arXiv:astro-ph/0703772v1 29 Mar 2007 eprmtrz h itiuino R e pnn nlsw angles opening jet GRB of distribution the parameterize We eoeSit esmaie[]admk nidpnetestim independent an make and o [6] fluxes summarize peak We Swift. minimum before the to corresponding [6], respectively hr easm h eetrtrsodfor ac threshold into detector takes that the GRBs assume for we model where physical a with explained be nsvrlsaitcltssa the at tests statistical several in h GOBTE epSX NERL n EE2i eetd[2] detected is HETE-2 and INTEGRAL, BeppoSAX, CGRO-BATSE, lohv esrdotclatrlwbaigbek 3 is [3] breaks beaming afterglow optical measured have also otebl ftesa omto stae ytebu n Vlu UV jett and GRB blue of the factor from by beaming range traced intrinsic the as mean activity formation the GRB star predicts that the model indicate (SFR2 of fitting bulk rate the our formation to of star results the The than panel). faster rises that history 0 e oi nl sruhycntn hogotteGBjt a jet, emitted GRB corrected the a time with throughout with values constant change best-fit roughly not obtain is do angle GRBs panel). solid of left properties per 1, the Fig. that (see assume GRBs of and density rate comoving the of e)adERT(0 e e)frte5BTEbrt lode also bursts BATSE 5 the for GeV) 5 – MeV (100 EGRET and MeV) 2 – wf is Swift ag pnn nl Rsta pre- that GRBs angle opening large ihteluc fthe of launch the With arccos on z . i ain,adwith and radians, 7 nrcn ok[] ecniee hte h ifrne be differences the whether considered we [6], work recent In eas siaetenme fGB e erGATwl observ will GLAST year per GRBs of number the estimate also We u nlsssosta odfist h pre- the to fits good that shows analysis Our Abstract. PACS: fluences. Keywords: GRB EGRET and BATSE of ratios on rasi h pia ih uvs efidta h ooigr comoving the that find We pre-Swif curves. the light and optical Swift, the before in missions breaks and Swift with sured afagemaue ihSitis Swift with measured half-angle h enitiscbaigfco fGB sfudt be to found is GRBs measureme of from factor inferred beaming rate intrinsic formation mean star The the whereas 5, – Swift = 2 ( . µ 2[] h ulhptei htterdhf distributions redshift the that hypothesis null The [4]. 72 h 86.x 98.70.Rz 98.62.Nx, j eaepsil.Afitradmr itn ouaino GR of population distant more and fainter A possible. became θ ) j stejthl-nl,adfidbs tvle o the for values fit best find and half-angle, jet the is am a ussi h wf n LS Era GLAST and Swift the in Bursts Ray ≈ i esmaieormdlfrln-uaingmarybrt (G bursts ray gamma long-duration for model our summarize We am-as uss—cosmology — bursts gamma-rays: ≈ 10 34 ◦ oprdt h pre- the to compared , − s Swift − ≈ 2 h nlssas niae htteaeaejtopening jet average the that indicates also analysis The 42. oe75,SaeSineDvso,NvlRsac Laborato Research Naval Division, Science Space 7653, Code 1 aelt 1,rpdflo-psuiso Rstigrdby triggered GRBs of studies follow-up rapid [1], . 25. ∼ > ≈ 7 ofiec ee [5]. level confidence 97% rogL n hre .Dermer D. Charles and Le Truong 10 Swift ◦ eetmt h ubro Rsprya htGATi expecte is GLAST that year per GRBs of number the estimate We . aeltscudntdtc seas [8]). also (see detect not could Swift ahntn C235 USA 20375, DC Washington, Swift γ INTRODUCTION ryenergy -ray vrg f7 of average Swift RESULTS n pre- and and ≈ 4–4,adw rdc httema R pia e opening jet optical GRB mean the that predict we and 42, – 34 R e pnn-nl itiuinifre rmachroma from inferred distribution opening-angle jet GRB t t est fGBsucsehbt oiieeouinto evolution positive exhibits sources GRB of density ate t ftebu n Vlmnst est ek at peaks density luminosity UV and blue the of nts Swift E 34 thg esit SR n F6 e i.1 left 1, Fig. see SFR6; and (SFR5 redshifts high at ,3,4) ◦ Swift γ esmlf h nlsswt a GRB flat a with analysis the simplify We a rae nteps n sntsml proportional simply not is and past the in greater was Rswt esit esrdb wf n missions and Swift by measured redshifts with GRBs f dtkn enitiscdrto f1 eod,we seconds, 10 of duration intrinsic mean a taking nd 6.Tu eepc odtc oefitlow-redshift, faint more detect to expect we Thus [6]. dotoscnrbtn oteotclbek ob in be to breaks optical the to contributing outflows ed = we h pre- the tween t ucino h form the of function a ith h γ t ftenme fGB htGATsol detect. should GLAST that GRBs of number the of ate z on h ifrn u hehlso R detectors, GRB of thresholds flux different the count esitadoeigagedt eur R rate GRB a require data angle opening and redshift ryeeg release energy -ray of i 4 dpigteuiomjtmdlweeteenergy the where model jet uniform the Adopting . ioiydniyo h nvre utemr,our Furthermore, universe. the of density minosity Rst be to GRBs = × Swift 10 1 sn h unerto fBTE( BATSE of ratios fluence the using e . h enrdhf f4 pre- 41 of redshift mean The . ,wie1 Rsdsoee by discovered GRBs 16 while 5, 51 B)ta t h esit( redshift the fits that RBs) n pre- and sta on ihtepre- the with found than Bs rs e pnn nlsi h ag 0 range the in angles opening jet ergs, etdi h GE pr hme [9]. chamber spark EGRET the in tected Swift ∼ Swift 10 and afageo Rsdtce with detected GRBs of half-angle E − h us lr eecp (BAT) Telescope Alert Burst the γ 8 Swift Rsaetesm srejected is same the are GRBs o ifrn ucinlforms functional different for and ry dN / esitdsrbtoscan distributions redshift ∼ d µ 10 z j itiuin mea- distributions ) − oosrebased observe to d ∝ 7 ( Swift 1 rscm ergs Swift ν − F ν µ z Swift Rsthat GRBs ∼ j ≃ spectrum, ) satellites s 3. – 1 − where , 0keV 20 z 2 ∼ > . tic have 5– 05 s 3 − 1 , FIGURE 1. Left panel: star formation rate (SFR) functions used in our GRB study. The solid line (SFR1) is a constant comoving density; SFR2 and SFR4 are low and high ranges for the SFR; SFR3 is a recent fit [7] to the data; SFR5 and SFR6 are GRB rate histories that give a good fit to the Swift and pre-Swift redshift distribution and the pre-Swift opening angle distribution [6]. Right panel: Estimate of the number of GRBs per year GLAST will observe, based on measured EGRET/BATSE fluence ratios.

