DOCSLIB.ORG

Stretch Your PERCEPTIONS: from Manga to Tanka and More OCTOBER 5-7 HOMECOMING HIGHLIGHTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stretch Your PERCEPTIONS: from Manga to Tanka and More OCTOBER 5-7 HOMECOMING HIGHLIGHTS Millikin QuarterSUMMER 2012ly Stretch your PERCEPTIONS: From manga to tanka and more OCTOBER 5-7 HOMECOMING HIGHLIGHTS • Career Connections: Alumni get back to the classroom MILLIKIN HOMECOMING • Fireworks Display • All-Alumni Reception with free hors d’oeuvres and a cash bar • Class Luncheon and Reunion Photos for the classes of 1937-62 with served luncheons • Class Receptions and Reunion Photos for the classes of 1967-2007 • All-Alumni & Friends Complimentary Luncheon • Home Athletic Contests: football, volleyball and cross country MILLIKIN HOMECOMING • Reunion Dinners and Receptions • Special Reunions for 1972 School of Music grads, WJMU staffers, University Choir alums and Black Alumni Network. Celebrations for the 100th anniversaries of Delta Delta Delta and Pi Beta Phi chapters. • Special recognition for the golden anniversary class of 1962 • Alumni Awards Dinner: Honoring selected alumni with Alumni Awards or induction into the Athletic Hall of Fame. This year’s alumni awards honorees include: Alumnus of the Year co-recipients Herbert Zuegel ’52 and Barbara Burgis Zuegel ’53, Richard Dechert ’54, Scott Flora ’78, Gregg Meisenhelter ’00, Kerry Muzzey ’92 and Bill Wright ’59. This year's Hall of Fame inductees include: Lance Brooks ’06, Denise Fogle ’91, Suzanne Murphy Short ’00 and Lin Stoner ’73. A FULL SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES WILL BE SENT IN AUGUST. Interested in helping plan a reunion for your class or organization? Contact the alumni relations office at 1-877-JMU-ALUM (568-2586). WWW.MILLIKIN.EDU/HOMECOMING PERSPECTIVE Dear Alumni and Friends of Millikin, Not long after ar- To give you just one example of how that riving at Millikin was on display at the event: Joseph Bein of Millikin University in April 2011, I Gibson City, Ill., a James Millikin Scholar Board of Trustees had the pleasure of (JMS) who graduated in May, created his Effective July 1, 2012 attending the an- own musical version of “The Picture of nual Celebrations Dorian Gray” as his JMS project. He not Douglas S. Basler ’83 of Scholarship, only wrote the script and the music, he Lucas Bills ’03 a fixture on auditioned and cast 12 performers, directed Phillip B. Blankenburg ’62 Millikin’s campus and performed all the music in a staged John Patrick Borders ’82 for several years reading of a production that simply wowed Mikel Briggs ’79 now. What originated as an undergraduate the audience. Not coincidentally, Joseph R. Michael Campbell ’67 research poster symposium more than 15 was the recipient of four separate awards Elta L. Cooke ’52 years ago has grown to encompass a two- at this year’s annual Honors Convocation, Cathy Coulter day opportunity for students to “stand and including the top three awards from the Karen Crapse ’88 deliver” on what they have learned. This English department and a top award from Van A. Dukeman * event is one of our most visible aspects of theatre. He truly is a classic example of David L. Giertz ’86 the unique Millikin performance learning Millikin’s performance learning model of Greg Griffin ’79 model of higher education. It is emblematic higher education, and you can learn more Tom Harrington ’70 of the learning that happens on campus about him on page 41. Douglas J. Hein ’87 each day as performance learning provides I was also impressed by the spirit of Lisa Holder White a very rich and relevant educational experi- camaraderie and collaboration that the Dr. Stephen Huss ence for our students. (You can view a few musical represented. Most assuredly, it was Debra Breeding Johnston ’89 photos from the event on page 6.) Joseph’s project, but without the assistance Kimberly Kenney Again this April, I attended as many of his student cast, it would not have been Donald F. McIntyre ’52 presentations as possible and walked away possible. These students took time out of Robert K. Murray ’50 significantly impressed. This high level of their own hectic schedules to make his James R. Neff ’78 ** execution, sophisticated subject matter project happen. It’s a spirit of collaboration Dr. Randy