DOCSLIB.ORG

Merknadshefte Offentlig Ettersyn 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Merknadshefte Offentlig Ettersyn 2 MERKNADSHEFTE OFFENTLIG ETTERSYN 2. gangs høring Kommuneplanens arealdel 2020-2040 Planident: 5403-20170001 Dokumentdato: 01.12.2020 Arkivsak: 16/6039 (ESA), 2019/3193 (Elements) alta.kommune.no Oppsummering merknader 2. gangs høring, Kommuneplanens arealdel 20170001 | 1 Boligformål/fortetting ............................................................................................................................................. 4 19/3193-56 Anders Berge Uglebakken, brev datert 01.02.20 ................................................................... 4 19/3193-73 Pål Johansen, registrert 23.06.20 ........................................................................................... 4 19/3193-74 Kjetil Krane, registrert 23.06.20 ............................................................................................. 5 19/3193-88 Liv Katrine Thomassen og Willy Thomassen, brev datert 24.06.20 ....................................... 6 19/3193-94 Ove-Andrè Thomassen, registrert 24.06.20 ........................................................................... 7 19/3193-102 Ellen Marit Sara, registrert 24.06.20 .................................................................................... 7 19/3193-104 Haldde Arkitekter AS, registrert 24.06.20 ............................................................................ 8 Andre typer utbyggingsformål ................................................................................................................................ 9 Idrettsanlegg ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 19/3193-121 Alta kommune v/kulturvirksomheten, brev datert 30.06.20 ............................................... 9 Fritidsboliger (eksisterende felt) ......................................................................................................................... 9 19/3193-70 Rambøll Norge AS, brev datert 17.06.20 ................................................................................ 9 19/3193-122 Frode Øverjord, registrert 30.06.20 ............................................................................... 10 Næringsbebyggelse og kombinerte formål ...................................................................................................... 10 19/3193-37 Vegard Berge Uglebakken, brev datert 31.01.20 ............................................................. 10 19/3193-59 JARO AS, brev datert 04.06.20 ......................................................................................... 11 Råstoffområder ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 19/3193-107 Tverrelvdalen Grunneierlag, brev datert 24.06.20 ........................................................ 13 Samferdsel og teknisk infrastruktur ...................................................................................................................... 13 19/3193-55 Syklistenes Landsforening, avd. Alta, registrert 29.05.20 ................................................ 13 Grønnstruktur ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 19/3193-108 Viggo Finstad Nilsen, registrert 24.06.20 ....................................................................... 14 LNFR (inkl. spredt boligbygging) ............................................................................................................................ 15 19/3193-43 Anne Therese Nilsen og Trond Nilsen, brev datert 16.03.20 ........................................... 15 19/3193-45 Ole Hammari på vegne av Stine Hedvig Moland, brev datert 24.04.20 .......................... 15 19/3193-53 Sondre Romsdal, registrert 13.05.20 ............................................................................... 16 19/3793-54 og 75 Anne Therese Nilsen og Trond Nilsen, brev datert 13.05.20 ................................. 16 19/3193-78 Sigbjørn Solli, registrert 23.06.20..................................................................................... 17 19/3193-103 Ola Haldorsen, registrert 24.06.20 ................................................................................ 17 19/3193-110 Kåfjord Bygdelag, registrert 24.06.20 ............................................................................ 