DOCSLIB.ORG

Tittabawassee River Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tittabawassee River Assessment ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A STATE OF MICHIGAN S P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR52 September 2009 Tittabawassee River Assessment Kathrin S. Schrouder, Roger N. Lockwood, and James P. Baker www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 52 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Special Report 52 September 2009 Tittabawassee River Assessment Kathrin S. Schrouder, Roger N. Lockwood, and James P. Baker MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: HUMAN RESOURCES Or MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Or OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CADILLAC PLACE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PO BOX 30028 3054 W. GRAND BLVD., SUITE 3-600 4040 NORTH FAIRFAX DRIVE LANSING MI 48909-7528 DETROIT MI 48202 ARLINGTON VA 22203 ATUR F N AL O R For information or assistance on this publication, contact the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, T E N S E O U M R T C Fisheries Division, PO BOX 30446, LANSING, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. R E A S P E DNR D TTY/TDD: 711 (Michigan Relay Center) M ICHIGAN Suggested Citation Format Schrouder, K.S., R.N. Lockwood, and J.P. Baker. 2009. Tittabawassee River assessment. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 52, Ann Arbor. ii Tittabawassee River Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................... viii LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........................................................................................xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... xiii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 RIVER ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 4 Geography ........................................................................................................................... 4 History.................................................................................................................................. 5 Geology ...............................................................................................................................9 Bedrock Geology.............................................................................................................. 9 Surficial Geology ............................................................................................................ 10 Hydrology........................................................................................................................... 11 Climate ........................................................................................................................... 11 Annual Streamflow ......................................................................................................... 12 Seasonal Flow................................................................................................................ 12 Streamflow at Hydropower Facilities .............................................................................. 13 Daily Streamflow............................................................................................................. 14 Flooding or Floodplains .................................................................................................. 15 Consumptive Water Use................................................................................................. 15 Soils and Land Use............................................................................................................ 16 Soils................................................................................................................................17 Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 19 Bridges and Other Stream Crossings............................................................................. 21 Oil and Gas Development .............................................................................................. 22 Channel Morphology.......................................................................................................... 23 Gradient.......................................................................................................................... 23 Specific Power................................................................................................................ 24 Channel Cross Section................................................................................................... 25 Dams and Barriers............................................................................................................. 28 Water Quality ..................................................................................................................... 35 Dioxin Contamination ..................................................................................................... 36 Point Source Pollution .................................................................................................... 38 Nonpoint Source Pollution.............................................................................................. 38 Storm Water Control....................................................................................................... 39 Sites of Environmental Contamination (Part 201 Sites) ................................................. 39 Superfund Sites.............................................................................................................. 40 Dissolved Oxygen, Temperature, Nutrients, and Bacteria ............................................. 40 Tainting of Fish............................................................................................................... 41 River Classification by MDNR, Fisheries Division .......................................................... 41 Consumption Advisories................................................................................................. 41 Procedure 51.................................................................................................................. 42 iii Tittabawassee River Assessment Summary of Water Quality Issues by River Section....................................................... 42 Special Jurisdictions .......................................................................................................... 44 Navigability ..................................................................................................................... 44 Federal Authority ............................................................................................................ 