Dm2020-0436.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dm2020-0436.Pdf Republic of the Philippines Department of Health OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY October 1, 2020 DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM No. 2020-0436 TO: ALL UNDERSECRETARIES AND ASSISTANT SECRETARIES; DIRECTORS OF BUREAUS AND CENTERS FOR HEALTH DEVELOPMENT: MINISTER OF HEALTH — BANGSAMORO AUTONOMOUS REGION IN MUSLIM MINDANAO; EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS OF SPECIALTY HOSPITALS; CHIEFS OF MEDICAL CENTERS, HOSPITALS, SANITARIA AND INSTITUTES; PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINE HEALTH INSURANCE CORPORATION; ALL DISEASE REPORTING UNITS: ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT __UNITS: ALL HOSPITAL FACILITIES: ALL LICENSED COVID-19 TESTING LABORATORIES; AND OTHERS CONCERNED SUBJECT: Minimum Data Requirements of COVID-19-Related Information Systems I. BACKGROUND The Department of Health continuously recalibrates its strategies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 pandemic. Among its top priority is to further strengthen COVID-19 surveillancg}. The current COVID-19 endemic has highlighted the need for timely, accurate, and relevant in ~ surveillance and epidemiologic information on COVID-19 casesand their close contacts the country. Such must be underscored in all levels from the disease reporting units (DRUs)or hospitals, local epidemiology and surveillance units (LESUs), regional epidemiology and surveillance units (RESUs) and the Epidemiology Bureau. To facilitate the submission of important COVID-19 information, and to ensure the interoperability of existing COVID-19-related information systems, the following shall serve as the minimum data fields for the COVID-19 Case Investigation Form (CIF) and COVID-19 information systems. Il. GENERAL GUIDELINES minimum 1. All COVID-19 related information systems shall include the specified data requirements. 2. The revised Case Investigation Form (CIF) shall contain the specified minimum data requirements. 3. Disease reporting units shall complete these data when filling out the Case Investigation Form (CIF) in accordance with Department Circular No. 2020-0318 entitled “Mandatory Submission of Accurate, Complete, and Timely COVID-19 Case Data __ Line 651-7800 local 1108, 1111, 1112, 1113 Building 1, San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Sta. Cruz, 1003 Manila e Trunk Direct Line: 711-9502: 711-9503 Fax: 743-1829 @ URL: http://www.doh.gov.ph; e-mail: [email protected] through the COVID Document Repository System (CDRS) and Laboratory Information System API.” Hil. SPECIFIC GUIDELINES l. Table 1 shows the minimum required data fields and their corresponding data type, description (in relation to the information system), format, and description. The Case Investigation Form is meant to be administered as an Interview by a health care worker or any personnel of the Disease Reporting Unit. This is not a Self- Administered Questionnaire. 1 CIF from . Disease Reporting Units are only allowed to obtain copy of accomplished a patient. All items must be filled out or must have a check mark on the appropriate box. Items with asterisks (*) are required fields and must be filled in completely and properly. | Never leave an item blank, just write N/A or not applicable. The Guidelines in Filling Out The Case Investigation Form Version 7 for COVID-19 shall be read prior to accomplishing the revised CIF. Table 1. Minimum Required Data Fields for COVID-19-related Information System Field Name Data Type Description Format Description I. Patient Information Disease String Reporting National The name ofthe facility Reporting Unit Health Health Facility (i.e. hospital, Facility Registry laboratory, health Format center, etc.) that is reporting the case. PhilHealth no. Integer(12) PhilHealth XXXX-XXXX- A 12 digit number, as Number XXXX reflected in the PhilHealth Number Card/Identification Card/Member Data Record (MDR). When Date of » Date Date of mm/dd/yyyy the interview Interview Interview with the case was conducted. Full name String 1. Last Name The nameof the case 1. Last Name 2. First being interviewedasit 2. First Name Name (and appearsin their birth (and Suffix) Suffix) certificate. 