DOCSLIB.ORG

Tree Use in Gulu, Uganda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tree Use in Gulu, Uganda T REE USE IN GULU, UGANDA Research about the Tree-use of the local people of Gulu District Simeon Derksen - Student Tropical Forestry - Herveld - December 2011 1 2 T REE USE IN GULU, UGANDA Research about the Tree-use of the local people of Gulu District S. Derksen BNB, Major Tropical Forestry Wageningen University of Applied Science, Larenstein Velp Herveld, December 2011 Mentor: A. Hettema 3 Summary In this thesis the indigenous tree-use of the local population of Gulu district, Uganda, will be discussed. How do people use their natural surrounding? Which trees doe they use and for which purposes? The local population of Gulu is dependent on the natural recourses from the surrounding area. Yet forest and nature degrade at high speed due to population growth, bad agriculture methods, and over-exploitation. Tree Talk is a foundation promoting tree-planting all over Uganda but especially in the north. The north is developing at a high rate due to the fact that the area is no longer a warzone. For Tree Talk it is important to have knowledge about the mindset of the population on their natural surroundings. The research is mostly done by interviewing and Observation. Local farmers have been interviewed about their tree-use. Also 8 tree rankings were done to get a picture on which trees are most valued. A list of most important tree species has been made as a result. Local farmers are for a great deal dependent on the natural recourses such as firewood, building materials, and food. The indigenous tree species are still valued for many reasons. People do not know how to grow these species although in most cases they are interested in planting these indigenous trees. Spreading knowledge on these issues could be one of the strategies to improve the situation. 4 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 5 List of figures ........................................................................................................................................... 8 List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 9 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 10 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Research subject.................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Background of the research .................................................................................................. 11 1.3. Relevance of the research ..................................................................................................... 11 1.4. Frame and motive for the thesis subject............................................................................... 12 2. Problem description/ analysis ....................................................................................................... 13 2.1. Importance of forest ............................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Forest values and importance: .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1. Forest products.............................................................................................................. 14 2.2.2. Subsistence needs ......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.3. Environmental services ................................................................................................. 15 2.3. Pressure from ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.3.1. Agriculture ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.2. Exploitation .................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3. Bush burning .................................................................................................................. 16 2.3.4. Encroachment ............................................................................................................... 16 2.3.5. Deforestation ................................................................................................................. 16 2.3.6. Degradation ................................................................................................................... 16 2.4. Causes for deforestation and land degradation: ................................................................... 16 2.4.1. Population growth ......................................................................................................... 16 2.4.2. Poverty .......................................................................................................................... 17 2.4.3. Lacking governance ....................................................................................................... 17 2.4.4. Other factors ................................................................................................................. 17 3. Sub questions ................................................................................................................................ 18 4. Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 19 4.1. Where were the interviews and observations done? ........................................................... 