. I am also assured of the fact that in this fast growing world of information and communication technology, the Institute is not only putting its best effort in providing training to the judicial officers and other legal professionals, but also widening the scope for creativity, innovation and research. It is needless to say that the contributors of this Journal have paved the way of its excellence by all means. Besides, a highly professional research team charged with indomitable love and affection for the Institute has also been engaged in developing the quality of this Journal. Hence, I extend my felicitation to the authors and also congratulate the editors, officials and staff of JATI involved in the process for their efforts. I expect that the members of the judicial guild will take benefit of this Journal and I request them to contribute to this Journal in its upcoming issues. I wish success of this publication of JATI Journal. Justice Khondker Musa Khaled June, 2019 Director General Dhaka Judicial Administration Training Institute vi A Brief Analysis on the Code of Conduct and Ethics for the Judicial Officers Justice Mohammad Anwarul Haque* This article attempts to delineate the scope and extents of judicial ethics and code of conduct of the judicial officers. Impartiality, wisdom and high character emanating from conduct, character and inner qualities of a judge epitomises high reverence for judges that ultimately determines the height of civilization in a given society. While emphasising on the highest integrity and rectitude of Judiciary, as one of the ancient institutions, this write- up also weighs on the sanctity of justice and correct judicial behaviour as a part of religious duty. Besides discussing the administration of justice and Code of judicial conduct during the Mughal period and ancient India largely drawn from the saying of the ancient jurists Manu, Katyan, Brihaspati, Kautilya, the article goes on saying about the importance of judicial discipline, a professional character, in the life of the judge of all time. A detailed narrative of canons of judicial ethics and conduct of Judicial Officers follow suit which includes avoidance of impropriety and free mixing, dealing with unprofessional conduct of lawyers, handling kinship or influence, dealing with individual idiosyncrasies and arbitrariness, inconsistent obligations, partisan politics, self-interest, gifts and favours, social relations, injudicious and untenable behaviour. Besides, emphasis is given on essential conduct of judges, promptness in performance, court organization, courtesy and civility, independence, proper intervention in conduct of trial, continuances, and judicial impartiality. Additionally, the article puts forward a summary of judicial obligation in * Chairman, Chattogram Hill Tracts Land Dispute Resolution Commission, Former Judge, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of Bangladesh
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country of Origin Information Report Bangladesh Country Overview
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Bangladesh Country Overview December 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Bangladesh Country Overview December 2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9494-830-4 doi: 10.2847/19533 BZ-07-17-148-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9494-829-8 doi: 10.2847/34007 BZ-07-17-148-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office 2017 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © International Food Policy Research Institute, A Crowded Market in Dhaka, Bangladesh, 6 May 2010 (https://www.flickr.com/photos/ifpri/4860343116). Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO COI REPORT BANGLADESH: COUNTRY OVERVIEW — 3 Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge the following national asylum and migration departments as the drafters of this report: Bulgaria, State Agency for Refugees (SAR), COI Unit; Italy, National Commission for the Right of Asylum International and EU Affairs, COI unit; United Kingdom, Home Office, Country Policy & Information Team.
