DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21St Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21St Century Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century Charles W. Wessner, Editor Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy Policy and Global Affairs Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street NW Washington DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by: Contract/Grant No. DE-DT0000236, TO #28 (base award DE-AM01-04PI45013), between the National Academy of Sciences and the Department of Energy; and Contract/Grant No. N01-OD-4-2139, TO #250 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. This report was prepared by the National Academy of Sciences under award number SB134106Z0011, TO# 4 (68059), from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This report was prepared by the National Academy of Sciences under award number 99-06- 07543-02 from the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Economic Development Administration, or the U.S. Department of Commerce. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number 13: 978-0-309-28734-0 International Standard Book Number 10: 0-309-28734-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2013941001 Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu/ . Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives* Mary L. Good (NAE), Chair W. Clark McFadden II Dean Emeritus, Donaghey College Senior Counsel of Engineering and Information Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Technology Special Advisor to the Chancellor David T. Morgenthaler for Economic Development Founding Partner University of Arkansas Morgenthaler Ventures at Little Rock Edward E. Penhoet (IOM) Michael G. Borrus Director Founding General Partner Alta Partners X/Seed Capital Management Tyrone C. Taylor William C. Harris President President and CEO Capitol Advisors Science Foundation Arizona on Technology, LLC *As of May 2013 v Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century PROJECT STAFF Charles W. Wessner Sujai J. Shivakumar Study Director Senior Program Officer McAlister T. Clabaugh David E. Dierksheide Program Officer Program Officer David S. Dawson Thomas R. Howell Senior Program Assistant Consultant vi Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century For the National Research Council (NRC), this project was overseen by the Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy (STEP), a standing board of the NRC established by the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and the Institute of Medicine in 1991. The mandate of the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy is to advise federal, state, and local governments and inform the public about economic and related public policies to promote the creation, diffusion, and application of new scientific and technical knowledge to enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the U.S. economy and foster economic prosperity for all Americans. The STEP Board and its committees marshal research and the expertise of scholars, industrial managers, investors, and former public officials in a wide range of policy areas that affect the speed and direction of scientific and technological change and their contributions to the growth of the U.S. and global economies. Results are communicated through reports, conferences, workshops, briefings, and electronic media subject to the procedures of the National Academies to ensure their authoritativeness, independence, and objectivity. The members of the STEP Board* and the NRC staff are listed below: Paul L. Joskow, Chair Alan M. Garber (IOM) President Provost Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Harvard University Ernst R. Berndt Ralph E. Gomory (NAS/NAE) Louis E. Seley Professor Research Professor in Applied Economics Stern School of Business Massachusetts Institute New York University of Technology John L. Hennessy (NAS/NAE) Jeff Bingaman President Former U.S. Senator, New Mexico Stanford University U.S. Senate William H. Janeway John Donovan Managing Director Senior Executive Vice President and Senior Advisor AT&T Technology Warburg Pincus, LLC and Network Operations AT&T Inc. Ellen Dulberger Managing Partner Ellen Dulberger Enterprises, LLC continued *As of May 2013. vii Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century Richard K. Lester Kathryn L. Shaw Japan Steel Industry Professor Ernest C. Arbuckle Professor Head, Nuclear Science of Economics and Engineering Graduate School of Business Founding Director, Industrial Stanford University Performance Center Massachusetts Institute Laura D'Andrea Tyson of Technology S.K. and Angela Chan Professor of Global Management David Morgenthaler Haas School of Business Founder University of California-Berkeley Morgenthaler Ventures Harold R. Varian Luis M. Proenza Chief Economist, Google Inc. President Professor Emeritus, University University of Akron of California-Berkeley William J. Raduchel Alan Wm. Wolff Independent Investor/Director Senior Counsel McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP STEP Staff Stephen A. Merrill Charles W. Wessner Executive Director Program
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NHSGGC Board Meeting Date of Meeting
    BOARD OFFICIAL NHS Greater Glasgow & Paper No. 20/40 Clyde Meeting: NHSGGC Board Meeting Date of Meeting: 25th August 2020 Purpose of Paper: For Noting Classification: Board Official Sponsoring Director: Medical Director and Nurse Director Clinical Governance Annual Report (including the Duty of Candour Report) 2019/2020 Recommendation The Board is asked to note the report, which has been approved for publication by the Clinical and Care Governance Committee. Purpose of Paper The Clinical Governance Annual Report provides a description of the key aspects clinical governance arrangements along with examples of improvement activities. The report contains the Duty of Candour Report, whose publication is legal requirement. The report is made publicly available via the Board’s website. Key Issues to be considered The report provides assurance of the maintenance of the clinical governance arrangements along with our Duty of Candour obligations. The report development and publication is being maintained but the process was compromised by the clinical