Project Tiger
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Can Community Forestry Conserve Tigers in India?
Can Community Forestry Conserve Tigers in India? Shibi Chandy David L. Euler Abstract—Active participation of local people through community (Ontario Ministry for Natural Resources 1994). In most forestry has been successful in several developed countries. In the developing countries, like India, the socio-economic prob- early 1980’s, developing countries tried to adopt this approach for lems will have to be addressed first to achieve the objectives the conservation and management of forests. Nepal, for example, of conservation (Kuchli 1997). has gained considerable support from local people by involving them Royal Bengal Tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) (fig. 1) are in conservation policies and actions. This paper illustrates that endangered and almost on the verge of extinction. Conser- people living near the Sundarbans Tiger Reserve/National Park in vation of these animals in Asia poses serious problems, as India should not be considered mere gatherers of forest products. their population has been reduced significantly due to They can also be active managers and use forest resources hunting, poaching, and habitat shrinkage. Reserves and sustainably, which will help in the conservation of tigers. parks have been established to protect the animals and separate people from the forests. This, however, has caused Conservation of tigers in Asia, especially in India, is a major concern. The Sundarbans offers a unique habitat for tigers, but the conservation strategies followed for the past 20 years have not yielded much result. One of the major reasons is that local people and their needs were ignored. Lack of concern for the poverty/forest interface, which takes a heavy toll on human lives, is another reason for failure. -
National Tiger Conservation Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests
F. No. 3-1/2003-PT REVISED GUIDELINES FOR THE ONGOING CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF PROJECT TIGER FEBRUARY, 2008 National Tiger Conservation Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India 1 Government of India Ministry of Environment & Forests National Tiger Conservation Authority REVISED GUIDELINES FOR THE ONGOING CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME OF PROJECT TIGER (1) Introduction: Project Tiger is an ongoing Centrally Sponsored Scheme of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. The revised guidelines incorporate the additional activities for implementing the urgent recommendations of the Tiger Task Force, constituted by the National Board for Wildlife, chaired by the Hon’ble Prime Minister. These, interalia, also include support for implementing the provisions of the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2006, which has come into force with effect from 4.09.2006. The activities are as below: (i) Antipoaching initiatives (ii) Strengthening infrastructure within tiger reserves (iii) Habitat improvement and water development (iv) Addressing man-animal conflicts (v) Co-existence agenda in buffer / fringe areas with landscape approach (vi) Deciding inviolate spaces and relocation of villages from crucial tiger habitats within a timeframe by providing a better relocation package, apart from supporting States for settlement of rights of such people (vii) Rehabilitation of traditional hunting tribes living in and around tiger reserves (viii) Providing support to States for research and field equipments (ix) Supporting States for staff development and capacity building in tiger reserves. (x) Mainstreaming wildlife concerns in tiger bearing forests outside tiger reserves, and fostering corridor conservation in such areas through restorative strategy involving local people to arrest fragmentation of habitats. -
Shivalik Elephant Reserve: Uttarakhand
