DOCSLIB.ORG

Modernising the Great Western Railway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modernising the Great Western Railway House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Modernising the Great Western Railway Forty-fourth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 February 2017 HC 776 Published on 3 March 2017 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Philip Boswell MP (Scottish National Party, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Chris Evans MP (Labour (Co-op), Islwyn) Caroline Flint MP (Labour, Don Valley) Kevin Foster MP (Conservative, Torbay) Simon Kirby MP (Conservative, Brighton, Kemptown) Kwasi Kwarteng MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) Nigel Mills MP (Conservative, Amber Valley) Anne Marie Morris MP (Conservative, Newton Abbot) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Karin Smyth MP (Labour, Bristol South) Mrs Anne-Marie Trevelyan MP (Conservative, Berwick-upon-Tweed) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Dr Stephen McGinness (Clerk), Dr Mark Ewbank (Second Clerk), Darren Hackett (Senior Committee Assistant), Sue Alexander and Ruby Radley (Committee Assistants), and Tim Bowden (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Committee of Public Accounts, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 4099; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Modernising the Great Western Railway 1 Contents Summary 3 Introduction 4 Conclusions and recommendations 5 1 Delivery of the Great Western modernisation programme 8 Electrification of the Great Western Railway 8 Network Rail’s cost estimation 9 2 The Department and Network Rail’s approach to planning and management of infrastructure programmes 11 The Department’s case for investing in infrastructure programmes 11 Network Rail’s planning of infrastructure work 11 The Department’s management of complex infrastructure programmes 12 Formal Minutes 14 Witnesses 15 Published written evidence 15 List of Reports from the Committee during the current session 16 Modernising the Great Western Railway 3 Summary We reported in November 2015 on the staggering and unacceptable increase in the estimated costs of the Great Western Main Line electrification programme which rose by £1.2 billion in the space of a year. The extent of the serious failings in the Department for Transport’s (the Department’s) and Network Rail’s management of the Great Western modernisation programme which led to these cost overruns and a delay to completion of up to three years are now clearer. Both the Department and Network Rail accept that there were significant failings in the design, planning and cost- estimating of the programme. The case for electrification and new trains were seen as two linked programmes, rather than being managed as a whole and the accountability arrangements put in place were overly complex and failed to provide the assurance the Department needed to be an effective client of Network Rail. The serious management failings evident in this programme raise concerns about the Department and Network Rail’s ability to manage similar projects in the future, such as the planned electrification schemes on Midland Main Line and TransPennine routes. The Department’s claim that many of the passenger benefits of electrification can be obtained without electrifying the whole route raises questions about whether full electrification is the most appropriate way to achieve benefits for passengers, and value for money for taxpayers. But whilst the Department is taking this optimistic view this cannot detract from the £330m additional costs that the delays to electrification will incur. 4 Modernising the Great Western Railway Introduction Modernising the Great Western Railway involves upgrading infrastructure, trains and passenger services along the rail route that connects London with south-west England and south Wales. The Department for Transport expects electrification of the railway line to increase capacity, reduce journey times, reduce operating costs and generate environmental benefits. The programme has seen significant cost increases and is taking longer than expected, and in November 2015 Network Rail replanned the modernisation programme. Electrification of the railway line between Maidenhead and Cardiff is now expected to cost £2.8 billion, which is an increase of £1.2 billion against the estimated cost of the project in 2014. The Department also currently expects to incur costs of up to £330 million as a result of delays to electrification. Electrification of some sections of the route will be delayed by up to 36 months. Some parts of the electrification project, such as between Bristol Parkway and Bristol Temple Meads, have been deferred to the next rail investment period (2019–2024). The Department is revising its business case for the