Daniela Urbanová Latin Curse Tablets of the Roman Empire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daniela Urbanová Latin Curse Tablets of the Roman Empire INNSBRUCKER BEITRÄGE ZUR KULTURWISSENSCHAFT Im Auftrag der Innsbrucker Gesellschaft zur Pfl ege der Geisteswissenschaften herausgegeben von WOLFGANG MEID Neue Folge Band 17 DANIELA URBANOVÁ LATIN CURSE TABLETS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE INNSBRUCK 2018 English translation, revised and updated, of the original publication Latinské proklínací tabulky na území římského impéria Host / Masarykova Univerzita, Brno 2014 Published with the fi nancial support of Masaryk University, Brno Cover Illustration: Curse Tablet Bologna 1 & 3 © Museo Civico Archeologico di Bologna ISBN 978-3-85124-245-4 © The Author, Masaryk University and Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 2018 INNSBRUCKER BEITRÄGE ZUR KULTURWISSENSCHAFT Series Editor: Wolfgang Meid Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck Bereich Sprachwissenschaft Copy editing by the Author and Mag. Tomás Hlavička English translation by Natália Gachallová Translation reviewed by Sarah Legowski Processed for printing by ARCHAEOLINGUA Budapest Printed by Prime Rate Kft. Budapest Orders to be addressed to: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck Bereich Sprachwissenschaft Innrain 52 6020 Innsbruck, Austria e-mail: [email protected] LATIN CURSE TABLETS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE DANIELA URBANOVÁ English Translation: Natália Gachallová Native speaker proof-reading of the English text: Sarah Legowski ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For inspiration, advice, and support, I would like to offer my special thanks to A. Bartoněk, P. Poccetti, P. Cuzzolin, W. Meid, B. Adamik, A. Barta, J. Nechutová, V. Blažek, J. Franek, N. Gachallová, L. Minarini. Significant assistance in processing statistical data provided by L. Novák. Many thanks also to T. Hlavička for his help in technical issues regarding the text, maps, and his friendly support as well as to L. Urbanová for her illustration. For the financial support of the publication, I am grateful to the Dean of the Faculty of Arts at Masaryk University M. Pol, Vice-Dean J. Horáková, and the Head of the Department of Classical Studies I. Radová. Ringraziamenti: Un particolare ringraziamento devo alla direzione del Museo Civico Archeologico di Bologna, che mi ha gentilmente concesso la riproduzione della fotografia per la copertina. ©Museo Civico Archeologico di Bologna. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 13 1.1 DEFIXIONES: A DEFINITION ............................................................ 17 1.1.2 Classification of Curses ................................................................ 18 1.1.2.1 Non-Specific Curses ............................................................ 18 1.1.2.2 Types of Curses According to Content ............................... 20 1.2 PRAYERS FOR JUSTICE: A Definition .............................................. 24 1.2.1 Prayers for Justice Outside Britannia ........................................... 26 1.2.2 Prayers for Justice from Britannia ................................................ 28 1.2.3 Differences between Curses and Prayers for Justice .................... 30 1.3 DATING AND SPREAD OF THE TABLETS IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE ................................................................... 33 1.4 MATERIALS USED ............................................................................. 36 1.5 AUTHORS OF THE CURSES ............................................................. 37 1.6 CURSED PEOPLE, FILIATION .......................................................... 38 1.7 GODS AND DAEMONS ...................................................................... 43 1.7.1 Voces Magicae − Nomina Barbarica, Signa Magica .................... 45 1.7.2 Script in the Service of Magic ...................................................... 49 1.8 RITUAL TREATMENT OF TABLET ................................................. 50 1.8.1 Figurines, Materia Magica, Gems ................................................ 50 1.8.2 Final Treatment of the Tablet ....................................................... 56 1.8.3 Depositing the Tablets − Locations of Findings ........................... 58 1.9 CURSING FORMULAE ....................................................................... 60 1.9.1 Structure of Curse ......................................................................... 61 1.9.2 Optional Supplements of Curses .................................................. 