Anchoring of Service Design Projects for Successful Implementation: How Service Design Can Learn from Change Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anchoring of Service Design Projects for Successful Implementation: How Service Design Can Learn from Change Management Anchoring of Service Design Projects for Successful Implementation: How Service Design Can Learn from Change Management Siri Bjørnsund Lønvik Department of Product Design Norwegian University of Science and Technology ABSTRACT Service design is the activity of planning and designing the experience of a service and the interaction between people and products within a service. Design of services usually happens as a project activity where service designers include the service providers and stakeholders in a user-centred design process. Anchoring is the activity of grounding and aligning project aims and goals in the organisations culture, needs and aims. This article gives an overview of research of anchoring tactics within the service design field as well as relating the theme to change management theory. A new approach for anchoring is suggested and the approach is discussed in a study of a service design project for a puBlic service. The article concludes that service design projects should be treated a type of change management and suggests that service design should borrow theory from the management fields. KEYWORDS: Service Design, Anchoring, Stakeholder Involvement, Change Management, Implementation, PuBlic Services 1. INTRODUCTION due to service design’s systemic and holistic 70 % of all new initiatives fail [1]. This is perhaps approach, which might otherwise Be difficult for especially evident in innovation projects within public service organisations to achieve. Service the puBlic sector, which can go over Budget and design is an interdisciplinary approach, although scheduled time and produce average results it has a strong emphasis on user-centred design. [2][3][4][5]. In later years the puBlic sector has been looking towards the service design field for Introducing new services translates to a change solving important proBlems [6][7]. This could Be in the organisation. Projects usually fail due to 1 Anchoring of Service Design Project for Successful Implementation implementation failures and not design failures supplemented with examples from a service as one might perhaps think [1]. The difficult part design project within the puBlic sector. of organisational change is therefore not the new organisation design but managing the 2. DEFINITIONS change to that organisation; the 2.1 Service Design implementation. A suBstantial amount of Service design is a relatively new field and is still research has Been done on factors that can in constant evolvement [9]. It has estaBlished improve implementation outside of design itself as a separate design discipline, however research [8]. As service designers should focus includes elements from various other fields on maximizing success rate, it is important to ranging from phycology to management [10]. uncover what service designers might learn There are as many definitions of service design from other fields when it comes to managing as there are practitioners and the definitions are change. often broad. In this article service design is defined as “the activity of planning and This article attempts to give an overview of organizing people, infrastructure, anchoring in service design and the communication and material components of a management field. First a presentation is given service in order to improve its quality and the of central concepts related to anchoring within interaction Between service provider and service design. Next, it explains what role customers” [11]. This definition illustrates anchoring has in service design and why it is service design’s emphasis on the user, however important for the service designer to consider it is also important to ensure that the service anchoring. The third part will give a short interface is effective, efficient and distinctive introduction to change management and give from the supplier’s point of view [12]. An an overview of anchoring within this field, important characteristic of service design is including different methods and approaches. It intangible experiences that span over different will then discuss the relationship between touch points and time [13]. One way services service design and change management on the differ from products, in addition to them Being suBject of anchoring. Based on the discussion it intangible, is that they are non-existing until will propose some principles for anchoring in used by someone. This is referred to as co- service design projects. Finally, the principles creation or co-production, which means that the and learning outcomes will Be discussed in light customers are participating in creating the of a project study. service [14]. This article is a review of literature from the 2.2 Anchoring fields of service design and change Anchoring is defined as providing firm basis or management, on the topics of anchoring, foundation [15]. One approach to anchoring is implementation management and stakeholder alignment, although it is not often used in involvement. Literature used in this study is conjunction with service design. However, in the from textbooks and research articles from project management field, alignment refers to various academic journals, as well as some the activity of aligning project goals and relevant news articles. The literature review is objectives with various stakeholders, and it 2 Anchoring of Service Design Project for Successful Implementation must Be done in the initiation phase, which is the first phase of a project. In Norwegian anchoring (“forankring”) is commonly used in project and development work, and it refers to how stakeholders understand the value and importance of a process, as well as having an interest in the project being done [16]. 