18 19/3193-116 Bodil og Tor Arne Mannsverk, brev datert 24.06.20 ..................................................... 18 19/3193-120 Arnfinn Holst-Olsen, mail datert 18.06.20 ..................................................................... 19 Reindrift ................................................................................................................................................................ 21 19/3193-64 Hakkstabben og Altneset bygdelag, registrert 14.06.20 .................................................. 21 19/3193-127 og 129 Marit og Iver Sara, brev datert 01.07.20 ............................................................ 21 19/3193-126-128 Distrikt Seainnus/Navggastat C – Jalgon, brev datert 01.07.20 .............................. 22 Kystsone/Akvakultur ............................................................................................................................................. 27 19/3193-72 Alta Laksefiskeri interessentskap, registrert 23.05.20 ..................................................... 27 19/3193-96 Norske Lakseelver, brev datert 24.06.20 ......................................................................... 27 Oppsummering merknader 2. gangs høring, Kommuneplanens arealdel 20170001 | 2 19/3193-97 Fiskarlaget Nord, brev datert 24.06.20 ............................................................................ 27 19/3193-111 Naturvernforbundet i Finnmark, brev datert 24.06.20.................................................. 28 Bestemmelser ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 19/3193-77 Alta kommune v/Oppmåling og byggesak, brev datert 24.06.20 .................................... 28 19/3193-98 Alta idrettsforening, registrert 24.06.20 .......................................................................... 30 19/3193-101 Haldde arkitekter AS, registrert 24.06.20 ...................................................................... 31 19/3193-115 Alta kommune v/ helse og sosial tjenesten – kommuneoverlegen, brev datert 30.06.20 31 19/3193-125 Alta kommune v/ Oppmåling og byggesak, mail datert 24.06.20.................................. 32 Andre tema ........................................................................................................................................................... 33 19/3193-58 og 60 Ellen Kristine Eira, brev datert 05.06.20 ................................................................ 33 19/3193-61 Amtmannsnes Bygdelag, brev datert 28.05.20................................................................ 33 19/3193-62 Representanter for familier på Amtmannsnes, brev datert 08.06.20 ............................. 33 19/3193-65 Alta kommune v/Landbruk (HTTML), brev datert 16.06.20............................................. 34 19/3193-66 Alta kommune v/Barn og unges representant, brev datert 17.06.20 ............................. 37 19/3193-76 Alta kommune v/Kommunalteknikk, brev datert 24.06.20 ............................................. 37 19/3193-89 Skaialuft velforening, registrert 24.06.20 ........................................................................ 37 19/3193-90 Alta sentrumsutvikling AS, brev datert 24.06.20 ............................................................. 38 19/3193-91 Bjørnar Andersen, registrert 24.06.20 ............................................................................. 40 19/3193-95 Camp Detsika Velforening, brev datert 22.06.20 ............................................................ 41 19/3193-99 TL-Regnskap AS, brev datert 24.06.20 ............................................................................. 41 19/3193-105 Alta Venstre, mail datert 24.06.20 ................................................................................. 41 19/3193-106 Langfjord næringshage (Ikke datert, registrert 24.06.20).............................................. 42 19/3193-109 Miljøpartiet De Grønne i Alta, registrert 24.06.20 ......................................................... 42 19/3193-112 Anne Stokke, registrert 25.06.20 ................................................................................... 43 19/3193-113 Statnett SF, brev datert 26.06.20 ................................................................................... 