37610 Dept Enviro Heritage Science Adel Botanic Gardens TEXT 2 Front
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay)
BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge. -
I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared. -
Host Specificity of Ambrosia and Bark Beetles (Col., Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in a New Guinea Rainforest
Ecological Entomology (2007), 32, 762-772 Host specificity of ambrosia and bark beetles (Col., Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in a New Guinea rainforest JIRI HULCRi'2, MARTIN MOGIA^, BRUS ISUA^ and VOJTECH N O V O T N Y ' ' ' Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, U.S.A., ^Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 'New Guinea Binatang Research Center, Madang, Papua New Guinea and '^ Institute of Entomology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic Abstract. 1. Bark and ambrosia beetles are crucial for woody biomass decomposition in tropical forests worldwide. Despite that, quantitative data on their host specificity are scarce. 2. Bark and ambrosia beetles (Scolytinae and Platypodinae) were reared from 13 species of tropical trees representing 11 families from all major lineages of dicotyledonous plants. Standardised samples of beetle-infested twigs, branches, trunks, and roots were taken from three individuals of each tree species growing in a lowland tropical rain- forest in Papua New Guinea. 3. A total of 81742 beetles from 74 species were reared, 67 of them identified. Local species richness of bark and ambrosia beetles was estimated at 80-92 species. 4. Ambrosia beetles were broad generalists as 95% of species did not show any preference for a particular host species or clade. Similarity of ambrosia beetle communities from different tree species was not correlated with phylogenetic distances between tree species. Similarity of ambrosia beetle communities from individual conspecific trees was not higher than that from heterospecific trees and different parts of the trees hosted similar ambrosia beetle communities, as only a few species preferred particular tree parts. -
Ericaceae in Malesia: Vicariance Biogeography, Terrane Tectonics and Ecology
311 Ericaceae in Malesia: vicariance biogeography, terrane tectonics and ecology Michael Heads Abstract Heads, Michael (Science Faculty, University of Goroka, PO Box 1078, Goroka, Papua New Guinea. Current address: Biology Department, University of the South Pacific, P.O. Box 1168, Suva, Fiji. Email: [email protected]) 2003. Ericaceae in Malesia: vicariance biogeography, terrane tectonics and ecology. Telopea 10(1): 311–449. The Ericaceae are cosmopolitan but the main clades have well-marked centres of diversity and endemism in different parts of the world. Erica and its relatives, the heaths, are mainly in South Africa, while their sister group, Rhododendron and relatives, has centres of diversity in N Burma/SW China and New Guinea, giving an Indian Ocean affinity. The Vaccinioideae are largely Pacific-based, and epacrids are mainly in Australasia. The different centres, and trans-Indian, trans-Pacific and trans-Atlantic Ocean disjunctions all indicate origin by vicariance. The different main massings are reflected in the different distributions of the subfamilies within Malesia. With respect to plant architecture, in Rhododendron inflorescence bracts and leaves are very different. Erica and relatives with the ‘ericoid’ habit have similar leaves and bracts, and the individual plants may be homologous with inflorescences of Rhododendron. Furthermore, in the ericoids the ‘inflorescence-plant’ has also been largely sterilised, leaving shoots with mainly just bracts, and flowers restricted to distal parts of the shoot. The epacrids are also ‘inflorescence-plants’ with foliage comprised of ‘bracts’, but their sister group, the Vaccinioideae, have dimorphic foliage (leaves and bracts). In Malesian Ericaceae, the four large genera and the family as a whole have most species in the 1500–2000 m altitudinal belt, lower than is often thought and within the range of sweet potato cultivation. -
37610 Dept Enviro Heritage Science Adel Botanic Gardens TEXT 2 Front
© 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 67–71 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia A key to Aglaia (Meliaceae) in Australia, with a description of a new species, A. cooperae, from Cape York Peninsula, Queensland Caroline M. Pannell Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Abstract An introduction and a key to the 12 species of Aglaia Lour. known from mainland Australia are presented. Aglaia cooperae, endemic to vine thicket on sand on Silver Plains in the Cape York Peninsula of Queensland, is described as new, illustrated and named after the author and naturalist, Wendy Cooper. Introduction The small or tiny flowers are complex in structure and The genus Aglaia Lour., with 120 species currently highly perfumed, especially in male plants. All species recognised, is the largest in the family Meliaceae. It have a fleshy aril. This usually completely surrounds the occurs in Indomalesia, Australasia and the Western seed, but in A. elaeagnoidea from the Kimberley region, Pacific, from India to Samoa and from southwest China it is vestigial and the pericarp is fleshy. The fruits or to northern Australia (Pannell 1992). Twelve species arillate seeds are eaten, and the cleaned seeds dispersed, of these small to medium sized, dioecious, tropical trees have been recorded in northern and north-eastern tropical Australia, mainly on the eastern side of the far north of Queensland, where four or five species are endemic, but also in Kimberley, Arnhem, Carpentaria, Burdekin and Dawson. -
(Continued from Aspects of Bryophyte Provided by Approach. Bot