Rentfro ’78 and engagement with faculty is certainly that is unparalleled at other universities. Douglas J. Schmalz not seen among undergraduates at other As I write this, we are expecting Mark Staley schools. I don’t know of anywhere that does hundreds of students and their families Trent Thompson MBA ’01 it remotely as well as we do. It is a clear-cut on campus for summer orientation and Frank Tyrolt ’54 example of the direct correlation between registration, a time of happy excitement as Dr. James Vascik ’73 the quality and uniqueness of the Millikin we meet with our new freshmen for the first Dr. Phyllis I. Warkentin ’70 educational experience and our students’ time. This August, these students will begin Dr. Melvin N. Wilson ’70 ability to prepare for success and lives of their own individual experiences in earning Michelle Wong ’86 meaning and value. a Millikin degree. To them, their parents Gary Workman ’64 The confidence to succeed is instilled and our alumni, donors and friends, I say Dr. H. Gale Zacheis on this campus, as well as the abilities to this: In these volatile economic times, I Ex-Officio think cogently, write intelligently and speak firmly believe that for those students who Dr. Harold G. Jeffcoat thoughtfully. aspire to achieve, there is no better choice Millikin President The Celebrations of Scholarship event than Millikin to help develop the confi- is a visible and comprehensive demonstra- dence to succeed in life, both professionally Rick Reider tion of the fulfillment of James Millikin’s and personally. And in the next few years, I VP for Finance and Business Affairs dream to combine theory and practice at look forward to watching the presentations Marilyn S. Davis ’00/MBA ’11 his university. I imagine that if Mr. Millikin of these freshmen during a Celebrations Board Secretary/Chief of Staff had been in attendance to see our students of Scholarship event. It’s a cycle that bears demonstrating their depth of understand- repeating, year after year. ● Dr. David Horn ing and knowledge, he’d have said, “This Faculty Representative is precisely what I wanted to happen.” His Caleb Buscher ’13 legacy is indeed thriving as our students are Student Representative stretched, challenged and empowered in preparation for life after Millikin. Dr. Harold Jeffcoat, Millikin President * chair ** vice chair EDITOR’S LETTER Changing it up It dawned on me be involved in shaping the future of this the other day that university magazine: I have been an edi- tor for this maga- 1. Complete a reader survey. zine for nearly You’ll find it online at http:/bit.ly/MU- 18 years and sole Qsurvey or take it through your smart managing editor phone by scanning the QR code below. for more than 15 The survey is anonymous, so feel free to of those years, yet let those opinions flow! If you’d like a this is my first true hard copy of the survey to complete, just editor’s column. give me a call at 217-424-6383, and I’ll Why write now after all these years of drop one in the mail to you. silence? Well, for one thing, I have some very good news to share. 2. Offer to serve on a focus group. Earlier this year, we welcomed a new Whether you live close to campus or on staff member to our team, Alida Duff the other side of the earth from the Big Sullivan, a 2006 Millikin graduate. Alida Blue, you can help us in shaping the “new brings fresh eyes and a younger perspec- Q.” Focus group volunteers will help us tive to the magazine’s development. She’s evaluate the content and look of some of also a “triple threat” in that she is trained the new features we are developing. To vol- as a photographer, graphic designer and unteer, send me an email with your name, writer. address and phone number to With her able assistance as associate [email protected] or call director of communications, along with me at 217-424-6383. the superb talents of associate editor Mar- garet Friend, we are planning a freshen- I can truly say that I have enjoyed being ing of this magazine over the summer to a part of Millikin Quarterly magazine these better serve you, our readers, in telling the past 18 years. It’s always a pleasure to Millikin story. It will include a new look hear from those of you who enjoy it, and I throughout, some new features we think always learn something from those of