DOCSLIB.ORG

Baffin Bay / Davis Strait Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baffin Bay / Davis Strait Region ADAPTATION ACTIONS FOR A CHANGING ARCTIC BAFFIN BAY / DAVIS STRAIT REGION OVERVIEW REPORT The following is a short Describing the BBDS region description of what can be The BBDS region includes parts of Nunavut, which is a found in this overview report territory in Canada and the western part of Greenland, an and the underlying AACA science autonomous part of the Kingdom of Denmark. These two report for the Baffin Bay/Davis land areas are separated by the Baffin Bay to the north and Davis Strait to the south. The report describes the Strait (BBDS) region. entire region including the significant differences that are found within the region; in the natural environment and in political, social and socioeconomic aspects. Climate change in the BBDS This section describes future climate conditions in the BBDS region based on multi-model assessments for the region. It describes what can be expected of temperature rise, future precipitation, wind speed, snow cover, ice sheets and lake ice formations. Further it describes expected sea-surface temperatures, changing sea-levels and projections for permafrost thawing. 2 Martin Fortier / ArcticNet. Community of Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada Nunavut, of Community Iqaluit, ArcticNet. / Fortier Martin Socio-economic conditions Laying the foundations This section gives an overview of socio-economic for adaptation conditions in the BBDS region including the economy, The report contain a wealth of material to assist decision- demographic trends, the urbanization and the makers to develop tools and strategies to adapt to future infrastructure in the region. The report shows that the changes. This section lists a number of overarching Greenland and the Canadian side of the region have informative and action-oriented elements for adaptation diff erent socio-economic starting points about how and the science report gives more detailed information. to adapt to future development. Concluding remarks The impacts of change This section sums up and describes point to the fact that Environmental changes and socio-economic factors adaptation is a complex issue and strategies to meet the will have profound impacts on people living in the future need to refl ect a broader context than climate BBDS region, which will interact with each other in change alone. The report point to essential factors for ways that will be complex and diffi cult to anticipate. adaptation and the relative importance of these will The report describes such impacts for seven themes; vary depending on scale and context. human health, education, non-living resources, living resources, tourism, shipping and infrastructure. 3 Introduction In 2011, the Arctic Council requested the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) to: “produce information to assist local decision makers and stakeholders in three pilot Bering - regions in developing adaptation Chukchi - tools and strategies to better deal with Beaufort climate change and other pertinent Barents environmental stressors”. Following significant interactions with both the Arctic science and decision-making communities, AMAP’s Baffin response to this request led to the Bay establishment of a new initiative called Adaptation Actions for a Changing Davis Arctic (AACA). This initiative provides Strait integrated stakeholder engagement and science-based information AACA terrestrial regions Bering, Chukchi, Beaufort (BCB) Baffin Bay, Davis Strait (BBDS) Barents Figure 1: The three AACA pilot regions. that can ultimately be synthesized AACA marine regions BCB BBDS Barents Large marine ecosystem (LMEs) boundaries and translated into knowledge that is useful and useable for making effective adaptation actions within a DEFINING ADAPTATION rapidly changing Arctic. Furthermore, the AACA is structured to promote The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change defines adaptation as: “The process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects. stakeholder engagement, including In human systems, adaptation seeks to moderate or avoid harm or exploit participation from many different beneficial opportunities. In some natural systems, human intervention may professional and public communities facilitate adjustment to expected climate and its effects”.1 For the purposes in the identification of the most of this study, we also consider non-climate drivers of change. relevant issues and challenges associated with a changing Arctic. Three regions, Baffin Bay/Davis Strait, This information, which combines 1 IPCC, 2014: Annex II: Glossary Barents and Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort, scientific and available traditional and [Mach, K.J., S. Planton and were chosen for an initial pilot phase. local knowledge, forms a knowledge C. von Stechow (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2014: These three regions were chosen base that can be used to better Synthesis Report. Contribution to provide a diverse range of socio- inform adaptation actions being of Working Groups I, II and III economic and ecological conditions, taken by the decision-makers. Thus, to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental as well as to include as many Arctic the AACA is truly an iterative process Panel on Climate Change. Council nations as possible. between the stakeholder, scientific, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, indigenous and local communities, pp. 117-130 Each of the three regional reports focused on providing a sustained level provides a scientific assessment of updated information for a diverse of the types and state of changes array of local, regional, national and within the specific regions, along international audiences. with a discussion of current levels of change, and the related impacts, This overview report is based upon effects and consequences of these the scientific assessment for the Baffin changes, past, present and future. Bay/Davis Strait (BBDS) region. 