Community Food Action Initiative Food on EVERY Table
Final Report
Prepared by Lydia Szymanski – Project Coordinator & Kate Sutherland – Facilitator
June 14, 2006 (updated August 17, 2006)
Sea to Sky Community Services Society 38144 Second Avenue Squamish, BC
1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 4 Introduction ...... 10 Our Approach ...... 11 Inviting & Engaging...... 12 Defining the Theme: ...... 12 Invitation Process:...... 12 Highlights from Community Meetings ...... 13 Squamish (May 17)...... 13 Whistler (May 18) ...... 14 Pemberton (May 18) ...... 15 Highlights: Corridor Open Space Event, May 30-31 ...... 16 The Format ...... 17 Recommendations ...... 18 Budget 2006/2007 ...... 19 Outcome Measurement Framework 1 Year ...... 19 Outcome Measurement Framework 3 Year ...... 23 Summaries of Dialogue Sessions, May 30...... 27 A. Summary of Access/Hubs Discussion and Action Plans for Implementation ...... 27 B. Growing Food Locally and Using Local Food...... 29 C. Working towards a Sustainable/Less Unsustainable Food System and Local Regional Food Policy...... 33 D. Sustainability – how to keep things going, who makes decisions etc. 35 Summaries of Action Planning Sessions, May 31 ...... 36 A. The 100 Mile Movement...... 36 B. Project: Food Calendar/Almanac ...... 39 C. Sea to Sky Corridor Food Security Coordinator Position...... 41 Appendices ...... 42 A. Environment Scan...... 42 B. Food System Assessment plus Gaps Analysis...... 50
2 C. Newspaper Coverage...... 57 D. Invitation...... 59 E. Squamish “Food on Every Table” Community Meeting Contacts ...... 61 F. Whistler “Food on Every Table” Community Meeting Contacts ...... 63 G. Pemberton and Area “Food on Every Table” Community Meeting Contacts ...... 64 H. Mountain FM Interview Questions and Notes...... 66 I. Mapping Squamish ...... 68 J. Mapping Whistler...... 72 K. Mapping Pemberton ...... 77 L. Proceedings of the Open Space Event ...... 83 M. Squamish Homeless Survey ...... 83
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
– Key Findings
Sea to Sky Country is a group of communities linked by the Sea to Sky highway on Canada's west coast.
Beginning at Horseshoe Bay, west of Vancouver, Sea to Sky Country stretches north through several mountain passes up to Pemberton, British Columbia. These passes, which are linked together by Sea to Sky Country, are known as the Sea to Sky Corridor.
The Corridor is a strong rural area with rural traditions. Many homes produce seasonal foods that are shared or sold locally. These foods are nutritious, affordable and at times, offer culturally appropriate food choices. Despite these efforts, there are numerous gaps and issues identified throughout the Corridor. Some are unique to a specific community or area, others are broader issues that all of us face.
Production
Each of the three larger communities (Squamish, Whistler, and Pemberton) offers both similar and different opportunities around food production. Each community has at least one community garden operating, many backyard gardens for personal and/or other consumption. There are some working farms in the Squamish and Pemberton areas that produce food for cost. It was estimated that there are 15 to 20 large farms (0ver 200 acres) operational in the corridor with full-time farmers and approximately 40 small farms. However, it was generally felt that proportional to the population of the corridor, there is little food production that is grown locally.
There is access to water in all three communities and local fishing and hunting is available, although regulated.
Squamish has several community gardens, one being located at the 55 and older residential complex. Seasonally there is a farmer’s market, although only one wholesaler sells produce; there are no farmers selling their goods. There is also Squamish Community Harvest, a partnership program between Sea to Sky Community Services Society and Squamish Bear Aware where excess fruit is picked by volunteers and distributed to people and programs in the community.
While food was the original industry in Squamish, with a hay ranch occupying what is now downtown Squamish and Brackendale being home to dairy and hop farms, this is no longer the case. There are a few small farms in Squamish and Paradise Valley where food is grown on a small scale. However, as the “Smart
4 Growth on the Ground Foundation Research Bulletin: Squamish” from March 2005 suggests there is great potential for local food systems in Squamish.
The availability of healthy food sources for those who rely on fishing in Squamish was severely impacted in the summer of 2005 in Squamish when caustic soda spilled into the Cheakamus River, killing steelhead and many other fish.
In Whistler, the value of locally grown food is increasing in the community. Currently there are three community greenhouses in which food is grown through the spring and summer. There are plans to expand the project and to have greenhouses growing food throughout the year, pending access to funding. Whistler also has various programs and events that assist their community. There is a farmer’s market, and several large greenhouses.
In Pemberton, there is a strong mushroom business although the majority of this is sent out of the community. This community has the largest farming production, potatoes being a main product. In addition to a community garden, a local organic farm, Across the Creek Organics, sells organic harvest boxes in the corridor.
Many people living in Pemberton and area north of Pemberton, hunt, fish and pick wild berries and mushrooms. There is a sense of community around hunting, fishing and harvesting food in the native communities. Hunters help the community when food gets low, during hard times including funerals. Deer is hunted in the area. Fishermen and fisherwomen help one another make nets. Rods nets and freezer space are shared. In the spring and summer the native populations of the Mount Currie and D’Arcy fish for salmon. Deer is hunted in the area.
Farming has been a mainstay of the Pemberton Valley since Europeans first settled here more than 100 years ago. Farming has been the traditional industry of the Pemberton Valley, and continues to be a significant contributor to the local economy. In 1967 Pemberton was the first commercial seed potato area in the world to grow virus-free seed potatoes. With careful monitoring, inspection and testing, Pemberton seed potato industry continues to enjoy renowned success. Some farmers today are choosing to diversify by growing a variety of vegetables and berries, which are sold locally and to customers in Whistler.
Common threads for each broad community are around the following: • Capacity to store foods appropriately i.e.) freezing, so that local food banks, and others could distribute over a longer period of time instead of having to decline some donations. • Increase in the number and size of community gardens. There are, for example, several farms in the Squamish and Pemberton area where not all the land is being utilized.
5 • Increase the communities’ education on home production and increasing distribution i.e.) Grow a Row program. • Engage our young people, get individuals involved sooner, through preschool, elementary and high school programs.
Accessibility
From the research, it is estimated in the Cost of Eating in BC report that Canadians spend 10% of their personal disposable income on food and non alcoholic beverages.
For the most part, food stores in the Corridor appear fairly well distributed and cover a wide range of consumer choice. The biggest issue is that the large chains, that typically offer reduced pricing are all located in Squamish, which often means families and individuals have to travel south for groceries or pay higher costs closer to home.
Each broad community has access to smaller grocery stores, typically within walking distance, however, costs are higher and more prohibitive than the larger chains. Seniors have the additional problem of no meals on wheels programs, relying on service from Burnaby, which provides frozen meals that must be purchased for 4 weeks minimum. Families and friends tend to provide the extra support needed for seniors, as well as the senior’s centre in each community at times has special events with meals.
Public transit is available in each of the communities at least 6 days a week. Busses travel to the center of each community where most grocery stores and restaurants are located. Residents living in Mount Currie and the New Site of Mt Currie usually travel to Pemberton to do their shopping and must travel approximately 8km and 18 km respectively to do so. Busses run 7 days per week approximately 4 times each way during business hours. Hitchhiking is common in Pemberton and area in between scheduled bus times.