you you’ll enjoy and a focus on making the who call or email with constructive criti- Millikin Quarterly experience more fun cism to offer. I look forward to the years Millikin Quarterly and more informative. We’ll be rolling out ahead as we take these steps to ensure Vol. XXVIII, No. 2 Summer 2012 the new and improved Millikin Quarterly that the magazine continues to reflect the Produced by the Millikin University with the fall issue. quality of the Millikin educational experi- Office of Alumni and Development. As part of this process, we welcome ence through the stories we tell about our Email comments to: your help. Here are two ways you can talented alumni, students and faculty. ● [email protected] Millikin Quarterly (ISSN 8750-7706) (USPS 0735-570) is published four times yearly; once during each of the first, second, third and fourth quarters by Deborah Hale Kirchner Millikin University, 1184 West Main Millikin Quarterly Editor Street, Decatur, Illinois 62522-2084. Periodicals postage paid at Director of Communications & Services Decatur, Illinois.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bratz Inspired Doll
    Bratz inspired doll Copyright © by Vanja Grundmann 2014 @ AigurumiBB 1 Materials needed: • DK yarn in flash color of your choice • Stuffing of your choice • Cotton darning needle or needle for doll sewing to connect the limbs to the body • Embroidery needle to close the last rounds on each piece made • Embroidery thread in black, white and eye color of your choice for eyes • Crochet hook 2,0mm for doll making • Crochet hook 1,25mm for eyes making • Tiny bit of white textile paint to add spark on doll’s eyes • Powder blush for cheeks or oil based pastel (works great as well and is long lasting-if using pastel, have one cotton bud to work over pastel, once color added on cheek) • Textile glue (if you like to use it for eyes) Gauge: 8 stitches x 8 rows in 1 square inch not important if you are creating doll for fun. Required if you are looking to reach similar size to Bratz doll. Abbreviations: R – round Sc – single crochet St(s) – stitch(es) Ch - chain Inc – increase, made by making 2 single crochets in one stitch Dec – decrease, one stitch made out of two stitches ( I used invisible decrease) ** - repeat what between stars as many times as it indicated with x(n) you will find right after This is basic doll body pattern! There are two more parts to connect to this one: 1. How to sew the limbs 2. How to create doll’s hair from satin ribbon ****************************************** Copyright © by Vanja Grundmann 2014 @ AigurumiBB 2 Head Sc6 in magic ring R1 inc6 (12 sts) R2 *inc1, sc1* x6 (18 sts) R3 *inc1, sc2* x6 (24 sts) R4 *inc1, sc3* x6 (30 sts) R5 *inc1, sc4* x6 (36 sts) R6-R13 sc36 R14 inc3, sc2, 4sc in one st, sc2, inc3, sc25 (48 sts) R15 sc8, dec2, sc33 (43 sts) R16 sc8, dec1, sc33 (42 sts) R17 dec1, sc4, dec1, sc1, dec1, sc4, dec2, sc21, dec1 (36 sts) R18 sc36 R19 *dec1, sc4* x6 (30 sts) R20 *dec1, sc3* x6 (24 sts) R21 *dec1, sc2* x6 (18 sts) Stuff the head nice and firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghouls, Dolls, and Girlhoods: Fashion and Horror at Monster High
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by IUScholarWorks Ghouls, Dolls, and Girlhoods: Fashion and Horror at Monster High Karen E. Wohlwend In Generation Z: Zombies, Popular Culture, and Educating Youth Edited by Victoria Carrington, Jennifer Rowsell, Esther Priyadharshini, Rebecca Westrup This is a preprint; the definitive version is in press at http://www.springer.com/us/ Wohlwend, K. E. (In press). Ghouls, dolls, and girlhoods: Fashion and horror at Monster High. In V. Carrington, J. Rowsell, E. Priyadharshini & R. Westrup (Eds.), Generation Z: Zombies, popular culture, and educating youth. New York: Springer. Girls, Ghouls, and Girlhoods: Horror and Fashion at Monster High Introduction How does a zombie doll in a popular horror franchise for tween girls serve as a productive site of contestation among overlapping visions of girlhood? In this chapter, I examine Ghoulia Yelps, a zombie character in the popular Monster High fashion doll franchise, not only as a toy in a global flow of licensed consumer goods but also as a site of identity construction and digital media production where facile notions of girlhoods are both