DOCSLIB.ORG

From Exemptions of Christian Science Sanatoria to Persons Who Engage in Healing by Spirtual Means: Why Children's Healthcare V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Exemptions of Christian Science Sanatoria to Persons Who Engage in Healing by Spirtual Means: Why Children's Healthcare V Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 15 Issue 2 Article 3 December 1997 From Exemptions of Christian Science Sanatoria to Persons Who Engage in Healing by Spirtual Means: Why Children's Healthcare v. Vladeck Necessitates Amending the Social Security Act Danyll Foix Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Danyll Foix, From Exemptions of Christian Science Sanatoria to Persons Who Engage in Healing by Spirtual Means: Why Children's Healthcare v. Vladeck Necessitates Amending the Social Security Act, 15(2) LAW & INEQ. 373 (1997). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol15/iss2/3 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. From Exemptions of Christian Science Sanatoria to Persons Who Engage in Healing by Spiritual Means: Why Children'sHealthcare v. Vladeck Necessitates Amending the Social Security Act Danyll Foix* Since 1965, Social Security statutory and regulatory exemp- tions have allowed Medicare and Medicaid to reimburse First Church of Christ, Scientist,' Boston, Massachusetts sanatoria 2 in- patients' room, board and primary nursing expenses. 3 In February of 1996, the organization Children's Healthcare Is a Legal Duty (CHILD)4 challenged these exemptions as violating the United * J.D. expected 1998, University of Minnesota; B.A. 1995 University of Min- nesota. The author gratefully acknowledges the members of Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, especially John Lacey, Mary Schouvieller, Erica Gutmann Strohl and Ben Weiss, for their comments and editorial assistance. 1. Popularly known as "Christian Science" and referred to in this Comment as "the Church." Christian Science will also be referred to in this Comment as the "Christian Science religion." 2. Christian Science sanatoria provide inpatients who are members of the Church with basic physical nursing care while they receive spiritual treatment. See infra notes 29-49 and accompanying text. 3. See infra Part II (explaining how the Social Security Amendments of 1965 provided for the current Medicare and Medicaid programs' exemptions for Chris- tian Science sanatoria). 4. See Andrew Herrmann, Christian Science's Battle over Healing, CHI. SUN- TIMES, Aug. 18, 1996, at 30A. Rita Swan formed CHILD after her own failed expe- rience with practitioner healing. Id. Raised as a Christian Scientist, Swan mar- ried another member of the Church. Id. Swan had always used the help of a prac- titioner for healing. Id. In 1977, when her 16-month-old son, Matthew, became ill with meningitis, she again enlisted the services of a practitioner. Id. After those services proved unsuccessful, Swan "brought Matthew to the hospital emergency room on the 12th day, saying he had a broken bone (which can be set under Church practice). The doctors were appalled. They wanted to do an emergency surgery to release the pressure on the brain." Id. After the doctors involved threatened to go to court, the Swans agreed to the surgery. Id. Their son, however, died seven days later. Id. The Swans brought an unsuccessful suit against the practitioner who had tried to heal their son. Id. These experiences led Rita Swan to form CHILD, a 300-member advocacy group dedicated to ensuring that children will not die because of parents' religious con- victions. Since founding CHILD, Swan has regularly criticized the Christian Sci- ence church on television and in print media. Id. Law and Inequality [Vol. 15:373 States Constitution. 5 In an unprecedented decision, the Federal District Court for the District of Minnesota Third Division ruled in Children's Healthcare Is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Vladeck6 that Medi- care and Medicaid payments to the Church's sanatoria violate the 7 Establishment Clause of the Constitution. This Comment provides the context in which Children's Healthcare was decided and analyzes the court's decision from both a legal and policy perspective. Part I examines the Christian Science religion's belief in spiritual healing, the Church's system of spiritual healers and the Church's process of certifying and "listing" its system of sanatoria, practitioners and nurses. Part II summarizes both the purpose and the administration of Medicare and Medicaid, discussing their relation to Christian Science sani- toria and introducing the statutes and regulations that the Chil- dren's Healthcare court held to be unconstitutional. Part III ex- amines current Establishment Clause jurisprudence and evaluates the proper standard for review of governmental accommodation of religion demonstrating that statutes that discriminate among re- ligions require strict-scrutiny review. Part IV reviews the Chil- dren's