DOCSLIB.ORG

"Canoe Routes of Algonquin Provincial Park" Map

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A P R National m a 46˚ Boom R Deposit u 10' Cr 20' 10' 00' Ra a Lalonde L East Thompson L 30' 10' ilw t 40' L Canadian ay b Lauder 50' Thompson o Rankin s le i s 78˚ 79˚ 79˚ 78˚ 78˚ Curly 78˚ L 78˚ L Cr d L C Fork MATTAWA Holden u r Moorberry L ut L 630 b 24 KM West N r Raps F a Keswil Boulter L B o Lauder Aumond n Aumond L Thompson d Little Thompson Cr R L L Lake Barbe L R Cr P420 Whisper Hurdman Barbut Lena North Martin 29 L Keswil Cr Big Poplar L L W R H L L o Shad L lfe Dam Kiosk Islandnil Wildgoose Linear Deux-Rivières Clara 46˚ L Dufond Farm cleared by Francis and Ba Campground 00' y Hurdman L P1025 Shada Muir L L Aumond L PO 17 Moose P120 Ignace Dufond in the1880s. Briefly L a k eKioshkokwi means L prosperous with logging camp market, 303 m i Carpenter Bay Cr Fassett o k w "lake of many gulls" in Stove Boon it was abandoned when Ignace h k Cr W L L P1325 died in 1916. Chattahoochee s Algonkin. The name Wrights L L P1190 ble o Cr H a du L i holds true today. Dumond Houghton L Pond Tyne Am F K Fassett L P200 Cr o P730 L Cr n Raps Balsam Mart L on H Raps d Brain s Big Gibson P1620 Litt Mink L b OTTAWA L P155 i Kuwasda R L P805 Hydro-Electric Leatherleaf R Raps L P165 P100 Greenbough G L Little Tyne L Pine Cr Mattowacka L P450 R R Villeneuv I P275 Raps R e L L P200 P775 P1300 P25 Gibson L Dam Kakasamic CrP200 Kakasamic Cr Lake Tyne Whitebirch Stretch Keewaydin L Ka Span L P455 kas Manitou Maple Mink L Widgeon E L ami 28 Crystalline Aylen c Cr L P300 Alder Clara L Power Parisien Cr L L Parisien L P190 Cauchon Cr Durrell 344 m Lake Brain A huge area in this part of L P1535 P90 Raps West Algonquin was burned by two Rit L P630 Lake Holden Ascalon L Corbeau great fires in 1922 and 1923. Morin L Baimwawa Big Swamp P320 Cr Québec Part of a swath P2800 MacGibbon Cr Little L L Lorne L Nebanawbaig P120 Paddy L 00' L P805 L Goosander Cr Corkery 11 km long Rainbow L P165 Reindeer S Rocher Capitaine L 78˚ Villeneuve Bernard I Edwards P730 flattened by a Waterclear Cauchon L Goosander L Unktahee Little Mums Commision Lake Cornick L P130 L L L L tornado on L P440 L P80 L L Rinne North Bissett Creek Cr Sisco August 27, 1973. N Sylvia Cr Ratrap P1190 L Lost Dog Scud L River Pat P2010 L Lorne P1920 P410 L Dahinda Minnewawa P500 L P240 L Whittla orbeau Maraboo L L Maki L orth C 1 L L Three Boggy Daventry N PO Billys Cr L P440 Loxley Hurdman L L du F P730 P550 P1135 P2650 Kangas L e ble ond P455 Maple 325 m Tower L n L ma Raps L Jackson L u A t Club L r R N Duhaime P135 P255 370 m L Little Laurel Cr o PROVINCE F PROVINCE S Arrow L L N Cr Mile y L P130 Sable Hondoo l P80 Cauchon P10 Mousseau a Wib L v P1180 L o Coming back or travelling i Cr Gilmour and Tecumseh Lakes Nadon L L I a P290 L r 381 m L P45 Adelard L P830 lie in the basin of the t L 10' west take left branch. P640 Windermere L P130 P180 h Kawawaymog P275 Aura Lee Brent Crater, still visible from RIVER Namea "Erables" is