DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study of Performance in Cryptography Algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Study of Performance in Cryptography Algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack) Journal of Computer Science 8 (7): 1191-1197, 2012 ISSN 1549-3636 © 2012 Science Publications Comparative Study of Performance in Cryptography Algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack) 1Ali Ahmad Milad, 2Hjh Zaiton Muda, 1Zul Azri Bin Muhamad Noh, 1Mustafa Almahdi Algaet 1Department of Computer System and Communication, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100, Melaka, Malaysia 2Department of Computer Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 34300, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Abstract: Problem statement: The main goal guiding the design of any encryption algorithm needs to be secured against unauthorized attacks. For all applied applications, performance and the cost of implementations are also important concerns. A data encryption algorithm would not be of much use if it is secure enough but slow in performance because it is a common repetition to embed encryption algorithms in other applications such as e-commerce, banking and online transaction processing applications. Inserting of encryption algorithms in other applications also prevents a hardware implementation and is thus a major cause of tainted overall performance of the system. Approach: In this study, the performance of the two of the popular secret key encryption algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack) was compared. Results: Blowfish and Skipjack, had been implemented and their performance was compared by encrypting input files of varying contents and sizes. The algorithms had been implemented in a uniform language C#, using their standard specifications to allow a fair comparison of execution speeds. Conclusion: The performance results have been summarized and a conclusion has been presented. Based on the experiments, we can conclude that the Blowfish is the best performing algorithm for implementation. Key words: Cryptography algorithms, blowfish algorithm, skipjack algorithm, encryption, decryption, feistel network, S-boxes, private key algorithm, Data Encryption Standard (DES), public key INTRODUCTION own schemes, but also of our adversaries. Cryptography usually uses a lot of mathematical formulae and logical Privacy is a sensitive subject that touches everyone. meanings. The science is quite novel for the public, that Common techniques to safe guard privacy are: when is why it is a very difficult subject, but now more writing a private letter an envelope is used to send it, when people are interested in it and a lot of books dealing using a credit card a secret code number is used and when with the subject have been written and it is now easy to speaking to someone in private. In case of find good cryptography information. It seems that the strongest cryptography algorithms now exist to the computers, sensitive data is public (e.g., assessment public even if it is very difficult to understand them. grades, financial accounts). With the Internet, the Certainly, the best way to know if a cryptography computer can be used like a telephone or like a post office, algorithm is strong is to make its source code and with the disadvantage that everybody connected to the documentation available to the public. If no one can network could have access to the data. This is why, break it, then it is safe to use it. especially with computers, privacy is important. Different levels of security (computer security, Algorithms types: network security) have to be measured. Cryptography Private key algorithm: A private key algorithm uses can be compared to an electronic safe where private one password (or one private key) to encrypt a data have been hidden. The cryptographer need always message, to decrypt it the same password is used. think about the intruder. Cryptography can be compared The same algorithm or a different one can be used to to the chess game, in that we must think not only of our crypt and decrypt. Corresponding Author: Ali Ahmad Milad, Department of Computer System and Communication, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100, Melaka, Malaysia 91 J. Computer Sci., 8 (7): 1191-1197, 2012 Public key algorithm: A public key algorithm consists knowledge and understanding. It is only used for bad of a public key (B) used to encrypt a message and a cryptography algorithms, but as with everything private key (A) used to decrypt the message, for one relating to computer science; it is very difficult to public key there is one private key (A I, B I) and only totally avoid making errors, so this attack is always the the private key that belongs to the public key can first one attempted. If no weak points are found the decrypt a message encrypted by the public key. Due to only attack that can be done is the "brute force" attack. this, everyone can use the public key. If someone wants This attack is based on the cipher text generated by a to send message, they encrypt the message with the cryptography algorithm. If the attacker can get into the receiver's public key and only the receiver, who knows password database and even if all the passwords in it the private key, can decrypt this message. are encrypted, software exists