DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Food Summit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pacific Food Summit 21-23 April2010 Port Vila, Vanuatu (at~~l World Health ~~§ Organization --"?~ -=--- Western Pacific Region FOOD SECURE PACIFIC REPORT FJFIC FOOD SUMMIT Port Vila, Vanuatu 21-23 April 2010 WHO/WPRO LmRARY MANILA. PHILIPPINES 3 0 SEP 2011 Manila, Philippines December 2010 WPDHP1002530-E Report Series Number: RS/2010/GE/22(V AN) REPORT PACIFIC FOOD SUMMIT Convened by: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC In collaboration with: FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL HEALTH INSTITUTE PACIFIC ISLAND FORUM SECRETARIAT SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND Port Vila, Vanuatu 21-23 April 2010 Not for sale Printed and distributed by: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific Manila, Philippines December 2010 NOTE The views expressed in this report are those of the participants of the Pacific Food Summit and do not necessarily reflect policies of the Organization. This report has been prepared by the World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific for governments of Member States in the Region and for those who participated in the Pacific Food Summit, which was held in Port Vila, Vanuatu from 21 to 24 April2010. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........ ... .... .... ........ .......... ...... ..... ... ... ... ... ...... ....... 1 1.1 Objectives ................ ..... ........ .. ... .. .. ..... ........ .... .... ..................... ... 2 1.2 Opening Remarks ........ ... .... ... ...... ...... ............... ... ........ ... ..... .......... 2 2. PROCEEDINGS .. ...... ...... .... ........ ... .................... ............ ............. 2 2.1 Session 1: The summit's purpose, structure, framework, and outcomes .... .... ... 2 2.2 Session 2: Country statements on food security and pacific-wide action ............ 5 2.3 Session 3: Meeting the challenge of food security .................................... 5 2.4 Parallel group sessions 4-9 .................................... ........................... 7 2.4.1 Session 4: Production, processing/trading of safe/nutritious local food .. ..........7 2.4.2 Session 5: Protect infants and vulnerable groups ...................................... 8 2.4.3 Session 6: Consumer empowerment and mobilizing partners ........................ 9 2.4.4 Session 7: Regulatory frameworks and public-private sector collaboration ...... 12 2.4.5 Session 8: Leadership and cooperation ........... ..................................... 13 2.4.6 Session 9: Building food security information systems ............................. 15 2.5 Feedback: Reporting back from the sessions ................................. ........ 16 2.6 Session 10: Finalizing the Framework and the way forward .. ..................... 16 3. CONCLUSIONS ............. ........ ......... .................. ... ......... ......... .... 17 3.1 The Summit outcomes document ...... ....... ........ ..... ...... .. ....... .. .. ... ...... 17 3.2 Next steps ............................................................... ... .............. 18 3.3 Closing .. .. ... .. ... ... ... ...... ............. .... ....... ..................................... 18 ANNEXES: ANNEX 1 - SUMMIT OUTCOMES DOCUMENT ANNEX2- LIST OF PARTICIPANTS, TEMPORARY ADVISERS, SECRETARIAT, OBSERVERS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF AGENCIES ANNEX 3- PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES ANNEX4- SUMMIT MEDIA REPORTS ANNEX5- COUNTRYSTATEMENTSONFOODSECURITY ANNEX6- OPENING AND CLOSING ADDRESSES SUMMARY A Pacific Food Summit was called for by Ministers attending the 7th Pacific Health Ministers meeting in 2007 in Vanuatu. In 2008, at a meeting in Niue, the Pacific Island Forum Leaders made food security a priority in the Pacific, and in 2009, Ministers of Trade, Agriculture and Health endorsed the concept of a Pacific Food Summit at their respective regional meetings. Continuing the impetus, several Pacific island countries held national food summits leading up to the Pacific Food Summit, which was held at Le Lagon Resort, Port Vila, Vanuatu, from 21 to 23 April2010. More than 170 people from 23 countries attended the meeting. Ministers and senior policy-makers from Agriculture, Health and Trade attended as well as representatives from the food industry, community organizations, faith-based organizations, consumer groups, academia and regional and national organizations. The purpose of the Summit was to enable regional action on food security. Specific objectives were: (1) to review threats to food security in the Pacific and best practices for improving food security; (2) to finalize and endorse a Framework for Action on Food Secuirty and agree on Summit outcomes; and (3) to agree on a process for advocating the endorsement of the Framework for Action by Pacific Forum Leaders and national governments and funding related activities. Before the Summit, a draft Framework for Action on Food Security was developed and circulated widely across the Pacific by Framework Partnership Agencies: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Global Health Institute (GHI), Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PWS), Secretariat for the Pacific Community (SPC), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Country representatives of the highest rank were invited to the meeting. The Summit was opened by the Acting Prime Minister of Vanuatu, Honourable Serge Vohor, with a supporting welcome addresses by Dr Shin Y oung-soo, WHO Regional Director for the Western Pacific, and Mr Feleti Teo Deputy Secretary General, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat. The first session of the Summit reviewed the meeting objectives, purpose and structure, presented the draft Framework and introduced a draft Summit outcomes document. During this session, the Pacific food security situation was presented along with the threats of population growth, climate change, food-related diseases, poverty and poor economic growth. It was stressed that individual sectors cannot achieve food security in isolation. To be effective and sustainable, government and society must work together. The Framework was a mechanism through which this could be achieved by providing long-term solutions that recognize the complexity of the food system and the means for multisectoral action. Individual country statements were delivered in second session of the Summit. Before the meeting, each country representative was given a draft of the Framework and asked to comment on the Framework in terms of relevance and national priorities. The responses were presented in the form of short verbal presentations supported by a more comprehensive written statement. Statements from all21 countries in attendance supported the Framework, with delegates identifying specific areas within the Framework that needed clarification and/or modification. The areas of transportation, energy, education and information and communication technology were raised as potential enablers of food security in the Pacific that needed more attention in the Framework. The third plenary session consisted of eight presentations on behalf of the private sector and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) followed by questions from the floor. Presentations from the private sector gave clear indications that the food industry can adjust to protect health. Partnerships between government and industry were a reality and food control systems can be fine-tuned not only to ensure foods are free from contaminants but also to ensure that foods contain acceptable levels of salt, fats and energy. Trade agreements can be made that ensure acceptable food quality and national regulations are made consistent with best practice. The NGO presentations showed that consumer power is alive and well in the Pacific and the role of NGOs cannot be underestimated. Information on food market surveillance, food safety concerns and "naming and shaming", advocacy and price monitoring are core activities. It was shown that most NGOs are run by or for women. Women and food go together and "food is what women do in the Pacific". It was shown that growing and consuming local foods increased food security and health. The key was to preserve as many varieties of indigenous crops as possible. This would provide protection against the effects of climate change, crop failures, pests and natural disasters. The main work of the Summit was done during six working group sessions that were aligned with the themes in the draft Framework for Action. Each session consisted of one or two short presentations that set the stage, a panel discussion with questions and answers followed by group table discussions. The group discussions were designed to follow a pre-set series of questions on the specific themes of the Framework. The questions prompted the groups to critique, modify and make changes to the Framework. Participants were asked to prioritize their changes and recommendations to one or two issues. The results of these discussions were recorded and then presented to all session partiCipants for further comments. The presentations were then synthesized, agreed upon and recorded for each of the six sessions then reported back to all participants at two separate feedback plenary sessions to identify priorities for action. The presentations made by groups at the feedback sessions recommended several changes to the Framework. Once again, there was good support from the floor for the changes recommended by the groups who worked on each theme. Most of the suggested changes were on technical
Recommended publications
  • Newsletter: Quarter 1, 2021

