DOCSLIB.ORG

Landscape Partnerships Evaluation 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landscape Partnerships Evaluation 2011 Evaluation of the Heritage Lottery Fund Landscape Partnership Programme 2011 Report prepared for the Heritage Lottery Fund by Richard Clarke, David Mount and Marija Anteric. Landscape Partnerships Evaluation 2011 Acknowledgements This report was produced by Richard Clarke and Marija Anteric of the Centre for European Protected Area Research at London University Birkbeck and David Mount of the Countryside Training Partnership. Additional input has been provided by Simon Lees (CTP: Section 4), Birkbeck’s Rural Evidence Research Centre and the Institute of Voluntary Action Research. The project team would like to thank the HLF Steering Group in particular Michelle Roffe (Landscape Partnership Programme Manager), Claire Renard (Landscape Partnership Programme Co-ordinator), Drew Bennellick (Head of Landscape and Natural Heritage) and Gareth Maeer (Head of Research and Evaluation) for their input and support throughout the project. We are grateful also to Grants Officers in HLF Country and Regional Offices – in particular the members of the Landscape Partnerships Practice Group – for their support and assistance. We wish also to express our gratitude to the managers and staff of all those landscape partnerships mentioned in this Report for their cooperation, and for providing information and sharing their experiences. We also wish to thank staff from country agencies and from several protected landscapes, who provided valuable input. Special thanks are due to HLF advisers/ mentors/ monitors who gave their time and expertise which has been embodied in our advice to partnerships and which is reflected in this Report. Richard Clarke [email protected] 020 3073 8220 David Mount [email protected] 01433-670300 Marija Anteric [email protected] 07405-929720 July 2011 Centre for European Protected Area Research Countryside Training Partnership University of London Birkbeck Ruskin Villa, Hope Road, Institute of Environment, Room 159, Edale, Hope Valley, Torrington Square, London WC1E 7HX Derbyshire. S33 7ZE www.bbk.ac.uk/environment/research/cepar www.countrysidetraining.co.uk Cover photo: Blaenavon’s ‘Forgotten Landscape’ March 2011 (R Clarke) i Landscape Partnerships Evaluation 2011 Contents 1 Introduction and context ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and structure of this report ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 The landscape context ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Landscape partnerships ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 A participative approach to evaluation ......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Contract brief and objectives ...................................................................................................... 10 2 Working methods ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Evaluation guidance and support for landscape partnerships .................................................... 11 Supplementary guidance to landscape partnerships on monitoring and evaluation. ......................... 11 Web support ........................................................................................................................................ 11 One-to-one evaluation support to landscape partnerships ................................................................. 11 Evaluation within Landscape Conservation Action Plans (LCAPs) ....................................................... 13 Workshops and information-sharing ................................................................................................... 14 Recommendations relating to evaluation guidance and support ........................................................ 15 2.2 Information gathering from landscape partnerships .................................................................. 16 Output data collation ........................................................................................................................... 16 Boundary files & GIS ............................................................................................................................. 19 Collection of evaluation information regarding longer term landscape partnership outcomes ......... 19 Recommendations relating to information gathering ......................................................................... 21 3 Outputs and outcomes of the landscape partnership programme ..................................................... 23 3.1 Basic data ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Distribution of funds and coverage of schemes between programmes and across the UK ................ 24 Lead bodies .......................................................................................................................................... 26 Protected landscapes ........................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Heritage benefits ......................................................................................................................... 30 Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 30 Built and archaeological features ......................................................................................................... 34 Industrial, maritime and transport....................................................................................................... 36 Museums, libraries and archives .......................................................................................................... 38 Intangible cultural heritage .................................................................................................................. 39 3.3 People benefits ............................................................................................................................ 41 Community participation ..................................................................................................................... 41 Access and learning .............................................................................................................................. 