Shivalik Elephant Reserve: Uttarakhand drishtiias.com/printpdf/shivalik-elephant-reserve-uttarakhand Why in News The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has asked the Uttarakhand government to consider avoiding sensitive areas of the Shivalik Elephant Reserve while exploring land suitable to use for the expansion of Dehradun’s Jolly Grant Airport. Key Points Background: The area proposed for the expansion, is a part of the Shivalik Elephant Reserve and it falls within a 10-km radius of Rajaji National Park. Protests: Children and social activists have tied protective strings around the trees marked to be cut, similar to the Chipko movement of the 1970s, when villagers in Chamoli hugged trees to stop contractors from felling them. Concerns: The expansion will threaten hundreds of species of fauna in Thano (near Rajaji National Park) and the elephant corridor nearby. The State also falls in seismic Zone IV and V, as per the Earthquake Zoning Map, and uprooting Thano will lead to soil erosion, a factor that exacerbated the 2013 Kedarnath floods, endangering countless lives. Earlier, social activists had criticised Chardham Pariyojana on environmental grounds. It is a programme taken up by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways for connectivity improvement for Chardham (Kedarnath, Badrinath, Yamunotri and Gangotri) in Uttrakhand. Recently, the Supreme Court upheld the 2011 order of the Madras High Court (HC) on the Nilgiris elephant corridor, affirming the right of passage of the animals and the closure of resorts in the area. 1/3 Shivalik Elephant Reserve: It was notified in 2002 under the ‘Project Elephant’. Project Elephant was launched by the Government of India in the year 1992 as a Centrally Sponsored Scheme with following objectives: To protect elephants, their habitat & corridors. -
The Human-Elephant Conflict
Gajaha 30 (2009) 41-52 The Human-Elephant Confl ict: A Review of Current Status and Mitigation Methods B. M. A. Oswin Perera Faculty of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Globally, wild elephants are present in 50 of the ecosystems they inhabit. Due to their countries, 13 of which are in Asia and 37 in requirement for large areas of forest habitat, Africa. At present the number of wild Asian conservation of elephants will automatically elephants (Elephas maximus) is between 35,000 ensure the conservation of other species that and 50,000 (www.elephantcare.org), while the co-exist in the same habitat. However, they can number in captivity is around 16,000. The trend also modify the environment in positive as well in almost all Asian range states has been a drastic as negative ways by their actions. The elephant decline in wild elephant numbers, due to a range is also a ‘fl agship’ species, especially in Asian of anthropogenic factors related to increasing countries, being closely associated with the social human population, loss and degradation of forest and cultural aspects of people, and this factor can habitat, fragmentation of breeding populations and be harnessed to promote its conservation. increasing human-elephant confl ict (HEC). The Asian elephant is categorized as an ‘endangered’ Many studies have been carried out on HEC both species in the Red List of the World Conservation in Asia (Sukumar 2003; Jayawardena 2004; de Union (IUCN, 2008: www.iucnredlist.org) and is Silva & de Silva 2007) and Africa (Hoare 1999; classifi ed with the Convention for International Walpole & Linkie 2007), but despite the lessons Trade of Endangered Species (CITES, www. -
Gajah 35 (2011)
NUMBER 35 2011 GAJAHJournal of the Asian Elephant Specialist Group GAJAH Journal of the Asian Elephant Specialist Group Number 35 (2011) The journal is intended as a medium of communication on issues that concern the management and conservation of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) both in the wild and in captivity. It is a means by which members of the AsESG and others can communicate their experiences, ideas and perceptions freely, so that the conservation of Asian elephants can benefit. All articles published in Gajah reflect the individual views of the authors and not necessarily that of the editorial board or the AsESG. The copyright of each article remains with the author(s). Editor Jayantha Jayewardene Biodiversity and Elephant Conservation Trust 615/32 Rajagiriya Gardens Nawala Road, Rajagiriya Sri Lanka [email protected] Editorial Board Dr. Richard Barnes Dr. Prithiviraj Fernando Ecology, Behavior & Evolution Section Centre for Conservation and Research Division of Biological Sciences MC-0116 35 Gunasekara Gardens University of California at San Diego Nawala Road La Jolla, CA 92093-0116 Rajagiriya USA Sri Lanka e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Jennifer Pastorini Heidi Riddle Centre for Conservation and Research Riddles Elephant & Wildlife Sanctuary 35 