DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmnetal Impact Statement for the Green Bank Observatory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmnetal Impact Statement for the Green Bank Observatory Draft November 9, 2017 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Bank Observatory, Green Bank, West Virginia National Science Foundation November 9, 2017 Cover Sheet Draft Environmental Impact Statement Green Bank Observatory, Green Bank, West Virginia Responsible Agency: The National Science Foundation (NSF) For more information, contact: Ms. Elizabeth Pentecost Division of Astronomical Sciences Room W9152 2415 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 Public Comment Period: November 9, 2017 through January 8, 2018 (extended beyond typical 45-day review period to allow for the holidays) To Submit a Comment: • Send email with subject line “Green Bank Observatory” to: [email protected] • Send mail addressed to: Ms. Elizabeth Pentecost, RE: Green Bank Observatory Division of Astronomical Sciences Room W9152 2415 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314 Abstract: The NSF has produced a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with potential funding changes for Green Bank Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia. The five Alternatives analyzed in the DEIS are: A) collaboration with interested parties for continued science- and education-focused operations with reduced NSF funding (the Agency- preferred Alternative); B) collaboration with interested parties for operation as a technology and education park; C) mothballing of facilities; D) demolition and site restoration; and the No-Action Alternative. The environmental resources considered in the DEIS are biological resources, cultural resources, visual resources, geology and soils, water resources, hazardous materials, solid waste, health and safety, noise, traffic and transportation, socioeconomics, and environmental justice. I Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.5.1 Action Alternative A: Collaboration with Interested Parties for Continued Science- and Education-focused Operations with Reduced NSF funding (Agency-preferred Alternative) ....................................................................... ES-5 ES.5.2 Action Alternative B: Collaboration with Interested Parties for Operation as a Technology and Education Park ...................................................................... ES-6 ES.5.3 Action Alternative C: Mothballing of Facilities .............................................. ES-6 ES.5.4 Action Alternative D: Demolition and Site Restoration .................................. ES-8 ES.5.5 No-Action Alternative: Continued NSF Investment for Science‐focused Operations ........................................................................................................ ES-8 ES.8.1 Action Alternative A: Collaboration with Interested Parties for Continued Science- and Education-focused Operations with Reduced NSF funding (Agency-preferred Alternative) ..................................................................... ES-13 ES.8.2 Action Alternative B: Collaboration with Interested Parties for Operation as a Technology and Education Park .................................................................... ES-15 ES.8.3 Action Alternative C: Mothballing of Facilities ............................................ ES-16 ES.8.4 Action Alternative D: Demolition and Site Restoration ................................ ES-17 ES.8.5 No-Action Alternative: Continued NSF Investment for Science‐focused Operations ...................................................................................................... ES-19 1 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Background and Location .................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 1-5 1.3 Federal Regulatory Setting .............................................................................................. 1-7 1.3.1 National Environmental Policy Act .................................................................... 1-7 1.3.2 National Historic Preservation Act ..................................................................... 1-7 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act ..................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.4 National Radio Quiet Zone ................................................................................. 1-8 1.4 Agency Notification and Collaboration ........................................................................... 1-9 1.5 Public Disclosure and Involvement ................................................................................. 1-9 1.6 Arrangement and Content of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ..................... 1-10 1.6.1 Document Content ............................................................................................ 1-10 1.6.2 Resource Analysis............................................................................................. 1-10 2 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Action Alternative A: Collaboration with Interested Parties for Continued Science- and Education-focused Operations with Reduced NSF funding (Agency-preferred Alternative) ...................