DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Resources Overview for the Fremont Carquest Development Site, Seattle, King County, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Resources Overview for the Fremont Carquest Development Site, Seattle, King County, Washington CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE FREMONT CARQUEST DEVELOPMENT SITE, SEATTLE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION May 18, 2015 Project Number 32264 Report Number 15-93 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE FREMONT CARQUEST DEVELOPMENT SITE, SEATTLE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Report Prepared for CoU LLC 2501 N. Northlake Way Suite 201 Seattle, WA 98103 By Amber Earley and Eileen Heideman May 18, 2015 Project Number 32264 Report Number 15-93 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION SWCA Environmental Consultants 5418 - 20th Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98107 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET Author: Amber Earley and Eileen Heideman Title of Report: Cultural Resources Overview for the Fremont Carquest Development Site, Seattle, King County, Washington Date of Report: May 18, 2015 County(ies): king Section: 18 Township: 25N Range: 4E Quad: Seattle North Acres: 0.7 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? Yes No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No TCP(s) found? Yes No Replace a draft? Yes No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No Were Human Remains Found? Yes DAHP Case # No DAHP Archaeological Site #: ABSTRACT SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) completed a cultural resources assessment for a private development on two parcels on North 34th Street in the Fremont neighborhood of Seattle, Washington. SWCA carried out background research to identify previous cultural resources investigations and known archaeological and historical sites within the project vicinity, and reviewed historic maps, published historic, ethnographic, and environmental information. SWCA’s architectural historian made a project reconnaissance to record existing historical buildings on the parcels. The buildings are recommended not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Because background research and field reconnaissance suggested moderate potential for cultural resources to be present, SWCA recommends monitoring during construction to determine if significant archaeological resources are present. No further work is recommended for the buildings. SWCA Environmental Consultants i May 18, 2015 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION SWCA Environmental Consultants ii May 18, 2015 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................i LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 Regulatory Setting .................................................................................................................. 1 METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 4 Background Research ............................................................................................................ 4 Structure Survey ..................................................................................................................... 4 NATURAL SETTING .................................................................................................................. 4 Geology and Geomorphology ................................................................................................. 4 Project Area Boreholes ....................................................................................................... 6 Vegetation .............................................................................................................................. 6 Fauna ..................................................................................................................................... 7 CULTURAL SETTING ................................................................................................................ 7 Prehistory ............................................................................................................................... 7 Ethnography ........................................................................................................................... 8 History .................................................................................................................................... 9 Project Area Land Use History ..............................................................................................11 Previous Cultural Resource Investigations ............................................................................20 BUILDINGS ..............................................................................................................................22 FRE-15-01 Fremont Electric Company Building .................................................................22 FRE-15-02 Fremont Electric Company Warehouse ...........................................................22 FRE-15-03 Carquest Auto Parts Building ...........................................................................24 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL FOR PROJECT AREA ........................................................25 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................25 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................27 APPENDIX A: HISTORIC PROPERTY INVENTORY FORMS ................................................ A-1 SWCA Environmental Consultants iii May 18, 2015 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project location. ............................