Gunasekara Gardens P.O.Box 715 Nawala Road, Rajagiriya Greenbrier, Arkansas 72058 Sri Lanka USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Alex Rübel Arnold Sitompul Direktor Zoo Zürich Conservation Science Initiative Zürichbergstrasse 221 Jl. Setia Budi Pasar 2 CH - 8044 Zürich Komp. Insan Cita Griya Blok CC No 5 Switzerland Medan, 20131 e-mail: [email protected] Indonesia e-mail:[email protected] GAJAH Journal of the Asian Elephant Specialist Group Number 35 (2011) This publication of Gajah was financed by the International Elephant Foundation Editorial Note Articles published in Gajah may be used, distributed and reproduced in any medium, provided the article is properly cited. -
Southern India Project Elephant Evaluation Report
SOUTHERN INDIA PROJECT ELEPHANT EVALUATION REPORT Mr. Arin Ghosh and Dr. N. Baskaran Technical Inputs: Dr. R. Sukumar Asian Nature Conservation Foundation INNOVATION CENTRE, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, BANGALORE 560012, INDIA 27 AUGUST 2007 CONTENTS Page No. CHAPTER I - PROJECT ELEPHANT GENERAL - SOUTHERN INDIA -------------------------------------01 CHAPTER II - PROJECT ELEPHANT KARNATAKA -------------------------------------------------------06 CHAPTER III - PROJECT ELEPHANT KERALA -------------------------------------------------------15 CHAPTER IV - PROJECT ELEPHANT TAMIL NADU -------------------------------------------------------24 CHAPTER V - OVERALL CONCLUSIONS & OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------------------------------32 CHAPTER - I PROJECT ELEPHANT GENERAL - SOUTHERN INDIA A. Objectives of the scheme: Project Elephant was launched in February 1992 with the following major objectives: 1. To ensure long-term survival of the identified large elephant populations; the first phase target, to protect habitats and existing ranges. 2. Link up fragmented portions of the habitat by establishing corridors or protecting existing corridors under threat. 3. Improve habitat quality through ecosystem restoration and range protection and 4. Attend to socio-economic problems of the fringe populations including animal-human conflicts. Eleven viable elephant habitats (now designated Project Elephant Ranges) were identified across the country. The estimated wild population of elephants is 30,000+ in the country, of which a significant -
WTI Brochure Latest Lowres-1.Pdf
Our Mission To conserve wildlife and its habitat and to work for the welfare of individual wild animals in partnership with communities and governments Indiscriminate slaughter of bull elephants has created absurdly skewed sex ratios that can have serious The Need demographic and genetic implications for the species. Even more worrying is the rampant destruction and fragmentation of elephant habitats, especially the impairment of traditional migratory corridors which is A land of striking contrasts, India is home to rich bringing elephants into increasing conflict with humans. biodiversity and wildlife. Although the country’s three Equally endangered are the musk deer and the snow flagship species – the Royal Bengal tiger, the greater leopard that face poaching and habitat loss in the alpine one-horned rhinoceros and the Asian elephant – Himalayas. Several magnificent birds such as the western dominate the spotlight, India is home to 423 mammal tragopan, the greater adjutant stork, the sarus crane, species, 1233 bird species, 526 reptile species, 342 the great Indian bustard and the Bengal florican require amphibian species, 3022 fish species, over 80,000 immediate attention. The pygmy hog, hispid hare, invertebrate species, and more than 50,000 plant species. hoolock gibbon, Malabar civet, Ganges river dolphin, The Indian wilderness also contains four of the world’s 35 gharial, olive Ridley turtle and whale shark are but a few biodiversity hotspots, 26 of the world’s most important examples of native and migrant species that are caught wetlands as defined by the Ramsar Convention, and in a crisis situation. seven natural World Heritage Sites as defined by UNESCO. -
Conservation Values of Asian Elephants: People’S Appreciation
