arXiv:math/0305231v1 [math.CA] 16 May 2003 (1.1) o all for rprythat property hoe 1. Theorem o any for elcdb mle constant. smaller a by replaced hoe 2. Theorem (1.2) inequality the have we Then × on ue,Seilmeans. Special rules,            h olwn euti nw nteltrtr sOtosisieult [1 inequality Ostrowski’s as literature the in known is result following The n[] h uhrhspoe h olwn srwk yeinequality type Ostrowski following the proved has author the [2], In 1991 Date e od n phrases. and words Key ( NIEULT FOTOSITP I POMPEIU’S VIA TYPE OSTROWSKI OF INEQUALITY AN ,b a, ( 2 ( x x x eray2,2003. 27, February : ahmtc ujc Classification. Subject Mathematics

p ) x − − x f ilmasaegiven. quadratu are for means applications cial and theorem value mean Pompeiu’s Abstract. . ( x ∈ ( a a ∈ Let x ) )

− ) ( f [ L L ,b a, ,b a, − | A ( p p − p Let f x Let ( 1 ( + ) ′ ∈ b ) ) ] ,a x, ( ( . − , t − A ,a x, 1 f R ) nieult rvdn oebud o h nerlma vi mean integral the for bounds some providing inequality An hr for where h constant The f ≤ | { \ a ) [ : = b b ) − − − Z [ : ,b a, 1 K 0 A − M a } ( a x b ,b a, p b ENVLETHEOREM VALUE MEAN ( srwk’ nqaiy opi envleterm quadr theorem, value mean Pompeiu inequality, Ostrowski’s ( ] ) f n suethat assume and ,b a, ( Z b − o all for → L f a ( − ] t ′ b p p x =sup := ) := ) ) a → R f ( ) x dt ,x b, L ) 6= ( ecniuu on continuous be 1. t

L p p R ) u t b, ≤ a 1 4 ..DRAGOMIR S.S. ) − ( dt ∈ ∈ ,x b, Introduction − 1 + 2 ( eadffrnibempigon mapping differentiable a be sbs osbei h es hti antbe cannot it that sense the in possible best is

| a,b ( p ( K ( ≤ ,x b, b ,b a, | ) x ) rmr 61,2D0 eodr 41A55. Secondary 26D10; 26D15, Primary , ( p −  b   − ( 1 ) ) u − steaihei mean, arithmetic the is f 2 4 1 . − 1 a x ′ − ) + ) a Then p p x ) 2 L (

| ( p p x f x ( x ′ − ,a x, [ ( − b ,b a, − u A − ) A | ) ) a

] ) a + 2 with < b ! if if if ∞ 2 p p p   > a . erlsadspe- and rules re ∈ ∈ = ( b ( (0 − − 0 −∞ 1 , n differentiable and a ∞ , ) , ; ) ( M, − ,b a, 1) . ) ∪ a ihthe with ( − ]. 1 ature , 0) 2 S.S. DRAGOMIR

1 bp+1 ap+1 p Lp = Lp (a,b)= − , is the p logarithmic mean p R 1, 0 , (p +1)(b a) − ∈ \ {− }  −  and b a L = L (a,b) := − is the logarithmic mean. ln b ln a − Another result of this type obtained in the same paper is: Theorem 3. Let f :[a,b] R be continuous on [a,b] (with a > 0) and differen- tiable on (a,b) . If → P (f ′) := sup uf ′ (x) < , u∈(a,b) | | ∞ then we have the inequality − 1 b P (f ′) [I (x, b)]b x (1.3) f (x) f (t) dt ln x−a + 2 (x A) ln x − b a a ≤ b a " "[I (a, x)] # − # − Z − for any x (a,b) , where for a = b ∈ 6 1 1 bb b−a I = I (a,b) := , is the identric mean. e aa   If some local information around the point x (a,b) is available, then we may state the following result as well [2]. ∈ Theorem 4. Let f :[a,b] R be continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) . Let p (0, ) and assume,→ for a given x (a,b) , we have that ∈ ∞ ∈ 1−p ′ Mp (x) := sup x u f (u) < . u∈(a,b) | − | | | ∞ n o Then we have the inequality

1 b (1.4) f (x) f (t) dt − b a a − Z 1 p+1 p+1 (x a) + (b x) Mp (x) . ≤ p ( p +1)(b a) − − − h i For recent results in connection to Ostrowski’s inequality see the papers [3],[4] and the monograph [5]. The main aim of this paper is to provide some complementary results, where instead of using Cauchy mean value theorem, we use Pompeiu mean Value Theorem to evaluate the integral mean of an absolutely continuous function. Applications for quadrature rules and particular instances of functions are given as well.