entire modernisation programme, which is expected to be completed in March 2017. Modernising the Great Western Railway 5 Conclusions and recommendations 1. It is not clear whether the Great Western electrification project can be delivered to the revised target of December 2018 and budget of £2.8 billion. The estimated cost of electrification increased by £1.2 billion to £2.8 billion by the end of 2015 following Network Rail’s replanning of the project, which also identified delays to parts of the project of 18 to 36 months. The Department and Network Rail are confident that the project is now on track as important milestones have been met. But Network Rail admitted that there are still “very significant risks” to be managed and noted that “every single part of the programme is absolutely on the limit”.1 The most recent risk analysis indicates a financial exposure of £274 million, £49 million more than the £225 million of contingency currently available and risks still remain that costs could increase further. Recommendation: Network Rail must ensure that all risks to the project are identified, monitored and controlled and use this information to identify with the Department the critical path for the whole modernisation programme, setting out how the infrastructure, new trains and planned services will interact with each other by March 2017. 2. Network Rail failed to plan the infrastructure work properly. Network Rail admits that the early stages of the project were not carried out in an appropriate way. The initial design was incomplete. The cost estimating was not good enough and it started construction before it had the necessary permits and consents in order to try to meet the schedule. Network Rail’s failure to put in place an adequate plan to obtain the more than 1,800 separate consents it needed from local authorities, such as permission for works that could affect protected species or listed buildings, led to higher costs. Network Rail could not explain why it had not sought to avoid these problems by obtaining an Order under the Transport and Works Act enabling the Secretary of State to have granted planning permission for the whole scheme. Recommendation: Network Rail must improve its ability to produce realistic cost estimates, including making greater use of data from completed projects. Network Rail must make sure that robust and detailed plans, including a critical path, are in place for infrastructure projects before starting construction works and consider whether an Order under the Transport and Works Act would be preferable to multiple individual planning consents and other approvals. 3. The Department failed to challenge Network Rail’s plans effectively despite the very significant sums of public money at risk. Depite being liable to pay £400,000 per day to lease new trains that could not be used until the overhead electrification was complete, the Department did not adequately challenge Network Rail’s plans to carry out the infrastructure work. Instead, it left the role of scrutinising Network Rail’s plans to ensure they were both deliverable and the most efficient way of carrying out the work to the Office of Rail and Road. The Department accepts that this system was too complex, “much weaker and less reliable than [it] thought”, though it believes that it has since put in place a “very clear structure of accountability”. 1 Qq 55, 58 6 Modernising the Great Western Railway Recommendation: The Department must ensure that it has obtained suitable assurance over cost and deliverability before taking decisions on infrastructure investment and other major decisions which depend on infrastructure being available. It must set out how it will continue to develop its own programme management expertise, and how it will use this to monitor Network Rail’s delivery. 4. The Department failed to integrate all the elements needed to deliver benefits for passengers successfully at the planning stage, and did not manage the programme in a joined-up way. Until 2015, the Department managed the different elements as separate but related projects, rather than as one single integrated project, even though improving services for passengers required all the elements to be completed on time. The Department should have had an integrated business case for the programme sooner than March 2015, bringing together the new infrastructure, new trains and service patterns.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rosa Katz: Oral History Transcript