2.3 Stakeholders A stakeholder can be defined as someone who has the ability to affect a project in any way Figure 1: Stakeholders [17][18]. Design commonly refers to the term users, who are users of the product or service in 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF question. Users are one of the stakeholders in a ANCHORING IN SERVICE DESIGN service design project. There are primary users, 3.1 The Complexity of Services the ones the product is made for, and secondary Service design has evolved from the field of users, for example service personnel or product design, and comparing the two fields installers. Users are sometimes the customer, allows us to see why service design has to Be a but not necessarily. One may have one suBject separate approach. In essence, product paying for the product or service (“the designers design for the interaction Between customer”), and another suBject using the product and user. To design a product, the product or service. Service design often refers to designer needs to have an understanding of actors [10], which is a Broader term than user, how people will interact with the product. The and includes everyone who are involved in product is fixed and will behave in a predictable delivering or using the service, also including way Based on different inputs. Services are staff or employees from the service provider more complex and consist of different service organisation. The term stakeholder is used in encounters. A service encounter is an both management theory and service design, interaction between people or between people and includes both users, customers and actors, and products; what is referred to as service as well as decision makers and Back office staff evidence [9]. All people are different and have in the organisation that delivers the service. In individual needs. People are more complex than services there are often many stakeholders products and will not behave in a predictable involved. For puBlic services, stakeholders can way based on different input. include service recipients, delivery agencies, their partners, ministers, other politicians, civil servants and taxpayers [19]. See Figure 1 for an illustration of how these concepts relate to each other. 3 Anchoring of Service Design Project for Successful Implementation actors in the organisation are the ones delivering the service, they need to be motivated to do it the right way. The client or management are often decision makers in the project, and in some cases there may also Be other stakeholder groups that affect final decisions. Because of this, an important task of service designers is to engage multiple stakeholders group [22]. Figure 2: Touch points and service encounters, 3.2 Service designers are user-centred adapted from Polaine, Løvlie & Reason [14]. Designers aim to Be user-centred, which means that they attempt to see the product or service In the case of traditional product design, the from the point of view of the user. This is called deliveraBle of a design project is a finished empathy, which is defined as the ability to Be product, ready for implementation. Services on aware of, understand and Be sensitive to other the other hand, cannot Be designed and people’s feelings and thoughts without having delivered in the same way. Services are had the same experience [23]. Empathy with the intangible and do not exist until they are used, user is achieved through various design research since services are created in the interactions methods, for example oBservation, data between users and service providers. Designing collection and analysis, and iterative services is therefore not about producing an end prototyping. Service designers excel at achieving result, But designing “a platform for action with empathy with end users and visualising new which diverse actors will engage over time” ideas and concepts, however they are criticized [20]. Services rely on complex and relational of their poor ability to implement new solutions entities that cannot be designed or pre- [24]. determined [21]. For instance, in order to implement a new service where the front staff Service designers strive to create delight and has to act in a different manner than before desire, and focus on what is called the user towards the customers, the staff needs change experience. There is an asymmetric power their existing routines Before one can see the distribution between the user and the result.
