DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiji – Indo-Fijians – Women – Fiji Labour Party – State Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiji – Indo-Fijians – Women – Fiji Labour Party – State Protection Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: FJI31964 Country: Fiji Date: 17 July 2007 Keywords: Fiji – Indo-Fijians – Women – Fiji Labour Party – State protection This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. What is the current situation for ethnic Fijian Indians in Fiji? 2. In particular if they are members of the Fiji Labour Party (FLP)? 3. How effective is state protection in Fiji for ethnic Fijian Indians against non state agents? 4. What is the situation for female ethnic Fijian Indians in particular? 5. Whether the situation would be the same throughout Fiji or whether relocation an issue? RESPONSE 1. What is the current situation for ethnic Fijian Indians in Fiji? Information on the current situation for ethnic Fijian Indians is detailed in Research Request FJI31224 of 31 January 2007. (RRT Country Research 2007, Research Response FJI31224, 31 January – Attachment 1). A recent report on the situation for the world’s minorities made the following assessment about Fijian Indians: Fiji The year 2006 proved to be an eventful one for minority rights protection in Fiji. Despite the Fijian Labour Party, representing the large Indian minority (45 percent), taking its place in a power-sharing system with the ethnic Fijian Soqosoqo Duavata ni Lewenivanua party, a military coup ousted the government on 5 December. The takeover – Fiji’s fourth in two decades – was the culmination of a long impasse between coup leader Commodore Frank Bainimarama and Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase over attempts to offer pardons to conspirators in the 2000 coup and to grant lucrative coastal land ownership to indigenous Fijians. Commodore Bainimarama, himself half an indigenous Fijian, said the bills were unfair to the islands ethnic Indian majority. At the time of writing , the island was enjoying a relative calm and the interim government was taking shape, with eight ministers being sworn under Bainimarama who had been declared Prime Minister.(Minority Rights Group 2007 ‘State of the world’s minorities 2007’, MRG website, March. (http://www.minorityrights.org/admin/Report/pdf/SWM2007.pdf - Accessed 21 March 2007 - Attachment 2) According to the New Zealand Herald the latest coup has benefited ethnic Fijian Indians: The racial politics of Fiji makes all coups complicated, this one more complicated that the last. Although it was led by an indigenous Fijian military leader, it is seen widely seen as an Indo- Fijian coup. As well as the possible personal motivation for the coup, Bainimarama politically objected to measures that disadvantaged Indo-Fijians. The coup has been embraced by many Indo- Fijians - with whom the commander has close personal relations - on the basis that “my enemy's enemy is my friend”'. The fact that the Fiji Labour leader Mahendra Chaudhry signed up to be Bainimarama's finance minister was a bitter blow for New Zealand Labour and others who had supported him after he was deposed as Prime Minister in the 2000 coup. (‘A new era of diplomacy’ 2007, New Zealand Herald, 23 June – Attachment 3) 2. In particular if they are members of the Fiji Labour Party (FLP)? The Fiji Labour Party forms part of the current unelected interim government. This is corroborated in the following press reports: a) Fiji's former prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry - twice before deposed from government in coups - has joined the interim cabinet formed by Frank Bainimarama on Tuesday. Commodore Bainimarama overthrew the elected government last month. Mr Chaudhry - Fiji's first ethnic Indian prime minister before being deposed and held hostage for 56 days in 2000 - was today sworn in as finance minister by reinstated President Ratu Josefa Iloilo. Mr Chaudhry also held the finance portfolio in 1987 when Sitiveni Rabuka led a military coup to reassert the political supremacy of indigenous Fijians over ethnic Indians. He was one of six ministers sworn in today to serve under Commodore Bainimarama, the interim Prime Minister and military commander. He was also the leader of the December 5 coup, which deposed the elected government of prime minister Laisenia Qarase. Another eight ministers were sworn in on Monday. Mr Chaudhry - the leader of the Labour Party, which narrowly lost elections to Mr Qarase's United Fiji Party last year - has described his appointment as a "strange twist of destiny". (‘Former Fiji PM Chaudhry back in government’, 2007, Australian Broadcasting Corporation website, 9January http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/01/09/1824114.htm Accessed 16 July 2007 – Attachment 4; US Department of State 2007, Background Note: Fiji, US Department of State website, April http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/1834.htm - Accessed 4 July 2007 – Attachment 5). c) The racial battle lines are still drawn. For me the scenario was both inexcusably and reassuringly familiar – the country's polarised political landscape has not lost its racial edge since I last lived there in 1987. I was back home after