service focus the pandemic response during the normal reporting period over April and May. 1 BOARD OFFICIAL Any Patient Safety /Patient Experience Issues Data on patient safety and experience is included in the report with assurance of learning and improvements Any Financial Implications from this Paper None specified Any Staffing Implications from this Paper None Specified Any Equality Implications from this Paper None Specified Any Health Inequalities Implications from this Paper None Specified Has a Risk Assessment been carried out for this issue? If yes, please detail the outcome. No Highlight the Corporate Plan priorities to which your paper relates Author – Head of Clinical Governance Date – August 2020 2 BOARD OFFICIAL Clinical Governance Annual Report 2019-2020 NHS GREATER GLASGOW & CLYDE Custodian: Head of Clinical Governance Issue date: July 2020 Status: Draft Version: Draft 3.0 1 BOARD OFFICIAL Section Title Page Front Page 1 Table of Contents 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Academy of Sciences July 1, 1979 Officers
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JULY 1, 1979 OFFICERS Term expires President-PHILIP HANDLER June 30, 1981 Vice-President-SAUNDERS MAC LANE June 30, 1981 Home Secretary-BRYCE CRAWFORD,JR. June 30, 1983 Foreign Secretary-THOMAS F. MALONE June 30, 1982 Treasurer-E. R. PIORE June 30, 1980 Executive Officer Comptroller Robert M. White David Williams COUNCIL Abelson, Philip H. (1981) Markert,C. L. (1980) Berg, Paul (1982) Nierenberg,William A. (1982) Berliner, Robert W. (1981) Piore, E. R. (1980) Bing, R. H. (1980) Ranney, H. M. (1980) Crawford,Bryce, Jr. (1983) Simon, Herbert A. (1981) Friedman, Herbert (1982) Solow, R. M. (1980) Handler, Philip (1981) Thomas, Lewis (1982) Mac Lane, Saunders (1981) Townes, Charles H. (1981) Malone, Thomas F. (1982) Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 SECTIONS The Academyis divided into the followingSections, to which membersare assigned at their own choice: (11) Mathematics (31) Engineering (12) Astronomy (32) Applied Biology (13) Physics (33) Applied Physical and (14) Chemistry Mathematical Sciences (15) Geology (41) Medical Genetics Hema- (16) Geophysics tology, and Oncology (21) Biochemistry (42) Medical Physiology, En- (22) Cellularand Develop- docrinology,and Me- mental Biology tabolism (23) Physiological and Phar- (43) Medical Microbiology macologicalSciences and Immunology (24) Neurobiology (51) Anthropology (25) Botany (52) Psychology (26) Genetics (53) Social and Political Sci- (27) Population Biology, Evo- ences lution, and Ecology (54) Economic Sciences In the alphabetical list of members,the numbersin parentheses, followingyear of election, indicate the respective Class and Section of the member. CLASSES The members of Sections are grouped in the following Classes: I. Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).
    [Show full text]
  • Conformational Transition in Immunoglobulin MOPC 460" by Correction. in Themembership List of the National Academy of Scien
    Corrections Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) 1301 Correction. In the article "Kinetic evidence for hapten-induced Correction. In the membership list of the National Academy conformational transition in immunoglobulin MOPC 460" by of Sciences that appeared in the October 1976 issue of Proc. D. Lancet and I. Pecht, which appeared in the October 1976 Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73,3750-3781, please note the following issue of Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 73,3549-3553, the authors corrections: H. E. Carter, Britton Chance, Seymour S. Cohen, have requested the following changes. On p. 3550, right-hand E. A. Doisy, Gerald M. Edelman, and John T. Edsall are affil- column, second line from bottom, and p. 3551, left-hand col- iated with the Section ofBiochemistry (21), not the Section of umn, fourth line from the top, "Fig. 2" should be "Fig. 1A." Botany (25). In the legend of Table 2, third line, note (f) should read "AG, = -RTlnKj." On p. 3553, left-hand column, third paragraph, fifth line, "ko" should be replaced by "Ko." Correction. In the Author Index to Volume 73, January-De- cember 1976, which appeared in the December 1976 issue of Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 4781-4788, the limitations of Correction. In the article "Amino-terminal sequences of two computer alphabetization resulted in the listing of one person polypeptides from human serum with nonsuppressible insu- as the author of another's paper. On p. 4786, it should indicate lin-like and cell-growth-promoting activities: Evidence for that James Christopher Phillips had an article beginning on p.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward B. Van Vleck 1863‐1943
    Remembering Van: Three Madison families and other tales “Van had many enthusiasms and loyalties, but none exceeded those he felt for the University of Wisconsin and its home, Madison.” 1 Charles Van Hise Born in 1857, Charles Van Hise was a distinguished geologist who had been elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1902. In 1903, he was named President of the University of Wisconsin 2 In 1904, Van Hise recruited Charles Russell Bardeen, a member of the first class to graduate of the Johns Hopkins Medical School, to found a medical school at the University of Wisconsin John Bardeen is at the right hand end. His grandfather, Charles W Bardeen, is second from the left. 3 Charles Sumner Slichter 1864-1946 In 1906, Van Hise appointed Charles S. Slichter head of the math department. An applied mathematician with interests in flow of liquids through porous media, Slichter realized the department needed to strengthen the faculty in pure mathematics. 4 Edward B. Van Vleck 1863‐1943 Edward B Van Vleck, had earned a PhD in mathematics at Gottingen in1893, and was a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Slichter’s first action as department head was to recruit Van Vleck to bring strength in pure mathematics. 5 John Hasbrouck Van Vleck was born in 1899. His interest in trains began at a early age. Van attended his first Wisconsin football game at age 10.(Wisconsin vs Minnesota) It was the first game at which the band played the famous song “On Wisconsin”. As an undergraduate at Wisconsin, Van played flute In the band.