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Action Alternative B: Collaboration with Interested Parties for Operation as a Technology and Education Park ...................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 Action Alternative C: Mothballing of Facilities .............................................................. 2-4 2.5 Action Alternative D: Demolition and Site Restoration .................................................. 2-5 2.6 No-Action Alternative: Continued NSF Investment for Science‐focused Operations .... 2-7 3 Affected Environment ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Ecological Setting ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Vegetation ........................................................................................................... 3-1 I TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 3.1.3 Wildlife ............................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................. 3-2 3.1.5 Migratory Birds................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.1 Area of Potential Effects ..................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.2 Site History ......................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Visual Resources ............................................................................................................ 3-13 3.3.1 Proposed Action Area ....................................................................................... 3-13 3.4 Geology and Soil ........................................................................................................... 3-18 3.4.1 Proposed Action Area ....................................................................................... 3-18 3.5 Water Resources ............................................................................................................ 3-23 3.5.1 Wetlands ........................................................................................................... 3-23 3.5.2 Surface Water ................................................................................................... 3-23 3.5.3 Floodplains ....................................................................................................... 3-24 3.5.4 Groundwater ..................................................................................................... 3-24 3.6 Hazardous Materials ...................................................................................................... 3-27 3.6.1 Existing Site Contamination ............................................................................. 3-27 3.6.2 Use of Hazardous Materials .............................................................................. 3-28 3.7 Solid Waste .................................................................................................................... 3-29 3.7.1 Proposed Action Area ....................................................................................... 3-29 3.8 Health and Safety ........................................................................................................... 3-31 3.8.1 Proposed Action Area ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multidisciplinary Use of the J Very Long Baseline Array
    PE84-16~690 Multidisciplinary Use of the j Very Long Baseline Array Proceedings of a Workshop REPRODUCED BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL NAS INFORMATION SERVICE us DEPAR1MENl OF COMMERCE NAE .. SPRINGFiElD, VA. 22161 10M 50272 ·101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION \1. REPORT NO. PAGE 4. TItle end Subtitle 50 Report Dete Multidisciplinary Use of the Very Long Baseline Array .. Februarv 1984 7. Author(l) L Performln. O...nlutlon Rept. No. 9. Performlna O...nlutlon Neme end Add.... 10. ProJKt/Tuk/Wort! Unit No. National Research Council 11. Contrect(C2 or Gr.nt(G) No. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and DMA800-M0366/P Resources ~MDA903-83-M-5896/P i (G)AST-8303119 2101 Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20418 ~NA 83AAA02632/P 12. Sponsor1na O..enlutlon Neme end Add_ 11. Type of Report & Period Covered National Science Foundation Final Report. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 11/01/82-3/31/84 Defense Mapping Agency 14. NOAA National Geodetic Survev , Defense Adv. Res. Proj. 15. Supplementer)' Notes . Agency 16. Abltreet (Umlt 200 words) The National Research Council organized a workshop to gather together experts in very long baseline interferometry, astronomy, space navigation, general relativity and the earth sciences,. The purpose of the workshop was to provide a forum for consideration of the various possible multi­ disciplinary uses of the very long baseline array. Geophysical investigations received major attention. Geodesic uses of the very long baseline array were identified as were uses for fundamental astronomy investigations. Numerous specialized uses were identified. i, Document Anelysll e. Descriptors Very Long Baseline Array, astronomical research, space navigation, general relativity, geophysics, earth sciences, geodetic monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Acronyms