    Newsletter: Quarter 1, 2021

    2021 TRANS-FORMTrans Pacific Union Newsletter 01, Jan-Mar Be a Transformer! On Easter weekend, I was sharing devotions for the youth camp that was held at Navesau Adventist High School in Fiji. What I saw really inspired me. These young people were not there just to have a good time, however were there to transform Navesau. They planted thousands of root crops, vegetables, painted railings and cleaned up the place. At the end of the camp, they donated many things for the school – from equipment for the computer lab, cooking utensils, fencing wire and even family household items. I am sure that it amounted to worth thousands of dollars. I literally saw our Vision Statement come alive. I saw ‘A Vibrant Adventist youth movement, living their hope in Jesus and transforming Navesau’. I know that there were many youth camps around the TPUM who also did similar things and I praise the Lord for the commitment our people have made to transform our Pacific. We can work together to transform our communities, and we can also do it individually. Jesus Christ illustrates this with this Parable in Matthew 13:33: “The kingdom of heaven is like yeast…mixed into…flour until it is worked all through the dough.” Jesus invites us to imagine the amazing properties of a little bit of yeast; it can make dough rise so that it bakes into wonderful bread. Like yeast, only a small expression of the kingdom of Jesus Christ in our lives can make an incredible impact on the lives and culture of people around us.
  • Vanuatu Mission, Nambatu, Vila, Vanuatu

