Postcolonialism, Neo-Colonialism and the “Pacific Way”: a Critique of (Un)Critical Approaches1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Postcolonialism, Neo-Colonialism and the “Pacific Way”: a Critique of (Un)Critical Approaches1 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY School of International, Political and Strategic Studies State, Society and Governance in Melanesia State Society and in Governance Melanesia DISCUSSION PAPER Discussion Paper 2010/4 POSTCOLONIALISM, NEO-COLONIALISM AND THE “PACIFIC WAy”: A CRITIQUE OF (UN)CRITICAL APPROACHES1 ABSTRACT When Fiji’s first Prime Minister, Ratu Sir supported colonial hegemony. This in turn STEPHANIE Kamisese Mara, first used the term the provided an important stimulus for the LAWSON “Pacific Way" during an address to the development of postcolonial theory as an UN General Assembly in 1970, its specific anti-hegemonic discourse critical not just of referent was the smooth transition to colonial history but manifestations of neo- independence of Fiji and several other Pacific colonialism in the contemporary period. island states that had thus far gone through In this paper I suggest that although the the decolonization process. The “Pacific “Pacific Way” is generally presented as Way" was soon used to denote a collective a counter-hegemonic discourse, in some political identity for the island states of the manifestations it provides support for other Pacific region in the postcolonial period kinds of hegemony. This is because it and, together with the “Melanesian Way", has so far evinced very little concern with developed the characteristics of an anti- colonial discourse — something that had the hegemonic practices of local elites. been noticeably lacking in Mara’s original At the same time, it continues to invest in formulation. During much the same period, the overarching West/non-West bifurcation Edward Said’s critical study, Orientalism, of the world, which also produces quite began to make its mark, especially in terms simplistic images of contemporary regional of its critique of the nexus between power politics that mask a much more complex set and knowledge and the way in which this of social, political and economic relations. Postcolonialism, Neo-Colonialism and the “Pacific Way" INTRODUCTION accountability, responsibility and sovereign 2 rights as well as the efficacy and legitimacy of “Western” modes of governance vis-à-vis In 1970, Fiji’s first Prime Minister, Ratu Sir local institutions and practices. The latter Kamisese Mara, delivered an address to the have often been defended through invocation UN General Assembly, characterizing the of the Pacific Way, the Melanesian Way and/ experiences shared by Fiji and some other or the narrower national formulations. Pacific island states in achieving a smooth The Pacific Way idea has had a varie- path to independence as the “Pacific Way”. gated political career in the postcolonial This term soon came to denote a collective period. One commentator notes that in its political identity for the island states of the early years it reflected a romantic euphoria Pacific region in the aftermath of indepen- about a Pacific renaissance which could dence, one which claimed a unique Pacific embrace modernity while fostering a unique character as based on broadly shared social Pacific identity shared by all island states, or and political values. It also came to acquire more especially, by emergent Pacific elites a strong anti-colonial resonance, comparable “who saw themselves as founders … of the in some ways to the négritude movement of new postcolonial Pacific order”. (Ratuva, postcolonial Africa as well as the later devel- 2003: 247). While the Pacific Way idea has opment of discourses about “Asian values” sometimes prompted cynicism, especially and the “ASEAN Way” in East and Southeast to the extent that it has been perceived as Asia, all of which sought a reaffirmation of serving the interests of those elites rather local ways in the aftermath of colonial rule. than Pacific people as a whole, it still has The Pacific Way was later joined by a much positive currency. Thus despite its elit- more specific assertion of a sub-regional ist orientation, as well as the fact that it is identity in the form of the Melanesian Way. often “embarrassingly clichéd", it remains a This was a more profoundly anti-colonial popular way of representing the region col- 2 articulation of identity from the start. Along- lectively. (Meleisa, 