3. Middle Name 3. Middle |Name Birthday Date Date of Birth mm/dd/yyyy The birth date of the case as it appears in their birth certificate. Age Integer(3) Age The age in years of the case in whole number. Sex String Sex (Male, Female) The sex of the case asit (Checkbox) appears in their birth certificate. Current Address String 1. House PSGC Format This refers to the in the Philippines No./ Lot present address of the and Contact Building/ case. _ Information No. For cases who live in 2. Street/Pu- closed settings such as 1. House No./ rok/Sitio prisons, residential Lot/ Bldg/ 3. Barangay facilities, retirement 2. Street/Purok/ 4. Municipa- communities, care Sitio lity/ City homes, camps etc., use 3. Barangay 5. Province the address of the 4. Municipality/ institution where the City case currently resides. 5. Province (XX) XXXX- The current telephone Home Phone No. | String Telephone XXXX number (with area code) of the case at home. Cellphone No. String Cellphone XXXX-XXXXXXX The cellphone number of the case or any cellphone number where he/she can be contacted immediately. Email Address String Email xxx@emailser The email address of Address vice. the case which he/she com uses most frequently. When had Date of First Date Date of First mm/dd/yyyy thecase first Consult Consult a COVID-19 related consultation with a health professional. Date of Date Date of mm/dd/yyyy When the case was Admission Admission admitted in a hospital or isolation/quarantine facility. Indicate earliest date of admission if patient was |1) admitted in multiple health facilities. Disposition at String Disposition e Admitted in Disposition of the Time of Report. (Checkbox) at Time of hospital patient at the time of Report (indicate report. hospital, date and time admitted) e Admitted in isolation/ quarantine facility (indicate facility, date and time Date admitted) e In home isolation or quarantine (indicate date and time started) e Discharged to home e Discharged (Date of discharge mm/dd/ yyyy) e Others Health Statusat String Patient’s e Asympto- Health status of the Consult (Checkbox) Health Status matic patient at the time of the e Mild interview. Moderate Severe Critical Classification String Case Suspect The classification of the (Checkbox) classification Probable patient at the time of at consult Confirmed interview. Non- COVID-19 Case II. Case Investigation Details Wo Health Care String Health Care Yes, No Refers to medical, allied Worker (Checkbox) Worker medical, and other necessary personnel String Yes, name and regardless of the nature location of of employment assigned health facility in hospitals, and health facilities who are directly catering to or exposed to persons who are classified as either suspect, probable or confirmed COVID-19 cases. Returning String Returning Yes, No A Returning Overseas Overseas (Checkbox) Overseas Filipino is a Filipino Filipino Filipino citizen whots returning String Indicate to the Philippines from © Country of abroad. There are two Origin (2) categories: 1.Overseas Filipino Workers (OF Ws) - are overseas Filipinos whose primary reason for being outside the country or for leaving the country is due to a contract of enployment in a foreign nation or a vessel flying another nation’s flag. 2.Non-Overseas Filipino Workers (Non- OFWs) - are overseas Filipinos whose primary reason for being outside the country is not due to a contract of employment in a foreign nation or a vessel flying another nation’s flag. Foreign National String Foreign Yes, No A Foreign National Traveler (Checkbox) National Traveler is a person Traveler whois not a naturalized String Indicate citizen of the country in Country of which they are Y, Origin living/traveling. Locally Stranded String Locally Yes, No A Locally Stranded Individual/ (Checkbox) Stranded Individual is a foreign APOR/ Traveler Individual/ national or Filipino String APOR/ Yes, indicate citizen (e.g. Traveler city/mun/prov_ construction and of origin domestic workers, tourists, students, among others) in a specific locality within the Philippines who have expressed intention to return to their place of residence/home origin. APOR — Authorized Persons Outside Residence Lives in Closed — String Lives in Yes, No If the case currently Settings (Checkbox) closed resides in a closed settings setting such prisons, String Yes, specify residential facilities, the type and retirement communities, the name of care homes, camps etc. the institution Date of Onset of Date Date Onset mm/dd/yyyy The date when the signs Illness of Illness (i.e. objective clinical finding as determined by a licensed physician) of illness first appeared and/or when the symptoms(e.g. fever, cough, sore throat, dyspnoea etc.) were