DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 2 Leake

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 2 Leake YOUR CONSERVATIVE TEAM FOR 2019 NICOLA DALTON I have lived in Rempstone for 40 years, where I brought up my three children. I now run my home as a Bed and Breakfast, and I'm delighted to have been selected as part of the new Conservative team for Leake Ward. Volunteering in the community plays a major part in my life and I'm president of the local Save the Children branch. I've been a Parish councillor for over 20 years and a governor of Costock Primary School. My professional career is a journalist and PR consultant in the public, private and industrial sectors. I'm keen to represent all the residents of Leake Ward, and I want to support the rural economy, to campaign for better health and education facilities, and to promote healthy and caring communities. SIMON ACKROYD I was born in Nottingham and have a Degree in Music and a Post Graduate Certificate in Education, and I teach music at a secondary school in Derby. For the past 18 years, I have enjoyed a rich and diverse career in music education and community music projects; conducting orchestras, choirs and several operatic societies. I'm greatly in demand as an organist, pianist and teacher of piano and singing. I live with my family in East Leake and I'm delighted to have been selected as a Conservative Candidate for the Leake Ward. I'm very passionate about the local area and I'm keen to represent all the residents of the Leake Ward on the Borough Council. I'm the organist at St Mary's Church in East Leake and I'm also one of the team that organises the East Leake Live Festival of Culture. JOHN THURMAN I'm married with a son and daughter and three grandchildren, I've lived in East Leake all of my life, and I'm seeking re-election as one of your Leake Ward Borough Councillors in May. I have been an East Leake Parish Councillor since 2007 and a Borough Councillor since 2013. I've seen tremendous changes to the village, particularly with the new housing. I'm asking for your vote so that I can continue to fight for the best facilities for all the residents of the East Leake, West Leake, Normanton on Soar and Stanford on Soar communities. If elected, I will continue to campaign for a new Health Centre and improved primary schools. I want to ensure that Rushcliffe Borough Council's excellent value for money services continue. The May election is all about local people and local issues. Conservatives - a great team working for the Leake Ward TRIBUTE TO Marie Males by John Thurman Councillor Marie Males retires as a Borough Councillor for the Leake Ward in May after 40 years of public service to the local community. She was elected in 1979 and has seen many changes in East Leake and the surrounding villages. In April last year Marie celebrated her 90th birthday, but she still attends Council Committees and events. In fact she has attended more than 200 Full Council meetings and has been Mayor of the Borough. Marie has a vast wealth of knowledge about the things that concern local people and it's been a real pleasure working with her. I wish her a long and happy retirement, but I'm sure she'll still be campaigning for residents for many more years to come. Vote for your Conservative candidates on 2ⁿd May 2019 Keep Rushcliffe a “great place, great lifestyle, great sport”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MAILING CONTENTS PAGE.Pub
    Clergy Mailing - July 2017 Contents 1. Nifty Notes 2. Ministry Vacancies 3. Open Churches Weekends 4. Summer Holiday Fun 5. Education Sunday Niftynotes news & information from the Diocese www.southwell.anglican.org JULY 2017 Compiled by Nicola Mellors email: [email protected] Bishop of Southwell & Nottingham to ordain twenty clergy this month record number of new MICHAEL ALLEN: Michael is clergy will be ordained married to Beth and they have Aby the Bishop of two children, Florence (2 ½) and Southwell & Nottingham on 1st Henry (8 months). Michael will and 2nd July in the Minster. serve his title with The Revd Tim Twenty will be ordained as Parker in the East Leake, West deacons and priests to serve in Leake, Stanford-on-Soar, parishes across the diocese, from Rempstone and Costock East Leake in the south to Bawtry Benefice. in the north. It is the largest number of stipendiary clergy NAEEM BAHADUR: Naeem is being ordained in the diocese for married to Rubina and they have over twenty years, including five Michele Hampson two children, Cyrus (5) and of those being ordained deacon Jeremiah (3). Naeem trained for who are under 30. They will be church. This is such a great ministry at the Queen’s serving in churches that encouragement as we seek to Foundation, Birmingham. He will incorporate every part of the grow the church in every Continued on page 3 diocese: city centre, outer urban, community, bringing the hope of market towns, and rural Jesus Christ to people of all communities. ages.” In this month’s issue: Bishop Paul says: “I am thrilled The Deacon candidates are: 2 News in brief to be ordaining so many deacons and priests to serve in churches PETER SHAW: Peter is married 4 Events & information across the Diocese of Southwell to Steph.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Line 1 1A 1B 1E N4 T D Cit R a Y Are a O a Bou B R Nda Ry Bus Route Terminus 1
    H Nottingham Nottingham u n t Trent University in South Notts 1 1A 1B N4 g d o City Centre n N4 NTU St City Campus G1 . Victoria U5 T7 Centre L. Parliament St. U4 Beastmarket Hill B2 M Arena a M2 id 1 1A 1B 1E M a r i a n Hill W Middle a y Broadmarsh Bus Station C3 and Library M5 (opens 2021) L o n ulevard d tle Bo o Cas n S2 R S6 o a Nottingham d . Notts County Dr s Football Ground en e u Q Nottingham Forest Meadows Football Ground Trent Bridge V ic to r Trent Bridge ia Cricket Ground County Hall E m . B d r b id a R g f Riverside n o k h rd Retail Park m ent g R u d o . r Nottingham o b Emmanuel 1 h 1A g School u o 1B L C l Wilford if 1E t e o Becket Catholic n n La B Comp. School N4 l v d e . Lan d r Wilfo Wilford n Green o t f li CITY AREA C ZONE C l i f t o n B o u l e v a r Fabis Drive d Fa e rn n b a or L 1 o u g n h to 1A f R li d The Nottingham C 1B . Silverdale Trent University N4 1E Farnborough Clifton N4 ve School ri D Village Glapton Glapton School h c 1 1A r u h 1B 1E N4 c h t u Crusader o Roundabout S 1A Nobel Road The Dip e Key to Map n 1A1A 1B1B a L Whitegate School n o Navy Line 1 1A 1B 1E N4 t d Cit r a y Are a o a bou B R ndary Bus route terminus 1 m Bus stop and timing point name Fabis Drive a h 1 g n i Bus operates in direction of arrow t t 1E o N Rail line and station NCT timetable retail outlet Public buildings/Places of interest Library Information Bureau Sports hall or swimming pool d oa Gotham R rth wo Keg Leake Road (Garage) e an NCT Garage L L e y ak n e n u R B d 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Aligned Core Strategy Accessibility of Settlements Study January 2010
    Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategy Accessibility of Settlements Study January 2010 Greater Nottingham Accessibility of Settlements Study January 2010 2 Greater Nottingham Accessibility of Settlements Study 1. Introduction 2. Overview – purpose and background 3. Methodology 4. Definition of settlements and origin points 5. Identifying and classifying facilities 6. Weightings for classifications of facilities 7. Measuring access to facilities 8. Accession model and scoring system 9. Model results and conclusions 10. Limitations to the study and potential further work APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Results tables Appendix 2 - Figures illustrating results Appendix 3 - Facility classification & sub-categories with weightings Appendix 4 – List of facilities with thresholds and sources of data Appendix 5 - Maps of settlements and areas, bus services, facilities. Appendix 6 – Evidence base for justification of weightings and travel time thresholds given to facilities Appendix 7 - Discussion of factors influencing the results produced by the accessibility modelling process Appendix 8 - Glossary Greater Nottingham Accessibility of Settlements Study January 2010 3 1. Introduction 1.1. Ashfield, Broxtowe, Erewash, Gedling, Nottingham City and Rushcliffe Councils are working jointly in order to prepare evidence to support the emerging aligned Core Strategies and Local Development Frameworks within their districts. Nottinghamshire County Council is assisting in this work. Part of the evidence base will be to inform the authorities about suitable settlements for the location of appropriate levels of development. 1.2. The aim of any spatial development strategy is to ensure that new development takes place at the appropriate scale in the most sustainable settlements. Most development should be concentrated within those settlements with the largest range of shops and services with more limited development within local service centres and villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Developer's Checklist
    RUSHCLIFFE BOROUGH COUNCIL Developer’s Checklist For all planning applications other than householder development Updated February 2012 *All of the Council’s forms, policies and other communications material can be requested in large print, Braille, audio or translated into another language. For further information please contact Customer Services on 0115 981 9911 or email [email protected]. FUNDAMENTAL DOCUMENTS The following forms, plans and information are compulsory and must be submitted with all planning applications: The appropriate application form clearly completed – Planning application forms are available at http://www.rushcliffe.gov.uk/developmentcontrol/applyingforplanningpermission/formsa ndfees/ The correct fee (where one is necessary). Completed Certificate of Ownership and a copy of any relevant notices and an Agricultural Holdings Certificate. Four copies of an accurate, up to date location plan showing the site and all adjoining development and generally 2 named roads at a scale of 1:1250 or 1:2500 (usually an up to date OS plan). The properties shown should be numbered or named. The application site area must be outlined in red and any adjoining land in the same ownership must be outlined in blue. The plan should preferably be at A4 size. Four copies of a block plan accurately showing the site with the proposal (extensions or new buildings) coloured or otherwise clearly marked, the direction north, the boundaries (fences/walls etc) to the property, the immediately adjacent properties and any trees, hedges, accesses and parking at a scale of 1:500 or 1:200 with written dimensions, including to the boundaries, positions and spread of trees, the extent and type of hardsurfacing and boundary treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • East Leake Parish Council's Response to NRC Consultation
    East Leake Parish Council supports the principle of provision of the National Rehabilitation Centre on the Stanford Hall site, and at this stage has no comments to make on the design and layout, but wishes to express severe reservations about access and sewerage. Vehicle Access and Impact on Road Network and Junctions The Transport Assessments are dated 2012 and gave predictions for 5 years on to 2017. East Leake Parish Council has not had sight of the updated Transport Assessment. Are existing traffic levels as predicted and have the predictions going forward been updated to reflect the following? the increase in traffic due to East Midlands Airport and massive development at Junction 24 the explosive growth in housing in East Leake the closure of the eastern arm of Rempstone Road at the junction with Loughborough Road, as stated in condition 5 (iv) of the inspector’s report for the appeal decision for the site off Rempstone Road. (Appeal ref APP/P3040/W/17/3178343, planning ref 16/01881/OUT) East Leake residents and Parish Council believe these factors seriously increases risks to all road users on the A6006, whether going to through destinations, local to East Leake and Loughborough, or actually going on site. Even if DRC has obtained all detailed permissions, NRC should now be required to take account of latest traffic conditions and our concerns. We do NOT have confidence in the access plans as drawn and would urge ARUP to provide better solutions, for instance a roundabout or traffic lights at the proposed new entrance, opposite Loughborough Road from East Leake.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAN 2 12 7 74.5M 5
    0487 rain Track De D The Walled f Garden Pond Gotham FB Moor T Long D Farm 3583 32.5m Plantation Drain BM 46.39m BM in ra 32.74m D M O OR n i L a r A N D ck E ra T 38 D r rain a D H i n k T m 2 .2 30 Long 1 Plantation Lodge 0076 D Plantation r a ni 22 1 4 b 31 BM 37.65m 1 The White 4 a Bunny C of E M Bungalow OOR South L ANE Primary School Lodge 27 TCB 1 1 SP 9a 0 43.3m 21 19 14 Fish Pond H rain D 17 R Dr 4371 ain m 2 2 . rani 1 1 D 32.4m 2 The Granary 0069 0869 4969 0069 37.0m The Fairham 2068 Middle 9 1 House 0 5 6 Barn F 7 a 11 irh Brookfield am Vicarage 8366 k Pond c rain H The a D R r T m 2 B 3 Jays 2 . r 1 o 1 o 1 El Farriers End k White BM MP .25 House Sub 5 1 The Coach 32.73m Sta 1 1 Pond 3 9 House 3 2 Bunny Park VIEW 32.9m M OOR The Stables BM 40.96m 1 CHURCH SRTEET i n n a i r a Pond r D St Mary's Church D Track Hall Bunny Park 2760 36.8m Keepers Cott 2859 Bunny 1 2 32.6m k BM 40.1m c a r Fountain T Track 37.47m 32.1m Bunny 2 Pond sm antled Railway Bunny Di Rancliffe 5856 H R n 14 Hall i L a m r O Arms 2 D 2 U 26 .
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting – 20 May 2020
    Stanford on Soar Parish Council Minutes of the Meeting of the Parish Council held virtually on 20 May 2020 at 19:00 Page 20/16 Present Frances McKim (Chairman) Rushcliffe Borough Councillor (RBC) Lesley Way Sarah Lambert Clerk to the Parish Council Rebecca Hague Craig Leggett 1. Apologies for absence Apologies received from Prue Adkin, Wendy Butler, Paul Waterfall, Rachael Eldessouky, Rushcliffe Borough Councillors Carys Thomas and Kevin Shaw and Nottinghamshire County Councillor Andy Brown. 2. Amendments to Standing Orders Proposed amendments to Standing Orders to allow for meetings to be held and decisions made virtually had been circulated to councillors prior to the meeting. Councillors agreed unanimously to adopt these amendments. 3. Declarations of interests None. 4. Open Session No residents present. 5. Minutes of the last meeting held on 26 February 2020 The minutes were accepted by Councillors as a true and accurate account of the meeting and signed by the Chair. 6. Borough and County Council Matters Cllr Way gave an update on Rushcliffe Borough Council matters, the main focus over the last couple of months had been the coronavirus response, financial support is available for businesses and also for individuals to help with council tax. A motion put to Rushcliffe Borough Council by Cllr Shaw regarding the reduction of noise from fireworks had received full support. This financial year’s community support fund is now available. The leader of Rushcliffe Borough Council has launched a loneliness campaign which will be built on going forward. 7. Planning • 20/00746/FUL – Miniature Golf Course at Stanford Hall - Erection of timber club house – PC No objection, pending decision from RBC 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the Rushcliffe (Electoral Changes) Order 2013 Sheet 1 of 1
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 Rushcliffe_Sheet1, Map 1:iteration 1_IT Map referred to in the Rushcliffe (Electoral Changes) Order 2013 Sheet 1 of 1 FLINTHAM CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of KNEETON CP the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2013. SIBTHORPE CP Boundary alignments and names shown on the mapping background SHELTON CP may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information applied as part of this review. SCREVETON CP P EAST BRIDGFORD CP C H T R O FLAWBOROUGH CP W S K W A H EAST BRIDGFORD CAR COLSTON CP THOROTON CP CRANMER SHELFORD AND NEWTON CP SCARRINGTON CP THOROTON ORSTON CP ASLOCKTON CP SAXONDALE CP BINGHAM EAST BINGHAM CP RADCLIFFE ON TRENT CP BINGHAM A RADCLIFFE ON TRENT WEST WHATTON-IN-THE-VALE CP D B ELTON-ON-THE-HILL LADY CP C HOLME PIERREPONT CP T BAY B R GAMSTON NORTH R E I D N CROPWELL BUTLER CP G T E GAMSTON CP N O S T E M ABBEY P WIVERTON HALL R U M C S CP GAMSTON CROPWELL TITHBY GRANBY CP O A T L E CP C L R SOUTH E S R E T COTGRAVE T E U CROPWELL BISHOP CP L TOLLERTON CP COTGRAVE CP EDWALTON LANGAR CUM BARNSTONE CP C L TOLLERTON IP F S T O N C P PLUMTREE CP NORMANTON KEY TO PARISH WARDS RUDDINGTON ON THE WOLDS OWTHORPE CP COLSTON BARTON IN FABIS CP CP BASSETT RUDDINGTON CP BINGHAM CP CP A BINGHAM EAST B BINGHAM WEST HOLME PIERREPONT CP BRADMORE
    [Show full text]
  • East Leake Parish Council Response to 18/02692/OUT, Land West of Field End Close OBJECT
    East Leake Parish Council Response to 18/02692/OUT, Land West of Field End Close OBJECT East Leake Parish Council vigorously objects to this planning application. It was discussed at a Parish Council meeting on 8 Jan 2019, attended by about 100 members of the public. A number of residents have also commented directly via the planning portal. The key points of East Leake Parish Council’s objections are: 1. No further development is appropriate for East Leake at this time 2. This is not “sustainable” development as the infrastructure capacity in East Leake has already been exceeded. 3. The location of this particular site is unsuitable and contravenes national and local policies. 4. This site does not support sustainable forms of transport into the village centre or elsewhere. 5. The access arrangements are inadequate and there are inaccuracies in the transport assessment. 6. There is significant ecological impact 7. Archaeology/heritage objections 8. The proposal contravenes many policies in the East Leake Neighbourhood Plan. We also note that there has been inadequate consultation process for this application and request that this be rectified. Should the application be approved despite our strong and valid objections, there are several matters that must be covered by developer contributions and/or conditions and these are summarised at the end of the document. 1 1. No further development is appropriate for East Leake at this time 1.1. Background East Leake had around 2700 homes at the start of the plan period (2013) and since then has already provided sites for 1257 new homes, expanding the village by almost half again.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 Ltd ‘2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement’ Consultation Response of Leicestershire County Council December 2018
    HS2 Ltd ‘2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement’ Consultation Response of Leicestershire County Council December 2018 Structure of this response This Response to the HS2 Ltd Working Draft Environmental Statement (WDES) by is split into four parts. These are as follows: PART 1: Document Introduction and Main areas of Concern PART 2: Response to WDES Vol 2 – Community Areas LA03, LA04 and LA05 PART 3: Response to WDES Vol 2 – Route-wide Effects PART 4: Response to WDES Vol 3 – Off-route Effects PART 5: Appendices For any enquires about this response, please contact: [email protected] 1 | Page PART 1: Document Introduction and Maim areas of Concern i) This document and its appendices comprise Leicestershire County Council’s (the Council’s) response to the Working Draft Environmental Statement (WDES) for HS2 Phase 2b (the proposed scheme). We issue this response in the spirit of contributing to the processes surrounding this vast infrastructure project, but must include the caveat that the Council can only respond to the material to hand and further intensive work with HS2 Ltd is required to fully understand the impacts for Leicestershire and the most appropriate mitigation. ii) The Council recognises that the WDES is a draft document. However, it is disappointing that even in draft; there is a distinct lack of information provided in sections of the WDES, especially regarding the proposed scheme’s constructional and operational impacts and in respect of its design. But, the Council have determined to use this as an opportunity to shape the design and mitigation across the County. Where clear mitigation is not yet defined, the Council will seek to secure assurances from HS2 Ltd that further work will be carried out to inform the preparation of the Hybrid Bill, including HS2 Ltd preparing an Interim Transport Assessment (including sensitivity testing), and during the Parliamentary processes.
    [Show full text]
  • West Leake Appraisal and Management Plan
    Contents PART 1 CHARACTER APPRAISAL ...................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction and Summary .......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 The West Leake Conservation Area ............................................................................................ 3 1.2 Key Characteristics ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Key issues ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose and Context .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 The purpose of a conservation area character appraisal .......................................................... 4 2.2 The planning policy context ......................................................................................................... 4 3 Location and landscape setting ................................................................................................... 5 4 Historic development and archaeology ...................................................................................... 6 5 Spatial analysis ............................................................................................................................. 9 5.1 Plan form and layout ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]