Recommended publications
  • Linking Design Management Skills and Design Function Organization: an Empirical Study of Spanish and Italian Ceramic Tile Producers
    CASTELLÓN (SPAIN) LINKING DESIGN MANAGEMENT SKILLS AND DESIGN FUNCTION ORGANIZATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SPANISH AND ITALIAN CERAMIC TILE PRODUCERS Ricardo Chiva (1), Joaquín Alegre (2), David Gobert (3), Rafael Lapiedra (1) (1) Universitat Jaume I, (2) Universitat de València, (3) ITC, Universitat Jaume I, ABSTRACT Design management is an increasingly important concept, research into which is very scarce. This paper deals with the fit between design management skills and design function organization, ranging from solely in-house to solely outsourced and including a mixture of the two. We carried out a survey in the Spanish and Italian ceramic tile industry, to which 177 product development managers responded. Our results revealed that companies have different degrees of design management skills depending on the approach to design function organization. Solely in-house design approach companies are the most skilled firms and solely outsourced ones are the least skilled. Despite the fact that the design function has apparently evolved towards outsourcing, this research supports the idea that, under certain conditions, the in-house design department is the best option in order to attain higher degrees of design management skills. Implications of the findings for both academics and practitioners are examined. P.BA - 79 CASTELLÓN (SPAIN) 1. INTRODUCTION In today’s competitive environment, design is becoming increasingly important. Good design, though, does not emerge by accident but as the result of a managed process (Bruce and Bessant, 2002, p. 38). Apart from the development process leading up to the creation of an artifact or product, the concept of design has traditionally involved a series of organizational activities, practices or skills that are required for this development to be achieved (Gorb and Dumas, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • A Glossary of User-Centered Design Strategies for Implemen- Tation Experts
    TBM ORIGINAL RESEARCH A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implemen- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/tbm/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/tbm/iby119/5232646 by guest on 07 December 2018 tation experts Alex R. Dopp,1, Kathryn E. Parisi,1 Sean A. Munson,2 Aaron R. Lyon3 1Department of Psychological Abstract Science, University of Arkansas, User-centered design (UCD), a discipline that seeks to ground Implications Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA the design of an innovation in information about the people 2 Practice: Use of shared language around user-cen- Department of Human Centered who will ultimately use that innovation, has great potential tered design (as presented in this glossary) can Design and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA to improve the translation of evidence-based practices from maximize the usefulness of interdisciplinary 98195, USA behavioral medicine research for implementation in health care efforts to promote the implementation of evi- 3Department of Psychiatry and settings. UCD is a diverse, innovative field that remains highly dence-based practices through improved design. Behavioral Sciences, University of variable in terms of language and approaches. Ultimately, we Washington School of Medicine, produced a glossary of UCD-related strategies specifically for Seattle, WA 98195, USA experts in implementation research and practice, with the goal Policy: Policymakers who wish to promote a of promoting interdisciplinary collaboration in implementation user-centered culture in health services should efforts. We conducted a focused literature review to identify consider the value of tools like this glossary in key concepts and specific strategies of UCD to translate into developing shared language and interdisciplinary the implementation field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Visual Communication Design Is Almost Invisible Or Why Skills in Visual Aesthetics Are Important to Service Design
    ServDes2018 - Service Design Proof of Concept Politecnico di Milano 18th-19th-20th, June 2018 The future of visual communication design is almost invisible or why skills in visual aesthetics are important to service design Mark Roxburgh [email protected] School of Creative Industries, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, Australia, 2308 Jemimah Irvin [email protected] nib Health Insurance, Locked Bag 2010, Newcastle, Australia, 2300 Abstract Over the past 20 years there has been an increase in post-secondary visual communication education in Australia while the growth of the industry itself has been low, meaning an increasing number of graduates compete for a limited pool of jobs1. The use of visualisation in human centered and service design approaches provides alternative employment opportunities for these graduates. This paper presents a case study of a visual communication honors research project that is indicative of those opportunities and the potential benefits of having highly skilled visual practitioners involved in human centered and service design processes. Furthermore, we argue that a consideration of the aesthetics of the visualisation methods used in this context is essential and that visual aesthetics should be a significant part of the service design skillset. KEYWORDS: visual communication, visual aesthetics, visual research methods, visual storytelling, visual skills 1 Average annual employment growth for visual communication in Australia: Historical 2010 – 2017, 0.69%. Forecast 2018 – 2024, 1.4% (Do, 2017). Introduction Whilst we use a visual communication honors design research project as a case study to argue our case, it is not our intention to provide a detailed account of the project, a step by step guide of the methods of research and an analysis of its success or failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Warts-And-All: the Real Practice of Service Design