With seniors expecting to experience reduced mobility as they age, transportation is identified as one of the ‘top three’ health issues. Seniors would like to see improved municipal transit, improved access to HandiDart and volunteer drivers.
Seasonally, there are some farm stands and U-picks available, mostly in the Pemberton area. In all three communities there is a farmer’s market and in Pemberton there is a Farmer’s Institute. Farmers did report that there are challenges getting local grocery stores and restaurants in the corridor to purchase their produce because the distribution system that has been in place for year makes it easier for them to purchase food from large companies and food distributors, including those in the US, than to purchase from local farmers. An additional barrier to smaller farmers selling their goods to grocery stores, is that shipment of produce is required to arrive at a certain temperature which requires refrigerated trucks.
6 Not all foods that are culturally relevant or traditional are available in the Corridor. South Asian food is available at Save-On-Foods in Squamish, however, it costs more than buying the same food in Vancouver. Grocery stores have Chinese and Japanese foods, but often people rely on trips to the city to stock up on their supplies due to cost and better variety. Fruits and vegetables are always available but they are more costly the farther north you travel.
Common threads for each broad community are around the following: • The large geographic area creates barriers for those who want to comparison shop as well as try and access the lowest costs. Squamish seems to offer the most competitive pricing but still higher than Vancouver. • Limited variety particularly regarding culturally relevant foods throughout the corridor. • Typically those foods that are cheaper to purchase tend not to be the most nutritious foods. • Seniors, throughout the corridor, do not have a well-developed food access/security system, often relying on family and friends. • Difficulties encouraging local grocery stores to purchase local farms produce. • Transportation issues in each of the communities creates challenges for vulnerable individuals.
Distribution
Each of the three larger communities has a food bank available. Squamish has its distribution twice per month; Whistler also distributes twice per month and Pemberton distributes food coupons through Sea to Sky Community Services Society (SSCSS) during business hours. Both Whistler and Pemberton have some capacity for emergencies and Pemberton has a small shelf of food available to supplement the coupons. In Squamish there tend to be pockets of services and agencies that also have small food cupboards to assist individuals and families they serve e.g.) United Church in Squamish, Healthy Pregnancy Outreach Program, Squamish Youth Centre and food coupons through the Mt. Currie band.
In addition to the food banks, Squamish runs a soup kitchen program two times per week. There are several Community Kitchen programs in each of the three larger communities that typically run weekly and allow participants to come together to cook one or more meals that they take home to their families. There is no cost for some cooking clubs and a minimal charge for others. There are school breakfast/food programs that run in several elementary and high schools throughout the corridor. Some of the programs offer free breakfast to students and/or a subsidized nutritious snack. At Whistler Secondary,
7 students are encouraged to share food from their lunch that they are not going to eat by putting it into a basket for other students.
There are several drop-in programs where food is served such as the Healthy Pregnancy Outreach program, Multicultural Drop-In program, Social Interaction group, Pemberton’s Senior’s lunch and the Elder’s lunch in Mt. Currie. As mentioned previous, there are farmer’s markets and community gardens in Squamish and Whistler where produce to sold. Most of the food redistribution takes place at a store to individual program level. Usually individual programs go to ask for leftovers to be donated to the programs. More often than not, restaurateurs and grocers dispose of the extra food they cannot sell rather than pass it on to other programs because of fear of liability.
Common threads for each broad community are around the following: • Limited access and distribution of food banks i.e.) twice per month, food coupons, make it difficult to ensure that individuals and families have healthy food all the time. With food coupon distribution, some education is needed around purchasing healthy foods and not necessarily buying the cheapest product. • Consistency and complete distribution of school breakfast/food programs is needed throughout the corridor, as not all schools participate. Again, some education needs to accompany these programs and the earlier the age the better. • Coordination of what’s available and how to access and distribute throughout the corridor would assist in what’s offered and how. It would also allow for opportunities to learn and share from each other.
Consumption/Waste Management
In 2003, (Act Now Brochure), it was estimated that only 40% of adults reported eating 5 or more servings of vegetables and fruits a day. It has already been noted that a key to success within food security initiative that goes forward, is enhanced or supported through this process requires a certain level of education. Services and programs have tended to act in isolation and this process is really the first for the corridor to consider its food management issues.
There are opportunities for excess food to be shared but it is not universal. For example, restaurants and grocery stores have policies that must be followed regarding the distribution of food. However, by working with these groups there maybe creative ways that excess food can be shared with those in need.
None of the communities offer a ‘city-wide’ composting program, however, many individuals and families have backyard composts. Carney’s in Squamish has
8 made some in roads to overall composting but it is not universally used. Sea to Sky communities have the additional issue of bears coming onto their properties and some municipalities have discouraged composting as a result.
Common threads for each broad community are around the following: • Lack of coordination around food security/action issues particularly in drawing in the business groups. • In addition to municipalities offering recycling services, there needs to be some consideration of a broad composting program. Community by- laws and policies could strengthen practice.
Where to start
1. Creation of a Community Food Action Committee for the Sea to Sky corridor that includes broad representation. 2. Create a simple list serve that supports communication and information flow. 3. Encourage the formation of strategic partnerships with regional municipalities and local businesses e.g.) Whistler 2020, Smart Growth on the Ground. 4. Hire a dedicated Sea to Sky Food Security Coordinator to keep the momentum going and support the corridor.
What has been learned is that the three larger communities in the Corridor are distinctly different – each with their own character, history and culture. The diversity is both a challenge and a source of strength. This is an exciting time and there is energy in the communities throughout the Sea to Sky Corridor to continue and follow through with some of the ideas, plans and projects that have emerged through this process.
9 Introduction
We are pleased to submit this report on the Sea to Sky Community Action Initiative, Food on EVERY Table.
The invitation to participate in this project coincided with a deeply felt need on the part of our lead staff person (Lydia Szymanski) to support both the accessibility and the sustainability of the food system in Squamish. But that daunting task had been pushed to the side of the desk by other commitments and priorities.
We are thankful for this process. It has enabled us to discover the passion and capacity relating to food issues, in Squamish, Whistler and Pemberton, and throughout the Sea to Sky Corridor. We have much better understanding of the depth and breadth of food issues – everything from emergency access to the viability of local farms, and a much richer sense of who is who and what is what.
Most particularly we are grateful for our own and other’s expanded understanding of what is possible, given the passion and dedication people have for issues around food security.
We know there is a lot of work to do, important work.
And we feel inspired and emboldened to continue, knowing that the will and capacity exist in our communities to support effective action.
10 Our Approach
From the outset we choose an appreciative, asset-based approach and worked to involve people and communities in finding solutions to their food security issues.
By focusing on assets/what’s already working, the process quickly engaged a wide range of community members and generated interest, commitment, and numerous excellent action plans and initiatives.