44 19/3193-117 og 124 Husbanken, brev datert 24.06.20 ...................................................................... 46 Regionale myndigheter ......................................................................................................................................... 47 19/3193-52 Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap (DSB), brev datert 11.05.20 ............. 47 19/3193-57 Statens vegvesen, brev datert 04.06.20 .......................................................................... 47 19/3193-63 Kystverket Troms og Finnmark, brev datert 10.06.20 ..................................................... 47 19/3193-68 Fiskeridirektoratet, brev datert 18.06.20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The ¢Aravarri Formation of the Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, Finnmark, North Norway; a Palaeoproterozoic Foreland Basin Succession
    NGUBull442_INNMAT 23.11.04 09:54 Side 5 TORE TORSKE & STEFFEN G.BERGH NGU-BULL 442, 2004 - PAGE 5 The ¢aravarri Formation of the Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, Finnmark, North Norway; a Palaeoproterozoic foreland basin succession TORE TORSKE & STEFFEN G. BERGH Torske, Tore & Bergh, Steffen G. 2004: The ¢aravarri Formation of the Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, Finnmark, North Norway; a Palaeoproterozoic foreland basin succession. Norges geologiske undersøkelse Bulletin,442,5–22. The ¢aravarri Formation is the youngest supracrustal unit in the Palaeoproterozoic Kautokeino Greenstone Belt of western Finnmark.This greenstone belt and correlative units at Alta farther north were formerly ascribed to a conti- nental rift setting near the northern margin of the Fennoscandian Shield.The ¢aravarri Formation is metamorpho- sed at very low grade and made up of c. 4000 m-thick, upward-coarsening, siliciclastic sandstones and conglomera- tes deposited in a presently NNW-SSE-trending basin. It rests with depositional contact on the underlying argillitic Bik’ka∏åk’ka Formation. The eastern boundary is an east-dipping thrust, with a hangingwall block of older, more highly deformed and metamorphosed metasupracrustals. The ¢aravarri Formation is subdivided into three lateral segments, from south to north, the Njargavarri, Gæsvarri and ¢aravarri segments, separated by inferred faults.The facies associations reveal: (i) an extensive lower conglome- ratic member (unit 1), present in all segments and interpreted as subaqueous debris-flow deposits, (ii) pebbly sand- stones and conglomerates interpreted as shallow-marine turbidites, debris flows or fan-delta deposits with locally derived carbonate clasts, which dominate in the Njargavarri segment and lower part of the Gæsvarri and ¢aravarri segments, and (iii) conglomerates and channelled and cross-bedded sandstones interpreted as prograding alluvial fan and fluvial trunk-river deposits that characterise the northern, ¢aravarri segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bergvesenet Rapportarkivet
    I. Bergvesenet Postboks 3021, 7002 Trondheim Rapportarkivet Bergvesenetrapport nr InternJournalnr Interntarkiv nr Rapportlokalisering GraderIng T & F 1007 BV 614 156/80 FB Trondbeim APell Kommerfra ..arkiv Eksternrapportnr Oversendtfra Fortrollgpga Fortrollgfra dato: Troms & Finnmark NGU 1650/46 A Tittel Middavarrekobberforekomst Forfatter Dato Bedrift Vik, Eirik 14.01 1980 ) NGU Kommune Fylke BergdistrIkt 1: 50 000 kartblad 1:250 000 kartblad Kvænangen Troms Troms og 17341 Finnmark 18344 Fagområde Dokumenttype Forekomster Geologi Middavarre Boring Geokjemi Råstofftype Emneord Malm/metall Cu Sammendrag Rapporten er en samlet beskrivelseav feltet, basert på undersøkelsenesommeren1978 og tidligere arbeider. Sommeren1978ble det boret 5 korte diamantborhull, ogdet ble prøvetatt på berghallene. Prøvene er analysert på Cu, Zn, Pb, Co, Ni, Mo, V, Ag,Au, Fe, ogS. Mineraliseringen består av en rekke steiltstående kvarts-kalkspatganger i en grovkornet grønnstein. Malmmineralene er svovelkis, kobberkis og magnetitt pluss en rekke andre mineraler i aksessoriske mengder. Kjemisk er malmen kobberdominert. Gullinnholdet er lavt. Prøvene somhar mer enn 0.2 ppm Au har gjennomsnittlig 0.4 ppm Au. Malmen er uhomogen,men er for liten til å vtere økonomisk interessant i dag. UNDERSØKELSEAV STATENS BERGRETTIGHETER 1980 NGU-rapportnr. 1650/46A Middavarrekobberforekomst, Kvænangen,Troms , Norges geologiske undersøkelse Leiv Eiriksons vei 39Postboks 3006Postgironr. 5168232 T11. (075) 15 8607001 TrondheimBankgironr. 0633.05.70014 Rapport nr. 1650/46A Apen/Boatscockbsigoduisl.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper IV.Pdf (5.305Mb)