Fiji's fourth coup in 20 years. After seeing two Indian-dominated governments toppled by coups, it was the Indians' turn to rejoice when Commodore Frank Bainimarama ousted Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase on December 5. Many view it as "karma", some label it as "sweet revenge", and the Indian support was cemented when former Indo-Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry – the man who was removed from office during the previous coup led by George Speight in 2000 – was ushered in as Bainimarama's new Minister of Finance. But a University of South Pacific academic of Indian origin – who doesn't want his name used, for fear of the consequences – has a warning. "Too many Indians are supporting this coup. It is a tragedy. I was appalled at the level of support from overseas Indians for Bainimarama's coup. There could be an Indian backlash if and when there is a change. "The military is making some important changes by sacking CEOs and the Great Council of Chiefs, but it doesn't have the mandate of the people to carry that out. People have had their lifestyles changed overnight and that is breeding deep resentment out there," he says. Indigenous Fijians on the streets seem somewhat divided in their support for Bainimarama. (Masih, P. 2007, ‘A return to coup country’, The Press. Stuff.co.nz website, 12 May http://www.stuff.co.nz/4056207a13135.html - Accessed 2 July 2007 – Attachment 6) 3. How effective is state protection in Fiji for ethnic Fijian Indians against non state agents? According to the US Fed News, the aftermath of the coup has had a detrimental effect on the law enforcement and judicial systems: SAFETY AND SECURITY: While a state of emergency is no longer in effect, some basic rights remain uncertain. The independence of Fiji's law enforcement and judicial systems appears compromised, putting into question protections ordinarily afforded by the rule of law. (‘State Department issues consular information sheet on Fiji’, 2007, US Fed News, 13 June – Attachment 7) 4. What is the situation for female ethnic Fijian Indians in particular? Although there is no singling out of ethnic Fijian Indian women in the following report, there is an indication the current climate can have an adverse effect on opponents of the coup: The Fiji home of Wellington- based lawyer Janet Mason, who has challenged Fiji's military rule, was invaded by masked men and her husband was roughed up. A United States State Department human rights report says the military government has arbitrarily detained and sometimes abused coup opponents, intimidated the media and sexually molested women who were detained for speaking out. Human rights advocate Shamima Ali says most visitors would be horrified to hear what happens beyond their resort gates. While they may feel safe inside their luxury fortresses, she encourages them to really think about the country they are visiting. "People should, but normally people don't think about these things. It's usually, `I'm OK' and that's it." Watkins, Tracy 2007, ‘Fiji: What the tourists don’t see’, The Press (Christchurch) – (Attachment 8) There is also no distinction between female ethnic Fijian Indians and other ethnic groups in the latest US State Department report on Fiji - this report notes that the issue of domestic violence is predominant problem: Women Domestic abuse, rape, incest, and indecent assault were significant problems. Police practiced a "no drop" policy, under which they pursued investigations of domestic violence cases even if a victim later withdrew her accusation. The police generally were more responsive to domestic violence cases than in the past. Nonetheless, courts often dismissed cases of domestic abuse and incest or gave the perpetrators minimal sentences. The head of the Fiji Women's Rights Movement reported that following the coup soldiers forcibly took a battered wife who had fled to her parents' home back to her husband. Incest was widely believed to be underreported. Traditional practices of reconciliation between aggrieved parties were sometimes taken into account to mitigate sentences in domestic violence cases, particularly in cases of incest. An active women's rights movement sought to raise public awareness about domestic violence. Four women's crisis centers funded by foreign governments operated in the country. The centers offered counseling and assistance to women in cases of domestic violence, rape, and other problems, such as child support.