Our process traces the four stages in an Appreciative Inquiry: 1. Discover -- discovering resources, assets, precedents in the community 2. Dream – envisioning our ideal future 3. Design – developing action plans and strategies to achieve the vision 4. Deliver – creating results based on the action plans and strategies
Specifically, re Discovering and Dreaming, we hosted three community meetings (Squamish, Whistler and Pemberton). Each meeting was 3 hours long, brought together a cross-section of individuals and organizational reps, and included two main elements: Mapping the assets of the community relating to food security, and either envisioning a desired future, or identifying gaps and opportunities.
Hosting meetings in each community made them accessible to a wide range of people, and was congruent with most peoples’ definition of their community. In addition to mapping and envisioning, it provided an opportunity to build momentum for the subsequent Corridor-wide event that offered an opportunity to support initiatives in their own community, and also to: o Learn about and cross-pollinate with what’s happening elsewhere in the corridor. o Explore potential for corridor-wide initiatives o Strengthen their voice at the civic/political level
Re Designing and Delivering, we hosted a corridor-wide Open Space event on May 30-31. In Open Space, the agenda is developed by participants based on a self-organized sorting of the issues and questions that matter most to them. The approach is an efficient way to identify where there is both passion and willingness to take responsibility – key ingredients for getting things done.
Other benefits include: - Focused time for action planning - Supports emergence of new key players/new reluctant leaders - Potential for synergy and cross pollination - People energized and supported by knowing what others are doing - People leave with summaries of all the Day One conversations, and the promise to have summaries of all the action plans
11 Inviting & Engaging
Events start with the invitation. And critical to the framing of the invitation was identification of the theme.
Defining the Theme: From initial outreach, we found that “Food Security” generally does not resonate with people. Most do not know what it means, and do not relate to it as an issue.
We framed the issue as a question: How can we keep putting food on EVERY table? We are pleased to say this theme attracted participants reflecting every aspect of the food system: from accessibility to the ecological sustainability of production and distribution, from GMO activists to people concerned about nutrition and lack of cooking skills...
In facilitating the events what emerged, as an even more resonant theme was “Food on EVERY table, now and seven generations from now”.
Invitation Process: Significant resources were invested in inviting people to the community meetings and corridor event. The invitation attached as Appendix E was sent through Sea to Sky Community Services Society’s extensive networks, as well as the Vancouver Coastal Health networks in the corridor. Outreach to newspapers generated articles that extended the invitation to several people who would not have know of the event otherwise, and ditto for an interview with local radio station Mountain FM.
Other networks helped to spread the word, e.g. inclusion of the invite in the Squamish Nation Newsletter and an announcement in the United Church Newsletter (Squamish)
In addition there was in-person outreach to Squamish’s Concerned Citizens for the Homeless, the Squamish Soup Kitchen, the Squamish Nation Family Program, Mt. Currie Band and Baptise Band, the Sea to Sky Pregnancy Outreach program and the Graduate Cooking Club. Unfortunately, participants of the Squamish Nation Family Program were unable to attend but are interested in participating in future committee meetings. The project coordinator made over 70 email/phone follow-ups. Councillor Tim Wake, who participated in the Whistler community meeting (May 18th), said that he came “Because Lydia (Szymanski) asked me to”.
12 Highlights from Community Meetings
As noted above, each of the community meetings created a “map” of their local food system assets. These maps are rich with resources and existing initiatives, capacity and people. The maps had a potent effect on many participants: they were energized by the possibilities. Please see Appendices G-I for summaries of the maps – each well worth reading and referring to when undertaking food system initiatives in the corridor. (As one small example, a key way to get the word out in Whistler is through posters at a small number of specific locations.) The following highlights do not substitute for reading the notes on the individual meetings, but rather supplement those notes with overarching and reflective comments. Making Connections Squamish (May 17) The venue for the Squamish meeting was the • Fifty+ people attended the meeting same space used for the local Soup Kitchen – a in Squamish, almost double what hall owned by the Squamish United Church that we expected based on the RSVPs, sits on a large corner lot. and the largest of all the meetings we organized. The energy mounted In the process of organizing the event, the as we added chairs, and logistics coordinator conferred with the Minister participants experienced directly and learned that he hoped to develop the very building where the meeting was to take place that there were many people and and was interested in partnering with others to much capacity relating to local food optimize the benefit to the community and issues. Several said it was the first different stakeholders. time in Squamish that such a broad range of people gathered relating to That conversation planted seeds: and there are this theme. currently exploratory talks between the United • The large number of participants is Church and Sea to Sky Community Services likely due to several factors: Society re co-development of the site as a social o Squamish is the largest of the service delivery hub. three main communities in the corridor o The lead organization is based in Ripples Squamish and so is both better known We know of several ripples from and better connected. the whole project. Some are large There was good prior coverage of the o scale, like the Making event in the local paper. Connections sidebar above.
o Some participants came at the last Others are on a smaller scale: One minute, learning about the event in part participant appreciated that the because it was located in the same venue catering for the Squamish as the local soup kitchen. Their community meeting was done by familiarity with the venue likely made members of the Graduate Cooking
the meeting more accessible. Club. The participant intends to explore sourcing catering for events she runs in the future through participants in a program she oversees. 13 • To initiate mapping community assets, we invited participants to brainstorm which categories of assets to include. Rather than categories such as people and organizations, participants jumped to mapping by initiatives/themes. This was beneficial in that people where energized to see how many assets already existed in the community relating to their priorities, but problematic in that the resulting map may have missed key assets. (For Whistler and Pemberton, we pre-identified five categories: people, initiatives, organizations, resources and information.) • The process of mapping surfaced the following key themes: Education and the value of food – Making Smart Choices Easier Potential Starting Points – for community mobilization Resources in general, and in particular for a Food Coalition Person/Place that is Central/Accessible Growing Food Here Distributing Food with Dignity Please see Appendix G for a summary of the assets identified for each of these categories. NB: These categories cover four of the six dimensions of a community’s food system as per the City of Vancouver’s Food Policy framework: Production, Distribution, Consumption, and Accessibility. The two missing are waste disposal and processing. • Specific Gaps identified include: Storage facilities for the local food bank. If the food bank had both more secure storage space, and capacity to freeze donated food, they could make use of offers of food donations that they currently have to decline. A central hub – a place for people to go for food, information, showers, job board, and access to services. A food coalition person – to liaise and broker, networking the networks to support food accessibility and sustainability. Access to land in Squamish for growing food Food bank operating more frequently than once/month (NB: on June 7th the food bank began opening 2x/month.)