    Vanuatu Mission, Nambatu, Vila, Vanuatu

    Vanuatu Mission, Nambatu, Vila, Vanuatu. Photo courtesy of Nos Terry. Vanuatu Mission BARRY OLIVER Barry Oliver, Ph.D., retired in 2015 as president of the South Pacific Division of Seventh-day Adventists, Sydney, Australia. An Australian by birth Oliver has served the Church as a pastor, evangelist, college teacher, and administrator. In retirement, he is a conjoint associate professor at Avondale College of Higher Education. He has authored over 106 significant publications and 192 magazine articles. He is married to Julie with three adult sons and three grandchildren. The Vanuatu Mission is a growing mission in the territory of the Trans-Pacific Union Mission of the South Pacific Division. Its headquarters are in Port Vila, Vanuatu. Before independence the mission was known as the New Hebrides Mission. The Territory and Statistics of the Vanuatu Mission The territory of the Vanuatu Mission is “Vanuatu.”1 It is a part of, and reports to the Trans Pacific Union Mission which is based in Tamavua, Suva, Fiji Islands. The Trans Pacific Union comprises the Seventh-day Adventist Church entities in the countries of American Samoa, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Niue, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu. The administrative office of the Vanuatu Mission is located on Maine Street, Nambatu, Vila, Vanuatu. The postal address is P.O. Box 85, Vila Vanuatu.2 Its real and intellectual property is held in trust by the Seventh-day Adventist Church (Vanuatu) Limited, an incorporated entity based at the headquarters office of the Vanuatu Mission Vila, Vanuatu. The mission operates under General Conference and South Pacific Division (SPD) operating policies.
  • 2Nd Quarter 2016

    2Nd Quarter 2016

    MissionCHILDREN’S 2016 • QUARTER 2 • SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION www.AdventistMission.org Contents On the Cover: Eleven-year-old Ngatia started a children’s Sabbath School under the trees. When the group couldn’t meet there anymore, God provided a very unusual meeting place. COOK ISLANDS FIJI 4 Life on the Island/ April 2 22 The Mystery of the Matches | June 4 24 Praying for Parents | June 11 SOLOMON ISLANDS 6 The Snooker Hut Girl| April 9 NEW ZEALAND 8 Giving the Invitation, Part 1 | April 16 26 Working With Jesus | June 18 10 Giving the Invitation, Part 2 | April 23 RESOURCES 12 The Children of Ngalitatae | April 30 28 Thirteenth Sabbath Program | June 25 PAPUA NEW GUINEA 30 Future Thirteenth Sabbath Projects 14 The Early Bird | May 7 31 Flags 16 Helping People | May 14 32 Recipes and Activities 18 Angels Are Real! | May 21 35 Resources/Masthead 20 The Unexpected Church | May 29 36 Map Your Offerings at Work The first quarter 2013, Thirteenth Sabbath Offering helped to build three Isolated Medical Outpost clinics in some of the most remote areas of Papua New Guiena, Vanuatu, and the Solomon Islands. These clinics provide the only easily accessible medical service to thousands of people living in these areas and offer a Seventh- day Adventist presence into these previously unentered areas. Thank you for your generosity! Above: The Buhalu Medical Clinic and staff house in Papua New Guiena were made possible in part through the Thirteenth Sabbath Offering. South Pacific Division ISSION ©2016 General Conference of M Seventh-day Adventists®• All rights reserved 12501 Old Columbia Pike, DVENTIST Silver Spring, MD 20904-6601 A 800.648.5824 • www.AdventistMission.org 2 Dear Sabbath School Leader, This quarter features the South Pacific and seashells.
  • Votes & Proceedings