Healthcare case. Part V confirms that the federal district court correctly held that the Medicare and Medicaid exemptions for Christian Scientists violate the Establishment Clause but sug- gests that the court's decision contravenes public policy. Part VI proposes amendments to the current Medicare and Medicaid stat- utes that would withstand constitutional scrutiny. This Comment concludes that the Children's Healthcare court reached the correct decision. The Constitution does not allow Congress to legislate Medicare and Medicaid exemptions for only the Christian Science religion. This Comment also concludes that the Medicare and Medicaid programs' failure to accommodate any religious beliefs is unacceptable as a matter of public policy.8 Therefore, Congress should amend the Social Security statutes to allow competent adults whose religious beliefs compel engaging in spiritual healing to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid pro- grams.9 Such religion-neutral amendments would be both consti- 5. Children's Healthcare Is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Vladeck, 938 F. Supp. 1466 (D. Minn. 1996). 6. Id. 7. Id. at 1480-81. 8. See infra notes 291-304 and accompanying text (noting the increasing popularity of alternative therapies and suggesting that such therapies be incorpo- rated into Medicare and Medicaid coverage). 9. See infra Parts V and VI (discussing the benefits of alternative medicine and proposing model amendments for effectively and fairly exempting spiritual 1997] CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE V. VLADECK 375 tutional under current Establishment Clause jurisprudence and prudent public policy because they would properly accommodate Medicare and Medicaid participants' religious beliefs. 10 I. Christian Science Religion, Sanatroria, Practitioners, Nurses, Church-Certification and "Listing" Mary Baker Eddy, founded the First Church of Christ, Scien- tist in the 1860s after her use of spiritual healing in her recovery from a serious fall." The Church is based both upon the King James Version of the Holy Bible and Eddy's interpretation of the Bible. 12 Today, Eddy's collection of essays and letters entitled Sci- ence and Health with Key to the Scriptures13 is regarded as the ba- sic text of the Christian Science religion.14 healing). 10. See Christian Scientists Lose Court Battle, STAR-TRIB. (Minneapolis), Aug. 9, 1996, at 4A. Robert Bruno, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, estimates that Christian Science practitioners collect $8 million to $10 million yearly in medical payments; Church spokesman Victor Westburg said a figure of $7 million to $7.5 million would be more accurate. Id. Neither of them knew how much the Church re- ceived in Medicaid money. Id. See also Children's Healthcare, 938 F. Supp. at 1486-87 (recognizing the potential impact its decision would have upon the Church and its members, the court stayed relief pending appeal). See also infra notes 327- 365 and accompanying text (explaining how such an amendment would pass Lemon test scrutiny). Examined in the context of the Christian Science religion, one can understand the importance of accommodating individuals whose religion is based upon spiritual healing. 11. See ROBERT A. NENNEMAN, THE NEW BIRTH OF CHRISTIANITY: WHY RE- LIGION PERSISTS IN A SCIENTIFIC AGE 117-25 (1992). 12. See id. at 122. See generally MARY BAKER EDDY, SCIENCE AND HEALTH WITH KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES (1916) (explaining Eddy's interpretation of the Bible) (hereinafter referred to as Science and Health). While one may question Eddy's particular Biblical interpretation, Eddy emphasized diligently that she "set forth Christian Science and its application to the treatment of disease just as I have dis- covered them." Id. at 126:22-3. Further, Eddy claimed: I have found nothing in ancient or in modern systems on which to found my own, except the teachings and demonstrations of our great Master and the lives of prophets and apostles. The Bible has been my only authority. I have had no other guide in "the straight and narrow way" of Truth. Id. at 126:26-31. 13. EDDY, supra note 12. 14. See NENNEMAN, supra note 11, at 123. Understanding that she could not personally speak with all persons curious about the Christian Science religion, Eddy realized that she would have to rely on her writings as the main source of her teaching. Id. From 1872 to 1874, Eddy spent most of her time writing her textbook. Id. She published it at her own expense in 1875. Id. See also STUART E. KNEE, CHRISTIAN SCIENCE IN THE AGE OF MARY BAKER EDDY 6 (1994) (citing a 1909 speech delivered by Augustana E. Stetson). "If people were hungry, de- pressed, ill or jobless. 'the teachings of our beloved leader, Mrs. Eddy... [and] our textbook, Science and Health will feed the multitude ... the bread of Life."' Id. (quoting AUGUSTANA STETSON, REMINISCENCES, SERMONS AND CORRESPONDENCE PROVING
