Awful Beyond Description" 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Directory of Members and 2014 Committees (As of April 2014)
American Embryo Transfer Association “The Vanguard of the Embryo Transfer Industry” Directory of Members and 2014 Committees (as of April 2014) American Embryo Transfer Association 1800 S. Oak Street, Suite 100 Champaign, IL 61820 Phone: (217) 398-2217 Fax: (217) 398-4119 [email protected] Table of Contents Officers and Board of Directors . 2 Past Presidents . 3 . Honorary Life Members . 4 . Emeritus Members . 4 . Geographical Listing of Members . 5 . Certified Members (alphabetical listing by member) . 11 Members (alphabetical listing by member) . 22 Freeze Codes (numerical listing by Freeze Code) . 64 AETA Committees (2014) . 69 Directory Update Sheet . 73 AMERICAN EMBRYO TRANSFER ASSOCIATION Officers and Board of Directors 2014 President Secretary-Treasurer Michael Pugh Dr. Bethany J. Funnell, DVM Westwood Embryo Services, Inc . University of Minnesota 1760 Dakota Ave Reproductive Biotechnology Center Waverly, IA 50677-9772 1861 E US Hwy 169 Phone: (319) 352-5905 Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3361 Fax: (319) 352-4162 Phone: (218) 327-4490 Email: westwood@westwoodembryo .com Fax: (218) 327-4126 Email: lova0011@umn .edu Vice President Jon Schmidt Immediate Past President Trans Ova Genetics Kevin A. Lindell, DVM 2938 380th St Tufts University Sioux Center, IA 51250-7514 PO Box 87 Phone: (712) 722-3586 South Woodstock, CT 06267-0087 Fax: (712) 722-3577 PHONE: (860) 974-2780 Email: jon .schmidt@transova .com FAX: (860) 974-2578 E-mail: kevin .lindell@tufts .edu Directors Richard S. Castleberry, DVM Dr. John R. Schneller, DVM Veterinary Reproductive Services 2280 Survey Rd 8225 FM 471 S Dodgeville, WI 53533-9107 Castroville, TX 78009-5316 Phone: 608-546-2061 Phone: (830) 538-3421 Fax: (608) 546-2032 Fax: (830) 538-3422 Email: jrschneller@yahoo .com Email: sam@vetreproservices .net Robert Stout Dr. -
An Incredible Opportunity for a $28-To-$1 Match to Save 158 Acres in the Gettysburg Campaign!
ABT 0621A1 June Appeal Letter: 8.5” x 11”; 6 pages/2 sheets; folds in half; prints 3 color Black, Pantones 1797 and 541 An incredible opportunity for a $28-to-$1 match to save 158 acres in the Gettysburg Campaign! Dear Dedicated Preservationist, In the time you and I have spent preserving our nation’s hallowed ground, we’ve had our share of opportunities to leverage $5-to-$1, $10-to-$1, even the occasional $20-to-$1 match to save critical at-risk battlefield land. But today, we have an opportunity that’s simply too important to ignore. Today, we have the chance to secure — are you sitting down? — a $28-to-$1 match to ensure the preservation of two key parcels of hallowed battlefield ground that figure prominently in the Gettysburg Campaign of 1863 — one of which you know and have seen and the other sits on a new-to-us battlefield. Together, the parcels add up to nearly 158 acres, the equivalent of 119 football fields, if you can imagine that. And this is truly essential battlefield land, having a combined value of $9.8 million. Now, if we had to come up with nearly $10 million to save this land on our own, we couldn’t do it, and it would likely be developed (or further developed!) and lost forever … But here’s the good news: Thanks to a great local partner organization, the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation (which has taken the lead on the preservation effort at the Second Battle of Winchester), a combination of expected federal and state government grants, a landowner donation, and large private gifts, 96.4% of the total has been raised. -
Our Position Was Finely Adapted to Its Use...”