2. Pompeiu’s Mean Value Theorem In 1946, Pompeiu [6] derived a variant of Lagrange’s mean value theorem, now known as Pompeiu’s mean value theorem (see also [7, p. 83]). Theorem 5. For every real valued function f differentiable on an interval [a,b] not containing 0 and for all pairs x1 = x2 in [a,b] , there exists a point ξ in (x1, x2) such that 6 x f (x ) x f (x ) (2.1) 1 2 − 2 1 = f (ξ) ξf ′ (ξ) . x x − 1 − 2 OSTROWSKITYPEINEQUALITES 3

1 1 Proof. Define a real valued function F on the interval b , a by 1   (2.2) F (t)= tf . t   1 1 Since f is differentiable on b , a and
1 1 1 (2.3) F ′ (t)= f f ′ , t − t t     then applying the mean value theorem to F on the interval [x, y] 1 , 1 we get ⊂ b a F (x) F (y)   (2.4) − = F ′ (η) x y − for some η (x, y) . Let x =∈1 , x = 1 and ξ = 1 . Then, since η (x, y) , we have 2 x 1 y η ∈ x1 <ξ

1 1 xf x yf y 1 1 1 − = f f ′ ,
x y   η − η η −     that is x f (x ) x f (x ) 1 2 − 2 1 = f (ξ) ξf ′ (ξ) . x x − 1 − 2 This completes the proof of the theorem.

Remark 1. Following [7, p. 84 – 85], we will mention here a geometrical inter- pretation of Pompeiu’s theorem. The equation of the secant line joining the points (x1,f (x1)) and (x2,f (x2)) is given by f (x ) f (x ) y = f (x )+ 2 − 1 (x x ) . 1 x x − 1 2 − 1 This line intersects the y axis at the point (0,y) , where y is − f (x ) f (x ) y = f (x )+ 2 − 1 (0 x ) 1 x x − 1 2 − 1 x f (x ) x f (x ) = 1 2 − 2 1 . x x 1 − 2 The equation of the tangent line at the point (ξ,f (ξ)) is y = (x ξ) f ′ (ξ)+ f (ξ) . − The tangent line intersects the y axis at the point (0,y) , where − y = ξf ′ (ξ)+ f (ξ) . − Hence, the geometric meaning of Pompeiu’s mean value theorem is that the tangent of the point (ξ,f (ξ)) intersects on the y axis at the same point as the secant line − connecting the points (x1,f (x1)) and (x2,f (x2)) . 4 S.S. DRAGOMIR

3. Evaluating the Integral Mean The following result holds.

Theorem 6. Let f :[a,b] R be continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) with [a,b] not containing 0.→Then for any x [a,b] , we have the inequality ∈ a + b f (x) 1 b (3.1) f (t) dt 2 · x − b a a − Z 2 b a 1 x a+b − + − 2 f ℓf ′ , ≤ x 4 b a  k − k∞ | | − !   where ℓ (t)= t, t [a,b] . ∈1 The constant 4 is sharp in the sense that it cannot be replaced by a smaller constant.

Proof. Applying Pompeiu’s mean value theorem, for any x, t [a,b] , there is a ξ between x and t such that ∈

tf (x) xf (t) = [f (ξ) ξf ′ (ξ)] (t x) − − − giving

(3.2) tf (x) xf (t) sup f (ξ) ξf ′ (ξ) x t | − |≤ ξ∈[a,b] | − | | − | = f ℓf ′ x t k − k∞ | − | for any t, x [a,b] . Integrating∈ over t [a,b] , we get ∈ b b b ′ (3.3) f (x) tdt x f (t) dt f ℓf ∞ x t dt a − a ≤k − k a | − | Z Z Z 2 2 ′ (x a) + (b x) = f ℓf ∞ − − k − k " 2 # 1 a + b 2 = f ℓf ′ (b a)2 + x k − k∞ 4 − − 2 "   #

b b2−a2 and since a tdt = 2 , we deduce from (3.3) the desired result (3.1). Now, assume that (3.2) holds with a constant k> 0, i.e., R a + b f (x) 1 b (3.4) f (t) dt 2 · x − b a a − Z 2 b a x a+b − k + − 2 f ℓf ′ , ≤ x  b a  k − k∞ | | − !   for any x [a,b] . ∈ OSTROWSKITYPEINEQUALITES 5

Consider f :[a,b] R, f (t)= αt + β; α, β =0. Then → 6 f ℓf ′ = β , k − k∞ | | 1 b a + b f (t) dt = α + β, b a 2 · − Za and by (3.4) we deduce

2 a + b β a + b b a x a+b α + α + β − k + − 2 β 2 x − 2 ≤ x  b a  | |     ! | | −   giving

2 a + b x a+b (3.5) x (b a) k + − 2 2 − ≤ − b a ! − for any x [a,b] . ∈ 1 If in (3.5) we let x = a or x = b, we deduce k 4 , and the sharpness of the constant is proved. ≥

The following interesting particular case holds.