44 Training and skills ................................................................................................................................. 47 4 Case Studies ......................................................................................................................................... 50 4.1 Bassenthwaite Reflections .......................................................................................................... 51 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 51 Ambitions and achievements ............................................................................................................... 51 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Dalriada ....................................................................................................................................... 57 ii Landscape Partnerships Evaluation 2011 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 57 Ambitions and achievements ............................................................................................................... 58 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 61 4.3 Kerridge Ridge and Ingersley Vale ............................................................................................... 63 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 63 Ambitions and achievements ............................................................................................................... 64 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 67 4.4 Neroche ....................................................................................................................................... 69 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 69 Ambitions and achievements ............................................................................................................... 70 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 73 4.5 Purbeck Keystone Project ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Somerset Woodland Strategy
    A Woodland Strategy for Somerset 2010 A Woodland Strategy for Somerset 2010 Contents ©ENP Introducing the Strategy 2 Mendip 20 Table of Contents 2 Sedgemoor 21 Woodland Strategy Overview 4 Taunton Deane 22 Benefits of a Somerset Woodland Strategy 4 West Somerset 23 VISION STATEMENT 5 Sensitive Landscape Areas 24 Analysis of Somerset’s Woodland Resource 6 Culture and Heritage 25 Somerset’s Woodland Resource 6 Cultural issues related to woodlands 25 Woodland distribution 6 Links with our history and a source of inspiration 25 Area of woodland 7 Ecosystem Services provided by trees and woodland 25 Woodland size 8 Recreation and access 26 Woodland species 8 The need for public access 26 Coniferous woodland 9 Accessible woodlands in Somerset 27 Hedgerow and parkland trees 10 Case Study - “The Neroche Forect Project” 28 Other elements of the woodland resource 10 Archaeology and the Historic Landscape 29 Nature Conservation 11 Historic woodland cover 29 SSSI Woodland 11 Ancient woodland 29 Importance of the designated areas 11 Ownership of ancient woodlands 30 Key woodland biodiversity types 12 Sensitive Management of Archaeological Features 31 Local Wildlife Sites 14 Case Study - “Exmoor National Park, Ancient Woodland Project” 32 Woodland wildlife of European importance 14 Historic value of hedgerow trees 33 Management for biodiversity 15 Historic landscape policy 33 Veteran Trees 16 Woodland Ownership 34 Landscape Assessment 18 Why people own Woodlands 34 Somerset Character Areas 18 Woodland ownership by Conservation bodies 35 Woodland in
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Aug 2012 for the Parishes of Bickenhall, Curland, Orchard Portman with Thurlbear and Staple Fitzpaine
    “Working Together for a Better Community” Issue No 5 Newsletter Aug 2012 For the Parishes of Bickenhall, Curland, Orchard Portman with Thurlbear and Staple Fitzpaine Virtually every corner of the British Isles has been owned and tilled, cropped and grazed for at least 7,000 years. There is hardly a square yard of land that has not been utilised by someone since the arrival of Neolithic man; the landscape we love and admire is almost entirely man-made. We don’t own the land; we’re merely looking after it. elcome to the fifth issue of the Neroche Villages’ Newsletter, which hopes to satisfy the need identified in the Parish Plan for a ‘hard copy’ local news and information medium delivered free to every household in Neroche Parish. The aim of this publication is to improve communication within the Parish by providing news and information on a wide variety of subjects and issues. 1 Newsletter Foreword David Fothergill (Somerset County Councillor) - June 2012 In my role as County Councillor I get to see a wide cross section of newsletters, sadly some appear tired and lacking enthusiasm, seemingly unloved apart from a few dedicated producers. I am delighted to say that the Neroche Villages Newsletter is totally the opposite of any of these criticisms; it is vibrant, interesting, informative and reflects the community it serves. A very big well done is deserved by all the team, from editor to volunteer deliverers, who seem to take the self-funding newsletter from strength to strength. It seems difficult to believe but in ten months’ time (where has the last three years gone?!) we will be electing a new County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Men of Buckland St Mary Who Fought in WWI
    Buckland St Mary Mary Buckland St who fought in WWI Remembering the men of Vanished Lives Vanished VANISHED LIVES ROSANNA BARTON BUCKLAND ST MARY PARISH COUNCIL Futility In Memory Of The Brave Men Move him into the sun— Gently its touch awoke him once, Of Buckland St Mary At home, whispering of fields half-sown. Who Gave Their Lives Always it woke him, even in France, In The Great War Until this morning and this snow. 1914-1919 If anything might rouse him now The kind old sun will know. Think how it wakes the seeds— Woke once the clays of a cold star. Are limbs, so dear-achieved, are sides Full-nerved, still warm, too hard to stir? Was it for this the clay grew tall? —O what made fatuous sunbeams toil To break earth’s sleep at all? Wilfred Owen Base of the War Memorial in Buckland St Mary churchyard ‘From Buckland St Mary there went into HM’s forces about seventy men from a population of about 450. Of these sixteen joined voluntarily all the remainder, except those underage at the time attested under Lord Derby’s scheme …1 … On the outbreak of war several ladies of the village took a course of sick nursing and ambulance work and being thus qualified they did most useful work at the V.A.D.2 hospital at Ilminster. The women of the parish were organised by Mesdames Lance and Pott and met weekly for the purpose of making pillowcases and moss bags for splints, several hundred of which, were sent to a collection station.’ (The Western Gazette) 1 See page 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Geology-A Good Rock Guide