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Air photo showing parcels and existing buildings. ......................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Bird’s Eye View, 1891, showing project area. ............................................................................. 10 Figure 4. Lake Washington Ship Canal under construction. ....................................................................... 12 Figure 5. Canal plan map, 1891, showing project parcels. ......................................................................... 13 Figure 6. Sanborn map, 1898, showing project parcels. ............................................................................ 14 Figure 7. Sanborn map, 1905, showing project parcels. ............................................................................ 15 Figure 8. Historic photo, 1911, along North 34th Street (Ewing Avenue), view northwest. ........................ 16 Figure 9. Historic photo, 1911, along North 34th Street (Ewing Avenue), view east. ................................. 17 Figure 10. Sanborn map, 1919, showing project parcels. .......................................................................... 18 Figure 11. Sanborn map, 1951, showing project parcels. .......................................................................... 19 Figure 12. Buildings locations, showing construction chronology for FRE-15-01. ...................................... 23 Figure 13. Recorded buildings, view to the northeast with the Aurora Bridge in the background. ............. 24 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Previous Cultural Resource Investigations Within Approximately ½ Mile of the Project Area. ... 20 Table 2. Previously Recorded Buildings on Adjacent Blocks. ................................................................... 21 SWCA Environmental Consultants iv May 18, 2015 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION INTRODUCTION CoU LLC plans to construct a mixed use building on parcels 1972202710 and 1972202730 in the Fremont neighborhood of Seattle (Figures 1 and 2). Three existing buildings on the parcels were constructed between 1917 and 1958 (FRE-15-01), in 1966 (FRE-15-02), and 1976 (FRE-15-03) and house several retail businesses. CoU LLC contracted with SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to provide a cultural resource assessment of the parcel and to evaluate the existing buildings for their significance. Regulatory Setting The project is within the area designated by the City of Seattle as the Government Meander line buffer, established in the late 1800s and approximating the historical Lake Union shoreline. Because of its proximity to the Meander Line, the project is subject to the Seattle DPD Director’s Rule 2-98. The Rule elaborates on State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (RCW 43 21C) Historic Preservation Policy and provides guidance for identification, protection, and treatment of archaeological sites on the City of Seattle’s shorelines. As noted in the Rule, many of Seattle’s existing and former shoreline areas may be sites of potential archaeological significance due to settlement patterns of Native Americans and early Euroamericans. Archaeological sites may be directly or indirectly threatened by development or redevelopment projects, and the SEPA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vol. 82 Tuesday, No. 33 February 21, 2017 Pages 11131–11298
    Vol. 82 Tuesday, No. 33 February 21, 2017 Pages 11131–11298 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 18:37 Feb 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\21FEWS.LOC 21FEWS sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with FRONT MATTER WS II Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 21, 2017 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal
    Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal October 2017 Alternative Formats Available Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Wastewater Treatment Division Submitted by: Timothy Clark, Wendy Eash-Loucks, and Dean Wilson King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank for following people for their contributions to this report: Staff at the King County Environmental Laboratory for field and analytical support. Dawn Duddleson (King County) for her help in completing the literature review. The King County Water Quality and Quantity Group for their insights, especially Sally Abella for her thorough and thoughtful review. Lauran Warner, Frederick Goetz, and Kent Easthouse of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Judy Pickar (project manager), Dean Wilson (science lead), and King County project team members (Bob Bernhard, Mark Buscher, Timothy Clark, Betsy Cooper, Wendy Eash‐Loucks, Elizabeth Gaskill, Martin Grassley, Erica Jacobs, Susan Kaufman‐Una, Lester, Deborah, Kate Macneale, Chris Magan, Bruce Nairn, Sarah Ogier, Erika Peterson, John Phillips, Cathie Scott, Jim Simmonds, Jeff Stern, Dave White, Mary Wohleb, and Olivia Wright). The project’s Science and Technical Review Team members—Virgil Adderley, Mike Brett, Jay Davis, Ken Schiff, and John Stark—for guidance and review of this report. Citation King County. 2017. Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Study: Analysis of Existing Data on Lake Union/Ship Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Montlake Cut Tunnel Expert Review Panel Report