    Rosa Katz: Oral History Transcript www.wisconsinhistory.org/HolocaustSurvivors/Katz. asp Name: Rachel (Rosa) Goldberg Katz (1924–2012) Birth Place: Lodz, Poland Arrived in Wisconsin: 1953, Oshkosh Project Name: Oral Histories: Wisconsin Survivors Rosa Katz of the Holocaust Biography: Rachel (Rosa) Goldberg Katz was born in Lodz, Poland, on May 6, 1924, to a well-to-do family with liberal Jewish beliefs. In 1935, her sister and brother-in-law immigrated to Palestine while the rest of the family remained in Poland. When the Germans occupied Lodz in 1939, 15-year-old Rosa was among the thousands of Jews crowded into the city's ghetto. Three years later, in July 1942, her mother was deported from the ghetto and never heard from again. In August 1944, the Lodz Ghetto was liquidated. Its starving residents, including Rosa, her father, brother, and sister-in-law, Hela, were all shipped to Auschwitz. There she was separated from her father and brother. She never saw them again. German officials mistakenly sent Rosa and hundreds of other Jewish women (instead of French prisoners) to work at the Krupp munitions factory in Berlin. For eight months, Rosa assembled delicate timepieces for German bombs. In March 1945, she was transferred to the death camp in Ravensbruck, Germany. The Swedish Red Cross liberated the camp within a month of her arrival. Its inhabitants were transported to Sweden where Rosa recuperated for several years. She married Bernard Katz there (also a survivor). In April 1948, they came to the U.S. Initially settling in North Carolina, the Katz family moved to Oshkosh, Wisconsin, in 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney, 17 July 2003 (PDF 435.1
    SPARK AND CANNON Telephone: Adelaide (08) 8212 3699 TRANSCRIPT Hobart (03) 6224 2499 Melbourne (03) 9670 6989 OF PROCEEDINGS Perth (08) 9325 4577 Sydney (02) 9211 4077 _______________________________________________________________ PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY INTO DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT MRS H. OWENS, Presiding Commissioner MS C. McKENZIE, Commissioner TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS AT SYDNEY ON THURSDAY, 17 JULY 2003, AT 9.09 AM Continued from 15/7/03 DDA 1332 dda170303.doc MRS OWENS: Good morning. Welcome to the public hearing for the Productivity Commission inquiry into the Disability Discrimination Act 1992, which we will refer to as the DDA. My name is Helen Owens, I'm the presiding commissioner. On my left is my associate commissioner, Cate McKenzie. The hearing will have breaks for morning tea, lunch and afternoon tea. We will need to stick fairly closely to the timetable today, because we've got a lot of participants. On 5 February this year the government asked the commission to review the DDA and the Disability Discrimination Regulations 1996. The terms of reference for the inquiry ask us to examine the social impact of the DDA on people with disabilities and on the community as a whole. Among other things, the commission is required to assess the costs and benefits of the DDA and its effectiveness in achieving its objectives. We have already talked informally to a wide range of organisations and individuals. The purpose of this hearing today is to provide an opportunity for interested parties to discuss their submissions and their views on the public record. We will be holding hearings in Melbourne following the hearings today and tomorrow in Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 1008 Thursday, No. 6 17 June 2021 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Ceisteanna - Questions 754 17/06/2021A00200Ceisteanna ar Sonraíodh Uain Dóibh - Priority Questions 754 17/06/2021A00300Aviation Industry 754 17/06/2021B00700Transport Policy 756 17/06/2021C00400Rail Network 758 17/06/2021D00200Rail Network 760 17/06/2021D01000Ceisteanna Eile - Other Questions 762 17/06/2021D01100National Development Plan 762 17/06/2021E00950Road Projects 765 17/06/2021F00600Driver Test 767 17/06/2021G00550Tax Reliefs 769 17/06/2021H00400Departmental Budgets 771 17/06/2021J00150Covid-19 Pandemic Supports 773 17/06/2021J01150Public Service Obligation �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������776
    [Show full text]
  • Go West: Bristol and the Post-Brexit Immigration System, IPPR
    Institute for Public Policy Research GO WEST BRISTOL AND THE POST-BREXIT IMMIGRATION SYSTEM Marley Morris and Rohan Roy October 2019 ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive think tank. We are an independent charitable organisation with our main office in London. IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated think tank for the north of England, operates out of offices in Manchester and Newcastle, and IPPR Scotland, our dedicated think tank for Scotland, is based in Edinburgh. Our primary purpose is to conduct and promote research into, and the education of the public in, the economic, social and political sciences, science and technology, the voluntary sector and social enterprise, public services, and industry and commerce. Other purposes include to advance physical and mental health, the efficiency of public services and environmental protection or improvement; and to relieve poverty, unemployment, or those in need by reason of youth, age, ill-health, disability, financial hardship, or other disadvantage. IPPR 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no: 800065 (England and Wales), SC046557 (Scotland) This paper was first published in October 2019. © IPPR 2019 The contents and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors only. The progressive policy think tank CONTENTS Summary ..........................................................................................................................3 Recommendations for the