4 Difficulties in finding the most appropriate actions to respond to climate change are compounded by the fact that climate is not the only driver of change in the region. A common feature is the need to build flexibility and adjust to increasing variability and new extremes – considering the cumulative impacts of weather or/and other socio-economic drivers. Based on dialogue with stakeholders in the region, including representatives of the public and private sectors, and residents in both Greenland and Canada, seven themes were chosen for analysis: Living resources; Non- living resources (such as mineral extraction); Education; Human health and well-being; Tourism; Shipping and Infrastructure. For each of the themes, the authors considered the current knowledge regarding climate change and other stressors, and described potential options for future planning and actions. It is important to note, however, that adaptation has its limits, both in the rate and the amplitude of change that can be accommodated. Mitigation actions at national and international levels will improve the chances of successful adaptation to Arctic climate change by local/regional actors, by decreasing the rate of change to which ecosystems and human systems must adapt, and by eventually limiting the ultimate amplitude of that change. While acknowledging the importance of continued climate change mitigation efforts, the emphasis of AACA is on identifying adaption options. Shutterstock / Disko Bay, Greenland Bay, / Disko Shutterstock 5 Lawrence Hislop / www.grida.no/resources/1087. Uummannaq, Greenland Describing the Baffi n Bay/ Davis Strait Region The Baffi n Bay/Davis Strait (BBDS) region includes most of the Qikiqtaaluk administrative region in the eastern part of of Nunavut, which is a territory in Canada and the western part of Greenland, an autonomous part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Between these land areas are Baffi n Bay to the north and Davis Strait to the south. Although the entire BBDS region is inside the Arctic climate zone, signifi cant differences are found within the region; in the natural environment and in political, social and socioeconomic aspects. While Nunavut and Greenland share a range of qualitatively On the Greenland side, open water south of Disko Bay (usually similar challenges, they must also engage in adaptation with unconsolidated ice), a productive ecosystem, and deep- actions from two very diff erent points of departure. water ports, allow for an intensive fi shery, carried out both Most notably there are important diff erences in terms of with modern trawlers in the off shore waters and smaller boats demography, distribution of population, migration, degree of and dinghies in the inshore parts. This industry has been the industrialization and infrastructure that mean that Greenland main vehicle of a comprehensive industrialization that has and Nunavut may have diff erent adaptation priorities. transformed Greenlandic society dramatically since the 1960s. However, it does not sustain the entire Greenlandic economy The majority of the population of the BBDS is Inuit. The and a primary concern for the Greenlandic self-government Greenlandic population in the region is approximately is how to ensure current standards of modern welfare and 52,500, more than twice the population of the Nunavut side, further economic growth and independence – e.g. by means of around 19,500. With approximately 17,000 inhabitants of economic diversifi cation. Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, is double the size of Iqaluit, the largest town in Nunavut, with approximately 7,500 On the Nunavut side, marine resources are generally exploited inhabitants. The population on the Nunavut side
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Baffin Bay Sea Ice Extent and Synoptic Moisture Transport Drive Water Vapor
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13929–13955, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13929-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Baffin Bay sea ice extent and synoptic moisture transport drive water vapor isotope (δ18O, δ2H, and deuterium excess) variability in coastal northwest Greenland Pete D. Akers1, Ben G. Kopec2, Kyle S. Mattingly3, Eric S. Klein4, Douglas Causey2, and Jeffrey M. Welker2,5,6 1Institut des Géosciences et l’Environnement, CNRS, 38400 Saint Martin d’Hères, France 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, 99508 Anchorage, AK, USA 3Institute of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Rutgers University, 08854 Piscataway, NJ, USA 4Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, 99508 Anchorage, AK, USA 5Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland 6University of the Arctic (UArctic), c/o University of Lapland, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland Correspondence: Pete D. Akers ([email protected]) Received: 9 April 2020 – Discussion started: 18 May 2020 Revised: 23 August 2020 – Accepted: 11 September 2020 – Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract. At Thule Air Base on the coast of Baffin Bay breeze development, that radically alter the nature of rela- (76.51◦ N, 68.74◦ W), we continuously measured water va- tionships between isotopes and many meteorological vari- por isotopes (δ18O, δ2H) at a high frequency (1 s−1) from ables in summer. On synoptic timescales, enhanced southerly August 2017 through August 2019. Our resulting record, flow promoted by negative NAO conditions produces higher including derived deuterium excess (dxs) values, allows an δ18O and δ2H values and lower dxs values.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Interannual Snowmelt-Onset Dates with Atmospheric Conditions