2000: 76). side the regionalist discourses also sit a The framework for analysis in this paper number of nationalist formulations such as takes its point of departure from postcolonial such as anga fakatonga (the Tongan Way), approaches which have been so influential fa’a Samoa (the Samoan Way) and vaka- in framing the terms of debate about the viti (the Fijian Way). While focusing on more colonial experience and its aftermath. The tightly bounded notions of local indigenous paper therefore looks first at some of the identities, these nonetheless resonate with main assumptions of postcolonial theory and aspects of the broader regional articulations then the specific circumstances in which the and contribute to their substance. Pacific Way was first articulated, as well as In one way or another, all these discourses the meaning with which it was imbued. Here are manifestations of postcolonial thinking — we see that although the Pacific Way has a style of thought which is generally critical since acquired many of the characteristics of not simply of the colonial past but of the a postcolonial discourse in the critical sense continuing effects of that past in the present. in which this term is generally understood, it Thus the Pacific Way and cognate discourses was anything but in its original formulation. have persisted into the present period, often Accordingly, the next section traces some as undertones but sometimes more explicitly of the shifts in meaning and application in debates about relations between Pacific as it developed over the next few years, island states and their regional neighbours, especially through the voice of academic especially Australia and New Zealand, interlocutors. Taken together, these two sec- countries which often stand accused of tions illustrate a significant transformation in neo-colonial attitudes and practices. At the meaning, thereby demonstrating some inter- centre of these debates are broad issues of esting contradictions and tensions.3 We then governance, security, aid, development and consider the issue of neo-colonialism with dependency, which in turn raise questions of specific reference to democracy promotion Postcolonialism, Neo-Colonialism and the “Pacific Way" as part of the broader “good governance" yet to penetrate the thinking, or perhaps agenda. Here we look at several critiques of “unthinking", of various politicians, journal- 3 Australian policy in particular, and the way ists, bureaucrats, consultants and other in which debates about Australia’s relations experts located in metropolitan centres far with the Pacific islands has been framed. from the everyday lives and experiences To the extent that these critiques embrace of Pacific islanders (Fry, 2000). Postcolo- the principles of postcolonial analysis they nial approaches themselves, however, are also embrace some of its shortcomings. The scarcely beyond criticism, especially to the concluding section therefore suggests that extent that they remain concerned with good critical scholarship, if it is seriously to issues of cultural identity at the expense of address problems of hegemony in the Pacif- pressing issues of political economy which ic islands, needs to avoid adopting the more are, for many, a matter of life and death. Arif simplistic postures of postcolonial analysis Dirlik and Aijaz Ahmed, in particular, have that has limited its scope to date. also take postcolonial theorists to task for abandoning or at least playing down class POSTCOLONIALISM as a category of analysis (Dirlik, 1997; Ahmed, 1994). As for postcolonial theory’s concern with unmasking historical ideas Edward Said’s critical study Orientalism which supported colonialism, even sympa- (Said, 1978), is widely regarded as the thizers such as Michael Hardt see a need to founding text in the genre of postcolonial move on, arguing that “the residues of colo- studies. It is a study in comparative lit- nialist thinking are not the central pillars of erature, but at the same time is much more contemporary forms of domination”.