19 4.2. When did the research take place ......................................................................................... 21 4.2.1. Time of the year ............................................................................................................ 21 5 4.2.2. Time of the day .............................................................................................................. 21 4.2.3. Who has been interviewed? .......................................................................................... 21 4.3. Observations.......................................................................................................................... 22 4.4. Interview ................................................................................................................................ 23 4.5. Literature ............................................................................................................................... 23 5. Area description ............................................................................................................................ 24 5.1. Uganda .................................................................................................................................. 24 5.1.1. Population ..................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.2. Economy ........................................................................................................................ 25 5.1.3. Education ....................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.4. Main problems .............................................................................................................. 26 5.2. Gulu district ........................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.1. Geography ..................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.2. Administrative structure ............................................................................................... 27 5.2.3. Climate ........................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.4. Soil ................................................................................................................................. 27 5.2.5. Population and demography ......................................................................................... 28 5.2.6. Health ............................................................................................................................ 29 5.2.7. Infrastructure ................................................................................................................ 29 5.2.8. Economy ........................................................................................................................ 30 5.2.9. Economic activities ........................................................................................................ 30 5.2.10. Education ....................................................................................................................... 31 5.2.11. History ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 61, NUMBER 1 THE WHITE RHINOCEROS With Thirty-one Plates EDMUND HELLER Naturalist, Smithsonian African Expedition Publication i 2180) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION 1913 tt%t £or6 (gfafttmore <pvt36 S. A. BALTIMORE, MD. : C. THE WHITE RHINOCEROS By EDMUND HELLER Naturalist, Smithsonian African Expedition (With Thirty-one Plates) PREFACE The white rhinoceros is so imperfectly known that it has been thought advisable to publish, in advance of the complete report of the expedition, the results obtained from the study of the specimens of this species collected in the Sudan by the Smithsonian African Expe- 1 dition, under the direction of Colonel Roosevelt. In order to make this material available to zoologists generally, a series of photographs of the skull of each specimen collected has been added to the paper. This has been found necessary not only to illustrate the text, but in order to fill one of the gaps in the literature pertaining to African mammalogy. Up to the present time no photograph of a perfect skull of this rhinoceros has appeared in print. There have been a few figures published, but none showing structural details well. The present publication will do much to remedy this want, and will also, it is hoped, serve to put the species on a more logical systematic basis. In the present paper considerable emphasis has been placed on the really great structural differences which exist between the white rhi- noceros and the black, with which it has hitherto been generically con- founded under the name Diccros.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Forest-Woodland-Savanna Mosaics in Uganda: with Implications for Conservation