    List of Acronyms List of Acronyms AAS American Astronomical Society AC (IVS) Analysis Center ACF AutoCorrelation Function ACU Antenna Control Unit ADC Analog to Digital Converter AES Advanced Engineering Services Co., Ltd (Japan) AGILE Astro-rivelatore Gamma ad Immagini LEggero satellite (Italy) AGN Active Galactic Nuclei AIPS Astronomical Image Processing System AIUB Astronomical Institute, University of Bern (Switzerland) AO Astronomical Object APSG Asia-Pacific Space Geodynamics program APT Asia Pacific Telescope ARIES Astronomical Radio Interferometric Earth Surveying program ASD Allan Standard Deviation ASI Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (Italy) ATA Allen Telescope Array (USA) ATCA Australia Telescope Compact Array (Australia) ATM Asynchronous Transfer Mode ATNF Australia Telescope National Facility (Australia) AUT Auckland University of Technology (New Zealand) A-WVR Advanced Water Vapor Radiometer BBC Base Band Converter BdRAO Badary Radio Astronomical Observatory (Russia) BIPM Bureau Internacional de Poids et Mesures (France) BKG Bundesamt f¨ur Kartographie und Geod¨asie (Germany) BMC Basic Module of Correlator BOSSNET BOSton South NETwork BVID Bordeaux VLBI Image Database BWG Beam WaveGuide CARAVAN Compact Antenna of Radio Astronomy for VLBI Adapted Network (Japan) CAS Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) CASPER Center for Astronomy Signal Processing and Electronics Research (USA) CAY Centro Astron´omico de Yebes (Spain) CC (IVS) Coordinating Center CDDIS Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (USA) CDP Crustal Dynamics Project CE
    [Show full text]
  • 390 the VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY PETER J. NAPIER National
    Radio Interferomelry: Theory, Techniques and Applications, 390 IAU Coll. 131, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 19,1991, T.J. Comwell and R.A. Perley (eds.) THE VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY PETER J. NAPIER National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O.Box 0, Socorro, NM 87801, USA ABSTRACT The Very Long Baseline Array, currently under construction, is a dedicated VLBI array consisting of ten 25m diameter antennas and a 20 station correlator. The key design features that make it a flexible, general purpose instrument are reviewed and some details are provided of the array layout, frequency coverage and sensitivity. INTRODUCTION Construction of the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) began in 1985 and is scheduled for completion in 1992. The goal of the project is to provide an instrument which can carry out research on a wide range of problems in the field of very high resolution radio astronomy. General information about the VLBA and its potential research areas is available in Kellerman and Thompson (1985) and a summary of its instrumental parameters is provided by Vanden Bout (1991). In this paper we briefly review the current major design goals for the instrument and give some details of the array layout and antenna and receiver performance. Details of other aspects of the VLBA can be found elsewhere in these proceedings; see Rogers (tape recorder), Bagri and Thompson (electronics design), Thompson and Bagri (calibration system) and Chikada (correlator). PROJECT DESIGN GOALS The principal design goals for the VLBA are as follows: (1) Provide an array of 10 identical elements dedicated to VLBI astronomy. The antennas will be in continuous operation under remote control from the Array Operations Center (AOC) in Socorro.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Astronomy
    Edition of 2013 HANDBOOK ON RADIO ASTRONOMY International Telecommunication Union Sales and Marketing Division Place des Nations *38650* CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Fax: +41 22 730 5194 Printed in Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 730 6141 Geneva, 2013 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978-92-61-14481-4 Edition of 2013 Web: www.itu.int/publications Photo credit: ATCA David Smyth HANDBOOK ON RADIO ASTRONOMY Radiocommunication Bureau Handbook on Radio Astronomy Third Edition EDITION OF 2013 RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU Cover photo: Six identical 22-m antennas make up CSIRO's Australia Telescope Compact Array, an earth-rotation synthesis telescope located at the Paul Wild Observatory. Credit: David Smyth. ITU 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. - iii - Introduction to the third edition by the Chairman of ITU-R Working Party 7D (Radio Astronomy) It is an honour and privilege to present the third edition of the Handbook – Radio Astronomy, and I do so with great pleasure. The Handbook is not intended as a source book on radio astronomy, but is concerned principally with those aspects of radio astronomy that are relevant to frequency coordination, that is, the management of radio spectrum usage in order to minimize interference between radiocommunication services. Radio astronomy does not involve the transmission of radiowaves in the frequency bands allocated for its operation, and cannot cause harmful interference to other services. On the other hand, the received cosmic signals are usually extremely weak, and transmissions of other services can interfere with such signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure in the Radio Counterpart to the 2004 Dec 27 Giant Flare From