first felt. Test Done String Type of Test @ RT-PCR Type of COVID-19 test (Checkbox) Done (OPS) done. e RT-PCR (NPS) e RT-PCR (OPS and NPS) e RT-PCR |_|(specimen y“ type) e Antigen Test e Antibody Test e Others, specify Date Collected Date Date mm/dd/yyyy The date when the Specimen specimen was collected Collected for testing. Results String Results of Pending Results of the COVID- (Checkbox) Test Positive 19 test conducted. Conducted Negative Equivocal Antibody Test e IgM (+) IgG (-) e IgGs) IgM (-) e IgM (+) IgG (+) e IgM (-) IgG (-) Other test, specify result Outcome String Outcome e Active Outcomeofthe (Checkbox) @ Recovered COVID-19 suspect/ , Date of probable/confirmed Date Recovery case. (mm/dd/yyyy) e Died, Date of Death (mm/dd/yyyy), Cause of Death (Immediate, Antecedent, Underlying) Ill. Contact Tracing History of String History of Yes, No, If the patient has history to known exposure to (Checkbox) Exposure to Unknown of exposure known probable known probable and/or 4hat and/or confirmed Date probable confirmed COVID-19 COVID-19 case and/or Yes, date of case 14 days before the 14 days before confirmed LAST contact onset of signs and the onset of signs COVID-19 (mm/dd/yyyy) symptoms orif and symptoms or case 14 days asymptomatic, 14 days if asymptomatic, before the before swabbing or 14 days before onset of signs specimen collection.
Recommended publications
  • The Evolving Paradigm of Filipino Prisoners' Artistic Performance As A
    Journal of Tourism and Management Research 127 ISSN:2149-6528 Journal of Tourism and Management Research ISSN: 2149-6528 2017 Vol. 2, Issue.2 The Evolving Paradigm of Filipino Prisoners’ Artistic Performance as a Tourism Product Abstract This is an exploratory study aimed at determining whether the artistic performance of inmates in the national penitentiary may be considered as a tourism product. The performance began to gather worldwide attention with the showing of the dancing inmates on You Tube. The research was carried further by looking at performances which have been featured and are still being shown inside the Maximum and Medium Security Compounds of the country‟s prison.The methodology is a comparative analysis of literature related to tourism product and the formulation of an appropriate definition of the tourism product under study, it being intrinsic to the country. Following Smith‟s generic tourism product definition and the tourism production process, the analysis reinforced the very nature of prisoners‟ performance as a tourism product indeed. As such the paper serves to enlighten both prison and tourism stakeholders on the potential of the tourism product. Keywords: Tourism product, Inmates, Artistic performance, National penitentiary, Rehabilitation, Remediation ____________________________________ Emma Lina F. Lopez, PhD. Senior Lecturer, Asian Institute of Tourism University of the Philippines Commonwealth Avenue, Diliman. Quezon City, Metro Manila/Philippines 1101. Email: [email protected] Landline: (632)437-40-20 Mobile: +639198261817 Original Scientific Paper Lopez, E.L.F. 2017, Vol.2, No.2, pp.127-143. DOI:10.26465/ojtmr.2017229489 Journal of Tourism and Management Research 128 1. Introduction Just like Filipinos who dream to make it big in the global market, the Cebu dancing inmates have caught worldwide attention as their performance went viral in You Tube with their Michael Jackson dance drill moves.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines 2019 Human Rights Report
    PHILIPPINES 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Philippines is a multiparty, constitutional republic with a bicameral legislature. President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, elected in May 2016, began his constitutionally limited six-year term in June 2016. Midterm elections in May for 12 (of 24 total) senators, all congressional representatives, and local government leaders were seen as generally free and fair, despite reports of violence and vote buying. The ruling party and allies won all 12 Senate seats and maintained a roughly two-thirds majority in the 306-seat House of Representatives. Barangay (village) and youth council elections originally scheduled for 2021 were rescheduled for December 5, 2022 so that local and national elections will occur in the same year. The Philippine National Police (PNP) is charged with maintaining internal security in most of the country and reports to the Department of the Interior. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), which reports to the Department of National Defense, is responsible for external security but also carries out domestic security functions in regions with a high incidence of conflict, particularly the Mindanao region. The two agencies share responsibility for counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations. The PNP Special Action Force is responsible for urban counterterrorism operations. President Duterte’s May 2017 declaration of martial law for the entire region of Mindanao and the Sulu Archipelago was extended until the end of the year, giving the military expanded powers in the area. Governors, mayors, and other local officials have considerable influence over local police units, including appointment of top departmental and municipal police officers and the provision of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Pangkat: Inmate Gangs at the New Bilibid Prison Maximum Security Compound
    FILOMIN CANDALIZA-GUTIERREZ Pangkat: Inmate Gangs at the New Bilibid Prison Maximum Security Compound This is a study of inmate gangs (pangkats) at the New Bilibid Prison Maximum Security Compound. Through focus group discussions (FGDs) with pangkatmembers and review of documents, the study found that pangkats formed around the 1950s around ethno-linguistic divisions between Tagalog (Sigue Sigue) and non-Tagalog speaking inmates (OXO). Inadequate provisions, strained inmate-guard relationship and restrictive visiting policies incited escapes and violent riots between rival gangs in those years. Since the 1980s the pangkats transitioned into units of local self-governance with mechanisms for leadership, dispute arbitration, control of antisocial behavior, and cooperation with other pangkats and the Bureau of Corrections. The combination of relaxed visiting policies, including conjugal visits and family stay-ins, and the increased entry of civil society groups (CSGs) boosted a local economy,”normalized” the all-male population and presented opportunities for inmates to regain lost “moral status” by occupying respected positions. When the barriers that isolated the compound were lowered, the pangkat society increased its social capital, expanded its social network, bridged gaps between other gangs, the Bureau of Corrections and the free society (taga- laya) and functioned less as parochial defense and conflict groups and more as organizations of self-local governance. Key words: inmate gangs, New Bilibid Prison, incarceration, self- governance, social capital Philippine Sociological Review (2012) • Vol. 60 • pp. 193-238 193 A satellite view of the Maximum Security Compound of the New Bilbid Prison in Muntinlupa City. (Source: Google Earth) 194 INTRODUCTION Public Perception of Prisons he confinement of criminal offenders in a well supervised yet Spartan prison that enables them to ponder on past mistakes T and change encapsulates the rehabilitative discourse of modern penology.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE of RAYMUND E. NARAG, Phd I. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION and CONTACT INFORMATION A. Present University Department O
    CURRICULUM VITAE OF RAYMUND E. NARAG, PhD I. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION AND CONTACT INFORMATION A. Present university Department or Unit: Criminology and Criminal Justice B. Office Address: Criminology & Criminal Justice Faner Hall, Room 4224 Southern Illinois University Carbondale Carbondale, Illinois 62901 E-Mail: [email protected] II. EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (2013) Master of Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (2007) Bachelor of Arts, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Philippines (1995) Cum Laude III. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Assistant Professor, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice (2012-Present) Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL Visiting Professor, National College of Public Administration and Governance (2015- 2016) University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines Graduate Assistant, School of Criminal Justice (2005-2012) Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI IV. RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY (*indicates graduate/undergraduate student co-author) A. Interests and Specialties: Correctional administration, Pretrial detention, Prison governance, Inmate classification and risk assessments, Violent