    CHANGING FOREST-WOODLAND-SAVANNA MOSAICS IN UGANDA: WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION Grace Nangendo Promoters: Prof. Dr. F.J.J.M. Bongers Personal Professorship at Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands Prof. Dr. Ir. A. De Gier Professor, Geo-information for Forestry / Department of Natural Resources International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands Co-promoter: Dr. H. ter Steege Chair Plant Systematics (Ag.), Nationaal Herbarium Nederland - Utrecht Branch Utrecht University, The Netherlands Examining Committee: Dr. J. F. Duivenvoorden, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Prof. Dr. M. J. A. Werger, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Dr. J. R. W. Aluma, National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda Prof. Dr. M. S. M. Sosef, Wageningen University, The Netherlands CHANGING FOREST-WOODLAND-SAVANNA MOSAICS IN UGANDA: WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION Grace Nangendo Thesis To fulfil the requirements for the degree of Doctor on the authority of the Rector Magnificus of Wageningen University, Prof. Dr. Ir. L. Speelman, to be publicly defended on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 15:00 hrs in the auditorium at ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands. ISBN: 90-8504-200-3 ITC Dissertation Number: 123 International Institute for Geo-information Science & Earth Observation, Enschede, The Netherlands © 2005 Grace Nangendo CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Composition and Population Structure of Vitellaria Paradoxa Subspecies Nilotica (Kotschy), A.N
    ECOLOGY, COMPOSITION AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF VITELLARIA PARADOXA SUBSPECIES NILOTICA (KOTSCHY), A.N. HENRY ET.AL.), IN ETHIOPIA: IMPLICATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF PRODUCTION Paper Presented On Naturally African : In support of African natural products development and marketing Sub-regional Consultative workshop For Eastern Africa Nairobi, Kenya, 18 - 20 May 2009 By Deribe Gurmu Benti (PhD) May 18, 2009 Table of content 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OBJETIVOS 3. MATERIAL AND METHODS 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5. CONCLUSIONES AND RECOMMENDTION IntroductionIntroduction n Vitellaria paradoxa belongs to: order ebenales, family Sapotaceae, genus vitellaria n The genus contains two subspecies: n ssp. paradoxa n ssp. nilotica n Deciduous in the dry seasons n Medium-sized, 12-15 meters (rarely up to 25 meters high) It has poor Vitellaria paradoxa ssp. nilotica stem forms with various tree:Gambella Region forms of crowns and is deep rooted Introduction Contd………………………. The tree has gnarled growth with umbellate to multiple flabellate and cauliflower crowns Cauliflower Umbellate multiple flabellate Introduction Contd………………………………………………………………………………. It has conspicuously thick, It exhibits pale, pink to red corky, horizontally colour, when slashed and longitudinally deeply fissured barked stem Leaves in large, dense fascicles, spirally arranged Secrets white at the end of the stout latex, as do broken twigs/ branches twigs or petioles Juvenile leaves are rust- red and pubescent The leaves are oblong Introduction Contd………………………………. At the time of peak flowering (January to February), the tree is Immature nearly covered with fruit green-yellowish flowers in terminal cluster of containing 30-40 each at the generally leafless tips only one oval or round red- brown fruit/nut (the ‘shea nut’) Seeds have white rarely more scar down one than one side.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Diversity of Indigenous Forage Plant Species of the Dry Season in Dry Lands of North Western Ethiopia
    Journal of Resources Development and Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2422-8397 An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.72, 2021 An Assessment of the Diversity of Indigenous Forage Plant Species of the Dry Season in Dry Lands of North Western Ethiopia: Implication for Their Conservation and Sustainable Use Dereje Mosissa1* Melak Agajie2 Dejene Reda1 1.Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute Assosa Biodiversity Center Forest and Rangeland Biodiversity Case Team 2.Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute Assosa Biodiversity Center Director and Researcher in Crop and Horticulture Biodiversity Case Team Abstract This study was done to assess the diversity of indigenous forage plants of the dry season in Combretum-Terminalia woodlands of Guba District, North West of Ethiopia. A total of 69 species of plants were identified and of which all are consumed as a feed resource by the local animal breeds during dry season. The diversity (H) values of the forage plant species ranged between 0.65 to 1.67 across the plots sampled. The similarities (J) between the plots in terms of species composition of all forage species were 0.56 and 0.94. The evenness (E) values of all forage species were in between 0.78 and 0.86 across the sampled plots. The densities of all forage species, including seedlings, were 1216 stems ha-1. In the study area Combretum colinum, Lonchocarpus laxiflorus, Terminalia laxiflora, Acacia polycantha and Ziziphus mucronata were the five relatively abundant forage species. The Importance Value Index (IVI) values of all the forage species ranged between 0.31 (Strychnos innocua) and 81.67 (Combretum colinum). Particularly local goat breeds of the study area were known to feed on various plant resources than other breeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Characterization of the Vegetation in the Sudano-Sahelian Zone of Cameroon