    SLAC-PUB-11623 astro-ph/0511214 Structure in the radio counterpart to the 2004 Dec 27 giant flare from SGR 1806-20 R. P. Fender1⋆, T.W.B. Muxlow2, M.A. Garrett3, C. Kouveliotou4, B.M. Gaensler5, S.T. Garrington2, Z. Paragi3, V. Tudose6,7, J.C.A. Miller-Jones6, R.E. Spencer2, R.A.M. Wijers6, G.B. Taylor8,9,10 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK 2 University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Cheshire, SK11 9DL, UK 3 Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe, Postbus 2, NL-7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands 4 NASA / Marshall Space Flight Center, NSSTC, XD-12, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA 5 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 6 Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands 7 Astronomical Institute of the Romanian Academy, Cutitul de Argint 5, RO-040557 Bucharest, Romania 8 Kavli Institute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA 9 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 10Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA 8 November 2005 ABSTRACT On Dec 27, 2004, the magnetar SGR 1806-20 underwent an enormous outburst resulting in the formation of an expanding, moving, and fading radio source. We report observations of this radio source with the Multi-Element Radio-Linked Interferometer Network (MERLIN) and the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA). The observations confirm the elongation and expansion already reported based on observations at lower angular resolutions, but suggest that at early epochs the structure is not consistent with the very simplest models such as a smooth flux distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Very Long Baseline Interferometry Imaging of the Advancing Ejecta in the first Gamma-Ray Nova V407 Cygni? M
    A&A 638, A130 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038142 & c ESO 2020 Astrophysics Very long baseline interferometry imaging of the advancing ejecta in the first gamma-ray nova V407 Cygni? M. Giroletti1, U. Munari2, E. Körding3, A. Mioduszewski4, J. Sokoloski5,6, C. C. Cheung7, S. Corbel8,9, F. Schinzel10;??, K. Sokolovsky11,12,13 , and T. J. O’Brien14 1 INAF Istituto di Radioastronomia, via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 INAF Astronomical Observatory of Padova, 36012 Asiago (VI), Italy 3 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Array Operations Center, 1003 Lopezville Road, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 5 Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA 6 LSST Corproation, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 7 Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA 8 Laboratoire AIM (CEA/IRFU – CNRS/INSU – Université Paris Diderot), CEA DSM/IRFU/SAp, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 9 Station de Radioastronomie de Nançay, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS/INSU, USR 704 – Univ. Orléans, OSUC, 18330 Nançay, France 10 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box O, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 11 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 12 Astro Space Center, Lebedev Physical Inst. RAS, Profsoyuznaya 84/32, 117997 Moscow, Russia 13 Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Universitetsky 13, 119991 Moscow, Russia 14 Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Alan Turing Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK Received 10 April 2020 / Accepted 11 May 2020 ABSTRACT Context.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Radio Astronomy Using Very Long Baseline Interferometry
    IOP PUBLISHING REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS Rep. Prog. Phys. 71 (2008) 066901 (32pp) doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/6/066901 High resolution radio astronomy using very long baseline interferometry Enno Middelberg1 and Uwe Bach2 1 Astronomisches Institut, Universitat¨ Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 2 Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hugel¨ 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected] Received 3 December 2007, in final form 11 March 2008 Published 2 May 2008 Online at stacks.iop.org/RoPP/71/066901 Abstract Very long baseline interferometry, or VLBI, is the observing technique yielding the highest-resolution images today. Whilst a traditionally large fraction of VLBI observations is concentrating on active galactic nuclei, the number of observations concerned with other astronomical objects such as stars and masers, and with astrometric applications, is significant. In the last decade, much progress has been made in all of these fields. We give a brief introduction to the technique of radio interferometry, focusing on the particularities of VLBI observations, and review recent results which would not have been possible without VLBI observations. This article was invited by Professor J Silk. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2.9. The future of VLBI: eVLBI, VLBI in space and 2. The theory of interferometry and aperture the SKA 10 synthesis 2 2.10. VLBI arrays around the world and their 2.1. Fundamentals 2 capabilities 10 2.2. Sources of error in VLBI observations 7 3. Astrophysical applications 11 2.3. The problem of phase calibration: 3.1. Active galactic nuclei and their jets 12 self-calibration 7 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Angular Separation Between Spacecraft and Quasars with the Very Long Baseline Array