    SR 520 Project Montlake Cut Tunnel Expert Review Panel Report EXPERT REVIEW PANEL MEMBERS: John Reilly, P.E., C.P.Eng. John Reilly Associates International Brenda Böhlke, Ph.D., P.G.. Myers Böhlke Enterprise Vojtech Gall, Ph.D., P.E. Gall Zeidler Consultants Lars Christian Ingerslev, P.E. PB Red Robinson, C.E.G., R.G. Shannon and Wilson Gregg Korbin, Ph.D. Geotechnical Consultant John Townsend, C.Eng. Hatch-Mott MacDonald José Carrasquero-Verde, Principal Scientist Herrera Environmental Consultants Submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation July 17, 2008 SR520, Montlake Cut, Tunnel Alternatives, Expert Review Panel Report July 17h, 2008 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................5 1.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................5 1.2. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................................................5 1.3. TUNNELING METHODS CONSIDERED......................................................................................................5 Figure 1 - Immersed Tunnel Construction (General) ......................................................................................6 Figure 2 - Tunnel Boring Machine (Elbe River, Hamburg) ............................................................................6 Figure 3 – Sequential Excavation
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Salish Culture – 70 Min
    Lesson 2: The Big Picture: Coast Salish Culture – 70 min. Short Description: By analyzing and comparing maps and photographs from the Renton History Museum’s collection and other sources, students will gain a better understanding of Coast Salish daily life through mini lessons. These activities will include information on both life during the time of first contact with White explorers and settlers and current cultural traditions. Supported Standards: ● 3rd Grade Social Studies ○ 3.1.1 Understands and applies how maps and globes are used to display the regions of North America in the past and present. ○ 3.2.2 Understands the cultural universals of place, time, family life, economics, communication, arts, recreation, food, clothing, shelter, transportation, government, and education. ○ 4.2.2 Understands how contributions made by various cultural groups have shaped the history of the community and the world. Learning Objectives -- Students will be able to: ● Inspect maps to understand where Native Americans lived at the time of contact in Washington State. ● Describe elements of traditional daily life of Coast Salish peoples; including food, shelter, and transportation. ● Categorize similarities and differences between Coast Salish pre-contact culture and modern Coast Salish culture. Time: 70 min. Materials: ● Laminated and bound set of Photo Set 2 Warm-Up 15 min.: Ask students to get out a piece of paper and fold it into thirds. 5 min.: In the top third, ask them to write: What do you already know about Native Americans (from the artifacts you looked at in the last lesson)? Give them 5 min to brainstorm. 5 min.: In the middle, ask them to write: What do you still want to know? Give them 5min to brainstorm answers to this.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Categorization in Motion: Duwamish Identity, 1792-1934 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/75s2k9tm Author O'Malley, Corey Susan Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Categorization in Motion: Duwamish Identity, 1792-1934 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Corey Susan O’Malley 2017 © Copyright by Corey Susan O’Malley 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Categorization in Motion: Duwamish Identity, 1792-1934 by Corey Susan O’Malley Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Rebecca J. Emigh, Chair This study uses narrative analysis to examine how racial, ethnic, and national schemas were mobilized by social actors to categorize Duwamish identity from the eighteenth century to the early twentieth century. In so doing, it evaluates how the classificatory schemas of non- indigenous actors, particularly the state, resembled or diverged from Duwamish self- understandings and the relationship between these classificatory schemes and the configuration of political power in the Puget Sound region of Washington state. The earliest classificatory schema applied to the Duwamish consisted of a racial category “Indian” attached to an ethno- national category of “tribe,” which was honed during the treaty period. After the “Indian wars” of 1855-56, this ethno-national orientation was supplanted by a highly racialized schema aimed at the political exclusion of “Indians”. By the twentieth century, however, formalized racialized exclusion was replaced by a racialized ethno-national schema by which tribal membership was defined using a racial logic of blood purity.
    [Show full text]
  • OFR 2003-23, Geologic Map of Squaxin Island 7.5-Minute
    WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES OPEN FILE REPORT 2003-23 Division of Geology and Earth Resources Ron Teissere - State Geologist Qp Qp Qp Qp Geologic Map of the Squaxin Island 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Qb Qgt Mason and Thurston Counties, Washington Qgt Qgt Qp Qgt Qp by Robert L. Logan, Michael Polenz, Timothy J. Walsh, and Henry W. Schasse Qp Qp Qp Qp 2003 Qp Qp Qp Qp Qp Qgt Qgof Qls INTRODUCTION with Possession glacial outwash deposits. Once Possession ice no deep troughs with sandy sediments characterized by northward-directed longer impounded the lake (but sea level was still significantly below paleocurrent indicators. These sediments provide evidence that The Squaxin Island quadrangle is located at the south end of Puget modern sea level), existing drainages, such as the Skokomish, drainage reorganized to flow northward through the recently formed Qgt Sound and covers a complex of inlets and passages that weave between Qp Qp Nisqually, and Puyallup Rivers, deeply and rapidly incised into their outwash plain. The thickness of these sediments (unit Qgos) varies Qgt Squaxin Island and mainland peninsulas. The quadrangle is rural former alluvial plains and became entrenched. At least initially, stage 3, substantially throughout the area, reaching more than 400 ft just south Qgt Qp Qp residential and agricultural land. Qgof Qp called the Olympia nonglacial interval locally (Armstrong and others, of the map area in a geotechnical borehole at the Port of Olympia Qp Qgt Qp Qp 1965), was characterized by downcutting and erosion. As sea level (Washington Public Power Supply System, 1974). Unit Qgos is Qgof GEOLOGIC HISTORY began to rise, most deposition was confined to these entrenched important because it is widespread throughout the populous South Late Wisconsinan–age Vashon Drift covers most of the quadrangle.