45 Coastal Zone Management ............................................................................................ 45 Federally Regulated Dams............................................................................................. 45 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)........................................................ 45 United States Fish and Wildlife Service–Lamprey Control............................................. 46 Natural and Scenic River Designation............................................................................ 46 County Authorities .......................................................................................................... 46 State Government .......................................................................................................... 47 Biological Communities ..................................................................................................... 48 Original Fish Communities ............................................................................................. 48 Factors Affecting Fish Communities..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Resources Compared
    Water Resources Overview The goals of the Water Resources Chapter are listed below: - Protect the water supply from pollution and encroachment of developments. - Provide an adequate and safe drinking water supply to serve the existing and future residents of the City of Frederick. - Provide an adequate capacity of wastewater treatment with effluent meeting all necessary regulatory requirements for existing and future residents of the City. - Restore and protect water quality and contribute toward meeting the water qualityby striving to meet or exceed regulatory requirements. for water quality. This will require addressinginclude current water quality impacts as well as future impacts from land development and population growth. - Develop adequate stormwater management. - Protect the habitat value of the local and regional rivers and streams. - Efficiently use public dollars for infrastructure that ensures sustainable, safe, and adequate supply of water for all residents. The City is committed to ensuring water and wastewater (sewer) capacity for both existing and new developments andwhile minimizing the negative impacts of stormwater runoff. In 2002, the City established the Water and Sewer Allocation System to make certain that adequate treatment capacity for potable water and wastewater is in place for new growth prior to approval. In 2012, Ordinance G-12-13 was adopted which updated the allocation process and combined it with it the Impact Fees payable for water and sewer service. The City adopted an Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) in 2007 that allows development to proceed only after it has been demonstrated that sufficient infrastructure exists or will be created in the water and wastewater systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Structures Assisting the Migrations of Non-Salmonid Fish: USSR
    FAO Structures assisting FISHERIES TECHNICAL the migrations of PAPER non-salmonid fish: USSR 308 D.S. Pavlov Severtsov's Institute of the Evolutionary Morphology and Ecology of Animals Leninskii Prospekt 33 117071 Moscow B-71, USSR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1989 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-42 ISBN 92-5-102857-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. 0 FAO 1989 PREPARATION OF THIS DOC UMENT The Working Party of Experts on Inland Fisheries of the Indo-Pacific Commission, at a meeting in New Delhi, India, in January 1984, recommended that information be collected on the use of fish-passes. s a result of this recommenda- tion, FAO commissioned a consultant to review stn ctures assisting migration of non-salmonid stocks in the USSR. The original manuscript has been subject to substantial editing by Drs R.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 of the Study Examined the Big Picture Or Potential Routes to Connect Each Community
    Tri-County Regional Path Study Phase 2 Bay, Midland and Saginaw Counties January, 2009 With professional assistance from: 230 S. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 1689, Saginaw, Michigan, 48607 (989) 754-4717 www.spicergroup.com Robert R. Eggers, AICP Tanya M. Moore, RLA, ASLA 117122SG200848607 Tri-County Regional Path Core Committee Members Phase 2 Adam Ball, Saginaw County Road Commission Jim Lillo, Bay County Road Commission Keith Baker, City of Midland Joseph Malan, Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail Trail Tom Begin, Consumers Energy Jeff Martin, Dow Chemical Heidi Bolger, The Rehmann Group Terry Moultane, City of Bay City Dave Engelhardt, Bay County Jay Reithel, MDOT Bay Region Michelle Goist, Saginaw County Parks John Schmude, Saginaw County Parks Kim Haller, Midland County Parks Dave Waite, Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail Trail Stephanie Harden, City of Saginaw Cathy Washabaugh, Bay Area Riverwalk/Rail Trail, Bay Dan Hoffman, Saginaw Area GIS Authority Area Community Foundation Mike Kelly, Saginaw Bay WIN/Conservation Fund Brian Wendling, Saginaw County Road Commission Craig Kendziorski, Friends of the Pere Marquette Railtrail Dirk Westbury, Bay County Transportation Planning The Phase 2 Tri-County Regional Path Study was funded by the following entities and events: Dow Chemical Company Foundation Saginaw Community Foundation Midland Area Community Foundation Bay Area Community Foundation Friends of the Saginaw Valley Rail Trail Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail Trail Bay Area Community Foundation Riverwalk/Rail Trail Committee Proceeds
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY
    MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY ( ) David Foute advertised wool carding at Accommodation Factory, Dumb Quarter extended, Frederick-Town Herald, June 23, 1827. ADAMS FULLING MILL (9) Frederick Brown advertised wool carding at 6-1/4 cents per pound at the old establishment of Mr. Adams, about 2 miles south of New Market, Frederick-Town Herald, May 11, 1831, p. 4. He had offered fulling and dyeing there (Mrs. Adams’), Ibid., August 20, 1825. This was presumably the fulling mill shown on the 1808 Charles Varlé map on Bush Creek, 0.33 mile north of the present Weller Road, SE of Monrovia. The 1860 Bond map showed the Mrs. H. Norris wool factory, while the 1878 atlas showed Mrs. Norris with a grist and sawmill. ADLER ROPEWALK (F) A ropewalk operated by John Adler in 1819 was on South Market Street, Frederick. The building was occupied in 1976 by Federated Charities (See, Ralph F. Martz, “Richard Potts,” Frederick Post, May 11, 1976, p. A-7). ADELSPERGER MILL CO (5) This steam foundry and machine shop was listed in the 1860 census of manufactures with $14,000 capital investment and 25 employees; annual output was $5000 in castings and $25,000 in machinery. ADLUM STILL ( ) John Adlum advertised to sell two stills, 106-gallon and 49-gallon, Frederick-Town Herald, August 14, 1802. AETNA GLASS WORKS (7) Thomas Johnson purchased some of Amelung’s machinery and built a new Aetna Glass Works on Bush Creek, hauling sand from Ellicott City in empty wheat wagons. He later built another works on Tuscarora Creek, The Potomac, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Kanawha Watershed Main Report