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gender Politics in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Gender Politics in the Asia-Pacific Region Amidst the unevenness and unpredictability of change in the Asia-Pacific region, women’s lives are being transformed. This volume takes up the challenge of exploring the ways in which women are active players, collaborators, partici- pants, leaders and resistors in the politics of change in the region. The contributors argue that ‘gender’ matters and continues to make a differ- ence in the midst of change, even as it is intertwined with questions of tradition, generation, ethnicity and nationalism. Drawing on current dialogue among femi- nism, cultural politics and geography, the book focuses on women’s agencies and activisms, insisting on women’s strategic conduct in constructing their own multiple identities and navigation of their life paths. The editors focus attention on the politics of gender as a mobilising centre for identities, and the ways in which individualised identity politics may be linked to larger collective emancipatory projects based on shared interests, practical needs or common threats. Collectively, the chapters illustrate the complexity of women’s strategies, the diversity of sites for action, and the flexibility of their alliances as they carve out niches for themselves in what are still largely patriar- chal worlds. This book will be of vital interest to scholars in a range of subjects, including gender studies, human geography, women’s studies, Asian studies, sociology and anthropology. Brenda S.A. Yeoh is an Associate Professor in the Department of Geography, National University of Singapore. Her research foci include the politics of space in colonial and post-colonial cities, and gender, migration and transnational communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Ties Among Protest Movements the Great Plains Connection
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Spring 1997 Cross-Border Ties Among Protest Movements The Great Plains Connection Mildred A. Schwartz University of Illinois at Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Schwartz, Mildred A., "Cross-Border Ties Among Protest Movements The Great Plains Connection" (1997). Great Plains Quarterly. 1943. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1943 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CROSS .. BORDER TIES AMONG PROTEST MOVEMENTS THE GREAT PLAINS CONNECTION MILDRED A. SCHWARTZ This paper examines the connections among supporters willing to take risks. Thus I hypoth­ political protest movements in twentieth cen­ esize that protest movements, free from con­ tury western Canada and the United States. straints of institutionalization, can readily cross Protest movements are social movements and national boundaries. related organizations, including political pro­ Contacts between protest movements in test parties, with the objective of deliberately Canada and the United States also stem from changing government programs and policies. similarities between the two countries. Shared Those changes may also entail altering the geography, a British heritage, democratic prac­ composition of the government or even its tices, and a multi-ethnic population often give form. Social movements involve collective rise to similar problems. l Similarities in the efforts to bring about change in ways that avoid northern tier of the United States to the ad­ or reject established belief systems or organiza­ joining sections of Canada's western provinces tions.
    [Show full text]
  • James Connolly and the Irish Labour Party
    James Connolly and the Irish Labour Party Donal Mac Fhearraigh 100 years of celebration? to which White replied, `Put that furthest of all1' . White was joking but only just, 2012 marks the centenary of the founding and if Labour was regarded as conservative of the Irish Labour Party. Like most politi- at home it was it was even more so when cal parties in Ireland, Labour likes to trade compared with her sister parties. on its radical heritage by drawing a link to One historian described it as `the most Connolly. opportunistically conservative party in the On the history section of the Labour known world2.' It was not until the late Party's website it says, 1960s that the party professed an adher- ence to socialism, a word which had been `The Labour Party was completely taboo until that point. Ar- founded in 1912 in Clonmel, guably the least successful social demo- County Tipperary, by James cratic or Labour Party in Western Europe, Connolly, James Larkin and the Irish Labour Party has never held office William O'Brien as the polit- alone and has only been the minority party ical wing of the Irish Trade in coalition. Labour has continued this tra- Union Congress(ITUC). It dition in the current government with Fine is the oldest political party Gael. Far from being `the party of social- in Ireland and the only one ism' it has been the party of austerity. which pre-dates independence. The founders of the Labour The Labour Party got elected a year Party believed that for ordi- ago on promises of burning the bondhold- nary working people to shape ers and defending ordinary people against society they needed a political cutbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution
    LABOUR PARTY CONSTITUTION LABOUR PARTY CONSTITUTION As amended at Party Conference 21-23 April 2017, Wexford Part 1: Principles and Objects OUR OBJECTIVE is to build a society based on political, social and economic democracy. We seek to challenge and redistribute all inequalities of power and wealth in society through the empowerment of ordinary people. We strive for social and economic justice, where everyone has a guaranteed standard of security and well-being, and fair opportunity to develop their personal and social selves and to participate in the economic, social and cultural life of the nation in conditions of freedom, solidarity, justice, economic security and equality. OUR DETERMINATION is to change Irish society through the broadest possible engagement with and empowerment of all progressive social forces – Irish, European and international – and through contesting elections and pursuing policies in government that further progressive ends. OUR PARTY is a democratic socialist party and, through its membership of the Party of European Socialists and the Progressive Alliance, is part of the international socialist movement working for equality and to empower of citizens, consumers and workers in a world increasingly dominated by big business, greed and selfishness. IT WAS FOUNDED from the trade union movement by James Connolly, Jim Larkin, Tom Johnson and others as a means for working people to organise politically, to combat squalor, ignorance, want, idleness and disease. These aspirations remain valid today. Despite Ireland’s economic wealth, class divisions continue to exist and many of its citizens continue to experience, from childhood, major inequalities in wealth, health and life chances.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy and State in Fiji Before and After the Coups
    Economy and State in Fiji before and after the Coups Bruce Knapman This paper is a rt;:vision and update of an earlier article on the economic consequences ofthe I987 military coups d'etat in Fiji (Knapman I988a). Its purpose is to explain what has happened against a background analysis of postindependence development, and to predict what is likely to happen. It is not prescriptive, but it does comment on the universalist, promarket, antistate analysis and policy recommendations in two recent books on the Fiji economy (Cole and Hughes I988; Kasper, Bennett, and Blandy I988). The conclusion is that Fiji probably faces a future ofeconomic stagnation. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AND PERFORMANCE I970-1986 In I874, at the beginning of the colonial period, Fiji's largely self-sufficient subsistence economy supported a population of about I40,000 Fijians who tolerated a shaky frontier economy of less than 2000 white settlers and traders. By I970, at the end of the colonial period, Fiji had an export economy supporting a population of 480,000. Of these, 200,000 were indigenous land-owning Fijians, 76 percent ofwhom lived in rural villages and retained a significant commitment to subsistence agriculture and neo­ traditional society. Another 24°,000 were Indians, 6I percent of whom lived in rural areas: they were predominantly Fiji-born (therefore "Indo­ Fijian"), grew the principal export crop (sugarcane) on leased land, and were prominent in small-scale commercial and service enterprises. The remaining, almost entirely urban, population consisted of Europeans and Chinese who dominated the management of largely foreign-owned big business in the manufacturing (mainly sugar milling), banking, trade, and tourism sectors (Knapman I987, I; CES, July I988; Fisk I970, 36-42).
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Fiji Futures
    CONFRONTING FIJI FUTURES EDITED BY A. HAROON AKRAM-LODHI Published by ANU eView The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at eview.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Confronting Fiji futures / A Haroon Akram-Lodhi (editor). ISBN: 9781921934292 (paperback) 9781921934308 (ebook) Subjects: Fiji--Politics and government. Fiji--Economic conditions. Fiji--Social conditions. Other Creators/Contributors: Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon (Agha Haroon), 1958- editor. Dewey Number: 320.099611 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph by M M (padmanaba01): www.flickr.com/photos/43423301@N07/3997565309/ First published 2000 by Asia Pacific Press This edition © 2016 ANU eView Stop Press Confronting the Present: The Coup of May 2000 A Haroon Akram-Lodhi On 19 May 2000, as With widespread doubt community politics that it ConfrontingFiji Futures went about who was in charge of suggested was not universal. to press, a group of 7 men the country, the Great It can be argued that the armed with machine guns Council of Chiefs met. On25 failure of the senior entered the Parliamentary May, following an intensely members of the government Complex in Suva. They took divided meeting, the council to recognise and seek to the Prime Minister, authorised the President to strengthen the fragility of Mahendra Chaudhry, establish, pending the the political consensus members of the Cabinet, and release of the hostages and helped create a climate that other members of the Fiji the resignation of the Prime made the coup possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Factionalism to Unity: Labour Under Starmer
    Beyond factionalism to unity: Labour under Starmer Article (Accepted Version) Martell, Luke (2020) Beyond factionalism to unity: Labour under Starmer. Renewal: A journal of social democracy, 28 (4). pp. 67-75. ISSN 0968-252X This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/95933/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Beyond Factionalism to Unity: Labour under Starmer Luke Martell Accepted version. Final article published in Renewal 28, 4, 2020. The Labour leader has so far pursued a deliberately ambiguous approach to both party management and policy formation.