    SOMERSET GEOLOGY-A GOOD ROCK GUIDE Hugh Prudden The great unconformity figured by De la Beche WELCOME TO SOMERSET Welcome to green fields, wild flower meadows, farm cider, Cheddar cheese, picturesque villages, wild moorland, peat moors, a spectacular coastline, quiet country lanes…… To which we can add a wealth of geological features. The gorge and caves at Cheddar are well-known. Further east near Frome there are Silurian volcanics, Carboniferous Limestone outcrops, Variscan thrust tectonics, Permo-Triassic conglomerates, sediment-filled fissures, a classic unconformity, Jurassic clays and limestones, Cretaceous Greensand and Chalk topped with Tertiary remnants including sarsen stones-a veritable geological park! Elsewhere in Mendip are reminders of coal and lead mining both in the field and museums. Today the Mendips are a major source of aggregates. The Mesozoic formations curve in an arc through southwest and southeast Somerset creating vales and escarpments that define the landscape and clearly have influenced the patterns of soils, land use and settlement as at Porlock. The church building stones mark the outcrops. Wilder country can be found in the Quantocks, Brendon Hills and Exmoor which are underlain by rocks of Devonian age and within which lie sunken blocks (half-grabens) containing Permo-Triassic sediments. The coastline contains exposures of Devonian sediments and tectonics west of Minehead adjoining the classic exposures of Mesozoic sediments and structural features which extend eastward to the Parrett estuary. The predominance of wave energy from the west and the large tidal range of the Bristol Channel has resulted in rapid cliff erosion and longshore drift to the east where there is a full suite of accretionary landforms: sandy beaches, storm ridges, salt marsh, and sand dunes popular with summer visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Peters's Church Staple Fitzpaine Somerset
    An Archaeological Watching Brief at St. Peters’s Church Staple Fitzpaine Somerset SFC 13 Carried out for: Staple Fitzpaine Parish Council Grid Reference: ST 2640 1826 Carried out by: C. and N. Hollinrake Ltd., Consultant Archaeologists, 12, Bove Town, Glastonbury, Somerset BA6 8JE Telephone: 01458 833332 Report Number 495 An Archaeological Watching Brief at the parish church of St. Peter, Staple Fitzpaine, Somerset Table of Contents ..............title......................................................................... page ..............Summary................................................................ 1 1.0.........Introduction............................................................ 1 2.0.........Topography and Geology ...................................... 3 3.0.........Archaeological Background .................................. 6 4.0.........Historic Background.............................................. 8 5.0.........Historic Maps......................................................... 10 6.0.........The Watching Brief – Method Statement.............. 14 7.0.........The Watching Brief – Results................................ 16 7.7.........The Interior of the Church ..................................... 32 8.0.........Discussion.............................................................. 41 9.0.........Finds and archive................................................... 43 ..............Acknowledgements................................................ 43 Appendices 1............Site drawings, churchyard ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conquest Medieval
    Medieval 12 Post-Conquest Medieval Edited by Stephen Rippon and Bob Croft from contributions by Oliver Creighton, Bob Croft and Stephen Rippon 12.1 Introduction economic transformations reflected, for example, in Note The preparation of this assessment has been the emergence, virtual desertion and then revival of an hampered by a lack of information and input from some urban hierarchy, the post-Conquest Medieval period parts of the region. This will be apparent from the differing was one of relative social, political and economic levels of detail afforded to some areas and topics, and the continuity. Most of the key character defining features almost complete absence of Dorset and Wiltshire from the of the region – the foundations of its urban hier- discussion. archy, its settlement patterns and field systems, its The period covered by this review runs from the industries and its communication systems – actually Norman Conquest in 1066 through to the Dissolu- have their origins in the pre-Conquest period, and tion of the monasteries in the 16th century, and unlike the 11th to 13th centuries simply saw a continua- the pre-Conquest period is rich in both archaeology tion of these developments rather than anything radi- (including a continuous ceramic sequence across the cally new: new towns were created and monas- region) and documentary sources. Like every region teries founded, settlement and field systems spread of England, the South West is rich in Medieval archae- out into the more marginal environments, industrial ology preserved within the fabric of today’s historic production expanded and communication systems landscape, as extensive relict landscapes in areas of were improved, but all of these developments were the countryside that are no longer used as inten- built on pre-Conquest foundations (with the excep- sively as they were in the past, and buried beneath tion of urbanisation in the far south-west).