enacted and reimagined (Forman- Brunell, 2012). Monster High is reconceptualized here as the site of converging cultural imaginaries (Medina & Wohlwend, 2014) in which children play in and out of gendered futures around fashion, adolescence, diversity, and schooling. Critical analysis of tween girls’ digital play with a zombie doll on social media reveals the resonances, slippages, and paradoxes among identity texts produced about, for, and by girls. After describing the scope of the Monster High franchise and how it materializes expectations for characters, consumers, and players, I next examine how these dolls and identity texts circulate three dominant imaginaries of girlhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Move Over, Bratz . . . Here's Proverbs Babe
    Move over, Bratz . here’s Proverbs babe - Times Online Page 1 of 2 THE TIMES THE SUNDAY TIMES TIMES+ The Times The Sunday Times Archive Article Please enjoy this article from The Times & The Sunday Times archives. For full access to our content, please subscribe here From The Sunday Times December 23, 2007 Move over, Bratz . here’s Proverbs babe Will children brought up with Sindy dolls and Action Man really take to Bible figurines, asks Amanda Foreman What if our son starts swinging naked Jesus by his hair? We were presented with this dilemma after One2believe, an evangelical toy company, sent us a selection from its new range of biblical dolls. According to the company’s own press material, its goal is to challenge the dominance of secular toys. With nothing more than double-joints and removable sandals, One2believe wants to rescue the young from the horrors of their toy box. Away with smutty Bratz and slutty Barbie and welcome to modest Mary. The company knows it is up against a ferocious marketing machine. To illustrate the point, the official website has a Thunderbirds-like video of the Samson and Goliath dolls hurling themselves at each other, gladiator style. The website urges shoppers to “join the battle” by downloading posters and handing them out at church. In real life, the tiny company has already experienced its Goliath moment. As of this week Amazon and the retailing giant Wal- Mart have sold out of all their talking Jesus dolls. But, I wondered, is getting the dolls under the Christmas tree only half the struggle? Will children whose aesthetic sense begins and ends with the size of plastic lips be swayed by more wholesome fare? Will they eschew bubble-gum pink polyester for tasteful sackcloth? My three older children, Helena, Theo and Halcyon, aged 5, 3, and 2 respectively, have never been short of dolls.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Toys and Childhood in 2006, the US Toy Industry Earned
    1 Chapter One Toys Make a Nation: An Introduction to Toys and Childhood In 2006, the US toy industry earned a whopping $22.3 billion in domestic retail sales, with nearly half those sales earned during the fourth quarter – the all important Christmas toy shopping season.1 Despite this seemingly impressive sales figure, not everyone in the industry was pleased with their annual sales. Mattel, the world’s largest toy manufacturer, continued to see sales of its iconic Barbie doll falter, a trend that was in part blamed on the introduction of a series of rival dolls called Bratz in 2001. To add insult to injury, the Bratz dolls were designed by a former Mattel employee, Carter Bryant. He reportedly developed the idea for Bratz in between stints at Mattel, while he observed teenagers in his hometown of Springfield, Missouri. His idea was a line of fashion dolls that dress like contemporary teenagers, including a heavy dose of teenage attitude.2 Bryant never shared his idea with Mattel, and instead sold the concept to MGA Entertainment, a small family-owned toy company in California. Make no mistake, the toy business is not just fun and games. Indeed, it is a hypercompetitive industry, striking for its secretive product development practices and the occasional accusations of corporate espionage that seem more fitting for military contractors than toymakers. Thus, it was no surprise when Mattel filed lawsuits against Bryant in 2004 and MGA in 2006 primarily based on the claim that any of Bryant’s designs developed while he worked for Mattel are legally theirs.