Whistler (May 18) • Six people attended the community meeting in Whistler. This smaller number is likely due to existing extensive community engagement in the Whistler 2020 sustainability initiative (16 taskforces with 10 community members in each, including taskforces on Health and Social, and Partnership Development.) • During the invitation follow up process, we also heard that people in Whistler generally don't relate to food or homelessness as key issues. It's a resort town. Dominant ethos: If can't afford to live here, suggest people move on. Health may be a better way to frame issues. E.g. poor people tend to eat junk food. Whistler is identified with health, more than social equity. And "Squatting" may be another framing approach. The many
14 people who squat at the margins. There is a vibrant counter culture of “pioneers” -- drawn to ski.... Culture of doing neat things. • Tim Wake of the Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW) participated in the meeting. Tim identified the strong potential link between the Community Food Action Initiative and Whistler 2020. He noted that when Whistler 2020 was established, they intended to address food policy/system issues with a dedicated taskforce. Then due to enormity of the initiative, food issues where allocated to the Health and Social Taskforce. Currently food system issues are not being addressed, and Tim named key RMOW staff contacts to follow up with. We have subsequently contacted RMOW’s Esther Speck, and she welcomes collaboration and helped to circulate the Open Space invitation through the W2020 network. • Affordable housing issues are a big challenge in Whistler given demand for holiday and time-share accommodation. This puts pressure on food budgets for people in medium and low paying jobs. Whistler has developed expertise in Resident Restricted Housing as a way of mitigating the effects of market forces on the availability of affordable housing. Given the tight link between rising housing costs and food affordability issues in our communities, this is a key asset. Whistler is already sharing their learnings with other communities. • The Olympics and Whistler 2020 are significant opportunities for doing innovative food system work. The “eyes of the world” are on Whistler, and there Whistler has a stated commitment to enhancing the sustainability of its food system. The Whistler 2020 initiative recognizes the need to collaborate with other communities in the corridor to achieve its sustainability goals, but so far little has been done in this regard. • Work on the ski hills, and the opportunity to ski attracts many Young Adults (referred to locally as YADs). Most have little or no cooking skills and live on fast food. This is an extreme version of the issues facing all communities: young people who’ve grown up on fast food due to their parents being a “lost generation” who similarly don’t know how to cook or prepare food from whole ingredients. Whistler has many innovative initiatives for addressing these issues (see Appendix H).
Pemberton (May 18) • The Pemberton Community Meeting attracted 17 participants, including three from the remote and predominantly First Nations community of Baptiste, and two from the Mount Currie Reserve. • We met at the farm of third generation farmer Bruce Miller and his wife Brenda, 10 Kms north of Pemberton. This was an excellent location as the meeting was a direct expression of the importance of improving linkages between the farm and the table, between sustainability of local farming and people in their “Foodshed.” • The Pemberton map is unique in naming the land and water, fish, berries and wild game as resources for the food system. This groundedness was potent and significant. For example, for food systems to be sustainable,
15 farming needs to be done sustainably. Local farmers face many challenges due to the globalization of our food system. Being on a working farm helped to bring this home. • While exploring gaps and opportunities the cross-pollination of ideas and reflections “birthed” an idea that galvanized the group. The mix included among many others: How Pemberton Farmers need a certified Excerpts: Pemberton Evaluations commercial kitchen to be A new learning or realization I have as a result of able to create value this session is: added products – to help • Stuff can happen when people get together farming be more • The power of mobilized community economically viable by getting more revenue for • How fortunate we are here their produce • A group of people can do wonders How First Nations • The connection people have to the land in this communities need better area facilities for canning • All things are possible here in Pemberton – lots salmon. of strength and energy to dream A licensed commercial • How much resources are here in our territory; kitchen as a potential how much caring and sharing people are here meeting place for “farm • As a group, even a small group, we can create folk” and “town folk”, and energy and powerful ideas and solutions for First Nations and • We need to connect with the entire corridor. non-First Nations – with food as the focus.
One participant shared that plans for a new Pemberton Recreation Centre might still be amended to include a licensed commercial kitchen, and was willing to follow up the next day. The energy of support and excitement was palpable (See sidebar for comments from evaluation forms.) Participants at the meeting signed a sheet indicating their support for the proposal. Please see the excellent letter subsequently sent to the Village of Pemberton, Attached.
Highlights: Corridor Open Space Event, May 30-31
The three larger communities in Uptake on Open Space the Corridor are distinctly different Initially there was a slow and low response to -- each with their own character, our invitation to the Open Space in Whistler. history and culture. This diversity Prior to the three community meetings in is both a challenge and a source of mid-May, only six people had RSVP’d for May strength. 30, and three for May 31.
In the end 20 participated on the first day and twelve on the second, plenty to have a good airing of key issues, and to support the development of potent action plans. 16 From anecdotal comments it seems that most people identify more with their local village/municipality than with the corridor as a whole. This made it difficult to attract people to a corridor-wide event, compounded by the barriers of time and expense to attend a meeting in a different community.
That same diversity contains important opportunities for collaboration and cross- pollination. We are excited that participants who had first hand experience of this potential are more likely to value and make time for corridor-wide food action gatherings in the future. Indeed one of the key requests emerging from the Open Space was for regular corridor-wide networking events (i.e. 1-4 times per year)
The Format Many commented on the Open Space format (For an explanation of Open Space, see http://www.chriscorrigan.com/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.WhatIsOpenSpaceTec hnology). They commented on how they had initially doubted it would work, how impressed they were by the almost universal participation in posting topics for dialogue, the self organizing aspect, the level of engagement, the quality of conversations.
Open Space runs on “passion bounded by responsibility”. Good ideas without passion to follow through on them are a distraction. Good ideas that have Another Ripple champions to convene a dialogue/action planning session have the potential to beget A participant in the Open Space was action. inspired the potential of community greenhouses to connect young Please see Appendix J for the Open Space children to where food comes from Proceedings including summaries for the and the excitement of growing their four dialogues from Day ONE, and the three own food. She plans to source action plans developed on Day TWO. These donations to enable greenhouse to be make for excellent reading, and express the built next to daycare facilities in the energy, passion and vision of participants in corridor. the community engagement process. In other words, the dialogues and action plans reflect where there is interest and aspiration in the Sea to Sky Corridor community relating to food issues.
17 Recommendations 1. We recommend that the proceedings of the community meetings and Open Space event inform future initiatives to support food security in the corridor, and that future CFAI funding honour the ideas and initiatives emerging from this community consultation/engagement process. This includes support for greenhouses at daycares, the Sea to Sky Corridor Food Security Coordinator position, the 100 Mile Movement, the Food Calendar/Almanac. It also includes ideas such as starting a Good Food Box program, promoting Grow a Row, creating more community gardens and kitchens/cooking classes, supporting local composting, creating food policy at a municipal level, including working on getting municipal resolution for a GE free zone and incorporating protection of the local food shed into the official community plan. 2. We recommend that the Sea to Sky Corridor Food Security Coordinator gives highest priority to activities that are highly leveraged such as the forming of strategic partnerships with regional municipalities and local businesses (such as Whistler 2020, Smart Growth on the Ground, Whistler Blackcomb, etc.), brokering collaborative initiatives, and securing funding for other corridor food security initiatives. 3. We recommend that community engagement/momentum be maintained and cultivated by creating a simple listserv that supports communication and information flow. Groups to be engaged in the ongoing process include but are not limited to seniors, Lil’wat and Squamish nation members, low-income individuals and families, the homeless as well as at-risk youth. 4. We recommend creation of a Community Food Action Committee for the Sea to Sky Corridor that includes broad representation. In particular, we recommend inclusion of reps from the business sector, municipal governments, seniors and first nations to complement the already active participation of the community services sector, farmers and citizens concerned about a range of community food related issues (GMO, Accessibility, Nutrition, etc.) 5. We recommend that the Community Food Action Committee over the next fiscal year, with the direction and assistance of the Food Security Coordinator, review this report, including Executive Summary and the Common Threads that were evidenced and develop a corridor wide plan of action to address these issues with the goal of increasing food security in the vulnerable population (as listed above).