    [Show full text]
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Nursing and the Development of Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the United States, 1955-1982
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 "We Were the Eyes and Ears...": Nursing and the Development of Neonatal intensive Care Units in the United States, 1955-1982. Briana Ralston University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons, and the Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Ralston, Briana, ""We Were the Eyes and Ears...": Nursing and the Development of Neonatal intensive Care Units in the United States, 1955-1982." (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1122. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1122 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1122 For more information, please contact [email protected]. "We Were the Eyes and Ears...": Nursing and the Development of Neonatal intensive Care Units in the United States, 1955-1982. Abstract ABSTRACT "WE WERE THE EYES AND EARS...": NURSING AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1982. Briana Ralston, MS, RN Julie Fairman, PhD, RN, FAAN In the 1960s and 1970s, neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) became the standard of care for critically ill newborns in hospitals across the United States. Though work has been done to examine how nurses participated in the development of ICU's for adult populations, scholarship related to the formation of NICUs is sparse. Using historical methodology to examine hospital archival data, oral history interviews, and scholarly literature, this work examines the roles nurses played in the development of NICUs as technological systems between 1955 and 1982 in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights International Physics Community Joins Forces for 2005 World Conference in South Africa
    June 2004 NEWS Volume 13, No. 6 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews International Physics Community Joins Forces for Innovation Task Force Unveils New 2005 World Conference in South Africa Advocacy Campaign On April 20, at a press confer- As part of the celebration of the made to society in the past, and Several international confer- America, and the Middle East, as well ence in Washington, DC, leaders World Year of Physics 2005, formulate a plan for the contribu- ences have been scheduled for as from more developed countries, from industry and academia UNESCO, ICTP, IUPAP and the tions that it can and should make 2004 on these topics, and will serve and the organizers hope to be able unveiled an advocacy campaign South African Institute of Physics in the future. The conference is as preparatory meetings for the to provide travel grants for as many to illustrate the importance of (SAIP) will sponsor a World Confer- partially a follow-up to a broader 2005 World Conference—the first as half of the attendees. basic research to the future of ence on Physics and Sustainable United Nations World Summit on time the international physics com- “Physics has contributed greatly American innovation, economic Development, to be held October Sustainable Development held in munity will focus its collective to the health and economic well growth, and job creation. 31-November 2, 2005, in Durban, Johannesburg in the summer of attention on these themes, and the being of people around the world. Targeted at policy makers and South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Data Sources
    Notes and Data Sources Chapter 1 Page 10 Exercise 1.1: From “About six-in-ten Americans support marijuana legal­ Page 3 Data on climate change due to human activ­ ization”; available online at http://www ity is from “Public and scientists’ views on .pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/05 science and society,” Pew Research Cen­ /americans-support-marijuana-legalization/. ter report by Cary Funk and Lee Rainie, Page 11 The estimates of the census overcount and January 29, 2015; available online at https:// undercount are available online at http:// www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29 www.census.gov/newsroom/releases /chapter-3-attitudes-and-beliefs-on /archives/2010_census/cb12-95.html. -science-and-technology-topics/. This survey contains data on the Page 15 Exercise 1.3: This problem is based on opinions about several other issues of information in the article, “The racial con­ U.S. adults and AAAS scientists. fidence gap in police performance”; avail­ able online at http://www.pewsocialtrends Page 3 The MLive.com poll is described in the .org/2016/09/29/the-racial-confidence-gap article “Take our online poll: Should Mich­ -in-police-performance/. igan legalize marijuana”; available online at http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo Page 15 Exercise 1.5: Richard Westfall, Murray /index.ssf/2014/02/take_our_poll_should Millar, and Mandy Walsh, “Effects of _michigan.html. instructor attractiveness on learning,” Journal of General Psychology, 143 (2016), Page 5 Example 1 is suggested by Maxine pp. 161–171. Pfannkuch and Chris J. Wild, “Statistical thinking and statistical practice: themes Page 17 Exercise 1.12: Jeffrey M.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright 2017 Laura Atkins