    [Show full text]
  • ST 02 Danielle Barbosa Lins De Almeida - UFSC/UFPB Viviane M
    Anais do VII Seminário Fazendo Gênero 28, 29 e 30 de 2006 Sobre gênero e preconceitos: Estudos em análise crítica do discurso – ST 02 Danielle Barbosa Lins de Almeida - UFSC/UFPB Viviane M. Heberle - UFSC As Bonecas da Contemporaneidade: Representações Midiáticas da Identidade Feminina O objetivo desse artigo é propor uma reflexão acerca dos brinquedos enquanto representações semióticas de ‘atores sociais de gênero’ (Caldas Coulthard & van Leeuwen, 2002), a partir da discussão sobre os papéis que bonecas contemporâneas de moda como Barbie, Susi e The Bratz evocam, a fim de examinar como a identidade feminina vem sendo representada pela mídia de dois países distintos – Brasil e Estados Unidos – através de típicas expressões do universo infantil. A análise inclui desvendar alguns dos valores que são incorporados às referidas representações bem como investigar o potencial de negociação da criança no sentido de desafiar as estruturas de significado que subjazem as identidades das chamadas ‘bonecas da contemporaneidade’. Palavras-Chave: bonecas, papéis, identidade. 1. Introdução Em suas inúmeras versões pelo mundo afora, as bonecas são mais comumente conhecidas por seu papel como objetos tridimensionais pertencentes ao universo infantil. Como símbolo inconfundível da infância, o mundo das bonecas não tem sido suficientemente explorado em pesquisas acadêmicas, visto que há relativamente poucos estudos que enfatizam a função das bonecas como fonte de conhecimento social, histórico e cultural (Peers, 2004). Historicamente, em sociedades como o Egito e a Melanésia, às bonecas eram atribuídas uma função mística, sendo então vistas como forma de se espantar maus espíritos e enfermidades, de se conferir proteção e de se prover acesso direto às dimensões espirituais da vida (Fraser, apud Kline, 1993, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbie As Cultural Compass
    College of the Holy Cross CrossWorks Sociology Student Scholarship Sociology & Anthropology Department 5-2017 Barbie As Cultural Compass: Embodiment, Representation, and Resistance Surrounding the World’s Most Iconized Doll Hannah Tulinski College of the Holy Cross, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://crossworks.holycross.edu/soc_student_scholarship Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Tulinski, Hannah, "Barbie As Cultural Compass: Embodiment, Representation, and Resistance Surrounding the World’s Most Iconized Doll" (2017). Sociology Student Scholarship. 1. http://crossworks.holycross.edu/soc_student_scholarship/1 This Department Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Anthropology Department at CrossWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of CrossWorks. “Barbie As Cultural Compass: Embodiment, Representation, and Resistance Surrounding the World’s Most Iconized Doll” Hannah Rose Tulinski Department of Sociology & Anthropology College of the Holy Cross May 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Abstract 4 Chapter 1: Barbie™ 5 Chapter 2: Cultural Objects and the Meaning of Representation 30 Chapter 3: Locating Culture in Discourse 45 Chapter 4: Barbie’s World is Our World 51 Chapter 5: Competing Directions of Cultural Production 74 Chapter 6: Role Threat 89 Role Transformation 104 Discussion 113 References 116 Appendix I: Popular Discourse 122 Appendix II: Scholarly Discourse 129 2 Acknowledgements First, thank you to Professor Selina Gallo-Cruz, who not only advised this thesis project but also who has mentored me throughout my development at College of the Holy Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa Osceola Takes the Helm at EIRA Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum Featured On
    BC RV Resort a Panther Posse at Florida Basketball is back at popular winter spot Gulf Coast University Ahfachkee School COMMUNITY Y 5A EDUCATION Y 1B SPORTS Y 1C Volume XLI • Number 12 December 29, 2017 Tribal members concerned about Lake Okeechobee Watershed project BY LI COHEN Staff Reporter BRIGHTON — A presentation made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District on Nov. 28 left the Brighton Reservation community in an uproar over the federal agency’s plans to potentially place a large part of the Lake Okeechobee Watershed (LOW) Project within 1,000 feet of Tribal lands in Brighton. According to the Corps, the project ultimately has four goals: Improve the quality, quantity, timing and distribution of water in Lake Okeechobee; better manage the lake’s water levels; reduce high-volume water discharges into the estuaries of the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers; and LPSURYHV\VWHPZLGHRSHUDWLRQDOÀH[LELOLW\ To achieve these goals, the Corps plans to Kevin Johnson build a large reservoir along the boundaries President Mitchell Cypress and Santa Claus bring some holiday cheer to Brianna, 11, a patient at Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital in Hollywood on Dec. 8. President Cypress and Santa distributed toys to of Brighton, near St. Thomas Ranch. patients throughout the hospital as part of the Board’s annual toy drive. At the meeting, attended by Chairman Marcellus W. Osceola Jr., Brighton Councilman Andrew J. Bowers Jr., and dozens of Tribal members, the Corps Board’s toy drive brings joy beyond reservations suggested four alternatives for reservoir placement, each of which uses reservoirs for above-ground storage and underground BY KEVIN JOHNSON toy drive.