BIBLIOGRAPHY: BRYOPHYTES 63 XI. Bibliography (continued from vol. 11, page 575) * Books have been marked with an asterisk. BRYOPHYTES BERNARD, S. & R. DE KONINCK. 1996. The retreat of theforest in SoutheastAsia: a cartographic assessment. Singapore J. Trop. Geogr. 17: 1-14, illus. — 2 maps of 1970and 1990compared; ‘retreat’ euphemism for ‘destruction’. BHAT, R.B. 1996. Leaf architecture and its taxonomicsignificance in the Sterculiaceae. Bot. Jb. 118: 407-418, illus. BOPP, M. & I. CAPESIUS. 1996. New aspects of bryophyte taxonomy provided by a molecularapproach. Bot. Acta 109: 368-372, illus. — Extant bryophytes separated mosses/liverworts. into two groups not identical with the Desmotheca CROSBY, M.R. 1997. Proposal to conserve name (Musci). Taxon 46: 337-338. 1996. Towards the DAMANHURI, A. & R.E. LONGTON. a revision of moss genus Taxithelium (Sematophyllaceae). Anal. Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. Auton. Mexico, Bot. 67: 35-58, illus. DEMIDOVA, E.E. 1996. An electron microscopic study ofthe annulus in Splachnaceae (Musci). Arctoa 6: 119-124, illus. Peninsular ELLIS, L. 1997. A new species of Calymperes (Musci: Calymperaceae) • from Malaysia. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. London, Bot. 27: 7-9, illus. G.L. SMITH MERRILL. 1997. Austral 22. The Balan- ENGEL, J.J. & Hepaticae. genus tiopsis in NewZealand, with observations on extraterritorial taxa and a phylogeny of Balantiopsis and thefamily Balantiopsaceae. Fieldiana, Bot. n.s. 37: 1-62, illus. — 1 new subfam, tribe & sp, 7 new comb; key; synonymy, descriptions; some Malesian. FRAHM, J.-P. 1997. Welche Funktion haben die Halocyten in den Blattern der.Dicrani- aceae? Cryptog., Bryol., Lichenol. 18: 235-242 (In German, English summ.). — Perhaps combinationof differentfactors: dessication, evaporation, photosynthesis. -
'The Wet Tropics, Australia's Biological Crown Jewels'
SUSTAINING THE WET TROPICS: A REGIONAL PLAN FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT VOLUME 2A CONDITION REPORT: BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Nigel Weston1 and Steve Goosem1,2 1Rainforest CRC, Cairns 2Wet Tropics Management Authority, Cairns Established and supported under the Australian Cooperative Research Centres Program © Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, and FNQ NRM Ltd. ISBN 0 86443 711 0 This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without written permission of either the Chief Executive Officer, Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, or Executive Officer, FNQ NRM Ltd. Published by the Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. Further copies may be obtained from FNQ NRM Ltd, PO Box 1756, Innisfail, QLD, Australia, 4860. This publication should be cited as: Weston, N. and Goosem, S. (2004), Sustaining the Wet Tropics: A Regional Plan for Natural Resource Management, Volume 2A Condition Report: Biodiversity Conservation. Rainforest CRC and FNQ NRM Ltd, Cairns (211 pp). January 2004 Cover Photos: Top: Geoff McDonald Centre: Doug Clague Bottom: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority CONDITION REPORT: BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION i PREFACE Managing natural resources for sustainability and ecosystem health is an obligation of stakeholders at all levels. At the State and Commonwealth government level, there has been a shift over the last few years from the old project-based approach to strategic investment at a regional scale. -
Solomon Islands
Solomon Islands Sixth National Report to the United Nation Convention on Biological Diversity 2019 Ministry of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management & Meteorology Executive Summary The Solomon Islands Government, through the Ministry of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management & Meteorology (MECDM), is pleased to presents its Sixth Report on the implementation of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. A qualitative and a quantitative analysis have been pursued to ascertain the level of national contribution towards achieving of relevant customized Aichi Biodiversity Targets (ABTs) - the Solomon Islands Biodiversity targets. Solomon Islands became a party to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity through accession in 1995. Under Article 26 of the Convention, Parties are obliged to report on the measures taken for implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action plan (NBSAP) and including the level of their effectiveness. Been mandated to develop national reports every four years by The Conference of Parties (COP), the Solomon Islands has already submitted Five Reports. To support the development of its Sixth National Report, the Environment and Conservation Division (ECD), resolves that it is necessary to undertake an in-depth analysis on Plant Biodiversity, hence provide the relevant case study for reporting and evaluating targets pursued, nationally. The case study provides sufficient evaluative scope in accessing the Solomon Island contributions towards its adopted national -
State of Wet Tropics Report 2013-2014
STATE OF THE WET TROPICS REPORT 2013–2014 State of Wet Tropics Management Authority 2013-2014 Ancient, threatened and endemic plants of the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area Purpose of the report Each year the Wet Tropics Management Authority prepares a report on the administration of the Act during the year, fi nancial statements for the year, and a report on the state of Area. This State of Wet Tropics report satisfi es the requirements of Queensland’s Wet Tropics World Heritage Protection and Management Act 1993 and the Commonwealth’s Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Conservation Act 1994. Public availability This publication can be accessed and downloaded from our website at www.wettropics.gov.au Alternatively, hard copies of this publication can be obtained by emailing [email protected] Interpreter service statement The Wet Tropics Management Authority is committed to providing accessible services to people from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have diffi culty in understanding this report and need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Government Library Services on +61 7 3224 8412. © Wet Tropics Management Authority 2014 Licence This report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 Australia licence. CC BY Licence Summary Statement In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute the work to the Wet Tropics Management Authority. To view a copy of this licence, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Attribution Content from this annual report should be attributed as: Wet Tropics Management Authority (2014) State of Wet Tropics Report 2013/14: Ancient, threatened and endemic plants of the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area. -