    Svecofennian shear zone networks of the Rombak Tectonic Window, North Norway: Structural architecture and regional correlation with the Fennoscandian shield Tine L. Angvik1 and 2, Iain H.C. Henderson1 and Steffen G.Bergh2 1. The Geological Survey of Norway 2. University of Tromsø Abstract The northern part of the Fennoscandian shield comprises several domains of Archean to Paleoproterozoic age. These domains include the Kola province in Russia, the Kola-Lapland and Kittilä provinces farther west, and the Norrbotten province in northern Sweden. The evolution of these domains was extremely complex and involved continental break ups, development of micro continents, island arcs and later closing of oceans (Kola ocean) accompanied by subduction, accretion and continent-continent collision. The Archean and Paleoproterozoic crust is commonly juvenile and the Fennoscandian shield has a high potential for mineral and ore deposits. Archean and Paleoproterozoic basement rocks are also present as inliers and outliers beneath and west of the Scandinavian Caledonides, and these provinces in general, have not been included in previous regional studies of the Fennoscandian Shield. Because of new knowledge of the stratigraphy, composition, age, structural relationship, and widespread sulphide mineralisation in the Rombak Tectonic Window and the similarities of these rocks with provinces farther north (inliers) and east, we consider them to be directly correlated with the basement rocks in northern Sweden, Norway and Finland. These provinces all show evidence of the same break-up activity in the Archean (2.5-1.9 Ga) that formed one or several micro continents filled in with Paleoproterozoic basin sediments and the development of island arcs and back arc basins and volcano-sedimentary deposits, terminating with the Svecofennian orogeny (1.92-1.79 Ga) which produced fold-thrust belts and regional ductile shear zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Fylkesros for Finnmark 1
    FylkesROS for Finnmark RISIKO- OG SÅRBARHETSANALYSE FOR FINNMARK 2014-2017 Innholdsfortegnelse Forord ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Innledning ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mål for FylkesROS i Finnmark ................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Sentrale begreper .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Risikovurderinger i FylkesROS ............................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Hjelpetabeller .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Oppbyggingen av FylkesROS ............................................................................................................. 9 2 Finnmark ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Geografi og demografi ......................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Natur og miljø .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology of the Palaeoproterozoic Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, Finnmark, Norway: Tectonic Implications in a Fennoscandia Context
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 95 Nr. 3–4 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg95-3-09 Geochronology of the Palaeoproterozoic Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, Finnmark, Norway: Tectonic implications in a Fennoscandia context Bernard Bingen1,2, Arne Solli1, Giulio Viola1,3, Espen Torgersen1, Jan Sverre Sandstad1, Martin J. Whitehouse4, Torkil S. Røhr1, Morgan Ganerød1 & Aziz Nasuti1 1Geological Survey of Norway, PO Box 6315 Sluppen, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. 2Departement of Geology, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium. 3Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. 