Toward Coherent Federal Oversight of Medicine
ZETTLER FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 7/27/2015 1:55 PM Toward Coherent Federal Oversight of Medicine PATRICIA J. ZETTLER* ABSTRACT The conventional wisdom in U.S. health law and policy holds that states regulate medical practice—the activities of physicians and other health care professionals—while the federal government regulates medical products. But relying on states as the principal regulators of medical practice has, at times, driven law and policy in directions that are problematic from a public health perspective, as demonstrated by a deadly 2012 outbreak of fungal meningitis that was linked to a primarily state- regulated practice known as drug compounding. This Article argues that the federalism concerns underlying the conventional wisdom are misplaced. It demonstrates that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the federal government is deeply entangled in regulating medical practice, and such federal regulation is lawful. After examining the goals of federalism within the context of medicine, this Article proposes an alternate paradigm for guiding decisions about when the federal government should be involved in overseeing medicine: Congress and administrative agencies * © 2015 Patricia J. Zettler. The author is a an Associate Professor at Georgia State University College of Law. She served as an attorney in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Chief Counsel from 2009 to 2013. The author would like to thank Jonathan Abel, Hank Greely, Daniel Ho, Cathy Hwang, Matthew Jordan, Dmitry Karshtedt, Bernard Lo, Paul Lombardo, Eleanor Mayer, Michelle Mello, Seema Shah, Jacob Sherkow, Kayte Spector-Bagdaddy, David Studdert, and the Stanford Law School Fellows for their helpful comments and critiques.
[Show full text]