Extremist Offenders, Juvenile delinquency and deviance, Court administration, Philippine policing, Comparative and cross-cultural criminology and criminal justice, Mixed methods (Qualitative and quantitative research) B. Current Projects : Filipino values imported inside the jail: Informal structures and practices to mediate the pains of imprisonment. A manuscript in preparation (with Clarke Jones and Sou Lee*). Explaining factors related to pretrial detention: An integrated approach. A manuscript in preparation (with Lauretta Sam*). Exploring factors related to post-release success: Evidence from the Philippines. Manuscript in preparation (with Stephanie Jerstad*). C. Grants Applied for but not Funded: Narag, R.E. Determining best practices in court management to reduce prolonged pretrial detention.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRECTIONS the Reformers
    CORRECTIONS the reformers Dario F. Guinayen Historical Perspective of Corrections: 13th Century – Securing Sanctuary - In the 13th century, a criminal could avoid punishment by claiming refuge in a church for a period of 40 days. 16th Century – Transportation of criminals in England was authorized. At the end of this century, Russia and other European Countries followed this system. This practice was abandoned in 1835. Gaols - (jails) – the description given to pretrial detention facilities operated by English sheriff in England during the 18th century. Galleys – long, low, narrow, single decked ships propelled by sails, usually rowed by criminals. A type of ship used for transportation of criminals in the 16th century. Hulks – these are former warships used to house prisoners in the 18th and 19th century. - These were abandoned warships converted into prisons as means of relieving congestion of prisons. They were called as the floating hells. Ordeal – is the church’s substitute for a trial until the 13th century wherein guilt or innocence was determined by the ability of the accused of being unscathed through dangerous and painful test. Charlemagne (Carolus Magnus)– gave bishops the power to act as real judges which enabled bishop tribunal to rule on secular matters. - King of Franks and Roman Emperor. EARLY CODES: 1. Babylonian and Sumerian Codes Code of King Hammurabi (Hammurabic Code) – Babylon, credited as the oldest code prescribing savage punishment. But in fact, Sumerian codes were nearly 100 years older. 2. Roman and Greek Codes a. Justinian Code – 6th century AD, Emperor Justinian of Rome wrote his code of law. An effort to match a desirable amount of punishment to all possible crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippine Penal Colonies the Iwahig Penal Colony the Iwahig Prison and Penal Farm Is One of the Most Popular Prisons in the Philippines
    The Philippine Penal Colonies The Iwahig Penal Colony The Iwahig Prison and Penal Farm is one of the most popular prisons in the Philippines. Iwahig Penal Colony was established in the early 1900's and to this date it's still operational. It is where criminals from other parts of the country were sent, jailed and forced to do hard labor while serving their sentence. Later on, the reformed ones are allowed to roam within the compound and mingle with the community while the "hard cores" remain in maximum confinement. Within the compound, there are farmstead tended by former prisoners who, after serving their sentence, have decided to stay in PP and start a new life. The Iwahig Prison and Penal Farm was originally set up in 1902 by the United tates to house Philippine prisoners who had fought againt the American colonization of the Philippines. Today, situated on the lush island of Palawan, only 30 minutes by road from Puerto Princesa City, Iwahig is unique among penal institutions. Despite the fact that most of the 2,300 inmates have been convicted o homicide, the majority are minimum security prisoners and are thus not locked up within the colony. Instead, these minimum security inmates live in dormitories and work on one of the many agricultural projects located within the prison farm. Prisoners who are deemed to be at risk of escaping are confined to medium or maximum security areas, where they are monitored, but these prisoners comprise less than fifty percent of the Iwahig population. Founded by the American colonial administration in 1904, The Iwahig prison on the island of Palawan in the Philippines is an open air penal colony covering 38,000 hectares of jungle and coastland.
