PSG2010 Abstracts.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PSG2010 Abstracts.Pdf asterisk = speaker underline = eligible for student award CORRELATING SEABIRD MOVEMENTS WITH OCEAN WINDS: LINKING SATELLITE TELEMETRY WITH OCEAN SCATTEROMETRY Josh Adams*,1,2, and Stephanie Flora3. 1U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 8272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, CA, 95039 USA, [email protected]; 2Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; 3Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 8272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, CA 95039 USA Satellite telemetry studies of seabirds are now common and have revealed impressive flight capabilities and extensive distributions at sea. Linking seabird movements with environmental conditions over vast expanses of the world’s open ocean, however, remains difficult. Seabirds of the Order Procellariiformes (e.g., petrels, albatrosses, and shearwaters) depend largely on wind and wave energy for efficient flight. We present a new method for quantifying the movements of far-ranging seabirds in relation to ocean winds measured by the SeaWinds scatterometer onboard the QuikSCAT satellite. We apply vector correlation to evaluate how the trajectories (ground speed and direction) for five procellariiform seabirds outfitted with satellite transmitters are related to ocean winds. Individual seabirds (Sooty Shearwater, Pink-footed Shearwater, Hawaiian Petrel, Grey-faced Petrel, and Black-footed Albatross) all traveled predominantly with oblique, isotropic crossing to quartering tail-winds (i.e., 105° to 165° in relation to birds’ trajectory). Entire track line trajectories were significantly correlated with co-located winds. Greatest correlations along 8-day path segments were related to wind patterns during birds’ directed, long-range migration (Sooty Shearwater) and movements associated with mega-scale meteorological phenomena, including Pacific Basin anticyclones (Hawaiian Petrel, Grey-faced Petrel) and eastward- propagating north Pacific cyclones (Black-footed Albatross). We suggest that vector correlation can be used to quantify movements for any marine vertebrate when tracking and environmental data (winds or currents) are of sufficient quality and sample size. Vector correlation coefficients can then be used to assess population- or species-specific variability and used to test specific hypotheses related to how animal movements are associated with fluid environments. RECENT POPULATION TRENDS IN WESTERN DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS: RESULTS FROM AN UPDATED STATUS ASSESSMENT Jessica Y. Adkins*, Daniel D. Roby, Donald E. Lyons, Karen N. Fischer, Timothy Marcella, Yasuko Suzuki, Peter Loschl, and Daniel Battaglia, USGS - Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, [email protected] Since the most recent status assessment for the entire Pacific Coast population of Double-crested Cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) was published in 1995 by Carter et al., the distribution of this population across its breeding range has changed dramatically. This is primarily due to the increase in the breeding population in the Columbia River estuary, which grew from 6,200 pairs in 1997 to up to 13,800 pairs in 2007. Preliminary estimates for British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and California suggest the current Pacific Coast breeding population of Double-crested Cormorants is ca. 26,000 breeding pairs. This is an increase of ca. 9,000 breeding pairs from Carter et al. (1995). Most of this increase can be attributed to the Columbia River estuary, which currently accounts for approximately 45% of Pacific Coast breeding pairs. In contrast to this growth, numbers in coastal British Columbia, Washington, and parts of California have declined. The 2009 breeding estimate in coastal British Columbia is down ca. 80% from a peak of 1,981 breeding pairs in 1987 (Moul and Gebauer 2002). The 2009 coastal Washington breeding estimate is down 51% from the 1992 estimate of 1,618 breeding pairs (Carter et al. 1995). And the 2008 estimate of 1,625 breeding pairs in Northern California is down from the 2003 estimate (2,437 breeding pairs; Capitolo et al. 2004), but similar to the estimate for 1989-1991 (1,633 breeding pairs; Carter et al. 1995). Increasing bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) populations and episodic human disturbance may be important factors causing declines in some regions. FORAGING ECOLOGY AND DIET COMPOSITION OF CASPIAN TERNS IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY Lindsay Adrean*1, Daniel D. Roby1, Ken Collis2, Donald E. Lyons1, S. Kim Nelson3, and Daniel Battaglia1; 1USGS Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97333 USA, [email protected]; 2Real Time Research, 53 SW Roosevelt Avenue, Bend, OR 97702 USA; 3 Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97333 USA The largest breeding colony of Caspian Terns (Hydroprogne caspia) currently resides in the Columbia River estuary and numbers approximately 10,000 pairs. The impact of this colony on survival of out- migrating, threatened and endangered juvenile salmonids has caused resource managers to attempt to relocate most of these terns to areas outside of