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Castle Slighting in the Middle Ages
    The Archaeology of Castle Slighting in the Middle Ages Submitted by Richard Nevell, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology in October 2017. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ……………………………………………………………………………… Abstract Medieval castle slighting is the phenomenon in which a high-status fortification is demolished in a time of conflict. At its heart are issues about symbolism, the role of castles in medieval society, and the politics of power. Although examples can be found throughout the Middle Ages (1066–1500) in England, Wales and Scotland there has been no systematic study of the archaeology of castle slighting. Understanding castle slighting enhances our view of medieval society and how it responded to power struggles. This study interrogates the archaeological record to establish the nature of castle slighting: establishing how prevalent it was chronologically and geographically; which parts of castles were most likely to be slighted and why this is significant; the effects on the immediate landscape; and the wider role of destruction in medieval society. The contribution of archaeology is especially important as contemporary records give little information about this phenomenon. Using information recovered from excavation and survey allows this thesis to challenge existing narratives about slighting, especially with reference to the civil war between Stephen and Matilda (1139–1154) and the view that slighting was primarily to prevent an enemy from using a fortification.
    [Show full text]
  • South Somerset District Council And
    Appendix Neroche Landscape Partnership Scheme Background In September 2006 the Neroche LPS was formally awarded £2M from the Heritage Lottery Fund to deliver a comprehensive package of projects embracing improved public access, biodiversity conservation, landscape enhancement, environmental education, heritage interpretation, volunteering, skills training and community engagement. In addition to the Lottery Funding, a further £300k was secured from 11 funding partners (including SSDC) and £645k secured from in- kind contributions and other grants. The Lottery funded programme comes to an end in April 2010. South Somerset District Council has committed a total of £10,500 to the Scheme in four annual instalments of £2,625 covering the period up to April 2010. Achievements so far – across the wider Somerset area The Neroche LPS has achieved a great deal over the last 3 years. A number of the key headlines are as follows: 13.5 miles of new multi-user circular trail established with innovative digital trail guide. 300 hectares (740 acres) of linking butterfly habitat and open space created following plantation harvesting. 90 English Longhorn cattle acquired to graze butterfly habitats and establish a new added- value beef business for a local farmer. 1000 metres of new all-ability trail and viewpoint suitable for wheelchair users. 50 health walks assisted catering for over 500 people with special needs. 25 staff from 17 primary and secondary schools trained as Forest School leaders. 500 volunteer days generated by local people on heritage projects including a community excavation on a lost Medieval village. 300 children and adults took part in the first ‘Punkie Night’ reviving a Blackdowns tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together for a Better Community Issue 33
    Working Together for a Better Community For the parishes of Staple Fitzpaine, Bickenhall, Curland and Orchard Portman with Thurlbear Issue 33 - Autumn 2019 'Fantastic entries for this year's Nursery Theme for the Scarecrow Festival - read the full story' Bel Deering from the RSPCA receiving their winner’s prize The Owl and the Pussycat Welcome to the Neroche Villages’ Newsletter, a quarterly publication delivered free to every household in Neroche Parish, helping the community to stay connected and up-to-date on local issues. ONCE UPON A SCARECROW FESTIVAL 2019 Now children - Are you sitting comfortably? Then I’ll begin. Once upon a time in a beautiful land called Neroche, the villagers decided to stop pesky crows eating their crops by making ScareCROWS. In 2019 two crows were happily visiting this idyllic part of Somerset. “Goodness” said VelCROW looking down. “It’s July again and that means one thing – Scarecrows! I’m out of here.” CROWdie looked none too pleased at being abandoned on her holidays and decided to take a closer look at what was going on beneath her. She flew down over the quaint area known as Bickenhall where Old Mother Hubbard was fretting over her bare cupboard and not one, not two but three Humptys Really Really Scared her. She thought Humpty Trumpty would be quite frightening; she was a little worried about Humpty Dumpty falling off the wall and hoped that his friend Humpty would remain upright too. She didn’t like the look of Jonathan Joe, with his mouth like an O, so she flew on to spy on Curland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Environment of the Blackdown Hills AONB