French Mouse Dam C Adelard 79˚ taire Lake Wet L Beaverly L Soli C Dendroica Gouinlock L the air 450 million years after R o P1470 Mangotasi L for "maples" r Boyd rb Lake L the explosion of a giant meteorite. L 26 e 25 Ontario L North Tea Lake L L P1070 P485 a P1125 Cr u Genack L McSourley Cayuga L Erables Tecumseh Corbeau L Manabezi Upper Dam P1700 Little Cedar L P1235 L P320 Kawa Wahwahtaysee Brant L L Grants Mink Spotter L Jeepi R P240 L Bug L P820 L Wendigo Creek Ama L Gilmour L ble Hornbeam Kawa L P763 One Mile Lake P410 Government Park P200 Bay d P90 R P810 P760 r P1105 North Cr u L L Ironwood S P960 P805 L C F P630 P140 P1645 h o Cr Ewayea Maple L r Powell L n Sinclair P230 Solitaire i River Lake d Charr L P2190 n u Lake Pipe L Ewayea L L Totem L Punch L P405 g o rth Stoney Pichette R Big L e m Brent Crater Trail o Cr Creek OF P230 372 m P475 P480 Gilmour r l N L i i P75 L OF Craig P560 Sawbill P485 P660 Thunder I s G R P1830 P180 Snow L Mud L Logslide L Cr Pishnecka L Judy Cr Carl Muskwa L Meda H Birchcliffe L Elsie P90 R Spencers L Stonecliffe L Cr P660 Allan k Grants Grants P870 Lismer Cr Rana P80 Merganser c PO L L Cr P225 L Gull Pan L a 50' P90 Devil Glacier R l Piglet Creek Dam P940 Biggar Lake L L B R Perch L Holden South P155 Pauwatine P720 L Ghost L P1570 Big Bissett L Marsh Tillie L L L Wilson P500 P2700 Lake 77˚ Skuce P1425 Shingeris L Except in spring, low water conditions Craig L L Cr Raven P240 P880 L Wabamimi Raps P2010 Spa L P620 P420 Peboan Owlet L make travel difficult from Nahma P605 N Raps P260 P200 L Camp Bluebill L L Little Wabamimi Big Bissett Lake to Weasel Lake. 24 Driftwood P200 Loughrin Raven L L Decoy L Christopher P90 Bopeep L P550 Upp Five 27 Ghost L Raps Lake Smith L L Birchcliffe Coral-root P365 er 346 m Owl L P345 Stranger Litt Nadine L Beau P1235 Brent Campground P255 Robin L Bay QUEBEC Craig Cr Bouillon L L N L P845 Wabamimi ONTARIO L P1190 a H DRIFTWOOD L Bouillon Litt Osler d L North Cliff L Menet L in Brent Store Chela Kabibonoka P360 L ett Dunns L PROV. PARK Cr e P300 Varley L iss Cr Cr River Nokomis Cr Calm L Belle L L L B Blimkie Horseshoe Marys P2560 Cr L P980 P870 Mishimokwa P865 Depot Cranberry L L Basil L is J E H L Cr Bissett L H een e y okom Osler Cr C E D A R P805 L Dam Sally N Macdonald Nadine P230 Acanthus L Stringer Nadi 307 m Tigger L ne L L th Mag L L P1020 Jolly P1765 C Lake r P275 Raps P640 L r ing Dam P915 o t Cr L L Lake Axton L P120 Burt L L Dam P110 iss River P2575 N t P155 P375 P785 Little L L ip Acanthus George P450 P190 se P140 Loughrin Lawren N s P290 Berwick 45˚ The South River is one of a Osler P1410 F P715 i P100 P275 Pooh L 17 Mackey 50' Cr P365 R P1510 I Weasel B L Dam half dozen major Harris L Behan L P180 McKenna Oliver L Pemican L Ozawabrek P20 Casque L Ravenau L I Big George P180 Jims Marsh Puffball Sweezy Bay River Dam R L Conway watercourses which drain off P1510 L Eeyore L L Cr Mackeys Station L Nid Linnet Loughrin P685 L Raps L Cr L Dunlop L L the Algonquin dome to the The machinery from an