the estuary. One proposed relocation site is Brooks Island in San Francisco Bay, which currently supports a Caspian Tern breeding colony of ca. 800 pairs. Based on studies conducted during 2003-2005, however, Sacramento River salmonids are a part of the diet at this colony, and fisheries managers are concerned that relocated terns could reduce survival of ESA-listed salmonids in the Bay Area. In 2008 and 2009 we collected diet composition information and used radio telemetry to investigate the foraging ecology of Caspian Terns nesting on Brooks Island. Diet composition data indicated that consumption of salmonid smolts has increased from 3% of prey items in 2005 to 10% in 2008 and 2009. Several popular foraging sites were in close proximity to new release sites for non-listed hatchery-raised Sacramento River Fall Chinook. TRAPPING AND BAND RECOVERY OF CALIFORNIA LEAST TERNS AT SAN DIEGO BAY COLONIES, 2008-2009 Jeff Allen*1, Elizabeth Copper2, and Robert T. Patton2, 1Department of Biology, Willamette University, 900 State St., Salem, OR 97301, USA, [email protected]; 2Avian Research Associates, 830 Orange Ave., Ste. K, Coronado, CA 92118, USA Although the population of the federally endangered California Least Tern (Sternula antillarum browni) has increased significantly over the past 20 years, fledgling production has remained low since 2001. It appears that aging and mortality of the majority of the breeding population may surpass productivity and replacement by younger breeders, threatening a rapidly accelerating decline in breeding pairs. Trapping of previously banded adults nesting at each colony around San Diego Bay was conducted in order to estimate an age profile of the population and to determine feasibility of a larger scale trapping project. During the 2008 and 2009 breeding seasons, 185 previously banded birds and 67 un-banded birds were trapped. Ages ranged from two-years old to 21, with average age of eight to nine years. As anticipated, birds nesting at their natal colony accounted for the highest percentage of the bands recovered, followed by individuals nesting at a different colony but still within the San Diego Bay colony complex, those from Mission Bay or elsewhere in San Diego County, and the lowest percentage had been recruited from Orange and Los Angeles County sites. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY: WHY MOST OF US ARE INTO SEABIRDS Daniel W. Anderson, University of California, Department of Wildlife, Fish, & Conservation Biology, Davis, CA 95616 USA, [email protected] Almost forty years ago, one of our early Lifetime Achievement Award (LAA) recipients, Jim Bartonek, with L. W. Sowl (1974), called seabirds “Alaska's most neglected resource.” This was largely true for most of the world's seabirds. Now, seabird conservation and seabird biology are at the forefronts of marine biology and natural history in many disciplines. Both aspects, seabird study and seabird conservation, have strong roots in the Pacific Seabird Group and other seabird-oriented organizations, worldwide. John Croxall, another PSG Lifetime Achievement Award recipient, stressed the importance of conservation as a lifetime goal of all seabird biologists and managers. And, as recently stressed by John Weins (at the most recent national conference of The Wildlife Society, 20-24 Sept. 2009), the “pure” science of [seabird] ecology and the applied science of [seabird] conservation are in reality a single continuum of interests and activities. The seabird biologist usually perches somewhere in the middle of this continuum. This person has strong roots in conservation that involve the protection, preservation, restoration, and study of the ecology, physiology, and behavior of seabirds and their populations, no matter which sub-discipline is involved. It behooves us to remain active and committed in the now-well- established activities of seabird study and conservation, the life-blood of PSG itself. KITTLITZ’S AND MARBLED MURRELET STATUS AND TRENDS IN KENAI FJORDS NATIONAL PARK, ALASKA Mayumi Arimitsu*1, John Piatt2, and Tom Van Pelt3, 1U.S. Geological Survey, 3100 National Park Rd, Juneau, AK 99801 USA, [email protected]; 2U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508 USA; 3U.S. Geological
Recommended publications
  • Birds of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Chagos Archipelago, Central Indian Ocean Peter Carr
    CARR: Birds of Chagos 57 Birds of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean Peter Carr Carr, P., 2015. Birds of the British Indian Ocean Territory, Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Indian BIRDS 10 (3&4): 57–70. Peter Carr, 80 Links Way, Beckenham, Kent, England, UK, BR3 3DQ. E-mail: [email protected]. Manuscript received on 02 June 2015. Introduction from three directions, the east, north and west and seabird The Chagos Archipelago lies at the end of the Chagos-Laccadive migrants from four, the north and south and dispersing east and Ridge and is some 500km due South of the Maldives archipelago. west along the equatorial counter current systems.” Observations It is the final termini for migrating organisms heading South in post-1971 have proven that Bourne’s words were prophetic; the central Indian Ocean. It is made up of five islanded atolls landbird and