    The historic environment of the Blackdown Hills AONB By Devon county archaeologist Bill Horner The Blackdown Hills Area of Outstanding Natural within the AONB are the large Iron Age hillforts that Beauty is rich in historic environment interest, make great advantage of the local topography. including historic and archaeological sites and Hembury is one of Devon’s most striking hillforts, buildings and settlements of historic interest. In all with other examples at Dumpdon, Stockland and 4,058 sites and buildings of archaeological and Membury, with Knapp and Howley on the Somerset historic interest are recorded within the AONB on side. Of the 26 Scheduled Ancient Monuments the Devon and Somerset Historic Environment within the AONB, 10 are Bronze Age barrows or Records (HERs) and there are 767 Listed Buildings barrow cemeteries and 7 are hillforts. of architectural and historic interest. However, the wider landscape of the AONB is also full of historic character. This landscape has been formed by A Roman fort has been identified within the hillfort at centuries of human activity and management, Hembury. A later civilian villa or at least a creating an intricate pattern of fields, heaths, woods, ‘Romanised’ farm with a luxurious bath-house is lanes, hamlets and villages. This ancient managed known at Whitestaunton and has been Scheduled landscape contributes greatly to the unique as an Ancient Monument. Other Romanised farms character of the Blackdown Hills AONB. existed at Membury and probably Woonton in Chardstock. Iron working was an important industry in the Roman period and continued into the Middle The AONB contains significant concentrations of Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan 2014 – 2019
    Blackdown Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plan 2014 – 2019 The Blackdown Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) covers 370 square kilometres (143 square miles) of unspoilt countryside straddling the Somerset and Devon border. AONB Partnership commendation: This management plan is endorsed by partnership organisations as the guiding framework for collectively maintaining the special character of the Blackdown Hills AONB, while recognising the need for a thriving future for the area and its communities. 2 Blackdown Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty CONTENTS CONTENTS Location of the Blackdown Hills AONB 2 VISION FOR THE BLACKDOWN HILLS AONB 20 APPENDICES 72 Ministerial Foreword 4 A. AONB Partnership organisations 72 AONB Chairman’s Foreword 5 B. Natural England monitoring framework 73 C. Additional data and information 74 D. Landscape Character Areas of the AONB 88 Part 1: Setting the scene 6 Part 2: Management framework 21 E. Glossary 95 Introduction 22 F. Summary of Review Process 98 INTRODUCTION 7 What is an AONB? 7 THEME 1: LANDSCAPE 23 The purpose of AONB designation 7 1.1 Landscape Character 24 Natural Beauty 7 Table 2: Landscape character types of the AONB 26 This Management Plan 8 1.2 Cultural Heritage 30 What is the plan for? 8 1.3 Biodiversity and Geodiversity 34 Who is the plan for? 8 Table 3: Habitats and species of the AONB 36 How does it relate to other plans, strategies and 1.4 Natural Resources 40 activities? 8 1.5 Farming, Forestry and Land Management 42 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE – THE
    [Show full text]
  • SM Management Plan WEST ENGLAND FOREST DISTRICT
    SM Management Plan __________________________________________________________________ WEST ENGLAND FOREST DISTRICT Scheduled Monument Management Plan for Castle Neroche SM Plan Period May 2016 - 2026 1 | SM Management Plan __________________________________________________________________ 1. Agreements and Consent 2. Introduction 3. Management Objectives 4. Description and List Entry Appendix 5. Location Maps 6. Photographic record 7. Historic England Listing details 1. Agreement & Consent District West England Forest District Name of SM Castle Neroche Period of Plan 2016-2026 Peter Kelsall pp. Kevin Stannard _______________________ Forest Management Director Forestry Commission England Date _______________________ _______________________ Historic England Date _______________________ 2 | SM Management Plan __________________________________________________________________ 2. Introduction Castle Neroche is one of the most visited recreational sites in the northern Blackdown Hills area. It comprises a Norman motte and bailey castle on the site of an earlier Iron Age hillfort. Much of the earthworks are still clearly visible. 3. Management Objectives The major management issues on the site are as follows: • Public access causes localised erosion of the historic features (ramparts) • Management needs to ensure the safety of public when they access the site • Vegetation obscures the impressive views and the roots cause disturbance underground, this includes plantation forestry on part of the monument and naturally regenerating material across
    [Show full text]