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences of 2001 Comparison of Interannual Snowmelt-Onset Dates with Atmospheric Conditions Sheldon D. Drobot National Center for Atmospheric Research, [email protected] Mark R. Anderson University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Drobot, Sheldon D. and Anderson, Mark R., "Comparison of Interannual Snowmelt-Onset Dates with Atmospheric Conditions" (2001). Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 173. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/173 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Annals of Glaciology 33 2001 # International Glaciological Society Comparison of interannual snowmelt-onset dates with atmospheric conditions Sheldon D. Drobot, Mark R. Anderson Department of Geosciences, 214 Bessey Hall, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0340, U.S.A. ABSTRACT. The snowmelt-onset date represents an important transitional point in the Arctic surface energy balance, when albedo decreases and energy absorption increases rapidly in response to the appearance of liquid water. Interannual variations in snowmelt onset are likely related to large-scale variations in atmospheric circulation, such as described by the Arctic Oscillation #AO).This research therefore examines the relationship between monthly-averaged AO values and mean annual snowmelt-onset dates overArctic sea ice in13 regions, from 1979 to 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Baffin Bay Sea Ice Inflow and Outflow: 1978–1979 to 2016–2017
    The Cryosphere, 13, 1025–1042, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1025-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Baffin Bay sea ice inflow and outflow: 1978–1979 to 2016–2017 Haibo Bi1,2,3, Zehua Zhang1,2,3, Yunhe Wang1,2,4, Xiuli Xu1,2,3, Yu Liang1,2,4, Jue Huang5, Yilin Liu5, and Min Fu6 1Key laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China 2Laboratory for Marine Geology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China 3Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 5Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China 6Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazard Forecasting Center, National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Beijing, China Correspondence: Haibo Bi ([email protected]) Received: 2 July 2018 – Discussion started: 23 July 2018 Revised: 19 February 2019 – Accepted: 26 February 2019 – Published: 29 March 2019 Abstract. Baffin Bay serves as a huge reservoir of sea ice 1 Introduction which would provide the solid freshwater sources to the seas downstream. By employing satellite-derived sea ice motion and concentration fields, we obtain a nearly 40-year-long Baffin Bay is a semi-enclosed ocean basin that connects the Arctic Ocean and the northwestern Atlantic (Fig. 1). It cov- record (1978–1979 to 2016–2017) of the sea ice area flux 2 through key fluxgates of Baffin Bay. Based on the estimates, ers an area of 630 km and is bordered by Greenland to the the Baffin Bay sea ice area budget in terms of inflow and east, Baffin Island to the west, and Ellesmere Island to the outflow are quantified and possible causes for its interan- north.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 12 (Final).Vp
    Geological mapping and resource evaluation of the Koonark carving stone deposit, northern Baffin Island, Nunavut H.M. Steenkamp1, R.A. Elgin2 and I. Therriault3 1Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, Iqaluit, Nunavut, [email protected] 2Lands and Resources Department, Qikiqtani Inuit Association, Iqaluit, Nunavut 3The University of British Columbia–Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia This work forms part of the Qikiqtani Inuit Association’s Quarry Evaluation Program to address the safety and sustainability of carving stone quarries located on Inuit Owned Lands around the Qikiqtaaluk Region of Nunavut. The program is jointly funded with research part- nerships between the Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, Government of Nunavut Department of Economic Development and Transpor- tation, and Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency. The program aims to carry out bedrock mapping and geochemical analysis of significant sites to better understand how carving stone deposits form, identify unexplored resources and develop known re- sources to increase carving stone accessibility in the region. Steenkamp, H.M., Elgin, R.A. and Therriault, I. 2017: Geological mapping and resource evaluation of the Koonark carving stone deposit, northern Baffin Island, Nunavut; in Summary of Activities 2017, Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, p. 139–150. Abstract Geological mapping was conducted by the Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office and Qikiqtani Inuit Association at the unde- veloped Koonark deposit on northern Baffin Island to better constrain the volume and characteristics of potential carving stone resources in the Qikiqtaaluk Region. The mapped area is dominated by greenschist-facies metasedimentary, metavol- canic and ultramafic metaplutonic rocks of the Archean Mary River Group that are adjacent to the Central Borden Fault, which juxtaposes them with Paleozoic carbonate rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Polar Bear Harvesting in Baffin Bay and Kane Basin: a Summary of Historical Harvest and Harvest Reporting, 1993 to 2014