    [Show full text]
  • BANGLADESH COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    BANGLADESH COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 30 September 2012 BANGLADESH 30 SEPTEMBER 2012 Contents Go to End Preface REPORTS ON BANGLADESH PUBLISHED OR FIRST ACCESSED BETWEEN 31 AUGUST AND 30 SEPTEMBER 2012 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 1.01 Public holidays ................................................................................................... 1.06 Maps of Bangladesh ............................................................................................. 1.07 Other maps of Bangladesh ................................................................................. 1.07 2. ECONOMY ....................................................................................................................... 2.01 3. HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 3.01 Pre-independence: 1947- 1971 ............................................................................ 3.01 Post-independence: 1972 - April 2010 .............................................................. 3.02 Government of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, 1972-75 ............................................. 3.02 Government of Ziaur Rahman, 1975-81 ............................................................. 3.03 Government of Hussain Mohammed Ershad, 1982-90 ...................................... 3.04 Government of Khaleda Zia,
    [Show full text]
  • ALRC 33 Civil Admiralty Jurisdiction Terms of Reference
    ALRC 33 Civil Admiralty Jurisdiction Terms of Reference I, NEIL ANTHONY BROWN, the Minister of State for Communications, acting for and on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, HAVING REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING: (a) that the Admiralty jurisdiction in Australia is at present still exercised pursuant to the United Kingdom Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890; (b) that the Constitution enables the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws conferring jurisdiction on the High Court and other federal courts in matters of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and to make laws investing any court of a State or Territory with such jurisdiction; and (c) the other countries, including Canada and New Zealand, to which the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 previously applied, have enacted their own Admiralty legislation in a revised and updated form; HEREBY REFER to the Law Reform Commission, for INQUIRY, REVIEW and REPORT thereon to the Attorney-General, all aspects of the Admiralty jurisdiction in Australia, and REQUEST the Law Reform Commission, in considering this reference, (a) to have regard to the Report of the Joint Committee of the Law Council of Australia and the Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand dated 22 April 1982 on Admiralty Jurisdiction in Australia, and (b) to take note of the draft Admiralty Jurisdiction Bill set out as Appendix “A” to that Report, and, in particular, to (i) make recommendations on the provisions to be included in an Australian Admiralty Act; (ii) consider whether any, and
    [Show full text]
  • Country Information and Guidance Bangladesh: Background Information, Including Actors of Protection, and Internal Relocation
    Country Information and Guidance Bangladesh: Background information, including actors of protection, and internal relocation November 2014 Preface This document provides supporting guidance to Home Office decision makers on handling claims made by nationals/residents of – but is predominantly country of origin information (COI) about – Bangladesh. It must be read in conjunction with the subject-specific country information and guidance reports. Public versions of these documents are available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bangladesh-country-information-and-guidance. Decision makers must consider claims on an individual basis, taking into account the case specific facts and all relevant evidence, including: the guidance contained with this document; the available COI; any applicable caselaw; and the Home Office casework guidance in relation to relevant policies. Within this instruction, links to specific guidance are those on the Home Office’s internal system. Public versions of these documents are available at https://www.gov.uk/immigration- operational-guidance/asylum-policy. Country Information The COI within this document has been compiled from a wide range of external information sources (usually) published in English. Consideration has been given to the relevance, reliability, accuracy, objectivity, currency, transparency and traceability of the information and wherever possible attempts have been made to corroborate the information used across independent sources, to ensure accuracy. All sources cited have been referenced in footnotes. It has been researched and presented with reference to the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the European Asylum Support Office’s research guidelines, Country of Origin Information report methodology, dated July 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • A CHALLENGE for CHANGE Court Processes, Problems and Solutions