that simply try every This algorithm can also be used to sign a message to prove that it is really the sender who is sending a possible passwords, encrypts them and compares the message, to do so the sender encrypts the message with cipher text generated with the one held in the password his private key that can be decrypted only with the database. Of course, it would take too long to try all the public key. possible passwords. Present computers are not fast There are a lot of cryptography algorithms have enough and there are too many possibilities. Keeping been created; it is not the aim of this research. To go these in mind, cryptographers need to provide the world into great detail about cryptography, so only two of the with a new encryption standard. Many of the unbroken cryptography algorithms are going to be quickly are protected by patents. If the world is to have a explained to give a general idea of how to encrypt and secure, unpatented and freely- available encryption algorithm, we need to develop several candidate decrypt a messages or files. encryption algorithms now. These algorithms can then Blowfish: Symmetric block cipher, designed by Bruce be subjected to years of public scrutiny and Schneier and included in a large number of cipher cryptanalysis. Then, the hope is that one or more suites and encryption products. Blowfish provides a candidate algorithms will survive this process and can good encryption rate in software and no effective eventually become a new standard. The purpose of the cryptanalysis of it has been found to date. Blowfish has thesis is to discuss the requirements for a standard a 64-bit block size and a variable key length from 32 up encryption algorithm. to 448 bits. It is a 16-round Feistel cipher and uses large Literature review: Some cryptography algorithms key-dependent S-boxes. have been designed in the past. Discussing all of them is outside the scope of this study. However the main Skipjack: Is a block cipher-an algorithm for ones have been listed according to their category. encryption-developed by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). Initially classified. It was originally Message digest algorithms: As an Internet standard intended for use in the controversial Clipper chip. (RFC 1321), message digest algorithms have been Subsequently, the algorithm was declassified and now active in a wide variety of security applications and is provides a unique insight into the cipher designs of a also usually used to check the integrity of files. A government intelligence agency. Skipjack uses an 80- bit key to encrypt or decrypt 64-bit data blocks. It is an message digest hash is typically a 32- characters unbalanced Feistel network with 32 rounds. It was hexadecimal numbers. Recently, a number of projects specially designed to replace the Data Encryption have been created message digest "rainbow tables" Standard (DES). which are simply accessible online and can be used to In this study we have been discuss in details opposite many hashes into strings that collide with the Blowfish algorithm and Skipjack algorithm because unique input. these two algorithms have not been cracked yet. MD5: Designer by Ron Rivest and Digest length: 16 There are different ways to attack a cryptography bytes, Block size: 64 bytes, Max.final block size: 55 algorithm. If the algorithm security is only based on its bytes, State size:16 bytes. (Rivest, 1992; Schneier, secret, once someone finds the algorithm source code it 1996; Berson, 1992; RSA Laboratories Security will be very easy to break it. Sometimes cryptography Dobbertin et al ., 1996). algorithms can have weak points. For example, with algorithms that just consist of adding the same number Ripemed-320: Designers by Dobbertin et al ., 1996, to all the password letters they are easier to break. This Alias: "RIPEMD", Digest length: 40 bytes, Block size: is because it is simple; all that is to be done it to find the 64 bytes, Maximum Final block size: 55 bytes, State number used. This attack needs strong cryptography size: 20 bytes. (Dobbertin et al., 1996; Menezes et 92 J. Computer Sci., 8 (7): 1191-1197, 2012 al ., 1997). This message digest is not claimed to MATERIALS AND METHODS provide a security level higher than RIPEMD-160. There are a lot of algorithms for block ciphers SHA-384, SHA-512 or Eddy is used instead. cryptography such as DES, AES, Blowfish, Skipjack, Symmetric key algorithms: Symmetric-key Safer and Tiger. In this study we have been discuss in algorithms are a class of algorithms for cryptography details Blowfish algorithm and Skipjack algorithm because these two algorithms have not been cracked that use pettily related cryptographic keys for both yet. Blowfish: In 1993, Schneier (1993) published the decryption and encryption.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Study of Advanced Encryption Standard Performance