    IPN Progress Report 42-162 August 15, 2005 Determination of Angular Separation Between Spacecraft and Quasars with the Very Long Baseline Array G. Lanyi,1 J. Border,1 J. Benson,2 V. Dhawan,2 E. Fomalont,3 T. Martin-Mur,4 T. McElrath,4 J. Romney,2 and C. Walker2 The interferometric technique of phase referencing was used to determine the relative angular positions of the Mars Exploration Rover B (MER-B) spacecraft with respect to angularly nearby quasars. The final cruise state of MER-B was ob- served in three sessions by the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) as part of a larger feasibility study to determine the accuracy of this technique. This article summa- rizes the VLBA observations and reductions of the nominal 10-station (45-baseline) observables, the incorporation of the delay data within the Orbit Determination Program, and the comparison of the VLBA and the Deep Space Network (DSN)- based delta differential one-way ranging (∆DOR) results. The pathway from VLBA observations to navigation use of the data is well-defined. The analysis shows that the formal accuracy of the VLBA-determined approximately declination-projected position of the spacecraft is 1.2 nanoradians (nrad) when the correlation among different-station delay observables is ignored. This formal accuracy, deduced from observed residual delay scatter, is about two times smaller than the corresponding result from the DSN ∆DOR observations. While the effect of quasar position and station location errors was included as a priori error in the estimate of formal errors, note that, to highlight the impact of improved measurement precision, the formal accuracy values do not include the larger Mars ephemeris and planetary-to-inertial- frame tie and the effects of possible modeling errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents - 1 - - 2
    Table of contents - 1 - - 2 - Table of Contents Foreword 5 1. The European Consortium for VLBI 7 2. Scientific highlights on EVN research 9 3. Network Operations 35 4. VLBI technical developments and EVN operations support at member institutes 47 5. Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe (JIVE) 83 6. EVN meetings 105 7. EVN publications in 2007-2008 109 - 3 - - 4 - Foreword by the Chairman of the Consortium The European VLBI Network (EVN) is the result of a collaboration among most major radio observatories in Europe, China, Puerto Rico and South Africa. The large radio telescopes hosted by these observatories are operated in a coordinated way to perform very high angular observations of cosmic radio sources. The data are then correlated by using the EVN correlator at the Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe (JIVE). The EVN, when operating as a single astronomical instrument, is the most sensitive VLBI array and constitutes one of the major scientific facilities in the world. The EVN also co-observes with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) and other radio telescopes in the U.S., Australia, Japan, Russia, and with stations of the NASA Deep Space Network to form a truly global array. In the past, the EVN also operated jointly with the Japanese space antenna HALCA in the frame of the VLBI Space Observatory Programme (VSOP). The EVN plans now to co-observe with the Japanese space 10-m antenna ASTRO-G, to be launched by 2012, within the frame of the VSOP-2 project. With baselines in excess of 25.000 km, the space VLBI observations provide the highest angular resolution ever achieved in Astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARECIBO OBSERVATORY PLANETARY RADAR SYSTEM. P. A. Taylor 1, M. C. Nolan2, E. G. Rivera-Valentın1, J. E. Richardson1, L. A
    47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 2534.pdf THE ARECIBO OBSERVATORY PLANETARY RADAR SYSTEM. P. A. Taylor1, M. C. Nolan2, E. G. Rivera-Valent´ın1, J. E. Richardson1, L. A. Rodriguez-Ford1, L. F. Zambrano-Marin1, E. S. Howell2, and J. T. Schmelz1; 1Arecibo Observatory, Universities Space Research Association, HC 3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612 ([email protected]); 2Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721. Introduction: The William E. Gordon telescope at of Solar System objects at radio wavelengths. The Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico is the largest and unmatched sensitivity of Arecibo allows for detection most sensitive single-dish radio telescope and the most of any potentially hazardous asteroid (PHA; absolute active and powerful planetary radar facility in the world. magnitude H < 22) that comes within ∼0.05 AU of Since opening in 1963, Arecibo has made significant Earth (∼20 lunar distances) and most any asteroid scientific contributions in the fields of planetary science, larger than ∼10 meters (H < 27) within ∼0.015 AU radio astronomy, and space and atmospheric sciences. (∼6 lunar distances) in the Arecibo declination window Arecibo is a facility of the National Science Founda- (0◦ to +38◦), as well as objects as far away as Saturn. tion (NSF) operated under cooperative agreement with In terms of near-Earth objects, Arecibo observations SRI International along with Universities Space Re- are critical for identifying those objects that may be on search Association and Universidad Metropolitana, part a collision course with Earth in addition to providing of the Ana G.