Corollary 1. With the assumptions in Theorem 6, we have

b a + b 1 (b a) ′ (3.6) f f (t) dt − f ℓf ∞ . 2 − b a a ≤ 2 a + b k − k   − Z | |

4. The Case of Weighted Integrals We will consider now the weighted integral case.

Theorem 7. Let f :[a,b] R be continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) with [a,b] not containing 0. →If w :[a,b] R is nonnegative integrable on [a,b] , then for each x [a,b] , we have the inequality:→ ∈

b f (x) b (4.1) f (t) w (t) dt tw (t) dt a − x a Z Z

x b f ℓf ′ sgn(x) w (t) dt w (t) dt ≤k − k∞ − " Za Zx ! 1 b x + tw (t) dt tw (t) dt x − | | Zx Za !# 6 S.S. DRAGOMIR

Proof. Using the inequality (3.2), we have (4.2) b b f (x) tw (t) dt x f (t) w (t) dt a − a Z Z b ′ f ℓf ∞ w (t) x t dt ≤k − k | − | Za x b = f ℓf ′ w (t) (x t) dt + w (t) (t x) dt k − k∞ − − "Za Zx # x x b b = f ℓf ′ x w (t) dt tw (t) dt + tw (t) dt x w (t) dt k − k∞ − − " Za Za Zx Zx # x b b x = f ℓf ′ x w (t) dt w (t) dt + tw (t) dt tw (t) dt k − k∞ − − " Za Zx ! Zx Za # from where we get the desired inequality (4.1). Now, if we assume that 0 < a < b, then b tw (t) dt (4.3) a a b ≤ b ≤ R a w (t) dt b provided a w (t) dt > 0. R With this extra hypothesis, we may state the following corollary. R Corollary 2. With the above assumptions, we have

b b a tw (t) dt 1 (4.4) f b b f (t) w (t) dt w (t) dt ! − w (t) dt a R a a Z x b b x R R w (t) dt w (t) dt w (t) tdt tw (t) dt f ℓf ′ a − x + x − a ≤k − k∞ b b "R a w (tR) dt R a tw (tR) dt # 5. A QuadratureR Formula R We assume in the following that 0 < a < b. Consider the division of the interval [a,b] given by

In : a = x < x < < xn− < xn = b, 0 1 ··· 1 and ξi [xi, xi+1], i = 0,...,n 1 a sequence of intermediate points. Define the quadrature∈ − n−1 2 2 f (ξi) xi+1 xi (5.1) Sn (f, In, ξ) := − ξ · 2 i=0 i X n−1 f (ξi) xi + xi+1 = hi, ξ · 2 · i=0 i X where hi := xi+1 xi, i =0,...,n 1. The following result− concerning the− estimate of the remainder in approximating b the integral a f (t) dt by the use of Sn (f, In, ξ) holds. R OSTROWSKITYPEINEQUALITES 7

Theorem 8. Assume that f :[a,b] R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) . Then we have the representation→

b (5.2) f (t) dt = Sn (f, In, ξ)+ Rn (f, In, ξ) Za where Sn (f, In, ξ) is as defined in (5.1), and the remainder Rn (f, In, ξ) satisfies the estimate

− 2 n 1 2 xi+xi+1 ′ hi 1 ξi 2 (5.3) Rn (f, In, ξ) f ℓf ∞ + − | |≤k − k ξ 4 hi  i=0 i X n−1  n− 1  1 h2 f ℓf ′ f ℓf ′ i k − k∞ h2. ≤ 2 k − k∞ ξ ≤ 2a i i=0 i i=0 X X Proof. Apply Theorem 6 on the interval [xi, xi+1] for the intermediate points ξi to obtain

xi+1 f (ξi) xi + xi+1 (5.4) f (t) dt hi − ξ · 2 · Zxi i 2 xi+xi+1 1 2 1 ξi 2 ′ hi + − f ℓf ∞ ≤ ξi  4 hi !  k − k

1 2 ′ 1 2  ′ hi f ℓf ∞ hi f ℓf ∞ ≤ 2ξi k − k ≤ 2a k − k for each i 0,...,n 1 . Summing∈{ over i from− 1} to n 1 and using the generalised triangle inequality, we deduce the desired estimate (5.3).−

xi+xi+1 Now, if we consider the mid-point rule (i.e., we choose ξi = 2 above, i 0,...,n 1 ) ∈{ − } n− 1 x + x M (f, I ) := f i i+1 h , n n 2 i i=0 X   then, by Corollary 1, we may state the following result as well.