4Swedish Museum of Natural History, 104 05, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail corresponding author (Bernard Bingen): [email protected] Zircon U–Pb geochronological data in 18 samples from Finnmarksvidda and one sample from the Repparfjord Tectonic Window, northern Norway, constrain the evolution of the Palaeoproterozoic Kautokeino Greenstone Belt and neighbouring units in a Fennoscandia context. The Jergul Complex is an Archaean cratonic block of Karelian affinity, made of variably gneissic, tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite–granite plutonic rocks formed between 2975 ± 10 and 2776 ± 6 Ma. It is associated with the Archaean Goldenvárri greenstone–schist formation. At the base of the Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, the Masi Formation is a typical Jatulian quartzite, hosting a Haaskalehto-type, albite–magnetite-rich, mafic sill dated at 2220 ± 7 Ma. The Likčá and Čáskejas formations represent the main event of basaltic magmatism. A synvolcanic metagabbro dates this magmatism at 2137 ± 5 Ma. The geochemical and Nd isotopic signature of the Čáskejas Formation (eNd = +2.2 ± 1.7) is remarkably similar to coeval dykes intruding the Archaean Karelian Craton in Finland and Russia (eNd = +2.5 ± 1.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Innlandsbosetting I Tidlig Metalltid En Analyse Med Utgangspunkt I Virdnejávri 112
    Innlandsbosetting i tidlig metalltid En analyse med utgangspunkt i Virdnejávri 112 Thor-Andreas Basso Mastergradsoppgave i arkeologi Det samfunnsvitenskapelige fakultet Universitetet i Tromsø Høsten 2007 Innlandsbosetting i tidlig metalltid En analyse med utgangspunkt i Virdnejávri 112 Thor-Andreas Basso Masteroppgave i arkeologi Det samfunnsvitenskapelige fakultet Universitetet i Tromsø Høsten 2007 SAMMENDRAG Forskningen på innlandsbosetting i Finnmark har fram til nå hatt et mindre fokus enn kystområdene. Man har undersøkt få boplasser, og disse har i tillegg vært behandlet i en mindre grad. I denne oppgaven har jeg valgt å rette søkelyset på innlandsboplasser fra perioden tidlig metalltid, og har valgt å ta utgangspunkt i boplassen Virdnejávri 112. I oppgaven gjennomførtes det en boplasstruktur analyse av Virdnejávri 112, med hensyn til hvordan boplassen ble dannet (dvs. formasjonsprosesser), der det ble tatt hensyn til tilstedeværelsen av anlegg/strukturer pluss spredningsmønstret av gjenstandsmaterialet. Boplasstruktur analysen for Virdnejávri 112 gjennomføres med k-means clusteranalyse og interpolering, som igjen ble satt opp mot en visuell vurdering av spredningsmønsteret for gjenstandsmaterialet. I tillegg diskuteres forskjellige boplasslokaliseringsfaktorer som har påvirket boplassens formasjonsprosesser. Virdnejávri 112 blir satt inn i en bredere kontekst ved å vurdere hvordan boplassen står i forhold til variasjon sammenlignet med andre tidlig metalltidsboplasser i Finnmark, og i forhold til noen utvalgte boplasser fra svensk og finsk Lappland. Dette for å se om det opptrer like type boplasser, eller om noen skiller seg ut med tanke på organisering og aktiviteter ved boplassene, og hvordan dette viser seg i distribusjonen av artefaktene i forhold til strukturer eller ikke. Analysene viser at boplassen Virdnejávri 112 skiller seg ut fra de andre boplassene i studiet, ved å framvise et vidt spekter av aktiviteter og mer intensivt bruk, noe som reflekteres i et langt mer variert og omfattende funnmateriale.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Boat Figures in Alta Rock Art and Other Scandinavian Locations
    1 Study of Boat Figures in Alta Rock Art and other Scandinavian locations. With a view to elucidate their construction, and discuss the origin of the Nordic Boat Per Gierløff Klem Master Thesis in Archaeology at the University of Oslo, Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History 2010 2 View from Ole Pedersen, 18 meters above sea level, with boat figure 44 in the middle of the foreground. Photo Karin Tansem, Alta museum Frontispiece The frontispiece is probably the oldest carving of a boat figure in Norway. It is located 26 meters above sea level at Kåfjord in Alta, showing a small boat with a reindeer figurehead superimposed on a larger elk head. Traced from photo by Karin Tansem. 