    United States Military Academy USMA Digital Commons West Point ETD 12-2018 A Quantitative Study of Advanced Encryption Standard Performance as it Relates to Cryptographic Attack Feasibility Daniel Hawthorne United States Military Academy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usmalibrary.org/faculty_etd Part of the Information Security Commons Recommended Citation Hawthorne, Daniel, "A Quantitative Study of Advanced Encryption Standard Performance as it Relates to Cryptographic Attack Feasibility" (2018). West Point ETD. 9. https://digitalcommons.usmalibrary.org/faculty_etd/9 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by USMA Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Point ETD by an authorized administrator of USMA Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF ADVANCED ENCRYPTION STANDARD PERFORMANCE AS IT RELATES TO CRYPTOGRAPHIC ATTACK FEASIBILITY A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Computer Science By Daniel Stephen Hawthorne Colorado Technical University December, 2018 Committee Dr. Richard Livingood, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Kelly Hughes, DCS, Committee Member Dr. James O. Webb, Ph.D., Committee Member December 17, 2018 © Daniel Stephen Hawthorne, 2018 1 Abstract The advanced encryption standard (AES) is the premier symmetric key cryptosystem in use today. Given its prevalence, the security provided by AES is of utmost importance. Technology is advancing at an incredible rate, in both capability and popularity, much faster than its rate of advancement in the late 1990s when AES was selected as the replacement standard for DES. Although the literature surrounding AES is robust, most studies fall into either theoretical or practical yet infeasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Stock Assessment and Fisheries Evaluation Report 2019
    Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Stock Assessment and Fisheries Evaluation Report 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | National Marine Fisheries Service 2019 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Management Division May 2020 Highly Migratory Species Management Division NOAA Fisheries 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Phone (301) 427-8503 Fax (301) 713-1917 For HMS Permitting Information and Regulations • HMS recreational fishermen, commercial fishermen, and dealer compliance guides: www.fisheries.noaa.gov/atlantic-highly-migratory-species/atlantic-hms-fishery- compliance-guides • Regulatory updates for tunas: hmspermits.noaa.gov For HMS Permit Purchase or Renewals Open Access Vessel Permits Issuer Permits Contact Information HMS Permit HMS Charter/Headboat, (888) 872-8862 Shop Atlantic Tunas (General, hmspermits.noaa.gov Harpoon, Trap), Swordfish General Commercial, HMS Angling (recreational) Southeast Commercial Caribbean Small (727) 824-5326 Regional Boat, Smoothhound Shark www.fisheries.noaa.gov/southeast/resources- Office fishing/southeast-fisheries-permits Greater Incidental HMS Squid Trawl (978) 281-9370 Atlantic www.fisheries.noaa.gov/new-england-mid- Regional atlantic/resources-fishing/vessel-and-dealer- Fisheries permitting-greater-atlantic-region Office Limited Access Vessel Permits Issuer Permits Contact Information HMS Permit Atlantic Tunas Purse Seine (888) 872-8862 Shop category hmspermits.noaa.gov
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing the Block Cipher Resource Overhead at the Link Layer Security Framework in the Wireless Sensor Networks
    Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2008 Vol I WCE 2008, July 2 - 4, 2008, London, U.K. Optimizing the Block Cipher Resource Overhead at the Link Layer Security Framework in the Wireless Sensor Networks Devesh C. Jinwala, Dhiren R. Patel and Kankar S. Dasgupta, data collected from different sensor nodes. Since the Abstract—The security requirements in Wireless Sensor processing of the data is done on-the-fly, while being Networks (WSNs) and the mechanisms to support the transmitted to the base station; the overall communication requirements, demand a critical examination. Therefore, the costs are reduced [2]. Due to the multi-hop communication security protocols employed in WSNs should be so designed, as and the in-network processing demanding applications, the to yield the optimum performance. The efficiency of the block cipher is, one of the important factors in leveraging the conventional end-to-end security mechanisms are not performance of any security protocol. feasible for the WSN [3]. Hence, the use of the standard In this paper, therefore, we focus on the issue of optimizing end-to-end security protocols like SSH, SSL [4] or IPSec [5] the security vs. performance tradeoff in the security protocols in WSN environment is rejected. Instead, appropriate link in WSNs. As part of the exercise, we evaluate the storage layer security architecture, with low associated overhead is requirements of the block ciphers viz. the Advanced Encryption required. Standard (AES) cipher Rijndael, the Corrected Block Tiny Encryption Algorithm (XXTEA) using the Output Codebook There are a number of research attempts that aim to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol Failure in the Escrowed Encryption Standard