    Copyright 2017 Laura Atkins ADAPTABLE LIVES: AGENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN A CANCER CLUSTER TOWN BY LAURA ATKINS DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Moon-Kie Jung, Chair Professor Assata Zerai Professor Lisa Marie Cacho Professor Norman K. Denzin ABSTRACT This dissertation provides an ethnographic account of the experiences of residents living within the cancer cluster town of Clyde, Ohio, where over 50 children have been diagnosed with or have died of cancers of the brain and central nervous system since the mid-1990s. My entry into the field coincided with the filing of a lawsuit against the town’s largest employer, a Whirlpool Corporation plant, after the discovery of nine feet of toxic PCB sludge at a former community recreational park built by the company. Drawing on in-depth interviews, archival documents, and government reports, I examine systems of power at work within the community that hamper a collective sense of community subpolitics. Using a grounded theoretical approach to analysis informed by risk theory, I discovered that community-level responses to risk echo national logics that promote the concepts of deterrence and avoidance of harm as matters of individual preventive choice. Within a cultural context where efforts towards pinpointing the toxins responsible for the elevated cancer rates in Clyde have failed and there exists an imperative for self-protection that is impossible to achieve, residents experience serious psychosocial and practical conflicts as they adapt to the impact of cancer on their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Dicke and the Naissance of Experimental Gravity Physics
    Eur. Phys. J. H 42, 177–259 (2017) DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2016-70034-0 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL H RobertDickeandthenaissance of experimental gravity physics, 1957–1967 Phillip James Edwin Peeblesa Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, USA Received 27 May 2016 / Received in final form 22 June 2016 Published online 6 October 2016 c The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract. The experimental study of gravity became much more active in the late 1950s, a change pronounced enough be termed the birth, or naissance, of experimental gravity physics. I present a review of devel- opments in this subject since 1915, through the broad range of new approaches that commenced in the late 1950s, and up to the transition of experimental gravity physics to what might be termed a normal and accepted part of physical science in the late 1960s. This review shows the importance of advances in technology, here as in all branches of nat- ural science. The role of contingency is illustrated by Robert Dicke’s decision in the mid-1950s to change directions in mid-career, to lead a research group dedicated to the experimental study of gravity. The re- view also shows the power of nonempirical evidence. Some in the 1950s felt that general relativity theory is so logically sound as to be scarcely worth the testing. But Dicke and others argued that a poorly tested theory is only that, and that other nonempirical arguments, based on Mach’s Principle and Dirac’s Large Numbers hypothesis, suggested it would be worth looking for a better theory of gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel 2017 Program
    2017 WESTERN MEDICAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE (WMRC) (formerly Western Regional Meeting) PROGRAM AT-A-GLANCE Carmel, California January 26-28, 2017 TIME ACTIVITY & LOCATION THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2017 8:00 am – 5:00 pm Registration Sunset Center – Entry Lobby 8:00 am – 5:00 pm Speaker Ready Room Sunset Center 9:30 am – 11:15 am WAP Symposium Studio 105 9:30 am – 12:00 pm WSPR Council Meeting Sunset Center – Bingham #3 11:15 am – 11:30 am WAP Business Meeting Studio 105 11:15 am – 12:15 pm How to Choose a Residency with a Research Focus Dr. Whipple Bring own lunch – Open to all students Sunset Center – Chapman #4 11:15 am – 12:15 pm New Investigator Workshops (Intended for Fellows and Jr. Faculty – Additional charge of $10 and lunch will be provided) How to Publish: Tips from a Journal Editor Michael McPhaul Chief Editor, Journal of Investigative Medicine Sunset Center – Green Room 12:45 pm – 3:00 pm Concurrent Sessions Sunset Center Adolescent Medicine and General Pediatrics I – Carpenter Hall Cardiovascular I – Promenade Lobby Endocrinology and Metabolism I – Bingham #3 Health Care Research I – Babcock #6 Immunology and Rheumatology I – Chapman #4 Infectious Diseases I – Conductor’s Room Neonatal Pulmonary I – Rehearsal Room Neonatology General I – Studio 105 Surgery I – Green Room 3:00 pm – 3:15 pm Break 3:15 pm – 5:45 pm Concurrent Sessions Sunset Center Cardiovascular II – Promenade Lobby Community Health I – Carpenter Hall Global Health I – Conductor’s Room Hematology and Oncology I – Green Room Neonatal Pulmonary II – Rehearsal Room Neonatology
    [Show full text]