    Votes & Proceedings

    Votes & Proceedings Of the Sixteenth Parliament No. 35 First Sitting of the Twenty-eighth Meeting 10.00 a.m. Friday, 22nd December 2006 1. The House met on Friday, 22nd December 2006 at 10 a.m. in accordance with the resolution made by the House on Thursday, 9th November 2006. 2. The Hon. Valdon K. Dowiyogo, M.P., Speaker of Parliament, took the Chair and read Prayers. 3. Statements from the Chair (i) ‘Members of the House, before we proceed with our normal business of the day, I have four statements to be made to this august House. As Members might be aware that the Parliament of Nauru has been provided with two Toyota Prado diesel four-wheel vehicles as a grant by the Government of India. These vehicles will serve the long term use of the Parliament in smoothening its work and facilitating the Members in their official duties. This project was taken by me with the then Minister for External Affairs who is also the Prime Minister of India and I am happy that they have acceded to my request. I have also regulated the use of the vehicle within the Parliament Secretariat in order to achieve the highest levels of efficiency and diligence. I would also like to state in no uncertain terms that this assistance would not have come without the endeavours of our Department of Foreign Affairs who had over the years strengthened the bilateral ties with India and the Minister, Hon. David Adeang, who talked to the Deputy Minister of External Affairs, Government of India, Hon.
  • The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Update

    The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Update

    The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Update Note Version 2.00 Abstract This document provides an update to the technical documentation for the Dynamic Gravity dataset, describing changes from Version 1.00 to Version 2.00. For full descrip- tion of the contents and construction of the dataset, see full technical documentation for Version 1.00 on the dataset page at https://www.usitc.gov/data/gravity/dgd.htm. This documentation is the result of ongoing professional research of USITC Staff and is solely meant to represent the opinions and professional research of individual authors. It is not meant to represent in any way the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its individual Commissioners. It is circulated to promote the active exchange of ideas between USITC Staff and recognized experts outside the USITC, professional development of Office Staff and increase data transparency by encouraging outside professional critique of staff research. Please address all correspondence to [email protected]. 1 1 Introduction The Dynamic Gravity dataset contains a collection of variables describing aspects of countries and territories as well as the ways in which they relate to one-another. Each record in the dataset is defined by a pair of countries or territories and a year. The records themselves are composed of three basic types of variables: identifiers, unilateral character- istics, and bilateral characteristics. The updated dataset spans the years 1948{2019 and reflects the dynamic nature of the globe by following the ways in which countries have changed during that period. The resulting dataset covers 285 countries and territories, some of which exist in the dataset for only a subset of covered years.1 1.1 Contents of the Documentation The updated note begins with a description of main changes to the dataset from Version 1.00 to Version 2.00 in section 1.2 and a table of variables available in Version 1.00 and Version 2.00 of the dataset in section 1.3.
  • Joint Media Release

    Joint Media Release

    Joint Media Release Pacific welcomes Prime Minister Key’s Future of Fisheries funding boost For immediate release: Friday 9th September 2016 FSMPIF2016, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia – A funding injection announced today by the Prime Minister of New Zealand, John Key, in Pohnpei will provide a significant boost for the regional Roadmap aimed at ensuring sustainable development in Pacific fisheries. Visiting Micronesia for the Pacific Forum Leaders Meeting, Prime Minister Key has announced NZ $12.15 million to support sustainable coastal fisheries and aquaculture in the region. The Pacific Community through its Coastal and Oceanic Fisheries Programs will partner with the Forum Fisheries Agency and New Zealand to implement the two new initiatives. The five-year "Improving fisheries food security and sustainable livelihoods for Pacific Island communities" project will focus on improving fisheries governance in nations across the Pacific. “The contribution of New Zealand and Australia enables Pacific nations to step up action on the commitments and goals set by Pacific leaders; for their oceanic and coastal fisheries,” says FFA Director General James Movick. At the 46th Forum, New Zealand committed $50m NZD to support fisheries management, and the work involved is well underway. The new NZ$4.9 million Sustainable Pacific Aquaculture Development project will focus on sustainable aquaculture demonstrating enhanced business acumen, reduced aquatic biosecurity risks and increased uptake of improved aquaculture practices. In welcoming the announcement by Prime Minister Key, the Pacific Community Director-General, Dr Colin Tukuitonga, said the scale of the projects will make it possible to address the complex issues affecting food security in isolated island communities.
  • FAO/FFA REGIONAL WORKSHOP to PROMOTE the FULL and EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION of PORT STATE MEASURES to COMBAT IUU FISHING 28 Augus