    Warts-and-all: the real practice of service design Dr Yoko Akama School of Media and Communication RMIT University GPO Box 2467V Melbourne Victoria 3001 Australia Tel: +61 (0)3 9925 9807 Fax: +61 (0)3 9639 1685 e-mail: [email protected] www.rmit.edu.au Introduction Service design practice, discourse and education are still nascent in Australia where most designers are trained in fields such as industrial design, architecture, communication design, and to a lesser degree, interaction design (a field that is equally nascent). Academic research on service design has so far been limited (Kimbell and Seidel 2008) and much of the knowledge generated from business contexts has been proprietary (Tether 2008). These factors have led to a lack of critical engagement in examining and investigating the complex contexts that surrounds service design projects. This also adds to the challenging obstacles for designers seeking to establish and embarking upon a service design-led practice in Australia. The paper critiques service design case studies that are often documented and reported in a manner that abstracts and generalises the realities of this field as obstacles to understanding the ‘real’ practice of service design. Through attempts to clarify, systematise and advocate the benefit of service design, authors might gloss over the messy realities and the contextual knowledge grounded in action. This has resulted in practice-based knowledge being ‘lost in translation’. This is a critical shortfall. It becomes a disadvantageous factor in developing learning frameworks for designers in similar contexts to Australia who are seeking models, methods, case studies and discourse on service design from established agencies and research institutions on service design across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Adding UX in the Service Design Loop: the Case of Crisis Management Services
    Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A, N.37, 2018, pp. 47-77 Adding UX in the Service Design Loop: The Case of Crisis Management Services 1 1 Karim Touloum , Djilali Idoughi , Ahmed Seffah2 1 University A. Mira of Bejaia, Bejaia, Algeria 2 Innovation and Software Department, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland {karim.touloum, djilali.idoughi}@univ-bejaia.dz [email protected] Abstract. Focus on user experience (UX) has been a growing trend in service design (SD), as it has various benefits. As it will be demonstrated in this paper, developing an efficient, yet usable crisis management service requires a deep understanding of the experience of all stakeholders involved in the crisis. While many SD studies have proposed different principles, practices and tools, there is a lack of a practical comprehensive design framework that empowers designers to integrate effectively UX in the SD lifecycle. In this paper we propose a methodological framework called UXD-IS (User eXperience Design of Interactions and Services) that combines UX characterization and touchpoints analysis. The framework has been validated through a case study related to flooding crisis management. The investigations reveal that the framework is a powerful support tool during the first phases of the development of a new service or the improvement of an existing one. Keywords: user experience, service design, interactive service, design framework, touchpoints, user journey, crisis management. 1 Introduction Crisis management services are undergoing major and fundamental changes in all countries around the world. This is a result of a number of convening forces including public budget cuts, demographic shifts, massive immigration, urbanization, environmental challenges, terrorism risks and rapid technological change [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretically Comparing Design Thinking to Design Methods for Large- Scale Infrastructure Systems
    The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2018) Bath, UK, January 31st – February 2nd 2018 THEORETICALLY COMPARING DESIGN THINKING TO DESIGN METHODS FOR LARGE- SCALE INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS M.A. Guerra1 and T. Shealy1 1Civil Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA Abstract: Design of new and re-design of existing infrastructure systems will require creative ways of thinking in order to meet increasingly high demand for services. Both the theory and practice of design thinking helps to exploit opposing ideas for creativity, and also provides an approach to balance stakeholder needs, technical feasibility, and resource constraints. This study compares the intent and function of five current design strategies for infrastructure with the theory and practice of design thinking. The evidence suggests the function and purpose of the later phases of design thinking, prototyping and testing, are missing from current design strategies for infrastructure. This is a critical oversight in design because designers gain much needed information about the performance of the system amid user behaviour. Those who design infrastructure need to explore new ways to incorporate feedback mechanisms gained from prototyping and testing. The use of physical prototypes for infrastructure may not be feasible due to scale and complexity. Future research should explore the use of prototyping and testing, in particular, how virtual prototypes could substitute the experience of real world installments and how this influences design cognition among designers and stakeholders. Keywords: Design thinking, design of infrastructure systems 1. Introduction Infrastructure systems account for the vast majority of energy use and associated carbon emissions in the United States (US EPA, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Engagement for Service Design Will Be the Main Focus of the Thesis