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for Selected Streams in the Upper Kanawha Watershed, West Virginia FINAL REPORT January 2005 Final Upper Kanawha Watershed TMDL Report CONTENTS Executive summary...................................................................................................................... ix 1. Report Format....................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads...................................................................................1 2.2 Water Quality Standards..........................................................................................4 3. Watershed Description and Data Inventory....................................................................5 3.1 Watershed Description.............................................................................................5 3.2 Data Inventory.........................................................................................................7 3.3 Impaired Waterbodies..............................................................................................7 4. Metals and pH Source Assessment.................................................................................13 4.1 Metals and pH Point Sources.................................................................................14 4.1.1 Mining Point Sources.................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Us Epa Fact Sheet
    953249 EPA Proposes Cleanup Plan for Middleground Island Tittabawassee River, Saginaw River & Bay Site Midland, Saginaw and Bay City, Michigan February 2020 Share your opinion EPA invites your comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), working with the Michigan proposed cleanup plan for soil on Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, has proposed a plan Middleground Island. to clean up dioxin-contaminated soil on Middleground Island in the Saginaw River. The public comment period is Feb. 12 through March 30, 2020. There EPA’s proposed plan calls for removing contaminated soil in people’s are several ways to comment: yards. At residential properties where soil tests show levels greater than 250 parts of dioxin in a trillion parts of soil – a measure known as “parts per • Fill out and mail the trillion,” or “ppt” – workers will dig up and remove contaminated soil, enclosed comment form. replace it with clean soil and restore grasses and plants. EPA’s proposed • Orally or in writing at the cleanup will ensure that people living on Middleground Island are safe public meeting. when they contact soil in their yard. Not every property will need a cleanup. • Email your comments to [email protected]. Your comments are needed EPA will select a final cleanup plan after reviewing comments received EPA may modify the proposed during the public comment period. This fact sheet gives you background cleanup plan or select another option information, describes cleanup options, and explains EPA’s based on new information or public recommendations. You can find more details in a document called the comments, so your opinion is Middleground Island Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action
    960629 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 IN THE MATTER OF: ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTION Middleground Island of the Tittabawassee Respondent: River, Saginaw River & Bay Site The Dow Chemical Company Docket No. V-W-20-C-013 Proceeding Under Sections 104, 106(a), 107 and 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9606(a), 9607 and 9622 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................................. 1 II. PARTIES BOUND .................................................................................................................................................. 2 III. DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 IV. FINDINGS OF FACT ............................................................................................................................................ 6 V. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DETERMINATIONS ...................................................................................... 12 VI. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ................................................................................................... 13 VII. DESIGNATION OF CONTRACTOR, PROJECT COORDINATOR, AND ON-SCENE COORDINATOR .. 14 VIII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the AFS Southern Division Trout Committee Meeting May 23-24, 2006 Gaston’S Resort, Arkansas
    Minutes of the AFS Southern Division Trout Committee Meeting May 23-24, 2006 Gaston’s Resort, Arkansas The 2006 meeting of the American Fisheries Society – Southern Division Trout Committee was called to order at 8:30 AM by Matt Kulp, Chair. A quorum of 10 members was present. Old Business Matt Kulp distributed the 2005 meeting minutes. Jim Habera made a motion for approval which was seconded by Doug Besler, and the minutes were approved by the membership. Frank Fiss gave a report on the SDAFS meeting held in San Antonio, Texas. A discussion about a proposed symposium on 2-story lake fisheries followed. There is not much information available yet, but the symposium will have invited papers on various issued concerning 2-story fisheries. Darrell Bowman gave the Treasurer’s report. A new account with Bank of America has been opened. Since the last Treasurer’s report, a check to AFS for the publication of the Southern Appalachian Brook Trout paper was written. Also, Jack van Deventer was reimbursed for attending the recent SDAFS meeting to discuss Microfish 3.0. Current balance is $4663 and about $1100 will be needed for the 2006 committee meetng. Mike Kruse made a motion to accept the Treasurer’s report and was seconded by Frank Fiss. The motion passed unanimously. Jim Habera discussed the electrofishing gear study to be conducted August 8-10, 2006. Anyone who would like to participate is welcome