    FAO/FFA REGIONAL WORKSHOP to PROMOTE the FULL and EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION of PORT STATE MEASURES to COMBAT IUU FISHING 28 Augus

    FAO/FFA REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO PROMOTE THE FULL AND EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF PORT STATE MEASURES TO COMBAT IUU FISHING 28 August – 1 September 2006 Mocambo Hotel Nadi, Fiji WORKSHOP PROSPECTUS 1. INTRODUCTION Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing occurs in all capture fisheries and poses a direct and significant threat to effective conservation and management of many fish stocks. By frustrating fishery management objectives, IUU fishing can lead to the collapse of a fishery or seriously impair efforts to rebuild depleted fish stocks. This in turn may result in lost economic and social opportunities, both short-term and long-term, and may diminish food security. Left unchecked, IUU fishing can completely negate the benefits of effective fisheries management. Since the late 1990s, a number of international fora have issued calls to combat IUU fishing,1 and in March 2001, the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI) adopted the International Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate IUU fishing (IPOA-IUU), which had been concluded within the framework of the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (“Code of Conduct”). In November, 2001, the United Nations General Assembly urged all States, as a matter of priority, to coordinate their activities and cooperate directly and, as appropriate, through relevant regional fisheries management organizations, in the implementation of the IPOA-IUU and to develop corresponding national plans of action (NPOAs).2 Since then, the IPOA-IUU has been the subject of ongoing high-level attention. To support implementation, the FAO has prepared and published Technical Guidelines3 and mounted a series of six regional workshops between 2003 and 2005 to build human capacity in developing countries for the elaboration of national plans of action to combat IUU fishing (NPOAs-IUU).4 Evaluations of the workshops by participants were very positive, and many called for related follow-up activities.
  • Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future?

    Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future?

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Chand, Satish Working Paper Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future? ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 61 Provided in Cooperation with: Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila Suggested Citation: Chand, Satish (2010) : Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future?, ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 61, Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila, http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1941 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/109573 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo www.econstor.eu ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Shaping New Regionalism in the Pacific Islands: Back to the Future? Satish Chand No.
  • History of the Pacific Islands Studies Program at the University of Hawaii: 1950-198

    History of the Pacific Islands Studies Program at the University of Hawaii: 1950-198

    HISTORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS STUDIES PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: 1950-198 by AGNES QUIGG Workinq Paper Series Pacific Islands Studies Program canters for Asian cmd Pacific Studies University of Hawaii at Manoa EDITOR'S OOTE The Pacific Islands Studies Program. often referred to as PIP, at the University of Hawaii had its beginnings in 1950. These were pre-statehood days. The university was still a small territorial institution (statehood came in 1959), and it is an understatement to say that the program had very humble origins. Subsequently, it has had a very checkered history and has gone through several distinct phases. These and the program's overall history are clearly described and well analyzed by Ms. Agnes Quigg. This working paper was originally submitted by Ms. Quigg as her M.A. thesis in Pacific Islands Studies. Ms. Quigg' is a librarian in the serials division. Hamnlton Library, University of Hawaii. Earlier in this decade, she played a crucial role in the organization of the microfilming of the archives of the U.S. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, Office of the High CommiSSioner, Saipan, Northern Marianas. The archives are now on file at Hamilton Library. Formerly, Ms. Quigg was a librarian for the Kamehameha Schools in Honolulu. R. C. Kiste Director Center for Pacific Islands Studies THE HISTORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS STUDIES PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: 1950-1986 By Agnes Quigg 1987 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to a number of people who have helped me to complete my story. Judith Hamnett aided immeasurably in my knowledge of the early years of PIP, when she graciously turned over her work covering PIP's first decade.
  • BACKGROUND Existing Cooperation Possible Areas of Collaboration