(Hardt, than that, setting out a scathing political 2001: 248). To these critiques it may be and social critique of key aspects of Euro- added that postcolonial approaches often pean colonialism. Said’s notion of Oriental- have a strong tendency to gloss over cases ism consists in a discourse through which involving forms of local (non-Western) domi- Europeans have historically represented the nation and subordination because they do “Orient" as an exotic space occupied by an not fit the particular normative framework inferior “Other" (the Oriental) against which of the postcolonial genre which has been positive images of Europe and the Euro- set up largely as a critique of “Western" pean self have been constructed. These practices. claims are embedded primarily in a critique This paper therefore takes issue with of colonial power relations and, in particular, postcolonial theory’s claims to constitute a the links between power, representation counter-hegemonic discourse. I argue that and knowledge. A recent text proposes that while it has certainly contributed a great postcolonial critique emerges as the product deal to the critique of (Western) colonialism of resistance to colonialism and imperial- and its mechanisms of oppression and ism and therefore
Recommended publications
  • The Southwest Pacific: U.S
    Order Code RL34086 The Southwest Pacific: U.S. Interests and China’s Growing Influence July 6, 2007 Thomas Lum Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Bruce Vaughn Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division The Southwest Pacific: U.S. Interests and China’s Growing Influence Summary This report focuses on the 14 sovereign nations of the Southwest Pacific, or Pacific Islands region, and the major external powers (the United States, Australia, New Zealand, France, Japan, and China). It provides an explanation of the region’s main geographical, political, and economic characteristics and discusses United States interests in the Pacific and the increased influence of China, which has become a growing force in the region. The report describes policy options as considered at the Pacific Islands Conference of Leaders, held in Washington, DC, in March 2007. Although small in total population (approximately 8 million) and relatively low in economic development, the Southwest Pacific is strategically important. The United States plays an overarching security role in the region, but it is not the only provider of security, nor the principal source of foreign aid. It has relied upon Australia and New Zealand to help promote development and maintain political stability in the region. Key components of U.S. engagement in the Pacific include its territories (Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa), the Freely Associated States (Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau), military bases on Guam and Kwajalein atoll (Marshall Islands), and relatively limited aid and economic programs. Some experts argue that U.S. involvement in the Southwest Pacific has waned since the end of the Cold War, leaving a power vacuum, and that the United States should pay greater attention to the region and its problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Pacific Status Report a Snapshot of Pacific Peoples in New Zealand
    Contemporary Pacific Status Report A snapshot of Pacific peoples in New Zealand i Ministry for Pacific Peoples Contemporary Pacific Status Report A snapshot of Pacific peoples in New Zealand The Contemporary Pacific Status Report offers a present-day snapshot of the Pacific peoples population in New Zealand. Information from various data sources, including the 2013 Census, are brought together into one easily accessible document and highlights the current position of Pacific peoples in New Zealand. PaMiniscitry for fic Peoples Te Manatu mo Nga Iwi o Te Moana-nui-a-Kiwa ISSN 2537-687X (Print) ISSN 2537-6888 (Online) ii Ministry for Pacific Peoples Contemporary Pacific Status Report iii Table of Contents Introduction 1–4 Pacific peoples in New Zealand 5–8 Where in New Zealand do Pacific peoples live? 9–11 Education 12–17 Labour market outcomes 18–32 Housing situation 33–38 Appendices 76 Households 39–42 Appendix 1: Background 77 information on data sources Health 43–48 Appendix 2: List of tables 79 and figures Wellbeing 49–55 Appendix 3: Classification of 81 Pacific peoples ethnicity at Population growth 56–59 Statistics New Zealand Appendix 4: Selected NZGSS 83 Crime and justice 60–64 measures by ethnicity – April 2014 – March 2015 Pacific languages spoken 65–69 Appendix 5: Terminations (abortion) 86 by ethnicity and age of women Religion 70–75 (Annual – December) 2014 Acknowledgements The Ministry for Pacific peoples would like to acknowledge the support of Statistics New Zealand in the collation and review of Census 2013 data and customised data, in particular Tom Lynskey and Teresa Evans.