and should contact Jim. University of Tennessee researchers have reviewed other studies concerning comparisons of various types of electrofishing gear. Matt Kulp gave an update on Microfish 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    AnnualAnnual ReportReport 20152015 MassachusettsMassachusetts DivisionDivision ofof FisheriesFisheries && WildlifeWildlife 109 Annual Report 2015 Massachusetts Division of fisheries & WilDlife Wayne MacCallum (partial year) Jack Buckley (partial year) Director Susan Sacco Assistant to the Director Jack Buckley (partial year) Rob Deblinger, Ph.D. (partial year) Deputy Director Deputy Director Administration Field Operations Jim Burnham Debbie McGrath Administrative Assistant to the Administrative Assistant to the Deputy Director, Administration Deputy Director, Field Operations Blank Page Inside Title Page>>> 4 Table of Contents The Board Reports .............................................................................................6 Fisheries ...........................................................................................................16 Wildlife .............................................................................................................30 Private Lands Habitat Management ................................................................47 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program .........................................50 Information & Education ................................................................................61 Hunter Education ............................................................................................71 District Reports ................................................................................................73 Wildlife Lands ..................................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. REC-ERC-90-L, “Compilation Report on the Effects
    REC-ERC-SO-1 January 1990 Denver Office U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation 7-2090 (4-81) Bureau of Reclamation TECHNICAL REEPORT STANDARD TITLE PAG 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG ~0. 5. REPORT DATE Compilation Report on the Effects January 1990 of Reservoir Releases on 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE Downstream Ecosystems D-3742 7. AUTHOR(S) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION E. Cheslak REPORT NO. J. Carpenter REC-ERC-90-1 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Denver CO 80225 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Same 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE DIBR 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Microfiche and/or hard copy available at the Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed: RDM 16. ABSTRACT Most of the dams built by the Bureau of Reclamation were completed before environmental regulations such as the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Protection Act, or Toxic Substances Control Act existed. The management and operation of dams was instituted under conditions where the ecology of the downstream habitat was unknown and largely ignored. Changing or modifying structures, flow regimes, and land use patterns are some of the efforts being pursued by the Bureau to reconcile or mitigate the effects of impoundment to comply with these environmental policies and to maximize the potential for recreation, fisheries, and water quality in tailwater habitats for the water resource users. The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document intended to aid in the management, compliance, and problem solving processes necessary to accomplish these goals in Bureau tailwater habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Order-Edenville Dam 09172020.Pdf
    STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GREAT LAKES, AND ENERGY LANSING LIESL EICHLER CLARK GRETCHEN WHITMER DIRECTOR GOVERNOR September 17, 2020 VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL Mr. Lee W. Mueller, Member Manager Mr. Lee W. Mueller, Member Manager Boyce Hydro Power, LLC Boyce Hydro Power, LLC 6000 South M-30 10120 W. Flamingo Rd., Suite 4, #192 P.O. Box 15 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 Edenville, Michigan 48620 SUBJECT: Emergency Order Edenville Dam, Dam ID No. 549 Gladwin County, T19N, R02W, Section 27 Dear Mr. Mueller: The Edenville Dam, Dam ID No. 549, is regulated under Part 315, Dam Safety, (Part 315) of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended (NREPA). On May 19, 2020, the Edenville Dam suffered a catastrophic breach of its earthen embankment which caused an uncontrolled release of impounded water from Wixom Lake. As a result, the Tittabawassee River side of the impoundment was mostly drained, and the flow of the Tobacco River was diverted through the causeway, partially lowering the Tobacco side of the impoundment. However, both the Tittabawassee portion of the dam and the Tobacco River side of the impoundment are still maintaining head, continue to meet the Part 315 definition of a “dam” and still pose a significant threat to public health and safety and the natural resources of the state. Currently the Tittabawassee side holds back roughly 10 feet of head, while the Tobacco side is holding back nearly 30 feet of head. During the breach, the Tobacco River side earthen embankment sustained significant damage, which could endanger the remainder of the dam, potentially causing another uncontrolled release of impounded water.
    [Show full text]
  • Edenville Dam Inspection Report
    Edenville Dam Inspection Report Dam Identification No.: 549 Hazard Potential: High SE ¼ Section : T.17N. – R.01W. Tobacco Township, Gladwin County, Michigan Located on Tobacco & Tittabawassee Rivers Per Part 315, Act 451 of 1994 Prepared for: Four Lakes Task Force Prepared By: Spicer Group, Inc. 230 S. Washington Saginaw, Michigan 48607 (989) 754-4717 Date of Inspection: June 2019 to March 2020 Project No. 126234SG2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 4 Overall Condition ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Observed Deficiencies/Prioritized Recommendations .................................................................................... 5 Further Detailed Studies and/or Investigations ............................................................................................... 5 Hazard Potential Classification ....................................................................................................................... 5 PROJECT INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................. 6 General Description of Dam ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]