    Chapter 8 SWG Final Report CHAPTER 8 POLAR BEAR HARVESTING IN BAFFIN BAY AND KANE BASIN: A SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL HARVEST AND HARVEST REPORTING, 1993 TO 2014 KEY FINDINGS Both Canada (Nunavut) and Greenland harvest from the shared subpopulations of polar • bears in Baffin Bay and Kane Basin. During 1993-2005 (i.e., before quotas were introduced in Greenland) the combined • annual harvest averaged 165 polar bears (range: 120-268) from the Baffin Bay subpopulation and 12 polar bears (range: 6-26) from Kane Basin (for several of the years, harvest reported from Kane Basin was based on an estimate). During 2006-2014 the combined annual harvest averaged 161 (range: 138-176) from • Baffin Bay and 6 (range: 3-9) polar bears from Kane Basin. Total harvest peaked between 2002 and 2005 coinciding with several events in harvest • reporting and harvest management in both Canada and Greenland. In Baffin Bay the sex ratio of the combined harvest has remained around 2:1 (male: • females) with an annual mean of 35% females amongst independent bears. In Kane Basin the sex composition of the combined harvest was 33% females overall for • the period 1993-2014. The estimated composition of the harvest since the introduction of a quota in Greenland is 44% female but the factual basis for estimation of the sex ratio in the harvest is weak. In Greenland the vast majority of bears are harvested between January and June in Baffin • Bay and Kane Basin whereas in Nunavut ca. 40% of the harvest in Baffin Bay is in the summer to fall (August – November) while bears are on or near shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act
    Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act 1.0 Review of Wildlife and Habitat Management Programs for Terrestrial Species in Nunavut…………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Wildlife Act and Wildlife Regulations………………………………………………..2 1.2 Qikiqtaaluk Region……………………………………………………………………2 1.2.1 Qikiqtaaluk Research Initiatives…………………………………………………….2 a. Peary caribou………………………………………………………………………….2 b. High Arctic muskox…………………………………………………………………...3 c. North Baffin caribou…………………………………………………………………..4 1.2.2 Qikiqtaaluk Management Initiatives………………………………………………...5 a. Peary Caribou Management Plan……………………………………………………...5 b. High Arctic Muskox…………………………………………………………………..5 c. South Baffin Management Plan……………………………………………………….6 1.3 Kitikmeot Region……………………………………………………………………...8 1.3.1 Kitikmeot Research Initiatives………………………………………………………9 a. Wolverine and Grizzly bear Hair Snagging………………………………………….. 9 b. Mainland Caribou Projects……………………………………………………………9 c. Boothia Caribou Project……………………………………………………………...10 d. Dolphin and Union Caribou Project……………………............................................10 e. Mainland and Boothia Peninsula Muskoxen………………………………………...11 f. Harvest and Ecological Research Operational System (HEROS)…………………...12 g. Vegetation Mapping……………………………………………………………….....12 1.3.2 Kitikmeot Management Initiatives…………………………………………………12 a. Grizzly Bear Management…………………………………………………………...12 b. Bluenose East Management Plan…………………………………………………….12 c. DU Caribou Management Plan………………………………………………………13 d. Muskox Status
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Manual for Fieldwork in the Arctic 3Nd Edition, January 2018
    Safety Manual for Fieldwork in the Arctic 3nd edition, January 2018 Editors: Mette Maribo Høgsbro Morten Rasch Susanne Tang Editorial Committee: Morten Rasch, Department of Geoscience and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen (Chairman) Jørgen Peder Steffensen, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen Kirsten Christoffersen, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen Morten Meldgaard, Natural History Museum of Denmark Peter Stougaard, Department of Plants and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen Susanne Tang, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen Mette Maribo Høgsbro, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen This safety manual is widely based upon information taken more or less directly from safety manuals pro- duced by other institutions, i.e., University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), Greenland Institute of Natural Re- sources, Aarhus University, the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) and The East Green- land Ice-core Project (EGRIP) UCPH. However, all information has been quality controlled by University of Copenhagen staff, and any errors that might occur in the manual are therefore the sole responsibility of the University of Copenhagen. Front page picture: Morten Rasch Publisher: Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen Photo: Morten Rasch Photo: Morten Preface Safety is important for all types of arctic fieldwork. Fieldwork in remote arctic areas with extreme climate and extreme physical settings require close attention to safety. This manual pertains to all arctic fieldwork associated with research projects and tasks commissioned or managed by the Faculty of Science at the University of Copenhagen (SCIENCE). The manual consist of an introductory section including a more general introduction to safety considera- tions of relevance to all arctic fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Variability of the Arctic Ocean Sea Ice During the Present Interglacial