    [Show full text]
  • Waves of Exchange
    Symposium Proceedings, 2020 Introduction: Waves of Exchange Brittany Myburgh, University of Toronto Their universe comprised not only land surfaces, but the surrounding ocean as far as they could traverse and exploit it... - Our Sea of Islands, Epeli Hau’ofa1 Oceania is connected by waves of movement, from ocean-faring migration to networks of information and exchange. Tongan scholar Epeli Hau’ofa has described Oceania as a “sea of islands,” or a sea of relationships and networks that challenges prescribed geographic boundaries and scales. Arguing for the theorization and use of the term ‘Oceania,’ to describe this zone, Hau’ofa seeks to subvert the ways in which European colonizers, from James Cook to Louis Antoine de Bougainville, conceptually and physically mapped the Pacific Ocean (Te Moana Nui) as islands scattered in a faraway sea.2 The Pacific has long held space in the Western imagination. Its presence, as Linda Tuhiwai Smith argues, is to be found in the West’s very “fibre and texture, in its sense of itself, in its language, in its silences and shadows, its margins and intersections.”3 The European activity of mapping the Pacific Ocean throughout the latter half of the eighteenth century was accompanied by the acquisition of material culture from within Oceania.4 The collection of 1 Epeli Hau'ofa, “Our Sea of Islands,” The Contemporary Pacific , vol. 6, no. 1, (Spring 1994): 152. 2 Hau'ofa, “Our Sea of Islands,” 151. 3 Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. (London: Zed Books, 1999): 14. 4 Attention is increasingly paid to provenance and biographies of objects in Oceanic collections to better assess the often fraught histories of encounter, trade, and appropriation or theft.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report September 2003
    Country Report September 2003 Samoa September 2003 The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St, London SW1Y 4LR United Kingdom The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For over 50 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York Hong Kong The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St The Economist Building 60/F, Central Plaza London 111 West 57th Street 18 Harbour Road SW1Y 4LR New York Wanchai United Kingdom NY 10019, US Hong Kong Tel: (44.20) 7830 1007 Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Tel: (852) 2585 3888 Fax: (44.20) 7830 1023 Fax: (1.212) 586 0248 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.eiu.com Electronic delivery This publication can be viewed by subscribing online at www.store.eiu.com Reports are also available in various other electronic formats, such as CD-ROM, Lotus Notes, online databases and as direct feeds to corporate intranets. For further information, please contact your nearest Economist Intelligence Unit office Copyright © 2003 The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Media Release
    Joint Media Release Pacific welcomes Prime Minister Key’s Future of Fisheries funding boost For immediate release: Friday 9th September 2016 FSMPIF2016, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia – A funding injection announced today by the Prime Minister of New Zealand, John Key, in Pohnpei will provide a significant boost for the regional Roadmap aimed at ensuring sustainable development in Pacific fisheries. Visiting Micronesia for the Pacific Forum Leaders Meeting, Prime Minister Key has announced NZ $12.15 million to support sustainable coastal fisheries and aquaculture in the region. The Pacific Community through its Coastal and Oceanic Fisheries Programs will partner with the Forum Fisheries Agency and New Zealand to implement the two new initiatives. The five-year "Improving fisheries food security and sustainable livelihoods for Pacific Island communities" project will focus on improving fisheries governance in nations across the Pacific. “The contribution of New Zealand and Australia enables Pacific nations to step up action on the commitments and goals set by Pacific leaders; for their oceanic and coastal fisheries,” says FFA Director General James Movick. At the 46th Forum, New Zealand committed $50m NZD to support fisheries management, and the work involved is well underway. The new NZ$4.9 million Sustainable Pacific Aquaculture Development project will focus on sustainable aquaculture demonstrating enhanced business acumen, reduced aquatic biosecurity risks and increased uptake of improved aquaculture practices. In welcoming the announcement by Prime Minister Key, the Pacific Community Director-General, Dr Colin Tukuitonga, said the scale of the projects will make it possible to address the complex issues affecting food security in isolated island communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Du Cericentre De Recherches
    les études du Ceri Centre de Recherches Internationales One Among Many: Changing Geostrategic Interests and Challenges for France in the South Pacific Denise Fisher One Among Many: Changing Geostrategic Interests and Challenges for France in the South Pacific Abstract France, which is both an external and resident South Pacific power by virtue of its possessions there, pursues, or simply inherits, multiple strategic benefits. But the strategic context has changed in recent years. China's increased presence; consequent changes in the engagement of the US, Japan and Taiwan; and the involvement of other players in the global search for resources, means that France is one of many more with influence and interests in a region considered by some as a backwater. These shifts in a way heighten the value of France's strategic returns, while impacting on France's capacity to exert influence and pursue its own objectives in the region. At the same time, France is dealing with demands for greater autonomy and even independence from its two most valuable overseas possessions on which its influence is based, New Caledonia and French Polynesia. How it responds to these demands will directly shape the nature of its future regional presence, which is a strategic asset. Une puissance parmi d'autres : évolution des enjeux et défis géostratégiques de la France en Océanie Résumé Compte tenu des territoires qu’elle y possède encore, la France est en Océanie une puissance à la fois locale et extérieure. A ce titre, et quand elle ne se contente pas de bénéficier d’avantages hérités, elle poursuit des objectifs stratégiques multiples.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests
    Order Code RL32187 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests January 7, 2004 name redacted and name redacted Analysts in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests Summary The major U.S. interests in the Southwest Pacific are preventing the rise of terrorist threats, working with and maintaining the region’s U.S. territories, commonwealths, and military bases (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Reagan Missile Test Site on Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands), and enhancing U.S.-Australian cooperation in pursuing mutual political, economic, and strategic objectives in the area. The United States and Australia share common interests in countering transnational crime and preventing the infiltration of terrorist organizations in the Southwest Pacific, hedging against the growing influence of China, and promoting political stability and economic development. The United States has supported Australia’s increasingly proactive stance and troop deployment in Pacific Island nations torn by political and civil strife such as East Timor, Papua New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands. Australia may play a greater strategic role in the region as the United States seeks to redeploy its Asia-Pacific force structure. This report will be updated as needed. Contents U.S. Interests in the Southwest Pacific .................................1 The Evolving U.S.-Australian Strategic Relationship......................2 Australia’s Role in the Region........................................5 China’s Growing Regional Influence...................................6 List of Figures Figure 1. Map of the Southwest Pacific ................................7 Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/File/Dossier-7.Pdf World Meteorological Organization
    Bibliography ABC News. (2013). ‘Kiribati fishermen rescued after four weeks lost at sea.’ 8 May 2013, http://www. abc.net.au/news/2013-05-08/an-fishermen-rescued-after-four-weeks-lost-at-sea/4676278. Abu-Lughod, L., & Lutz, C. A. (1990). ‘Introduction: Emotion, discourse, and the politics of everyday life.’ In C.A. Lutz & L. Abu-Lughod, (Eds.), Language and the politics of emotion (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Nelson, D. R., Berkes, F., Eakin, H., Folke, C., et al. (2011). ‘Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change.’ Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(5), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.133 Agence France Presse (2012). ‘Health fears as flood-ravaged Fiji begins clean-up.’ 3 April 2012. Akerblom, K. (1968). Astronomy and navigation in Polynesia and Micronesia. Stockholm: Ethnografiska Museet. Alkire, W. (1978). Coral islanders. Arlington Heights: AHM Press. Allen, A. (1993). ‘Architecture as social expression in Western Samoa: Axioms and models.’ Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 5(1), 33–45. Anon. (2000). ‘1000 flee as sea begins to swallow up Pacific islands.’ The Independent. 29 November 2000. Anon. (2008). ‘Climate change and biodiversity in Melanesia.’ Ka ‘Elele: The Journal of Bishop Museum, Winter, 6–8. Aperau, A.M. (2005). ‘Focus. Home gardening after the cyclones. Cook Islands Ministry of Agriculture.’ Cook Islands News, 23 February 2005. Aron, R. (1957). The opium of the intellectuals (T. Kilmartin, Trans.). New York: Doubleday & Co. Australian Bureau of Meteorology and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). (2011). ‘Climate change in the Pacific: Scientific assessment and new research.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Festival of Pacific Arts
    DBEDT RFP #18-02-BDSD Coordinator for the Festival of Pacific Arts & Culture Description 2018 2019 2020 3-Yr Total Salaries Festival Coordinator Directs all planning, budget preparation, implementation and reporting activities $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 Finance Director Establishes and manages FESTPAC accounts, bookkeeping and financial reporting. Assists in budget preparation. $ 25,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 105,000 Director of Establishes and manages Administration and FESTPAC planning systems, Development fundraising and advocacy. Assists in budget preparation. $ 10,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 85,000 Grant Writer Prepares public and private funding proposals $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Administrative Assistant Assists Festival Coordinator with scheduling, notetaking, communications and marketing $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 50,000 Travel $ - South Pacific Community (SPC) FESTPAC planning meeting - Council Meeting in Planning Team (4 travelers) x 4 Fiji days travel, accommodations, ground and per diem. Makana. $10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 160,000 $ 170,000 $ 450,000 FESTPAC-Hawaiʻi 2020 Budget DRAFT 2018 2019 2020 3-Yr Total Planning and Design Salaries Festival Coordinator $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 Finance Director $ 25,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 105,000 Director of Administration and Development $ 10,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 85,000 Grant Writer $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Administrative Assistant $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 50,000 Travel $ - South Pacific Community (SPC) Council Meeting in Fiji