    DOI: 10.21276/sajb.2017.5.3.6 Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences (SAJB) ISSN 2321-6883 (Online) Sch. Acad. J. Biosci., 2017; 5(3):164-173 ISSN 2347-9515 (Print) ©Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher (An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources) www.saspublisher.com Original Research Article Ecological characterization of the Vegetation in the Sudano-Sahelian Zone of Cameroon Haiwa Gilbert, Tchobsala, Ngakou Albert University of Ngaoundere, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Laboratory of biodiversity and sustainable development, Cameroon P.O BOX 454 *Corresponding author Haiwa Gilbert Email: [email protected] Abstract: The study was carried out in the Mayo-Danay, Mayo-Kani, Mayo-Sava and the Logone-Chari Divisions in the Far-North Region of Cameroon, to ecologically characterize the shrub savannahs, wooded savannahs, protected areas and sacred forests of the sudano-sahelian zone. In total, 48 hectares were chosen at random with 12 hectares per Division. The experimental design was a split-plot (4 x 4) x 3, where the 4 Divisions represented the main factor and the 4 types of vegetation the secondary factor. Dendrometric parameters (DBH and number plant species) where observed on 100m2 plots. Results indicate that vegetation has an “L” structure, obtained when the DBH was taken into consideration. Guiera senegalensis, Anogeissus leiocarpus and Combretum collinum showed ecological indexes with high values (35.78, 34.39 and 32.87 respectively), whereas a lower index was obtained for Boswellia dalzielii (0.01), Lonchocarpus laxiflorus (0.01) and Steganotaenia araliacea (0.01). The Mayo-Sava and Logone-Chari Divisions were the most affected by the deforestation based on the density of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Woody Species Composition, Structure and Diversity of Vegetation Patches of a Sudanian Savanna in Burkina Faso
    BOIS ET FORÊTS DES TROPIQUES, 2007, N° 294 (4) PEUPLEMENTS FORESTIERS 5 SAVANE SOUDANAISE Woody species composition, structure and diversity of vegetation patches of a Sudanian savanna in Burkina Faso Patrice Savadogo1 Mulualem Tigabu1 Louis Sawadogo2 Per Christer Odén1 1 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Forest Sciences Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology In order to develop conservation guidelines, information on the state of Tropical Silviculture Sudanian forests is urgently needed. Inventories conducted in four types of forest–dense and Seed Laboratory woodland, open woodland, gallery forests and fallow land–have shown in particular that the SE- 901 83 Umeå Fabaceae and Combretaceae families are the most abundant. Young individuals are Sweden predominant, and there are numerous rare species. Species with high conservation importance should be reintroduced in order to maintain a viable population. 2 Centre National de Recherche Scientifique et Technologique Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherche Agricole Département Production Forestière BP 10 Koudougou Burkina Faso Photo 1. Dense woodland. Photo D. Tiveau. BOIS ET FORÊTS DES TROPIQUES, 2007, N° 294 (4) 6 FOREST STANDS SUDANIAN SAVANNA Patrice Savadogo, Mulualem Tigabu, Louis Sawadogo, Per Christer Odén RÉSUMÉ ABSTRACT RESUMEN COMPOSITION, STRUCTURE ET WOODY SPECIES COMPOSITION, COMPOSICIÓN, ESTRUCTURA Y DIVERSITÉ DES ESPÈCES LIGNEUSES STRUCTURE AND DIVERSITY OF DIVERSIDAD DE LAS ESPECIES EN SAVANE SOUDANAISE AU VEGETATION PATCHES OF A SUDANIAN LEÑOSAS DE LA SABANA SUDANESA BURKINA FASO SAVANNA IN BURKINA FASO EN BURKINA FASO La variabilité climatique croissante et The woodlands of the Sudanian region La creciente variabilidad climática y el les impacts des activités humaines are heavily degraded due to increasing impacto antrópico provocan una fuerte entraînent une forte dégradation des climatic variability and anthropogenic degradación de los bosques de la forêts de la région soudanienne.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming Beyond the Escarpment: Society, Environment, and Mobility in Precolonial Southeastern Burkina Faso
    FARMING BEYOND THE ESCARPMENT: SOCIETY, ENVIRONMENT, AND MOBILITY IN PRECOLONIAL SOUTHEASTERN BURKINA FASO by Daphne E. Gallagher A dissertation submitted in partial fufillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard I. Ford, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Rebecca D. Hardin, Co-Chair Professor Paul E. Berry Professor John D. Speth Professor Henry T. Wright © Daphne Gallagher All Rights Reserved 2010 To Stephen ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A project of this scope is never the work of one person, and I am deeply grateful to all of those who have provided support throughout the process. The pilot season of fieldwork in 2004 was funded by the University of Michigan Center for Afro- and African American Studies (CAAS-Africa Initiative) and the Museum of Anthropology Griffin Fund. A National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant provided the primary funding for the 2006 fieldwork in Burkina