"...Our Position Was Finely Adapted To Its Use...” The Guns of Cemetery Hill Bert H. Barnett During the late afternoon of July 1, 1863, retiring Federals of the battered 1st and 11th corps withdrew south through Gettysburg toward Cemetery Hill and began to steady themselves upon it. Following the difficult experiences of the first day of battle, many officers and men were looking to that solid piece of ground, seeking all available advantages. A number of factors made this location attractive. Chief among them was a broad, fairly flat crest that rose approximately eighty feet above the center of Gettysburg, which lay roughly three-quarters of a mile to the north. Cemetery Hill commanded the approaches to the town from the south, and the town in turn served as a defensive bulwark against organized attack from that quarter. To the west and southwest of the hill, gradually descending open slopes were capable of being swept by artillery fire. The easterly side of the hill was slightly lower in height than the primary crest. Extending north of the Baltimore pike, it possessed a steeper slope that overlooked low ground, cleared fields, and a small stream. Field guns placed on this position would also permit an effective defense. It was clear that this new position possessed outstanding features. General Oliver Otis Howard, commanding the Union 11th Corps, pronounced it “the only tenable position” for the army.1 As the shadows began to lengthen on July 1, it became apparent that Federal occupation of the hill was not going to be challenged in any significant manner this day. -
Cofa Reports March 25, 2017
Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War Council of Administration Report March 25, 2017 Columbus, Ohio Contents 1 Preface .................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 National Signals Officer & Webmaster: James P. McGuire, DC .................................................... 6 2.2 National Military Affairs Committee; Henry E. Shaw, Jr., PCC ...................................................... 6 2.3 Committee on Lincoln Tomb Observance: Robert M. Petrovic, PDC ............................................ 7 2.4 National Special Committee on Confederate Battle Flag Policy (2017): Brad Schall, PCinC ........ 7 2.5 Department of Colorado and Wyoming; Garry W. Brewer, DC .................................................... 8 3 National Elected Officer Reports .......................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Commander-in-Chief: Donald L. Martin, CinC .............................................................................. 8 3.2 Senior Vice Commander-in Chief: Mark R. Day, PDC .................................................................... 9 3.3 Junior Vice Commander-in-Chief: Donald W. Shaw, PDC ............................................................. 9 3.4 National Secretary: Jonathan C. Davis, PDC ............................................................................... -
89.1963.1 Iron Brigade Commander Wayne County Marker Text Review Report 2/16/2015
89.1963.1 Iron Brigade Commander Wayne County Marker Text Review Report 2/16/2015 Marker Text One-quarter mile south of this marker is the home of General Solomon A. Meredith, Iron Brigade Commander at Gettysburg. Born in North Carolina, Meredith was an Indiana political leader and post-war Surveyor-General of Montana Territory. Report The Bureau placed this marker under review because its file lacked both primary and secondary documentation. IHB researchers were able to locate primary sources to support the claims made by the marker. The following report expands upon the marker points and addresses various omissions, including specifics about Meredith’s political service before and after the war. Solomon Meredith was born in Guilford County, North Carolina on May 29, 1810.1 By 1830, his family had relocated to Center Township, Wayne County, Indiana.2 Meredith soon turned to farming and raising stock; in the 1850s, he purchased property near Cambridge City, which became known as Oakland Farm, where he grew crops and raised award-winning cattle.3 Meredith also embarked on a varied political career. He served as a member of the Wayne County Whig convention in 1839.4 During this period, Meredith became concerned with state internal improvements: in the early 1840s, he supported the development of the Whitewater Canal, which terminated in Cambridge City.5 Voters next chose Meredith as their representative to the Indiana House of Representatives in 1846 and they reelected him to that position in 1847 and 1848.6 From 1849-1853, Meredith served -
Graceland Announces Additional Guests for Elvis Week 2019 August 9-17
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: David Beckwith 323-632-3277 [email protected] Christian Ross 901-652-1602 [email protected] Graceland Announces Additional Guests for Elvis Week 2019 August 9-17 The New Guests Have Been Added to the Line-up of Events Including Musicians Who Performed and Sang with Elvis, Researchers and Historians Who Have Studied Elvis’ Music and Career and More Memphis, Tenn. – July 31, 2019 – Elvis Week™ 2019 will mark the 42nd anniversary of Elvis’ passing and Graceland® is preparing for the gathering of Elvis fans and friends from around the world for the nine- day celebration of Elvis’ life, the music, movies and legacy of Elvis. Events include appearances by celebrities and musicians, The Auction at Graceland, Ultimate Elvis Tribute Artist Contest Finals, live concerts, fan events, and more. Events will be held at the Mansion grounds, the entertainment and exhibit complex, Elvis Presley’s Memphis,™ the AAA Four-Diamond Guest House at Graceland™ resort hotel and the just-opened Graceland Exhibition Center. This year marks the 50th anniversary of Elvis’ legendary recording sessions at American Sound that produced songs such as “Suspicious Minds,” “In the Ghetto” and “Don’t Cry Daddy.” A special panel will discuss the sessions in 1969. Panelists include Memphis Boys Bobby Wood and Gene Chrisman, who were members of the legendary house band at the American Sound between 1967 until it’s closing in 1972; Mary and Ginger Holladay, who sang back-up vocals; Elvis historian Sony Music’s Ernst Jorgensen; songwriter Mark James, who wrote "Suspicious Minds"; and musicians five-time GRAMMY Award winning singer BJ Thomas and six-time GRAMMY Award winning singer Ronnie Milsap, who will also perform a full concert at the Soundstage at Graceland that evening. -
James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg
“Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area. -
Generalsecond Bullrun Campaign Under Pope That the Whole Corps Had to Be Detached from the Army of the Potomac for Rest and Recuperation