Corollary 3. With the assumptions of Theorem 8, we have

b (5.5) f (t) dt = Mn (f, In)+ Rn (f, In) , Za where the remainder satisfies the estimate:

′ n−1 2 f ℓf ∞ hi (5.6) Rn (f, In) k − k | |≤ 2 xi + xi i=0 +1 X− f ℓf ′ n 1 k − k∞ h2. ≤ 4a i i=0 X 8 S.S. DRAGOMIR

6. Applications for Special Means For 0 < a < b, let us consider the means a + b A = A (a,b) := , 2 G = G (a,b) := √a b, · 2 H = H (a,b) := 1 1 , a + b b a L = L (a,b) := − (logarithmic mean), ln b ln a − 1 1 bb b−a I = I (a,b) := (identric mean) e aa   and the p logarithmic mean − 1 bp+1 ap+1 p Lp = Lp (a,b)= − , p R 1, 0 . (p +1)(b a) ∈ \ {− }  −  It is well known that H G L I A, ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ and, denoting L0 := I and L−1 = L, the function R p Lp R is monotonic increasing. ∋ 7→ ∈ In the following we will use the following inequality obtained in Corollary 1,

b a + b 1 (b a) ′ (6.1) f f (t) dt − f ℓf ∞ , 2 − b a a ≤ 2 (a + b) k − k   − Z provided 0 < a < b.

(1) Consider the function f :[a,b] (0, ) R, f (t) = tp, p R 1, 0 . Then ⊂ ∞ → ∈ \ {− } a + b f = [A (a,b)]p , 2   1 b f (t) dt = Lp (a,b) , b a p − Za (1 p) ap if p ( , 0) 1 , f ℓf ′ = − ∈ −∞ \ {− } [a,b],∞  k − k 1 p bp if p (0, 1) (1, ) .  | − | ∈ ∪ ∞ Consequently, by (6.1) we deduce

(6.2) Ap (a,b) Lp (a,b) − p p (1 p) a (b a) − − if p ( , 0) 1 , A (a,b) ∈ −∞ \ {− } 1  ≤ 4 ×  p  1 p b (b a)  | − | − if p (0, 1) (1, ) . A (a,b) ∈ ∪ ∞    OSTROWSKITYPEINEQUALITES 9

(2) Consider the function f :[a,b] (0, ) R, f (t)= 1 . Then ⊂ ∞ → t a + b 1 f = , 2 A (a,b)   1 b 1 f (t) dt = , b a L (a,b) − Za 2 f ℓf ′ = . k − k[a,b],∞ a Consequently, by (6.1) we deduce b a (6.3) 0 A (a,b) Lp (a,b) − L (a,b) . ≤ − ≤ 2a (3) Consider the function f :[a,b] (0, ) R, f (t) = ln t. Then ⊂ ∞ → a + b f = ln [A (a,b)] , 2   1 b f (t) dt = ln [I (a,b)] , b a − Za a b f ℓf ′ = max ln , ln . k − k[a,b],∞ e e       Consequently, by (6.1) we deduce

A (a,b) b a a b (6.4) 1 exp − max ln , ln . ≤ I (a,b) ≤ 4A (a,b) e e        References

[1] A. OSTROWSKI, Uber¨ die Absolutabweichung einer differentienbaren Funktionen von ihren Integralmittelwert, Comment. Math. Hel, 10 (1938), 226-227. [2] S.S. DRAGOMIR, Some new inequalities of Ostrowski type, RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll., 5(2002), Supplement, Article 11, [ON LINE:http://rgmia.vu.edu.au/v5(E).html]to apper in Gazette, Austral. Math. Soc. [3] G. A. ANASTASSIOU, Multidimensional Ostrowski inequalities, revisited. Acta Math. Hun- gar., 97 (2002), no. 4, 339–353. [4] G. A. ANASTASSIOU, Univariate Ostrowski inequalities, revisited. Monatsh. Math., 135 (2002), no. 3, 175–189. [5] S.S. DRAGOMIR and T.M. RASSIAS (Eds), Ostrowski Type Inequalities and Applications in Numerical Integration, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2002. [6] D. POMPEIU, Sur une proposition analogue au th´eor`eme des accroissements finis, Mathemat- ica (Cluj, Romania), 22(1946), 143-146. [7] P.K. SAHOO and T. RIEDEL, Mean Value Theorems and Functional Equations, World Sci- entific, Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong, 2000.

School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Victoria University of Technology, PO Box 14428, MCMC 8001, VIC, Australia. E-mail address: [email protected] URL: http://rgmia.vu.edu.au/SSDragomirWeb.html