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Religion and the Courts 1790-1947 Leslie C. Griffin When the Framers
    Religion and the Courts 1790-1947 Leslie C. Griffin* When the Framers drafted the United States Constitution in 1787, the only mention of religion was the remarkable text of Article VI, which states “no Religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” That groundbreaking language marked a shift from prior practice in Europe and the states. At the time of the Constitution’s drafting, most states had religious qualifications for government officials, following the pattern in Britain, where the monarch was required to be a member of the Church of England. In Europe the guiding principle was cuius regio, eius religio: the religion of the people is determined by the religion of the ruler. Many of the Framers, especially James Madison, believed that the new Constitution protected liberty of conscience by creating a government of enumerated and separate powers that gave Congress no authority over religion. During the ratification process, however, constitutional critics demanded greater protection of individuals from the power of the government. In order to secure the Constitution’s ratification, the new Congress drafted a Bill of Rights that protected religious freedom in the following language: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Upon ratification by the states in 1791, the language about religion became the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 The two Religion Clauses of the First Amendment are known as the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Although Madison suggested that the standard protecting liberty of conscience should apply to state as well as federal governments, the language of the First Amendment—“Congress 1 shall”—applied only to the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • List of New Thought Periodicals Compiled by Rev
    List of New Thought Periodicals compiled by Rev. Lynne Hollander, 2003 Source Title Place Publisher How often Dates Founding Editor or Editor or notes Key to worksheet Source: A = Archives, B = Braden's book, L = Library of Congress If title is bold, the Archives holds at least one issue A Abundant Living San Diego, CA Abundant Living Foundation Monthly 1964-1988 Jack Addington A Abundant Living Prescott, AZ Delia Sellers, Ministries, Inc. Monthly 1995-2015 Delia Sellers A Act Today Johannesburg, So. Africa Association of Creative Monthly John P. Cutmore Thought A Active Creative Thought Johannesburg, So. Africa Association of Creative Bi-monthly Mrs. Rea Kotze Thought A, B Active Service London Society for Spreading the Varies Weekly in Fnded and Edited by Frank Knowledge of True Prayer 1916, monthly L. Rawson (SSKTP), Crystal Press since 1940 A, B Advanced Thought Journal Chicago, IL Advanced Thought Monthly 1916-24 Edited by W.W. Atkinson Publishing A Affirmation Texas Church of Today - Divine Bi-monthly Anne Kunath Science A, B Affirmer, The - A Pocket Sydney, N.S.W., Australia New Thought Center Monthly 1927- Miss Grace Aguilar, monthly, Magazine of Inspiration, 2/1932=Vol.5 #1 Health & Happiness A All Seeing Eye, The Los Angeles, CA Hall Publishing Monthly M.M. Saxton, Manly Palmer Hall L American New Life Holyoke, MA W.E. Towne Quarterly W.E. Towne (referenced in Nautilus 6/1914) A American Theosophist, The Wheaton, IL American Theosophist Monthly Scott Minors, absorbed by Quest A Anchors of Truth Penn Yan, NY Truth Activities Weekly 1951-1953 Charlton L.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitchell V. Helms: Does Government Aid to Religious Schools Violate the First Amendment? an Extensive Analysis of the Decision and Its Repercussions
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 41 Number 2 Volume 41, Fall 2001, Number 2 Article 5 Mitchell v. Helms: Does Government Aid to Religious Schools Violate the First Amendment? An Extensive Analysis of the Decision and Its Repercussions Peter Swift Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MITCHELL v. HELMS: DOES GOVERNMENT AID TO RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT? AN EXTENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DECISION AND ITS REPERCUSSIONS PETER A. SWIFT* INTRODUCTION The United States Constitution prohibits Congress from enacting legislation regarding the establishment of religion.' The Establishment Clause grows out of the First Amendment and not only prohibits the institution of an official church, but also bars the use of public funds for religious institutions. 2 The religion *J.D. Candidate, June 2002, St. John's University School of Law. B.A./B.S. University of Scranton, summa cum laude (1998). 1 See U.S. CONST. amend. I. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. ..." Id.; see also Everson v. Bd. of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947) (setting a standard by which religion clauses were to be interpreted by holding that neither the state or federal government can set up a religion).
    [Show full text]
  • And Then God Created Kansas--The Evolution/Creationism Debate In
    COMMENTS AND THEN GOD CREATED KANSAS? THE EVOLUTION/CREATIONISM DEBATE IN AMERICA'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS MARJORIE GEORGE' "For most Kansans, there really is no conflict between science and religion. Our churches have helped us search for spiritual truth, and our schools have helped us understand the natural world." -Brad Williamson, biology teacher at Olathe East High School in Olathe, Kansas.' INTRODUCTION Kansas has recently become embroiled in a fierce debate over the minds of the state's children, specifically regarding what those children will learn in their public school science classrooms. At first glance, a science curriculum does not seem like a subject of great controversy, but it continues to be one in Kansas and other communities across the country. The controversy hinges specifically on the role evolution should play in science classrooms, but also reflects the broader debate over what role schools should play in students' moral development. Today many parents are worried about sending their children to t BA. 1993, Washington University; J.D. Candidate 2001, University of Pennsylania. Thank you to Sarah Barringer Gordon for her initial advice and editorial comments, and Tracey George for her always helpful comments, as well as her thirty years of encouragement and inspiration. A very special thanks to Jonathan Petty tor alwa)s believing in me and providing unwavering support for my decision to attend law school and of my numerous pursuits during law school. Finally, thank you to all of the Penn Law Review editors for their hard work on this and every article. I Brad Williamson, I Teach, Therefore I IVor7, in Kansas, WASH.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee V. Weisman: a New Age for Establishment Clause Jurisprudence? Elizabeth Brandt University of Idaho College of Law, [email protected]
    UIdaho Law Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law Articles Faculty Works 1993 Lee v. Weisman: A New Age for Establishment Clause Jurisprudence? Elizabeth Brandt University of Idaho College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation 23 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 535 (1993) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEE v. WEISMAN: A NEW AGE FOR ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE?* ELIZABETH BARKER BRANDT** I. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court's most recent opinion in the area of the Establishment Clause, while purporting not to question existing precedent, injects a new standard - coercion - into the re- quirements for proving an Establishment Clause violation. In the majority opinion in Lee v. Weisman,' Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Blackmun, Souter, O'Connor and Stevens, os- tensibly declined to overrule Lemon v. Kurtzman,2 the touch- stone of the Court's modern Establishment Clause jurispru- dence. Surprisingly, however, other than declining to reconsider Lemon and mentioning the case in the context of reviewing the holdings of the lower courts, Justice Kennedy never again cited Lemon in his opinion. He did not undertake an identifiable anal- ysis or application of the three elements of the Lemon test. In a concurring opinion, Justice Blackmun engaged in a traditional application of Lemon.
    [Show full text]
  • Unity's Five Basic Principles
    UNITY BASICS UNITY'S FIVE BASIC PRINCIPLES There is only One Presence and One Power. God the Good, Omnipotent. The Divinity of humankind. Our true nature is good. The Formative Power of Thought. The Practice of the Presence through Prayer and Meditation. (affirmations, prayer and the silence). The Law of Demonstration. You Will Also See The 5 Principles Expressed This Way: God is absolute good, everywhere present. Human beings have a spark of divinity within them, The Christ spirit within. Their very essence is of God, and therefore they are also inherently good. Human beings create their experiences by the activity of their thinking. Everything in the manifest realm has its beginning in thought. Prayer is creative thinking that heightens the connection with God‐Mind and therefore brings forth wisdom, healing, prosperity, and everything good. Knowing and understanding the laws of life, also called Truth, are not enough. A person must also live the truth that he or she knows. The 5 Principles Adapted For Children And Teens: God is all good and active in everything, everywhere. I am naturally good because God’s Divinity is in me and in everyone. I create my experiences by what I choose to think and what I feel and believe. Through affirmative prayer and meditation, I connect with God and bring out the good in my life. I do and give my best by living the Truth I know. I make a difference! The 5 Principles Adapted For Adult Learners: There is only one Presence and one Power active as the universe and as my life, God the Good.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving the Free Exercise and Establishment Conflict in Caldor V
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 35 Issue 1 Article 8 1984 Resolving the Free Exercise and Establishment Conflict in Caldor v. Thornton: Anlysis of Legislation Designed to Protect Religious Freedom or Prevent Religious Discrimination Gale Westhafer Kathryn M. Hartrick Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gale Westhafer and Kathryn M. Hartrick, Resolving the Free Exercise and Establishment Conflict in Caldor v. Thornton: Anlysis of Legislation Designed to Protect Religious Freedom or Prevent Religious Discrimination, 35 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 132 (1984) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol35/iss1/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Note RESOLVING THE FREE EXERCISE AND ESTABLISHMENT CONFLICT IN CALDOR V. THORNTON: ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO PROTECT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OR PREVENT RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION In Caldor v. Thornton, the Connecticut Supreme Court found that a statute permit- ting employees to refuse to work on their sabbath violated the first amendment as an impermissible establishment of religion. This Case Note argues that the Connecticut Supreme Court incorrectly applied the current establishment clause test and should
    [Show full text]
  • The First Amendment's Implied Political Establishment Clause Robert D
    The First Amendment's Implied Political Establishment Clause Robert D. Kamenshinet INTRODUCTION The freedom-of-speech clause of the first amendment contains no express prohibition against political establishment-the advocacy of political viewpoints by or with the assistance of government.' That clause prohibits only government interference with the freedom of ex- pression. In contrast, the first amendment's religious freedom provi- sion explicitly forbids the government from restricting the free exercise of religion and from establishing religion.2 This Article proposes that the courts should read the first amend- ment to contain an implied prohibition against political establishment. It further argues that traditional analysis under the religious establish- ment clause is instructive of how courts should implement the political establishment prohibition. The premise of this new reading is that par- ticipation by the government in the dissemination of political ideas poses a threat to open public debate that is distinct from government impairment of individual expression. Programs of direct government dissemination and private dissemination that is government subsidized not only inform but also persuade. The government has the potential to use its unmatched arsenal of media resources and legislative prerog- atives to obtain political ends, to nullify the effectiveness of criticism, and, thus, to undermine the principle of self-government. The free ex- ercise of political rights, therefore, depends as much on a guarantee against political establishment as it does on the guarantee against inter- ference with free speech. Part I of this Article develops the theoretical basis for the political establishment prohibition. It demonstrates that the implication of such a prohibition is necessary and, as the similar implication of the freedom t Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Science Hymnal, with Five Hymns Written by Reverend Mary Baker Eddy
    The Christian Science hymnal, with five hymns written by Reverend Mary Baker Eddy. Boston, Mass., The Christian Science Publishing Society [1909 i.e. 1910] https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015056375143 Public Domain, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google We have determined this work to be in the public domain, meaning that it is not subject to copyright. Users are free to copy, use, and redistribute the work in part or in whole. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE HYMNAL Y THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE HYMNAL WITH FIVE HYMNS WRITTEN BY REVEREND MARY BAKER EDDY DISCOVERER AND FOUNDER OS CHRISTIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHEDBY THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING SOCIETY FALMOUTH AND ST. PAUL STREETS BOSTON, U.S.A. Copyright, 1898, 1903, 1905 and 1909 by The Christian Science Board of Directors" BOSTON, MASS. All rights reserved. (Printed in U. S. A.) PREFACE TO THE 1910 EDITION OF THE HYMNAL. In presenting the 19 10 edition of the Hymnal, the Committee does not claim that all the hymns therein are strictly scientific, as the selection had to be made very largely from the writings of authors who were unacquainted with the teachings of Christian Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Baker Eddy Pamphlets and Serial Publications a Finding Aid