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTACT: Arturo Varela (267) 765-0367, [email protected] Tweet Us: @Visitphillypr
    CONTACT: Arturo Varela (267) 765-0367, [email protected] Tweet Us: @visitphillyPR Tweet It: The queens and the scene that make Philadelphia drag so fun @visitphilly: https://vstphl.ly/2G84zRN DRAG IN PHILADELPHIA: THE BOLD, THE BEAUTIFUL & THE BRUNCH Philly Drag History, Current Shows & Queens To Follow PHILADELPHIA, March 25, 2019 – Philadelphia’s drag scene dates back centuries—and thrives to this day. Contemporary Philly drag queens most often perform in the bars and clubs of the Gayborhood, part of Center City’s Washington Square West neighborhood. But a growing number of venues beyond the neighborhood host drag brunches, game nights, variety shows and kids’ story times. Philadelphia men have been costuming in ruffles and feathers since the 1600s, when Swedish immigrants began a raucous New Year’s tradition that, in 1901, officially became the Mummers Parade. Modern Mummers’ costumes are bold, bright, sequined—and blue collar. Women were permitted to join their ranks in the 1980s. In 2012, the Philly Drag Mafia became the first official queens to strut in the parade. The city’s drag nightlife dates to at least to the 1950s, when the The New Forrest Lounge—now The Bike Stop, in the Gayborhood—required reservations for drag shows such as The Fabulous Fakes. Other drag hotspots Miss P’s at 18th and Lombard streets and ’90s dance club Shampoo helped broaden the audience for local drag culture, while dive bar Bob & Barbara’s emerged as a once-a-week base for performers. Today, drag personalities replete with tongue-in-cheek names and spectacular style make their marks at nearly every queer bar in the Gayborhood, including Tabu Lounge & Sports Bar and Voyeur Nightclub, known for hosting frequent performances by both top-tier local talent up to nationally known queens from “RuPaul’s Drag Race.” So-called straight scenes that have gotten into the act include Northern Liberties’ Bourbon and Branch and Fishtown comedy club Punch Line Philly, hosts of brunch-time drag shows.
    [Show full text]
  • Arantegui Gallardo Tutor: Elías Pérez
    TFG BALL JOINTED DOLLS: ESTUDIO, DISEÑO, MODELADO Y CONSTRUCCIÓN DE UN PROTOTIPO DE MUÑECO ARTICULADO Presentado por Alejandro Arantegui Gallardo Tutor: Elías Pérez Facultat de Belles Arts de Sant Carles Grado en Bellas Artes Curso 2019-2020 Creación de un prototipo de BJD. Alejandro Arantegui Gallardo 2 RESUMEN Diseño, modelado y construcción de un prototipo de BJD (Ball Jointed Doll) basado en un personaje propio. Una BJD es un tipo de muñeca de coleccionista asiática que recibe ese nombre debido a su sistema de articulaciones en forma de bola, tensadas mediante gomas. Este tipo de muñecas tiene una gran popularidad entre coleccionistas por su capacidad de customización, y en este ámbito encontramos artistas que las trabajan llegando a crear verdaderas obras de arte. El objetivo del proyecto es diseñar y crear un prototipo de BJD funcional, abordando todas las fases del diseño de prototipo, desde la preproducción a las ilustraciones finales, para en un futuro poder producirlo e introducirlo en el mercado. PALABRAS CLAVE BJD, Ball Jointed Doll, muñeco articulado, modelado, ilustración ABSTRACT Design, modeling and construction of a BJD (Ball Jointed Doll) prototype based on an original character. A BJD is a kind of asian collector doll that gets its name due to its ball shaped joint system, strung together with a set of rubber bands. This kind of doll has a huge popularity amongst doll collectors thanks to its customization possibilities. In this field there are artists who are creating true works of art. The goal of this project is to design and create a functional BJD prototype, tackling every phase of design, from preproduction to final illustrations, with the goal of being able to produce and market it in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • GIVE ME BACK MY TOY: ANALYZING HOW the DECISION-MAKING STYLES of the PARTIES in MGA ENTERTAINMENT V