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Lake Union & Ship Canal 34-43.P65
    Seattle’s Aquatic Environments: Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal System Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal System The following write-up relies heavily on the Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal Subarea Chapter by Douglas Houck (with substantial contributions by Deb Lester and Scott Brewer) of the Draft Reconnaissance Assessment – Habitat Factors that Contribute to the Decline of Salmonids by the Greater Lake Washington Technical Committee (2001). Overview Lake Union and the Lake Washington Ship Canal Washington to Puget Sound. are located in the city of Seattle and combine to In 1916, the 8.6 mile long Lake Washington Ship serve as the primary outlet of Lake Washington Canal was completed, which included the construc- into Puget Sound. In 1916, drainage from Lake tion of the Montlake Cut, the Fremont Cut, and Washington into the Black River was blocked and the Chittenden Locks. The new Ship Canal the Ship Canal and Hiram M. Chittenden Locks provided navigable passage for commercial vessels, were constructed to allow navigable passage barges, and recreational boaters between Lake between Puget Sound, Lake Union, and Lake Washington and Puget Sound. Washington and provide better flushing in Lake Washington. In a 1943 report published by the Washington State Pollution Commission, 45 industries were listed The Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal adjoining Lake Union (Tomlinson 1977). Along system is comprised of the Montlake Cut, Portage with the marinas, houseboats, and commercial Bay, Lake Union, the Fremont Cut, and the Salmon Bay Waterway. The Montlake Cut is an approximately 100-foot wide channel with con- crete bulkheads extending along the length of the channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Design Commission #2 Brief
    SR 520 Montlake to Lake Washington I/C and Bridge Replacement Project SEATTLE DESIGN COMMISSION #2 BRIEF SR 520 Project Background The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is redeveloping the Seattle segment of the State Route (SR) 520 corridor between I-5 and Lake Washington, known as the “Rest of the West”. The redevelopment will include new bridges that meet current seismic standards, updated roadways with HOV capacity and new pedestrian and bicycle facilities. In addition, the project will include a lid between Montlake Blvd E. and 24th Ave E, as well as a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over SR 520 to the east of the Montlake lid. The Montlake lid will include improved transit connections, open spaces, and enhanced non-motorized connections. Although the entire project is fully funded, funding for design and construction is allocated over several biennia. Construction is occurring in phases: • Phase 1- West Approach Bridge North • Phase 2- West Approach Bridge South and the mainline corridor spanning from Lake Washington to Montlake Blvd. This phase will include the design and construction of the Montlake lid, the Pedestrian Land Bridge, Lake Washington Boulevard and restoration of Foster Island. • Phase 3 - I-5 Express lane connection • Phase 4 - Includes replacement of the Portage Bay Bridge, a new Roanoke lid • Phase 5 – Includes a second bascule bridge over the Montlake Cut. In 2016, The Seattle Design Commission (SDC) provided recommendations to WSDOT on final design concepts related to Phase 2 of the corridor, which will be designed and constructed by a design-build contract. These SDC recommendations along with detailed input from city departments and the public assisted WSDOT in developing the 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP) for construction of Phase 2.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project
    Historic Property at 2517 Lake Washington Blvd E, aka 2517 26th Ave. E, Seattle, WA 98112 Inventory Report for LOCATION SECTION Field Site No.: SR520W259 OAHP No.: Historic Name: Common Name: 2517 Lake Washington Blvd Property Address: 2517 Lake Washington Blvd E, aka 2517 26th Ave. E, Seattle, WA 98112 Comments: County Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec Quadrangle Coordinate Reference King T25R04na 21 NE SEATTLE NORTH Zone: 10 Spatial Type: Point Acquisition Code: Digitized Source Sequence: 1 Easting: 552660 Northing: 5276769 Sequence: 1 Easting: 552660 Northing: 5276769 Tax No./Parcel No. Plat/Block/Lot Supplemental Map(s) Acreage 0260000045 Arensberg Add/0010/TR9 0.18 IDENTIFICATION SECTION Survey Name: SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Field Recorder: Lori Durio Date Recorded: 9/14/2009 Owner's Name: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Childs, Shawn M 2517 Lake Washington Blvd. E Seattle, WA 98112 Classification: Building Resource Status Comments Survey/Inventory Within a District? No Contributing? National Register Nomination: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: DESCRIPTION SECTION Historic Use: Domestic - Single Family House View of front elevation taken 2/29/2004 Current Use: Domestic - Single Family House Photography Neg. No (Roll No./Frame No.): N/A Plan: L-Shape No. of Stories: 1 Comments: Structural System: Platform Frame Changes to plan: Intact Changes to interior: Unknown Style Form/Type Changes to original cladding: Intact Changes to other: Ranch Single Family - Side Gable Page 1 of 3 Printed on 9/23/2009 11:18:18 AM Historic Property at 2517 Lake Washington Blvd E, aka 2517 26th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Suquamish 7.5' Quadrangle and Part of the Seattle