3 Table of Contents List of Illustrations 4 Foreword 5 Acknowledgments 6 Chapter 1 Introduction 7 Chapter 2: Research History 11 Chapter 3: Boats of the Circumpolar Region 22 Chapter 4: Boats in other Cultures 38 Chapter 5: Boat Figures of Hunters and Gatherers 44 Chapter 6: Alta 50 Chapter 7: Boat Figures in Alta 53 Chapter 8: Table of Proposed Generations 54 Chapter 9: Catalogue of Boat Figures 55 Chapter 10: Analysis 71 Chapter 11: Comments on the Hjortspring boat 83 Chapter 12: Summary and Conclusion 88 List of literature and sources 93 4 List of Illustrations 1. Rødøy and Skjomen carvings, from Brøgger 1951: 15 2. Evenhus carving, from Brøgger 1951: 17 3. North Alaskan Whaling Umiak, from Adney 2007: 187 4. Detail of decorated ceremonial skin, Siberia, from Fitzhugh 1988: 309 5. Figurehead decoration of Kayaks, Brindley 1919: 132 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Lille Raipas Copper-Bearing Breccias: Structure and Origin (Alta- Kvaenangen Tectonic Window, Northern Norway)
    LILLE RAIPAS COPPER-BEARING BRECCIAS: STRUCTURE AND ORIGIN (ALTA- KVAENANGEN TECTONIC WINDOW, NORTHERN NORWAY) 1Voytenko, V. N., 1Koreshkova, M.Yu. 1 Institute of Earth’s Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, [email protected], Russia, 199155, St. Petersburg, Dekabristov per., 16, +79111540699 Some new actual data on copper-bearing breccias on Lille Raipas have been obtained during the geological mapping fieldtrips of SPbSU’s students in 2016-2017. The autochthonous rocks of Raipas Gr. compose the steep-dip to southwest limb of a asymmetric anticline. High-order folds with slowly dipping to the northeast axial planes complicate the anticline limb. The cleavage planes and low- amplitudes thrusts are observed along these axial planes. The rocks of Storviknes Fm. lie with disconformity on volcano-sedimentary sequences of Kvenvik Fm. that have relics of weathering crust at the top. In turn, shale-sandstone sequences of Skoadduvarry Fm. superpose the stepped paleo-relief composed by Storviknes dolomite with stromatolite replaced by silica. The copper-bearing breccias are widespread only within shale-dolomite sequences of the Storviknes Fm. Generally, breccia bodies orient across the Storviknes dolomite bedding (60-70º), and have a length of 250-380 m. The breccia bodies have wedge-like or irregular tree-branch shapes, at the bottom, they have slump folds. Their thickness increases up to 60 m to the top (123 m with sub-layer apophyses). In horizontal plane, the breccia bodies are observed with spaces of 260 and 420 m. The breccias consist of large (1-4, rarely 10-80 m) angular or sub-rounded fragments of Storviknes dolomite and small sharp-edged fragments of mudstones, cherts and chalcedony.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Structure and Stratigraphy of the Northwestern Repparfjord Tectonic Window, Northern Norway
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 95 Nr. 3–4 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg95-3-06 Revised structure and stratigraphy of the northwestern Repparfjord Tectonic Window, northern Norway Espen Torgersen1,2, Giulio Viola1,2 & Jan Sverre Sandstad1 1Geological Survey of Norway, Pb 6315 Sluppen, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. 2Department of Geology and Mineral Resources Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Sem Sælands veg 1, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail corresponding author (Espen Torgersen): [email protected] The Repparfjord Tectonic Window (RTW) consists of a ~8 km-thick low-grade, weakly deformed Early Palaeoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary succession that hosts abundant Cu mineralisations. Two major, sediment-hosted, Cu-deposits occur in the Saltvatnet Group, a <6 km-thick sequence of mainly coarse-grained clastic rocks that forms the core subject of the present study. Results from new mapping, structural analysis and whole-rock geochemistry from the northwestern part of the RTW are presented and used in association with high-resolution geophysical data to propose a revised stratigraphy of the Repparfjord volcano-sedimentary succession and its tectonic and geodynamic settings. The Saltvatnet Group is better characterised as containing four formations, now including also the uppermost volcaniclastic siltstones and dolostone members of the herein newly defined