L A K E P770 Stans Marsh L r Gibson L Cr Cr Raps Cr C P825 L L Alligator a steam warping R P2285 P1865 L M surrounding lowlands. Zema n L a P255 P960 Dam ac o P495 South Osler Cr tug used for towing log w F Petawawa Lafrenieres L k P110 L s P2835 Lantern L wa P685 P1250 Blackbass ey Dam b P340 ta ey i P2220 Barred Kelly South Osler booms, and capable Pe Raps Devils Wee George L Collins L Keyes ck H.E.P.C. G Stacks Raps R L a Sahwa L Nod L P10 Plumb of winching itself Dam Chute Grants L Des Joachims Wabanah Owl L L L R R M Gash L overland remains here. Raps (F.8') Menona Menona P230 P500 Power Dev L P90 P1950 K P860 P1810 Raps Wren Reed Jennings Colton L 635 el g Luckless R P2345 Esker Garreau ly sin P80 L P230 Chateau Dam P915 P155 P840 is R R North Bukadawin L Trail L L South D River C P1300 Nip r River L L Oval P345 P2715 L P170 Harvey Cr r P365 Dam P850 P410 F C P310 L Dam P595 Raps L L Rolphton Cr Dam High R s P60 Gunning P495 R Dam oe Shoal P135 Alco L Fitz Grants L PO n Rapids Raps Falls Plumb g lle Narrowbag L i Cr P1555 Clamshell Soldier L A odee Cr Cr L P45 sk d Squawk Coldspring i P2650 L Gum L L Creek PEMBROKE M n Twosound R Creation Browse Cr L L P380 Cart Roney Paxton L P2470 e Litt P20 Devon L nd L L Macoun L Miskodee Pukina L P1895 Tayler L 59 KM fla g L Kennedy Lynx Catfish W R Gerald L l P Cap L Ducknest Max 46˚ 10' o n P1930 Nenemousha l Stephen L i o L Jennings Cr W Junco L Kagagee L Waymuk L North s L P705 Wendigoes Nenemousha Cr v L L Moor L P365 s Remona Robinson L L e i P2170 L r Cr Otterpaw L Rouge Mujekiwis Beaverpaw Chemung L L L 387 m Tee 40' p Yellow Birch P1450 Dam Way L P180 i P480 L C L C P385 L P275 Winifred P110 Beaverpaw Vulture L Coldspring Pukina Snipe r North Otter L Manard L an L N P645 278 m Dorami a Towinee P25 Hayes North Cuckoo d 77˚ L Cr L Nenemousha L ia L L P1285 Lister L L Rockery Harvey Mossberry n L P90 L Cr Snowbird Whiskeyjack L Cr R P10 P925 L Plover Southwind L o Trout L Togo L L L L Lake Radiant Lake u Cr L L Wolfland L Shag Loontail Birch Bay Snowshoe Odenback L East L g Portal Rapids P90 Cr e Rock L Big Bob Redhead P420 Raps Dam derella Folly L Osseo L Squirrel Plover P365 R Bates L in P235 Moor Lake P200 L Whistle P320 P365 Owenee R L Head L P155 Perley Bird L C Folly A grave site Dam Deerhorn L Rat L y Wylie Lee PO Yellowbird L a Cedar Raps Alco Lost Coin la Hiah Hiawatha L Cr L P695 d Cr Cr L D P65 Lake aw Catfish Raps containing Radiant Beaver Lature n L L Grass L L w Owenee Big Sawyer and L R i P790 P55 L Shag eta Sunfish River casualties of the F Sand Pacific R R Hag L Whistle P Cinderella Battery Raps Grillade Rapids L L Patersons West W Cr Nipissing Cr D est Koko L L hazardous log R I V E R P130 Crooked L P65 R P240 L Bay L e L Koko Pond P100 P1105 P70 O e P425 River Cr Cr P3565 drives, and some Cap r Chute P820 L aha Cascade Raps h Big Thompson Findlay Lazy Indian Pipe P200 Wehawe h ka t o o Coldspring e Newt L as D early park visitors.
Recommended publications
  • Rideau Canal National Historic Site of Canada