    [Show full text]
  • CIA-2014-LOG.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Central Intelligence Agency Washington,• D.C. 20505 7 April2015 Mr. John Greenewald, Jr. Reference: F-2015-01346 Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is a final response to your 29 March 2015 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, received in the office of the Information and Privacy Coordinator on 30 March 2015, for a copy of the 2014 calendar year FOIA Case log. Enclosed is a copy of the 2014 calendar year CIA FOIA log, consisting of 95 pages. Please note the FOIA case logs are unavailable in electronic format. The information includes the date the case was created, the case number, and the subject of the request. Since you are entitled to the first 100 pages free, there is no charge for this document. Sincerely, lfcLJ)~ Michael Lavergne Information and Privacy Coordinator Enclosures FOIA CASE LOG JANUARY- MARCH 2014 02-Jan-14 F-2014-00535 ;RECORDS ON NELSON MANDELA ~· --··~ ~-- ~. .,.~r·~ --.- ~ w----···"·-. '" ... ···--r_... •. , ... _ .......- ....._ --- .. ------ · ·~"---"'"'·'·~--·' '"' ··~ • -· .... --.. -···~~·-·-h• --- ...... --··· - .. ---.· ..... __.,. _,,..._. i 02-Jan-14 · 1F-2014-00536 tCREST DOC ....... ... ..... --·--... .....+------- -... ···-·--·-·-·--·------ --·---+----·----· ----.............. _.. ___ .......... _.. ____________ .. -- .. - ...... .. - .. .......... ,_, _____ .. ____ , ........... ........ --- ...... --------·-· .... .. ....... .. ..... .. !COPY OF AN IRAQ WMD RETROSPECTIVE SERIES INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT ON (02-Jan-14 l:F-2014-00539 !"BIOLOGICAL WARFARE EFFORTS" .r ..
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers Book One
    Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers Book One Since 2013 I have been emailed several dozen reports of possible medical and other hazards from intense electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and towers, Wi-Fi, smart meters, and wireless computer accessories including wireless computers, keyboards, mice, routers, printers, and laptops. I have compiled over 200 pages of these reports in chronological order. This file is linked at www.commutefaster.com/vesperman.html and www.padrak.com/vesperman. Several related ‗EMF‘ files are also linked at these two websites. A second Book Two with the same title as this Book One is also linked at these two websites. This report begins with ―Disclaimers‖, Table of Contents, and potentially useful ―Recommendations for Actions‖ followed by a selection of short ―Items of Outstanding Interest‖. Gary Vesperman 588 Lake Huron Lane Boulder City, NV 89005-1018 702-435-7947 [email protected] Urgent! By July 12, 2016 please send the template letter on page 210 to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and your Senators and Representative. The FCC is voting July 14, 2016 on whether to move forward with 5G – an extremely dangerous technology. Wireless technology has the potential to compromise the genetic integrity of individuals for all future generations. (The FCC did approve 5G at their July 14 meeting.) Hazards of Toxic Cell Phones, Wireless Devices, Etc – Book One 1 August 17, 2016 Disclaimers Inclusion of any invention or technology in this ―Possible Hazards of Cell Phones and Towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and Wireless Computers, Printers, Laptops, Mice, Keyboards, and Routers – Book One‖ does not in any way imply its suitability for investments of any kind.
    [Show full text]