seabird vagrants and migrants are an exciting aspect centred upon the Great Chagos Bank, the largest atoll structure of birding in the Chagos. The vast majority of migratory species in the world. The climate is tropical oceanic, hot and humid yet are of northern hemisphere origin (though there is evidence moderated by trade winds. Mean monthly temperatures vary that a limited number of vagrants are from the east and west) from a maximum of 30.75°C in March to a minimum of 28.03°C and are generally present in the archipelago from September in August. The northern atolls of the archipelago are the wettest through to March. As more ornithological research is conducted in the Indian Ocean (Stoddart & Taylor 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Birds in Iran in the Late 1960S and 1970S
    Podoces, 2008, 3(1/2): 1–30 Rare Birds in Iran in the Late 1960s and 1970s DEREK A. SCOTT Castletownbere Post Office, Castletownbere, Co. Cork, Ireland. Email: [email protected] Received 26 July 2008; accepted 14 September 2008 Abstract: The 12-year period from 1967 to 1978 was a period of intense ornithological activity in Iran. The Ornithology Unit in the Department of the Environment carried out numerous surveys throughout the country; several important international ornithological expeditions visited Iran and subsequently published their findings, and a number of resident and visiting bird-watchers kept detailed records of their observations and submitted these to the Ornithology Unit. These activities added greatly to our knowledge of the status and distribution of birds in Iran, and produced many records of birds which had rarely if ever been recorded in Iran before. This paper gives details of all records known to the author of 92 species that were recorded as rarities in Iran during the 12-year period under review. These include 18 species that had not previously been recorded in Iran, a further 67 species that were recorded on fewer than 13 occasions, and seven slightly commoner species for which there were very few records prior to 1967. All records of four distinctive subspecies are also included. The 29 species that were known from Iran prior to 1967 but not recorded during the period under review are listed in an Appendix. Keywords: Rare birds, rarities, 1970s, status, distribution, Iran. INTRODUCTION Eftekhar, E. Kahrom and J. Mansoori, several of whom quickly became keen ornithologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Adak Army Base and Adak Naval Operating Base and Or Common Adak Naval Station (Naval Air Station Adak) 2
    N?S Ferm 10-900 OMB Mo. 1024-0018 (342) NHL - WWM, PACIFIC Eip. 10-31-84 Uncled States Department off the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register off Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections ' _______ 1. Name__________________ historic Adak Army Base and Adak Naval Operating Base and or common Adak Naval Station (Naval Air Station Adak) 2. Location street & number not (or publication city, town vicinity of state Alaska code 02 county Aleutian Islands code 010 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district X public __ occupied __ agriculture __ museum building(s) private __ unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence X site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government __ scientific being considered .. yes: unrestricted industrial transportation __ no ,_X military __ other: 4. Owner off Property name United States Navy street & number Adak Naval Station, U.S. Department of the Navy city, town FPO Seattle vicinity of state Washington 98791 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. United States Navy street & number Adak Naval Station. U.S. Department of the Navy city, town FPO Seattle state Washington 98791 6. Representation in Existing Surveys y title None has this property been determined eligible? yes J^L no date federal _ _ state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered _K original site __ good X_ ruins _X altered __ moved date _.__._.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Defensive Behaviors of Deep-Sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy
    Defensive Behaviors of Deep-sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy by Stephanie Lynn Bush A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Roy L. Caldwell, Chair Professor David R. Lindberg Professor George K. Roderick Dr. Bruce H. Robison Fall, 2009 Defensive Behaviors of Deep-sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy © 2009 by Stephanie Lynn Bush ABSTRACT Defensive Behaviors of Deep-sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy by Stephanie Lynn Bush Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Roy L. Caldwell, Chair The deep sea is the largest habitat on Earth and holds the majority of its’ animal biomass. Due to the limitations of observing, capturing and studying these diverse and numerous organisms, little is known about them. The majority of deep-sea species are known only from net-caught specimens, therefore behavioral ecology and functional morphology were assumed. The advent of human operated vehicles (HOVs) and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) have allowed scientists to make one-of-a-kind observations and test hypotheses about deep-sea organismal biology. Cephalopods are large, soft-bodied molluscs whose defenses center on crypsis. Individuals can rapidly change coloration (for background matching, mimicry, and disruptive coloration), skin texture, body postures, locomotion, and release ink to avoid recognition as prey or escape when camouflage fails. Squids, octopuses, and cuttlefishes rely on these visual defenses in shallow-water environments, but deep-sea cephalopods were thought to perform only a limited number of these behaviors because of their extremely low light surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feather Lice of the Levantine Shearwater Puffinus Yelkouan And