    Geologic Map of the Suquamish 7.5’ Quadrangle and Part of the Seattle North 7.5’ x 15’ Quadrangle, Kitsap County, Washington By Ralph A. Haugerud and Kathy Goetz Troost Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3181 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey This page intentionally left blank Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Geologic framework .............................................................................................................................1 About this report ...................................................................................................................................2 Stratigraphy ....................................................................................................................................................3 Glacial and nonglacial deposits .........................................................................................................3 Deposits older than Olympia interglaciation of Armstrong and others (1965) ...................3 Deposits older than Vashon stade of Fraser glaciation of Armstrong and others (1965)..............................................................................................................................4 Vashon Drift ..................................................................................................................................4 Late-glacial deposits
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Walking Tour at the University of Washington Dedicated to Indigenous Students; Past, Present, and Future
    Indigenous Walking Tour at the University of Washington Dedicated to Indigenous students; past, present, and future. First Edition: 2021 Written by Owen L. Oliver Illustrations by Elijah N. Pasco (@the_campus_sketcher) This piece of work was written, created, and curated within multiple Indigenous lands and waters. Not limited to but including the Musqueam, Duwamish, Suquamish, Tulalip, Muckleshoot, Tlingit, Haida, and Tsimshian territories Contents Stop 1: Guest from the Great River Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture The beginning of this tour starts with a testament of knowledge. Specifically, Indigenous knowledge systems, Stop 2: Longhouse Welcome and how they are grounded in place on the University of Washington campus. This is especially important as these Intellectual House systems are not sprinkled around like many visitors and guests to the land may view it. These knowledge systems Stop 3: A Changing Story are rooted in the natural landscape that ties language Miller Hall and sacred history into what we call ‘Place’. Place of the first peoples has been intentionally and continuously Stop 4: Shoreline Connection entangled with colonial assimilation and destruction. What few people explain though, is how resilient Union Bay Natural Area and Preserve these Indigenous Knowledge Systems are. Ultimately, forgetting to showcase how these Indigenous Stop 5: Rest and Relaxation communities alongside welcomed community members, University of Washington Medicinal Garden allies, and all peoples take action and responsibility to prune out historical disenfranchisements. Stop 6: Building Coalitions, Inspiring others Samuel E. Kelly Ethnic Cultural Center Stop 7: Onward Husky Union Building Stop 1: Guests from the Great River I come from the people of the Lower Columbia River.
    [Show full text]
  • “Boys in the Boat” - Scenes in Seattle
    “Boys in the Boat” - Scenes in Seattle Many guests visiting Seattle these days have read the recent best-selling book The Boys in the Boat: Nine Americans and their Epic Quest for Gold at the 1936 Berlin Olympics by Daniel James Brown. This fascinating non-fiction book is about the University of Washington crew team that overcame great odds to get to Germany and win the 1936 Olympic gold medal. Spend an afternoon exploring north Seattle and see some highlights from the book. Drive by historic Roosevelt High School, where team member Joe Rantz graduated, walk the nearby, beautiful University of Washington (UW) campus, see the original winning shell built by George Pocock, rent a boat at the UW Waterfront Activities center during the nicer weather months, and make a stop at a local favorite, Agua Verde, for lunch or cocktails and maybe a kayak rental. University of Washington, www.washington.edu UW is also known as U-Dub to the locals. This university enrolls 45,000 students, and the main entrance is located at 17th Ave. NE and NE 45th Street. Its western border is Lake Washington and the southern border is the Montlake Cut, which is the body of water connecting Lake Washington and Lake Union, and where the UW crew team used to row. UW Waterfront Activities Center, https://www.washington.edu/ima/wac/ This building was originally a seaplane hangar built by the Navy in WWI and became the Canoe House which was where the original 1936 crew team practiced. It is now open to the public during the nicer months of the year and is used as a canoe and rental facility.
    [Show full text]