65 1.9.3 Classification of Cursing Formulae .............................................. 70 1.10 AIMS AND WISHES OF THE AUTHORS ....................................... 77 1.10.1 Aims and Wishes of the Curses’ Authors ................................... 77 1.10.2. Aims and Wishes of the Authors of Prayers for Justice ............ 85 1.11 TABLETS’ EXPECTED EFFECT − DID THEY WORK? ................ 92 1.12 CRITERIA OF ANALYSIS ................................................................ 95 1.12.1 Shared Criteria of Curses and Prayers for Justice ...................... 96 1.12.2 Criteria of Analysis Specific to Curses ....................................... 96 1.12.3 Criteria of Analysis Specific to Prayers for Justice .................... 97 1.13 AIMS OF THE WORK ....................................................................... 98 1.14 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ 100 2. TYPOLOGY OF CURSING ....................................................................... 102 2.1 SIMPLE AND COMBINED CURSES ............................................... 103 2.1.1 Simple Nominal Lists of Cursed People ..................................... 104 2.2. DIRECT CURSING FORMULAE .................................................... 104 2.2.1 Formula 1: Direct Curse with the Predicates of Cursing ............ 104 2.2.2 Formula 1a: Direct Curse with the Predicates of Committal ...... 105 2.3 INVOKING FORMULAE .................................................................. 107 2.3.1 Formula 2: Invoking Formula with the Predicates of Committal, Request, and Plea ................................................... 111 2.3.2 Formula 2a: Invoking Formula with the Predicates of Committal, Request, Plea, and Cursing .................................... 114 2.3.3 Formula 3: Imperative Invoking Formula with the Predicate in Imperative ................................................................................. 116 2.3.4. Formula 3a: Extended Imperative Invoking Formula with the Predicate in Imperative .................................................... 118 2.3.5 Formula 4: Invoking Wish-Formula with the Predicate in the 3rd sg./pl. Pres. Subj. ............................................................ 120 2.3.6 Formula 5: Simile-Formula, i.e. Analogy within Invoking Wish-Formulae .............................................................................. 123 3. OCCURRENCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND DATING OF CURSING FORMULAE IN PARTICULAR PROVINCES ....................................... 127 3.1 CURSING FORMULAE IN CURSES AND PRAYERS FOR JUSTICE ..................................................................................... 127 3.1.1 Formula 0 ................................................................................... 127 3.1.2 Formula 1 in Curses .................................................................... 128 3.1.2.1 Formula 1 in Prayers for Justice .............................................. 128 3.1.3 Formula 1a in Curses .................................................................. 129 3.1.3.1 Formula 1a in Prayers for Justice ............................................ 129 3.1.4 Formula 2 in Curses .................................................................... 130 3.1.4.1 Formula 2 in Prayers for Justice .............................................. 131 3.1.5 Formula 2a in Curses .................................................................. 131 3.1.5.1 Formula 2a in Prayers for Justice ............................................ 132 3.1.6 Formula 3 in Curses .................................................................... 132 3.1.6.1 Formula 3 in Prayers for Justice .............................................. 133 3.1.7 Formula 3a in Curses .................................................................. 134 3.1.7.1 Formula 3a in Prayers for Justice ............................................ 134 7 3.1.8 Formula 4 in Curses .................................................................... 135 3.1.8.1 Formula 4 in Prayers for Justice .............................................. 135 3.1.9 Simile-Formula − Formula 5 in Curses ...................................... 136 3.1.9.1 Simile-Formula − Formula 5 in Prayers for Justice ................. 137 3.2 CONCLUSION ................................................................................... 137 3.3. OTHER ADDITIONAL FORMULAE .............................................. 145 3.3.1 Time Data in Curses ................................................................... 145 3.3.1.1 Time Data in Prayers for Justice.............................................. 148 3.3.2 Vota ............................................................................................ 152 3.3.3 Other Optional Supplements ...................................................... 154 4. TYPES OF CURSES ................................................................................... 157 4.1 OCCURENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE PARTICULAR TYPES OF CURSES IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE ............................. 160 4.1.1