Gajah 29 (2008) 28-31 Conservation Values of Asian Elephants: People’s Appreciation Nirupam Hazarika1, Archana Sharma², Bibhab K. Talukdar1, Naba K. Nath1 and Pranjit K. Sarma1 Aaranyak, Survey, Guwahati, Assam, India 2Department of Economics, Gauhati University, Assam, India Introduction the economic value attached to the conservation of elephants, as one of the key causes for elephant The Asian elephant Elephas maximus has been habitat decline is the failure to account adequately considered as one of the most reminiscent cultural for their environmental and ecological non-use symbols of the people of Asia and it also stands values. Although more attention has been given for the need to safeguard suffi cient natural forest on economic issues involved in the conservation areas; however the survival of the species has of African elephants, Loxodonta africana, the been in danger due to a number of conservation Asian elephant has received little consideration issues (AERCC 1998). Asian elephants are (Bandara & Tisdell 2004). Keeping this in confi ned to 13 Asian range countries, of which, mind, we initiated an economic valuation study India holds over 50% of the global population – in Golaghat District of Assam from January to approximately 24,000–28,000 distributed across July 2007 to see how people appreciate different 18 states of the country (Menon 2003; Sukumar economic values related to elephant conservation. 2003). Northeast India holds around 30% of the This is a preliminary attempt to understand the country’s total elephant population (Bist 2002b). feasibility of valuation study with regards to Within this north-eastern countryside, the state wildlife in general, and elephants in particular, of Assam is known as the key conservation in this region. -
Status of Tigers in the Sundarban Landscape Bangladesh and India
Status of Tigers in the Sundarban Landscape Bangladesh and India Principal Investigators T. K. Dey, Md. J. Kabir, Q. Qureshi & Y. V. Jhala Bangladesh Forest Department National Tiger Conservation Authority T.K. Dey, M. J. Kabir, M. M. Ahsan, S. P. Yadav, Himmat S. Negi, B. S. Bonal M. M. Islam, M. M. R. Chowdhury & S. Hassan. & Rajesh Gopal World Wide Fund for Nature - India West Bengal Forest Department Debmalya Roy Chowdhury, Pankaj Sarkar, Soumitra Dasgupta & Pradeep Shukla Ratul Saha, Sunit Kumar Das & Jimmy Bora Wildlife Institute of India Manjari Roy, Dipanjan Naha, Ahana Dutta, Bhaskar J Bora, Manendra Kaneria, Rahul K Talegaonkar, Sougata Sadhukan, Urjit M Bhatt, Ujjwal Sinha, Q. Qureshi & Y. V. Jhala Suggested Citation: Jhala, Y.V., Dey, T.K., Qureshi, Q., Kabir, J., Md., Bora, J. & Roy, M. 2016. Status of tigers in the Sundarban landscape Bangladesh and India. Bangladesh Forest Department; National Tiger Conservation Authority, New Delhi, & Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. TRNO -2016/002. i çdk'k tkoMsdj jkT; ea=kh (Lora=k çHkkj) Prakash Javadekar MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) i;kZoj.k] ou ,oa tyok;q ifjorZu ENVIRONMENT, FOREST & CLIMATE CHANGE Hkkjr ljdkj /GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Message Sundarbans is the last unexplored mystical home of the tiger. Here the tiger is dreaded and worshipped. It serves as a guardian of these majestic forests and has saved them from human overexploitation. For the first time, the joint assessment of tiger status by Bangladesh and India using a common standard scientific protocol, has unraveled the ecological aspects of this unique and little known tiger population that will be of immense value for its conservation. -
Forest Department.Indd
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA FOREST DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2014-15 ANNUAL REPORT 2014-15 (1-4-2014 to 31-03-2015) INDEX Chapter Page CONTENTS No. No. 1 INTRODUCTION 1-2 2 ORGANISATION 3 3 SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT 3 METHODS OF EXTRACTION OF FOREST PRODUCE AND 4 4 ITS DISPOSAL 5 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 5-13 7 PROJECTS 14-24 8 WORKING PLANS 25-30 10 FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 32-35 11 FOREST DEVELOPMENT FUND 35 12 WILDLIFE 35-49 13 COMPENSATORY PLANTATION 50-51 14 FOREST CONSERVATION 52-57 15 LAND RECORDS 58-59 16 FOREST RESEARCH & UTILISATION 59-74 17 FOREST PROTECTION & VIGILANCE 75-77 18 FOREST TRAINING 78-87 Chapter Page CONTENTS No. No. 25 KARNATAKA STATE FOREST INDUSTRIES CORPORATION 100-102 26 KARNATAKA STATE MEDICINAL PLANTS AUTHORITY 103-109 TABLES Table PARTICULARS Page No. No. 1 DISTRICT WISE FOREST AREA IN KARNATAKA STATE 110 2 DISTRICT WISE FOREST AREA BY LEGAL STATUS 111 4 ORGANISATION CHART OF THE