    Rideau Canal National Historic Site of Canada

    Rideau Canal national historic site of canada Management Plan Copyright Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2005 Government of Canada Catalogue No. R64-257/2005E ISBN: 0-662-33356-X Aussi disponible en français Rideau Canal national historic site of canada Management Plan May 2005 Lt. Col. John By, Royal Engineers; Royal Engineers Museum of Military Engineering Gillingham, U.K. If ever a man deserved to be immortalized in this utilitarian age, it was Lieutenant Colonel By. In an unexplored part of the country, where the only mode of progress was the frail Indian canoe, with a department to be organized, workmen to be instructed and many difficulties to overcome, he constructed a truly remarkable work. (Captain Richard Bonnycastle of the Royal Engineers, London, 1842) RIDEAU CANAL NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA Management Plan Foreword Canada’s national historic sites, national parks and national marine conservation areas represent the soul of our country. They are a central part of who we are and what we are. They are places of beauty and wonder and heritage. Each tells its own story. Together, they connect Canadians to our roots, to our future and to each other. We see a future in which each of the national historic sites of Canada, whether federally owned or not, enjoys sound commemorative health, and in which our system of sites evolves as our country evolves. Our national historic sites will be places for all Canadians to experience and learn from. They will help our communities to be vibrant and creative, and contribute to our efforts to revitalize Canada’s cities.
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared

    Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared

    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
  • 2.6 Settlement Along the Ottawa River

    2.6 Settlement Along the Ottawa River

    INTRODUCTION 76 2.6 Settlement Along the Ottawa River In spite of the 360‐metre drop of the Ottawa Figure 2.27 “The Great Kettle”, between its headwaters and its mouth, the river has Chaudiere Falls been a highway for human habitation for thousands of years. First Nations Peoples have lived and traded along the Ottawa for over 8000 years. In the 1600s, the fur trade sowed the seeds for European settlement along the river with its trading posts stationed between Montreal and Lake Temiskaming. Initially, French and British government policies discouraged settlement in the river valley and focused instead on the lucrative fur trade. As a result, settlement did not occur in earnest until the th th late 18 and 19 centuries. The arrival of Philemon Source: Archives Ontario of Wright to the Chaudiere Falls and the new British trend of importing settlers from the British Isles marked the beginning of the settlement era. Farming, forestry and canal building complemented each other and drew thousands of immigrants with the promise of a living wage. During this period, Irish, French Canadians and Scots arrived in the greatest numbers and had the most significant impact on the identity of the Ottawa Valley, reflected in local dialects and folk music and dancing. Settlement of the river valley has always been more intensive in its lower stretches, with little or no settlement upstream of Lake Temiskaming. As the fur trade gave way to farming, settlers cleared land and encroached on First Nations territory. To supplement meagre agricultural earnings, farmers turned to the lumber industry that fuelled the regional economy and attracted new waves of settlers.
  • Comparative Analysis of Ecological and Cultural Protection Schemes Within a Transboundary Complex: the Crown of the Continent

    Comparative Analysis of Ecological and Cultural Protection Schemes Within a Transboundary Complex: the Crown of the Continent