Recommended publications
  • Königl, Bayer Akademie Der Wissenschaften
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-philologische Classe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften München Jahr/Year: 1865 Band/Volume: 1865-1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Glück Christian Wilhelm von Artikel/Article: Die Erklärung des Rénos, Moinos und Mogontiâcon, der gallischen Namen der Flüsse Rein und Main und der Stadt Mainz 1-27 S itzim g ’sb erich te der königl, bayer Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München. Jahrgang 1865. Band I. M ü n c h e n . Druck von F. Straub (Wittelsbacherplatz 3). 1865. In Commission bei G. Franz. Sitzungsberichte der königl, bayer. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch - philologische Classe. Sitzung vom 7. Januar 1865. Herr C hrist berichtet über eine Abhandlung des Herrn VV. G lü ck , welche die Classe hiermit dem Drucke übergibt: „Die Erklärung des Renos, Moinos und Mogon- tiacon, der gallischen Namen der Flüsse Rein und Main und der Stadt Mainz.“ Der Rein heisst bekanntlich bei den Griechen ‘Prjvog, bei den Römern Rhfrnus. Der gallische Name lautet Rönos, früher Renas1). Das Keltische hat kein gehauch- 1) Die alte Nominativendung as der auf a ausgehnden männ­ lichen Stämme findet sich noch in den ältesten Denkmälern der irischen Sprache, den Ogaminschriften. (Hierüber s. unsere Schrift: Der deutsche Name Brachio nebst einer Antwort auf einen Angriff Holzmanns. München 1864. 10. S. 2. Anm.) Doch kommt auch dort die Endung os vor (s. Beiträge zur vergleich. Sprachforsch. I, 448). In den in gallischer Sprache geschriebenen Inschriften (ebend. III, [1865. I. 1.] 1 2 Sitzung der philos.-philol. Classe vom 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin Curse Texts: Mediterranean Tradition and Local Diversity
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Acta Ant. Hung. 57, 2017, 57–82 DOI: 10.1556/068.2017.57.1.5 DANIELA URBANOVÁ LATIN CURSE TEXTS: MEDITERRANEAN TRADITION AND LOCAL DIVERSITY Summary: There are altogether about six hundred Latin curse texts, most of which are inscribed on lead tablets. The extant Latin defixiones are attested from the 2nd cent. BCE to the end of the 4th and begin- ning of the 5th century. However, the number of extant tablets is certainly not final, which is clear from the new findings in Mainz recently published by Blänsdorf (2012, 34 tablets),1 the evidence found in the fountain dedicated to Anna Perenna in Rome 2012, (26 tablets and other inscribed magical items),2 or the new findings in Pannonia (Barta 2009).3 The curse tablets were addressed exclusively to the supernatural powers, so their authors usually hid them very well to be banished from the eyes of mortals; not to speak of the randomness of the archaeological findings. Thus, it can be assumed that the preserved defixiones are only a fragment of the overall ancient production. Remarkable diversities in cursing practice can be found when comparing the preserved defixiones from particular provinces of the Roman Empire and their specific features, as this contribution wants to show. Key words: Curses with their language, formulas, and content representing a particular Mediterranean tradi- tion documented in Greek, Latin, Egyptian Coptic, as well as Oscan curse tablets, Latin curse tablets, curse tax- onomy, specific features of curse tablets from Italy, Africa, Britannia, northern provinces of the Roman Empire There are about 1600 defixiones known today from the entire ancient world dated from the 5th century BCE up to the 5th century CE, which makes a whole millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ancient Cave Sanctuary Underneath the Theatre of Miletus