    [Show full text]
  • State Violence in the Philippines
    State violence in the Philippines An alternative report to the United Nations Human Rights Committee presented by People's Recovery, Empowerment and Development Assistance Foundation, Inc. A project coordinated by World Organisation Against Torture Case postale 21- 8, rue du Vieux Billard CH-1211 Geneva 8, Switzerland Geneva, September 2003 Foreword Writing alternative reports is one of the main activities of the OMCT and a vital source of information for the members of the Human Rights Committee. With these reports, it is possible to see the situation as objectively as possible and take a critical look at government action to eradicate torture. Under the aegis of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation, the “Special Procedures” program presented this report on state violence and torture in the Philippines at the 79th session of the Human rights Committee, which took place in Geneva from 20th October to 7th November 2003 and during which the Government’s report of the Philippines was examined. The study is divided into three parts. Part I provides a general overview of torture and inhuman or degrading treatments (in prisons in particular) committed by state officials. Parts II and III deal with torture and inhuman or degrading treatments of women and children respectively. This rather novel approach sheds light on the situation of particularly vulnerable groups of people. The Human Rights Committee’s Concluding Observations and Recommendations adopted following examination of the Filipino Government’s Report are included in the Appendices. This report was jointly prepared by the following three Filipino human rights NGOs: PREDA Foundation. Nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001, Preda Foundation, Inc., was founded in 1974 in Olongapo City.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Cebu's Dancing Prisoners
    Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy Volume 5, Number 2, October 2019, pp. 133-161 Dance Music and Creative Resilience within Prison Walls: Revisiting Cebu’s Dancing Prisoners Menelito P. Mansueto Colegio de San Juan de Letran [email protected] Abstract Using Foucault’s concept of governmentality vis-à-vis Appadurai’s “global ethnoscapes” as frames, I argue for a techno-cultural dimension which brought forth the phenomenon of the “dancing inmates,” an argument against the charge of Filipino colonial mimicry of a Hollywood popular entertainment. Albeit the inmates’ dance routines indeed depict Foucault’s “docile bodies” in his analysis of the modern prison, as pointed out by critics, I am inclined to show how the internet mediation through social media networks awakened a culturally imbibed dance and musical character trait vis-à-vis the jolly cultural disposition of Filipinos. Thus, I view these characteristics as existential responses, hence, ‘creative resilience,’ to the inhuman incarcerating conditions of the prison life through using the art of dance with the aid of media technology. I argue on the role of the internet as the prisoners’ avenue to the outside world that was strategically deprived of them as a form of punishment, and the role of the internet as their last frontier to freedom and to realize their human potentials. Keywords: Colonial Mimicry, Panopticism, Spectacle of Power, Western Gaze, Global Ethnoscapes, Filipino Culture, Bisayan People © 2019 Menelito P. Mansueto ISSN: 2467-5784 134 Menelito P. Mansueto Introduction My initial interest in this topic was propelled by the idea of being able to catch a glimpse of the evolving identity of the Filipino as Filipino, particularly through the detainees of the Cebu Provincial Detention and Rehabilitation Center (CPDRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines 2017 Human Rights Report
    PHILIPPINES 2017 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Philippines is a multiparty, constitutional republic with a bicameral legislature. President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, elected in May 2016, began his constitutionally limited six-year term in June 2016. The presidential and 2013 midterm national elections were generally free and fair. The 2016 local elections were twice postponed until May 2018. Proponents of delaying the elections cited several reasons, among them the continued influence of drug money on local elections. Civilian control over the Philippine National Police (PNP) improved but was not fully effective. The government confirmed a civilian head of the Internal Affairs Service in December 2016, after an eight-year hiatus. In May members of the terrorist Maute Group and supporters of other extremist organizations attacked Marawi City, on the southern island of Mindanao. In response President Duterte declared martial law in all of Mindanao. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) restored government control of the city on October 23. Approximately 360,000 persons were displaced as a result of the crisis. Extrajudicial killings have been the chief human rights concern in the country for many years and, after a sharp rise with the onset of the antidrug campaign in 2016, they continued in 2017. From January to the end of September, media reports chronicled more than 900 fatalities in police operations suspected to be connected with the government’s antidrug campaign. Police claimed to have begun investigations of all reports of extrajudicial killings. As of August, police claimed to have resolved 1,889 cases, and 4,373 remained under investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Women’s rights in the Philippines: the struggle for full recognition .................................. 