18 Budget 2006/2007
Revenue:
Vancouver Coastal Health $20,000.00
Expenditures:
Facilitator/Coordinator $ 7,280.00 (7 hours/week x 52 weeks) x $20.00
Travel $ 2,000.00
Admin/Office Facilities $ 2,000.00
Priority Projects as identified from the CFAI report $ 8,720.00
(Greenhouses at Group Daycares - $3,000.00) (Food Calendar - $2,000.00) (Accessibility fund, including child daycare and travel, for participants to attend meetings etc. - $1,000.00) (Small fund to assist existing food banks/soup kitchens for supplies - $2,750.00)
Total $20,000.00
Outcome Measurement Framework 1 Year
(Next Page)
19
Inputs Activities Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Long Term Outcomes Outcome Creating a job # of members on Committee has a clear Community Food There is SSCS description and terms hiring committee definition of Action healthy Executive of reference for PT Job Description Community Food Action Initiative is locally grown Director Community Food Action Terms of reference Initiative responsive food on every oversight Initiative Liaison/ Liaison/Coordinator’s table in the and Coordinator role and job Community Food Sea to Sky connections expectations Action corridor, now Initiative is and seven SSCS Office Post position to # of resumes received Hiring a PT Community accessible generations Administrat solicit resumes and # of candidates Food Action Initiative from now. or support interview candidates interviewed Liaison/Coordinator Community Food Support for working Action SSCS Human groups and initiatives Initiative is Resource formed during CFAI sustainable Manager consultations People involved in Other projects SSCS CFAI feel supported by or initiatives Director of continuity of liaison started. Early and coordination Childhood function Development Services Creating a listserv for • # of people on Communication flow is people involved and listserv improved and people in Interim PT interested in food listserv the corridor are kept Community security communication informed regarding Food Action food security
21 Inputs Activities Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Long Term Outcomes Outcome Initiative Recruit participants # of volunteers for Developing food As above As above Coordinator (including seniors, food security security committees first nations etc) as committee in Squamish for each of the three Sea to Sky volunteer members for # of volunteers for larger communities in Corridor food security committee food security the Corridor VCH and develop terms of committee in Whistler (Squamish, Whistler Community reference for committee # of volunteers for and Pemberton) Developer food security Greater networking and Support committee in improved information Pemberton flow and support for Office Terms of reference and between people and Space, initiatives re: food Supplies security in the and corridor Equipment Food Security (fax, Committee has a clear phone, definition of its desk, purpose and procedures chairs) as well as greater validity Committee to explore the possibility of creating a map of the corridor’s resources
Supporting working • Support for: • Moving forward with groups formed during Greenhouses at Setting up May CFAI consultations daycare centers Greenhouses at Calendar/Almanac daycares Other priority Calendar/Almanac projects as Other priority identified by projects as committee and identified by coordinator committee and coordinator
22 Inputs Activities Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Long Term Outcomes Outcome Engaging and involving # of individuals from Increased food vulnerable and/or vulnerable security for As above As above marginalized populations involved vulnerable populations such as, # of priority populations in the but not limited to, projects corridor seniors, low-income determined to further individuals and assist in increasing families, Lil’wat and food security of Squamish nation vulnerable members, people with populations mental health challenges, homeless etc. in developing and prioritizing food security initiatives and projects
Soliciting grants and # of grants/amount of Additional funding and in-kind contributions additional funding in-kind contributions to support secured are secured sustainability of # of in-kind More food security community action for contributions initiatives can be food security. initiated and sustained Sea to Sky corridor CFAI coordinator position and initiatives are sustainable
Outcome Measurement Framework 3 Year
(Next Page)
23 Inputs Activities Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Long Term Outcomes Outcome Sea to Sky Hiring a PT Community • PT Community Food • People involved in Community Food People in the Executive Food Action Initiative Action Initiative Community Food Action Action Sea to Sky Director Liaison person. Liaison person is Initiative feel Initiative is Corridor have oversight hired. Target date: supported by responsive. access to and September 2006. continuity of liaison locally connections and coordination Community Food grown, function. Action locally Sea to Sky Supporting working • Support for: • Moving forward with Initiative is produced Office groups formed during Greenhouses at Setting up accessible. food, and the Administrat May CFAI consultations daycare centers Greenhouses at awareness to or support Calendar/Almanac daycares Community Food eat in Other priority Calendar/Almanac Action healthy Interim PT projects as Other priority Initiative is balanced way. Community identified by projects as sustainable. Food Action committee and identified by Initiative coordinator committee and Other projects Coordinator Note: See Action Planning coordinator or initiatives summary in Appendices. started. Sea to Sky Developing food • Volunteer committees • Greater empowerment, Corridor security committees for formed in Squamish, networking and Vancouver each of the three main Whistler and information flow Coastal communities in the Pemberton. between people and Health Corridor (Squamish, • initiatives re: food Authority Terms of reference Whistler and Pemberton) security in the Community are developed for corridor. Developer Community Food • Support Security Committee Channel for engagement and support for people interested in moving forward with ideas and initiatives.
24 Inputs Activities Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Long Term Outcomes Outcome Jan Developing a Coordinating Increased information As above As above Durocher coordinating committee committee for the flow between Resource for the corridor corridor is formed communities re Development Terms of reference successes and Officer are developed for strategies for food Food Security security. Coordinating Increased synergy Volunteer Committee. between communities – Committee e.g. growers in and Pemberton better subcommitte linked to markets in e members Whistler and Squamish, identified or School programs through the developed for whole May CFAI corridor. Consultatio Convening networking Networking events Engagement of greater n process. events (frequency TDB take place 1-4 times number of people (1-4x/yr) to link per year Support for creation people in the corridor of new initiatives working on food Identification of security initiatives public policy recommendations
Supporting working # of working groups Engagement of greater groups in forming to formed number of people work on a variety of # of new initiatives Support for creation food security of new initiatives initiatives/projects.
Creating strategic # of strategic Partners collaborate partnerships partnerships formed to engage in activities that promote food security
25 Inputs Activities Outputs Short Term Outcomes Intermediate Long Term Outcomes Outcome Soliciting grants and • # of grants/amount of • Current food security As above As above in-kind contributions additional funding initiatives receive to support secured additional financial sustainability of • # of in-kind support community action for contributions • Additional food food security security initiatives are initiated Engaging and involving # of individuals from • Increased food vulnerable and/or vulnerable/marginaliz security of vulnerable marginalized ed populations populations in the populations in involved corridor determining priority • # of priority projects and projects initiatives determined to further assist in increasing food security of vulnerable populations Coordinator and # food policies • Increased municipal committee to lobby for created and/or regional creating a municipal Amount of local support for increasing and/or regional food produce in grocery access to healthy, policy, including stores locally grown, GE free policy and distribution food in the corridor system/transport that • More locally grown would make it easier food is available in for local growers to grocery stores get produce to local stores
26 Summaries of Dialogue Sessions, May 30
A. Summary of Access/Hubs Discussion and Action Plans for Implementation
Convener: Jeanne Cameron (10:30-noon session) Participants: Lois Wynne, Jen Leigh, Marissa Schiesser, Karen Kay, Donna Bent, Shannon Brown, Jane Balance, and Dania Matiation.