    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Philipp Niewöhner An Ancient Cave Sanctuary underneath the Theatre of Miletus, Beauty, Mutilation, and Burial of Ancient Sculpture in Late Antiquity, and the History of the Seaward Defences aus / from Archäologischer Anzeiger Ausgabe / Issue 1 • 2016 Seite / Page 67–156 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/1931/5962 • urn:nbn:de:0048-journals.aa-2016-1-p67-156-v5962.3 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion der Zentrale | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition 2510-4713 Verlag / Publisher Ernst Wasmuth Verlag GmbH & Co. Tübingen ©2017 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Mit dem Herunterladen erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen (https://publications.dainst.org/terms-of-use) von iDAI.publications an. Die Nutzung der Inhalte ist ausschließlich privaten Nutzerinnen / Nutzern für den eigenen wissenschaftlichen und sonstigen privaten Gebrauch gestattet. Sämtliche Texte, Bilder und sonstige Inhalte in diesem Dokument unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts gemäß dem Urheberrechtsgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Inhalte können von Ihnen nur dann genutzt und vervielfältigt werden, wenn Ihnen dies im Einzelfall durch den Rechteinhaber oder die Schrankenregelungen des Urheberrechts gestattet ist. Jede Art der Nutzung zu gewerblichen Zwecken ist untersagt. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer Lizensierung von Nutzungsrechten wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die verantwortlichen Herausgeberinnen/Herausgeber der entsprechenden Publikationsorgane oder an die Online-Redaktion des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Emmanuel Ramírez Nieves
    Universidad de Puerto Rico Recinto de Río Piedras Departamento de Literatura Comparada Literatura Clásica Latina, LITE 3052. Segundo semestre, año académico 2018-2019. Profesor: Dr. Emmanuel Ramírez Nieves Oficina: Janer 129 Horas de oficina: lunes 2:30-3:30 p.m., jueves 2:30-3:50 p.m., o por acuerdo e-mail: [email protected] Salón: LPM 122 3 créditos, 3 horas Sitio web del curso: https://sites.google.com/s/1fS2hDv2GpvcfzZMmonitG4zlNk8eDWl1/p/1p_hGp5 0pCqmNd6Wl6d8u6pifZmL3awmR/edit Descripción general del curso: En esta parte del curso de dos semestres, estudiaremos la literatura clásica romana (desde el siglo III a. C. hasta los siglos IV y V d. C.) en sus contextos culturales e históricos. Leeremos ejemplos de varios géneros literarios clásicos: dramas de Séneca (tragedia) y Plauto (comedia), poemas de la lírica clásica latina de Catulo y Horacio, ensayos filosóficos de Cicerón, la épica La Eneida de Virgilio y las Metamorfosis de Ovidio, entre otros. Consideraremos éstos en relación con los textos filosóficos, cosmogónicos, científicos e históricos de la cultura clásica romana. Preguntaremos ¿qué significaba la literatura en la época clásica y cómo interpretan otros tiempos posteriores esta literatura? ¿Cuál era su importancia en la legitimación y formación de la cultura occidental durante los siglos? ¿Qué significa la literatura clásica dentro de los estudios de la literatura comparada en la UPR? Además de los estilos y el contenido de la literatura consideraremos también asuntos teóricos de género, la sex ualidad, el placer, las emociones, la formación de comunidades y la ética. Objetivos: Al finalizar el curso el y la estudiante: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Temples and Priests of Sol in the City of Rome
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242330197 Temples and Priests of Sol in the City of Rome Article in Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · January 2010 DOI: 10.1353/mou.2010.0073 CITATIONS READS 0 550 1 author: S. E. Hijmans University of Alberta 23 PUBLICATIONS 9 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: S. E. Hijmans Retrieved on: 03 November 2016 Temples and Priests of Sol in the city of Rome Summary It was long thought that Sol Invictus was a Syrian sun-god, and that Aurelian imported his cult into Rome after he had vanquished Zenobia and captured Palmyra. This sun-god, it was postulated, differed fundamentally from the old Roman sun-god Sol Indiges, whose cult had long since disappeared from Rome. Scholars thus tended to postulate a hiatus in the first centuries of imperial rule during which there was little or no cult of the sun in Rome. Recent studies, however, have shown that Aurelian’s Sol Invictus was neither new nor foreign, and that the cult of the sun was maintained in Rome without interruption from the city’s earliest history until the demise of Roman religion(s). This continuity of the Roman cult of Sol sheds a new light on the evidence for priests and temples of Sol in Rome. In this article I offer a review of that evidence and what we can infer from it the Roman cult of the sun. A significant portion of the article is devoted to a temple of Sol in Trastevere, hitherto misidentified.