    Timely Justice for all in Bangladesh A CHALLENGE FOR CHANGE Court processes, Problems and Solutions Supreme Court of Bangladesh & United Nations Development Programme Timely Justice for All in Bangladesh: Court Processes, Problems and Solutions A CHALLENGE FOR CHANGE Supreme Court of Bangladesh & United Nations Development Programme 2015 A CHALLENGE FOR CHANGE Copyright © United Nations Development Programme, Democratic Governance Cluster, IDB Bhaban, E/8-A Begum Rokeya Sharani, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Complex procedures, case backlogs, and a lack of effective case management are key constraints to the court system in Bangladesh. They put pressure on the capacity of the system, and create challenges for citizens in accessing justice. UNDP supports the judiciary of Bangladesh to strengthen its capacity by reducing these constraints. This will in turn provide a sustainable foundation for citizens of Bangladesh, in particular women and vulnerable groups, to access justice. This report is a result of a year-long a detailed analysis of case workflows, and aims to map the business processes of the courts. By analysing the different stages of a court case it provides evidence-based insight to support decision-making. It identifies causes for delays in court cases, areas that potentially undermine the efficiency in courts, and outlines key obstacles within the courts themselves to ensuring equal access to justice for all citizens. Team Leader and Editor Jakhongir Khaydarov, Chief Technical Advisor, JUST Project, UNDP Research Team Md. Zakir Hossain, Registrar, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of Bangladesh Keenan G. Casady, International Court Management Consultant, UNDP Bangladesh Sahhriar Kabir, Joint District Judge, Dhaka Saqeb Mahbub, Junior Justice Consultant- UNDP Bangladesh Cynthia Farid, Junior Justice Consultant, UNDP Bangladesh Concept, Design and Publication Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Environmental Justice: Role of the Judiciary in Bangladesh
    Access to Environmental Justice 1 ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN BANGLADESH Jona Razzaque * GENERAL INTRODUCTION In Bangladesh, justice, judiciary and the rule of law are bound together as an integrated whole. Similar to other common law countries with written constitution, neither the Constitution nor the judiciary is supreme and the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of law. Like USA 1, there is always check and balance between the two organs of the state. The function of the judiciary includes the enhancement of rule of law, to promote the fundamental rights, and to administer the law impartially between citizen and state and between citizen and citizen. The judiciary can mould principles of law and give them a sense of coherence and direction. The degree of radicalism of the judiciary, however, is limited both by the system of appointment by the government of the day, and by the desire of judges to reflect the values of their particular jurisdiction. Since the judges in Bangladesh are not involved in electoral politics, they are more willing than other body of the government to take unpopular decisions beneficial in the long run. With the expansion of the meaning of right to life to accommodate environmental protection, the court created an expectation on the * Jona Razzaq, LL.B. (Hons) & LL.M. (Dhaka University), Bar at Law (non- practising), LL.M. & Ph.D. Candidate (University of London) is the Outreach Co-ordinator, Environmental Law Foundation, London. 1 In the USA, the Constitution separates power among the judiciary, executive and the legislature, and no branch has the absolute sovereignty over the other.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Republic of Bangladesh
    PEOPLE ’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH (G ANA PRAJATANTRI BANGLADESH ) BACKGROUND AND LEGAL SYSTEM Mixed legal system of personal, religious, and common law LEGAL SYSTEM system. POLITICAL SYSTEM Unicameral Parliamentary Democracy. President, elected by the Parliament for a five-year term with HEAD OF STATE the right to only one re-election. The president's duties are normally ceremonial, appointing the Prime Minister from the majority leader of the Parliament and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from the senior judge from amongst the judges of the Appelate Division. However, under the 13th amendment to the constitution ("Caretaker Government Amendment"), the president's role becomes significant when Parliament is dissolved and a caretaker government is installed, at presidential direction, and to supervise the elections. Prime Minister, elected following legislative elections. The leader of the party that wins the most seats is appointed prime HEAD OF minister by the president. Though not written down, this GOVERNMENT function is based on Article 58(3) of the Constitution, which states the President shall appoint as Prime Minister the member of Parliament who commands the majority of its members. SUBNATIONAL There are 6 Divisions - Barisal, Chittagong, Dhaka, Khulna, ENTITIES Rajshahi, Sylhet. The capital is Dhaka. Washington University Manual of International Legal Citation Bangladesh, People’s Republic of SUBLOCAL There are 64 Districts ( Zila ), 507 Townships ( Thana ), 4484 ENTITIES Unions, and over 88,000 villages . Disagreement exists between Bangladeshi and foreign scholars. The Department of Law of the South Asia Institute of Heidleberg University has been working on translation TRANSLITERATION project for all laws since 1985-1995, but focused on only SYSTEM selective laws, rather than the total body of Bangladeshi law.
    [Show full text]
  • ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRAN
    Click here for Explanatory Memorandum ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 1 [No. 28.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [2007.] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 [2007.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [No. 28.] Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, sess. 2, c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas.