Our group had many ideas and points of view. From our focus of children and families we discovered that we shared a vision of universal accessibility, where all people have access to food with no stigma or cost.
Out of this came the idea that we need to start education young, give young children the opportunity to grow things and provide assistance to others who can facilitate this process.
The Child Care Resource and Referral Program has taken ownership of a project that would see greenhouses donated to Family and Group Daycare centres so that children will have an opportunity to grow and enjoy their own food. The CCRR will cost source greenhouses and approach lawn and garden centres, Carney’s and other businesses about donations of soil, compost, tools etc. We have a vision that a portion of the “Seed Money” would be just that, to assist with providing these resources to daycares free of charge. There are a variety of other groups who would benefit from this style of outreach and we hope to incorporate their needs into our proposal.
It was discovered during our conversations that Soup Kitchen staff did not have access to Food Safe Training, which prevented them from being a distribution source for food that could be donated from local sources, farmer’s, grocery stores, restaurants etc. It was decided that Lois Wynne, of Sea to Sky Community Services, would look into providing or organizing this training. During the discussion it was also mentioned that this training would benefit others as well, including but not limited to daycare staff and community organization leaders (i.e. Girl Guides, Scouts). We would like to see Food Safe Course Seats subsidized by seed money and various community organizations.
We would like to see further dissemination of nutrition information. Having access to resource people who have the know- how, even in our small group, was a benefit to those of us who didn’t know that soaking brown basmati rice the night before reduces
27 cooking time. While this may seem trivial, getting actual healthy choice information out to those who can use it is not as straightforward as it may seem. The CCRR has offered to include submissions on healthy eating and cooking and can provide links on their website. To submit content please contact the CCRR at 604-815- 4144 or [email protected].
We also thought that having Family Days at local grocery stores, where families receive a discount similar to seniors, and focussing on healthy foods such as local produce would be a wonderful project to implement. Jane Balance, with the Putting Children First Initiative, has volunteered to explore the possibility of such a relationship with local grocery stores.
Ideally we felt that having a Liaison Position would be extremely useful and effective. We hope that funding for such a position would come through sources like the United Way and Seed Money. We envisioned this person as someone who had first hand experience with the difficulties of accessing food in the corridor and have come up with the following tasks for this position, once it has been created: Advocacy Newsletter Resource Directory Good Samaritan Implementation: Excess foods from restaurants, grocery stores, other sources to be distributed to seniors, food bank, daycares, youth centres, staff housing, and family housing (Castle Rock).
We have attached time lines to some of our projects, hoping to see Greenhouses sprouting up at daycares within the next two months, and the organization of a food safe course within the same time frame. The current CCRR newsletter will be distributed this week and will include some information on this process. The next newsletter will be coming out in September. Submissions are welcome at any time and must be received by mid August. We hope to see Family Days at Grocery Stores and a Food Security Liaison Position in the relatively near future.
28 B. Growing Food Locally and Using Local Food 10:30am session
The LOCAL manifesto… of Bruce Miller (Convener), Dietrich Jordan, Adam Hart, Caroline Ashekian, Sandra Midtal, Geraldine Joseph, Lisa Richardson, Lydia Szymanski.
(Scribed by Lisa Richardson with apologies to everyone for any misrepresentations or rantings that don’t reflect your part of the dialogue or incorporating my own personal tangents…)
We are united by our interest in: • Making locally grown food more accessible • Increasing the amount of locally grown food • Providing more of our own food for ourselves within the corridor • Distributing local food to local people • Shortening the distance between farmers and consumers, between earth and table, to create accountability and intimacy • Railing against the industrial food system and domination of big corporations and government • Increasing the vitality of grown things, and by consuming that, our own vitality • Anticipating coming food crises • Cultivating awareness so we can grow market/consumer demand for local produce
Facilitated by Bruce Miller, we map our corridor. The farming land here includes 60 miles2 in Pemberton and 3000 acres in Squamish, as well as some excellent farmland not in production in Mt Currie and at Baptiste. This farmland is big enough to feed the corridor. And half of Vancouver.
But there are challenges: For farmers, reaching markets, and market expectations, is a challenge. There are also development pressures on farmland, and competitive pressures from international agribusiness. Smaller operators often produce food in small irregular volumes – insufficient to generate regular distribution systems.
For the consumer, we have expectations of fast, instant, convenient, year around access to food. We suffer a knowledge gap, as 2nd generation fast-food consumers, and don’t know how to find our way back to local produce. How to get it, grow it, prepare it, preserve it. We face economic access issues, and sometimes choose cheaper food, because prices do not factor in true costs of production.
The new reality: the current industrial food system, subsidized by cheap oil, and government subsidies in the US, and global food distribution, is not sustainable. Prices are going to begin to reflect the rising cost of gas. We need to replace our
29 addiction to petroleum as our fuel of choice and instead fuel our bodies and communities and economies with LOCAL PRODUCE.
We can see the coming changes, and instead of seeing crisis, we see opportunity. An opportunity to break habits, and re-inhabit our foodsheds. To create a new system – or actually, to return to an older system, incorporate old-fashioned values of self-sufficiency.
We recognize that our assets are here. In our local environment. Our local community.
We embrace a quiet revolution. An evolution.
Through education.
We wish to educate consumers as to why eating locally is healthier for you, and for the food system. We wish to educate consumers that farmers have limitations, and cannot produce lettuce at 10c a pound, or strawberries in November. We wish to educate developers that habitat is more than housing – it is also the ability to feed ourselves, so if we build houses over farmland, we are in fact destroying habitat. We wish to educate people about the consequences of their actions, their purchases, their diets.
Through distribution systems.
We wish to ensure that surplus produce reaches the needy, through farmer partnerships with food banks and social services and schools.
And so, We propose a new manifesto. The Manifesto of the 100 Mile Movement.
Everyone who takes part in the 100 Mile Movement, will be motivated by different energy. The Movement aims to reconnect consumers with the source of their food. Be it by a sense of competition; a deep sense of spirit or ecological connection or desire for a practice of mindfulness; a desire to spend time as family and experience and teach our kids about the world, useful skills; a need for cheap food; the potential to make income; or for exercise/health and wellbeing, the 100 Mile Movement invites action.
The goal: The 100 Mile Movement draws a radius around the Sea to Sky corridor. Within that zone, we will build capacity for a local food system. With baby steps.
We invite the entire Sea to Sky corridor to take any one of the steps below.
We invite…
30 Gardeners to plant one extra row of food in their garden, to tithe to the food bank or distribute at the local farmers market
Farmers to contribute 1% of their crop to the social service system. To devote 1% of their working land to a new organically grown GMO free crop. Farmers to devote at least one weekend a year to hosting consumers/families etc for farm tours.
Restaurateurs to offer at least one meal on their menu that is 100 Mile.
Governments to dedicate at least 1% of their public lands to community greenhouses, gardens or edible landscaping.
Developers to commit 1% of each project landscape and budget to space for food security – community gardens, etc
Consumers to commit to having one product on their plate every day that is grown in the 100 mile locale. To buying into local farms through CSA or harvest box programs. (I.e. buy a share in a farm, share the risk, and get real dividends!)