    [Show full text]
  • JD-Acting-General-Secretary-Wales
    Labour Party Job Description Job title: Acting General Secretary – Wales Responsible for: All staff employed by the Labour Party in Wales Location: The post holder will be based at the Welsh Labour HQ in Cardiff Key Purpose: The General Secretary – Welsh Labour is responsible for the effective and efficient organisation of Welsh Labour. The General Secretary will build the organisational capacity necessary to maximise Labour representation at all levels of government. Specific Responsibilities: Working to implement the Welsh Labour Organisational strategy, including strategies for the promotion of membership recruitment, campaigning activity, media communications and the selection of candidates. Co-ordinating the work of AMs/MPs/MEPs/ and representatives of the Welsh Local Authorities to maximise support for Labour’s policy programme. Under the political leadership of the Welsh Labour Leader and working with all other stakeholders to ensure the effective promotion of, and campaigning for the Welsh Labour Government and Labour’s Shadow Cabinet in Wales. Maintaining relationships with Leaders of Labour Groups in Local Authorities in Wales to ensure the effective promotion of and campaigning for Welsh Labour policies in local government. The co-ordination and production of all Welsh policy documents, manifestos and research briefings, ensuring they promote Welsh Labour’s policy programme in government in Wales and as the official Opposition in Westminster. Co-ordination of effective communications between Welsh Labour and elected representatives and individual members. Day-to-day management of all Labour Party staff in Wales. Act where appropriate, as Media Spokesperson on organisational matters for Welsh Labour. Financial management including drawing up maintaining and controlling budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiji Islands Political Crisis: Background, Analysis, and Chronology
    Fiji Islands Political Crisis: Background, Analysis, and Chronology December 11, 2000 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS20690 SUMMARY RS20690 Fiji Islands Political Crisis: Background, December 11, 2000 Analysis, and Chronology Thomas Lum On May 19, 2000, Fijian businessman George Speight and his followers took Prime Specialist in Asian Affairs Minister Mehendra Chaudhry, an ethnic Indian Fijian, and 30 government and parliamentary officials hostage in an attempt to return the political system to indigenous Fijian dominance. The Fiji military appointed an interim civilian government, negotiated the release of the hostages on July 14, 2000, and then arrested Speight on July 26, 2000. Although the interim civilian government expressed disapproval of Speight’s actions, it also indicated plans to create a new Constitution that bars Indo-Fijians from the position of Prime Minister. On November 16, 2000, the Fiji High Court found the formation of the interim government and abrogation of the 1997 Constitution illegal. The United States has demanded a swift restoration of democratic government in Fiji. Congressional Research Service Fiji Islands Political Crisis: Background, Analysis, and Chronology Background Fiji’s Importance in the Region The Republic of the Fiji Islands has the second largest population (813,000 persons) among Pacific Island states, after Papua New Guinea; and second highest per capita income, after the Cook Islands. Many observers regard the Fijian economy as one of the most viable and potentially prosperous in the region.1 Prior to the 1987 coups, described below, many political analysts regarded Fiji as a model of democratic, multi-ethnic government. Even in undemocratic periods, political violence has been relatively minimal and most human rights have remained protected.2 Fiji and Papua New Guinea are the only two South Pacific nations to have significant armed forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis of the Social Democratic Liberal Party: a Struggle Against the Odds Pio Tabaiwalu