Periodic Report Attachments
Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area September 2002 _________________________________________ Update of Original Wet Tropics of Queensland Nomination Dossier Stephen Goosem Wet Tropics Management Authority Cairns, Queensland. Australia. 4870. Description and Inventory Australia’s Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area covers 894,420ha. It is located in the north-east coastal region of the State of Queensland, where it extends from just south of Cooktown to just north of Townsville. The World Heritage Area comprises a large proportion of the 1,849,725 ha Wet Tropics biogeographic region (Thackway & Cresswell 1995; Goosem et al 1999). The rainforests of the Wet Tropics of Queensland are a relict of a vegetation type which was once much more widespread. Fossil pollen records have indicated that much of Australia was covered by closed forests some 50 to 100 million years ago. Australian rainforests are currently restricted to a series of discontinuous pockets extending for more than 6,000 km across northern Australia and along the east coast to Tasmania. Representatives of the sub-tropical and temperate rainforests are included in the Central Eastern Rainforests Reserve World Heritage Area in New South Wales and south-east Queensland and the cool temperate rainforests are included in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Australia has a total native forest area of almost 156 million hectares (National Land & Water Resources Audit 2001). With a land area of almost 769 million hectares, only about 20 per cent of the Australian continent is forested. It is estimated that rainforests currently cover just over 3.0 million hectares of Australia (National Land & Water Resources Audit 2001). -
Ecography ECOG-03849 Redmond, C
Ecography ECOG-03849 Redmond, C. M., Auga, J., Gewa, B., Segar, S. T., Miller, S. E., Molem, K., Weiblen, G. D., Butterill, P. T., Maiyah, G., Hood, A. S. C., Volf, M., Jorge, L. R., Basset, Y. and Novotný, V. 2019. High specialization and limited structural change in plant-herbivore networks along a successional chronosequence in tropical montane forest. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ ecog.03849 Supplementary material Appendix 1. Figure A1. A- Location map of the nine 0.2ha montane forest plots sampled in Yawan, Papua New Guinea. Blue squares = Young secondary, Red squares = Mature secondary and Green squares = Primary plots. B- Top right panel shows the location of Yawan on a map of Papua New Guinea marked as a red and white circle. Figure A2. Reconstructed plant phylogeny of a montane rainforest community in Papua New Guinea. Host phylogeny was reconstructed using two loci: rbcL, and psbA-trnH, with these sequences located in the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD). DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing was carried out at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding following standard protocols and administrated through the BOLD system. Existing sequences were sourced from online databases if available. Sequences were assembled and edited using Geneious 5.4 (Kearse et al. 2012). Host phylogeny was reconstructed using Bayesian inference as implemented in BEAST v2.4 (Drummond et al. 2012). The following substitution models were selected based on BIC computed in JModelTest 2 (Darriba et al. 2012) and were used for individual loci: rbcL: GTR+I+G, psbA-trnH: TIM1+I+G. The topology was constrained using Phylomatic 3 (Webb and Donoghue 2005). -
Phytophthora Species Diversity and Impacts of Dieback on Rainforest Canopies
RAINFOREST DIEBACK MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT Phytophthora species diversity and impacts of dieback on rainforest canopies Edited by Paul Gadek and Stuart Worboys. School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University Established and supported under the Australian Cooperative Research Centres Program © Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management and Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management. ISBN 0 68443 695 5 This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected pass- ages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without written permission of the Chief Executive Officer, CRC for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. Published by the Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. Further copies may be requested from the Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, James Cook University, PO Box 6811 Cairns, QLD, Australia 4870. This publication should be cited as: Gadek, P. and Worboys, S. (2003) Rainforest Dieback Mapping and Assessment: Phytophthora species diversity and impacts of dieback on rainforest canopies. Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. Rainforest CRC, Cairns. (114 pp) June 2003 TERMS OF REFERENCE This publication provides a report on the status of dieback studies in upland rainforest of the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area of North Queensland. The report focuses on field work undertaken over the period August 2001 – July 2002, and represents Stage 3 in a program of studies initiated in 1998.