    Protocol Failure in the Escrowed Encryption Standard Matt Blaze AT&T Bell Laboratories [email protected] August 20, 1994 Abstract The proposal, called the Escrowed Encryption Stan- dard (EES) [NIST94], includes several unusual fea- The Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES) de¯nes tures that have been the subject of considerable de- a US Government family of cryptographic processors, bate and controversy. The EES cipher algorithm, popularly known as \Clipper" chips, intended to pro- called \Skipjack", is itself classi¯ed, and implemen- tect unclassi¯ed government and private-sector com- tations of the cipher are available to the private sec- munications and data. A basic feature of key setup be- tor only within tamper-resistant modules supplied by tween pairs of EES processors involves the exchange of government-approved vendors. Software implementa- a \Law Enforcement Access Field" (LEAF) that con- tions of the cipher will not be possible. Although Skip- tains an encrypted copy of the current session key. The jack, which was designed by the US National Security LEAF is intended to facilitate government access to Agency (NSA), was reviewed by a small panel of civil- the cleartext of data encrypted under the system. Sev- ian experts who were granted access to the algorithm, eral aspects of the design of the EES, which employs a the cipher cannot be subjected to the degree of civilian classi¯ed cipher algorithm and tamper-resistant hard- scrutiny ordinarily given to new encryption systems. ware, attempt to make it infeasible to deploy the sys- By far the most controversial aspect of the EES tem without transmitting the LEAF.
    [Show full text]
  • KLEIN: a New Family of Lightweight Block Ciphers
    KLEIN: A New Family of Lightweight Block Ciphers Zheng Gong1, Svetla Nikova1;2 and Yee Wei Law3 1Faculty of EWI, University of Twente, The Netherlands fz.gong, [email protected] 2 Dept. ESAT/SCD-COSIC, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3 Department of EEE, The University of Melbourne, Australia [email protected] Abstract Resource-efficient cryptographic primitives become fundamental for realizing both security and efficiency in embedded systems like RFID tags and sensor nodes. Among those primitives, lightweight block cipher plays a major role as a building block for security protocols. In this paper, we describe a new family of lightweight block ciphers named KLEIN, which is designed for resource-constrained devices such as wireless sensors and RFID tags. Compared to the related proposals, KLEIN has ad- vantage in the software performance on legacy sensor platforms, while its hardware implementation can be compact as well. Key words. Block cipher, Wireless sensor network, Low-resource implementation. 1 Introduction With the development of wireless communication and embedded systems, we become increasingly de- pendent on the so called pervasive computing; examples are smart cards, RFID tags, and sensor nodes that are used for public transport, pay TV systems, smart electricity meters, anti-counterfeiting, etc. Among those applications, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have attracted more and more attention since their promising applications, such as environment monitoring, military scouting and healthcare. On resource-limited devices the choice of security algorithms should be very careful by consideration of the implementation costs. Symmetric-key algorithms, especially block ciphers, still play an important role for the security of the embedded systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance and Energy Efficiency of Block Ciphers in Personal Digital Assistants
    Performance and Energy Efficiency of Block Ciphers in Personal Digital Assistants Creighton T. R. Hager, Scott F. Midkiff, Jung-Min Park, Thomas L. Martin Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA {chager, midkiff, jungmin, tlmartin} @ vt.edu Abstract algorithms may consume more energy and drain the PDA battery faster than using less secure algorithms. Due to Encryption algorithms can be used to help secure the processing requirements and the limited computing wireless communications, but securing data also power in many PDAs, using strong cryptographic consumes resources. The goal of this research is to algorithms may also significantly increase the delay provide users or system developers of personal digital between data transmissions. Thus, users and, perhaps assistants and applications with the associated time and more importantly, software and system designers need to energy costs of using specific encryption algorithms. be aware of the benefits and costs of using various Four block ciphers (RC2, Blowfish, XTEA, and AES) were encryption algorithms. considered. The experiments included encryption and This research answers questions regarding energy decryption tasks with different cipher and file size consumption and execution time for various encryption combinations. The resource impact of the block ciphers algorithms executing on a PDA platform with the goal of were evaluated using the latency, throughput, energy- helping software and system developers design more latency product, and throughput/energy ratio metrics. effective applications and systems and of allowing end We found that RC2 encrypts faster and uses less users to better utilize the capabilities of PDA devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Encryption Routines for the PIC18