    [Show full text]
  • FAO/FFA REGIONAL WORKSHOP to PROMOTE the FULL and EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION of PORT STATE MEASURES to COMBAT IUU FISHING 28 Augus
    FAO/FFA REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO PROMOTE THE FULL AND EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF PORT STATE MEASURES TO COMBAT IUU FISHING 28 August – 1 September 2006 Mocambo Hotel Nadi, Fiji WORKSHOP PROSPECTUS 1. INTRODUCTION Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing occurs in all capture fisheries and poses a direct and significant threat to effective conservation and management of many fish stocks. By frustrating fishery management objectives, IUU fishing can lead to the collapse of a fishery or seriously impair efforts to rebuild depleted fish stocks. This in turn may result in lost economic and social opportunities, both short-term and long-term, and may diminish food security. Left unchecked, IUU fishing can completely negate the benefits of effective fisheries management. Since the late 1990s, a number of international fora have issued calls to combat IUU fishing,1 and in March 2001, the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI) adopted the International Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate IUU fishing (IPOA-IUU), which had been concluded within the framework of the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (“Code of Conduct”). In November, 2001, the United Nations General Assembly urged all States, as a matter of priority, to coordinate their activities and cooperate directly and, as appropriate, through relevant regional fisheries management organizations, in the implementation of the IPOA-IUU and to develop corresponding national plans of action (NPOAs).2 Since then, the IPOA-IUU has been the subject of ongoing high-level attention. To support implementation, the FAO has prepared and published Technical Guidelines3 and mounted a series of six regional workshops between 2003 and 2005 to build human capacity in developing countries for the elaboration of national plans of action to combat IUU fishing (NPOAs-IUU).4 Evaluations of the workshops by participants were very positive, and many called for related follow-up activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Chand, Satish Working Paper Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future? ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 61 Provided in Cooperation with: Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila Suggested Citation: Chand, Satish (2010) : Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future?, ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 61, Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila, http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1941 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/109573 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo www.econstor.eu ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future? Satish Chand No.
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd/Undesa/Unescap Workshop on Developing Sustainability Strategies in Asia
    DRAFT AGENDA OECD/UNDESA/UNESCAP WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPING SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES IN ASIA UN Conference Centre, Bangkok, Thailand, 8-9 March 2007 Purpose: This workshop will review national sustainable development strategies (NSDS) in countries in Asia and the Pacific and their relationship to national development plans and poverty reduction strategies (PRS) with a view to better integration. It is co-sponsored by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (UNDESA) and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). Thursday, 8 March 2007 9h00 – 10h00 Opening Remarks • Kim Hak-Su, Executive Secretary, UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) • Kiyo Akasaka, Deputy Secretary-General, OECD • JoAnne DiSano, Director, UN Division for Sustainable Development (UNDESA) 10h00 – 11h00 Session 1: Sustainability and Development in Asia and the Pacific Overview: Rae Kwon Chung, Director, Environment and Sustainable Development Division, UNESCAP Discussants: • Bertrand Fort, Coordinator, Asia Europe Environment Forum (ASEF) • Jan Adams, Australian Ambassador for Environment, Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) 11h00 – 11h30 Coffee 11h30 – 13h00 • Greg Urwin, Secretary General, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS) • Chong Chun Kim, Director General, Presidential Commission on Sustainable Development, Republic of Korea General Discussion 13h00 – 14h30 Lunch Keynote Speaker -- Emil Salim, Chair, Preparatory Committee, World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) 1 14h30 – 16h00 Session 2: Governance Approaches to National Sustainable Development Strategies in Asia and the Pacific Overview: Representative, UNEP Regional Resource Centre for Asia and the Pacific Discussants: • Magarita Roque Songco, Deputy Director General, National Economic and Development Authority, Philippines • B.
    [Show full text]