DEPARTMENT 116 6 RECORDED MINOR FOREST PRODUCE 118 to 119 FIREWOOD RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC FOR DOMESTIC AND 7 120 OTHER USE 8 SUPPLY OF BAMBOO TO MEDARS AND OTHERS 121 9 PLANTATIONS RAISED 122 10 PLANTATIONS RAISED FROM 2007-08 to 2014-15 123 11 PROGRESS UNDER STATE SCHEMES 124-125 12 PROGRESS UNDER CENTRAL PLAN SCHEMES 126 13 PROGRESS UNDER CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEMES 127 14 PROGRESS UNDER CENTRAL PLAN SCHEMES 127 15 PROGRESS REPORT UNDER FOREST DEVELOPMENT FUND 128 Table PARTICULARS Page No. No. 16 FOREST OFFENCE CASES 129-132 17 STAFF POSITION 133 18 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE 134 THE NON-PLAN ESTIMATES FOR 2012-13 AND REVISED 19 135 ESTIMES -
Western Ghats
Western Ghats From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Sahyadri" redirects here. For other uses, see Sahyadri (disambiguation). Western Ghats Sahyadri सहहदररद Western Ghats as seen from Gobichettipalayam, Tamil Nadu Highest point Peak Anamudi (Eravikulam National Park) Elevation 2,695 m (8,842 ft) Coordinates 10°10′N 77°04′E Coordinates: 10°10′N 77°04′E Dimensions Length 1,600 km (990 mi) N–S Width 100 km (62 mi) E–W Area 160,000 km2 (62,000 sq mi) Geography The Western Ghats lie roughly parallel to the west coast of India Country India States List[show] Settlements List[show] Biome Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests Geology Period Cenozoic Type of rock Basalt and Laterite UNESCO World Heritage Site Official name: Natural Properties - Western Ghats (India) Type Natural Criteria ix, x Designated 2012 (36th session) Reference no. 1342 State Party India Region Indian subcontinent The Western Ghats are a mountain range that runs almost parallel to the western coast of the Indian peninsula, located entirely in India. It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and is one of the eight "hottest hotspots" of biological diversity in the world.[1][2] It is sometimes called the Great Escarpment of India.[3] The range runs north to south along the western edge of the Deccan Plateau, and separates the plateau from a narrow coastal plain, called Konkan, along the Arabian Sea. A total of thirty nine properties including national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserve forests were designated as world heritage sites - twenty in Kerala, ten in Karnataka, five in Tamil Nadu and four in Maharashtra.[4][5] The range starts near the border of Gujarat and Maharashtra, south of the Tapti river, and runs approximately 1,600 km (990 mi) through the states of Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu ending at Kanyakumari, at the southern tip of India. -
Section II: Periodic Report on the State of Conservation of the Manas
PERIODIC REPORTING EXERCISE ON THE APPLICATION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION SECTION II State of Conservation of specific World Heritage properties State Party: INDIA Property Name: Manas National Park Periodic Reporting Exercise on the Application of the World Heritage Convention Section II: State of conservation of specific World Heritage properties II.1. Introduction a. Country (and State Party if different): 001 India. b. Name of World Heritage property: 002 Manas Wildlife Sanctuary, now National Park c. In order to locate the property precisely, please attach a topographic map showing scale, 003 orientation, projection, datum, site name, date and graticule. The map should be an original print and not be trimmed. The site boundaries should be shown on the map. In addition they can be submitted in a detailed description, indicating topographic and other legally defined national, regional, or international boundaries followed by the site boundaries. The State Parties are encouraged to submit the geographic information in digital form so that it can be integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS). On this questionnaire indicate the geographical co-ordinates to the nearest second (in the case of large sites, towns, areas etc., give at least 3 sets of geographical co- ordinates): Centre point: 90o 56’30” E 26o 39” N North-west corner: 90o 46’ 30” E 26o 42” N South-east corner: 91o 10’2” E 26o 37” N d. Give the date of inscription on the World Heritage List and subsequent extension 004 (if applicable): 6 – 12 – 1985 e. Organisation(s) or entity(ies) responsible for the preparation of this report.