    Abstract Service design is a field emerging from the new-found interest in services as a design material by practitioners and academics of the human-centred design tradition. As such, the field can build on the knowledge from previous work in design as well as in service research. Introducing a new design material may however also introduce new challenges to practice. The research presented in this thesis investigates how the design research phase of the human-centred design process is affected by making services a design material. How users, staff and other stakeholders are involved in service design projects was studied in four studies. Two studies focused on getting a holistic view of how service designers engage stakeholders in their design research. The methods used for these two studies were interviews in one case and participatory observation in the other. The two remaining studies focused on specific aspects of the stakeholder engagement process. One compared how designers and anthropologists approach ethnography, whereas the second investigated the communicative qualities of service design visualisations. It is argued that service design is a stakeholder-centred design discipline. The tools used in service design are to a large extent borrowed from other qualitative research traditions, but design-specific tools do exist. By analysing and synthesising the information obtained, it is then i Abstract transformed into insights. These insights are visualised to provide easily accessible representations of service situations. The final section of the thesis identifies challenges ahead for service design practice, based on the findings of the thesis and based on existing theoretical frameworks for the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Innovation Through Touch-Points: Development of an Innovation Toolkit for the First Stages of New Service Development
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Service Innovation Through Touch-points: Development of an Innovation Toolkit for the First Stages of New Service Development Simon Clatworthy Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Norway This paper reviews one of the central areas of service design, the area of touch-point innovation. Specifically, it describes the development and use of a card-based toolkit developed in the AT-ONE project - the AT-ONE touch-point cards. These cards have been developed to assist cross-functional teams during the first phases of the New Service Development (NSD) process. This paper describes and analyses the development of the tools, their intended use and their evaluation following actual uptake by several commercial service providers. The results show that the toolkit assists the innovation process during the first phases of the new service development process and helps develop team cohesiveness. The card-based approach offers a tangibility that teams find useful, and that offers multiple usage alternatives. In addition, the paper describes the multiple functions that tools used in service innovation need to accommodate, and how design makes an important contribution to this. The work also reflects upon the materials of service design and suggests that touch-points are one of the materials used by designers to understand, explore and develop innovative service solutions. Suggestions for further work are included that include aspects of toolkit tangibility, usage areas and touch-point innovation. Keywords – Touch-points, Methods for Service Innovation, Touch-point Cards, Toolkit, Cross-functional Teams, Service Design, Innovation. Relevance to Design Practice – Describes how innovation in new service development processes can be achieved through focusing on touch-points, and describes a toolkit approach to foster this in service organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Typography and Information Design to Health Communication
    The contribution of typography and information design to health communication Book or Report Section Accepted Version Walker, S. (2017) The contribution of typography and information design to health communication. In: Cooper, R. and Tsekleves, E. (eds.) Design for health. Routledge, pp. 92- 109. ISBN 9781472457424 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/66530/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Publisher: Routledge All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Thematic Unit: Communication Design for Public Health The contribution of typography and information design to health communication abstract This chapter is about the role that information design, and typography and graphic communication play in effective public health communication. It introduces the way that information designers work, particularly in relation to what have been called ‘functional texts’ – those that enable people to take some kind of action, or to better understand something. Examples of late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century printed ephemera are used to draw attention to the ways that language and visual presentation work together to enhance the meaning of a particular message. The role of pictures in health communication is discussed with reference to Isotype and the work of Otto and Marie Neurath.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Design with the Effective Use of Communication Media: the Relationship Between Design Dialogues and Design Team Meetings