    10 The genesis of the Social Democratic Liberal Party: A struggle against the odds Pio Tabaiwalu Introduction Fiji’s political landscape has been shaped along a fractured fault line between the country’s two main communities: indigenous Fijians and Indo-Fijians. This legacy of Fiji’s colonial past has dogged the country since independence in 1970. The Indo-Fijians are descendants of Indians brought to the colony as indentured labourers by Britain, the then colonial power, to develop a plantation economy. Indo-Fijians came to dominate the economy, arousing resentment from indigenous Fijians. There was increasing fear amongst indigenous Fijians, many of whom lived in semi-subsistence communities, that the Indo-Fijians would ultimately acquire political dominance as well. This difficult relationship has been the cause of much political upheaval, beginning with the military coup d’état of 14 May 1987 that resulted in the overthrow of the elected government of Prime Minister Timoci Bavadra, the deposition of Elizabeth II as Queen of Fiji, and the declaration of a republic, ending the monarch’s reign in Fiji. This was 191 THE PEOPLE Have SPOKEN followed by a second coup on 28 September 1987. Both military actions were led by Lieutenant Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka, then third in command of the Royal Fiji Military Forces. The Fiji coup of 2000 was a complicated affair involving a civilian, George Speight, backed by hard line indigenous Fijian nationalists against the elected government of Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry on 19 May 2000. The latest coup was carried out by military commander Commodore Frank Bainimarama, who seized power on 5 December 2006 from elected Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections and Politics in Contemporary Fiji
    Chiefs and Indians: Elections and Politics in Contemporary Fiji Brij V. Lal 1he Republic of Fiji went to the polls in May 1992, its first election since the military coups of 1987 and the sixth since 1970, when the islands became independent from Great Britain. For many people in Fiji and out­ side, the elections were welcome, marking as they did the republic's first tentative steps toward restoring parliamentary democracy and interna­ tional respectability, and replacing rule by decree with rule by constitu­ tionallaw. The elections were a significant event. Yet, hope mingles eerily with apprehension; the journey back to genuine representative democracy is fraught with difficulties that everyone acknowledges but few know how to resolve. The elections were held under a constitution rejected by half of the pop­ ulation and severely criticized by the international community for its racially discriminatory, antidemocratic provisions. Indigenous Fijian po­ litical solidarity, assiduously promoted since the coups, disintegrated in the face of the election-related tensions within Fijian society. A chief-spon­ sored political party won 30 of the 37 seats in the 7o-seat House of Repre­ sentatives, and was able to form a government only in coalition with other parties. Sitiveni Rabuka, the reluctant politician, became prime minister after gaining the support of the Fiji Labour Party, which he had over­ thrown in 1987, and despite the opposition of his predecessor and para­ mount chief of Lau, Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara. In a further irony, a consti­ tutional system designed to entrench the interests of Fijian chiefs placed a commoner at the national helm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Labour Party for Unite Affiliated Supporters
    Why should I join the Labour Party as a full member? Because you can play a full part in all activities. You can vote at meetings on policy issues and in officer elections and you can stand for election to officer positions. You can take part in selections for local candidates for the council, devolved administrations (where relevant) and for your Parliamentary candidate. You can even stand for these positions yourself! If your CLP has GC meetings, you can stand to become a delegate from your Unite branch or your local Labour Party branch. How do I get full membership? To join for just £15 for the first year, download a form from the Unite web site at www.unitetheunion.org/joinlabour. Alternatively, join via the Labour Party at https://join.labour.org.uk. Select the option for Trade Union to join at a A Guide to reduced rate, currently £1.96 a month. Call 0191 246 5004 to join by phone. Why get involved? the Labour Party Because you can make a difference! Unite’s political strategy is about: for Winning working people for Labour – encouraging Unite members to get involved in the Labour Party so that it is truly representative of society. Winning Labour for working people – making our voice heard on policy Unite Affiliated Supporters issues that matter to ordinary people, their families and communities. Building a broad alliance to beat the Tories – working with others who support our values to fight back against cuts and austerity. This brief guide is an introduction to the Most importantly – winning a Labour Government that governs in the Labour Party for Unite Affiliated Supporters.
    [Show full text]