    Comparative Analysis of Ecological and Cultural Protection Schemes within a Transboundary Complex: The Crown of the Continent A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning In the School of Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning by Keysha Fontaine B.S. University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2013 Committee Chair: Craig M. Vogel, MID Committee Advisor: Danilo Palazzo, Ph.D, M.Arch ABSTRACT Protected areas are critical elements in restoring historical wildlife migration routes, as well as, maintaining historical cultural practices and traditions. The designations created for protected areas represent a cultural and/or natural aspect of the land. However, designations for the protection of these resources fail to include measures to take into account the ecological processes needed to sustain them. Ecological processes are vital elements in sustaining cultural resources, because most cultural resources are the derivatives of the interactions with natural resources. In order to sustain natural resources, especially wildlife, the processes of fluctuating habitat change and migration are pivotal in maintaining genetic diversity to maintain healthy populations with the fittest surviving. The survival of the fittest species allow populations to have greater adaptability in the face of climate change. Currently in the Crown of the Continent (COC), several non-profit organizations are collaborating under an umbrella initiative, the Yellowstone to Yukon Initiative, to restore historical migration routes. The collaborators of this initiative performed ecological planning of the entire Yellowstone to Yukon region to identify impediments that may hinder wildlife movements.
  • Quaternary Geology of the Long Point-Port Burwell Area; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5873, 212P

    Quaternary Geology of the Long Point-Port Burwell Area; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5873, 212P

    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the "Content") is governed by the terms set out on this page ("Terms of Use"). By downloading this Content, you (the "User") have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario's Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an "as-is" basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the "Owner").
  • Impact Cratering

    Impact Cratering

    6 Impact cratering The dominant surface features of the Moon are approximately circular depressions, which may be designated by the general term craters … Solution of the origin of the lunar craters is fundamental to the unravel- ing of the history of the Moon and may shed much light on the history of the terrestrial planets as well. E. M. Shoemaker (1962) Impact craters are the dominant landform on the surface of the Moon, Mercury, and many satellites of the giant planets in the outer Solar System. The southern hemisphere of Mars is heavily affected by impact cratering. From a planetary perspective, the rarity or absence of impact craters on a planet’s surface is the exceptional state, one that needs further explanation, such as on the Earth, Io, or Europa. The process of impact cratering has touched every aspect of planetary evolution, from planetary accretion out of dust or planetesimals, to the course of biological evolution. The importance of impact cratering has been recognized only recently. E. M. Shoemaker (1928–1997), a geologist, was one of the irst to recognize the importance of this process and a major contributor to its elucidation. A few older geologists still resist the notion that important changes in the Earth’s structure and history are the consequences of extraterres- trial impact events. The decades of lunar and planetary exploration since 1970 have, how- ever, brought a new perspective into view, one in which it is clear that high-velocity impacts have, at one time or another, affected nearly every atom that is part of our planetary system.
  • Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Variants of Concern, Canada

    Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Variants of Concern, Canada

    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.28.21259420; this version posted July 3, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against variants of concern, Canada Authors: Sharifa Nasreen PhD1, Siyi He MSc1, Hannah Chung MPH1, Kevin A. Brown PhD1,2,3, Jonathan B. Gubbay MD MSc3, Sarah A. Buchan PhD1,2,3,4, Sarah E. Wilson MD MSc1,2,3,4, Maria E. Sundaram PhD1,2, Deshayne B. Fell PhD1,5,6, Branson Chen MSc1, Andrew Calzavara MSc1, Peter C. Austin PhD1,7, Kevin L. Schwartz MD MSc1,2,3, Mina Tadrous PharmD PhD1,8, Kumanan Wilson MD MSc9, and Jeffrey C. Kwong MD MSc1,2,3,4,10,11 on behalf of the Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Provincial Collaborative Network (PCN) Investigators Affiliations: 1 ICES, Toronto, ON 2 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 3 Public Health Ontario, ON 4 Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 5 School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, ON 6 Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON 7 Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 8 Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON 9 Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa and Bruyere Hospital Research Institutes, Ottawa, ON 10 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 11 University Health Network, Toronto, ON Corresponding author: 1 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
  • National Park System Plan