    Natural variability of the Arctic Ocean sea ice during the present interglacial Anne de Vernala,1, Claude Hillaire-Marcela, Cynthia Le Duca, Philippe Robergea, Camille Bricea, Jens Matthiessenb, Robert F. Spielhagenc, and Ruediger Steinb,d aGeotop-Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada; bGeosciences/Marine Geology, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany; cOcean Circulation and Climate Dynamics Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, 24148 Kiel, Germany; and dMARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences and Faculty of Geosciences, University of Bremen, 28334 Bremen, Germany Edited by Thomas M. Cronin, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Jean Jouzel August 26, 2020 (received for review May 6, 2020) The impact of the ongoing anthropogenic warming on the Arctic such an extrapolation. Moreover, the past 1,400 y only encom- Ocean sea ice is ascertained and closely monitored. However, its pass a small fraction of the climate variations that occurred long-term fate remains an open question as its natural variability during the Cenozoic (7, 8), even during the present interglacial, on centennial to millennial timescales is not well documented. i.e., the Holocene (9), which began ∼11,700 y ago. To assess Here, we use marine sedimentary records to reconstruct Arctic Arctic sea-ice instabilities further back in time, the analyses of sea-ice fluctuations. Cores collected along the Lomonosov Ridge sedimentary archives is required but represents a challenge (10, that extends across the Arctic Ocean from northern Greenland to 11). Suitable sedimentary sequences with a reliable chronology the Laptev Sea were radiocarbon dated and analyzed for their and biogenic content allowing oceanographical reconstructions micropaleontological and palynological contents, both bearing in- can be recovered from Arctic Ocean shelves, but they rarely formation on the past sea-ice cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in Qikiqtaaluk
    Qikiqtani Truth Commission Thematic Reports and Special Studies 1950–1975 Paliisikkut: Policing in Qikiqtaaluk Qikiqtani Inuit Association Published by Inhabit Media Inc. www.inhabitmedia.com Inhabit Media Inc. (Iqaluit), P.O. Box 11125, Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 1H0 (Toronto), 146A Orchard View Blvd., Toronto, Ontario, M4R 1C3 Design and layout copyright © 2013 Inhabit Media Inc. Text copyright © 2013 Qikiqtani Inuit Association Photography copyright © 2013 Library and Archives Canada, Northwest Territories Archives Originally published in Qikiqtani Truth Commission: Thematic Reports and Special Studies 1950–1975 by Qikiqtani Inuit Association, April 2014. ISBN 978-1-927095-63-8 All rights reserved. The use of any part of this publication reproduced, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, or stored in a retrievable system, without written consent of the publisher, is an infringement of copyright law. We acknowledge the support of the Government of Canada through the Department of Canadian Heritage Canada Book Fund program. We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts for our publishing program. Please contact QIA for more information: Qikiqtani Inuit Association PO Box 1340, Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 Telephone: (867) 975-8400 Toll-free: 1-800-667-2742 Fax: (867) 979-3238 Email: [email protected] Errata Despite best efforts on the part of the author, mistakes happen. The following corrections should be noted when using this report: Administration in Qikiqtaaluk was the responsibility of one or more federal departments prior to 1967 when the Government of the Northwest Territories was became responsible for the provision of almost all direct services.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Observing Network: Sustained Observations at the Davis Strait Gateway
    The Arctic Observing Network: Sustained Observations at the Davis Strait Gateway PIs: C. M. Lee, J. I. Gobat, and K. M. Stafford University of Washington, Seattle, WA International Collaborators: B. Petrie and K. Azetsu-Scott Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Nova Scotia The Davis Strait observing program (Figure 1) has supported 22 published papers, with three more currently under review, three doctoral dissertations and several reports. Highlights from some of these results serve to illustrate the scientific role of long-term observations at the Davis Strait gateway. Six-year (2004-2010) monthly-mean sections of cross-strait velocity, temperature, and salinity from moorings and gliders (Curry et al. 2014) illustrate persistent features and a seasonal cycle (Figure 2). A sharp, persistent front separates the south-going Baffin Island Current from north-flowing waters composed of the upper- ocean West Greenland Current and the deeper West Greenland Slope Current. The cross-strait position of this important front varies seasonally and interannually, which strongly impacts flux calculations (Curry et al. 2011; Curry et al. 2014). Glider-based sections provide a well-resolved measure of frontal position and structure, and quantify seasonal changes in the upper ocean, addressing two large sources of uncertainty and resolving seasonal to interannual changes in important flow structures that were previously impractical to sample. The 2004-2013 monthly-mean net volume and freshwater flux through Davis Strait (Curry et al. 2014) has significant interannual variability, with only weak seasonality (due to phase cancellations in the water mass components that make up the mean) and no statistically significant trends. The 2004-2013 mean net volume and freshwater fluxes are -1.6±0.2 Sv and -94±7 mSv, respectively, with sea ice contributing -10±1 mSv of freshwater flux.
    [Show full text]