    GIVE ME BACK MY TOY: ANALYZING HOW THE DECISION-MAKING STYLES OF THE PARTIES IN MGA ENTERTAINMENT v. MATTEL LED TO MISSED OPPORTUNITIES AND PROPOSING A SOLUTION THAT WOULD BRING PARTIES CLOSER TO SETTLEMENT Kristina Unanyan I. INTRODUCTION If Barbie could talk, what would her testimony be? The fifty-year old doll has finally faced the ultimate competition: the young and hip Bratz dolls. Bratz made their way onto the doll runway and are taking the nation by storm while Barbie can no longer walk the way she used to. Will old age take her down or will a few minor adjustments, a lawsuit, and, perhaps, some Botox be the cure to her problems? Mattel Inc. (Mattel)1 and MGA Entertainment (MGA)2 became rivals when Mattel realized that the designer of the Bratz dolls had once worked for them. Mattel’s revenue had dropped and they had found the perfect fix: a lawsuit. However, emotions and desperation were not the key to a successful lawsuit and both parties ended up in a whirlpool of trials where after some 1 Mattel, Inc. is the company that owns the rights to Barbie. See generally Mattel, MATTEL, http://corporate.mattel.com/our-toys/ (last visited June 20, 2014). “The Mattel family of companies . is the worldwide leader in the design, manufacture[,] and marketing of toys and family products.” About Mattel, MATTEL, http://news.mattel.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=29 (last visited Oct. 27, 2014). Mattel’s brands include Barbie, Hot Wheels, Monster High, American Girl, Thomas & Friends, and Power Wheels. Id.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woman-Object's Glorious New Clothes
    The Woman-Object’s Glorious New Clothes Liz Conor. The Spectacular Modern Woman: Feminine Visibility in the 1920s. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2004. ISBN 0 253 21670 2. Juliette Peers. The Fashion Doll: From Bébé Jumeau to Barbie. Oxford and New York: Berg, 2004. ISBN 1 85973 743 9. Robyn Walton “Dolls raise so many issues about the representation and cultural posi- tioning of the feminine in society,” writes Juliette Peers in the “Introduction” to her book The Fashion Doll (Peers: 8). Liz Conor might well have begun her text about feminine visibility by using the same statement, substituting for “dolls” the words “mass media images of women.” “Appearance” and “appearing,” in their multiple meanings, are also key words for both au- thors. Peers’s primary interest is fashionably dressed dolls’ appearance (looks) and appearance (emergence) in the market-place, while Conor elaborates on the emergence of the “new formation of subjectivity” she calls the Modern Appearing Woman in the technologically enhanced ocular field of the 1920s. Discussing these two books in terms of their covers is a temptation not to be resisted since each text is so much about representation. Appropri- ately, a photographic image of a woman or an inorganic 3D representation of a woman occupies each cover. The front of Peers’s book shows a styl- ishly dressed young woman ostensibly adjusting her underwear in the company of an up-to-date doll; the front of Conor’s is occupied by the glamorously painted face of a store display dummy or mannequin. Accord- COLLOQUY text theory critique 11 (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Bratz Dolls: Responding to Cultural Change Jessica Burns Fugate the University of Tampa
    Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 12 – October, 2014 Bratz dolls: Responding to cultural change Jessica Burns Fugate The University of Tampa Ronald Kuntze The University of Tampa Erika Matulich The University of Tampa Janette Carter The University of Tampa Kristen Kluberdanz The Univesity of Tampa ABSTRACT Barbie was introduced by Mattel in 1959 and quickly dominated the market and continued to do so for decades. As a beautiful blonde, Barbie represented the traditional qualities of women and the line later expanded to include diversity among the other dolls. In 1999, Barbie’s 40th anniversary year, sales hit approximately $1.5 billion and nearly $24 billion in total sales over the life of the doll. In 2001, MGA introduced the Bratz line and the dolls immediately became popular, gaining market share as Barbie sales declined. Within the first six months on the market, MGA sold more than $20 million in Bratz dolls. In response, Mattel introduced the MyScene dolls to the market in 2002 but were unable to compete with Bratz. In 2004, MGA experienced a 45 percent growth in Bratz doll sales, while Barbie sales had fallen, resulting in a $500 million loss. In 2006, Bratz became the number one selling doll and Barbie was bumped to number two. Bratz dolls were created to more closely match the look of girls today, instead of the ideological perception of women in the 1950s when Barbie was created. Bratz dolls have a realistic height, look more ethnic, and have distinct fashion styles. Every Bratz doll is different with its own personality, much like tween girls today.
    [Show full text]