    [Show full text]
  • Caecilia, Calpurnia, and Their Dreams of Political Importance. Patterns of Constructing Gender Relations and Female Scope for Action in Ancient Roman Sources
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 4, Issue 2 – Pages 93-116 Caecilia, Calpurnia, and Their Dreams of Political Importance. Patterns of Constructing Gender Relations and Female Scope for Action in Ancient Roman Sources By Anna Katharina Romund During the crisis of the Roman Republic, ancient sources mention a number of political interventions by women. The paper at hand seeks to investigate two of these occurences in which dreams motivated women to play an active role in political affairs. Cicero and Julius Obsequens report the dream of Caecilia Metella that instigated the repair of the temple of Juno Sospita in 90 BC. Nicolaus of Damascus, Velleius Paterculus, Valerius Maximus, Plutarch, Suetonius, Appian, Cassius Dio, and, again, Obsequens cover the dream of Caesar's wife Calpurnia in their works. According to them, the dream drove her to save Caesar from the imminent assassination in 44 BC. If we aim for a better understanding of the growing female scope for action, we will need to systematically analyse ancient authors’ personal conceptions of gender relations in a comparative way. Therefore, my paper examines the reports on Caecilia and Calpurnia in order to find recurring patterns that reflect the writers’ ideas of gender relations and gender hierarchies. A three-step analysis scheme will be created. 1) The model regards family roles as an indicator of the gender relationship discussed by the author. 2) The verbal or non-verbal mode of the woman’s intervention, whether of strong or weak intensity, mirrors the options of female action depending on that specific relationship. Furthermore, this relationship is defined by means of the depicted reaction attributed to the addressee.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G
    Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) 1–224, 498–521, 532–96, 648–89, 725–835 G Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary ILDENHARD INGO GILDENHARD AND JOHN HENDERSON A dead boy (Pallas) and the death of a girl (Camilla) loom over the opening and the closing part of the eleventh book of the Aeneid. Following the savage slaughter in Aeneid 10, the AND book opens in a mournful mood as the warring parti es revisit yesterday’s killing fi elds to att end to their dead. One casualty in parti cular commands att enti on: Aeneas’ protégé H Pallas, killed and despoiled by Turnus in the previous book. His death plunges his father ENDERSON Evander and his surrogate father Aeneas into heart-rending despair – and helps set up the foundati onal act of sacrifi cial brutality that caps the poem, when Aeneas seeks to avenge Pallas by slaying Turnus in wrathful fury. Turnus’ departure from the living is prefi gured by that of his ally Camilla, a maiden schooled in the marti al arts, who sets the mold for warrior princesses such as Xena and Wonder Woman. In the fi nal third of Aeneid 11, she wreaks havoc not just on the batt lefi eld but on gender stereotypes and the conventi ons of the epic genre, before she too succumbs to a premature death. In the porti ons of the book selected for discussion here, Virgil off ers some of his most emoti ve (and disturbing) meditati ons on the tragic nature of human existence – but also knows how to lighten the mood with a bit of drag.
    [Show full text]
  • LITURGICAL COMMITTEE (Arts
    134 SUPPLEMENT 3 SUPPLEMENT 3 LITURGICAL COMMITTEE (Arts. 90, 135) The synod of 1964 appointed the Liturgical Committee and gave it this mandate: "a. ,to review all our liturgical literature in the light of its history, its theological content, and the contemporary needs of the churches; and to recommend such revisions or substitutions as the results of this review might recommend. "b. to study liturgical usages and practices in our churches in the light of Reformed liturgical principles and past synodical deci­ sions, and to advisp synod as to the guidance and supervision it ought to providllocal congregations in all liturgical matters." It soon became apparent to the committee that this mandate could be significantly fulfilled only by way of a thorough study of the history ()£ Christian worship in general and of Reformed worship in particular. Therefore, in harmony with the intention expressed to the synod of 1966 (Acts, 1966, p. 262) the committee has concentrated its initial effort on the order for the Sunday morning service of worship. In this work it has been served by the counsel of many colleagues outside the com~ rnittee. The resulting order· and its rationale are offered in the present report. The committee has now turned its attention to the baptismal service and confidently anticipates presenting a report embodying orders for the baptismal service to the synod of 1969. We 'wish to express our sincere appreciation to synod and to the ad­ ministration of Calvin College for releasing Dr. Lewis B. Srnedes from part of his teaching duties last semester so that he could prepare the initial drafts of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • After Life in Roman Paganism