Faso, supplemented by additional funds from the Department of Anthropology. Additional post-field analyses were funded by The Richard I. Ford Fund for the Anthropological Study of Humans and the Environment (University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology). In Burkina Faso, field research was facilitated by Dr. Lassina Kote of the University of Ouagadougou. Dr. Kote’s insights on every aspect of the project from the practical to the theoretical were invaluable, and I am especially grateful for his taking time to visit me in the field. At the CNRST, Drs. Vincent Sedogo and Eloi Bambara ensured that we held all proper research permits, and Dr. Oumarou Nao at the Ministry of Culture granted export permits for the faunal and botanical samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry Parkland Species Diversity
    Agroforestry Parkland Species Diversity: Uses and Management in Semi-Arid West Africa (Burkina Faso) Albert Nikiema Promotoren: Prof. Dr.Ir. L.J.G. van der Maesen Hoogleraar Plantentaxonomie Wageningen Universiteit Co-promotor Dr. J.B. Hall Senior Lecturer, School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK Promotiecommissie:Prof. Dr. P. Baas Universiteit Leiden Prof.dr. A.M. Cleef Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. K. E. Giller Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. J. Lejoly Université Libre de Bruxelles Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Biodiversiteit II Agroforestry Parkland Species Diversity: Uses and Management in Semi-Arid West Africa (Burkina Faso) Albert Nikiema Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. Ir. L. Speelman in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 8 maart 2005 des namiddags te 13.30 uur in de Aula III Nikiema, A. Agroforestry Parkland Species Diversity: Uses and Management in Semi-Arid West Africa (Burkina Faso) PhD thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen ISBN 90-8504-168-6 Key words: Species diversity, agroforestry parkland, diversity indices, NWFPs, Bush fire, Semi-arid West Africa, fodder trees This study was carried out at the CNSF, Centre National des Semences Forestières, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, and at NHN-Wageningen, Biosystematics Group, (Generaal Foulkesweg 37, 6700 ED Wageningen), Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, the Netherlands. IV To my wife Blandine and my children Brice, Sylviane, Nadège and José V Ia Ib ■ Ouagadougou IIa ■ IIb Ia = Sahelian north sector Ib = Sahelian south sector IIa = Sudanian north sector IIb = Sudanian south sector ■ Study sites Vegetation map of Burkina Faso (Fontes & Guinko 1995) VI Contents Samenvatting VIII Summary IX Résumé X Chapter 1 General introduction: Managing woody species 1 diversity in agroforestry parklands.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytochemical Investigation of Three Leguminosae Plants for Cancer Chemopreventive Agents
    UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI COLLEGE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY PHYTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF THREE LEGUMINOSAE PLANTS FOR CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS BY IVAN GUMULA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) IN CHEMISTRY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 2014 ii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my family iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank the University of Nairobi for admitting me as a Doctoral student. I wish to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisors; Prof. Abiy Yenesew, Dr. Solomon Derese and Prof. Isaiah O. Ndiege whose close supervision coupled with resourceful guidance/advice enriched me with the knowledge, skills and attitude resulting in the success of this research. I am grateful to the German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) and the Natural Products Research Network for Eastern and Central Africa (NAPRECA) for financial support during my studies. I appreciate the help extended to me by Dr. Matthias Heydenreich of the University of Potsdam in spectroscopic/spectrometric analyses of some of the compounds reported in this thesis. Special thanks go to the Swedish Institute for sponsoring my research visit to the University of Gothenburg. I am indebted to my host supervisor, Prof. Máté Erdélyi, and the Halogen Bond Research Group of the Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, at the University of Gothenburg for his unwavering support and guidance in isolation and spectroscopic techniques and analysis. My sincere gratitude is extended to Dr. John P. Alao and Prof. Per Sunnerhagen of the Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Gothenburg for carrying out cytotoxicity assays.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Vegetation Types and Utilization in Wildlife Park of the University of Agriculture Makurdi, Nigeria
    Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences ISSN: 2276-7770; ICV: 6.15 Vol. 3 (1), pp. 001-005, January 2013 Copyright ©2017, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) http://gjournals.org/GJAS Research Article Evaluation of Vegetation Types and Utilization in Wildlife Park of the University of Agriculture Makurdi, Nigeria Tyowua B.T 1*, Agbelusi E.A 2, and Dera B.A 3 1Department of Wildlife and Range Management, University of Agriculture, Makurdi. ([email protected]) 2Department of Wildlife and Ecotourism, Federal University of Technology, Akure. 3 Department of Forest Production and Products, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article No.: 110512225 The vegetation types in the Wildlife Park of the University of Agriculture, Makurdi was evaluated to determine its plant species composition and percentage DOI: 10.15580/GJAS.2013.1.110512225 distribution, structure in terms of diameter at breast height (DBH) and utilization level. The point- centered quarter method (PCQ) and step-point line technique (SPLT) were used in the survey. There were 31 woody plants species in the park. The common species in the woodland vegetation type were Daniellia oliveri Submitted: 05/11/2012 (14.17%), Vitex doniana (12.00%), Khaya senegalensis (9.33%), while in the Riparian Accepted: 25/11/2012 vegetation, Vitex doniana (17.00%) was the prominent species. Acacia polyacantha Published: 20/01/2013 (24.00%), Combretum molle (23.00%) and Prosopis africana (31.00%) were the commonest species in the Grassland vegetation. Syzigium guineense, Diospyros *Corresponding Author mespiliformis and Elaeis guineense occurred only in the Riparian Vegetation. The result on structure revealed that DBH class> 100 cm had the highest number of Tyowua B.T woody plants in the Riparian vegetation and was significantly (P<0.05) different E-mail: [email protected] from the Woodland and Grassland vegetation types.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    Government of the Republic of the Sudan Ministry of Environment and Tourism The Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources (HCENR) / · /f J 7 J _-_ / .J ' '7 L First National Report on the Implementation of The Convention on Biological Diversity Khartoum, Sudan 2000 Sudan: FirstNatiS_i Rep_ te_B : : TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................. ii Executive Summary ..................................................................... iii 1. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 1 2. THE STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY IN SUDAN .......................................... 1 3. MAJOR THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY IN SUDAN ............................... t4 4. BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN (BSAP) ................... 17 5. LEGAL INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS ....................................................... 20 6. VISION ................................................................................................... 20 7. NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES...20 8. PROPOSED PROJECTS AND SUGGESTED BUDGETS .................. 24 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB African Development Bank ARC Agricultural Research Corporation BADEA Arab Development Bank for Africa BSAP Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa CSD Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers of Diet Selection of Critically Endangered Western Derby Eland
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Drivers of diet selection of critically endangered Western Derby eland during the food shortage period Received: 26 September 2017 Accepted: 30 May 2019 within conservation breeding in Published: xx xx xxxx Senegal Pavla Hejcmanová1, Magdalena Miřejovská1, Petr Homolka2,3 & Michal Hejcman4 Browsers represent a challenge for breeding facilities because of their sensitivity to nutritional management. Western Derby eland (Tautrotragus derbianus derbianus, WDE) is a large browsing antelope with a very diverse diet. Because of its critically endangered status, a small WDE population is kept for conservation purposes in the fenced Fathala reserve (Senegal) and during the critical, hot dry season, the animals are ofered supplementary Acacia albida pods. We aimed to identify which woody plant species were preferentially selected/avoided by WDE during the period of food shortage, which plant nutritional properties were drivers of animals’ diet selection, and how this selectivity was afected by supplemental feed. The animals were selective for certain plant species, most for Piliostigma thonningi pods. Preferences decreased with a feed supplement, while avoidances remained intact. Diet selection was connected with chemical traits, mostly by negative correlations to N, Mg, Ca and hemicellulose, which disappeared or were weaker when supplemental feed was ofered. Our fndings indicate that large browsers during periods of food shortage must cope with inappropriate chemical composition in regard to nutrition and seek to alleviate them not only by diversifcation of plant species in the diet, but also by adjusting chemical diet quality as a whole. Western Derby eland (Tautrotragus derbianus derbianus, WDE) is a large, West African savannah dwelling ante- lope, listed by IUCN Antelope Specialist Group as critically endangered1.
    [Show full text]