    [Show full text]
  • Real Good Whole FOOD
    Entertainment & Stuff Pomfret, Connecticut ® “To Bean or not to Bean...?” Volume 15 Number 2 April - June 2011 Free* ~ Quality Since 1989 ~ 85 Main’s he Vanilla Bean Café has focused on quality 3rd Annual Shuck-Off for over 20 years. We strive for quality on his year, 85 Main - our sister restaurant in Put- every level which means that our menu items T nam - will host their 3rd Annual Oyster Shuck- are carefully prepared with real, whole, minimally ing Competition and Shellfish Celebration on processed ingredients including fresh (locally T st sourced) produce. Our emphasis on quality reflects Sunday, May 1 , from 12:00-6:00 PM. The new loca- our philosophy of caring about the health of our tion for this popular event is by the Quinebaug river families in the communities we serve. We are a fam- in Putnams’s Rotary Park. Free admission. Entertain- ily owned and operated restaurant; not a chain. All ment throughout the day. Food, including oysters, menu items are prepared when your order, right here and beverages available for purchase. For additional on the premises. information, visit www.85main.com. c We serve fresh, Real delicious, healthy food to you and Good your family every Whole day. Enjoy. c FOOD Pomfret Proprietors www.VisitPomfret.com omfret Proprietors’ website notes, “Pomfret’s quiet country roads lead you to pastoral Pbyways, historic landmarks, unique shops and exceptional restaurants.” A trip up Scenic Route 169 is lovely but won’t show you all that Pomfret has to offer. The Pomfret Proprietors’ website states, “It is the mission of the Pomfret Proprietors’ Association to share our beautiful town with others by promoting the excitement and fun of local businesses.” So, while you are here, visit the Pomfret Proprietors’ website.
    [Show full text]
  • West of England Strategic Economic Plan 2015-2030 01 Contents
    WE ARE A PARTNERSHIP FOR GROWTH EMBRACING GROWTH DEAL NEGOTIATIONS FOR 2015-2021 WEST OF ENGLAND STRATEGIC ECONOMIC PLAN 2015-2030 01 CONTENTS Curriculum Vitae: Knowledge, Innovation, Quality of Life 03 Forewords by James Dyson and Colin Skellett 04 1 The West of England Strategic Economic Plan 06 2 The City Region of Choice for a sustainable future 18 3 Economic Strategy 24 4 Local Growth Fund Deal Negotiations 31 5 Using our Levers of Growth 62 5.1 People – Knowledge Economy, Skills & Social Inclusion 63 5.2 Place & Infrastructure 70 5.3 Investment & Promotion 78 5.4 SME Business Support 82 6 Implementation Plan 88 7 Delivery Plan 96 8 Evaluation Plan 106 Appendices 112 Appendix 1: Six Year Plan for the Local Growth Fund 114 Appendix 2: FE Capital Projects – a breakdown of individual proposals 116 Appendix 3: Deadweight and displacement calculations 118 Appendix 4: Pipeline of interventions for the Local Growth Fund 120 3-6 year programme Appendix 5: The Process to identify Interventions for the 124 Local Growth Fund Appendix 6: Shared Priority Investment Maps & Key 126 Appendix 7: Full Business Case Template 138 Technical Supporting Documents available on the LEP website: www.westofenglandlep.co.uk/strategicplan 1 Outline Business Cases for the Local Growth Fund current 2 year programme 2 LEP Sector Prospectus 3 Equality Impact Assessment CuRRICULUM VITAE: KNOWLEDGE, INNOVATION, QUALITY OF LIFE 02|03 CuRRICULUM VITAE KNOWLEDGE, INNOVATION, QUALITY OF LIFE • Over one million people and growing Knowledge Quality of Life • An economy worth
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Express
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN EXPRESS TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 A POSTCARD TO THE EDUCATOR 4 CHAPTER 1 ALL ABOARD! THE FILM 5 CHAPTER 2 THE NORTH AMERICAN DREAM REFLECTIONS ON THE RIBBON OF STEEL (CANADA AND U.S.A.) X CHAPTER 3 A RAILWAY JOURNEY EVOLUTION OF RAIL TRANSPORT X CHAPTER 4 THE LITTLE ENGINE THAT COULD THE MECHANICS OF THE RAILWAY AND TRAIN X CHAPTER 5 TALES, TRAGEDIES, AND TRIUMPHS THE RAILWAY AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES X CHAPTER 6 DO THE CHOO-CHOO A TRAIL OF INFLUENCE AND INSPIRATION X CHAPTER 7 ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACKS ACTIVITIES FOR THE TRAIN-MINDED 2 A POSTCARD TO THE EDUCATOR 1. Dear Educator, Welcome to our Teacher’s Guide, which has been prepared to help educators integrate the IMAX® motion picture ROCKY MOUNTAIN EXPRESS into school curriculums. We designed the guide in a manner that is accessible and flexible to any school educator. Feel free to work through the material in a linear fashion or in any order you find appropriate. Or concentrate on a particular chapter or activity based on your needs as a teacher. At the end of the guide, we have included activities that embrace a wide range of topics that can be developed and adapted to different class settings. The material, which is targeted at upper elementary grades, provides students the opportunity to explore, to think, to express, to interact, to appreciate, and to create. Happy discovery and bon voyage! Yours faithfully, Pietro L. Serapiglia Producer, Rocky Mountain Express 2. Moraine Lake and the Valley of the Ten Peaks, Banff National Park, Alberta 3 The Film The giant screen motion picture Rocky Mountain Express, shot with authentic 15/70 negative which guarantees astounding image fidelity, is produced and distributed by the Stephen Low Company for exhibition in IMAX® theaters and other giant screen theaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Customer Experience Survey 2016
    Caltrain Customer Experience Survey Market Research & Development March 2016 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methodology 2 Executive Summary 4 Survey Findings 9 Service Ratings 9 Service Rankings 10 Communication Ratings 11 Customer Comfort/Enjoyment Ratings 12 Payment Ratings 13 Rankings (Communication, Customer Comfort/Enjoyment, Payment) 14 Value of Service 15 Use of TNCs 16 Electric Trains Amenity Ratings 17 Electric Trains Amenity Rankings 18 Ridership 19 Demographics 24 Questionnaire 30 Comments 36 Introduction The Caltrain Customer Experience Program was recently implemented to identify short-, mid- and long- range improvements in collaboration with the Citizens Advisory Committee. Part of this initiative also includes seeking input from the frequent, infrequent and non-riders through online, intercept and focus group studies that will guide Caltrain efforts in providing the ultimate customer experience. In this first online survey, Caltrain asked the general public to rate and identify priorities, and provide ridership and demographic information. This is not a statistically valid study but it’s the first step to help Caltrain’s improvement process. The results of this survey will inform the questions on the next statistically valid Customer Satisfaction Survey in June. The last study of this series will be a focus group in which Caltrain will test some of the possible improvements and ensure they make a positive impact on riders’ daily use of the system. 1 Methodology The study was developed and launched in Survey Monkey (an online survey tool) as an opt-in survey, meaning that customers (and the general public) could choose to click on the link and complete the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Cities: Graduate Mobility and Productivity
    Future of Cities: Graduate Mobility and Productivity An experiment in place-based open policy-making Foresight Future of Cities Project The Foresight Future of Cities Project is run from within the Government Office for Science (GO-Science) and was launched in June 2013 by Sir Mark Walport. This major project has developed an evidence base on the future of UK cities to inform decision-makers. It has used evidence and futures analysis, taking a view towards 2065, considering how people will live, work and interact in our cities 50 years from now. The project has focused on taking a holistic, long-term view of the future of UK cities, working across spatial scales from the national system of cities to city and sub-city systems. Foresight is not alone in this space. Through the lifetime of the project we have seen an increasing number of organisations taking an interest in the future of cities. Along with this, there has been a growing amount of research and analysis on the future of cities, both in the UK and around the world. We have sought to work with these organisations and drawn upon much of this work. We have collected evidence in a variety of ways, from the commissioning of working papers and essays, to running futures workshops, and visiting, supporting and working with more than 20 cities of various types and sizes across the breadth of the country. There is a considerable evidence base available on the project’s website including the peer reviewed working papers, essays and workshop reports. The project undertook an experiment in open policy making, adopting a place-based approach to a key challenge emerging from the Future of Cities project’s evidence base: graduate mobility and productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Log of Questions & Answers Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Silver Line Project
    Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Silver Line Project Master Log of Questions & Answers (ID# 1; Received May 20, 2019; Answered May 21, 2019) Q: Why Diesel Train? Are there plans to convert to electric? Have you seen the Volkswagen scandal, I do not understand why diesel? I looked through the environmental impact and no mention? The train will go through neighborhoods. My only thought is diesel was a cheaper alternative. Diesel first The FLIRTs are driven by electric traction motors with power provided by the “Power Pack”. The Power Pack is a special car located in the middle of each trainset that can contain up to 4 diesel generators which provide the electricity used to drive the train. Because of this diesel-electric design, when the Trillium Line is eventually electrified, the FLIRTs can be easily converted to fully electric trains by removing the Power Pack car and installing pantographs. A: The selected vehicle is discussed in Section 2.3.2 of the FEIS/ROD. Vehicles operating in the Cotton Belt Corridor must be compliant with FRA requirements since the passenger rail will share much of the corridor with freight operations. As such, overhead catenary cannot be used as they are incompatible with freight clearances. Air Quality is discussed in Section 4.13 of the FEIS/ROD. The diesel engines will be compliant with EPA Tier 4 ultra-low emission standards. (ID# 2; Received May 20, 2019; Answered May 21, 2019) Q: Freight – I was told these trains might be used for freight. How can a potential commuter line be turned into freight? I do not want freight being shipped through my neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-SIXTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Wednesday, 28 July 2010 (Extract from book 10) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor Professor DAVID de KRETSER, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier, Minister for Veterans’ Affairs and Minister for Multicultural Affairs....................................................... The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Deputy Premier, Attorney-General and Minister for Racing............ The Hon. R. J. Hulls, MP Treasurer, Minister for Information and Communication Technology, and Minister for Financial Services.............................. The Hon. J. Lenders, MLC Minister for Regional and Rural Development, and Minister for Industry and Trade............................................. The Hon. J. M. Allan, MP Minister for Health............................................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Minister for Energy and Resources, and Minister for the Arts........... The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services, and Minister for Corrections................................................... The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Community Development.............................. The Hon. L. D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Small Business.............. The Hon. J. Helper, MP Minister for Finance, WorkCover and the Transport Accident Commission, Minister for Water
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOG of GIFTS 2017 / 2018 Annual Gift Magazine of The
    CATALOG OF GIFTS 2017 / 2018 Annual gift magazine of the BOOKS GAMES MOVIES MORE FANTASTIC HOLIDAY GIFTS FOR EVERY RAILFAN 2018 CALENDARS 2018 McMillan Rio Grande Calendar 13.9” x 19.4” hung. $15.95 (#9105) 2018 Colorado Narrow Gauge Calendar A railfan favorite, Colorado Narrow Gauge shows the trains that once traversed the narrow gauge rails, serving the Centennial State’s mountain communities and their mines from the 1800s into the mid-1900s. 13.7” x 21.5” 2018 McMillan Union Pacific Calendar hung. $15.95 (#9031) 13.9” x 19.4” hung. $15.95 (#9106) 2018 BNSF And Its Heritage Calendar 2018 Great Trains - Paintings by 2018 Those Remarkable Trains 11” x 18” hung. $14.95 (#9032) Gil Bennett Calendar 13.7” x 21.5” hung. 13” x 21” hung. $15.95 (#9036) $15.95 (#9033) 2018 Narrow Gauge Memories Calendar 2018 Howard Fogg’s Trains Calendar 2018 Classic Trains Calendar 13” x 21” 11” x 18” hung. $14.95 (#9067) 13.7” x 21.5” hung. $15.95 (#9034) hung, B&W photos. $14.99 (#9107) 2018 Union Pacific Then & Now Calendar 2018 Santa Fe Railway Calendar 2018 Union Pacific Calendar 11” x 18” hung. $14.95 (#9068) 13.7” x 21.5” hung. $15.95 (#9035) 13” x 21” hung. $15.95 (#9037) 01 Colorado Railroad Museum Catalog 2017 / 2018 HATS & SHIRTS CLOTHING D&RGW Locomotive D&RGW Locomotive Galloping Goose Khaki Colorado Railroad Museum No. 346 Baseball Hat No. 491 Baseball Hat Baseball Hat Embroidered, Baseball Hat Embroidered, Embroidered, adjustable velcro Embroidered, adjustable Museum logo in back, adjustable velcro strap strap $25.99 (#5370) velcro strap.
    [Show full text]