3 2.1 Laws and their implementation ............................................................................ 4 2.2 Violence against women in the family and community ....................................... 4 2.3 Discrimination against women subjected to sexual violence ............................... 5 3. Torture of women political detainees with impunity: the 1970s to the 1990s ..................... 7 4. Torture and ill-treatment of women in police custody ........................................................ 9 4.1 Violations of women’s rights under the anti-vagrancy law ................................ 12 4.2 Prosecutions of police officers for rape ............................................................ 15 5. Violations of women’s rights in prisons ........................................................................... 17 5.1 Prison conditions ............................................................................................... 21 6. Reports of rapes by the military in Mindanao ................................................................... 23 7. Investigating rape in custody: the importance of medico-legal documentation ................. 24 8. Amnesty International’s recommendations ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Children in Conflict with the Law in Cebu : Profile and Experience with the Juvenile Justice Process
    CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN CEBU: PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCESS Felisa U. Etemadi Ching Li Ye Cresencio Bermudez Jr. CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN CEBU: PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCESS Felisa U. Etemadi Ching Li Ye Cresencio Bermudez, Jr. This report forms part of the CD-ROM entitled, “BREAKING RULES: Children in Conflict with the Law and the Juvenile Justice Process, The Experience in the Philippines.” Published by: Save the Children UK 3/F FSS Building 1 89 Scout Castor Street, Quezon City, Philippines Copyright 2004 Save the Children – UK Philippines Programme This material is copyright but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable. Research Team Consultant, Research Team Leader and Editor: Prof. Felisa U. Etemadi Senior Researcher: Ching Li Ye Research Associates: Cresencio Bermudez, Jr. Mercedita Coca Research Assistants: Ana Janet F. Suñga Consultants: Michael Maestrado Gerralyn Sayson Norman Yap Jannice Saso Technical editing: Wilma T. Bañaga Design and layout: Dok Pavia Save the Children UK is a member of the International Save the Children Alliance, the world’s leading independent children’s rights organisation, with members in 27 countries and operational programmes in more than 100 countries. Save the Children works with children and their communities to provide practical
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Gangs and Prison Governance in the Philippines
    Prison Gangs and Prison Governance in the Philippines Author Jones, Clarke Published 2014 Journal Title Griffith Asia Quarterly Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/340307 Link to published version http://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/141524 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au 57 Prison Gangs and Prison Governance in the Philippines Clarke Jones* Australian National University Abstract: In the large, overcrowded, out-dated and under-funded prisons of the Philippines, the essential task of maintaining prison order is complex and often problematic. To carry out this crucial (albeit usually elusive) task, prison administrators are forced not only to compromise organisational integrity, but also to relinquish basic aspects of their management function to prison gang leaders. Due to scarce resources and high levels of corruption, prison administrators are also unable to adequately provide security and protection to inmates. It is therefore common practice for Philippine prisons to operate under a system of shared governance. In this type of arrangement, prison gang leaders help to maintain internal control and safeguard inmates as best they can. Even though prison stability is fragile, gang leaders help prison guards restore order quickly once disorder occurs. Based on the author’s personal observations over a three-year period, as well as his personal interactions with prison gang leaders and prison officials, this paper provides insight into the compromises prison administrators take to gain inmate compliance in New Bilibid Prison (NBP) - the largest maximum security facility in the Philippines and one of the largest in the world. In New Bilibid Prison’s (NBP) maximum security compound - one of the largest of its kind in the world - the primary task for prison administrators is to prevent the prison from falling into disorder.1 This task is made difficult because the prison is severely overcrowded, out-dated and under-funded.
    [Show full text]