    AN953 Data Encryption Routines for the PIC18 Author: David Flowers ENCRYPTION MODULE OVERVIEW Microchip Technology Inc. • Four algorithms to choose from, each with their own benefits INTRODUCTION • Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) This Application Note covers four encryption - Modules available in C, Assembly and algorithms: AES, XTEA, SKIPJACK® and a simple Assembly written for C encryption algorithm using a pseudo-random binary - Allows user to decide to include encoder, sequence generator. The science of cryptography decoder or both dates back to ancient Egypt. In today’s era of informa- - Allows user to pre-program a decryption key tion technology where data is widely accessible, into the code or use a function to calculate sensitive material, especially electronic data, needs to the decryption key be encrypted for the user’s protection. For example, a • Tiny Encryption Algorithm version 2 (XTEA) network-based card entry door system that logs the persons who have entered the building may be suscep- - Modules available in C and Assembly tible to an attack where the user information can be - Programmable number of iteration cycles stolen or manipulated by sniffing or spoofing the link • SKIPJACK between the processor and the memory storage - Module available in C device. If the information is encrypted first, it has a • Pseudo-random binary sequence generator XOR better chance of remaining secure. Many encryption encryption algorithms provide protection against someone reading - Modules available in C and Assembly the hidden data, as well as providing protection against tampering. In most algorithms, the decryption process - Allows user to change the feedback taps at will cause the entire block of information to be run-time destroyed if there is a single bit error in the block prior - KeyJump breaks the regular cycle of the to to decryption.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel and Highly Efficient AES Implementation Robust Against Differential Power Analysis Massoud Masoumi K
    A Novel and Highly Efficient AES Implementation Robust against Differential Power Analysis Massoud Masoumi K. N. Toosi University of Tech., Tehran, Iran [email protected] ABSTRACT been proposed. Unfortunately, most of these techniques are Developed by Paul Kocher, Joshua Jaffe, and Benjamin Jun inefficient or costly or vulnerable to higher-order attacks in 1999, Differential Power Analysis (DPA) represents a [6]. They include randomized clocks, memory unique and powerful cryptanalysis technique. Insight into encryption/decryption schemes [7], power consumption the encryption and decryption behavior of a cryptographic randomization [8], and decorrelating the external power device can be determined by examining its electrical power supply from the internal power consumed by the chip. signature. This paper describes a novel approach for Moreover, the use of different hardware logic, such as implementation of the AES algorithm which provides a complementary logic, sense amplifier based logic (SABL), significantly improved strength against differential power and asynchronous logic [9, 10] have been also proposed. analysis with a minimal additional hardware overhead. Our Some of these techniques require about twice as much area method is based on randomization in composite field and will consume twice as much power as an arithmetic which entails an area penalty of only 7% while implementation that is not protected against power attacks. does not decrease the working frequency, does not alter the For example, the technique proposed in [10] adds area 3 algorithm and keeps perfect compatibility with the times and reduces throughput by a factor of 4. Another published standard. The efficiency of the proposed method is masking which involves ensuring the attacker technique was verified by practical results obtained from cannot predict any full registers in the system without real implementation on a Xilinx Spartan-II FPGA.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Advanced Encryption Standard
    Volume 126, Article No. 126024 (2021) https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.024 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Development of the Advanced Encryption Standard Miles E. Smid Formerly: Computer Security Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA [email protected] Strong cryptographic algorithms are essential for the protection of stored and transmitted data throughout the world. This publication discusses the development of Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS) 197, which specifies a cryptographic algorithm known as the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). The AES was the result of a cooperative multiyear effort involving the U.S. government, industry, and the academic community. Several difficult problems that had to be resolved during the standard’s development are discussed, and the eventual solutions are presented. The author writes from his viewpoint as former leader of the Security Technology Group and later as acting director of the Computer Security Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, where he was responsible for the AES development. Key words: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES); consensus process; cryptography; Data Encryption Standard (DES); security requirements, SKIPJACK. Accepted: June 18, 2021 Published: August 16, 2021; Current Version: August 23, 2021 This article was sponsored by James Foti, Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The views expressed represent those of the author and not necessarily those of NIST. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.024 1. Introduction In the late 1990s, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was about to decide if it was going to specify a new cryptographic algorithm standard for the protection of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Sample Size in Marine Megafauna Tagging Studies