We find that the average BATSE/EGRET fluence ratio is ≈ 5%, though with large scatter and not taking into account Earth occultation (e.g., for GRB 940217) [11], deadtime effects [9], and anomalous GRBs like GRB 941017 [10]. Our estimate uses the BATSE 4B fluence distribution, a Band function with Band β = −2.5 added to a > 30 MeV spectral component with a −2 photon index in the EGRET/GLAST range [12], and power-law approximations for the EGRET and GLAST effective areas [13]. Fig.1, right panel, gives the resulting estimate of the number of GRBs GLAST should observe per year full-sky for a fluence ratio of 10%, for different photon numbers and energies. We find that there will be ≈ 350 (≈ 25) GRBs/yr full-sky from which the GLAST LAT would detect ≥ 5 photons with energy E > 30 MeV (> 1 GeV), and ≈ 25 (≈ 8) GRBs/yr full-sky with ≥ 1 photon with E > 5 GeV (> 10 GeV). A similar conclusion [14], obtained by extrapolating BATSE results fitted with the Band function to LAT energies, gives an estimate of 50-70 GRBs/yr with < > 5 photons with E > 30 MeV. Our analysis also shows that GRBs give very little ( ∼ 1% ) contribution to the diffuse extragalactic γ-ray background.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

T. L. is funded through NASA GLAST Science Investigation No. DPR-S-1563-Y. The work of C. D. D. is supported by the Office of Naval Research. We thank Nicola Omodei and Brenda Dingus for discussions, and Brenda Dingus for pointing out how deadtime effects could be important for EGRET.

REFERENCES

1. Gehrels, N. et al. 2004, Astrophysical J., 611, 1005 2. Berger, E. et al. 2005, Astrophysical J., 634, 501 3. Friedman, A. S., & Bloom, J. S. 2005, Astrophysical J., 627, 1 4. Jakobsson, P. et al. 2006, . & Astrophys., 447, 897 5. Bagoly, Z. et al. 2006, Astron. & Astrophys., 453, 797 6. Le, T., & Dermer, C. D. 2006, Astrophysical J., in press (astro-ph/0610043) 7. Hopkins, A. M., & Beacom, J. F. 2006, Astrophysical J., 651, 142 8. Perna, R., Sari, R., & Frail, D. 2003, Astrophysical J., 594, 379 9. Dingus, B. L. 1995, Astrophys. Space Sci. 231, 187 10. González, M. M. et al. 2003, Nature, 424, 749 11. Dermer, C. D. 2005, in Atmospheric Cherenkov Detectors VII, astro-ph/0512164 12. Dingus, B. L., Catelli, J. R., & Schneid, E. J. 1998, AIP Conference Series, 428, 349 13. Dermer, C. D., & Dingus, B. L. 2004, New Astronomy Review, 48, 537 14. Omodei, N., for the GLAST/LAT GRB Science Group 2006, astro-ph/0603762