Citizens to donate one day a year to earth-stewarding – to volunteer on a farm, to clean up litter, to pick fruit from abandoned trees, to build trails.
Families to commit to making one farm visit a year. Or to planting one edible thing – be it in a container garden, an herb pot on a windowsill, in the garden, a tree…a year.
Schools: to commit to devoting at least one day a year to the discussion of food and our foodshed.
Grocers to commit to devoting 10% of fruit and veg floor space to local produce.
Mechanisms: • Availability of vermincomposting/worm farms for indoor composting in bear areas (schools) • A schools project where kids start seedlings in the classroom. Similar to the salmonids in the classroom project. And once the seeds become small plants, in May, kids can take them home to plant, and tend over the summer, and eat from. • A foodshed map. A source guide of chefs who want to incorporate local ingredients. Of producers. Of farmgate operations. Of farmers markets. For the entire corridor. Available at the visitor info booths as well. • Work with bear aware groups to harvest “edible landscapes” promptly (e.g. Fruit Tree Projects) • Identify land with agricultural potential and partner it with wannabe farmers/farm tenants. Recommission farmland!
31 • Measure or chart the economic impact of a “grow local, eat local” movement. • Develop a logo/sticker/label that will clearly identify locally grown (within corridor) produce, and identify it as GMO free. • Investigate adopting the “Green Table” label for restaurants. • Support the development of local farmers markets, as ideal education/outreach situations, and places to grow a market, with maximum return to farmers. • Grocers to identify the source of the food they are selling. To offer taste tests comparing local and non-local food. • Lobby the SLRD to hire a Food Security Policy Coordinator, to link corridor, take education initiatives, support initiatives, identify land for edible landscaping, community gardens, etc.
32 C. Working towards a Sustainable/Less Unsustainable Food System and Local Regional Food Policy
Convener: Dania Matiation (1:00-2:30) Who was there: Dania Matiation, Sandra Mitdal, Adam Hart, Caroline Ashekian, Lydia Szymanski, Dietrich Jordan, Lisa Richardson, Bruce Miller, Donna Bent, Karen Kay, Jen Leigh
What we talked about: • Organic farming is an example of sustainability • Increasing the value of what farmers do • Education, labelling where our food comes from, the slow food cycle, packaging • Educating ourselves by talking to others who have done it before, people with experience • Educating people about why buying local is important • Educating school children (Power of Food-Adam Hart and Eric Jones) • Encouraging developers to working garden plots into landscaping • Integrating ideas into the Official Community Plan (OCP) • Partnering land owners and land seekers (for gardening and farming) • Creating policy at SLRD level to make the area GMO free; this has been done in Powell River! • Do our communities have an official food policy? • SLRD/RMOW/Village of Pemberton, District of Squamish to create food policy - Have an official food policy at municipal level that ensures that local farmers’ produce is used in stores • Ensuring that you can keep the farm in the family and keep the family in the farm; making sure land is protected and that farming is a viable, attractive livelihood for the next generation • Providing a discount for healthy eating, or making healthier food cheaper and junk food more expensive • Connecting farmers with nutritionists and cooks to teach school children about the where/how food is grown, the nutritious value and how to prepare it • Helping connect children to where food really comes from (not from a box on the grocery store shelves) • Whistler Housing Authority-community greenhouses to be incorporated • Lobby council for local food policies to be implemented • In US there is a reduction in health insurance for those who buy locally grown food • Use your own land to grown your own food; share knowledge that you don’t need fancy equipment to do so; borrow your neighbour’s equipment • In a time of crisis …government mandates everyone to grow a garden
33 • Keep in mind that there is not one answer for everyone because everyone is motivated differently in making decisions (relaxation, economy, gratification, some people wouldn’t garden because they grew up in a time where it was a sign of abject poverty)
Actions: • Have the Sea to Sky corridor challenge Vancouver’s 2010 community gardens by increasing the # of gardens or edible landscapes that we have • Create a resource to support networking – examples: website and mentoring • Create a Sea to Sky Corridor diary/almanac resource where we include what is grown locally, what grows at different times, info on what you need to garden, compost, also recipes for ideas on how to use what is in season and locally grown • Make a commitment that by 2010 have 20% of our overall food intake and 100% of the produce we eat come from the Sea to Sky Corridor • Teach people to eat seasonally • Work on getting municipal resolution for a GE free zone • Include protection of local food shed in community OCP • Support local composting (Carneys organic composting in Squamish) because there is pressure because of the smell to get rid of it
34 D. Sustainability – how to keep things going, who makes decisions etc.
Convener: Lois Wynne (1:00-2:30pm)
Participants: Jane Ballance, Lois Wynne, Karen Clarke, Erin Stewart, Marissa Schiesser, Geraldine Joseph
Summary of Discussion:
How to keep things going: • Food security committee developed • Consider a P/T paid staff • Organize around specific projects • Have quarterly forums to get together and share what’s been happening (action oriented) • Can we link or piggyback onto existing committees or groups to keep this alive
How does funding get allocated?: • By committee (more formal with terms of reference etc.) • By community or by corridor – each community decides on one project to start with
Ideas: • Good Food Box – incorporates education, distribution, local foods, affordable • Consider boxes that reflect different cultures in the corridor • Have cooking classes that wrap around the distribution of the boxes • Create a cookbook that has recipes with just a few ingredients, easy to use • Add an extra row in your garden to share • Develop a cooking calendar for a fund raising opportunity • Set up a sign up sheet for committee members
We discussed that priorities and how to draw on our strengths needs to be considered throughout the corridor. The question at this point is whether a corridor group or committee would be as effective as local community groups that communicate with each other or vice versa.
It was great to begin to look at the possibilities that could come out of these discussions and we moved from looking at Good Food Boxes to cooking classes to developing a cookbook to having a Chef Dinner at local farms to having an annual cookbook calendar to raise funds. Great group, great ideas, looking forward to the next steps.
35 Summaries of Action Planning Sessions, May 31
A. The 100 Mile Movement
Champions: We hope Lisa Richardson and Bruce Miller
Others who will help: We hope Dan Wilson, Peter Ackhurst, and many others!