    1072 CIB World Building Congress 2007 CIB2007- 213 Managing Design With The Effective Use Of Communication Media: The Relationship Between Design Dialogues And Design Team Meetings Stephen Emmitt and Ad den Otter ABSTRACT Effective and efficient design team communication is an essential component of architectural design and construction projects. Face-to-face communication, via meetings and dialogue, is an essential means for design team members to discuss and communicate design ideas. Meetings represent an important forum in which all parties have an opportunity to understand the implications of design decisions on a number of levels. Dialogue between design team members forms an important part of the interpersonal communication that occurs during design development. Dialogues have the highest chance of achieving understanding of the design, especially in the early phases when uncertainty is high and less design information is generated compared with later stages in the project. A survey of communication practices via project websites across multiple cases found that design team members chose dialogues as their preferred communication medium. The results are discussed against research findings from communication in design and management team meetings. The relationship between dialogues and team meetings is then explored from a design team management perspective. The results have implications for the effectiveness of communications within international design teams and hence the manner in which communications are planned and managed. Keywords: Design management, Team communication, Dialogues, Interaction, Meetings, Project Websites. CIB World Building Congress 2007 1073 1. INTRODUCTION Architectural design is a collaborative act that relies on effective interaction between project actors and stakeholders. Interaction affects the strength of relationships between the actors and ultimately colors their ability to work together successfully.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Cultures of Design Identifying Roles in a Co-Creative Landscape
    Changing Cultures of Design Identifying roles in a co-creative landscape Marie Elvik Hagen Department of Product Design Norwegian University of Science and Technology ABSTRACT The landscape of design is expanding and designers today are moving from expert practice to work with users as partners on increasingly complex issues. This article draws up the lines of the emerging co-creative design practice, and discusses the changing roles of the designer, the user as a partner, and design practice itself. Methods and tools will not be considered, as the roles will be discussed in terms of their relations. The co-design approach breaks down hierarchies and seeks equal participation. Research suggests that the designer needs to be responsive or switch tactics in order to take part in a co-creative environment. A case study exploring co-creative roles complements the theory, and finds that the designer role needs to be flexible even when having equal agency as partners and other stakeholders. Sometimes it is necessary to lead and facilitate as long as it is a collaborative decision. Bringing users in as partners in the process changes the design culture, and this article suggests that Metadesign can be the holistic framework that the design community need in order to understand how the different design practices are connected. KEYWORDS: Co-design, Co-creativity, Roles in the Design Process, Participatory Design, Metadesign, Cultures of participation, Design Agenda 1. INTRODUCTION This article seeks to examine how the role of the designer, the role of the user and the role The landscape of design is changing.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Activist
    ...not content with the way things are... ActivistAffect change in the established way of doing things. Architecture Philosophy & Practice of the Community Design Center Edited by: Dan Pitera & Craig L. Wilkins ActReflect ii Book Editors: Craig L. Wilkins, Ph.D., AIA, NOMA, ARA Instructor, University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture + Urban Planning Former Director, Detroit Community Design Center Dan Pitera, FAIA, ACD Professor, University of Detroit Mercy School of Architecture Executive Director, Detroit Collaborative Design Center Book Design: Dan Pitera, FAIA, ACD Cover Image: DCDC Workshop Process with The Alley Project, Southwest Detroit ISBN: 978-0-9904595-3-8 © 2015 Detroit Collaborative Design Center, University of Detroit Mercy School of Architecture iii Thank You ...to all those who help expand the nature of all practices to include more people, more programs and more geographies. iv Preface You are not a profession that has distinguished itself by your social and civic contributions to the cause of civil rights. You are most distinguished by your thunderous silence and your complete irrelevance….You are employers, you are key people in the planning of our cities today. You share the responsibility for the mess we are in, in terms of the white noose around the central city. It didn’t just happen. We didn’t just suddenly get this situation. It was carefully planned….It took a great deal of skill and creativity and imagination to build the kind of situation we have, and it is going to take skill and imagination and creativity to change it. We are going to have to have people as committed to doing the right thing, to “inclusiveness,” as we have in the past to exclusiveness.
    [Show full text]