    [Show full text]
  • Inexistent Rule of Law in Bangladesh Vol
    article 2 special report special report article of the International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights Vol. 13, No. 2 & 3 June - September 2014 ISSN 1811 7023 Inexistent Rule of Law in Bangladesh Rule of Law Inexistent Vol. 13, No. 2 & 3 June - September 2014 - September 2 & 3 June 13, No. Vol. special report Inexistent Rule of Law in Bangladesh Who’s reading article 2 “In an age when the major media barely touch the surface of major social issues, article 2 provides in-depth analysis of human rights violations and people’s struggles around Asia. For me, article 2 is an essential part of keeping abreast of major developing movements.” George Katsiaficas, author of Asia’s Unknown Uprising * * * “...that is quite a report, very interesting especially section on the stories of the victims and injured. Again, great work, it was a big undertaking and glad you managed to compile this valuable report (Focus on Southeast Asia - Suppression of emerging protests in Cambodia, March 2014)” Naly Pilorge, director, Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO) * * * “We have received 1 (one) exemplars Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Vol. 12, No. 4-Vol. 13, No. 1. We are really grateful for receiving the article. It would become useful collection for our library” Dr. Paripurna, S.H., M. Hum., LL.M., dean of the faculty of law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Contents SPECIAL REPORT: INEXISTENT RULE OF LAW IN BANGLADESH Introduction: The Rule of Law does not exist in Bangladesh 3 Editorial board, article 2 Rule of Law in Bangladesh: Normative standards and reality’s mirror 9 Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Courts Act 1981 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 04 July 2021
    Status: Point in time view as at 30/09/1998. This version of this Act contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Changes to legislation: Senior Courts Act 1981 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 04 July 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Supreme Court Act 1981 1981 CHAPTER 54 An Act to consolidate with amendments the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 and other enactments relating to the Supreme Court in England and Wales and the administration of justice therein; to repeal certain obsolete or unnecessary enactments so relating; to amend Part VIII of the Mental Health Act 1959, the Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968, the Arbitration Act 1979 and the law relating to county courts; and for connected purposes. [28th July 1981] Extent Information E1 For extent see s. 153(4)(5) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 By Criminal Justice Act 1991 (c. 53 SIF 39:1), s. 101(1), Sch. 12 para.23; S.I. 1991/2208, art. 2(1), Sch.1 it is provided (14.10.1991) that in relation to any time before the commencement of s. 70 of that 1991 Act (which came into force on 1.10.1992 by S.I. 1992/333, art. 2(2), Sch. 2) references in any enactment amended by that 1991 Act, to youth courts shall be construed as references to juvenile courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh Country Overview
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Bangladesh Country Overview December 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Bangladesh Country Overview December 2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9494-830-4 doi: 10.2847/19533 BZ-07-17-148-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9494-829-8 doi: 10.2847/34007 BZ-07-17-148-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office 2017 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © International Food Policy Research Institute, A Crowded Market in Dhaka, Bangladesh, 6 May 2010 (https://www.flickr.com/photos/ifpri/4860343116). Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO COI EEPORT BANGLADESH: COUNTRY OVERVIEW — 3 Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge the following national asylum and migration departments as the drafters of this report: Bulgaria, State Agency for Refugees (SAR), COI Unit; Italy, National Commission for the Right of Asylum International and EU Affairs, COI unit; United Kingdom, Home Office, Country Policy & Information Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Journal of Constitutional Law Vol.5
    i 2011 & 12 Volume 5 PATRONS VEER SINGH FAIZAN MUSTAFA K. K. VENUGOPAL ADVISORY BOARD JUSTICE P.C. RAO JUSTICE ZAKERIA M. YACOOB JUSTICE B.P. JEEVAN REDDY GRANVILLE AUSTIN M.P. SINGH MARC GALANTER VEPA P. S ARATHI P.P. C RAIG A. LAKSHMINATH UPENDRA BAXI AMITA DHANDA S.L. DESHPANDE BOARD OF EDITORS ARANI CHAKRABARTY DANISH SHEIKH FAIZA RAHMAN MALAVIKA PRASAD MYTHILI VIJAYKUMAR SRISHTI KALRO FACULTY ADVISOR N. VASANTHI ii Indian J. Const. L. Published by The Registrar NALSAR University of Law 3-5-874/18, Hyderguda, Hyderabad – 500 029, India This Journal is NOT FOR SALE Cite this Volume as: 5 INDIAN J. CONST. L. <PAGE NO.> (2011) Contents iii Vice-Chancellor’s Message v Editorial vii-xi In Retrospect Suchindran B.N. Vivian Bose and The Living Constitution : A Tribute 1 Articles and Essays Nuno Garoupa Empirical Legal Studies and Constitutional Courts 26 Gautam Swarup Why Indian Judges would Rather be Originalist : Debunking Practices of Comparative Constitutional Law in India 55 David Pimentel Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: Grappling with Ideology and History in the New Nepali Constitution 77 Arghya Sengupta Judicial Independence and the Appointment of Judges to the Higher Judiciary in India: A Conceptual Enquiry 99 Manmeet Singh Rai Tracing a Meaningful Right to Vote 127 Archana Parashar Right to Have Rights: Supreme Court as the Guarantor of Rights of Persons with Mental/Intellectual Disability 160 M. Jashim Ali Chowdhury Claiming a ‘Fundamental Right to Basic Necessities of Life’: Problems and Prospects of Adjudication in Bangladesh 184 iv Indian J. Const. L. Case Comments Karishma D Dodeja Indian Medical Association v.
    [Show full text]