What we will do together: • Develop a campaign of community engagement called The 100 Mile Movement in support of local agriculture, sustainable agriculture, healthy communities, accessibility of food for all, and other community food action goals. • To do this we need to develop a Brand, and integral to the 100MM brand is that it is a call to action: Families called to visit a farm 1/year Gardeners called to “grow a row” for the local food bank Schools called to spend one day/year focused on food accessibility and sustainability… Etc, etc. For other ideas – see Lisa Richardson’s notes on dialogue session B. Basically every person and organization can be invited to sign on/join the movement. The idea is to make the steps easy ones, and that in taking one simple step people are part of something that collectively can have a big impact on awareness, and on the food system in the corridor. • To develop a brand we need to: Create a committee to work on this initiative. Convene a meeting with stakeholders, and involve people with marketing expertise – e.g. so they can help profile “clients” and develop strategy. Learn from other branded calls to action like Vancouver’s One Day campaign, and the Suzuki Foundation’s Nature Challenge. Create a business plan/framework planning for development and roll-out of the Movement. Seek funding. Sources include: • Whistler Blackcomb Foundation • Regional Municipality of Whistler Community Enrichment Program • Community Foundation of Whistler • Fundraiser
36 • Fees (e.g. $5/year for individuals and higher fees for organizations for being part of the Movement) • Agricultural grants – e.g. to conduct a study/do a questionnaire In time, other ideas include: • Explore options for stickers/signs to publicize participant’s involvement in the movement – including logo development. Also sticker to show that food is grown within the 100 mile radius/the corridor, and also that it is GMO Free • The movement could support product development and brokering relationships between farmers and buyers – e.g. Pemberton Potato farmers to supply 100% of the potatoes used for French fries at Whistler Blackcomb. • Support for a Licensed Commercial Kitchen in Pemberton to support creation of value added products by farmers • Linking with the Green Table initiative re Restaurants • A Foodshed map – education, linkages, culinary tourism • Grocers identify source of food, and offer taste tests comparing local and non-local produce • Support local farmers markets • Measure the economic impact of a “Grow local, eat local” movement. • Set goal of 20% of food consumed in the corridor coming from the corridor, and 100% of the produce being locally grown
Who else we need to invite: • Person(s) with marketing expertise • A cross-section of stakeholders • We see that a partnership with Tourism Whistler can offer support for this initiative. Tourism Whistler has a big marketing budget and interest in culinary tourism is growing. Whistler is hiring a Tourism Development Officer effective September 2006 with the goal of diversifying Whistler’s offerings for visitors and cultivating options for the shoulder seasons. The Slow Food Cycle is an example of something that could be a great fit with Whistler’s tourism objectives. The Slow Food Cycle is also great for farmers as it offers an easy entry point for experimenting with welcoming the public to their farms, along with creating linkages between farm folk and city folk, greater
37 awareness of food and food sustainability issues, community, etc etc. • Tourism Pemberton • Pemberton Farmer’s Institute. Perhaps they might take ownership of the 100 MM?? • Please keep Kate Sutherland in the loop: [email protected]. She is happy to connect the 100MM to Marc Stoiber of Change Advertising Inc re development of the brand. His goal is to “Make Sustainability Sexy.”
When we will meet again: TBD
38 B. Project: Food Calendar/Almanac
Champion: Karen Kay to co-ordinate
Others who will help: Mary Freskin, Jane Ballance, Geraldine Joseph, Nancy Norman
What will we do together? • ***make a proposal • ***search for funding (Mary) • meet regularly – first in mid-august, then perhaps monthly • find/create a template • keep in contact
Who else we need to invite? Anyone interested. High-school students, disabled adults and children, First Nations and other cultural groups, farmers, chefs, Elders, food bank, soup kitchen representatives, videographer. Computer wiz(es).
When we will meet again: mid-August
Our group convened to discuss the following items: • education of food consumers (i.e. buy local, in-season, healthy choices); • Sea to Sky Corridor diary/almanac; • worm composting for indoors/bear areas; • cooking/recipe calendar as a fundraiser.
The group felt that these ideas were linked and therefore chose to discuss them as part of a common direction/project. We talked about the idea of a package/book that would encompass all of these ideas.
Criteria for the ‘book’ would include a focus on local produce and farms, seasonal changes and opportunities, cultural aspects and accessibility (i.e.. visuals, non- literate, non-English speaking, etc.).
This book would possibly include: • a calendar with seasonal info (i.e. what things to plant, what is available locally at specific times of year) • prompts (i.e. when to plant what, when to harvest what, local events to attend and support) • growing tips from local farmers • recipes (i.e. 4 ingredient/simple, catered to specific ages, cultures and abilities – possibly to pull out) • low income/budgeted cooking ideas
39 • nutrition info • local resources directory • indoor growing and composting info • greenhouse info, and other relevant material/info.
We think the ‘book’ should be filled with pictures of people in our own communities, in (food-related) action.
The group talked generally about distribution of the book and the info it would hold. Suggestion was made that the info needs to be made accessible in various forms (visual, in relevant languages, physically accessible) – i.e. Guest chefs, apprentice cooks and others could carry out short, dynamic cooking demos in local groceries and other suitable outlets while handing out the ’book’. A video series of the same nature could play (continuously) at the food bank – addressing prep of the local foods available at a particular time.
The group offered some suggestions for contacts for ‘book’ (and related) contributions including: • Steve Milstein re: greenhouse funding; • Adam Hart re: “Power of Food” video series; • university calendars for template ideas; • local high-school students involved in graphic design and photography courses; • VANOC; • many other community members.
We talked about connections with the 100 Mile Movement idea, suggesting the book be a tangible gift received upon joining the movement, and that it showcase the movement’s ideals.
The time frame around release of the ‘book’ is specific if it is to include a calendar (January), which would likely require a production deadline of early fall. The group talked about possibly releasing smaller sections of the ‘book’ as they are finished, before the full version of the book is ready for release. The group acknowledged that this is likely a project that will require much action to initially complete then require only upkeep over the following years. The group decided that the people working on this project should do so as a sub-committee of the Food Security Committee (in the works?).
We hope that this book may then become a fundraising tool, to enhance and sustain this and such food-related projects.
40 C. Sea to Sky Corridor Food Security Coordinator Position
Participants: Dietrich Jordan, Roxanna Kuurne, Karen Clarke, Lydia Szymanski
People to involve in Organizing/Supporting the Position • Sea to Sky Community Services Lydia Szymanski, SSCSS Lois Wynne, ED of SSCSS Jan Durocher (assist with more funding) SSCSS • Support from Vancouver Coastal Health – Karen Clarke
Terms of Reference for position need to be determined using the Act Now BC report from the Sea to Sky Corridor
# of hours will be determined by amount of funding in the beginning
Funding Opportunities • Act Now BC (Vancouver Coastal Health) • United Way • Community Foundation of Whistler • Squamish Community Foundation • Whistler/Blackcomb Foundation • Jan Durocher from Sea to Sky Community Services can assist with looking for more funding • CEDTAP Funding for a possible Research Position to support the various food security efforts in the corridor as well as use for a lobbying/advocacy tool i.e. gas price increase affecting food cost, availability of land for community gardens, protection of agricultural lands, etc.
Initial Coordinator Tasks • Seek funding for continuation of position and for food security projects in the corridor (Jan Durocher can support this work) • Organize Food Security Committees in Squamish, Whistler and Pemberton as well as Sea to Sky Corridor Food Security Forums once or twice a year so everyone can meet • Coordinate volunteers on committees and projects • Create link between communities so ideas are shared • Network with Claire Gram the Food Security Coordinator from Vancouver Coastal Health Work on projects recommended in the report i.e. Protection of Agricultural Lands (OCP), School Agricultural Program (Agriculture in Classroom Foundation), GE/GMO Free Municipalities, Increasing Community Gardens, Good Food Box, Food Processing Facilities, etc.
41 Appendices
A. Environment Scan (N.B. The information contained is the best that could be put together with the time constraints for the report. If you have more information to enhance this scan, please e-mail [email protected])
a. Economic
Income differences of consumers1 • Average Family Income 2000 All Census families $ 67,298 Husband/Wife $ 72,944 Female lone parent $ 31,344
• Income distribution among families <$20,000 10% $20,000-$79,999 59.7% $80,000 30.3%