    With the Compliments of YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY NEW HAVEN, CONN., U.S.A. AFTER LIFE IN ROMAN PAGANISM YALE UNIVERSITY MRS. HEPSA ELY SILLIMAN MEMORIAL LECTURES SILLIMAN MEMORIAL LECTURES PUBLISHED BY YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS ELECTEICITY AND MATTEE. By JOSEPH JOHN THOMSON, D.Sc., LL.D., PH.D., F.E.S., Fellow of Trinity College and Cavendish Professor of Ex perimental Physics, Cambridge University. (Fourth printing.) THE INTEGEATIVE ACTION OF THE NEEVOUS SYSTEM. By CHARLES S. SHERRINGTON, D.Sc., M.D., HON. LL.D. TOR., F.E.S., Holt Professor of Physiology, University of Liverpool. (Sixth printing.) EADIOACTIVE TEANSFOEMATIONS. By ERNEST RUTHERFORD, D.Sc., LL.D., F.E.S., Macdonald Professor of Physics, McGill University. (Second printing.) EXPEEIMENTAL AND THEOEETICAL APPLICATIONS OF THEE- MODYNAMICS TO CHEMISTEY. By DR. WALTER NERNST, Professor and Director of the Institute of Physical Chemistry in the University of Berlin. PEOBLEMS OF GENETICS. By WILLIAM BATESON, M.A., F.E.S., Director of the John Innes Horticultural Institution, Merton Park, Surrey, Eng land. (Second printing.) STELLAE MOTIONS. With Special Eeference to Motions Determined by Means of the Spectrograph. By WILLIAM WALLACE CAMPBELL, Sc.D., LL.D., Director of the Lick Observatory, University of California. (Second printing.} THEOEIES OF SOLUTIONS. By SVANTE ARRHENIUS, PH.D., Sc.D., M.D., Director of the Physico-Chemical Department of the Nobel Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. (Third printing.) IEEITABILITY. A Physiological Analysis of the General Effect of Stimuli in Living Substances. By MAX VERWORN, M.D., PH.D., Professor at Bonn Physiological Institute. (Second printing.) PEOBLEMS OF AMEEICAN GEOLOGY. By WILLIAM NORTH RICE, FRANK D.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury (Mythology) 1 Mercury (Mythology)
    Mercury (mythology) 1 Mercury (mythology) Silver statuette of Mercury, a Berthouville treasure. Ancient Roman religion Practices and beliefs Imperial cult · festivals · ludi mystery religions · funerals temples · auspice · sacrifice votum · libation · lectisternium Priesthoods College of Pontiffs · Augur Vestal Virgins · Flamen · Fetial Epulones · Arval Brethren Quindecimviri sacris faciundis Dii Consentes Jupiter · Juno · Neptune · Minerva Mars · Venus · Apollo · Diana Vulcan · Vesta · Mercury · Ceres Mercury (mythology) 2 Other deities Janus · Quirinus · Saturn · Hercules · Faunus · Priapus Liber · Bona Dea · Ops Chthonic deities: Proserpina · Dis Pater · Orcus · Di Manes Domestic and local deities: Lares · Di Penates · Genius Hellenistic deities: Sol Invictus · Magna Mater · Isis · Mithras Deified emperors: Divus Julius · Divus Augustus See also List of Roman deities Related topics Roman mythology Glossary of ancient Roman religion Religion in ancient Greece Etruscan religion Gallo-Roman religion Decline of Hellenistic polytheism Mercury ( /ˈmɜrkjʉri/; Latin: Mercurius listen) was a messenger,[1] and a god of trade, the son of Maia Maiestas and Jupiter in Roman mythology. His name is related to the Latin word merx ("merchandise"; compare merchant, commerce, etc.), mercari (to trade), and merces (wages).[2] In his earliest forms, he appears to have been related to the Etruscan deity Turms, but most of his characteristics and mythology were borrowed from the analogous Greek deity, Hermes. Latin writers rewrote Hermes' myths and substituted his name with that of Mercury. However, there are at least two myths that involve Mercury that are Roman in origin. In Virgil's Aeneid, Mercury reminds Aeneas of his mission to found the city of Rome. In Ovid's Fasti, Mercury is assigned to escort the nymph Larunda to the underworld.
    [Show full text]
  • War Gods in Archaic Greece and Rome Tyler Krentz Trinity University, [email protected]
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Classical Studies Honors Theses Classical Studies Department 4-19-2011 War Gods in Archaic Greece and Rome Tyler Krentz Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/class_honors Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Krentz, Tyler, "War Gods in Archaic Greece and Rome" (2011). Classical Studies Honors Theses. 3. http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/class_honors/3 This Thesis open access is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. War Gods in Archaic Greece and Rome Tyler Krentz A departmental senior thesis submitted to the Classical Studies Department at Trinity University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with departmental honors. April 19, 2006 _________________________ _________________________ Thesis Advisor Department Chair _________________________ Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs Student Copyright Declaration: the author has selected the following copyright provision (select only one): [x] This thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which allows some noncommercial copying and distribution of the thesis, given proper attribution. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. [ ] This thesis is protected under the provisions of U.S. Code Title 17. Any copying of this work other than “fair use” (17 USC 107) is prohibited without the copyright holder’s permission.
    [Show full text]