Gorahatjohka Formation. Field oberservations and structural analysis show that the current geometry of the Saltvatnet Group is that of a km-scale, upright, NE–SW-trending anticline, the Ulveryggen anticline, cored by the Saltvatnet Group, which thus represents the lowermost exposed rocks of the RTW. New and existing geochemical data are used to demonstrate that the two volcanic-dominated Nussir and Holmvatnet groups, which crop out on either side of the Ulveryggen anticline, have similar geochemical character and can be interpreted as temporal and lateral correlatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Alta Og Talvik Menighetsblad 03/2018
    NR. 3/4 – 2018 Alta kirke 160 år Foto: KØ-foto Foto: TOGETHER FOR A JUST WORLD TEKST OG FOTO: PROST ANNE SKOGLUND I begynnelsen av oktober fikk jeg Vi fikk presentert ulike prosjekter som KN er anledning å reise til Tanzania med styret engasjert i i Tanzania. Vi besøket prosjekter i Kirkens Nødhjelp (KN). Her har KN hatt i Moshi, like i nærheten av Kilimanjaro. Her arbeid i flere 10-år. Styret har et behov fikk vi møte en kvinne som var medlem i en for å få mer kunnskap om hvordan VEGGIE-gruppe. Hun fikk kjøpe frø, gjødsel arbeidet drives i Tanzania. og vanningssystem til et bed på 8 meter for 7$ (se bilde nede til venstre). Hun fikk del Det jeg sitter igjen med etter turen, er ordet i god veiledning av lokale agronomer som «sammen - together». hadde god kunnskap om å dyrke grønnsaker og som kjente markedet godt. Hun fikk Tanzania er et land med både kristne og også del i et distribusjonsnett for å nå fram muslimer som lever tett med hverandre. til markedet. Denne kvinnen dyrket spinat Til tross for at landet har hatt stabil (jeg har aldri sett så stor spinat!). Det var økonomisk vekst, er det et stort gap stor etterspørsel etter spinat, så denne mellom de rike og fattige. Tanzania har kvinnen kunne etter kort tid utvidet arealet stor befolkningsvekst og stadig økende hun dyrket på og hun fikk mer inntekt. arbeidsledighet blant unge mennesker. Det gav barna hennes mulighet for å få De unge utgjør i dag om lag 35% av mat, skolegang og til å legge inn strøm i befolkningen på 47 millioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary-Volcanic Successions of the Alta–Kvænangen
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 95 Nr. 3–4 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg95-3-01 Sedimentary-volcanic successions of the Alta–Kvænangen Tectonic Window in the northern Norwegian Caledonides: Multiple constraints on deposition and correlation with complexes on the Fennoscandian Shield Victor A. Melezhik1, Bernard Bingen1, Jan Sverre Sandstad1, Boris. G. Pokrovsky2, Arne Solli1, Anthony E. Fallick3 1Geological Survey of Norway, Postbox 6315 Sluppen, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. 2Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky drive, 7, 109017, Moscow, Russia. 3Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride, Scotland. G75 0QF. E-mail corresponding author (Victor A. Melezhik): [email protected] Airborne geophysical data, sedimentological and geochemical characteristics of carbonate rocks, geochemical features of igneous rocks, carbon isotope chemostratigraphy and radiometric dating form a multiple approach applied for the reconstruction of depositional environments and the age of the sedimentary-volcanic succession exposed in the Alta–Kvænangen Tectonic Window (AKTW) in the northern Norwegian Caledonides. Aeromagnetic geophysical data confirm that the AKTW succession continues beneath the Caledonian nappe complexes and connects with the Kautokeino Greenstone Belt in the main part of the Fennoscandian Shield. The carbonate rocks, mainly dolostones, of the Kvenvik formation are markedly enriched in 13C (d13C = +7.4 ± 0.7‰, n = 51) and record a global positive excursion of carbonate carbon isotopes in sedimentary carbonates known as the Lomagundi –Jatuli isotopic event whose duration was constrained in the Fennoscandian Shield between c. 2220 and 2060 Ma. A radiometric date of 2146 ± 5 Ma (U–Pb, zircon) obtained from a gabbro comagmatic with mafic lavas provides a minimum age for the deposition of the 13C-rich, Lower and Upper dolostones and the accumulation age of the 13C-rich Uppermost dolostone.
    [Show full text]