    Ecological Applications, 0(0), 2019, e01947 © 2019 by the Ecological Society of America The importance of sample size in marine megafauna tagging studies 1,17 2 3 4 5 6 6 A. M. M. SEQUEIRA, M. R. HEUPEL, M.-A. LEA, V. M. EGUILUZ, C. M. DUARTE, M. G. MEEKAN, M. THUMS, 7 8 9 6 4 10 H. J. CALICH, R. H. CARMICHAEL, D. P. COSTA, L. C. FERREIRA, J. F ERNANDEZ -GRACIA, R. HARCOURT, 11 10 10,12 13,14 15 16 A.-L. HARRISON, I. JONSEN, C. R. MCMAHON, D. W. SIMS, R. P. WILSON, AND G. C. HAYS 1IOMRC and The University of Western Australia Oceans Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia 2Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No 3, Townsville, Queensland 4810 Australia 3Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania 7000 Australia 4Instituto de Fısica Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC – UIB), E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain 5Red Sea Research Centre (RSRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900 Saudi Arabia 6Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (M096), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia 7IOMRC and The University of Western Australia Oceans Institute, Oceans Graduate School, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia 8Dauphin Island Sea Lab and University of South Alabama, 101 Bienville Boulevard, Dauphin Island, Alabama 36528 USA 9Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95060 USA 10Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109 Australia 11Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, PO Box 37012 MRC 5503 MBC, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Art in Lightweight Symmetric Cryptography
    State of the Art in Lightweight Symmetric Cryptography Alex Biryukov1 and Léo Perrin2 1 SnT, CSC, University of Luxembourg, [email protected] 2 SnT, University of Luxembourg, [email protected] Abstract. Lightweight cryptography has been one of the “hot topics” in symmetric cryptography in the recent years. A huge number of lightweight algorithms have been published, standardized and/or used in commercial products. In this paper, we discuss the different implementation constraints that a “lightweight” algorithm is usually designed to satisfy. We also present an extensive survey of all lightweight symmetric primitives we are aware of. It covers designs from the academic community, from government agencies and proprietary algorithms which were reverse-engineered or leaked. Relevant national (nist...) and international (iso/iec...) standards are listed. We then discuss some trends we identified in the design of lightweight algorithms, namely the designers’ preference for arx-based and bitsliced-S-Box-based designs and simple key schedules. Finally, we argue that lightweight cryptography is too large a field and that it should be split into two related but distinct areas: ultra-lightweight and IoT cryptography. The former deals only with the smallest of devices for which a lower security level may be justified by the very harsh design constraints. The latter corresponds to low-power embedded processors for which the Aes and modern hash function are costly but which have to provide a high level security due to their greater connectivity. Keywords: Lightweight cryptography · Ultra-Lightweight · IoT · Internet of Things · SoK · Survey · Standards · Industry 1 Introduction The Internet of Things (IoT) is one of the foremost buzzwords in computer science and information technology at the time of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Simplifying Assumptions in Power Analysis
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Public Access Theses and Dissertations from Education and Human Sciences, College of the College of Education and Human Sciences (CEHS) 4-2011 The Effects of Simplifying Assumptions in Power Analysis Kevin A. Kupzyk University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss Part of the Educational Psychology Commons Kupzyk, Kevin A., "The Effects of Simplifying Assumptions in Power Analysis" (2011). Public Access Theses and Dissertations from the College of Education and Human Sciences. 106. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/106 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Education and Human Sciences, College of (CEHS) at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Access Theses and Dissertations from the College of Education and Human Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Kupzyk - i THE EFFECTS OF SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS IN POWER ANALYSIS by Kevin A. Kupzyk A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Psychological Studies in Education Under the Supervision of Professor James A. Bovaird Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2011 Kupzyk - i THE EFFECTS OF SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS IN POWER ANALYSIS Kevin A. Kupzyk, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2011 Adviser: James A. Bovaird In experimental research, planning studies that have sufficient probability of detecting important effects is critical. Carrying out an experiment with an inadequate sample size may result in the inability to observe the effect of interest, wasting the resources spent on an experiment.
    [Show full text]