PITTSBURGH VOLUNTEERS WITH SICKLES' EXCELSIOR BRIGADE Bruce Sutherland PART 3 Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville Heintzelman's Third Corps had been so badly mauled in the battles on the Peninsula under McClellan and in the GeneralSecond BullRun campaign under Pope that the whole Corps had to be detached from the Army of the Potomac for rest and recuperation. The three divisions of the Corps were assigned to that quiet sector known as the Defenses of Washington. General Hooker's old division, the Second, was placed temporarily under the command of General Grover while Colonel Nelson Taylor commanded the Excelsior Brigade, subject to General Sickles' return. Early in September 1862, the Excelsior regiments were en- camped about two miles southwest of Alexandria near Fort Lyon. They had fallen back from the Chantilly battlefield and as William Wiley of the Friend Rifles describes it, "We only went a short dis- tance beyond that field when we again laid on our arms, and it was raining and very cold. No sleeping was done that night. The next morning we got a loaf of bread and started off again towards Fairfax and then left itand went out scouting through the country until dark when we camped again on a beautiful farm and where we lived well for that night on corn, potatoes and apples. At daylight, the morning of the 3rd, we were on the move towards Alexandria ... J>1 The column moved through thickly wooded country toward the Potomac at Pohick Church and by early afternoon the troops were on the river road which skirted Mount Vernon. -
The American Civil War: a War of Logistics
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR: A WAR OF LOGISTICS Franklin M. Welter A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2015 Committee: Rebecca Mancuso, Advisor Dwayne Beggs © 2015 Franklin M. Welter All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Rebecca Mancuso, Advisor The American Civil War was the first modern war. It was fought with weapons capable of dealing death on a scale never before seen. It was also the first war which saw the widespread use of the railroad. Across the country men, materials, and supplies were transported along the iron rails which industrial revolution swept in. Without the railroads, the Union would have been unable to win the war. All of the resources, men, and materials available to the North mean little when they cannot be shipped across the great expanse which was the North during the Civil War. The goals of this thesis are to examine the roles and issues faced by seemingly independent people in very different situations during the war, and to investigate how the problems which these people encountered were overcome. The first chapter, centered in Ohio, gives insight into the roles which noncombatants played in the process. Farmers, bakers, and others behind the lines. Chapter two covers the journey across the rails, the challenges faced, and how they were overcome. This chapter looks at how those in command handled the railroad, how it affected the battles, especially Gettysburg, and how the railroads were defended over the course of the war, something which had never before needed to be considered. -
Gettysburg National Military Park & Eisenhower National Historic Site
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Gettysburg National Military Park & Eisenhower National Historic Site Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/083 THIS PAGE: North Carolina State Monument (NPS Photo) ON THE COVER: Gettysburg NMP, looking toward Cemetery Ridge Cover photo by Bill Dowling, courtesy of the Gettysburg Foundation Gettysburg National Military Park and Eisenhower National Historic Site Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/083 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 March 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters. -
Lincoln's Role in the Gettysburg Campaign
LINCOLN'S ROLE IN THE GETTYSBURG CAMPAIGN By EDWIN B. CODDINGTON* MOST of you need not be reminded that the battle of Gettys- burg was fought on the first three days of July, 1863, just when Grant's siege of Vicksburg was coming to a successful con- clusion. On July 4. even as Lee's and Meade's men lay panting from their exertions on the slopes of Seminary and Cemetery Ridges, the defenders of the mighty fortress on the Mississippi were laying down their arms. Independence Day, 1863, was, for the Union, truly a Glorious Fourth. But the occurrence of these two great victories at almost the same time raised a question then which has persisted up to the present: If the triumph at Vicksburg was decisive, why was not the one at Gettysburg equally so? Lincoln maintained that it should have been, and this paper is concerned with the soundness of his supposition. The Gettysburg Campaign was the direct outcome of the battle of Chancellorsville, which took place the first week in May. There General Robert E. Lee won a victory which, according to the bookmaker's odds, should have belonged to Major General "Fight- ing Joe" Hooker, if only because Hooker's army outnumbered the Confederates two to one and was better equipped. The story of the Chancel'orsville Campaign is too long and complicated to be told here. It is enough to say that Hooker's initial moves sur- prised his opponent, General Lee, but when Lee refused to react to his strategy in the way he anticipated, Hooker lost his nerve and from then on did everything wrong. -
The First Republican Army: the Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War
Civil War Book Review Fall 2017 Article 14 The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War Zachery Fry Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Fry, Zachery (2017) "The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 19 : Iss. 4 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.19.4.19 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol19/iss4/14 Fry: The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicaliz Review Fry, Zachery Fall 2017 Matsui, John H. The First Republican Army: The Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War. University of Virginia Press, $39.50 ISBN 9780813939278 John Pope, the Army of Virginia, and the Road to Hard War Civil War historians find the political motives behind Union squabbles in the Eastern Theater fascinating. Scholars and lay readers alike can count on a constant barrage of books on the high command of the Army of the Potomac, for instance, replete with well-worn accounts of backstabbing by George McClellan, Fitz John Porter, and Joseph Hooker. Over the past several years, however, a critical mass of innovative literature by young scholars such as Timothy Orr and Jonathan White has emerged to investigate the rich intersections of soldier ideology and command politics, adding to earlier pioneering work by historians such as John Hennessy. Instead of debating how many Union soldiers embraced emancipation, as scholars of the 1990s and early 2000s did, historians now want to know what that undeniable ideological divide meant for command and control.