    BACKGROUND Existing Cooperation Possible Areas of Collaboration

    5th Meeting of the Commission Adelaide, Australia, 18 to 22 January 2017 COMM 5 - DOC-05 rev.1 (23.12.2016) Options for Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with other RFMOs Secretariat BACKGROUND At its last meeting in January 2016, the SPRFMO Commission has asked the Secretariat to assess and advise the Commission on options for Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with neighbouring or overlapping RFMOs. Such MoUs are intended to facilitate the cooperation between organisations. Existing Cooperation SPRFMO has an “Arrangement” with CCAMLR (ANNEX 4) as well as a MoU between the SPRFMO and ACAP Secretariats (ANNEX 5). It is noteworthy that ACAP contributed extensive expert advice to the development of CMM 4.09 (Minimising Bycatch of Seabirds). In addition, there exists an informal collaboration among all Secretariats of RFMOs, through (a) the Regional Bodies Secretariat’s Network (RSN) (described in ANNEX 1) convened every two years in conjunction with FAO’s Committee on Fisheries (COFI), and (b) intersessional communications and consultations. Since the last Commission meeting, the Executive Secretary has consulted with the Secretaries of neighbouring and overlapping RFMOs (see report in ANNEX 2) and found that all are interested in strengthening the informal collaboration and possibly broadening and formalising it through MoUs. Summary descriptions of advisory RFBs of possible interest to SPRFMO and operating in the Pacific and some global relevant organisations are given in ANNEX 3. Possible areas of collaboration The general scope of collaboration with other RFMOs will be similar and might include the following areas: Matters related to IUU fishing, e.g. recognition of each other’s IUU Lists Monitoring and surveillance including vessel information, VMS, and observers, e.g.
  • Scientific Committee Thirteenth Regular Session

    Scientific Committee Thirteenth Regular Session

    SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION Rarotonga, Cook Islands 9 – 17 August 2017 REPORT OF THE JAPAN TRUST FUND STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 11 August 2017 WCPFC-SC13-2017/ RP-JTF-02 SECRETARIAT Introduction The Steering Committee (SC) meeting of the Japan Trust Fund (JTF) was held on Friday 11th August 2017, in the margins of the Thirteenth Scientific Committee (SC13). The meeting was chaired and convened by the WCPFC Executive Director, Feleti Teo, with support from Japan, Takahiro Fujiwara, JTF Administrator Tony Beeching and the project selection committee was represented by Pamela Maru of the Fisheries Forum Agency (FFA). The initial 5 years of the second phase of the JTF ended in 2016. However, Japan extended the second phase project for one year for 2017 with a greater emphasis on monitoring and compliance than the first phase. Total funding available for 2017 projects amounted to USD128,843.25, which was all allocated and disbursed in support of four projects. The Steering Committee’s role is to review the performance of projects and discuss with the view to resolve any project implementation issues and to share experiences in the implementation of projects and learn from those experiences. Review of project performance The Steering Committee received update of the status of implementation of each of the project supported by the JTF. The updates as follow: 2017 Projects Cook Islands: Development of a national MCS strategy for Cook Islands Offshore Fisheries The project is on course; the terms of reference for the project are agreed and the next step is to undertake a gap analysis.
  • Regional Strategy Paper and Regional Indicative Programme

    Regional Strategy Paper and Regional Indicative Programme

    EUROPEAN COMMUNITY - PACIFIC REGION Regional Strategy Paper and Regional Indicative Programme 2008-2013 The European Commission and the Pacific region, represented by the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, hereby agree as follows: (1) The European Commission (represented by Stefano Manservisi, Director-General for Development and Relations with ACP countries, Roberto Ridolfi and Wiepke Van der Goot, respectively former and present Head of the Delegation of the European Commission in the Pacific) and the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS) (represented by Greg Urwin and Tuiloma Neroni Slade, respectively former and present Secretary-General, Iosefa Maiawa, Feleti Teo and Peter Forau, Deputies Secretary-General), hereinafter referred to as the Parties, held discussions in Suva from March 2006 to September 2008 with a view to determining the general direction of cooperation for the period 2008-2013. The European Investment Bank, represented by David Crush, Head of Division, Pacific and Caribbean, was consulted. During these discussions, the Regional Strategy Paper, including an Indicative Progranune of Community Aid in favour of the Pacific, was drawn up in accordance with the provisions of Articles 8 and 10 of Annex IV to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 and revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005. These discussions complete the progranuning process in the Pacific region. The Pacific region includes the following countries: Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor Leste, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. The Regional Strategy Paper and the Indicative Progranune are attached to this document. (2) As regards the indicative progranunable financial resources which the Community intends to make available to the Pacific region for the period 2008-2013, an amount of €95 million is earmarked for the allocation referred to in Article 9 of Annex IV to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement.