DOCSLIB.ORG

Idaho Cleanup Project Is Operated for the Cleanup U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Idaho Cleanup Project Is Operated for the Cleanup U.S ICP/EXT-04-00271 Revision 0 Waste Information and Location Database for the OU 7-13/14 Project M. Doug McKenzie Donald E. Sebo Kirk M. Green Vivian G. Schultz November 2005 Idaho The Idaho Cleanup Project is operated for the Cleanup U.S. Department of Energy by CH2M•WG Idaho, LLC Project ICP/EXT-04-00271 Project No. 23378 Waste Information and Location Database for the OU 7-13/14 Project M. Doug McKenzie Donald E. Sebo Kirk M. Green Vivian G. Schultz Edited by Lynn Bailey November 2005 Idaho Cleanup Project Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14516 ABSTRACT This report provides the history of the development and updating of various databases leading to development of the Waste Information and Location Database (WILD). WILD contains the inventory of waste buried in the Subsurface Disposal Area, a radioactive waste landfill located at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex, part of the Idaho National Laboratory. WILD makes available the most current and comprehensive information about waste buried in the Subsurface Disposal Area through June 1997 by linking updated estimates of contaminant inventories and burial locations. This report presents the method for verification and validation of WILD to enable its use in the comprehensive remedial investigation and feasibility study by Waste Area Group 7, Operable Unit 7-13/14. A data set was taken from WILD on November 29, 2004, to serve as the source term inventory for the Operable Unit 7-13/14 remedial investigation/baseline risk assessment and feasibility study. This particular data set is referred to as the remedial investigation/feasibility study Snapshot. Subsequent modifications to the source term inventory applied to the Snapshot and used in the remedial investigation/feasibility study will be documented in the remedial investigation/baseline risk assessment report. In addition, this report documents refinement of the waste inventory from the Reactor Technology Complex (formerly Test Reactor Area), enabling this updated information to be included in WILD. iii iv CONTENTS ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................................iii ACRONYMS............................................................................................................................................... ix 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Brief History and Description of the Idaho National Laboratory.......................................... 2 1.4.1 Brief History of the Subsurface Disposal Area................................................... 4 1.4.2 Geophysical Description ..................................................................................... 5 1.5 Document Organization......................................................................................................... 5 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF WASTE INFORMATION AND LOCATION DATABASE ................. 7 2.1 Brief History of Databases and Reports Detailing Waste Inventory..................................... 8 2.1.1 Radioactive Waste Management Information System ........................................ 9 2.1.2 Historical Data Task and Recent and Projected Data Task Reports ................. 10 2.1.3 Contaminant Inventory Database for Risk Assessment Database..................... 10 2.1.4 Supplement to the Recent and Projected Data Task Document........................ 11 2.1.5 Inventory Update Documents............................................................................ 11 2.1.6 Integrated Waste Tracking System ................................................................... 11 2.1.7 WasteOScope Database..................................................................................... 11 3. SUMMARIES OF MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO WASTE STREAMS AND TOTALS OF CURIES...................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Test Area North................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Waste Stream Assessment................................................................................. 13 3.1.2 Data Analysis .................................................................................................... 13 3.1.3 Overview of Methodology ................................................................................ 14 3.1.4 Calculation Process and Description of Models................................................ 15 3.1.5 Disposal Waste Stream and Model Relationship .............................................. 15 3.1.6 Uncertainty Estimates ....................................................................................... 15 3.1.7 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Reactor Technology Complex............................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Conclusion......................................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Uncertainty........................................................................................................ 16 v 3.3 Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center ........................................................... 16 3.3.1 Data Collection and Analysis............................................................................ 17 3.3.2 Uncertainties ..................................................................................................... 17 3.3.3 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 18 3.4 Naval Reactors Facility ....................................................................................................... 18 3.4.1 Estimated Inventory .......................................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Uncertainties ..................................................................................................... 19 3.5 Materials and Fuels Complex.............................................................................................. 19 3.5.1 Waste Stream Assessment................................................................................. 19 3.5.2 Analysis Approach............................................................................................ 20 3.5.3 Overview of Methodologies.............................................................................. 21 3.5.4 Estimated Inventory .......................................................................................... 21 3.5.5 Uncertainties ..................................................................................................... 23 3.5.6 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 24 3.6 Rocky Flats Plant................................................................................................................. 24 3.6.1 Refinements due to Waste Retrievals from Pits 11 and 12 ............................... 24 3.6.2 Organic Inventory Calculation Refinements..................................................... 24 3.6.3 Radiological Inventory Refinements................................................................. 25 3.7 Other Facilities .................................................................................................................... 26 4. PARTITIONING OF FACILITY INVENTORY REFINEMENTS TO WASTE SHIPMENTS.... 27 4.1 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Test Area North................................................... 27 4.2 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Reactor Technology Complex............................. 27 4.3 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center..............................................................................................................27 4.4 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Naval Reactors Facility ....................................... 29 4.5 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Materials and Fuels Complex.............................. 30 4.6 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Rocky Flats Plant................................................. 31 4.7 Isotopic Breakdown of Shipments from Other Facilities .................................................... 31 4.8 Chemical Contaminant Data................................................................................................ 32 5. DEVELOPMENT OF RI/FS SNAPSHOT ...................................................................................... 33 5.1 Test Area North................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Reactor Technology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix If Nec- 2105 Federal Liabilities: Other
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY gram’s account, and program direction for Secure Transpor- ADMINISTRATION tation Asset remains in Weapons Activities. Federal Funds Object Classification (in millions of dollars) General and special funds: Identification code 89–0313–0–1–053 2005 actual 2006 est. 2007 est. OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR Personnel compensation: 11.1 Full-time permanent.................................................. 160 153 176 For necessary expenses of the Office of the Administrator in the 11.3 Other than full-time permanent ............................... 3 5 5 National Nuclear Security Administration, including official reception 11.5 Other personnel compensation .................................. 7 7 7 and representation expenses not to exceed $12,000, ø$341,869,000¿ $386,576,000, to remain available until expended. (Energy and Water 11.9 Total personnel compensation .............................. 170 165 188 Development Appropriations Act, 2006.) 12.1 Civilian personnel benefits ............................................ 41 46 46 13.0 Benefits for former personnel ........................................ 3 3 3 Program and Financing (in millions of dollars) 21.0 Travel and transportation of persons ............................ 13 11 12 22.0 Transportation of things ................................................ 1 ................... ................... Identification code 89–0313–0–1–053 2005 actual 2006 est. 2007 est. 23.1 Rental payments to GSA ................................................ ..................
    [Show full text]
  • FY 1982 Submission Provided
    DRAFT DOE/FE-0033 Previous No. DOE/ER-0102 ENERGY MATERIALS COORDINATING COMMITTEE (EMACC) Fiscal Year 1982 March 1983 ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 DRAFT DOE/FE-0033 Previous No. DOE/ER-0102 ENERGY MATERIALS COORDINATING COMMITTEE (EMACC) Fiscal Year 1982 March 1983 ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Department of Energy TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 Fiscal Year 1982 Activities ....................................... 2 Materials Funding Trends in the Department of Energy .............. 6 PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS ................................................ 11 - Office of Conservation and Renewable Systems .................... 14 * Office of Building Energy Research Development .............. 14 * Energy Conversion and Utilization Technologies .............. 15 * Division of Energy Storage Technology - Electrochemical Storage Branch .............................. 16 * Office of Vehicle and Engine R&D ............................ 17 * Office of Industrial Programs ............................... 18 * Biomass Energy Technology Division - Biological Hydrogen Program .......................................... 18 * Division of Ocean Energy Technology - Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Program ................................. 19 * Office of Solar Energy/Photovoltaics Energy - Technology - Materials Research ........................... 20 * Wind Energy Technology Division - Large Wind Turbine Research and Technology Development ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 162/Monday, August 23, 2004
    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2004 / Notices 51825 Format (PDF) on the Internet at the Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, and oxidation process). Other following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ SW., Washington, DC 20585; e-mail: corrections include: B&T Metals (OH) fedregister. [email protected]; toll free: (the DOE designation was in error and To use PDF you must have Adobe 1–877–447–9756; URL: http:// has been removed), Foote Mineral (PA) Acrobat Reader, which is available free www.eh.doe.gov/advocacy/. (the BE designation has been on the at this site. If you have questions about SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: program’s Web site (noted below) since using PDF, call the U.S. Government inception, but was inadvertently Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– Purpose missing from the Federal Register 888–293–6498; or in the Washington, The Energy Employees Occupational notice), Swenson Evaporator (is located DC, area at (202) 512–1530. Illness Compensation Program Act of in Harvey, not Chicago, IL) and C.H. 2000 (‘‘Act’’), Title 36 of Public Law Schnorr, PA (previously Schnoor). This Note: The official version of this document 106–398, establishes a program to is the document published in the Federal notice also deletes the listing for Ledoux Register. Free Internet access to the official provide compensation to individuals (NY) entirely because it was learned that edition of the Federal Register and the Code who developed illnesses as a result of no radioactivity was used at that of Federal Regulations is available on GPO their employment in nuclear weapons location.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of ENERGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY 11.3 Other Than Full-Time Permanent
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY 11.3 Other than full-time permanent ............................... 5 5 5 11.5 Other personnel compensation .................................. 5 3 3 ADMINISTRATION 11.9 Total personnel compensation .............................. 167 165 149 Federal Funds 12.1 Civilian personnel benefits ............................................ 36 36 35 General and special funds: 13.0 Benefits for former personnel ........................................ 3 4 3 21.0 Travel and transportation of persons ............................ 9 13 13 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR 23.1 Rental payments to GSA ................................................ 4 4 4 23.3 Communications, utilities, and miscellaneous charges 5 9 9 For necessary expenses of the Office of the Administrator in the 25.1 Advisory and assistance services .................................. 38 38 38 National Nuclear Security Administration, including official reception 25.2 Other services ................................................................ 32 33 35 and representation expenses (not to exceed $12,000), ø$339,980,000¿ 25.3 Other purchases of goods and services from Govern- $333,700,000, to remain available until expended. (Energy and Water ment accounts ........................................................... 20 21 21 Development Appropriations Act, 2004.) 25.4 Operation and maintenance of facilities ...................... 5 9 9 25.5 Research and development contracts ........................... 1 1 1 Program and Financing (in millions
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of ENERGY ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES 70.00 Total New Budget Authority (Gross) 5,152 5,700 5,831 5,831
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES 70.00 Total new budget authority (gross) 5,152 5,700 5,831 5,831 Federal Funds Change in unpaid obligations: 72.40 Unpaid obligations, start of year: Obli- General and special funds: gated balance, start of year .............. 1,120 1,356 1,527 1,604 WEAPONS ACTIVITIES 73.10 Total new obligations .............................. 5,194 5,746 5,831 5,831 73.20 Total outlays (gross) ............................... ±4,957 ±5,575 ±5,754 ±5,818 For Department of Energy expenses, including the purchase, con- 73.45 Adjustments in unexpired accounts ........ ±1 .................. .................. .................. struction and acquisition of plant and capital equipment and other 74.40 Unpaid obligations, end of year: Obli- incidental expenses necessary for atomic energy defense weapons ac- gated balance, end of year ................ 1,356 1,527 1,604 1,617 tivities in carrying out the purposes of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), including the acquisition Outlays (gross), detail: 86.90 Outlays from new current authority ........ 2,488 2,640 2,719 .................. or condemnation of any real property or any facility or for plant ø 86.93 Outlays from current balances ............... 1,465 1,635 1,735 1,799 or facility acquisition, construction, or expansion; the purchase of 86.97 Outlays from new permanent authority 1,005 1,300 1,300 4,019 not to exceed 1 fixed wing aircraft;¿ and the purchase of passenger motor vehicles (not to exceed ø32¿ 3 for replacement
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Energy NOTICE Washington, D.C
    U.S. Department of Energy NOTICE Washington, D.C. DOE N 473.4 Approved: 5-26-00 Expires: 12-31-00 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BADGES 1. OBJECTIVE. To establish requirements for Department of Energy (DOE) badges. 2. CANCELLATION. None. 3. APPLICABILITY. a. DOE Elements. The requirements in this Notice apply to DOE, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and contractor facilities and operations on DOE-owned or -leased property. b. Contractors. Attachment 1 contains the Contractor Requirements Document (CRD). The requirements in the CRD apply to the extent set forth in a contract. c. Exclusions. (1) Consistent with the responsibilities identified in Executive Order 12344, the Director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program will determine the applicability of this Notice for activities and facilities under his control. (2) The requirements in this Notice do not apply to DOE and contractor facilities and operations on DOE-owned or -leased property involving access of 30 or fewer people. 4. REQUIREMENTS. Requirements as stated in DOE M 5632.1C-1, MANUAL FOR PROTECTION AND CONTROL OF SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY INTERESTS, for badging remain in effect. The following requirements are provided for clarification of DOE badge issues.CANCELED a. DOE badges shall be issued to each DOE Federal and contractor employee. The DOE security badge, or the Office of Science common badge are the only formats to be used. (1) Those individuals with an access authorization must be issued a DOE security badge. DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY: All Departmental Elements Office of Security and Emergency Operations 2 DOE N 473.4 5-26-00 (2) The DOE security badge will be accepted at all DOE facilities, including those facilities where the Office of Science common badge is issued, as listed in paragraphs 4.c and 4.d below.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act of 2000; List of Covered Facilities
    6450-01-p DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act of 2000; List of Covered Facilities AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Listing of Covered Facilities SUMMARY: The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act of 2000 (“Act”), Public Law 106-398, establishes a program to provide compensation to individuals who developed illnesses as a result of their employment in nuclear weapons production- related activities and certain other federally-owned facilities in which radioactive materials were used. On December 7, 2000, the President issued Executive Order 13179 (“Order”) directing the Department of Energy (“Department” or “DOE”) to list covered facilities in the Federal Register. This notice responds to both the Act and the Order. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Worker Advocacy, 1-877-447- 9756. ADDRESSES: The Department welcomes comments on this list. Individuals who wish to suggest additional facilities for inclusion on the list, indicate why one or more facilities should be removed from the list, or provide other information may contact: Office of Worker Advocacy (EH-8) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 email: [email protected] toll-free: 1-877-447-9756 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1 Purpose: The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act of 2000 (“Act”), Public Law 106-398, establishes a program to provide compensation to individuals who developed illnesses as a result of their employment in nuclear weapons production-related activities and certain other federally-owned facilities in which radioactive materials were used. On December 7, 2000, the President issued Executive Order 13179 (“Order”) directing the Department of Energy (“Department” or “DOE”) to list covered facilities in the Federal Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of the Census (DOC), Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 411 801 IR 056 626 AUTHOR Hollins, Martha TITLE Directory of Federal Libraries and Information Centers: 1994. Technical Report. INSTITUTION Bureau of the Census (DOC), Washington, DC. Governments Div. REPORT NO NCES-97-507 PUB DATE 1997-08-00 NOTE 105p.; This Directory represents information as of September 30, 1994, and for certain libraries some or all of the entries may have changed since 1994. This caution is particularly true of the listed contact person, but it may also be, as in the case of the Bureau of Mines, that the agency no longer exists and the library or information center may no longer be in operation or may be part of another agency. AVAILABLE FROM U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Reference Materials Directories /Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Directories; *Federal Government; Government (Administrative Body); *Government Libraries; *Library Statistics; *Library Surveys; National Libraries; *National Surveys; Public Agencies; Reference Materials; State Libraries ABSTRACT This Directory is based on a survey of 1,234 federal libraries and information centers in the 50 states and the District of Columbia conducted in 1994. The survey was developed and funded by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) with the advice and guidance of a survey working group of the Federal Library and Information Center Committee of the Library of Congress and was conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. The Directory is organized by branch of government (Legislative, Judicial, or Executive), by agency in the Legislative and Judicial Branches and by department in the Executive Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 1995 Progress and Plans of the Environmental Luianagement Program
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 1995 Progress and Plans of the Environmental lUianagement Program IDE/EM-0221 W WW m 1995 \ * 1995 1995 1995 United States Department of Energy February 1995 miamim OF THIS UOCUIKHNT IS USUKITEB DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Environmental Management 1995 &j& #%^: iJEi»* DISTRIBUTER OF THIS DOCUMENT I? UNLIMITED Qjj/ Printed with soy ink on Recycled paper Readers' Guide to Environmental Management 1995: Environmental Management 1995 is the second report prepared in response to the requirements of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Yearl994. The first report, Environmental Management 1994, was published in February 1994. This report is intended to provide a broad overview of the Environmental Management programs activities in 1994, 1995, and 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget and Spending Concerns at Doe Hearing
    BUDGET AND SPENDING CONCERNS AT DOE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 18, 2012 Serial No. 112–137 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce energycommerce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 78–727 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 14:05 Feb 12, 2013 Jkt 037690 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\11425C~1\112-13~1 WAYNE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE FRED UPTON, Michigan Chairman JOE BARTON, Texas HENRY A. WAXMAN, California Chairman Emeritus Ranking Member CLIFF STEARNS, Florida JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky Chairman Emeritus JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York MARY BONO MACK, California FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey GREG WALDEN, Oregon BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois LEE TERRY, Nebraska ANNA G. ESHOO, California MIKE ROGERS, Michigan ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York SUE WILKINS MYRICK, North Carolina GENE GREEN, Texas Vice Chairman DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado JOHN SULLIVAN, Oklahoma LOIS CAPPS, California TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee CHARLES A. GONZALEZ, Texas BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire MIKE ROSS, Arkansas PHIL GINGREY, Georgia JIM MATHESON, Utah STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana G.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary Launches Global Threat Reduction Initiative DOE Lab
    JUNE 2004 DOE-funded researchers receive Presidential honors Secretary launches Global Threat Reduction Initiative DOE lab researchers win technology transfer awards Science.gov takes next step in information retrieval June 2004 1 U.S. Department of Energy Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham discussed energy security and nonprolif- eration issues with world leaders and at major conferences during a six-country 3 trip in mid May 2004. Published monthly in Washington, D.C., by the Department of Energy, Office of Public Affairs, for the information of Department employees and affiliates and available to others by paid subscription. The Department of Energy’s Fermi The Secretary of Energy has determined National Accelerator Laboratory that this periodical is necessary in the transaction of public business as required recently shipped the first of a series by law. Use of funds for printing has been of superconducting magnets that it approved by the director of the Office of Management and Budget. The con- built for the Large Hadron Collider. 8 tent is reprintable without permission and pictures are available for media repro- duction upon request. Spencer Abraham Secretary of Energy Jeanne Lopatto The Celilo Converter Station, Director, Office of Public Affairs The Dallas, Ore., has been Bonnie Winsett modernized by the Department Editor of Energy’s Bonneville Power SUBSCRIPTION price for 12 issues is $22 9 Administration. ($27.50 foreign). Send check, or provide VISA or Mastercard number and expira- tion date, to: Superintendent of Docu- ments, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Credit-card orders can be called in 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Consultation
    Health Consultation NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY – ALBANY ALBANY, OREGON (FORMERLY KNOWN AS: ALBANY RESEARCH CENTER) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EPA FACILITY ID: OR2141590008 OCTOBER 25, 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation An ATSDR health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH
    [Show full text]