    68 Zonfrillo & Palma Atlantic Seabirds 2(2) The feather lice of the Levantine Shearwater Puffinus yelkouan and its taxonomic status Veerluizen van de Yelkouanpijlstormvogel Puffinus yelkouan en de taxonomische status daarvan 2 Bernard Zonfrillo1 &Ricardo+L. Palma ‘Applied Ornithology Unit. Zoology Department. Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ. Scotland. U.K.; 'Museum ofNew Zealand, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand. lice Four species of feather (Insecta: Phthiraptera) were found on one fresh dead and five museum skins of Levantine Shearwaters Puffinus yelkouan from various localities in the Mediterranean. Two of them, Halipeurus diversus (Kellogg, 1896) and Saemundssonia (Puffinoecus) kosswigi Timmermaan, 1962 (uniqueto P. yelkouan), had been recorded previously from this host; the other two, Austromenopon paululum (Kellogg & Chapman, 1899) and A. echinatum Edwards, 1960, represent new host-louse records. One bird collected fresh in Cyprus yielded the most lice, including 20 specimens of A. echinatum. The taxonomic position of the Levantine Shearwater is discussed it briefly and the opinion that be regardedas a distinct species is supported. Zonfnllo B. & Palma R.L. 2000 The feather lice of the Levantine Shearwater Puffinus yelkouan and its taxonomic status. Atlantic Seabirds 2(2): 68-72. INTRODUCTION Two species of feather lice (Insecta; Phthiraptera) have been recorded from Puffinus shearwaters in the Mediterranean.The Levantine Shearwater Puffinus is host diversus yelkouan to Halipeurus (Kellogg, 1896) and a unique louse, Saemundssonia (Puffinoecus) kosswigi Timmermann, 1962 (on the status of Puffinoecus, see Palma 1994). Palma et ai (1997) recorded only a single species of feather louse H. diversus) on 19 systematically deloused specimens of Balearic Shearwater Puffinus mauretanicus Lowe, 1821 from the Balearic archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Squid Stock Complex in the Gulf of Alaska
    21. Assessment of the squid stock complex in the Gulf of Alaska Olav A. Ormseth NMFS Alaska Fisheries Science Center Executive Summary Squids in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) are managed as a single stock complex comprising approximately 15 species. Historically squids were managed as part of the GOA “Other Species” complex, which included squids, octopuses, sharks, and sculpins. In 2011, the “Other Species” group was broken up into individual stock complexes and the squid complex received its own harvest specifications. Harvest recommendations are based on an historical catch approach setting OFL equal to maximum historical catch during 1997 – 2007. In June 2017 the North Pacific Fishery Management Council moved to reclassify squid as an “Ecosystem Component” complex, meaning that once the Fishery Management Plan has been amended to reflect this decision there will no longer be annual catch limits for squids (see https://www.npfmc.org/squid-reclassification/ for more information). Summary of Changes in Assessment Inputs 1) Trawl survey data from 2017 have been added. 2) Catch data have been updated through October 11, 2017. Summary of Results 1) The 2017 trawl survey biomass estimate was 2,296 t, the lowest it has been since 1999. 2) The 2017 catch data are incomplete (29 t as of October 11), but it is likely that the 2017 catch will be low compared to 2015 (411 t) and 2016 (239 t). 3) Harvest recommendations are unchanged from the status quo. Harvest Recommendations last year this year Quantity/Status 2016 2017 2017 2018 Specified/recommended
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2004-1234
    Catalog of Earthquake Hypocenters at Alaskan Volcanoes: January 1 through December 31, 2003 By James P. Dixon1, Scott D. Stihler2, John A. Power3, Guy Tytgat2, Seth C. Moran4, John J. Sánchez2, Stephen R. McNutt2, Steve Estes2, and John Paskievitch3 Open-File Report 2004-1234 2004 Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 Alaska Volcano Observatory, U. S. Geological Survey, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320 2 Alaska Volcano Observatory, Geophysical Institute, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320 3 Alaska Volcano Observatory, U. S. Geological Survey, 4200 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508-4667 4 Cascades Volcano Observatory, U. S. Geological Survey, 1300 SE Cardinal Ct., Bldg. 10, Vancouver, WA 99508 2 CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................................3 Instrumentation .............................................................................................5 Data Acquisition and Reduction ...................................................................8 Velocity Models...........................................................................................10 Seismicity.....................................................................................................11 Summary......................................................................................................14 References....................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Sea of Okhotsk Pollock Fishery for the Russian Pollock Catchers Association (PCA)
    Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Russia Sea of Okhotsk Pollock MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION Russia Sea of Okhotsk Pollock Public Comment Draft Report May 2018 Prepared For: Russian Pollock Catchers Association Prepared By: Acoura Marine Ltd Authors: Andrew I.L. Payne, Robert O’Boyle, David W. Japp Acoura Version V2.1 04/01/17 Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Russia Sea of Okhotsk Pollock Fishery name Russia Sea of Okhotsk Pollock Fishery Species and Stock Walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) Date of Site Visit Week beginning 2 October 2017 Assessment team Lead assessor: Andrew I.L. Payne (TL & P3) Assessor(s): Robert O’Boyle (P1) David W. Japp (P2) CAB name Acoura Marine CAB contact details Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ United Kingdom Phone/Fax +44 (0)131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Polly Burns Client contact details Address Russian Pollock Catchers Association (PCA) 517B, 51-a, Svetlanskaya Street Vladivostok 690990 Russia Phone/Fax +7 (423) 222 43 13 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Alexey Buglak Page 2 of 230 Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Russia Sea of Okhotsk Pollock Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary................................................................................................................................ 6 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Whole-Colony Counts of Common Murres, Brandt’s Cormorants and Double-crested Cormorants at Sample Colonies in Northern and Central California, 1996-2004 Phillip J. Capitolo, Gerard J. McChesney, Harry R. Carter, Michael W. Parker, James N. Hall, Richard J. Young, and Richard T. Golightly Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Newark, California Final Report - March 2006 Whole-Colony Counts of Common Murres, Brandt’s Cormorants and Double-crested Cormorants at Sample Colonies in Northern and Central California, 1996-2004 Phillip J. Capitolo1, Gerard J. McChesney2, Harry R. Carter3, Michael W. Parker4, James N. Hall1, Richard J. Young1, and Richard T. Golightly1 1Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521 USA 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, P.O. Box 524, Newark, California 94560 USA 3Carter Biological Consulting, 1015 Hampshire Road, British Columbia V8S 4S8 Canada 4Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 27820 South Centennial Road, Lima, Montana 59739 USA Final Report Intergovernmental Agreement # MOA-2004-183/1274 (DOI/FWS Agreement Code CRA-2004-1971-1102) between National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperative Agreement #14-48-0001-96502 between U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, and Humboldt State University Foundation March 2006 Suggested Citation: Capitolo, P. J., G. J. McChesney, H. R. Carter, M. W. Parker, J. N. Hall, R. J. Young, and R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA)
    The Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA) Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of Breeding Seabirds and their Habitats in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Draft 27 April 2004 April 2004 PERSGA is an intergovernmental organisation dedicated to the conservation of coastal and marine environments and the wise use of the natural resources in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region. The Regional Convention for the Conservation of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Environment (Jeddah Convention) 1982 provides the legal foundation for PERSGA. The Secretariat of the Organization was formally established in Jeddah following the Cairo Declaration of September 1995. The PERSGA member states are Djibouti, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. PERSGA, P.O. Box 53662, Jeddah 21583, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Tel.: +966-2-657-3224. Fax: +966-2-652-1901. Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.persga.org This document was prepared through the Habitat and Biodiversity Conservation component of the Strategic Action Programme for the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, a Global Environment Facility project executed by PERSGA and implemented by the GEF partners - United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Bank. Supplementary funding was provided by the Islamic Development Bank and the PERSGA member states. © 2004 PERSGA The text of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without the permission of the copyright holders provided that acknowledgement of the source is given.
    [Show full text]