    National Park System Plan

    National Park System Plan 39 38 10 9 37 36 26 8 11 15 16 6 7 25 17 24 28 23 5 21 1 12 3 22 35 34 29 c 27 30 32 4 18 20 2 13 14 19 c 33 31 19 a 19 b 29 b 29 a Introduction to Status of Planning for National Park System Plan Natural Regions Canadian HeritagePatrimoine canadien Parks Canada Parcs Canada Canada Introduction To protect for all time representa- The federal government is committed to tive natural areas of Canadian sig- implement the concept of sustainable de- nificance in a system of national parks, velopment. This concept holds that human to encourage public understanding, economic development must be compatible appreciation and enjoyment of this with the long-term maintenance of natural natural heritage so as to leave it ecosystems and life support processes. A unimpaired for future generations. strategy to implement sustainable develop- ment requires not only the careful manage- Parks Canada Objective ment of those lands, waters and resources for National Parks that are exploited to support our economy, but also the protection and presentation of our most important natural and cultural ar- eas. Protected areas contribute directly to the conservation of biological diversity and, therefore, to Canada's national strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. Our system of national parks and national historic sites is one of the nation's - indeed the world's - greatest treasures. It also rep- resents a key resource for the tourism in- dustry in Canada, attracting both domestic and foreign visitors.
  • Preserving Wild Country Along the Pigeon River

    Preserving Wild Country Along the Pigeon River

    Wilderness News FROM THE QUETICO SUPERIOR FOUNDATION SPRING 2002 VOYAGEURS NATIONAL PARK quetico superior country The Quetico Superior Foundation, established in 1946, encourages and supports the protection of the ecological, cultural and historical resources of the Quetico Superior region. “Here [in the Quetico] the values of aboriginal society and of white society are merging to ensure that there will be a wilderness to pass Horne Falls area on the Pigeon River on to our children and to their children. Knowing the past, they will want to honor, respect and Preserving Wild Country Along take care of it.” – Shirley Peruniak the Pigeon River By Diane Rose, Wilderness News Contributor; Photography by Tom Duffus The Nature Conservancy of Minnesota is making two land purchases that will help preserve the scenery, history and unusual ecosystem of the Pigeon River border area between Minnesota and Ontario. Wilderness News In early March – with help from its independent part- la verendrye provincial park pigeon river Published by the Quetico Superior Foundation ner, Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC), Ontario provincial park Frederick Winston, President Provincial Parks and a Quetico Superior Foundation Charles A. Kelly, Vice President Pigeon River contribution – the Conservancy purchased the last Middle Falls Dodd B. Cosgrove, Secretary-Treasurer Walter E. Pratt, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer unprotected seven miles of river frontage on the CANADA U.S.A. James C. Wyman, Treasurer Canadian side of the river from the Purnell family of grand portage indian reservation Directors Milwaukee. The 750-acre purchase, known as Horne Falls, extends from LaVerendrye Provincial Park to horne falls Jonathan S.
  • History of Toronto from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia the History of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Begins Several Millennia Ago

    History of Toronto from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia the History of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Begins Several Millennia Ago

    History of Toronto From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The history of Toronto, Ontario, Canada begins several millennia ago. Archaeological finds in the area have found artifacts of First Nations settlements dating back several thousand years. The Wyandot people were likely the first group to live in the area, followed by the Iroquois. When Europeans first came to Toronto, they found a small village known as Teiaiagon on the banks of the Humber River. Between visits by European explorers, the village was abandoned by the Iroquois, who moved south of Lake Ontario and the Mississaugas, a branch of the Ojibwa settled along the north shore of the lake. The French first set up trading posts in the area, including Fort Rouillé in 1750, which they abandoned as the British conquered French North America. In 1788, the British negotiated the first treaty to take possession of the Toronto area from the Mississaugas. After the United States War of Independence, the area north of Lake Ontario was held by the British who set up the province of Upper Canada in 1791. See also: Name of Toronto https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DavenportBathurstSoutheast.jpg Davenport Road, as shown here in 1914, does not follow Toronto's standard street grid pattern, as it originated as a First Nations travel route between the Humber River and the Don Valley named Gete-Onigaming, Ojibwe for "at the old portage."[1] Toronto is located on the northern shore of Lake Ontario, and was originally a term of indeterminate geographical location, designating the approximate area of the future city of Toronto on maps dating to the late 17th and early 18th century.
  • CANADIAN PARKS and PROTECTED AREAS: Helping Canada Weather Climate Change