    The Mary Baker Eddy Library Mary Baker Eddy Pamphlets and Serial Publications a finding aid mbelibrary.org [email protected] 200 Massachusetts Ave. Boston, MA 02115 617-450-7218 Collection Description Collection #: 11 MBE Collection Title: Mary Baker Eddy Pamphlets and Serial Publications Creator: Eddy, Mary Baker Inclusive Dates: 1856-1910, 1912 Extent: 15.25 __LF Provenance: Transferred from Mary Baker Eddy’s last home at Chestnut Hill (400 Beacon St.) on the following dates: August 26, 1932, June 1938, May 7, 1951, and April 1964. Copyright Materials in the collection are subject to applicable copyright laws. Restrictions: Scope and Content Note Mary Baker Eddy Pamphlets and Serial Publications consists of over 600 items chiefly from Mary Baker Eddy's files from her last residence at Chestnut Hill. All of the items in the collection were published during Eddy’s lifetime except "The Children’s Star" dated October 1912 (PE00030) and "A Funeral Sermon: Occasioned by the death of Mr. George Baker," 1679 (PE00109). Many of the items were annotated, marked, and requested by Eddy to be saved (see PE00055.033, PE00185-PE00189, PE00058.127). The collection consists of two series: Series I, Pamphlets and Series II, Serial Publications. Series I, Pamphlets, consists mostly of the writings of Mary Baker Eddy as small leaflets or booklets. The series also consists of writings by persons significant to the history of Christian Science (Edward A. Kimball, Bliss Knapp, Septimus J. Hanna, etc.). Some of the pamphlets were never published such as "Why is it?" by Mary Baker Eddy (PE00262). Pamphlets also include "Christ My Refuge" sheet music (PE00032) and a Science and Health advertisement (PE00220).
    [Show full text]
  • Spiritual-Treatment Exemptions to Child Neglect Statutes—State V
    Spiritual-Treatment Exemptions to Child Neglect Statutes—State v. Crank: Vagueness and Establishment Clause Challenges to Selective Prosecution of Faith-Healing Parents PABLO J. DAVIS* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................761 II. BACKGROUND AND ISSUES ......................................................764 A. Vagueness .........................................................................764 B. Establishment Clause .......................................................766 C. Elision...............................................................................769 D. Spiritual Treatment Exemptions .......................................772 1. Early Cases ..................................................................772 2. ST Exemptions ............................................................774 3. Oklahoma ....................................................................776 4. Ohio.............................................................................777 5. California ....................................................................778 6. Minnesota ....................................................................779 7. Tennessee ....................................................................780 III. STATE V. CRANK ......................................................................781 A. Background and History...................................................781 B. The Tennessee Supreme Court’s Decision .......................783 IV. ANALYSIS OF DECISION
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirituality of Science Fiction
    European Journal of Science and Theology, October 2018, Vol.14, No.5, 15-24 _______________________________________________________________________ THE FINAL SPIRITUAL FRONTIER? THE SPIRITUALITY OF SCIENCE FICTION Armand J. Boehme* Trinity Lutheran Church, 803 Winona St., Northfield, MN 55057, USA (Received 12 August 2017, revised 4 April 2018) Abstract A number of science fiction authors have stated that the genre of science fiction is a form of mystical faith, a spirituality that attempts to understand who human beings are and what they shall become in the future. This essay will set forth an understanding of the spirituality of science fiction. It will include an examination of the beliefs of the Raelians and other science-fiction-based religions, the interplay between Science and science fiction, ethical realities stemming from the displacement of traditional religious ethics by new spiritual and religious beliefs, and the spirituality of encounters with aliens and alien abductions. Science fiction‘s view of God, the new humanity, its view of organized religion, the present and the future will be examined. Christian science fiction from individuals like C.S. Lewis and George MacDonald will also be included in this study. Keywords: science fiction, Raelians, Christian science, C.S. Lewis, G. MacDonald 1. Introduction During the last 100 years, the Western religious world has experienced dramatic change because of the following: the rise of secularization; the lessening of the societal influence of traditional religions especially Christianity; the elevation of Science as the prime repository of truth; the rise of interest in Eastern religions; the New Age movement; the occult; trends towards individual spirituality including those defining themselves as spiritual but not religious; the larger presence of the nones; the dramatic increase of many spiritualities and New Religious Movements (NRMs) including invented religions which are entirely based on science fiction (SF) [1, 2].
    [Show full text]