    CANADIAN PARKS and PROTECTED AREAS: Helping Canada Weather Climate Change

    CANADIAN PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS: Helping Canada weather climate change Report of the Canadian Parks Council Climate Change Working Group Report prepared by The Canadian Parks Council Climate Change Working Group for the Canadian Parks Council Citation: Canadian Parks Council Climate Change Working Group. 2013. Canadian Parks and Protected Areas: Helping Canada Weather Climate Change. Parks Canada Agency on behalf of the Canadian Parks Council. 52 pp. CPC Climate Change Working Group members Karen Keenleyside (Chair), Parks Canada Linda Burr (Consultant), Working Group Coordinator Tory Stevens and Eva Riccius, BC Parks Cameron Eckert, Yukon Parks Jessica Elliott, Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship Melanie Percy and Peter Weclaw, Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Rob Wright, Saskatchewan Tourism and Parks Karen Hartley, Ontario Parks Alain Hébert and Patrick Graillon, Société des établissements de plein air du Québec Rob Cameron, Nova Scotia Environment, Protected Areas Doug Oliver, Nova Scotia Natural Resources Jeri Graham and Tina Leonard, Newfoundland and Labrador Parks and Natural Areas Christopher Lemieux, Canadian Council on Ecological Areas Mary Rothfels, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Olaf Jensen and Jean-François Gobeil, Environment Canada Acknowledgements The CPC Climate Change Working Group would like to thank the following people for their help and advice in preparing this report: John Good (CPC Executive Director); Sheldon Kowalchuk, Albert Van Dijk, Hélène Robichaud, Diane Wilson, Virginia Sheehan, Erika Laanela, Doug Yurick, Francine Mercier, Marlow Pellat, Catherine Dumouchel, Donald McLennan, John Wilmshurst, Cynthia Ball, Marie-Josée Laberge, Julie Lefebvre, Jeff Pender, Stephen Woodley, Mikailou Sy (Parks Canada); Paul Gray (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources); Art Lynds (Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources).
  • Fundy National Park 2011 Management Plan

    Fundy National Park 2011 Management Plan

    Fundy National Park of Canada Management Plan NOVEMBER 2011 Fundy National Park of Canada Management Plan ii © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2011. Cette publication est aussi disponible en français. National Library of Canada cataloguing in publication data: Parks Canada Fundy National Park of Canada management plan [electronic resource]. Electronic monograph in PDF format. Issued also in French under the title: Parc national du Canada Fundy, plan directeur. Issued also in printed form. ISBN 978-1-100-13552-6 Cat. no.: R64-105/80-2010E-PDF 1. Fundy National Park (N.B.)—Management. 2. National parks and reserves—New Brunswick—Management. 3. National parks and reserves—Canada—Management. I. Title. FC2464 F85 P37 2010 971.5’31 C2009-980240-6 For more information about the management plan or about Fundy National Park of Canada: Fundy National Park of Canada P.O. Box 1001, Fundy National Park, Alma, New Brunswick Canada E4H 1B4 tel: 506-887-6000, fax: 506-887-6008 e-mail: [email protected] www.parkscanada.gc.ca/fundy Front Cover top images: Chris Reardon, 2009 bottom image: Chris Reardon, 2009 Fundy National Park of Canada iii Management Plan Foreword Canada’s national historic sites, national parks and national marine conservation areas are part of a century-strong Parks Canada network which provides Canadians and visitors from around the world with unique opportunities to experience and embrace our wonderful country. From our smallest national park to our most visited national historic site to our largest national marine conservation area, each of Canada’s treasured places offers many opportunities to enjoy Canada’s historic and natural heritage.